►
From YouTube: June 30, 2022 City Council
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
D
B
A
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
do
have
a
quorum
next,
we'll
have
the
adoption
of
our
agenda.
F
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
just
want
to
amend
the
agenda
to
include,
under
the
order
of
notice
of
ordinance
introductions,
the
notice
of
intent
by
by
myself
and
council
member
chavez.
A
Thank
you,
council
member
chug
thai
council
member
chuck
tay
has
moved
to
a
mandate
agenda.
Second,
is
there
a
motion
so
moved,
there's,
emotion,.
G
B
A
H
A
Second
clerk:
will
you
please
follow
wrong
council.
B
A
H
I
B
This
is
the
referral
of
petitions
and
communications
to
committees:
aye
council
member
vita,
aye
councilmember,
rainville,
aye,
councilmember,
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
palmisano
aye,
president
jenkins
aye.
There
are
13
eyes.
J
Good
morning,
madam
presidents,
members
of
the
council,
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
is
bringing
16
items
forward
for
approval
this
morning.
Item
number
one
is
a
change
we've
been
looking
forward
to.
This
has
to
do
with
the
off
sale
beer
that
can
be
sold
from
breweries
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
as
passed
by
the
state
law.
We're
codifying
that
law
item
number
two
is
a
long-awaited
land
sale
at
800.
Washington
item
number
three
is
the
single
biggest
development
project
in
the
city
of
minneapolis?
J
This
is
the
land,
conveyance
and
tif
plan
for
the
upper
harbor
terminal
item
number
four
is
a
variance
appeal
that
the
committee
voted
to
grant
the
variance
item.
Five
are
the
liquor
license
approvals
and
six
are
the
renewals
item?
Seven?
Are
the
gambling
license
approvals?
Item
number.
Eight.
Is
a
change
in
our
consolidated
plan
to
make
a
budget
adjustment
now
that
we
have
final
numbers
item,
nine
are
grant
applications
to
the
livable
communities.
Demonstration
account
as
well
as
the
tod
development
account
item
number
10
are
appointments
to
the
minneapolis
advisory
committee
on
housing.
J
Item
number
11
is
passing
a
resolution
allowing
hennepin
county
to
put
bonds
into
a
project
canvas
apartments
in
the
first
ward
item.
12
is
a
housing
revenue
bond
extension
for
penn
avenue
union
item.
13
is
an
agreement
for
the
name
image
and
likeness
the
rights
to
be
able
to
use
them
with
the
family
of
prince
rogers
nelson
item.
14
is
an
appointment
to
the
family
housing
fund.
15
is
the
release
of
a
conservation
need
easement,
indeed,
restriction
and
item
16
is
a
significant
commercial
property
development
fund
loan
at
2700,
longfellow
and
2708
east
lake
street.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
goodman,
councilmember
goodman
has
moved
the
biz
report.
Is
there
any
discussion.
C
A
K
Member
winsley.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
shout
out
to
item
number
16.,
the
cpdf
loan
for
the
coliseum
building,
specifically
just
a
little
context.
K
That
site
was
damaged
in
the
wake
of
the
uprising
following
george
floyd's
murder
during
the
summer
of
2020,
and
people
might
know
it
as
the
old
denny's
man
that
food
bat
was
bad
there,
but
it
was
old
danny's
on
east
lake
street,
it's
going
to
be
renovated,
while
also
maintaining
a
beautiful,
exterior
and
supporting
local
black
businesses
and
ownership,
while
also
actually
actualizing
a
community-led
vision.
The
folks
behind
this
project.
K
I
know
some
of
you
all
are
here
in
the
room
right
now
is
the
seward
redesign
chris
montana,
who
owns
and
operates
due
north
social
spirits,
which
I
also
want
to
give
them
a
shout
out.
They
were
there
on
the
front
lines
during
the
uprising,
dodging
tear
gas,
getting
tear
gas,
providing
food
supplies
to
residents,
and
I'm
really
grateful
for
them.
Also,
they
are
the
first
black
owned
distillery
in
the
nation.
K
Janice
dowling
and
alicia
belton
will
also
be
utilizing
this
space
for
their
own
businesses,
as
well
as
to
offer
community
events
a
training
lounge
and
become
a
space
where
bipac
entrepreneurs
can
innovate
and
grow.
K
B
Vice
president
palmisano
aye
president
jenkins
aye,
there
are
13
eyes
on
the
report
except
for
item
number
three,
which
has
essentially
12
eyes
and
one
extension
items.
3.1
and
3.2
also
have
three
nays.
A
G
Thank
you,
madam
president.
The
committee
of
the
whole
is
bringing
forward
five
items
for
consideration
today.
The
first
is
the
executive
mayor,
legislative
council
government
structure,
implementation
funding
for
three
new
positions.
These
are
all
related
item.
Two
is
establishing
the
position
of
city
operations
officer.
The
third
is
establishing
the
position
of
community
safety.
G
Commissioner
position
item
number
four
is
about
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility,
campus
expansion,
and
you
will
see
a
slightly
modified
mou
term
sheet
at
your
here
at
your
seat
at
your
seat
on
the
dais,
and
I
will
ask
council
member
chavez
to
go
through
that
and
item
number.
Five
is
a
small
revision
to
our
work
group
structure
for
the
housing
and
rent
stabilization
work
group.
A
L
Thank
you
to
both
of
you
I'm
talking
about
today
about
the
high
water
campus
expansion.
I
was
approached
as
a
south
minneapolis
resident
about
this
project
way
before
my
time
on
this
council
and
especially
as
someone
who
was
born
and
raised
and
felt
the
environmental
impacts
of
my
childhood
neighborhood
here
in
east
phillips.
L
I
supported
this
project
from
day
one
because
it's
important
that
environmental
justice
is
at
the
forefront
of
everything
that
we
do
when
I
first
came
into
office.
This
is
the
first
project
that
I
worked
on
and
I
took
it
on
on
day
one.
I
want
to
tell
you
all
the
work
that
we've
done
since
we
began
in
office.
L
On
february
24th,
I
put
out
a
notice
of
intent
after
working
with
my
colleagues
to
suspend
the
hiawatha
campus
maintenance
facility
project
by
working
with
our
east
phillips
neighbors,
especially
with
ethni
and
my
colleagues,
specifically
councilman
johnson
and
councilmember
koski.
L
On
march
10th
2022
my
motion
to
suspend
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
campus
expansion,
an
effort
to
bring
back
a
training
center,
which
has
been
at
the
forefront
of
this
as
well
and
direct
staff
to
identify
city
funds
to
repay
the
14
million
in
water
funds
passed
with
the
at5
vote.
This
gave
the
east
slopes
neighborhood
institute
an
opportunity
to
submit
a
proposal
to
build
this
project.
L
On
march
11
2022,
we
received
a
notice
that
our
original
proposal
had
been
vetoed.
However,
it
was
not
the
end
of
the
dream
for
the
east
phillips
neighborhood
institute.
Nor
was
it
the
end
of
the
urban
farm
project
here
in
east
phillips,
because
it
allowed
us
to
bring
a
proposal
on
this
date
today
june
30
2022.
L
Since
then,
my
office
has
been
working
with
mayor,
frye,
councilman,
rakovsky,
councilmember,
johnson,
our
city
staff
and
the
east
phillips
neighborhood
institute
to
find
something
forward,
and
today
I'm
bringing
that
best
possible
outcome
through
my
office
and
that
best
possible
outcome
to
this
legislative
body
that
I
was
able
to
achieve.
So.
L
Some
of
the
new
changes
based
on
the
conversations
on
tuesday
and
committee
of
the
whole
was
that
the
city
will
work
with
mpca
to
prepare
the
community
levels
and
effects
analysis
per
minnesota
statutes,
and
we
can
find
that
in
the
information
that
is
handed
in
front
of
you,
the
city
will
integrate
resources
into
the
surrounding
community,
including
education
and
programming
on
lead
exposure,
reducing
air
pollution
that
contributes
to
asthma,
which
is
really
important
to
my
neighbors.
Here
in
east
phillips
and
weatherization
assistance,
the
city
will
add
a
camp
to
the
vehicle
counts.
L
L
That
will
reduce
some
of
the
environmental
mitigation
that
are
concerned
with
our
neighbors.
That
will
bring
economic
opportunity
to
the
people
in
east,
phillips
and
south
minneapolis
that
deserve
it,
and
this
has
gone
this
far
specifically
because
my
neighbors
in
east
phillips
have
fought
for
so
long
and
I
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
even
bring
this
up
without
the
support
of
my
colleagues
here
on
this
body
and
the
support
of
councilman
cossey
and
councilmember
johnson,
who
have
been
here
with
me
and
my
hip
this
entire
time.
L
C
C
I
am
so
grateful
to
have
had
the
opportunity
over
the
past
six
months
to
work
with
council
member
jason
chavez
on
this
council
member
jason
chavez.
You
have
fought
tirelessly
for
your
community
and
I
am
grateful
that
I've
been
able
to
join
you
in
that
fight
and
I'm
so
grateful
to
be
able
to
call
you.
C
B
Him
personally,
I
might
say
that
perhaps
councilmember
koski
is
clarifying
a
motion
to
approve
number
four
was
already
put
on
the
table
by
the
chair
moving
the
item
forward,
and
this
is
simply,
I
think,
substituting
out
specific
provisions
of
the
motion
made.
