►
From YouTube: City Council Work Session, Downtown Redevelopment Request For Proposals Process And Criteria, 2/2/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
Welcome
to
the
February
2nd
city
of
oldsmeyer
council
work
session
on
downtown
Redevelopment
requests
for
proposals
and
process
and
criteria.
It
is
6
p.m.
I
am
calling
this
meeting
to
order
good
evening.
Everyone.
Thank
you
for
joining
us.
Let's
start
the
meeting
with
our
invocation
and
our
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag,
which
will
be
led
by
our
City
attorney
Tom
Trask.
Please
rise.
D
Our
heavenly
father
help
us
to
carry
out
the
tasks
necessary
for
us
to
fulfill.
Our
purpose
help
us
to
stay
on
track
so
that
we
may
let
this
meeting
work
for
our
good
and
for
the
good
of
our
community
help
us
to
be
good
stewards
of
positive
change
to
benefit
the
city
of
Oldsmar
in
its
residents
and
this
we
pray,
amen.
C
D
C
Foreign,
thank
you.
Tom
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
the
oldsmeyer
public
open
Forum
each
speaker
will
be
recognized
once
and
will
be
limited
to
five
minutes
presentation
on
any
subject.
Please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
The
open
Forum
will
conclude
at
6
30
PM.
Is
there
anybody
that
would
like
to
speak
to
the
council?
C
C
E
C
F
F
So,
ideally,
what
we're
going
to
talk
about
is
the
review
process
and
scoring
criteria
and
then
Felicia
is
going
to
talk
about
the
development
agreement
and
negotiation
process
and
and
how
that
will
proceed
once
that
we
get
to
that
stage.
So,
first
of
all,
does
this
work?
Yeah,
I'm,
wondering
I,
don't
know
yeah!
Thank
you,
okay.
So,
first
of
all
we're
going
to
start
our
review
process,
so
we've
kind
of
laid
this
out
in
steps.
F
The
intent
of
that
is
to
kind
of
follow
a
sequence
and
give
you
all
a
sequence
that
you
can
hopefully
see
as
a
progressive
process.
So,
first
of
all,
obviously
the
first
thing
that's
going
to
happen
is
that
proposals
are
going
to
be
submitted
from
the
individuals
who
respond,
so
you've
got
the
five
firms
that
you're
going
to
invite
to
respond
to
the
RFP.
F
So
the
first
thing
that's
going
to
happen
is
those
proposals
from
those
five
firms
or,
however,
many
of
them
choose
to
respond,
will
be
submitted
to
the
city
staff.
Will
you
know
record
all
of
those
documents
stamp
everything
and
they
will
share
those
proposals
with
us
at
gai
and
at
that
point
the
purchase
price
or
the
offer
is
still
going
to
be
sealed
in
a
separate
envelope.
We
won't
see
that
that
will
be
held
here
for
the
initial
stages
of
the
review
process.
F
The
next
step
is
within
about
a
week
or
so,
depending
on
schedules.
There
will
be
a
sort
of
trade,
show
style,
open
house,
that's
going
to
be
held,
and
that's
basically
going
to
be
an
opportunity
for
folks
from
the
public
and
any
of
you,
of
course,
to
come
and
and
see,
what's
being
proposed
by
these
developers,
we're
going
to
ask
that
they
each
prepare.
F
Some
sort
of
you
know
boards
that
people
can
see
of
the
plan
concept
that
is
contained
within
their
proposal,
so
that
will
happen
like
I
said
with,
hopefully
within
approximately
a
week
or
so
of
when
proposals
are
submitted
to
the
city.
The
price
of
course,
or
proposed
purchase
price
will
still
remain
in
a
sealed
envelope
at
that
point
and
we
are
going
to
solicit
comments
back
from
the
public
and
anyone
else
who
attends
at
that
time
as
well.
F
The
next
step
is
going
to
be
that
gai
will
review
all
of
those
proposals,
as
well
as
the
feedback
from
that
open
house.
So
you
know
before
the
open
house
even
occurs.
