►
From YouTube: General Plan Steering Committee | July 20, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Calling
the
meeting
the
general
plan
steering
committee
of
july
20th
to
2020
to
order
can
we
have
roll
call?
Please.
A
Certainly,
chairwoman
grant
wilson
member
wilson
is
unavailable
tonight
and
is
absent,
so
member
watts
eric
member
powell
here
amber
park.
A
Volumes
you
can
call
in
margaret
if
that
might
be
easier
too,
but
I'll
note
that
margaret
park
is
here.
I
remember
miller.
A
D
A
B
And
I
didn't
see
an
agenda
for
the
meeting,
but
the
meeting
is
to
go
through
the
the
general
vision
and
then
the
goals.
Is
there
any
issue
with
the
agenda.
A
Yeah
so
the
first
item
of
business,
actually,
I'm
just
being
told
we
have
a
person
who's
trying
to
enter
the
meeting
but
is
unable
to
get
in.
So
if
you
just
excuse
me
for
one
moment.
A
Okay,
so
chad,
wermuk
and
committee
members.
The
item
that
we're
reviewing
today
is
a
continued
discussion
of
the
general
plan,
vision
and
priorities.
As
you'll
recall
back
in
june,
we
had
our
last
meeting.
A
A
A
So
I'll
go
over
those
here,
let
me
share
my.
A
D
A
So
what
you
see
on
the
screen
here
is
the
durham
plan
vision.
The
original
2007
vision
is
shown
here
on
the
left
side
of
the
table.
A
A
So
what
we'll
do
probably
is
make
it
this
kind
of
more
of
an
interactive
review,
we'll
go
through
this
and
then
we'll
go
through
the
10
priority
statements
and
the
recommended
changes
to
those
statements
from
the
general
plan.
So
why
don't
we
start
here
with
the
vision
and
actually
before
we
jump
into
that?
The
other
item
that
we
have
before
jumping
into
this
is
public
comment.
I
would
just
note
that
we
don't
have
any
specific
public
comments
as
of
right
now.
A
No
one
has
requested
to
speak,
but
we
may
have
someone
jump
on
the
zoom
meeting
momentarily
if
they're
choose
to
do
so
from
what
I've
been
told
from
other
staff
here
at
city
hall.
So
with
that.
F
Madam
chair
real,
quick
question:
we
already
went
through
two
of
these.
Are
we
gonna
go
back
and
rehash
each
the
the
original
vision
again
too,
or
are
we
going
to
let
that
lie,
as
we
did
last
time
and
then
just
work
on
the
priority
statements
that
we
haven't
talked
about.
B
There
were
some
changes
suggested
by
the
subcommittee
in
the
first
in
the
division.
B
And
I
don't
think
david
underlined
them,
but
I
think
the
come
in
where
we
use
the
word
city
and
where
we
didn't
use
this.
The
word
city,
that's.
F
A
So
so
correct
the
the
primary
changes
were
kind
of
just
starting
the
this.
You
know
the
start
of
each
of
these
sentences.
We
we
actually
pulled
out
one
this
sentence
here
from
and
added
another
sentence.
We
foster
equity
and
unity
among
all
of
our
residents,
so
that
was
one
that
it
was
kind
of
pulled
out
and
separated.
So
that
was
an
additional
change
that
was
recommended
by
by
the
subcommittee,
so
I'll.
Let
madam
chair,
if
she
or
any
of
the
other
subcommittees,
have
additional
comments
about
it.
B
I
think
we
added
the
words
we
added
the
word
city,
where
we
thought
it
was
appropriate
and
I
think
we
did.
We
made
some
changes
saying
the
city
balances
economic
growth
with
sustain
with
a
sustainable
environment,
so
those
were
changed
words
and
then
we
pulled
that
out
and
then
we
had.
The
city
provides
resources
as
opposed
to
we,
because
two
of
those
things
were
city
functions.
A
Let's
see
we
had
that
discussion.
G
This
is
kurt
I
seem
to
recall
from
our
last
meeting
when
there
was
a
larger
group,
not
just
the
subcommittee.
There
was
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
in
terms
of
diversity
versus
inclusive
and
do
they
capture
the
same
meaning.
So
I
don't
know
if
pressure
memory
wise,
if
the
use
of
at
the
beginning
with
meant
to
accomplish
that.
E
Equity
and
diversity.
A
Yeah,
I
was
just
looking
at
our
notes
from
the
group
discussion
in
june
and
there
was
a
comment
about
emphasis
on
diversity
in
the
description,
but
that
we
would
add
the
word
inclusive
inclusivity
to
achieve
the
intent
with
diversity.
C
A
A
A
E
The
thoughts
I
have
a
comment
about
the
fourth
fourth
blurb
at
the
recent
listening
session
regarding
policing
and
public
safety.
There
were
a
number
of
comments
about
how
resources
might
not
be
evenly
distributed
across
the
city
and
some
ways
to
affect
change
there.
So
I
think
it
might
be
good
to
add
the
word
all
so.
The
city
provides
responsive,
friendly
and
efficient
public
services
for
all
our
residents
and
businesses.
E
E
That
we've
achieved
yet,
but
it
should
be
our
goal.
That's
good.
B
A
A
Okay,
sorry,
I'm
just
the
individual
who's
trying
to
get
in
has
requested
the
link,
so
I'm
emailing
it
to
them,
so
they
should
jump
on
here
momentarily
okay.
A
So
again
we
talked
about
the
priorities
back
in
june
as
a
group,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
what
does
world's
premiere
mean.
Does
it
is
it
necessary?
A
So,
ultimately,
the
subcommittee
came
back
and
took
out
the
world
world
took
out
the
word
worlds
and
just
left
it
as
a
premier
desert
resort,
as
well
as
making
removing
the
word,
including
down
the
words
including
downtown
from
the
description,
so
that
there
wasn't
such
an
emphasis
on
one
area
of
the
city
as
an
entertainment
district.
