►
From YouTube: OCT 7, 2021 | Redistricting Advisory Commission
Description
City of San José, California
Redistricting Advisory Commission of October 7, 2021
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=894093&GUID=07D99A83-0151-4F64-B706-1D725035DA5C
A
B
A
E
B
A
A
A
G
E
B
H
H
Just
would
like
to
note
my
assumption
was
that
in
the
future,
files,
including
draft
maps,
would
be
included
in
a
format
that
would
be
usable
on
that
website.
Certainly
we're
seeing
that
the
the
draft
maps
that
were
posted
late-
you
know
a
couple
hours
ago
were
posted
in
a
different
third
party
kind
of
it
was
in
an
html
format
using
another
kind
of
file.
H
So
I
just
would
encourage
the
commission
to
be
able
to,
in
the
future,
make
the
draft
maps
available
in
a
format
that
works
for
those
who
may
want
to
look
at
the
draft
maps
in
district
r
or
in
other
formats.
You
know
perhaps
like
a
csv
file.
So
those
who
want
to
look
at
these
things
in
more
in
greater
detail
can
do
so
without
having
to
draw
out
all
the
vagaries
of
the
lines
maps.
So
just
encourage
you
to
think
about
what
kind
of
files
we're
posting
and
going
forward.
G
E
B
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Moving
on
to
item
five
public
hearing
tonight
we
will
be
holding
a
public
hearing
on
draft
maps
that
have
been
drawn
up
based
on
the
new
census
data,
as
well
as
information
on
communities
of
interest
submissions
we
have
received
so
far
so
I'll
now
turn
it
over
to
kimmy
of
redistricting
partners
to
present
welcome
kimmy
thank.
I
J
I
I
There
was
communities
of
interest
that
had
in
person
and
submitted
testimonials,
and
so
those
were.
We
tend
to
sort
of
group
these
at
sort
of
a
higher
level.
Instead
of
listing
every
single
comment,
so
the
themes
tended
to
be
around
keeping
penitencia
in
district
four
dalmas
park
and
downtown
west
being
in
the
same
district,
keeping
the
filipino-american
community
together,
keeping
downtown
san
jose
together
and
keeping
barry
essa
together.
I
I
There
were
about
16
of
these,
I'm
just
going
to
go
through
them,
and
then
you
all
have
the
presentation.
If
you
want
to
look
at
them
a
little
bit
more,
this
one
for
district
4
was
actually
we
received
this
one
twice.
I
think
that
they
were
different
drawings
and
then
this
one
was
a
little
bit
more
detailed
in
their
description
and
it's
really
keeping
sort
of
that
st
vios
and
midtown
area
together,
in
that
this
is
when
they
go
into
some
detail
around
reasons
why
this
is
again:
district
4
collins.
I
I
I
So
the
process
that
we're
looking
at
now
is
going
to
be
reviewing
draft
maps
this
evening
and
really
the
goal
of
this
process
is
to
get
as
much
feedback
from
the
commission
around
what
you
see
in
maps.
The
draft
maps
that
we're
presenting
that
you
like
and
that
you
think,
should
move
forward
or
items
that
you
dislike
and
that
you
think
should
be
excluded
from
the
next
round
of
plans.
I
So
each
of
these
plans
will
have
an
overview
page
accompanied
by
data
tables
and
then
individual
districts,
so
we
can
go
as
sort
of
as
quickly
or
as
slowly
as
you'd
like
to.
I
do
have
web
viewer
html
links
ready
if
people
have
questions
that
they
want
to
see
at
street
level
for
district
lines
or
any
of
those
pieces.
I
I
I
You
will
notice
that
the
areas
are
lettered
as
opposed
to
being
numbered,
and
it's
really
because
the
numbers
tend
to
belong
more
when
to
the
city
council
members,
and
so
we
try
and
sort
of
use
letters
to
make
it
slightly
less
a
little
more
that's
a
little
easier.
I
think
so.
This
is
the
demographics
for
plan.