We'll
have
already
started
our
review
and
observations
of
the
proposals
that
have
come
in
and
then
once
that
the
open
house
has
happened,
then
we'll
also
include
that
feedback
in
our
review
and
again
at
that
time
the
purchase,
price
or
purchase
offer
is
still
going
to
remain
confidential
and
sealed
it
still
hasn't
been
revealed
yet
so
for
step.
F
Four
at
that
point,
City
staff
will
provide
our
sorry
the
proposals
and
our
observations
as
we've
provided
back
to
them
to
all
of
you
to
start
digesting
that
information.
So
what
this
will
be
is
essentially
a
report
of
observations
from
us
on
each
of
the
proposals.
We
won't
be
doing
a
scoring
or
a
ranking,
we're
not
going
to
tell
you.
We
would
do
this
or
we
would
do
that,
we're
simply
going
to
identify
deficiencies
or
issues
or
areas
that
we
feel
need
to
be
addressed.
F
We'll
also
identify
areas
that
we
think
were
you
know
particularly
well
responded
to
or
where
maybe
the
the
team
that's
proposed
has
has
a
lot
of
experience
or
has
really
shaped
that
well,
we'll
also
talk
a
bit
in
there
about
how
the
public
perceived
that
plan
in
terms
of
the
feedback
that
was
received
during
the
open
house
con
portion
now
at
this
time
again,
the
purchase
price
is
still
confidential.
Nobody
knows
what
is
being
offered
for
the
land
price
at
this
stage,
so
that
gets
us
up
to
where
it's
in
your
hands
right.
F
So
at
this
point
you
have
the
proposals
you
have
all
of
our
feedback
and
observations
on
everything
and
y'all
will
start
to
dive
into
all
of
those
proposals,
so
that
takes
us
up
to
step
five
so
step.
Five
is
where
we
get
into
the
actual
special
meeting
of
city
council:
that's
going
to
occur
after
you
all
had
some
time
to
digest
the
proposals
you'll
be
doing
that
on
your
own
time,
we'll
come
to
this
room
again.
F
Those
will
be
read
into
the
record
at
that
time.
Again,
the
price
is
still
confidential.
It's
still
in
a
sealed
envelope.
It
hasn't
been
opened.
Your
staff
doesn't
know
what
the
offer
price
is.
We
don't
know
you
don't
know,
that's
where
we're
still
at
at
this
point,
your
Council
scoring
sheets
are
going
to
be
even
staff
and
they
will
tabulate
those
during
the
special
meeting.
F
At
that
time.
The
purchase
price
is
once
that
you've
all
submitted
your
scoring
over
to
staff
for
tabulation.
Then
the
purchase
prices
will
be
opened.
Those
offers
will
be
read
into
the
record
and
your
staff
will
enter
them
directly
into
that
same
tabulation
sheet
where
all
of
your
scoring
went
and
that
will
give
us
then
a
weighted
score
for
each
of
the
respondents
proposals
and
that
will
then
be
presented
back
to
you
as
a
one.
A
Go
ahead.
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you
for
outlining
this,
or
it
makes
it
much
easier
to
understand
rather
than
speaking
in
theoretic
theoreticals.
This
helps
me
see
more
clearly
each
of
the
steps
in
the
process.
It's
not
so
much
a
question.
It's
more
of
a
comment
that
I,
S
and
I
know
I
talked
about
this
at
like
last
time,
so
I'm
not
going
to
say
all
of
the
things
again,
but
I
am
still
very
uncomfortable
with
the
whole
keeping
the
purchase
price
confidential
in
a
sealed
envelope.
A
A
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
again,
just
throwing
it
out
there,
because
before
we,
you
know
make
this
the
process
I
am
totally
fine
with
making
price
of
the
the
weighted
thing,
but
I
don't
know
that
it's
fair
that
we're
gonna
tell
the
public.
You
know
here
are
the
options
and
then
we
get
the
prices
and
then,
if
that
you
know
substantially
changed
the
weight,
then
I
don't
know
I
feel
like
they
might
not
get
to
say.
Maybe
I
should
ask
them.
There
are
some
of
them
here.
A
G
F
F
So.
Yes,
we
do
this
for
other
municipalities.