A
G
A
C
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to
mention
that,
because
I
was
going
to
say
is:
is
that
our
number
one
priority
is
being
known
as
a
premier
resort?
So
is
there
a
lead-in
that
will
will
define
that
as
not
rating
it.
A
Yeah,
I
think
we
can
have
some
some
preface
remarks
before
we
get
into
the
to
the
priorities
that
you
know.
These
are
all
kind
of
important,
independent
of
where
they're
at
on,
in
order
right.
F
F
Whatever
I
don't
know
kurt
you
had
you
had
you
thought
you
didn't
catch
that
like
I
did.
G
F
B
D
A
Any
questions
with
the
text
or
is
this
sound
okay,
I
mean
one
thing
that
we-
and
I
should
should
have
mentioned
this
when
we
started
talking
about
the
priorities
last
time
in
june.
Didn't
look
at
actually
these
further
descriptors
that
I
think,
remember
powell
brought
up
that.
You
know
it's
important
to
see
the
statement
that
you
see
here
in
green,
but
it's
also
important
to
see
what
it's
important
to
see.
A
A
C
F
C
C
C
B
B
Then
promote
sustainability
and
the
efficient
promotes
sustainability
in
the
use
of
no.
B
G
B
E
E
I
think
there
are
lots
of
ways
that
you
can
measure
sustainability,
but
I
question
whether
or
not
simply
being
a
half
a
step
ahead
of
the
city
behind
us
is
the
appropriate
measure,
the
appropriate
metric.
So
I
put
that
out
there.
I
don't
know
that
I
necessarily
have
a
an
alternative,
but
that
would
that
that
I'm
not
sure
that
that's
the
appropriate
way
to
be
thinking
about
how
we
approach
sustainability.
E
To
me
it
seems
it
should
be
related
to
sort
of
the
livability
and
sort
of
comfort
of
residence
or
something
in
that
vein,
rather
than
just
being
better
than
palm
desert.
John.
B
But
it,
but
he
is
correct,
that
we
kind
of
limit
it
on
the
next
sentences
to
development
of
alternate
energy
sources,
and
it
doesn't
talk
about
the
livability
of
the
community.
E
From
my
perspective,
the
point
of
sustainability
is
actually
livability.
You
know
you
can
the
most
sustainable
thing
to
do
in
the
summer.
Time
is
to
turn
off
your
ac
completely,
but
nobody
would
do
that.
So
it's
about
finding
that
balance.
You
know
of
making
sure
that
it's
livable
while
we're
so
so,
I
think
that's
an
important
aspect.
E
We
don't
want
to
be
sustainable
to
the
point
where
it's
not
comfortable
and
we
don't
want
to
be
sort
of
inefficient
in
our
use.
So
maybe
it's
more
of
a
balance.
You
know
we
use
the
stranger.
F
G
C
A
G
E
Is
focused
on
and
yeah
someone
else
go.
B
I'm
just
thinking
livability,
because
we
don't
really
make
that
that
broad
livability
relates
to
having
cooling
the
you
know:
cooling,
the
environment,
so
that
we're
adding
trees
we're
focusing
on
how
much
concrete
we
put
down
where
this
original
sentence
didn't
go
far
enough
in
terms
of
the
way
people
think
now
about.
E
B
C
What
if
we
use
the
word,
what
if
we
use
the
word
optimize
in
the
highlighted
area,
instead
of
expand
on
optimize
optimize.
C
F
E
Optimize
would
be
we're
optimizing
for
livability
and
sustainability.
We're
not
optim
we're,
not
necessarily
trying
to
simply
be
leaders
in
sustainability.
We
don't
want
simply
want
to
be
better
than
dhs
or
palm
desert.
We
want
to
optimize
the
way
we
sort
of
build,
grow
and
develop
the
city
for
livability
and
sustainability.
F
Because
isn't
it
more
generic
than
that
optimize,
the
city's
environmental
role
or
role
in?
Is
it
isn't
that
what
we're
doing
optimizing,
the
city's
environmental
role?
That's
not
the
whole
sentence
or
something
missing
and
then
below
is
how?
Because
we're
talking
about
sustainability
and
livability?
Those
are
going
back
to
the
environmental
issues,
because
I
think
we're
tightening
we're
tightening
too
far.
If
we
talk
about
optimize,
the
city's
role
of
sustainability
and
livability.
E
I
think
if
we
just
say
optimize
the
city
for
sustainability
and
livability,
and
then
we
maybe
capture
sort
of
the
governmental
aspects
of
a
city
as
well
as
sort
of
the
physical
infrastructure
aspects
of
the
city,
because
when
we
talk
about
the
city,
we
probably
mean
both
things
right.
We
mean
the
government
and
the
physical
land
mass
infrastructure
buildings.
All
those
things
too,
I
think
we're
talking
about
both
things
here.
D
Or
even
continue
to
improve,
I
think
that
optimizes
gets
to
be
very
nebulous.
What
you
mean.
F
G
It
feels
like
to
me
when
we
just
say
improve
sustainability
and
livability.
That
kind
of
is
like
judging
our
current
case,
without
saying
what
it
is,
as
if
you
know
we
could
be
in
a
very
bad
current
situation,
which
is
why
we're
saying
to
improve
it
saying
continue
to
improve,
definitely
acknowledges
that
we've
been
doing
it,
but
it
still
doesn't
seem
very
aspirational
to
me
in
terms
of
what
the
measurement
for
that.
C
Could
it
be
advanced
instead
of
continue
to
advance
sustainability.
C
G
F
D
C
F
Promote
the
efficient
use
of
energy
land,
water
and
other
natural
resources
to
enhance
the
sustainability
and
livability
of
our
community.
Okay,
I
like
that
yeah,
it's
right
there.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
it
in
the
chat
box,
but
that's
kind
of
what
I
wrote.