I
don't
think
we
need
another
motion,
but
that
clarification
for
the
record
is
important.
Thank
you.
So
much.
C
E
M
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
think
there's
only
a
handful
of
council
members
that
have
been
around
these
chambers
as
long
as
myself
and
realize
that
full
journey
we've
been
on
from
the
council
side
of
this
council
member
goodman,
palmisano
council.
M
President
jenkins
has
certainly
been
here,
and
it
has
been
such
a
journey
such
an
effort
to
get
to
this
point
today
and,
first
and
foremost,
thank
you
to
the
community
for
continuing
continuing
to
continuing
to
push
on
the
city
at
this
site
when
it
seemed
like
there
were
no
paths
available
left
that
we
were
all
out
of
options
and
that
the
public
works
facility
was
just
going
to
move
forward,
as
it
was
originally
proposed.
It's
because
of
that
persistence
that
we're
here
today.
M
It's
also
because
of
the
leadership
of
council
member
chavez-
and
I
just
cannot
thank
him
enough
for
continuing
to
bring
the
voice
of
the
community
into
every
conversation
and
and
he
never
put
himself
there.
He
was
always
saying
I'm
here
for
the
community,
the
community,
the
community,
the
community.
Those
words
were
coming
out
of
his
mouth
every
single
time
and
he
made
it
about
the
community
and
stood
up
for
the
community
and
fought
for
the
community
and
said:
what
does
this
community
need?
What
does
this
community
want?
What
can
we
do
for
this
community?
M
How
do
we
get
it
and
he
was
persistent
in
his
wellness,
and
I
mean
it's
it's
remarkable,
because
I
cannot
think
of
a
big
win
like
this,
where
we
were
at
such
an
impasse
with
community
over
such
a
contentious
issue
and
where
we're
now
at
a
huge
compromise
and
a
win-win
situation
with
the
parties
involved
and
the
council
member
koski
for
her
leadership
stepping
in
even
though
she's
this
wasn't
in
her
ward
saying
you
know
what
I'm
here
to
help.
How
do
we
figure
this
out?
M
M
That's
before
us,
and
I
think
this
is
a
huge
moment
and
I
don't
want
that
to
be
lost
because
it
truly,
I
think,
is
an
example.
It's
an
example
for
for
me
to
take
away
from
the
leadership
of
others
as
well
about
how
to
get
things
done,
and
people
coming
together
on
this
council
to
get
good
things
done.
I'm
excited
about
this
brighter
future
now
in
east
phillips
that
we
have
ahead
of
us
moving
forward.
So
thank
you.
K
A
K
Well,
I'm
speaking
to
items
one
through
three
related
to
the
government
restructure
and
the
creation
of
the
two
positions,
specifically
the
city
operations
officer
in
the
community
safety
commissioner.
So
I
have
a
couple
comments
on
that.
K
I
ran
for
office
to
build
power
for
working
class
people,
and
this
proposal
does
not
get
us
closer
to
that
right
now.
There
is
massive
support
for
24
7
bus
lanes
on
hennepin
ave,
thousands
of
residents
and
professional
staff
support
it.
The
met
council
supports
it.
The
minneapolis
state
delegation
supports
it
and
the
majority
of
council
supported
it,
but
the
mayor
vetoed
it.
This
is
unfair.
It's
unfortunate,
but
the
most
alarming
part
of
the
hennepin
ave
conversation
was
the
attempt
to
undermine
our
legislative
authority
from
various
mayoral
appointees.
K
K
There
has
been
no
information
provided
on
how
having
a
commissioner
of
the
office
of
community
safety
will
increase
accountability
or
avoid
the
14
bosses
problem.
The
mayor
has
yet
to
explain
how
the
office
will
work
with
the
mayor
and
the
council
sharing
legislative
control
over
different
departments.
K
K
Another
unanswered
question
is:
why
is
the
mayor
talking
confidently
about
eliminating
the
city
coordinator
position,
which
he
does
not
have
authority
to
do
or
to
eliminate
without
unanimous
consent
of
the
council
or
by
public
approval
on
the
ballot?
This
is
democracy
and
the
mayor
can't
just
eliminate
charter
positions
or
assume
outcomes
of
votes.
K
There
have
been
many
vague
claims
that
the
two
roles
of
this
restructure
proposal
will
create
a
more
effective
and
efficient
government,
but
there
is
still
no
evidence
to
support
these
claims
in
actuality.
The
only
reason
the
mayor
has
given
us
to
support
this
rush
process
is
that
he
needs
administrative
support
to
manage
his
expanded
responsibilities.
K
K
This
restructured
proposal
also
disregards
the
charter's
commission's
own
race
and
equity
recommendations
that
advise
that
after
question,
one
any
further
changes
should
be
based
on
evaluation
over
two
full
election
cycles
at
minimum.
It
has
only
been
seven
months
since
question
one
was
implemented.
That
alone
should
be
enough
to
stop
this
conversation
right
now.
K
K
This
will
be
a
huge
opportunity
to
rebuild
public
credibility
in
the
city,
especially
at
a
time
when
unelected
individuals
are
taking
a
outsized
role
in
controlling
our
lives
at
the
national
level,
and
especially
when
public
trust
in
the
city
is
at
an
all-time
low.
The
public
wants
to
be
active
participants
in
this
process
with
us.
K
G
G
We
have
started
this
government
restructure,
work
together
and
our
goals
have
been
for
it
to
be
equitable,
for
it
to
be
more
effective
and
to
run
an
efficient
government.
This
conversation
has
been
underway
for
quite
some
time.
We've
discussed
this
last
term.
We've
had
several
briefings
again,
also
last
term
when
question
one
passed
and
also
starting
with
the
orientation
conversations
for
the
new
council
this
year.
G
G
There
is
no
division
that
was
listed
on
the
presentation
that
my
colleagues
saw
this
cycle,
with
the
exception
of
a
division.
Two
divisions
that
were
being
raised
up
into
departments
there
is
no
division
into
individual
divisions
listed
in
that
in
this
cycle's
restructuring
work
because
those
conversations
have
not
yet
been
finalized.
G
N
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
actually
want
to
echo
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
council
member
onesie
raised,
and
I
think
first
among
them
is.
N
I
don't
think
we
all
have
actually
been
equally
engaged
in
this
conversation
as
a
body.
I
think
that
a
lot
of
these
com
decisions
had
been
made
not
always
in
the
public
around
some
of
these
decisions,
and
that
was
really
concerning,
because
these
are
some
of
the
biggest
decisions
we're
making
for
our
city
and
just
last
week
we
were
introduced
this
new
path
where
we're
starting
with
these
two
executive
positions.
N
N
I
am
having
a
voice
in
shaping
this,
and
I
am
really
encouraged
in
those
conversations
with
the
mayor
and
his
team
and
that
this
work
is
not
done
yet,
though,
and
it
is
not
leaving
us
me
completely
satisfied
with
where
we
need
to
be
completely
satisfied
with
the
number
of
ftes
that
we
that
the
mayor
has
been
able
to
commit
to.
We
are
going
to
have
an
ongoing
conversation
about
that.
I'm
encouraged
that
I
do
have
a
seat
at
that
table.
N
Finally,
and
I
know
that
there's
still
work
to
be
done
and
I'm
just
encouraging
all
of
us
to
continue
to
engage
in
that
work.
Through
my
conversations,
I
am
getting
the
confidence
from
the
mayor
that
they're
willing
to
make
commitments.
Obviously
I'm
gonna
be
working
with
them
to
commit
more
deeply
to
some
of
the
concerns
that
I
have
like
some
of
the
concerns
that
council
member
wansley
has-
and
I
recognize
the
challenge
of
this
and
the
complexity
of
this.
N
A
I
put
myself
in
queue
to
speak
to
item
number
four,
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
and
just
wanna
echo
many
of
the
things
that
have
been
said
regarding
the
community
stepping
forward
and
continuing
to
pressure
the
city
to
to
make
amends
for
many
of
the
harms
that
have
been
done
in
that
community,
as
well
as
my
colleagues
council
member
chavez,
who
has
been
able
to
come
onto
this
body
and
move
this
conversation
in
ways
that
many
many
many
other
council
members
have
tried
and
so
kudos
to
you
and
to
all
of
the
council
members,
particularly
councilmember,
johnson
and
koski,
to
help
move.
A
This
work
forward.
Mayor
frye,
the
public
works
director,
margaret
anderson
kelleher
and
her
team,
who
have
been
working
diligently
to
bring
this
to
fruition.
A
A
Living
wage
jobs
that
will
provide
opportunities
for
people
to
attend
college,
to
buy
homes,
to
send
their
children
to
college,
etc,
and
so
and
then.
Consequently,
the
community
will
have
the
opportunity
to
create
a
urban
farm
as
well
as
other
amenities
that
the
community
has
been
advocating
for
without
cost
to
that
land
and
with
the
full
support
of
the
city
to
help
bring
those
plans
to
fruition.
A
And
so
this
is,
I
think,
a
a
a
culmination
of
our
city
coming
together
to
bring
this
project
to
fruition.
The
community,
the
mayor,
the
city,
council
and
staff
have
all
been
playing
a
major
role
in
in
helping
to
bring
this
this
project
to
fruition,
and
I
hope
it
is
a
a
signal
for
continued
cooperation
collaboration.
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
you
know,
I
just
want
a
really
quick
speak
to
items
number
one
through
three.
