►
From YouTube: Charter Review 4-20-2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Don't
worry,
all
right
looks
like
we're,
live
and
recording,
and
you
see
john
john
isaac
joined
us
john.
Are
you
able
to
turn
the
camera
on
for
the
meeting.
A
Yeah,
I
think,
just
as
we
the
way
that
the
law
is
written,
state
law
is
written,
we
could
do
telephonic
meetings,
but
you
got
to
have
yeah.
B
C
Okay,
this
is
april
20th
and
the
city
of
norton
charter
review
at
seven
o'clock
is
now
called
to
order.
A
D
D
A
A
Yeah
is
it
isaac
john
isaac?
Yes,
that's
correct
dave
kennedy.
D
A
We'll
give
josh
a
second
to
come
into
the
room.
A
No
problem
yeah,
it's
we're
just
doing
roll
call,
so
josh
smith.
A
There
you
go
perfect,
so
todd
I
can.
I'm
happy
to
you
know
talk
about
this
charter.
I
think
I
think
what
we
had
talked
about.
What
you
had
talked
about.
The
last
meeting
was
that
you
were
looking
for
administration
feedback
on
changes,
they're
looking
for
in
the
charter
having
interacting
with
it
every
day,
and
so
I
did
provide
that
to
the
charter
review,
commission
and.
A
It
and
sort
of
talk
about
all
the
things
that
are
marked.
However,
you
think
it's
best
to
sort
of
walk
through
that
or
if
anyone
has
particular
questions
after
reviewing
it,
we
can
do
it
that
way,
sort
of
leave
it
up
to
you
guys
how
you
want
to
proceed
so.
A
C
D
A
The
administration
and
the
staff
has
all
reviewed
and
provided
provide
their
feedback.
I
did
get
some
feedback
from
council
members
that
was
more
in
the
discussion
realm
that
we
could
talk
about
and
that
I
could
formalize,
but
they'll
have
well
sent
to
you
as
just
illustration
thoughts
for
that.
C
So
what
I
was
thinking
I
would
like
to
do,
is
you
know?
After
we
get
through
the
administration,
then
we're
going
to
take
and
divide
the
document
up
into
maybe
thirds
or
whatever
we
want
to
do
and
then
individually,
we'll
kind
of
come
up
with
any
additional
comments
that
we
want
to
make
to
talk
about
them
as
well.
So
that's
normally,
what
is
done?
A
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure,
there's
a
normal
procedure,
but
I
think
that's.
I
think
it
was
done
a
little
differently
last
time
which
was
going
through
piece
by
piece.
I
know
mr
dobbins
had
some
hesitancy
about
going
through
using
that
method,
reviewing
each
section
one
at
a
time
being
a
little
more
systematic.
C
About
it,
but
I
think
either
way
we
can
we
can,
we
can
divide
it
up
and
how
how
many
pieces
we
need
to
to
get
through,
but
I'm
just
thinking
of
you
know
to
be
able
to
manage
the
time
over
the
next
few
weeks
or
a
couple
months,
but
all
right.
So
the
second
thing
I
had
before
we
start
going
through
this
is,
I
know
you
sent
out
the
document
as
a
word
document
with
track
changes
and
things
like
that
on
there,
and
I
was
just
curious
before
we
adopt
these
things.
C
I
personally
would
like
to
to
capture
our
comments
that
we
would
have
on
this
document
kind
of
as
a
draft
with
comments,
and-
and
so
that's
why,
when
I
was
originally
thinking,
we
would
want
to
have
a
share
site
to
go
to.
That
would
be
fine
or
we
just
do.
It
live
as
we're
talking
right
now,
and
if
you
want
to
facilitate
capturing
those
comments
justin
or
we
can
ask
somebody
else
to
do
it,
you
know
just
using
track
changes.
You
could
put
your
comments
right
next
to
them.
A
Yeah
and
I'm
happy
to
do
that
for
tonight
there
is
a
I
did
send
or
intended
to
send
a
link
to
a
dropbox
that
has
that
document
redlined
that
everyone
could
access
to
the
extent
people
didn't
receive
it.
I
understand
that
I'll
capture
comments
and
I'll
just
update
what
was
sent
out
as
we
go
along.
Okay,
I
can
do.
C
That
all
right,
so
if
you
wanna,
if
you're
gonna,
pull
up
the
document,
then
we
can
look
at
that.
Then,
let's
just
go.
Basically
the
order
tonight
is
to
get
through
the
comments
that
the
administration
has
put
in
place.
Add
our
comments,
our
thoughts,
maybe
some
minor
edits
to
that
and
and
hopefully
we
can
get
through
those.
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
get
through
those
tonight
as
a
group
and
then
we'll
set
the
the
agenda
for
the
next
meeting.
As
far
as
what
sections
we
want
to
get
through.
A
C
F
C
No
yeah
either
way
we're
not
going
to
approve
or
agree
to
anything
yet
tonight.
I
don't
think
I
think,
there's
some
comments
that
I
have
that
before
I
would
move
on
that.
I
want
to
discuss
with
everybody
as
well,
so
all
right,
I'm
going
to
take
that
down
and
let
jason
kind
of
or
just
yeah
too
many
j's
in
my
life.
A
A
So
the
first
change,
then
again,
if
there's
questions
or
anyone
wants
to
interrupt
and
add
viewpoints,
please
I
don't
mean
to
be
the
only
one
talking
so
feel
free
to
chime
in
the
first
change
is
section
2.03,
and
this
was
this.
What
this
is
is
really
we
feel
it's
antiquated
language,
with
the
mayor
being
temporary,
absent
from
the
municipality.
It's
created
some
issues
over
time
with
council
members.
When
you
have
council
mayor
that
get
along,
that's
not
a
problem.
If
there's
they
don't
get.
D
A
Then,
when
the
mayor
goes
on
vacation
or
the
mayor,
whatever
whatever's
happening
council
president
is
then
maybe
asserting
their
position
that
they're
in
charge
of
the
city
while
they're
gone,
and
it's
happened
in
the
past
in
the
city
of
norton.
So
with
technology,
the
way
it
is
email,
accessibility,
cell
phones.
We
think
that
temporarily,
abstinent
language
is
a
little
antiquated
and
the
mayor
can
perform
his
functions
or
her
functions.
Fine,
even
if
they
are
temporarily
absent
from
municipality,
so
understood
if
they're
not
able
to
perform
the
duties
but
temporarily
absent.
C
Yeah
from
my
point
of
view,
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
that.
I
thought
it
was
kind
of
almost
like
a
even
redundant
in
a
way
to
an
extent,
because
the
key
word
is
able
to
perform.
