►
From YouTube: Measure J Commission | May 16, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
It's
now
time
for
public
comment.
This
is
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
measure,
Jay
Commission
on
agenda
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
Commission.
Although
the
measure
Jay
Commission
values
your
comments
persuade
to
the
Brown
Act,
it
generally
cannot
take
any
action
on
items
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
There
will
be
three
minutes
for
each
speaker.
Do
we
have
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak?
A
A
G
A
B
Hello,
so
if
you
turn
to
page
what
is
this
one
of
one
here,
Arianna,
okay,
one
of
one
I'll
quickly
go
over
the
revenues
with
you.
So
we
have
a
revised
estimate
for
1819
of
fourteen
point
nine
million
dollars
and
for
the
next
two-year
budget
cycle,
I
projected
a
4%
increase
rather
than
a
3%
increase
and
then
I
brought
it
left
it
the
same
at
3%
for
21
22.
Just
so
we
can
be
conservative
with
that
we're
going
to
go
into
now
the
projects
with
the
money
that
we
now
have
left
over.
B
H
B
A
F
I
I
A
I
On
the
the
yes
I
do
believe
that
is
too
early
to
tell
as
far
as
how
the
work
is
gonna
progress,
but
from
the
very
GetGo
they
are
a
completely
different
company,
they're,
really
working
to
make
the
staff
at
PD
very
comfortable
and
making
sure
that
everyone's
aware
that
they're
there
now
and
they
are
not
the
old
contractor.
All
indications
are
they're.
Gonna
do
a
great
job
for
us
and
the.
G
Beauty
of
it
is
that
this
contractor
this
is
what
they
do,
so
they
actually
stepped
in
in
another
police
apartment
project
that
went
sideways
as
a
takeover
contractor.
So
they
actually
look
for
this
kind
of
work
and
there
that
they've
projected
out
to
November,
which
is
probably
conservative
for
them,
because
they
don't
want
to
be
held
to
liquidated
damages,
because
the
liquidated
damages
will
start
again
if
they
don't
finish
in
time,
so
I
we're
hopeful
that
they'll
finish
it
earlier.
A
D
F
B
A
Right
so
we
will
move
on
told
business
and
that
is
to
review
the
commissioners
prior
toward
prioritize
unfunded
capital
projects
and
Marcus
I,
guess
I'll,
let
you
you
had
sent
out
it
a
document
to
us
today.
We've
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it
a
little
bit
so
we'll
let
you
kind
of
take
off
with
this
and
I'm
sure
we'll
have
some
questions
and
again
for
all
commissioners.
This
is
our
determining
our
final
recommendation
of
what
will
recommend
next
week
and
the
joint
meeting
with
Council.
G
Okay,
thank
thank
you,
commissioners,
as
I.
Don't
expect
you've
had
a
chance
to
digest
this
if
you've
even
seen
it
because
it
went
out
about
1:00
o'clock
this
afternoon,
but
we
were
wrapping
up
the
Joint
Commission
City
Council
staff
report,
which
goes
out
tonight
for
next
Thursday,
along
with
the
council
agenda
for
next
Wednesday,
and
so
what
I
did
is
took
the
measure
J
capital
fund,
discussion
from
that
staff
report
out
and
put
it
all
here
for
you
to
look
at
the
staff
report.
G
You'll
see
tonight
also
has
discussion
about
other
non
measure,
J
capital
project
funds,
because
we
want
to
have
that
conversation
with
Council
on
just
the
overall
capital
project
funding,
which
includes,
obviously
more
than
measure
J.
So
so,
as
you
can
see,
there,
we're
recommending,
instead
of
just
the
generic,
provide
direction
to
staff,
which
is
what
we
had
been
indicating
before.
G
Last
year
and
will
be
realized
this
year,
so,
as
you
mentioned,
there's
almost
12
million
and
change
in
programming
with
for
measure
J,
12.2
and
I
I
thought
it
would
be
important
to
have
a
informed
discussion
at
the
joint
meeting
with
the
City
Council
to
talk
about
the
community
project
allocation.
Just
so
that
we're
clear
it
is
or
it
isn't
in
the
budget
and
on
the
contingency
and
the
general
fund.
G
So
I
don't
know
that
I
need
to
go
through
the
history
unless
some
of
the
newer
commissioners
were
familiar
with
how
we
got
to
where
we
are
today,
but
it's
all
there.
You
know.
Last
this
time.
Last
year
we
were
working
with
a
much
smaller
amount
of
money
and
had
identified.
You
know
the
9-1-1
CAD
system
and
those
other
projects
as
priorities.
G
So
what
has
happened
since
then,
as
we
went
ahead
and
moved
forward
so
I'm
on
page
three,
where
it
really
fresh
is
our
memory
of
the
measure
J
commission's
recommendations.
This
time
last
year
we
proceeded
and
awarded
the
keyless
entry
system,
phase
1
using
capital
funds,
so
capital
funds
are
come
from
the
general
fund,
as
well
as
for
the
IT
city
wireless
network
system,
so
those
have
fallen
off
because
we've
proceeded
to
work,
move
forward
on
those
projects
with
basically
general
fund
dollars.
G
There
is
an
item
on
the
council
agenda
on
May
22nd
to
proceed
with
life
safety
upgrades
at
DeMuth
again
using
capital
funds,
not
measure
J
funds.
The
Moose
Community
Center
was
the
highest
priority
facility
that
was
going
to
be
funded
with
the
four
hundred
thousand
listed
here,
because
it
has
no
fire
sprinklers
and
needed
to
have
some
fire
code
upgrades.
So.
G
G
G
The
manufacturer
has
been
working
on
a
retrofit
and
we're
still
working
and
waiting
on
them.
So
it
wasn't
our
contractors
fault.
It
was
the
manufacturer
of
the
bollard,
so
they
had
promised
a
product
that
just
doesn't
deliver
because
the
vibrations
from
the
traffic
cause
these
things
to
shoot
up
in
the
middle
of
traffic,
and
so
we've
we've
had
to
basically
deactivate
them.
G
So
they're
they're
not
they've,
taken
the
air
out
of
them,
so
they
won't
pop
up
and
so
I
think
what
the
problem
is
is
they're
realizing
the
retrofit
is
gonna
involve
the
casing,
which
means
all
of
those
things
have
to
come
out.
They've
been
trying
to
come
up
with
a
retrofit
that
works
where
they
don't
have
to.
They
just
can
take
the
guts
out
of
it
of
it
out
and
refix
it
and
we're
still
waiting
on
a
response
to
my
latest
email,
so
yeah.
