►
From YouTube: 08 20 18 Special and COTW 1 of 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
D
C
C
D
D
E
B
E
E
B
F
D
D
D
B
G
H
H
E
B
E
E
C
C
D
The
turnout
gear
has
been
on
a
continual
replacement
program
over
five
years,
and
that
total
is
about
seventeen.
Seventeen
five
I
think
it
is,
and
so
it's
just
time
for
that
next
replacement.
Piece
of
that.
This
is
the
fourth
year
or
fifth
year
running
for
support.
So,
fourth
of
five
year
replacement
program.
F
I'd
spoken
to
the
chief
right
before
the
meeting
and
I
told
my
I:
just
I:
don't
have
anything
against
it.
I
just
was
hoping
to
see.
He
told
me
there's
basically
down
to
just
two
companies
that
they
can
get
quotes
from.
They
had
three,
but
one
one
out
of
business
and
unless
I'm
not
reading
it
right,
I
don't
see.
The
second
quote:
I
just
need
it
for
reference.
D
C
D
F
A
A
D
Right
any
other
questions
very
none,
then
I
will
move
to
add
this
to
counsels
next
agenda
and
waiving
the
second
and
third
and
the
reason
for
waiving
the
second
and
third
on
that
is.
As
soon
as
we
approve
it.
The
company
is
willing
to
supply
the
turnout
gear,
put
the
order
in
and
get
things
rolling
so
and.
D
D
D
D
With
regards
to
the
heart
monitors,
this
also
includes
its
4:3
heart
monitors
and
two
automated
CPR
pieces
of
equipment.
This
will
free
up
one
individual
as
their
they're
taking
care
of
a
situation
once
they
have
this
apparatus
on
an
individual
performing.
The
CPR,
then
they'll
be
able
to
go
ahead
and
assess
and
take
care
of
other
things.
So
it's
like
having
an
extra
pair
of
hands
right
there
if
needed.
D
So,
what's
the
life
expensive,
the
chief
said
that
they
vary
the
last
ones
that
we
had.
We
had
well
over
ten
years.
He
said
this
one,
the
set
that
we
currently
have
has
ten
years
on
it,
and
he
said
it's
kind
of
like
a
cell
phone
technology.
When
they
come
out
with
new
technology,
then
they
kind
of
obsolete,
started
obsolete
in
the
parts
and
the
service
and
the
programming
of
the
current
ones.
And
that's
where
we're
at
right
now:
okay,
he.
D
D
E
C
D
D
E
F
F
A
A
But
what
we
can
have
happen
is
if
it's
a
three
three
stalemate
which
we
had
happen
on
this
council
previously
that
someone
goes
on
represented
for
five
six
seven
months
while
we
drag
feet,
and
so
we
see
that
as
valuable
to
change
that
procedure.
The
procedure
has
changed
previously.
It
didn't
work,
and
so
the
recommendation
again
just
the
recommendations
council
to
vote
on
and
ultimately
the
people
to
approve,
would
be
to
look
at
that
procedure
and
fine-tune
it
if
possible.
So
that's
that's
the
first
one.
D
A
One
is
502
E
and
the
second
is
503
B
and
that
deals
with
competitive
bidding
and
the
procedure
for
letting
contracts
and
right
now,
if
you
look
at
5:02
II
that
is
actually
titled,
competitive
bidding
and
there's
a
competitive
bidding
requirement
there
and
then
502
503
B
has
sort
of
a
different
take
on
it,
but
also
appears
to
be
a
different
competitive
bidding
requirement
similar
to
it.
What
we
would
want
to
do
is
streamline
the
competitive
bidding,
move
it
back
to
competitive
bidding,
that's
required
under
state
law.
That's
not
to
evade
or
to
quit.
A
You
know
quick
push
projects
through
council.
Really.
What
that
is,
is
there
are
certain
projects
that
just
aren't
well
suited
to
competitive
bidding
and
the
to
say:
that's
a
strict
dollar
limit
limits
you
to
the
type
of
contract
that
you're
doing
and
sometimes
like
purchases
of
services.
There
may
only
be
one
contractor,
there's
things
that
competiting
just
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense.
It
doesn't
prevent
counsel
from
when
we
come
to
you
and
ask
for
authorization
to
say
hey.
What
are
you
doing?
A
Go
competitively
bid
this
year
and
bunch
of
knuckleheads,
but
it
just
wouldn't
require
by
charter.
An
example
would
be
you
know
any
kind
of
small
building.
If
it's
a
small
building
under
$50,000
under
state
law,
you
wouldn't
have
to
get
that
you
would
have
to
get
plans
and
specs
and
bid
it
under
our
charter
provision.
A
Currently,
if
it's
a
small
building
under
50,000,
you
theoretically
would
have
to
go
out,
get
plans
and
specs
drawn
by
an
architect
ahead
of
time
and
then
go
and
let
out
a
bid
based
on
material
prices,
and
sometimes
it
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
and
it
doesn't
actually
save
you
money.
