►
From YouTube: SEP 18, 2023 | Community Stabilization and Opportunity Pathways Fund Commission Meeting #2
Description
Community Stabilization and Opportunity Pathways Fund Commission Meeting #2
This is a recording of the second Community Stabilization and Opportunity Pathways Fund Commission Meeting, hosted on September 18, 2023.
The Community Stabilization and Opportunity Pathway Fund Commission is responsible for providing guidance and decision-making input on the distribution of community benefits funding generated as a result of the development agreement for the Downtown West project.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1119329&GUID=009237DE-128E-4C5C-858B-27D272A58EAC
A
A
B
B
B
Then
today
is
all
about
training,
so
we're
going
to
do
a
staff
presentation
about
the
bylaws
Brown
act,
some
other
policies
that
we
want
to
inform
you
about
and
have
a
discussion
and
question
and
answer
session
with
you
all
and
then
we'll
end
with
public
comment
and
then
adjourn,
but
before
we
proceed,
I
didn't
want
to
pass
it
off
to
Nancy
for
other
welcoming
remarks
as
well.
Yes,.
C
C
Brown
act
Etc,
so
please
don't
hesitate
to
either
ask
more
questions
tonight
or
give
one
of
us
a
call
later
on,
as
questions
come
to
you
very
much
looking
forward
to
continuing
the
work
and
then
jumping
further
into
the
more
creative
portion,
perhaps
on
bringing
on
fund
manager
Etc.
But
with
that
I'll
turn
it
back
to
Christian
and
thank
you
again.
B
Thank
you
Nancy.
So
before
we
proceed,
I
think
we
wanted
to
offer
the
opportunity
for
everyone
to
just
do
a
quick
round
of
introductions
again.
I
know
it's
been
what
three
months
since
we
last
met.
Maybe
we
don't
meet
too
often
so,
just
to
reacquaint
ourselves
again.
My
name
will
start
off
with
a
consultant
entity
staff
and
then
we'll
go
around
and
then
we'll
we'll
end
with
some
of
our
new
our
new
edition
Julie.
F
D
B
Q
Sure
so
I've
been
a
resident
of
the
city
of
San
Jose
for
about
27
years
and
I
have
worked
in
social
impact
and
philanthropy.
For
probably
my
entire
career
I
initially
started
out
working
in
professional
sports,
doing
charity
events
and
with
the
San
Jose
Sharks
and
the
Sharks
Foundation,
and
then
I
spent
about
16
and
a
half
years
with
eBay
and
PayPal,
and
we
were
really
focused
on
Economic
Opportunity
and.
N
B
B
Okay,
great
so
last
meeting
we
wanted
to
be
firm
about
and
and
reiterate
the
purpose
of
the
commission
right.
Why
are
you
all
here
and
I
think
when
you
ask
yourself
why
I
think
you
all
care
deeply
about
your
community
but
to
really
focus
in
on
on
the
namesake
for
this
commission,
the
purpose
of
the
fund
is
really
to
uplift
under
resource
communities
in
San
Jose
through
the
two
program
areas
that
are
the
commission's
namesake
Community
stabilization,
and
what
does
that
mean?
B
These
are
examples
preventing
the
onville
entire
displacement
of
residents,
communities,
small
businesses
through
affordable
housing,
preservation,
rental
assistance
and
similar
programs
and
then
two
opportunity
Pathways,
for
example,
increasing
Economic
Security
and
educational
attainment
through
training
programs,
Support
Services
entrepreneurial
assistance
and
similar
programs
next
slide.
Please
pass
it
off
to
my
colleague,
Jess
Jocelyn,
to
share
a
little
bit
about
where
we're
at
in
the
timeline.
A
So
we
just
wanted
to
provide
a
quick
overview
of
the
commission
work
plan
and,
as
a
reminder,
there
are
several
steps
that
need
to
happen
before
grants
can
be
distributed
from
the
fund.
The
focus
of
2023
is
to
onboard
the
Commissioners,
develop
bylaws
for
the
commission
and
to
launch
the
process
of
selecting
a
third
party
fund
manager.
R
B
So
for
commissioner
involvement,
and
so
what
will
U.S
Commissioners
be
doing
I
think
we
reviewed
this
at
the
first
commission
meeting,
but
in
in
addition
to
attending
preparing
and
actively
participating
in
these
committee
meetings,
there
are
different
levels
of
involvement
that
start
from
informing
Consulting
to
collaborating
and
really
and
ultimately,
empowerment.
Of
course,
you'll
you'll
review
the
information
that
we
provide.
B
So
with
that
for
the
Stop
presentation,
we'll
first
start
off
the
last.
If
you
recall
the
last
question,
we
asked
you
before
the
last
at
the
end
of
the
first
meeting
was
about
your
ideas
for
group
book
debrisments.
Since
you
all
will
be
here
for,
for
the
for
the
foreseeable
coming
years,
I
think
it's
good
to
establish
group
agreements
we'll
revisit
those.
Then
we'll
have
a
presentation
from
the
city
attorney's
office
about
the
brown
act
and
we'll
end
with
some
review
of
the
commission.
H
H
R
E
Christian
all
right,
you
guys
ready.
This
is
going
to
be
the
fun
part
of
the
evening
training.
This
is
going
to
be
a
lot
of
fun.
So
let's
wait
for
the
Maestro
to
cue
up
my
presentation
here.
I
made
a
special
presentation
for
you
all
just
to
try
to
make
something.
That's
generally
not
very
exciting,
somewhat
interesting
to.
P
B
K
F
There
should
be
a
packet
in
front
of
you
where
the
slides
are
available
as
well.
So
if
you
look
towards
in
the
back
of
the
packet
should
be
separated
by
little
blue
sheets
of
paper,
the
very
last
section
or
not
the
very
last
session.
The
very
last
session
we'll
have
all
the
handouts,
but
the
section
before
that
should
have
the
next
presentation
we're
about
to
go
through.
E
But
this
this
presentation
will
be
about
30
minutes
all
right.
So
here
is
our
training
road
map.
We
are
going
to
talk
about
the
brown
Act
next,
the
public
records
Act,
then
City
policies
and
then
a
brief
mention
of
our
bylaws
or
what
bylaws
are
and
then
the
Rules
of
Order,
which
are
kind
of
how
how
meetings
are
run
procedure
and
then,
finally,
we'll
get
into
conflicts
of
interest.
E
City
so
first
we'll
be
talking
about
the
brown
Act,
so
we
start
off.
In
1952
there
was
a
10-part
series
in
the
San
Francisco
Chronicle
called
your
secret
government.
It
was
all
about
the
back
room
deals
that
were
happening
for
local
governments
and
most
local
decisions
at
that
time
were
done
in
back
rooms
right
without
the
public
being
present,
and
so
the
California
legislature
got
together
and
they
passed
What's
called
the
Ralph
m
brown
act
in
1953,
which
was
signed
into
law
by
Governor
Earl
Warren.
E
So
this
one
of
the
bits
from
the
law
says
the
public
commissions,
boards
and
councils
and
other
public
agency
in
this
state
exist
to
Aid
in
the
conduct
of
the
people's
business.