F
I
know
we
had
a
pretty
extensive
conversation
about
this
at
a
committee
of
the
whole
earlier
this
week
and
since
then
you
know,
we've
received
actually
some
some
really
positive
signs
about
moving
forward
and
and
collaborating
on
creating
again
a
government
structure
that
isn't
just
about
serving
the
the
needs
of
residents
policymakers
employees
as
as
they
exist
today,
but
moving
forward,
and
so
you
know
late
late
in
the
evening
yesterday,
we
received
you
know
communication
from
from
the
mayor
on
on
this
on
this
piece
around
progress
with
what's
happening
in
the
strategic
management
section
of
the
the
government
or
the
city
coordinator's
office,
and
you
know
some
might
some
some
commitment
to
support
on
transferring
a
portion
of
of
the
ftes
from
from
one
of
our.
F
You
know
from
one
of
those
departments,
and
I
we
as
we're
voting
on
all
of
this
today
and
as
we're
moving
forward
on
government
structure.
I
know
that
we're
having
two
some
slightly
separate
but
very
deeply
related
conversations.
One
is
on
creating
positions
and
one
is
on
moving
ftes
through
the
budget
process,
but
we're
doing
all
of
this
together
and
I
just
am
extremely
concerned
about
some
of
the
implications
around
moving
a
portion
of
ftes
from
a
department
to
another
and
how
that
might
have
an
impact
on.
F
You
know
somebody
losing
their
seniority
or
somebody
losing
their
title
and
you
know
maybe
experiencing
a
demotion
or
how
that
impacts.
The
different
labor
contracts
that
we
have-
and
I
know
this
was
all
coming
together
very
very
last
minute
and-
and
my
intention
isn't
to
say
that
I
believe
anyone
has
malicious
intent.
But
I
think
when
we
do
work
with
haste
in
this
way
and
do
work
last
minute
in
this
way.
I
don't
want
us
to
end
up
in
a
position
where
we
are.
F
You
know,
making
commitments
around
moving
people
around
and
accidentally
opening
ourselves
up
to
all
types
of
other
risks,
and
you
know
I'll
just
say:
I'm
particularly
sensitive
to
the
retaliation
piece
that
I
know
was
discussed
extensively
in
in
the
in
the
last
council
meeting,
and
I
believe
deeply
that
that
we
are
not
trying
to
do
that.
That
that
we
are
not
trying
to
you
know,
engage
in
that
as
a
city
and
as
as
policymakers
here.
F
So
I'm
just
a
little
bit,
I'm
concerned
about
the
moving
of
of
of
you
know
some
ftes
from
you
know,
one
section
from
from
the
regular
structure
into
the
legislative
department,
and
I
you
know
I
would
just
ask
us
to
consider
that
I
would
ask
us
to
consider
you
know,
holding
off
for
a
cycle
on
making
a
decision
on
this.
While
we
get
clarity
around
the
the
labor
piece,
while
we
get
clarity
around
around
like
the
the
the
demotions
pay
skills,
those
types
of
things.
F
Yes,
I
want,
I
want
our.
I
want
this
body
to
consider
a
motion
to
delay
items
one
through
three
and
bring
them
back
to
our
next
regularly
scheduled
council
meeting.
F
Yeah,
so
at
around
6
p.m.
Yesterday
we
received
some
communication
on
the
transferring
of
some
ftes.
This
was
a
continuation
of
the
conversation
that
council
member
payne
raised
in
our
our
committee
of
the
whole
meeting,
and
you
know
I
I
want
us
to
ensure
that
we
have.
We
are
really
really
clear
about
the
labor
and
hr
pieces
around
this
right.
A
All
right,
so
colleagues,
we
do
have
a
motion
now
to
delay.
I
am
going
to
I
see
council
vice
president
palmisano
in
queue,
but
is
there
a
second
for
this
motion.
G
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
respect
that.
There's
a
motion
to
delay
and
we'll
be
taking
a
vote
on
that,
but
I
did
want
to
point
out.
There
is
nothing
germane
to
this
motion
that
has
anything
to
do
with
ftes
moving
around
from
one
side
to
the
other.
This
is
solely
about
these
three
positions
as
outlined
in
in
these
items,
which
is
the
city
operations
officer,
the
community
safety
commissioner
and
the
city
auditor.
There
is
nothing
that
is
germane
to
having
more
information
about
other
things
that
are
not
part
of
this
motion.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilmember,
goodman,.
J
K
K
The
second
point:
the
second
request:
if
you
see
after
council
member
chuck
thai,
it
was
rainbow
latricia
council
member
vita,
put
her
put
him
in
stack,
and
then
it
was
me.
A
My
apologies
councilmember
thank
you,
but
we
are
now
right.
We
did
change
the
order
of
our
discussion
because
we
had
an
emotion
and
so
that
precedes
our
previous
discussion
and
council
member
goodman.
Please.
J
Thank
you.
I
only
wanted
to
speak
to
the
amendment
and
which
I
I
understand
that
there's
some
confusion.
So
let
me
help
clarify
the
confusion.
Item
number
one:
executive,
mayor,
legislative
council,
government
structure,
implementation
passing
a
resolution
adding
the
resources
for
the
following
positions:
city
operations,
officer,
community
safety,
commissioner
city
auditor.
J
Only
those
three
positions-
all
it's
doing
is
allocating
money
for
those
three
positions.
Item
number
two
appointed
position
of
the
proposed
office
of
public
service
city
operations,
officer
establishing
the
grade
figuring
out.
The
number
of
points
allocating
it
to
grade
19
and
then
passing
an
ordinance
with
a
salary
schedule.
Item
number
three:
appointing
the
position
of
the
office
of
community
safety;
community
safety.
Commissioner,
establishing
the
position
evaluating
the
number
of
points
rating
it
at
grade
19
and
passing
the
ordinance
in
order
to
put
together
a
salary
schedule.
J
J
I
was
unable
to
make
a
briefing
I
was
briefed
by
staff
after
requesting
it,
so
I
I'm
pretty
clear
about
what
we're
voting
on
and
hopefully
now
that
I've
read
the
agenda
out
loud.
You
can
see
what
items
we're
voting
on
and
I
urge
us
to
get
with
it.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
government,
councilmember,
ellison.
I
Thank
you,
madam
president,
president
respectfully,
I
do
want
to
say
that,
while
I
understand
that
the
items
before
us
are
the
items
that
were
read
by
council
member
goodman,
I
there
was
a
discussion
at
committee
of
the
whole
about
ftes
about
legislative
support,
and
I
think
that
what
councilmember,
chughtai
and
others
are
discussing
is
is
are
what
they're
bringing
up.
Is
that
discussion?
I
Not
only
do
we
have
a
discussion
where
multiple
council
members
sort
of
indicated
that
their
support
for
these
items
that
are
on
the
agenda
would
be
predicated
on
commitments
to
to
make
sure
that
opi
and
other
departments
were
supported
and
a
part
of
the
legislative
structure.
I
The
mayor
did
also
send
an
email
saying
you
know
indicating
that
he
he
wanted
to
to
to
to
aim
in
the
direction
of
of
that
support,
and
he
kind
of
spelled
out
some
of
those
terms
as
well.
And
so
I
don't
think
that
it's.
I
don't
think
that
the
discussion
that's
happening
is
irrelevant
to
the
items
one
through
three
that
we're
discussing
here.
While
they
might
not
be
enumerated
here.
I
The
discussion
at
cal
is
public,
and
the
communication,
and
the
discussion
with
the
mayor's
office
is,
is,
is
aware
to
the
entire
council.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
think
that
that
is.
I
wanted
to
speak
and
I
do
think
that
the
discussion
that's
happening
right
now
is
relevant
and,
while
I
wasn't,
you
know
aware
of
the
motion
that
were
that
was
going
to
be
coming
before
us
in
the
moment.
I
do
think
that
it's.
I
I
do
think
that
it's,
it's
totally
fine
for
council
members
to
say
that
they
want
that
clarity
based
on
the
communication
that
we
had
yesterday,
based
on
the
discussion
that
we
had
at
cal,
just
wanted
to
say
that.
So
thank
you.
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
want
to
offer
some
clarification
to
the
public
about
this
restructuring
process
where
we're
voting
on
pieces
of
it
today
in
terms
of
positions,
three
positions,
we're
not
going
to
say
here,
keep
lying
acting
like
these
proposals
are
not
separate
and
additional
question.
One
was
implemented
in
in
december
of
2021.
K
K
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
The
only
discussion
or
even
limited
public
engagement
around
these
new
sets
of
proposals
has
been
decided
by
two
private
work
groups
around
government
restructure
and
around
public
safety.
That
is
the
extent
of
public
engagement
that
has
happened
around
the
secondary
set
of
proposals
that
are
not
related
to
question
one
because
question
one
has
been
implemented,
so
I
do
not
want
us
to
continue
on
misleading
the
public.
Thinking
that
we're
doing
these
things
out
of
the
extension
or
because
question
one
was
not
implemented.
K
That
is
simply
not
true,
so
I
do
want
to
put
that
on
record,
because
that's
what
we
keep
disguising
these
proposals
as
extension
of
question
one
it's
been
implemented
if,
as
I
noted
earlier,
if
the
mayor
needs
support
in
handling
his
growing
and
expanded
responsibilities
that
he
asked
for,
he
has
the
staff
and
the
resources
to
do
that.
