►
Description
Live Teleconference of the September 18, 2023 Joint Agency Meeting to Build Relationships and Share Perspectives Regarding the Education Enhancement Reserve Joint Powers Agreement
S
R
When
we
share
the
insights,
they
didn't
come
from
us,
they
are
synthesized
and
analyzed
and
then
shared
with
you,
so
you'll
still
be
hearing
and
listening
to
each
other
as
elected
officials.
This
is
a
unique
opportunity.
You'll
also
be
able
to
discuss
some
of
the
things
we
have
in
common.
Often
when
we
have
challenges
and
areas
where
we
disagree.
We
don't
always
realize
that
we
have
many
many
things
even
more
in
common
and
that's
how
you
build
relationships.
R
You
focus
on
what
you
have
as
common
ground,
we'll
be
able
to
establish
some
norms
and
ground
rules.
You
were
very
free
in
sharing
some
great
rules
of
thumb,
for
how
to
conduct
ourselves
and
how
to
establish
some
ways
and
norms
for
interacting
that
will
take
us
forward
and
will
also
set
great
groundwork
and
rules
for
the
ad
hoc
committee
and
even
more
important.
It's
we'll
be
able
to
share
some
of
the
considerations
that
have
been
co-created
and
ideas
that
have
come
up
and
they're
not
limited.
R
New
ideas
may
come
to
you
this
evening
and
that
will
help
us
move
forward.
Just
want
to
remind
what
it
is
not
is.
It
is
not
negotiations
I'm,
not
an
attorney.
Thank
goodness
no
offense
I
know
we
have
many
attorneys
here,
but
and
I
it's
also
not
a
town
hall.
So
we
we
do
have
public.
Who
would
love
to
speak
to
you
and
and
care
about
our
community
here,
but
it's
also
just
not
a
free
throw
Open
Mic.
R
So
we
would
just
ask
that
everybody,
you
know,
make
sure
that
we
behave
and
comfort
ourselves
with
respect
for
each
other.
We
also
do
have
a
parking
lot
and
it's
not
the
real
parking
lot.
It's
an
imaginary
one
that
Luke
will
be
monitoring
and
there's
two
ways
to
look
at
that
when
you
have
a
meeting
such
as
this
often
people
will
leave
and
then
they
go
into
the
parking
lot
and
they
say
things
that
maybe
they
should
have
said
here
well.
R
So,
first
of
all,
we'd,
like
you
to
say
things
here,
you
can
still
digest
and
Rewind
in
the
parking
lot,
but
we
don't
want
you
to
feel
as
if
something
should
have
been
said
that
was
stifled.
So
we
do
hope
that
you
feel
comfortable
sharing
here,
but
also
we
may
end
up
touching
on
something
some
kind
of
concept
that
doesn't
quite
fit
in
our
focus
and
if
it
leans
toward
one
of
those
items,
then
we'll
put
it
in
the
parking
lot
again
to
respect
and
listen
to
you
to
note
it.
R
But
it
would
be
for
future
considerations.
It
might
be
part
of
the
ad
hoc
committee
work
or
elsewhere,
and
most
of
all,
we
ask
that
all
of
you
just
come
in
with
an
open
mind
and
a
spirit
of
wanting
to
work
with
us
to
move
things
forward,
and
we
really
do
appreciate
that
collaborative
intention
that
we
have
experienced
with
every
single
one
of
the
people
we've
interacted
and
before
I
go
on.
I
did
want
to
share
just
a
little
bit
more
about
how
how
people
were
feeling
about
this
meeting.
People
were
very
candid.
R
When
we
met
with
them.
There
was
a
range
and
you've
all
Fallen
somewhere
in
that
range.
Some
were
anxious.
Some
were
skeptical,
some
were
excited
and
most
people
were
in
between
cautious
cautiously
optimistic,
but
not
quite
sure,
and
the
reason
is
because
you,
this
hasn't
been
part
of
your
history.
This
hasn't
been
something
that
we
normally
do
and
some
communities
do.
It
may
be
something
that
you
decide
that
you
like,
or
maybe
something
that
you
decide.
We
don't
need
to
repeat,
but
regardless,
however,
you
came
to
tonight.
R
I
hope
that
you
leave
in
a
better
place.
I
hope
that
you
feel
more
positive
about
breaking
bread
with
each
other,
having
interaction
and
listening
and
attending
to
other
perspectives.
Besides
our
own,
and
with
that
in
mind,
I
would
like
to
ask
you
to
pick
up
your
glass
of
water,
and
this
is
just
an
easy
thing
to
do:
we're
all
picking
up
a
glass
of
water.
Does
anyone
know
where
I'm
going
with
this?
R
R
Let's
keep
on
holding
that
glass,
suddenly
the
same
glass
that
doesn't
feel
very
heavy,
the
same
glass
that
you
can
just
pick
up
and
hold
all
by
yourself
without,
depending
on
anybody
else,
begins
to
be
a
heavy
load,
and
one
thing
that
I
learned
from
meeting
with
so
many
of
you
is
that
people
have
been
carrying
a
heavy
load,
part
of
it's
being
an
elected
official.
That
is
not
an
easy
task.
R
Part
of
it's
been
a
staff
member
for
a
very
high
performing
community,
but
a
lot
of
it
is
because
we
want
to
get
things
right
so
as
hard
as
has
been
to
carry
that
load.
I
wanted
to
raise
my
glass
and
salute
you
for
trying
and
let
you
know
that
my
job
as
a
facilitator
is
to
help
carry
that
load
to
help
put
some
of
the
burden
on
my
shoulders,
so
that
I
can
help
us
move
forward.
R
But
it's
also
time
for
you
to
look
around
and
see
that
there
are
many
many
people
here
who
can
also
help
lighten
that
load
and
share
and
carry
the
burden.
Not
that
being
and
working
being.
An
elected
official
is
a
burden,
but
there's
a
huge
responsibility
and
you
take
it
seriously.
So
we're
going
to
share
the
burden,
we're
going
to
carry
the
water
together
and
hopefully,
when
you
leave
tonight,
your
load
will
feel
a
little
bit
lighter.
R
And
then
I
believe
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
where
we've
been
so
I
mentioned
a
journey,
and
so
just
most
of
us
know
about
the
Shoreline
Community,
but
before
we
get
there,
there
was
a
quote
that
I
wanted
to
share,
never
rest
on
past.
Success,
create
something
better
and
that's
kind
of
my
challenge
is:
we've
had
great
success
and
we
know
that
we
can
do
things
successfully
together.
R
We
also
know
that
it
receives
a
special
property
tax
revenue
and
through
that
there
are
annual
contributions
they're
going
to
these
districts
to
the
schools
through
the
education,
enhancement,
Reserve
joint
Powers
agency.
These
are
all
things
that
we've
come
to
know
so
that
those
contributions
are
continuing.
The
First
Agreement
was
in
2005.
R
and
the
amount
was
about
four
hundred
thousand
or
was
four
hundred
thousand
in
2019.
Then
there
was
a
new
portion
of
that
that
was
amended,
and
so
a
full
tax
rate
allocation
on
any
new
residential
development
also
began
to
be
part
of
that,
and
so,
where
we
are
now
is
the
current
agreement
operating
under
has
these
annual
contributions,
so
our
Mountain
View
Westman
school
district
is
at
6.4
million
on
our
Mountain
View
Los
Altos
I
Sunday
is
here:
Union
School,
Union,
Union,
High
School
District
is
4.3,
but
we
also
know
that
there
are
many
areas.
R
R
So
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
We
have
quite
an
audience
here.
We
know
that
all
of
you
have
shared
a
lot
and
that
will
begin
to
share
more.
But
it's
really
important
that
we
all
understand
our
public
is
listening,
our
public
is
watching
and
our
public
cares
it's
not
about
the
city
and
that
district
and
this
District
it's
about
our
community
of
Mountain
View,
and
we
need
to
begin
to
co-create
and
work
on
things
and
attend
to
those
who
listen.
The
roles
you're
in
I
always
say
is
like
a
fishbowl.
R
You
can't
really
hide
you're
here,
and
everyone
is
watching
and
scrutinizing,
and
sometimes
judging
and
that's
part
of
that
burden
that
you
carry.
But
it's
also
part
of
the
joy
because
you're
doing
everything
transparently
and
openly-
and
you
listen
to
your
community,
so
we're
going
to
give
them
that
opportunity
and
we'll
listen.
A
A
V
X
Furthermore,
the
park
needs
protections
from
sea
level
rise
landfill
operations
to
ensure
that
greenhouse
gases
do
not
escape
the
landfill,
Recreation
and
educational
opportunities
and
general
up
peak
of
the
park
that
is
visited
by
millions
of
bay
residents,
Bay
Area
residents
every
year
they
visit
because
they
crave
wildness
as
do
I.
My
crave,
keeping
my
fellow
creatures
like
Brewing
Wells
and
black
skimmers,
safe
and
I
hope
that
you
will
preserve
funding
for
Habitat.
Thank
you.
U
Good
evening
afternoon,
whatever
anyway,
thank
you
for
giving
an
opportunity
to
comment.
I
work
on
30
by
30
Campaign,
which
is
Statewide
campaign
to
conserve
30
percent
of
land
and
water
by
2030,
and
this
park
is
a
gorgeous
multi-purpose
Park
that
provides
Equitable
access.
It
has
lots
of
habitat
for
wildlife,
and
it's
also
provides
nature
for
children
and
children.
You
know
you've
all
probably
read
about
the
nature
deficit,
so
I'm
busy
trying
to
get
more
parks
and
more
wildlands,
and
so
I
hope.
This
funding,
for
this
part
can
be
maintained.
U
Y
Hello,
everybody
so
I'd
like
to
see
this
funding
spent
on
protected
bike
Lanes
in
this
area,
to
make
it
safer
to
get
around
and
make
this
a
really
car
light
area
of
the
city
and
enhance
the
active
transportation
of
this
area,
so
that
includes
making
it
lockable,
making
it
bikeable,
building
public
transit
out
that
people
actually
want
to
use.
So
that
means
well
shaded,
maybe
there's
some
public
art
along
the
routes
benches
things
like
that
trash
cans-
and
this
is
also
we've
heard.
Y
A
lot
of
nature
comments,
we'll
probably
hear
a
lot
more,
but
this
also
a
place
where
people
live
and
many
people
many
more
people
will
hopefully
live
so
that
you
know
includes
high
density,
housing,
hopefully
and
affordable
housing
that
I'd
love
to
see
more
of
and
green
streets
will
enhance
everything
that
I've
just
mentioned.
So
that's
going
to
make
it
safer
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists.
People
taking
public
transits
going
to
slow
down
the
cars,
provide
shade,
help
the
the
wildlife
and
the
native
life.
Thank
you.
Z
Thank
you,
I'm
Cliff,
Chambers
and
I'm,
one
of
the
caring
residents
of
of
Mountain
View
I'm,
also
a
parent
of
an
8th
grader
at
Crittenton
I'm,
really
asking
the
city
council
and
the
Board
of
Trustees
to
really
work
collaboratively
together
to
establish
a
decision-making
framework
for
a
successful
long-term
successor,
eer
jpa
agreement.
It's
going
to
take
really
strong
leadership
from
both
the
city
council
and
the
Board
of
Trustees.
To
make
this
happen,
and
simply
the
states
are
too
high
not
to
be
successful.
Why
are
the
stakes
too
high?
Z
The
eerjpa
really
must
provide
the
funding
to
to
enable
this
Vision
to
happen,
and,
finally,
as
the
housing
is
built
in
North,
Shoreline,
there's
going
to
be
need
for
facilities
for
skilled
children
and
for
schools,
and
we
really
need
to
have
the
funding.
So
you
really
need
to
balance
these
three
priorities
to
make
this
work
and
I
hope
you
can
do
that
in
a
very
constructive
and
collaborative
way
so
that
we
can
be
proud
of
our
elected
officials.
Thank
you.
AA
Think
trust
has
been
broken
in
a
lot
of
ways
with
both
the
community
and
with
the
council
and
with
the
district
and
I
think
in
order
for
us
to
have
a
real
solution
that
we
can
take
care
of
the
gym
that
is
Shoreline
Park,
that
we
can
make
our
school
systems
the
best
that
we
can
be,
which
is
just
as
important
to
the
citizens
that
we
can
protect,
build
a
city
of
the
future.
That
is
not
like
a
suburb
or
an
excerpt
of
some
other
place.
We
need
to
start
small.
AA
We
need
to
start
developing
trust.
We
need
to
reach
out
and
I
thank
Dr
Bowers
for
participating
in
this
and
bringing
her
expertise
and
I.