You
know
to
me,
but
that's
my
question
is
what
and
who
determines
whether
the
mayor
is
unable
to
perform
the
duties
and
is
that
something
that
we
need
to
kind
of
reference.
A
That's
a
good
question
todd
I
mean
it's
almost
a
legal
conclusion.
A
I
would
assume
I
mean
typically,
what
ends
up
happening
is
the
mayor
lets
people
know
when
they're
when
he's
gonna
be
out
of
town,
so
they
know
who
to
contact
and
otherwise
unavailable.
But
you
know,
ultimately
it
sounds
kind
of
crazy.
You
know
you'd.
A
E
No,
this
is
I
I
was
questioning
why
it
was
necessary
to
include
this,
but
you've
explained
it
justin.
I
didn't
know
why
temporarily
absent
from
municipality
was
somehow
unrelated
to
unable
to
perform
the
mayor's
functions,
but
you've
explained
it
if
it
hasn't
been
a
practical
problem
in
the
past.
We
want
to
try
to
eliminate
practical
problems.
A
C
Right,
you
know
you
look
up
the
you
know
and
what
I'm
trying
to
avoid
is
I
don't
want
an
angry
mob,
say.
Well,
the
mayor
was
gone
for
two
days.
You
know
so
he's
unable
to
perform
his
duties
and
just
that
kind
of
crap.
But
you
know
you
look
above
at
the
paragraph
above
it.
You
know
it
talks
about
there's
a
lot
of
vagueness
to
some
of
this
stuff
that
I
don't
really
personally
like
that.
C
C
It's
and
I
don't
know
I
don't
want
to
make
a
mountain
out
of
a
molehill
either
way.
I
don't
think
that
sentence
the
temporary
absent.
I
agree
that
that
should
be.
You
know
stricken
from
that.
I
just
still
question
the
unable
for
any
reason,
as
as
maybe
as
deemed
as.
B
D
C
Well,
so
the
comments
to
me
on
this
one
justin
is
that
we
we
agree
with
the
change
right
now
and
it's
still
open-ended
as
far
as
the
ability
to
determine
if
the
mayor
is
not
able
to
perform
those
duties.
So
is
that
that
might
be
a
different
place
in
this
charter,
but
I
think
it's
it's
it's
it
it's
too,
too
vague.
C
D
A
Sort
of
spread
around
the
charter
yeah,
you
know
norm's
tricky
because
as
the
part-time
mayor
with
the
administrative
officer
performing
a
lot
of
the
executive
functions,
so
it
is
a
little
bit
of
a
hybrid
that
section
202
for
qualifications.
C
So
maybe
maybe
that's
where
we
look
to
change
that
just
put
a
note
in
there.
Maybe
the
qualifications
ought
to
be
more
of
a
duties,
qualifications
and
duties
for
section
2.02,
and
then
we
consider
a
major
minor
revision
to
that.
A
A
C
C
G
I
have
a
comment,
question
yeah,
but
the
fact
that
our
mayor
is
not
a
full-time
mayor.
I
think
it
also
takes
into
account
that
there
are
certain
limits
to
his
accessibility
and
that
within
reason,
it
is
technically
a
part-time
job,
since
the
administrator
is
actually
the
one
implementing
a
lot
of
the
actual
day-to-day
functions
and
duties
that
need
to
be
carried
out.
G
So
is
that
really
necessary
to
get
that
specific?
If
we're
or
would
that
be
handled
by
addressing
the
fact
that
he
is
only
a
part-time.
C
Goes
right
with
that
same
thing,
you
know,
as
far
as
that
expectations
and
requirements,
so
I
agree
with
you.
Part-Time
mayor,
you
know,
doesn't
mean
he's
got
to
be
in
the
city
limits.
You
know,
24
7.,.
H
C
G
D
G
C
C
D
A
C
D
A
Okay,
yeah
we'll
go
let's:
okay,
yeah,
let's
go
down.
Do
you
want
to
have
anything
under
204
and
205.
C
A
G
A
A
C
A
E
A
All
right
put
that
in
there,
okay
really
the
next
section.
This
is
our,
and
this
is
the
council
request.
This
did
not
come
from
the
administration
we
talked
about
this
and
denise
may
be
very,
very
familiar
with
this,
because
her
husband
dealt
with
it
last
time.
We're
making
our
recommendation
our
council's
making
a
recommendation
that
the
mayor's
salary
be
increased.
A
Get
you
the
exact.
I
forget
the
you'd
be
surprised
by
what
the
mayor
gets
paid,
which
is
not
very
much
right.
What
we're
looking
to
do
is
bring
that
salary
right
above
what
president
council
gets
paid
and
make
it
a
salary
rate
that
would
be
and
give
incentives
to
qualified
people
to
run.
A
There's
you
know,
even
for
our
council
seats,
there's
not
a
lot
of
people
who
are
interested
in
running
so
looking
at
this
as
being
an
incentive
to
get
qualified
individuals
to
run
and
also
to
allow
part
of
that
incentive
is
to
provide
salary
rate
that
lets
the
elected
officials,
earn
pers
public
employee
retirement
system,
time
they're
not
paid
at
our
rates
sufficient
to
be
able
to
actually
accrue
that
time.
So
that's
the
reason
for
that
change,
and
that
was
a
council
couple.
Members
on
council
who
had
expressed
that
concern.
E
A
A
It
was
just
a
number
that
was
thrown
out
there
as
being
above
that
14
000
range.
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
I
mean
you
guys
can
recommend
whatever
you
want
to
recommend.
I.
A
Funds
there
to
pay
the
20
000,
I
think
there'd
be
sufficient
funds
to
pay
a
higher
rate
than
even
that,
but
for
a
part-time
mayor
with
the
exec
with
the
administrative
officer
performing
a
lot
of
the
functions,
I
think
20
000
was
just
suggested
as
a
rate
that
would
be
acceptable
or
not
acceptable,
but
recommended.
C
That's
that's
not
a
whole
lot
of
money,
so
my
first
thought
was.
I
think
we
ought
to
put
something
in
play,
but
I
was
wondering
if
there's
a
way
we
could
put
something
in
play.
That
starts
it
out
at
a
rate
that
we
feel
comfortable
with
and
would
have
more
of
a
merit
increase
based
on
an
inflation
rate.
So
it's
not
something
that
has
to
be
discussed
now.
It
could
always
be
more
than
at
it.
C
If
the
council
sees
fit
to
increase
that,
but
at
a
minimum
it
would
be
increased
at
an
inflation
rate
of
whatever
the
rate
is
for
the
united
states
or
something
like
that.
