►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of June 16, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=857490&GUID=5B2F42FE-B50C-4074-A47F-B8C8FA69E371
A
B
A
A
C
A
Davis
here
corrales
here
jones
president
and
I
did
know,
I
will
like
to
note
that
uranus
will
be
gone
for
the
entire
meeting.
D
B
And
before
we
start
the
meeting
lee,
I
believe
you
want
to
make
a
statement
about
the
gun,
gun,
harm
reduction,
memo.
C
Yes,
vice
mayor,
thank
you
very
much
lee
wilcox
deputy
city
manager.
So,
yes,
I
do
need
to
read
something
so
to
the
rules
committee,
members
and
members
of
the
public
item
g2
on
today's
agenda,
which
is
reducing
the
gun,
harm
and
public
burdens
of
gun.
Violence
needs
to
be
referred
directly
to
the
city
council
for
june
29th.
C
B
A
B
Okay,
thank
you
tony,
and
the
just
make
note
that
this
meeting
starts.
The
regular
session
starts
at
11
a.m.
A
A
Part
of
the
reason
is
that,
because
of
the
city,
manager's
retirement,
you
have
to
take
up
appointing
and
acting,
and
so
that's
agendized
on
the
closed
session
for
next
week.
Okay,.
B
A
B
I'll,
let
the
maker
motion
make
that
okay,
okay,
so
five
and
six
seven
and
eight.
B
B
C
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
A
I'm
council,
member
or
chair
vice
mayor
jones.
Sorry
it
was
a
long
night.
As
you
know,
the
version
you're
looking
at
has
more
pages
than
the
version
I
shared.
Oh.
B
A
In
so
we
have
items
from
the
mayor
for
city
auditor,
independent
police,
auditor,
city
attorney,
city
clerk
and
then
items
from
the
city
manager's
office,
okay,.
C
Vice
mayor
also
just
for
the
rules
committee's
information
we've
gone
through
and
made
sure
anything
that
can
be
deferred
off
until
august
is
deferred.
We've
moved
things
to
june
29th
where
appropriate,
but
it
is
a
very
full
agenda
with
a
lot
of
different
items.
So
we
are
recommending
and
asking
the
city
clerk
to
notify
the
mayor
and
the
council
to
keep
wednesday
morning
the
23rd
open
for
a
possible
overage
on
the
curfew.
B
A
D
E
All
right
yeah,
I
guess
your
public
comment
is
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
So
basically,
I'm
just
making
public
comment
about
the
rules.
Blair
beekman
called
me
to
say
that
there
was
information
that
we're
going
to
be
addressing
about
our
transportation
management
and
one
of
the
issues.
The
two
issues
that
concern
me
are
the
issue
of
not
supporting
working
at
home
and
that
that
has
been
something
that
mayor
licardo
has
fought.
E
The
metropolitan
transportation
commission's
recommendation
that
the
way
we
reduce
our
greenhouse
gases,
the
you
know,
60
percent,
that
we
were.
You
know
that
they
could
figure
out
in
the
ways
you
know,
as
they
did
the
science
and
figured
out
the
science
of
what
we
need
to
do.
They
said
this
is
what
we
need
to
do.
We
need
to
work
at
home
and
we
need
to
have
our
big
companies.
Do
that
and
you
know
mayor
le
cardo
fought
it
and-
and
I
guess
it
got
changed
and
that's
really
a
real
travesty.
E
A
real,
horrific
decision
that
we're
making
as
we
are
facing
the
abyss
is
what
the
head
of
the
the
un
is
saying.
Our
antonio
guterres,
we
are
facing
the
abyss
and
the
steps
that
we
make
right
now
are
so
critical.
E
Either
we
go
into
the
abyss
or
or
not,
and
so
when
we
we
need
to
be
working
at
home,
and
anybody
of
us
that
can
should
be-
and
this
this
needs
to
be
changed
immediately
as
we
go
forward
that
there's
that
that
is
the
way
we
can
reduce
our
greenhouse
gases,
and
we
have
to
do
that
as
soon
as
possible,
and
you
know
it's
never
too
soon,
and
so
that's
one
issue
and
then
the
other
issue
is
that
you
know
in
terms
of
transportation
management
we
need
to
be
building
without
car
infrastructure
and
that
that
needs
to
go
forward
that
we
need
to
be
not
building
for
cars.
F
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
paul,
soto
and
good
afternoon
to
to
you,
tessa
and
blair.
I
didn't
understand
anything
that
that
lee
just
articulated,
that
is
a
foreign
language
to
me,
and
it's
very
frustrating.
As
a
citizen,
there
is
no
big
use
in
little
me's
in
this
city.
There
is
that
doesn't
exist.
F
F
B
Thank
you
paul
go
ahead,
blair.
G
All
right,
thank
you,
blair,
beakman,
here
to
speak
to
item
2.19
and
the
udon
station
integrated
planning.
We
all
need
to
learn
to
be
really
really
clear
that
the
chsr
can
and
will
be
built
in
the
next
10
years
from
la
to
merced,
to
stockton
to
sacramento,
as
these
are
the
ideas
of
great
of
green
sustainability,
with
long
distance
travel
and
some
of
the
initial
ideas
of
chsr.
G
I
hope
you
can
work
towards
the
future
of
community
sustainability
and
local
democracy
and
ideas
of
peace,
not
war
with
ideas
of
open
public
policy
with
the
future
of
digital
divide
issues
and
finally,
with
police
items.
Four
point
one:
two
and
three:
I
hope
the
new
the
peer
review
program
seem
how
much
time
I
have
here.
I
have
36
seconds.
I
hope
the
peer
review
program
can
grow.
Let
me
see,
I
hope
the
peer
review
program
can
grow
into
some
of
its
initial
good
purposes
with
internal
investigations.
G
I
hope
the
ideas
of
reimagine
means
that
we
can
offer
a
0.25
decrease
in
recent
police
wage
increases
and
a
0.2
0.25
percent
increase
for
city
workers.
I
hope
you
can
consider
that
that
sort
of
mediation
and
please
consider
I'll
talk
about
flea
market
stuff
later.
Thank
you.
H
Clear
wonderful,
first
time,
I've
ever
done
this,
so
please
be
with
me:
I'm
a
father
of
two
and
avid
citizen
here
looking
to
participate
in
the
democratic
process,
I'm
particularly
interested
in
motion
r
d,
21,
21-16
or
616
regarding
gun
violence,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
was
discussed.
Yet
I
did
have
some
comments.
I'm
taking
time
out
of
work
to
participate.
H
B
And
I'm
sorry
david!
Yes,
so
we're
not
discussing
the
gun,
harm
reduction
on
in
this
meeting
because
it's
been
deferred
to
council.
H
A
Other
vice
mayor,
this
is
nora.
Maybe
you
can
explain
to
him
that
at
the
end,
if
he
on
open
forum,
if
he
wants
to
not
talk
about
that
specific
item
but
talk
about
guns
generally,
he
can
do
that.
Then.
B
B
Okay,
I
don't
see
any
other
members
of
the
public,
so
I'm
going
to
bring
it
up
david.
I
see
you
have
your
hand
raised
again.
Is
it
specific
to
the
agenda.
B
Yes,
so
you
can
make
comments,
but
you
have
to
wait
till
the
end
of
the
meeting.
It
has
to
be.
A
Mayor,
do
you
want
me
to
explain
again,
do
you
care,
but
I
I
could
explain
again
why
we
can't
have
the
discussion
on
that
particular
item.
If
you
would
like
give
it
another
shot:
norah,
okay,
we
we
announced
at
the
beginning
mr
wilcox,
announced
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting
that
there
was
a
a
problem
with
the
memo,
because
too
many
members
of
the
rules
committee
had
signed
it,
and
so
we
aren't
under
state
law.
A
We
aren't
allowed
to
discuss
it
in
this
meeting
and
we
aren't
allowed
to
have
a
public
hearing
on
it,
so
it
is
automatically
going
to
the
council
for
a
full
hearing
on
the
29th.
I
believe
we
said
so
that
was
the
announcement
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting
and
that's
the
reason
why
our
council
members
aren't
able
to
have
a
have
the
discussion
under
state
law
they're
not
allowed
to.
So
that's
that
he
wasn't
trying
to
shut
you
down,
nobody's
trying
to
shut
you
down.
We
just
aren't
allowed
to
have
that
discussion.
B
Thank
you
norah.
You
articulated
that
much
better
than
I
did
so
we're
gonna
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
and
councilmember
cohen,.
I
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
would
like
to
ask
for
a
time
I'm
not
really
time
certain
but
a
time
item,
a
time
specific
item
to
put
item
10.3,
not
before
7
pm
for
for
the
meeting
next
week,
and
and
with
that,
I
would
move
the
agenda
with
closed
session
at
8.
30
item
8.2
deferred
to
june
29th,
item
10.3,
not
before
7
o'clock
and
the
ad
sheet.
A
B
I
B
J
Yeah,
thank
you
and
thank
you
norah
for
providing
the
explanation,
especially
for
an
individual,
their
their
first
time
participating.
Our
processes
are
not
very
intuitive,
and
certainly
the
languages
is
not
always
intuitive
and
just
to
make
it
clear
because
in
case
I
don't
know,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
interpreting
this
correctly.
But
this
this
message
is
for
paul
soto.
J
I
believe
you
may
have
interpreted
incorrectly
what
I
was
trying
to
do
last
night,
because
I
would
agree
with
you
that
what
what
you
said
today
and
what
you
said
last
night
and
that's
was
my
intent
last
night-
was
to
try
and
help
get
some
clarification.
There
was
no
intent
on
on
making
anybody
feel
as
though
they
were
ignorant
on
something,
because
I
agreed
with
you
the
term
vacation
last
night
is
not
intuitive
and
and
then
as
well.
J
Today,
I
would
agree
that
it's
not
intuitive,
why
we
can't
talk
about
item
g2,
which
is
on
the
agenda,
they're,
reducing
gun
harm,
and
so
thank
you
norah
for
for
specifying
that
I'll
make
it
even
a
little
bit
more
clear,
myself,
council,
member
cohen
and
vice
mayor
jones
are
all
signatories
we're
all
you
know,
people
that
signed
that
item
g2
along
with
councilmember
carrasco
and
le
cardo,
but
unfortunately,
because
there
are
three
of
us
that
also
sit
on
this
committee,
that
that
makes
a
majority
of
this
committee
of
of
five
individuals
and
based
on
that,
we
are
not
allowed
to
talk
about
it
in
this
committee.
J
That
would
be
the
same
thing
with
any
committee.