We
do
not
have
to
do
the
ordinance,
a
piecemeal
ordinance
process
and
create
positions
for
departments
that
do
not
exist
with
no
visions
and
no
plans
behind
them.
We
do
not
need
to
move
that
forward.
K
A
G
A
That
amendment
fails
and
we
will
now
move
back
to
our
original
motion,
which
is
to
adopt
the
committee
of
the
whole
report.
We
have
in
queue
from
that
council
members,
rainbill
and
wandsley.
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Madam
president,
I
will
be
voting
yes
on
this
and
I
want
to
publicly
thank
the
mayor,
his
office,
the
leadership
on
this
council
for
their
openness,
their
transparency
and
their
very,
very
hard
work
to
put
the
people's
efforts
forward
charter.
One
is
very
important
to
implement
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
people
working
hard
on
that
I'm
grateful
for
them.
I'm
pleased
to
vote
for
this.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you,
council
president.
I
will
be
supporting
this
today,
although
I
have
my
concerns,
I'm
still
excited
to
work
with
the
executive
body
as
we
move
forward
on
this
new
government
structure
and,
like
I
mentioned
at
the
last
council
at
last
committee
of
the
whole,
I
do
still
expect
the
opi
stay
intact,
while
I'll
be
supporting
this
today.
I
look
forward
to
the
conversations
that
will
happen
in
the
future.
A
I
Sorry
I
was
typing
my
name
into
the
chat
a
little
slow
here.
I
just
wanted
to
to
remind
my
colleagues
that
yes
I'll
be
supporting
this
as
well
today,
but
the
the
government
structure,
ultimately
how
it
looks
the
the
mayor
has
been
involved.
I've
appreciated
conversations.
I
I've
appreciated
the
way
in
which
he
has
engaged
with
a
lot
of
council
members,
but
the
vote
is
ours
to
take
rain
and
we
get
to
shape
this
thing
and
and
obviously
a
lot
of
us
want
to
work
well
with
the
mayor
and
and
so
that's
why
you
know
he's
been
and
it's
and
it's
and
it's
the
structure
that
he
has
to
exist
in.
So
that's.
Why
he's
been
leading
this
discussion?
I
But,
ultimately
you
know
we
get
to
shape
what
this
thing
looks
like
if
we
want
to
have
as
many
ftes
as
we
want
on
the
legislative
side.
That
is
up
to
us-
and
I
want
to
remind
my
colleagues
of
that-
and
I
want
the
public
to
know
that
and
it
is
with,
and
it
is
understanding
you
know
where
our
authority
lies
and
where
it
ends.
I
That
gives
me
a
lot
of
confidence
going
into
this
proj
process
and
so
I'll
be
supporting
this
motion
today,
but
wanted
to
remind
my
colleagues
that
these
are
ultimately
our
decisions
to
make.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
ellison,
and
seeing
no
further
discussion.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
her
alone.
A
I
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
The
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
is
bringing
forward
15
items
recommending
for
approval
today.
The
past
item
number
one
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
related
to
the
transfer
of
funds
related
to
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority,
scattered
site
construction
project
and
housing.
Opportunity
fund
item
number
two
is
accepting
a
bid
for
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
grading
and
demo
project
item
number
three
is
accepting
a
bid
for
liquid
chlorine
item.
Number
four
is
accepting
a
bid
for
minneapolis
park.
I
Ramp
signed
replacement
item
number
five
is
accepting
a
bid
for
a
public
tower
in
district
b
zone.
Five
item
number
six
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
the
city
of
st
louis
park
for
animal
shelter
services.
Item
number
seven
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
hennepin
county
for
digital
elevation
data
item
number.
Eight
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
aspen
psychological,
consulting
llc
for
psychological
evaluation
services.
I
Item
number
eleven
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
morocco,
construction
company
inc
for
construction
changes
at
the
target
center
item
number
12
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
modern
piping
inc
for
additional
mechanical
work
for
the
public
service
building
project.
Item
number
13
is
authorizing
a
contract
amendment
with
american
tower
inc
for
various
services
at
the
minneapolis
convention
center.
I
I
remember
14
is
authorizing
a
lease
agreement
for
the
space
at
1499
west
river
road
for
the
office
of
emergency
management
and
for
the
health
department
and
related
to
item
number
15
is,
I
don't
know,
15
of
the
mayor's
nominations
to
the
civil
service
commission.
I
I
am
moving
to
withdraw
the
nomination
of
elizabeth
peterson
and
to
approve
or
grant
the
nomination
of
william
walker,
and
so
with
that
I
will
move
to
withdraw
item
15-1
and
and
approve
the
rest
of
the
agenda.
Thank
you.
B
E
B
A
D
The
public
health
and
safety
committee
is
bringing
forward
seven
items
that
it's
recommending
for
approval
item.
One
is
granting
consent
to
the
mayor's
nomination
of
barrett
lane
to
the
appointed
position
of
director
of
emergency
management
item
two
is
approving
the
minneapolis
advisory
committee
on
aging
appointments
item.
Three
is
approving
the
south
side
green
zone
council
appointments
item.
Four
is
approving
police
conduct
review
panel
appointments
item.
D
Five
is
accepting
a
police
bomb
disposal
unit
services
grant
for
from
minnesota
homeland
security
and
emergency
management
item
6
is
accepting
a
2022
national
forensic
sciences,
improvement
grant
from
the
minnesota
department
of
public
safety
for
the
police
crime
lab
item.
7
is
accepting
a
national
association
of
county
and
city
health
officials
grant
for
overdose
and
suicide
prevention
with
that?
Madam
president,
I'll
move
approval
of
these
items.
A
M
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
I
wanted
to
speak
on
item
number
one.
This
is
a
really
tough
one
and
I
won't
be
supporting
this
appointment
today,
director
lane,
if
you're
appointed
today,
hope
you
take
these
words
to
heart.
Over
my
concerns,
I
have
found
you
to
be
responsive,
knowledgeable,
professional.
M
M
M
Now
this
wasn't
all
nor
most
of
the
operation
of
emergency
management's
fault.
We
know
mpd
was
operating
an
incident
command
that
was
a
parallel
structure
and
was
outside
of
what
best
practices
are.
We
also
see
in
the
after
action
report
that
there
were
missed
opportunities
for
oem
as
well,
and
even
when,
looking
at
the
operation
of
emergency
management's
role
on
our
website,
it
includes
communication
preparedness
assessment.
M
The
city
was
not
prepared
for
this
emergency.
We
did
not
communicate
effectively
with
the
public.
I
I
don't
believe
those
assessments
reached
us
leadership
of
the
city.
I
remember
particularly
on
the
communication
front.
I
think
it
was
three
days
after
my
community,
the
downtown
the
heart
of
it
was
burning
that
I
realized
the
city
wasn't
putting
out
and
probably
wasn't
soon
going
to
put
out
communication
and
information
and
essentially
had
to
invent
that
function
myself
for
my
residence.
M
M
Even
today,
we're
still
not
operating
according
to
best
practices,
and
we
needed
more
initiative
to
resolve
this
following
rules
and
following
a
chain
of
command
is
critical
in
emergencies,
but
outside
of
emergencies,
department
heads
need
to
show
leadership
in
raising
awareness
over
these
problems.
They
need
to
help
bring
visibility.
M
They
need
to
work
to
navigate
the
structure
of
the
city
and
build
support
for
these
changes
and
I'm
voting
no,
because
I'm
looking
forward
not
just
backwards.
This
is
a
decision
over
who
we
should
put
in
this
role
for
the
next
four
years
and
the
charter
change
amendment
number
one
actually
makes
this
harder.
It
raises
the
bar.
We
knew
that
it
would
because
this
council,
our
only
vote,
is
over
the
next
four
years.
M
M
And
while
I
do
not
support
this
appointment
director
lane,
if
you
are
confirmed
today,
I
hope
you'll
take
my
words
as
a
challenge
to
step
up
and
take
more
of
a
lead.
I
know
there's
a
lot
that's
outside
of
oem's
control
on
this,
but
we
need
to
have
you:
do
everything
possible
to
raise
awareness
and
show
us
who's,
not
in
compliance
and
what
still
needs
to
be
done
and
bring
those
updates
regularly
through
and
work
through.
The
network
work
through
the
other
leaders
in
this
city
to
work
to
make
those
changes
happen.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember,
johnson
and
colleagues.
I
put
myself
in
queue
just
to
state
that
I
too
was
deeply
concerned
about.
You
know
as
everybody
in
this
city
and
this
country
about
the
unprecedented
reaction
and
uprising
that
occurred
and
that
in
and
of
itself
was
a
response,
but
our
response
to
that
uprising,
as
the
after-action
report
stated,
left
a
lot
to
be
desired.
A
E
A
Re-Elected
is
the
the
director
of
the
office
of
emergency
management
and
it
was
a.
A
Our
our
response
to
this
unprecedented
event
left
so
much
to
be
desired,
and
I
think
that
the
role
of
our
director
of
emergency
management
is
to
at
least
coordinate
that
response,
so
that
we
have
a
better
chance
of
dealing
with
the
emergency
situations
that
our
city
finds
ourselves
in,
and
so
with
that.
I
share
council
member
johnson's
concerns
and
will
be
very
very
mindful
if.
A
Mr
lane
is
confirmed
that
we
are
addressing
these
issues
and
establishing
a
leadership
command
that
can
help
us
to
respond
to
these
kinds
of
events,
and
we
will
certainly
have
more
emergency
events
in
our
community.