A
the
total
deviation
will
come
in
under
10
percent.
I
So
this
is
district,
a
in
the
draft
plan
a
it
does
look
a
little
bit
like
the
district,
four
collins
ones
that
were
presented
district
b
again,
a
largely
majority
asian
c
bath
population.
Here
district
c
is
another
api
cvap
community
district
d,
which
is
the
latino
majority
community
district
e
f,
which
is
another
asian
pacific,
islander
community,
and
then
g
h.
I
And
I
and
then
district
j,
which
is,
I
think,
fairly
similar
to
the
current
district
draft
plan
b.
So
areas
in
this
mount
draft
area,
c
d,
g
and
h
are
the
majority
asian
pacific
islander
districts
area
district
e,
which
is
sort
of
sandwiched
in
the
middle,
is
the
majority
latino
district
for
this
plan.
I
I'm
sorry
I'm
a
little
too
busted,
so
district
c
or
plan
c.
I'm
sorry
has
an
8.5
deviation
and
this
is
really
what
we
sort
of
refer
to
as
a
minimal
change
plan.
So
it's
based
on
the
current
lines.
The
eastern
seats
also
are
looking
at
the
50
percent
or
more
c-vap.
So
on
this
plan
areas
a
b
and
d
are
majority
api
and
then
c
in
this
one
is
latino,
which
is
really
actually
pretty
similar
to
draft
plan
b.
I
I
All
of
the
draft
plans
will
be
placed
on
the
website
they're
already
in
the
legistar
and
your
agenda
on
the
website.
We
do
welcome
public
comment
and
any
input
from
the
community.
The
community
survey
forum
is
still
up
there.
District
r
is
definitely
still
live
and
working,
and
so
you
could
also
excuse
me,
so
anybody
that
wanted
to
submit
will
still
be
collecting
that
testimony
the
community
of
interest,
testimony
and
any
draft
maps
that
people
would
like
to
submit,
and
we
can
certainly
incorporate
that
into
any
changes.
B
Okay,
why
don't
we
open
it
up
to
questions
from
the
commission
and
all?
Well,
I
wait
for
our
hands
to
be
raised.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
kimmy
and
maybe
it's
just
my
lack
of
understanding
the
data,
but
when
we
had
the
presentation
last
week,
I
was
under
the
impression
that
the
only
big
changes
in
population
were
going
to
come
from
districts,
4
and
10,
and
so
these
these
maps
to
me
are
like
very,
very
different
from
our
current
district
map.
B
I
Sure
so
the
maps
took
into
account
the
community
of
interest,
testimony
that
was
received
and
the
need
to
be
able
to
draw
several
majority
minority
districts
primarily
on
the
sort
of
the
western
end
of
the
city,
the
northwestern
end
of
the
city,
rather
so
the
community
of
interest
testimony
played
into
those
into
the
drawing
of
the
maps,
as
well
as
the
district
r
maps
that
were
put
in
and
then
in
terms
of
having
sort
of
a
minimal
change
map.
I
think
that
plan
c
is
sort
of
the
most
minimal
change.
I
K
Yes,
hi.
I
have
some
questions
kimmy
specifically
regarding
district
four,
that's
the
district
with
the
largest
population,
and
I
know
that
if
we're
going
to
have
a
change,
it's
going
to
be
district
four,
it's
kind
of
in
the
hot
seat
and
I'm
in
trying
to
read
the
maps
again.
My
broken
record
is,
I
don't
see
some
street
names.
I
wanted
to
ask
you
if
the
penitentia
creek
area
that
is
on
one
of
the
cois,
is
that
in
it
did
that
in
any
of
your
plans.
K
I
I
studied
this
all
these
maps
and
I
can't
tell
if
it
remained
in
our
current
district
four
or
is
pushed
into
district
five,
and
also,
if
berryessa
as
a
whole,
is
in
district.
It
looks
like
it
might
be
split
between
four
and
five,
the
berryessa
area,
which
the
community
specifically
did
not
want
that.