If
there
were
three
or
more
people
on
a
particular
memo
or
or
had
already
given
their
direction
on
a
policy
item,
that
committee
would
not
be
able
to
talk
about
that
item,
and
unfortunately,
that
happens
here
at
rules
occasionally,
and
so
because
of
that
we
have
to
simply
direct
the
item
straight
to
the
full
council.
That's
the
way
to
remedy
it.
J
So
it's
still,
you
know
our
community
members
for
those
that
came
here
to
speak
on
that
item
like
like
david,
you
still
get
an
opportunity
to
speak
up
on
that
next
tuesday,
but
you
also,
as
our
our
chair,
said
here
of
ours,
mary
jones,
you
can
speak
at
public
forum.
It
just
happens
to
be
that's
at
the
end
of
the
the
day
today,
which
actually
shouldn't
be
too
long
now,
currently
we're
just
on
the
the
agenda
for
next
tuesday,
which
is
the
item
that
we're
taking
public
comment
on.
J
So
all
of
that
is
not
intuitive,
especially
if
you're
on
your
first
meeting,
and
so
thank
you
for
nora,
for
the
explanation
and
and
as
well
to
our
community
members
for
your
understanding
and
patience.
There's
no
intent
to
try
and
you
know,
mute
people
or
shut
people
up
or
or
not.
You
know
invite
participation.
J
There
are
rules
that
we
that
we
have
to
follow
as
well,
and
I
agree
we
could
do
a
better
job
of
explaining
them
and
so
for
that,
hopefully,
that
that
explanation
helped
a
little
bit
and
hopefully
we'll
hear
you.
You
would
public
comment
and
as
well
with
with
mr
soto
as
well
public
comment
so
on
the
the
item
for
the
agenda
for
the
22nd.
J
J
I
I
am
nervous
about
the
not
to
be
heard
before
language,
and
I
know
we
have
a
time
certain
already
with
one
item
the
reimagining
community
safety.
I
believe
it's
at
6
30.
Is
that
correct?
That
is
correct.
J
So
I
I
I
guess
what
I
would
ask
and
who
knows
how
long
we're
gonna
go.
But
if,
if
that's
the
case,
I
would
like
for
just
the
item
10.3
and
10.4,
to
just
be
heard.
You
know
immediately
after
that
item,
because
otherwise
we
could
here,
if
it's
not
before
seven
we're
going
to
hear
it.
You
know,
god
knows
how
late
so
that
that
would
be
an
only
ask.
D
I
A
B
B
Okay,
I
have
a
quite
a
couple
of
questions.
One
is,
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
representative
from
the
property
owner,
but
I
know
that
there
was
a
letter
issued
by
the
small
business
advisory
task
force,
requesting
that
the
vendors
can
get
90
days
to
have
a
dialogue
and
discussion
with
the
property
owner
to
address
some
outstanding
issues,
and
I
have
a
strong
desire
to
see
that
that
conversation
dialogue
continues.
So
I
don't
know
if
it
was.
B
B
A
B
Know
that
dennis
king,
who
is
part
of
the
task
force,
also
wants
to
provide
input,
so
dennis
go
ahead.
E
L
So
pardon
me,
my
name
is
dennis
king
from
the
hispanic
chamber
of
commerce,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
from
the
san
jose
small
business
advisory
task
force.
First
of
all,
I
wanted
to
express
our
appreciation
to
the
the
bum
family
for
its
wonderful
legacy
of
the
barista
flea
market.
We
also
want
to
thank
cohen
david
cohen,
has
been
trying
to
find
common
ground
in
this
conflict.
L
L
L
B
B
Can
we
allow
eric
an
opportunity
to
talk,
go
ahead
eric.
M
Good
afternoon
vice
mayor
jones,
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
eric
schnauer.
I
represent
the
property
owner
and
development.
First
of
all,
dennis.
M
Has
had
no
involvement
in
the
process
for
many
years,
so
he
hasn't
participated
in
the
many
many
meetings
that
we've
had
with
the
vendors
with
the
community.
This
is
an
urban
village
planning
process
you,
the
city,
did
extensive
community
workshops
with
the
nearby
community
and
we,
the
owners,
have
met
directly
with
the
vendors.
M
M
The
reason
that
delay
is
problematic
is
that
we
for
a
year
have
been
planning
to
submit
our
application
for
an
infill
infrastructure
grant
from
the
state
of
california
that
could
bring
upwards
of
30
million
dollars
to
the
site
to
facilitate
infrastructure
that
will
result
in
the
construction
of
affordable
housing
units.
Our
plan
is
to
build
all
of
the
required
affordable
housing
units
on
the
site
instead
of
just
paying
in
lieu
fees
and
have
affordable
units
integrated
into
the
new
neighborhood
to
create
a
mixed
income.
M
B
So
eric
come
back,
I
have
more
questions
for
you
and,
and
one
question
is:
is:
is
it
only
the
grant,
that's
the
critical
timeline?
M
Well,
the
grant
is
the
most
defined
timeline.
M
The
other
is
that
you
know
we're
looking
for
a
development
partner
and
now
is
the
best
time
to
do
it
because,
as
we
come
out
of
the
pandemic,
there
are
a
lot
of
investment
dollars
ready
to
connect
with
development
projects,
and
we
don't
want
to
be
on
the
sideline
in
this
time
where
money
is
looking
to
invest
in
cities
like
san
jose.
M
So
we
would
oppose.
We
would
oppose
that.
For
that
reason
as
well-
and
we
don't
know
what
else
we
can
do
and
we've
had,
we
and
councilmember
cohen's
office
has
have
extensive
dialogue
with
the
vendor
advocates
and
we
don't
have
any
more
money
to
give.
So
you
know,
we've
offered
up
2.5
million
dollars,
we're
not
required
to
give
anything.
M
We've
offered
up
advanced
notification,
we've
offered
to
participate
in
the
flea
market
advisory
group
to
work
towards
all
these
solutions
and,
as
I've
already
said,
we've
endowed
the
the
vendor
business
support
fund.
M
So
we
don't
know
what
else
we
would
do,
even
if
there
were
more
weeks
to
talk
about
it,
because
we
don't
I
mean
we're-
not
google
we're
not
the
sixth
wealthiest
company
on
earth.
We
can't
just
give
endless
money.
B
B
Land,
okay,
that
that's
all
the
questions
I
have
for
you
eric,
thank
you
and
I
see
other
members
of
the
public
have
raised
their
hands
dennis
and
eric
were
addressing
specific
questions
that
I
had
so
we're.
Not
we
didn't
open
it
back
up
for
for
public
comments,
that's
closed,
but
I
can
ask
members
of
the
public
specific
questions
and
they
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
on
that
it
and
raul
and
nora.
Did
I
state
that
okay
or
just
checking
in
all
right
so
bring
it
back
to
council?
I
Oh,
my
my
okay,
my
let
me
just
say
first
of
all
to
the
to
your
to
your
last
question.
Vice
mayor
about
the
conditions
of
approval,
the
the
the
staff
memo
and
the
memo
coming
out
from
our
office
tomorrow
or
by
the
end
of
the
week,
will
have
a
very
detailed
list
of
conditions
for
development
and
that
list
of
conditions
will
include
the
response.
I
The
the
solutions
that
address
each
of
the
five
specific
demands
that
the
vendors
had
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
that
we've
worked
with
them
and
and
discussed
solutions
about,
and
so,
though,
you'll
see
that
that
those
are
very
specific
and
the
I
there
will
be
opportunities
for
the
council
to
weigh
in
in
the
future
on
the
specifics
of
some
of
the
arrangements
such
as
how
the
market,
how
the
flint
fund
will
be
structured,
how
the
market
will
be
built.
I
The
the
purpose
of
this
zoning
meeting
in
the
or
the
zoning
change
next
week
is
to
meet
the
requirements,
conditions
that
were
put
on
the
property
owners
back
in
2016
by
this
council,
which
I
know
that
a
couple
of
you
were
there,
and
I
appreciated
that
because
I
was
advocating,
on
behalf
of
the
school
district
at
the
time
for
some
property
rezoning.
That
was
part
of
that
answer.
But
we.
I
There
was
no
request
at
the
time
from
the
council
to
address
the
displacement
of
the
vendors,
which
was
unfortunate,
but
at
the
beginning
of
this
year,
when
I
I
came
into
office,
I
began
to
stress
the
importance
of
figuring
out
how
to
prevent
the
displacement
and
retain
a
flea
market
on
site,
and
so
we've
now
gotten
a
voluntary
agreement
from
the
property
owners
to
add
to
what
they're
coming
to
council
for
the
upzoning.
I
I
The
conditions
that
are
coming
forward,
we'll
also
we'll
definitely
we'll
be
including,
and
we're
not
going
to
get.
I
want
to
get
into
all
the
details
now,
unless
you
would
like
to
ask
about
them
all,
but
one
of
the
conditions
is
at
least
a
couple
years
be
before
a
one-year
notice
would
be
given
to
the
vendors
of
any
change
to
the
current
configuration
of
the
market.
I
So
there
will
be
lots
of
time
for
that
parallel
process
to
occur
as
far
as
what
the
new
market
will
look
like
and
how
relief
funds
can
be
allocated
in
order
to
provide
resources
to
the
to
the
vendors.
So
this
is
really
just
a
vote
at
the
council
meeting
next
week
to
cross
the
starting
line
of
which
then,
which
will
then
enable
the
vendors
to
become
part
of
an
organization
that
will
bring
it
to
the
finish
line
down
several
years
down
the
road.
B
B
Representatives
from
the
vendors
roberto
since
roberto
I'm
going
to
ask
you,
allow
you
to
speak,
and
so
I'm
going
to
ask
you
why
you
feel
the
vendors
need
90
days
to
work
out
to
work
through
some
of
these
issues.
L
All
right,
thank
you.
Everyone
on
the
committee,
david
cohen,
laura.
We
appreciate
you
know
giving
us
the
floor
here.
The
reason
we're
asking
for
a
90-day
notice
is
because
these
plans
have
been
you
know
in
action
for
20
years
and
not
until
I
want
to
say
the
last
three
months.
Maybe
two
months
is
when
we've
had
the
city
actually
get
involved
and
step
in,
and
you
know
ask
for
more
from
the
property
owner
in
the
plans
from
the
get-go.
L
There
was
no
mention
of
the
flea
market,
no
mention
of
the
vendors
no
plan
for
us.
So
that's
why
we
started
this
advocacy.