We
do
this
in
other
jurisdictions,
but
it
comes
down
to
what
is
most
important
to
you
and
I
think
you
are
all
very
much
in
agreement
that
getting
the
best
uses
the
best
project.
You
know
that
the
land
is
developed
most
consistent
with
the
vision
and
the
mission
was
your
number
one
goal
that
that
carried
the
greatest
amount
of
significance
for
all
of
you
on
how
this
proceeds,
which
is
why
we
kept
the
price
out
of
that
mixture.
So
as
not
to
confuse
the
ultimate
scoring.
F
D
F
D
F
Time
these
types
of
things
happen
and
you're,
not
even
aware
you're
necessarily
doing
them.
So
if
it's
something
that
you
want
to
be
aware
of-
and
you
want
to
have
the
price
disclosed
to
you-
we
can
absolutely
alter
this
process.
The
reason
we've
laid
it
out
this
way
is
because
it
sounded
like
that
was
your
intent
at
our
last
conversation
was.
The
most
important
thing
is
getting
the
very
best
project
on
that
property.
So.
C
A
G
A
So
what
I,
don't
my
worst
fear
is
that
we
have
this
great
proposal
and
the
developer
we
opened
that
envelope
and
it
says
you
give
us
the
land
for
free
or
city
of
Oldsmar.
You
pay
us
I
just
want
that
to
be
completely
out
on
the
table
that
you're
all
prepared
to
open
that
envelope
and
rank
it
based
on
a
zero
dollar
exchange
to
me,
I
would
want
to
know
ahead
of
time.
I
understand
I'm
in
the
minority.
That's
totally
fine,
but
this
is
my
opportunity
to
make
that
point.
H
Councilman
again,
I
completely
understand
where
you're
coming
from
and
when
I
think
about
this
process
and
what
we're
about
to
go
through,
let's
say
worst
case
scenario:
we
score
one
of
these
ranks
as
high
as
possible,
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
go
for.
We
open
up,
can't
afford
it
right.
We
still
have
the
opportunity
to
make
a
decision
to
go
to
the
second
or
the
third
we're
not
locking
ourselves
in
based
upon
this
decision.
The
price
is
just
the
other
Factor
we
just
I
personally,
don't
want
the
price
impacting
we're
getting
X
number
trees.
H
To
use
your
example,
you
know:
that's
that's
where
I'm
coming
from
it's
still
going
to
be
a
part
of
this,
the
decision-making
process
that
we
need
to
decide
on
yeah,
it's
just
removing
that
influence
from
the
first
step
to
say
this
is
what
I
feel
is
the
best
interest
for
the
city
of
Baltimore
moving
forward.
This
is
the
second
is
the
third.
How
can
we
afford
it
right?
H
I
For
me,
I
think
I
was
the
last
time
we
discussed
it.
It
was
the
same
kind
of
way.
It's
like
it.
What
do
you
want
in
a
house?
And
so
you
say,
oh
I
want
a
pool.
I
want
a
fence.
I
want
this
I
want
this
I
want
this
I
want
good
schools.
I
wanted
to
be
here.
You
know,
I
I
want
this
type
of
driveway
I
want
this
this
this
this
and
this
okay.
Let's
go
look
well.
How
much
is
it
it's
like?
I
Okay,
well,
I
can
deal
without
the
fence
or
I
can
deal
without
the
pool,
because
there's
a
community
pool
around
the
corner.
It's
those
sorts
of
things
where
it's.
If
it's
going
to
Cloud
your
judgment's
going
to
impact,
how
you're
ranking
these
things
in
terms
of
Aesthetics
I,
don't
think
that
was
our
plan
all
along
the
money
is
going
to
show
up
we're
going
to
have
to
look
at
that
and
determine
whether
or
not
it's
okay
as
the
voice,
as
the
vice
mayor
just
said.
Well,
maybe
we
can't
swing.
It.
I
mean
it's
the
same.
I
It's
the
same
kind
of
process
and
I.
Think,
with
you
know,
market
conditions
will
dictate
a
lot
of
that,
and
you
know
it's
well.