It's
no
question
about
it.
It's!
How
are
we
going
to
respond
council,
member
goodman.
J
J
There
is
no
one
sitting
in
this
chair
now
or
whoever
has
who
has
done
their
job
perfectly
and
to
the
level
of
expectation
that
citizens
of
the
city
of
minneapolis
have
come
to
deserve,
but
the
public
lashing
that
seems
to
be
happening
to
mr
lane
right
now
makes
me
wonder
if
anyone
will
come
to
the
city
to
take
these
kinds
of
positions,
we
are
not
in
a
position
to
blame
one
person.
I
noted
that
members
of
this
council
certainly
didn't
blame
police
chief
feredondo.
J
J
No
one
spoke
out
against
other
leaders,
including
the
council
president,
at
the
time
the
council
vice
president
at
the
time
who
is
now
our
council
president
or
anyone
else.
We
are
a
group
of
people
who
are
supposed
to
work
together
and
not
point
fingers
at
each
other
and
try
to
lay
blame
at
one
person's
feet.
J
The
director
of
emergency
management
is
a
position
that
requires
a
massive
amount
of
knowledge
and
training.
There
are
national
standards
that
are
required,
and
many
of
the
new
council
members
know
that,
because
councilmember
johnson
and
I
sat
in
the
training
that
sat
through
the
training
that
mr
lane
did
for
ongoing
council
members,
I
really
fear
that
we're
becoming
a
place
where
scapegoating
individuals
for
a
collective
systemic
failure
will
lead
us
down
a
very
sad
path
in
terms
of
getting
quality
people
to
work
in
our
city.
G
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
We
did
have
some
important
discussion
and
conversations
and
back
and
forth
in
committee
about
the
path
forward,
and
it
was
actually
a
give
credit
to
council
member
payne
for
bringing
forward
what
he
thought
were
uncomfortable
questions
that
we
had
a
great
opportunity
to
learn
more
about.
If
you
read
the
after
action
review
carefully,
you'll
see
that
the
office
of
emergency
management
did
what
they
were
supposed
to
do,
but
simply
they
were
not
engaged.
G
We
need
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
happen
again
and
that's
on
all
of
us.
We
have
to
make
sure
incident
command.
Functions
are
fully
integrated
with
incident
support
functions,
and
there
is
nobody
other
than
mr
lane
who
is
as
deeply
involved
in
that
work
and
checking
in
with
us
regularly
that
training
for
our
newer
colleagues
started
during
orientation.
G
This
term,
I
think
our
last
meeting
about
this
was
in
february
that
had
some
of
our
colleagues
there,
but
I
urge
my
colleagues
to
look
at
the
after
action
review
and
how
each
of
these
different
components
worked
individually,
as
well
as
how
they
interacted
with
one
another
of
emergency
management
is
not
a
first
responder.
That's
important
to
understand
these
are
things
that
came
up
in
committee,
but
I
just
want
to
reiterate
them
for
everybody,
because
not
everybody
was
was
there.
G
The
office
of
emergency
management
doesn't
get
to
override
the
decisions
of
police
leadership
of
fire
leadership.
I
think
in
the
past
there
was
a
perception
that
the
office
of
emergency
management
inserted
themselves
too
much,
but
we
cannot.
I
think
we
are
doing
that
course
correct
in
the
correction.
That's
important
work
to
do.
We
cannot
punish
an
office
of
emergence
of
emergency
management
director
for
the
problems
outlined
in
that
report.
G
Our
director
of
emergency
management
is
a
highly
technical
position
and
I
find
mr
lane
to
be
at
the
top
of
his
profession.
I
think
we're
lucky
that
he
wishes
and
is
willing
to
continue
his
service,
and
I
just
want
to
appreciate
the
proactive
work
that
has
happened
here
since
the
after
action
review
that,
I
don't
think,
is
real
public
facing
work.
It's
been
our
own
internal
work
to
to
get
connected
on
and
to
start
to
be
more
interdisciplinary
after
everything
we
do.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
wanted
to
speak
because
you
know
I
will
be
changing
my
vote
from
committee.
I
was
vaguely
supportive
a
lot
for
a
lot
of
the
reasons
that
I
think
council
member
goodman
laid
out.
You
know
there
was
a
huge
issue
with
the
response
to
protests
that
that
that
happened,
and
I
felt
like
you
know,
is
that
really
are
we
really
going
to
fall?
Is
this
really
going
to
fall
on
the
feet
of
one
person?
I
Is
this
really
going
to
fall
on
the
feet
of
the
director
of
emergency
management
and
that
felt
unfair?
You
know,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
you
know
I.
I
was
somebody
who
who
criticized
very
publicly
the
chief
at
the
time,
and
I
was
someone
who
criticized
very
publicly
the
mayor,
the
current
mayor
and
then
more,
I
didn't
just
criticize.
I
I
was
out
there
driving
around
for
the
next
10
days
all
night,
trying
to
put
out
fires
with
my
with
my
with
my
neighbors
trying
to
make
sure
that
people
weren't
injured
in
my
neighborhood,
and
so
you
know
I
I
I
I
feel
like
you
know
for
for
me.
This
isn't
about
putting
the
blame
on
one
person,
but
the
chief,
maybe
to
his
wisdom.
I
I
A
lot
of
there
were
a
lot
of
shortcomings
in
our
response
and
I
don't
think
that
that
all
falls
at
the
feet
of
barrett
lane,
but
I
won't
be
supporting
his
nomination
today
and
I
you
know
the
the
the
last
thing
I
want
to
say
is
that
I
believe
I
agree
with
councilmember
paul
masano,
that
these
issues
are
systemic
and
that
and
that
was
sort
of
driven
home.
I
For
me,
when
there
was
a
there
was
a
report
that
was
talking
that
had
some
anonymous
sources
and
they
discussed
that.
Somebody
who
would
have
had
credibility
in
this
in
this
realm
is
was
former
staff
employee,
rocco
forte?
I
Who
was
somebody
who
left
the
city
whose
legacy
at
the
city
is
not
a
good
one?
But
if
that's
who
has
credibility
in
the
city,
I
think
that
that
speaks
to
just
how
systemic
the
the
issues
are.
I
That
being
said,
we
did
not
have
control
during
those
what
10
days,
and
I
do
believe
that
some
of
the
issues
enumerated
in
the
after-action
report-
a
report
point
to
leadership
in
the
office
of
emergency
management.
So
just
wanted
to
speak
to
that
and
thank
my
colleague
for
giving
me
the
time.
D
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
will
be
supporting
mr
lane
today.
I'm
grateful
that
he's
stepped
up
and
he
wants
to
serve
our
city
for
another
term
and
for
the
core
competence
that
he
brings
to
the
office
of
emergency
management
on
the
heels
of
the
act.
After
action
report,
baird
has
taken
a
proactive
approach
to
overhauling
the
city's
emergency
response
plan
and
protocol,
he's
effectively
marshaling
resources
and
providing
direction
to
city
leadership
to
establish
an
enterprise-wide
response
system.
D
I'm
extremely
grateful
grateful
for
that,
and
I
just
want
to
lastly
say
that
barrett
is
no
stranger
to
complex
systems,
and
I
have,
I
truly
believe
that
he's
going
to
continue
to
do
the
work,
to
make
sure
that
things
get
better
for
our
system.
Our
system
in
the
future
there's
no
way
that
we
can
put
all
of
this
on
one
person
I
mean
we've
been
through
lots
over
the
past
few
years,
and
I
I
am
I'm
grateful
for
his
leadership.
D
O
You
thank
you,
madam
president,
director
lane
I
will
be
voting
for
you.
I
appreciate
your
willingness
to
serve
the
city.
I
appreciate
all
the
past
work.
You've
done,
whether
as
an
elected
official
or
with
the
office
of
emergency
management,
you
are
the
best
person
for
this
job
and
thank
you
again
for
being
willing
to
serve
our
city.
P
I
think
we,
our
city,
went
through
a
lot
and
you
were
the
center
of
it
and
doing
everything
you
can
and
other
council
members
mentioned,
that
we
can't
blame
one
person,
but
I
I
want
to
look
forward
and
come
back
better
and
stronger
in
the
future,
and
I
trust
you
in
that
position.
Your
leadership
and
our
communication
has
been
nothing
but
great,
and
I
will
be
supporting
your
nomination
and
I
wish
you
good
luck.
N
Thank
you,
madam
president,
echoing
some
sentiments
that
council
member
ellison
shared,
I
also
moved
his
nomination
forward
out
of
committee,
but
if
anybody
watched
that
session,
I
had
a
lot
of
challenging
questions
and
one
of
the
things
I've
been
wrestling
with
is
this
notion.
That's
been
really
spoken
to
a
lot
of
the
days
here.
Is
this
about
the
person
in
their
leadership
or
is
this
about
systemic
failures,
and
I
think
it's
very
clear
that
this
was
a
systemic
failure.
It
can't
be
all
blamed
on
one
person.
I
think
that
is
abundantly
clear.
N
I'm
also
a
systems
change
nerd
and
for
systems
change.
We
have
to
think
really
critically
about
our
defaults
and
we
have
to
think
really
critically
about
momentum
and,
if
we're
going
to
change
the
system,
we
have
to
really
challenge
the
default
and
we
have
to
challenge
momentum,
and
so
I
have
been
very
appreciative
of
your
service
director.