Unfortunately,
it
really
is
frustrating
for
me
to.
G
I
G
Contractor
is
not
because
we
specified
the
manufacturer,
the
manufacturer
promised
something.
What
the
manufacturer
left
out
is
that
they
had
these.
These
are
manufactured
in
China
and
sold
to
cowpie
bollards,
and
then
they
had
an
aftermarket
fix
that
they
were
gonna
do
to
it
that
they
didn't
share
with
anyone.
G
So
it's
not
our
contractors
fault,
unfortunately,
but
so
it's
it's
an
issue
we're
trying
to
resolve
so
we're
going
to
hold
on
the
bollards
at
the
moment
and
continue
to
coordinate
with
police
and
fire
on
strategic
placement
of
vehicles,
and
you
know
the
the
procedure
we
have
now
to
make
sure
there
aren't
errant
vehicles
or
problems
with
with
that.
So
a
quick.
G
G
The
so
the
new
projects
that
we're
recommending
is
the
emergency
generators,
so
some
of
these
projects
are
multi-year
projects,
and
so
we
wanted
to
program
the
design
phase,
knowing
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
marry
you
to
the
project,
but
the
intent
would
be.
Then
then,
fiscal
year,
2021
we'd,
start
programming,
construction
funding
for
some
of
these
projects
so
like,
for
example,
that
emergency
generators,
we
would
want
to
move
forward
with
the
design
of
that
fire
station
number
one.
G
You
know
again,
it's
gonna
be
like
a
downtown
park
kind
of
project,
I,
anticipate,
it's
gonna
be
a
one
to
two
year
design
phase,
because
it's
an
important
facility,
it's
historic!
It's
an
expansion,
it's
gonna,
be
a
complicated
project.
I
would
expect
that
we
would
have
you
know
one
to
two
years
of
design,
and
then
you
know
two
years
of
construction,
so
we'll
have
I,
see
it
being
listed
as
another
multi-year
project
starting
next
year
and
we'll
have
a
better
idea
of
what
that
cost
will
be.
G
G
G
What
David
and
I
talked
about
and
we're
recommending
to
you
tonight
and
to
the
Commission
and
to
the
council
that
the
joint
meeting
is
to
suggest
that
at
least
to
advance
or
initiate
the
design
phase,
because
we
know
we
have
to
do
the
building
upgrades
for
that
facility.
The
you
know
all
the
mechanical
electrical
plumbing
all
of
the
systems
have
to
be
upgraded.
You
know
the
bulk
of
that.
G
Basically,
the
our
architects
estimate
was
10
million
to
do
all
of
the
facility
improvement
upgrades,
and
then
there
was
2
million
in
architectural,
historic
renovations,
with
the
reliefs
on
the
sides
inside
the
theater
and
some
of
the
lobby
restoration.
So
anyway,
I
don't
know
how
the
rest
of
the
council
will
feel
about
this,
but
we're
just
suggesting
programming
the
million
dollars
to
get
going
on
the
design
of
those
improvements
of.
B
The
way
I
recall
the
when
we
assembled
all
our
votes,
the
plaza
theater,
came
very
low
in
our
priorities,
and
we
know
that
there
is
outside
fundraising
and
private
money
going
in
I'm
a
little
concerned
to
see
the
plaza
theater
for
a
million
and
have
it
come
before
the
downtown
park,
which
is
one
of
our
top
priorities.
Right.
G
Let
me
explain
that
so
we're
having
to
consider
also
some
of
the
priorities
coming
from
counsel,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had.
You
know
a
full
discussion
at
the
joint
meeting
on
on
both
your
priorities
and
the
council's
priorities
and
again
the
council
may
look
at
that
and
say
no,
no
we're
gonna
have
outside
funding.
You
know
for
all
I
know
they
may
have
that
much
an
outside
funding
by
next
year.
G
E
Further
question
on
the
plaza,
so
there's
a
there's,
an
inevitable
project.
This
is
sort
of
this
feels
like
in
some
ways
the
library
discussion
for
me,
which
is
there's,
there's
an
inevitable
project
that
when
it
occurs,
the
feasibility
process
is
complete.
It's
been
defined
and
there's
a
goal
and
is
buying
how
far
along
is
that
process
for
feasibility
and
buy-in,
and
then
a
million
dollars
would
be
committed
to
a
project.
That's
from
my
impression
it's
it's
very
vague
beyond
the
need
to
rehabilitate
a
an
envelope.
E
So,
as
you
talked
about
the
the
design
fees
for
base
building
systems
and
the
rest
or
the
architectural
restoration
needs
for
historic
building
with
that
million
dollars,
is
that
going
to
just
to
initiate
anything?
Or
is
that
also
contemplating
how
to
get
to
a
project
that
hasn't
been
defined
yet
well?.
G
I
think
the
project
is
defined
so
that
we
haven't
defined
like
who's
gonna
use
it
or
how
they're
gonna
use
it.
That's
programming
I
mean
you
could
go
in
there
today
and
and
have
hold
functions
in
the
theater
is
just
you
you
can't
have
you
can't
really
utilize
it
with
the
end-users
with
you
know,
anyone
that's
gonna,
go
in
there
and
put
on
a
show
or
a
cabaret
or
even
a
play.
G
So
that
so
this
this,
our
intent
is
to
update
the
building,
to
you
know,
address
all
the
deficient
systems
that
haven't
been
upgraded
in
decades
and
decades
and
decades
I
mean
the
last
thing
we
did
to
the
theater
was
in
the
early
90s
when,
where
you
place
the
air
conditioners,
so
I
mean
I.
For
my
perspective,
it's
a
well-defined
project
because
we
know
it's
just
upgrading
all
of
its
systems,
all
of
its
infrastructure,
electrical
plumbing
heating,
air
conditioning
redoing,
the
seating.
You
know,
renovating
the
the
the
lobby
and.
E
A
lot
of
that
need
of
the
use
is
part
and
parcel
of
what
the
design
caught
the
design
project
the
design
scope
would
be
unless
all
of
this
is
just
universally
translated
and
I'm,
not
sure
it
is
universally
translated
to
whether
this
is
cabaret
production
that
opens
doors
in
two
or
three
years
verses.
So
a
different
type
of
use
that
open
door
opens
door
its
door
in
five
or
10
years.
D
E
G
Yeah
all
the
infrastructure
to
support
basically,
for
example,
an
ultimate
electrical
load
that
any
user
might
need
for
the
facilities.
So
it
doesn't
really
dictate
who,
how
or
who
would
operate
in
there.