We
probably
wouldn't
be
able
to
necessarily
guess
if
there's
a
crazy
Gap
and
it's
like
well,
what
is
this
made
out
of
gold
like
I,
don't
understand?
Why
is
this
price
so
high
like?
Why
is
this
so
extravagant
when
we're
getting
a
little
bit
less
for
this?
But
for
such
a
such
a
lower
amount
of
money
and
I,
don't
think
going
in
where
it's
you
know.
Well,
these
are
the
boxes.
I
These
are
the
things
that
we
want
to
see
in
the
public
yeah.
These
are
the
same
things
that
we
want
to
see.
But
what,
if
we
open
up
the
price,
the
price
is
perfect
and
everything
just
coalesces
and
we're
good
nobody's
judgment
is
clouded
going
into
those
decisions,
and
so
that's
why
I've
been
on
that
same
bandwagon?
Keep
it
closed,
so
we're
all
going
in
with
the
same.
These
are
the
components
that
we
want
to
see
downtown.
C
B
B
I
think
just
to
as
your
kind
of
Devil's,
Advocate
or
worst
case
scenario,
I
I
think
don't
want
to
speak
for
anybody
else,
but
I
think.
Ideally
we
don't
want
to
give
away
the
farm
or
be
in
a
position
where
we're
shelling
out
money
for
a
project,
so
I
think,
even
though
we
have
the
ability
to
score
this
and
be
more
weighted
or
more
interested
in
the
concept
and
the
plan,
I
think
we're
all
have
the
best
interest
of
the
city
at
heart
to
say
we're
not
going
to
just.
G
B
Even
if
there's
a
massive
Gap,
it's
still
something,
if
you
say
well,
we
want
10
million
dollars
right,
it's
going
to
make
it
pause
and
say,
and
and
as
what
council
member
Graber
just
said,
it
might
check
every
single
box,
but
if
we're
willing
to
give
up
a
couple
boxes
and
find
that
happy
medium,
that's
ultimately,
where
the
decision
time
comes
in
and
puts
us,
you
know
us
in
a
tough
spot
at
that
point.
If,
if
we
come
to
it
circumstance
like
that,
it's.
B
That's
what
I
thought,
though,
as
far
as
the
the
price
goes
in
public
knowledge
of
it?
Would
it
be
possible
that,
after
that,
open
house
happens
if
we
are
able
to
collect
those
people,
that
information
that
has
participated
and
wants
that
price
is
disclosed,
send
out
something
to
get
elicit
their
feedback
at
that
point,
if
it's
just
like
a
one
or
two
question
thing
to
get
that
additional
level
of
feedback,
would
that
be
possible
so.
F
F
Meeting
and
then
you'd
have
to
have
another
meeting
so
that
they
could
then
come
and
comment
on
the
price.
Now,
with
that
said,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
I
do
keep
hearing
is
you're
concerned
that
you
may
have
this
huge
ask
where,
instead
of
offering
you
a
price
point
to
purchase
the
land,
they
may
say
we're
offering
you
nothing,
and
we
need
you
to
give
us
two
million
dollars
in
order
for
this
to
even
pencil
out.
F
F
You're
getting
right
in
there
now,
because
my
I
think
when
we
spoke
before
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
think
in
our
last
work
session
that
we
had
one
of
the
topics
that
came
up
was:
was
there
any
interest
in
leveraging
anything
other
than
the
land?
As
part
of
this
deal
and
I
thought,
we
were
generally
in
consensus
that
there
wasn't
a
desire
for
the
city
to
invest
in
the
project
other
than
the
land
being
that
tool
that
you're
saying
offer
us
something
for
the
land
to
get
a
project.
F
That's
you
know
consistent
with
the
vision
and
Mission
right.
Is
there
some
ask
that
you
would
be
comfortable
with
if
they
said
you
know,
we
can
give
you
2
million
for
the
lamb,
but
we
need
you
guys
to
kick
in.
You
know
some
amount.
Is
there
an
ask
that
you
would
be
comfortable
with,
or
is
there
no
ask
that
you
would
be
comfortable
with?