We
started
raising
our
voices
and,
if
that
had
really
truly
been
planned
out,
like
dennis
king
said
you
know,
taking
the
example
of
google,
we
wouldn't
be
here,
fighting
so
hard.
You
know
with
tooth
and
nail
to
save
our
businesses,
our
small
businesses
save
our
livelihoods,
there's
thousands
of
families
that
will
be
impacted
by
these
plans
and
there's
no
one
that
will
be
more
impacted
than
the
vendors
ourselves.
L
That's
why
we're
asking
for
the
90-day
deferral
so
that
we
could
all
sit
down
and
negotiate
a
win-win-win
situation
for
all
of
us.
I
mean
I
do
want
to
thank
council,
member
cohen
and
council
member
perales
for
moving
the
needle
forward
and
we're
going
in
the
right
steps,
but
it's
still
just
not
enough.
There
has
been
numerous
times
on
council's
past
that
promises
and
words
were
said
and
look
where
we
are
now
we're
still
in
the
same
position.
You
know
what
and
to
go
back
to
eric's
point
of
2.5
million.
L
If
we
divvy
that
up
between
the
vendors
that
are
here,
which
I
strongly
believe
is
more
than
450
vendors,
it
would
be
roughly
4
000
per
vendor,
which
would
not
be
enough
to
supplement
us
for
not
even
a
six-month
business
interruption
and
put
the
livelihoods
of
so
many
families
at
at
the
line
that
are
also
residents
of
san
jose
that
will
possibly
even
displace
them
from
their
homes.
You
know,
so
we
do
need
that
time
and
we
ask
for
that
fan.
B
Thank
you
roberto.
Now,
I'm
going
to
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
again
councilmember
braless.
J
Thank
you
chair,
and
I
know
you
you.
You
tried
to
describe
kind
of
why.
Maybe
public
comment
had
closed
on
this
item?
I
see
all
the
hands
still
up.
I
don't
think
people
understood
exactly
what
the
the
how
the
rules
work
there
as
well
and
so
I'll
try
to
explain
that
and
then
I'm
actually
going
to
ask
you
to
make
an
exception.
J
If
you
would,
it
is
at
the
chair's
discretion
so
just
for
for
everybody
that
is
participating,
we
we
we
take
the
public
comment
on
items
and
then
we
ended
up
closing
that
and
then
we
start
discussing
it
as
council
members,
and
we
were
actually
just
about
ready
to
take
a
vote
and
then,
as
our
chair
and
asked
a
couple
questions
of
the
representative
of
the
developers
here,
a
bunch
of
hands
went
up
and
I
obviously
recognize
the
number
of
these
hands
like
roberto
as
representatives
of
the
flea
market,
and
so
I
I
am
going
to
guess
that
maybe
you
just
showed
up
a
little
late
to
the
meeting
and
I
don't
want
to
to
exclude
your
voice
today,
and
I
will
have
some
comments
so
vice
mayor,
I
will
re-raise
my
hand
after
this.
J
If
you
don't
mind
kind
of
returning
the
the
floor
back
to
me
if
I
could,
but
I
I
I'd
like
to
ask
if
you
to
make
an
exception
to
allow,
I
think
it
is
five
other
individuals
that
have
not
spoken
yet
and
if
we
could
allow
them
the
two
minutes
each
to
to
speak
on
this
item.
B
And
councilmember
there's
eight
hands
raised.
Do
you.
J
B
J
Thank
you
and
if
you
don't
mind
vice
mayor,
I
can
translate
that.
Thank
you.
So
I
I
grabbed
my
notepad
quick
so
and
I
apologize
as
I
was
grabbing
my
notepad.
I
missed
her
name,
but
she's
been
a
vendor
for
33
years
at
the
flea
market.
She
doesn't
have
any
other
job.
J
This
is
how
she
makes
her
her
livelihood
is,
is
off
of
being
a
vendor
at
the
flea
market,
and
the
most
important
aspect
for
her
is
to
be
able
she's
asking
as
well
for
more
time
to
be
able
to
to
save
her
job.
That's
that's!
That's
the
most
important
thing
for
her.
K
Hello,
can
you
hear
me
now
I'm
clear?
Thank
you
very
much
brother
council
and
the
reason
why
I'm
raising
my
hand
is
because
I
believe
that
the
city
council
boat
is
being
kind
of
rushed.
You
know,
there's
still
very
little
information
about
the
impacts
of
the
decision.
They'll
have
for
the
protections
of
the
vendors
and
thousands
of
workers
or
jobs
that
are
involved
on
the
everyday
activities,
and
there
is
this
is
the
the
income
that
we
have.
K
We
have
had
for
over
30
years
working
here
at
the
flea
market,
and
now
this
is
being
just
rushed.
You
know
for
interest,
you
know
that
the
interest
that
anybody
can
can
have-
and
we
have
not
seen
any
research.
K
You
know
that
that
it
will
have
the
conclusion
that
the
two
million
dollars
or
two
and
a
half
million
dollar
aid-
it's
is
being
sufficient,
you
know,
and
and
and
the
delay
it's
gonna
just
give
us
the
opportunity
to
have
a
win-win
situation
at
this
point,
so
you
have
a
better
informed
vote
that
it
will
benefit
all
the
parties,
not
just
one
two
parties.
You
know
all
of
them.
K
B
Thank
you
next
speaker
is
maria.
D
D
B
B
N
Hi,
my
name
is
mariana.
I
am
the
vice
president
of
the
of
the
various
flea
market,
banners
association.
I
I
had
my
whole
script,
but
I
I
was
just
hearing
eric
talk
and
he
was
saying
that
we
have
been
we've
been
talking
with
vendors.
This
plan
is
going
for
20
years
and
it
benefits
him
now
because
there
are
developers
going
on
this
moment,
but
the
vendors
are
not
going
to
benefit
from
that.
You
want
to
displace
banners
during
this
pandemic,
where
many
of
them
were
not
we're
jobless.
N
Many
of
them
don't
get
money
at
the
ver
at
the
end
of
the
month.
Like
everybody
does
in
this
meeting,
there's
we
we
want
to
delay
because
we
need
the
time
to
have
a
win-win
situation.
Like
roberto
was
saying
we
we
talk
about
pictures
in
the
wall,
where
we
don't
realize
that
at
this
moment
at
this
place,
there's
people
in
a
flea
market.
It's
not
an
empty
stand,
it's
actually
people
that
are
depending
on
the
flea
market.
Right
now,.
N
To
represent
me
right
now
to
delay
the
vote,
so
vendors
could
have
more
time
and
and
just
being
a
table
if
you're
not
in
the
table
you're
in
the
menu
and
that's
where
we
are
right
now
we're
not
in
the
menu
we're
not
being
heard.
Yes,
we
had
meetings,
but
in
those
meetings
vendors
were
not
hurt
and
the
information
was
not
given
correctly
and
that's
why
we
needed
delay.
We
we
know
that
we
cannot
get
a
win-win
solution
and
we're
not
going
to
get
everything
that
we
want.
And
that's
we
understand
that.
N
But
at
least
we
can
open
a
conversation
to
your
office
and
the
flea
market,
so
we
could
get
to
the
right
place
and
not
displace
flea
market
vendors.
Well,
not
displaced
families
like
let's,
let's
take
the
planning
out
of
it.
There's
families
right
there
who
depend
on
it
with
kids
who
pick
colleges
every
it's
it's
more
time
than
just
apartments.
It's
it's
actually
people
in
there.
N
So
please
recommend
delay
the
bone.
It's
it's!
If
it's
it's
just
90
days
when
asking
for
years,
and
it's
just
to
be
in
the
table
to
be
something-
that's
been
for
20
years.
D
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
victor
vazquez.
I
work
at
somos
mayfair,
and
I'm
also
here
in
support
of
what
these
families
have
are
asking
for
a
90-day
referral
to
make
sure
that
over
400,
plus
vendors
or
they're
really
family
businesses.
Small
family
businesses
represent
families
and
children.
I
would
say:
1200
people
should
be
heard
and
that
over
the
three
to
five
years,
probably
more,
we
work
tirelessly
to
address
anti-displacement
for
tenants
for
business
owners,
and
this
commitment
is
based
on.
D
D
And
so
I,
like
the
vendors
and
the
families,
have
said
they're
not
asking
for
a
special
favor
they're
asking
for
time,
because
they
generated
a
lot
of
wealth
for
this
community
for
san
jose.
It's
put
folks
on
the
map
and
so
they're
asking
for
time,
and
I
think
we
support
that,
and
we
saw
what
happens
with
fat
small
family
businesses
in
the
alumni
quarter
when
they
had
to
shut
down
due
to
transportation
and
development
and
how
many
latino
businesses
close
down
that
time.
D
B
Thank
you
paul
already
spoke
on
this
item.
Christopher
is
next
up.
G
H
My
apologies,
hello,
council
members.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
I
I
actually
wasn't.
I
did
not
have
my
hand
up.
At
least
I
didn't
think
I
did
I
was
I
was
listening
and
but
nonetheless
I'll
I
will
speak.
H
H
We
need
more
time
to
be
able
to
figure
out
what
all
this
means
for
the
vendors
there's
been,
as
already
mentioned,
15
plus
years
of
studies
and
plans
for
the
other
people
that
the
city
wants
to
accommodate
on
the
site,
but
scarce
attention
given
to
the
people
that
will
be
directly
impacted.
The
people
that
are
already
on
this
site,
and
so
just
a
few
weeks,
is
not
sufficient
to
be
able
to
do
the
kind
of
planning
and
analysis
and
consensus
building
that
is
necessary
and
trust
building.
H
H
Well,
you
have
to
take
a
step
back
in
order
to
move
forward
together.
Part
of
what's
going
on
here
is
the
trust
issue.
The
city
had
previously
said
in
2007
that
it
would
work
with
the
vendors
and
the
owners
to
find
the
relocation
option
and
the
vendors
were
left
to
the
side.
Now
here
we
are
13
years
later
and
we're
just
barely
starting
to
figure
out
the
the
situation.
I
ask
for
a
90-day
referral.
H
It's
not
asking
too
much
in
my
opinion,
so
that
we
can
all
come
up
with
a
solution
that
works
for
everybody.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
so
louise.
D
Yeah,
my
name
is
luis
and
you
know
I'm
an
abandoner
in
the
san
jose
barrier
and
I'm
just
asking
for,
like
you
know
like,
like
the
other
people
said,
we
need
more
time
because
you
know
I
used
to
work
in
a
restaurant
and
you
know
after
you
know,
before
the
pandemic,
and
you
know
all
the
you
know.