Wish
you
every
success,
but
I
think
we
don't
put
the
bar
too
high
and
we
just
look
at
ways
of
of
developing
Trust
I
met
with
Dr
Rudolph
about
two
weeks
ago
and
I
said
a
real
solution
is
going
to
be
one
that
nobody
likes,
but
before
we
agree
to
a
solution
that
no
one
likes,
we
have
to
trust
each
other
and
that's
where
I
think
we
have
to
start.
AA
W
C
So
one
of
the
things
we've
been
seeing
in
the
news
from
Mountain
View
Lisbon
school
district
is
that
they
really
need
this
funding
to
provide
quality
services
to
our
students
they
pitch.
We
can
only
reduce
class
sizes
if
they
get
their
share
of
this
tax
fund
and
they're.
The
best
organization
available
to
direct
those
funds
to
our
children
and
I
have
two
of
them
at
Pub.
C
The
myth
of
this
narrative
is
that
the
shoreline
communities
tax
fund
is
not
currently
going
to
our
children.
These
funds
are
being
spent
on
mitigating
rising
sea
levels,
for
our
children,
protecting
endangered
species
for
our
children
and
goes
helps
support
the
city's
general
fund,
which
also
provides
services
to
our
children.
I
know
that
my
children
enjoy
many
of
the
city's
family
events.
They
go
to
the
camps
when
we
were
looking
for
preschool
day
camps,
the
city
options
were
often
the
most
comprehensive
one
of
the
most
important.
C
Things,
though,
is
I,
feel
the
city
takes
our
input
on
how
to
improve
their
services
and
actually
funds
and
implements
them.
Conversely,
we've
had
a
some
challenging
times
with
Mountain
View
Westman
during
community
outreach.
That
is
usually
once
during
during
working
hours
at
Thursday,
at
4
pm
for
advice
on
topics
and
then,
when
we
give
advice,
none
of
it
is
actually
implemented.
AB
Hi
extended
friends,
okay,
so
far,
facilitation
seems
very
nice.
Chill
I
was
also
I
was
hoping
for
robust
negotiations.
Tonight
it
was
some
physical
challenges
or
duels
I
feel
like
that,
might
get
us
to
a
resolution
much
faster
and
be
more
fun
for
the
audience.
I
do
value
education.
I
do
I
just
want
the
education
as
someone
who
lives
in
North
Bayshore
not
to
be
emergency,
swim
lessons,
because
we
fail
to
maintain
the
levees.
AB
Not
doing
this
I
am
doing
this
for
you,
okay,
on
a
rare
series.
Note
I
would
much
rather
have
all
these
discussions
be,
grounded
in
something
more
material
via
proposed
budget
items
instead
of
vague
illusions
that
establish
a
false
dichotomy
between
children
and
the
environment.
I
think
you
know
we
could
do
that.
We
can
say
here
are
the
things
we
need
and
how
much
they're
probably
going
to
cost.
Let's
start
there,
instead
of
eventually
getting
there
in
the
meantime
being,
like
think
of
the
children,
all
right
thanks.
AC
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
sunny:
kleinhaus
I'm,
the
environmental
advocate
for
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
Audubon
Society.
Our
organization
has
been
involved,
with
advocacy
for
wildlife
and
for
environmental
benefits
in
Mountain
View.
For
many
years
we
have
a
lot
of
members
in
Mountain
View.
Our
education
program
reaches
every
fifth
grader
in
the
wisman
school
district.
We
provide
in-class
programming
to
all
the
district,
elementary
schools
introducing
students
to
Concepts
such
as
prog
such
as
adaptation,
local
conservation,
habitat
or
species,
local
ecosystems
and
birds,
and
we
use
a
lot
of
local
case
studies.
AC
We
help
students,
provide
Foster,
a
sense
of
appreciation
and
understanding
of
the
complex
habitats
that
were
surrounded
with
here,
and
it's
really
really
critical
that
they
also
have
the
chance
to
experience
those
habitats
to
go
out
to
Nature
to
come
to
the
park,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
programming
for
adults
and
for
children
in
at
Shoreline
Park.
So
we
reach
thousands
of
people
every
year
in
Mountain,
View
and
I.
AC
Think
it's
really
really
critical
to
understand
that
for
children
having
knowing
that
there
are
animals
there
and
knowing
that
they
exist,
and
if
you
ask
them,
do
you
want
to
have
five
more
friends
in
your
classroom
or
do
you
want
to
save
a
species?
I
think
I
know
what
they're
going
to
tell
you
and
I
think
we
should
listen
to
that.
We
have
some
brochures
about
the
birds
of
Shoreline,
which
was
produced
in
the
early
90s
and
one
on
endangered
species.
Here
that
was
produced
in
the
80s.
AC
Some
of
the
species
that
we
have
in
the
92
birds
of
Shoreline
are
no
longer
seen
here,
Quail
think
about
when
those
of
you
get
that
far.
When
was
the
last
time
you
saw
a
quail
or
a
pheasant
here,
so
we
do
need
to
take
care
of
this
place.
It's
special.
It's
really
really
special
and
it
needs
Very
Special
Care.
Thank
you.
B
Good
evening
Matthew
Reed
I'm,
the
director
of
policy
at
Silicon
Valley
at
home.
We
are
an
affordable
housing
and
housing
advocacy
organization
working
in
Santa,
Clara,
County
and
I've
had
the
honor
and
privilege
of
being
involved
in
the
North
Bay
Shore
planning
process
for
as
long
as
I've
been
an
employee
pretty
much
from
the
beginning.
So
it's
my
pleasure
to
be
here,
I
think
from
the
beginning
of
this
process.
B
We
knew
that
that
there
were
a
lot
of
challenges
of
balancing
all
of
the
different
needs
of
the
community
of
the
city
in
bringing
together
this
plan
and
I
think
there
was
a
shared
commitment
to
finding
that
balance
in
a
way
that
ensured
the
best
possible
outcomes
for
the
neighborhood
that
was
going
to
be
built
for
us.
This
was
really
about
making
sure
that
members
of
Mountain
View
Community
that
are
struggling
right
now
to
afford
to
live
in
this
city,
have
access
to
the
new
communities
in
North
Bayshore
that
are
going
to
be
built.
B
Part
of
that
is
having
access
to
the
full
amenities
that
were
in
the
plant,
the
richness
of
the
Investments
and
the
environment,
the
sustainability
of
the
area,
and
so
we
just
hope
that
that
we
would
keep
in
mind
that
there
are
real
interests
that
are
going
to
be
a
part
of
this
community,
that
there
aren't
simple
answers.
But
it's
really
essential
that
we
ensure
that
the
Investments
That
Mountain
View
makes
are
in
the
the
value
of
creating
Equitable
opportunities.
B
AD
Okay,
thanks
for
this
opportunity
comment
on
the
allocation
of
Shoreline
District
funds.
Over
the
last
few
months,
the
school
district
has
voiced
concerns
that
has
Mountain
View
population
grows
a
greater
percentage
of
Shoreline.
District
funds
should
be
allocated
to
the
school
district
to
support
the
growing
school-age
population,
while
all
of
us
in
Mountain
View
want
the
best
education
for
our
children.
AD
I
believe
how
much
needs
to
be
allocated
to
the
schools
should
be
based
on
actual
growth
in
school
population
and
not
just
projections,
while
the
last
seven
years
have
been
a
time
of
great
Mountain
View
housing
production,
the
school
age
population
has
actually
declined.
13
percent,
while
funding
for
the
student
per
student
has
more
than
doubled
according
to
postings
on
livable
I
mean
balanced
Mountain
View.
AD
The
shoreline
fund
currently
Sports
several
important
current
and
future
projects,
including
maintaining
a
Park
and
Wildlife
Refuge,
protecting
against
sea
level
rise
and
transforming
North
Bay
Shore
into
area
that
will
support
much
of
the
housing
growth
in
our
city.
Funding
for
these
must
not
be
compromised.
So,
let's
find
a
way
to
accommodate
what
the
schools
actually
need,
while
still
maintaining
our
current
Shoreline
obligations
and
plans.
Thank
you.
I
see
my
time.
AE
Hello,
my
name
is
Dasha
Leeds
I'm,
the
conservation
coordinator
for
the
Sierra
Club
Loma
Prieta
chapter
as
Shani
and
other
previous
speakers
have
said.
Shoreline
Park
is
important
for
wildlife
and
local
biodiversity.
Shoreline
Park
is
a
model
for
how
to
manage
access,
providing
recreational
opportunities
while
allowing
sensitive
species
to
live
and
thrive.
The
Shoreline,
Park
Community
Fund
provides
essential
funding
for
this
and
many
other
important
Services
functions
and
programs
such
as
other
speakers
have
mentioned
sea
level,
rise
adaptation,
nature-based
infrastructure
and
controlling
emissions
from
the
landfill.
AE
This
and
many
important
ecological
climate
and
adaptation
actions
should
be
protected.
As
you
move
through
this
process,
we
hope
to
protect
and
continue
funding
for
implementing
the
plans
that
support
Wildlife,
Wildlife
education
and
park
maintenance.
So
please
do
not
reduce
the
funding
for
a
Shoreline
Park.
Thank
you.
AF
I'm
Craig
Fisk
I'm,
a
software
CEO
in
in
San
Jose,
actually,
I've
done
a
couple
of
startups
and
I
previously
was
at
Intel
I've,
been
enjoying
the
the
nature
environment
at
at
the
Charlton
slaw
in
particular,
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
funding
maintained
at
the
same
level
or
perhaps
increased
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
the
cities
actually
take
efforts
to
reduce
the
ecological
footprint
of
of
people
in
the
area.
Thank
you,
I'll
see
the
rest
of
my
time.
T
All
right
good
evening,
I'm
Susan
Desjardins
I'm,
the
chair
of
Sierra
Club,
Loma,
prieta's,
Bay
Live
program,
which
is
committed
to
protect
San,
Francisco
Bay
I'm.
Also
an
enthusiastic
bait
Trail
user
Shoreline
Park
is
a
very
special
place.
It's
an
important
asset
for
not
only
Mountain
View,
but
for
the
surrounding
communities.
Please
do
not
reduce
funding
to
Shoreline
Park
Shoreline
Park
is
critical
wildlife
habitat
and
it's
where
the
city
of
Mountain
View
will
encounter
sea
level
rise.
T
A
R
Thank
you,
mayor
Hicks,
so
I
did
just
want
to
reiterate,
based
on
the
comments
that
we
heard
that
tonight
is
not
for
negotiations,
but
we
are
setting
that
groundwork.
We
will
be
negotiating
a
successor
agreement
and
the
purpose
of
tonight's
mean
is
to
establish
that
trust
and
start
the
relationships
and
build
that
framework,
so
that
those
negotiations
will
be
successful
and
will
come
out
better.
But
I
also
wanted
to
just
share
with
you
something
of
of
what
I
sense
is
going
on,
and
I
used
to
teach
and
debate
and
I
also
used
to
teach.
R
And
one
of
the
things
that
we
always
worked
on
was
the
other
side
of
the
coin,
and
so
we
often
are
finding
ourselves
hearing
different
versions
and
different
points
of
view,
and
even
different
data
is
being
shared
and
that's
perfectly
normal,
but
we
just
we
can't
be
surprised
by
that.
What
we
need
to
understand
is
when
we
are
working
through
things.
R
Often
our
role
is
almost
like
being
an
Umpire
we're
going
to
take
our
information,
we're
going
to
make
those
calls
we're
going
to
make
those
decisions
and,
depending
on
perspectives,
some
people
will
say
they
got
that
call
another
will
say
what
were
they
thinking
they
missed
it,
and
so
we
really
have
to
find
in
ourselves
to
do
our
best.
Put
our
best
self
forward.
R
But
I
do
appreciate
the
fact
that
our
community
is
so
passionate
and
wants
to
help
guide
where
things
are
going.
I,
don't
want
them
to
feel
ignored
at
all.
What
we
have
done
is
Place
those
things
in
a
parking
lot,
not
to
minimize
it,
but
just
to
say
tonight
is
not
about
negotiations,
but
certainly
many
things
that
were
shared
we'll
have
bearing
going
forward
So.
Speaking
of
going
forward.
W
R
So
as
we
go
into
where
we
are
now,
I
have
some
thoughts
and
quotes
for
you
to
ponder
one.
Is
successful
leaders
see
the
opportunity
in
every
difficulty,
rather
than
the
difficulty
in
every
opportunity,
and
also
in
the
midst
of
every
crisis.
There
is
an
opportunity,
and
so
I
wouldn't
say
that
we're
in
an
emergency
crisis,
but
I
would
definitely
say
that
we've
hit
some
roadblocks
and
there
have
been
some
tensions,
and
so
basically
we
can't
dance
around
that.
We
have
to
acknowledge
it.
