►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Yes,
hakun
abdullahi
karina
bowler
here,
mary
christensen,
you're,
joey,
dobson,.
C
D
C
D
E
D
F
B
G
A
All
right,
hakuna
abdulahi
karina
bowler;
yes,
mary
christensen,
yes,
joey,
dobson,
yes,
colleen
ebbinger,.
B
E
E
E
A
C
F
A
K
L
D
J
E
A
Rose
tang,
yes,
shanae,
turner,
smith,
yes,
annie
wells,
yes,
hakun
abdullahi,
queen
kimmons,.
A
Yes,
so
we,
this
week,
the
city,
council,
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
recommended
moving
forward
to
the
full
council
committee,
the
committee
membership
for
2021
and
2022.,
and
so
there
are
12
members
on
this
current
committee,
who
did
reapply
and
were
recommended
for
another
term
on
the
committee,
and
then
there
were
two
vacancies
that
we've
had
for
a
while.
A
Now
that
were
filled,
the
vacancies
were
on
the
organization
that
works
to
advance
equity
in
housing
outcomes
and
also
for
a
shelter,
a
representative
of
an
emergency
shelter
and
so
and
then
there
will
be
seven
new,
so
nine
total
new
members,
two
filling
those
vacancies
and
then
seven
for
the
remaining
spots.
A
And
so
I
know
I
think,
we'll
have
a
chance
a
little
bit
later
to
give
our
members
who
are
not
continuing
on
a
chance
to
say
something.
If
they'd
like
to.
I
can
share
a
couple
of
other
things
we
have
you
know.
Ryan
strack
was
the
minneapolis
public
schools
representative.
There
will
be
a
new
representative
for
minneapolis
public
schools,
charlotte
kinsley,
and
there
will
be,
like
I
already
said,
a
new
member
for
emergency
shelter
and
the
organization
that
works
on
equity.
A
So
there
is
a
link
in
the
agenda
to
the
report
that
went
to
council.
So
you
can
see
everybody's
name,
and
you
know
a
little
bit
of
information
about
all
of
the
new
all
of
you
who
are
returning
and
the
new
committee
members.
So
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
the
whole
list,
because
it's
long,
but
you
know,
I
think
we,
the
council
offices
and
the
staff
for
the
committee
worked.
A
We
had
a
large
number
of
applications
again
for
us
relatively
small
number
of
spots
on
the
committee,
and
so
we
worked
to
make
sure
that
we
had
representation
from
people
who
have
different
experiences,
different
backgrounds
and
who
are
from
different
parts
of
the
city
as
well,
so
that
we're
somewhat
geographically
dispersed
in
terms
of
where
people
live
in
the
city
and
and
the
perspectives
they're
bringing
to
the
committee.
A
So
we're
excited
that
there
was
a
strong
group
from
our
current
committee
who
are
interested
in
continuing
to
serve,
and
so
I
think
it'll
be
nice
to
have
the
continuation
and
also
some
new
voices
on
the
committee.
So
that
was
really
it.
That
was
the
update
we
wanted
to
give
our
first
meeting
as
a
new
committee
will
be
in
january.
A
They
are
two-year
terms
and
for
you
know,
the
new
committee
members
will
have
to
do
some
of
the
things
you
all
did
back
in
early
2019,
which
was
the
oath
and
the
ethics
training.
But
all
of
that
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge
is,
is
good
for
four
years
and
so
for
returning
committee
members.
You
will
not.
I
know
that's
certainly
true
for
the
ethics
training
and
I'm
pretty
sure
that
is
the
case
for
the
oath
as
well.
A
So
you
won't
have
to
do
that
again,
this
time
around
so
happy
to
take
any
questions
if
there
are
any
and
kelly
lisa
robin
and
robin
garwood
from
council
member
gordon's
office
and
andrea
in
away
from
the
mayor's
office,
we're
all
part
of
the
process
so
and
we're
all
on
the
call.
So
any
of
us
can
take
questions
if
you
have
them,
but
that's
kind
of
the
the
summary
and
you
can
link
to
the
agenda
and
the
report
to
see
more
details
but
happy
to
take
any
questions.
M
D
D
M
Our
next,
the
next
portion
of
our
agenda
is
the
public
comment
period.
Before
moving
on
to
that,
I
will
just
say
as
katie
mentioned
so
the
plan
for
the
committee
members
will
be
in
at
january,
our
january
meeting
on
january
14th.
We'll
do
some
introductions,
of
course,
to
make
sure
you
know
we
get
to
know
each
other
a
little
bit,
but
we
will
be
moving
forward.
So
january
will
be
a
substantive
meeting
with
agenda
items
not
sort
of
a
housekeeping
meeting,
as
our
very
first
meeting
was
so.
M
Thank
you
we're
looking
forward
to
another
year.
Another
two
years
of
this
committee
so
now
is:
is
our
committee's
public
comment
opportunity?
As
you
all
know,
we
set
aside
10
minutes
of
our
agenda
each
meeting
to
hear
public
comments
from
non-members.
M
M
Great
welcome
to
the
committee,
and
you
have
about
one
minute
to
share
with
us
your
your
comment.
Thanks
for
being
here,
you
may
go
ahead.
D
Okay,
I
wanted
to
ask
about
the
household
situation
about
calling
when
you
call
3-1-1
and
trying
to
get
help
from
them.
They
tell
you
that
they're
going
to
call
you
back
because
they're
going
to
help
you
out,
but
they
never
do.
Return
have
returned
to
any
of
my
calls
and
never
got
back
with
me,
and
I
want
to
thank
carina
boulder.
D
D
She
helped
me
get
the
beat,
and
I
want
to
thank
her
so
much
and
also
about
people
that
live
in
the
building
also
work
in
the
building
that
lives
in
a
building
and
they're
working
in
the
builder
under
the
hud's
personal
information,
the
other
attendance
that
is
on
us
or
public
housing
that
information
shouldn't
be
where
that
attendant.
That
was
there
should
not
even
be
there
around
that
kind
of
information.
D
So
I
was
just
wondering
to
get
some
feedback
on
those
two
things
or
how
can
I
get
the
connection
on
that.
F
M
M
Great
thank
you
for
sharing
your
comments
and
maybe
specif
sounded
like
you
mentioned
a
concern
about
not
getting
in
touch
with
311.
I
don't
know
if
kelly
you
want
to
respond
to
that
now
or
if
you
want
to
make
plans
to
connect,
maybe
offline
about
that
yeah.
H
I
think
I
I
could
just
say
that
311
should
be
calling
you
back
if
you
call
and
make
a
complaint,
and
you
need
to
follow
up
on
that
complaint.
There's
that's
you
know
they
should
call
you
back
or
give
you
some
tracking
information.
So
I
I
didn't
get
your
first,
your
your
first
name.
I
don't
know.
H
Okay,
and
so,
if,
if
you
wanna,
let
me
know
what
your
phone
number
is,
I
can
call
you
back
or
if
there's
a
better
way
to
reach
you.
A
I
can
see
the
number
you're
calling
in
from
so
I
can
take
it
down
and
then
you
or
I.
D
H
My
number
is
I'm
going
to
give
you
my
work
number
is.
H
612.,
six,
seven,
three,
three
five
o
six
and
my
name
is
kelly
jones,
k-e-l-l-I-e
j-o-n-e-s,
and
so
I
can
follow
up
and
make
sure
that
3-1-1
gets
back
to
you.
That's
that's
what
I
can
do.
D
D
F
D
N
M
K
My
name
is
donna
neste
and
I
really
would
like
to
see
the
city
come
up
with
a
very
comprehensive
plan
about
how
to
deal
with
the
encampments
in
the
city.
I
live
in
phillips
neighborhood
and
we
suffer
from
many
of
them
and
it's
not
the
poor
people
that
are
in
these
camps.
You
know.
I
really
believe
that
there
needs
to
be
a
lot
more
outreach
and
a
lot
more
housing
for
them,
but
they
attract
a
whole
lot
of
crime.
K
They
bring
a
whole
lot
of
crime
into
the
neighborhood,
just
dealers
and
prostitution
and
and
the
neighborhoods
that
have
these
encampments
in
them
have
to
put
up
with
a
lot
of
stuff
needles
all
over.
You
know
in
the
alleys,
and
I
really
would
like
to
see
the
city
come
up
with
a
far
more
comprehensive
plan
about
how
to
deal
with
them
and
I'm
not
talking
about
just
pushing
them
out.
You
know
into
another
area,
but
I'm
talking
about
outreach
workers
going
into
them
and
we
really
need
a
lot
more.
K
M
Thank
you.
No.
Thank
you
very
much
for
bringing
your
concerns
to
this
committee.
I
we
do
try
to
keep
these
to
a
little
over
a
minute
to
and
we're
a
little
over
a
minute
so,
but
thank
you
for
expressing
yo.
Thank
you
very
much
and
it
was
donna.
Is
that
correct
yeah,
and
could
you
spell
your
last.
K
M
M
M
O
Yes,
this
is
tanisha
gibson
here,
and
my
comment
to
the
city
would
be.
There
is
a
lot
of
friends,
spiritual
assistance
happening,
but
it
is
not
reaching
the
families
that
are
in
need.
Now,
that's
something
the
committee
can
take
a
look
at.
M
O
Yes,
in
addition
to
that,
I
believe
that
the
the
city
can
do
a
better
job
at
ensuring
that
people
are
getting
the
rental
assistance
that's
available
to
the
multiple
neighborhoods,
because
there's
a
lot
of
covert
money
out
there
and
the
families
in
different
neighborhoods
are
not
getting
the
assistance
and
that's
my
comment.
Thank
you.
M
M
B
Thanks
joy,
so
in
november
we
spent
some
time
going
over
a
variety
of
different
home
ownership
programs,
david
shared
about
bill,
wealth's
work,
hello,.
B
P
L
P
M
P
M
P
P
Okay,
I
live
in
a
unit
which
is
overcrowded
and
I
have
been
looking
for
more
of
child
family
oriented
place
and
I've
been
waiting
for
it
for
the
last.
P
Let
me
see
maybe
10
years
and
about
and
since
I'm
a
truthful
class
on
it
seems
like
nobody
is
giving
me
that
option
or
there's
always
excuse
why.
