►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of June 9, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=857489&GUID=0B5C26DA-51D5-4D73-9348-8B6953D6A293
A
A
A
A
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
And
we
have
three
public
speakers:
vanessa
go
ahead.
D
And
on
behalf
of
our
many
partner
organizations,
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
flavored
tobacco
ordinance.
That's
scheduled
to
be
discussed
on
june
15th.
It's
agenda
item
7.1
and
we've
heard
that
there's
some
discussion
about
the
potential
for
it
to
be
moved,
and
I
just
wanted
to
stress
that
we're
really
dealing
with
an
epidemic
and
an
ongoing
public
health
crisis
when
it
comes
to
tobacco
use.
Tobacco
companies
have
pushed
flavored
tobacco
candy
flavored
tobacco
products
into
the
youth
market,
hooking
kids
into
a
dangerous
addiction
to
nicotine.
D
Nearly
a
quarter
of
the
stores
here
in
san
jose
sold
to
an
underage
person
in
our
last
survey.
Moreover,
the
longer
mental
cigarettes
and
flavored
little
cigars
remain
on
the
market,
the
main
product
used
by
african
americans
the
longer
it
will
allow
for
continued
disproportionate
deaths
from
tobacco-related
disease
in
the
black
community.
D
So
we
need
the
the
city
council's
focus
on
this
crisis
to
protect
my
kids
here
in
san
jose,
your
kids
in
san
jose
and
our
community.
So
this
is
not
passing
a
strong
ordinance
is
not
a
wheel
that
needs
to
be
reinvented
or
discussed
it
shouldn't
be
hard
and
doesn't
need
to
be
deferred.
D
It
can
happen
quickly
over
100
cities
in
california,
virtually
every
major
jurisdiction.
The
bay
area
has
already
ended
the
sale
of
flavor
tobacco
without
any
exemptions,
including
san
francisco,
oakland
and
many
jurisdictions
here
in
santa
clara
county.
So
we
really
urge
you
to
continue
to
move
forward
on
june
15th
and
get
these
products
removed
from
our
city.
So
thank
you
very
much.
F
F
Hi
blair
beekman
here
happy
wednesday.
I
there's
three
items
on
next
week's
agenda
that
that
deal
with
water,
garbage
and
community
energy.
F
You
know
it's
a
time
we
have
to
consider
new
practices
and
and
make
those
things
open
and
available,
and
good
luck
on
those
efforts
and
good
luck
to
community,
to
not
fear
asking
about
these
programs-
and
I
also
wanted
to
mention-
there's
east
bay,
community
energy
ideas
and
their
subsidy
plans.
That
should
be
some
good
models,
how
we
can
work
in
san
jose.
F
You
know
I.
I
just
hope
that
you
know
with
so
much
state
funding
and
federal
funding,
that
we
can
talk
about
subsidies
a
bit
differently
now
and
a
bit
more
proactively.
F
This
may
not
be
forever,
but
it
can
be
important
ideas
at
this
time
and
I
hope
we
can
be
open
about
it
with
30
seconds.
I
wanted
to
remind
there
is
a
office
of
immigration
item
that
I
just
wanted
to
remind
that.
I
hope
we're
practicing
and
considering
very
much
the
ideas
of
we're
trying
to
leave
the
time
of
an
english-only
society
that
was
fostered
on
us
in
the
1980s,
and
how
do
we
talk
about
that
and
work
that
out?
F
G
Good
afternoon
committee
members,
my
name
is
jen
gran
lahanno,
I'm
from
the
american
cancer
society
cancer
action
network,
I'm
the
government
relations
director
for
northern
california,
and
I
wanted
to
echo
vanessa
marvin
about
the
flavored
tobacco
control
item.
That
is,
I
believe,
currently
scheduled
for
7.1
on
the
june
15th
agenda
and
just
to
emphasize
the
importance
of
this
issue,
and
we
also
recognize
that
there
are
other
high
priority
issues
to
be
heard
locally
and
but
just
to
highlight
a
few
areas
that
we
recommend
to
make
the
ordinance
stronger.
G
Currently,
there
were
some
issues
that
we
would
we'd
like
to
see
some
some
options
to
strengthen
that
ordinance.
There's
some
federal
preemption
issues
that
we're
concerned
about,
or
the
definition
of
flavored
tobacco
product,
we'd
like
to
most
importantly,
to
see
the
removing
all
exemptions
for
hookah
premium,
cigars
and
loose
leaf
tobacco
that
are
currently
in
that
draft
ordinance
ensure
strong
enforcement
for
all
retailers
that
this
applies
to
all
retailers
and
there
are
no
exemptions
for
any
kind
of
tobacco.
G
Retailer
align
a
phase-in
period
for
all
retailers
and
then
remove
the
arm's
length
transaction
language
to
reduce
any
loopholes
for
tobacco
retailers
and
align
with
other
local
jurisdictions
in
the
county.
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
bring
that
up
and
just
say
that
we
hope
that
this
comes
before
the
council
soon
and
and
we'd
like
to
see
some
recommendations.
Thank
you.
B
H
H
I
want
to
echo
the
comments
of
vanessa
marvin
from
the
coalition
in
santa
clara
county
and
we've
been
waiting
a
very
long
time
already
for
protections
in
san
jose
that
mirror
what's
going
on
elsewhere
in
the
bay
area
and
meanwhile,
every
day
we
watch
more
kids
get
addicted.
