►
From YouTube: 07 09 18 Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
E
E
E
F
B
C
G
G
G
D
E
B
B
B
I
F
A
J
K
B
B
G
B
C
C
L
Everything
is
looking
great.
Don't
really
need
any
updates,
I'm
real
happy
with
the
way
it's
coming
together.
However,
since
I've
been
back
for
my
4th,
July
shows
from
a
couple
of
different
sources
and
a
couple
different
municipalities.
I
have
heard
that
Ohio
is
going
to
be
changing
the
law
next
year
and
I'm
sure
you'll
be
thrilled
about
this.
Fireworks
will
be
legal
for
consumers
to
shoot
in
their
backyard.
That's
the
word:
I
got
from
the
Statehouse
that
that
is
gonna
pass
they're
going
to
be
putting
it
on
municipalities
to
make
up
their
own
laws.
L
L
Justin
would
probably
want
to
sit
in
on
this
too,
to
make
sure
that
the
cities
don't
end
up
with
any
liability,
but
I
think
it
would
be
a
great
idea
to
have
something
for
Norton
that
the
fire
department
would
do
a
very
quick
inspection
and
issue
a
certificate,
giving
the
municipality
a
chance
to
look
at
the
site
and
say:
hey,
listen.
This
is
not
big
enough
to
do
what
you
want
to
do,
not
having
it
a
money-making
thing,
but
making
it
a
safety
thing.
L
I
got
a
whole
new
perspective
this
year,
normally
I'm
out
of
town
for
the
4th
of
July
doing
fairly
large
shows,
and
this
year
just
the
way
the
schedule
went.
I
was
out
west
until
the
second
and
I
flew
home
the
evening
of
the
second
to
grab
four
hours
of
sleep
and
then
I
had
to
go
to
Dayton
to
do
their
show
and
I
say
four
hours
of
sleep.
All
I
heard
was
fireworks
all
night
and
I
thought
boy.
I,
love
fireworks,
but
I'm
not
really
digging
it
right
now,
because
I
can't
get
to
sleep.
L
It's
stuff
like
that.
That
I
think
we
could
put
in
in
and
along
with
a
certificate
saying.
Yes,
you
can
do
it
on
your
property,
a
time
line.
You
know
you
got
to
be
done
by
11
o'clock
or
11:30
a
safety
thing.
You
can
only
go
so
big
and
consumer
fireworks
are
some
of
the
stuffs
getting
pretty
serious
now
and
I.
L
Think
it'd
just
be
a
good
thing
to
be
proactive
when
this
law
does
change,
that
Noren
will
be
ready
for
it
and
hopefully
keep
citizens
safe,
because
I
know
how
this
went
in
other
states
the
first
year
everybody
goes
nuts
and
people
get
hurt,
so
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
volunteer
my
time
to
anybody
who
wants
to
to
get
together
at
any
point
and
I've
got
a
lot
of
experience
in
this
stuff.
So
I
think
we
can
make
it
a
reasonable
set
of
rules
that
the
public
will
like
and
the
city
will.
B
L
No
consumer
fireworks
and
it's
actually,
it
used
to
be
called
Class
C.
Now
it's
1.4,
it's
a
desing
that
they
put
on
it
for
shipping.
So
one
point
for
fireworks:
they're
the
only
thing
that
people
are
still
going
to
be
able
to
buy,
which
are
consumer.
However,
consumer
fireworks
over
the
past
10
years
have
gotten
bigger,
there's
small
novelty
items
all
the
way
up
to
a
reloadable
shell,
they're,
no
bigger
than
inch
and
7/8,
but
they're
still
relatively
powerful,
and
you
have
500
gram
repeaters
that
are,
you
know
they
pack
a
fairly
good
punch.
L
It's
nothing
like
what
we
shoot,
but
it's
still
enough
to
start
your
house
on
fire
and
I
mean
common
sense.
If
you
live
next
to
the
gas
station,
you
probably
shouldn't
get
a
certificate
to
be
shooting
fireworks
off
the
same
thing
with
you
know,
if
you're
packed
close
you're,
your
neighbors
are
too
close.
L
You
don't
have
a
big
enough
back
yard,
then
keep
it
to
novelty
items,
there's
just
a
lot
of
common
sense,
things
that
and
frankly,
the
o.r
see
with
the
rules
they
have
for
us,
it's
two
inches
thick
and
it
contradicts
itself
everywhere
and
you
can
tell
it
was
written
by
people
who
had
never
been
around
fireworks
before
so
I.
Think
it's
a
good
idea,
get
to
get
someone
who's
experienced
to
know
and
and
make
it
doable
for
the
backyard
person
if
they
really
want
they're
gonna.
L
L
They
were
all
over
our
neighborhood
you'd
be
shocked
even
in
the
cities,
when
I
was
in
Las
Cruces
this
year,
you're
talking
a
decent-sized
City
and
there
were
there
was
stuff
going
off.
I
know
it
wasn't
consumer
fireworks
and
it
goes
up
right
to
the
point
where
we
start
our
show.
Now.
This
is
a
$50,000
show,
that's
20,
minutes
long
and
I'm.
Talking
about
the
second,
it
ends
everything
around.
You
starts
right
back
up,
so
people
are
going
to
do
it
anyway
and
I'm.
L
K
Becky
Woodruff
I
live
at
3-6,
6-3,
Durham
Drive
in
Norton
and
I'm
just
presenting
additional
information
regarding
the
proposed
housing
development
at
Clarke,
Mill,
Road
I'll.
First
thank
the
council
members
for
truly
listening
to
these
concerns
and
not
making
taking
the
attitude
that
nothing
can
be
done
regarding
this
proposed
development
I,
especially
thank
miss
McGee
and
mr.
Malone
for
their
supportive
comments.
At
the
last
meeting,
we
moved
to
our
durm
home
in
May
1998.