So
can
you
clarify
the
boundaries
first?
For
me,
please.
K
I
I
Sure
so
this
is
plan
c,
which
is
sort
of
the
minimal
change
plan
and
very
essence
here,
I'm
trying
to
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more.
This
does
allow
you
to
see
the
street
names
if
you
zoom
in
a
little
bit
further.
So
here
is
barry.
Yes,
it
does
look
like
it
may
have
been
split
between
these
two
districts.
A
K
I
I
A
I
K
K
Well,
I
would
advise
advise
the
map
makers
to
please
keep
in
mind
all
the
testimony
that
they
got
especially
a
lot
of
testimony
from
the
berryessa
area
and
the
penitentiary
area,
because
some
of
these
plans
don't
seem
to
have
taken
any
of
that
into
into
account
from
what
I
see
here.
I'm
very
surprised
this
happened.
K
K
I
K
E
E
Just
completely
I
mean
it's
a
complete
rewrite,
I
mean,
and
I
it
makes
me
inherently
very
uncomfortable,
so
it's
I
think
I
made
a
comment
last
time
that
we
would
try
to
be
kind
of
surgical
in
our
approach
about
this,
and
I
think
there's
good
reasons
for
that,
and
this
is
more
like
a
sledgehammer.
So
I
would
like
to
pull
up
c
again,
which
you
referred
to
as
a
minimal
change.
I'm
not
exactly
sure
if
that's
the
appropriate
characterization.
But
again
I
haven't
had
a
lot
of
time
to
look
at
this
closely.
E
Yet
at
first
blush
it
appeared-
and
I'm
just
going
to
speak
for
the
district
that
I
represent,
because
that's
what
I
know
best
and
I'll
leave
the
other
commissioners
to
really
opine
on
their
own
districts,
but
I'm
looking
at
the
maps
and
all
three
of
them.
I
believe
excise,
north
willow,
glenn
and
palm
haven
from
what
was
traditionally
district
six
and
I'm
not
exactly
sure
because
the
letters
what
district
is,
but
that's
another,
really
significant
source
of
confusion.
But
you
know
there's
a
north
willow
glenn.
I
happen
to
live
in
north
willow
glen.
E
So
this
is
why
I
know
this
there's
a
north
willow,
glen
neighbors
association.
I
mean
it's
a
very
tight
community
and
it
seems
to
be
getting
split
off
from
the
rest
of
little
glenn,
as
is
palm
haven,
which
all
historically
have
been
considered
to
be
part
of
willow,
glenn,
and
I
think
district
six,
so
that
that
inherently
concerns
me,
and
so
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
that
if
we're
going
to
be
revising
the
maps,
I
think
those
areas
should
remain
contiguous
with
the
district
that
they're
currently
in.
E
And
there
was
some
some
reference
to
delmas
park
and
I'm
not
familiar.
I
mean
I
live
right
next
to
dallas,
there's
vibrant
park,
which
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
trains.
Maybe
that's
what
they're
referring
to
is
dalmas
park,
but
could
somebody
could
clarify
that
for
me,
that
would
also
be
helpful
since
there
was
testimony
about
keeping
that
with
downtown
west.
E
Yeah,
and
maybe
I'm
just
not
I'm
not
familiar
with
what,
where
where
delmas
park
is,
I
mean
I
obviously
live
right
next
to
dallas
avenue,
but
I'm
just
not
sure
what
landmark
they're
referring
to
there's.
Somebody
maybe
just
give
me
a
reference
point
about
where
that
is.
It
may
be
completely
different
than
what
I'm
thinking
of.
F
A
F
F
B
A
E
I
B
H
H
You
know,
there's
a
host
of
concerns
and
just
the
both
the
timing
of
when
these
maps
were
released
and
the
inaccessibility
of
being
able
to
get
them
in
formats
where
we
can
do
things
like
look
at
overlaying
the
current
district
lines
or
overlaying.
You
know
information
about
neighborhood
associations.
