►
From YouTube: Committee Work Session
Description
09-20-21 - 7:00 p.m.
A
C
A
A
A
E
D
F
C
F
F
B
B
F
H
F
I
I
I
I
F
I
I
I
Freedom
or
yes,
I
can,
I
can
provide
that
information.
We
do
have
that
it's
around
70
000,
I
believe,
don't
quote
me
on
the
exact
number,
but
it's
almost
half
of
the
truck
stop,
which
is
why
we
were
trading
them
in.
If
you
recall,
on
our
capital,
we're
playing.
We
talked
about
trading
it
in
sooner
so
as
to
get
a
better
price
and
eliminate
maintenance
costs,
because
we
still
haven't
found
them
again
to
help
us
maintain
it.
H
H
H
In
that
case,
I'll
move
to
add
ordinance,
number
92
2021
to
council's
next
agenda
again
with
emergency
language
and
waiving
readings.
The
reason
for
the
waiver
of
readings
in
the
emergency
language
is
that
we
need
to
get
this
legislation
in
place
so
that
we
can
schedule
the
work
and
have
the
road
repaved
as
early
in
the
year
next
year
as
possible,
and
also
to
lock
in
lock
in
the
the
price
anything
else.
Mr
fowler
did
I
state
that
correctly.
I
I
G
I
B
H
This
is
just
giving
administration
permission
to
apply
for
opwc
funds
for
that
water
line
that
over
on
rhymer
road
and
carl
in
that
area
over
there.
Anything
further
on
that,
I
think
the
deadline
to
apply
is
september
30th,
so
I'm
going
to
be
asking
to
wave
and
to
do
emergency
language
on
this.
Also,
is
that
correct,
mr
fowler.
C
I
I
H
H
A
A
A
G
Yes,
mr
president,
I
I
don't
know
why
I
didn't
notice
this
before,
but-
and
I
know
that
some
of
the
other
tiff
things
have
said
the
same
thing.
But
why
does
this
only
take
four
members
of
council
to
approve
and
get
it
pushed
through
under
emergency?
Basically
so
it'll
be
in
effect,
right
away,
as
opposed
to
the
two-thirds.
J
J
F
F
I
F
F
Both
parties
agreed
to
a
dollar
an
hour
increase
for
2021,
with
an
additional
10
payment
for
health
care
and
requiring
the
union
to
pick
up
pick.
One
vision
plan
and
for
2022
they'll
receive
the
same
dollar
increase
as
the
full-time
contract
year
for
employees
and
paying
an
additional
ten
dollars
a
month
for
health
insurance,
and
all
this
takes
is
a
a
voice
vote
at
the
next
council
meeting,
regular
council
meeting
any
questions
just
for.
G
F
G
F
C
F
This
is
pretty
much
the
same
as
before:
2022
and
2023
dollar
an
hour
per
per
hour
increase,
and
I'm
assuming
this
is
just
2022
and
2023,
so
with
an
additional
10
payment
for
health
care
requiring
the
union
to
pick
one
vision
plan
the
contract
also
eliminated
year,
one
of
the
labor
wage
scale
and
added
a
paid
differential
to
the
foreman
of
0.38
in
2022
and
0.5
and
20
23.,
and
same
as
clerical.
This
requires
just
a
voice
vote
at
next
council.
G
I
Tentative
agreement
once
it's
reached
by
both
parties.
It
only
requires
a
vote
of
affirmative
and
affirmative
vote
accounts.
Should
you
reject
the
ta,
then
we'd
go
back
to
bargaining,
but
once
both
parties
have
agreed,
council
can
do
a
voice
vote,
a
tentative
of
a
tentative
agreement.
There
are
statutory
limitations
on
the
time
frame.
That
council
has
once
it's
presented
to
approve
the
tentative
agreement,
which
is
why
a
voice
vote
is
accepted.
G
F
H
F
I
C
H
A
A
A
C
I
And
I
you
know,
mr
tiles.
I
called
mr
brandman
today
to
confirm
that
this
is
the
process
we're
undertaking,
I'm
going
to
get
counsel,
all
of
them
I'll
all
of
you
in
that,
because
what
I've
found
is
there's
only
one
sliver
parcel
out
there.