As
of
2008,
the
wooded
land
behind
our
property
line
was
zoned.
Agricultural
trees
were
harvested
for
lumber
and
mulch.
K
Although
the
project
was
abandoned
near
the
natural
gas.
Well,
the
soil
there
was
so
soft
due
to
an
underground
spring
that
heavy
equipment
became
stuck
in
the
mud.
There
is
a
need
to
maintain
vegetation
in
this
area
to
stay
ahead
of
the
wet
conditions
if
the
green
spaces
are
eliminated
by
this
housing,
development,
Durham
and
other
residents
would
also
see
an
increase
in
the
noise
from
the
Barberton
Speedway.
At
the
last
meeting,
mr.
Gaynor
stated
that
the
importance
of
tech,
the
importance
of
tax
dollars
from
Norton
for
Norton
that
would
come
from
this
development.
K
Perhaps
there's
a
better
way
to
achieve
that
goal
than
to
continue
building
houses.
Perhaps
the
speedway
should
be
asked
to
pay
more
taxes,
the
average
weekend
racetrack
for
several
division,
races
with
25,
laps,
Barberton,
Speedway's
event
on
june
29
in
vault
opening
the
pits
at
two
o'clock
in
the
afternoon,
hot
laps
at
three
gates,
opening
at
4:30
and
racing
at
6:30.
There
were
four
divisions
of
race
cars
with
fifty
lap
features
and
a
huge
fireworks
show
followed.
This
was
one
of
twenty-three
events
that
had
been
scheduled
this
season.
K
The
decibel
level
for
conversational
speech
is
60.
Damage
begins
at
85.
According
to
the
Texas
Health
Resources
website,
these
levels
can
exceed
130
for
race,
car
track,
race,
track
drivers
and
for
spectators.
96
is
average,
they
choose
to
be
there
and
they
enjoy
the
vibration
and
the
noise.
It's
their
excitement.
Many
drivers
and
pit
crew
have
seriously
impaired
hearing
even
when
using
earplugs.
The
same
goes
for
construction
and
factory
workers
and
those
attending
rock
concerts
and
some
sporting
events,
people
living
near
a
racetrack
are
forced
to
live
with
it
and
suffer
health
consequences.
K
Even
their
pets
get
nervous
Saturday
evening.
I.
Listen
to
the
Speedway
from
my
home
and
I
decided
to
get
in
the
car
and
I
drove
over
to
the
entrance
and
just
sat
there
for
a
moment.
I
can't
imagine
trying
to
put
kids
to
bed
yeah.
This
was
9:30
I,
can't
imagine
trying
to
put
kids
to
bed
at
that
hour
with
that
kind
of
racket
going
on.
It
was
horrible
and
they
still
racing
by
10:15.
K
They
had
just
started
another
one
in
my
opinion
to
intentionally
build
homes
where
you
know
its
residents
could
sustain
permanent
hearing
damage
is
cruel
and
wrong.
Residents
would
need
to
wear
earplugs
at
home
during
a
race
or
spend
a
large
part
of
the
day
elsewhere
for
nearly
half
of
the
weekends
each
year
is
the
developer
going
to
build
these
homes
with
soundproof
walls?
K
Well,
potential
buyers
not
only
be
alerted
to
the
speedway's
location,
but
also
to
the
risk
of
having
permanent
hearing
damage
by
living
there
would
they
be
asked
to
sign
a
waiver
releasing
all
responsibility
for
such
future
damage,
who
would
want
to
sacrifice
their
family's
health
by
living?
There
I
asked
that
u.s.
councilmen
properly
addressed
consequences
that
this
development
is
built.
Many
of
us
most,
including
me
once
smoked
cigarettes.
Cars
were
not
equipped
with
seat
belts
and
we
let
our
kids
ride
their
bikes
in
the
streets
without
wearing
a
helmet.
We
know
better
now,
yes,
mr.
K
Gaynor,
this
is
America
and
we
are
free
to
smoke,
not
wear
a
seatbelt
or
ride
without
a
helmet
at
our
own
risk.
If
we
want
the
consequences
are
well-known
and
of
our
own
doing,
we
don't
have
the
right
to
force
others
to
do
so.
It's
clear
the
Speedway
is
here
to
stay,
in
my
opinion,
to
knowingly
sacrifice
the
hearing
of
108
families
by
building
this
development
for
its
tax
dollars
is
callous
greed.
There
must
be
a
better
way.
Thank
you.
Thank.
N
Corrie
Kendrick
1867
West,
Market,
Street,
Akron,
Ohio
I'm,
the
director
of
population
health
here
representing
Summit,
County,
Public,
Health
and
I
just
want
to
briefly
talk
about
the
tobacco
legislation.
That's
on
the
agenda
tonight.
I
just
want
to
thank
all
the
members
of
council
for
bringing
this
important
piece
of
legislation
up
and
having
a
debate
about
it
and
appreciate
you
taking
a
look
at
this
important
issue.
I
just
want
to
say
a
few
more
things
tonight
about
it
before
you
make
your
consideration
on
the
third
reading.
N
If,
if
students
never
start
smoking,
they're
95%
less
likely
to
ever
start
if
they
can
make
it
to
21
years
of
age.
So
that
is
why
this
is
the
numbers
21.
It's
scientifically
proven.
It's
not
just
to
align
with
drinking
or
anything
else,
there's
actually
some
scientific
basis
in
this
number
and
smoking
is
still
the
number
one
cause
of
preventable
premature
death.
N
One
other
thing
of
note:
we
had
a
public
meeting
on
this.
We
invited
all
of
the
retailers
affected
by
the
new
law
in
Akron
in
Twinsburg
about
250
letters,
went
out
to
retailers
and
not
one
retailer
showed
up.
So
this
is
an
issue
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
an
issue.
It's
it's
going
across
the
country
and
retailers
are
not
providing
us
any
feedback.