H
It
makes
it
really
hard
for
the
public
to
be
able
to
have
an
active
dialogue
and
certainly
for
the
commissioners
to
really
have
that
kind
of
critical
debate.
When
we
only
have
a
couple
of
weeks
before
we
have
to
come
to
some
decisions,
so
certainly
hope
that
the
the
consultants
take
into
account
what
they're
hearing
from
the
commissioners
and
that
we
can
put
this
information
out
to
the
public
in
a
way
where
it's
more
accessible.
H
Certainly,
I
understand
the
the
need-
and
I
think
there
are
other
ways
from
my
understanding
to
reach.
The
excuse
me
reach
the
goals
of
having
majority
and
plurality
districts
of
latinx
and
aapi
communities
that
don't
involve
such
drastic
reshaping
of
communities
that
I
think,
particularly
when
you
think
about
the
communities
in
district
5,
district,
8
and
district
7
that
that
do
see
commonalities.
H
L
L
L
They
tend
to
split
neighborhoods
and
divide
some
of
these
communities
of
interest,
even
the
ones
that
may
not
be
you
know
have
been
submitted
because
there
are
a
lot
of
those
out
there
that
aren't
necessarily
submitted,
for
example,
on
draft
plan.
A
downtown
is
divided
into
about
four
or
five
council
districts,
depending
how
you
define
downtown
as
another
example
on
draft
plans
b
and
c
willow,
glenn
split,
almost
directly
through
downtown
along
willow
street
or
along
bird
avenue
respectively.
L
M
Hi,
my
name
is
gabriela
garcon
gupta,
I
am
with
the
asian
law
alliance,
and
I
just
wanted
to
basically
request
that
this
process
be
more
public
facing,
for
example,
the
timeline
for
map
drafting
max
emission
map
finalization.
It's
not
able
to
be
found
on
the
website,
and
other
cities
like
sunnyvale,
do
have
that
pretty
clear
on
their
website,
also
to
have
this
powerpoint
easily
accessible
on
the
website,
since
it
is
drafting
maps
for
the
city
of
san
jose,
which
a
lot
of
people
are
invested
in
so
just
making
this
overall
pretty
accessible.
M
I
also
echo
the
concerns
that
some
of
the
commission
members
had
about
the
lettering
being
pretty
difficult
to
understand
and
just
interpret
for
the
general
public.
So
I
just
think
maybe
even
a
dedicated
session
going
over
these
draft
maps
for
the
public
would
be
wonderful.
We've
had
people
even
asking
it
one
of
the
deadlines
to
submit
community
of
interest,
testimony,
etc,
etc.
M
B
N
N
N
N
N
Okay,
so
now
the
the
districts
are
colored.
So
this
is
map
plan
a
and
you
can
see
that
the
the
current
the
districts
in
the
in
that
map
are
one
color.
And
then
this
pink
border
is
are
the
current
lines,
and
then
I
pulled
up
the
current
district
number.
So
you
can
see
if
you
want
to
reference
that,
because
it
seems
like
that's
that's
what
you're
most
comfortable
with.
N
So
that's
one
reason
why
the
berryessa
neighborhood
is
split
somewhat
out
of
four
into
two
different
districts,
because
of,
if
you
allow
me,
I
can
show
you
the
api
and
latino
50
plus
census
blocks
and
where
they
are
in
the
city,
you
can
see
there's
a
high
concentration
in
the
berry
as
a
neighborhood,
and
this
this
is
the
area
where
to
basically
create
two
api
seats,
one
in
the
north
and
one
kind
of
farther
to
the
south.
You
need
the
population
to
balance
those
both
those
districts
and
make
those
possible.
A
D
Yes,
I
did
thank
you
so
much.
I
would
say
that
there
are
also
concerns
for
the
southern
portion
of
the
city
as
well,
what's
known
as
districts
10
as
well
as
nine,
because
I
would
just
we
it
appears
with
how
the
map
is
that
amaden
is
being
split
in
two,
so
I
would
recommend
keeping
it
whole
if
at
all
possible.