But
it
would
just
put
the
ultimate
systems
in
there
that
are
necessary
for
whether
it's
a
theater
or
even
it's
just
somebody
at
a
podium
doing
a
talk
or
a
full-blown
cabaret
show
with
Suzanne
Somers
or
whatever
it
might
be.
But.
E
G
I
mean
the
next
step
would
be
to
engage
with
the
architect
and
actually
move
forward
with
the
final
design
and
construction
drawings
for
doing
all
of
this
mechanical
electrical,
plumbing
and
heating
and
air-conditioning
upgrades
and
and
then
getting
a
better
estimate
of
what
that's
gonna
cost.
So
it
wouldn't
it's
nothing
that
would
be
thrown
away,
and
this
is
what,
if
I'm
trying
to
understand
what
your
concern
is,
is
that
we.
E
H
I
only
think
that
there
has
to
be
a
contingency
on
use
that
it
was
entirely
private
use,
project,
I,
wouldn't
think
I
think
the
measure
J
should
not
necessarily
use
the
money
for
that.
If
it
becomes
sort
of
a
combined,
you
know
City
private
thing,
then
it
makes
more
sense,
but
if
it's
I
won't
necessarily
want
to
pay
a
million
dollars
to
have
it
be
the
suzanne
somers
theater,
I.
G
Don't
think
there's
any
intent
of
the
city
at
this
point
to
sell
or
lease
this
for
private
use
for
total
private
use.
I
did
10
is
still
to
have
it
available
for
the
film
festival,
but
I
mean
there
hasn't
been
any
decision
on
how
I
mean
from
what
I
understand
this
point.
The
city
itself
will
still
continue
to
manage
or
operate
the
theater
until
we
decide
something
down
the
line.
But
again,
as
you
mentioned,
that
the
the
intent
here
is,
we
have
to
improve
the
building
for
the
whole
range
of
flexible
options
for
its
ultimate.
G
D
Have
concerns
about
this?
It
was
I'm
on
the
board
of
the
Film
Fest
when
the
Film
Festival
turn
this
down
to
buy
it
because
of
the
cost
of
what
it
was
gonna
take
to
put
this
building
into
the
shape
it
is
the
chairman
of
the
board
said
he
had
consulted
the
people
who
do
Coachella
and
they
said,
if
you're
really
going
to
look
at
this
in
the
broadest
way.
You
just
can't
plan
on
redoing,
the
seats,
etc.
D
You've
got
even
planned
with
the
idea
of
having
seats
that
are
on
tracks
that
you
pull
the
seats
out
anytime,
you
want,
so
you
can
do
stand-up
in
there
for
a
concerts,
so
it's
just
more
than
just
it's
got
to
have
so
much
multi-use
to
it
and
if
we
agreed
to
give
a
million
dollars
for
design
and
things
that
are
going
on
with
it
today.
My
concern
is
by
the
time
that
private
funding
can
raise
12
million.
D
The
price
may
be
18
million,
and
that
we
may
be
just
spinning
our
wheels
on
something
I'm
concerned
about
us.
Putting
out
that
kind
of
money
up
front
on
something
like
this
I
think
this
is
a
long
project
going
ahead
because
I
don't
know
how
much
private
funding
I
know.
One
of
the
council,
members,
they've
and
the
mayor
have
gotten
together
and
they
have
committee
going
and
everything
on
this
now
and
they're
enthused
about
it.
But
I
I
don't
see
an
outcry
from
the
public
on
this.
D
They
just
like
they
don't
like
the
way
the
building
looks
I
brought
up
a
year
ago
that
at
least
let's
fix
the
lights
on
of
their
turn,
the
lights
off
on
it
because
half
the
letters
are
lit
and
when
the
tourists
come
to
village
fest,
it
looks
cheesy.
Well,
it's
been
a
year
and
it
still
looks
that
way
today.
So
I'm
concerned
about
the
moving
ahead
on
something
like
this
for
us
to
consider
giving
that
large
of
an
amount
of
money
to
me,
it's
almost
a
million
dollars
on
spec
techniques
towards
me.
A
G
G
To
make
sure
everybody
understands,
there's
not
much
in
the
way
of
restoration,
so
10
million
of
the
Gensler
estimate
was
for
all
the
infrastructure
improvements
and,
for
you
know,
redoing
the
flooring
and
the
seating
and
the
electrical
and
heating
and
air
conditioning
the
the
restoration
really
related
to
the
proscenium,
that's
hidden
behind
all
the
scaffolding
or
the
falsework
that
rift
mark
what's
put
up
and
the
reliefs
along
the
edges
of
the
interior
of
the
theater
and
then
some
renovations
in
the
in
the
lobby.
Okay,.
A
And
that's
awesome.
That's
great
and
I
think
this
echoes
some
other
comments.
I
think
this
is
perfect
for
measure
J
I
just
question:
are
we
throwing
good
money
at
bad
right
now?
Not
knowing,
as
commissioner
Robin
stated,
it's
true
purpose.
I
would
hate
to
see
so
much
go
into
infrastructure,
design,
wise
and
even
it
being
implicated
or
you
know,
built
out
and
then
finally,
they
they
figure
out.
A
Oh,
this
is
what
we're
gonna
use
it
for,
and
this
company
is
coming
in
whether
it's
golden
voice,
the
Film
Festival,
a
cabaret,
show
or
whatever
you
know,
AEG,
Live
and
they're,
like
you
know
what
we
need
to
add
green
rooms.
We
need
to
chop
this
up
back
here
and
add
this
there
and
now
this
whole
hva
system
that
you
put
in
its
all
wrong
and
it's
bad.
We
got
to
redesign
it
to
meet
our
needs
for
how
we
want
this
to
operate.
A
J
As
far
as
I
know
from
attending
meetings
and
going
to
things,
this
is
going
to
be
renovated
to
be
quote
a
theater,
and
what
that
means.
Is
it's
not
going
to
be
big
enough
to
do
big
productions?
Cuz,
there's
no
room
to
build
it's
going
to
be
a
space
that
the
city
would
rent
out
whenever
a.
If
the
Film
Festival
wanted
to
use
it,
they
could
show
movies.
J
If
a
cabaret
show
wants
to
use
it,
they
can
show
something
else,
but
it's
going
to
be
like
a
regular
theater
that
things
would
come
and
go
in
in
the
city
of
Boston
and
there's
all
kinds
of
theaters
like
that,
and
if
a
show
is
too
big,
it
just
doesn't
go
into
that
theater.