It
cost
you
more
money
because
you're
gonna
pay
for
the
materials
pay
for
the
design
pay
for
the
advertisement,
so
it
doesn't
suit
you
well,
the
the
trade-off
here
is.
A
A
A
A
A
So
that
that
deck,
because
board
of
controls
really
so
I
go
back
and
forth
about
this
Norton
does
border
control
differently
than
anybody
else.
That
I'm
aware
of
border
control
is
an
administrative
approval
at
a
contract
and
that
administrative
approval
of
a
contract
is
there
so
that
no
department
head
can
enter
into
a
contract
over
a
certain
dollar
level
without
people
in
the
city
being
aware
of
it,
and
it's
really
just
a
protection.
A
So
the
idea
would
be
you'd
move
that
a
council
approval
to
502
E,
which
talks
about
competitive
bidding
and
really
count
what
council
is
required
to
do
and
then
503
B,
which
is
approval
of
contracts,
just
deal
support
of
control
and
it's
not
two
separate
requirements.
So
that's
the
idea.
Mr.
Tousley,
the
last
sentence
says:
if
it's:
if
it's
over
ten
thousand
has
to
come
to
council,
okay,.
F
A
Could
be
two
changes,
separate
changes,
so
that
raises
the
question:
what
if
one's
approved
and
the
other
isn't
and
we
may,
we
may
have
some
chaos
still.
We
have
chaos
now
we
may
have
chaos
after
that,
so
hopefully,
if
the
resident,
if
it
does
go
to
the
residents,
they
see
fit
to
change
both
of
them
at
the
same
time,
could.
A
I
I
E
F
F
E
I
A
I
A
I
E
A
A
J
E
A
Competitive
biddings
required
see
here's
the
difference
between
this
language
and
the
Revised
Code
Revised
Code
competitive
bidding
is
only
required
for
certain
types
of
contracts.
Our
language
is
every
type
of
contract.
So
if
it's
above
25,000
doesn't
matter
what
the
contracts
for
you
have
to
competitively
bid
it
under
the
Revised
Code,
it's
a
$50,000
limit,
but
it's
only
certain
types
of
contracts
that
have
to
be
competitively
bid.
So
there's
there's,
there's
a
difference
that
way
too,
but.
E
A
The
simplest
way
to
explain
it
would
be
if
it's
over
5,000,
no
matter
what
the
contract
is.
Board
of
Control
has
to
approve
it
if
it's
over
10,000,
no
matter
what
the
contract
is,
council
has
to
approve
it.
Okay,
if
the
Revised
Code
requires
competitive
bidding,
we
also
have
to
competitively
bid
it.
That
would
be
the
new
scheme
that
we
work
under
that.
I
A
Yes-
and
you
get
two
bites
of
that,
you
budget
it
in
you
actually
through
the
contract
right
so
and
that's
what
we
had
talked
about.
We'd
even
be
comfortable
lowering
the
dollar
amount
where
it
comes
to
council
to.
If
that's,
if
that's
a
better
council
control,
that's
okay!
That's
not
what
we're
trying
to
evade
we're,
not
trying
to
duck
that
we're
just
trying
to
make
sure
we
know
what
the
rules
are.
A
Why
is
that
mattered
to
the
city
right?
Because
some
people
say
well,
it's
just
voting
on
your
own
raise
well,
the
reason
that
matters
to
the
city
is
everyone.
The
city
should
be
worried
about
having
competent
people
who
are
willing
to
volunteer
their
time
and
get
up
there
and
run
for
council
members.
Maybe
that
gets
you
more
competition
in
the
future,
but
one
of
the
perks
of
being
council
members,
you
get
pension
credit
right.
D
A
If
that's
not
even
available
that
limits,
the
number
of
people
who
may
be
considering
running
for
council,
we
want
to
increase
that
pool,
plus
I.
Think
it's
just
fair
that
if
you're
up
there,
you
should
be
able
to
earn
that
credit
long
term.
That's
one
of
the
things
that
it's
one
of
the
reasons
that
you're
serving
or
one
of
the
benefits
of
serving
the
reason.
A
The
benefit
of
serving
is
to
be
able
to
earn
that
pension
credit.
So
that's
the
reason
for
the
for
the
change.
Other
communities
have
done.
This
they've
just
changed
their
charter
provision
by
charter
to
say
whatever
the
full-time
service
credit
amount
is
set
by
opers,
that's
the
minimum
salary
that
way
doesn't
have
to
go
back
to
the
voters
every
time.
That's
not
a
workaround,
that's
just
making
it
administrative
Lee
a
little
bit
easier.
So
it's
not
you
voting
on
your
own
salary
increase
over
time.
A
It's
the
state
pension
system
really
dictating
what
that
salary
is,
and
so
that
also
would
lead
to
a
change
under
202
which
deals
with
the
mayor's
compensation
and
that's
the
same
argument.
There.
You
want
people,
people
who
are
willing
to
run
for
mayor
it's
a
part-time
position,
but
it
works
late.
More
part-time
I
can
attest
to
that
on
behalf
of
mayor
Zita
you're
not
doing
it
for
the
money,
but
for
the
amount
of
time
you're
putting
into
it.