You're,
going
to
see
this
a
lot
tonight,
this
is
all
about
the
people's
business
and
all
these
laws
and
regulations
are
aimed
at
protecting
openness
and
transparency
for
the
people's
business.
So
it's
the
intent
of
the
law
that
their
actions
be
taken
openly
and
that
their
deliberations
be
conducted
openly.
E
E
E
Legislative
bodies-
well
legislative
bodies
are
defined
in
the
statute
as
any
governing
body
of
a
local
agency
or
a
commission.
So
you
are
a
commission
Therefore,
your
legislative
body,
that
is
under
the
brown
Act,
but
there
are
exceptions
to
the
brown
Act
if
we
form
an
ad
hoc,
temporary
subcommittee
with
a
defined
purpose
and
a
definitive
end
made
up
of
less
than
a
majority
of
members.
That's
not
subject
to
the
brown
Act.
E
Basically,
that
meetings
must
be
open
to
the
public
and
properly
noticed,
and
a
meeting
is
defined
as
any
Congregation
of
a
majority
of
members
of
a
legislative
body
at
the
same
time
and
location
to
hear,
discuss,
deliberate
or
take
action
on
any
item
that
is
with
within
the
subject
matter,
jurisdiction
of
the
legislative
body
now
subject
matter.
Jurisdiction
is
basically
within
your
purview
whatever
it
is
that
your
granted
authority
to
do
in
the
city.
That's
your
subject
matter
jurisdiction
right
here,
we're
talking
about
funds
talking
about
Community
stabilization,
anti-displacement
measures,
anything
that's
within
that
purview!
E
That's
when
we're
talking
about
when
we
say
when
you're
in
the
same
place
same
time
to
hear,
discuss
and
deliberate
or
take
action
on
anything
that,
with
within
your
purview,
so
I
had
a
little
fun
with
this
because
I
like
superheroes,
and
they
were
easy
to
cut
and
crop
into
my
presentation.
So
I
chose
some
superheroes.
Maybe
you
know
who
they
are,
but
this
will
give
you
an
example
of
what
I'm
talking
about
here
when
we're
talking
about
members
of
the
city
council.
E
This
is
a
super
City
Council
when
they're
all
here
a
quorum
means
a
majority.
So
tonight
we
have
a
quorum
because
there's
a
majority
of
you
here
now.
If
we
take
some
of
them
away,
there's
no
Quorum
right,
there's
less
than
a
majority.
That's
the
fancy
word
of
Quorum.
So
whenever
you
hear
Quorum
talking
about
majority,
but
if
we
add
one
more
person
miles
comes
back,
we
got
a
quorum
now
we're
going
to
talk
about
serial
meetings.
E
Now
serial
meetings
are
prohibited
under
the
brown
act
and
there's
a
few
examples
of
what
a
Serial
meeting
could
be.
So,
let's
say:
America
Chavez
discusses
something
with
the
Hulk
right.
They're
talking
about
an
item,
that's
within
their
subject
matter
jurisdiction.
They
chat,
that's
not
a
Serial
meeting!
That's
fine!
E
Two
of
them
have
a
conversation,
no
problem,
however,
when
when
you
add
one
more
person
to
that
which
then
becomes
a
majority,
even
if
it's
just
one
other
person
talking
to
that
person
about
the
same
item
or
same
subject
that
becomes
a
Serial
meeting,
that's
what's
prohibited
under
the
brown
Act
now.
Another
way
to
have
a
Serial
meeting
is
to
use
an
intermediary.
So,
let's
say
America
talks
are
two
R2
also
talks
at
the
Hulk
about
the
same
thing
and
so
does
miles.
E
E
Now,
when
all
these
members
get
together
outside
of
a
publicly
noticed
meeting,
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
That's
not
what
we
want
to
do.
However,
if
they
get
together,
let's
say
at
a
publicly
noticed
or
Open
Door,
the
public
Gathering
community
meeting,
that's
fine!
They
just
can't
discuss
anything.
That's
in
their
subject
matter,
jurisdiction,
right,
no
commission
business
with
the
majority,
but
you
can
go
to
any
sort
of
community
meeting
together
and
that's
fine.
Just
don't
talk
about
commission
business,
so
a
snapshot.
The
basic
rules
for
Public
Access.
E
If
you
have
a
lot
of
the
same
members
who
are
on
Facebook
or
Instagram,
or
some
other
social
media
and
discussing
something,
that's
within
your
subject
matter,
jurisdiction
just
want
to
be
careful
right.
The
idea
here
is
that
you
don't
want
a
majority
to
know
how
each
other
are
going
to
act,
how
they're
going
to
vote
all
that
that's!
What
we're
trying
to
prevent
is
that
the
public
needs
to
be.
E
E
So
the
agenda,
here's-
what
a
common
agenda
looks
like
for
the
city
council
gives
you
the
date,
tells
you
where
it's
going
to
be
a
little
Zoom
link.
All
the
different
members,
historic
landmarks
commission
has
one
Planning:
Commission
has
one.
This
is
just
the
and
this
commission
has
one
so
inside
of
the
agenda.
That's
posted
online.
It
gives
some
instructions
of
how
to
join
a
meeting.
What
are
some
of
the
accommodations
that
are
provided?
How
to
provide
public
comment?
That's
what
the
agenda
is
there
for
at
the
at
the
beginning
of
the
agenda.
E
E
We
have
public
comment
from
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
speak
before
the
meeting,
then
any
items
that
may
be
deferred
or
removed
from
the
calendar,
and
then
this
is
a
new
page
at
the
top.
A
consent,
calendar
I'm,
not
sure
we're
going
to
have
consent,
calendars,
but
consent
calendars
are
are
items
that
are
somewhat
routine,
something
that
doesn't
necessarily
warrant
a
lot
of
discussion,
something
that
can
be
taken
in
a
group
and
voted
on
in
one
block,
and
then
we
have
public
hearings
or
kind
of
other
items,
main
items
for
a
business.
E
So,
for
example,
what
I
want
to
stress
here
is:
if
we
take
one
of
these
items,
you
see
that
the
item
has
a
link,
and
this
will
be
the
same
for
your
agendas.
You'll
have
a
link
that'll,
send
you
to
a
a
memo
or
staff
report
for
the
most
part,
but
what's
key
here
is
that
the
item
that
you're
reading
that's
on
the
agenda
that
you're
here
to
take
action
on
your
limit.
The
discussion
is
limited
to
that
item.
For
example,
here
we're
talking
about
a
development
agreement
with
Cisco
Systems.
E
Now
this
is
from
a
Planning
Commission
meeting.
They
can
only
discuss
the
development
agreement,
they're
not
talking
about
Cisco
they're,
not
talking
about
things
that
Cisco
has
done
in
the
past.
We're
just
talking
about
that
and
we're
only
taking
action
on
that.
So
I
just
want
to
stress
that
we're
we're
limited
to
what's
on
the
agenda
again,
because
we
want
to
be
able
to
have
the
public
there
to
comment
on
the
discussions
that
are
going
to
happen
at
the
meeting.
E
E
So
next
we
go
on
to
teleconference
rules.
Basically
you
can.