Restaurants,
I
shut
down,
and
now
you
know
I
just
have
you
know
you
know
selling
of
the
free
market.
D
If
you
know
if
the
flea
market
is
close,
so
I
don't
know
what
I'm
gonna
do
you
know
I
have
family,
happy
kids,
so
just
we're
just
asking
for
more
time
we're
not
asking
for
something
free,
we're
gonna
pay
rent
for
those
three
months.
B
Thank
you,
blair
already
spoke.
A
A
K
Thank
you
tony
thank
you.
Vice
mayor,
hello,
everyone,
castro,
working
partnerships
here
to
speak
alongside
the
vendors
and
their
supporters
in
requesting
a
nine-day
deferral
of
this
item.
This
is
an
opportunity.
K
Nine-Day
deferral
essentially
gives
an
opportunity
really
for
everyone
to
come
to
the
table
and
and
negotiate
an
agreement
and
as
well
as
that
gives
others
the
opportunity
to
conduct
a
more
robust
analysis
in
order
to
get
the
opportunity
to
really
generate
generate
a
an
accurate
value
capture
of
the
of
the
value
that
of
this
real
zoning
in
general.
K
You
know
we're
talking
about
a
whole
bunch
of
different
issues
here,
but
we're
also
discussing
the
issue
of
displacement
in
various
different
forms
and
a
big
contributor
to
that
would
be
to
eliminate
economic
opportunities
which,
which
very
much
is
one
here
for
well,
we've
been
talking
about
450
vendors,
but
I
think
recent
updates
show
that
there's
genuinely
way
more
than
that,
maybe
even
closer
to
a
thousand
vendors
actually
within
that
site,
which
actually
is
another
point,
as
the
offered
compensation
package
would
be
that
much
less
for
each
individual
vendor.
K
So
we
would,
you
know,
urge
the
committee
to
look
into
deferring
this
another
90
days
and
given
an
opportunity
for
for
folks
to
really
come
out
and
and
hammer
out
an
agreement.
Thank
you
very
much.
N
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
council.
Thank
you
for
so
much
for
having
us
here.
N
My
name
is
alma,
I'm
also
a
vendor
at
the
flea
market
and
as
well
as
my
as
my
partners,
I
would
like
to
a
90-day
referral,
because
we
basically
need
more
time
to
have
a
win-win
situation,
as
you
can
see,
or
as
you
are
knowing
now,
we
haven't
been
informed
of
the
plans
openly,
even
though
you
are
being
told
that
we
we
are
aware
of
what's
going
on
since
2007,
and
I
would
like
to
invite
you
to
go
and
visit
the
flea
market
to
see
how
many
families
will
be
affected.
N
There
is
no
need
for
a
new
plan.
There
is
no
need
in
san
jose
for
a
new
development.
You
will
see
over
there.
There
is
a
spot
where
more
than
700
families
are
making
a
living
to
stay
here
in
san
jose.
It's
true.
There
is
only
around
450
vendors,
but
they
have
some
of
them
more
of
two
spots
inside
which
means
another
person
working
in
that
spot
and
also
even
three
people.
N
So
please,
please
give
us
more
time
to
work
something
out
together
and
to
have
a
a
plan
to
help
my
my
partners,
especially
or
elders,
who
doesn't
have
any
other
opportunity
to
work
outside
the
flea
market
working
over
there
is
their
only
way
that
they
can
have
an
income
now.
So
please
guys
take
our
word
in
consideration
and-
and
please
visit
us
talk
to
us,
see
what's
going
on,
don't
stay
using
these
meetings
consoles.
N
Please
I
openly
invite
you
to
go
and
to
see
for
you
how
many
people
will
be
affected
and
the
money
is
also
coming
to
the
same
economy
to
san
jose.
It
will
be
a
huge
impact.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
amanda.
N
Okay,
perfect
hello,
my
name
is
amanda
valenzuela.
I
am
a
constituent
on
district
three
I
have
lived
in
san
jose
my
entire
life.
I
am
an
advocate
for
the
vendor
association
at
the
various
flea
market.
N
N
I
strongly
strongly
believe
that
our
city,
council,
members
and
mayor
lecardo
are
listening
and
want
to
support
the
vendors,
however,
trying
to
cast
a
vote
within
the
next
couple
of
days
without
the
vendors
being
properly
addressed
and
also
included
in
the
proposal,
I
think,
is
a
bit
rushed
so
allowing
the
90-day
referral
to
be
passed.
N
This
will
allow
the
vendors
to
be
included
in
the
proposal.
It
would
provide
economic
if
we
can
provide
economic
relief.
Allow
the
vendors
to
stay
be
promised
some
land,
but
we
also
need
this
in
writing
right.
So
if
this
can
be
all
provided
in
the
proposal,
then
we
can
have
a
win-win
situation
for
our
vendors.
We
cannot
allow
them
to
be
displaced,
they
need
to
keep
their
livelihood
and
the
barriers
of
flea
market
is
loved
by
our
community.
It's
been
there
for
60
years.
N
A
Hi
this
is
kayla,
I'm
the
treasurer
of
the
various
african
market,
vendors
association
and
I'm
also
asking
for
an
extension
of
the
proposals
so
that
we
can
further
work
on
what
is
already
being
proposed.
As
you
may
know,
we
haven't
really
worked
closely.
We
have
worked
with
them
and
we're
really
I'm
getting
error
of
this
new
plans
and
we
need
to
further
analyze
them
with
with
the
whole
vendors
and
we're
not
asking
for
any
money.
A
So
we
understand
when
eric
said,
you
know,
there's
no
more
money,
they
can
give
us,
but
we're
not
asking
for
money,
we're
asking
for
the
for,
for
our
live
users
not
to
be
taken
away
from
us,
so
we
don't
want
money.
We
want
a
spaces
so
that
our
families
can
continue
to
work
and
provide
for
us,
their
kids
and
and
for
themselves.
B
J
Raised,
thank
you
very
much
vice
mayor
for
allowing
public
comment
to
to
happen
after
we
had
closed
it.
I
appreciate
that
I
think
hearing
from
the
vendors
is
important
in
this
item
and
we
we
obviously
want
to
make
sure
that
that
they're
not
excluded
for
that
and
simply
because
maybe
missing
it
by
a
short,
a
couple
minutes,
and
so
I
wanted
to
just
read
off
the
the
quick
notes
that
I
took
for
maria
who
spoke.
I
think
it
was
maria
they
lord
of
this.
It's
up
there.
J
She
stated
she's
been
a
vendor
for
12
years.
She
also
does
not
work
anywhere
else
like
a
lot
of
people
that
work
they're,
not
just
the
vendors
themselves,
but
their
employees
that
depend
on
on
these
jobs.
She
was
stating
she
she,
you
know
doesn't
know.
What's
going
to
happen,
she
doesn't
want
to
end
up
homeless
if
she
ends
up
losing
her
job
here
and
she
just
wants
time.
J
She
wants
us
to
give
her
time
to
give
the
vendors
time
to
negotiate,
and
she
also
stated
that
the
money
that's
currently
was
being
suggested
would
only
help
for
a
couple
months
worth
of
rent,
which
would
not
be
sufficient
and
she's
saying
that
there's
thousands
of
people
that
depend
on
on
the
on
the
flea
market
and
then
she
hopes
that
they
can
have
more
time.
And
so
my
I
have
a
couple
questions,
but
I'll
start
with
just
some
comments
and
first
off.
Thank
you
to
the
vendors
and
and
councilman
cohen's
office.
J
My
office
has
been
engaged
since
late
last
year
when
there
were
a
couple,
vendors
and
then
representatives
of
vendors
that
reached
out
to
my
office
in
regards
to
concerns
that
they
had
with
not
being
able
to
to
engage
more
fully
and
as
councilmember
cohen
can
state.
J
We
we
touched
base
about
this
almost
immediately
after
his
he
won
his
his
election
and
and
I
was
able
to
to
be
able
to
keep
a
part
of
that
conversation
from
then
until
now,
and
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
to
his
office
for
continuing
to
and
actually
as
as
we
speak.
Obviously,
there's
a
lot
of
work
still
going
on
and
thank
you
roberto
as
well
and
I'll
reiterate
here
what
I've
already
told
the
vendors
association.
J
I
I
personally
don't
agree
with
a
90-day
deferral.
I
think
that
the
90
days
is
arbitrary.
What
I
do
agree
with
is:
if,
if
we
need
a
deferral,
then
I
can
support
that
we
have
until
next
tuesday
to
to
see
if
that
is
the
case,
if
indeed
we
need
a
deferral
or
not,
I
don't
believe
we
have
to
ask
for
one.
I
know
we
don't
have
to
ask
for
one
here
today.
J
We
can
ask
for
a
deferral
at
orders
of
the
day
on
tuesday,
if,
indeed
that
is
the
desire
of
the
council-
and
I
will
say
my
mind-
is
not
made
up
yet
and
councilman
cohen
knows
this,
and
the
vendors
know
that
I'm
hoping
we
can
find
a
way
to
thread
this
needle
before
next
tuesday-
and
I
know
councilmember
cohen,
is
as
well
and
that's.
J
The
goal
is
to
try
to
see
we
have
a
meeting
actually
tonight
that
was
coordinated
by
councilman
cohen's
office,
with
the
vendors
and
and
representatives
of
the
bum
family
over
at
the
flea
market
and
and
the
hope
is
that
we
can
continue
to
stay
in
conversation.
I
will
ask
that
just
of
roberto-
I
I
don't
expect
anything.
Less
roberto
has
been
tremendously
willing
to
be
cooperative
through
this,
and
my
hope,
though,
is
that
we
can
find
a
way
to
to
come
to
an
agreement
before
tuesday.
J
If
we
can't,
then
I
then
we
can
ask
for
a
deferral
if
supported
by
the
council
at
that
time,
at
orders
of
the
day.
So
for
those
that
are
very
interested
in
that,
I
would
just
say
that,
let's,
let's
not
lose
hope
that
we
can't
potentially
get
there
within
the
next
couple
days,
but
if,
if
we
can't,
I,
I
certainly
agree
with
with
whether
vendors
concerns
are
that
you
know
that
a
little
bit
more
time
should
not
really
be
something
that
dissuades
any
of
us.
J
I
could
see
why
90
days
is
maybe
sounds
like
that
would
be
a
little
bit
too
much
time
and-
and
I
wouldn't
ask
specifically
for
something
like
90
days-
I
would
say:
let's
defer
it
until
we
need
to,
and
we
believe
that
it's
not
worthwhile
anymore
or
we
can't
achieve
anything
else.