That's
not
i1
that
was
done
well
before
and
anything
south
of
there
started
and
the
idea,
I
think,
when
I
talked
to
minister
raymond
because
some
of
the
office
worker
work
in
that
office
buildings
also
like
a
process
building,
there
was
a
thought
that
it
should
be.
I
won.
I
I
I
One
of
the
concerns,
I
think,
if
I
was
a
neighbor,
I
would
have
with
vehicular
traffic
on
that
street
and
we
want
to
assure
the
people
that
it'll
be
it's
a
neighborhood
street,
so
there
should
be
nothing
heavier
than
a
regular
vehicle.
There
should
be
no
commercial
vehicles
accessing
that.
So
that's
why
we're
working
on
an
alternate
plan
to
access
those
properties
off
of
cleveland
mass.
E
J
J
J
G
A
A
I
thought
you
and
I
had
driven
up
there.
Maybe
you
wasn't
with
me,
but
there's
a
driveway
up
there
already
and
I'm
assuming
that
they're
going
to
increase
the
size
and
dimension
and
everything
of
that
driveway
to
access
the
buildings
that
would
be
for
industrial
use
and
then
in
the
back.
If
you
look
at
this
plan
in
the
back
four
28th
street
strikes,
the
460
906.9
is
pretty
much
on
the
eastern
end
of
that
of
that
parcel
and
the
neighbors
that
paul's,
referring
to
the
46
triple
o
6
8.
A
A
Spot
zoning
like
he
said
that
would
allow
us
to
to
interfere
with
what
they
built
there.
Of
course,
if
it
wants
to
zone
yes,
they
could
build
close
by,
but
they
would
still
have
to
maintain
that
I
forget
what
it
is.
We
discussed
this
once
before
when
they
were
building
the
park
land
up
there
and
people
were
concerned
about
how
close
they
could
get
to
the
houses.
A
Entrance,
as
has
been
stated,
a
separate
entrance
entrance,
that's
going
to
come
off
of
cleveland
maslin
road,
where
that
house
is
at
the
top
of
the
hill
from
the
existing
driveway.
You
can
drive
up
the
driveway.
Now
it's
it's
an
open
driveway,
where
they're
building
the
new
structure
and
the
way
I
understand
it,
they're
going
to
be
putting
a
new
entrance
in
from
cleveland.
J
A
C
A
A
A
G
C
A
The
way
I
understand
it,
charlotte
robert,
can
answer
that
better,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that
there's
going
to
be
an
office
building
off
of
28th
street
and
the
other
industrial
structure
that
they're
building
kda's
building
is
going
to
have
an
entrance.
As
I
said
off,
of
cleveland
maslin,
so
all
together.
Yes,
there
would
be
the
three
buildings
one.
J
G
A
A
G
G
Well,
I
did
have
a
question,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
relevant
to
this,
but
I
know
I'd
been
shown
some
pictures
of
that
there
were
all
kinds
of
oh
cans
for
lack
of
a
better
word
containers
where
they
were
going
to
put
up
something.
What's
in
them,
that's
just
sitting
out
there
do
you
have
any.
G
G
A
H
H
B
F
G
G
I
think
everybody's
got
a
copy
and
they
should
have
been
able
to
look
at
it.
Now
as
to
what
the
explicit
difference
is.
I
never
did
get
a
response
as
far
as
are
there
some
houses
down
there,
starting
from
76
that
don't
have
access
to
sewer
yet
on
the
cleveland
maslin
phase,
one
because
I
keep.
I
keep
getting
told
that
there's
people
down
there
that
don't
have
sewer
access
close
to
76
and
osher
and,
like
I
said,
I've,
never
had
a
response
to
that
yet,
and
I'm
not
going
to
do
anything
with
this.
G
G
As
I
understand
it,
there
was
a
mr,
I
think,
milo
milkovitch,
that
he
has
tied
in
and
it
had
tied
into
the
sewer
down
there
around
the
school,
the
rental
property
right
in
front
of
us
right
in
front
of
the
new
school
high
school
up
through
there,
and
then
he
had
tied
in
last
december.
Third,
if
that'll
help,
I
believe
it
was
december
3rd
or
december
4th.
I
had
it
written
down
here
somewhere,
but
that
he
had
tied
in
and
I
believe
he
would
have
been
paying
the
16
000..