Yeah.
A
Like
a
cpi
index
yeah,
I
think
I
would
say
that
you
know:
council,
establishing
administrative
salary
rates
is
consistent
with
the
other
administrative
positions
in
the
city,
so
I
think,
leaving
that
to
council
discretion
is
a
good
check
and
balance
over
the
administration.
A
I
don't
think
that's
a
punitive
thing
for
that
position
and
it's
consistent
with
the
other
positions,
because
council.
A
Rates,
but
really
I
mean
again,
you
can
you
can
build
in
that
automatic
increase.
We
weren't
trying
to
get
too
crazy
with
it,
but
that
way.
C
I
mean,
I
think
that
number's
too
low
I
mean,
if
you
just
even
assumed
he
did
16
hours
a
week.
I
mean
that's
16
hours
a
week
at
basically
25
an
hour
and
I
think.
C
Low
in
my
mind,
for
20
grand,
but
I
also
would
like
to
see
some
kind
of
indexing
in
there
so
that
you
don't
have
an
ongoing
issue
about
that
and
and
I
suppose
it
would
be
based
on
an
indexing.
I
guess
that's
not
a
terrible
thing
to
have.
D
H
D
C
E
One
one
provision
of
this
2.09
is:
it
changes
the
way
that
the
rate
of
compensation
can
be
paid,
usually
in
most
political
subdivisions.
It
takes
an
election
and
a
ballot
by
the
electors,
and
in
this
provision
that
we
were
considering
in
the
charter,
it
would
allow
council
to
make
that
decision
as
opposed
to
the
electors.
A
Yeah,
so
I
wasn't
around
in
2007
as
law
director,
my
understanding
was,
there
was
a
there
was
a
salary
increase
that
was
done
by
council
that
that
someone
took
umbrage
to
circulate
a
petition
to
have
the
charter
provision
changed
to
retroactively,
eliminate
that
raise
and
then
lock
it
into
the
2007
rate,
and
then
council
will
never
be
able
to
touch
it
again.
It
would
have
to
be
about
the
people,
so
I
think
that's
the
that's.
The
history
is
my
understanding.
A
If
someone
didn't
like
the
race
I
was
given
at
whatever
point
before
2007.,
I
would
say
that
it's
I've
seen
it
both
ways.
I
sometimes
see
it
where
it's
a
charter
change
to
allow.
Let's
change
the
mayor's
compensation.
A
A
This
was
just
trying
to
avoid
having
to
go
back
to
the
voters
on,
but
probably
to
todd's
point
people
typically
think
of
step
increases
for
public
officials
so
having
the
lloyd
going
back
to
the
voters.
For
that,
so
that's
but
anyways,
fine
right!
Oh
I
mean
the
voters
would
have
to
go.
I'm
sorry.
C
C
I
just
I
I
don't
know,
I
I
think
it's
I
I
like.
I
would
recommend
that
we
go
with
maybe
a
little
higher
than
that,
but
20
grand
at
minimum
for
sure
that,
like
I
said,
that's
based
on
16
hours
a
week
and
25
an
hour,
get
you
20
grand
per
year,
and
it
would
have
to
have
that
in
their
rate
of
20
000
per
hour.
If
you're,
not
careful,
that
could
get
in
there
and.
H
C
Then
I
would
like
to
see
some
kind
of
I
don't
know
the
legal
or
the
the
the
financing
language
to
go
along
with
it,
but
and
shall
be
annually
increased
based
on
whatever
that
jargon
is
that
would
reference
it
to
the
inflation
rate
or
a
normal
indexing
rate
that
could
apply
and.
A
Careful
too,
because
the
way
that
administrations
the
raises
are
handled
now,
it's
it's.
What
people
would
typically
call
like
a
metoo
clause.
So
really
it's
tied
to
the
the
public
unions,
what
they,
the
rate
of
increases
they
negotiate,
so
that
the
administration's
not
getting
salary
raises
that
are
out
of
line
with
what
the
union
employees
are
getting.
So
the
way
council
set
it
up
now
it
happens
automatically
every
year.
But
let's
say
everybody
gets
a
two
percent
raise.
A
Then
the
administration
gets
two
percent
raise,
so
it
prevents
that
those
things
from
being
out
of
step
with
each
other.
So.
A
C
Is
you
as
you,
you
know,
kind
of
put
a
check
on
that
by
maybe
over
so
many
you
know
just
do
an
increase
over
the
next
couple
years
and
then
you
have
to
look
at
it
again
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know.
That's
that,
that's
what
I
would
like
to
find
a
way
to
do.
If
I'm
the
only
one
that
I
I
hear
what
you're
saying
and
and
next
thing
you
know,
you
got
a
whole
financial
battle
going
on
because
of
of
one
line
item.
C
A
I
my
like
my
thought
on
the
issue
is
that
if
the
mayor's
salary
was
now
subject
to
council
approval,
they
may
or
would
fall
into
the
same
non,
what
they
call
non-bargaining
employee
ordinance
and
it
would
get
the
same
increases
as
the
other
administrative
employees.
If
all
this
came
to
be,
council
would
have
to
amend
their
ordinance
right.
A
A
E
A
I
I
would
say
that
a
mayor
in
a
city-
well
other
reasons-
I
think
I
think
other
reasons.
Definitely
you
got
to
be
civic
minded,
particularly
at
the
existing
salary
rate.
You
have
to
be
pretty
civic
minded
and
want
the
best
for
your
community,
which
everyone
wants
the
best
for
the
community,
but
the
way
it's
paid.
Now
it's
really
a
volunteer.
It's
more
like
a
volunteer
position
based
on
the
number
of
hours
you
put
in
and
they're
in
the
cell.
A
Again
I'll
get
it's
under
ten
thousand
dollars.
I
think
it's
like
ninety
five
hundred,
but
I
don't
wanna
misstate
it
that
they
get
paid
now
the
mayor
gets
paid
now,
wow.
E
D
E
I
I
joined
with
what
todd
says
with
respect
to
increasing
it
to
a
decent
amount
of
money.
I
think,
as
residents
of
norton,
we
want
our
mayor
to
work
for
more
than
25
an
hour
I
mean
we
know
mayor
works
more
than
16
hours
a
week,
but
I
agree
that
that
a
higher
salary
would
maybe
draw
more
people
to
look
at
that
position.
H
A
H
A
C
So
I
I
like
you
know
if,
if
the
consensus
is
not
to
do
any
kind
of
a
merit,
increase
or
indexing
increase-
and
I
would
say,
let's
just
put
30
grand
in
there
and
leave
it
like
the
language-
it
is
except
that
part
of
it
where
councils
shall
annually
review
the
salary
rate.