I
do
want
to
ask
eric
schenhauer
a
question.
I
don't
know.
If
he's
still
on
the
call,
I
do
believe
he's
there.
If
we
don't
mind
bringing
eric
up.
C
J
You
so
you
you
had
mentioned
in
regards
to
some
of
the
the
reason
for
the
timeliness
and
why,
as
council,
as
vice
mayor
jones,
had
asked
around,
you
know
some
of
the
urgency
on
the
time
here
and
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
my
interpretation
of
the
notice
of
of
funding
availability,
the
nofa
that
that
you
were
referencing.
J
It
doesn't
have
a
requirement,
the
way
that
I'm
reading
it
that
the
the
the
land
use
you
know
entitlements
in
the
the
the
the
on
the
infield
areas.
As
I'm
reading
it
here
that
the
land
use
authority
has
to
actually
be
finalized,
it's
just
it.
It
could
dock
you
points
in
that
process,
so
it
could
hurt,
it
could
hurt
your
application,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
disqualify
it
am.
I
reading
that
correctly.
M
That's
correct,
so
it's
a
point
rating
system,
it's
a
250
point
system
and
I
gave
you
all
the
documents,
so
you
have
them
in
front
of
you
right
there.
Yes
and
it's
a
250
point
system.
M
Project
readiness
is
100
of
those
250
points
and
in
that
category
of
project
readiness,
environmental
review
and
entitlements
are
a
combined
50
points
combined
50
points
and
the
the
criteria
is
that
the
entitlement
and
this
environmental
review
has
to
be
in
place
on
the
application
due
date,
and
you
can
see
that
on
page
27
and
page
28,
I
circled
it
in
red
for
you,
so
I
mean
there's
no
way
we
would
be
successful
in
the
competition.
M
These
are
very
very
competitive
processes
statewide,
and
we
have
a
great
chance
of
success,
because
our
project
is
exactly
what
the
state
of
california
is
looking
for.
They
want.
They
want
new,
large-scale
development
at
major
transit
stations
that
will
provide
affordable
housing
within
the
developments
where
exactly
what
this
program
is
about.
J
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
The
clarification
that
was
my
only
question
for
you
and
I
just
wanted
it
to
be
clear
as
well
and
specific,
because
and
and
sometimes
we
speak
in
in
short,
right
and
and
and
and
make
statements-
and
I
wanted
it
to
be
very
clear.
That
was
all
the
questions
I
had
for
eric.
J
So
I
wanted
it
to
be
very
clear
that
there
wasn't
necessarily
a
disqualifier
if
we
indeed
decide
to
to
defer
this
item,
but
I
would
not
disagree
with
with
eric's
interpretation
that
the
potential
loss
of
you
know
whether
it's
25
or
50
points.
I
I
would
have
to
to
get
a
little
bit
more
clarity,
because
I
I
would
say
eric,
I
don't.
I
don't.
100
percent
agree
with
your
interpretation,
but
I'm
not
the
expert
on
these
on
these
applications.
J
So
I
do
think
it's
possible
that
up
to
the
50
points
you
could
lose
and
that
that
may
very
well
be
significant
enough
to
to
not
qualify,
but
that
it's
not
automatically
a
disqualifier
in
in
the
grant
system.
Just
to
be
again
very,
very
clear
to
know
what
we're
all
sort
of
up
against
here
and,
quite
frankly,
as
you
know,
eric
this
was
this
was
a
kind
of
a
last-minute
item
brought
to
to
our
attention
as
sort
of
we're.
J
Looking
at
you
know,
do
we
need
an
extra
week
or
do
we
need
some
more
time,
potentially
even
a
couple
weeks
which,
unfortunately,
we're
coming
up
to
a
july,
a
july
recess,
which
I
think
is
is
clearly
also
another
factor.
You
have
a
july
12
deadline,
we
don't
meet
in
july
and
so
a
deferral
past
two
weeks
is
gonna.
J
Put
this
thing
in
august,
and
so
that's
another
factor
just
a
reality
on
on
what
we're
up
against
and
so
and
I'm
very
aware
of
that,
but
at
the
same
time
again
just
wanted
it
to
be
to
be
clear
that
there
wasn't
some
sort
of
disqualifier
for
the
decision
we
may
take
to
to
defer,
and-
and
I
have
you
know
again
my
some
questions
myself-
that
I'd
like
to
try
to
iron
out-
and
you
know
I
may
not
be
completely
comfortable-
come
tuesday
and
that's
that's
a
decision.
J
I
have
to
make,
but
I
I
will
give
it
my
all,
and
I
that's
again
what
I'll
ask
for
the
vendors
for
to
roberto
we'll
see
you
tonight.
I
think
we
will
be
in
conversation.
A
lot
between
now
and
tuesday.
I
know
councilmember
cohen
is
is
dedicated
as
well.
We
have,
we
have
certainly
come
a
long
way
and
much
further
than
than
I
think
would
have
happened.
J
We
we
were
there
last
year
and-
and
I
think
that
the
lack
of
of
collaboration
that
we
saw
happening
last
year
and
councilmember
cohen,
has
stepped
in
to
to
really
try
and
move
that
needle,
and
so
I
look
forward
to
the
next
couple
days
ahead
and
we'll
see
what
we'll
see
what
tuesday,
what
tuesday
brings
thanks.
B
Thank
you,
council,
member
and
councilmember
cohen
before
you.
I
know
you
have
your
hand
up
before
you
speak.
I
just
want
to
just
also
recognize
that
I
know
full
well
the
effort
and
time
and
energy
that
you
put
into
getting
this
whole
project.
B
In
addressing
everybody's
concerns
and
needs,
and
and
trying
to
get
everything
to
to
be
in
alignment-
and
I
really
have
an
appreciation
for
that-
so
I
want
you
to
feel,
like
you
know
after
you've
gone
through
this
process
and
done
all
this
hard
work
that
you
know
we're
just
or
I'm
just
trying
to
jump
into
the
11th
hour
to
try
to
muck
up
the
the
process,
but
as
as
you
also
know
too,
that
I
have
a
strong
commitment
and
a
desire
to
support
small
businesses
and
minority
businesses,
and
the
flea
market
is
the
ultimate
in
that
demographic.
B
So
I
just
want
to
just
get
that
out
there,
because
I
do
have
an
appreciation
for
all
your
hard
work
and
efforts
so
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
Go
ahead,
councilman
we're
going
well.
I
I
appreciate
that
and
I'm
not
this
isn't
really
about
me
and
the
work
that
our
office
has
put
in,
but
about
the
small
businesses
that
we're
advocating,
on
behalf
of
all
of
which,
all
of
whom
are
constituents
of
district
4,
because
anyone
who
operates
a
district
of
business
in
district
4
is
a
constituent
of
mine.
So
we're
you
know
we're
advocating
on
their
behalf
and
that's
been
our
entire.
That's
been
the
only
motivation
we've
had
for
this.
I
It
was
supposed
to
come
in
the
spring
and
it
got
deferred
rightfully
so
so
that
we
could
work
on
the
things
that
would
help
preserve
the
space
and
provide
the
opportunity
and
resources
to
make
sure
that
these
businesses
have
a
place
to
continue
to
operate,
and
it's
really
not
just
it's.
That's
a
really
important
part
of
it,
but
it's
also
about
the
community
amenity
of
having
a
flea
market
here
in
our
district.
I
I
live.
I
You
know
having
lived
by
within
walking
distance
of
the
flea
market
and
gone
with
my
family
monthly
for
years
and
brought
every
visitor
that
comes
into
town
to
the
flea
market.
It's
important
to
to
the
community.
It's
important
to
me,
it's
important
to
everybody,
so
I
had
no.
I
had
a
sincere
interest
in
making
sure
the
flea
market
continued
five
years
ago.
When
you
know
people
here
were
on
the
council
that
this
was
brought
forward,
and
there
wasn't
much
talk
at
the
time
about
what
would
happen
to
the
vendors
it
could
have
been.
I
Well,
let's
do
what
the
council
has
always
done,
which
is
not
consider
this
element
of
it,
but
we
were
doing
what
we
think
was
the
right
thing
to
do,
which
was
find
a
an
agreement
and
this
agreement
just
just
one
last
point:
this
agreement
is
a
voluntary
agreement
that
we
just
want
to
make
sure
it
doesn't
fall
apart
that
we
are
going
to
have
something
in
place
to
preserve
the
vendors,
and
I
also
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear
to
everybody
on
this
here
in
the
meeting
that
the
council
has
entitled
this
property.
I
The
council
entitled
this
property
14
years
ago
in
2007
at
that
time,
that
entitlement
meant
the
flea
market
would
close
and
meant
that
this
development
would
occur
at
some
future
date.
As
the
date
gets
closer,
it
becomes
more
urgent
that
we
work
on
something
to
to
to
address
the
potential
displacement
and
try
to
prevent
it
and
try
to
give
resources
to
help
people
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
here,
but
not
passing
this.
I
B
I'm
going
to
support
the
motion
with
the
the
caveat,
just
like
my
colleague,
councilman
perales,
that
you
know
when
we
debate
this
or
discuss
this
on
tuesday
that
you
know
obviously
the
devil's
in
the
details
and
I'd
like
to
to
see
all
the
details
and
just
have
a
comfort
level
that
the
vendors
will
have
an
opportunity
to
continue
to
engage
in
dialogue
and
get
their
wishes
and
desires
expressed
to
the
property
owner.
B
B
B
B
B
E
Well,
I
guess
I've
been
doing
the
best
I
can
to
follow
along,
but
the
issue
that
I'm
very
concerned
about
is
the
transportation
management
in
downtown
and
we've
been
talking
about
making
san
jose
car
free,
downtown
needs
to
be
car
free,
and
my
daughter
just
recently
went
to
santa
barbara
and
the
state
street,
which
had
no
parking
to
begin
with.
E
There
was
never
any
parking
on
state
street,
but
now
the
whole
street
has
been
closed
off
and
it
became
a
a
beautiful
piazza
for
the
people
dancing
and
enjoying
the
streets,
which
is
the
problem
with.
What's
happened
in
our
streets?
E
Currently,
we
need
to
reclaim
the
streets,
it's
that
you
know,
we've
lost
to
the
car
and
it
has
been
killing
us
and
disabling
us
on
in
so
many
ways,
and
so
the
the
the
model
of
what
we
need
to
do
with
downtown
san
jose
and
santa
clara
street
is
to
make
it
car
free.