I
should
not
get
that
opportunity,
and
the
other
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
is
what
the
earlier
comment
person
said
about
rental
assistance,
and
maybe
it's
something
where
we
majority
somebody
like
me:
I
need
it.
M
Well,
amina,
thank
you
very
much
for
being
with
us
today
and
for
sharing
your
experience,
both
the
need
for
more
larger
units,
more
family
oriented
subsidized
housing
units
and
for
the
need
to
make
sure
rental
assistance
is
getting
to
families
who
need
it.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
being
here
today
and
for
sharing
your
important
comment
with
us.
B
Yeah
so
just
in
summary,
you
know-
we've
talked
in
november
instead
of
an
overview
trying
to
provide
kind
of
a
foundational
basis
of
knowledge
across
all
of
us.
Roxanne
kimball
shared
some
work
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
has
been
doing
david
mcgee
shared
work
about
build
wealth.
B
I
shared
a
bit
about
about
the
work
family
housing
fund
has
been
doing
to
reduce
some
of
the
racial
disparities
in
rental
property
ownership,
and
then
mary
christensen
talked
about
being
like
the
city
of
lakes,
community
land
trust
and
that
experience
so
we're
just
trying
to
give
kind
of
an
even
lay
of
the
land
about.
B
You
know
different
programs
that
are
out
there
and
some
various
different
policies
at
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
so
we
wanted
to
do
a
follow-up
discussion
about
that
in
talking
about
what
the
city
or
sorry
what
the
this
committee
might
want
to
do.
As
follow-up
we
had
at
the
beginning
of
2020
identified
homeownership
as
one
of
our
priority
areas
that
we
wanted
to
go
into
in
more
depth
and
that
got
delayed
a
bit
because
of
our
very
number
of
months,
not
meeting
during
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic.
B
B
You
know
mary
had
some
comments
and
some
ideas
related
to
you
know
some
of
the
most
urgent
issues
related
to
home
ownership
right
now,
in
particular,
this
recognition
that
you
know
with
with
the
pandemic
and
with
kobe
that
there's
potentially
going
to
be
a
really
there's
a
real
threat,
as
people
are
unable
to
pay
their
mortgage.
So
there's
a
number
of
different
programs
that
have
been
out
there,
certainly
the
home
ownership
center
and
their
and
all
of
their.
B
F
Q
Well,
as
far
as
the
foreclosure
issue
goes,
the
current
forbearances
from
fannie
freddie
and
other
large
lenders
only
go
through
march
of
of
2021,
and
you
know
so
many
hundreds,
maybe
thousands
of
homeowners
are,
are
going
to
be
under
threat
of
foreclosure
starting
in
march,
and
I
don't
know,
maybe
others
have
better
information.
But
I
heard
legal
aid
is
no
longer
taking
referrals
because
of
the
high
number
of
eviction
and
foreclosure
issues
already
in
their
hands
and.
Q
So
I
mean
I
don't
have
any
answers
and
I
don't
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
background
in
this
area,
so
I
don't
know
what
else
I
can
offer,
except
my
own
concerns.
Q
B
No
that's
great
to
raise
that.
Does
anyone
else
have
what
are
other
thoughts
on
these
two
topics
that
mary
has
raised?
B
Do
you
want
to
comment
on
those
or,
if
there's
anything
else,
specific
to
home
ownership
that
we
that
we
should
discuss
as
follow
until
last
month's
discussion.
N
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
this
queen.
So
a
while
ago
there
was
a
program
created
by
citibank
and
it
was
called
deed
for
lease
and
what
it
was
was
like
when
people
were
getting
in
trouble
with
their
mortgage
loans
that
they
would
actually
try
to
change
their
mortgage
loan
based
on
you
know
what
they
would
qualify
for
and
put
it
as
a
lease
option
so
that
they
could
keep
their
property
it
kind.
N
It's
gonna
kind
of
be
really
sad
if
you
already
got
tent
city
for
us
to
kind
of
have
more
people
losing
their
homes
to
foreclosure,
and
we
don't
know
where
they're
going
to
be
able
to
be
housed.
N
So
I
would
just
like
to
know
if
we
could,
probably,
if
there's
like
something
that
we
could
go
to
the
banks
with,
is
there
something
that
the
city
could
do
with
the
banks,
where
we
could
ask
them
to
create
something
where
the
people
can
stay
in
their
homes
instead
of
going
through
this
another?
That's
another
added
layer
of
a
cry.
A
Oh
go
ahead,
colleen.
Otherwise
I
can.
B
I
don't
I
was,
I
don't
know
specific.
The
council's,
I
think
my
sense
is,
I
think,
everyone's
sort
of
waiting
to
see
the
federal
government
act
with
more.
You
know
covet
and
pandemic
relief
at
the
federal
level,
which
then
could
provide
the
support
needed
to
stay
in
homes.
I
think
it's
much
harder
to
do
this
at
the
local
level
and
even
the
state
for
that
matter,
but
katie
go
ahead.
If
there's
anything
more
be
that
you
know
the
local
level.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
mean
I
think
that
is
accurate.
What
I
will
say
is
that
the
city
has
received
some
federal
covet
response
money
through
the
community
development
block
grant
program,
and
so
we
did
provide
some
funding
to
the
minnesota
homeownership
center
to
help
kind
of
try
to
re-um
read.
I
don't
know
what
the
word
is,
but
kind
of
bring.
A
Reinvigorate
thank
you.
The
network
of
homeownership
counselors
that
was
had
been
really
built
up
during
the
foreclosure
crisis
and
in
the
aftermath
of
that,
and
so,
and
that
is
just
one
specific
thing,
but
I
think
there
is
certainly
a
recognition
that
that
you
know
obviously,
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
concerns
about
renters
and
risk
of
eviction
and
needing
emergency
rental
assistance.
But
I
think
there's
recognition
that
there
is
a
need
for
homeowners
as
well.
A
The
state's
emergency
housing
assistance
was
open
to
homeowners
as
well
as
renters
and
the
city
and
the
the
county
are
currently
thinking
about.
Whether
we
have
we,
we
are
likely
to
make
some
additional
emergency
housing
assistance
available
with
some
of
the
remaining
cova
dollars
that
we
have
and
we're
currently
kind
of
talking
about
what
that
would
look
like
I,
but
to
colleen's
point
it's
not
a
lot
of
money
that
the
city
has
available
to
respond
to
this.
A
So
I
think
everyone
is
also
looking
very
closely
at
what
the
federal
government
might
do,
because
there
aren't
a
lot
of
resources
currently
that
we
have
at
our
disposal
for
for
sort
of
the
emergency
response.
M
And
if
I
can't
just
tame
into
from
a
legal
aid
perspective,
since
I
know
you
mentioned
that
mary,
you
hearing
that
legal
age
is
not
taking
home
ownership
referrals
right
now
on
on
mortgage
issues-
and
I
was
just
while
we
were
just
discussing-
I
was
chatting
with
our
homeownership
expert,
so
I
don't
work
with
homeowners.
I
work
with
pretty
exclusively
with
our
landlord
tenant
with
renters,
but
we
have
so
we
at
legal
aid.
M
We
have
one
attorney
who
focuses
right
now
on
homeowners,
specifically
low-income
homeowners
and
issues
that
they're
facing
and
you're
correct
mary
that
right
now
we
are
not
accepting
referrals
for
the
simple
reason
that
she
is
overwhelmed
right
now
and
she
is
at
over
capacity,
and
that
is
likely
to
be
the
case
through
the
end
of
the
year
like
through
the
end
of
december.
M
So
currently,
during
that
time
period,
we
are
we're
sending
folks
to
the
minnesota
homeownership
center.
Just
like
katie
said
what
my
colleague,
brittany,
mccormick
was
just
sharing
with
me.
Is
that
generally,
the
questions
that
people
are
asking
right
now,
while
the
forbearance
is
in
play,
are
ones
that
those
counselors
are
a
good
fit
for?
Is
what
kind
of
mortgage
do
I
have
it?
Does
the
forbearance
apply
to
me?
What's
the
timeline,
but
from
just
again
from
a
legal
aid
perspective.
M
Again
lots
of
things
to
be
determined
with
what
the
federal
government
does
and
everything,
but
from
a
legal
support
standpoint
that
is
our
homeownership
representation
plan
is
that
we
will
be
reopening
january
in
january.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up.
I'm
happy
to
talk
more
offline
about
legal
aid
capacity
too.
R
R
In
our
ward,
I
went
as
far
as
like
to
uptown
and
it
was
nothing
but
foreclosures,
and
so
I
think
I
stated
the
last
time
pushing
people
to
purchase
homes
right
now,
I
think,
is
like
crazy,
because
people
are
losing
their
jobs.
R
One
thing
that's
been
coming
to
my
attention:
is
property
owners
are
offering
tenants
cash
for
keys,
and
I
know
that
that
program
I
have
reached
out
to
you
too
joey.
I
know
that
that
program
is
somehow
related
to
foreclosure,
but
it's
also
something
that
they
can
offer
potentially
over
income.
If
their
property
is,
you
know,
tax
credit,
but
I
don't
know
that
to
be
true,
but
I
just
know
that
some
tenants
are
now
being
offered
cash
for
keys
in
the
residence
where
they
live
in.
R
They
get
blindsided
by
it,
don't
understand
it
so,
but
a
lot
of
foreclosures
are
happening.
Condo
buildings
houses,
all
in
our
war,
are
up
for
foreclosure.
Like
I
said
I
went
as
far
as
uptown.
It
was
74,
foreclosed
properties
and
again
like
queen
sail.
Where
would
these
people
go?
What's
the
plan
like?
Is
there
any
solid
plan
for
people
to
be
housed,
paycheck
protection,
housing
protection?
Where
is
the
leadership
for
those
protections
to
keep
us
housed
in
our?
E
Karina
this
is
scott.
It
sounds
like
you're
saying
that
you'd,
rather
that
you'd
rather
prioritize
you
know
keeping
people
in
their
foreclosure
foreclosure
than
you
know.
Initiatives
that
kind
of
bring
new
people
into
into
home
ownership
is.
Is
that
what
you're
saying.
R
I
mean
I
can
we
can
keep
people
in
on
home
home
ownership.