Because,
if
there's
a
situation
where
that's
the
reality,
then
it
would
be
best
just
to
put
that
in
the
RFP,
because
that
resolves.
G
A
H
Being
someone
that
responds
to
rfps,
you
limit
me
on
the
pricing.
I
can't
provide
the
full
value
or
the
full
scope
of
what
you
may
be
envisioning
and
it
may
limit
some
of
their
ability
to
do
that.
I.
Also
looking
at
this
from
from
my
perspective,
when
I've
been
in
these
meetings
before,
on
the
other
side
of
the
RFP
process,
their
hearing
price
is
important
to
us,
they're
hearing
it
from
us
today.
H
That's
my
first
thing
on
the
price
going
to
the
process
here.
I
I
do
agree
that
the
public
should
have
the
ability
to
input
on
the
price
conversation
and,
if
we're
doing
it
at
that
special
meeting,
it's
more
of
a
process.
Question
we
go
through
the
scoring
is
ranked
by
the
clerk
we
open
the
envelopes.
Are
we
going
to
open
up
to
an
open
Forum
at
that
point,
for
responses
to
from
the
public
to
say,
I,
don't
want
you
spending
five
million
dollars
or
I?
F
So
I
mean
I,
I
mean
I,
don't
know
that
that's
not,
but
the
intent
was
for
the
pricing
or
the
offer
on
the
land
that
if,
in
fact
you
decide,
we
don't
want
to
have
some
big
ask
and
you
want
to
put
some
sort
of
ceiling
on
that.
That's
fine,
but
the
intent
was
that
the
price
would
not
be
something
that
was
subjective.
It
is
the
price.
F
So
whatever
points
can
be
awarded
to
the
price
or
whatever
the
weighted
value
is
whoever's,
price
is
the
best
or
whoever's
envelope
has
the
best
deal
in
it
gets
all
of
that
and
then
it
just
follows
sequentially
proportionally
from
there
down
in
terms
of
the
points
awarded.
So
even
somebody
who
doesn't
have
the
best
price
offer.
You
know
that
could
still
be
a
situation
where
if
they've
got
the
best
plan,
true
it's
still
going
to
rise
to
the
top
true,
so
the
intent
there
was
not
for
the
pricing
scoring
to
be
in
any
way
subjective.
F
That's
why,
in
the
when
we
talk
about
it,
we
say
you're
gonna,
we're,
then
gonna
open
the
envelopes
here,
we'll
read
each
of
the
envelopes
for
each
of
the
proposals
into
the
record,
and
then
it
just
gets
added
into
the
tabulation.
That's
already
going
from
the
scoring
you've
already
done
on
your
on
your
score
ballots
that
each
of
you
will
have
and
then
that
just
gets
added
into
that
spreadsheet.
Wait
it
out,
and
then
that
gives
you
a
ranking
one.
Two
three
four
five.
H
Go
ahead,
go
ahead
on
on
the
pricing,
because
I
have
never
seen
the
pricing
on
this
side.
How
complex
does
it
usually
get
we're
going
to
give
access
you
give
this
you
give
this
and
how
much
time
are
we
going
to
spend
up
here
negotiating?
What's
the
best
deal
based
upon
those
answers
like
how
complex
are
those
responses
in
pricing.
F
E
F
F
Those
are
the
type
of
things
that
you're
going
to
see,
but
the
intent
is
not
to
negotiate
at
that
time.
It's
to
score.
It
rank
it
and
then
ask
you
all
to
approve
that
ranking
and
then
we'll
proceed
from
there
into
negotiations.
Now
you
also
have
the
ability
not
to
approve
that
ranking
and
to
alter
that
ranking
based
on
what
you
hear,
but
it
won't
be
an
opportunity
to
start
negotiating
and
asking
people
hey.
Okay,
now
bring
your
best
and
final
offer.
No,
the
the
prices
have
been
read
in
and
that'll,
be
it
okay.
C
Anything
else,
so
one
last
question:
first
of
all,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
explaining
this
through
your
your
PowerPoint
slide,
explained
it
much
better
for
me,
understanding
where
we're
going
to
be
starting
and
how
is
it
going
to
end
so?
