►
From YouTube: 07-05-2022 Committee Work Session
Description
07-05-2022 Committee Work Session
D
D
B
C
D
B
F
B
F
I
just
wanted
to
say
it
again
my
opposition
to
the
moratorium
on
muds.
I
think
anyone
who
has
any
idea
about
the
needs
for
future
development
in
a
city
would
understand
the
reason
the
proposed
organs
would
thwart
our
efforts
to
bring
more
housing
business
and,
hopefully,
a
good
living
area
for
senior
citizens
to
retire.
B
D
You,
mr
president,
so
this
is
about
recording
our
boards
and
commissions
meetings,
so
I
was
reading
a
little
here
in
the
ordinance.
So
did
we
have
a
little
bit
of
a
language
change
in
here
to
show
that,
because
now
we
discussed
about
what,
if
the
electricity
is
out
or
what,
if
we
can't
do
the
recording
at
that
time,
the
way
I'm
understanding
it
is
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
a
live
feed
correct
it
just
is
going
to
be
copied
at
that
time.
A
D
Right
and
the
language
says
that
the
planning
commission,
the
board
of
zoning
building
appeals,
the
civil
service
commission,
the
park
and
cemetery
board,
and
the
charter
review
commission
shall
broadcast
all
meetings
by
streaming
service
to
allow
greater
public
access
to
those
meetings.
The
failure
to
broadcast
any
meeting
by
streaming
device
due
to
internet
outage
power
outage
or
unforeseen
equipment
problems
such
as
hardware,
failure
failures
or
software
bugs
that
prevent
broadcasting
such
a
meeting
shall
not
cause
to
invalidate
any
official
action
taken
by
a
board
or
commission
during
such
meeting
so
and
then.
D
Furthermore,
it
says
that
the
the
we
shall
retain
the
videos,
a
copy
of
the
video
recording
of
each
meeting
of
such
board
and
commission
until
the
hard
copy
minutes
of
the
board
of
commission
meeting
are
approved.
So
basically,
as
soon
as
the
the
hard
copy
of
the
minutes
the
jet
are
approved,
then
we
don't
no
longer
have
to
maintain
a
video
recording
of
that
also.
So
I
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
has
any
other
comments
or
any
questions,
it
seems
pretty
straightforward
yeah.
I
would.
A
Just
mention
that
it's
not
going
to
stop
the
city
from
still
hosting,
if
it's
on
youtube
that
video
can
stay
on
youtube.
This
is
just
the
copy
that
the
city's
required
to
keep
for
its
records
would
be.
You
could
get
rid
of
it
once
the
mints
are
approved,
which
is
consistent
with
their
public
records
policy,
but
it's
not
going
to
stop
anybody
from
hosting
it
on
youtube
posting
it
keeping
it.
Okay.
A
A
A
A
D
A
Yeah,
so
if
you
look
in
paragraph
b,
what
I
I
was
anticipating
that
concern,
so
what
we
proposed
is
if
the
video
copy
of
the
meeting
is
a
two
cents
is
from
the
bottom
of
paragraph
b.
If
the
video
copy
of
the
meaning
is
not
available,
you
should
make
a
copy
audio
copy
of
the
meeting
available
to
the
public
on
the
city's
website.
So
there,
the
city
has
the
ability
on
its
website
currently
to
put
a
link
to
audio
or
video.
D
It's
pitch
dark
in
here
we're
probably
not
going
to
have
the
meeting
right,
but
if
we
come
in
and
say
it's
a
snowstorm
and
man,
the
internet's
totally
out,
we
can
still
have
the
meeting
and
it
can
just
be
it
can
be,
it
wouldn't
necessarily
be
live
streamed.
It
would
just
be
recorded
yeah
on
the
personal.
A
D
D
C
D
We
can't
really
go
through
the
microphone
system
either
without
okay
yeah
I'm
not
trying
to
be
difficult,
I'm
just
trying
to
foresee
any
kind
of
possible
situation.
So
we
can
not
be
sitting
here
one
night
and
then
be
like.
Oh
wait
a
minute.
You
know
we're
here,
but
the
internet
is
out,
but
we
can
record.
Can
we
still
go
forward.
H
A
D
A
D
A
H
B
A
B
C
D
D
B
D
B
D
H
H
D
B
B
B
H
Been
approached
by
some
residents
that
they
were
asking
about
some
of
the
things
that
are
some
of
the
tombstones
that
are
toppled
over
those
could
not
be
put
back
up
in
some
manner.
I
think
we've
done
it
before
that
could
also
be
looked
at
as
well.
They
think
it
it
adds
character
to
both
cemeteries
and
then,
when
they're,
talking
about
a
four
foot
wide
and
60
foot
high
plaque
mounted
on
eight
inch,
thick
granite.
I
H
D
Well,
excuse
me-
and
I
I
think
what
she
had
said
when
she
was
here,
was
that
they
felt
like
it
was
just
kind
of
a
like
a
losing
battle
trying
to
keep
those
headstones
to
stay
up.
They
were
just
constantly
falling
over.
I
mean
we've
had
issues
with
people
pulling
them
over
pushing
them
over
too.