We
have
to
be
pragmatic.
R
We
have
to
be
realistic,
we're
not
in
the
place
that
Mountain
View
would
like
to
be
as
a
community,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
we're
not
going
to
get
through
it,
and
so
what
we
wanted
to
start
with
was
some
of
the
norms
and
ground
rules
that
you
yourselves
have
come
up
with
and
shared
so
freely.
And
if
you
didn't
have
an
opportunity
to
meet
with
me
and
if
something
else
comes
to
you,
then
we
would
also
like
to
hear
that.
But
these
are
some
of
the
norms
and
ground
rules.
R
Remember,
Norms
are
how
we
treat
each
other
and
ground
rules
are
the
rules
of
thumbs
and
the
protocols
for
how
we
will
interact,
and
so
what
I'd
like
you
to
do,
rather
than
only
listen
to
me,
I'd
like
you
to
go
through
this
and
you
have
a
copy
at
your
place
as
well
read
through
them.
Take
them
in.
They
came
from
your
counterparts.
R
A
Well,
I
can
start
with
leave
historical
baggage
at
the
door
and
focus
on
the
future
and
outcomes.
I
I
mean
I
like
a
lot
of
these
I,
don't
think
we
can
use
one
I'll
go
forward
with
one
alone,
but
I
think
that
you
know
I,
think
that
there's
great
potential
for
collaborating
and
that
we
can
produce
better
things.
If,
if
we
collaborate-
and
maybe
we
just
put
put
history
in
the
past,.
L
This
was
because
so,
and
so
did
that-
and
he
said
to
them-
I'm
here-
to
fix
the
problem
not
to
affix
the
blame
and
I
think
that
was
a
key
Insight
that
we're
not
going
to
look
to
pin
the
tail
on
some
donkey.
We
are
here
to
solve
a
problem
and
I
actually
think
we
are
here
to
balance
interests
among
many
problems.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
G
H
I
I
would
go
with
take
the
high
road,
especially
as
someone
who
represents
high
school
children.
It's
very
important
that
I
take
the
high
road
one
day,
I'm
at
meetings,
whether
it's
with
Phil
and
the
negotiating
team,
or
in
this
public
meeting.
It's
my
responsibility
as
an
elected
official
that
I
take
very
seriously.
R
F
O
I
don't
think
we
are
ever
going
to
completely
agree
on
data
and
information
and
I,
don't
think
we
should
try
I
think
we
need
to
respect
that.
The
city's
expert
on
city
data,
the
school
districts,
are
the
experts
on
the
school
district
data
and
that
we
should
come
up
with
an
approach
to
this
issue
that
doesn't
rely
on
us
completely
agreeing
on
data.
Thank
you.
R
M
That,
yes,
okay,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
add
a
new
one
here
that
hasn't
been
shared,
move
from
judgment
to
curiosity,
try
to
understand
and
empathize
with
the
challenges
and
priorities
of
others.
So
what's
critical
for
you
may
not
be
as
critical
for
me,
but
I
do
think
in
this
process
that
it's
important
to
understand
both
sides
so
that
we
can
compromise
and
reach
a
solution.
N
Hi
I
I
would
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
no
surprises,
no
blind
size.
I
think
that
it
is
true
that
the
trust
between
our
institutions
has
been
eroded
and
I
think
we
owe
it
to
the
people
of
Mountain
View
to
build
it
back
and
the
way
we're
going
to
build
it
back
is
by
going
through
this
process
and
treating
each
other
respectfully
and
not
pulling
rabbits
out
of
the
Hat.
N
R
Well,
I
think
that
we've
come
up
with
a
wonderful
ground
rule
at
ground
rule
list.
I
also
think
that
it's
one
thing
to
list
them
and
that's
symbolic
and
that's
a
start.
The
other
one
is,
as
I
heard
you
speak.
Most
of
you
gave
examples
and
kind
of
reaffirmed
your
commitment
to
it
and
I
think
that's
even
more
important,
because
you
know
we
all
have
passed
many
resolutions
and
proclamations,
and
we
know
that
our
community
challenges
us
to
not
just
say
them,
but
to
live,
breathe,
work
with
each
other
and
abide
by
them.
R
And
the
next
part
we're
going
to
go
to
and
that's
why
I
brought
up
inspiration
was
I.
Had
this
unique
opportunity
to
meet
and
interface
with
you,
I
also
did
my
diligence
looking
at
LinkedIn
and
other
things,
but
it
was
really
a
wonderful
moment
to
hear
from
many
of
you
about
what
inspired
you
to
be
in
your
public
service,
that
very
important
role
and,
of
course,
if
you're
elected
many
other
people
were
also
inspired
enough
to
cast
their
vote.
R
To
put
you
in
that
role
and
what
I
was
so
impressed
with
is
none
of
you
were
dialing
it
in
every
single
person
that
I
encountered
or
that
Luke
and
I
spoke
with,
is
all
in
you
have
skin
in
the
game.
It
was
really
evident
whether
or
not
you
agreed
with
everybody
on
everything
we
didn't
go
into
that.
What
we
wanted
to
talk
about
was
what
brought
you
here
and
were
you
still
staying
inspired
in
order
to
do
the
challenging
work?
R
The
fact
that
you
are
willing
to
do
this
and
to
give
your
time
and
to
take
another
chance,
take
a
leap
of
faith
and
to
continue
doing
the
challenging
work
and
I
know
that
a
few
of
you
brought
up
creativity
and
collaboration
and
I
always
like
to
dissect
that
word.
Collaboration
is
co-labor,
it's
working
together,
but
it's
labor.
It
is
work.
R
I
thought
the
second
part
of
that
was
really
profound,
because
it
wasn't
just
it's
easy
to
see
a
problem,
it's
harder
to
try
to
solve
it,
educating
and
protecting
and
nourishing
our
youth
making
sure
Mountain
View
is
Affordable
and
livable
for
our
diverse
community
and,
if
you
think
about
it,
the
diverse
Community
is
also
something
that
we
value
and
working
toward
and
contributing
to
the
greater
public
good
every
single
person.
Nobody
was
saying:
I
did
this
for
myself
or
my
own
child
or
my
own
interest.
R
It
was
always
something
Beyond,
affordable,
housing
and
tenant
protections,
and
we've
heard
that
echoed
the
importance
of
that
from
our
community
helping
disadvantaged
families.
Not
everybody
is
experiencing
their
best
quality
of
life.
There
are
hardships
and
helping
them
navigate,
as
can
be
a
myriad
of
Act
of
things,
lifelong
activists
that
was
in
our
group,
Environmental
Protections.
These
are
the
passions
that
brought
people
to
their
role
and
then
guiding
that
next
Generation
towards
success,
giving
back
helping
others
a
fascination
with
government
policy.
Lucky
you
that
was
not
mine,
but
you
know
what
it's
important.
R
If
not
us,
then
who's
going
to
work
on
this,
and,
if
not
now,
then,
when
we
can't
put
it
off,
we
have
to
get
the
work
done,
providing
beautiful
and
joyful
experiences
for
children
and
then
paying
forward
the
opportunities
that
you
had,
and
this
is
a
highly
educated
group.
Many
of
you
have
had
many
incredible
opportunities,
but
the
fact
that
you
want
to
make
sure
that
that
continues
for
the
next
generation
is
really
amazing.
R
I
used
to
have
a
communication
Council
and
it
turned
into
the
complaint.
Council
and
I
was,
and
sometimes
it
just
wears
on
you
that
people
want
to
point
out
when
things
are
wrong.
On
the
other
hand,
you
can't
get
better
if
you
don't
know,
but
it
would
be
nice
sometimes
to
have
some
affirmation
and
know
when
we
get
it
right,
but
that's
not
what
people
run
into
social
media
to
tell
us,
it's
not
usually
the
headline
that
we
want
to
put
that
people
want
to
read.
R
People
genuinely
want
to
tell
us
when
we
need
to
do
something
better
or
different,
and
so
we
took
this
opportunity
when
we
met
with
each
of
you
to
tell
us
what
you
value
about
the
other
agencies.
This
wasn't
your
time
to
brag
about
yourself.
It
was
really
to
look
at
the
other
agencies,
the
other
three
agencies,
the
other
two
agencies.
Excuse
me
of
the
three
of
the
Triad
and
say:
what
do
they
do?
What
do
we
appreciate
about
them?
What
is
so
wonderful?
R
What
are
they
contributing
and
the
reason
why
this
was
really
wonderful
is
I
bet
that
some
of
you
would
have
no
idea
who
said
them
and
you
shouldn't
we're
not
attribute
to
a
person,
but
just
the
fact
that
someone
took
note
hopefully
can
make
you
feel
more
appreciated
and
more
validated,
because
when
we're
at
in
a
disconnect,
sometimes
you
don't
take
that
time
to
affirm
so
I'll
just
take
volunteers.
If
somebody
would
want
to
read
from
the
slide.
R
I
didn't
say
those
exact
words
you're
right
and
so
what
I?
What
I
think
is
wonderful,
is
someone
from
a
different
agency
also
felt
that,
and
so
that
is
right
there.
What
we're
talking
about
different
agencies,
different
perspectives,
different
roles,
yet
feeling
that
same
value.
So
thank
you
so
much.
I
N
Yeah
I
I
think
I
recognize
the
last
one
which
is
Mountain
View,
Westman
School
District
does
an
amazing
job
of
providing
for
all
students,
regardless
of
background,
and
my
kids
went
to
Mountain
View
Westman
schools
quite
a
long
time
ago.
They
are
now
in
their
30s,
but
one
of
the
things
that
was
part
of
the
custom
was
making
sure
that
every
kid
was
included
and
and
that
the
that
each
child
got
the
assistance
that
they
needed.
N
M
A
So
this
is
kind
of
fun
to
read.
Because
I
for
no
reason
related
to
this
meeting
was
just
talking
to
my
son
earlier
today
about
what
he
thought
he
got
most.
He
went
to
Castro
school,
which
is
an
mpwsd
School,
Graham,
Middle,
School
and
then
Mountain
View,
High
School.
So
I
asked
him
what
he
got,
what
he
thought
he
brought
away
from
each
one
and
he
had
a
lot
to
say.
A
But
so
you
know,
learning
Spanish
was
because
he
went
to
Castro's
school
and
then
making
lifelong
friends
who
still
talks
to
every
day
in
Middle,
School
and
then
high
school.
He
worked
with
the
robotics
team,
which
got
him
interested
in
engineering
I'm
going
to
put
so
you
know
he
still
remembers
now.
I'm
gonna
pick
one
that's
already
been
picked
on.
Vwsd
does
an
amazing
job
of
providing
for
all
students,
regardless
of
background
I
mean
when
we
went
to
Castro
and
Graham.
A
That
was
really
particularly
evident,
but
because
my
kids
went
to
Mountain
View
High
School
I,
don't
want
to
leave
Mountain
View
High
School
out,
so
I
was
gonna.
Pick
yes,
mvla
does
an
amazing
job
of
getting
our
students
prepared
for
life.
They
give
them
unique
experiences
like
the
robotics
I
taught.
I
talked
about
and
challenged
them.
M
Q
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
the
one
up
here
about
mvla
provides
top-notch
high
schools
and
people
move
here
to
go
there.
That,
indeed,
is
true
and
I
think
that's
tied
to
one
that
was
on
the
previous
Slide,
the
on
the
previous
Slide.
The
mdla
treats
it
stopped
very
well
and
provides
a
model
on
how
teachers
and
staff
should
be
paid.
I
think
those
are
tied
to
each
other
and
acknowledge
the
success
of
mvla.
R
Thank
you
we're
going
to
move
on
one
of
the
other
questions
that
we
asked
were
examples
of
successful
collaboration.
And
again
we
talked
about
that
co-labor
and
people
voluntarily
came
up
with
some
of
these
and
you'll
recognize
some
of
them,
but
having
affordable
housing
for
elementary
school
teachers
that
doesn't
happen
in
every
Community.
R
That
again
is
about
safety
and
providing
and
beyond
the
bell.
So
these
are
just
some
examples
of
successful
collaboration
that
has
worked
the
the
next
one,
I
needed
a
little
more
information
about
my
notes.
Weren't
as
good
sounds
as
if
people
came
together
to
provide
food
to
supplement
the
universal
meal
program.
Was
this
during
covid
solely
or
was
this
Beyond.
I
R
Still
ongoing,
okay,
that's
what
I
thought
was
pretty
phenomenal.
That's
what
I
thought
that
I
wasn't
sure
and
so
again,
knowing
that
there
are
different
demographic
backgrounds
and
that
young
people
and
families
have
different
stresses
and
hardships.