G
So
that's
that's
what
I've
been
saying
that
I
wanted
as
far
as
standardizing
all
the
tie-in
benefits,
I
don't
know
how
you're
going
to
do
that
when
we
have
various
ways
that
we
end
up
with
our
sewer
lines
going
in
and
water
lines
too.
For
that
matter,
we've
got
the
petition
like
what
happened
down
in
loyal
oak,
where
it
was
actually
asked
for
and
stated
that
the
developer
or
whoever
bought
the
property
would
pay
for
it.
G
So
I
don't
know
how
you
could
actually
say:
everything's
going
to
be
the
same
way
when
you
have
three
different
ways
of
developing
as
we
go
along,
but
I
will
stand
steady
that
phase
one
should
get
the
same
thing,
the
same
benefits
that
everybody
else
got
the
option
to
be
able
to
make
the
payments
or
pay
up
front
and
no
increase.
Every
year,
anybody
who
has
paid
that
increase
should
be
reimbursed
that
money,
it's
not
like,
there's
a
100
homes
involved.
I
don't
believe.
F
C
F
Price
of
everything
you
know,
if
you
look
at
the
cost
of
what
it
was
to
put
in
a
sewer
line
a
year
ago
versus
today,
it's
night
and
day
I
mean
prices
have
gone
through
the
roof
on
all
construction
materials.
So
by
going
by
a
percentage,
though,
now
you
can
capture
that
difference
and
that
500
a
year
also
helps
take
care
of
the
dollar
value.
F
B
F
F
G
G
Well
then,
that
raises
another
question:
if
we
do
put
it
onto
the
sewer
bill,
then
can
these
people
actually
deduct
it
off
of
their
taxes
or
are
they
they
just
lose
that
option,
because
it's
on
a
utility,
as
opposed
to
being
assessed
on
their
on
their
actual
property?
You
know
when
you
file
your
taxes
every
year
with
the
state
and
federal
someone
had
asked
me
about
it,
and
I
could
not
answer
that
question.
H
Well,
I
don't
know
because
I'm
not
a
tax
attorney,
but
I
will
tell
you
this:
if
somebody
needs
to
pay
an
assessment
and
we
don't
have
the
acceleration
clause,
we
as
the
city
are
paying
interest
on
that
money
that
they're
not
paying.
That
means
you
all
get
to
pay
that
interest
and
they
get
to
use
that
money
for
free
for
up
to
10
20
years
before
they
decide
to
tap
in
and
that's
not
fair
if
they
need
to
tap
in
and
they
don't
tap
in
right
away
the
next
year.
H
There
should
be
some
acceleration
to
cover
the
cost
of
using
the
city's
money,
because
that's
what
they're
doing
so,
they
need
to
make
the
rest
of
the
citizens
in
the
city
whole
by
paying
that
money
back.
That's
one
reason
for
the
acceleration
clause.
The
other
reason
for
the
acceleration
clause
is
to
try
to
encourage
people
to
tap
in
more
quickly.
Now
you
know
whether
that
works
or
not.
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
to
me-
that's
not
the
biggest
point.
H
The
biggest
point
is
that
the
acceleration
clause
is
needed
to
make
the
city
whole
because
we're
paying
service
on
that
money
and
that
needs
to
be
reimbursed
to
the
city.
That's
why
I
support
the
acceleration
clause.
I
you
know
the
other
stuff
about
making
payments
and
things
of
that
nature.
You
know
making
payments
to
me
is
something
that
should
be
for
people
who
didn't
have
a
choice.
H
We
were
ordered
to
put
something
in,
we
put
it
in,
they
have
to
pay
for
it.
I
understand
not.
Everybody
has
fifteen
thousand
dollars
sitting
around
to
pay
that,
so
I
understand
them
having
to
make
you
know
to
me
or
wanting
to
make
payments,
whether
it's
on
taxes
or
sewer
bills
or
whatever
it
is.
If
somebody
petitions,
then
they
ought
to
be
prepared
to
pay
for
that
for
their
assessment,
then,
if
they
petition
for
it.
A
It
gets
pretty
complete
and
upsetting
here,
just
convoluted
or
whatever.
The
word
is
you
that
the
we're
saying
the
people
at
loyola
petitioned
was
it
the
only
the
person
that
bought
the
meeting
place
that
petitioned.
It
was
him
right
only
okay,
so
the
other
people
who
are
wanting
to
hook
into
that
particular
line.