Lane
you've
been
really
helpful
and
responsive,
and
we
really
do
need
to
do
some
systems
change
here
and
part
of
that
systems.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
president,
to
state
very
clearly
to
put
all
that
happened
during
those
ten
days
in
late
may,
and
early
june
of
2020
on
director.
Lane
is
entirely
unfair.
Q
Q
It
talked
about
providing
more
of
the
ability
for
the
office
of
emergency
management
to
do
their
work,
not
less,
and
they
the
report
very
clearly
did
not
stick
that
on
barrett
lane.
I
encourage
you
all
to
read
the
report
very
clearly
and
do
not
make
a
decision
on
this
prior
to
reading
the
report
in
full.
Q
A
decision
today
on
that
followed
by
a
read
of
the
report,
which
states
clearly
that
this
was
not
all
on
him
and
in
many
cases
not
on
him
at
all,
I
think
is
extremely
unfair.
You
know
this
is
about
more
than
the
words
of
of
changing
a
system
or
challenging
momentum.
Q
Q
There's
a
number
there's
a
ton
of
work
that
is
already
underway
that
some
of
which
you
may
know
about
some
of
which
you
may
not
know
about
that
needs
to
take
place
to
ensure
that
our
city
is
safe
through
any
possible
crisis.
That
may
happen,
and
I
think
that
that
voting
against
him
today
is
is
not
just
unfair.
It's
not
just
premature.
F
F
What
strikes
me
is,
I
have
heard
now
a
few
different
times
when
we
have
been
at
critical
decision-making
moments
that
one
person
cannot
be
blamed,
for
you
know
the
the
failure
of
of
entire
systems.
But
what
strikes
me
is
if
we
say
that
at
every
single
turn,
and
if
we
say
that
about
every
single
person,
then
who
do
we
hold
accountable?
And
how
do
we
ensure
that
things
are
going
to
change?
I
did
read
the
entire
after
action
review
on
on
the
days
following
the
murder
of
george
floyd.
F
What
I
am
compelled
and
moved
by
even
in
hearing
what
some
of
some
of
our
colleagues
are
saying
here
today,
is
the
recommendations
coming
out
of
the
fourth
precinct
occupation
after
action
review
are
so
similar
to
the
recommendations
we
got
after
the
the
most
recent
after
action
review
and
in
that
in
between
those
two
reports,
years
passed
and
conditions
changed
and
new
people
came
and
old
people
left
right
and.
F
I
I
will
not.
I
agree
that
we
can't
hold
one
person
responsible
for
the
mistakes
of
an
entire
system,
but
there
are
certain
changes
that
that
we
have
known
for
years.
We
needed
to
make
and
those
have
not
gotten
prioritized,
and
I
think
that
that's
a
pretty
compelling
reason
to
me
and
some
of
the
other.
F
You
know
pieces
of
information
that
I
have
heard
and
and
reasons
that
I've
heard
from
my
colleagues
here
today
I
came
in
you
know,
ready
to
actually
you
know
probably
support
this
nomination,
but
you
know
I've
changed
my
mind
and-
and
I
I'm
I'm
planning
on
voting
against
this.
M
You,
madam
president,
I'd
more
want
to
kind
of
speak
to
a
decorum
thing
than
anything
else.
I've
heard
some
colleagues
try
to
say
what
the
concerns
we're
raising
are
about
anger,
there's
not
anger
here,
and
I
would
encourage
colleagues
not
to
ascribe
motives
to
one
another.
I
heard
another
colleague
describe
it
as
trying
to
punish
it's
not.
E
M
L
Yeah
I
just
want
to
let,
for
the
public
record,
know
why
I'm
voting.
No.
Today
I
was
a
resident
while
my
ward
was
burning
to
the
ground,
and
that
is
not
something
that
I
wish
upon
anyone
and
I'm
not
going
to
say
that
it
is
your
fault
in
itself,
because
that
would
not
be
the
truth.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
issues
in
the
report
that
blames
a
lot
of
people
on
how
we
as
a
city
could
have
been
better,
but
I,
with
good
conscience,
cannot
support
this
appointment.
L
Knowing
that
the
this
impacted,
my
constituents
heavily
and
the
trauma
still
continues
to
unfold
on
the
people
of
ward
9
after
that
heavy
heavy
heavy
day
in
the
days
following
so
just
want
to.
Let
the
people
know
that
I
will
be
voting
out
today,
and
I
don't
blame
you
for
everything.
I
think
that
we
can
do
better
as
a
city,
and
we
must
do
better,
but
there
should
be
subsequent
things
to
help
address
what
happened
so.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
chavez
kelly's.
I
think
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
pull
item
number
one
for
a
separate
vote
and
vote
on
the
remaining
committee
report
and,
if
there's
no
objections
to
that,
I
would
I
would
like
to
proceed
in
that
manner.
Are
there
any
objections.
A
So
kelly.
Mr
clerk,
can
you
please
call
the
roll
on
items
two
through
seven
on
the
public
health
and
safety
committee
report
council.
A
That
part
of
the
report
passes
items
two
through
seven.
Next,
we
will
take
up
item
number
one:
granting
consent
of
the
mayor's
nomination
of
barrett
lane
to
the
appointed
position
of
the
director
of
emergency
management
for
four-year
term
beginning
january
3rd
2022.
C
Thank
you,
madam
president,
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
postpone
this
a
cycle.
I
I'm
not
part
of
the
committee
that
had
this
discussion.
I
am
grateful
to
hear
that
there
was
a
robust
discussion,
but
it
is
the
you
know.
We
didn't
talk
about
this
more
in
our
committee
of
the
whole
and
was
not
aware
that
this
was
something
that
we
were
conflicting
and
maybe
needed
some
additional
conversations
with.
So
I'd
just
like
to
move
to
postpone
this
appointment.
One
cycle.
A
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
proper
second
to
postpone
item
number
one.
Is
there
any
discussion.
B
Council,
member
goodman,
aye
councilmember
johnson,
no
councilmember,
osman,
aye
councilmember
payne,
no
councilman,
berkowski,
aye,
councilmember,
thai,
no
councilmember
chavez;
no
councilmember
ellison,
no
council,
member
vita,
aye
councilmember,
rainville,
aye,
councilmember
wansley;
no
vice
president
palmisano
hi
president
jenkins
hi.
There
are
seven
eyes
and
six
nays.
A
That
motion
carries
and
item
number
one.
The
appointment
of
the
director
of
emergency
management
will
be
moved
to
the
next
cycle.
Our
next
committee
report
is
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee,
and
that
report
will
be
given
by
its
share
council
member.
M
Johnson,
thank
you.
Madam
president.
The
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
is
bringing
six
items
forward
today.
The
first
is
the
2022
capital
improvement
program
appropriations
and
revenue
adjustments
within
the
city's
capital
projects.
Items
two
and
three
are
appointments
to
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee
items.
Four
is
a
grant
from
aarp
for
the
community
challenge,
items
5
and
item
6
are
both
large
block
event
permits.
I
will
go
ahead
and
move
all
items
on
the
report.
A
B
A
A
That
report
is
adopted
and
our
next.
B
Madam
president,
I'm
sorry
I
didn't
myself
in
queue
very
quickly.
If,
with
your
permission,
the
council's
indulgence,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
return
to
the
report
that
was
offered
by
the
committee
of
the
whole.
B
It's
my
understanding
and
I
perhaps
had
misrecorded
the
vote
that
was
intended
to
be
offered
by
council
member
wansley
so
either
with
the
consensus
of
the
body
or
by
emotion
to
reconsider.
It
would
be
good
for
the
body,
for
the
sake
of
the
record,
to
reconsider
the
actions
taken
on
items.
One
two
and
three.
K
A
Thank
you,
and
is
there
a
second
second
all
right,
so
we
have
a
motion
to
revisit.
The
committee
of
the
whole
report
vote
on
items
number
one.
A
All
right,
I
see
councilmember
rainbow.
B
B
B
And
now
items
one
two
and
three
from
the
committee
of
the
whole
are
back
before
us
again.
It's
my
understanding
that
I
perhaps
misrecorded
the
vote
or
the
intended
vote
from
councilmember
wansley.
The
only
matter
before
us
is
for
her
to
correct
her
quote.
B
Certainly
the
body
could
have
further
discussion
now
that
it's
before
us,
but
the
the
reason
I
raised
it
to
your
level.
Madam
president,
is
it's
my
understanding
that
I
didn't
capture
her
vote
correctly.
A
E
A
And
we
are
simply
clarifying
the
vote.
Correct.
C
A
That
item
passes
and
the
entire
report
is
now
adopted.
So
next
we
will
move
to
the
notice
of
ordinance
introductions
and
there
are
two
items:
first,
a
notice
of
I'm
sorry.
B
This
time,
madam
president,
yes,
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
again.
Also
you'll
recall
that
we
amended
the
agenda
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting
to
add
a
third
notice
of
intent
that
was
offered
by
shagtai.
And
so
this
is
the
motion
to
amend
the
agenda
under
this
notice
of
ordinance
introductions
related
to
amendments
to
title
12,
chapter
244,
which
relates
to
housing,
which
would
provide
amendments
related
to
temporary
housing
provisions
and
the
development
of
an
encampment
response
policy.
So
that
notice
also
was
included
here
and
would
be
given.
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk,
and
for
clarity.