E
It
needs
to
be
a
car
free
zone
and
that
would
also
change
the
dimensions
of
what,
in
terms
of
the
bar,
when
we
we
made
the
compromises
about
doing
bart
for
the
the
business
friendliness
of
our
city,
which
was
the
wrong
value
instead
of
public
safety
and
health,
and
now,
even
more
so
with
bart,
you
know,
being
really
unsustainable.
Nobody
wants
to
be
in
the
dungeon
in
a
cell
down
there
in
a
bar
with
our
pandemic,
and
it's
still
going
on.
E
As
you
know,
and
the
thing
is,
is
that
the
the
choices
we
made
about
the
bar
coming
into
san
jose,
because
we
want
to
keep
the
traffic
flowing?
That
was
the
wrong
choice,
and
so
there's
many
choices
that
we're
making
and
one
of
them
is
that
is
to
make
downtown
san
jose
car
free.
E
B
F
Vice
mayor
jones,
I
I
can't
I
I'm
serious.
I
cannot
extend
to
you
or
express
over
express
my
gratitude
for
what
you
did
with
respect
to
the
the
item
because
of
a
leader,
somebody
that
has
power
his
responsibility
and
duty
is
to
give
it
to
those
that
have
not
that
have
none
and
and
yeah.
I
saw
that
exercise
here
in
a
very
diplomatic,
a
very
humane
way,
and
I
I
just
just
I
appreciate
that.
F
Secondly,
I
didn't
get
I
didn't
have
enough,
I
guess
maybe
there
was
some
confusion,
but
I
didn't
speak
on
the
item
when,
when
I
saw
the
when
I
saw
the
kind
of
way
that
it
started
turning,
that's
when
I
raised
a
hand,
but
I
would
like
I
want
to
get
into
that
fight,
so
I
would
like
it
if
roberto
is
listening.
If
you
can
contact
me
with
respect
to
the
agenda
items,
sometimes
politics
is
optics.
F
We
cannot
continue
to
defer
the
reimagining.
I'm
asking
the
council
to
no
longer
defer
those
items
because
it
it.
It
says
something.
It
says
something
if
they
can
just
the
fact
that
we
couldn't
come
to
oakland's
handling
sacramento.
All
these
other
cities
are
actually
implementing
the
policies
right
now.
San
jose
couldn't
okay.
So
this
is
this.
This
is
right
there.
F
This
is
what
builds
the
trust
between
the
people
and
and
and
the
the
citizenry
and
the
institutions
that
are
in
place
to
protect
them
and
when
you,
when,
when,
when
the
council
keeps
learning
from
what
it
is
saying,
is
that
the
people's
voice
and
the
people's
issues
are
not
important
enough
and
optics
doesn't
look
good.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
blair.
B
G
Ahead,
blair
hi.
Thank
you
thanks
a
lot
for
the
first
words
of
paul
soto
on
this
public
comment.
Excuse
me:
I
was
really
impressed
with
how
you
handled
it
to
offer
extra
public
comment
as
well:
council
person,
jones
and
perales.
Thank
you.
It
was
really
helpful
and
I
learned
a
lot,
albeit
my
ego,
is
hurt,
but
I've
learned
a
lot
just
in
the
past
half
hour
half
past
hour,
so
thank
you.
G
I
wanted
to
quickly
offer
with
item
8.3,
about
working
with
sacred
heart
on
issues
of
rental
assistance.
In
this
era
of
covid
I
a
couple
items
to
mention.
I
think
there
are
ways
to
work
with
the
economy
at
this
time
and
and
negotiate
with
developers,
but
we
don't
have
to
suspend
the
affordable
housing
impact
fee
and
that,
with
the
eviction
moratorium
issue
coming
up
by
the
end
of
june,
a
reminder
in
the
good
health
of
state
and
federal
funding
ideas.
G
I
hope
we
can
be
open
in
how
the
subsidy
process
can
create
funding
streams
and
practices
for
many
local
government
programs
at
this
time.
It
is
from
this
local
government
needs
to
learn
to
explain
these
available
choices
clearly
and
that
everyday
community,
both
owners
and
tenants,
do
not
have
to
feel
afraid
to
ask
how
these
programs
can
help
can
be
to
help
themselves
can
be
of
help
to
themselves.
You
know
and
our
work
in
the
community.
G
I
also
wanted
to
comment
at
the
beginning.
The
meeting
about
you
know
the
council
agenda
items
that
the
gun
issue
will
not
be
happening
and
that
you
know
that
should
allow
time
at
open
forum.
The
person
can
be
allowed
to
speak
about
the
issue
at
open
forum
time
kenny,
that's
a
procedural
question.
He
tried
to
answer
it.
I
hope
you
can
answer
it
at
this
time.
If
you
can.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
That's
all
the
public
speakers
bring
it
back
over
to
the
committee
and
councilmember
perales.
J
Thank
you
and
just
to
kind
of
go
backwards
here
to
help
out
for
blair's
question.
Yes,
the
public
speaker,
david,
can
speak
at
open
forum
today
on
that
item
he
was
trying
to
speak
about
on
on
gun
protections
and
then
we
did
approve.
We
did
no.
We
no
longer
deferred
the
reimagining
community
safety
item
to
be
heard.
That
was
actually
on
the
last
item.
We
voted
on
so
that
will
be
heard
next
week,
and
that
was
the
one
time
certain
item
at
6
30
p.m.
J
So
for
for,
if
there
was
confusion
on
that,
that
is
no
longer
deferred.
I
would
agree
with
paul
we're
we're
actually
happy
that
that
we're
gonna
hear
that
update
next
tuesday
and
then
for
the
current.
The
current
item
we
did,
it
looked
like
housing
staff
had
asked
for
a
deferral
of
the
citing
policy
and
it
was
one
week
so
it
would
be
now
on
this
calendar
and
I'm
j.
I
won't
ask
for
the
the
exact
time
certain
right
now,
but
that's
an
item.
J
I
would
like
to
have
a
a
time
certain
on,
so
I'm
just
I'm
going
to
suggest
you
know
around
the
after
dinner
time,
like
we've
done
before
or
6
30
or
something,
but
I
I
we
can
leave
that
up
for
a
formal
motion
next
week,
so
but
I'm
just
giving
staff
a
heads
up.
That's
something
I'd
like
to
see
for
now.
I
remember
thank
you
for
now
I'll
I'll
move,
approval
of
and
I'm
blanking
on
the
the
date
sorry
june.
B
29Th
before
before
we
get
a
second,
I
am
aware:
there's
an
opportunity
to
defer
item
3.3
the
appeals
hearing
board
interviews,
if
there's
a
desire
of
the
committee
to
lighten
some
of
the
agenda
for
that
day,.
A
C
B
Sounds
like
a
plan,
so
I
will
withdraw
my
suggestion
and
we'll
go
with
the
the
motion
and
we
can
get
a
second.
D
B
All
right,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded,
let's
see
and
council
member
cohen.
I
C
They
would
and
there's
the
possibility
that
the
east
union
might
get
pushed
to
the
first
meeting
of
august
as
well,
there's
additional
details
to
get
worked
out,
but
they
would
be
brought
forward
next
week
as
ads.
I
C
I
that
it's
some
small
technical
and
contractual
issues,
and
so
the
teams
are
meeting,
I
think,
as
we
speak
and
tomorrow,
to
tighten
those
up
all
right.
Thank
you.
A
To
clarify
did
we
have
an
11
a.m?
Start
time
on
the
29th.
A
I
don't
have
that
agenda
yet
so
we'll
see
depends
on
what
you
don't
finish
next
tuesday,
all
right:
okay,
so
cohen,
hi
davis,
yes,
travis.
C
B
B
So
item
d
schedule
meeting
schedules.
Let
me
see
if
there
are
any
public
comments.
Yes
go
ahead,
tessa.
E
So
I
guess
it's
the
same
issues
that
you
know
really
need
to
be
addressed
as
we
re
imagine
ourselves,
and
we
really
address
our
major
crisis
of
climate
and
climate
change
and
how
we're
going
to
go
forward
and
know
more
bs,
as
I
say,
and
that
we
have
to
really
start
making
the
reductions
and
having
that
our
leadership
do
that.
E
But
it's
very
difficult
for
our
leadership
to
do
that,
because
they
are
in
the
pockets
of
our
of
the
of
all
the
businesses
as
usual
and
that's
what
funds
their
campaigns.
And
so
that's.
E
You
know
what
what
the
problem
is
is
and
that's
where
extinction
rebellion
says
that
we
need
a
citizen's
action
committee
to
really
make
the
changes,
and
so
you
know
as
part
of
that
citizen
action
committee,
I'm
saying
that
we
need
to
have
a
a
reduction
in
our
you
know,
use
of
of
the
automobile
and
that
it
needs
to
go
away
really,
and
even
even
the
electric
car
is
not
the
solution,
because
it
still
has
100
miles
per
hour
and
and
tinted
windows
and
issues
like
that
and
still
is
the
car
itself.
E
You
know,
kills
40
000.
I
think
it's
40
000
a
year
americans
and
maims
and
disables
three
million
every
year,
and
so
we
really
need
to.
You
know
that
your
job
is
truly
to
protect
us
from
harm,
and
so
how
we
create
a
a
a
a
society
without
the
car
is
is
what
we
have
to
start
doing,
and
you
know
the
other
issue
is
I
I
was
anyway
last
night
when
sergio
jimenez
showed
us
the
budget.
E
G
Hi,
thank
you.
This
sounds
like
a
really
interesting
hopeful
meeting
that
you'll
be
having
in
august,
and
it's
kind
of
it
brings
back
tesla
and
it
brings
back.
You
know
our
better
practices
and
you
know
the
sustainable
future
ideas
that
we
were
totally
building
before
kovid,
and
you
know
this
is
our
regular
good
stuff.
So
thank
you.
G
We
are
now
in
a
different
bit
of
a
different
situation
and
dynamic
after
covet.
I
hope
I
can
speak
about
the
relation
and
and
all
the
items
that
you're
going
to
talk
about
you're,
going
to
talk
about
housing,
equity
issues,
I
mean
just
a
whole.
You
know
green
sustainability.
G
I
hope
this
can
be
a
time
I
can
talk
about
mass
transportation
issues
in
the
future
say
the
vta
and
as
a
part
of
this
process-
and
you
know
I
I
I
hope
this
can
be
a
time
to
start
to
consider
that
you
know
how
are
we
gonna
bring
back
mass
transportation
as
a
part
of
this
structure
of
this
meeting,
and
is
it
the
idea?