I
want
to
have
a
closing,
shall
and
annually
review
and
pri,
provide
recommendations
for
increase
or
not
to
increase,
but
just
don't
review
it.
I
wanna
I
wanna
yeah.
A
G
I
I
think
this
is
looking
for
an
argument
you
have
a
if
this
is
ultimately
going
to
have
to
go
to
the
residents
to
vote
upon.
G
It's
going
to
be
dead
in
the
water
and
now
to
even
think,
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
warranted,
but
the
average
person
that
will
show
up
to
vote
will
say
this
is
outrageous
and
I
think
we're
better
off
having
it
a
little
having
it
more
modestly
paced,
so
that
each
year,
then,
the
council
has
a
chance
to
make
increases
yearly
increases
as
opposed
to
having
something
that's
going
to
be
shot
down
from
the
very
beginning
and
he's
going
to
be
back
to
9
500
a
year.
But.
H
H
H
G
C
C
F
Well,
I
agree
with
denise
that
they'll
choke
on
it,
but
I
think
that
if
you
don't
make
it
like
1999,
000
or
9,
you
know
something
low
like
20
30
000.
I
think
people
will
choke
on.
I
I
like
the
20,
000
or
19
999,
but
then
they'll
see
through
that
and
get
fooled.
But
the
point
I
think,
with
with
same
with
denise
was
we
want
this
to
get
passed.
We
want
this
to
get
otherwise,
like
so-and-so
said
that
sorry,
that
he's
back
to
9
500.
C
H
C
C
D
H
D
C
A
C
What
we're
doing
too
so,
let's,
let's
kind
of
let's
kind
of
agree
that
we
need
to
have
something
in
there.
Obviously,
the
the
review
part
has
to
have
a
recommendation
tied
with
that
closing
and
then,
if
there's,
if
it's
absolutely
do,
do,
we
think
that
the
step
increase
or
indexing
is
a
bad
idea
or.
D
C
A
Politically,
having
council
be,
the
overseer
is
more
palatable
than
just
having
automatic
increases.
C
C
F
I'll
just
close
it
with
this
only
because,
if
you
put
in
that
caveat
or
the
comments
about
the
member
of
a
council,
I
I
think
fee
people
will
feel
there's
a
check
and
balance.
So
if
council
feels
it's
going
too
high,
they
can
make
adjustments
or
or
the
representatives
can
get
involved
with
some
of
that
stuff.
F
That's
why
I
don't
know
I'm
back
to,
I
think
a
number
that
can
pass
and
I
like
todd's
concern
about
you-
know
a
cpi
or
something,
but
I
think
that
if
you
had
references
to
counsel
to
review-
and
I
think
you
should
put
the
word
annually
in
here
too-
that.
H
F
C
So
that,
maybe
that's
maybe
that's
an
idea,
I
think
I'm
hearing
you
right
is
where
you
say
the
rate
may
be
increased
up
to
whatever
that
indexing
price
is
subject
to
council's
approval.
C
C
One
percent,
whatever
I
don't
know
is
that
something
is
that
what
you
were
thinking
dave?
I.
F
G
But
if
we're
leaving
it
to
council
shouldn't,
they
be
the
ones
to
determine
that,
and
you
know
we're
getting
very
fixated
on
this
whole
procedural
thing
when
it
should
be.
I
think,
in
in
broader
terms
that
we
want
to
see
he
gets
an
increase
and
if
we're
then
saying
we're
going
to
leave
it
up
to
council,
let
them
determine
what
the
method
is.
C
Well,
I
guess
ultimately
you're
right,
you
know,
and-
and
they
will
actually
do
that-
I
think
maybe
the
only
thing
that
I
was
thinking
they
would
achieve
would
be
it.
It
would
be
a
a
prodding
effect
that
all
right,
you
know,
let's
look
at
it,
does
he
deserve
the
the
annual.
The
annual
inflation
rate
is
two
percent,
so
does
he
deserve
two
percent
as
a
starting
point?
I
don't
know
if
it
would
help
or
hurt.
C
E
Well,
I
think,
politically,
if,
if
the
other
bargaining
units
are
getting
per
year,
that
would
be
a
political
out
for
the
council
members
to
say:
hey
our
mayor's
working
he's
working
well,
we
we
think
our
mayor
deserves
an
additional
two
percent
this
year
and
that
would
be
tied
in
as
as
denise
said,
that
would
be
allow
discretion
with
council
to
decide.
It
would
provide
them
with
some
political
cover
if
they
in
fact
deem
a
raise
appropriate
at
that
stage.
D
D
C
You
know
I
hear
what
you're
saying
denise,
you
know
as
far
as
the
the
wow
factor
or
the
crap
factor.
What
whoever
the
voter
is.
You
know,
and
I
think
again
you
know
20
000
is
where
I
would
want
to
see
a
minimum
on
there
and-
and
I
think
we
can
just
help-
justify
that
at
the
voter
at
the
ballot
by
making
sure
the
duties
are
clearly
defined
and
that
people
see
all
right
well,
we're
paying
them
twenty
thousand
dollars
and
wow
look
what
else
they
did
in
the
charter.
C
G
Well,
I
think
also
something
you
need
to
take
into
account
other
than
by
hearsay
saying
you
know,
the
mayor
earns
x
amount.
How
many
citizens
of
this
city
are
going
to
sit
with
the
charter
and
say
hey
look
at
this.
The
mayor
is
responsible
for
x,
y
and
z.
Nobody
is
going
to
do
that
in
reality.
G
They're
just
going
to
look
at
a
bottom
figure
and
make
a
snap
judgment.
Is
there
any
way
that
it
could
be
put
that
a
an
increase
would
be
done
based
on
what
the
council
proposes
and
leave
that
if
the
council
is
now
suggesting
20
000.
does
twenty
thousand
necessarily
have
to
be
put
in
well?
Can
it
be
left
almost
like
the
council
has
the
discretion
of
making
the
recommendation
and
leave
it
a
little
open-ended.
C
Well,
that
that
sounds
kind
of
good,
but
here's
the
problem
that
I
see
if
we
don't
put
a
real
number
in
there,
you're
never
going
to
have
real
candidates
or
options,
and
you
have
the
one
mayor
that
loves
the
city
and
will
do
it
for
next
to
basically
doing
it
for
nothing
but
there's
other
people
that
you
know
would
consider
it.
You
know,
and
but
yeah.