I
think
you
can
copy
if
you
like,
that
david
cut
and.
B
F
Yeah
so
he
said
now
we're
getting
now
we're
broadening
out
again.
So
it's
it's
it's
a
very
it's
a
it's.
A
good
word.
Livability
is
good,
but
it
means
so
much
and
then,
if
we
started
doing
that
now
we
have
another
four
sentences
to
talk
about
livability
we're
talking,
I
believe
the
livability
around
the
the
sustainability
and
livability
as
together
as
one
if
I
caught
what
john
was
saying
before,
being
sustainable
and
livable.
But
now,
if
we're
talking,
then
we
talk
about
trees.
Then
we
talk
about
streets
and
bike
routes
and
everything
else.
B
G
Well,
I
was
going
to
suggest
I
think
we
can
cut
down
on
that
last
sentence
by
changing
it
to
promote,
promote
skip
the
development
of
promote
alternative
energy
industries
and
stop
use
of
so
it'll
be
promote
alternative
energy
industries
and
out
and
energy
sources
cut
such
as
wind
and
solar
just
say
in
new
and
existing
construction
to
minimize
this
and
conserve
resources.
It
shortens
it
a
bit,
I'm
hoping
it
still
accomplishes
what
you're
going.
E
For
think,
it's
positive
to
remove
specific,
specific
uses
that
that
may
or
may
not
make
sense.
20
years
from.
D
D
D
B
D
F
A
All
right
did
everyone
get
my
tat.
My
chat
text
yeah
just
sent
you
actually
yours.
F
B
Yeah,
can
we
just,
I
think
that
we're
close?
Can
we
just
resolve
it
without?
I
haven't
been
looking
at
the
chats.
B
G
G
E
I
I
actually
do
like
the
sentence:
where
are
we
with
promote
alternative
in
energy
industries
and
the
use
of
alternative
energy
sources?
Is
that
staying
or
are
we
just
using
the
part
in
yellow.
A
A
F
D
E
So
I
I
know
we
have
we're
short
on
time
here
and
I
don't
wanna,
you
know
be
labor
points
for
too
long,
but
I
can
live
with
the
second
sentence,
but
I
will
just
point
out
that,
from
my
perspective,
saying
alternative
in
energy
industries
and
the
use
of
alternative
industry,
alternative
energy
sources
is
really
talking
about
energy
supply
and
the
other
piece
of
the
puzzle
here
that
we
should
be
talking
about
is
energy
reduction,
which
is
efficiency.
E
Right
so
I
think
if
we
said
in
the
second
sentence,
supporting
sort
of
sustainable
energy
use
and
efficient
or
sustainable
energy
production
and
efficient
energy
use.
E
Okay,
so
that
yeah-
I
I
guess
to
me
rather
than
saying-
alternative
energy
sources-
a
new
and
existing
construction
to
minimize
resource
depletion.
That
seems
a
little
too
specific
to
me.
E
The
work
to
me
that
this
sentence
is
doing
is
trying
to
describe
what
sustainability
is,
and
it's
really
about
using
energy,
creating
energy
an
efficient
way
and
using
it
in
an
efficient
way.
So
to
me
that
that's
the
balance
that
the
sentence
should
have
somehow,
rather
than
speaking,
specifically
about
how
you
use
energy
and.
D
E
The
reason
why
I
I
I
honestly
could
advocate
for
removing
the
second
sentence
honestly,
because
it
doesn't
require
alternative,
indus
energy
industries
to
be
sustainable.
You
can
encourage
pedestrian-friendly
walkways,
which
is
also
sustainable
and
isn't
necessarily
related
to
an
industry
quote
unquote.
So
to
me
it
just
feels
it
it
doesn't.
E
B
G
I
might
I
might
suggest
the
other
alternative.
The
subcommittee
consider
is
dropping
this
from
this
paragraph,
but
then
anything
related
to
some
of
the
use
of
these
energies
in
new
and
existing
construction
could
obviously
be
steps
which
is
the
next
level
down.
As
I'm
sure
there
are
others
that
will
be
there.
E
G
A
So
this
third
priority,
obviously
you
see
there's
a
bit
more
changes
to
this
one
and
then
or
the
steering
committee
did
kind
of
discuss
this
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
we
ran
out
of
time
last
time.
A
But
you
can
see.
Probably
the
main
difference
here
is
that
the
subcommittee
had
comments
about
or
concerns
about.
You
know
business
and
being
kind
of
resilient
after
after
a
pandemic,
and
how
do
we
do
that,
and
I
think
kind
of
the
key
points
that
we
discussed
were
having
adequate
infrastructure
to
do
that.
So
does
the
city
have
adequate
infrastructure
in
terms
of
its
wireless
networks?
A
Does
the
city
have
adequate
infrastructure
in
terms
of
firework,
cable,
fiber
optic
cables
to
support?
You
know
wi-fi,
and
you
know
all
things
that
you
know
all
the
you
know.
We
do
see
some
gaps
in
coverage
for
certain
areas
of
the
city,
so
I
think
those
are
kind
of
some
of
the
main
issues
here,
as
that
were.
A
Say
that
when
the
planning
director
reviewed
this,
he
was
concerned
about
having
this
phrase
in
here.
So
we
might
consider
saying
something
more
general,
given
that
this
is
kind
of
a
you
know,.
D
A
Span
not
a
100-year
span
of
of
the
priorities
for
the
city,
so
maybe
just
more
generalized
and
something
that
would
just
say.
B
B
G
G
I
like
that
as
well.
I
would
like
to
also
put
on
the
table
that,
instead
of
just
saying,
diversify
the
city's
economic
foundations,
they
diversify
and
strengthen
the
city's
economic
foundations,
because
to
me
from
my
background
in
economic
development,
just
changing
the
mix
is
what
I
think
of
with
diversify,
even
with
the
existing
economic
components,
we
need
to
work
to
strengthen
those
not
just
broaden
their
scope.
