►
From YouTube: June 2, 2022 Human Relations Commission Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Human Relations Commission
A
Okay
hi
everyone
good
evening
before
we
begin
the
meeting
I'll
read
this
announcement
from
the
city
during
this
declared
state
of
emergency.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
54953
e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
human
relations
commission
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location.
A
As
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda,
members
of
the
public
May
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
for
an
item
by
joining
the
zoom
webinar.
Any
emails
received
by
5
pm
today
were
forwarded
to
the
commission
and
now
I'll
ask
the
assistant
to
the
city
manager
to
proceed
with
roll
call.
D
A
A
A
E
A
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
commission
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
commission
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
for
any
non-agenda
items
and
I
don't
see
anyone
in
the
attend
use
box
I
do
have
a
question
for
the
staff.
A
We
received
an
email
earlier
today
from
a
Community
member
wanting
to
ask
whether
we
might
consider,
including
in
our
work
plan
for
next
year,
sort
of
a
portion
of
a
community
project
that
she
was
proposing.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
we
might
discuss
here.
If
that's
considered
part
of
the
agendized
items
for
later
on.
A
A
G
I'll
miss
when
this
part
is
of
this
is
over
well
I'll.
Keep
it
short
out
of
spite.
Maybe
that
wouldn't
be
out
of
spite.
No
is
still
planned
for
July
to
July
at
the
senior
center
more
details,
TV
TV
as
far
as
a
little
bit
of
feedback
on
my
end
up
seems
to
be
fading,
so
we'll
be
sending
around
details
about
that
event
on
email
once
we're
on
break,
so
keep
your
eyes
wide
open.
For
that.
Just
a
quick
excuse
me,
a
quick
update
on
the
project
itself.
G
We
kept
our
online
surveys
open
for
a
little
bit
longer.
We've
got
some
great
help
from
the
city's
com
team,
for
that
I
am
so
sorry,
but
I
actually
spaced
and
didn't
get
an
account
on
how
many
additional
surveys
had
come
in.
Although
we
had
a
lot
of
robust
discussion
on
various
email
lists
and
online,
so
I
think
we
inspired
a
lot
of
people.
We
also
feel
that
a
few
questions
from
the
public
about
what
the
heck
are
you
doing.
So
that's
good.
G
It's
always
good
to
be
challenged
and
think
about
why
you're
doing
something.
So
the
survey
is
now
completed
and
done
we're
happy
with
that
we're
moving
on
to
our
oral
history,
part
of
the
project.
We
had
a
little
bit
of
a
game
delay
due
to
the
release,
form,
authorization
and
actually
I
was
going
to
ask
Christina
if
there's
an
update
on
that.
B
G
Yeah,
no
doubt
no
doubt
at
all
and
I
did
take
a
look
at
the
timing,
math
and
I'm
pretty
sure.
If
we
start
next
week,
we're
okay.
If
we
start
much
later
than
next
week,
we
could
run
into
some
problems
just
in
part
because
it's
summer
and
even
though
people
want
to
take
part
in
the
interviews,
people
might
be
traveling
or
busy
or
whatever
so,
but
I
think
we're
still
in
the
A-Okay
window.
G
Some
of
the
secondary
research
that
we've
talked
about
that
has
been
done
by
actually
all
the
members
of
the
commission
all
survive,
members
of
historical
Association
and
by
Stanford
University.
Some
of
that
secondary
information,
kind
of
a
sneak
preview
of
it
got
presented
at
a
conference
like
on
community
history
at
Stanford
University
a
couple
weeks
ago.
G
It's
looking
really
really
really
good
and
super
engaging
to
the
audience
and
that's
before
any
of
our
survey
results
our
oral
history
and,
frankly
before
all
the
secondary
research
was
put
together
and
compiled
so
I
believe
that
link
is
public
I'm
happy
to
share.
If
anyone
wants
to
see
that
I
could
share
it
out
to
through
Christina
I'm
really
excited.
That's
all
I
got
so
if
anyone
one
has
any
questions,
let
me
know.
G
E
Yes,
I
think
Beyond
the
venue
and
date
and
top
title
we
gave.
We
didn't
have
much
following
those,
but
I
think
the
Flyers
have
been
done,
but
I
think
Christina.
You
might
help
us
here,
since
you
have
been
interacting
with
adolfer
I.
Think
because
you
have
more
updated
information
than
the
rest
of
I
have
a
little
bit,
but
it
won't
be
complete.
So
but
I
know
you
would
have
all
the
complete
but
you've
been
working
directly
with
them.
So
could
you
help
us
out
with
this?
Please
sure.
B
So,
as
Nirvana
mentioned,
the
Flyers
have
been
posted
I
just
received
today.
The
translated
flyers
in
Russian,
Spanish
and
Chinese,
so
I
will
be
freeing
that
to
the
forwarding
that
to
the
commission
after
tonight's
meeting,
so
that
you
can
distribute
those
to
your
networks.
In
addition
to
the
English
version
of
the
flyer,
we
are
reserved
for
June
22nd
at
the
community
center
and
the
Redwood
Room.
B
A
B
D
Yes,
thank
you,
I'm,
looking
for
the
forward
to
the
event
and
just
made
a
note
to
myself
that
I
need
to
make
sure
that
I
register
for
it
I
wanted
to
ask,
am
I
correct
that,
as
is
usually
the
case
that
will
be
interpreting
services
available
in
Spanish,
Mandarin
and
Russian.
That
is
correct.
Yes,
okay,
great
and
assuming
that
there
are
some
kind
of
breakout
groups.
D
Will
breakout
groups
be
my
language
group,
or
will
interpreters
be
going
with
the
breakout
groups?
I'm
just
wondering
how
that
will
work
and
part
of
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
you
know
also
for
thinking
about
our
color
of
law
event
coming
up
in
July
and
just
kind
of
you
know
trying
to
think
about
different
possibilities
for
how
to
work
effectively
with
different
language
groups
when
everybody's
all
together.
I
A
H
Is
correct?