This
is
amazing
that
many
agencies
came
together,
the
teen
center
feeding
families
working
on
obtaining
land,
and
then
there
has
been
a
long
history
of
school
fields
and
Parks
collaboration,
something
to
look
at.
R
And
so
the
next
part
is
we've
kind
of
touched
on
where
we've
been
and
we
touched
on
where
we're
going,
but
I
also
wanted
to
tell
you
how
impressed
I
was
with
the
backgrounds
of
all
of
you.
We
have
attorneys,
we
have
teachers,
we
have
principal,
we
have
people
who've,
LED
planning,
commissions,
people
who
worked
in
environmental
issues,
certainly
computer
science
and
technology.
R
But
this
is
when
we
have
to
call
upon
you
to
help
because
I'm
the
facilitator,
I'm,
not
magical
I,
don't
have
all
the
answers,
but
I
can
definitely
help
guide
you
in
that
direction
and
pull
from
you
the
things
that
will
most
resonate
but
I
needed
to
and
I
think
I
even
brought
it.
We
have
my
elephant
Luke's,
going
to
help
me
out,
so
I
did
share
with
one
of
one
or
two
of
you.
We
have
an
elephant
in
the
room
and
this
is
just
kind
of
silly,
but
it
is
representative.
R
R
And
so
we've
heard
that,
even
though
we
have
these
great
other
instances
of
collaboration
that
has
not
translated
into
this
particular
environment,
and
so
the
words
on
the
left
came
up,
there's
concern
about
imbalance
and
control.
There's
a
strong
fear
of
some
that
some
people
have
of
making
the
wrong
decision
making
the
wrong
choice,
not
doing
the
right
thing,
and
there
has
been
a
breakdown
of
communication.
I.
Think
many
of
us
touched
on
that,
but
those
things
can
be
solved.
R
We
can
get
past
them
and
I
think
that's
what
was
so
fabulous
was
just
as
many
in
fact
more
things
came
up
as
we
talked
about
the
future.
So
shifting
from
those
things,
almost
every
single
one
on
the
left
has
a
stronger
reaction
on
the
right,
and
so,
if
you
think
about
deflection,
you
go
into
reflection.
If
you
think
about
being
isolated,
you
look
at
Partnerships.
R
You
have
a
lot
of
people
in
our
community
that
are
really
counting
on
you
to
do
this,
and
so
we
have
to
find
this
path
forward.
We
can't
stay
mired
in
it.
We
need
to
get
to
that
right
side
but,
as
we
said,
we're
going
to
take
the
high
road,
but
we
also
we
can't
dwell
in
history,
but
we
we
also
can't
ignore
the
fact
that
there
has
been
some
trust.
That's
broken
and
I
did
a
lot
of
studying
on
trust
and
trust
is
broken
up
into
components
and
it's
basically
personal
regard,
integrity,
competence.
R
And
those
types
of
things
go
into
it.
You
can
and
they're
built
by
day-to-day
interactions
and
every
time
that
someone
tells
you
something
and
then
does
it
or
tells
you
something
and
then
doesn't
do
it
or
blindsides
or
does
something
like
that.
It's
a
little
break
and
trust,
or
it's
a
little
movement
forward.
So
you
think
of
it
like
a
number
line
and
we're
here
and
we
don't
know
I,
don't
know
I'm
new
to
you.
You
don't
know.
R
R
It
doesn't
mean
you
can't
get
it
back,
but
it's
going
to
be
more
guarded
and
gradual,
so
the
relationships
we
have
in
joint
agencies
are
just
like
any
relationship.
They
have
to
be
cultivated
and
nurtured
and
they
cannot
be
taken
for
granted
and
when
you
think
about
trust,
what
happens
in
people
in
leadership
positions,
some
people
think
trust
me
because
I
have
the
title.
The
title
does
not
give
you
trust.
R
What
you
do
with
a
title
in
your
empowerment
is
how
you
build
trust.
Some
people
think
that
trust
comes
with
just
knowing
someone,
but
who
has
good
intentions
but
good
intentions
if
they're
not
followed
through
and
good
intentions,
if
you
don't
have
the
competency
to
make
it
happen,
then
I
can't
put
my
confidence
in
you.
R
I
can't
give
you
something
because
you're
a
good
person
that
I
like
if
I,
don't
think
you
can
make
it
happen,
and
so
I'm
really
challenging
the
ad
hoc
committee,
because
not
only
does
the
public
trust
all
the
people,
as
elected
thousands
of
people
voted
to
put
you
in
these
positions
were
appointed.
However,
that
happened.
People
are
counting
on
you
in
the
position
of
the
ad
hoc.
That's
an
even
greater
responsibility.
We
really
have
hope
and
confidence
that
you
will
get
to
that
next
level,
but
it's
going
to
be
challenging.
R
It's
very
complicated,
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
are
looking
to
see
that
you
do
it
right,
but
if
you're
going
to
accept
it,
something
you
can
live
with,
if
you're
going
to
be
creative
about
it,
if
you're
going
to
critically
pause
and
reflect,
then
you
can
do
it
and
you
want
to
think
about
we're.
Looking
back
to
1969,
the
people
in
the
future
will
be
looking
back
and
saying:
what
did
they
do
not
with
judgment
but
hopefully
with
relief?
They'll
say,
thank
goodness.
R
R
R
We
have
to
have
a
nod
to
the
past,
but
we
have
to
look
forward
and
that
trust
is
coming
through
our
speech,
our
conversation,
our
commitments
and
our
actions
tonight
by
all
of
you
coming
here
already
that's
a
step
in
the
right
direction
by
participating
in
our
process.
That
was
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
wanted
to
dissect
that
a
little
bit
even
the
process
that
I
set
up,
which
I
thought
was
pretty
standard
protocol
for
facilitation,
which
was
having
an
individual
intake
to
get
feedback
and
then
share
and
synthesize
themes.
R
R
Think
one
of
you
may
have
coined
the
phrase.
I
was
trying
to
analyze
that
and
say:
why
is
it
and
I
think
it's
almost
one
of
those
things
is
when
I've
the
communities
I've
worked
with
have
not
been
as
abundant
and
I.
Think
someone
used
the
word
Perils
of
prosperity,
words
and
what
happens
is
when
you
are
truly
Standalone
and
resilient.
You
have
many
things
going
for
you.
You
don't
need
to
rely
on
others.
R
You
saw
different
different
kinds
of
things
come
up
during
coven
because
suddenly
people
needed
during
the
pandemic,
like
we
have
to
all
band
together,
but
when
you
actually
have
very
independent,
Standalone,
successful
outstanding
agencies
and
organizations
that
are
doing
great
things
in
their
own
right.
You
have
to
choose
then,
to
work
with
each
other,
because
there's
not
always
a
compelling
need
so
again
just
something
to
think
about
not
an
answer
to
anything
but
just
Ponder
and
think.
Okay,
we'll
go
for
it.
R
Take
a
position,
that's
kind
of
the
old
debate
model.
Here's
my
position,
here's
yours
and
we
figure
out
where
it
goes,
I
think
some
of
our
community
members
alluded
to
it,
there's
also
interest
based,
which
is
another
step,
and
many
probably
more
common,
now
and
interest
bases
where
you
put
forth
your
interests,
but
sometimes
your
interest
could
be
different
and
so
then
again
you're
back
in
that
position.
So
when
you
have
traditional
position
base,
what
happens?
Is
you
have
winners
and
losers?
R
You
have
zero
sum,
some
win
and
some
lose,
but
when
you
get
to
core
values,
what
you
find
is,
if
you
can
do
a
core
values
based
decision
making.
You
find
those
common
things
and
no
one
value
is
has
a
higher
priority
than
the
others,
and
so
they're
not
weighed
in
that
way.
You
wouldn't.
Even
if
you
value
this,
you
would
never
do
it
at
the
expense
of
the
other
value,
because
you
also
value
that.
R
So,
as
you
think
about
these,
we
have
core
values,
and
that
leads
to
a
vision
for
what
the
future
could
be.
This
is
just
a
subset:
it's
usually
a
whole
Workshop,
but
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
the
types
of
core
values
and
visioning
that
that
our
group
has
already
done,
but
you
did
it
in
isolation,
it's
so
much
more
powerful
when
you
do
it
with
others,
but
if
clearly,
we
still
value
a
functional
working
relationship.
R
Clearly,
we
all
understand
that
we're
better
and
stronger
together
we
value
our
community
equity
and
belonging,
and
this
one
was
really
special
to
me.
Coming
from
outside
is
you
are
an
Exemplar
in
the
region
and
you
value
that
and
then
you
go
and
look
to
the
other
side,
and
you
see
the
vision.
What
does
that
mean?
If
we
value
the
functional
working
relationship,
we
will
strengthen
our
Partnerships.
We
will
put
our
efforts
into
those
things
and
that's
a
way
of
Shifting
to
the
values
so
I.
R
W
I
I
would
say,
equity
and
belonging
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know.
I
have
dystonia
and
I
work
every
day
with
a
service
dog,
so
that
belonging
not
only
pertains
to
the
humans,
but
also
our
planets
I.
Consider
us
one
of
the
animals
that
lives
on
our
planet
and
I
know
that,
because
every
day
actually
every
moment,
I
communicate
with
another
animal
who
is
not
lying
at
my
feet.
So
to
me
that
is
belonging
is
something
that
actually
dogs
need.
They
need
to
be
part
of
a
pack.
I
Humans
may
not
necessarily
say
I
need
to
be
part
of
a
pack,
but
in
fact,
if
they're
not
part
of
a
community,
then
their
mental
health
suffers
and
covid-19
has
sure
shown
us
that
isolation
and
virtual
schooling
and
virtual
work
does
not
serve
our
need
for
human
connection
and
I.
Just
read
an
article
on
learning
loss
from
covid-19,
and
it's
also
a
direct
result
of
our
proximity
to
animals
in
the
environment.
Q
Q
But
I
feel
like
unpacking
that
that
left
side
there
is
necessary
for
there
to
be
a
functional
relationship,
some
level
of
saying
there's
an
elephant
but
not
saying
what
the
elephant
is
doesn't
get
us
to
a
place
where
I
think
the
ad
hoc
or
us.
Some
will
be
at
that
functional
place
in
the
aspirational
right
side.
R
A
So
I'm,
looking
at
the
Visions
and
I'm
not
going
to
read
a
particular
one
out,
because
I
I
really
think
they're
best
taken
as
a
whole
and
they
do
maybe
they
don't
sum
up
everything
that
the
two
districts
and
the
city
want
to
do.
But
they
really
sum
up
a
lot
of
it
and
I
think
those
kind
of
are
our
goals
to
reach
those
Visions.
You
know
all
seven
of
them
and
maybe
a
few
more
yeah.
J
So
I'm,
looking
under
the
vision
where
there's
the
bullet
point
about
ensuring
our
community
is
served
by
all
agencies
of
Mountain
View
I
might
offer
a
little
bit
of
an
edit
that
you
know
we
all
are
serving
our
community,
but
serving
our
community
in
an
exemplary
manner
being
able
to
serve
our
community
to
the
best
of
our
abilities
having
the
resources
needed
to
serve
our
community.
Well,
having
effective,
Partnerships
I
think,
there's
a
qualitative
piece
that
needs
to
be
added
to
that
statement
to
really
reflect
what
I
think
the
meaning
behind
it
was.
N
Yeah
I,
one
of
the
core
values
I
would
like
to
see
as
part
of
this
negotiation
is,
is
working
with
the
best
information
we
have
available.
We
don't
have
an
infinite
amount
of
time
to
to
study
things,
so
we
want
to.
We
want
to
work
with
the
best
information
that
we
have
available
and
and
come
to
a
consensus
that
it's
it's.
It
will
work
for
the
the
for
the
need
that
we
have
at
the
moment
and
then
maybe
in
the
future,
we'll
need
to
develop
more
information
that
that's
better.
R
So
when
we
go
back
to
the
word
cloud
that
trustee
chengwit
had
mentioned,
we
also
are
recognizing.
There
have
been
hurdles,
and
so
some
of
this
you
might
have
heard
already
in
different
ways,
but
these
were
the
ones
that
actually
people
identified
and
again
this
isn't
coming
from
me.
This
is
coming
from
people
that
we
spoke
with.
So
there
is
some
history,
but
that
also
can
become
some
historical
baggage
that
weighs
people
down.
R
There's
been
some
entrenched
patterns
that
people
are
having
trouble
breaking
from
the
lack
of
trust.
We've
heard
the
collateral
damage
that
comes
a
little
bit
with
the
blind
sides
and
surprises,
but
it
plays
out
in
the
public
and
there
has
been,
as
you
so
eloquently
acknowledged,
some
heart
feelings
and
emotions,
and
they
can't
be
just
ignored.