Any
negative
feedback
on
this
as
well,
so
I
want
to
provide
that
input
and
aspect
as
well
as
we've
received
no
negative
citizen
complaints.
N
F
You,
mr.
president,
I
just
want
to
just
say
that
the
Bicentennial
ceremonies
and
stuff
for
the
Bicentennial
is
coming
along.
We
have
a
meeting
tomorrow
night,
so
I
believe
that's
at
7:00
o'clock,
so
that'll
help
finalize
some
more
of
the
of
what's
happening,
but
all
of
the
things
that
we
know
of
and
again
once
again
that
is
the
week
of
July
22nd
through
the
29th
and
most
of
it
is
down
here
at
Columbia,
Woods
Park.
So
it's
moving
moving
forward
rather
well
anything
else.
No,
that's
all
I
got
right
now,
thanks
mr.
Fowler.
O
The
short
of
it
is
that
the
consumer
of
recycled
goods
has
altered
the
type
of
recycled
goods
they
wish
to
receive
because
we
were
not
us
because
those
that
receive
the
recycled
goods
were
not
as
efficient
and
altering
their
collection
as
they
were
for
selling.
They
resulted
in
it
back
up
into
recycling
now
they're
asking
that
we
no
longer
recycle
glass,
only
plastics
one
into
newspapers
cardboard,
but
they
want
them
to
be
clean.
There's
a
cleanliness
factor.
O
O
H
H
All
they
want,
are
this
number
one
and
two
plastics
yes
and
newspapers
and
cardboard,
and
everything
has
to
be
clean,
which
I
think
the
paper
worked
had
already
been.
You
couldn't
have
food
items
like
an
attorney
if
they
had
to
be
cleaned
up,
am
I
wrong
in
when
I
say
they
actually
make
money
on
recycling,
don't
they
get?
Don't
they
actually
go
somewhere
and
they
or
they
have
their
own
recycling
plant.
J
I
think
that's
the
issue.
Is
it's
not
as
profitable
as
it
used
to
be,
particularly
with
the
paperboard
once
China
stopped
accepting
it
the
paperboard?
And
that's
not
just
this
service
providers.
A
lot
of
people
are
having
issues,
as
mr.
Fowler
knows,
I
do
some
work
for
the
Salt
Waste
Authority,
which
tries
to
spearhead
recycling
within
Summit
County,
and
this
has
been
a
issue.
They've
had
their
radar
for
about
a
year,
knowing
that's
coming
down
the
line
and
could.
K
J
O
But
I
just
wanted
to
bring
forward
that
they
have
asked
us
for
an
increase.
The
director
and
I
feel
strongly
that
if
the
provider
is
not
able
to
provide
that
service
at
the
cost
or
the
bid
due
to
market
fluctuations,
that
we
would
recommend
termination
of
the
contract
and
then
pursuing
an
alternative
method,
you.
O
O
O
Things
like
that
I,
don't
know
that
we've
decided
what
we
want
to
do,
but
you
know
the
mayor,
Justin
and
I
have
had
this
discussion
where
what
do
we
do?
This
was
something
that
just
came
on
us
about
a
week
ago
and
we're
trying
to
navigate
this
situation.
So
to
be
candid,
without
really
having
full
review
of
all
the
administrative
I
thought
you.
O
F
Our
job
as
city
officials
is
to
you
know,
encourage
the
recycling
but
I'm
not
sure
at
a
cost.
I
mean
that
was
the
argument
with
the
last
hauler
that
we
had
on
the
little
yellow
bins
was
that
we
were
looking
for
the
rollout
containers
and
they
were
going
to
end
for
recycling
rollout
for
recycling
and
what
we
were
getting.
The
feedback
we
were
getting
from.
F
The
contractor
at
that
time
was
that
he
would
give
us
a
roll
out
larger
container,
but
then
charge
extra
money
for
the
bill,
and
it
was
like
well
I'm
not
going
to
encourage
recycling
and,
at
the
same
time,
passed
a
cost
on
to
the
residents
to
absorb.
So
we
ended
up
staying
with
the
yellow
container
until
we
switched
haulers
and
then
went
with
the
rollout
this
time
around,
but
kinda,
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
right
and
we're
right
back
almost
a
full
circle.
So.
H
J
H
J
O
We
are
in
the
process.
Fortunately
this
happened
now.
I
know
it's
I
see
that
in
a
different
way,
but
fortunately
this
happened
now
because
we're
in
the
process
of
making
new
signage,
so
the
new
signage
will
articulate
this.
We
had
actually
already
had
a
proof
of
the
new
signage
before,
but
fortunately
we
had
not
had
the
construction
started
so
printed,
so
we
will
be
getting
new
signage
here
as
to
what
our
items.
The
other
thing
we
take
is
metal,
metal
cans,
aluminum
cans
and
I'll.
O
A
O
A
O
H
E
J
Not
really
I
mean
the
one
the
consideration
we
gave
them
is.
We
gave
them
an
exclusive
license
to
do
residential
hauling
in
the
city,
and
so,
if
they
don't
want
to
provide
the
service
for
what
they
bid
at,
then
they
lose
that
exclusive
license,
and
maybe
that
isn't
important
to
them.
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
force
them,
we
could.
Can
we
take
them
to
court
and
say
you
have
to
provide
the
service
at
that
rate
theoretically,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
successful
that
would
be
no
cost
time
and
money.
Yeah
I'm.
F
J
P
J
B
O
The
bid
is
always
the
lowest
and
best
yeah
and
I
would
argue
that
anybody
who
voids
a
contract
or
doesn't
provide
a
service
as
bid
would
not
be
the
best
contractor
going
forward,
regardless
of
how
good
of
a
price
we
would
get,
and
you
know
I
think
we
have
some
protections,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
your
attention
that
this
was
posed
to
us
and
and
administrative
ly.
We
don't
feel
it's
appropriate
to
pass
that
cost
off
to
the
customer
and
our
residents
so.