H
I
Good
afternoon
rules
committee
members,
my
name-
is
brian
davis
and
I'm
a
member
of
the
tobacco-free
coalition
of
santa
clara
county
san
francisco,
oakland
palo
alto,
los
gatos,
cupertino
unincorporated,
santa
clara
county
and
over
60.
Other
cities
and
counties
in
california
have
chosen
to
stop
selling
all
flavor
tobacco
products,
including
men,
fall
cigarettes
in
all
stores
in
their
jurisdictions.
I
That
includes
vape
shops
and
stores
that
only
sell
tobacco
products.
Those
community
leaders
recognize
the
urgency
of
protecting
their
children
from
these
deadly
addictive
products.
While
san
francisco
retailers,
when
san
francisco
retailers
were
visited
to
educate
them
about
the
new
law,
many
store
owners
expressed
how
much
they
appreciated
the
even
playing
field.
The
city
had
established
requiring
each
retailer
to
play
by
the
same
rules.
I
Stopping
the
sale
of
flavor
tobacco
in
san
francisco
did
not
cause
any
business
to
close
its
doors
and
if
a
store
did
go
out
of
business
because
they
couldn't
find
an
alternative
business
model
to
selling
candy
flavored
e-cigarettes
or
one
dollar
fruit,
flavored,
cigarillos
or
hookah,
aimed
at
underage
teens
or
menthol
cigarettes
that
big
tobacco
used
to
give
away
for
free
to
nine-year-old
black
kids.
In
the
projects
to
get
them
hooked,
what
does
that
say
about
that
business?
Is
that
the
kind
of
business
that
san
jose
wants
to
have?
I
J
Hi
good
afternoon
rules
committee
and
happy
pride
month.
My
name
is
amaya
wooding,
I'm
here
this
afternoon.
As
a
member
of
the
tobacco-free
coalition
of
santa
clara
county
to
discuss,
as
you
guessed
it,
the
importance
of
timely
action
on
flavored
tobacco
and
the
tobacco
industry
spends
millions
of
dollars
a
day
to
the
tune
of
billions
of
dollars
a
year
to
keep
its
cheap
flavored
products
within
reach
of
children.
There's
more
advertising
for
these
products
in
low-income
areas
and
flavored
products
are
used
more
by
children,
racial
minorities
and
lgbtq
people.
J
I
also
want
to
add,
having
seen
adult
store,
exemptions,
be
discussed
and
sometimes
even
enacted
and
then
fall
or
need
to
be
repealed
in
places
like
palo,
alto,
oakland
and
fremont,
and
the
current
ordnance
language
as
it
stands
is
worrisome
for
the
precedent
that
it
would
set
regionally,
especially
given
san
jose's
heavyweight
status
in
the
bay
area.
Thank
you.
K
I
am
actually
kind
of
shocked
with
what's
going
on
and
considering
that
the
city
has
had
very
little
outreach
and
communication
with
the
retailer
community
and
we're
the
most
impacted
by
this
type
of
ordinance.
If
this
ordinance
were
to
pass,
I
you
know
I
want
to
know,
along
with
many
other
retailers,
that
I've
spoken
to
how
the
city
plans
to
compensate
us
for
our
for
the
loss
of
our
businesses
and
welfare,
and
we
take
it.
K
You
know
we
take
the
selling
to
miners
very
seriously
and
we're
very
careful
at
our
business
and,
like
I
said,
along
with
the
a
lot
of
other
retailers
that
I
know,
I
know
that
they
take
it
very
seriously,
follow
the
law
and
make
sure
to
cart.
So
thank
you
for
your
time,
your
attention,
and
hopefully
consideration.
L
Sean
good
afternoon
vice
mayor
and
members
of
the
rules
committee,
sean
kelly
rye.
No
one
is
going
to
dispute
the
fact
that
flavor
tobacco
used
by
children
is
horrible
and
aberrant
and
shouldn't
happen,
and
no
one
is
saying
that
you
shouldn't
do
something
about
that.
What
we're
saying
is
that
you
should
defer
this
issue,
because
there
are
small
businesses
here.
This
is
still
a
legal,
federally
and
state
product.
It
is
not
illegal,
it
is.
L
It
is
legal
and
small
businesses
have
been
relying
on
this
for
decades
to
make
money
and
make
a
living
and
put
food
on
the
table,
and
there
ought
to
be
some
more
consideration.
I
think,
for
the
same
way
that
there's
consideration
being
made
for
flea
market
small
businesses,
they
understand
that
they
may
need
to
pivot.
L
They
understand
that
they
may
have
to
go
elsewhere,
but
there
should
be
some
conversation
other
than
one
phone
call
and
or
a
zoom
session,
with
the
the
business
community
telling
them
not
asking
them
but
telling
them
what
they're
going
to
do,
and
even
not
even
full
disclosure
there's
been
no
draft
ordinance
that
we've
seen.
L
Outreach
may
have
been
done
a
lot
to
the
other
side
to
the
opposition,
and
that's
fine
and
that's
that's
that's
great,
but
it
hasn't
been
done
in
small
businesses,
and
so
I
just
want
everyone
to
acknowledge
that
you
can't
say
that
you're
pro-small
business
or
that
you're
supporting
small
business
or
that
you
love
small
business
or
that
you're
there
for
the
small
guy.