C
F
F
I
don't
think
that
would
go
into
this
item
at
all,
but
instead
of
create
employment
opportunities
that
that's
basically
saying
we
create
employment,
we
create
jobs
and
that's
not
what
we
can
do.
I
would
say
it's
more
develop
and
encourage
employment
opportunities
and
maintain
a
stable
and
diverse
economy
and
part
of
that
developing
employment
opportunities
could
come
into
the
the
next
step
down
the
developing
of
workers
in
job
opportunities
and
things
like
that.
B
F
F
C
I
do
too,
because
you
know
we're
were
a
candidate
for
a
four-year
university
campus,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
we
need
to
aspire
to
to
have
something
like
that,
and
it
seems
like
this
would
be
the
best
place.
To
put
it.
G
Well,
let
me
ask
the
question,
because,
what's
jumping
out
of
me
now
is
whether
or
not
where
it
says:
development
and
courage
that
will
maintain
including
opportunities
if
it
should
be
including
educational
opportunities,
if
not
education.
What
are
the
opportunities
that
we're
talking
about
when
we
want
workers
to
live
in
the
communities
in
which
they
were
not.
E
If
I,
if
I
was
to
push
on
that,
I
agree
it's
a
housing
issue,
but
if
I
was
to
push
on
that
a
little
further,
I
would
think
that
the
opportunities
for
employment
would
be
related
to
a
livable
wage
being
able
to
live
in
the
communities
the
community
where
they
work
and
then
also
it
the
opportunity
to
be
educated
in
the
place
where
they
live.
E
E
F
A
Well,
first
thing
to
recognize
is:
diversify
and
strengthen.
This
is
economic
foundations.
So
that's
one
thing
and
then
so
how
do
we
clarify
that
and
then
the
second
thing
is:
are
we
improving
infrastructure
for
a
digital
future?
B
The
two
infrastructure
things
for
a
digital
future
are
education
and
and
infrastructure
like
what
better
internet
those
are
things
that
will
attract
businesses
here.
That
may
provide
a
living
wage
and
also
may
keep
people
continuing
to
work
here.
F
G
A
Well,
it
would
be
the
policy,
the
goals
and
the
policies,
so
the
goals
and
the
policies
are
going
to
be
more
specific.
Living
wage
would
probably
fall
more
in
to
a
goal
and
a
policy
then
more
than
I
would
say,
an
aspirational
statement,
because
it's
more
specific,
I
mean
something
more
broad
that
you
could
say
would
be
including
opportunities
for
all
workers,
presidents
and
visitors,
or
something
that's
more
general.
A
If
it's
going
to
be
geared
toward
residents,
then
opportunities
for
residents
families.
So
it's
going
to
be
probably
a
little
more
generalized.
It's
kind
of
a
run-on.
C
G
B
I
you
know,
I,
I
don't
think
I
think
that
was
a
carryover
from
the
other
one
and
I
think
what
we
wanted
to
do
in
the
subcommittee
was
not
focus
this
on
attracting
industry
or
being
the
first
choice
for
business,
but
actually
create
the
conditions
where
we
can
attract
businesses
or
attract
workers.
Who
can
look?
Who
can
work
from
home?
B
So
recognizing
that
you
just
can't
go
out
and
say
I
want
to
bring
amazon
here.
If
you
don't
have
those
in
those,
if
you
don't
have
the
educational
and
the
other
infrastructure,
you
need.
A
And
it
needs
to
be
like
one
where.
D
D
D
C
E
B
C
A
There's
a
couple
of
things
that
are
happening
with
this
priority.
So
if
it's
there's
there's
one
thing
where
we're
talking
about
the
economic,
you
know
the
city's
economic
economics
and
there's
another
side
to
it,
but
we're
talking
about
infrastructure.
So
do
we
need
to
do
we
want
to
separate
these,
or
do
we
are
we
comfortable
leaving
them
together?.
C
C
I
don't
know,
but
that
just
made
me
think
about
it
as
we
went
back
there
and
as
david
helped
us
break
it
into
two
bits.
It
seems
like
that
that
the
only
only
thing
we
would
be
doing
for
infrastructure
would
be
for
digital
future.
E
C
E
E
F
F
G
C
What
are
we,
including
in
infrastructure
I
mean
it
seems
like
the
the
digital
future,
is
only
one
bit
of
of
in
infrastructure
that
we
might
be
needing
for
businesses
to
thrive.
So
I
it,
I
guess,
I'm
troubled
a
bit
with
just
still
having
digital
future.
There.
F
So
so
so
kurt,
if
does
this
phrase,
diversify
the
strength
of
the
city's
economic
and
business
foundations?
Is
that
a
right
sentence,
because
then
you
can
say
and
improve
the
infrastructure
for
digital
future
to
ensure
businesses
thrive?
If
you
do
it
that
way,
you're
not
talking
about
just
digital
business
and
people
working
at
home,
you're
talking
about
the
guy
who's
running
the
the
store
downtown
that
needs
that
digital
enhancements.
G
Yeah,
I
guess
my
thought
would
be
building
on
what
kathy
was
saying
is
take
the
for
a
digital
future
out
of
here.
If
anything,
we
put
it
down
into
the
paragraph,
so
we
can
put
it
as
a
I
like
how
john
had
enhanced
this
top
one
of
diversify
and
strengthen
the
foundations
and
improve
business
infrastructure,
ensure
business
thrive
for
me,
diversify
and
strengthen,
is
talking
about
bringing
in
something
other
than
hospitality,
so
that
to
kathy
wermick's
earlier
comment
that,
during
you
know,
turn
down
in
the
tourism
business
we
get
slammed.
B
A
G
A
So
they
so
the
so.
The
changes
here
were
just
really
to
the
title
or
the
first
sentence,
and
then
everything
else
after
it
would
be
the
same
as
what's
in
on
this
side,
I.