My
last
question
is
step.
Five.
Do
we
have
a
time
frame
or
a
month?
Are
we
talking
a
year
from
now?
No.
F
The
hope
is
step.
Five
is
happening,
pretty
quick,
the
expectation
to
have
an
RFP
for
you
all
to
review
the
actual
document.
That'll
go
out
to
the
developers
that
that'll
be
brought
to
you
for
consideration,
early
March,
I,
believe,
okay,
so
you'll
be
considering
that
and
hopefully
approving
it,
then
for
it
to
go
out
as
soon
as
the
proposals
come
back.
F
So
our
hope
is
that
Within
two,
maybe
three
weeks,
tops
from
proposals
coming
in
we're
handing
them
back
to
staff
to
share
with
all
of
you
and
then
hopefully
you
all
have
a
week,
maybe
two
weeks
alone,
with
the
proposals
and
our
feedback
and
the
summary
of
the
feedback
from
the
open
house.
To
then
do
your
own
sort
of
Deep
dive
into
those
proposals?
F
Hopefully,
once
the
proposals
are
here
once
once,
we
have
them
in
staff's
hands.
It
all
starts
going
pretty
quickly.
Actually
at
that
point,
because
we're
just
getting
them
all
to
you
guys,
which
is
the
goal
right
to
get
them
everything
into
your
hand,
so
that
you
can
start
your
process
and
we
want
to
give
you
adequate
time
to
do
that.
We
don't
want
you
to
feel
rushed.
C
B
In
addition
to
those
in
the
upper
section
there
of
the
presentation
of
proposals
in
Q
a
with
each
of
the
respondents,
we
have
a
means,
because,
essentially
at
that
point,
unless
other
people
provide
us
with
questions
that
they
want
to
know,
we're
only
going
to
be
able
to
come
up
with
what
we
want
to
know
or
what
we've
talked
to
people
about.
Can
we
add
a
component
to
where
again
submit
things
that
could
either
be
addressed
ahead
of
time?
You
know
deadline,
get
your
questions
by
this
point
so
that
the
response.
E
F
F
So
I
think
that
is
totally
an
option.
We
can
certainly
ask
at
the
open
house
that
would
probably
be
a
great
opportunity
actually
when
we
do
the
open
house
to
say:
okay,
if
you
can
provide
comments,
that'd
be
great
and
if
you
have
any
specific
questions
that
you
would
like
addressed
by
the
developers
or
the
the
proposers
when
they
do
their
presentation,
you
know
please
identify
you,
know
team
one
I'd
like
to
know:
where
is
the
bus?
Stop
gonna
go.
F
You
know
whatever
the
case
may
be
and
then
we
can
provide
those
ahead
of
time
as
Felicia
was
saying
to
those
individual
teams
and
say
Hey.
You
know
these
are
the
questions
the
public
had
for
team
one
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
then
they
would
be
able
to
address
those
questions
to
you
because
they'd
ultimately
be
the
ones
answering
them.
C
C
F
So
from
here
these,
so
this
is
just
kind
of
now
procedural,
because
at
this
point
we're
assuming
the
ranking
has
been
approved
or
some
firm
has
been
approved
as
the
highest
ranking.
So
from
here,
City
staff
is
going
to
notify
each
developer
of
the
ranking
and
they're
going
to
request
confirmation
from
that
highest,
ranking
firm
that
they
actually
wish
to
proceed
with
negotiations,
and
if
that
is
declined-
and
they
say
you
know
what
no
we've
decided-
we
don't
want
to
go
forward
with
this
or
whatever
the
case
may
be.
F
So
the
scoring
part.
So
we
talked
a
bit
at
our
last
work
session
about
how
you
wanted
to
prioritize
these
things
that
the
you
know
you
wanted
the
plan
to
really
take
priority.
That
should
be,
you
know
the
content
of
that
plan
and
how
it's
consistent
with
the
mission
and
the
vision
and
the
content
you
wanted
that
to
be
your
highest
weighted
element.
We've
also
added
the
technical
components
here
and
the
price.