A
O
H
F
B
F
Q
You're
considering
the
alternatives
and
mr.
Fowler,
you
mentioned
multiple
hog,
haulers
I-
think
if
everybody
remembers
why
we
went
to
single
hauler
to
start
with,
it
was
to
eliminate
the
traffic
heavy
reduc
traffic
on
our
roads
and
then
the
past
week
alone,
and
this
hasn't
been
out
in
the
public
as
far
as
I
know
about
what
you
brought
up
this
evening.
O
Do
one
more
thing:
some
of
you
noticed
that
the
parents
started
paving
last
week.
They
kind
of
actually
we
two
weeks
ago,
now,
Friday
or
a
week
ago,
Friday,
but
they
will
be
doing
Haim
town
tomorrow
should
be
grinding
it
tomorrow
or
Wednesday
and
they
will
be
doing
meets
pavement
tomorrow.
So
once
they
get
meats
and
Haim
town,
we
had
to
do
a
change
order
on
Reimer
because
there's
a
call
box
culvert,
that's
in
need
of
repair,
so
they're
they're
parents
going
to
do
the
change
order
on
that
understand.
O
O
H
So
I've
heard
and
just
for
the
public's
information,
this
is
where
player
and
paved,
and
maybe
you
didn't
get
an
apron
coming
off
the
street,
don't
feel
alone,
I
didn't
either,
and
that's
that's
what
we're
talking
about
now
is
that
will
be
taken
care
of,
because
that's
not
good
for
the
cars
going
in
and
out.
It's
definitely
not
good
for
our
brand-new
paved
roads.
So.
O
R
H
Q
O
O
A
O
Q
B
L
O
Just
so,
everyone
understands
that
administrative
Lee,
the
mayor,
Larry
and
I,
are
putting
together
the
2019
paving
lists.
I,
know
you're,
probably
thinking.
Why
are
you
doing
it
today?
My
goal
is
to
have
that
administrative
leap
it
together,
then
I'll
separate
it
out
in
the
wards
and
ask
the
Ward
council
people
to
identify
the
roads
that
our
street
superintendent
has
said
are
the
worst
roads
that
he
wants
to
fix
and
then
maybe,
if
the
council
would
prioritize
the
roads
that
they
find
the
idea
behind
that
is
so
that
we
go
to
budget
season.
O
H
O
B
D
Ordinance
to
authorize
the
administrative
officer
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
engineering
associates
incorporated
for
professional
engineering
services
in
connection
with
the
design,
construction
and
construction
observation
of
the
Cleveland
masam
Road
water
line
and
sewer
line
extensions
and
declaring
an
emergency.
This.
B
B
O
I
E
H
Agree
with
mr.
Tousley,
we
were
supposed
to
be
looking
at
this
on
the
25th
that
never
came
or
actually
even
you
know,
on
the
25th
that
never
came
forward.
Then
now,
all
of
a
sudden
we've
got
it
in
front
of
us,
and
we
want
to
waive
second
and
third
and
I
just
feel
like
no
did
not
get
to
look
at
this
enough.
I
have
other
questions
I'd
like
to
have
ants.
H
O
O
H
H
H
H
Then,
okay,
before
we
went
forward
with
any
legislation,
never
saw
anything
on
that
I
want
to
see
that
which
is
another
reason
why
I
don't
want
to
move
and
waive
any
of
this
and
I
want
something
in
front
of
us
that
says
the
seventy-five
thousand
will
be
paid
back
within
five
years,
which
is
actually
what
I
had
written
down
in
my
notes.
I
would
be
willing
to
go
along
with
an
assessment
for
that.
As
long
as
we're
not
setting
a
precedent
somewhere
and
I
forewarn,
you
I
feel
the
same
way
about
Clark
mill.
H
Only
more
so
I'm
not
gonna
agree
to
any
assessment
on
that
either
I
don't
think
we
should
I
mean
people's
going
to
stand,
I,
don't
mind
helping
businesses
and
I'd
asked
who
the
developer
was.
We
were
supposed
to
have
two
signatures:
mr.
meetings
and
a
developer,
although
I
didn't
see
that
on
the
petition
anywhere,
who
is
a
developer
for
this?
That
would
be
getting
held
happen.
The
developers
who
I'm
assuming
is
who
bought
the
property
that
hadn't
transferred
the
last
time
we
talked
about
it
on
the
18th.
H
There's
a
lot
of
questions
going
forward
with
this
that
I'm,
not
at
all
comfortable
with
moving
forward,
let
alone
effect,
I
asked
you
if
we
bid
it.
This
is
$75,000
we're
going
to
spend,
regardless
of
whether
we're
getting
the
money
back
or
not
or
charter,
clearly
says
anything
over
25.
Let's
go
for
a
bid
and
excuse.
O
H
You
have
come
to
us.
The
administration
has
and
has
asked
permission
to,
pursue
looking
at
approaching
engineers
to
get
prices
on
it.
You
can
look
under.
Let's
see,
92
2010
ordinance,
it
was
a
proposal
for
getting
the
engineering
for
nanites.
We've
got
41
2011,
that's
where
it
was
accepted,
28
2012
advertised
for
bids
for
the
norton
water
line,
and
that's
was
for
a
design-build
I'm
just
like
I
said
I
asked
about
the
bid.
You
didn't
say
anything
about
it
being
illegal
to
go
out
for
bids
on
an
engineering
project
when
I
asked
about
it.
Maybe.
L
O
O
H
H
M
So
I'm,
assuming
there's
a
couple
steps
here
to
this
process,
so
this
first
step
is,
is
that
we
hire
the
engineers
and
they
do
the
engineering
and
then
I
would
assume
that
you
come
back
with
legislation
that
sets
the
assessment
and
the
five-year
time
period
and
the
3%
interest,
and
all
of
those
things
is
that
correct
or
is
that
not
correct
mr.