If
you're
going
to
ignore
him
when
it
matters-
and
this
is
the
time
all
we're
asking
for-
is
time-
we're
not
asking
you
for
anything
more
than
that.
L
B
Thank
you,
tim.
E
Hi,
my
name
is
tim
gibbs,
I'm
with
the
campaign
for
tobacco-free
kids,
and
I
wanted
to
sort
of
take
issue
with
the
previous
speaker.
City
staff
has
done
a
phenomenal
job
of
outreach
to
small
business
and
retailers.
There
was
a
stakeholder
meeting.
There
were
tons
and
tons,
and
just
pages
and
pages
of
comments,
I'm
not
sure
what
more
city
staff
could
have
done
to
outreach
to
retailers
who
sell
tobacco
products.
You
know
to
the
extent
that
the
products
that
these
retailers
are
selling
mainly
menthol
cigarettes-
I
mean
meant
those
cigarettes.
E
E
Unfortunately,
the
tobacco
companies
spent
21
million
dollars
to
put
that
law
on
hold
for
two
years,
all
the
way
until
november
of
2022,
so
san
jose
children
would
have
had
those
protections
already,
but
because
of
the
tobacco
industry,
they
will
not
in
at
least
until
2022
or
unless
the
council
acts,
which
is
what
we're
asking
them
to
do.
So
we
are
requesting
prompt
action
on
this
critical
issue
to
protect
not
only
kids
in
san
jose,
but
also
communities
who
are
targeted
by
the
predatory
marketing
practices
of
the
tobacco
industry.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
call
in
user.
A
B
All
right,
that's
in
the
public
comments
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee.
Councilmember
davis.
N
Thank
you
vice
mayor.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
say
I'm
in
support
of
the
the
proposed
ordinance
on
7.1,
but
I
have
heard
from
a
number
of
small
businesses
that
that
they
were
not
part
of
the
discussion.
I
my
understanding
is.
N
N
So
I
really
feel
like
we
need
to
do
more
outreach
and
I
I
fully
expect
to
be
voting
in
favor
of
the
ordinance
when
it
comes
to
us,
but
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we
are
fair
and
that
all
of
the
impacted
stakeholders
are
included
in
the
process,
because
we
know
that
our
small
businesses
have
been
hurting
in
the
last
year
and
a
half,
and
I
just
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
there's
sufficient
outreach.
N
Another
piece
of
information,
and
my
I
guess
I
would
I've-
heard
conflicting
reports
about
which
cities
actually
already
have.
This
and
part
of
my
question
about
that,
and-
and
I
hope
that
this
would
be-
I
haven't-
seen
the
memo
yet.
I
know
that
it
is
out.
I
just
looked
and
saw
that
it
was
posted
the
memo
and
the
proposed
ordinance
are
posted.
N
But
if,
if
the
surrounding
cities
are
are
don't
have
this,
then
we
know
that
people
can
just
go
a
couple
of
miles
and
and
and
get
what
they
want,
and
so
I'm
a
little
bit
I'd
like
to
know
which
santa
clara
county
cities
are
either
in
the
process
of
creating
an
ordinance
or
already
have
an
ordinance
similar
to
this.
N
So
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
actually
I'd
like
to
hear
from
from
council
member
arenas,
because
I
know
that
she's,
the
I
think,
she's
the
chair
of
the
committee,
that
heard
this
and
my
understanding
was.
It
was
supposed
to
go
back
to
committee,
so
I'll
hold
off
on
the
motion,
but
I
think
I
thought
it
was
supposed
to
go
back
to
your
committee
before
it
came
to
council,
and
I
I'm
definitely.
N
I
would
like
to
to
ask
for
more
stakeholder
outreach
and
for
it
to
potentially
go
back
to
your
committee
before
before.
It
comes
to
council,
so
I'll
I'll
I'll
hold
off
on
making
a
motion,
because
I
see
that
council
member
erinos
has
her
hand
raised.
Actually
everybody
has
her
entries,
but
I'd
like
to
hear
about
that.
B
Okay,
great
councilmember
reyes
is
next
so
perfect
timing.
Announcement.
O
Thank
you
I'm
having
some
technical
issues,
so
I
might
freeze
up
and
stop
my
video
just
warning,
so
I
unfortunately
was
sick
with
covid
in
december
when
this
came
to
nsc,
and
so
my
co-chair
councilmember
carrasco
heard
the
item,
but
I've
been
keeping
track
of
this
expecting
because
during
the
nsc
committee
meeting
I
did
get
you
know
the
the
notes,
of
course,
would
transpire
during
that
meeting
and
one
of
the
commitments
that
we
had
made
as
as
a
committee
was
to
ask
our
staff
to
continue
with
some
outreach.
O
There
was
some
concern
from
you
know:
small
mom-and-pop,
save,
marts
and
and
local.
You
know
neighborhood
mart's
that
they
hadn't
been
connected
with,
and
so
I
I
want
to.
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
despite
you
know
whether
it's
unpopular
or
not-
and
I
you
know
as
a
mom-
I
absolutely
don't
want
flavored
tobacco.
O
I
already
have
my
son
on
a
track
that
cigarettes
are
terrible,
terrible
for
your
brain
and
so
no
matter
what
what
kind
of
flavor
it
is,
and
so,
as
a
mom.