J
J
J
K
Something
because
it's
hard
for
me
like,
even
if
I
wanted
to
study
these
I'm
on
I'm
on
my
computer
now
for
the
meeting,
and
I
can't
even
I
can't
pull
any
of
this
up
unless
I
have
a
second
computer.
It's
just
hard,
it's
just
hard
for
me
to
deal
with
all
this
information
when
everything's
electronic
and
you
have
to
scroll
and
everything.
So
if
we
had
some
some
paper
versions
of
some
of
this,
it
would
help
me
out
anyway,.
N
B
N
N
E
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
clarify
something,
so
are
our
a
b
and
c
that
we
come
up
with
tonight.
Are
these
basically
the
only
options
we
have
to
tinker
with,
because
what
I
heard
is
that
the
trying
to
achieve
these
minority
populations
primarily
on
the
east
side,
is
now
rippling
out
and
causing
splits
amongst
all
of
these
other
districts.
N
I
one
of
the
things
that
we
try
to
do
as
a
registering
firm
is
show
is
ensure
that
the
majority
minority
seats
are
drawn
if
they're,
if
it's
possible
to
do
so,
and
we
found
that
there
they
were
possible
to
draw
we'd
look
to
county
council
to
get
further
recommendations
on
these.
On
the
east
side
lines,
we
can
also
produce
additional
maps.
N
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
obviously
that
I
mean
that
seems
to
be
the
driving
force
and
for
good
reason
I
mean
I
would
definitely
encourage
you
guys
to
talk
with
whatever
county
or
city
council.
You
need
to
talk
with,
because
I
mean
it's
a
lot
of
unintended
consequences.
It
seems
like,
while
you're
trying
to
comply
and
there's
a
reason
why
the
law
was
passed
in
that
in
actuality.
It
seems
like
some
of
the
comments
from
the
other
commissioners.
Even
the
east
side
populations
are
being
disrupted
in
a
way
that
they're
not
totally
thrilled
about.
E
E
B
N
N
Based
on
comments
from
the
commission.
I
think
the
other
thing
to
take
into
consideration
is
that
these
are
truly
drafts
and
one
of
the
hard
parts
we've
had
is
that
we
haven't
had.
There
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
of
comment
about
certain
parts
of
the
city,
and
so
it
was
really
hard
to
take
community
input
into
into
consideration.
N
For
those
first
plans
a
and
b
where
we
were
really
trying
to
look
to
community
ventures
testimony,
and
there
just
were
parts
that
just
weren't
covered.
So
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
people
who
feel
like
the
parts
of
the
city
aren't
represented
well
in
maybe
all
the
plans.
If
you
can
talk
through
the
neighborhoods
that
you
really
think
are
kind
of
the
cores
of
districts
that
must
be
as
much
as
possible,
of
course,
conserved
and
created
in
the
next.
G
G
Well,
yeah,
I
guess
an
advantage
over
any
other
group,
but
it
seems
like
to
me
you
know
you
you
come
out
tonight
and
you
got
abc.
I
mean
district
a
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
was
district
a
because
on
your
draft
fee.
I
can
barely
see
it,
and
so
I'm
just
hoping
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
revisit
this
before
we
actually
make
our
final
decision
on
this
thing.
D
B
Yes,
I
I
echo
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised.
As
far
as
you
know,
as
I
think
about
how
we
move
forward,
I
I
don't
feel
comfortable
really
moving
forward
with
any
of
these
drafts,
just
because
a
we
haven't
had
enough
time
with
them
to
really
understand
what
all
these
changes
are
and
be.
I
feel
like
we
don't
have
like
for
me.
B
It
would
be
helpful
to
have
just
a
baseline
map
just
purely
based
on
population
without
any
other
considerations,
and
I
was
hoping
that
would
be
an
option
for
me
for
us
as
well
today,
so
I'm
struggling
a
little
bit
with
how
we
can
be
productive
with
with
the
rest
of
the
time
that
we
have
together
today
and
whether
it
makes
sense
just
to
offer
our
comments
and
suggestions
to
redistricting
partners
and
request
updates
to
these
maps.