Yes,
so
there
may
need
to
be
adjustment
there
for
for
in
person,
but
yes,
just
sort
of
highlighting
that
the
approach
taken
in
that
setting
was
to
have
a
single
group
for
anyone
needing
language
assistance
and
that
included.
You
know,
English
speakers,
but
who
needed
some
sort
of
transcription
or
anything
like
that.
A
A
J
J
So
this
is
the
second
of
your
two
meeting
process
for
establishing
next
fiscal
Year's
work
plan.
You
all
did
a
great
job
last
meeting
in
May
and
generating
some
thoughtful
suggestions
for
potential
work
plan
items.
Six
new
items
were
brought
to
the
table.
Two
items
that
are
on
this
year's
work
plan,
but
not
yet
completed,
are
on
the
list
for
being
carried
forward.
J
So
those
are
the
two
carry
forward
items
and
then
there
were
six
potential
new
items
and
what
staff
did
in
keeping
with
our
past
practice
is
to
look
at
each
of
those
projects
and
provide
some
descriptive
descriptions
based
on
our
understanding
of
what
the
scope
would
be.
And
if
we
had
questions
that
that
came
up
that
weren't
covered
in
the
commission's
discussion
from
the
prior
meeting,
we
put
those
in
a
category
of
needs,
more
information.
If
there
was
something
that
we
felt,
we
did
not
recommend
to
be
considered
going
forward.
J
We
put
that
in
a
category
of
not
recommended
and
then
everything
else
we
have
in
a
category
to
recommend
that
you
consider
it
as
part
of
your
prioritization,
with
the
end
product
being
a
three
project
kind
of
special
to
this
upcoming
big
school
year
project.
In
addition
to
all
the
other
ongoing
items
that
are
always
on
the
commission's
work
plan
and
just
to
briefly
go
through
the
projects
and
which
categories
they
are
in
from
staff's
assessment.
J
J
You
may
or
may
not
know
that
we
have
had
two
of
those
in
the
recent
past
that
have
been
quite
sophisticated
and
comprehensive.
One
looking
at
needs
and
assets
associated
with
the
lgbtq
plus
community
in
Mountain
View
and
the
other
associated
with
resources
available
for
immigrants
in
Mountain,
View
and
I.
Think
those
not
to
embarrass
commissioner
Solomon
too
much.
J
Those
really
benefited
from
the
fact
that
we
are
lucky
to
have
somebody
whose
professional
expertise
is
in
doing
that
kind
of
work,
and
she
brought
that
expertise
to
scoping
it
and
and
also
to
conducting
it
and
then
even
provided
some
additional
person
power
for
some
of
the
analysis
when
that
was
needed.
So
I
I
bring
that
up,
because
those
have
tended
to
be
heavier
lift
projects
and
have
needed
the
better
part
of
two
work
plan
years
to
to
conduct.
J
J
Givers
needs
an
assets
assessment
of
really
trying
to
understand
how
that
model
of
Investigation
would
apply
to
that
topic
and
whether
we
have
the
capacity
to
carry
it
out
and
then
the
that
covers
two
of
the
three
that
are
in
this
category.
The
other
is
mental
health
awareness
advocacy,
and
there
was
a
little
bit
of
discussion
at
the
last
meeting
around
kind
of
what
the
commission's
role
is
around
advocacy,
that
not
being
a
something
that
that
is
typical
of
of
City
advisory
boards.
J
J
This
item
has
come
up
before
in
in
Mountain
View.
In
addition
to
these
other
places,
and
it
was
something
that
the
council
chose
not
to
pursue
when
it
was
raised
from
the
HRC
last
time
so
I
don't
believe.
We
have
Council
level
policy
support
for
an
item
that
would
have
this
significant,
a
lift,
even
though
I
know
that
the
project
is
a.
Let's
explore
what
it
would,
what
it
would
mean
to
do
it
or
who
would
benefit,
or
you
know,
are
there
pros
and
cons
around
it?
J
J
A
J
Right
so
now
might
be
the
time
if
there
are
questions
about
process
before
you
get
into
the
actual
discussion
of
the
items.
If
we
had
public
comment,
I
would
I
mean
if
we
had
public
in
attendance.
This
might
also
be
the
time
to
take
public
comments.
Since
you
know,
once
you
guys
start
your
deliberation
of
moving
things
around,
you
would
want
to
be
informed
by
that
comment,
but
I
don't
see
anyone
in
the
attendee
list
so.
A
J
J
J
C
J
Great,
so
these
are
the
projects
in
their
categories
and
if
you
would
like
to
start
with
the
recommended
for
consideration,
my
question
to
the
group
would
be:
are
there?
Any
of
these
you
want
to
discuss,
advocate
for
ask
questions
about
or
propose
be
moved
to
a
different
category,
and
if
it's
clear,
if
we
you
feel,
like
you,
remember
what
we
discussed
last
time
and
you
don't
have
questions
about
them,
you
know
that's.
Okay,
too,.
A
A
So
I
suggested
the
continuation
of
racial
reconciliation
and
I
was
thinking,
I
mean
when
we
discussed
it
last
week
about
combining
them.
I
think
I
I
was
against
that
just
because
I
I
think
all
level.
All
all
types
of
diversity
are
really
important
to
acknowledge,
but
I
sort
of
saw
this
as
sort
of
being
able
to
I
guess
like
brings
special
attention
to
racial
issues
and
diversity.
D
D
For
example,
could
one
of
them
be
a
continuation
of
the
focus
on
racial
reconciliation
and
the
other
events
could
be
focused
on
other
dimensions
of
diversity,
so
yeah
I,
guess
I,
guess
it
was
a
question
of
like
like
Is
it
feasible
is.
It
is.
Is
that
within
the
realm
of
possibility,
but
also
is
it
something
that
the
group
might
be
interested
to
do
and
reconsider
from
our
discussion
last
month.
A
Great
I
is
the
I
think
it
was
vice
chair
Sylvester,
who
suggested
diversity
week,
I
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
hard
for
me
to
see
with
the
shared
screen
whether
if
there's
a
physical,
like
hand
up
or
anything.