Absolutely
I
want
to
support
this,
but
I
don't
want
to
trample
on
pro
process.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
rather
whatever
you
know,
whatever
my
opinion
is
it's
independent
of
the
process,
and
so
we
can't
really
skip
a
step.
O
O
I
think
it
was
only
20
of
of
retailers
are
141
out
of
687
retailers,
and
so
our
committee
made
a
commitment
to
to
complete
this
outreach,
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
it
sounds
like
we
haven't
completed
it
just
yet
and
I
would
be
absolutely
open
council
member
davis
for
it
to
come
back
to
committee
just
for
us
to
ensure
that
it
has
you
know,
we've
vetted
it
and
that
it
can
go
to
council.
O
You
know
without
us
double
without
having
to
think
twice
about
it.
I
see.
B
O
A
P
A
P
P
Here
lee
wilcox,
deputy
city
manager,
yeah.
P
The
the
work
plan
for
the
community
engagement
here,
obviously
a
lot
of
it-
took
place
during
the
peak
of
our
communities
experience
through
coven,
19
and
kind
of
re-sheltering.
So
that's
obviously
made
it
difficult
for
us
to
engage
on
a
variety
of
subjects
this
included.
So
you
know
we
could
do
additional
outreach
over
the
summer
to
small
business
and
then
bring
it
back
to
possibly
neighborhood
services
and
education
committee
in
august
and
then
come
back
to
council.
P
So
we
can
do
that
as
well
as
some
of
the
best
practices
research
of
what
some
of
our
other
jurisdictions
and
the
timing
of
those,
because
at
that
point
is
also
important
council
member
davis.
So
if,
if
the
rules
committee
so
directs
us
to
do
that,
we
can
absolutely
follow
through
on
that.
O
Great,
I
I
would
be
very
supportive
of
that,
and
you
know
I
want
to
just
thank
also
the
speakers
who
took
their
time
to
discuss
this
item.
O
It
is
absolutely
impor
important
for
our
the
future
of
our
generation
to
make
sure
that
they
are
as
safe
as
they
can
be,
and
I
will
absolutely
support
this
once
it
comes
to
council.
We
just
need
to
make
sure
that
it
gets
vetted,
and
that
was
my
our
commitment
from
from
our
committee,
and
so
thank
you
lee
for
that.
I
appreciate
that.
B
Thank
you
councilmember,
as
councilmember
perales.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
had
actually
a
couple
questions
for
staff,
but
that
they
have
been
answered
in
regards
to
the
outreach,
because
I
was
not
so
familiar
on
what
that
looked
like,
and
I
was
hearing
the
same
concerns.
Q
P
Yeah,
I
would
defer
to
rosalind
and
rachel
kind
of
on
the
outreach
and
what
they're
thinking
about
in
the
way
of
additional
outreach.
Luckily,
we
do
have
the
chair
of
neighborhood
services
and
education
also
on
this
committee,
so
I
would
suggest
you
know,
unless
I'm
not
seeing
more
clearly
that
one
of
the
first
two
meetings
in
august
or
september
that
the
committee
could
hear
that
and
it
could
come
to
council
and
a
cross-referral
the
following
week
or
two
after
that.
So
I
think
this
is
a
late
summer.
Very
early
fall
thing.
Q
Okay,
I
think,
and
just
for
respect
of
of
those
that
have
been
engaged
and
certainly
for
individuals
that
want
to
see
this
policy
pla
passed.
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
give
an
indication
of
some
timeline,
and
so
you
know
I
think
that
that's
a
rough
indication
as
soon
as
we
we
can
get
an
actual
date
on
the
calendar
for
nse.
Q
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible
to
to
do
now,
while
we're
debating
this,
but
as
soon
as
we
can
get
that,
I
think
that
would
be
important
to
to
promote
that
out,
and
then
we
have
you
know,
then
we
work
backwards
from
there
on
over
the
summer.
Q
In
regards
to
the
the
outreach
that
needs
to
get
done-
and
I
would
you
know,
I
guess
I'd
be
concerned-
if
there's
a
fear
of
sort
of
continual
delay
based
on
maybe
a
lack
of
response
right
and
that
would
be
the
we
can't
force
people
to
come
to
the
table
right
at
a
meeting
or
whatever
it
may
be
in
regards
to
providing
input.
Q
We
can
do
the
best
we
can
at
trying
to
create
the
opportunities,
but
I
don't
want
to
necessarily
give
the
indication
that
we're
going
to
keep
delaying
if
exactly
the
results
come
back
the
same
right,
hey,
look.
We
weren't,
we
still
weren't
able
to
contact
several
hundred
businesses
right.
I
think
at
some
point
you
have
to
just
move
forward
and
say:
look
we've,
we've
done
outreach,
we've
done
extended
outreach
and
now
we're
going
to
come
to
the
table.
Q
So
that's
just
the
indication
I'd
like
to
give,
especially
to
those
that
came
out
to
speak
today
that
you
know
are
nervous
about
this
delay
and
and
want
to
see
this
come
forward,
and
I
do
think
that
there's
probably
a
strong
indication
of
the
council
adopting
this.
Q
So
I
don't
think
that
there's
that
you
know
major
concern,
it's
really
going
to
be
timing
of
when,
and
so
that
would
be
my
interest
in
just
feedback,
and
so
if
we
can
get
a
date
as
soon
as
possible
with
nsc,
I
would
appreciate
knowing
when
that
is
and.