It's
always
good
to
have
competition
for
for
political
positions
for
sure,
of
course,.
H
C
If
it's
in
there,
though,
for
future
mayor
candidates,
you
know
it
would
be.
Oh
okay,
it's
worth
my
hassle.
It's
worth
my
extra
effort.
You
know
a
little
bit.
H
B
G
Justin
with
the
last
charter
review,
I
seem
to
think
they
recommended
15
and
that
was
knocked
down
knocked.
A
E
D
E
That's
the
message
I
mean
we,
we
as
seven
people
who
are
residents
believe
that
twenty
thousand
dollars
is
appropriate.
We're
recommending
that
the
council
council
will
have
to
either
buy
that
recommendation,
put
it
on
the
ballot
or
not,
and
if
it
goes
on
the
ballot,
then
the
voters
will,
you
know,
rightfully
or
wrongfully,
agree
with
us
or
disagree
with
us.
I
I
agree
that
we
should
have
some
starting
number
in
the
charter,
because
that
way
the
council
doesn't
have
to
take
the
political
heat
for
setting
the
mayor's
salary.
E
A
C
A
A
You
know
I'm
obviously
willing
to
me
as
long
as
you
guys
are.
Is
there
a
time
todd
you're,
looking
to
sort
of
aim
for?
Is
there
a
number
of
provisions
you
wanted?
Were
you
trying
to
do
all
of
it
or.
C
A
Yeah
so
council
section
3.08
we're
now
in
the
council
section.
I
guess
we
should
ask
before
we
get
there.
They
don't
have
any
questions
about
anything
in
the
council
sections
before
section
308.
A
So
going
along
with
compensation
and
again
I'll
say
this
one:
this
is
an
administration
thing,
but
I
think
it's
also
a
good
government
thing.
Council
much
like
the
mayor
doesn't
get
pers
credit
for
the
time
that
they
provide
to
the
city
based
on
their
salary
rates
so
similar
to
what
the
mayor
had.
It
would
be
a
recommendation
and
set
that
salary
rate
to
12
000
a
year
for
regular
council
members
and
then
14
000
a
year
for
president
council,
who
does
more
administrative
work.
A
A
C
A
Yeah,
that's
what
they're
trying
to
avoid
people
they're
called
spiking
the
pension
system.
A
E
A
A
I
have
to
check
that
may
be
actually
I'll
double
check
that
rick
I
could.
It
may
be
more
than
that
now,
maybe
more
than
a
thousand
dollars
a
month.
I
have
to
double
check
the
bill.
E
E
A
I
think
the
last
chart
review
commission.
We
even
had
language
in
there
that
it
the
increase
it
would
increase
by
the
minimum
needed
to
earn.
That
credit,
I
think,
was
what
the
recommendation
ended
up
being,
I'm
not
sure
where
that
ended
up.
I
can't
remember
where
that
ended
up
with
the
council
initially
voted
that
down
yeah.
C
C
Because
I
you
know,
I
personally,
it
still
doesn't
solve
the
problem
that
people
have
used.
You
know
in
the
past
on
that
thing,
but
so
I
don't
know
if
I
don't
know
much
about
the
whole
per
system,
I
mean
I
know
what
it
does
and
I
know
what
you
can
do
with
it,
but
the
the
amount
of
money
that
we're
asking
for
here.
I
can't
remember
what
what
the
current
rate
is
so.
A
We'll
get
you
the
current
rate
for
council
members
and
president
and
the
mayor,
so
you
have
it
I'll,
get
that
to
you
guys
in
a
separate
email
after
the
meeting
I
should
have
got
two
before
and
I
apologize,
but
I
will
get
you
that
so
you.
D
G
A
C
It's
the
same
thing
you
want
to
have
again,
I
think
the
more
the
more
competition
you
have,
the
more
people
that
are
wanting
to
do
it.
I
think
it's
better
for
the
whole
city
when
it's
all
said
and
done,
but
yeah.
I
don't
think
these
rates
are
unreasonable
either,
but
especially
from
what
I
remember.
A
A
Works
is
council
can
never
give
themselves
a
raise
currently
the
way
that
court
law
has
sort
of
came
down
on
that
issue
is
you
could
only
increase
it
for
the
next
council,
so
it'd
only
go
into
effect
after
the
next
election.
You
can
never
vote
for
a
raise
for
yourself
in
the
current
term.
A
So
that's
there's
some
protection,
but
that's
more
of
a
that's
a
that's
a
court
case
issue
not
a.
D
C
C
H
F
Confident
and
again
I
like
that
there
was
a
phrase
before
to
help
meet
the
minimum
prs
requirements.
D
F
Think
that
would
remove
some
anxieties
from
the
electorate
when
they
see
12
000,
because
they're
not
just
thinking
they're,
just
getting
a
raise,
but
it's
is
to
meet
the
minimum
requirement.
So
I
know
I
heard
justin
mentioned
that
the
last
council
didn't
pass
it
to
go
to
the
voters,
but
it'd
be
nice
if
that
kind
of
verbage
was
still
in
here
this
time,
maybe
this
time
it'll
pass
to
the
voters
it'll
get
to
the
voters.
H
F
A
Why
don't
we
get
those
amounts
for
you
guys,
we'll
get
we'll
get
the
salary
for
all
those
positions
and
then
we'll
get
that
minimum.
So
you
actually
know
what
it
is.
So
we're
not
guessing
all.
F
G
Justin,
I
have
a
question
regarding:
wouldn't
the
same
rationale
apply
to
the
mate,
the
mayor's
salary,
then
with
the
pers,
or
would
he
be
exempt
from
that?
Why
couldn't
that
be
tied
in
with
him.
A
A
D
H
A
Yeah,
I
always
I
always
want
to
be
careful
when
you
do
things
like
that,
because
if
the
pension
systems
tank
right,
they're
saying
well
now
you
got
to
make
50
000
a
year
to
be
eligible
to
participate
in
the
pension
system.
Now
you're
locked
right,
so
you
always
got.
Lawyers
are
paid
to
worry
about
everything.
A
So
that's
the
only
concern
I
have
with
the
language,
but
it
would
be
a
way
that
you
could
push
it
off
on
something
that
this
that
wouldn't
necessarily
be
counsel
or
political,
but
could
be.
Could
something
could
happen
if
the
pension
systems,
when
solvent
or
whatever
situation
could
happen
down
the.
D
A
Okay,
this
was
our
question
mark
director
of
finance,
which
was
I'm
not
sure
what
this
is
historically,
but
when
they
talk
about
a
council
clerk,
they
say
who
may
be
the
director
of
finance.