It
can't
so
a
big
traveling
Broadway
show
is
not
going
to
go
into
the
plaza
theater.
H
F
H
G
Days
or
whatever,
what's
been
suggested,
is
using
the
office
space.
That's
on
Indian,
where
we
currently
rent
the
police
substation
that's
going
to
go
away,
so
the
reality
is
is
that
the
the
dressing
rooms
downstairs
are
better
used
for
mechanical,
which
is
how
it
was
originally
designed
to
have
the
cooling
happening
from
underneath
the
seats
rather
than
in
the
ceiling.
You
know
in
the
attic,
and
so
it's
there
is
no
room
to
expand
the
theater,
so
the
idea
would
be.
The
best
option
is
to
have
permanent
green
rooms
in
other
rooms
in
the
Pitts
building.
C
Just
clarify
a
clarifying
question
on
timeline,
so
I've
heard
a
lot
of
comments
about
concerns
of
this
private
funding
and
what
they,
what
their
use
might
be.
But
assuming
that
we
would
give
the
million
dollars
for
the
is
it.
The
city,
slash
measure
J
offers
a
million
dollars
for
the
design
and
then
once
we
have
the
design
complete
and
a
vision
complete
than
we
seek
outside
funding.
Or
are
we
assuming
that
we
find
outside
funding
and
they
are
a
partner
in
that
design
and
then
that's
when
those
million
would
be
used.
C
G
There
will
sew
as
funds
are
raised,
those
funds
I,
don't
know
how
they're
gonna
control,
whether
they're
allocated
to
design
or
construction
or
if
they're
pledges
until
a
certain
threshold
is
reached.
I,
don't
you
know,
know
how
that's
gonna
work,
but
the
the
thought
here
was
just
we've
got
to
get
started
and,
to
a
certain
extent
you
can
have
better
opportunity
of
fundraising.
If
you
know
that
something's
actually
still
under
is
it
is
underway,
and
so
it's
almost
like,
if
you
have
something,
that's
shelf,
ready
and
ready
to
go
and.
G
F
Think
part
of
the
problem
is
the
word
design.
I,
think
that
if
we
said
something
and
and
I'm
not
necessarily
supporting
this
but
of
preservation
and
maintenance,
so
it's
clear
to
the
City
Council
is
this
confusion
here,
I
can
imagine
what
the
audience
is.
Gonna
be
like
at
the
City
Council
meeting.
They're
all
gonna
be
jumping
up
and
down.
How
can
you
design
something
when
you
don't
even
know
what
you
want
to
do
with
it?
F
But
if
you
say,
preservation
and
maintenance,
and
you
make
it
clear
to
everyone,
this
is
just
to
get
it
going,
that
these
are
the
things
that
no
matter
what
it
becomes,
they
will
still
be
in
place.
I
think
that
there'd
be
a
better
argument
for,
for
this,
and
it'd
be
more
clear
to
the
people
that
have
to
consider
it.
That's
just
one
view.
B
G
G
J
E
Is
is
there
a
width
on
the
scale
from
zero
to
a
million?
Is
there
I'm,
assuming
it
pardon
me
for
assuming
the
million
dollars
I'm
interpreting
is
for
full
working
drawings,
full
definition
of
mechanical
electrical
plumbing
basic
building
structure?
Is
there
an
intermediate
step
of
feasibility,
scope
and
pricing
estimates
that
might
be
for
a
fraction
of
that
and
is
just
as
useful
in
the
feasibility
and
the
pitch?
Well.
G
That's
what
we've
already
done
so
Gansler
did
a
feasibility
study
and
did
preliminary
I
mean
we
had.
You
know
they
had
all
their
sub
consultants
out
there,
looking
at
the
building,
identifying
the
condition
of
the
building
and
and
that's
how
they've
come
up
with
and
they
had
a
Cost
Estimator
who
came
in
and
looked
at
at
all
and
that's
where
they
came
up
with
the
ten
million
to
12
million
dollar
range
and
so
I,
just
rule
of
thumb,
10%
for
construction
drawings,
so
yeah
I
can
see,
there's
some
confusion.
G
G
E
G
E
So
this
is
this
is
an
apologize
for
going
on.
This
helps
me
understand
it
better.
The
million
dollars
positions
the
city
to
move
forward
on
a
project
rather
than
what
it
turns
out
or
learning
you
already
have.
The
knowledge
of
this
is
we
understand
the
scope.
We
understand
the
requirement.
We
have
a
have
a
good
sense
of
the
cost
estimate
for
that
for
desktop
analysis
and
negotiation
with
other
parties
that
might
want
to
rent
or
use
or
invest.
The
desktop
is
complete.
G
This
well,
if
we
get
some
design
funding,
then
we
can
reach
out
to
Gensler
and
get
some
actual
formal
proposals
from
them
to
do
the
design,
and
at
least
my
goal
would
be
to
do
the
main
infrastructure.
I
agree.
Seeding
is
probably
the
one
element
that
is
gonna
be
very
depending
on
the
use,
and
so
we'd
want
to
have
them.
A
Yeah
I
was
just
curious
if
it's
going
right
down
to
seeding
a
drinking
fountain,
bathroom
layouts,
you
know
whatever,
or
is
it
more
we're
talking
just
kind
of
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
how
this
building
operates?
So
the
electrical
upgrades
HVAC
any
you
know
it.
Obviously
it
sounds
like
this
is
a
big
deal
or
repurposing
a
lot
of
rooms
and
reshow.
A
Well,
you
said
putting
like
the
infrastructure
in
the
lower
level
where
the
dressing
rooms
are
and
again
I've
not
been
in
this
facility,
so
I'm
kind
of
clueless
on
what
it
looks
like
currently
and
I'm.
Ok,
with
that
I'm
just
I,
just
I
think
we
need
to
be
clear
as
a
commission,
the
million
dollars
doesn't
get
us
to
like
ok
this
is
it
right
down
to
the
fabric,
and
now,
let's
press
go
when
the
funding
when
the
when
they
can
raise
twelve
million
dollars.
This
is
really
kind
of
getting
us
to
a
point
of
great.
A
H
Of
the
issues
I
have
with
a
number
of
these
project.
Is
that
we're
not?
We
don't
have
full
information
on
exactly
how
the
money
would
be
used
and
what
other
potential
sources
are
and
and
we're
trying
to
make
recommendations
without
having
that
this
one
is
a
new
one
we
do
have
to
make.
We
should
I
believe
we're
supposed
to
make
recommendations
for
twelve
million
dollars
by
next
week
that
tonight
right.