A
A
A
J
A
Those
people
also,
I
think
those
people
also,
I
agree
with
joe
and
scott
on
that.
I
think
that
it
wouldn't-
I
don't
think
it's
overbearing-
to
require
them
to
pay.
If
it's
the
500
per
year
for
every
year,
they
don't
hook
up.
I
don't
know
how
many
years
that's
set
up
for
is
that
set
up
for
a
five
maximum
five
or
what
I
think.
G
A
Per
per
year
increase
for
every
year,
they
don't
hook
up,
but
in
in
return
for
that.
In
return
for
that
us
recouping
our
three
percent
interest
in
return
for
that,
I
think
all
of
those
people
in
phase
one
and
loyal
oak,
who
hook
up
no
matter
what
the
line
who
paid
for
the
line
originally
no
matter
who
paid
for
it.
I
think
they
should
have
the
option
to
put
it
on
their
taxes,
whatever.
C
A
C
A
Had
the
ability
to
put
it
on
a
little
longer
because
they
were
forced
into
it
from
from
the
epa
and
health
department,
but
these
people
down
there
are
not
forced
into
it.
So
maybe
their
repayment
period
might
be
set
up
a
little
less,
but
but
I
believe
that
all
of
those
people
hooking
up
the
sewers
down
through
that
whole
area
where
they're
the
new
sewers
are
going
in,
they
should
have
an
ability
to
put
it
on
their
taxes
yearly
and
pay
for
yearly
on
their
taxes.
A
Because
I
don't
know
about
you
but,
like
joe
said,
I
don't
have
15
000
to
or
16
or
if
I
wait
another
year
or
whatever
it
is.
I
don't
have
that
kind
of
money.
Most
people,
don't
the
the
businesses
should
be
lower
the
lowered
amount
of
time
they
had
to
pay
for
it,
but
but
as
far
as
petitioning
the
way
I
understood
it,
it
was
only
those
the
person
who
petitioned
for
the
two
thousand
and
one
thousand
foot
of
sewer
and
water
so
and
they're
they're
going
to
be
hopefully
given
some
time
to
pay.
A
Also,
because
of
the
vast
amount
of
money
that
was
involved,
so
I
I
don't
have
a
problem
charlotte
with
with
the
five
hundred
dollars.
I
what
I
have
a
problem
with
this,
I
think
everyone
should
be
allowed
to,
and
I
think
they
agree
I
everyone
should
be
allowed
to
have
it
extended
over
a
period
of
time,
10
years,
20
years,
whatever
the
is
decided,
I'm
in
favor
of
it,
but
I
also
believe
those
people
who
have
already
paid
the
500
they've
paid
it.
So
anybody
in
the
future
that
that
wants
to
hook
up
they.
A
C
A
Don't
really
have
a
problem
with
the
500
extra
and
but
I
think
it
should
be
publicized
widely,
as
it
was
done
over
here
at
nash
heights.
For
the
people
who
were
not
in
the
mandated
area,
they
were
given
a
certain
amount
of
time
to
hook
up
or
they
would
be
charged
the
extra,
if
you
remember
they
would
be
charged
the
extra
per
year
for
hooking
up
late,
and
so
I
I
don't.
A
I
don't
see
any
problem
with
if
it's
publicized
widely
that,
if
you
don't
hook
up
and
also,
I
think
it
will
help
it'll
help
the
city
of
norton
by
having
more
water
customers
more
sewage
customers
which,
in
the
long
run,
is
a
benefit
to
everybody
in
the
future
lines,
any
future
lines
that
we
ran.
I
think
it
should
be
set
up
the
same
way
unless
it's
mandated
for
an
example
of
another
whole
community.
We've
got
two
or
three
communities
that
are
not
exactly
sewer
rich.
They
have
the
septics
and
everything.
A
A
I
don't
think
that's
unusual,
I
mean
outrageous,
but
what
I
do
think
would
be
outrageous
is
if
we
don't
allow
them
to
to
extend
the
repayment
period,
although
everybody
who,
who
wants
to
hook
up,
should
be
given
the
opportunity-
and
I
understand
that
they're
being
told
now
or
allowed
to
put
it
on
their
water
bill.
I
I
I'm.