She
just
one
asks
that
the
eliminated,
because
that
that's
a
separate
full-time
position
doesn't
make
any
sense
to
have
yet
I'm
not
sure
what
why
that
was
there
historically
yeah.
H
A
Executive
sessions,
so
in
the
past
I
figured
with
this
provision
put
in,
I
think
2008.
Maybe
there
were
some
court
cases
that
said.
If
your
charter
didn't
allow
you
to
have
executive
session,
then
city
could
not
hold
executive
session
even
those
in
the
ohio
revised
code.
A
So
there
was
provisions
that
were
adopted
by
the
by
the
residents
and
it
it
said
basically
the
reasons
that
were
listed
plus
any
other
future
reasons
that
were
in
the
statute:
121
222,
which
is
the
statute
that
allows
executive
sessions
that
language
is
a
little
bit
over,
but
it's
cumbersome.
A
So
the
thought
here
was
to
clarify
that
executive
session
could
occur
at
a
regular
meeting
or
special
meeting
which
isn't
clarified
currently
and
that,
if,
if
it's
allowed
by
the
ohio
advice
code,
then
norton
can
also
hold
an
executive
session
for
the
same
reason,
so
just
to
eliminate
any
confusion
to
make
sure
that
if
it's
allowed
in
the
future,
as
the
general
assembly
changes
its
mind
from
time
to
time,
that
norton
can
follow
state
law
on
that
issue.
So
that's
the
that's.
The
thrust
of
those
changes.
G
I
have
a
question
about
clarification
with
the
law
with
the
section:
that's
not
in
question
where
it
says
chambers
shall
be
open
to
the
public
in
compliance,
but
we've
seen
with
covet
they're,
not
open
technically,
could
we
say
or
accessible
and
or
accessible,
which
would
that
make
sense
to
clarify
that
since
people.
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
see
that
language,
oh
yeah,
I
don't
know
what
shall
be
opened
to
the
public.
I
want
to
look
at
the
statute
to
see
if
that's
language,
that's
in
120
122.,
it's
really
not
the
yeah.
I
mean
I,
I
think
they
would
say,
or
the
general
assembly
would
say
that
having
telemeetings
is
open
to
the
public,
but
I
don't
know
if
it
tracks
the
statute
or
where
that
language
comes
from.
But
you
want
you
want
to
say
that
it
could
be
excessive
accessibility
right
to
the
meeting.
A
E
High
revised
code
as
meetings
or
zoom
meetings,
or
that's,
why
we're
holding
this
at
zoom
meeting?
I
certainly
I
certainly
wouldn't
want
a
requirement
for
health
purposes
that
we
have
that
it's
necessary
to
have
a
public
meeting
if
the
director
of
health
deems
that
that's
inappropriate
or
dangerous.
A
A
E
A
Yeah
and
I
think
rick
there
was
some
language
that
was
some
hedge
language
here,
which
I
just
in
the
current
charter,
as
such
matters
may
be
amended
from
time
to
time.
So
there's
some
language
in
the
current
charter
that
allows
for
new
purposes
to
get
added
from
time
to
time,
but
it's
not
as
straightforward
as
it
should
be
right.
A
A
Any
any
thoughts
on
this
regular
meeting
section.
C
Now
does
everybody
have
access
in
case?
I
didn't
hear
it,
but
access
to
the
revised
code,
section
121.22
just
so
you
can
skim
through
it.
A
A
A
B
A
Stations
would
be
the
public
library
right,
it's
like
all
sorts
of
places
that
council
figure
out
where
to
actually
post
their
legislation.
The
thought
now
is
that
everybody's
gonna
use
the
internet.
For
the
most
part,
people
aren't
going
to
locations
to
look
for
ordinances
so
to
because
that's
really
what's
what's,
I
think
done
in
practice.
This
would
clean
up
that
you
can
come
into
the
administration
building
it'll
be
posted
outside
of
council
chambers
or
you
can
go
on
the
website.
Those
are
the
two
ways
you
can.
C
A
Anyone
else
have
any
thoughts
on
nope
few
sections.
A
That
was
the
yeah.
That's
we'll
get
down
to
that.
The
one
thing
it
didn't
appear
here
and
I
was
actually
talking
about
this
with
the
mayor
the
other
day
we
know
we
have
a,
we
have
an
executive
officer
called
the
administrative
officer.
You
don't
really
know
what
it
is,
but
that
person
just
exercises
all
the
power
on
behalf
of
the
city.
A
If
there
was
a
you
know,
maybe
a
title
change
it
gets
confusing.
You
almost
want
to
call
this
person
a
city
manager,
that's
how
they're
acting.
There
are
city
managers
under
state
law
that
have
different
powers
and
different
types
of
oversight,
so
it
may
be
confusing,
but
one
thing
to
just
think
about
is
whether
or
not
we
want
our
chief
executive
officer
called
the
administrative
officer,
because
I'm
not
sure
what
that
is.
A
It's
not
consistent
with
other
communities
either
how
they,
how
they
title
their
positions,
but
we
don't
have
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
just
something
to
think
about
I'll.
Just
put
no
change.
A
The
the
title,
administrative
officer
that
was
a
you
know
just
whether
or
not
we
wanted
to
think
of
a
different
name
for
that,
like
a
city
manager,
but
we
don't
have
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
it
tonight.
Right,
okay,
go
to
article
five,
these
administrative
departments
so
yeah
there
is.
A
A
The
administrative
officer-
and
you
know
other
people
that
the
city
sort
of
all
take
on
that
role
and
function,
so
thought
would
be
since
it's
not
really
something
that's
staffed
or
something
that's
looking
to
be
staffed
that
we
eliminate
the
position
just
because
it
doesn't
reflect
how
the
government's
currently
operating.
E
E
The
charter-
someone
at
some
point
in
time,
thought
it
was
important
to
include
that
in
the
charter
at
section
5.08
think
about
the
history
of
why
that,
because
it
says
council
shall
provide
by
ordinance
which
is
mandatory.
I
I
just.
I
wondered
why
it
was
being
eliminated
now
why
it
was
promulgated
in
the
first
place.
A
Yeah
it's
kind
of
interesting,
so
they
have
the
way
that
it's
handled
now
is
the
administrative
officers
sort
of
doing
all
those
positions.
I
don't
know
why
that
one
was
separated
out.
I
can
try
to
find
out
someone
who
does
know
the
history
of
why
that
position
was
created.
I
I
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
that.
Rick
figure
that
out
there's
a
good
question:
why'd
someone
want
to
sort
of
separate
it
out.