We
can
keep
whoever
we
want,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
under
this
pandemic,
people
don't
have
the
money
to
pay
the
bills,
so
I'm
all
for
whatever
it.
It
makes
sense
if
it
makes
sense
and
families
are
housed
and
business
are
thriving
and
people
are
doing
what
they
need
to
do
to
stay,
housed
and
jobs,
and
all
that
I'm
all
for
it.
Well,
not
at
the
expense.
R
When
you
know
jobs
are
being
lost
because
of
the
wages
and
they
don't
have
the
money
to
pay
their
employees
and
families
don't
have
food
to
eat
on
their
table.
It's
the
holidays
right
now.
Some
people
don't
have
money
to
provide
presents
for
their
children.
Let
know
they
have
to
pay
a
mortgage
utilities.
Taxes
put
food
on
the
table:
toys
under
the
tree,
so
my
my
commitment
is:
I
can
do
the
best
that
I
know
how
to
is
to
give
advice
and
do
the
best
I
can
to
help
people
who
need
the
answers.
R
B
Thoughts
david,
do
you
have
any,
but,
given
you
have
so
much
experience
in
this
area,
what's
your?
What
is
there
something
that
you
think
that
the
committee
should
be
focusing
on
related
to
home
ownership,
whether
that's
preserving
current
homeownership
or
advancing
more.
J
I
still
think
it's
an
important
objective
to
try
to
get
people
in
the
home
ownership
that
are
able
everybody's
not
out
of
a
job,
and
we've
got
two
there's
a
two
front.
We
gotta
work
on
people
that
are
homeless
and
people
that
are
can't
find
affordable
rental
opportunities,
as
well
as
those
that
are
in
a
position
to
own
homes.
J
Putting
energy
in
that
area
would
just
be
a
travesty
to
to
me
and
all
kinds
of
communities
I'll
go
that
way.
I
am
concerned
about
the
what's
going
to
happen
with
the
foreclosure
crisis
as
well
as
this
march
mandate.
That's
going
to
come
to
a
head.
I
I
just
think
this
committee
has
to
keep
an
eye
on
disparities.
J
Minneapolis
has
to
be
in
the
top
five
worst
disparities
in
homeownership
in
the
nation,
and
so
that's
got
to
be
something
that
is
on
the
top
of
our
list
and
any
other
housing
committee
or
any
other
housing
advocate,
see
group
that
has
to
be
on
the
top
of
our
list.
If
we're,
if
we're
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
because
there
was
a
time
where
we
were
the
worst
and
then
we
were
second
worst
in
the
country,
so
I
think
we
always
got
to
keep
that
in
the
front
of
our
minds.
J
We
already
had
the
worst
disparity,
so
if
we
run
into
a
situation
where
people
are
losing
jobs
losing
homes
going
to
foreclosure
now,
what
is
that
going
to
do
to
the
you
know
that
gap
and
so
keeping
an
eye
on
that
in
finding
remedies
and
pathways
to
keep
closing
that
gap
would
be
in
our
in
our
best
interest
and
whether
it
be
housing,
development
subsidies,
small
homes,
all
all
the
different
types
of
affordable
home
ownership
strategies
that
are,
we
already
are
talking
about
last
week.
B
You
know
I'm
wondering
since
a
number
of
people
you
know
we
were
talking
about
this
march
deadline.
I
wonder
if
that's
something
for
us
to
be
just
as
a
committee
sort
of
checking
in
on
throughout
the
first
months
in
the
early
months
of
2021,
to
keep
it
as
something
that
we're
you
know
and
maybe
ask
ourselves,
is
there?
B
Is
there
some
role
for
us
and
if
nothing
else,
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
on
the
on
the
minds
of
not
only
city
council
leaders
but
our
city
council
members,
but
also
just
everyone
within
our
network
who
may
have
some
influence
in
either?
You
know
push
it.
You
know
let
a
federal
delegation
to
push
for
congressional
action
or
putting
getting
together
some
sort
of
local
response.
B
Assuming
that
nothing,
you
know,
if
nothing
happens,
at
the
federal
level
I
mean
it
might
it
does
feel
like
such
a
cliff
to
potentially
fall
off
that
it
should
be.
Maybe
maybe
we
say
it's
a
it's
a
check-in
point
in
the
first
couple
months
in
2021
and
we'd
kind
of
keep
assessing.
Is
there
some
role
for
us
to
play?
I
don't
know
what
about
what
do
people
think
about.
J
I
think
I
didn't
mean
to
jump
in
again
so
fast,
but
I
do
think
keeping
an
eye
on
some
possible
forbearance
strategies
and
modification
strategies
would
be
an
ideal
as
well.
I
know
legal
ads.
Legal
aid
is
in
the
room,
but
I
mean
just
finding
out
opportunities
that
maybe
there's
opportunities
to
do
some
things
outside
of
the
federal
mandates
in
government
to
create
some
strategies
around
forbearance
with
the
lenders.
You
know-
and
I
know.
J
Center
and
I
worked
a
lot
with
habitat
for
humanity
back
in
the
day
that
we
shouldn't
wait
until
it's
such
a
big
fire.
Maybe
there's
some
good
opportunities
to
set
some
strategies
up
with
some
of
the
main
lenders
in
advance
to
you
know
to
you
know,
get
some
forbearance
and
modification
and
reworks
that
will
be
six
to
nine
to
ten
months
I'll
if
we
start
maybe
putting
an
iron
in
the
fire.
Now
that
could
be
good
opportunity
to
stop
some
of
the
people
from
actually
going
into
foreclosure.
J
I
mean
the
clock
is
still
going
to
keep
ticking,
so
the
lender
is
still
going
to
be
earning
money.
If
we
can
just
be,
I
guess,
be
offensive
offensively
be
engaged
with
them
to
try
to
see
if
we
can
work
something
out.
B
B
You
know
working
with
homeownership
center,
maybe
a
couple
people
could
put
their
heads
together
and
just
think
of
a
couple
things
that
we
could
discuss
further
in
january.
No,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
it
figure
out.
What's
the
best
way
to
keep
make
some
momentum
and
moving
forward.
J
Yeah
I'd
be
interested
in
on
a
a
small
committee
to
talk
about
possible
strategies
to
present
and
then
engage
with
julian
and
the
home
ownership
center.
That
wouldn't
be
a
bad
idea.
D
M
And
maybe
this
is
joey
something
we
can
be
thinking
and
watching.
As
the
state
legislative
session
rolls
out,
I
mean
obviously
we're
a
city
advisory
committee,
but
the
city
also
has
advocates
who
lobby
at
the
legislative
level,
of
course-
and
so
I
think
you
know,
as
the
as
the
state
legislature
is
considering,
you
know
all
kinds
of
different
things
for
responding
to
the
current
all
the
kind
of
the
complicated
crises
we're
finding
ourselves
in
as
a
community.
M
As
you
know,
that
could
be
something
as
things
related
to
homeownership
and
foreclosures
and
hoa
rules
and
things
like
that
as
those
things
percolate
potentially
in
the
legislature.
M
Just
thinking
you
know
what
tools
do
we
have
in
our
toolbox
as
a
as
a
committee,
we
advise
the
city,
but
one
of
those
might
be
advising
you
know
making
comment
on
the
city's
legislative
agenda
and
where
they
put
resources
because
of,
like
david,
said,
the
dire
disparities
we
we
face
here
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
So
I
just
want
to
you
know,
put
a
bug
in
for
that
strategy
of
indirect
advocacy,
but
you
know
advocating
for
certain
things
to
be
prioritized
for
city
advocates.
At
the
capitol.
B
All
right:
well,
I
think
that
sounds
I
mean
it
sounds
like
we've
got
something
that
we
can
kind
of
keep
moving
forward
in
it
too,
and
that
seems
like
a
really
practical
way
to
keep
our
you
know
our
thumb
on
the
pulse,
so
that
sounds
good.
So
I
think,
if
without
hearing
more,
I
will
move
us
on
to
the
next
agenda
item
which
is
joey
starting
to
talk
through
committee
recommendations.
M
Great
thanks
everyone,
so
just
a
little
bit
of
kind
of
backstory
here
a
reminder.
So
this
report
is
in
draft
mode
still.
It
has
been
for
quite
some
time
because
we
were,
we
had
it
prepared
to
potentially
present
to
the
to
committee
at
city
council
back
in
march,
and
that
was
right
when
our
worlds
changed.
So
this
was
a
draft.
We
had
a
draft
that
we
were
getting
ready
to
present
and
then
all
that
got
put
on
hold.
M
So
basically,
what
this
is
is
we
are
supposed
to
report
to
back
to
city
council
on
the
work
of
our
committee,
and
the
question
for
today
is
so
this
draft
was
connected
or
was
then
attached
linked
to
the
agenda.
If
you
don't
have
it,
but
the
the
question
for
us
today
is:
is
there
anything
we
think
needs
to
be
added
to
the
report
section?
But
more
importantly,
is
there
any?
Is
this
a
vehicle
we
want
to
use
for
providing
any
additional
recommendations
to
city
council?
M
We
successfully,
I
think,
came
together
and
voted
and
submitted
a
pretty
robust
comment
on
the
budget,
and
I
know
we
talked
about
this
a
little
at
our
last
meeting.
You
know
if
there
were,
if
there
were
recommendations
that
weren't
directly
tied
to
the
budget,
that
this
would
be
a
place
where
those
could
go.
So
this
is
just
sort
of
an
open
floor
discussion.
M
Do
we
want
to
include
any
sort
of
recommendations
for
the
city
council
as
we
look
forward
to
2021
of
what
we
want
them
to
be
prioritizing
it's
I,
the
format
of
this
report-
I
don't
believe
is
mandatory.
You
know,
is,
is
set
in
stone
or
anything,
so
it's
not
absolutely
necessary
that
we
make
recommendations.
It's
just
an
opportunity
for
us
to
do
so
so
open
floor
for
anyone
who
has
thoughts
on
policy
or
you
know
other
types
of
recommendations
you
might
like
to
see
in
this.
In
this
report,.
B
I
mean,
I
would
just
say,
building
like
discussion,
we
just
wrapped
up.
At
least
you
know
tracking
the
march
foreclosure.
You
know
the
forbearance
and
protections
deadline,
something
along
those
lines.