So
if
you're,
raising
your
hand
could,
if
you
could
use
the
raise
hand
function,
that's
easier
for
me
to
see.
B
H
G
Maybe
maybe
a
couple
of
things
first
of
all,
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
chair
Lynn's
comments.
I
mean
I.
Remember
them
last
month
about
why
she
wanted
to
keep
the
two
items
separate
and
I.
I
guess
I
remain
torn
I
respect
her
opinion,
but
without
a
whole
lot
of
definition.
For
what
diversity
week
could
be
it's
hard
to
say
how
a
particular
type
of
event
might
fit
into
it.
G
G
So
with
that
said,
I
could
see
how
trying
to
shoehorn
Community
engagement
event
into
that
around
a
specific
topic
might
feel
a
little
premature
and
also
just
a
reminder
that
the
idea
behind
diversity
week
was
I.
Don't
know,
I,
don't
want
to
say
it
wasn't
near
and
dear
to
me,
but
it
was
something
I
thought
we
could
start
thinking
about.
G
A
J
D
Thank
you
thank
you
for
asking
and
thank
you
everyone
for
your
comments,
reminding
me
also
about
additional
points
from
last
month.
I
think
I
think
I
think
device
chair,
Sylvester's
point.
It
is
without
having
the
ideas
for
diversity
week
further
fleshed
out.
It
is
kind
of
hard
to
to
see
how
well
or
not
so.
Well,
you
know
these
might
fit
together,
so
so
I
think
I
will
stay
tuned,
as
we
have
further
discussion.
H
G
J
J
K
H
Your
attention,
yeah
so
I
think
to
some
extent,
so
I
propose
both
the
navigating
grief
and
the
caregivers,
but
I
think
their
their
address
is
two
different
items
on
here.
So
navigating
grief
really
focusing
around
both
individual
and
Community
grief.
How
do
we
deal
with
loss
because
there
has
been
a
tremendously
higher
level
of
of
loss
of
all
different
forms?
H
Both
you
know
human
loss
losing
people
to
covet
or
other
purposes
during
covid,
but
also
loss
of
opportunity,
all
sorts
of
different
pieces,
and
we
as
a
society
are
really
trying
to
Grapple
with
that
and
I
think
it's
it's
something.
That's
very
hard
and
different
people
are
processing
it
different
ways
and,
and
that
sort
of
thing
now
caregivers
have
been
particularly
impacted
and,
in
some
cases,
probably
have
some
overlap
in
terms
of
being
impacted
with
grief.
But
at
least
in
at
the
proposal
level.
H
K
H
I,
so
I
need
to
understand
a
little
bit
what
the
proposal
was.
There
I
think
you
know
honestly,
given
all
of
the
different
things
on
the
plate.
My
my
senses,
we
should
probably
pick
one
I
I,
do
think
I
tend
to
bias
towards
focused
events
rather
than
things
trying
to
touch
every
button.
I
think
that.
L
H
Can
be
a
little
bit,
you
know
it
doesn't
necessarily
help
everyone,
but
it
helps
the
people
that
it
helps
a
lot
more,
so
I
I
would
actually
my
preference
would
be
to
separate
them
or
keep
them
separate
and
and
probably
given
the
the
scope
of
what
we
have
capacity
for.
We
move
forward
with
one
probably
not
both,
but
the
you
know
if,
if
you
see
a
good
way
to
combine
them
in
a
way
that
feels
coherent
and
whole.
J
K
J
J
You
know
that
continues
and
continues
to
be
a
concern.
I
know
that
our
Multicultural
engagement
program,
coordinator,
Nancy
dukos,
who's
running
our
current
Chinese
language,
Civic,
Leadership
Academy,
is
is
hearing
that,
in
fact,
tonight's
session
is
with
the
police
department,
and
that
is
a
big
topic
that
they
want
to
talk
about.
J
Does
this
mean
we're
creating
a
Mountain
View
specific?
We
completely
make
it
up
from
beginning
to
end,
or
are
we
finding
things
like
candidly
speaking
that
that
exist
as
models
that
we
can
make
happen
in
Mountain
View
and
help
promote,
and
there
was
I
think,
coincidentally,
a
series
that
was
happening
that
the
library
had
planned,
that
the
HRC
was
able
to
to
help
share
the
word
about.
But
there
was
always
the
intention
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
not
speaking
for
the
HRC
members
who
are
on
that
committee
to
do
something
more.
J
G
The
Cheryl,
Lynn
and
I
attended
some
of
the
online
training
a
couple
of
things,
one.
It
certainly
wasn't
tailored
towards
Mountain
View,
but
we
also
thought
online,
just
didn't
seem
to
have
the
right
impact
and
we
we
really
both
thought,
although
we
had
not
come
to
the
conclusion
that
we
should
in
person
a
bit
with
this
kind
of
training,
would
be
much
much
more
powerful
in
community
building
than
trying
to
do
something
online,
but
we
never.
A
A
A
Malia
Perez
so
she's
a
Community
member
who
works
pretty
closely
with
some
of
the
underserved,
not
just
in
Mountain
View,
but
also
in
the
area
and
and
then
she
was
asking
if
we
wanted
to
also
include
the
housing
insecure,
which
I
thought
was
a
pretty
good
idea
as
well
and
wanted
I
guess.
Maybe
we
should
put
it
to
both
staff
and
the
rest
of
the
commission,
whether
they'd
be
interested
in
like
sort
of
opening
up
this.
J
J
It
doesn't
necessarily
mean
more
stories,
but
it
might
mean
more
variety
in
stories
and
could
affect
the
you
know
how
easy
it
is
to
identify
and
Reach
people
and
and
and
and
and
decision
making
about
how
to
to
scope
that
I.
Don't
inherently
have
a
staff
answer.
It
wouldn't
change
the
recommendation.
In
my
opinion,
but
it'd
be
something
that,
as
a
subcommittee
began
to
work
on
it,
they
would
have
to
kind
of
grapple
with
that
those
scope
questions.
Does
that
answer
your
question.
Chairlin.
A
F
I
can't
I've
been
spending
a
lot
of
time.