G
You
know
I
I've
mentioned
aerosol
vaccines
before
do
we
talk
about
that
subject
more
often
and
make
it
more
comfortable
as
a
as
a
use
for
in
vehicles
in
buses
to
offer
a
sense
of
safety
and
convenience
and
comfort
and
actually
protection
and
and
good
practices,
and
what
are
the
moral
implications
of
that?
G
H
Hello
again-
and
I
just
wanted
to
express
thanks
and
appreciation
for
the
council
to
clarify
in
the
process,
I
appreciate
just
being
informed
and
seeking
to
clarify
and
educate
being
a
member
of
this
community.
That's
valuable
to
me
and
just
thank
you.
I
I
suppose
my
position.
H
We,
you
know
we
are
a
technology
family.
We
help
drive
some
of
the
awesome
technology
that
builds
that
is
built
right
here
in
silicon
valley.
San
jose
just
so
happens
to
be
a
wonderful,
suburban
lifestyle
for
our
family,
and
I
suppose
my
my
question's
more
to
how
do
we
maintain
that
livelihood?
You
know
I
have
two
children,
we
have
daycare,
we
have
multiple
locations
and
activities
all
over
the
city.
H
Cars
are
a
critical
means
of
really
getting
there
and
to
and
from
and
handling
incredibly
complex
logistics,
and
so
I
I'm
all
100
for
finding
better
ways
of
doing
things
and
iterating
that's
kind
of
one
of
the
major
principles
we
have
in
technology.
It's.
I
kind
of
asked
that
the
council
and
the
community
to
have
a
conversation
around
is
just
banning
cars.
The
right
way,
or
can
we
incentivize
just
new
effective
means
of
both
transportation
or
better
commuting?
I
mean
everyone
commutes
from
san
jose
to
various
companies.
H
It's
one
direction
in
and
out,
and
I
know
that
there's
some
efforts
to
diversify
where
those
technology
companies
are
located.
So
you
know,
public
transportation
is
also
a
great
consideration
and
so
just
some
thoughts
that
you
know.
How
do
we
accommodate
those
who
require
cars
as
a
critical
means
of
everyday
life.
B
J
B
You,
okay
on
to
the
public
record,
and
we
have
several
speakers
go
ahead.
Paul.
G
G
It
could
be
a
simple
line
that
would
be.
You
know
four
drivers
an
hour
each
way
once
every
half
hour.
You
know,
I
think
it's
important,
that
we
have
some
sort
of
regularity
to
our
schedule.
There
isn't
buses
that
go
up
and
down
for
a
street
and
a
lot
of
transportation,
a
lot
of
housing
around
the
gish
area,
kitchen
first
and
at
the
north
end
there's
a
lot
of
housing,
there's
a
santa
clara
county
probation
and
just
health
services
department
and
the
vta
itself.
G
G
We
have
to
start
thinking
of
our
pause,
more
positive
ideas
and
the
whole
light
rail,
isn't
such
a
bad
guy,
and
I
think
we,
hopefully
we
can
think
of
the
future
of
av
automatic
vehicle,
use
that
I
don't
want
to
disrespect
the
mayor,
who's
working
and
pushing
really
hard
for
the
av
to
replace
the
light
rail.
Why
not
we're
considering
so
much
the
deirdon
to
airport
underground
tunnel
system
transportation
service?
G
That
would
be
a
perfect
place
to
practice
the
automatic
vehicle
things
and
then
work
up
top
to
get
the
light
rail
going
again
with
new
transit
line
ideas
to
focus
around
light
rail
being
the
center
of
our
future,
and
we
can
get
that
more
positive
energy
going
and
and
and
learn
how
to
not
treat
the
light.
Rail
is
our
distant
third
cousin.
You
know
and
treated
as
a
as
our
greens,
a
sustainability
friend
and
a
center
of
a
city
process
and
community
that
we
can
all
enjoy.
O
Yeah
hi
martha
o'connell
speaking
as
an
individual
and
not
as
a
member
of
any
commission,
of
which
I
may
be
a
member
I'd
like
to
draw
your
attention
to
the
letter
from
the
housing
commission.
The
recommendation
on
the
rent
increases
the
housing
commission
by
a
vote
of
8
to
3
voted
to
continue
the
2021
rent
increase
moratorium
through
august
31st
during
the
public
meeting.
The
chair
changed
his
her
vote.
For
two
reasons.
O
She
stated
that
one
was
the
argument
of
commissioner
andrea
wheeler
that
this
change
affected
only
a
small
minority
of
renters
and
it
aligned
with
the
end
of
the
eviction
moratorium
and
two,
the
slew
of
articles
in
the
mercury
news
that
document
that
the
distribution
system
of
the
rent
relief
funds
is
broken
absolutely
and
almost
completely
broken.
O
E
Thank
you.
So
this
is
public
comment,
so
basically,
I
think
anyway,
I
want
to
discuss
something:
that's
critical
to
our
my
neighborhood,
which
is
615
stockton
avenue
and
how
it
I
from
my
research
that
it
was
actually
deb
davis
and
the
council
in
agreement
to
not
allow
a
affordable
housing.
That's
the
research
I
found,
even
though
deb
davis
said
it
was,
there
was
something
to
do
with
the
state.
It
wasn't
to
do
with
the
state
of
california.
E
B
I'm
sorry
sorry
for
interrupting
which
letter
are
you
referring
to.
E
B
E
Oh
public
record,
okay,
I
don't
know
what
letter
so
the
public
record.
Oh
the
letter,
I
don't
know
I'm
just
talking
about
the
fact
that
the
the
zoning
was
not
allowed.
Affordable
housing
was
not
allowed
at
615
stockton
avenue,
though
it
was
proposed
because
of
protecting
the
businesses.
What.
B
I'm
sorry
for
interrupting
again,
so
the
public
record
is
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
any
letters
that
have
been
submitted
to
the
city.
E
Oh
okay:
oh
that's,
beautiful,
okay,
good,
okay,
good
public
record.
So
what
letter?
Okay,
the
letter
to
the
city?
Okay,
there
is
a
letter,
that's
good!
Thank
you
sweetie!
I
really
appreciate
it
because
there
was
a
letter
and
it
came
from
from
edward
sound
and
edward
sound
who's.
The
on
the
on
the
you
know,
shipna
he's
on
the
public.
You
know
he
deals
with
permanent.
He
deals
with
planning
for
the
sasta
hanship
neighborhood
park
association
and
his
letter
was.
E
It
was
a
very
poor
decision
for
it
to
become
a
hotel
and
we're
still
fighting
it.
Our
neighborhood
is
fighting
it
and
that
when
we
had
the
city,
when
we
was
a
proposed
for
affordable
housing,
which
would
be
better
than
a
hotel,
because
hotel
is
part
of
our
past,
we
need
to
put
that
in
our
past
traveling.
We
need
to
stay
home
and
stop
burning.
Fossil
fuels.
Hotels
are
part
of
our
past.
E
Our
future
is
affordable
housing
because
we
have
a
the
climate
crisis
is
going
to
bring
so
many
people
that
are
what
do
they
call
it.
You
know
climate
refugees,
we
need
housing
and
housing
was
stopped
because
it
was
protecting
businesses
to
keep
housing
away
from
businesses
instead
of
controlling
businesses.
Thank
you.
Tessa.
B
All
right,
coming
back
to
the
committee,
can
I
get
a
motion.
Please
motion.
G
Hi,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
yourselves
again
for
how
you
handled
the
first
item
today
and
council
person.
Perales
said
there
was
a
first
speaker
speaking
about
the
gun
issues
and
that
it's
the
democratic
process.
Sometimes
it
isn't
intuitive.
Yet
it's
it's.
It's
really
intuitive
inside
all
of
us,
yet
sometimes
it
isn't
intuitive
as
we
work
it
out.
G
So,
thanks
for
the
patience
in
in
listening
to
ourselves
and
and
trying
to
just
make
a
council
meeting
process
organized
and
respectable
and
some
people,
it
takes
a
little
bit
extra
effort.
Thanks
for
your
patience
with
that.
B
F
Yeah,
thank
you
paul,
I'm
speaking
with
respect
to
the
national,
the
acknowledgement
of
the
immigrant
community.
I
would
like
to
remind
the
committee
that
the
council
that
they're,
I
would
challenge
the
council
to
think
about
the
fact
that
there
is
no
such
thing
as
a
mexican
immigrant
in
the
state
of
california.
F
Think
about
this.
You
see
the
the
the
the
mexican
the
chicano
is
different
than
any
other
race
in
the
world.
Why
is
that
is
because
he
is
considered
he
is.
He
is
the
only
one
think
about
all
the
races
from
the
sociological
perspective
anthropological
perspective,
the
chicano
and
the
mexican
is
the
only
group
of
people
that
is
considered
immigrant
in
that
land
of
their
ancestry.
F
F
E
Okay,
thank
you.
There's
my
calendar,
okay
good.
So,
basically,
you
know
appreciate
what
everybody's
saying
I
was
looking
at
the
consent
calendar
it's
a
lot
of
parking
and
recreation,
so
the
other
imagining
that
I've
been
dealing
with
in
terms
of
my
neighborhood
615
stockton
avenue
at
the
intersection
of
sheila.
This
is
a
very
historic
neighborhood
and,
like
paul
was
saying
how
we
you
know.
Capitalism
has
has
exploited
people
and
nature
for
profit,
so
we
are
right
here
next
to
the
el
camino.
E
And
so
what
I've
been
also
proposing
for
615
is
that,
yes,
we
bring
the
garden
alameda
back
to
being
a
food
garden
again
in
terms
of
our
food
crisis
and
and
sustainability
that
we
need
to
grow
food
locally,
and
so
what
you
know
if
I
look
at
the
history
of
our
neighborhood
from
lincoln,
lincoln
lincoln
high
school,
that
was
a
future
farmers
of
america
site
and
it
was.
E
It
was
sold
because
the
person
who
the
developer
and
it
became
it-
became
commercial
property
that
the
school
board,
even
though
it
was
it,
was
endowed
to
the
city
to
be
open
land,
and
this
has
happened
so
many
times
it
happened
at
the
old
city
hall.
The
land
was
endowed
to
stay
agriculture
and
it
changed.
It
also
happened
at
and
push
park
emma
push
park.
The
little
park
was:
oh,
it's
so
great.
Well,
we
lost
more
than
half
of
it.
E
J
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
move
approval.
I
I
forgot
if
we
had
done
that
already
apologize.
B
All
right,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
did
we
lose
councilmember
davis.
B
C
B
So
the
gun
harm
reduction
has
been
moved
to
the
29th
agenda,
so
we're
on
to
open
forum
and.
J
E
Oh
good,
thank
you.