M
Great
yeah
that
makes
perfect
sense
and,
as
you
can
for
those
who
are
here
on
on
a
device
or
who
have
visual
of
this
katie
is
typing
in,
has
shared
her
screen
and
is
typing
in
some
of
these
thoughts
into
the
document
itself.
So,
if
you're
on
the
phone,
we're
adding
that
as
a
into
the
draft
as
a
potential
item
here
and.
M
N
Add
okay,
this
is
queen,
so
are
you
saying
we
need
to
make
some
more
if
we
wanted
to
use
this
as
a
tool
to
recommend
to
city
council.
M
N
Well,
one
other
thing:
I'm
thinking
about
is
like
they
was
denying
people
certain
programs
when
it
came
to
their
income
and
seeing
if
they
was
gonna,
be
able
to
qualify
to
get.
You
know
this
rent
stuff
paid,
so
maybe
if
they
had
a
liaison
person
or
something
somebody
to
keep
track
of
that
information,
that
would
be.
That
would
be
good.
I
think
we
should
use
that
also.
M
Yeah
you're
thinking
about
like
the
coved
response,
like
the
gap
funding
the
rent,
the
new
rent
assistance
program
that
was
developed
this
year,
hooray
correct
yeah,
so
maybe
it
could
be
something
like
you
know,
engage
with
stakeholders
around
reevaluating,
like
verification,
income
and
other
verification
requirements
for
eligibility
for
any
future.
Rent
assistance-
and
I
don't
know
if
engage
with
stakeholders-
is
what
is
that
what
we
would
be
asking
them
to
do
is
you
know,
talk
to
people
on
the
ground
before
you
revise
the
rules
for
any
future
program
queen?
M
M
Katie
I
mean
I
would,
I
would
suggest
you
know,
really
prioritize
the
eviction
prevention
strategies.
I
know
we'll
get
an
update
later
in
today's
meeting
about
the
report
that
katie
and
staff
made
regarding
right
to
counsel
and
other
eviction
prevention
opportunities
that
the
city
has,
but
I
would
just
put
in
a
plug
for
recommending
that
be
a
top
priority
for
2021.
M
As
we
know,
we
don't
know
when
the
eviction
moratorium
is
going
to
end,
but
there
are
plenty
of
cases
that
are
still
ongoing,
even
despite
the
the
moratorium,
and
we
know
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
people,
potentially
at
risk
of
facing
eviction
cases.
So
I
would
just
suggest
that
we
urge
city
council
to
prioritize
that.
M
R
Joey
I
just
wanted
to
piggyback
off
of
queen
to
the
rental
assistance
program.
I
spoke
to
katie
about
this
before
there
were
people
who
did
qualify
for
but
didn't
qualify,
but
who
filled
out
to
get
the
rental
assistance
and
they
got
denied
because
they
was
on
some
sort
of
subsidy.
R
So
the
subsidy
could
have
been
public
housing,
subsidized
housing
and
I
think
they
couldn't
receive
certain
public
assistance.
So
I
don't
know
how
accurate
that
is,
but
that's
some
of
the
things
that
I've
heard.
C
T
A
I
just
didn't
want
to
yeah
it's
it's
your
discussion,
so
I
don't
want
to
take
over,
but
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
what
crainer
said
we
had
talked
about
that
before
and
a
number
of
the
programs
that
is
accurate,
that
people
who
were
receiving
housing
subsidies
were
not
eligible
for
some
of
the
emergency
rental
assistance
programs
and
the
re.
The
reason
being
is
that,
theoretically,
if
somebody
is
receiving
you
know,
is
in
public
housing
or
section
in
section
8
housing.
A
If
their
income
changes,
then
their
rent
can
be
adjusted
so
that
then
they're
only
paying
30
of
their
income,
their
new
income
for
housing.
However,
that
being
said,
I
think
the
reality
is
that
those
adjustments
don't
happen
automatically.
A
People
have
to
know
to
notify
their
property
owner
the
property
owner
no
has
to
know
that
they
need
to
do
that,
and
so
there
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
reasons
that
that
maybe
didn't
wouldn't
have
happened
for
someone,
and
so
I
know
I
know
that
when
the
state
was
doing
their
program,
that
was
something
where
I
think
they
did
end
up,
making
some
adjustments
to
try
to
address
that
issue,
at
least
at
least
if
they
were
aware
that
the
adjustment
hadn't
been
made
or
something
like
that,
and
I
can
tell
you
that,
as
I
mentioned
early
on
in
this
meeting,
the
city
and
county
are
currently
talking
to
see
if
they're,
if,
if
we
can
make
some
additional
assistance
available-
and
that
is
one
of
the
things
we'll
be
talking
about
as
well-
is
how
can
we
maybe
address
that
issue?
S
This
is
jeff
I
can
just
vouch.
I
can't
speak
for
other
cities
or
other
housing
authorities,
but
that
we
have
been
as
aggressive
as
we
possibly
can
be
to
make
sure
that
people
know
how
to
how
to
do
that
and
yeah
someone
with
section
8
does
not
need
to
mess
around
with
their
property
owner.
S
They
just
need
to
contact
the
housing
authority,
and
so
we
have
we've
recognized
from
the
get-go
that
that
was
extremely
important
tool
and
the
way
that
we're
able
to
provide
a
level
of
stability
for
people
in
our
programs
that
not
available
to
people
in
the
private
market
in
other
situations
and
so
katie
katie's
right.
That
was
the
logic
by
which
those
programs
were
limited
to
people
who
were
not
already
receiving
that
sort
of
income
based
public
public
subsidy,
but
interesting
to
see
what
comes
next.
M
Yeah
thanks
jeff,
and
this
is
so
this
is
joey.
I
would
just
add
two.
I
think
that's
right-
that
there
clearly
is
that
mechanism.
Even
if
you
know
it
sounds
like
I
know
I
know,
mbha
sounds
like
it's:
making
has
made
efforts
to
make
that
really
clear
I'll
just
say.
Maybe
the
comment
could
also
be.
I
think
it's
important
to
just
for
the
city
or
whoever's
administering
these
programs
to
think
about
the
situation
a
little
more
holistically.
M
I
guess
somebody's
formal
income
might
be
able
to
be
adjusted
and,
and
will
you
know,
will
be
adjusted
if
there's
a
subsidy.
However,
some
of
those
indirect
forms
of
support-
and
you
know,
income
or
help
that
folks
get
are
also
impacted
that
don't
get
reflected
in
a
in
a
rent.
M
Recalculation,
for
example,
grandma
used
to
come
over
and
help
with
child
care,
but
grandma
can't
do
that
anymore
because
of
kovid
or
you
know,
there
are
just
other
ways
that
I
think
the
widespread
pandemic
has
made
people's
lives
harder
that
aren't
all
reflected
in
their
official
income
drop.
That
makes.
S
Sense,
well,
that's
true.
I
also
think
we,
you
know
it's
something
in
general
that
I
think
we
have
to
I
like
us
to
keep
in
mind.
You
know
we
have
to
respect
the
limited
resources
available
to
policymakers,
to
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
as
they
propose,
let's
say
as
much
as
they
can,
but
we,
the
city,
does
not
have
endless
resources
for
things,
and
so,
when
there's
no,
they
need
to
make
a
public
policy
choice.
Who
you
know
about
how
to
prioritize
the
limited
amount
of
money
they're
making
available.
S
You
know,
anyway,
we're
going
down
a
little
bit
of
a
different
track
here.
I
suppose,
but
they
want
to
make
sure
that
the
people
who
you
know
people
who
don't
have
that
they
don't
have
that
lever
at
all,
like
their
rent,
stays
what
it
is,
no
matter
what
their
income
is,
that
they
do
not
miss
out
on
that
opportunity
because
they
really
need
it.
S
We
all
know
where
I
work.
Obviously
I
have
an
interest
in
that
issue
and
follow
it
closely,
but
they're
recognizing
that
resources
are
not
endless.
S
You
know
the
city
has
has
power
and
it
has
used
it
effectively
in
ways
like
stable
home,
stable
schools
and
also
to
partner
with
mpha
on
on
some
some
big
projects,
and
we
we
think
that
that
is
demonstrates
what
we
can
do
together
and
this
committee
and
all
the
great
passion
it
brings
with
this
mission,
I
think,
would
is-
is
really
a
valuable
place
to
help
keep
the
keep
the
heat
applied
and
focus
on
that
potential.
M
Great
thanks,
jeff,
and
maybe
we
could
consider
on
that
note.
We
could
consider,
as
a
committee
incorporating
the
comment
that
we
got
from
a
member
of
the
public
today
about,
in
addition
to
deeply
affordable,
which
this
committee
has
brought
up
multiple
times,
but
with
all
sort
of
maybe
a
fully
larger
bedroom
units
kind
of
coupled
with
that
deeply
affordable.
I
do
I
want
to
respect
that.
I
put
rose
in
the
queue
and
maybe
move
to
rose
next.
T
Oh
sure
I
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
appropriate
for
this,
because
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
limited
to
things
that
we
discussed
in
2020,
but
I
just
saw
that
the
that,
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
today,
we're
gonna
have
the
opportunity
to
listen
to
the
presentation
from
cnhtd
and
twin
cities
lisk
about
opportunity
to
purchase
and
just
thought
that
that
will
be.
I
think
that
will
be
an
important
issue
for
housing
in
2021
and
something
having
had
the
opportunity
to
hear
this
presentation
already.
T
I
just
think
it's
a
really
interesting
and
exciting
opportunity
policy
opportunity.
I
guess
that
that
could
have
a
big
impact
on
preventing
displacement
and
preservation
of
existing,
affordable,
unsubsidized
housing,
so
just
interested
in
in
having
a
conversation
about
that
beyond.
Probably
just
you
know,
listening
to
the
presentation
so.
M
Absolutely
yes,
that's
great
and
today
is
on
today's
agenda.
Your
rate
is
just
the
I
shouldn't
say
just
a
is
the
presentation
piece
knowing
that,
since
there
isn't
an
ordinance,
any
ordinance
that
that
that
does
crop
up,
we,
it
is
very
likely.
I
can
almost
guarantee
that
this
committee
will
have
an
opportunity
to
actually
engage
with
any
policy
proposals
I
could
put
forward
and
katie.
Did
you
get
that
one.
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
guess,
I'm
I'm
not.