Looking
at
the
charter
of
this
group
and
one
of
the
five
responsibilities,
powers
and
responsibilities
is
to
serve
as
a
forum
for
public
discussion
and
the
third
item.
There
is
inclusivity,
so
issues
concerning
Outreach
to
diverse
segments
of
the
population
and
soliciting
input
from
the
community
and
I
find
this
to
really
meet
that
need
for
outreach
to
diverse
segments
and
and
finding
a
way
to
solicit
input.
I
mean
storytelling
is
definitely
soliciting
input
to
me.
F
A
Okay,
Vice
chair
Sylvester
yeah-
oh
sorry,
just
just
so
folks
know.
My
panel
is
limited,
so
I
can't
really
see
if
you're
physically
raising
your
hand
necessarily
just
so
happens
that
I
happen
to
see
Vice
chair
Sylvester's
this
time.
So
if
you
can,
please
use
the
raise
hand,
function,
that'll,
guarantee
that
ICU
and
can
call
on
you.
G
G
G
G
We
we
could
discuss
it
later,
but
I
did
want
to
point
out
to
anyone
who
didn't
have
a
chance
to
read
Malia
Perez's
letter.
It's
really
really
impressive
and
one
of
the
things
it
implies
is
that
she
would
be
willing
her
organization
would
be
willing
to
help
identify
and
help
organize
people
to
to
such
an
event.
So
that
would
be
a
huge
win
for
us,
because
she
has
so
much
credibility
in
the
community
and
so
many
connections.
G
D
Yes,
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
briefly
in
terms
of
the
terminology.
I
can't
remember
now:
it's
I
feel
like
it's
pandemic
time,
meaning
you
like
you
can't
distinguish
one
whether
something
happened
one
year
ago
or
three
years
ago,
but
sometime
in
the
last
few
years,
I
was
actually
looking
into
the
vocabulary.
D
Around
this
issue
and
I
did
also
see
a
preference
in
what
I
read
within
the
community
for
talking
about
unhoused
or
another
termite
scene
was
unstably
housed,
which
I
think
seems
rather
similar
to
housing,
insecure,
but
anyway,
just
wanted
to
to
put
out
there
that
I
think
those
are
preferred
terms
instead
of
of
homelessness.
So
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
on
that.
A
J
A
K
A
A
A
G
Ahead:
it's
okay,
it's
more
fun
to
do
the
raw
raw
thing
to
make
sure
someone
catches
me
out
of
the
quarter
of
their
eye.
I'm
happy
to
address
staff's
earlier
post
questions
about
the
gender
needs
and
assets
by
starting
by
making
my
own
amendment
to
delete
the
phrase
needs
and
assets
from
the
discussion
totally
agree
that
needs
an
assets
assessments
at
least
how
we've
defined
them
historically
have
been
a
lot
so
even
calling
the
needs
and
assets,
like
probably
caused
some
confusion.
G
So
I
do
like
the
idea
of
focusing
on
a
form
more
of
a
form
of
community.
Listening
we've
looked
at
a
lot
of
different
demographic
groups.
As
in
our
work
in
the
HRC
lgbtq
we've
looked
at
race,
we've
looked
at
immigration,
we
looked
at
housing
status,
but
we've
never
actually
looked
at
gender.
So
my
thinking
around
gender
is
that
you
know
a
pandemic
has
had
a
disparate
impact
on
jet
different
genders.
G
We
live
in
a
tech,
heavy
Society
in
Silicon
Valley
here
in
Mountain
View
in
particular,
where
gender
issues
are
often
downplayed
but
often
known
to
be
an
issue.
Policy
issues
often
affect
people
differently
based
on
their
gender,
so
I
thought
it
was
timely.
I
was
partially
inspired
by
the
woman
who
came
to
speak
to
us
about
cdaw
about
you
know
elevating
in
her
case
she
was
talking
about
elevating
women's
rights
in
our
policy
making.
A
G
J
Thank
you,
Vice,
chair
Sylvester.
Yes,
that
was
clarifying
for
me
and
the
the
the
two
things
trying
to
get
at
and
putting
things
in
this
category
is
making
sure
that
it
would
fit
within
the
parameters
of
what
we
could
Undertake
and
also
just
do.
Are
we
sure
clear
enough
what
it
is
and
so
I
you
know,
in
my
opinion,
if
the
commission
as
a
whole
would
like
to
move
or
not
as
a
whole
as
a
majority
who
would
like
to
move
that
item
up,
staff
does
not
have
a
concern
with
that.
J
A
H
Yes,
so
I
was
going
to
discuss.
The
caregivers
needs
some
assets
assessment,
which
was
one
of
the
items
that
I
proposed
as
staff
highlighted.
We,
the
previous
needs
and
assets,
assessments
that
we
have
done
have
leaned
very
heavily
on
commissioner
Solomon's
expertise.
I
noticed
I
was
looking
at
the
listen
I
saw
see,
commissioner
Solomon.
Your
second
term
is
up
at
the
end
of
this
calendar
year,
so
you
will
not
be
around
for
the
full
duration
of
this
work
plan
kind
of
regardless
so
I,
based
on
that.
D
But
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that.
But
that's
kind
of
my
perspective
on
this
topic,
I
think
I
just
started
this
work
I
in
the
past
six
months
or
so
so
I
would
say
that
that,
certainly,
if
you
know
when
I'm
no
longer
on
the
HRC
I'm
I'm
happy
to
Provide
support
to
the
HRC
as
a
community
member-
and
there
won't
be
a
an
issue
of
you
know-
we
can
only.
D
L
H
I
mean
I
think
that
is
extremely
generous
and
we
should
probably
not
try
to
pre-obligate
you
given
you're
not
going
to
be
on
this,
so
I
I
well,
I
appreciate
it
I
think
both
your
statement
that
the
sort
of
core
of
the
issue
right
now
from
what
you're
seeing
already
doing
work
in
this
is
at
the
state
level
rather
than
the
city
level,
and
that,
while
you
are
generously
offering
your
time,
I
I
would
not
want
to
to
sort
of
have
you
pre-commit
to
that
I.
