►
From YouTube: 08-15-2022 Committee Work Session
Description
08-15-2022 Committee Work Session
D
D
D
A
A
G
I
am
the
president
of
the
norton
professional
firefighters,
local
4219,
I'm
addressing
you
guys.
We
had
wrote.
I
wrote
in
this
in
advance
of
being
made
aware
that
this
was
all
being
moved
to
the
side,
but
my
brothers
and
sisters
behind
me
here
and
myself
are
here
to
show
their
support
for
this
community
and
the
continuity
of
professional
service
and
safety
that
has
been
provided
by
the
men
and
women
of
the
norton
firefighters.
G
A
similar
amendment
proposal
in
2016
failed
by
a
4-3
council
vote
as
it
currently
stands
under
civil
service
as
a
classified
position.
If
less
than
three
internal
candidates
are
eligible
for
promotional
examination,
who
are
immediately
below
that
class
being
tested,
the
mayor
and
or
city
administrator
may
request
to
include
the
next
lower
class
and
or
external
candidates
to
expand
the
potential
candidate
grouping.
This
is
a
competitive
process
to
find
the
best
candidate
for
the
position.
A
H
My
name
is
angela
beck
and
I
have
served
on
the
civil
service
commission
since
2006
and
I
I
didn't
know
this
matter
was
set
aside
and
I
still
wanted
to
address
the
council
and
let
you
know
that
we
do
have
home
rules
for
the
norton
civil
service
commission,
which
mr
eisenhower
just
talked
about,
and
I
would
also
like
to
let
you
know
some
of
my
other
credentials.
I've
been
in
the
hr
field
since
1994..
H
I
currently
serve
as
the
hr
business
partner
for
a
very
large
corporation
and
I
support
over
1500
employees.
I
hold
two
certifications
and
I
would
like
to
know
if
any
of
the
council
members
are
qualified
to
pick
a
fire
chief
or
a
police
chief,
and
you
know
the
civil
service
commission,
an
important
point
is
we
do
not
hire
or
terminate
anybody,
and
the
civil
service
commission
is
put
in
place
to
have
rules
that
are
fair
and
equal.
H
And
obviously,
if
the
charter
change
comes
up
in
the
future,
it
wouldn't
be
necessary
because
there
are
already
rules
in
place
and
if
candidates
are
a
concern,
we
can
expand.
That
just
like
michael
has
expressed
it's
in
the
rules
and
if
council
wants
to
be
part
of
that
that
choosing
they
can
be,
they
just
need
to
work
with
the
city
administrator
and
the
mayor.
H
I
do
have
some
questions.
We
have
been
without
a
quorum
and
we
have
had
no
communication
and
no
transparency.
Our
meetings
have
been
suddenly
halted
and
we
have
had
no
information
as
to
why
I
would
like
to
know
how
many
classified
jobs
have
been
filled
with
no
civil
service
process
at
all.
In
the
past
few
years.
I
would
like
to
know
how
many
classified
positions
have
resigned
or
retired.
I
would
like
to
know
how
many
entrance
exams
were
given
to
replace
these
positions.
I'd
like
to
know
how
many
classified
promotional
exams
there
have
been.
H
H
We
used
to
get
a
list
of
classified
payroll
certification
we
have
repeatedly
requested
and
have
not
received.
When
was
the
last
time
the
city
sent
in
the
state
personnel
board
of
review,
also
known
as
serb.
This
is
mandated
by
the
state
of
ohio
and,
if
reporting
has
been
timely,
where
are
our
copies?
H
H
We
would
like
to
respectfully
request
to
have
our
previous
secretary
put
back
into
place
under
home
rule
2-1,
section
b.
We
would
like
that
immediately
and
again
we
just
want
communication
and
transparency,
it's
been
lacking
and
we
have
requested
meetings
and
to
no
avail.
So
again,
16
years
I
have
humbly
served
this
community
on
this
commission,
and
all
I
would
like
is
some
communication
and
transparency
back.
I
I'd
just
like
to
say
whatever
it
is
she
asks
for.
I
want
all
those
answers
as
well,
and
I've
been
asking
about
some
of
the
same
question,
not
nearly
as
in-depth
as
you,
but
I've
been
concerned
about
you're
not
having
the
quorum,
and
I
haven't,
and
I've
asked
constantly
before
that
at
least
two
or
three
weeks
in
a
row.