But
if
I
remember
correctly,
I
think
she
would.
She
almost
even
said
that
it
was.
It
was
just
like
a
never-ending
battle
trying
to
keep
those
headstones
up
well,.
H
G
B
A
H
I
G
Yeah,
this
is
a
continuation
of
the
talk
of
the
mud
districts,
mixed
use,
districts
that
we've
been
talking
about
topic
here
in
council.
I
know
some
people
are
for
for
having
the
mystic
use
districts
and
some
people
are
against
having
the
district
so
just
to
continue
discussion,
on
maybe
reasons
to
not
have
and
reasons
to
have
this
tool
for
the
city,
so
I'll,
just
open
it
up.
If
anybody
has
anything
that
they
want
to
add
or
discuss.
B
H
H
H
You're
gonna
have
to
come
up
with
the
written
statement
as
to
why
you're
being
it's
being
turned
down
and
over
and
over
again
we
were
told
so
maybe
I'm
just
not
grasping
this
whole
thing,
but
I
would
really
like
this
specified
because
I
don't
know
how
many
times
we
were
told
council
will
have
the
last
say
in
how
this
goes
down.
But
then,
when
it
comes
down
to
the
very
end,
we
don't
have
any
say.
Well,
you
can
say
no,
but
then
we're
told
we're
going
to
go
to
court,
which
that
was
a
mistake.
H
What
we
did
up
there
was
not
what
we
all
voted
through
to
begin
with.
This
has
been
admitted
time
and
time
again,
yet
we're
living
with
it
and
I'm
speaking
specifically
of
brookside.
I
don't
think
we
can
compare
this
to
the
parks
property,
because
that
property
actually
belonged
to
the
city
of
norton.
H
So
there's
no
comparison.
We
were
the
ones
that
had
the
say
on
it
as
to
what
was
going
to
happen
and
stuff,
unlike
someone
else,
owning
the
property
and
then
wanting
to
sell
it
for
whatever
reason,
which
I
get,
that
I
believe
people
ought
to
be
able
to
sell
their
property,
but
when
it
affects
the
amount
of
people
they'd
come
in,
and
nato
wanted
to
put
up
some
kind
of
a
porno
place
that
wouldn't
have
been
allowed
to
happen
and
no
way
she
performed.
H
We
have
the
ordinances
to
cover
that
and
protect
the
people,
but
here
we
have
the
rabbit
hutch
city
going
in
down
there
amongst
an
area
that
what's
going
in,
has
no
way
of
reflecting,
and
I
don't
see
where
it's
been
such
a
boon
for
the
city
of
norton.
I
know
in
the
past
it's
been
said:
oh
our
service
department,
our
police
department,
a
fire
department-
everybody
can
handle
this.
We
can
take
it
on
I'm
sorry.
I
never
bought
that.
I
don't
buy
it
today.
We
start
putting
in
that
many
more.
H
H
The
whole
thing
we
need
to.
If
we
put
this
on
the
back
burner-
and
we
have
time
to
think
about-
we
can
come
up
with
something
that
would
be
much
better
fitting
in
to
what
norton
has
been
about
and
why
many
people
stayed
here
and
why
many
of
the
people
that
did
move
here
moved
here
as
opposed
to
fitting
more
or.
H
Complex
but
separate
homes,
it's
a
little
more
than
that,
but
it
definitely
does
not
fit
in
down
there
and
the
senior
complex
that
what
that
would
have
been
something
that
we
did
need.
We've
talked
about
doing
it,
how
many
times
it's
never
come
about
and
regardless,
if
we
had
not
had
that
mud
in
place,
we
may
not
be
looking
at
that
and
for
one
second,
I
do
not
buy
that
the
property
wouldn't
sold.
That's
a
prime
piece
of
property,
it's
on
a
main
road
for
somebody.
H
Anyone
to
stand
there
and
say
the
property
would
not
have
sold
to
me.
That's
ridiculous,
but
I
agree
that
honestly,
we
need
more
time.
We
don't
have
to
go
to
two
years,
I'm
perfectly
fine,
as
mr
pilot
suggested.
Just
put
it.
You
know
two
six
months,
something
and
well:
it's
gonna
have
to
be
longer
than
two,
because
we're
gonna
be
out
of
here
for
a
month,
so
we
won't
be
here
to
be
able
to
do
anything
with
it
so
two
months.
H
H
D
A
H
When
it
was
first
presented
to
us,
there
were
going
to
be
businesses
right
on
greenwich
right.
That
was
going
to
be
in
reflection
to
the
senior
citizen
accommodations
there,
which
there
was
going
to
be
assisted,
living
as
well
as
non-assisted
living,
and
then
it
was
going
to
go
back
if
the
apartments
were
always
going
to
be
there.
I've
never
said
that
they
weren't,
but
that's
where
the
commercial
tied
in
okay,
because
I
had
a
problem
with
being
right:
commercial,
but.
H
D
D
People
are
very,
very
proud
of
you,
know
their
houses
over
there
that
they
have
a
new
house
and
it
fit
into
their
budget
and
what
they
wanted,
and
you
know
I
know
that
we
have
residents
around
there
that
are
not
happy
as
well,
and
it's
it's
it's
just
a
tough
situation.