My
recommendation
to
drop
this
would
stand.
A
So
Audrey,
if
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
and
take
that
off,
then
thanks
for
I
mean
it's.
It's
very
important
topic,
commissioner:
ball
I,
but
appreciate
you
helping
us
with
this
decision
tonight,
because
it
will
be
hard
to
I,
think
Whittle
it
down
to
two
or
three
for
sure.
So
that
was
very
helpful
and
generous
of
you,
so
mental
health
awareness
advocacy,
I,
I'm,
sorry
I!
Can't!
Oh
commissioner,
knock
you
do!
That
was
you.
E
E
You
know
topics
already
and
just
to
answer
the
questions
for
staff.
It's
you
know
the
intent
you
know
like
just
like
I
brought
up
this
idea
of
this
racial
reconciliation.
It's
me
just
you
know
sensing
what's
going
on
in
the
community,
what
I
feel
is
needed
and
again
we
know
that
mental
health
is
very
prevalent
right
now,
and
many
people
are
really
suffering
with
mental
illness,
and
so
I
mean
that's
the
intent
or
the
motive
in
me.
E
Bringing
this
up
and
I'm
trying
to
find
ways
in
which
there
could
be
some
kind
of
support
so
that
people
can
find
ways
to
live
functional
lives,
especially
after
the
pandemic
and
so
yeah.
The
purpose
is
really
to
just
find
ways
to
support
our
community
to
live
quality
lives
and
not
to
feel
like
you
know.
This
is
a
stigma
on
them
or
shame
that
they're
suffering
from
this
condition,
because
I
think
on
some
one
way
or
the
other
we
all
do,
and
so,
of
course,
the
internet
audience
is
still
our
community.
E
You
know,
whatever
issues
we
deal
with,
whether
it's
race
or
mental
health
or
on
house
situations
whatever
it
is
that
we
can
all
find
ways
to
bring
it
to
the
table
and
find
ways
to
provide
support
in
terms
of
the
scope
of
it.
I
I
didn't
think
too
broadly
of
it,
but
what
I
was
just
thinking
of
just
more
recently
in
the
couple
of
days
was
you
know
what,
if
we
partnered
with
experts
or
local
organizations,
that
already
do
this
kind
of
work
to
provide
some
kind
of
map?
E
You
know
mental
health
and
to
maintain
a
functioning
Society
getting
past.
You
know
kovid
or
whatever
situations
that
you
know
it
will
pre-covet.
You
know
people
have
been
dealing
with.
You
know
Mental
Illness,
but
I.
Think
people
don't
talk
about
it
because
it's
a
stigma
and
people
sometimes
are
ashamed
of
it.
E
E
You
know
even
people
who
are
refusing
to
go
back
to
work
or
to
the
employers,
it's
part
of
what
they're
dealing
with.
So
how
do
you
really
help
people
to
be
released
from
from
that?
It's
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
articulating
well,
but
I
just
see
people
seem
stagnant
and
can
move
forward.
So
that's
just
my
I
feel.
A
J
So
one
of
the
things
I
think.
Maybe
we
did
talk
about
something
like
this.
In
the
last
work
plan
prioritization
session,
that
was
described
as
a
resource
Fair
like
a
mental
health
resource,
fair
and
I,
wonder
I
mean
that's
something
like
I'm
trying
to
picture.
What
would
we
actually
do
and
and
how
would
it
fit
the
the
experience
and
strengths
and
capacity
of
the
HRC?
That's
what
popped
into
my
mind,
so
I
guess
I
would
ask
if
that
did
I.
Is
that
similar
to
what
you're,
thinking
or
a
direction
that
you
think
would
be
suitable.
E
I
didn't
think
about,
but
I
think
once
you
mentioned
it,
it
made
sense
and
I
was
thinking
about
people
who
have
even
you
know,
other
other
conditions
where
there's
a
hotline
or
there's
some.
You
know
you
know
where
they
can
call
before
it
gets
too
far.
If
you
know
somebody
who's
going
through,
you
know
such
a
situation.
You
know
just
providing
that,
because
people
don't
naturally
reach
out
or
if
they
don't
know,
they're,
not
aware
that
they
could
seek
help
to
go.
E
But
the
thing
we
deal
with
mental
health
on
the
day-to-day
it's
here
but
I
think
it's
just
like
the
whole
racial
situation.
Thing
it's
like
I,
think
there's
some
issues
where
we
want
to
be
in
denial
or
we
do
want
to
talk
about
it
because
it's
an
issue
of
shame
or
discomfort,
but
that's
more
of
our
reality.
E
J
That's
why
yeah
yeah
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
that
it's
at
least
speaking
for
myself.
It's
not
at
all
coming
from
a
place
of
denial,
and
it's
just
way
too
evident
in
my
personal
circles
and
just
being
a
member
of
this
community.
But
in
terms
of
what
is
the
role
of
a
city
yeah,
it's
not
a
public
health
provider
or
a
behavioral
health
provider
or
the
role
of
an
HRC
to
to
to.
How
do
we
add
value
to
that.
J
And
not
not
important,
but
how
do
we
add
value
to
that?
So,
if
you're
comfortable
calling
it
a
resource
Fair
like
say
mental
health
awareness,
slash
resource
Fair,
then
perhaps
your
colleagues
can
indicate
whether
they
would
be
wanting
to
have
it
moved
to
the
to
the
recommended
for
consideration
list.
A
G
G
H
So
I
think
there
is
a
lot
of
similarity
I'm.
A
big
advocate
of
focus,
so
I
mean
I
think
that
you
can
probably
have
a
much
more
effective
event
if
you
focus
on
a
thing
whether
it's
or
a
condition,
whether
it's
grief
or
I,
think
there's
a
lot
of
anxiety
around
reintegration,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
depression
in
various
things.
My
inclination
would
be
for
us
to
pick
one
of
those
and
focus
an
event
around
it
or
pick
several,
but
have
them
be
distinct.
Events,
I
think.