Is
there
like
a
specific,
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
to
word
that,
for
this
report
is
the
recommendation
that
the
city
continue
to
work
on
development
of
the
policy
or.
A
M
T
I
think
all
of
those
are
those
would
would
work
for
me
personally,
you
know
in
terms
of
yeah,
exploring
and
understanding
supporting
the
city
and
developing,
you
know
actively
developing
a
policy,
and
I
I
mean,
and
we
don't
need
to
put
it
on
here
like
I
said,
if,
if
you
all
think
that
there
will
be
opportunities
for
the
for
the
committee
to
kind
of
weigh
in
on
this
in
a
different
format,
I
would
be.
T
I
would
be
happy
with
that,
and
and
it
wouldn't
need
to
necessarily
be
on
the
recommendation
list
here.
Just.
M
Oh
sorry,
yeah.
I
think
we
will
have
an
opportunity.
I
don't.
I
do
not
think
that
that
means
it
shouldn't
be
on
here,
because
this
is
another
way
of
just
stating
what
we
think
the
city's
priorities
should
be.
M
I
don't
know
if
robin,
if
you're
on
the
line,
I
think
you're
on
the
line,
but
if
you
have
any
thoughts
about
what,
in
this
recommendation,
section
would
be
most
helpful
to
council,
member,
gordon
and
and
and
the
rest
of
the
council
feel
free
to,
of
course,
chime
in.
If
there's
anything,
you
think
would
be.
M
M
Okay,
great
so
just
not
having
done
this
before.
I
appreciate
that
yeah
and
maybe
I
wonder
about
even
a
more
general
like
a
more
general
recommendation.
I
think
that
a
number
of
city
council
members
have
done
this
and
brought
things
been
really
intentional
about
bringing
things
to
our
committee,
but
we
could
have
a
more
general
recommendation.
Just
that,
as
the
council
is
is
considering
things
to
you
know,
make
sure
to
engage
with
this
with
this
committee
and
that
you
know
we're.
M
We
have
a
lot
of
members
who
represent
a
lot
of
really
important
pieces
of
the
housing
kind
of
tapestry
in
our
city.
So
I
know
like,
for
example,
scott
and
brenda
have
been
really
involved
in
the
single
room,
occupancy
conversations.
I'm
sure
others
would
be
willing
to
step
in
to
work
on
other
specific
projects
or
policy
development.
M
So
maybe
just
another
chance
to
say,
hey
we're
here.
We
care
we're
volunteering,
our
expertise
and
and
service.
U
Yeah,
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
and
and
expect
you
know,
as
we
continue
to
have
conversations
about
opportunity
to
purchase
and
things
like
that
that
we'll
bring
them
here
too.
But,
yes,
I
think
reminding
folks
that
this
exists
as
a
as
a
touch
point
with
a
pretty
good,
diverse
group
of
folks
does
make
sense.
M
Okay
looks
like
we
have
a
couple
hands
up:
I'm
gonna
go
to
annie.
V
I
would
like
us
to
add
a
recommendation
that
the
city
prioritizes
addressing
the
issue
of
literal
homelessness,
so
we've
had
a
number
of
public
comments
about
the
encampments
and
joey.
I
think
you
mentioned
that
earlier
and
I
just
wanted
to
have
that
stated
on
here
as
a
as
a
recommendation
that
that
be
prioritized,
and
by
addressing
I
don't
mean
clearing,
so
we
don't
see
them,
I
mean
actually
adequately
addressing
by
expanding
shelter,
opportunities
working
with
the
county
and
doing
that
and
providing
actual
solutions
and
not
just
clearing
them
so
that
they're
not
visible.
J
You
yeah,
I
had
a
question
just
what
jeff's
comments
had
kind
of
spurred
this
about
the
concentration
on
the
budget.
I'm
not
really
familiar
with
it,
but
I
was
just
thinking
about
the
collective
efforts
with
hennepin
county
in
terms
of
tapping
into
more
resources
for
some
of
the
housing
stuff
we're
doing.
J
I
know
the
city's
budget
is
strained
with
the
pandemic
and
I
philippine
county
is
really
their
finances
are
just
quite
interesting
and
I
was
just
wondering:
are
there
some
collective
efforts
of
the
city
aligning
with
hennepin
county
on
some
of
these
efforts
and
I'm
not
familiar
with
what
they
are
and
katie?
You
may
have
more
ideas
than
than
I
would,
but
I'm
wondering
are
there
some
more
collective
opportunities
with
budgetary
stuff
with
hennepin
and
city
working
together.
A
I
could
comment
briefly
and
then
I
I
think
so
I
do
you
know
the
city
and
county
do
try
to
work
together
in
term
in
a
lot
of
ways
what,
but,
I
think
housing
development
in
particular,
which
I
think
is
what
you're
getting
at
like
the
development
of
new
housing
and
maybe
not
so
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
there
is
a
lot
of
collaboration.
I
mean
typically
when
the
city's
putting
funding
into
a
new
housing
development.
A
The
county
probably
is
too
like
we're
and
I
think
we're
constantly
trying
to
figure
out
like
who
has
the
right
resources
to
make
these
projects
move
forward.
That
being
said,
I
am
sure
there
are
ways
we
could
be
more
creative
or
think
of
new
opportunities
to
collaborate.
So
I
certainly
think
it's
an
appropriate
thing
to
put
in
a
report
like
this
as
well.
J
Yeah,
I
was
just
not
not
specifically
just
for
housing
development,
but
all
of
the
you
know
the
things
we're
talking
about
with
rental,
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
with
people
being
homeless.
Just
how
do
we,
as
a
committee
or
as
the
city?
How
do
they
always
try
to
make
this
a
collective
effort
with
the
county?
And
I
don't
know
whether
they
are
at
what
level
that
is,
but
seems
like.
J
That
would
be
really
interesting
for
us
to
kind
of
be
deliberate
about
that
and
and
some
of
our
work
going
forward.
B
B
So
I
you
know,
I
know
brenda
scott
you've
worked
a
lot
on.
Is
there
anything
that
we
want
to
recommend
on
sros.
E
Honestly,
I'd
have
to
think
about
it
for
a
little
bit
yeah
and
I
guess
I'd
also
want
to
hear
you
know
what
different
decisions
that
the
city
staff
are
trying
to
know
that
some
of
the
ones
that
we
talked
about,
which
I
think
I
presented
at
a
previous
meeting
where
you
know
what
size
should
they
be?
What
should
the
right
recommend
or
what
should
the
you
know,
recommended
occupancy
or
regulated
occupancy
be,
and
my
personal
you
know
instinct-
is
to
just
kind
of
throw
open
the
gates
and
say:
listen.
E
We
have
a
real
big
problem
here
and
we
should
you
know,
let
kind
of
you
know
as
many
of
these
solutions
come
up
as
we
as
we
can,
and
then
you
know.
If
there
are
problems
down
the
line,
then
we
can
regulate
them,
but
you
know
just
take
a
really
robust
approach
to
allowing
as
much
sros
as
many
sros
as
many
different
kinds
as
many
different
parts
of
the
city
as
possible.
M
And
it
kind
of
maybe
fits
to
in
the
you
know,
addressing
homelessness
by
expanding
housing
solutions
robin
I
see
your
hands
up.
U
M
Sure
so,
thank
you
in
the
interest
of
time.
I
think
we
want
to
kind
of
wrap
this
up.
Is
there
anything
at
final?
So
what
I'm?
What
I'm
suggesting
we
do
here
is
we
vote
and,
if
at
all
possible,
if
we
can,
you
know,
agree
on
this
slate
as
a
whole
and
do
one
vote.
I
think
that
that
would
be
great
in
the
interest
of
time,
but
is
there
anything
else
that
is
really
missing
here
before
we
take
that
step
and
take
a
vote
on
these.
A
So
I
think
joey
just
for
the
sake
of
anybody
who
might
be
on
the
phone
it
should.
We
should
probably
read
through
these,
and
I
might
suggest
that
assuming
the
the
committee
decides
to
adopt
these,
I
might
suggest
that
the
whoever
makes
the
motion
that
it's
like
we're,
adopting
the
substance
but
allow
the
committee
co-chairs
to
maybe
so
I
think,
they're-
probably
not
written
exactly
the
way
we
want
them
to
be
so
like
make
some
stylistic
or
or.
M
Grammatical
changes;
okay!
Well,
maybe
at
this
point,
then
I
will
move
that
the
committee
adopt
the
following
one:
two,
three,
four:
five,
six,
eight
priority
recommendations
and
again
with-
and
the
motion
will
be
that
these
the
substance
of
these
will
be
modified
just
for
pure,
you
know
grammatical,
the
substance
will
say
the
same
and
there
might
be
some
grammatical
changes
to
how
they
are
worded
right
now,
but
the
general,
the
substance
of
the
comment
will
not
change.
M
So
I
move
that
the
committee
adopt
the
following
eight
recommendations
for
our
annual
report
to
the
city
council,
and
these
include
track
the
march
mortgage
forbearance
deadline
and
think
of
ways
to
assist
homeowners,
two
engage
with
stakeholders
to
re-evaluate
income
and
other
verification
requirements
for
eligibility
for
future
rental
assistance.
Programs:
three
to
prioritize
eviction
prevention
strategies,
four,
to
continue
to
focus
on
how
the
city
uses
budget
and
bonding
capacity
to
create
and
preserve
deeply
affordable
housing.
M
Five
cities
should
continue
to
explore,
develop
an
opportunity
to
purchase
policy.
Six
as
council
is
considering
new
housing
policies,
engage
with
housing
advisory
committee.
Given
the
wide
range
of
perspectives
and
expertise
on
the
committee,
seven
cities
should
prioritize
addressing
issue
the
issue
of
homelessness
by
expanding
shelter,
opportunities
and
housing
solutions,
including
adopting
an
ordinance
to
allow
single
room
occupancy
and,
finally,
eight.
The
city
should
be
deliberate
about
collaborating
with
the
county
to
meet
housing
priorities
and
the
order
that
these
get
listed
in
might
change
just
for
for
clarity.
C
A
I
Sure
so
not
meaning
to
to
to
wordsmith,
but
it
is
significant-
and
I
think
I
could
support
this
if
we
could
make
a
small
change
and
that
is,
you've
got
prioritizing
eviction
prevention
strategies.