You
can
attend
two
meetings
in
a
year
via
teleconference,
so
attending
meetings
via
teleconference
is
limited
to
two
times,
given
the
amount
of
times
that
we
meet
and
it's
only
reserved
for
cases
of
emergency
or
some
other
just
cause
like
illness
or
taking
care
of
a
child
or
a
loved
one.
E
You'll
need
to
give
a
general
description
of
the
circumstance
to
the
commission
to
justify
your
absence
and
then
your
remote
participation
requires
a
simple
majority
vote
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
in
favor
of
your
participation
now
I
think
we
have
somebody
who's
on
teleconference
tonight
because
they're
ill
we're
not
taking
any
action
tonight.
But
after
this
presentation
we
can
have
a
vote.
Just
a
nice.
E
E
E
All
right
Brown
act
violations,
so
anyone
can
sue
the
city
to
challenge
an
action
taken
by
a
body
in
violation
of
the
brown
act
so
upon
successful
challenge,
the
action
can
be
invalidated.
Basically,
that's
kind
of
what
happens
right.
If
we,
if
somebody
alleges
that
we
broke
the
brown
acts,
they
can
say
hey
that
was
taken
illegitimately
or
in
violation
of
the
brown
act,
and
they
can
invalidate
it
potential
criminal
penalties
exist
for
those
members
who
knowingly
participate.
R
K
R
K
E
Public
records
Act
was
enacted
in
1968
Safeguard.
The
accountability
of
government
to
the
public,
promote
maximum
disclosure
of
the
conduct
of
governmental
operations,
explicitly
acknowledge
the
principles
that
secrecy
is
antithetical
to
a
democratic
system
of
government
to
the
People
by
the
people
and
for
the
people.
E
So
public
records
act
defines
public
records
as
any
writing
containing
information
related
to
the
conduct
of
the
Public's
business,
prepared,
owned,
used
or
retained
by
any
state
or
local
agency,
regardless
of
physical
form
or
characteristics.
So
what
does
all
that
mean?
All
you
need
to
be
worried
about.
As
far
as
the
public
records
Act
is
concerned,
those
are
the
records
that
you're
maintaining
this
is
the
records
that
you're
creating.
E
So
all
of
your
emails
using
your
city
issued
email
address
is
a
public
record,
so
just
be
aware
of
that
I
created
a
hypothetical
here
with
just
to
give
you
an
example
of
what
I'm
kind
of
talking
about
here
with
public
records
and
how
sensitive
they
can
be.
So
if
you
read
along
here,
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
I've
reviewed
the
upcoming
agenda
and
the
new
project
we
are
reviewing
at
our
next
meeting
is
a
big
waste
of
time.
I've
been
talking
to
the
neighbors
and
we
all
agree.
E
The
developer
is
an
idiot,
I
hope.
The
city
reconsiders
supporting
this
joke
of
a
project
thanks,
commissioner,
face
palm
all
right.
So
obviously
this
is
not
a
real.
This
is
giving
you
an
idea
of
whatever
you
write
in
an
email
will
be
disclosed
as
a
public
record
unless
you're
asking
a
legal
question
to
an
attorney,
that's
covered
by
a
specific
attorney-client
privilege.
If
you
ask
me
some
questions
about
the
brown
act,
some
legal
legalities
about
your
actions
or
something
that's
privileged
and
that's
not
going
to
be
disclosed.
E
However,
when
you're
writing
something
embarrassing
or
something
that's
basically
not
privileged,
it
will
be
released
and
you
just
want
to
avoid
being
on
the
front
page
of
some
newspaper
right
under
the
quotations
big
waste
of
time.
So
this
is
just
kind
of
it's
one
thing
that
they
tell
you
when
you
first
join
an
office
right
or
when
you
first
learn
about
the
brown
act
just
be
comfortable
with
whatever
you're
writing
in
an
email
for
it
to
be
on
the
front
page
right.
E
All
right
moving
right
along
two
policies
and
bylaws
again:
here's
a
video
of
how
to
find
our
bylaws
our
policies,
you
go
to
boards
and
commissions
and
under
boards
and
commissions
scroll
down
on
the
left,
and
you
will
find
the
council
policy
manual
there
under
Administration
and
government.
Our
list
of
a
bunch
of
City
policies.
E
Oh
0-4,
this
is
the
basic
policy
governing
boards
and
commissions.
It's
about
appointments,
legislative
process,
political
activities,
the
referral
system,
it's
33,
Pages,
take
a
look.
There
won't
be
a
test
on
it,
but
it's
good
stuff
to
know
now.
This
is
actually
important
to
know.
I
would
hope
that
you
all
review
this.
It's
only
three
pages
0-15.
This
is
the
code
of
ethics
for
officials.
You
are
all
City
officials
now,
so
you
should
take.
Take
a
look.
E
E
So
when
you're
speaking
in
public
or
writing
publicly,
it's
it's
very
important
that
you
make
clear
that
you're
speaking
on
your
in
your
personal
capacity
right
unless
you
are
authorized
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
commission,
if
you're
speaking
on
an
item
or
an
any
subject,
that's
within
the
purview
of
the
commission
make
sure
that
you're
telling
whoever
you're
speaking
to
that
you're
speaking
on
in
your
personal
capacity
and
not
on
the
application.
So
and
I
can't
stress
this
enough.
E
Do
not
use
your
commission
title
unless
you
are
speaking
on
the
commission's
behalf
right
I
know:
there's
a
huge
temptation
to
write
at
the
end
of
an
email
to
the
entire
city.
Council-
hey,
you
know,
I'm
a
commissioner
as
long
as
you
make
clear
that
you're
writing
on
your
personal
behalf.
That's
fine!
Just
don't
put
your
title
in
there
so
that
that's
City
policy,
0-36
and
commissions
may
not
independently
support
or
oppose
state
or
federal
legislation.
But
you
can
make
recommendations
to
the
city
council
through
the
rules
committee.
E
The
Rules
of
Order.
This
is
basically
how
meetings
are
run
so
Robert's
Rules
of
Order,
which
is
what
we
used
to
run.
Meetings
through
Robert's
Rules
of
orders,
basically
written
by
a
gentleman
by
the
name
of
Henry
Martin
Robert
who's,
a
U.S
army
officer
living
in
San
Francisco
in
the
late
1800s.
That's
a
picture
from
there
and
a
very
old
Roberts
Rules
book.
E
But
public
meetings
in
that
time
didn't
have
rules
of
procedures.
They
were
just
kind
of
chaotic,
so
he
thought:
hey
I
want
some
sort
of
standard
parliamentary
procedure
to
make
meetings
run
efficiently,
so
he
modeled
some
rules
after
the
House
of
Representatives
rules
and
came
up
with
this.
But
it's
very
Antiquated.
R
E
So
this
is
just
a
brief
rosenberg's
rules
at
a
glance
I
found
this
online.
You
can
find
these
online
I
think
rosenberg's
rules
will
be
handed
to
you
or
emailed
to
if
they
haven't
been
already,
but
this
is
basically
how
you
run
a
meeting
right.
Making
a
motion
seconding
that
motion
right
so
making
a
motion
is
how
you
present
an
action
to
the
commission.