H
H
F
Reiterate
what
commissioner
nakedo
says,
which
is
that
mental
health
is
a
huge
issue
in
our
City
and
and
Society
I
mean
I,
think
about
the
suicides.
We've
had
I
think
about
the
stigma
that
how
much
we
need
to
destigmatize
mental
health
around
here
I
think
it's
much
bigger
than
just
an
event
to
provide
assistance
on
what
is
available
in
the
community.
F
I
mean
one
of
the
roles
of
this
group
is
tolerance
right
issues
considering
concerning
non-discrimination,
diversity
and
cultural
awareness
and
making
people
in
the
community
aware
of
people
with
mental
health
challenges
and
the
fact
that
they
are
functioning
members
of
society
is
extremely
it's
just
as
important,
and
it's
just
as
discriminatory
for
some
people.
As
you
know,
other
forms
of
discrimination-
people
are
constantly,
you
know.
If
you
have
depression
or
anxiety
or
add
you're,
you
know
sent
out
of
companies.
F
These
are
big
issues
and
I
I
do
see
the
importance
of
focusing
on
them
as
a
group.
In
the
same
way,
we
focus
on
race
case
or
other
things,
I
mean
I.
Do
we
have
you
know?
Do
we
have
the
expertise?
That's
not
there's
nothing
in
here.
That
says
that
the
people
on
this
committee
have
to
have
the
expertise
to
discuss
any
of
these
issues.
F
The
role
of
this
committee
is
to
go
out
and
find
the
people
with
expertise
and
bring
them
in
and
help
create
the
liaison
between
the
city
and
the
community,
and
so
I.
Don't
find
that
to
be
a
compelling
argument.
I
really
do
think
inclusivity
and
inclusivity
includes
people,
disabilities,
people
with
mental
health
issues,
all
kinds
of
things
I
find
this
to
be
an
extremely
important,
compelling
issue
myself.
So
I
just
wanted
to
support.
My
fellow
commissioner.
H
So
I
think
thank
you
for
that.
Commissioner,
rickster
I
think
it
raises
a
really
interesting
question
around
the
goal
of
the
event,
because
to
your
point
you
know
if
we're
trying
to
destigmatize
mental
illness
in
that
context,
I
100
agree
with
you
right.
It
doesn't
matter
if
what
you're
struggling
with
is
anxiety,
depression,
PTSD
something
else,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
an
area
that
we're
going
and
that
may
actually
be
a
distinction
that
we
haven't
been
clear
enough
in
sort
of
describing
what
we're
trying
to
go
here.
H
I
think
if
we're
trying
to
help
individuals
who
are
struggling
with
a
particular
condition.
That's
where
I
think
that
targeting
is
more
helpful
or
more
useful.
You
don't
treat
PTSD
the
same
way
that
you
treat
bipolar
the
same
way
that
you
treat
anxiety
and
I.
Think
if
we're
trying
to
give
people
a
forum
for
talking
about
something
in
particular,
we
should
focus.
E
E
E
You
know
mental
health,
mental
health.
Whatever
this
when
it
disrupts
your
life,
you
know
it
disrupts
you
from
functioning,
so
I
don't
think
we
could
just
even
do
an
event
to
say.
Oh
only
those
suffering
from
you
know,
X
can
show
up
at
this
event,
because
mental
health
is
not
just
one
thing.
You
know
it's
it's
multiple
of
things
but
I
think
giving
people
permission
or
like
like
it's
okay,
you
know
to
not
be
okay,
I,
think
that
begins
to
Free
People
to
feel
like.
E
I
think
it's
just
I'm
just
thinking
more
in
terms
of
empathy
and
compassion
rather
than
stigma
and
shame
like
you
know,
to
just
move
from
stigma
and
shame
to
more
of
empathy
and
compassion,
yeah,
so
I
think
I
I
did
think
about
the
survey
but
I
think
when
Audrey
mentioned
you
know
the
fair.
It
made
sense
too.
You
know
whatever
it
is
you're
dealing
with.
You
know
we
might
have
a
resource
or
some
answers
or
a
roadmap
for
you,
and
this
is
where
you
can
go.
D
Yes,
in
terms
of
the
possibility
of
doing
a
kind
of
mental
health
needs
and
assets
assessment
as
much
as
I,
you
know,
I
greatly
enjoy
doing
needs
and
assets
assessments,
but
I
think
that
to
do
a
mental
health
needs.
An
assets
assessment
well
would
require
a
certain
level
of
technical
expertise
and
input.
Regarding
what
kinds
of
questions
to
ask
and
how
that
I
think
would
have
to
be
given
a
lot
of
consideration.
D
D
Also,
if
I,
if
I
understood
correctly,
I
heard
you
referring
to
a
sequence
of
collecting
data
and
then
providing
resources,
which
is
ideal,
I
mean
that's
what
we
would
want
to
do,
but
I
think
it
seems
that
from
a
resource
perspective,
it
would
be
in
our
scope
if
we
were
to
do
a
needs.
An
assessment
to
just
do
a
needs,
an
assets,
assessment
and
then
I
believe
that
recommendations
would
go
to
city
council.
A
Audrey
all
I'll,
throw
it
back
to
you.
I,
don't
know
with
that
discussion
if
you
have
enough
to
really
to
to
sort
of
it
seems
like
this
might
be
moving
in
like
a
couple,
different
paths,
so
not
sure
if
you
like
I,
guess,
I'll,
just
ask
you:
if
you
have
what
you
need
in
terms
of
sort
of
moving
this
do
like
do.
We
need
to
move
it
to
a
cat
or
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is
number
one.
A
J
Perhaps
you
know
not
feeling
included,
feeling
more
marginalized,
feeling
more
stressed
and
at
risk
and
they're
not
being
a
broader
Community
conversation
about
that,
so
that
felt
like
a
second
possible
Direction
and
then
the
other
was
the
way
that
I
was
filtering
and
interpreting.
What
commissioner
could
do
was
saying
around
you
know:
is
it
bringing
together
resources
when
you
were
talking
about
Partners,
so
that
people
could
could
learn
about
the
range
of
ways
that
we
as
a
community,
come
together
around
mental
health
and
what
does
exist
and
how
to
learn
more
about
that?