You
know,
I
just
wonder:
had
we
had
this
moratorium
in
place?
H
Right
that
definitely
not
like
it's
gone
in
a
bunch
of
rabbit
hunches
is
that
close
apart
and
like
some
of
those
residents
down
there
have
stated
you
know
when
those
get
done,
they're
going
to
look
over
there
and
they'll
just
see
low
houses,
there
would
have
been
houses
put
in
there.
I
don't
have
a
doubt
in
my
mind.
If
we
didn't
get
senior
complex
just
they
would
have
been,
they
would
have
had
more
of
a
yard.
H
D
Just
just
on
one
hand,
it
also
seems
like.
Maybe
we
could
have
learned
a
lesson
from
this
and
the
next
time
we're
more
selective
with
what
we
would
already
have
the
authority
to
approve
and
disapprove
without
putting
this
extra
step
in,
but
I
mean
I,
I
yeah,
I'm
not
trying
to
battle
with
you
either
way,
I'm
just
trying
to
work
through
this.
In
my
own
mind,
like
I
said
what
is
best
for
the
residents,
what
is
best
for
the
city?
What
is
best
overall,
I
would
just
hate
to
have
some
kind
of
an
opportunity.
D
H
C
H
As
long
as
that's
in
place,
someone
comes
along
and
it
puts
in
with
it
it
ain't
going
to
make
any
difference
of
how
the
residents
feel,
or
we
personally
feel
it's
in
place
and
you're
going
to
be
told.
Well,
they
meet
all
the
requirements,
they're
meeting
everything
that's
under
this
mud
district,
so
either
you
say
yes
or
we
can
go
to
court
and
fight
them
and
lose.
H
I
mean
this
went
on
for
a
while
right,
the
planning
commission,
everyone
they
had
issues
with
it.
It
wasn't
like
this
was
a
done
deal
that
everybody
was
happy
with
so
and
judging
from
the
way,
the
planning,
commission
and
things
sometimes
vote.
That
tells
you
right.
There
there's
still
a
problem
with
this
and
as
long
as
it's
standing
there
whole
they
come
along.
They
sign
the
papers,
they're
ready
to
go
for
it.
Are
you
gonna?
Then
you
can't
say
no.
C
H
If
I
don't
know
what
I'm
talking
about
explain
to
me,
how
we
have
the
last
say
in
something,
but
then
when
it
comes
to
the
last
say
we
do
not,
you
can
say
no,
but
then
you
better
be
ready
to
back
it
up
with
a
letter
and
everything
as
to
why
we're
going
to
court.
I
want
this
explained
because
apparently
I
don't
have
a
grip
on
it,
so
I
want
that
explained.
But
as
long
as
that
stands
in
place,
somebody
comes
along
we're
basically
going
to
be
stuck
with
it,
unless
it's
our
property.
H
E
H
E
G
My
opinion
on
it
is,
I'm
all
for
tightening
up
doing
it
right,
making
sure
it's
done
right,
making
sure
there's
no
loopholes
that
things
just
fall
through
on
the
floor.
You
know
if
it's
a
a
six
month
and
we
think
we
can
get
something
done
to
tighten
it
up.
I
think,
then
we
should
do
it.
24
months
is
kind
of
excessive.
H
Well,
I
think
we
all
would
have
a
better
grip
and
understand
better
as
the
the
repercussions
and
what's
going
to
come
down
the
path
and
how
it's
going
to
affect
everybody
and
all
as
well
as
the
city.
I'm
sure
the
planning
commission
would
have
better
knowledge
on
it,
because
I
mean
this
was
took
me
by
surprise
as
the
way
we
started
out
and
then
what
we
ended
up
with.
G
G
Going
to
live
there
right
so
we're
not
to
judge
what
we
consider
beautiful,
what
they
consider
beautiful
you
know,
and
so
the
city
is
going
to
grow
and
the
city
is
going
to
evolve.
This
is
a
protection
for
how
we
see
the
future
of
the
city
growing,
I'm
all
for
protecting
the
properties
of
the
residents
that
are
here
and
making
sure
that
those
that
are
going
to
come
and
build
here
have
the
best
lot
that
they
can
build
on
and
not
have
houses
that
are
jammed
on
top
of
each
other.
G
E
I
D
Remember
without
when
they
started
that,
like
15
to
about
17
years
ago,
when
the
houses
were
really
close
on
top
each
other
people
love
living
over
there
too.
So
it
is
a
personal
preference.
I
mean
some
people
want
that
close
neighborly
kind
of
situation,
or
else
nobody
would
be
buying
the
houses.
So
it's
tough.
It's
tough
to
decide.
G
G
G
B
B
A
G
B
H
B
D
C
D
C
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
And
I'd
ask
about
the
water
line
being
discussed
on
odot
property
and
haven't
heard
anything
else
from
that,
as
well
as
discussions
or
internal
thoughts
on
leasing,
the
odot
property
or
anything
to
do
with
the
norton
impound
lot
and
I've
asked
about
the
assessment
tie-in
fees
on
brookside.
I've
not
heard
any
more
about
that.