E
Something
is
the
motion
right
and
the
only
way
that
motion
is
discussed
or
acted
upon
is,
if
there's
a
second,
so
somebody
else
has
to
second
that
motion
in
order
for
there
to
be
discussion,
and
eventually
a
vote
so
just
note
that
within
Robert's
Rules
of
Order
it'll
kind
of
give
you
a
brief
outline
of
how
you
run
a
meeting
right,
making
motions
how
you
object,
how
you
call
the
question:
how
do
you
call
a
vote?
All
that
is
in
there
very
important
information.
E
E
So
this
is
just
an
example
of
the
planning
commissions
bylaws.
We
haven't
adopted
our
bylaws
for
this
commission
yet
and
that's
part
of
the
what
we're
going
to
be
focused
on
tonight,
but
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
what
some
bylaws
look
like
right.
Bylaws
talk
about
the
officers
in
the
in
the
commission.
They
talk
about
kind
of
what
are
the
powers
and
duties
of
that
person.
They
talk
about
motions,
the
debate,
voting
eyes
and
no's.
How
do
you
petition
and
communicate
all
that
is
within
the
bylaws?
E
All
of
you
filled
out
form
700,
which
might
have
been
a
little
invasive.
Maybe
I,
don't
know
it's
kind
of
odd
to
to
write
down
everything
that
you
own
and
but
it's
for
good
reason.
Right,
I
mean
I,
think,
there's
a
theme
tonight.
All
these
laws
and
regulations
are
all
about
protecting
the
public
right,
protecting
the
Public's
right
to
their
government,
and
so
what
the
political
reformed
act
does
is
that
prohibits
public
officials
from
Gaining
financially
from
their
public
service
and,
if
done
effectively,
that's
a
very
powerful
tool
right
we
want.
E
We
don't
want
people
to
sit
and
positions
of
power
and
make
money
off
of
that,
so
you're
prohibited
from
taking
action,
and
this
is
important
that
will
foreseeably
impact
your
personal
finances,
sources
of
income,
real
property
or
business
entities.
So
those
are
the
four
steps
down
below.
Is
it
reasonably
foreseeable
that
there
will
be
an
impact
on
your
personal
finances?
Are
those
will
the
action
be
material
or
will
it
affect
the
public
generally?
If
so,
all
those
are
answered.
E
Yes,
then,
it's
prohibited
for
you
to
participate
so
we'll
just
kind
of
walk
through
all
these
different
impacts,
personal
finances.
So
does
the
Action
Impact
your
personal
finances,
including
expenses,
income
assets
or
liabilities,
as
well
as
those
of
your
immediate
family?
So
we're
talking
about
is
when
you're
taking
an
action
as
a
commission.
E
How
is
that
action
going
to
affect
your
personal
finances
right?
How
is
that
going
to
impact
your
sources
of
income?
That's
what
we're
looking
at
here.
We
just
need
to
be
mindful
right.
So
does
the
action
involve
an
individual
or
entity
from
whom
you
or
your
spouse
or
domestic
partner,
have
received
an
income
or
promised
income
aggregating,
500
or
more
in
the
previous
12
months,
real
property,
so
real
property
that
you
own?
E
E
Location
of
real
property
from
Project
will
determine
whether
the
impact
is
material
or
not.
So,
for
example,
that's
the
house
you
own
in
the
middle
there
within
500
feet.
Let's
say:
there's
a
decision
being
made
for
a
particular
location
right,
we're
giving
money
to
a
great
charitable
organization
in
that
organization,
happens
to
be
close
by
to
your
house,
or
it
involves
some
sort
of
development
at
the
organization
or
development
of
that
property.
Whatever
it's
going
to
do
will
have
an
impact
on
your
house
or
your
property
if
it's
close
enough.
E
So
if
it's
within
500
feet
of
your
house
or
your
property
it'll
have
it's
considered
a
material
effect
if
it's
between
500
and
a
thousand
feet,
there's
a
rebuttable
presumption,
basically
a
weighing
of
of
of
the
the
considerations
in
state.
So
then,
if
it's
beyond
a
thousand
feet,
you're
clear,
don't
have
to
worry
about
it
likely
not
going
to
come
up
very
often,
and
if
it
does
I
have
a
question
about
it.
E
E
You
know
if
somebody's
taking
you
to
lunch
or
something,
if
they're
taking
you
to
lunch,
and
it's
clear
that
they're
doing
so
because
you're
a
commissioner
and
they
want
to
you,
know,
get
some
favor
from
you.
That's
a
no
no
just
decline
and
the
political
reform
act
has
a
Prohibition
on
gifts,
totaling
590
dollars
in
one
year,
so
something
to
keep
in
mind.
E
So
when
in
doubt
sit
it
out,
if
you
have
a
conflict,
you're,
not
sure
just
recuse
yourself,
so
if
you
think
you
have
a
conflict
of
interest
contact
me
contact
city,
attorney's
office,
happy
to
talk
it
through.
If
an
upcoming
decision
will
present
a
reasonably
foreseeable
my
material
Financial
impact,
then
you
should
complete
a
conflicts
of
interest
declaration,
give
it
to
me
or
and
the
city
clerk
or
you
can
just
send
it
to
me
or
staff
and
within
24
hours
of
the
meeting
and
you
recuse
yourself.
Recusal
is
basically
you
sit
up.
E
You
go
in
the
Next
Room,
you
don't
hear
the
item,
you
don't
hear
the
discussion
and
then,
when
it's
over,
we
call
you
back
in
basically
we're
just
looking
to
avoid
the
appearance
of
bias,
even
the
Optics
of
a
conflicts
of
interest,
so
political
reform
act
violations,
administrative
proceedings
before
the
fair
political
practices,
commission,
fppc,
a
criminal
prosecution
by
a
local
district
attorney
or
State
Attorney
General
civil
action
by
the
public.
Certain
government
agencies,
fppc
enforcement
division.
Hopefully
it'll,
never
come
to
that
all
right,
and
that
does
it
so
happy
to
take
questions
now.
E
C
S
C
A
number
of
other
attorneys
do
it,
but
nobody
better
with
any
more
humor.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
fireworks.
Definitely
no
fireworks,
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
also
before
I
turn
it
back
to
Christian.
Just
jump
in
and
say:
is
there
I
know
this
has
got
to
be
kind
of
weird,
especially
for
the
people
who
haven't
been
on
commissions
before
and
just
to
reiterate,
you
are
more
than
welcome.
That's.
Why
we're
here
to
ask
some
questions
now
and
you're.
S
B
O
O
What
actually
Commissioners
should
be
concerned
about
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you
and
encourage
the
the
city
attorney's
office
to
use
that
presentation
in
the
future,
because
you
know
oftentimes,
they
think
there's
a
more
conservative
approach
laid
out
of
what
could
or
could
not
be
discussed
outside
of
of
the
commission
and
so
I
think
you
know
the
the
superhero
presentation
of
allowing
a
minority
to
speak
about
issues
outside
I
think
was
a
a
great
great
great
way
to
help
people
learn
and
to
be.
You
know,
really
explain.