J
A
Sure,
too,
sure
that
I
would
like
to
see
it
go
on
the
water
bill,
who's
going
who's,
collecting
the
water
bill,
barbers
and
who's
who's,
banking,
that
money
and
making
interest
on
it.
I
I
would
think
that
it
would
be
I
I
would
prefer
that
the
myself
that
it
would
be
put
on
their
tax
duplicates
and
they
would
pay
it
with
their
taxes
every
year.
Just
like
everybody
else
does
you
know,
but
that's
that's
up
to
you
charlotte.
You
want
to
pass
it
on
or
not.
A
That's,
that's
your
ability,
but
I,
but
I
think
that
that
can
be
written.
I'm
sure
they
can
write
that
up
and
include
the
500
increase,
but
also
include
the
fact
that
we
give
them
a
certain
time
period.
This
could
be
decided
on
time.
You,
you
know
the
other
people
that
are
here
can
decide
on
the
time
period,
but
but
I
think
it
should
be
a
time
period
for
sure
and
that's.
G
I
don't
know,
I
just
don't
think
it's.
I
don't
think
it's
that
beneficial
to
go
from
fifteen
thousand
up
to
nineteen
thousand
over
the
course
of
time
on
people
who
did
not
ask
for
it
and
if
they
do
fail,
then
they
get
an
extra
10
years
anyway.
I
believe
it
goes
up
to
20
years
to
pay
it
off
if
they
were
to
fail
and
the
county
was
come
in
and
say
that
they
had
to
tie
in
and
they
did
get
extra
time
at
making
the
monthly
payments
or
paying
up
front.
However,
the
case
may
be.
G
G
I
think
it's
all
kind
of
it
just
well.
I
won't
say
that,
but
it's
a
mess,
okay,
as
to
how
we've
actually
set
this
up
to
begin
with,
but
I'm
not
willing
to
go
back
and
tell
these
people
when
we
thought
about
it.
Now
we
decided
we
want
you
to
pay
extra
money
and
we
present
it.
One
way
when
all
I
was
asking
is
making
equitable
for
the
other
people.
That's
already
been
had
the
water
lines
and
the
sidewalks
and
the
sewer
lines
put
in
front
of
their
houses,
maybe
or
maybe
not
and
depending.
I
As
a
as
mr
gaynor
stated,
the
project
phase
2-3
or
phase
3,
however,
however,
we're
quantifying
that
those
were
all
made
before
I
got
here,
but
that
sewer
line
is
part
of
the
project
for
which
there
was
debt
issued
to
pay
that
street
recruit
and
if
you
don't
escalate
that
cost,
then
the
city's
covering
that
interest
for
all
those
people
for
that
portion
of
the
project
so
essentially
you're
giving
a
zero
percent
loan.
When
the
city
is
paying
three
percent
going
to
nash
heights.
J
A
Pay
over
a
period
of
years
charlotte,
just
while
I'm
before
I
skip
to
my
mind
again
here
you
mentioned
you
know
a
tax
to
bill
every
six
months.
I
don't
know
about
most
people,
I
I
believe
most
people
have
a
mortgage
and
and
that
normally
the
taxes
they
don't
have
to
have,
but
normally
they're
in
escrow,
and
so
they
do
pay
it
monthly
with
their
mortgage
payment.
G
A
Don't
say
I'm
saying
most:
maybe
it's
not
most,
but
I
expect
that
it
would
be
a
bigger
percentage.
It
would
pay
it
monthly
then
would
pay
it
yearly
or
six
month
wise,
you
know
quarterly
or
whatever,
but
but
I
I
like,
I
said
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
500
paul
you
haven't
spoke
on
this.
I
I
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
500
that
that.
E
J
E
A
E
Feeling
is,
we
shouldn't
leave
this
meeting
until
we
have
that
agreement,
so
the
administration
can
come
back
next
year
next
week,
whether
it's
with
two
or
three
changes
to
the
old
ones
and
new
ones.
Whatever
we
got
to
do
that,
we
can
move
this
forward
for
people,
because
I
have
not
met
them.
The
homeowner
who
lost
the
sale
of
the
home,
but
I
know
if
that
was
me,
I
might
have
had
another
house
contingent
on
it.
F
F
A
F
I
F
A
E
A
F
F
During
committee
of
the
whole
at
the
beginning
of
the
next
meeting,
and
make
sure
that
you're
in
agreement
with
it,
if
you
see
it,
come
out
or
as
soon
as
administration
has
a
draft
copy
of
it,
send
it
out,
and
anybody
with
any
questions
or
concerns.