R
D
R
D
I
would
say
all
the
above
I
mean
truly
we're
developing
relationships
where
individuals,
but
you
know
we
also
need
to
have
the
formal
communication
and
we
need
the
structure
of
like
the
like
the.
What
are
we
calling
the
joint,
the
the
meeting
ad
hoc
committee
meetings
and
then
you
know
our
school
board
and
our
Council
meetings
as
well,
but
I
think
we
need
to
pick
up
the
phone,
sometimes
hey.
This
is
going
to
be
on
our
agenda
or
whatever
I
I.
D
E
Yeah
I
would
follow
up
on
that
by
saying
that
really,
it's
not
only
just
communicating
over
matters
of
mutual
interest,
but
working
together
on
understanding
how
the
decisions
that
affect
one
agency
impacts
the
other
agency
and
vice
versa,
and
those
situations
like
we're
doing
now.
You
know
get
together
to
work
through
those
those
issues
ahead
of
time
before
it
happens
not
afterwards.
R
E
R
A
Yeah,
so
I
would
just
agree
with
that.
One
I
think
that
it's
something
that
that
the
city
is
experiencing
as
well.
You
know
decisions
that
are
made
that
that
we
don't
feel
we've
heard
ahead
of
time
and
that
there
are
consequences.
I,
don't
know
what
I
don't
want
to
argue
with
them,
whether
that
you're,
known
or
unknown
I
I
have
a
feeling
that
that
both
agencies
don't
know
ahead
of
time
fully
what
what
the
consequences
are,
but
maybe
you're
right.
R
R
I
I
I
think
the
city
and
mbla
have
really
cooperated
in
terms
of
land,
as
you
saw
historically,
but
now
land
is
at
a
premium,
and
so
that
is-
and
you
know,
the
city
has
presented
options
but
they're
all
externally
constrained.
Let's
put
it
that
way.
So
I
think
that
is
the
biggest
hurdle,
I
think,
but
I
think
it's
something
that
the
city
has
expertise
in
working
with
many
different
agencies.
I
R
I
feel
like
I,
can
see
your
minds
thinking,
but
people
are
a
little
bit,
maybe
forming
your
thoughts,
so
we
can.
This
is
the
most
probably
powerful
piece,
because
the
first
step
to
moving
forward
is
to
kind
of
acknowledge
what
it
is.
What
are
these
root
causes?
What
are
the
things
that
are
keeping
us
from
being
there
already.
K
Maybe
this
is
a
dangerous
question
to
ask,
but
I
feel
like
I
want
to
connect
this
to
one
of
the
Norms
that
nobody
brought
up
speak
with
Candor
and
honesty
and
I
feel
like
at
the
appropriate
time.
It
might
be
helpful
to
speak
with
precision
or
to
provide
specific
examples
where
there
have
been
where
there
has
been
a
breakdown
in
communication,
or
we
feel
like
we're
being
targeted
or
attacked
I'm.
Not
feeling
like
this
is
the
appropriate
time
to
do
that.
W
Q
In
response
to
councilman,
I
would
hope
that
this
is
the
setting
that
sometime,
we
do
have
those
honest
conversations
here,
because
once
we
move
into
ad
hoc
those
aren't
necessarily
public
meetings
in
the
way.
This
is
people
attend
because
they're
worried
about
this
we're
here,
because
we
worry
about
this
and
I,
don't
know
if
we
really
are
speaking
candidly
about
what
our
worries
are.
Q
I
feel
like
there's
so
much
to
unpack
here
of
anything
that
I
don't
know.
I
just
don't
want
us
to
like
people
are
down
for
by
formalities
and
it's
eight
o'clock,
and
then
we
put
everything
into
this
like
what
is
ultimately
a
silo
process.
Once
we
go
to
non-brown
acts,
ad
hoc
meetings,
so
I
just
I
hope
that
people-
you
know,
if
not
now,
I
I,
do
want
to
hear
the
list,
because
I
want
to
recognize
the
challenges
that
the
city's
feeling
and
it's
not
a
tip
or
tat,
I.
Q
Think
it's
more
about
acknowledging
that
there's
been
hurt
and
it's
it's
not
about
performing
for
the
public
either.
It's
about
us
in
this
room
bearing
witness
to
there's
been
challenges
and
I
hope
that,
in
our
you
know,
remainder
of
our
time
together.
I
hope
these
things
get
aired
because
I
think
that's
a
necessary
part
for
us
to
have
a
functional
relationship.
R
And
I
would
Echo
that
first
of
all,
you
could
be
my
co-facilitator
now
sorry
Luke,
because
that
was
my
point
too.
I
think
this
is
the
time
if,
if
not
now,
then
when
we
did
say
that
we
would
follow
the
Norms,
so
we
would
do
it
in
a
respectful
manner.
We
wouldn't
be
blaming
shaming,
judging,
but
we
can
say,
for
instance,
in
this
setting
we
didn't
have
a
mechanism
or
we're
disagreeing
about
data
or
we
felt
blindsided
or
something.
R
K
The
first
is
it
bothers
me
greatly
greatly
when
the
city
of
Mountain
View
is
accused
of
breaking
the
law.
It
makes
it
hard
for
me
to
negotiate
in
good
faith
when
I'm
being
accused
or
the
agency
I
represent,
is
being
accused
of
doing
things
that
the
state
does
not
allow.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
Civics
Center
Act,
and
the
jua
discussion
on
Tuesday,
so
I
won't
rehash
that.
K
But
more
pertinent
to
this
discussion
is
the
use
of
the
term
Redevelopment
agency
to
describe
the
Shoreline
Community.
If,
in
fact,
you
believe
that
it
really
is
a
Redevelopment
agency,
you
are
accusing
us
of
breaking
the
law,
and
that
is
a
very
severe
accusation
right.
The
state
does
not
allow
Redevelopment
agencies
they
just
they
were
dissolved
over
a
decade
ago.
So
if
there
is
a
continued
use
of
that
term
to
describe
the
Shoreline
Community,
it
makes
it
hard
for
me
to
feel
like
we're
working
in
good
faith.
K
It
feels
like
a
statement
that
is
intended
to
be
inflammatory
right.
It
feels
like
a
great
way
to
discredit
the
city
or
to
create
alarm
and
confusion
and
consternation
so
I
I
couldn't
work
with
someone
who
insists
on
calling
the
Shoreline
Community
a
Redevelopment
agency,
because
it
is
not
and
it
legally
cannot
be.
K
I'm.
Also
I
brought
some
I.
My
toner
was
running
out,
so
I
couldn't
print
copies
for
everybody,
but
there
is
a
flyer:
I'll
send
it
through
that
way
into
this
way,
that
is
posted
on
the
Mountain
View
wisman
School
District
website.
That
I
feel
like
is
designed
to
again
create
alarm
and
consternation
and
confusion,
and
it
includes
statements
like
the
city
of
Mountain.
K
View
keeps
the
Surplus
it
receives
in
the
Shoreline
Community,
and
this
is
a
great
way
to
try
and
foment
concern
and-
and
you
know,
animosity
within
the
community,
it
is
very
difficult
to
negotiate
with
an
agency
that
insists
on
antagonizing
its
supposed
partner.
I
feel
like
a
great
way
to
demonstrate.
Good
faith
is
to
take
down
this
flyer
and
the
website
that
includes
a
lot
of
information
that
it
I.
You
know
I
have
to
be
careful
because
I
don't
want
to
well
I
forgot
what
the
term
is
here.
K
I
have
to
interpret
charitably
right.
Perhaps
there
are
serious,
there's
a
serious
misunderstanding
of
the
Shoreline
Community
and
how
it
works,
and
if
that's
the
case,
then
let's
work
with
the
city
and
put
information
on
that
website.
If
you
need
to
have
it
that
more
accurately
describes
the
work
and
the
functioning
of
the
Shoreline
Community.
K
K
That's
a
lot
of
housing,
but
it
erases
the
fact
that
116
apartments
that
included
a
number
of
students
who
go
to
the
schools
that
you
represent
used
to
live
there
right,
it's
a
great
way
to
again
create
alarm
and
consternation
and
fear,
and
I
sent
an
email
saying:
Hey
FYI,
you
know
here
are
some
examples
where
the
numbers
I
think
could
could
be
a
little
bit
more
accurate.
Two
years
later,
March
2023
in
a
Public
Presentation
to
the
trustees.
The
same
map
was
used
with
the
same
numbers.
K
It's
very
difficult
for
me
to
negotiate
in
good
faith
with
an
agency
that
insists
on
using
numbers
that
they
know
are
inaccurate,
because
I
sent
a
letter
and
a
very
similar
letter
was
sent
by
the
city
of
Mountain
View
two
years
later
so
I
I,
guess
what
I
would
be
interested
in.
Knowing
is
do
you
actually
want
to
work
in
good
faith
right?
Will
you
be
willing?
Would
you
be
willing
to
take
this
flyer
down
that
presents
information
to
the
community?
K
That
is
not
accurate,
right
or
you
know,
to
insist
on
using
housing
production
figures
that
I
feel
are
designed
to
construct
an
alarmist
narrative,
and
if
you
want
to
do
that,
that
is
fine.
That
is
a
perfectly
valid
strategy,
but
it's
one
that
is
antithetical
to
our
ability
to
negotiate
in
good
faith.
R
I
did
see
that
you're
really
conscious
of
the
norms
and
used
iMessages
and
I
will
say
when
we
get
to
some
of
the
suggested
considerations.
There
are
solutions
that
can
come
forward
to
things
like
joint
messaging
agreeing
on
what
goes
on
a
website
and
if
it's
coming
with
both
logos,
it
takes
more
or
all
three
logos.
It
takes
more
effort,
but
there
are
solutions
for
that.
But
thank
you
other
other
examples
of
some
of
these
breakdowns
so
that
we
know
what
we're
dealing
with.
D
D
What
you
feel
is
inaccurate,
we
feel
is
accurate
and
so
going
back
to
communication,
I
think
talking
about
the
the
perceptions
and
kind
of
parsing
it
so
that
we
can
come
to
a
shared
understanding
and
perspective.
It's
super
super
helpful
and
I
I'm,
just
I'm
hopeful
that
we
can
get
there
to
a
place
where
we
can
do
that.
But
you
know
I
do
appreciate
your
concerns.
R
F
Having
that
that
that
record
of,
like
the
staff
is
doing
this
because
of
this
direction
from
the
elected
official
body,
I
think
is,
is
something
I
think
that
could
help
us
moving
forward,
because
it's
very
strange
I,
the
the
flyer
that
we
that
that
was
sent
out,
I
I,
can't
imagine
like
the
the
Board
of
the
School
Board
being
like
we
are
going
to
decide
on.
This
is
how
we're
going
to
put
out
our
Flyers
kind
of
thing,
I.
Think,
there's
there's.
F
There
is
probably
some
some
wiggle
room,
but
to
have
to
make
the
board
make
a
decision
on
okay
going
forward.
This
is
this:
is
not
the
kind
of
data
we're
gonna
put
out?
This
is
not
the
kind
of
narrative
we're
going
to
put
out,
or
even
for
means
like.
If
that
is
the
narrative
you
want
to
put
out
I
want
to
see
a
vote
on
it.
I
want
to
see
the
public
input
on
that
I
think
that
would
that
would
go
far.
H
Thank
you
perhaps
taking
a
step
back
just
something
that
I
have
been
thinking
about
and
I
had
to
to
be
on
an
airplane
last
week,
so
I
missed
the
council.
Discussion
on
this,
but
I
think
going
back
to
the
norms
and
ground
rules.
I
I
am
seeing
one
that's
missing
and
it
kind
of
goes
back
to
the
one
that
I
had
prioritized,
which
is
provide
clear
agenda
items,
goals
and
objectives
and
I
think
understanding
how
each
body
communicates
with
each
other
would
be
extremely
helpful.
H
Last
week
we
had
members
coming
forward
saying
that
they
were
speaking
in
their
personal
capacity
as
residents
and
I
think
it
was
for
me
very
confusing
to
understand
what
whose
position
there
is
getting
represented,
and
sometimes
we
get
letters
and
this
is
for
for
both
entities.
Sometimes
we
get
letters
from
the
superintendent.
Sometimes
we
get
letters
from
the
board
president
and
so
maybe
setting
up
a
norm
on
how
we
communicate
so
that
we
understand
how
the
information
is
being
sent
to
council
would
be
helpful.
So,
for
example,
was
this
decided
in
a
vote?
H
R
D
We
could
move
forward
more
quickly
on
certain
agenda
items,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
if
we're
trying
to
give
the
governing
agency
a
chance
to
respond
as
an
agency
that
that
there's
time
to
schedule
an
to
agenda
as
a
meeting
in
order
to
have
that
opportunity,
so
I
think
I'd,
add
the
maybe
timing
or
Cadence
to
that
suggestion.