J
So
I
guess
what
what
I
would
say
is
that
based
on
I
I
had
some
similar
thoughts,
as
commissioner
Solomon
did
about
what
it
would
really
mean
to
do.
Meaningful
needs
and
asset
assessment
and
and
and
and
I
think
that's
what
I
meant
around
expertise.
You
know
the
HRC
doesn't
need
to
be
expert,
but
but
this
is
the
kind
of
thing
that
the
county
has
an
entire
staff
of
Behavioral
Health
Specialists
to
do,
and
in
fact
they
have
done
it,
they
have
recently
done.
J
J
As
the
way
to
to
kind
of
tweak
the
description
of
this,
either
towards
the
kind
of
listening
and
connecting
and
and
storytelling
and
Community
empathy
or
around
a
resource,
fair
and
then
then
you
can
decide
whether
to
move
it
up
and
staff
would
be
able
to
support
either
of
those.
In
terms
of
you
know,
your
consideration
for
priorities.
A
A
Okay,
I
I
saw
a
nod,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
do
it.
So
if
you
can
raise
your
physical
hand
or
press
the
raise
hand
function
for
moving
the
first
item
that
Audrey
described,
which
is
sort
of
a
listening
empathy,
storytelling
type
event.
If
you
would
want
to
move
that
up
to
the
recommended
for
consideration
of
prioritization
go
ahead
and
do
that
I
see
well,
we
definitely
have
a
quorum
I'm
looking
to
see
if
it's
unanimous,
it's
okay,
it's
unanimous!
C
A
Hands
for
that
okay,
so
we
will
this.
This
will
be
the
list.
I
don't
want
to
skip
the
voter
rights
extension
needs
and
assess
assets
assessment
if
there
are
any
questions
or
concerns
about
that
item
not
being
recommended
from
any
of
the
Commissioners
and
I.
Sorry
I
can't
remember
who
recommended
that
last
time
yeah
commissioner
Solomon.
D
Yes,
I
I
will
just
say:
I
was
the
one
who
recommended
that
and
put
that
on
the
list.
I
am
not
going
to
make
a
proposal
that
it
be
moved
up
to
the
recommended
for
consideration
list.
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
that,
and
when
we
get
to
our
last
agenda
item
tonight,
I'll
share
just
an
update
from
what's
going
on
in
San
Jose
just
for
everyone's
knowledge,
but
I'm
I'm
do
not
contest
where
this
item
is.
A
You
thanks,
commissioner,
and
looking
forward
to
your
update
and
thank
you
staff
for
providing
a
for
doing
a
lot
of
follow-up
on
that
and
providing
a
very
robust
rationale
for
why
that
was
not
recommended,
I
think
so
yeah
that
was
yeah.
Thank
you
for
following
up
with
the
city
attorney
and
everyone
else
for
that
and
looking
into
sort
of
historical
proposals
as
well.
So
we
have
our
list.
A
J
What
I
would
suggest
is
that
we
go
commissioner
by
commissioner
rather
than
project
by
project
and
with
the
N
divided
by
three
plus
one.
If
we
round
up
you
get
four
four
votes
and
we'll
see
if
that,
if
that
shakes
out
such
that,
we
have
three
things:
no
more
than
three
things
that
will
wind
up
at
the
top
of
the
list.
D
H
C
J
A
G
A
D
A
A
C
G
L
J
A
J
B
L
E
A
B
A
A
A
K
B
L
D
I
I,
third,
everything
that
commissioner
Webb
said
and
as
somebody
who's
been
on
the
commission
for
a
pretty
long
time,
but
still
sometimes
just
worry.
I
worry
about
yeah
like
not
knowing
how
to
word
things
saying
the
wrong
thing,
just
feeling
foolish,
as
commissioner
Webb
said,
still
have
that
worry
sometimes
so.
D
H
Yeah
not
wanting
to
make
this
run
too
much
longer,
but
I
think
you
know
you
think
of
the
hrc's
role
as
providing
kind
of
a
human
touch
connecting
the
city
to
the
the
world
or
to
the
city
to
the
citizens.
If
all
of
them
employees
of
the
city
were
as
good
at
bringing
that
human
self
forward
as
Christina
is
I,
don't
know
that
we
need
an
HRC,
so
I
think
it's
been
really
wonderful.
H
You
know
the
extent
to
which
you've
been
able
to
just
connect
with
everyone
and
and
really
bring
a
real
person
and
not
just
a
you
know:
nameless
City
staffer,
like
Christina,
we
could
be
buddies.
We
could
be
hanging
out
having
a
beer
we're
also
just
you
know,
talking
with
things
so
I
really
appreciate
how
much
you've
been
willing
to
bring
that
of
yourself
to
us.
G
Again,
not
wanting
to
to
drag
this
on
and
embarrass
Christina
too
much
more,
but
many
times
it's
felt
like
you've
been
our
eighth
member
or
one
of
one
of
us
in
so
many
ways
and
that's
been
lovely.
So
thank
you,
I'm
glad
you're
staying
with
the
city,
so
we
can
still
find
you
and
talk
to
you
and
see
you
and
I
want
to
just
say
best
of
luck
to
to
you
and
whoever
whoever
in
the
city
is
getting
you
I,
I,
they're,
very
lucky,
and
the
city
remains
lucky
to
keep
you.
B
Audrey
stuck
with
me
for
a
while.
Thank
you
very
much
for
all
of
those
kind
words.
I
really
do
appreciate
it
and
I
did
receive
the
card
and
after
confirming
that
it
was
legit,
I
did
click
on
the
link
and
I
read
all
the
notes,
and
they
were
delightful
and
I
really
appreciate
the
thought
and
and
effort
that
was
put
into
it,
and
it
has
been
a
real
pleasure
working
with
all
of
you
over
the
last
five
and
a
half
years,
and
but
I
am
leaving
you
in
capable
hands.
B
Laurel
is
amazing.