P
All
the
the
work
plans
for
committees
are
will
be
approved
in
the
coming
weeks,
so
we
can
I'm
sure
that
we
can
slide
that
in
according
to
angel
rios
who's.
Texting
me
that
there
is
room
available
in
august
and
september
in
that
committee.
R
Thank
you,
chair
jones.
I
I
was
just
going
to
offer
some
comments,
putting
on
my
community
engagement
hat
for
a
moment
and
just
to
acknowledge
that
we
know
how
difficult
sometimes
it
is
to
engage
our
community
and
businesses
during
the
summer
months,
particularly
july.
R
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Councilmember
cohen,.
S
Yeah,
I'm
I'm
hesitant
to
postpone
this.
I
do
believe
that
we,
you
know
that
we've
that
there's
been
a
long
time
that
this
has
been
discussed
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
done
and
a
lot
of
advocacy
on
this
issue.
For,
for
you
know
I
I
know
it's
been
at
least
a
year
or
more.
I
understand
that
that
you
know
there's
always
going
to
be
folks
who
are
going
to
be
hesitant
about
whether
they've
been
enough
outreach.
S
I
can't
speak
to
the
complete
efficacy
of
the
outreach
process,
but
you
know
the
biggest
health
concern
for
high
school
students
before
covid
was
vaping,
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
for
the
urgency
on
this,
and
we
were
you
know
hoping
that
we'd
get
this
to
council
before
the
next
school
year
starts.
The
focus
of
the
proposal
was
going
to
be
on
retailers,
near
schools,
and
the
idea
was
to
have
this
ordinance
in
place
so
that
it
could
take
place.
S
It
could
take
effect
before
the
next
school
year
so
that
we
could,
you
know,
make
a
difference
on
the
epidemic
of
vaping
with
high
school
students.
So
anyway,
that's
my
preference.
Now
I
understand
that
there's
there's
some
feeling
here
that
some
folks
have
you
know
haven't
had
their
chance
to
weigh
in.
I
am
hearing
that
the
council
is.
Everyone
here
is
likely
to
support
the
ordinance.
So
it's-
I
guess
I'm
I
don't
want.
S
I
don't
want
to
delay
this
so
much
given
that
we're
all
basically
telegraphing
an
outcome
on
the
issue
and
we
can
delay
the
benefits
for
our
students
who
are,
you
know,
have
access
near
their
schools
and
many
retailers
to
these
products.
S
So
you
know
I,
while
I
don't
want
to
delay
it,
I
also
want
to
ask:
is
it
necessary
to
come
back
to
nsc?
Can
we
do
an
outreach
over
the
summer
and
bring
it
back
to
council
in
august?
Is
that
possible?
Is
it
necessary
to
have
that
extra
couple
month,
step
in
there
to
get
it
before
nse?
First,
I
mean
that's
a.
P
S
So
that
would
be
my
preference
if
we
want
to
maybe
postpone
this
into
august,
give
the
give
staff.
You
know
another
round
of
outreach
to
businesses
that
would
be
affected
in
july
and
then
bring
it
to
council
in
august,
and
then
you
know
try
to
get.
You
know
this
on
the
books
a
little
sooner.
That
would
that
would
be
what
I'd
support.
B
R
Yes,
thank
you
councilmember
jones.
I
just
wanted
to
provide
in
some
additional
context
and
we
did
our
tobacco
reta
retail
licensing
renewal
every
year
in
july,
so
we
had,
you
know,
deferring
it
out
to
june.
There
was
some
consideration
of
that,
because
we
would
be
able
to
do
some
of
our
implementation
as
part
of
that
process,
so
taking
on
additional
outreach
during
that
time
period.
R
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
eurenas,.
O
I
had
forgotten
that
I'd
raised
my
hand
and
I
think
angel
answered
the
question
about
it,
coming
back
to
nse
and
having
some
we're
just
developing
our
work
plan
for
the
later
part
of
the
year,
but
it
sounds
like
staff
is
saying
that
they
need
the
additional
time
until
september,
and
I
have
no
objections
if
it
comes
directly
back
to
counsel.
I
really
just
want
to
avoid
the
issue
of
whether
we
completed
or
enough
outreach.
I
don't
want
that
to
be
the
topic
of
discussion.
O
I
wanted
it
to
be
really
where
we
stand
in
terms
of
flavored
tobacco,
so
as
long
as
the
the
outreach
is
done
in
in
the
way
that
we
just
discussed
now,
I
don't
know
that
we
would
have
to
vet
it
anymore
and
it
could
come
directly
to
council
and
I
think
it's
in
september,
okay.
N
Sorry
about
that,
thank
you,
councilmember
arenas
for
the
the
clarification
on
whether
it
should
go
back
to
nse
or
not.
I
understand
that
santa
clara
had
four
outreach
meetings
so
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
of
what
what
I've
been
hearing
for
the
number
of
of
outreach
meetings
and
it
sounds
like
97
participants
out
of
almost
700,
I
thought
it
was
500.
N
That's
you
know
if
you
have
a
few
more
meetings
that
we
should
maybe
get
to
everybody,
so
I'm
hopeful,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
make
the
motion
to
accept
the
agenda
for
tuesday
june
15th
by
the
way.