Where
are
we
advertising?
I
J
H
K
I'm
mike
norman
with
the
ohio
association
of
professional
firefighters,
I
live
at
3155,
west
159th
street
in
cleveland,
ohio
serb
is
properly
the
state
employee
relations
board
for
your
information,
I
rise
to
support
to
commend
the
committee
for
the
council
for
eliminating
this
provision.
I
think
that
that
was
the
right
thing
to
do
I'll
echo
some
of
president
eisenhower's
comments.
K
I
think
this
comes
down
to
service
and
safety,
the
men
and
women
of
of
the
norton
fire
department
served
proudly,
and
they
should
all
have
the
opportunity
that
every
norton
firefighter
has
had
to
one
day
aspire
to
lead
the
division
of
fire
in
norton
and
for
safety.
I
think
that
I've
heard
things
about
mandating
for
overtime,
some
issues
with
that.
I
think
that
your
your
focus
should
be
on
hiring
more
firefighters,
making
sure
that
as
norton
grows,
the
citizens
are
provided
with
the
safety
and
the
service
that
they
deserve.
So
I'll
keep
my
comments
short.
A
J
I
J
I
J
J
A
L
Thank
you,
mr
president.
Ordinance
68
is
an
ordinance
to
provide
for
a
school
resource
officer
for
the
schools,
be
looking
to
put
this
on
the
next
agenda
and
waive
second
and
third
readings.
I
know
that
the
administration
had
gotten
some
information
out
to
us
last
week
and
had
asked
to
if
people
had
questions
to
approach
them,
but
now
would
be
the
time
again
to
ask
any
questions
regarding
the
sro.
A
A
K
A
B
Mean
we
we
could,
if
we
weren't
at
minimum
staffing.
So
if
we've
got
you
know
more
officers
and
three
or
more
officers
on
the
road,
we
could
do
that,
but
it
it.
It
says
here
that
they
would
attend
juvenile
court,
so
it
would
be
actually
stemming
from
an
incident
that
happened
at
the
school
okay,
which
is
why
that's
in
there,
so
that
they
would
be
responsible
for.
A
M
B
B
B
J
C
C
E
In
our
discussion
with
the
school
we
would
bill
them
quarterly
for
the
hourly
rate
plus
benefits
that
the
individual
is
in
the
school.
So
what
does
that
mean?
So,
let's
hypothetically
say
in
a
quarter
that
employee?
Maybe
there
were
four
snow
days.
There
were
a
teacher
in
service
day
spring
break
so
say
there
were
10
out
of
60
that
that
employee
worked,
the
city
would
pay
for
the
10
and
we
would
subsequently
build
the
school
each
quarter
for
the
50
hours
of
work.
C
B
I
D
B
I
I
Okay,
we're
less,
I
think,
would
come
out
of
section
10.
The
funding
on
page
five
of
the
current
mou
and
page
13
of
the
packet
is
where
that's
coming
from
that's
yeah.
It
says
any
grants
are
to
go
to
the
school
as
opposed
to
the
divided
percentage
that
we
would
have
had
from
the
mou
from
2015,
where
we
were
going
68
32
when
we
were
setting
it
up
back
then.
I
So
I
have
an
issue
with
saying
that
any
of
the
grant
money
goes
to
them
when
we're
actually
the
one
that's
either
already
paid
for
it
or
whatever.
Now,
if
it's
got
something
to
do
with
the
actual
pay
and
the
payments
for
the
officer
while
they're
during
the
school
okay,
but
I
don't
want
to
pay
for
schooling
for
our
officers
and
then
turn
around
and
give
the
money
to
them,
I'm
I'm
sorry.
They
got
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
every
school
this
year,
just
for
safety.
I
We
okayed
this
back
in
2015,
there's
incidents
that
took
place
up
there
that,
regardless
of
how
they
try
and
keep
them
quiet
they
get
out
there,
people's
got
their
videos
and
stuff.
I
had
no
idea
there
wasn't
an
officer
there,
yet
our
contract.
Clearly
the
memorandum
of
understanding
clearly
states
on
the
last
section
that,
if
it's
going
to
end
in
some
way
that
we
should
be
the
other
entity
has
to
tell
that
entity.