So
much
basically
talking
about
the
bar
to
santa
clara
needs
to
stop.
We
need
to
stop
the
bar
to
santa
clara.
It
needs
to
stop
at
diridon.
E
We
need
to
reduce,
I
mean
the
scientist
is
saying:
we
need
to
reduce
our
consumption
of
fossil
fuels
50,
and
so
that
is
part
of
how
we
need
to
go
forward
and
so
and
bringing
bart
to
santa
clara
is
a
problem,
and
you
know,
because
we're
spending
over
a
billion
dollars
to
go
that
one
mile
and
to
build
any
a.
What
is
that
called
a
a
maintenance
yard,
an
equipment
yard?
E
E
Our
range
needs
to
be
very
hyper
local
and
that's
where
we
need
to
work
at
home,
all
those
that
can
and
then
we
have
a
world-class
bicycle
and
pedestrian
infrastructure
that
we
move
around
on
and
that's
where
the
countries
that
have
you
know
followed
the
science
you
know
way
back
in
1979,
we
had
the
oil
embargo,
that's
why
the
european
countries
have
developed
a
world-class
bicycle
infrastructure
and
we
need
that
and
and
to
fix
our
roads
for
traffic
calming
and
to
create
the
the
type
of
thing.
G
Hi
blair
beekman
thanks
a
lot
for
the
meeting
today
to
try
to
make
myself
clear
from
last
night
or
more
clear
measure:
t
public
oversight,
committee,
commission,
they're,
looking
for
public
outreach
about
how
to
work
towards
better
public
outreach
for
their
meetings
and
their
purpose.
Basically,
I
think
this
can
be
a
really
good
time
to
reintroduce
open
public
policy
and
accountability
ideas
to
them.
You
know
from
the
aclu
all
the
good
surveillance
and
technology
ordinance
ideas.
G
I
mean
there's
a
whole
system
that
is
trying
to
teach
better
practices
of
community
democracy
basically,
and
I
think
it
would
give
them
a
lot
of
good
pointers
and
important
lessons
and,
in
fact,
work
towards.
You
know
a
a
more
shared
effort,
a
more
shared
effort
of
community-
and
you
know
it's
it's
government
and
commissions
working
towards
a
technology
future
together.
G
It's
the
idea
of
the
technology
review
board
that
we've
been
dreaming
of
and
working
towards,
but
yet
can't
seem
to
quite
do
with
the
public
having
much
more
say
and
much
more
important
part
of
the
process.
That's
the
future
goal.
They
can
simply
review
what
the
what
the
aclu
stuff
is
doing
and
just
realize
how
good
it
is
and
how
good
it
feels
that
should
help
bring
in
you
know
some
really
important
changes.
Good
luck
on
how
you
work
on
it.
I
really
wanted
to
speak
on
the
flea
market
items.
G
You
know,
mr
schoenhauer
he's
he's
he's
doing
this
funding
thing
is
that
gonna
rush
us
into
doing
a
whole
bunch
of
other
things
afterwards,
if
he
can
do
the
funding
thing
without
being
rushed
to
work
with
new
developers,
so
we
can
all
work
on
the
issue
together.
That's
an
important
purpose.
I
think
if
we
can
really
slow
down,
if
he
does
go
for
this
california
state
funding
and
not
push
for
having
a
bunch
of
developers
immediately
afterwards,
so
we
can
take
our
time.
That's
key!
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
paul.
F
So
in
one
month,
thank
you!
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor
in
one
month
for
the
indigenous
populations,
it
will
be
500
years
that
hernan
cortes
doctor's
ships
in
veracruz
bringing
this
system
in
the
system
of
the
exploitation,
the
commodification
and
the
dehumanization
of
a
human
being.
That's
what
this
is
about.
500
years,
okay,
I'm
the
california
native
mission,
indian.
I
am
a
de
bueno
from
from
the
mission
my
ancestors
built
the
mission
san
diego.
We
had
to
deal
with
junipero
sarah,
we
had
to
deal
with
cortez.
F
F
Okay
and
then,
ten
years
later,
big
vegas?
Please
come
back
mexicans
so
that
we
can
build
this
country
because
they
were
going
off
to
war.
I'll,
give
you
one
guess
as
to
who
is
the
most
decorated
soldier
in
world
war
ii.
The
most
decorated
soldier
has
38
congressional
medals
of
honor.
You
guessed
it
the
mexican.
F
These
are.
These
are
historical
facts:
okay,
and
what
google,
gary
dillable
eric
hayden.
All
the
urban
community
urban
catalysts,
scott
niece,
all
these
dudes
are
playing
chess
with
my
existence,
and
I
take
great
offense
to
that,
because
the
land
has
not
been
healed.
Reckoned
with,
it
has
not
been
reckoned
with.
There
has
been
no
rectitude,
there
has
been
no
reconciliation
and
there
has
been
no
reparation,
and
until
we
get
to
that
point,
the
land
and
the
people
and
the
corruption
will
continue.
B
Thank
you.
The
person
with
the
number
ending
4963.
O
Yeah
hi
martha
o'connell,
I'm
really
sorry
that
council
person
davis
left
because
I
wanted
to
commend
her
last
night
three.
I
I
didn't
watch
the
meeting
last
night
because
I
can't
stay
up
that
way.
It's
discrimination
against
the
disabled
to
have
these
bloody
meetings
that
go
on
until
after
midnight.
So
I
had
to
watch
the
meeting
this
morning
and
of
course
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
speak,
and
there
were
three
council
members
who
voted
no
to
extend
the
meeting
until
12
30.
council
person,
foley
council
person,
davis
and
council
person
jones.
O
Thank
you
very
much
for
doing
that,
and
I
have
to
tell
you
that
I
applaud
sam
licardo
when
he
cuts
the
time
to
one
minute,
because,
quite
frankly,
I
don't
call
into
these
meetings
to
entertain
myself.
I
don't
speak
on
every
single
item
on
the
agenda.
I'm
petitioning
my
government
and
when
the
same
five
or
six
people
talk
on
every
single
item
for
two
minutes,
let's
say:
there's
five
of
them
and
they're
talking
for
two
minutes
and
they're
talking
on
six
items.
O
I
have
to
sit
for
an
extra
hour
to
try
to
get
my
time
in
and
I'm
only
wanting
to
speak
on
one
on
one
item,
so
I
mean
this
is,
in
my
opinion,
outrageous,
and
I
wish
that
people
would
consider
others
others
beside
themselves
and
their
need
to
pontificate
on
every
item
that
comes
before
the
council,
because
you're
shutting
out
people
like
me
that
simply
can't
stay
up
until
until
midnight
or
one
o'clock
in
the
morning,
and
so
our
voices
are
not
heard.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
kudos
to
davis,
foley
and
jones.
H
Thank
you
very
much,
and
once
again
I
thank
you
for
educating
me
on
the
process,
as
I
am
new
to
this
forum,
and
I
just
appreciate
that
effort,
you
know,
as
of
as
I
said,
as
a
father,
I
have
particular
concern
about
this,
particularly
from
a
safety
perspective
of
my
family
and
also
of
my
children
from
themselves.
H
I
I'm
you
know
if
I,
if
you
look
at
the
purchase
of
a
gun,
most
people,
they
don't
buy
more
than
one
of
the
same
gun.
They
buy
different
guns
and
there's
certain
costs
associated
with
every
gun.
If
you
think
about
it,
if
I
were
to
go
out
and
buy
a
rifle
today,
let's
just
say
the
rifle
is
two
thousand
dollars
sites.
300
magazine,
100,
ammo
250
at
least
an
ammo
box
is
300
and
I
have
the
opportunity
to
spend
600
and
buy
a
safe
and
the
appropriate
locking
mechanism.
H
H
If
additional
costs
are
placed
on
the
purchase
of
my
gun,
already,
it's
costing
an
arm
and
a
leg
either
I
could
forgo
buying
a
safe
or
I
could
buy
insurance.
Now,
insurance
isn't
going
to
prevent
my
kids
accidentally
shooting
themselves,
but
a
safe
would
so
I'm
just
kind
of
asking
this
as
a
question
to
the
council
to
consider.
H
Are
we
really
incentivizing
really
some
of
the
more
dangerous
aspects
of
gun
ownership,
which
is
just
storing
it
safely
and
securely?
Yes,
there's
always
people
out
there
who
are
malicious
and
have
malicious
intent.
I
doubt
people
with
malicious
intent
will
pay
insurance,
but
are
we
incentivizing
the
use
of
guns
safe
to
protect
our
children
and
their
families
from
themselves?
Thank
you.
L
L
I
want
you
to
raise
your
hand
if
you're
in
favor
of
gun
control
get
your
hands
up
there
raise
them
up.
I
want
to
know
who
you
are
now
if
you've
got
your
hand
raised
up
there,
I
want
you
to
put
it
at
a
45
degree
angle
and
yell
sig
higher
okay,
you'll
stick
high
because
it
all
starts
with
this.
This
ordinance
that
you
want
to
do
what's.
L
What's
sam,
going
to
do,
come
on
a
bicycle
to
people's
houses
and
take
their
guns
away,
no
who's,
he
going
to
send
san
jose
pot
dealers
or
san
jose
pot
derelicts
with
raw
perales.
Is
he
going
to?
Is
he
going
to
be
the
guy
who's
going
to
be?
You
know,
ramming
the
door
into
people's
houses
to
know
where
guns
are.
L
This
is
the
most
insane
thing
I've
ever
heard
of
sam
soft
sold
it
as
oh,
it's
only
if
people
commit
crimes
with
it.
This
is
the
first
step
of
tyranny.
You
tell
me
every
dictator,
who's
ever
lived
has
taken
guns
away
mao.
Did
it
pol
pot?
Did
it
hitler?
Did
it
mussolini?
Did
it
stalin?
Did
it
the
english
government?
Did
it
the
european
governments
still
do
it?
Do
you
want
to
go
down
that
road,
because
it's
going
to
be
bad
and
san
jose
pot,
derelicts,
that's
what
I'm
going
to
call
them.
L
That's
what
sjpd
stands
for
now,
who
can't
come
out
to
a
call
takes
them
an
hour
to
come
out
to
call
sometimes,
are
citizens
going
to
have
to
wait
to
be
to
be
protected
and
served
by
the
worst
police
department
on
the
planet,
and
now
they've
got
the
time
to
come
out
and
knock
on
your
door
to
see
if
there's
a
firearm
somewhere
in
the
house,
how
are
they
going
to
do
that?
How
is
this
going
to
stand
up
to
the
the
second
amendment?