There
are
three
items
that
will
three
introductions
of
ordinances
coming
forward
in
our
next
cycle,
and
given
that
we
have
dispensed
with
the
ordinance
introductions,
we
will
now
move
to
unfinished
business.
A
First,
there
are
four
rezoning
items
that
were
postponed
from
the
last
meeting.
It
is
my
understanding
that
we
need
to
continue
postpone
action
pending
a
better
understanding
of
the
litigation
of
the
2040
comprehensive
plan,
and
I
will
recognize
the
city
attorney
to
give
us
any
additional
information
relative
to
that
action.
R
Madam
president,
that's
correct.
We
would
recommend
that
these
four
items
be
continued
until
next
cycle.
As
you,
you
may
be
aware,
there
are
presently
actions
brought
by
the
city
to
stay.
The
court's
orders.
Those
have
not
been
decided
yet
we're
hopeful
that
by
the
time
of
our
next
council
meeting,
we'll
have
some
further
clarification,
but
at
this
time
we
would
recommend
that
those
items
be
postponed
to
cycle.
A
Thank
you,
mr
ginder
and
councilmember
goodman.
My
apologies
for
some
reason.
There's
a
glitch
in
my
system
and
your
name
didn't
appear
until
after
I
called
on
the
city
attorney.
J
Thank
you
and
thank
you
to
my
friend,
mr
ginder.
I
think
we
I
need
to
provide
a
more
fulsome
explanation,
and
I
know
this
because
I'm
being
asked
by
developers,
I'm
being
asked
by
housing,
advocates
I'm
being
asked
by
colleagues
where
we're
at
so
let
me
just
try
to
describe
this
kind
of
in
non-legal
terms.
J
The
court
said
we
don't
like
what
you're
doing.
We
had
some
projects
in
process
prior
to
the
day
that
the
court
said
stop
what
you're
doing.
The
four
that
are
listed
here
are
projects
that
have
been
through
staff
recommendation,
the
planning
commission,
this
committee
biz
and
were
sitting
on
the
floor
when
the
decision
was
made
on
a
wednesday
for
a
thursday
meeting.
Those
will
all
need
to
continue
on
the
council
agenda
to
be
postponed
until
our
request
to
stay
meaning.
Stop
stopping.
J
I
hate
to
say
it.
That
way
is
either
granted
or
not
so
the
court
could
say:
don't
move
forward
on
those
or
the
court
could
say,
move
forward
on
those
and
here's
something
else
you
should
do
and
so
we're
waiting
for
that
decision.
We're
lucky
there's
a
free
week
within
this
process,
because
we
could
get
that
decision
during
the
city's
free
week
and
be
able
to
move.
J
Some
people
would
wonder
why
they're
not
controversial,
they
would
probably
go
on
consent,
but
I
feel
that
I
personally
feel-
and
I
think
some
others
feel
that
this
would
be
a
provocation
of
the
judge,
to
go
ahead
and
put
them
on
the
agenda
and
move
them
forward
to
the
council
and
allow
things
to
just
pile
up
here.
We
feel
like
we
should
probably
just
sit
with
where
we're
at
until
whether
or
not
the
stay
is
granted
or
not,
and
staff
have
done
a
good
job
of
reaching
out
to
the
applicants.
J
I
do
want
to
note.
None
of
these
are
controversial.
All
of
them
are
projects
that
have
strong
support
from
staff
from
the
planning
commission,
and
I
can't
predict
what
will
happen
in
committee,
but
likely
the
council.
So
it's
an
unfortunate
situation.
We're
in
it'll
be
six
projects
so
far.
We
will
also
be
taking
up
other
quasi-judicial
issues
and
you're
probably
wondering
how
is
that
possible?
There
are
quasi-judicial
decisions
that
don't
involve
rezonings.
J
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
goodman,
for
that
explanation
and
for
your
interpretation
as
well:
city
attorney,
gender,
and
so
with
those
explanations.
I
will
move
to
postponed
items
for
one
additional
cycle
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
wrong.
B
A
That
carries
and
those
matters
are
continued
to
the
next
regular
scheduled
meeting.
Our
next
item
of
unfinished
business
is
pertaining
to
the
hennepin
avenue
south
street
reconstruction
project.
At
our
last
meeting,
the
council
approved
the
layout
and
associated
actions.
Two
of
those
actions
were
vetoed
and
returned
by
the
mayor
with
his
objections,
the
layout
for
the
project
and
parking
restrictions,
I'll.
B
Thank
you,
madam
president,
as
you
noted,
the
mayor
vetoed
and
returned
two
of
the
items
related
to
the
hennepin
avenue
street
reconstruction
project.
The
first,
as
you
said,
is
the
project
layout.
The
second
has
to
do
with
parking
restrictions
along
the
route
pursuant
to
city
charter,
section
4.4,
c3
and
council's
rule
8,
section
8.
Those
matters
vetoed
by
the
mayor
are
automatically
reconsidered
by
the
full
council
at
its
next
subsequent
regular
meeting.
So
today,
under
those
legal
provisions,
the
council
will
then
reconsider
the
mayor's
veto
on
those
two
items
on
reconsideration.
B
The
motion
automatically
put
before
the
body
is:
shall
the
decision
of
the
council
stand
notwithstanding
the
veto
of
the
mayor?
So
in
response
to
that
question,
an
affirmative
vote
is
a
vote
to
override
the
mayor's
veto
to
pass
the
council's
original
action.
A
negative
vote
is
a
vote
to
sustain
the
mayor's
veto
and
it
would
defeat
the
council's
original
action
so
on
roll
call,
council
members
would
respond.
I
if
they
wish
to
override
the
veto
and
approve
the
original
action.
It
would
respond,
nay
if
they
do
not
wish
to
override
the
veto.
A
Is
there
any
discussion
and
I
see
councilman
richard
ty?
Thank
you.
F
I'm
also
happy
to
speak
after
okl.
I
know
the
the
clerk
just
explained
the
the
way
the
vote
works,
and
it
might
make
actually
sense
for
us
to
do
that
before.
A
B
Council,
member
goodman,
no
councilmember
johnson,
aye,
councilmember
osman,
aye
councilmember,
payne,
aye,
councilmember,
koski,
no
councilmember,
shuktai,
aye,
councilmember
chavez,
aye
councilmember,
ellison,
yes,
councilmember,
vita,
no
council,
member
rainville,
no
councilmember,
wansley
aye,
vice
president
paul
nisano.
No
president
jenkins,
there
are
eight
eyes
and
five
nays
and,
madam
president,
just
to
be
clear
on
the
record.
It
takes
a
two-thirds
affirmative
vote
of
the
entire
membership
of
the
body.
That's
nine!
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk,
and
then
the
next
item
is.
It
will
take
up
our
the
mayor's
veto
on
parking
restrictions.
B
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
so
the
motion
before
the
body
is
shall
the
action
of
the
city
council
in
approving
parking
restrictions
along
the
route
as
part
of
the
hennepin
avenue
south
reconstruction
project
pass.
Notwithstanding
the
veto
of
the
mayor
again,
an
affirmative
vote
is
a
vote
that
seeks
to
overturn
that
veto
and
approve
the
original
council
action.
A
Thank
you,
mr
clerk,
and,
once
again
I
want
to
clarify
my
colleagues
who
are
in
cube.
Do
you
wish
to
speak
after
this
roll
call
or
now?
A
Thank
you
and
seeing
no
further
discussion.
I
will
ask
kirk
to
call
the
role.
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
president.
You
know
I
just
I
know
that
getting
this
layout
approved
has
been.
It's
been
a
a
journey
in
the
background
that
we
have
been
on
now
since
the
beginning
of
this
term.
F
I
think
it
was
in
one
of
my
first
weeks
at
city
hall
so
prior
to
to
being
sworn
in,
that
I
had
my
very
first
conversation
with
city
staff
about
about
this
layout,
and
you
know-
and
this
is
a
project-
that's
been
moving
for
years
before
that,
and
so
others
have
seen
this
process
through
through
the
city
for
for
far
longer
than
I
have,
and
you
know.
I
hope
that
we
are
at
this
point
nearing
the
end
of
the
finish
line.
F
I
I
have
stated
over
and
over
again
why
this
project
matters
so
deeply,
who
it
prioritizes
and
how
our
actions
have
to
line
up
with
supporting
not
just
with
our
words
but
with
our
actions,
people
who
take
transit
people
who
own
small
businesses,
people
who
who
live
and
work
and
play
in
this
corridor,
and
so
you
know
I'm.
F
I
I
think
that
council,
member
johnson
is
probably
gonna
more
formally
make
this
motion,
but
I
really
hope
that
in
these
these
next
couple
of
weeks
that
I
see
some
spirit
of
of
collaboration
from
from
the
the
mayor's
office
and
getting
to
some
sort
of
consensus
and
some
sort
of
agreement
on
how
we
move
forward
on
on
this
layout,
so
that
this
doesn't
become
the
next
thing
that
we
are
just
talking
about
and
fighting
over
for
for
months
and
months.
F
I
don't
think
that
that's
healthy
or
productive
or
or
useful
for
any
of
us.
So
you
know.
I
really
hope
that
very
soon
we
are
going
to
be
coming
back
and
we
are
going
to
be
presenting
something
to
you
that
that
is
going
to
work
for
all
of
us
and
and
then
you
know,
I
would
invite.