So
what
we
should
decide
is
potentially
whether
we
want
something
like
this
as
part
of
the
recommendation.
H
However,
we
also
recommend
that
it
be
dependent
upon
having
exact
information
of
what
it
would
be
used
for
method.
It's
really
up
to
us
in
the
end,
but
at
least
that
way
we
could
say
we're
not
just
saying
you,
here's
a
million
dollars.
We
can
say
here's
a
million
dollars,
but
we'd
like
to
know
exactly
how
it's
going
to
be
used.
H
A
A
J
A
G
G
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
that.
So
if
you
look
yeah,
if
you
look
at
the
description
I
and
in
it,
you've
seen
it
before,
but
basically
those
mellow
high
metal,
halide
light
fixtures
are
no
longer
manufactured
and
we
basically
bought
all
of
the
ones
we
can
find.
So
at
some
point
our
fields
will
go
dark
because
we
can't
rely
real
amp,
the
old
metal,
halide
fixtures
and.
I
G
So
tonight
you'll
see
the
staff
report
I
prepared
to
approve
the
plans
for
bidding
and
lucky
enough
we
have
a
lot
more
Quimby
Park
fees
that
we've
received
so
as
you've
seen
all
these
new
buildings
popping
up
residential
buildings
being
built,
we've
collected
a
lot
more
in
Quimby
Park
fees
on
each
of
those
building
permits.
So
there's
a
lot
a
lot
more
funding
for
that
project
coming
from
Quimby
fees
and
the
intent
is.
F
G
Utilize,
the
two
million
for
the
Andaz
parking
structure
for
the
downtown
park.
The
only
reason
I
have
this
two
million
set
aside-
is,
if,
for
some
reason
and
I,
have
no
reason
to
think
we
won't.
But
if
there's
some
reason
we
don't
get
the
dream,
hotel
parking
fee,
we
still
need
and
we
still
have
to
pay
for
the
end
as
parking
structure,
I
still
need
two
million
dollars
for
the
downtown
park.
G
So
what
it
means
for
you
today
is
that
you
actually
and
I
would
I
would
recommend
you
have
your
backup
position
or
projects
that
you
would
want
to
fund
with
that
two
million
dollars,
and
you
know
if
I
look
at
what
you
voted
on.
You
know.
Emergency
generators
is
at
the
top
and
we
were
already
Rebekah
recommending
the
design
you
could
say
well,
we'll
just
fully
fund
the
full
cost.
G
G
G
And
then
in
my
staff
report,
I
do
mention
you
know
to
the
extent.
Let's
just
say
council
says:
no,
we
don't
want
to
do
community
projects
anymore.
Then.
That
just
means
that's
a
million
more
for
you
to
consider
what
you
want
to
fund
just
generally,
but
if
they
do
say
yes,
we
like
the
idea
of
the
community
projects.
G
F
G
What
what
we,
what
we
used
for
the
Civic
projects,
was
actually
your
first
hotspots
money
that
was
gonna
pay
for
that
1.8
million
dollar
sidewalk
project,
so
we
counsel
deferred
that
said,
go
get
a
grant.
The
grant
was
oversubscribed.
We
really
needed
that
money
to
be
able
to
award
that
contract.
So
so,
so
that's
why
I'm
saying
we
either
go
back
to
the
sidewalk
project
that
isn't
funded
at
this
point
or
we
move
on
and
maybe
start
working
on
the
park.
J
So
it's
a
little
weird
to
me
that
that
I
just
wouldn't
want
to
I,
don't
mind
pickleball
courts
at
sunrise.
Just
that
location
is
they
can't
expand,
really
any
other
place
very
my
guess
they
could
expand
a
little
bit
towards
burry
Stowe,
but
they're
landlocked
with
the
stadium,
the
only
ways
they
can
go
or
sideways
so
and
I
know
they
need
no
more
parking.
And
yes
in
that
plan
that
was
done
five
or
six
years
ago.
A
I
agree
with
David
and
that
is
very
low
on
our
list.
Are
we
are
we?
Should
we
be
proactive
on
that
that
we
could
be
usurped
on
this
somehow
because
again,
I
don't
think
it
makes
sense
at
all,
especially
when
I
looked
at
the
map
and
I
look
at
Duluth
Park,
you
could
easily
add
eight
to
twelve
pickleball
courts
by
only
removing
some
trees
at
DeMuth
and
and
make
a
pickleball
Center
literally
where
the
pickleball
courts
are
right.
Now,
there's
so
much
field
space
and
there's
so
much
ample
parking.
A
It
makes
complete
sense
to
do
it
at
sunrise
where
it's
busy
and
you've
already
got
a
library.
That's
screaming
that
they
don't
have
enough
parking,
makes
absolutely
zero
sense
to
me
so
again,
I
think
it's
low
on
our
priority,
but
I
think
you
know
that's
at
least
two
commissioners
opinion
on
that
think
that
would
just
be
really.
D
Very
great
spam
can
I
just
add
one
thing,
so
we
work
with
the
designers
for
the
conceptual
design
and
I
did
bring
up
your
point
regarding
the
library,
but
since
the
library
doesn't
really
know
what
direction
it
is,
when
you
just
kind
of
think
about
what
a
pickleball
court
is
it's
a
flat
slab
fencing,
maybe
some
lights
around
it.
If
that
had
to
be
torn
down,
it's
not
like
tearing
out
a
whole
building,
so
the
cost.
You
know
it's
right.
D
A
And
I,
and
one
thing
to
bring
home
here:
pickleball
is
a
it's
a
community
sport
and
there's
a
lot
of
they
like
to
be
near
each
other
when
they
play
pickleball.
It's
it's
a
community
kind
of
action.
It's
a
sport
that
involves
you
know
you
don't
want
to
be
separated
by
by
other
people
that
are
also
playing.
A
G
That
was
evaluated
by
the
Parks
and
Rec
Commission
and
I.
Think
when
we
discussed
this
with
the
council,
the
council
wanted
to
explore
having
pickleball
at
different
parks.
Not
you
know
so
that
there
was
a
range
of
recreational
opportunities
for
the
public
at
each
park,
not
having
to
go
to
just
one
part
for
one
thing.
G
So
that
was
the
concept,
but
we
can
have
a
discussion
about
that
on
Thursday
with
the
City
Council
and
again
we
took
the
feasibility
study
or
the
the
report
for
the
library
and
considered
that
to
ensure
that
the
area
that
was
being
proposed
for
pickleball
wouldn't
conflict,
so
I'm
not
aware
that
the
plans
for
the
expansion
of
the
library
went
any
further
than
what
was
shown
on
this.