There's
an
11
am
start
time.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
noticed
that,
with
with
a
7.1
deferral
until
september,
for
staff
to
be
able
to
do
additional
outreach
and
also
to
come
back
with
a
supplemental
memo
about
which
other
cities
are
are
in
the
process
or
undergoing
or
have
already
passed
an
ordinance.
N
B
B
And,
let's
see
so,
that's
no
more
hands
are
up
and
I
will
support
the
motion.
I
understand
the
desire
to
move
this
along
as
quickly
as
possible
without
giving
it
enough
time
to
do
outreach.
It
doesn't
even
really
make
sense
to
to
defer
it
or
delay
it.
So
I
think
it's
great
that
we're
going
to
at
least
provide
an
opportunity
for
as
much
outreach
and
business
input
as
possible
and
council
member
proles.
Q
B
All
right
all
right,
tony.
A
B
B
And
there
is
also,
as
a
councilmember
davis
likes
to
point
out
at
11
a.m.
Start
time
and
june
is
the
only
month
where
I'll
you
know
give
up
on
my
battle
to
not
have
the
early
stock
start
times.
So
just
so
you
know
this
is
the
only
month
so
so
again,
pages
four
and
five
six
and.
B
B
B
B
B
B
F
Hi
fled
beakman
here
to
try
to
remember
the
items
in
order
thanks
for
the
vta
honor
you'll
be
doing
next
week
or
this
agenda.
I
hope
it
can
be
a
time
to
think
of
not
only
gun
limitation
issues
but
mental
health
issues
as
well.
F
F
I
don't
think
it
should
be
secretive
and
deferred
you
kip
at
smart
cities.
Last
week
he
offered
an
explanation
about
smart
light,
poles
and
the
lights
that
was
not
very
impressive
and
that
you
guys
are,
I
think,
falling
behind
a
bit
and
how
to
be
open
and
accountable
about
the
technology
practices.
I
think
we
have
to
consider
how
to
be
open
about
it
and
and
everything
that
this
digital
inclusion
project
is
going
to
be
going
through.
F
F
F
I
mean
the
vendors
union,
I
mean
they're
people
who
come
from
mexico,
central
america,
vietnam,
I
think
to
ask
what
how
they
would
design
a
place
and
how
they
can
have
an
incredibly
important
part
in
the
future
of
the
process.
I
think
you
come
up
with
some
really
thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
A
A
B
Okay,
great
so
the
page
that
we
missed.
B
B
So
there
you
go
councilmember
cohen,.
S
Yeah,
I
was
primarily
going
to
move
the
I
want
to
first
move
the
agenda
as
presented,
but
I
had
a
question
about
that.
That
last
part,
the
joint
the
joint
authority,
part
at
the
end,
is
that
that's
intended
to
follow
the
very
end
of
the
agenda
in
terms
of
order.
Is
that
right.
P
As
laid
out
now,
yes,
but
those
are
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
would
look
at
and
often
those
are
removed
to
be
heard
right
after
consent,
especially
with
this
agenda,
we're
going
to
be
proving
a
variety
of
budget
things
that
need
to
happen
early
on
in
the
agenda
before
anything
else,
and
this
memory
isn't
coming
back
to
me.
But
this
could
be
one
of
those
things
so
that'll
be
something
that
we
can
kind
of
emphasize
with
you
when
we
come
back
next
week.
Okay,.
B
All
right,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
tony
arenas.
I
F
Hi,
thank
you
boy,
beekman.
If
I
got
cut
off
just
to
simply
offer,
I
think
the
vendors
union
can
offer
some
interesting
ideas
about
development
and
what
the
future
the
vending
can
be
like
for
that
area
for
this
item
public
record
an
interesting
variety
of
letters
again
this
week.
Thank
you.
I
was
interested
in
the
abag
letter
that
talked
about
housing
issues.
F
You
know,
and
I've
made
a
my
own
little
push
this
past
month
about
the
a
few
months
about
the
ideas
of
you,
know:
mixed
income,
eli
and
vli,
and
we
could.
I
hope
this
could
just
be
a
time
to
really
be
considering
them
and
that
we
all
want
to
return
to
market
rate
in
our
regular
economy
and
all
that
stuff.
F
I
mean
we
really
have
to
consider
eli,
bli
and
mixed
income
ideas,
and
you
got
to
get
down
to
those
practices,
and
I
know
you
you're
not
necessarily
geared
to
do
that
yet.
But
may
this
is
the
time
to
really
start
thinking
about
that
and
working
towards
it
as
concepts
of
reimagine
and
a
really
just
interesting
idea
is
the
bafa
program
of
mtc.
F
You
know,
mtc
has
more
programs,
housing
programs
besides
rena,
I
mean
there's
choices,
and
this
is
a
time
we
talk
about
choices
with
sacramento
and
and-
and
I
hope
you
guys
just
consider-
what's
inventive
and
decent
and
creative,
and
we
can
address
the
single
zoning
issues
with
mixed
income.
I
think
in
san
jose
good
luck
in
creative
thinking.
Q
I'll
move
approval
of
this
item,
I
I
wanted
to
see
if
we
could
just
get
a
clarification
on
the
on
the
first
item.
We
passed
the
agenda
for
june
15.
so
but
I'll
move
this
and
then
ask
if
we
can
just
ask
that
question
after
this
item.
O
B
Okay,
it's
moved
in
second
here,
let's
vote.
B
Right,
councilmember
braless,
your
your
questions
on
the
june
15th.