Markey
is?
Are
we
gonna
get
other
legislation
after
this?
M
J
M
M
J
O
This
would
the
assessment
process
is
strictly
to
cover
the
city.
Should
the
developer
back
out
right.
So
so
we
go
through
with
the
process
we
get,
we
get
an
engineered
and
then
the
developer
says:
okay,
you
know
what
I
own
this
five
parcels
of
land,
but
I
can't
afford
my
financing
goes
through
or
whatever
it
doesn't
fall
through.
M
J
The
intention
would
be
to
bring
a
development,
so
I
was
trying
to
get
to
mr.
fallow
you'd
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
the
intention
would
be
to
come
back
to
counsel
the
development
agreement
in
the
future
that
would
sort
of
lay
out
what
you're
would
you
just
talk
about?
What
raises
the
expectations
of
the
city
as
to
the
development
I
guess.
M
What
I
just
want
to
make
sure
of
very
crystal
clear
is
that
council
gets
a
second
bite
at
this
Apple
that
this
is
going
to
come
back
to
us
and
we're
going
to
approve
some
type
of
a
development
agreement.
Along
with
that,
there's
gonna
be
this
assessment,
because
it's
not
in
here
in
fairness-
it's
not
in
here
I
mean
we
could
do
it
here.
You
could
do
it
here,
I'm
quite
sure,.
B
M
J
A
M
O
J
M
And
that's
what
I
want
to
make
sure,
because
to
be
comfortable
to
move
on
this
tonight.
I
need
to
know,
in
my
own
mind
that
we
can
come
back
later
and
say
we're
going
to
assess
this
in.
M
A
Q
A
M
J
B
O
B
M
O
That's
why
we,
but
so
just
so
you
understand
the
property
is
not
transferred
yet,
like
so
I
had
both
parties,
Thomas
Thomas
somebody
and
Mister
Medan
have
both
signed
that
petition,
because
it's
in
the
midst
of
the
transfer
once
that
property
is
transferred,
then
it
would
be
the
full
responsibility
of
mr.
Thomas.
O
M
N
R
J
S
A
O
G
A
H
R
H
A
B
B
H
M
B
M
P
H
G
H
O
J
The
way
the
way
the
petitions
work
is
mr.
Fowler
may
mention
it
before.
Is
they
waive
all
rights
to
every
form
of
process
that
you
could
have
for
a
petition
for
an
assessment?
So,
theoretically,
you
could
assess
this
back
in
one
year.
I
think
the
handshake
agreement
at
the
city
is
assessing.
It
would
be
at
five
years.
M
J
G
J
E
M
E
O
O
Though
you're
still
have
to
bid
right-
and
we
can't
I
mean
I-
think
to
your
question-
we
can't
tell
the
developer
how
much
it's
going
to
be
costing
him,
because
we
have
to
design
it
right.
Justin
I'll
just
be
clear:
Justin
I,
the
mayor
and
and
Ron
we've
had
discussions
on
how
to
proceed
with
this.
I
have
a
concern
with
allowing
the
developer
to
select
an
engineer
and
telling
us
what's
going
to
go
there.
We
have
no
control
over.
We
have
limited
control
with
this.
I
can
have
a
design
control.
O
P
O
O
And
when
we
did
the
261
water
line
selection
process,
they
were
selected
to
do
two
sick.
They
were
selected
due
to
the
waterside
I,
didn't
select
them
to
do
the
sewer,
but
if
I
split
that
contract
off
both
engineers
would
have
to
survey,
so
it
would
be
twice
the
cost
for
the
survey
work
so
rather
than
we
go
through
that
process
for
the
sewer,
I
just
said,
you're
gonna
be
doing
the
survey
work
it's
900
and
1,000
feet
of
sewer
line.
O
N
H
G
F
H
F
H
F
H
J
H
J
J
If
you
want
our
money,
you
gotta
have
a
contract,
that's
approved
by
council,
so
that
bite
second
bite
at
the
Apple
I
mean
that's,
that's
another
second
bite
of
the
Apple,
we're
just
designing
it,
that'd
be
bid
and
then
it'd
have
to
be
a
determination
of
who's
constructing
who's.
How
the
might
asking
paid
for
that's
all
I
think
to
be
determined
yet.
H
Who
would
be
paying
for
you're
gonna
come
back
to
us
and
say
we
need
to
do
another
one
in
and
we'll
wait
to
get
paid,
or
is
the
developer
working
out
that
money?
That's
now
I
was
concerned
about
seventy-five
thousand
just
for
designing.
How
concerned
you
think
I'm
going
to
be
about
the
next
step
and
that's
putting
up
the
money
first,
just
those
are
just
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Now
I
get
it
it.
H
B
B
R
D
B
R
G
G
E
D
B
B
G
B
B
R
R
G
R
D
H
G
P
G
B
P
M
M
D
Ordinance
tentatively
approving
the
preliminary
plan
of
the
major
subdivision
proposed
by
JLP
Development
LLC
mr.
and
mrs.
Dodd
and
Fisher
sand
and
gravel
corporation,
a
Clark
Mill
Road
parcel
numbers,
four:
six:
zero,
seven,
six,
one:
five:
four:
six:
zero:
seven:
three
one:
five
and
four:
six:
zero:
seven:
zero:
three
nine.
G
H
H
J
M
J
A
J
M
M
M
Okay,
so
and
I
will
say
this
I
totally
get
when
people
have
empty
property
behind
them
and
they
want
to
see
it
stay
woods.
I
get
that
I
understand
that
I
understand
that
we
don't
like
to
see
things
change,
sometimes
I
understand
green
space,
I
love,
green
space,
I
think
green
space
is
a
great
thing.
The
problem
is
is
that
this
property
is
owned,
a
particular
way.
This
person
has
bought
it
and
they
have
a
right
to
develop
it.