I
don't
think
anybody
on
council
was
aware
of
that,
so
that
little
ditty
was
about
useless.
I
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
I
went
something
stronger
in
there
for
that,
because
I
was,
I
said
I
was
one
of
the
ones
that
fought
long
and
hard
to
try
and
get
them
up
there.
I
believe
they
have
a
place
up
there.
They
they're
needed
up
there.
The
kids
need
that
extra
guidance
and
to
be
able
to
establish
the
bond,
and
I
don't
for
whatever
reason
that
they
stopped
having
an
officer
in
there.
All
of
us
should
be
made
aware
of
it,
instead
of
finding
out
years
after
the
fact
that
that
really
really
really
sucked.
I
I
agree
with
mr
d
harpard.
I
believe
he
was
stating
that
if
we've
got
their
pace
to
be
paying
for
40
hours,
I
get
that.
But
if
we've
got
an
officer
up
in
court
I
mean
we're
not
setting
them
up
there.
Just
so
we
can.
They
can
get
a
paycheck
and
be
in
school
all
day.
There's
reasons
why
those
officers
are
there
and
justifiably
so.
I
There
ought
to
be
somebody
there
and
if
we
only
have
one
officer,
how
are
we
going
it
states
anywheres
or
that
one
at
I'm
just
kind
of
I'm
not
going
like.
I
said,
I'm
not
following
my
little
listing
I'm
doing
this
from
memory
so
bear
with
me.
If
we
only
have
one
officer,
an
officer
is
basically
going
to
be
expected
to
be
watching
the
unloading
and
the
loading
of
the
buses.
How
is
he
going
to
do
that
for
each
and
every
school.
N
B
B
B
M
O
I
If
I
recall
correctly
back
in
this
past
march,
I'd
I'd
asked
about
anybody
being
up
there
and
you
said-
and
it
was
you,
mr
fowler,
that
had
responded,
that
they
were
having
some
off-duty
officers
up
there,
so
they
could
still
pursue
that
route
as
well,
and
that
would
be
on
their
dollar
right.
Correct.
We've
talked.
I
Well,
I'd
still
like
to
see
a
provision
in
his
just
so
like
I
said
I
did
not
appreciate
the
fact
I
was
didn't
know
anybody
was
there.
I
thought
we
had
officers
in
there
and
a
lot
of
the
public
did
also
think
that
we
had
them
in
there
that
entire
time,
so
if
they
decide
to
go
that
route
and
or
even
get
more
extra
ones
to
put
in
there,
I'd
like
to
be
kept
aware
of
it.
D
C
B
J
Don't
think
there's
anyone
that
would
disagree,
that
our
kids
are
worth
whatever
measure
we
have
to
take
to
make
sure
they're
protected.
I
would
like
to
see
ultimately
a
resource
officer
in
every
school.
I
think
is
the
right
thing
to
do.
I
think,
given
the
culture
that
we
have
with
just
craziness
going
on,
like
we
can't
afford
to
not
have
a
protected
school,
so
I
think
that's
what
we
should
move
towards.
J
L
C
A
A
A
Last
year
there
was
damage
done
to
new
park
drive
and
it
has
been
in
need
of
repair
ever
since
and
as
you
know,
that
was
a
almost
brand
new
road
when
the
damage
happened
so
administration
reached
out
for
four
quotes.
They
only
got
heard
back
from
two,
but
the
the
lowest
and
best
was
perrin
asphalt
at
35
hundred
dollars
to
fix
it.
So.
A
C
C
E
E
We've
been
discussing
how
it
will
be
paid
for,
and
instead
of
waiting
for
those
decisions
to
be
resolved,
the
city
determined
to
move
forward
repair.
The
damage
would
be
a
complete
reconstruction
they'll,
remove
the
panels
that
are
damaged
and
put
in
new,
concrete
panels,
so
as
that
road
will
remain
new,
as
it
was
two
years
prior.
Okay.
C
I
I
A
discussion:
what
is
there
to
discuss
if
we
already
know
that
they
broke
it,
they
should
be
responsible
for
fixing
it,
and,
if
we're
not
and
didn't,
we
have
an
engineer
down
there,
an
engineer
inspector
when
they
were
putting
that
in
I
mean
we've
done
pretty
well,
it's
sending
somebody
down
there
that
supervisors
or
watches
these
things
going
on.