Drawing.
J
Note
because
the
plans
that
you
looked
at
did
not
include
an
expansion
okay,
so
those
plans
five
years
ago
did
not
include
any
external
additions
to
the
building.
However,
currently
the
three
plans
are
renovate
with
the
current
footprint
renovate
and
add-on,
which
would
mean
more
land
needed
there
and
then
or
a
completely
new
building.
J
So
since
the
libraries
are
already
underway
with
a
their
feasibility
study
and
they
just
got
$100,000
to
do
their
planning,
it
seems
that
even
if
this
is
a
great
idea,
it
should
be
12
months
from
now
when,
when
the
library
will
kind
of
really
know
which
direction
they're
gonna
go
and
then
I
would
be
very
comfortable
if
they
don't
need
the
land
to
choose
it,
but
I
just
don't
want
to
put
something
in
and
then
three
or
four
years
from
now
we
have
to
tear
it
out.
I
I
know
it's
simple,
but
public
relations-wise.
F
G
H
A
I
think
we
have
to
stick
with
sidewalks
for
one
that
was
part
of
our
initial.
If
that,
if
that's
a
leftover
from
hot
spots,
I
would
say
if
pickleball
was,
you
know,
I
play
pickleball
for
over
a
year
and
I
and
I
get
it
it's
a
community
of
people.
You
do
not
want
to
disjoint
that
community
and
start
spreading
out
pickleball
courts.
It's
gonna
be
not
well-received
by
that
community.
A
They
like
to
play
together
because
they
play
a
lot
of
other
people
and
they
that's
how
people
meet
and
the
switch-up
teams
it's
that's
kind
of
how
that
sport
works.
So
if
that
were
to
come
to
us
as
a
community
project
and
then
yeah
I
would
say
we're
we
could
be
for
pickleball,
but
I.
Don't
know
why
we're
not
looking
at
two
muth
park
that
has
ample
space
and
parking.
F
B
G
J
I
would
move
that
we
hope
that
till
September,
because
you
don't
really
know
the
answer
to
that
question,
whether
we
need
it
or
don't
need
it.
Hopefully
in
September
you
would
know,
and
then
it
could
be
allocated
at
that
point
in
time.
But
if
they
go
ahead,
if
we
go
ahead
and
allocate
everything
that
you've
already
recommended,
it's
this
cook.
D
H
G
F
F
G
A
A
J
G
I
also
don't
know
what
the
bid
will
be,
but
I
will
learn
in
nine
points.
Really
just
yeah.
We
don't
need
a
decision
today.
I
just
wanted
you
to
understand
what
that
set-aside
was
for,
and
hopefully
we
don't
need
it,
because
the
bids
come
in
I'm
being
strategic
and
how
we're
bidding
the
downtown
park.
So
that
should
the
bids
come
in
and
you
know
I'm
just
ten
million
dollars,
we
can
pull
out.
D
J
D
J
J
D
D
D
A
I
thought
it
was
covered
because
we
had
so
much
left
over,
but
than
that
we
had
so
many
projects
in
hot
spots
that
couldn't
be
completed
and
saved
money
that
it
would
pay
for
what
was
left
I
thought,
even
though
some
of
what
was
left
in
London
I
was
higher
in
price,
because
it's
you
know
several
years
later,
I
thought
we
were
kind
of
like
we
were
like.
We
were
like
a
clean
slate
with
hot
spots.
I
A
B
D
E
F
Take
the
emergency
generators
instead
of
just
giving
them
$150,000
towards
the
design,
give
them
1
million
one
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
so
we
can
get
the
emergency
generators
done.
So
that
would
be.
My
motion
is
that
we
mirror
here:
staff
is
proposing
here
or
recommending,
with
the
exception
of
the
plaza
theater
and
in
lieu
of
the
plaza
theater,
take
number
six
and
then
emergency
generators
and
give
it
a
total
budget
of
1
million
150
thousand
dollars.
F
H
H
F
F
F
Yeah,
what
historically,
what
happened
was
it
was
decided
that
the
Commission
would
only
take
staff
recommendations
to
be
considered
and
in
return
for
doing
that,
they
wanted
a
million
dollars
that
they
could
do
anything
they
wanted,
with
working
with
the
community
going
to
one
PS,
etc,
etc.
Going
to
the
Parks
and
Rec
and
saying
what
can
we
do?
Just
okay
and
City
Council
agreed
to
that.
F
The
City
Council
I
think
is
concerned
that
a
man
dollars
are
small
potatoes
and
the
overall
scheme
of
things
they'd
like
to
see
bigger
projects
and
so
there's
a
question
whether
they
want
to
continue
with
us
going
that
those
community
projects
going
forward.
I
have
no
idea
what
the
answer
will
be,
but
if
they
do
decide
to
stay
with
the
community
projects,
that's
what
we're
talking
about.
We
will
continue
to
do
the
1
million
dollars
toward
sidewalks.
F
E
F
That's
not
accurate,
that's
just
the
way
we
decided
to
spend
their
time
it
could
have
been.
We
were
gonna.
Do
parks,
we're
gonna
shady
for
the
partner
with
the
community
project
right
for
a
million
dollars
and
that
had
to
be
pushed
out
because
the
Seebeck
grant
so
could
be
anything
for
the
community.
It's
just
one
of
those
things
where
we
as
a
commission
are
going
to
go
out
to
the
public,
go
out
to
the
community
and
say
what
is
it
that
you
would
like
to
see
instead
of
staff?
F
E
Did
yes,
it's
it's!
The
information
is
clear.
The
explanation
is
clearing
weather
how
how
the
hierarchy
works
one
year
after
the
fact
of
hot
spots
and
sidewalks,
which
used
to
be
so
important,
I
guess
the
punch
lines
of
the
punch.
The
punch
line
of
this
question
would
be
so
not
as
important,
but
not
as
important
as
generators.
E
F
Still,
it
still
will
be
up
to
this
commission
to
decide
that
mm-hmm.
If,
if
we
decide
as
a
commission
that
sidewalks
are
the
most
important
thing,
then
we
make
that
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
at
the
meeting
that
we
have
every
year.
We
we
we
don't
always
we're,
not
always
in
sync,
with
the
City
Council
trust
me
and
Marcus
will.
So
we
you
shouldn't,
stop
doing
what
you
think
is
the
most
important
thing
for
our
community.
That's
our
job
and
well.
The
City
Council
takes
our
recommendation,
not
is
their
job.