D
Think
our
thought
here
from
the
subcommittee
was
that,
where
it
says
develop
a
full
range
of
reachable
opportunities,
we
really
can't
do
that
with
our
size
and
market.
So
we
went
just.
Let
me
change
it
to
maintain
and
enhance.
D
E
A
D
G
A
Yeah
and
the
one
thing
that
the
that
we
hadn't
figured
out
yet
was
the
the
text
after
the
title.
So
that
was
something
that
that
I
added
based
on
the
discussion
of
what
I
thought
the
intent
was
for
for
the
first
sentence.
A
A
About
promoting
businesses
that
serve
the
needs
of
daily
lives
in
close
proximity
to
residential
neighborhoods,
and
I
can
add
that,
if,
if
we'd
like,
because
that
was
another
kind
of
sentence
that
I
think
we
could.
B
B
F
Don't
that
say
wayne,
that's
don't
say
that
they
strengthen
promote
equitable
access
to
a
variety
of
retail,
to
support
physical,
social
and
mental
well-being
you're
getting
too
detailed
in
there.
I
think
it's
it's!
It's
developed,
develop
local
retail
neighborhood,
whatever
something
something
of
that
nature.
E
My
question
is
whether
or
not
we're
talking
about
sort
of
health
and
human
services
infrastructure
here
or
if
we're
talking
about
lifestyle
amenities.
Are
we
simply
talking
about
being
able
to
walk
to
a
nice
store
down
the
street
because
it's
nice
or
are
we
talking
more
about
people
not
being
able
to
meet
their
their
specific
needs?
Their?
You
know
human
and
familial
needs
with
the
retail
opportunities
that
are
in
their
neighborhoods
there's
a
difference
there.
One
is
a
nice
to
have,
and
one
is
a
must-have.
Are
we
talking
about
one
or
both.
G
I'm
wondering
if
the
group
would
feel
good
about
if
we
condense
this
down
by
changing
it
to
starting
with
the
strengthen
and
promote
equitable
access
to
a
variety
of
retail
opportunities
and
then
pick
up
at
the
end
that
serve
the
needs
of
daily
lives
in
close
proximity
to
residential
neighborhoods.
I
think.
B
F
F
Something
if
you
put
something
in
the
middle
of
the
city
it
is,
it
is
in
close
proximity
to
all
residential
neighborhoods.
I
think
it
was
kind
of
fine
before
because
you're
saying
equitable
access
to
a
variety
of
retail
opportunities
to
serve
the
needs
of
daily
lives
in
close
proximity
to
residential
neighborhoods.
Does
that
mean
you
put
a
grocery
store
in
in
desert
highlands
and
then
a
grocery
store
up
near
the
the
new
development
and
the
grocery
store
in
midtown.
E
G
F
That's
why
we
have
a
problem
with
getting
a
grocery
store
up
north,
because
you
know
on
the
economic
development
subcommittee.
We
talked
about
that
and
it's
grocery
stores
don't
want
to
go
there
because
there's
just
not
enough.
A
This,
well,
I
will
say
we
do
have
an
application
for
a
for
a
tower
market
which
is
like
a
it's
kind
of
a
grocery
store,
hybrid
and
it's
a
gas
station
and
a
grocery
store.
That's
proposing
to
go
in
off
of
san
rafael
and
india.
G
D
E
Market
is
that
something
like
grocery
store,
like
a
bonds
they're
on
gene,
autry
and
eastbound
canyon,.
C
F
A
F
A
Okay,
so
if
we're
good
with
the
way
this
is,
this
is
written,
I
think
we'll
jump
into
number.
A
A
So
number
five:
there
was
no
change
recommended
and
if
the
rest
of
the
steering
committee
is
okay
with
that,
we
can
jump
into
number
six
but
I'll.
Let
you
tell
me,
I
think
it's
great.
G
G
A
Point:
okay,
so
number
six.
The
subcommittee
said
that
we
could
either
completely
delete
this
one
or
we
could
replace
it
with
something
like
you
see
here,
because
it's
kind
of
jumps
in
a
couple
of
different
directions:
it's
not
real
concise,
so
I
think
that
either
we
could,
you
know
the
subcommittee
thought
that
we
could
either
delete
this
or
change
it
to
to
kind
of
describe
what
we
thought
the
intent
was
with
taking
out
some
things
that
we
didn't
think.
B
Oh,
we
were
going
toward,
we
have
un
unimproved
parks
facilities,
culture,
you
know
cultural
centers
that
do
provide
engagement
and
we
basically
need
to
maintain
and
enhance
them.
I.
B
Yeah
yeah
I
mean
we,
we
haven't
invested
in
our
community
centers,
we
do
have
a
new
community,
we
will
probably
have
the
the
cultural
center
from
the
the
tribe,
which
I
think
will
be
exciting.
B
Hopefully
we
still
have
the
museum,
but
if
we
improve
these
facilities,
I
think
it's
something
the
city
needs
to
do
and
make
a
real
goal
of
over
the
next
20
years.
G
E
Are
we
really
talking
about
only
facilities
and
infrastructure,
that's
owned
by
the
city,
or
are
we
talking
about
the
city,
also
enhancing
sort
of
cultural
heritage,
landmarks
and
things
that
exist
outside
of
the
city's
purview,
specifically
so,
for
example,
buildings
that
are
not
designated
but
are
historically
significant
or
culturally
significant
or
other
areas
of
cultural
significance?
I
mean:
are
we
talking
about
that
or
just
things
that
are
owned
by
the
city?
D
E
E
Parks
only
or
you
know
a
great
1932
frontier
style
house-
that's
not
designated,
but
it's
kind
of
important
can.
Can
the
city
do
something
put
a
plaque
there
to
enhance.
B
I
think
that's
a
good
idea:
let's
first
take
the
word
facilities
out
and
say:
community
facilities
so
take
out
facilities
and
and.