Q
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
I
don't
think
we
need
to
recall
the
item.
I
just
wanted
clarification
actually
councilmember
cohen,
as
he
mentioned
that
we
didn't
secure
any
time
certains.
So
I
looked
back
because
I
think
we
we
had
and
just
to
be
clear.
We
do
have
a
time
certain
at
6
30
for
the
police
reforms
work
plan.
Is
that
correct?
It
just
says
to
be
heard
at
so
I'm
assuming
that's
the
time
certain
language.
P
That
is
correct,
except
that,
and
we
also
recommended
deferral
one
week,
so
that
will
be
heard
on
the
22nd.
Oh
okay
now
have
any
time
certains
for
the
15th,
but
still
an
awful
lot
of
items
to
start.
Q
We
could
we
could
take
that
one
up
next
week,
then
as
well.
Yeah,
that's.
P
Right,
I
think,
that's,
I
think,
that's
part
of
give
us
the
the
week
to
kind
of
figure
that
all
out
for
you,
because
the
22nd
is
going
to
be
quite
a
few
items.
B
F
All
right,
thank
you
very
big
man.
I
meant
my
previous
words
more
as
a
pep
talk,
not
as
a
condemnation.
Thank
you
yeah
for
this
item.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
that.
You
know:
there's
there's
a
national
night
out
issue.
Item
on
this
that
will
be
coming
up.
A
national
night
will
be
coming
up
and
its
item
is
on
this
agenda.
The
consent
calendar.
F
I
just
wanted
to
offer
that
you
know
it's
a
year
later,
since
you
know
reimagine
and
really
came
into
focus
and
the
george
floyd
incidents,
and
I
think
people
were
a
bit
defensive
and
worried
and
they're
kind
of
circling
the
wagons
at
that
time.
F
I
I
hope
this
year's
national
night
out
can
be
a
much
more
open
experience
about
how
to
talk
about
the
future
of
our
policing
and
that
it
is
more
than
just
we
love
our
police.
You
know
I
mean
we
may,
but
I
I
think,
there's
there's
really
interesting
practices
to
address
the
future
of
sustainability
and
to
address
genuine
ideas
of
peace
and
to
really
address
the
future
of
the
military-industrial
complex
in
this
country.
F
We
are
at
that
time
I
mean
the
mayor.
Has
made
a
real
point
to
want
to
focus
on
technology
and
surveillance
and
data
collection?
There
is
a
larger
world
than
that.
It
is
a
world
of
open
public
policy.
It
is
people
communicating,
it
is
sharing
of
ideas,
that's
the
future
of
innovation
and
revolution
and
all
the
good
stuff.
Sorry,
I
said
the
word
revolution,
but
that's
that's
the
key
to
innovation.
F
It's
how
people
can
talk
to
each
other
more
on
a
simple
day-to-day
neighborhood
level,
and
all
of
that
sort
of
stuff
that
you
know
that's
what
the
neighborhood
night
out
is,
and
it's
not
you
know
just
pounding
us
with
what
police
needs.
You
know
we're
learning
and
how
to
openly
describe
that
to
ourselves.
That's
that's
the
efforts.
I
think
we
can
all
do
well
in
the
next
few
years
and
it
can
be
a
good,
interesting
process
for
us.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
Can
we
get
a
vote
tony.
A
T
P
B
C
C
F
Hi
blair
beekman
with
your
ideas
of
community
energy-
I
you
know
I
I
feel
like
it's
a
sense
that
you're
what
you're
trying
to
consider
is
the
future
of
renewable
ideas
and
where
that
whole
process
stands-
and
I
just
wanted
to-
I
hope
san
jose
is
reassessing
its
renewable
energy
plan
and
how
it
can
be
more
accessible
to
the
everyday
public
and
that
you're
considering
I,
I
think
you
know
in
the
next
few
years
you
know
we
may
be
preparing
for
natural
disasters
as
a
part
of
our
overall,
as
as
part
of
our
overall
portfolio
of
how
to
talk
and
work
as
a
city
which
is
which
I
tried
to
mention
last
night.
F
It's
incredibly
admirable
what
you're
doing,
and
I
thank
you
for
that.
I
think
it's
from
that.
You
know
we
that's
how
we
develop
the
next
few
years
about
just
how
we,
how
we
can
talk
about
reimagine
and
equity
and
and
our
good
prac.
All
of
our
good
practices,
which
I
mean,
equity
and
reimagine,
are
just
our
better
ideals
and,
and
we
learn
to
include
renewable
energy
plans
and
not
focus
on
you
know,
dirty
fossil
fuels.
F
That
will
be
needed
for
regenerator
time,
but
more
focus
on
renewables
and
that
whole
process
it
transitions
ourselves
out
of
a
natural
disaster,
time
much
easier
and
much
simpler
and
quicker,
and
we're
just
we'll
just
feel
better
about
ourselves
and
you're
starting
to
do
that
by
us,
offering
natural
disaster
preparedness
plans
and
your
council
agendas
at
this
time.
That's
awesome
of
you!
F
Thank
you
and
I
I
hope
you
can
include
open
public
policies
as
a
part
of
this
whole
process
and
that
renewables
of
a
concentration
on
renewable
energy
and
with
the
community
energy
program
at
this
time.