E
Propose
to
the
council
that
it
by
present
to
the
voters,
an
elimination
of
section
508,
then
we
wouldn't
really
need
any
change
to
section
5.01,
because
you,
as
the
law
director,
could
just
change
that.
A
That's
true:
okay,
that's
true!
Yeah,
one
point
that
rick's
making
that
everyone
might
not
be
aware
of.
There's
part
of
my
job
as
solicitors.
I
can
make
conforming
changes.
Typographical
changes
to
the
charter,
so
the
point
he's
making
is:
if
we
eliminate
the
department,
then
the
solicitor
me
should
be
able
to
go
to
the
charter
and
say:
okay
that
no
longer
exists.
I'm
going
to
make
a
conforming
change,
yeah
some
sense.
A
Well,
yeah
yeah,
it
does.
If
you
decide
you
want
to,
if
you
decide,
you
want
to
go
that
way,
that
that's
true,
so
I'm
going
to
strike
that
out
and
I'll
just
make
a
note
that
solicitor
can
make
conforming
change
yeah!
That's.
F
Good,
so
so,
and
what
what
am
and
what
I
hearing
that
that
that
that
would
never
have
to
go
to
a
vote
anyhow
to
remove
that
department.
Is
that
what
you're
saying.
A
Just
just
fix
this
paragraph.
F
A
If
you
choose
to
submit
it
again-
and
I
know
this,
is
you
don't
want
to
fatigue
people
right
because
each
of
these
are
going
to
show
up
separately,
so
there
may
be
some
sort
of
priority
ranking?
You
guys
want
to
assign
to
these
when
it's
all
said
and
done,
because
you
can't.
A
F
A
F
A
C
Yeah,
but
never
I
think
that
was
jeff
pritchard
at
the
time.
Wasn't
it.
D
A
So
this
is
a
this
is
an
idea,
and
we
don't
really
have
to
talk
about
this
if
you
guys
don't
want
to,
but
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
that
you
can
do
as
a
charter
and
it's
maybe
better
for
council,
so
I'll,
just
I'll
just
throw
it
out
there.
One
thing
you
can
do
our
charters,
you
can
levy
taxes
by
charter.
A
The
way
that
taxes
are
levied
outside
of
charter
is
that
the
state
reduces
them
over
time.
Essentially,
so
you
collect
less
and
less
money
as
over
time
from
the
same
levy.
So
if
someone
says
I
give
you
three
emails
to
operate
your
your
fire
department,
you
know
ten
years
from
now
that
three
mills
is
generating
way
less
than
what
it
did
at
the
time
you
passed
it
traditionally.
A
That
does
not
not
happen
when
you
do
it
by
charter,
so
there's
some
communities
that
have
what
we
call
charter
millage
and
that's
what
this
is.
So
we
threw
it
in
there
just
as
an
idea,
we're
not
sure
if,
council,
what
council
thinks
about
it,
but
really
just
to
it's
really.
Just
to
I
don't
know,
I
guess
I'll
leave
it.
There.
C
Well,
I
don't
you
know
the
the
the
the
details
behind
levies
and
things
like
that.
I'm
not
an
expert
at
it
as
far
as
how
the
dollars
are
are
levied,
but
if
it
provides
the
city
council,
whatever
with
opportunities
to
be
creative
with
money,
maybe
it's
not
a
bad
thing.
I
I
don't
understand
it
enough
to
see
it
being
a
a
negative
thing
or
a
positive
thing.
I
I
need
a
little
bit
more
understanding
of
what
that
could
do
and
how.
A
That
could
be
to
help
her
yeah.
I
mean
you
would
be
asking
people
to
vote
for
a
levy
increase
essentially
right.
That's
really
what
it
is
just
like
any
any
other
levy,
todd
so
again
that
that
we
may
decide
that,
for
you
guys,
if
not,
we
you
guys,
may
decide
that
maybe
outside
the
scope
of
the
charter
review
commission,
which
is
okay,
but
that's
just
an
idea.
The
administration
had
well,
that's
the
fun
safety
services,
roads
and
you
know
whatever,
and
we
could.
A
So
unless
you
would
olymp
it's
it's,
unless
you
eliminate
a
levy,
it
would
be
new
new
millage
new
levy.
A
Gotta
yeah.
F
A
Yep,
that
was
from
the
fine
instructor
yeah
sorry.
I
was
trying
to
gloss
that
over.
Thank
you
yeah.
So,
right
now,
right
now
the
council
approves
is
required
to
approve
any
contract.
That's
ten
thousand
dollars
or
more
defines
director.
You
know
from
a
from
a
administration
standpoint:
all
these
expenditures
are
budgeted
first,
what
what
we
would
consider
a
smaller
contract,
25,
000
or
under
it's-
sometimes
tough,
to
get
things
to
council
quickly,
because
things
evolve
quickly
and
get
them
to
move
quickly.
A
So
the
idea
would
be
that
you
wouldn't
have
to
go
to
council
for
any
contract
under
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
still
to
be
budgeted
still
to
be
approved
by
the
border
control,
which
is
the
administrative
approval
of
a
contract.
It's
just
what's
required
to
go
to
city
council.
A
I
think
the
last
I
think
it
was
last
change
the
last
charter
review
yeah.
It
was
yeah
and
at
that
time
there
was
there
were
some
inconsistent
provisions
that
existed
at
that
time.
So
really
what
we
did
is
we
said
we
changed
it
to
that
ten
thousand
dollars
for
contract
expenditures
and
then
we
change
competitive
bidding
requirements
just
to
follow
state
law.
G
I
just
think
that's
too
much.
I
remember
with
the
last
change
when
it
was
raised
to
10,
but
I've
been
at
enough
city
council
meetings
when
they
were
taking
place,
that
each
time
something
went
like
12
or
15.
There
would
be
several
people
on
council
and
say
how
did
you
get
this
drew
and
it
was
always
mentioned.
Well,
it's
above
the
10
threshold.
G
I
just
think
the
jump
from
10
to
25
is
too
too
much,
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
scaled
back.
I
understand
what
you're
saying
with
timeliness
that
sometimes
you
can't
get
things
to
cancel.
It
just
seems
too
much
flexibility
on
the
part
of
the
administrator
or
the
finance
director
to
make
those
decisions
without
council's
approval
and
the
council
is
elected
by
the
electorate.
A
E
Aren't
most
contracts
for
labor
materials
services?
Aren't
they
by
cooperative
purchase
purchasing
set
by
the
state
of
ohio?
Anyway,
I
mean
there's
a
like
a
a
group
purchasing
power
and
we
would
be
allowing
we
and
denise
has
a
good
point
about
oversight
and
transparency.