Yes,.
E
F
And
it'll
be
important
going
forward
this
way,
it's
why
the
Commission
put
three
million
dollars
a
year
every
year
in
the
streets.
They
just
said
you
know
what
no
matter.
What
happens
this
just
maintaining
our
streets,
three
million
dollars,
doesn't
cover.
So
that's
why
we
did
that
as
commission
and
why
it's
still
doing
that
going
forward
and
they've
never
questioned
that
they've
been
supportive
of
that
all
all
the
way
and
I
must
I.
Don't
I'm
not
trying
to
suggest
that
the
City
Council
isn't
supportive
of
fixing
sidewalks.
F
They
just
know
they
can
get
C
back
grants.
They
can
get
other
money
from
other
sources.
So
when
I
tie
up
measure
J
funds
for
that
type
of
thing,
when
we
can
get
grants
to
take
care
of
that-
and
we
can
go
after
big-ticket
items
like
the
library
and
the
fire
station
and
things
like
that
that
are
well
paying
your
projects,
and
so
that's
the
argument,
that's
being
made
I
think.
A
I
And
we
see
cover
is
see
if
I
can
clarify
a
little
bit
more
for
you
I
think
that
the
council
will
act
and
say
that
community
hotspots
is
important
and
immediately
you'll
have
a
million
dollars
for
the
sidewalk
project.
If
the
council
acts
and
says
they're,
not
in
the
box,
it's
not
important
than
maybe
the
Commission
could
say
well,
instead
of
a
million
dollars
flowing
the
generator.
Let's
put
that
in
the
dollars
towards
a
sidewalk,
you
have
that
option.
Awesome.
D
E
G
You
can
enter
down
today.
I
want
you
to
have
a
conversation
about
sidewalks
and
hotspots
community
project
project.
When
we
bid
it,
it
was
almost
2
million
dollars
to
do
all
the
sidewalks
that
we
had
bundled
together.
That
probably
I
think
it
was
one
point,
six,
eight,
so
I'm
figuring
out
to
two
million
dollars
when
we
rebid
it
there
weren't
savings
from
the
hotspots.
G
G
Council
made
a
decision
not
to
award
that
contract
and
deferred
that
thinking
there
were
higher
priority
capital
projects
that
should
be
spent
with
measure
J
funds,
so
we'd
like
to
know
whether
we're
coming
or
going
with
that
sidewalk
project.
So
I
look
forward
to
that
conversation
next
week.
Okay,.
B
Since
we
all
had
the
highest
priority
for
these
emergency
generators,
I
agree
with
Michael,
let's
take
that
million
and
do
the
whole
funding
for
what
a
million
1.15
for
the
design
and
emergency
generators.
That's
actually
a
safety
life
safety
issue.
C
Yes,
just
so
we're
looking
at
staff
recommendations
on
page
5
of
Marcus's
list,
it's
simply
6
through
11
are
the
things
that
we
didn't
decide
last
month
right
but
number
6.
The
generators
and
number
7
the
water
treatment
were
both
scored,
very
high
and
we're
comfortable
moving
forward
with
those.
That's
my
assumption
right,
and
so
it
seems
to
me
that
the
only
things
that
were
questioning
is
8,
9
and
10,
and
also
we
should
also
acknowledge
that
number
5
is
a
bigger
allocation
than
what
we
had
originally
agreed
for
the
sprinklers,
which
was
1.4.
C
F
C
C
D
D
F
D
D
C
J
J
Can
we
just
do
this
line
by
line
because
the
library
recommendation
from
staff
is
less
than
what
we
voted
and
we
need
to
do
these
line
1
line,
2
line,
3,
94,
95
and
then
tap
them
up
so
I
think
pretty
much
people
are
okay
through
number
5,
although
that
means
that
the
library's
recommendation
is
a
little
less
than
what
we
recommend
correct.
So
we
are.
J
We
are
moving
number
one
that
we
fund
the
police
department,
CAD
system
at
two
point:
two:
three
old,
the
keyless
entry
system
phase,
two
at
four
hundred:
seventy
five
thousand,
the
main
library
renovation,
our
new
construction.
At
one
point
three,
four:
five
Park
renovation.
We
prepare
an
88
upgrades,
which
is
two
projects
at
one
point:
six
life
safety
improvements
which
fire
sprinklers
fire
alarms
at
one
point:
nine.
Now
we
are
moving
money
into
number.
Six
emergency
generates
design
and
construction
1.15
zero.
J
F
C
J
J
G
A
F
F
A
F
F
J
D
G
D
A
G
J
G
J
Of
it
this
this
is
an
issue
that
can't
really
be
deferred,
because
eventually
you
know,
if
we
don't
keep
up
with
technology
eventually
you
don't
have
a
light.
So
if
you
can't
hide
the
bulb,
you
can't
have
light
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
a
little
bit.
Proactive
and
I
certainly
agreed
that
we
at
least
need
to
have
the
designer
know
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
we
have
soon
so
that
we
don't
have.
J
D
F
F
J
F
J
J
J
G
Well,
you
and
you
are
because
if
council
says
Thursday
night,
you
know
we're
we're
and
I,
don't
have
a
reason
to
think
they'll
say
this,
but
suppose
they
say
no,
we
don't
want
to
do
community
projects.
We
just
want
to
have
it
part
of
the
overall
fund.
Then
you
now
have
thirteen
point:
two
million
for
programming
of
capital
projects
for
recommendation
to
the
council.
Well,.
D
J
F
F
Think
we're
getting
too
caught
up
in
the
name
community
project
right.
What
that
will
mean
is
they
will
just
say
we're
not
going
to
do
community
projects
going
forward,
so
you
will
say
as
the
chair
and
then
you
will
be
the
one
doing
ninety-nine
point
percent
of
the
talking.
Then
we
want
to
put
a
million
dollars
toward
sidewalks.
Yes,.
F
H
J
G
This
is
new
money
in
this
current
fiscal
year
and
going
forward
we
still
show
the
million
dollars
as
a
multi-year
community
projects.
That's
a
multi-year
project
right
I,
just
want
to
get
clarity
from
the
council
is
that
there
do.
Is
that
their
understanding
and
that
you
still
have
the
discretion
to
determine
the
theme
and
recommend
through
the
public
projects,
for
them
to
approve
out
of
that?
1
million
didn't.
D
J
B
D
A
H
H
G
And
that's
why
I'm
suggesting
if
completing
the
original
community
projects
is
important
to
the
Commission,
because
it
was
a
priority,
then
it's
probably
worth
having
a
discussion
on
our
sidewalks
a
priority
with
the
council
and
so
right.