If
they
see
happening
to
where
we
would
absolutely
know
already
that
it
was
done
correctly.
To
begin
with,
I
mean
I
could
go
back
and
pull
up
all
that
paperwork.
I
If
I
have
to
get
that
answer,
but
I
thought
that
we'd
basically
had
somebody
down
there
looking
at
any
times,
we
were
doing
that
cop
that
much
road
work
we
had
somebody
down
there.
Checking
it
out
to
make
sure
it
was
done
correctly
might
have
been
a
time
ahead
of
that.
But
if
it's,
if
it
wasn't
due
to
the
faulty
work
of
who
put
the
work
down
there
to
begin
with,
then
we
already
know
somebody
put
a
water
line
in
without
a
permit
and
didn't
do
it
right.
C
I
M
I
was
going
to
say
just
assuming,
assuming
we
are
do
move
forward
with
these.
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
that
I
know
we're
not
looking
at
the
try
more
one
because
they
came
in
higher,
but
their
proposal
has
an
exclusion
of
sales
tax
inspection
fees.
I
shouldn't
see
that
on
the
parent
one
and
I
didn't
know
if
I
knew
we
built
in
a
contingency,
but
do
we
think
that
contingency
would
cover
that?
If
that's
not
included
in
that
one
too.
E
We
we
don't
pay
sales
tax
so
that
that's
not
really
pertinent
to
us,
but
we
will
have
an
inspector
down
there
and
to
ms
whitkey's
question:
there
was
an
inspector
at
the
original
construction,
but
I'm
not
willing
to
discuss
pending
or
imminent
litigation
on
the
council
floor.
If
council
wishes
to
have
an
executive
session,
we
would
be
happy
to
discuss
why
and
how
we
want
to
move
forward.
I
I
would
definitely
like
to
hear
more
about
it
since
it's
been
going
on,
and
I
mean
I
coming
in-
that's
that
was
disgusting.
What
I've
seen
down
here
after
we've
done
those
roads
and
what
their
land
that
was
just
for
what
was
a
water
line
or
sewer
line
we
had
to
fix,
and
now
we
got
even
it
just
keeps
getting
worse
on
brand
new
roads.
A
C
A
F
D
A
L
L
I
B
J
B
B
L
I
B
A
C
M
L
A
A
A
J
A
J
J
I'm
very
excited
about
this.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
would
share
my
enthusiasm
of
the
prospect
of
norton
having
a
place
where
we
can
give
a
really
really
fitting
memorial
for
gold,
star
parents,
those
that
have
lost
children
in
combat
and
I'm
excited
about
it,
and
I
think
that
I
know
several
people
have
reached
out
to
me
that
are
excited
about
it
as
well.
I
I
J
I
J
Well,
so
the
back
of
it
for
those
of
you
that
are
curious.
Can
I
see
this
the
gold
star
memorial
on
the
front
of
it?
It
says
a
tribute
to
gold,
star
families
and
relatives
who
sacrificed
a
loved
one
for
our
freedom.
Now,
if
I
remember
correctly,
because
we're
still
in
the
preliminary
stages
of
this,
the
back
of
the
pillars
is
four
big
black
granite
pillars.
Homeland,
family,
patriot
and
sacrifice
are
the
kind
of
main
titles
across
the
bottom.
These
four
pillars.
Now
that's
not
something
we
came
up
with.
J
This
is
the
woody
williams
foundation,
which
was
created
by
a
man
named
woody
williams.
That
was
a
medal
of
honor
recipient
and
I
would
have
to
verify,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that
part
of
it
they
don't
want
changed
that
you
know
that's
part
of
their
foundation
and
you
know
not
rules
per
se,
but
that's
their
vision
for
their
foundation.
They've
created
this
woody
williams
foundation
that
helps
fund
with
not
fund
but
helps
create
these
kind
of
monuments
for
different
cities.
There's
a
lot
of
cities
across
the
country.
J
O
J
I
J
Well,
I
hope
a
lot
because
that
would
help
go
towards
the
monument,
but
if
I
remember
when
we
initially
started
the
discussions
with
the
woody
williams
foundation,
setting
up
that
donation,
I'm
not
going
to
say
account,
but
that
they
wanted.