D
We
want
to
have
anything
in
here
about.
We
certainly
could
have
unique
places
and
facilities
that
happen
to
be
private.
B
F
I
don't
think
you
need
to
well
see
if
you
maintain
and
enhance
unique
places.
That
means
you're,
keeping
and
fixing
what
you
already
have
you're
not
going
broader.
So
you
can
encourage
unique
places
and
facilities
or
you
encourage
and
enhance
unique
places
and
facilities,
but
maintaining
enhancing
means
you're,
not
broadening.
C
C
A
It
would
be
considered
a
cultural
or
activity
center.
Yes,.
C
F
C
F
But
they
are
but
they
fit.
The
the
art
museum
is
also
a
community
facility.
I
mean
I
I'm
not
saying
I'm
not
saying
kathy
is
wrong.
I'm
just
saying
that
they're
they're,
it's
kind
of
in
there
already
they
said,
keep
listening,
keep
listening,
but
I
think
biggest
thing
right
now
is
talking
about
that
first
sentence.
F
E
C
F
D
A
E
D
F
E
I
might
argue,
I
might
argue
that
you,
you
could
improve
landmarks
with,
like
you
know,
interpretive
signage
or
you
can
prove
access
to
landmarks
through
orienteering
having
maps
in
the
city.
Things
like
that
online
resources
that
help
people
access
them.
So
I
I
guess
the
reason
why
I'm
arguing
that
is,
it
would
solve
two
problems.
It
would
allow
landmarks
to
be
in
this
sentence
and-
and
it
would
also
help
us,
keep
it
short
so,
but
maybe
that's
the
strategy.
F
C
C
F
A
A
Well,
I'm
just
thinking
so
we're
talking
about
improving
these
things.
We
also
say
in
the
first
sentence
that
you
know
we're
trying
to
support
lively
activity
offer
visual
interest.
So
why
are
we
doing
this?
Is
it
live.
E
F
G
C
What
what
if
we
put
a
period
after
identity
identity
and
then
move
the
visual
interest
and
supportive
into
the
bottom
half
instead
of
the
top.
C
D
A
In
terms
of
this
one,
the
subcommittee
didn't
really
have
any
changes
to
it.
There
was
some
discussion
about
ensuring
that
there
is
the
right
combination
of
uses
in
the
city's
commercial
districts,
and
so
that
was
really
something
that
we
thought
could
go
or
be
expanded
upon
further
when
we
got
into
the
goals
and
policies.
I.
G
Yeah,
I
don't
want
to
make
it
too
wordy,
but
I
the
only
comment
I
had
was
that
maybe
since
we're
talking
about
more
than
just
residential
in
the
part
of
that
is,
maybe
we
need
to
add
to
promote
vibrant
neighborhoods
and
commercial
areas
to
reduce
the
need
for
vehicle
use.
So
it's
the
comment.
We're
talking
about
the
mixing
of
land
uses
for
both
neighborhoods
and
commercial
areas
to
reduce
the
need
for
that.
B
And
communities
serving
retail
uses
because
the
retail
uses
we've
been
getting
our
creative
mix
of
cannabis
and
retail,
and
I
so
I
think
we
want
community
serving
as
opposed
to
just
retail
or
just
industrial.
B
D
F
F
Commercial
areas,
a
neighborhood,
is
both
residential
and
commercial,
so
I
don't
think
we
need
to
separate
commercial
areas
there
out,
because
you're
going
to
promote
vibrant
neighborhoods
that
reduce
the
need
for
vehicle
use
and
then
down.
There
combine
residential
retail
office
and
other
land
use
within
downtown.
G
C
Yes,
but
what
we're
doing
is,
with
the
approval
of
the
downtown
association,
we're
going
to
be
expanding
the
adjacent
neighborhoods
to
include
the
commercial
part
rather
than
having
a
separate,
downtown
neighborhood,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
going
with
expansions
instead
of
newly
created
neighborhoods
to
chisel
out
and
leave
alone,
this
downtown
right
now
the
downtown's
not
represented,
and
it
would
be
then
in
an
adjacent
neighborhood.
G
C
F
D
That's
a
little
different
that
4b
is
kind
of
going
after
our
food
deserts,
and
things
like
that.
D
G
And
wasn't
it
with
the
general
concept
of
since
it
talked
about
reducing
the
need
for
driving?
It
was
to
spread
these
things
out
and
make
neighborhoods
where
people
feel
like
they
can
walk
to
something
or
bike,
or
do
that
kind
of
thing,
or
at
least
not
drive
a
long
distance
to
get
to
some
activities.
F
Goal
how
so,
if
you're
talking
about
encouraging
creative
mixing
of
land
uses
to
promote
or
enhance
or
change
that
a
little
bit
because
you're
talking
it
sounds
to
me
like
they're,
they're,
too
they're
too
aligned
strength
and
promote
access
to
retail
in
our
neighborhoods,
and
this
is
in
our
neighborhoods
talking
about
having
things
of
retail,
etc.
So
people
don't
have
to
use
the
car
well
to
me,
they
seem
really
entwined.
B
I
would
just
leave
it
the
way
it
is.
I
think
it
actually
talks
about
different
kinds
of
uses
like
housing
over
retail.
It's
it's
looking
at
a
different
way
of
of
allowing
things
to
be
built.
G
A
D
A
E
D
Well,
the
other,
so
what
we're
also
have
been
thinking
historically
with
this
is
looking
at
some
of
our
existing
shopping
centers,
for
example,
smoke
tree
where
there
may
be
opportunities
to
put
in
residential
and
the
same
for
the
some
of
the
commercial
opportunities
there
or
commercial
districts
there
at
distinctino
and
sunrise,
and
the
thought
here
that
at
least
I've
had
for
all
along
is
that
there's
there's
vacant
land
in
both
of
those
types
about
three
of
those
centers,
because
there's
two
at
this
pacino
and
the
except
there's
making
land
we
don't
want
to
look
potentially
bring
residential
right
into
there.