I
But
the
long-term
solution,
which
I
think
should
be
prioritized,
is
the
creation
of
housing
and
the
preservation
of
housing,
and
so
I
could
support
it
if
that
was
the
priority
rather
than
because
they're
just
saying
continue,
and
I
think
I've
heard
a
lot
of
advocates
and
and
say
that
you
know
we
need
more
housing
and
that's
the
the
best
eviction
prevention
strategy
is
the
the
right
housing
for
the
right
person
at
the
right
level
of
affordability.
I
For
the,
when
you
say
continue,
I
would
say
prioritize
the
focus
on
how
the
city
uses
its
budget
and
bonding
capacity
and
then
could
you
just
put.
The
word
continue
on
the
continue
the
eviction
prevention
strategies,
because
there
are
a
number
of
eviction
prevention
strategies
in
place,
and
I
know
that
there
are
others
that
folks
want
to
consider
which
that's
a
different
debate.
M
So
as
as
I,
I
suppose,
the
informal
author
of
this
of
this
motion
or
the
the
bringer
of
this
motion,
I'm
I'm
not
a
roberts
rules
person.
I
would
say
that
I'm
fine
with
saying
prioritize,
focusing
on
how
the
city
uses
its
budget
and
bonding
capacity.
M
I
do
think
that,
given
the
crisis,
we're
facing
right
now
that
eviction
prevention
should
be
an
equal
priority,
especially
in
the
short
term.
So
I
I
would
be
fine
with
saying
that
they
both
should
be
prioritized
without
making
it
a
clear
indication
with
wording
that
one
is
more
important
than
the
other,
but
that
they
both
are
extremely
important.
S
B
I
I
B
M
R
I'm
working
with
safe
homes
and
in
maryland
landlords
are
evicting
people
under
this
pandemic
when
they
are
not
supposed
to
so
they're,
not
protected
and
they're
reaching
out.
Some
of
them
are
private
market
homes.
Majority
of
them
are
public,
housing
majority
are
subsidized
and
it's
all
in
that
same
housing
market,
but
they're,
being
evicted,
and
so
I'm
on
those
calls
and
I'm
listening
to
people
begging
for
help
their
families
are
on
the
street
and
and
so
they're
being
evicted.
Even
the
landlords
are
not
following
the
rules
and
they're
kicking
people
out.
R
M
Thanks
karina
yep
is
there
any
other
any
other
discussion
or
burning
questions
before
we
take
a
vote
on
this
slate
of.
M
D
J
A
A
Ryan
strack
did
ryan
join.
I
don't
think
so
rose
tang,
yes,
shanae
turner,
smith,.
M
Okay,
thanks
everyone.
I
know
that
was
a
lot
of
work,
but
I
also
think
it's
cool
that
in
the
last
couple
meetings
we
have
successfully
voted
on
a
lot
of
substance,
so
thanks
everyone
for
your
participation,
all
right
so
just
with.
I
know
we're
a
little
bit
over
the
time
that
we
had
planned
to
a
lot
for
this
discussion,
but
just
really
briefly.
M
I
wanted
to
take
this
time
to
thank
the
members
of
the
committee
who
are
with
us
today,
but
are
not
going
to
be
present
moving
forward
and
not
because
they
weren't
selected
as
katie
mentioned,
but
for
for
their
own
reasons
are,
did
not
reapply.
So
I
just
wanna.
I
think
the
ones
who
are
here
today
with
us
are
mary
christensen
and
is
damaris
on
the
phone.
M
B
Q
On
mute,
mary
yeah,
there
we
go
sure.
I
guess
I
would
just
like
to
remind
the
committee
that
in
general,
home
ownership
is
less
expensive
on
a
monthly
basis
than
rental
housing,
and
so
I
would
urge
the
committee
to
promote
home
ownership
for
lower
income
people,
because
rental
housing
is
a
trap
and
ownership
is
the
way
to
get
ahead.
M
M
M
If
we
had
more
time,
we
could
all
have
a
an
end
of
the
year
party
to
celebrate
our
our
term
coming
to
a
close.
Unfortunately,
we
can't
do
that,
but
I
really
appreciate
having
been
part
of
this,
this
committee
for
the
last
two
years,
with
all
of
you
and
looking
forward
to
continuing
on
with
most
of
you.
M
Right,
I
think
now
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
try
to
whirl
through.
So
there
are
a
number
of
things
that
we
have
discussed
to
some
extent
in
this
committee
that
we
wanted
to
just
circle
back,
as
things
have
moved
forward
to
just
circle
back
on
some
of
those
items
with
where
they're
at
now.
So
I
don't
know
katie,
should
I
turn
it
over
to
you
or
to
robin
and
andrea
for
budget
updates.
A
Yep,
I
think
yeah,
if
robin
or
andrea,
could
start
and
we're
gonna.
This
is
gonna
be
kind
of
rapid
fire
because
we
still
have
one
more
thing
to
get
to
on
the
agenda,
but
these
are
all
they're,
just
a
number
of
things
that
have
had
that
came
to
the
committee
at
one
point
during
the
year
and
have
had
some
action
since
they
came
to
the
committee.
A
A
Yeah,
but
yes,
if
robin
andrea
and
robin,
if
you
could
do
a
quick
update
on
the
budget
and
obviously
with
a
well,
maybe
not
obviously,
but
I
think,
focusing
on
the
housing
components
of
the
budget.
What
was
ultimately
adopted
yesterday
by
the
council
or
maybe
early
this
morning,.
A
L
I'll
go
because
I'm
unmuted,
sorry
that
I
don't
have
my
camera
on
today,
I'm
having
some
technical
difficulties,
but
first
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
the
submission
of
this
committee's
review
of
the
budget
and
priorities.
I
think
it
was
really
a
helpful
thing
to
see
the
priorities
in
that
form,
and
you
know
a
really
easy
way
to
to
share
that
message.
So
thank
you
for
participating
in
that
way.
L
As
katie
mentioned
last
night,
the
city
council
passed
the
2021
budget
and
it
will
be
now
be
going
to
the
mayor's
desk
for
signing,
which
we
expect
to
happen
in
the
next
few
days.
On
the
housing
front,
the
package
that
was
originally
presented
that
we,
that
you
all
discussed
in
this
committee,
remained
in
the
final
version.
L
The
two
things
I'll
highlight
that
sort
that
were
additions
through
the
console
process
was
ninety
five
thousand
dollars
that
close
member
osman
introduced
and
had
passed
into
the
budget,
which
is
specifically
to
support,
tenant,
advocacy
and
homeownership
support
within
this
african
community
to
fill
a
gap
in
service
that
that
he
had
heard
from
his
constituents,
and
then
katie
mentioned
earlier.
L
That
we've
also
been
trying
to
prioritize
our
cdbg
and
esg
cova
dollars
that
come
in
from
that
have
come
in
from
the
federal
government,
and
one
additional
action
within
the
budget
process
was
to
continue
to
do
that
with
our
remaining
cdbg
dollars,
specifically
to
earmark
some
of
those
funds
for
the
health
department
in
terms
of
responding
to
some
of
the
public
health
needs
at
the
encampment.
So
those
are
sort
of
the
two
housing
related
items
that
changed
throughout
the
process.
L
So,
even
in
a
year
where
we
had
to
make
some
pretty
hard
decisions
and
some
cuts
within
departments,
we
were
able
to
fund
some
really
strategic
investments
and
and
some
key
areas,
including
housing.
So,
thank
you
all
for
your
work
in
advocating
for
all
that
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
all
may
have.
H
H
Briefly
say
that
yeah,
so
it's
something
I've
actually
been
working
with
joey
on
quite
a
bit,
is
to
try
to
last
year
the
city
passed,
a
relocation
benefit
ordinance,
which
means
that
if
for
if
the
city
takes
an
action
that
results
in
the
owner
losing
their
license
or
or
taking
away
their
privilege
to
rent
the
the
ordinance
says,
the
landlord's
supposed
to
pay
relocation
assistance.
H
But
in
the
practice
practicality,
you
know
without
a
sort
of
a
resource
that
was
going
to
be
difficult,
but
the
city
included
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
a
revolving
pool
of
money
so
that
we
could
pay
housing.
Relocation
assistance
in
the
event
of
a
the
proper
needs
to
be
vacated
due
to
a
regulatory
action.
So
I
was
happy
about.
C
L
So
that's
from
the
budget
from
2020,
and
so
they
passed
those
allocations
which
is
10
projects
over
14.5
million
dollars
that
were
announced
to
go
into
projects
throughout
the
city
and
the
trust
fund
funds
units
at
50
and
30
percent
of
ami.
So
the
950
units
include
some
other
units
within
the
project,
but
projects,
but
those
that
funding
goes
specifically
towards
50
and
30
ami
units,
so
that'll
be
going
for
at
this
level.
A
Yes,
thank
you,
andrea.
It's
big!
It's
always
a
big
announcement.
Okay,
I'm
going
to
try
to
move
through
the
rest
of
these
fairly
quickly
and,
like
I
said
I
can
send
a
more
detailed
written
update
too,
but
so
on.
Just
touching
on
some
homelessness
response
updates
this
week
on
monday,
a
new
shelter
did
open
homeward,
bound.
It's
operate
owned
and
operated
by
american
indian
community
development
corporation,
and
it
is
50
new
beds
specifically
focused
on
serving
people
who
are
unsheltered
from
our
native
american
community.
A
A
There
will
be
20
new
women's
shelter
beds
later
this
month
available
and
then
there's
a
lot
of
work
being
done
to
try
to
get
the
avivo
villages
project
online
before
the
end
of
the
year
as
well,
and
a
lot
of
staff
working
through
a
lot
of
stuff
at
the
city
working
through
kind
of
the
zoning
and
regulatory
issues,
but
also
a
lot
of
work
being
done
to
just
get
the
all
the
funding
together
as
well.
So
just
wanted
to
give
those
quick
updates
that
we
are.
A
We
have
some
additional
shelter
capacity
now
and
there
is
more
coming
later
in
the
month
as
joey
mentioned
earlier,
there's
we
gave
a
report
to
council.
Earlier
this
month
there
had
been
a
stat
dean,
porter
nelson
came
to
our
committee
meeting.