M
So
let
me
just
put
it
this
way:
there's
a
rock
concert
up
at
the
Q.
You
have
a
choice
as
to
whether
or
not
you
want
to
go
and
subject
yourself
to
that
noise
or
not.
Here
you
have
a
choice.
Whether
you
want
to
buy
a
house
in
that
allotment
or
not
and
I
guess
the
market
forces
will
drive
whether
or
not
this
developer
can
sell
those
properties
or
not
and
how
much
they
can
sell
them.
M
H
H
Well,
I'm
also
about
mrs.
Woodruff
had
stated
she
did
not
receive
a
notice
to
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
until
the
day
after
the
meeting,
and
that
was
with
everybody
over
there.
I'm
thinking,
that's
probably
correct
and
I
went
through
the
Charter
and
I
looked
at
things
that
I
can't
find
anything
to
help
you
on
that.
Don't
like
it.
H
R
R
Add
one
thing
you
know:
I
will
say
it's
not
a
great
spot
for
a
well
I've,
been
because
of
that
bargain
speed,
where
I
think
it's
going
to
be
some
problems,
but
yeah
and
I
agree
with
Charlotte
about
the
Planning
Commission
I
mean
normally
we
do
pass
what
they
say,
but
those
people
did
not
have
their
word
on
it.
But
the
one
thing
on
the
design,
construction,
Robert
I,
know
we
go
by
standards,
but
I
know
a
new
lobbyists.
R
R
One
new
or
a
lot
as
they
do
and
I
know
that's
been
causing
problem
with
a
lot
of
our
streets,
because
that
ice
forms
and
it
ends
up
breaking
up
our
roads
I
know.
Would
you
check
into
that?
Well
because
I
think
that's
something
we
should
look
at.
Why?
Because
these
people's
sump
pumps
run
all
day
long
and
the
gutters
in
you
know
in
the
wintertime
that
just
forms
that
ice
all
over
that
road
really.
O
O
O
J
Q
I
just
asked
when
this
project
or
any
other
project
is
developed
and
storm
sewers
are
installed,
who
owns
and
maintains
the
storm
sewers?
Who
well
there's
been
some
controversy
here
in
the
recent
past
about
that
and
I
still
like
to
have
an
answer
on
that
as
to
who
owns
what
I've
been
told,
three
or
four
different
people,
three
or
four
different
things
and
I'd
like
to
know
in
this
particular
development,
since
it's
a
fairly
large
one
and
it's
not
there.
Q
O
The
answer
to
that
question
is
very
complex.
With
this
case,
I
can
answer
how
I
think
it's
going
to
I
I,
don't
know
that
that
determination
has
been
made.
My
understanding
is:
there's
consideration
for
a
homeowner's
association
that
homeowners
association
would
then
be
responsible
for
the
operation,
maintenance,
etc,
because
they're
gonna
handle
snow,
plowing,
grass,
cutting,
etc.
O
That
would
be
my
intention,
the
more
that
other
people
are
paying
for
the
better
off.
We
are
and
I
understand
your
concern
again.
If,
if
we
are
mitigating
situations
on
private
property,
and
that's
because
there's
a
public
safety
or
a
public
emergency,
we
have
the
ability
I
would
defer
to
the
law
director
to
assess
all
those
property
owners
for
us,
mitigating
something
that
that
substantially
impacts.
O
Q
Q
B
And
I
also
agree
with
mrs.
Woodruff,
especially
with
the
the
speedway.
There
was
an
incident
out
in
wodsworth
several
years
ago,
where
some
developers
built
some
houses,
and
there
happened
to
be
next
to
some
chicken
farms.
Well,
if
anybody
has
been
anywhere
in
the
area
of
a
chicken
farm,
you've
smelled
it
well,
it
ultimately
went
to
court
and
the
judge
basically
said
chicken
farm
was
here.
Sorry,
I,
I
hope
that
people
do
their
homework.
They
know
that
it's
the
speedway's
right
there
I
understand
the
backyard
issue
as
well.
M
H
H
J
F
H
O
O
I'll,
be
candid:
I've
asked
for
less,
because
I
have
an
interest
in
one
parcel
for
the
city,
so
I'm
trying
to
get
them
to
reconfigure
the
parcel
layout
so
that
we
can
get
one
for
the
city.
So
this
is
just
a
preliminary
plat
and
we're
trying
to
identify
the
parcel
for
access
for
our
emergency
personnel.
All.
H
Q
G
G
G
H
G
G
H
R
I
will
say
that
we've
all
probably
heard
about
this.
Now
it's
been
in
the
paper
that
it's
been
in
the
news.
It's
been
every
word
and
we've
done
our
three
readings,
we're
not
hiding
nothing
from
nobody.
It's
we're
just
asking
this
as
a
safety
feature,
we're
asking
you
not
to
go
ten
miles
over
the
speed
limit
during
the
construction
time,
we
will
have
sign
locations,
its
chief
about
eight
of
them,
I
think
I,
think,
there's
eight
sign
locations
and
we're
just
asking
not
to
go
ten
miles
over
the
speed
limit.
R
R
M
You
know
we've
talked
about
this,
as
mr.
Macklin
said
it's
been
in
the
paper.
Look
this
this
isn't
about
making
money!
Folks!
If
this
was
about
making
money
we'd
have
these
things
set
up
on
twenty
one:
we'd
have
them
set
up
on
261.
We
have
them
set
up
on
76,
we'd,
have
them
set
up
everywhere
and
there
wouldn't
be
any
limit
as
to
the
time
period.
We
just
enter
into
a
contract,
take
the
pictures
and
send
out
the
civil
violations,
but
that's
not
what
we're
doing.
M
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
is
that
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
protect
our
citizens
and
our
police
I,
don't
want
to
wake
up
some
day
or
get
an
email
some
afternoon
and
find
out
that
one
of
our
officers
is
dead
or
one
of
our
citizens
is
dead
because
someone
was
speeding
down
76
because
there
was
a
truck
that
couldn't
stop
and
skidded
for
113
miles
and
hit
four
cars.