Q
E
I
E
In
favor
of
this
organization,
but
if
when
when
in
time,
it
comes
happy
to
talk
it
through
because
it
can
be
complicated
right,
sometimes
how
much
of
that
item
involves
your
board
or
how
much
of
it
is
involved
that
organization?
It
really
depends,
so
it's
really
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
but
certainly
if
there's
you're
getting
money
from
an
organization,
a
non-profit
organization
you're
getting
paid
by
the
organization
and
this
fund
commission
is
going
to
delegate
some
funds
to
go
to
that
organization.
Yes,
you
would
recuse
yourself.
P
E
K
E
E
E
Yeah
I
mean
it
so.
Conflicts
of
interest
are
about
your
finances.
Right
generally,
there
is
the
appearance
of
bias.
That
is
a
separate
issue.
If
you
have
a
conflict
that
means
you're
you're.
You
know
if
you're
getting
money
from
as
a
source
of
income,
let's
say
they're,
paying
you
or
there's
a
dividend
or
some
sort
of
stock
that
you
get
money
from.
E
That
is
the
financial
component
of
the
conflict
of
interest.
So
if
you've
left
somewhere
right
and
you're
no
longer
there
and
this
commission
votes
to-
let's
say
it's
been
two
years
and
you're
no
longer
sitting
on
the
board
of
this
non-profit-
that
the
commission
is
about
to
vote,
to
give
money
to
I.
Think
that's
fine
right,
I
mean
there's
you're,
not
getting
any
money
from
it.
There's
no
Financial
conflict,
however,
is
there
an
appearance
of
bias?
Are
people
going
to
say?
E
Oh
yeah,
Efren
he's
you
know,
he's
definitely
going
to
vote
and
favor
them,
and
that's
not
fair,
because
you
know
he
has
a
special
inclination
to
support
them.
I
mean
people
can
make
those
allegations
to
prove
very
hard
to
prove
right.
I
mean
I
feel,
like
you
know,
there's
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
close
calls
like
that
on
this
commission.
I
would
imagine,
but
I
would
I
think
that,
as
long
as
you
make
it
clear
that
there's
no
conflict
so
about
how
you
feel
right,
I
can
only
give
you
recommendations.
E
K
E
B
It
is
quite
dense,
but
I
think
Daniel
did
a
good
job
of
of
trying
to
make
it
really
accessible
in
this
first
try
and
again
we're
here
to
to
answer
any
questions
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
Should
you
have
them
so
with
that?
If
there's
no
questions,
Final,
Call,
okay,
so
the
last
part,
the
last
pieces
for
our
agenda
to
continue
on
the
the
sort
of
dry
streak
is,
is
looking
at
the
commission
bylaws
right.
So
this
is
something
that
Daniel
alluded
to
and
spoke
about.
B
You
all
received
a
draft
and
I'll
reiterate.
It's
a
draft
commissioned
bylaws
for
this
commission
specifically
and
I'll.
Go
over
some
highlights
of
those
bylaws
with
you.
I
think
Daniel
did
a
great
job,
reviewing
some
of
them,
so
I'm
going
to
skip
over
some
or
just
skim
over
some
of
them
since
Daniel
already
reviewed
some
of
them.
But
there
are
two
points
in
particular
that
we
wanted
to
discuss
with
you
all
today
and
then
we'll
leave
it
open
at
the
end
for
discussion.
B
It's
only
it's
only
like
nine
slides,
so
so
bear
with
me.
So
next
slide,
please
don't
don't
get
intimidated,
but
these
are
just
as
as
Daniel
alluded
to.
There
are
many
rules
that
govern
commissions
such
as
the
bylaws,
such
as
the
brown
act,
such
as
rosenberg's
rules
of
orders.
This
is
just
one
tool
to
govern
a
commission,
so
next
slide,
please
and
really
to
emphasize
the
purpose.
What
is
the
purpose?
The
purpose
of
bylaws
the
bylaws
is
specific
to
this
commission.
B
It
establishes
a
set
of
rules
that
govern
the
management
and
procedures
of
the
commission's
meetings.
They
help
to
map
out
the
duties
and
obligations
of
Commissioners
and
City
staff,
provide
guidance
on
voting
and
decision-making
processes
and
then
for
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
specifically
most
commissions
operate
under
standard
set
of
bylaws
established
by
the
city
clerk's
office
unless
otherwise
designated.
But
for
this
specific
commission
it
has
been
designated
as
one
of
those
commissions
where
you
can
adopt
amended
bylaws.
So
you
have
the
ability
to
change
them.
B
So
next
slide,
please
so
for
General
Provisions
in
discussions
with
City
staff
and
Consultants.
We
we
wanted
to
offer
these
two
additions
to
the
general
Provisions,
so
you
all
were
the
first
one.
Good
standing
Commissioners
must
be
in
good
standing
and
body
good
character
during
and
that's
how
the
commission
meeting
setting
just
to
reiterate,
you
all
were
selected
due
to
your
upstanding
commitment,
leadership
and
stature
with
your
respective
community
and
the
San
Jose
Community
as
a
whole.
B
They
don't
negatively
impact
the
integrity
and
credibility
as
the
commit
of
the
commission
as
a
whole
you'll
be
making
critical
decisions
that
may
have
a
big
impact
on
the
community
with
many
eyes
on
the
conversations
and
then
decisions
that
are
made,
then
for
the
section.
Second,
one
group
agreements
that
we
were
referred
to
earlier,
that
Commissioners
will
adhere
to
the
group
agreements
established
by
the
commission
and
that
they'll
be
Revisited
on
a
bi-annual
basis
and
updated
or
amended
as
necessary,
and
this
is
really
about
adaptability
right.
B
B
So
then
next
slide
please
for
rosenberg's.
Rules
of
Order
Daniel
already
talked
about
this.
So
so,
really
it's
it's
a
simplified
rules
of
parliamentary
procedure
for
for
the
meetings
Daniel
talked
about
how
the
flow
is
that
the
chair
establishes
the
the
agenda,
invites
presentations
and
finds
public
comment
and
that
their
emotions
and
seconded
motions,
and
that
there's
there's
space
for
public
comment
for
those
votes
are
made.
B
So
next
slide,
please
so
for
the
second
and
third
articles.
This
is
really
about
the
chair
right
and
the
vice
Sheng
share
Pro
Temp.
So
what
is
the
responsibility
of
the
chair,
they're
responsible
for
for
presiding
over
the
meeting
conducting
the
meeting
in
alignment
with
rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order
the
city
policy
and
municipal
code,
and
serve
as
a
signatory
for
documents
and
recommendations
from
the
commission?
B
The
vice
chair
presides
over
meetings
in
the
absence
of
the
chair
and
all
duties
in
the
absence
of
the
chair
in
the
chair,
Pro
Temp
is
available
to
fill
either
the
chair
and
vice
share
position
the
event
of
a
vacancy-
it's
like
please
so,
as
indicated
in
So.
Currently,
you
know
one
point
of
discussion
that
we
did
want
to
bring
to
the.