I
think
in
september.
Maybe
to
get
some
input.
The
council
had
directed
us
to
look
at
possibilities
for
a
right
to
counsel
policy,
which
would
mean
right
to
counsel
for
people
who
are
for
eviction
cases,
and
so
we
did.
A
The
city
has
provided
money
to
legal
aid
for
eviction
prevention,
legal
services
and
increased
our
contract
a
little
bit
using
some
of
the
covid
response
dollars,
because
we
are
expecting
an
increase
in
need
because
of
covid,
and
so
the
other
recommendation
to
the
council
was
that
they
would
really
need
to
look
at
ramping
up
funding,
particularly
starting
in
2022,
to
to
find
more
funding
to
fund
a
right
to
council
policy
as
well.
A
So
sorry
that
I'm
just
flying
through
these,
but
I'm
gonna,
keep
going
here.
The
state
legislative
agenda
is
another
thing
that
joey
mentioned
so
every
process,
where
there's
a
team
of
staff
from
across
the
city
enterprise
who
meet
with
our
government
relations
team
and
make
recommendations
for
things
that
should
be
included
on
the
city's
state
legislative
agenda,
and
these
recommendations
are
things
that
come
from
people's
work
with
community
and
other
partners,
things
that
we've
identified
as
needs.
A
So
in
the
housing
area,
we
did
add
a
few
new
new
statements
this
year.
A
couple
were
that
the
city
should
support
at
the
state
level,
a
just
cause,
eviction
policy
and
then
a
pay
or
quit
notice,
which
essentially
meaning
you
extend
the
time
period,
that
somebody's
notified,
that
of
of
an
eviction
filing
to
when
the
the
filing
actually
takes
place.
A
We
also
added
a
statement
about
needing
more
support
for
state
and
regional
response
to
unsheltered
homelessness,
recognizing
that
there
needs
to
be
response,
a
collaborative
response
from
all
levels
of
government
to
be
able
to
respond
to
the
homelessness
crisis
that
we
have,
and
so
just
really
wanting
to
be
explicit
about
that
that
that's
that
we
recognize
that
need
there,
of
course,
is
already
collaboration
happening,
but
there
needs
to
be
more
beyond
that
is
basically
what
the
the
gist
of
the
statement
is
and
then,
lastly,
the
on
the
legislative
agenda
right
now
the
city
is
limited
in
and
how
long
affordability
periods
can
be
for
affordable
housing,
we're
under
by
state
law
we're
limited
to
no
more
than
30
years
of
affordability.
A
We
would
like
to
be
able
to
require
longer
than
that,
and
so
we
are
suggesting
a
legislative
change
that
would
just
allow
cities
to
set
their
own
affordability
periods,
and
this
was
something
that
the
governor
supported
last
year
and
so
we're
hopeful.
Maybe
it
can
get
some
movement,
but
that's
something
that
we
added
to
our
legislative
agenda
and
then
the
community
preference
policy.
This
committee
received
a
presentation
on
that
from
erica
coleman
over
the
summer
and
we
never
circled
back
to
share
that.
A
It
was
adopted
by
the
council
this
this
committee
submitted
a
comment
on
it
as
well
in
support
of
it,
so
that
was
adopted
by
the
council
in
october.
It
currently
applies
to
our
homeownership,
the
minneapolis
homes
programs,
and
this
is
where
people
residing
in
certain
geographies
or
who
were
displaced
from
certain
geographies
have
preference
for
city
homeownership
programs.
A
We
will
be
working
to
also
have
this
applied
to
our
rental
programs
and
starting
to
work
on
that
now,
so
we
will
be
back
to
the
committee
to
get
some
guidance
on
on
the
rental
side
for
a
community
preference
policy,
but
it
was,
it
was
adopted
by
the
council
and
currently
applies
to
our
homeownership
programs,
and
then
sro
ordinance
is
on
the
list
here
as
well,
but
I
think
we
kind
of
already
covered
that
in
our
last
update
that
work
is
still
underway
and
we,
I
will
have
more
updates
likely
early
next
year.
A
So
I
know
that
was
a
lot
in
a
pretty
short
amount
of
time
and-
and
we
have
one
more
presentation
to
get
to
that's-
also
a
lot
of
information
so
happy
to
pause
and
take
any
questions,
but
really
wanted
to
make
sure
you
all
just
had
those
updates.
B
A
Okay,
so
I
think
we
can
move
to
our
last
agenda
item,
so
this
and
gretchen
nicholls
from
twin
cities.
Lisk
is
here,
and
she-
and
I
are
gonna
cover
this
together.
So
this
has
already
come
up
earlier
in
our
meeting
today,
but
over
the
last
year
the
city
had
engaged
so
in
2019,
council
members,
fletcher
and
schrader
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
robin,
I
think
those
were
the
two
that
did
the
subject
matter:
introduction
for
right
of
first
refusal
or
opportunity
to
purchase
policy.
A
After
that
there
was
a
study
session
where
city
staff
and
some
non-profit
staff
from
washington
dc
came
and
presented
to
our
city
council
on
the
washington
dc
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
act
and
then,
after
that,
the
city
did
engage
with
consultants
to
help
explore
opportunity
to
purchase
policy
options
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
so
our
consultants
were
the
coalition
for
non-profit
housing
and
economic
development
out
of
washington
dc
and
scott
bruton,
unfortunately
ended
up
having
a
scheduling
conflict
so
couldn't
be
here
this
afternoon,
but
then
they
were
also
partnered
with
twin
cities,
lisk
and
gretchen,
nicholls
from
twin
cities.
A
Lisk
is
here,
and
so
they
engaged
with
a
number
of
stakeholders
to
talk
about
different
potential
opportunity
to
purchase
policy
options
and
have
prepared
a
report
for
the
city
they
presented
to
council
in
november,
and
so
we
just
wanted
to
give
sort
of
the
highlights
of
that
report
to
this
committee
and
before
we
dive
into
that,
I
just
kind
of
want
to
frame
this
as
a
couple
things.
A
This
is
a
very
complicated
policy
and
obviously
we
can't
do
it
justice
in
18
minutes
here,
but
we
are
what
we,
the
purpose
of
bringing
it
to
this
committee
today,
is
just
to
give
an
update
on
kind
of
here's.
The
report
that
was
given
to
council
here
are
the
policy
options
that
city
council
members
are
sort
of
will
be
able
to
consider,
and
as
joey
and
robin
already
mentioned,
as
this
moves
forward
this
next
year,
this
committee
will
have
the
opportunity
to
really
dig
in
more
on
this
and
give
and
provide
input.
A
So
really.
The
reason
we
wanted
to
bring
it
today
is
just
the
because
it
went
to
council
in
november
wanting
to
just
give
you
a
chance
to
get
introduced
to
it
and
get
a
sense
for
the
policy
options.
So
I'm
going
to
share
the
powerpoint
and
we're
not
going
through
this
whole
thing,
but
we
will
go
through
some
of
it,
and
this
is
linked
on
the
agenda
for
anybody
who's
on
the
phone.
M
C
R
A
Okay,
well,
why
don't
I'm
gonna
keep
playing
around
with
this
gretchen?
Do
you
want
to
start?
Gretchen
was
gonna,
so
I'm
happy
to
have
gretchen
nichols
here
from
twin
cities.
Lisk
and
she
was
gonna
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
process
that
went
into
informing
the
policy
options
so
gretchen.
Why
don't
you
start
and
I'll
try
to
get
this
to
work.
W
Okay,
so
I'm
just
gonna
roll
through
the
slides
katie,
if
that's,
okay
and
okay,
so
hello,
everyone,
I'm
gretchen
nichols
from
lisq
twin
cities.
It's
been
an
honor
to
work
with
the
city
on
this
project.
This
is
a
really
interesting
policy
strategy
that
we
are
trying
to
gather
all
of
the
knowledge
and
information
from
other
other
communities
across
the
country
that
have
explored
and
participated
in
this
policy
option.
So
we
look
forward
to
the
further
discussion
I
wanted
to
just
quickly
acknowledge
that
the
process
was
very
iterative.
W
The
background
incorporated
a
lot
of
data
around
the
existing
rental
housing
stock
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
of
those
properties
that
are
rental,
a
vast
majority
of
them
are
single
family
and
those
are
located
throughout
the
city.
W
W
We
also
monitored
how
many
rental
property
sales
happen
year
year
by
year
in
the
city.
This
doesn't
have
the
single
family,
because
when
a
single-family
property
is
sold,
it
isn't
neces.
It
isn't
usually
known
if
it
was
used
as
a
rental
or
an
ownership
property
at
the
point
of
sale,
so
it
just
documents
over
time
kind
of
to
see
an
averaging
of
of
properties
and
then
average
sales.
W
We
also
tried
to
assess
the
impact
of
1031
exchange
in
terms
of
how
many
properties
utilize
that
tax
abatement
tool,
and
just
so
we
have
that
information
as
well,
also
to
note
that
we
were
advised
by
stakeholders
that
the
initial
life
stages
of
prop
of
new
construction,
the
first
10
years
or
so
there's
usually
a
cascade
of
ownership
that
occurs
that
would
make
it
very
cumbersome
for
investors
to
support
new
construction
in
our
market.
So
we
pulled
this
data
from
properties
that
were
10
years
or
older.
A
Sorry,
I
was
muted.
I
think
I
didn't
do
a
very
good
job
at
the
introduction
of
this,
of
just
kind
of
setting
up
what
the
goals
are
for
this
type
of
policy
and
just
like
the
basics
of
what
is
an
opportunity
to
purchase
policy.
So
I'm
gonna
do
that
right
now,
so
so
really
the
goals
that
have
been
identified
by
the
council
members
who
are
interested
in
this
policy
is
creating.
A
You
know:
tenants,
tenants,
rights,
anti-displacement
and
preserving,
preserving
affordable
housing.
A
Those
are
some
of
the
main
goals
that
have
been
identified
and
so
and
really
essentially,
what
an
opportunity
to
purchase
policy
is,
is
giving
either
tenants
or
a
certain
subset
of
organizations
the
opportunity
to
purchase
a
rental
property
before
it
is
sold
in
a
you
know,
just
a
more
of
a
typical
transaction.