Thank
you.
J
And
if
I
might
clarify
I
know
a
couple
of
our
interests.
Do
you
spoke
last
week,
but
our
board
had
not
had
a
public
discussion
about
the
jua,
so
that
I
believe,
is
why
they
felt
constrained
to
say
as
an
individual,
as
opposed
to
formally
representing
the
school
board,
because
the
school
board
has
not
discussed
it.
J
I
think
you
know
feeding
into
this
challenge
around
communication
when
there
is
an
issue
that
somebody
notices
how
how
that
is
questioned,
why?
Why
is
the
body
doing
that
asking
each
agency?
Why
has
this
action
taken
place
and
then
listening
to
that
why
it
is
very
challenging
when
things
are
presented
as
ultimatums,
and
so
you
know
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things
the
city
is
a
much
more
powerful
organization
than
either
of
the
school
districts.
It
has
a
significantly
higher
budget.
J
It
has
more
citizens
who
vote
for
it
at
least
than
the
elementary
school
district.
So
there's
more
cities
more
residents
being
represented.
It
also
has
a
much
larger
administrative
staff.
We
don't
have
legal
counsel
in
house,
for
example,
our
legal
counsel
is
contracted
out
because
we're
not
big
enough
to
have
legal
counsel.
In-House,
so
those
are
some
things
that
mean
I
think
sometimes
things
come
across
as
not
being
as
Sleek
as
what
the
city
might
do,
but
it
is
in
fact,
being
a
smaller
agency
with
less
resources.
R
Q
I
I
just
appreciate
when
then
they
said
that
the
city
would
city
council
would
prefer
there
not
to
be
kind
of
messages
from
the
school
district
that
seem
to
disparage
the
city
and
I
I.
Think
I
think
we
all
share
that
value,
that
we
don't
want
agencies
sending.
You
know
unilateral
statements
of
the
community
that
maybe
you
know
that
don't
have
all
the
perspective.
Some
I
think
the
you
know.
Part
of
that
is
just
we
don't.
We
shouldn't
be
meeting
more
often
right.
Q
This
is
unprecedented
that
we're
all
here,
and
you
know
so,
and
some
some
of
you
are
watching
there
was
a
the
city
had
a
meeting
last
week
about
this,
the
school
about
an
issue
between
the
school
district
and
the
city.
That
was,
you
know
that
media
that
unilateral
meeting
of
them
agendaizing
that
there
were
more
hours
on
that
meeting
than
what's
scheduled
for
this
one
right
scheduled
for
this
two
and
a
half
hours
together
right
so
like
and
we
in
the
school
district
do
the
same.
Q
We
spend
hours
longer
than
this
meeting
talking
about
the
city
right,
so
it's
like.
If
we're
spending
hours
talking
about
you
and
you're
spending
hours
talking
about
us,
why
aren't
we
spending
more
hours
talking
together
and
I?
Think
that
part
of
that
thing's
help
when
I
apologize
to
mbla,
because
I
sometimes
feel
like
mbla
is
like
the
the
middle
child?
Just
like
what
is
going
on
here?
Q
It's
like
we
don't
have
a
lawyer
at
the
table
like
so
like
I
I,
just
for
I
apologize
to
mbla
about
this,
for
them
I
I
just
feel
like
I
hope.
This
isn't
our
only
meeting
of
this
sort
because,
like
while
this
Norm
setting,
is
really
important,
but
it's
also
important
that
we
just
are
talking
with
each
other
at
the
same
table,
because
then
there
isn't
a
question.
There
was
so
much
at
the
last
meeting
where
they're
like
what
is
the
school
board
thinking
and
we
couldn't
speak
because
we
weren't
it.
Q
Wasn't
our
agenda's
meeting
right
and
that's
why
our
our
trustees
were
trying
to
be
very
precise
and
saying
that
so
I
would
actually
really
agree
with
what
councilmember
Ramirez
is
saying
about,
like
that's
all
of
us
not
send
single
statements,
because
that
conveys
this
idea
that
we're
a
self-sufficient
agent
agencies.
This
idea
of
the
philosophical,
the
second,
the
last
bullet
point
independent,
self-sufficient
agencies
and
I,
feel,
like
that's,
been
our
rhetoric
recently
and
maybe
that's
some
of
our
actions.
Q
That's
kind
of
like
kind
of
like
putting
this
road
map
that
we
are
moving
that
direction
when
historically
Mountain
View.
None
of
our
three
agencies
have
been
self-sufficient
and
we're
certainly
not
independent.
We
all
depend
on
each
other
and
and
there's
a
few
decisions
we're
about
to
make
some
of
our
agencies
that
will
set
the
direction
of
Are
We,
setting
a
new
course
and
trying
to
be
independent,
self-sufficient,
which
I
think
we'd
fail
at
so
I
hope.
A
I
I
just
want
to
I
agree
with
much
of
what
you
said,
but
maybe
not
all
of
it,
but
but
I
just
want
to
remind
you
that
and
everybody
that
that
both
agencies
are
often
in
that
situation
like
I've
a
number
of
a
number.
The
number
is
probably
two
times
come
to
mvwsd
board
meetings
because
we
caught
something
on
the
agenda
very
last
minute
we
weren't
told
about
it
ahead
of
time.
A
The
particular
one
I'm
thinking
about
is
a
a
presentation
where
it
was
said
that
I'm
not
going
to
be
able,
to
paraphrase
it
completely,
but
that
that
the
the
only
solution
that
we're
going
down
a
road
where
mvwsd
may
have
to
put
Portables
all
over
the
Mauna
Loma
campus,
which
I
personally
think
is
unlikely.
But
nobody-
and
there
were
several
other
statements
in
that
presentation
like
that.
A
We,
the
city,
was
indicating
a
site
in
the
North
Bay
Shore
area
for
a
school
that
had
no
I'm,
not
remembering
exactly
but
sewage
treatment
center
right
next
to
it,
which
was
out
of
date,
information
and
we
weren't.
You
know
none
of
that
was
run
by
us
ahead
of
time
and
I
was
there
and
I've
been,
and
some
of
our
staff
was
there
as
well
speaking-
and
you
know
in
in
very
much
the
same
situation
as
as
you
were.
A
A
Who
would
have
heard
all
this
inaccurate
information
if
we
hadn't
noticed
at
the
last
minute,
so
you
know
I
think,
there's
I
think
there's
a
a
lot
of
that
going
on
I
feel
like
we're
often
portrayed
badly
and
we're
not
warned
about
it
ahead
of
time
and
we
have
to
come
up.
Come
I've.
I've
been
phoned
at
the
last
minute
to
attend
those
meetings,
and
so
I
think
that
that
there
could
be
Improvement
in
that
area.
G
Well,
I
want
to
go
back
to
constraints,
external
constraints,
but
constraints
and
also
assumptions,
and
then
the
data,
and
when
you
make
a
decision
that
any
of
the
agencies
in
theory,
we
know
the
assumptions
on
which
we're
making
it.
We
know
the
constraints
that
either
external
or
internal
that
are
we're
doing
them
with,
and
then
we
have
the
data
that
we
need
to
consider
as
we
make
the
decision
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
what's
missing.
G
I
They
decided
that
I
I'm
very
honored
as
a
trustee
elected
in
November,
but
I
was
on
Parks
and
Rec
commission
for
eight
years
and
Phil
our
board
president,
our
our
Representatives
in
this
Comm
committee
or
whatever
we're
calling
it.
We
have
not
had
any
public
meetings
about
it.
Therefore,
I
have
not
said
anything
in
public
about
it,
because
I'm
constrained
by
the
brownouts
I've
not
said
anything
to
other
trustees.
I
For
those
of
you
who
don't
know,
are
never
discussed
in
public
because
they
involve
multiple
entities
who
have
multiple
interests,
and
if
I
were
to
bring
up
their
names,
then
it
would
immediately
make
discussions
much
more
difficult,
because
that's
just
the
way
land
negotiations
go
and
that's
true
for
any
land
negotiation,
whether
it
be
for
affordable
housing,
a
park,
a
school
I.
Anybody
on
city
council
can
tell
you
this.
This
is
not
new
information,
so
that
is
why
I
am
not
saying
anything
that
significant.
I
Apart
from
what
I
just
told
you-
and
that
is
some
total
of
mvla's
involvement
so
far,
and
we
would
definitely
like
to
proceed
forward
with
good
faith
and
we
have
work
with
the
city
and
and
in
fact,
as
you
saw,
we
have
had
great
success
with
the
city.
It's
just
gotten
considerably
more
difficult
now,
not
to
not
do
the
city,
it's
due
to
the
fact
that
the
land
is
now
that
much
more
expensive,
and
now
it's
not
just
one
agency.
I
No,
it's
not
just
a
city,
it's
like
four
or
five
different
agencies,
and
we
are
hoping,
as
I
mentioned,
that
the
city
well,
the
city
is
already
honking
us
with
this
and
I
appreciate
that
so
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
and
I
also
want
to
say
that
that
depends
on
trust
and
I.
Think
so
far
at
least
I
hope
Lucas.
I
I
You
got
to
do
this.
Like
you
know,
every
other
meeting
is
a
meeting
about
some
developments.
This
is
you
know
for
us.
Like
you
know,
the
last
time
we
acquired
a
school,
probably
Phil
has
good
information,
but
it
was
a
long
time
ago.
So
you
know
we
just
don't
have
that
knowledge
and
yes,
I
did
say
that
to
be
funny,
because
I
mean
you
gotta
have
some
Liberty
in
this
meeting.
I
So
yes,
we
would
really
appreciate
that
and
and
that's
also
being
public
knowledge.
The
city
has
actually
put
some
ideas
forward
in
their
public
meeting,
so
I'm
not
sharing
anything,
that's
not
already
being
shared
by
the
city,
but
as
to
how
and
what
they're
doing
exactly
I
have
to
go.
Please
City
help
us
because
there's
just
no
way
we
can,
like
you
know,
get
a
third
High
School.
I
Without
your
help
and
for
us
you
know,
our
enrollment
has
been
flat
despite
covid,
as
you
guys
know,
you
spent
a
lot
of
money,
helping
us
expand
our
schools
and
that
that
life
expansion
before
cause
mental
health
challenges
for
our
kids
overcrowding
literally
caused
our
kids
to
like
get
lost.
We
don't
want
that
to
happen
again.
R
R
M
J
Okay,
I
had
been
about
to
speak
and
then
notice.
Theta
was
ready
to
speak
and
didn't
want
to
cut
her
off
I
I'm
curious.
Some
of
what
we're
doing
today
is
kind
of
setting
up
a
framework
for
moving
forward
right
and
what
I'm
hearing
is
a
real
need
for
what
does
it
mean
when
trustees
come
to
speed
to
speak
at
a
council
meeting?
What
does
it
mean
when
things
appear
on
agendas
or
in
packets?
J
That
one
agency
thinks
are
incorrect
and
how
do
we
address
that
and
I
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
that.
I
know:
we've
experienced
it
too,
like
there
was
a
deir
that
was
put
forward
to
the
environmental
Planning
Commission
that
talked
about
schools,
but
the
school
district
got
really
upset
because
it
was
inaccurate
in
our
view,
and
that
was
back
in
January.
So
it's
not
I,
don't
think
it's
single-sided
and
I
know.
For
example,
you
know
this
is
a
Mia
culpa.
J
When
we
talked
at
our
first
meeting,
this
fall
where
we
talked
about
the
Mauna
Loma
perimeter
controls
the
fencing
project.
For
example,
our
mayor
and
our
assistant
city
manager
were
both
present
and
commented
during
public
comment
on
the
options
that
were
presented
and,
in
my
mind,
I
went.
Oh
that's,
fantastic,
I'm,
so
glad
they
were
here.
R
N
Much
I
just
wanted
to
mention
nomenclature.
You
know
in
English
this.
The
the
a
single
word
can
mean
a
lot
of
different
things
and
I.
Think
it's
in
in
this
case,
one
of
the
things
that
is
used
very
differently
by
the
city
and
the
school
district
is
the
term
housing
in
the
city
lexicon.
When
we
talk
about
housing,
we
need
places
where
people
sleep
they
eat
they.
You
know
they
live
Apartments
houses
that
sort
of
thing.
F
You're
up
one
of
the
things
I
do
I
I
mentioned
before,
like
how
much
how
important
it
is
to
have
a
vote
that
solidifies
the
direction.
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
we
learned
early
on
on
Council.