Based
on
our
concerns
and
comments.
E
Yeah,
it
is
no,
I
I
mean
I
agree
with
you
100
I
mean,
I
think,
the
closest
thing,
if
we're
going
to
use
something
as
a
launching
off
point
for
the
next
round
of
revisions.
Maybe
you
use
something
like
c,
but
even
that
you
know,
like
you
said,
we
haven't
had
a
lot
of
time
to
study
it.
It's
just
a
minimal
change.
B
F
D
Yeah,
thank
you
thanks.
I
appreciate
your
comments.
Chris,
I
think
what
we've
been
saying
is
not
necessarily
go
back
to
the
drawing
board,
but
it
would
be
helpful
if,
as
a
baseline,
you
have
the
current
districts,
but
then,
as
one
of
my
fellow
commissioners
had
suggested,
adjust
by
population
numbers,
because
we
do
recognize
that
they
have
to
be
more
or
less
similar
in
size,
and
we
did
see
quite
a
few
discrepancies
based
on
the
latest
census
data.
B
F
O
O
In
the
past
couple
months,
vivo
staff
has
conducted
many
community
outreaches
via
many
media
forums,
including
printed
material,
radio
and
social
media,
especially,
we
have
organized
four
webinars
meetings
that
attract
the
total.
More
than
hundred
participants
in
total,
the
topic
of
redistricting
is
important.
O
First,
the
good
news
is
the
great
majority
of
the
community.
Point
of
interest
was
well
within
the
existing
boundary
of
san
jose
district
4,
7
and
8,
so
they
do
not
face
any
threat
of
being
cut
off
or
left
out.
The
community
members
have
identified
several
locations.
Most
of
them
are
industries,
seven
and
districts.
Eight
and
four
and
seven
four.
The
big
boundaries
are
in
the
north
or
story
road,
where
the
little
saigon
is
on.
The
west
is
monterey.
O
O
So
the
members
of
media
also
raised
one
interested
issue.
They
would
like
the
commission
to
withdraw
the
boundary
in
such
a
way
that
will
include
more
vietnamese
american
vote
voters
so
that
in
the
future
we
will
be
able
to
elect
a
vietnamese
american
into
the
councilman,
which
is
with
now
we
have
100
000
members.
We
will
have
any
accounts
represented
there.
O
H
Thank
you,
members
of
the
commission.
You
know,
I
think,
the
the
the
comments
from
the
commission.
I
I
I
would.
I
definitely
agree
with
right
now
the
the
kind
of
drastic
cuts
that
we're
seeing
in
an
effort
to
well
it's
certainly
it's
it's
a
it's
important
to
try
to
look
to.
How
do
we
increase
the
number
of
minority
or
majority
minority
districts,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
remember
you
know
in
the
city,
you
know
with
current
lines
and
the
2020
census.
H
We
had
the
the
two
majority
minority
asian
districts
in
the
one
majority
minority
hispanic
district,
but
we
also
had
you
know:
districts
like
district
seven,
where
you
had
two
strong
pluralities.
Well,
you
had
basically
a
you
know
within
one
one
percentage
point
difference
between
hispanic
and
non-hispanic
asian
in
terms
of
what
is
it
like,
a
44
and
43
percent
split,
and
so
you
know,
while
not
a
pure
majority
minority
district
you
had
in
that
district.
H
H
P
J
Okay,
I
strongly
suggest
that
we
avoid
the
lettering
on
the
other
maps
that
are
going
to
be
dressed
and
just
use.
The
district
numbers
that'll
make
it
so
much
easier
than
trying
to
then
to
have
all
these
different
letters
for
different
for
each
of
the
different
maps.
Just
use
the
numbers,
our
district
members,
so
we
can
see
where
they
lay.