F
So
when
we
think
about
this
in
terms
of
what
this
means,
the
plan
itself
is
basically
four
buckets
that
roll
up
into
those
percentages
you
saw
a
moment
ago
and
basically,
they
have
these
individual
elements
for
each
of
these
buckets
those
come
directly
from
the
vision
and
Mission
exercise.
So
when
you
see
you
know
architectural
scale
and
massing
respective
of
Street
Frontage
that
comes
directly
from
the
vision
and
Mission
exercise
for
this
property
from
last
fall.
F
So
each
of
these
that
you
see
there,
with
the
exception
of
the
public
open
house
feedback
element,
come
directly
from
your
vision,
your
vision
and
Mission
exercise.
So
that's
how
each
of
these
are
broken
down
as
the
items
that
you
will
score.
So
when
you
see
this
scoring
Matrix,
this
is
rolled
up
into
those
buckets
right.
So
for
the
plan
it's
rolled
up
into
those
four
buckets.
When
you
actually
score
this,
there
will
be
a
scoring
for
each
of
these
bulleted
items
because
they
each
roll
up
into
their
bucket.
F
Now
it's
an
equal
distribution
of
weighted
points
below
so,
if
there's
five
items
that
go
into
appearance
and
aesthetic,
each
of
those
has
the
same
distribution
of
weight
for
each
of
them
and
the
same
for
each
of
the
subsequent.
So
you
will
have
each
of
these
topics
that
you're
actually
awarding
a
score
on.
F
F
There
we
go
all
right
so
then
the
next
section
that
you're
going
to
score
on
is
the
technical
component.
So
just
for
clarity
when
we
say
lead
we're
talking
about
the
individual
who
is
going
to
be
leading
the
team
of
that
proposal.
So
maybe
that's
an
individual.
Maybe
it's
a
firm
with
a
couple
of
individuals,
but
ultimately,
when
we
say
the
lead,
we're
talking
about
the
person
who
signs
the
cover
letter
and
who's
actually
got
their
name
on
everything
as
they're
going
to
be
the
ones
leading
that
team
or
that
group
effort.
F
F
F
Be
a
lot
more
points
than
that.
The
points
will
each
be
multiplied
by
a
weighting
Factor
so
like,
if,
if
you
see
a
weight
of
40
percent,
the
the
points
that
you
award
are
weighted
40.
So
the
way
that
we
had
laid
out
the
Matrix
as
a
draft
for
your
staff
to
start
looking
at,
was
to
allow
you
to
score
between
0
and
10
on
every
single
category
and
then,
however,
many
of
that
0
to
10
you
award
is
multiplied
by
the
weighting
factor,
and
that
gives
you
a
weighted
score
for
that
element.
Okay,.
B
F
So
let
you
know
if,
if
maybe
the
mayor
doesn't
really
like
giving
scores
below
three
so
most
of
his
fall
above
that,
but
you
know
maybe
Mr
Buckman
prefers
to
you,
know,
drop
some
ones
and
some
zeros
in
places
because
he
feels
more
comfortable
using
the
lower
values.
All
of
that's
going
to
normalize,
because
he's
not
just
going
to
do
that
on
one
plan
he's
going
to
do
it
consistently
across
all
of
them,
so
it
It
ultimately
averages
across
cool.
F
F
G
A
F
F
G
G
A
C
F
And
just
a
reminder,
you
know
the
way
that
we
kind
of
approach
the
plan
and
the
technical
split
is.
We
know
the
plan
is
most
important.
That's
why
it's
at
55,
but
you
know
you
want
a
really
good
team
that
can
actually
Implement
that
plan
and
can
bring
it
all
the
way
through.
So
that's
why?
Then,
the
team
configuration
qualifications
experience.
All
of
that
is
also
consistent
with
that.
You
know
it's
it's
not
as
high
as
the
plan,
but
it's
important
that
you
get
a
good
team.
C
B
C
F
I
You
mayor
I
changed
a
couple
for
appearance
and
Aesthetics,
a
change
from
18
down
to
16.
sense
of
place.