C
What
about
the
the
plans
that
college
of
the
desert
have
for
the
area?
That's
going
to
be
adjacent
to
my
neighborhood
and
yours,
kurt
and
david.
It's
going
to
have
a
restaurant,
it's
going
to
have
a
hotel,
it's
part
of
the
cultural
center!
That's
going
to
share
that
space.
C
C
B
F
B
F
G
Well,
david,
I
I
actually
agree
with
you
because
I
feel
like
we
want
to
have
some
flexibility
here,
that
it
can
go
both
directions
and
I
think,
by
just
leaving
it
as
combined
residential
retail
office
and
other
land
uses,
to
create
active,
full-service
neighborhoods.
To
me,
that
seems
that's
going
to
get
us
where
we
need,
and
then
the
goals
can
talk
about
both
these
directions:
adding
commercial
to
what
is
primarily
residential,
now
or
adding
residential
to,
what's
primarily,
commercial
or
from
the
ground
up
vacant
lots
what
happens.
F
F
F
A
E
I
I
want
to
just
throw
one
more
thought
out
too,
as
as
long
as
you
know,
we're
we're
mixing
it
up
and
really
investigating
here.
So
what
if
we
just
add
a
final
clause
that
said
something
like
and
ensured
equal
access
to
community
serving
to
community
services
throughout
the
city
to
deal
with
sort
of
the
food
desert
issue
or
the
lack
of
strategies
throughout
the
city
issue,
and
we
don't
need
4b
right.
E
Yeah,
something
like
the
phrase
would
be
something
like
community
serving
amenities,
or
what
are
we
talking
about
here?.
F
F
A
A
I
can-
and
I
can
just
tell
you
when
we
would,
if,
as
a
from
a
planet's
perspective
when
we're
reading
these
priorities,
if
I
read
this
priority
here
4b,
I
would
look
at
it
and
I
would
say:
okay.
This
means
we
want
to
bring
healthy
food
options
to
areas
that
don't
have
them,
and
so
that's
what
we're
talking
about
with
the
food
deserts,
so
that's
that
would
achieve.
We
can
do
things
to
achieve
this
this
priority.
If
we
look
at
this
one
number,
seven,
it
means
okay.
D
A
F
D
We
might
want
to
do
david
is
when
you
remember
these,
you
could
put
four
b
and
seven
together,
but
beside
each
other,
sequentially
sure.
C
F
B
B
F
G
F
B
B
I
have
a
small,
a
small
laptop.
D
G
G
C
B
B
It's
it's
just
where
you
can
encourage
it's
very
hard
to
encourage
people
to
do
a
combination
anyway,
and
it
just
happens
in
commercial
districts.
F
D
A
A
A
G
B
E
F
G
A
It
we're
running
up
at
the
end
of
time
here
so
to
move
forward,
we'll
just
I
guess,
leave
the
way
it
is
unless
there's
a
strong
majority
here
that
wants
this
taken
out.
D
A
Okay,
number:
nine,
no
change
to
the
title.
Only
description,
there's
just
a
little
bit
of
change
where
the
placement
of
because
there
was
a
discussion
about
complete
streets
and
you
know
having
a
safe
street,
so
that
was
added
up
in
this
area.
A
I
didn't
took
it
out
of
insurance.
D
It's
a
well-defined
term
these
days.
It
basically
means
that
you
would
want,
rather
than
just
building
a
partial
street
when
you
have
a
development
you'd
like
to
build
a
full
street
that
has
side
with
sidewalks
bike
lanes,
whatever
this
complete
street
would
ultimately
be.
D
You
discourage
the
development
of
partial
streets
like
half
sections,
and
things
like
that.
D
E
I'm
finding
that
there's
a
balance
here
between
being
too
specific,
that
we
don't
have
room
for
to
you
know,
meet
our
priorities
and
goals,
but
in
some
cases
we
want
to
be
clear
that
we're
that
this
vision
is
very
specific
because
because,
when
I
see
complete
streets,
I'm
thinking
something
very
specific
here.
So
I
think,
if
we're
okay
with
that,
that's
fine!
If
that's
really
our
priority,
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
that's
what
we
think
I
would
I
would
I
would
support
it,
but.
A
Yeah
yeah:
we
have
that
in
the
current
general
plan,
and
we
can
you
know
if
that's
a
that's
something
that
we
want
to
add
for
complete
streets.
We
can
do
that.
Okay,.
A
Yeah
there's
two
emails
that
we
received
today
regarding
preservation
of
open
space.
A
So
that's
something
that
you
know
if
this
is
going
to
impact
this
priority,
perhaps
that
that
would
be
the
appropriate
place
for
it.
So
it
can
be.
Obviously
you
can
see
there
was
just
a
minor
change
in
the
title
and
then
there
was
no
other
proposed
changes.
G
Yeah
when
I
looked
at
the
two
letters
that
came
in
you
know,
my
sense
was
that
they've
got
a
specific.
They
have
specific
parcels
of
land
that
they
want
to
be
open
space
and
I
think
we're
not
getting
into
those
levels
of
specifics
here,
but
we
do
address
that.
We
want
open-based
and
you
know
access
to
them.
So
it
would
be
under
that
umbrella
that
they
could
make
their
case.
E
E
I
don't
know
that
we
necessarily
want
to
exclude
the
value
of
you
corridors
as
we
look
to
do
things
like
mixed-use
development,
and
you
know
things
of
that
sort.
So
by
marketing
view
corridors,
maybe
we
can
help
people
to
see
the
value
and
the
beauty
of
other
ways
of
thinking
of
views
I'll
just
but
maybe
that's
for
later
down
in
the
document
too,
but.
C
Well,
it's
sort
of
like
pocket
parks.
If
you
will,
I
mean
you
know
it's
not
not
saying
for
this
particular
use
of
land,
but
I
mean
it's.