It's
really
important
and
it's
part
of
a
whole
plan
that
I
think
we
can
talk
about,
as
as
the
budget
ideas
have
presented
themselves,
how
we
can
talk
about
our
budget
and
our
thinking
overall
values
for
the
next
few
years.
Thanks.
B
Thank
you,
blair,
councilmember,
perales,.
A
K
T
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
I
want
to
talk
to
you
about
and
I'm
commenting
on
the
housing
podcast
too,
that
was
removed
from
the
housing
website,
since
it
presented
only
one
side
again.
Thank
you
for
that.
The
housing
department
website
now
indicates
that
they
are
making
an
additional
podcast
families
and
homes.
San
jose
has
not
received
any
requests
from
the
housing
department
to
participate.
In
this.
We
are
a
grassroots
organization
and
have
been
working
to
provide
information
to
the
community.
T
We
have
sent
and
forwarded
numerous
letters
from
neighborhood
associations
to
the
housing
department
and
to
elected
officials.
We
would
love
and
like
to
participate
with
the
housing
department
in
developing
the
second
webcast,
so
that
both
sides
can
be
presented.
I'm
a
little
shocked.
We
haven't
been
contacted
in
light
of
our
numerous
communications
and
being
a
local
grassroot
organization,
but
I
do
look
forward
and
hope
that
you
will
encourage
the
housing
department
to
consider
and
contact
us.
We
have
a
website,
they
know
it,
and
most
of
you
have
seen
our
letters
too.
B
Thank
you,
blair.
F
Hi
claire
beekman,
thanks
for
yourself
for
your
patience
for
with
myself
today.
As
always,
I
there
was
an
item
about
trying
to
end
the
affordable
housing
impact
fee
and
I
don't
think
that's
a
very
good
idea.
We
want
things
to
be
regular
and
and
there's
bargaining
involved.
I
I
don't
think
that
should
be
used
as
a
bargaining
ship,
necessarily
there's
a
cobit
issued
extending
cobid
into
the
future.
I
wanted
to
quickly
mention
that
the
u.n
general
assembly
chair-
I
I
don't
quite
know
his
name.
F
He
was
just
reelected
to
re-elected
to
a
second
term,
and
I
did
not
hear
much
debate
or
question
about
him
being
re-uh
to
that
position
which
to
me
signals
you
know
for
all
the
macho
stancing
of
in
this
country
about
we're,
not
wearing
masks
and
that
we
want
our
freedom
nobody's
talking
about
the
actions
of
the
un
and
the
who
and
not
just
china,
but
the
u.s
too.
The
us
has
had
a
major
part
in
this
development
of
possible
development
of
cobit
19
that
we
have
to
consider
that
has
to
be
open.
F
Subject
matter,
this
isn't
just
china's
fault.
We
have
to
consider
the
un.
The
who
and
the
u.s
as
a
part
of
a
whole
process
of
healing
and
accountability
for
ourselves
and
how
we
can
talk
to
each
other
in
decent
terms
in
the
future.
So
I
hope
this
all
gets
together
and
we
learn
to
address
the
un.
We
learn
to
address
the
who
and
ask
some
serious
questions
with
that
said.
You
know
I
wanted
to
talk
quickly.
F
If
I
can
about
the
vision,
zero,
ksi
statistics,
you
had
a
big
push
to
make
sure
that
we
understood
things
about
ksi
that,
but
the
ksi
numbers
have
been
shifted
to
respect
that
there's
been
new
counts
of
homeless
people,
which
in
itself
is
a
great
process,
but
you
don't
know
how
to
add
those
numbers
compared
to
years
of
previous
statistics.
Good
luck!
How
to
do
that
better
in
the
future.
Thanks.
B
Thanks
blair,
colin
user.
M
One
yeah,
I
think
the
most
important
thing
for
me.
M
Is
proper
police
coverage
from
midnight?
Six
I
mean
there's
so
many
nicey
nice
things
that
that
this
government
city
council
want
to
do
all
this
flag
waving
and
raising
and
lighting
up
the
the
the
rotunda
you
know
have
they
have
they
lit
up
the
rotunda
for
the
italian
americans
lately?
No,
they
they
haven't.
They
took
away
that
columbus
statue.
M
It
offended
even
sam
who
is
italian
yeah.
Is
it
have
they
lit
the
rotunda
for
the
feast
of
the
sacred
heart?
No,
they
haven't
done
that
I
regress.
You
know
it's
another
big
month-long
charade
parade
for
you,
people
down
there,
but
and
of
course
you
always
have
the
police
involved
prancing
around
with
flags
and
things
disgusting.
You
know,
we've
got
where
I
live.
There's
so
much
crime
they've
got
tires
being
stolen
off
of
cars,
home
break-ins,
but
you
guys
are
just
concerned
about
agenda
21
and
mass
transit
to
nowhere.
M
Have
you
ever
just
thought
of
normal
normal
things
that
are
bread
and
butter
issues?
I
mean
when
we,
when
we
call
for
police,
all
you
guys
do
is
re,
have
a
revenue
on
a
corner
of
brian
and
cherry.
M
I
thought
you,
I
thought
you
guys
would
would
have
enough
money
from
all
the
pot
tax,
no
paralysis,
sad,
that
there's
not
enough
pot
tax.
M
I
thought
that
was
going
to
pay
for
everything.
You
know
the
potheads
have
been
saying.
For
decades
they
were
going
to
be
able
to
pay
for
everything
with
marijuana
attacks.