I
would
invite
the
mayor
and
I
would
invite
the
mayor's
office
to
roll
up
their
sleeves
and
and
really
take
seriously
engaging
in
in
moving
and
and
getting
to
some
sort
of
consensus.
I'm
really
committed
to
that.
F
I
know
council
member
johnson's
really
committed
to
that.
I
think
all
of
us
are
so
thank
you.
M
M
Second
all
right!
Thank
you.
So
you
know,
while
I'm
disappointed
in
the
veto
on
this
item
today,
I
also
am
reflecting
on
the
fact
of
the
accomplishment
around
roof
depot
and
what
came
out
of
a
veto
there.
I
know
the
mayor's
office
and
my
conversations
with
him
directly
has
committed
to
working
on
a
compromise.
M
I
have
hope
that
we
will
be
able
to
come
together
with
a
compromise
that
works,
that
we
can
all
be
better
off
as
a
result
of,
and
once
again
show
leadership
of
how
both
this
council
and
the
mayor
work
well
together
and
are
able
to
work
through
these
matters.
So,
by
sending
this
back
to
committee,
we'll
have
some
additional
time
to
have
those
conversations
with
public
works
with
the
mayor
with
the
council
and,
respectively,
with
our
community
communities
as
well,
in
order
to
hopefully
get
to
a
better
place.
M
Ultimately,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
so
that's
I
know,
certainly
my
commitment
to
work
with
the
different
partners
and
stakeholders
and
colleagues
in
order
to
get
there.
I
know
that's
a
commitment
shared
by
my
colleague,
chug
thai
and
I
think
that's
where
we
will
get
to,
and
I
remain
optimistic
that
we
can
reach
a
great
compromise
on
this
one.
Thank
you.
A
A
Thank
you
and
then
councilmember
chuck,
ty
yeah,
but.
F
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
this
right,
so
this
motion
to
refer
this
item
back
to
committee.
I
know
in
in
previous
meetings.
We
attach
a
date
to
that
so
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
is
that
am
I
understanding
that
that's
what
we
are
doing
right
now.
B
Madam
president,
if
no
date
is
attached,
the
clerk's
going
to
send
it
to
the
next
committee
meeting,
so
it
will
show
up
on
the
committee's
agenda
in
the
next
cycle,
noting
that
there
is
a
ward
work
week
in
between
so
it'll
be
a
slight
delay
and
then
the
committee
certainly
can
take
whatever
action
at
its
meeting
it
it
chooses
to
at
that
time.
A
And
I'm
sorry,
colleagues,
we
are
now
have
a
motion
before
us
to
refer
item
one
back
to
committee.
B
A
That
carries
and
that
item
will
be
referred
back
to
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee.
K
Yeah,
thank
you.
Madam
president.
I
just
wanted
to
offer
a
couple
of
comments
on
the
unfortunate
veto.
I
just
want
to
first
say
that
I
am
amazed
and
grateful
for
the
persistence
of
our
residents
and
organizers,
who
have
championed
the
fight
for
24
7
bus
lanes,
which
are
essentially
crucial
for
working-class
people
in
our
city.
K
K
K
Our
staff
has
poured
a
great
deal
of
their
expertise
in
making
this
happen.
They've
engaged
thousands
of
residents.
This
is
one
of
the
most
engaged
projects
that
we've
had
at
the
city
and
it's
really
alarming
that
we're
also
disregarding
their
expertise
and
that
of
those
who
have
worked
at
the
met
council.
K
Our
statewide
leaders,
who've
all
collectively
worked
to
to
bring
in
60
million
dollars
for
us
to
make
this
project
happen.
It's
really
sad
that
they're
not
being
listened
to
because
of
the
effort
to
change
the
status
quo
here
around
road
infrastructures
and
do
the
work,
the
systemic
work
that
we
all
claim
that
we
want
to
do
here.
K
24
7
bus
lanes
is
essential
to
maintaining
reliable
quality
public
transportation
for
every
single
resident
in
our
city
and
the
majority
of
bus
riders
are
working
class
people
and
to
not
include
these
bus
lanes
is
an
intentional
action
to
de-prioritize
them
in
our
city
planning
and
it's
so
it's
easy
to
talk
about
compromise
when
the
ones
who
are
having
to
sacrifice
are
consistent,
consistently
working
class
people
who
are
bearing
the
brunt
of
those
compromises.
K
So
I
want
to
reiterate
I'm
alongside
working-class
residents
every
single
step.
This
was
a
project
that
was
not
controversial.
It
didn't
even
need
to
get
to
this
veto.
It
should
have
passed
overwhelmingly
and
it's
very
disappointing
that
once
again,
this
body's
actions
have
not
aligned,
with
our
words
our
symbolisms,
through
motions
to
say
that
we
care
about
working
class
people
in
this
city.
K
So
I'm
sorry,
but
this
fight
ain't
over
and
it
sucks
that
y'all
have
to
go
through
this
all
over
again
and
we
didn't
have
to
get
here,
but
I
know
y'all
ain't
going
away.
So
thank
you
continue.
Sending
those
emails
for
the
inboxes
keep
holding
marches,
keep
pressure
on
these
folks
here
and
on
the
mayor
to
make
sure
we
do
carry
out
public
transportation
and
24
7
bus
lanes
at
all
parts
of
our
city
for
working-class
people.
A
Next
is
on
our
agenda
is
new
business
and
we
have
one
item.
The
mayor
has
forwarded
his
nomination
of
anthony
kelly
to
the
appointed
position
of
civil
service.
Commissioner,
I'd
entertain
a
motion
to
refer
that
nomination
to
the
policy
government
oversight
committee
for
public
hearing
to
be
held
on
july
18th
in
the
next
council
cycle.
So.
H
B
B
A
That
carries
and
that
item
will
be
referred
to
the
policy
government
oversight
committee.
Colleagues,
we
do
have
requests
for
a
closed
session
today.
I.
I
A
Many
of
you
were
thinking,
I'm
hoping
that
we
did
not,
but
indeed
we
do
and
before
we
move
to
closed
session,
I
would
take
up
any
announcements.
First,
are
there
any
announcements
from
my
colleagues.
L
P
Yes,
one
more
reminder
for
there
will
be
a
big
event
on
lake
street
this
saturday
somali
festival
week,
where
we,
a
beautiful
culture
of
somalia
and
east
african
community,
it's
all
day,
long
on
blissbury
avenue
and
blaise
dale
lake
street
music,
food
beautiful.
If
you
bring
family,
it's
family
friendly
event.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
osman,
seeing
no
one
else
in
queue.
I
will
go
ahead
and
acknowledge
that
we
are
celebrating
the
birth
of
our
nation
this
weekend.
The.
A
July,
it's
a
long,
complicated
and
many
times
contradictory
history
of
the
united
states
of
america
when
in
1776,
when
the
declaration
of
independence
was
signed,
america
was
a
slave-holding
country
that
displaced
native
americans
all
throughout
this
entire
country.
A
It's
with
that
context
and
understanding
that
we
celebrate
and
acknowledge
and
reflect
on
our
history.
As
this
country,
we
have
had
some
very
disappointing
supreme
court
decisions
in
the
past
couple
of
weeks,
which
again
contradicts
much
of
what
our
society
has
been
moving
towards
for
for
many
many
years,
and
I
know
that
june
june.
E
A
I
have
to
keep
using
this
word
contradictory
moment
in
in
our
history,
and
so
I
just
encourage
us
all
to
really
think
about
our
history
as
a
country
as
democracy
think
about
democracy
and
how
it
is
sustained
and
maintained
in
our
culture
and
in
our
society
and
hope
that
everyone
stays
safe
and
have
a
great
long
weekend.
A
R
Thank
you,
madam
president.
As
you've
indicated,
the
next
items
on
the
agenda
are
the
cases
of
crackleburg
versus
the
city
of
minneapolis.
At
all,
these
cases
are
in
active
litigation
in
state
or
federal
court
or
otherwise
pending
lawsuits.
Your
lawyers
wish
to
discuss
with
the
council
litigation
strategy
and
or
settlement
possibilities.
A
Thank
you,
mr
city
attorney,
and
with
that
I
will
move
that
our
public
meeting
be
closed,
is
authorized
under
the
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
specifically
minnesota
statutes,
section
13
d,
.05,
subdivision
3b
for
the
purpose
of
discussing
the
litigation
matter
with
the
city
attorney
may
have
a
second
to
that
motion.
B
A
A
B
B
F
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Colleagues,
I
want
to
move
that
all
claims
against
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
any
of
its
named
or
unnamed
employees
asserted
in
the
matter
of
amy
e
crickelberg.
The
city
of
minneapolis
be
settled
in
the
amount
of
185
thousand
dollars
payable
to
amy
kreckleberg
and
that
the
state
law
claims
that
would
be
asserted
by
kreckleberg
against
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
any
of
its
named
or
unnamed
employees
in
a
second
state
court
lawsuit
be
settled
in
the
amount
of
130
000,
also
payable
to
amy
krugelberg.
F
G
B
The
role
councilmember
goodman
aye
councilmember
johnson
aye
councilmember
osmond
is
absent:
councilmember
payne,
aye,
councilmember,
koski,
aye,
councilmember
shock
tai,
aye,
council
member
chavez,
aye
council,
member
ellison,
aye
council
member
vita,
aye
council
member
rainville,
aye
councilmember,
wansley
aye.
Vice
president
paul
masano
aye,
president
jenkins.
All
right
there
are
12
eyes.