I
raised
it
from
18
to
20.,
planned
content
intended
objective
and
functions
from
16
down
to
14.,
open
house
feedback.
I
raised
from
three
to
five
lead
stayed
at
25
teams
stayed
at
15
and
price
stayed
at
5.
H
B
C
J
C
J
F
All
right
so
now
we
have
our
weighting.
So
what
will
happen?
Is
we
will
update
the
actual
scoring
Matrix
and
then,
like
I,
said
each
of
those?
You
know
individual
scoring
elements
underneath
each
of
these
higher
sort
of
subcategories
will
then
just
be
an
even
distribution
of
weight
below
that
afraid
of
decimals,
because
we've
got
a
few
yep.
F
E
For
you
know,
in
the
spirit
of
transparency,
to
help
people
understand
that
that
after
a
selection
is
made,
and
after
we
do
our
financial,
you
know
the
due
diligence
and
see
if
the
developer
still
wants
to
have
a
proposal.
We
still
have
a
long
way
to
go
so
our
the
development,
our
development
Agreements,
are
required
for
the
site.
They're
subject
to
the
Land
Development
code,
section
14.7,
so
I'm
just
going
to
briefly
talk
about
some
of
those
steps.
E
City
council
authorizes
a
city
manager
to
negotiate
the
city
council
decides
to
pursue.
Negotiate
the
city
council
decides
to
pursue
negotiations.
Instructs
the
city
manager
to
proceed.
The
the
property
owner
submits
the
development
proposal,
which
will
have
this.
The
the
city
manager
and
the
staff
reviews
the
development
proposals.
E
The
city
manager
and
staff
meet
and
negotiates
with
the
property
owner
regarding
development
and
the
terms
and
conditions.
So,
as
you
know,
sometimes
that's
a
long
process.
It
takes
us
a
a
lot
of
iterations
when
you
see
something
as
a
concept
Plan
before
before
it
becomes
part
of
the
development
agreement.
It
takes
us
going
back
and
forth
and
we're
discussing
all
those
details.
Everything
does.
Does
it
meet
the
code,
it
doesn't
meet
all
the
new.
You
know
the
coastal
High
Hazard
regulations.
E
What
are
they
going
to
do
about
storm
water?
Is
there
a
fire
lane
so
that
that
that
process
alone
takes
us
a
while
the
city
manager
determines
that
a
tentative
agreement
regarding
the
terms
and
conditions
has
been
reached
or
is
not
attainable
right?
So
then
that's
an
update
for
me
in
a
council
meeting
I
report
the
status
of
the
negotiations
to
you
all
the
essential
terms
of
the
agreement
are
presented
in
outline
form
and
Council.
E
So
we
just
went
through
this
process
with
Devin
rushnell
the
council
reviews
and
votes
to
proceed
with
the
creation
of
development
agreement.
We
also
have
the
three
public
hearings
that
were
added
to
the
code,
so
you
all
authorize
me
to
host
three
public
hearings.
We
host
those
public
hearings,
we
bring
back.
Oh
thank
you,
I'm,
sorry,
counseling
public.
E
Then
I
and
then
we
bring
back
the
comment
to
you
all
and
then
then
you
say:
City
attorney
go
draft
the
development
agreement.
Then
we
City
attorney
drafts
a
development
agreement
and
then
I
transmit
that
to
the
planning
board
and
then
the
planning
with
the
recommendations
from
the
city
manager
and
then
the
planning
board
reviews
and
makes
a
recommendation
to
council
within
30
days,
and
then
the
council
conducts
two
public
hearings
when
the
development
agreement
is
executed
and
then
within
14
days,
that
agreement
has
to
be
recorded.
E
So
just
to
remind
everyone,
it's
it's
quite
the
process.
Even
after
we
get
someone
and
then
I
also
wanted
there's
more
to
this
process.
So
the
the
code
requires
consistent
monitoring.
The
property
owner
submits
a
summary
report.
Every
12
months
we
review
all
lands
subject
to
the
development
agreement,
no
less
than
once
a
year
to
determine
the
compliance.
Obviously
this
is
a
bigger
project
that
would
be
more
of
a
more
frequent
basis.