That
was
part
of
the
initial
process
of
setting
up
this
process
and
doing
it
was
one
of
the
steps
that
were
involved.
It
wasn't
something
that
we
took
upon
ourselves
and
said:
okay,
it's
now
immediately
time
to
start
taking
contributions
for
this.
I
O
J
I
No,
you
want
this
to
be
passed
next
week
and
then
collect
30,
some
half
of
68
000
for
a
memorial
and
you're
going
to
take
it
out
of
the
park
fund.
Long
as
we
have
the
money
put
back
to
take
care
of
the
cemetery
we
already
have.
That
needs
to
be
have
the
work
done
to
it
that
we've
put
off
taken
care
of
and
has
been
asked
for.
I
I
just
don't
feel
like
we
anybody.
There
was
a
very
few
number
of
people
that
was
actually
involved
in
this.
We
didn't
ask
parks,
we
didn't
ask
any
of
council,
it
was
just
presented,
and
this
is
what
we're
going
to
get.
This
is
what
it
costs,
and
this
is
what
we
have
to
do
and,
like
I
said,
I'm
asking
you
what's
going
to
happen
with
the
gazebo.
I
J
Absolutely
I
mean,
and
I
would
be
curious
to
know
too
I
just
all
I'm
saying
is
that
we
I
I
don't
know
the
answer
that
question.
Maybe
someone
else
in
the
administration
can
answer
that
question.
I
don't
think
the
gazebo
is
a
deal-breaker
there's
plenty
of
room
for
it
to
stay
over
there.
I
would
imagine
and.
E
I
will
forward
what
I
had
sent
previously,
so
the
reason
we're
asking
I
apologize,
mr
tonsley,
so
to
her
question
about
donations,
you
can
make
donations
presently
they
will
not
start
making
the
memorial
until
half
of
the
money
has
received.
So
our
intention
was
to
pay
for
half
of
the
monument
at
this.
I
E
E
We
won't
we're
only
paying
for
half
correct
so
provided
those
donations
are
received
prior
to
I'd,
say
april
of
april
1st,
at
the
latest
and
they're
submitted
under
the
city
of
norton
project.
They
will
get
credit
for
them
under
our
project
and
then
the
final
invoice
amount
would
be
less.
Those
donations
received
or
pledges.
Okay.
I
So,
just
for
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
and
the
public
understands
we're
going
to
fork
out
37
thousand
dollars
for
la
honester
rate,
rounded
off
34
000,
to
get
this
started
and
to
pay
for
the
granite.
And
then,
when
it
comes
down
to
the
end
of
the
project,
then
we're
going
to
have
another
34
000,
it's
going
to
be
that's
going
to
need
to
be
paid
outside
of
minus
any
donations
that
might
have
been
given.
I
C
J
Do
I
don't
believe
so
I
don't
believe
that
that
that's
not
really
their
mission,
their
their.
Their
main
mission
is
just
the
gold
star
monuments
and
making
they.
I
forget
how
many
cities
they've
done.
I
could
look
it
up,
but
it's
it's
all
over.
There's
all
over
the
continental
united
states
alaska,
just
about
every
state
in
the
country,
I
believe,
but
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
of
any
grant
opportunities
that
they
offer
per
se.
J
At
this,
as
kind
of
an
ongoing
process
as
in
this
would
just
be
the
initial
steps
on
getting
a
nice
norton
veterans
park
and
then,
as
time
goes
on,
we,
I
believe
you
know
mr
fowler,
we
discussed
a
little
bit
that
maybe
other
entities
within
the
city
with
would
be
interested
in
volunteering
services
or
time
or
supplies
materials.
Things
like
that,
just
just
to
help
offset
any
costs
that
it
would.
You
know
to
make
the
park
better.
M
L
And
there
should
be
some
way
to
recognize
that
there
should
be
some
way
to
thank
them.
For
that,
and
I
understand
the
money
and
the
questions
regarding
the
money,
but
I
don't
see
any
reason
not
to
get
this
ball
rolling
and
get
it
started,
because
really
it's
the
least.
We
can
do
to
recognize
these
people
who
have
given
a
child.
D
I
I
I
That
I
have
an
issue
with
how
it
was
done,
how
it
was
handled,
how
it's
still
being
done
and
how
it
was
handled.