Folks,
if
you
don't
want
a
civil
violation,
I
got
a
suggestion,
drive
the
speed
limit.
M
It's
that
simple
drive
the
speed
limit,
not
even
ten
over
with
all
due
respect,
drive
the
speed
limit.
It's
really
dangerous
I'm
in
I,
don't
even
drive
76
anymore,
because
you
come
off
of
Cleveland
Master
Road
and
it's
like
a
cattle
shoot.
I
mean
hey.
You
know,
you're,
looking
back
and
you're,
hoping
to
God
that
you
can
get
up
too.
You
know
because
some
semis
coming
behind
you
going.
You
know
70
miles
now
or
down
through
there's
nowhere
to
go.
There's
nowhere
to
go
and
the
fact
of
the
matter
is.
M
We
can't
put
our
police
officers
out
there
because
there's
nowhere
for
them
to
pull
people
over
safely.
There's
there's
no
way
to
enforce
it.
This
is
the
only
way-
and
you
know
if
you
think
that
we're
doing
this
just
to
make
money
you're
you're
dead
wrong,
because
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this
on
council
I
know
people
were
uncomfortable
with
it
because
of
the
fact
that
it's
you
know
it's
cameras
and
things
of
that
nature.
M
H
President,
yes
I,
agree
totally
couldn't
say
it
better
than
what
mr.
Kernan
did.
It
is
about
safety.
We've
been
over
backwards
to
make
sure
that
this
relates
to
everyone's
safety.
Our
service
forces
police,
everybody,
including
the
people
using
that
district.
If
I
expect
Barberton
that
is
going
to
go
along
with
doing
what
something
similar
I
know
they
were
looking
at
it.
So
there
may
be
a
whole
stretch,
perhaps
even
wise,
Worth
and
again,
if
speed
limits
55
through
construction
zone,
I,
don't
use
70
that
part
a
70
either
anymore.
Mr.
H
Kearney
and
I've
had
a
lot
of
people.
Tell
me:
they've
almost
had
accidents
just
trying
to
get
off
on
barber,
Road
or
elsewhere.
It's
not
worth
it.
I
went
and
I
fought
against
the
cameras
back
when
we
talked
about
him
before
this
is
a
totally
different
thing.
It's
strictly
to
keep
everyone
as
safe
as
we
can
keep
them.
R
B
B
We've
given
up
the
nine
ten
miles
an
hour
where
you
won't
get
a
ticket,
so
don't
think
that
if
you're
going
to
miles
an
hour
over
you're
getting
a
ticket,
these
type
of
situations
are
very
effective.
I,
just
drove
back
from
Virginia
Beach
two
days
ago,
going
down
the
highway.
Allison
I
saw
the
sign
photo
enforcement
area.
B
T
I
did
get
a
report
from
ou
DPS
in
reference
to
the
accidents
on
76.
Our
stretch,
I
actually
asked
them
to
do
like
a
three
year.
Comparison
and
I
will
tell
you
that
from
January
1st
to
I
think
it
was
July.
1St
we've
had
84
accidents
just
an
hour
stretch.
Last
year
alone
in
2017
we
had
147.
That
was
a
construction
year
the
year
prior.
We
only
had
83
so
we're
looking
at
doubling
that
already.
B
And
that's
when
the
chief
came
to
us
he
saw
this
problem
saw
a
problem
with
our
officers
being
out
there.
Safety
concerns
with
them
being
out
there,
not
to
mention,
as
mr.
Kernan
already
did,
that,
there's
nowhere
to
pull
him
over.
You
run
radar,
but
there's
no
place
to
pull
him
over.
So
this
is
purely
about
safety.
Normally,
in
a
construction
zone,
speeding
tickets
are
doubled.
So
if
it's
165
you're
looking
at
three
hundred
and
thirty
dollars-
and
we
said
no-
that's
that's
too
much.
B
A
R
Q
P
P
R
D
H
B
G
G
G
D
G
B
T
A
C
H
H
R
I'm
going
to
say
first
at
Corey,
really
said
it
all
for
Summit,
County,
Health
and
I'm,
just
saying
that
right
now,
Akram
Mogador
in
Twinsburg
in
Summit
County
has
this
and
other
cities
like
Cleveland
and
Columbus
and
I
really
do
feel
that
I
see
other
cities
following
us
soon.
So
I
think
it's
maybe
one
day
it
might
be.
The
whole
state
I
think
we
got
five
or
six
states
right
now
that
completely
do
it
so
I'm
all
for
this
tobacco
21
movement.
Mr.
M
President,
if
I
may-
yes,
we
just
got
done
talking
about
some
ordinances
just
before
this,
about
safety
and
and
protecting
our
citizens,
and
this
is
an
ordinance
where
we
have
the
opportunity
to
protect
some
younger
citizens,
those
kids
who
might
obtain
these
products
and
should
not
I,
think
the
science
is
clear.
If
we
can
prevent
one
one
kid,
we
can
prevent
one
kid
from
starting
smoking,
getting
cancer
and
dying.
M
It's
worth
it.
It's
totally
worth
today,
it's
no
different
than
drinking.
If
we
can,
you
know
we
could
lower
the
drinking
limit
to
18,
but
we
have
decided,
and
science
shows
that
if
you
raise
the
drinking
limit
to
21
less
people
die,
I
mean
isn't
that
what
we're
supposed
to
do
we're
supposed
to
protect
our
citizens.
Is
this
an
infringement
on
freedom
yeah?
It
probably
is
to
a
degree
I
mean,
but
that's
those
are
the
that's
what
we
weigh
all
the
time.
M
B
A
E
Side
of
this
that
tobacco
is
dangerous
and
harmful,
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
I
do
believe
this
is
more
appropriate,
a
state
issue.