Actually,
it
kind
of
rotates,
as
we
get
new
council
members
every
once
in
a
while
through,
but
when
we
have
a
study
session
and
then
each
council
member
says
what
they
need
or
want,
and
then
at
the
end
of
it
they
turn
to
staff
like
do
you
have
what
you
need
and
staff
is
like?
F
Yes,
do
we
know
what
staff
actually
like
got
through
and
that's
why
toward
that?
More
recently,
we
were
more
like
okay.
Is
there
a
agreement
on
this
straw
poll
I?
Think
that
could
be
helpful
with
all
our
our
bodies
to
have
stuff
like
that
in
relation
to
the
decisions
that
are
being
made
so
that
our
staff
and
your
staff
have
Clarity
on
a
Direction
moving
forward.
M
I
was
going
to
say
we
should
move
on,
but
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing:
I
think
we
really
have
been
caught
up
in
sort
of
coming
up
with
the
the
same
numbers
for
things
right:
housing,
projection,
families,
students
and
oftentimes.
Our
our
presentations
are
based
on
the
numbers
that
we've
received
from
our
Consultants
right,
which
then
seem
untrue
to
someone
else
who's.
Looking
at
those
numbers,
so
I've
heard
you
know
we're
never
going
to
agree
on
the
numbers.
I've
heard
you
know
we
need
to
come
up.
M
R
R
It
is
not
a
frequent
I
guess,
it's
atypical
that
agencies
go
as
and
use
the
podium
for
public
comment,
usually
there's
another
form,
a
different
way
for
for
sharing
information
or
correcting
information,
and
so
that's
just
something
to
think
about
it,
not
to
say
they
can't,
but
that
there's
generally
it's
it
usually
that's
to
me
it's
not
necessarily
the
problem,
it's
a
symptom
of
of
the
larger
problem
right
and
as
well
as
public
records
requests.
Those
are
typically
not
between
an
interagent
sees
in
one
Community.
It's
again
doesn't
mean
it
can't
happen.
R
People
have
a
right
to
do
it.
They
generally
come
from
public
and
usually
interagency,
shares
more
freely,
and
so
these
are
just
some
things
again
for
us
to
think
about
as
we
work
towards
Solutions
and
just
other
models
and
other
ways
of
of
interacting
and
doing
business,
because
we
want
to
be
mindful
of
constraints.
But
we
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
for
growth
here,
because
we
can
co-construct.
R
We
can
share
information
in
advance
and
we
can
even
it's
not
I've,
seen
it
hundreds
of
times
when
agencies
are
brought
to
be
part
of
the
presentation,
the
other
agencies
that
have
the
expertise
or
the
Manpower
or
female
power,
whatever
the
people
power
when
they
they
actually
come
and
co-present,
and
so
those
are
things.
I
haven't
seen,
of
course,
I'm
new
to
Mountain
View,
not
to
say
they
haven't
happened,
but
those
are
just
some
things
that
we,
you
know
that
we
might
want
to
consider.
A
A
I
As
far
as
mvla
enrollment
goes,
Mike
Matheson
presents
both
our
Productions
and
our
actuals,
and
mostly
we
meet
our
actuals
I
mean
it
might
be
off
by
say
20
students,
so
at
least
the
time
I've
been
here,
and
he
also
presents
historical
data
and
you're-
welcome
to
ask
him
for
that
data.
It's
freely
available
because
he
presents
it
on
public
meetings.
R
I
was
looking
for
your
green
I.
Didn't
have
my
green
on
okay,
so
now
we're
going
to
move
on
so
I
think
we've.
This
is
just
another
way.
A
lot
of
people
pictures
worth
a
thousand
words
as
I
met
with
people.
I
asked
you
to
come
up
with
metaphors
for
where
we
are
and
then
again
we're
going
to
take
that
leap
going
forward.
We
see
tug
of
wars,
we
see
people
rowing
in
different
directions.
We
see
people
working
in
silos,
we
see
sometimes
it's
a
one-way
Street,
maybe
one
one
way
where
things
are
being
transactional.
R
We
see
A
house
divided,
we
see
one,
we
see
little
a
little
child
with
the
plate
divided
into
three
pieces
so
that
the
you
know
the
peas
never
touch
the
mashed,
potatoes
and
the
corn.
You
know
and
all
that
and
we
see
the
sapling
that
is
being
braced
and
that's
the
symbol
of
the
relationship.
It's
a
small
sapling
that
is
being
braced
up
by
the
three
stakes
and
those
would
be
the
agencies
that
would
hopefully
help
it
grow
into
something
we
see
and
some
of
you
referenced
it.
R
So
but
I
do
think
that,
as
trustee
Chang
said
is,
it
is
important
that
we
invest
in
this
process
for
these
hours
and
then
the
one
on
the
top
right
is
that's
this
one
would
really
kind
of
struck
me,
and
maybe
it's
because
of
family
Dynamics,
but
it's
someone
in
the
family
has
passed
away
and
they're
quibbling
about
a
will
and
forget
their
family,
and
so
it
just
kind
of
struck
me
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide
because
then,
as
always,
we
go
towards
the
future.
So
we
see
the
strong
sapling
relief.
R
The
strong
tree
now
that's
grown.
We
see
people
rowing
in
the
right
direction.
We
see
that
there
is
a
two-way
communication
and
two-way
give
and
take,
but
we
also
see
that
merging
the
merge
sign
of
people
coming
together
to
go
together
that
little
plate
becomes
a
beautiful
charcuterie
board,
which
someone
brought
that
up
and
then,
instead
of
a
tug
of
war,
you
see
a
rope,
bracing
and
holding
up
people
helping
them
go
to
Heights.
They
had
never
anticipated
and
then
the
choir
I
don't
remember.
R
Who
came
up
with
that
when
you
probably
could
self-identify,
but
it
was
about
not
losing
your
identity.
You
still
have
your
distinct
role.
You
have
your
part,
but
when
you
put
it
together,
it's
a
Harmony
and
that's
the
community
that
Mountain
View
wants
that's
our
community
here
that
we
can
be-
and
we
are
in
so
many
instances
we're
just
not
quite
there
with
this
project.
R
So
we'll
move
to
these
ideas-
and
these
are
some
and
tonight
I-
think
you've
even
come
up
with
more
so
I'm
fully
present
in
the
facilitating
Luke
is
taking
a
lot
of
notes,
but
also
I
would
say.
This
is
the
beginning
and
of
this
conversation
too.
So
if
something
else
comes
to
you,
it's
not
too
late
to
share.
That's
where
the
parking
lot
ends,
if
you're
in
the
parking
I
think
I
should
have,
could
have
it's
not
too
late,
but
these
are
some
Concepts
that
have
been
shared.
R
Could
we
bring
them
in
to
have
them
share
that
expertise?
And
likewise,
if
schools
have
certain
expertise
on
mental
health
or
youth
or
needs,
then
that
would
be
shared
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
biggest
things
that
we've
found
with
this
particular
situation
is
we
had
some.
We,
we
kind
of
let
things
get
too
far.
R
R
R
Points
I,
think
some
of
you
captured
it
better
than
we
did
even
about
the
input
prior
to
those
key
decisions
because
they
are
going
to
affect
other
agencies
and
how
do
we
allow
for
that
input
everything's
moving
fast,
so
it
can't
happen
in
every
instance,
but
particularly
major
decisions
need
to.
There
has
to
be
some
kind
of
opportunity
for
that
and
the
word
choice
you
said
nomenclature
I
mean
we
need
to
think
about
that
and
our
messaging,
our
messaging,
whether
it's
our
websites
or
our
flyers
or
our
communication
to
our
primary
constituents.
R
We
all
know
we
can
rally
up
troops
right.
We
can
do
that
if
that's
our
intention,
but
is
that
the
best
use
or
could
we
have
other
ways
of
interacting
the
unilateral
public
statement?
Someone
else
used
I
think
it
was
ultimatums
and
things.
You
know.
A
joint
statement
is
so
hard.
In
fact,
the
first
time
I've
worked
with
agencies
on
joint
statements
that
have
not
been
accustomed
to
it.
R
It's
we
end
up
saying
not
almost
nothing,
because
we
can't
agree
on
anything,
but
then
you
get
into
the
routine
with
it,
and
it
makes
the
reporters
jobs
easier
because
we've
given
them,
they
don't
have
to
decipher.
They
don't
have
to
pick
this
and
that
or
say
there's
this,
and
this
and
somewhere
in
the
truth,
is
in
between.
This
is
what
we
stand
and
we
post
that
together
jointly
and
one
of
our
elected
officials,
I
almost
gave
it
away.
R
K
So
I'm
a
negative
person
and
I
like
to
say
negative
things.
One
thing
that
we
haven't
really
talked
a
lot
about
that
is
one
of
the
elephants
in
the
room
and
will
be
challenging
to
address,
is
I
actually
think.
There's
a
lot
more
Harmony
on
the
elected
official
side
than
there
is
on
the
staffsa.
I
have
I,
have
I
think
good
relationships
with
with
all
of
the
elected
officials.
Here,
I,
like
everyone,
no
I.
K
I
get
the
impression
at
least
that
when
I
speak
with
individuals
on
other
agencies,
the
bodies
of
other
agencies
that
they're
they're,
productive
and
I
think
we're
actually
generally
aligned
on
values.
As
one
of
one
of
the
earlier
slides
that
indicated,
I
have
less
confidence
that
when
we
say
to
our
respective
staffs,
okay
great,
let's
work
together
that
there
will
be
less
success
and
I.
Don't
know
how
to
fix
that,
and
it's
unfortunate
that
we
didn't
have
sort
of
a
staff
equivalent
to
this
I
I.
Actually
so,
I'm
curious.
K
I'm,
just
I
remain
skeptical
that
when
we
start
to
transition
the
bulk
of
the
work
to
staff
that
there's
that
there
will
be
the
same
ability
to
it
to
address
the
Gap
and
I'd
be
curious
to
hear
in
your
experience,
working
with
other
agencies.
What
can
we
do
as
elected
officials
to
help
our
staffs
succeed?.
R
Having
been
I've,
never
been
elected,
official
I've
always
been
staff.
You
rise
to
the
expectation,
if
it's
clear
and
reasonable
and
then
also
there
needs
to
be
support
for
it.
Sometimes
it's
education,
sometimes
it's
coaching.
Sometimes
it's
giving
people
a
path
forward
and
I
think
it
just.
It
won't
happen
as
publicly
but
there's
ways
to
to
rebuild.
If
the
trust
is
broken,
there's
but
it
it
starts
small
and
but
basically
what
we
find
is.
F
F
I
remember
I
did
not
go
to
the
means,
but
I
listened
to
them
or
watch
them
via
YouTube,
because
we
had
a
brown
act
already
there
that
went
through
the
meetings,
but
one
of
the
things
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
so
frustrated
by
is
I
listened
to
to
the
the
trustees
in
the
Mountain
View
was
in
the
school
district.
I
was
like
oh
yeah.
That
was
a
good
thing
that
they
said
and
as
I'm
driving
or
whatever
I'm
doing,
while
I'm
listening
to
the
meetings.
F
R
And
so
just
just
to
respond,
just
in
the
short
term
on
that
everything
can't
go
to
a
vote.
That's
but
many
things
can,
but
the
other
part
is
Direction,
and
so
that's
just
that's
just
a
protocol
that
people
can
learn
I
had
to
learn
it.
Most
leaders
do
to
just
say
so
what
I'm
hearing,
because
it's
hard
to
parse
out
when
you
hear
a
lot
of
input
from
a
lot
of
people?
What
I'm
hearing
is
this?
R
This
is
my
direction
and
then
you
put
it
in
the
minutes
and
then
it's
something
that's
there,
so
that
is,
it
doesn't
always
have
about.
Votes
are
the
most
clear,
but
but
definitely
seeking
staff.
Direction
and
I
see
someone
superintendents
nodding
their
head.
I
think
that
that
is
Staff
direction
is,
is
a
general
way
and
I
know.
This
is
primarily
for
elected
officials,
but
since
we
are
talking
about
staff,
I
don't
want
to
ignore
any
leaders
who
are
staff.
Members.
J
And
and
to
be
clear,
there's
so
the
way
a
school
board
meetings
are
organized
in
our
agendas.
There
are
discussion
items
and
there
are
action
items
so
discussion
items
there
is
no
vote,
but
then
often
the
board
may
give
direction,
which
is
what
Dr
Bowers
is
talking
about
versus
when
I
view,
City
Council
meetings
I
see
sometimes
there's
study
sessions
which
might
be
the
equivalent
of
our
discussion
items
and
then
everything
else
is
an
action
item.
J
You
guys
vote
on
a
lot
of
things,
and
so
it's
it's
a
structure
of
of
how
the
bodies
actually
operate
differently.