So
you've
got
the
million
dollars
in
community
projects
funding
in
this
current
1819
fiscal
year,
plus
the
million
in
1920
your
hot
spots
2.0
has
already
been
handled
with
the
sivak
project,
so
you
still
have
the
old
original
community
projects
that
hasn't
been
completed.
G
A
H
A
A
D
G
A
A
A
A
F
F
There
were
nine
of
us
legend,
but
anyways
citrus
deficits
we
sit,
we're
set
since
I
will
walk
me
up.
They
understand
Jim,
as
chair
will
take
the
lead,
we'll
go
through
our
ten
recommendations
and
our
community
project,
and
if
they
shoot
it
down,
then
you
will
say:
okay,
we're
no
longer
have
community
projects.
We
want
to
take
that
money
and
put
it
towards
sidewalks.
F
Then
he'll
go
through
the
ten
recommendations
that
we
have
and
give
a
quick
explanation
of
them.
There
will
be
questions
and
they
will
address
them
to
Jim,
but
they
will
also
ask
the
commissioners
whole
and
is
there
somebody
that
has
a
different
view
or
is
there
some
other
thing,
and
so
anybody
on
the
Commission
can
raise
their
hand
and
say
well.
Yes,
this
is
how
I
personally
feel
about
this
particular
situation
or
whatever
it
goes,
Marcus
or
David
ready,
doctor
ready.
F
H
S'okay
I
mean
I,
understand
this,
but
you
know:
what's
happened
with
a
lot
of
these
things,
especially
for
us
new
people
that
some
of
these
projects
are
on
here
and
we're
not
quite
sure
exactly
what
is
alternative
funding
for
them
or
whether
they've
already
been
done
or
a
way
they've
put
them
into
you
know.
Can
we
go
through
all
of
them
at
some
point
after
this
meeting
when
there's
more
time
and
things
that
are
unfunded,
but
so
that
we're
not
voting
on
them?
Okay,.
F
Well,
in
September,
yeah,
okay,
see
yeah.
This
is
this
is
how
it
works.
In
September
they
come
back
with
the
unfunded
capital
projects
that
were
not
funded
or
not
recommended.
They
do
not
go
away.
They
stay
on
the
list.
They
will
bring
that
list
and
anything
that
might
have
come
up
over
the
summer.
When
we're
dark
that'll
be
your
September
meeting,
is
you
will
start
the
process
all
over
again
about
what
the
priorities
are?
What
questions
you
would
like
staff
to
be
able
to
come
back
and
answer.
F
F
We
usually
have
our
first
vote
and
in
March
this
year
we
really
didn't
do
it
until
April,
so
we're
really
kind
of
a
month
behind
so
you'll,
see
after
you've
had
a
fall
behind
you
that
this
will
go
more
smoothly
for
you
and
you're
gonna
have
time
to
ask
staff
to
come
back
and
answer
your
questions
as
you're
going
through
it.
One
thing
that
you
might
as
well
know.
Now,
though,
there's
always
a
surprise.
I
And
we,
as
staff
are
also
going
to
do
our
homework
cause.
A
lot
of
these
projects
existed
for
a
while
as
well
and
Don
and
I
are
committing
to
try
to
figure
out
what,
where
these
projects
came
from,
get
good
descriptions.
Try
to
get
you
as
much
information
so
that
we're
also
educated
with
what,
where
they
came
from,
and
why
their
priorities,
because
they're
not
all
from
Public
Works.
It.
A
C
A
What
will
happen
is
after
June,
we
lose
Commissioner,
Johnson
and
Commissioner
vixen,
so
a
little
party
to
maybe
bring
cupcakes
or
something
again
and
then
technically
the
city
is
supposed
to
evaluate
these
commissions
when
were
dark,
so
they
typically
happen
over
the
summer.
And
that's
what
didn't
happen
last
year
and
I?
Don't
know
you
know
what
all
the
reasoning
was,
but
hopefully
they
would
be
more
on
schedule
with
this,
so
that
we
would
actually
have
our
two
replacements
come
September.
J
I
have
a
quick
question
about
the
City
Council,
so
we
have
elections
coming
in
November
of
this
year,
correct.
So
so
this
City
Council
is
you
know
making
all
these
they're
gonna
make
a
decision
for
the
budget,
but
we
will
actually
have
three,
or
maybe
at
least
two
new
City
Council
members
can
January.
Is
that
correct?
Yes?
J
F
F
You
represent
the
community
and
the
best
thing
we
can
do
that
and
so
don't
get
caught
up
in
trying
to
second-guess
what
the
City
Council
wants
you
to
do,
pay
attention
if
they're,
obviously
gonna,
say
you're
gonna,
give
me
two
million
dollars
for
a
roundabout,
whether
you
want
to
or
not
don't
spend
your
wills
give
them
their
two
million
move
on.
But
when
that's
not
the
case,
if
you
should
just
stick
to
your
convictions,.
G
J
Let
me
let's
hope
that
there
would
be
things
like
the
library
and
general
streets
and
so
forth
that
everybody
wants,
but
I
can't
imagine
that
there
won't
be
some
special
project
that
that
new
City
Councilmember
ran
on
and
comes
back
to
us
and
says
in
January.
Well,
this
is
my
priority.
So
I
think
we
need
to
be
prepared
for
that
and
know
that,
ahead
of
time,
that.
F
J
J
B
Have
I
have
one
thing
to
say:
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
time
visit,
Bellingham
Washington
every
summer,
it's
a
small
seaside
college,
town,
I'm
sure
their
budget
is
nothing
like
ours.
I'm
gonna
give
this
to
Jim,
because
this
is
something
we
could
possibly
do
next
year
and
we
keep
talking
about
having
more
visibility,
getting
more
involved
with
the
neighborhood's.
There
are
something
like
40
neighborhoods:
they
give
small
and
simple
grants
up
to
$5,000
to
various
neighborhoods
for
one-time
projects
and
I
thought.
What
a
good
idea
for
us.
A
Yeah
we're
up
to
40
more
than
40
47
I,
believe,
okay,
let's,
let's
get
back
to
the
agenda
real
quickly
and
we're
gonna
skip
over
one
of
them.
Cuz
I
think
we
just
did
it,
but
do
we
have
any
public
comment?
We
do
not
staff
member
comments,
staff
staff
going
once
going
twice,
Commissioner
comments,
I
feel
like
we
kind
of
did
that
any
additional
well
taken.
My.