This
state
would
make
that
decision,
and
then
we
wouldn't
have
community
against
community,
which
is
what
this
is
going
to
cause,
but
again
I
just
like
to
reiterate
for
myself.
This
is
not
about
tobacco.
This
is
about
government,
and
is
it
appropriate
for
government
to
discriminate
between
groups
of
legal
adults
and
to
dictate
which
groups
get
of
legal
adults,
get
more
rights
and
which
group
of
legal
adults
get
less
rights?
E
P
Yes,
thank
you
and
I'll
agree
with
you
on
the
issue,
for
it
should
be
a
state
issue,
but
right
now
we're
just
building
that
momentum,
but
I'd
love
to
see
it
in
a
state.
So
I
will
agree
with
you.
It
should
be.
Statewide
I
saw
recent
statistics
that
we've
had
quite
an
inroad
on
the
effectiveness
of
smoking.
P
Cessation
about
14
percent
of
our
United
States
population
now
were
considered
smokers
as
of
last
year,
meaning
86
percent
of
our
population
or
adults
are
non-smokers,
so
some
things
have
worked
and
some
states
have
gone
and
enacted
this
legislation
which
may
have
affected
those
numbers
already
I
think
taking
a
step
down.
That
path,
encourages
our
good
health
and
since
I
represent
the
city
on
the
board
of
health.
P
I
kind
of
near
and
dear
to
my
heart,
plus
I've,
been
a
pharmacist
for
about
40
years
and
I've
seen
those
devastating
effects
we
still
have
when
I
say
14%
that
represents
about
30
million
people,
united
states
that
are
still
considered
smokers.
So
we
have
some
work
to
do
still
and
I
think
this
is
part
of
that
work.
P
H
I
do
I
agree
with
mr.
Tousley.
This
isn't
something
we
should
be
deciding
if
she
either
be
left,
make
it
a
statewide
thing:
put
it
on
the
ballot.
Let
the
people
decide,
they
should
have
a
voice
in
this
and
I
know
we're
talking.
Statistics
I've
read
the
article
today
in
it
from
The,
Herald,
Thank
You,
mr.
McCollum
and
Kerri
and
I'm
sorry,
I
hate
statistics.
I
want
to
hear
numbers
like
the
chief
gave
us
tonight.
There
was
X
amount
of
accidents
on
76.
That
impresses
me
statistics.
Don't
to
me.
H
Statistics
is
just
a
numerical
way
of
portraying
what
you
want
to
portray,
not
say
that
they're
all
wrong,
but
when
I
hear
that
they're
not
they
have
to
have
cold
cars
brought
in
and
other
counties
or
other
cities
to
take
care
of
the
people.
It's
od'd.
That
tells
me
there's
a
lot
more
people
dying
from
drugs
and
then
what
there
is
a
cigarette
I.
Don't
think
we
have
this
right,
I,
don't
think
we
should
be
doing
this.
I
mean
we
have
the
right
obviously,
or
this
legislation
wouldn't
be
bad,
but
it
shouldn't
be
our
decision.
H
J
B
B
However,
like
I
mentioned
before
at
18
year,
old
votes
for
us
votes
for
the
President
of
the
United
States,
but
he
can't
make
a
decision
whether
or
not
he
wants
to
smoke
cigarette.
He
wants
to
go,
buy
a
house.
You
can
go
sign.
A
contract
get
alone
sign
a
contract
for
a
hundred
and
some
thousand
dollars.
Two
hundred
and
seven
thousand
dollars,
there's
no
problem
there,
but
when
it
comes
to
this
now,
all
of
a
sudden
you
know,
there's
there's
issues
with
it,
his
insurance
or
his
or
hers
insurance.
B
Obviously,
they're
gonna
pay
the
price
throughout
life
as
a
smoker
and
yeah
I
was
a
smoker
and
I
paid
more
I
paid
extra
taxes.
They
always
put
the
extra
taxes
on
the
cigarette
and
everything
else.
None
of
that
deters
a
smoker
because
of
that
nicotine
level
that
addiction.
So
if
you
want
to
make
some
changes,
reduce
the
amount
of
nicotine
and
a
cigarette
to
where
it's
not
addictive
there
you're
gonna
make
an
impact.
This
is
nothing
more
than
a
band-aid
and
I
will
not
support
it.
Well,.
H
P
Q
O
Q
O
O
Sign
is
still
up
to
prove
it
so
for
anyone
to
say
that
we
did
not
make
every
attempt
possible.
I
I
want
to
thank
Council
for
their
help
and
trying
to
get
that
message
out,
but
but
we
did
everything
we
could
and
41
people
now
I
understand.
There
are
some
exigent
circumstances
on
a
couple
of
these
houses
and
and
Barberton
is
handling
those,
but
but
for
the
majority
that
that's
not
the
case
in
had
passed
away
so
that
that's
one
of
these
shows.
O
H
H
F
No
other
than
the
only
thing
you
just
want
to
remind
you,
though,
that
we
still
have
the
charter
amendment
that
we
would
like
to
you
guys
think
about
a
little
bit
on
the
primary
election
for
Summit,
County
and
I
said
we
didn't
commit
one
way
or
another,
but
I
told
her
them
that
we
would
move
forward
on
making
a
decision
in
enough
time
to
put
it
on
the
ballot.
If
that
was
something
that
we
were
going
to
do
all
right,
one.
Q
Q
More
thing,
the
district
Advisory
Committee
is
still
looking
for
employee
for
an
employee
of
Norton
or
Barberton,
or
the
Health
District
to
be
a
member
of
the
mad
mosquito
abatement
district
board,
so
anyone
who's
an
employee
of
either
city
or
the
Health
District.
If
you're
interested
in
that
position,
please
follow
the
directions
posted
in
the
newspaper
and
other
places
and
apply
and.