That
I
think
can
be
challenging
and
then
some
of
these
things
are
closed
session
right
and
so
we're
not
going
to
see
what
you
all
vote
on
in
closed
session
unless
it's
something
that's
directly
reportable
to
the
public
and
it's
the
same
with
school
boards
as
well.
F
Q
And
just
for
the
record,
Lucas
I
do
like
you
and
and
all
the
city
council
members
here,
but
the
the
ideas
for
achieving
success.
One
thing
I
think
about
on
the
school
district
side,
one
of
our
most
contentious,
no
contentious
one
of
our
challenging
things
we
have
to
do
regularly
is
teacher
negotiations
and
their
data
matters
right
and
the
one
that
data
points
for
whether
mvla
or
Mountain
View
Westman
is
like
comparable
districts
right.
Q
Q
So
we
don't
need
to
share
data
because
it's
it's
a
regular
tax
District,
but
in
Shoreline
all
that
the
tax
funds
go
to
the
Shoreline
Community,
which
is
the
city
right.
So
in
this
situation
you
know,
that's
why
the
school
districts
are
trying
to
share
their
data,
because
you
know
it's
like
you
know
my
daughter's
sitting
outside
which
I
apologize.
Q
That's
why
I've
been
running
in
and
out
and
and
my
daughter,
my
daughter,
lasts,
like
I'm
like
well,
you
know,
I
want
a
new,
iPhone
and
I'll
say
no
and
then
she'll
go
well
like
I
see
that
you
buy
a
lot
of
books.
So
why
can't
you
get
me
a
new
iPhone
or
like
it's
I?
Don't
know
if
that
analogy
made
any
sense,
but
this
idea
that,
like
we're
in
a
relationship
where
here
at
this
the
Shoreline
Community,
we
don't
control
our
regular
tax
dollars.
Q
We
would
in
any
other
part
of
Mountain
View
right.
So
we
need
to
justify
or
we
need
to
show
our
needs
to
the
city
and
the
city
needs
to
explain
why
they
can't
give
so
much
to
us
right.
Like
I
tell
my
daughter,
I
can't
get
her
iPhone
15,
because
I'm,
a
teacher
and
I
have
to
buy
these
things
or
pay
for
her
music
class,
or
something
like
that
and
I
I
feel
like
we've
broken
down
where
the
data's
so
important,
because
I'm
trying
to
say
the
data
is
really
important.
Q
We
have
to
get
to
agreement
of
what
are
the
genuinely
the
city's
needs
in
the
shrine
community
and
we,
the
school
districts,
need
to
acknowledge
that
and
the
city
needs
to
generally
see
like
what
are
our
needs
with
all
this
upcoming
growth
and
our
needs
to
want
to
become
the
best
schools
for
a
Mountain,
View
and
right
now.
I,
just
like
I
I
hope
that,
whether
it
be
the
ad
hoc
somebody
comes
up
with
that,
whether
we'd
we
Outsource
this
to
a
third
party
to
find
a
comparable
data
for
us.
Q
But
what
we're
doing
right
now
are
bus
generating
reports
and
them
generated
reports.
It
neither
acknowledges
that
data
is
important
because
it
is
and
we
need
to
get
to
Common
data.
So
I
don't
know.
If
anyone
here
has
some
suggestions
on
how
we
get
to
there
but
I
feel
like
we
need
to
get
to
a
common
agreement
on
City
expenses
Shoreline
and
what
our
enrollment
needs
are
and
school
needs
so
that
the
AHA
can
have
a
success.
N
I
I
would
kind
of
like
to
add
on
to
what
you've
said
and
I
think
in
addition
to
that,
we
do
need
to
just
decide
on
data.
That's
I
mean
we
have
to
have
shared
data
that
we
can
all
say.
Okay,
these
are
the
numbers
we're
going
to
use
and
we'll
we'll
have
to
work
that
out
and
I
would
imagine
that
it
will
be
a
sort
of
a
bit
of
a
patchwork
quilt
and
different
agencies.
N
N
We
we
are
talking,
I
mean
the
the
North
Bay
Shore
development
agreement
is
for
30
years.
So
there
are
a
great
many
things
that
will
change
over
30
years.
I
mean
you,
don't
have
any
housing
new
housing
out
there
that
has
had,
as
that
has
generated
students
yet,
but
there
will
be
a
time
when
you
do
and
then
it'll
be
really
important
to
make
sure
that
that
the
school
can
be
built.
But
we
don't
necessarily
need
to
pay
for
that
this
year.
N
You
know
because
those
kids
aren't
there
yet,
on
the
other
hand,
sea
level
rise
is
something
that
is
coming
Fast
and
Furious,
and
we
really
need
to
get
those
sea
level
rise.
Protections
completed
in
the
next
10
or
15
years,
so
I
think
that
another
thing
we
need
to
agree
on
not
only
is
the
data
but
kind
of
what's
the
chronology
of
how
these
things
are
important
and
how
it
can
make
some
decisions
over
time
about
when
things
become
trigger
points,
because
we
don't
really
know
what
all
of
them
are
right
now
and.
R
And
there
are
many
models
of
that
include
formulas
and
contingencies
and
things
like
that,
and
that
would
be
something
for
the
ad
hoc
committee
to
look
at.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
stay
on
on
this
Focus
anything
else.
Yes,
I'm.
Sorry,
I
barely
can
look
to
my
right
and
I
said
I,
just
I,
don't
wanna
no
worries.
O
O
O
O
O
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
city
is
committed
to,
and
we
have
worked
on
in
conjunction
with
others
is
an
elementary
school
in
the
North
Bay
Shore
area.
There
are
four
acres
that
we
have
said:
they're
earmarked
for
an
elementary
school,
no
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
to
convince
people
that
we're
serious
about
that.
O
O
You
know,
yes,
we
might
use
it
for
something
else.
In
the
meantime,
because
we
don't
need
that
elementary
school-
for
you
know
maybe
15
20
years,
depending
upon
what
happens
with
the
development
in
Shoreline
but
I-
think
we're
all
committed
to
that
will
be
an
elementary
school
in
the
North
Bayshore
area.
O
O
And,
yes,
we
have
study
sessions.
Actually
it's
in
2019
that
we
started
doing
the
summary
and
the
straw
boats
not
recently,
and
that
was
again
thanks
to
council
member
Ramirez,
who
said
you
know
sometimes
not
just
the
public,
but
the
council
members
come
away
and
go.
What
did
we
decide?
What
direction
did
we
give
staff
so
we
started
summarizing
it
and
taking
votes
and
I
appreciate
that
process.
Improvement
I
appreciate
all
process
improvements,
and
we
have
lots
of
opportunity
here
so
anyway,
I
guess.
O
R
I
can't
add
anything
that
was
wonderful,
so
the
next
we're
just
going
to
end
with
a
little
recap
of
where
we've
been
so.
The
ad
hoc
committee
has
been
established,
we've
convened
this
meeting.
We
were
able
to
co-identify
some
norms
and
ground
rules
for
how
we're
going
to
interact
that
could
carry
over
to
the
ad
hoc.
R
I
mean
my
water
glass
is
very
light
right
now,
because
I
I
wasn't
sure
where
we
were
going
to
go
and
I
and
I
appreciate
the
Candor
and
the
depth
that
everybody
went
and
I
think
we've
you
ended.
On
that
note,
there
was
we
reinforced
the
commitment
that
we
are
going
to
co-labor
together
and
work
on
a
viable
successor
agreement,
because
our
community
is
counting
on
it
and
our
kids
need
it
too.
R
So
we'll
look
ahead
to
some
of
the
next
steps.
We've
heard
the
urgency
of
timelines
and
the
Cadence,
and
so
next
steps
would
be-
and
it's
not
for
me
to
do,
but
there
will
be
work
to
establish
timelines
and
schedules
for
the
ad
hoc
committee,
because
I
think
we're
you
know:
we've
got
a
framework,
let's
get
it
hap,
let's
make
it
happen
and
mutually
establish
the
scope
and
authority
and
their
limitations,
because,
as
we
heard,
we
want
to
have
checkpoints,
the
rest
of
the
the
elected
officials
are
not
necessarily
there.
So
how
do?
R
How
is
their
joint
messaging?
How
are
their
updates
given
and
if
things
get
stuck,
how
do
we
course
correct
so
that
we
don't
just
spin
our
Wheels
or
was
it
being
the
mud
in
the
tires?
I
think
I've
heard
that
before
mutually
established,
these
milestones
and
goals
and
any
other
really
burning
next
steps
on
the
short
term.
R
I
I
think
my
only
request
and
I
really
appreciate
glucose
specifically
talking
about
you
know.
We
are
two
different
agencies:
Mountain
View,
westmin
and
mvla.
We
are
both
school
districts,
we
have
different
needs,
and
yet
we,
both
because
of
the
housing
in
North
Bay
Shore,
need
another
school
and
another
high
school
is
a
much
bigger
ask.
So
we're
going
to
have
to
work
really
hard
together.
I
I
Well,
if
anyone
has
anything
to
say
differently,
I
would
like
to
hear
it
because
it's
important
for
us
to
know
as
elected
officials,
that
our
staff
are
not
working
well
together,
because,
honestly,
you
know
Nelly,
our
amazing
superintendent
basically
runs
our
ship.
We
give
her
high
level
Direction
and
she's
the
one
that
makes
it
go.
So
we
are
not
the
ones
who
we
sit
there
and
we
say
please
implement
this
thing
and
she
does
it.
So
that
is
how
a
school
board
works.
I
Q
A
I
Foreign
ly
agree
with
that
because,
as
a
I
mean
I'm
a
new
trustee,
it
there's
an
incredible
amount
of
work
involved
in
getting
up
to
speed
so
trying
to
trying
to
get
a
new
trustee
in
a
new
city
council.
Member
up
to
speed
on
what's
been
going
on,
I
think
is
a
pretty
heavy
lift
and
we
are
going
to
have
two
new
city
council
members
for
sure,
because
we
have
two
members
terming
out,
so
I
would
hate
for
that
knowledge
to
belong.
So
I
really
would
like
to
have
that
deadline.
D
R
So
I'm
not
sure
we're
going
to
establish
it
tonight,
but
this
is
all
great
input,
so
we
we
will
stay
tuned
on
that
one.
But
thank
you
for
the
clarity
and
then
in
closing,
these
are
just
some
things
for
you
to
think
about.
What
would
success?
Look
like
did
anything
surprise
you.
What
resonated
was
there
any
aha
moment
where
suddenly
things
clicked?
R
R
What
will
I
do
better
or
differently
or
in
more
depths
or
what
will
I
continue
to
do
if
I'm
already
doing
it
and
that's
a
question
only
you
can
answer
each
of
you
is
an
individual.
What
will
your
part
be
in
making
that
happen,
because
people
are
expecting
it,
and
if
people
want
to
share
that
one
commitment,
then
it's
super
accountable.
R
R
My
final
reflection,
so
today
I
don't
know
if
you
learned
something
as
concrete,
as
maybe
everyone
had
maybe
hoped
for.
But
hopefully
you
didn't
learn
from
this
experience
and,
more
importantly,
you're
going
to
reflect
on
it
and
you
will
learn
and
take
away
even
more
than
you
thought
and
my
final
quote:
I'm
a
big
quote
person,
sorry,
but
not
really,
sorry
and
it's
just
kind
of
fun.
R
A
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
Dr
Bowers
and
now
for
the
for
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
I
think
we
heard
I
mean
I
I
heard
a
few
good,
positive
things
and
a
few
tough
things
for
said
and
I
think
that's
probably
as
much
as
we
can
expect
out
of
a
a
meeting
like
this
now
for
the
ad
hoc
committee
anyway.
The
next
step
in
the
process
I'm
just
reading
from
a
script.
A
By
the
way,
the
next
step
in
the
process
will
be
meetings
of
the
ad
hoc
committee
comprised
of
Representatives
of
all
three
agencies.
This
committee
will
continue
the
work
started
tonight,
enhancing
working
relationships
between
the
agencies
getting
deeper
into
sharing
information
and
data
relevant
to
the
education
enhancement,
Reserve
joint
Powers
agreement,
identifying
shared
in
individual
agency
interests
and
providing
guidelines
for
staff
level.
Negotiation
of
the
successor
agreement.
A
I
want
to
thank
the
members
of
each
agency,
who've
agreed
to
serve
on
the
ad
hoc
committee,
which
will
be
comprised
of
Trustees,
Conley
and
Blakely
from
of
Mountain
View
wisman
trustees,
fellas
and
corns
from
Mountain
View,
Los,
Altos
and
board
members,
Showalter
and
Ramirez.
In
addition
to
myself
from
the
Shoreline
Community,
this
meeting
is
adjourned
at
8
14..
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
coming
all
the
way
out
here.