I
think
that
would
help
me
for
me.
G
G
A
B
All
right,
thank
you
and
we
had
a
motion
pending.
I
will
not
do
commissioner
diddles
and
suggestion
justice,
but
essentially
it
would
be
for
redistricting
partners
to
take
our
comments
and
suggestions
today
to
provide
us
with
revised
draft
maps
that
refer
to
districts
by
number
and
are
accessible
through
redistricter
and
paper
form
by
next
tuesday.
G
A
B
B
Okay,
moving
on
to
item
eight
public
comment:
open
forum:
this
is
the
time
for
public
comment
on
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
The
brown
act
prohibits
the
commission
from
discussing
any
item
that
is
not
agendized.
Each
speaker
will
be
given
two
minutes
and
the
clerk.
Please
call
on
any
speakers.
M
Hi,
this
is
gabriela
garcon
gupta
again,
I'm
with
the
asian
law
alliance.
I
just
wanted
to
again
reiterate
the
need
to
make
this
a
public
process
so
again,
I'm
just
making
sure
that
we
do
get
those
dates
on
the
website
for
when
this
draft
map
is
happening-
and
I
think
also
just
another
thing
I
didn't
mention
earlier-
was
just
an
explanation
of
the
census
data.
M
A
F
P
Hi
thanks
for
the
meeting
tonight,
thanks
for
your
work,
blair
beekman
here,
thanks
for
your
work
on,
you
know
we're
trying
to
practice
our
good
democracy
at
this
time.
I
attend
city
charter
meetings,
sometimes-
and
you
know,
they're
they're-
we're
all
aware
that
they've
they've
shifted
the
the
mayor
election
to
2024.
P
P
How
can
they
be
a
part
of
the
in
the
future
and
that's
an
interesting
concept
to
consider-
and
I
just
wanted
to
remind
yourselves
that
the
good
practices
that
democracy
were
working
towards
and
and
it's
hopeful
and
in
these
difficult
times,
you
know,
there's
something
there
are
things
that
are
hopeful
that
we
can
work
towards.
You
know
my
work
with
accountability
with
technology
that
can
very
much
ask
our
local
governments
to
address
technology
issues
openly
with
their
community.
P
So
so
it's
a
combination
of
things
that
I
think
we're
actually
going
to
be
building
a
future
country,
a
better
oversight
with
with
community
involvement
and
that's
an
interesting,
interesting
concept,
and
it's
these
redistricting
ideas
and
how
we
practice
election
ideas
that
will
lead
the
way
to
do
that.
So
thank
you
for
your
efforts
and
good
luck
in
the
work
of
equity
and
reimagine
thanks
a
lot.
F
Before
I
go
to
the
next
speaker,
I
just
want
to
note
that
any
recommendations
suggested
by
the
charter
review
commission
are
not
implemented
and
they
will
be
going
to
council.
I
don't
want
people
to
get
the
impression
that
the
mayoral
election
has
moved.
It
has
not.
It
needs
to
go
to
council,
I'm
jeffrey
buchanan.
H
H
H
I
think
there
was
a
number
of
aiming
to
get
to
17.1
and
then
some
numbers
mentioned
for
the
different
maps
it
might
help
to
just
have
for
for
the
future
iterations
of
the
maps,
the
sums
of
those
deviations
and
it'd
be
great
if
if
there
was
some
way
to
get
pointed
to
how
how
one
actually
adds
up
the
positive,
the
negatives
to
get
to
the
numbers
that
were
referenced,
maybe
I'm
just
missing
something
there.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
the
next
item,
nine
meeting
schedule
and
agenda
items.
The
next
meeting
will
be
next
thursday
october
14
2021
at
seven
o'clock
p.m.
By
zoom
again,
and
before
we
adjourn,
I
just
wanted
to
seek
input
from
the
commissioners.
If
there
were
any
items
that
you
would
like
to
add
to
or
wish
to
see
on
the
agenda
for
next
week's
session.