You
know
fire
those
questions
back
to
administration
and
get
them
hashed
out
during
the
week
and
then
by
next
monday.
We
can
just
go
ahead
and
go
over
it
vote
on
the
add
it
and
go
from
there.
F
F
F
G
Well,
until
this
county
any
of
these
people
in
phase
one
of
the
road,
the
cleveland,
madison
project,
loyal
oak
or
phase
three-
it's
not
mandatory
mandatory
for
any
of
them
until
the
county
and
the
health
department
comes
in
and
says
that
they
have
to,
and
then
it's
mandatory
they
have
no
choice
right.
We.
H
F
A
A
C
F
A
I
I
I
I
just
want
to
ask
council
I'm
not
trying
to
start
this,
but
I
I
think
mrs
whitkey
brought
up
a
good
point.
We
should
offer
this
to
everybody
and
if
council
says
that
that's
acceptable,
we'll
prepare
the
other
ordinances
for
the
next
committee
meeting,
as
I
think
she
brings
up
the
very
good
point
that
everybody
should
have
the
option
to
pay
it
this
way.
I
C
F
Not
the
if
I
may
yeah
percentage
of
the
total
cost.
That's
the
benefit
cost,
that's
the
rate
I
was
referring
to.
So
if
the
project
was
you
know,
185
000,
divided
by
five
homes
or
whatever,
and
you
know
we
decide
that
we
want
residents
to
pay
47
percent
of
the
cost.
Whatever
that
percentage
is
that
stays
the
same.
F
A
E
A
A
Though
is
the
the
question
charlotte
had
about
the
house
mayor,
you
might
know
the
answer
to
this
right
off
the
last
house
on
the
left.
Before
you
get
to
interstate
76,
I
thought
it
was
an
address
on
osir.
She
says
it's
listed
as
the
address
on
cleveland
maslin,
but
there's
no
driveway
on
cleveland
and
I
just
wondered
if
they
might
have
that.
A
A
A
And
the
contract
called
for
them
to
run
it
to
osir
and
not
to
the
house
past
hoser,
then
I
could
understand
why
the
house
was
not
included,
but
if
we
had
a
contract
to
run
it
to
osir
and
the
two
houses
before
osir
were
not
included,
then
there's
something
wrong
that
they
should
have
been
if
they
weren't.
I
I
don't
know
what
the
contract
called
for.
I.
C
H
C
G
H
So
you've
got
the
parameters
of
what
council
is
looking
for
going
forward
and
looking
back
to
the
ordinances
that
we've
beat
to
death
for
the
last
four
meetings,
so
hopefully
come
next
monday.
We
can
have
those
and
have
them
in
some
form
that
they're
consistent
with
one
another
and
take
a
look
at
those
correct.
D
H
F
A
F
H
H
D
I
will
announce
it
next
week,
but
I
just
wanted
to
announce
tonight.
I
know
that
I
see
from
time
to
time
there's
been
questions
as
to
trick
or
treat
for
halloween
and
we
are
going
to
be
at
the
city
of
norton,
we'll
be
having
a
trick-or-treat
on
saturday,
the
30th
from
five
to
seven
pm
and
we'll
have
a
flyer
and
so
forth
and
we'll
have
it
out
and
posted.
So
if
people
are
asking
you
just
so,
you
know
we're
planning
on
doing
it
on
saturday
night.
H
From
five
to
seven
and
again,
we
we
ask
folks
and
neighborhoods
to
do
the
the
full
city,
the
the
whole
city
trick
or
treat
only
because
then
we
know
people
are
doing
it.
The
police
are
aware
of
it.
The
safety
forces
are
aware
of
it.
They
can
keep
a
better
eye
on
things.
So
please
do
the
the
the
date
that
the
city
has
set
on
october
30th
right.
B
G
We
had
received
that
email
consenting
concerning
our
police
and
the
awards.
They
were
recognized
for
saving
the
lives
down
here
on
eastern
road.
Could
the
mayor
mayor,
you
were
you're
familiar
with
this.
I
would
just
like
to
acknowledge
this
on
the
council
floor,
since
we,
I
think,
we've
kind
of
overlooked
it.
The
entire
time.