B
B
Rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order
could
still
be
utilized
until
that
point
to
govern
the
meeting
and
votes
would
be
carried
through
via
consensus
majority
vote
called
by
any
commissioner
and
the
thinking
behind
this
was
due
to
you
know
the
procedural
administrative
nature
of
these
introductory
meetings,
which
includes
the
trainings
introduction
to
the
RFP
process
and
selection
of
the
fund
manager.
So
once
the
fund
manager
is
selected
at
meeting
five
onwards,
it's
at
that
point
the
commission
would
have
or
substantive
discussion
on
commission
work
and
and
as
the
grantee
selection,
with
a
strategic
plan
process
commences.
B
B
And
then,
after
this
point,
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that
we
will
be
taking
public
comment
after
this
discussion.
So
if
you're
online
or
joining
us
in
person
feel
free
to
fill
out
a
common
card
or
or
use
the
race
I
think
it's
the
race
hand
feature
online,
but
we'll
first
go
to
committee
committee.
Discussion:
go
ahead,
Jeffrey.
O
Yep,
thank
you.
So
it
was
helpful.
Christian
I
appreciated
the
explanation
of
of
the
two
options
in
the
bylaws
it
or
the
draft
bylaws
that
we
were
presented.
I
didn't
see
the
conversation
on
the
chair,
Vice,
chair,
working
with
staff
to
develop
agendas
that
are
brought
before
the
commission.
Is
that
just
or
did
I
miss
that,
or
is
that
just
informally?
How?
O
Typically
it's
done
because
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
for
us
and
in
particular
you
know,
given
you
know,
this
body
was
hopefully
able
to
become
rather
self-directing
in
in
terms
of
setting
its
agenda.
It'd
be
important,
for
you
know
the
someone
and
so
for
us
to
have
some
way
of
ensuring
that
some
representation
of
the
board
is
involved
in
developing
agendas
that
that
come
back
to
the
board,
and
you
know
having
the
chair
and
vice
chair.
O
C
It
the
chair
Vice
chair
in
the
bylaws,
but
we
just
hadn't
gotten
there
yet
so
that's
why
we
were
explicitly
pointing
out
sort
of
as
a
matter
of
convenience,
because
the
first
several
meetings
are
strictly
administrative,
but
again
as
thanks
to
Christian
and
Frank
and
the
winter
team
laying
that
out.
So
you
can
explicitly
make
a
choice.
Yeah.
P
B
P
F
General
divisions
have
been
added
to
the
draft
that
was
sent
to
you
for
your
review
and
is
in
front
of
you
today.
So
those
are
staff
and
consultant
recommendations
that
we
are
suggesting
that
we
add
and
we're
added
and
then,
as
far
as
the
conversation
regarding
the
chair
and
and
officers,
it's
something
we
would
just
wanted
to
open
up
to
the
commission
to
have
a
conversation
about.
P
F
C
F
They
are
in
the
packet
in
the
back,
but
it
sounds
like
I
may
have
printed
the
wrong
ones
so
that
I
I
will
I'm
going
to
put
the
provisions
that,
for
the
general
Provisions,
the
six
and
seven
I'll
put
them
back
up
on
the
screen
for
you
to
review.
Those
have
been
added
to
the
draft
that
we
are
maintaining
as
a
draft
one
okay
and
it
should
have
been
what
was
sent
to
you
in
your
package
email
prior
to
this
meeting.
That's.
P
E
F
E
E
So
we
just
put
that
in
the
bylaws
that
this
commission
shall
be
governed
by
rosenberg's
rules
of
order,
because
it's
a
lot
easier
to
understand,
they're,
clearer,
and
so,
if
you
have
any
questions
instead
of
going
through
Robert's
Rules,
which
is
a
huge
book,
I
mean
there's
other
Rules
of
Order
out
there,
but
rosenberg's
rules,
we've
decided,
is
kind
of
the
easiest
to
use,
and
so
the
bylaws
will
say
you
know
this
commission
shall
be
you
know,
kind
of
held.
The
meeting
shall
be
held
under
Robert
or
under
rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order.
P
E
So
I
wanna,
I,
wanna,
I
wanna,
stress
to
you
all.
These
are
your
bylaws.
This
is
up
to
you.
You
guys
decide
what
you
want
to
go
in
there
right
and
so
that's
why
this
question
is:
do
you
want
a
chair?
What
does
the
chair
do?
Do
you
need
a
chair
right?
Do
you
want
somebody
who's
going
to
be
kind
of
the
point
person
to
run
the
meeting
who's
a
volunteer
up
there,
or
do
you
want
staff
to
run
the
meeting
right
and
and
not
have
a
chair
right.
I
E
That's
kind
of
that's
really
what
the
decision
is
here,
all
the
other
Provisions
we
can
talk
about
they're
kind
of
just
you
know
the
mechanics
of
of
how
we
run
these
meetings,
and
so
the
really
important
piece
tonight
to
decide
is:
do
you
want
a
chair
or
not
have
a
chair?
Maybe
we
don't
have
a
chair
for
the
first
few
meetings
because,
like
Nancy
said
it's
administrative,
and
maybe
you
don't
need
a
chair
but
later
on
you're
going
to
want
somebody,
maybe
up
there
to
help
work
with
staff
to
decide
what
goes
on
the
agenda.
P
P
P
B
B
I
appreciate
the
questions
Regina.
Thank
you.
Yeah
I
think
that
we
wanted
to
lay
out
the
different
options
right
and
I.
Think
please
ask
clarifying
questions
and
I
think
this.
Is
your
commission
I
think
we
provided
the
different
options?
We
know
that
a
lot
of
these
introductory
meetings
are
procedural,
but
we
do
acknowledge
that
you
know
we
wanted
to
just
provide
the
options
for
a
chair
if
I
share
Pro
Temp
as
well,
Sana.
M
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
my
question
was
around
vacancy,
so
I
see
that
you
have
a
chair
and
vice
chair
description
of
what
to
do.
If
there's
a
vacancy,
however,
I
know
that
the
appointment
process
to
the
commission
is
different,
but
is
there
language
that
would
go
and
normally
in
the
bylaws
around
how
that
process
happens?.
K
E
F
But
I
think
to
answer
the
question
a
little
more
detailed.
Yes,
you
could
make
a
suggestion
to
add
some
Provisions
that
speak
specifically
to
it.
This
chair
also
has
an
alternate
that
serves
as
an
opera
as
somebody
who
can
fill
in
for
a
vacancy
as
well,
so
that
person
is
not
here
today,
but
but
normally
they
would
be
available,
should
some
should
a
seat
become
vacant.
L
E
The
the
role
of
the
chair
yeah,
so
the
chair
runs
the
meeting
right.
So
the
chair
will,
you
know,
welcome
everybody
here
say
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
call
roll.
They,
the
chair,
kind
of
when
I
say,
runs.
The
meeting
is
keeping
track
of
you
know
kind
of
saying:
okay,
now
we're
going
to
have
staff
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much.
Now
we're
going
to
go
to
public
comment
staff.
Are
there
any
hands
raised?
You
know
running
the
meeting
as
to
okay.
Here's
the
first
item
of
business.
Is
there
any
discussion?
E
Are
there
any
motions
on
the
table?