A
So
that's
really
the
the
basic
concept
of
what
we're
talking
about
here
and
the
goals
of
the
the
goals
that
this
type
of
policy
can
are
these
things
you
know
tenant
rights
and
tenant
protections,
anti-displacement
and
then
preservation
of
affordable
housing,
and
I
think
one
an
important
thing
to
note
is
that
the
policy
options
I'm
gonna
quickly
go
through
here
sort
of
meet
those
goals
to
varying
degrees,
and
so
so
the
what
the
consultants
have
brought
forward
are
some
different
options
for
policy
makers
to
consider
and
to
think
about,
you
know
what:
how
do
they
want
to
best
meet
some
of
these
goals
that
they're
trying
to
meet
through
these
policy
options?
A
So
the
way
these
options
are
there,
there
are
three
options
that
the
consultants
have
put
together.
All
of
them
contain
a
feature
where
either
tenants
or
a
tenant
organization
or
a
qualif
depending
on
the
option.
This
might
also
be
available
to
what's
called
a
qualified
organization.
A
Under
all
three
of
these
options,
there
is
a
process
through
which
some
one
of
these
buyers,
who
has
these
rights
under
the
policy,
could
first
make
a
right
of
first
offer.
So
if
a
if
a
property
owner
was
going
to
sell
their
property,
they
would
have
to
go
to
whoever
has
the
rights
under
the
policy
and
that
will
be
determined
by
the
different
policy
options.
They
would
have
to
give
them
the
right
to
make
a
first
offer
before
they
market
the
property
for
sale
and
so
the
tenant.
A
Let's
say
it's
a
tenant
organization
that
wants
to
do
this.
They
would
have
to
register
their
rights
within
a
certain
number
of
days
to
make
an
offer.
Not
do
that,
then
the
sale
can
just
proceed
like
it
normally
would.
If
they
did
do
that,
then
there
are
additional
steps
that
would
have
to
happen.
So
then
there
would
be.
You
know,
there's
time
laid
out
in
the
policy
for
negotiation
periods
and
and
getting
financing,
and
things
like
that.
A
So
so
the
three
policies
that
the
consultant
have
put
together.
You
can
see
this
slide
sort
of
lays
out
the
objective
so
gretchen.
Could
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
I'm
just
going
to
go
quickly
through
each
policy
option.
So
the
first
one
is
really
focused
on
tenants
rights,
but
then
also
preventing
displacement
and
it.
This
policy
is
most
similar
to
the
washington
dc
tenant
opportunity
to
purchase
policy.
A
A
Under
this
policy
option
there
there's
not
a
requirement
to
you
know,
afford
affordability
restrictions
on
the
property
after
it's
sold.
So
if
it,
the
tenants
assigned
their
rights
to
a
third
party
developer,
that
developer
would
not
be
required
to
maintain
the
affordability
of
the
property.
The
way
the
policy
is
designed,
it's
more
giving
the
tenants
the
ability
to
kind
of
negotiate
the
terms
of
the
purchase
and
then
for
all
of
these
policies.
A
The
consultants
have
recommended
that
the
city
provide
funding
for
technical
assistance
to
tenant
organizations
or
community-based
nonprofits
to
help
tenants
understand
how
they
could
exercise
their
rights
and
to
and
to
go
through
the
purchase
process
and
this
chart
just
it
outlines
the
the
how
the
policy
would
work.
A
So
it's
a
flow
chart,
so
you
can
see
kind
of
what
I
described
on
the
right
if,
if
the
so
the
owner
owner
would
be
required
to
notify
tenants
and
the
city
of
their
intent
to
sell
on
the
right,
if
the
tenants
did
not
submit
a
statement
of
interest
within
45
days,
then
the
sell,
then
the
sale
can
just
move
on
like
it
normally
would.
A
If
they
did
register
their
statement
of
interest,
then
you
can
see
on
the
left
side
it
sort
of
flows
from
there
and
in
what
would
what
steps
would
take
place
all
right?
Let's
move
to
the
next
one,
because
I
want
to
be
cognizant
of
time
here
this
one.
This
policy
option
is
sort
of
blends,
both
tenants
rights
and
trying
to
prevent
displacement
with
tenant
production,
tenant
protections
and
preservation
of
affordable
housing.
So,
under
this
policy,
a
tenant,
a
tenant
organization
or
a
qualified
organization
could
exercise
the
right
to
purchase.
A
So
what
that
means
is
under
that
first
period
of
time,
where
an
owner
notifies
the
tenants
that
they're
going
to
sell
there,
could
there
would
also
be
a
list
of
qualified
organizations
that
that
the
city
maintains
that
those
organizations
would
also
be
notified
of
the
sale
and
they
could
also
register
their
right
to
purchase.
A
The
tenants
would
sort
of
have
first
crack
at
that,
but
if
they
chose
not
to
a
qualified
organization,
would
also
have
the
right
to
exercise
the
right
to
purchase
under
this
version
of
the
policy
and
then
beyond
that
it's
kind
of
similar
to
the
first
option,
but
but
tenants
could
only
assign
their
rights
to
a
qualified
organization
and
not
just
to
to
anyone
under
this
version
of
the
policy
and
that's
aimed
at
addressing
some
concerns
from
washington
dc.
That
has
this
policy
where
people
were
selling
their
rights.
A
You
know
perhaps
kind
of
talked
into
selling
their
rights
for
maybe
not
a
lot
of
money
and
then
just
displaced
in
the
end
anyway.
So
this
is.
This
is
sort
of
designed
at
trying
to
address
that
concern
and
then,
under
this
policy,
what
the
what
the
under
this
policy
option.
A
The
consultants
have
suggested
that,
if
a
qualified
organization
purchases
a
property
using
the
opportunity
to
purchase
that
they
would
be
required
to
abide
by
certain
tenant
protections
like
just
cause
eviction
and
then
again,
recommending
that
the
city
provide
funding
for
technical
assistance
for
this
policy.
A
Okay,
let's
keep
moving
gretchen,
and
this
is
again
just
the
chart
that
outlines
how
the
policy
would
work.
And
then
the
third
option
that
the
consultants
have
put
together
for
the
city's
consideration
is
is
focused
on
really
the
preservation
of
of
affordable
housing
and
preventing
displacement.
A
And
this
under
this
option,
only
qualified
organizations
that
have
met
certain
criteria
would
be
allowed
to
exercise
rights.
This
option
is
similar
to
one
that
was
adopted
by
san
francisco
a
couple
of
years
ago,
and
so
it's
kind
of
like
the
city,
working
with
qualified
developers
or
or
other
organizations
could
acquire
properties
and
preserve
the
affordability
and
then
what
the
consultants
have
suggested
is
that
any
anyone
who
would
exercise
rights
to
purchase
under
this
policy
again
would
have
to
comply
with
certain
tenant
protections.
W
So,
as
you
can
see,
it's
kind
of
a
variation
between
kind
of
an
open
market
concept
to
more
the
second
option,
having
more
guard
rails
and
the
third
one,
having
a
more
restricted
set
of
players
who
could
purchase
the
properties
and
and
again,
the
third
version
is
designed
to
streamline
or
create
more
time
efficiencies
for
the
project
for
the
policy.
W
But
again
it
illustrates
that
the
option
three
has
a
much
more
condensed
set
of
timelines
versus
one
and
two,
where
the
tenants
have
the
ability
to
organize
and
and
activate
their
rights.
This
chart
identifies.
One
of
the
concerns
is
the
duration
of
time.
The
policy
would
imply-
and
this
illustrates
that
in
the
average
market
you
have
data
around
how
long
the
maximum
amount
of
days
that
housing
was
on
the
market
versus
the
maximum
number
of
days.
W
So
I
know
this
is
a
real
lot
to
absorb
and
there's
no
way
you're
really
going
to
get
the
full
gist
of
it.
Also
to
just
make
note
that,
there's
a
variety
of
exceptions
that
were
identified
for
properties
that
probably
don't
aren't
a
good
fit
for
opportunity
to
purchase
largely
around
the
single
family
properties
where
seoul
residents
you
know
versus
a
corporate
owner
and
when
there's
bankruptcy,
foreclosure
or
tax
sales.
Some
of
these
elements
are,
I
identified
in
other
policies
across
the
country
where
these
are
exceptions.
A
So
yes,
gretchen,
can
you
I
and
we're
pretty
much
at
time
here,
but
could
you
go
back
to
sli
the
second
to
last
side,
yeah,
so
just
kind
of
wrap
up
here
so
kind
of
the
next?
So
the
the
consultants
outlined
these
three
policy
options,
but
within
each
policy
option
there
are
a
number
of
decisions
that
policymakers
will
have
to
make
like
gretchen
was
talking
about.
Does
it
apply
to
all
size,
rental,
housings,
from
single
family
up
or
only
to
certain
sizes?
A
Does
it
apply
to
any
properties,
regardless
of
how
long
they've
they
have
existed
based
on
their
age
or
is
it
do
we
exempt
properties
that
are
less
than
10
years
old?
So
there's
a
number
of
questions
sort
of
outlined
here
on
the
slide
that
policymakers
will
need
to
work
through,
in
addition
to
you
know
determining
which,
which
of
these
paths
that
they
want
to
go
down,
and
so
we
are
at
time
and
we,
this
is
a
lot
and
we're
happy
to
stay
on
for
a
minute
for
questions.
A
But
mostly
our
purpose
today
was
to
just
kind
of
make
sure
you
had
the
information.
There
will
be
a
written
report,
we're
working
with
gretchen
and
scott
right
now,
just
to
finalize
all
of
it.
The
details
in
that
report,
so
a
written
report
to
go
along
with
this
presentation
that
will
be
posted
to
the
city's
website
within
the
next
couple
of
weeks
as
well.
M
F
M
In
time
that
was
impressive,
gretchen
and
katie.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
and,
like
we've
said
a
couple
times,
you
know,
as
this
gets
developed
like
this
committee
will
have
more
opportunities
to
weigh
in
as
this
gets
developed.
So
any
final
burning
questions
or
things
that
people
want
to
say
before
we
adjourn.
N
This
is
queen,
I
just
wanted
to
say.
I
think
that
I
was
I
was
introduced
to
something
like
this.
They
got
something
like
this
going
on
in
new
york,
and
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
kind
of
following
behind
that
as
well.