But
there
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
transparency
with
this
of
purchasing
that
we
as
a
city
could
jump
on
the
rate.
That
is,
that
the
state
of
ohio
receives
and
other
communities
receive
through
this
power
of
collective
purchasing,
and
that
that,
though,
may
be
hard
to
explain
to
the
voters.
A
A
This
is
something
we
want
to
mark
strike
it
mark
it
to
talk
about
later.
What
is
everyone
else?
It
means
I
think,
you're
saying
go
to
10,
go
back
to
ten
and
nine.
C
I
wanna
I'm
gonna,
I
wanna
there
was
some
some
thought
I
had
on
on
that
as
it
related
to
the
ohio,
revised
code
and
everything
else,
and
I
can't
remember
what
my
thought
was
on
that.
So
I
I'd
like
to
just
punt
it
till
the
next
meeting
to
satisfy
my
thoughts,
but
there
was
something
to
do
with
bidding
and
what-
and
maybe
this
isn't
the
same
section,
but
did
this
cover
every
any
purchases
or
any
contracts
that
the
city
would
have
justin?
This
section.
C
Yes,
and
and
the
only
thought
I
had
had
to
do
with
with
professional
services
and
competitive
bidding,
and
I
have
to
think
about
it
for
a
second
so
give
me.
A
Meeting
yeah,
so
the
way
I
mean
the
way
it
works
in
the
way
it
works
in
practice
tie
is
that
those
those
contracts
are
not
required
to
be
bid
under
state
law,
so
the
city
is
not
required
to
competitively
bid
those
contracts
because
it's
not
required
by
state
law.
So
it's
that's
the
way
that
works
in
practice
for
professional
services,
contracts.
A
Right
so
the
only
thing
this
does
so
there's
two
different
requirements:
one
relates
to
competitive
bidding
and
won't
relate
to
how
much
a
contract
is
before
council
has
to
approve
it
so
right,
the
professional
service
firm.
If
I'm
right,
I
don't
have
to
it's,
not
a
competitive
bid
contract,
but
if
it's
over
ten
thousand
dollars
the
council
has
to
approve
it
yeah.
So
you're,
not
sorry.
C
A
C
A
C
A
So
there's
a
couple
here:
yeah,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
there's
two
different
processes
for
contracts
in
the
city.
The
one
is
any
any
contract
that
expends
over
currently
expense
over
five
thousand
dollars
has
to
be
approved
by
the
border
control,
which
is
the
members
are
listed
there.
So
that's
an
administrative
body
that
meets
every
time,
there's
a
any
qualifying
contract.
They
meet,
they
discuss
them
and
they
approve
those
contracts.
A
So
that's
some
administrative
approval
and
the
point
of
that
is
to
provide
oversight,
so
department
heads
aren't
entering
into
agreements
without
everybody,
knowing
about
essentially
over
a
certain
dollar
amount.
So
it's
supposed
to
detect
fraud
right
people
trying
to
benefit
personally
from
contracts,
so
border
control
meets
a
lot
because
we
have
a
lot
of
contracts
that
meet
that
five
thousand
dollar
threshold.
This
again
was
just
a
recommendation
to
increase
that
threshold,
but
understanding
that
there's
that
you
know
cost
benefit
of
oversight
versus
convenience.
A
So
that's
the
that's
the
concept
and
then
the
investment
section
section
c
that
border
control
doesn't
tell
the
director
findings
how
to
do
investments.
That's
a
written
investment
policy
that
it's
a
state
law
issue.
The
state
of
ohio
requires
you
to
have
a
written
investment
policy
that
complies
with
the
revised
code.
Is.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
Let
me
think
about
that.
Can
we
scribbling
our
channel
shoot
scrimmer.
C
A
Yeah
part
of
that
is
having
good
people
in
place
because
right
there
there's
definitely
that's
that
is
right
for
abuse
and.
A
C
A
All
right
yeah
and
they
tried
to
deal
with
that.
Just
so
everybody
knows
you
know.
The
audit
requires
state
auditor
requires
the
finance
director
to
send
the
check
register
right,
all
the
checks
that
are
written
and
the
financial
reports
every
month,
and
that's
intended
to
try
to
catch
that
and
be
a
check
and
balance.
So
the
thought
is
that
other
people
are
looking
at
the
finances,
not
just
the
finance
director
right.
But
again,
your
point,
that's
the
that
todd.
That
is
the
issue
on
all
the
requirements.
D
C
For
so
I
can't
remember:
justin
you
didn't
set
up
the
next
meeting.
Did
you
on
our
calendars.
A
Didn't
send
a
calendar,
though,
because
I
wanted
to
do
this
one
and
just
see
what
everyone
thought
yeah.
Everyone
thought.
C
D
D
A
D
D
A
Yeah
and
then
we'll
just
get
you,
those
salary,
summaries
and
there's
some
things
we
talked
about.
Oprah's
gives
you
the
actual
salary
rates
current
versus
proposed,
and
then
the
opers
amounts.
C
Yeah
and
then
you'll
get
the
link
for
the
ohio,
revised
code
section
and
then
so
I'm
thinking
you
know
besides
going
through,
what's
already
been
in
front
of
us.
Maybe
we
take
the
first,
how
many
say
there's
13
sections
all
together
is
that
right,
maybe
we
make
it
a
point
to
individually
look
at
any
potential
edits
that
we
might
see
to
discuss.
You
know
maybe
the
first
four
sections
just
to
add
into
it.
Just
so
we
could.
You
know,
I
don't
know,
that's
my
thought
and
then
you're.
C
Yeah
to
see
if
anybody's
got
any
additional
recommendations
or
thoughts
and
and
then
we
can
put
that
on
the
table-
and
you
know
first
thing
next
time
is
finish
up
the
administration's
requests
and
then
we
go
back
and
hit
some
of
the
ones
that
we
looked
at.
C
C
D
D
C
All
right
so
yeah
so
you'll
get
us
that
link
to
the
site
where
the
document's
stored.
We
can
review
that
and
then
and
then
next
time,
we'll
look
at
sections
one
through
four
on
our
own
plus
finish
up
the
admins
comments.
D
A
And
if
anyone
has
any
questions
in
the
meantime
between
meetings,
just
about
what
a
section
means-
or
you
know
whatever
whatever
comes
to
mind,
just
feel
free
to
email
me,
give
me
a
call
and
happy
to
talk
through
it
all
right.
So,
two
weeks,
seven
o'clock
again
yep
I'll,
send
the
calendar
unless
I
hear
otherwise,
that's
good.