It's
presented
great
idea,
beautiful
memorial
if
it
is
made
personally
to
fit
norton,
but
nobody
else
was
asked
how
they
felt
do
we
want
to
spend
this
kind
of
money
or
what
was
going
to
be
done
about
it.
We
just
decided-
and
we've
had
more
discussion
this
evening
than
what's
been
from
the
first
time
it
was
brought.
N
I
I
understand
that
I
stand.
I
understand
that
perfectly.
I
didn't
start
yesterday,
but
the
point
of
it
is
nobody
had
any
input
on
actually
getting
to
this
point
and
then
say
I
want
to
wave
to
waive
the
second
and
third
readings.
I
get
the
idea
of
what
it
done
by
may.
I
have
no
issue
and
applaud
wanting
to
put
a
memorial
out
somewhere,
but
it's
the
way
things
are
handled,
that's
a
few
people
decide
and
then
we
get
get
it
thrown
at
us
and
then
we're
told.
Well
we
had
the
discussion.
I
I
A
I
A
F
I
O
O
C
O
I
M
O
M
A
J
You,
mr
president,
okay,
so
this
amendment
is
to
amend
ordinance,
number
36
36-2022
to
change
it
to
ordinance
number
73-2022,
and
the
issue
is
the
language
was
not
quite
right
under.
It
should
be
reading
the
first
tuesday
after
the
first
monday
in
may.
If,
if
it
is
necessary
to
hold
a
primary
election,
such
non-pro,
partisan
primary
election
shall
be
had
the
municipality
municipality
on
the
first
tuesday
after
the
first
monday
in
may.
So
I
guess
the
language
was
not
quite
right
from
before,
and
we
need
to
update
that.
J
M
A
A
A
D
A
Moratorium,
I'm
sorry.
The
mayor
has
decided
to
exercise
his
privilege
and
power
to
veto
that
and
according
to
charter
section
2.07,
the
council
has
to
revisit
the
issue
at
the
next
scheduled
council
meeting,
which
is
next
monday.
So
I'm
just
making
the
public
aware
that
we
will
be
revisiting
that
next
week.
I
I
They
generally
meet
once
a
month
at
6,
00
pm
and
adds
for
that
opening
should
be
running
starting
august,
18th
and
august
25th
and
they'll
be
in
the
post
and
the
barberton
herald.
You
need
to
anybody
that
might
be
interested
can
send
letters
of
intent
to
the
mad.
You
can
get
a
hold
of
mrs
mccumber
and
she
can
help
you
direct
you
to
where
you
would
be
doing
it
sending
them
to,
but
the
letters
of
interest
would
need
to
be
in
by
september
7th.
I
I
I
C
E
D
N
N
N
N
N
D
C
President,
I
do
have
something
sorry
about
that:
oh
you're,
fine!
I
have
some
papers
here
if
you
want
to
pass
some
of
those
down
pass
them
down.
This
is
for
something
that's
kind
of
near
and
dear
to
my
heart.
I
grew
up
in
inner
city
of
akron
and,
as
I
watched
neighborhoods
turn
over,
I
watched
some
of
the
older
residents
in
akron,
where
I
grew
up
pass
away
and
those
houses
became
rentals
and
some
of
the
houses
stayed
beautiful.
C
Some
of
the
houses
turned
into
big
major
eye
sores
and
I've
seen
some
of
that
start
to
happen
in
norton,
and
you
know
so.
I've
kind
of
come
up
and
I
want
to
start
the
process
of
discussion
of
a
rental
registration
program
here
in
norton,
and
I
certainly
don't
want
to
put
a
constraint
on
anybody
or
or
any
more
laws
on
anybody,
but
I
I
want
to
hold
property
owners
that
rent
houses
out
accountable
for
what
they
look
like
right.
C
You
got
people
here,
residents
here
that
have
150
200
000
300
000
houses,
and
you
have
houses
that
are
next
to
them
that
are
just
dilapidating
and
falling
down
around
them,
and
it
really
it
drives
the
values
of
our
homes
down.
It
drives
the
values
of
our
community
down,
and
I
think
norton
is
a
beautiful
place
to
live.
I've
passed
out
a
copy
of
legislation
from
the
city
of
north
canton,
ohio.