A
second,
let's
have
a
vote
doing
the
roll
call
vote,
so
the
person
is
basically
running
the
meeting
and
the
vice
chair
is
kind
of
filling
in
for
the
chair
when
the
chair
is
not
there
right.
So
if
the
chair
is
absent
for
illness
or
some
other
reason,
it
can't
be
there.
The
vice
chair
will
fill
in
now.
What
we're
saying
tonight
is
that
perhaps
this
commission
doesn't
want
a
chair,
and
that
was
something
that
was
floated
I
I,
completely
open
to
it.
E
I
have
never
seen
that
before,
but
you
know,
perhaps
we
can
do
that.
Just
not
have
a
chair,
but
I
think
the
idea
was
perhaps
during
these
first
few
meetings.
We
don't
need
a
chair,
but
we
want
a
chair
eventually
the
chair,
meaning
this
the
person
who's
going
to
run
the
meeting
right
and
that
would
be
for
a
year
right
and
then
commission
votes
for
somebody
new
to
do
it
the
next
year,
who's
going
to
run
the
meeting
right.
E
So
it's
a
it's
a
responsibility
to
really
know
the
material
be
on
time,
run
the
meeting
efficiently
right
and
pay
attention
to
what
motions
are
on
the
table:
pay
attention,
who's
voting.
What
how
all
that?
So
it's
it's!
Somebody
who,
in
in
the
chair,
doesn't
necessarily
the
chair
doesn't
make
motions
chair
can
make
a
motion,
but
chair
usually
allows
facilitates
the
discussion
right
to
run
the
meeting.
L
L
E
I
think
so
I
mean
for
other
commissions
right.
So
the
chair,
the
chair,
asked
to
place
things
on
the
agenda
right,
so
Commissioners
can
ask
the
chair,
hey.
You
know
what
about
putting
this
on
the
agenda
for
next
time.
The
chair
can
kind
of
take
take
stock
of
what
are
all
the
different
requests
for
things
that
can
go
on
the
agenda
and
decide
what
should
go
on
the
agenda
and
discuss
with
staff.
That
I
would
like
to
put
this
on
the
agenda
for
next
time.
E
Right
now,
there's
not
going
to
be
much
of
that
right,
because
we've
already
set
out
the
first
few
meetings,
which
are
administrative.
That
kind
of
get
this
commission
up
and
running.
There's
not
many
decisions,
as
of
yet
I
mean
when
we
do
the
fund
manager.
That's
the
first
major
decision
that
you're
going
to
be
making
but
again
I.
Think
it's
really
up
to
you
all
to
decide.
If
you
want
one
person
up
there
to
run
the
meeting
or
would
you
rather
have
Christian
and
staff
run
the
meeting?
L
E
L
Q
E
I
think
next
meeting
we're
actually
voting
to
approve
the
bylaws.
So
it
might
be
something
that
you
guys
all
want
to
discuss
tonight
to
kind
of
come
to
some
agreement
as
to
whether
or
not
I
mean
you
don't
need
to
decide
until
next
time
take
some
time
to
think
about
it.
But
maybe
next
time
we
adopt
the
bylaws
that
we'll
have
the
chair
of
the
vice
chair
or
not.
O
You
know
these
are
important
decisions
that
we're
making
at
the
foundation
of
of
this
effort,
and
so
I
think
it
makes
sense
that
we
have.
We,
as
Commissioners,
have
as
much
say
into
how
these
meetings
are
run
and
that
you
know
we
get
into
practice,
because
eventually
we
are
going
to
be
needing
to
run
these
meetings
and
and
make
our
own
decisions,
and
so
I
I
think
well.
I
appreciate
the
the
alternative
sets
of
proposals.
You
know,
as
a
body
I
think
it
would.
O
There
may
be
things
whether
it's
you
know
what
the
city's
doing
in
relation
to
Acts
or
you
know,
bringing
in
an
issue
expert
on
why
it
may
make
sense
to
just
have
a
standing
item
and
like,
for
instance,
I
serve
on
a
school
board
and
that's
something
that
we
have
in
every
every
agenda.
You
know
asking
for.
O
Are
there
standing
items
that
we
want
to
bring
to
the
next
board
meeting
and
I
think
it
might
be
a
worth
thinking
about,
including
whether
it's
in
our
our
bylaw
laws
or
you
know
just
how,
how
we,
how
we
run
our
meetings
so
yeah,
just
those
are
my
initial
thoughts
based
on
the
conversation,
and
you
know
how
what
what
what
transpired
to
get
us
here
to
this
dice.
Thank
you.
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
G
Q
Yeah
I
just
want
to
Echo
the
earlier
comments.
Daniel.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
the
presentation
and
I
think
it
was
great
that
we're
getting
kind
of
this
foundational
start
to
the
commission
and
that
you,
you
know,
sort
of,
went
through
every
piece
of
it
want
to
make
sure.
There's
good
understanding
across
the
commission
and
and
I
think
it's
great
that
the
commission
has
also
decided
on
our
group
agreements.
M
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
all
the
information
today,
I
would
say.
I
look
forward
to
finalizing
the
bylaws
and
the
decision
that
we
come
up
with.
As
a
commission
and
I
would
say,
recommendation
would
be
perhaps
going
more
in
depth
on
the
chair
or
the
president
and
the
vice
president
of
the
chair,
or
vice
chair
role,
providing
pros
and
cons,
or
you
know
at
least
examples
of
current
commissions
that
are
using
one
or
the
other
or
either.
N
O
G
P
P
But
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
communicate
with
our
colleagues
so
I,
don't
know?
If
there's
more
detail,
you
can
tell
us
about
like
how
trans
what
translation
services
will
be
available
to
us
to
make
sure
that
there's
nothing
hampering
like
us
being
able
to
work
with
everyone
equitably
and
then
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
things
I
look
forward
to
is
being
able
to
leverage
all
of
our
various
experiences
perspectives.
P
Basically
what
we
bring
to
this
Commission
in
every
step
of
the
work.
So
you
know
hoping
that
when
we
start
talking
about
the
RFP
process
that
there's
ways
we
can
bring
in
the
different
things
that
we're
hoping
to
see
the
motivations,
the
the
hopes
that
we
have
for
this
fund
through
every
step
of
the
process,
so
that
it's
not
like
so
technical
that
we're
not
actually
getting
to
know
more
about
what
ultimately,
how
we're
going
to
shape
this
fund.
So
I'm.
Looking
forward
to
to
that.
L
Thank
you,
I
appreciate
all
the
information
that
you
guys
give
us
today.
I,
like
the
presentation,
was
very,
very
funny
learning
something
that
I
think
I'm
looking
for
it's
to
really
set
up
the
rfe
and
find
someone
that's
gonna,
you
know
help
us
with
this.
This
journey
feedback
that
I
will
give
is
like
I,
don't
know
how
do
we
make
sure
that
non-english
speakers
understand
what's
going
on?
You
know
at
the
time
the
the
meeting
is
going.
L
I
know
I
know
because
of
the
time,
but
I
think
what
you
go
a
little
bit
slower,
make
sure
everyone
you
know
is
the
same
page
and
it's
I,
don't
know
if
it's
me,
but
it's
really
hard
for
me
to
to
kind
of
understand.