She
brings
a
lot
of
experience
and
and
energy
and
new
ideas
from
her
prior
role
and
so
I
look
forward
to
helping
Laurel
as
she
on
boards,
as
your
staff
lays
on
and,
of
course,
I
am
not
going
anywhere
technically
so
anytime.
You
guys
want
to
reach
out
to
me.
You
know
how
to
find
me
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
later
this
summer,
at
our
events
and
then
in
the
future
for
future
events.
So
thank
you.
J
Your
liaise
on
starting
in
September,
with
Christina
kind
of
as
a
shadow
or
two
training
wheels
initially,
but
she
knowing
Laurel
and
all
the
ways
in
which
Justin
the
four
or
five
weeks
that
she's
been
with
us.
She
she
doesn't
need
training
wheels
for
for
long
Laurel.
Would
you
mind
saying
a
few
words
about
your
background
and.
I
Yeah
not
at
all,
can
you
hear
me
I'm
using
my
laptop
speaker
for
the
first
time?
Okay,
perfect
thanks
Audrey
for
the
introduction
and
I
also
want
to
say
thank
you
to
Christina
for
an
amazing
Handover
she's
been
doing
a
great
job
preparing
me
for
supporting
this
body
and
I'm
very
excited
to
come
on
board.
I
A
J
A
A
D
Yes,
I
did
want
to
just
give
a
brief
update
on
the
topic
of
potential
voting
rights
for
non-citizens
in
San
Jose,
so
I
had
talked
about
that
a
bit
last
month
when
I
raised
potential
needs
and
assets.
Assessment
of
voting
rights
for
non-citizens
in
Mountain
View
is
a
possible
topic
for
our
work
plan.
So
the
San
Jose
City
Council
study
session
on
non-citizen
voting
rights
looks
like
it's
going
to
be
set
for
September
by
the
rules
and
open
government
committee.
D
So
what
that
means
is
that
this
topic
cannot
be
a
possible
topic
on
the
November
ballot,
because
there
is
a
deadline
of
August
12th
for
ballot
measures
to
qualify.
So
supporters
of
non-citizen
voting
were
hoping
that
the
study
session
was
going
to
be
happening
now,
so
that
there
could
potentially
be
a
ballot
item.
D
So
I
did
also
note,
just
in
passing
that
Oakland
is
actually
considering.
This
just
was
announced
like
from
what
I
saw
in
the
past
week
or
so
that
Oakland
is
actually
considering
extending
voting
rights
for
school
district
elections
to
sorry,
School,
Board,
I'm,
sorry,
School,
Board,
elections
to
non-citizens
and
it
looks
like
Boston
is
perhaps
considering
changes
as
well
and
and
Audrey.
D
I
appreciated
your
mentioning
earlier
and
talking
about
this
topic
that
there's
actually
been
a
a
legal
challenge
to
San
Francisco's
law
based
on
state
law
and
I
hadn't
seen
anything
about
that
online.
But
if
you
happen
to
have
a
link
to
that
to
any
information
about
that,
if
you
might
put
that
in
the
chat
or
or
just
send
it
out,
because
I
I'm
just
interested
to
read
more
about
this
topic.
So
thank
you.
D
So
that
was
my
update
and
and
I
also
wanted
to
ask
if
Jill,
if
you
might
say
a
little
bit
about
yourself,
so
we
know
a
little
bit
more
about
you.
You
were
just
thrown
into
the
fire
today
and
it's
been
wonderful
to
work
with
you
in
this
meeting,
but
just
would
love
to
hear
a
little
bit
about
your
background.
If
you're
willing.
F
To
share
hi
I
Foster
puppies,
so
I
have
two
crazy
ones.
Right
now,
I
have
been
a
long
time
volunteer
in
Mountain
View,
mostly
in
the
school
district
for
years,
and
then
when
Trump
was
elected,
I
helped
form
an
organization
called
listos,
with
a
bunch
of
Mistral
parents
to
support
emergency
planning
for
our
latinx
community.
F
F
Worker
Center
for
like
a
year,
I
would
go
to
the
restaurant
supply,
store
the
thousand
dollars
and
buy
all
their
meat
and
beans
and
rice
and
bring
it
back
because
for
some
reason,
I
thought
I
was
invincible
and
knocking
wood,
I
never
got
covered,
and
then
I
spent
a
lot
of
time.
Working
with
Malia
and
Sandra
Esparza
and
cafecitos
and
I've
been
really
just
involved
in
supporting.
F
You
know
some
of
our
more
vulnerable
communities
in
whatever
ways
I
can
and
when
this
opportunity
came
up
to
kind
of
Step
Up
more
globally.
I
also
am
a
huge
special-led
legal
support
person,
so
I
work
with
a
lot
of
parents,
especially
I,
have
two
special
ed
students,
and
so
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
parents
of
special
ed
students,
helping
them
understand
the
law
and
their
rights
and
working
them
as
an
advocate.
And
so
that's
another
one
of
my
big
passions,
Passions,
along
with
puppies.
A
That's
great
I
know
there's
more
than
one
dog
person
on
this
commission
so
yeah
a
couple
of
us
have
dogs
and
cats.
So
that's
great
Jill
I
may
have
seen
you
actually
in
like
the
food.
Where
are
you
the
one
driving
like
a
truck
like
with
around
crisanto
with
yeah
I?
Think
I've
seen
you,
but
like
lots
of
masks
and
gloves
and
hard
to
I'm
like
now,
I
recognize
you
so
yeah.
J
E
F
K
A
Okay,
okay:
are
there
any
other
commission
reports
to
make
and
staff
reports
none?
Okay,
in
that
case,
I'll
just
say:
everyone
have
a
great
summer.
I
believe
our
next
meeting
is
scheduled
for
September,
1st
2022
at
6,
30
pm
and
whether
or
not
it'll
be
in
person
is
I.
My
understanding
is
that
that
is
TBD,
but
it's
a
possibility
so
fingers
crossed
yeah
and
thank
you.
Everyone
have
a
good
night.
Have
a
good
summer
see
you
at
the
events,
see.