A
pocket
park
is
a
good
thing,
even
though
it's
small
and
the
corridors
are
small.
E
D
G
A
The
time
the
only
thing
that
we
had
also
on
the
agenda
is
the
discussion
of
our
work
plan
back
when
you
got
your
steering
committee
guidance
document.
By
now,
we
were
supposed
to
be
into
the
housing
element
and
reviewing
the
journal
plan
goals
and
policies.
Let
me
first
jump
off
of
this.
A
So
with
cobit,
unfortunately,
we're
still
a
little
bit
behind,
obviously
further
behind
them.
We
would
like,
but
the
next
thing
that
we'll
be
working
on
are
the
general
plan
goals
and
policies
so
kind
of
drilling
down
to
some
of
the
specifics
of
the
general
plan,
goals
and
policies
and
then
also
discussing
the
housing
element.
A
Just
an
introduction
to
that
going
over
some
of
the
things
that
we've
kind
of
been
working
on
the
past
few
months,
we're
actually
getting
really
close
with
the
housing
element
and
our
consultant
getting
that
to
a
point
where
we're
ready
to
kind
of
share
the
ideas
and
and
the
analysis
that
we've
come
up
with.
So
that's
just
kind
of
the
next
steps
of
where
we're
at
with
this.
A
What
what
we're
going
to
do
with
your
recommendations
on
the
priorities
and
the
vision
statement,
is
we're
going
to
take
it
to
the
planning
commission
at
a
study
session
on
july
29th,
so
whether
we
get
through
this,
so
that
we
can
prepare
the
report
for
the
planning
commission
to
look
at
your
recommendations
and
then
those
will
ultimately
be
forward
to
the
city
council.
A
So
that's
kind
of
one
part
of
what
we've
done
and
where
it's
going
and
the
next
sport
for
us,
the
steering
committee
is
going
to
be
looking
at,
like
I
said,
the
goals
and
policies
get
into
the
housing
element
details
and
I
kind
of
want
to
give
an
introduction
to
the
housing
element
today,
but
with
time
being
what
it
is,
we'll
we'll
save
that
for
the
next
video.
A
So
I
think
that's
all
I
have
chair
and
if
there's
anything
else
when
it's.
A
Yeah,
I
think
we're
going
to
go
dark
in
august
just
to
be
consistent
with
all
the
other
boards
and
commissions.
So
it
looks
like
our
next
meeting
won't
be
until
september,
probably
the
second
or
third
week
of
september.
D
A
We've
had
the
affordable
housing
subcommittee
review
kind
of
the
direction
that
we're
taking
just
to
give
them
an
introduction
to
what
we're
looking
at
in
terms
of
the
housing
numbers
that
skag
and
arena
numbers
are
looking
at,
so
we're
looking
at
about
2
500
units
in
the
next
eight
years.
A
This
has
kind
of
the
preliminary
numbers
that
we've
been
given.
That's
the
number
of
thousands
we're
gonna
have
to
provide,
so
I
don't
get
into
too
many
specifics,
but
we'll
talk
to
you
about
that
at
the
next
reading,
and
so
I
think
that's
I'm
just
looking
at
the
chat.
A
It
looks
like
margaret
had
she
just
texted
me
and
she
had
to
jump
off,
but
so
anyway,
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
and
where
we're
going
like.
I
said
in
september,
and
for
those
who
weren't
aware,
donald
and
janaki,
who
was
who
helped
us
at
the
last
meeting.
They
were
supposed
to
be
on
the
subcommittee,
but
ultimately
they
they
were
had
to
bow
out
because
they
are
moving
out
of
the
area
they're
doing
what
can
give
you
an
update
on
that.
C
We're
trying
to
have
a
we
will
be
having
a
virtual
meeting
for
1ps
in
september
and
we're
meeting
next
week
to
decide
the
exact
date.
We
had
picked
a
date,
but
it
it
bumps
into
the
jewish
holidays
and
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
we're
going
to
be
doing.
But
it
would
be
helpful
if
we
could,
you
know
try
to.
C
Maybe
I
should
just
communicate
with
you
david
to
see
what
you're
thinking
about
in
terms
of
dates,
because
we
have
to
work
around
the
council
as
well,
because
we're
moving
our
meetings
to
the
evening.
A
Let's
yeah,
let's
talk
online
later
on,
as
we
start
to
kind
of
get
closer
to
september,
all
right,
maybe
in
august
late
august,
and
we
can
make
sure
that
we
we
don't
conflict.
It
looks
like
the
council's
meeting
on
september
3rd
and
17th.
C
1Ps
is
going
to
have
its
membership
meeting
on
tuesday
unless
we
change
our
minds
at
our
meeting
that
we
are
having
next
week
because
we're
staying
away
from
we're
staying
away
from
the
the
council
jumping
around
on
various
thursdays.
So
we
gave
up
our
thursday
once
they
switched
their
meeting
day.
C
F
B
To
do
as
long
as
it's
past,
3
30.
A
Okay,
so
so
what
I'll
probably
do
is
just
reach
out
to
you
all,
as
we
get
closer
to
september,
just
to
make
sure
that
well
maybe
just
to
check
in
to
see
if
there's
a
if
there's
a
monday
or
tuesday,
that
doesn't
work
for
you
or,
if
there's
multiple.
Just
let
me
know
as
we
get
closer
and
then
we'll
we'll
make
sure
and
finalize
the
take.
Then
okay.
B
A
What
we
were
trying
to
do
was
the
fourth
tuesday
of
the
month,
but
that
might
change,
given
the
kind
of
nature
of
how
the
schedule
has
been
revised
and
we're
trying
to
move
things
along
a
little
bit
more
quicker
quicker.
Now
that
we're
kind
of
getting
used
to
the
online
format.
One
thing
we
still
haven't
figured
out
yet
is
what
we're
going
to
do
with
the
public
workshops.