My
college
is
like
an
echo
in
here,
but
it's
also,
you
know
it's
so
it's
hard
for
me
to
understand
when
they
were
they're
speaking
I
have
to
like
really
even
kind
of
close,
my
eyes
and
kind
of
pay,
my
attention
to
them.
So
I
don't
know.
L
What's
what
could
we
do
about
that,
but
also
I
know
that
the
interpretation
it's
going
on
also
I,
also
I,
remind
myself
and
all
of
us
here
to
kind
of
go
a
little
bit
speak
a
little
bit
slower
because
it's
really
hard
you
know
to
interpreter.
You
know
when
someone
is
speaking
fast,
but
yeah
I
I
really
want
to
make
sure
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
all
understand.
You
know
the
discussion
is
going
on.
L
G
R
G
K
D
V
Just
weren't
I
want
to
apologize.
We
are
the
interpreters,
but
we
weren't
aware
that
we
were
going
to
have
somebody
speaking
in
Spanish,
so
in
the
future
we're
going
to
opt
to
sit
a
little
closer.
We
were
all
the
way
upstairs
because,
usually
that's
where
they
like
us
to
be
so
I
apologize
to
everybody
who's
present.
There
are
services
that
can
be
given
to
you
in
person
so
that
everybody
can
have
facilitation
to
be
able
to
speak
together.
G
V
P
I
I
have
another
question:
I
don't
know
if
I
can,
because
there
was
a
question
about
how
do
you
get
rid
of
the
chair
or
the
vice
chair?
I
saw
that
in
the
bylaws,
when
when
we
talk
about
parts
of
the
bylaws,
can
you
refer
to
where
that
is
just
so
we
can
see
how
that's
written
up,
because
I
was
trying
to
find
that,
but
it
I
saw
it
in
here
in
terms
of
how
to
get
rid
of
the
chair,
but
it
might
help
if
you
can
point
us
to
that.
F
F
E
C
E
I
might
I
know
that
Mr
rote,
you
have
a
question
but
be
just
before
you
do
I
just
wanted
to
say:
I
encourage
you
all
to
to
take
a
look
at
these
bylaws
come
up
with
any
edits
questions
comments,
bring
them
to
the
meeting
next
time
because
we're
going
to
vote
on
on
approval
of
the
bylaws.
So
we
can
incorporate
those
at
that
meeting.
So
that's
I
mean
it's
kind
of
the
hard
part
about
public
service.
J
Thank
you,
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
the
acoustic
comment.
It
is
pretty
problematic
and
I.
Imagine
it's
even
worse
for
anyone,
who's,
deaf
or
hard
of
hearing
if
I
logged
into
the
zoom
meeting
I
could
turn
on
the
captions.
So
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
do
the
same
up
on
this
screen
Just
for
future
meetings,
because
it's
pretty
difficult.
F
G
Okay,
before
we
finish
with
the
exit
question
and
go
on
to
public
comment,
I
do
want
to
give
an
opportunity
to
commissioner
Sarah
to
give
us
some
feedback
as
well.
If
there's
anything
that
you
would
like
to
add
anything,
you
know
you
would
suggest
that
we
improve
next
time
or
anything
you're
looking
forward.
J
D
I
actually
have
a
clarification
question.
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
heard
correctly
in
regards
to
whether
or
not
you
needed
the
chair
in
the
vice
chair,
I
think
you
mentioned
you
didn't
have
to
have
Sarah
Vice
chair,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
everyone
heard.
That
is
that
what
you
had
mentioned
in.
D
E
V
E
F
S
Don't
need
it
I
appreciate
the
meeting
just
make
sure
that
on
the
City
calendar,
when
it
states
all
the
meetings
that
are
taking
place,
that
you
are
now
going
to
be
put
on
there
and
your
time,
because
I'm
not
sure
how
I
found
you
but
I,
don't
believe
it
was
on
that
City
calendar.
The
other
thing
is
a
smaller
room
would
be
better
because
when
you're
looking
at
it
from
Zoom,
you
can
hardly
see
the
faces.
I
can't
even
see
the
names
with
the
faces,
so
maybe
you
just
might
want
to
read
that.
F
E
Before
we
break
I,
just
wanted
to
reiterate
just
how
excited
I
am
to
be
a
part
of
this
and
just
wanted
to
say:
please
be
patient
right.
This
is
a
very
long
process.
I
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
passion
in
the
room.
I
share
that
passion
and
addressing
some
of
the
problems
that
we
see
in
our
community,
but
I
want
you
to
just
hang
on
it's
going
to
take
a
while
to
for
us
to
get
there,
but
I
just
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
C
F
W
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
extending
me
that
courtesy,
Paul
Soto
from
the
Horseshoe
I
have
zero
confidence
in
the
process
and
this
council's
ability
to
of
function
in
the
intention
for
which
it
was
created.
Now
that's
dirty
money
to
begin
with,
and
it
was
too
low
to
begin
with.
I'm
not
satisfied
with
what
we
have
I
wanted
a
university
as
well,
because
this
is
about
Community
stabilization
and
so
what
I
wanted
from
Google
Mr
benavidez?
Okay,
you
need
to
contact
me.
W
W
Do
you
know
that,
at
the
time
that
they
were
formulating,
this
deal
that
Google
had
its
most
prosperous
year
in
its
entire
history?
A
hundred
and
ninety
billion
dollars
during
covet
in
one
year
in
one
year,
190
billion
dollars,
and
they
got
the
nerve
to
offer
a
disgusting
200
million
man?
That's
chump
change,
so
I'm,
not
very
confident
in
in
in
in
the
Integrity
of
what
this
money
represents,
because
all
that's
happening
is
this.
W
Money
is
going
to
go
to
a
bunch
of
non-profits
that
gathered
all
of
the
data
and
all
of
the
information
from
the
Barrios
and
fed
it
back
to
Google.
That's
what
it
is.
It's
nothing,
but
it's
nothing
but
hush
money
to
somos,
Mayfair,
to
Silicon,
Valley,
rising
to
working
Partnerships
and
all
of
those
other
non-profits
that
have
a
stake
in
this.
So
the
the
entire
process.
It
stinks,
I'm
gonna,
be
here
for
that
long
haul
and
believe
it
I'm
gonna
be
the
last
man
standing
Benavides.
You
need
to
get
a
hold
of
me.
Dude.
B
All
right
so
with
that
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
what
Daniel
said:
I
think
this
is
a
long
process.
You
are
Commissioners
I,
think
we
recognize
the
passion
and
we
recognize
your
dedication.
We
recognize
that
you
took
time
off
of
your
day-to-day
to
be
here
right
and
I.
Think
we
wanted
to
commend
you
for
all
of
that
and
that
this
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
again
that
there
is
a
there's,
a
lot
of
content
that
was
delivered
today.
B
Past
five
to
be
here
and
everyone
who
put
this
meeting
together
again
today,
we
really
value
your
input.
I
think
we're
gonna
try
to
get
another
room
next
time,
so
we
can
really
Foster
more
intimate
dialogue
and
setting
and
I.
Think
we'll
we'll
see
you
then
so
with
that
I
think
we're
gonna
adjourn
at.