►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of June 8, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://legistar.granicus.com/sanjose/meetings/2022/6/5023_A_City_Council_22-06-14_Agenda.pdf
A
B
D
C
B
B
B
B
24
and
25
and
on
item
10.2,
I
am
going
to
request
that
we
defer
that
item
for
a
week
to
the
agenda
of
june
21st,
there's
still
additional
information
that
we're,
having
received
from
the
developer
that
we
need
to
have
before
we
can
finalize
our
recommendations.
So
I
requested
a
deferral
for
that
item
and
so
that's
24
and
25.
C
A
A
Well,
I
can't
name
it
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
there
there
is
a
community
energy
item
on
next
week's
agenda
that
I
think
is
very
much
related
to
items
that
were
talked
about
at
the
transportation
meeting
on
monday.
Can
I
be
allowed
to
continue?
Yes,
please
go
ahead.
Thank
you
so
yeah.
So
with
a
transportation
meeting,
a
lot
was
talked
about
carbon
neutral
issues
and
carrie
wrote
romanov.
I
can't
remember
quite
remember
last
name
the
environmental
you
know
chair
she.
E
E
We
there
were
so
many
people
we
had
to
go
into
the
overflow
room.
We
went
out
of
that
meeting
with
great
relief
and
happiness
because
we
believed
that
that
vote
meant
that
all
the
all
the
parks
in
san
jose
were
going
to
get
a
mobile
home
designation.
We
didn't
understand,
and
I
have
a
masters
in
political
science.
I
didn't
know
that
you
guys
didn't
vote
any
money.
E
E
I
urge
you
to
support
the
paralysis
memo
or
the
himanas
foley
memo
they're
only
off
by
a
dollar
and
let's
get
it
moving
and
not
just
do
five
parks.
We've
already
waited
two
years
and
I
gotta
tell
you
and
I'm
giving
you
the
straight
scoop.
The
residents
are
angry,
they
don't
trust
their
government,
they
said
hey,
we
thought
this
was
a
done
deal.
So
please,
on
the
14th,
do
the
right
thing
and
accept
one
of
the
two
memos
either
the
perales
memo
or
the
hamanez
foley
memo.
Thank
you.
C
C
B
G
Well,
I
won't
commit
to
not
having
you
there
until
12
o'clock
at
night,
because
there's
other
factors
at
play,
but
yes,
we've.
We've
scrubbed
this
we're
going
through
an
analysis
for
this
meeting,
the
one
on
the
21st
and
the
one
on
the
28th
of
what
really
needs
to
be
done
before
the
end
of
the
year
and
are
already
shifting
things
into
august.
So
we
do
believe
everything
on
this
agenda
needs
to
move
forward.
D
G
C
D
G
C
C
H
H
Well,
that's
a
fair
point,
since
many
of
us
don't
make
it
to
council
chambers
now
before
before
closed
session.
All
right,
I,
I
guess
I'll-
make
the
motion
reluctantly
to
move
the
people
of
the
agenda
with
the
deferral
that
vice
mayor
asked
for
on
item.
What
was
it
10.3
or
10.2
10.2
and
a
start
time
for
closed
session
of
9
a.m
and
a
start
time
for
open
session
of
11
a.m?.
D
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
A
A
This
is
a
new
concept
for
us
as
the
bay
area
as
local
communities.
It's
been
a
bit
difficult
to
learn
how
to
do,
but
I
think
we're
getting
the
hang
of
it
and
it's
important
good
work.
That's
developed
since
the
type
of
the
time
of
george
floyd
and
reimagine,
and
thank
you
that
that
we're
considering
this
the
city
of
san
francisco
has
just
voted
out
their
d,
their
current
d.a.
A
To
show
that
there
I
feel
san
francisco
is
a
bit
out
of
focus
in
exactly
what
their
political
direction
is
at
this
time.
Good
luck!
How
they
can
work
on
that
because
I
think
their
da
and
and
the
da
who
ran
in
san
jose
both
have
very
progressive
agendas
and
agendas
of
reimagine.
I
don't
think
we
have
to
throw
away
those
concepts.
I
think
there's
something
incredibly
important,
we're
learning
at
this
time
that
is
going
to
be
for
our
lifetimes.
It
is
building
our
good
future.
A
A
B
G
All
right,
yes,
it
will
vice
mayor
we're
going
through
that
now
we'll
be
able
to
answer
any
questions
next
week
that
the
rules
committee
wants
to
know
in
the
way
of
what
legally
needs
to
go
before
the
end
of
the
year.
And
then
what
was
council
directed
that
the
rules
committee
has
authority
to
push
into
august
if
they
so
wish.
E
G
F
All
right,
hi,
hi
again
all
right
good
afternoon.
My
name
is
quincy
johnston,
I'm
with
the
environmental
organization
californians
against
waste,
and
we're
calling
today
to
express
our
support
for
the
resolution
to
endorse
the
plastic
ballot
measure.
This
ballot
measure
marks
a
once
in
a
generation
opportunity
to
truly
change
the
tide
on
plastic
pollution,
while
investing
in
our
environment
and
economy,
the
california,
recycling
and
plastic
pollution
reduction
act
places
a
fee
of
up
to
one
cent
per
component
of
plastic
packaging
and
single-use
foodwear,
based
on
the
cost
of
recyclability.
F
Shifting
costs
to
plastic
manufacturers.
The
fee
is
slated
to
in
part
fund
local
jurisdictions
for
investment
in
recycling
and
waste
management
infrastructure,
as
well
as
education
and
outreach
programs.
Additionally,
this
fee
establishes
continued
annual
investments
in
infrastructure
and
programs
paid
for
by
manufacturers
ensuring
that
rates
are
low
for
consumers.
F
Concerns
of
costs
being
passed
on
to
consumers
is
based
on
the
wrong
assumption
that
producers
would
continue
with
the
same
production
and
not
opt
for
the
most
feasible
recyclable
and
environmentally
friendly
materials
under
the
precisions
of
the
ballot
measure,
and
that
is
unrealistic.
We
respectfully
urge
the
san
jose
city
council
to
support
this
ballot
measure.
C
A
A
It
was
very
relaxing
for
me
and
while
I
was
there,
I
was,
I
learned
that
they
have
a
plastic
bag
ban
and
they're,
not
too
keen
on
plastics,
no
plastic
straws,
and
I
it
may
be
a
good
model
for
yourselves
to
look
into
as
a
state
and
how
they
work
their
plastic
policies.
That
may
be
of
interest,
and
though
I
thought
I'd
mention
it
at
this
time
and
a
a
nice
reminder
that
zoom
meetings
are
an
interesting
process
where
I
can
be
at
a
different
place
and
call
in
and
attend
a
public
meeting.
I
Yeah
sure
so
this
this
ballot
initiative
is
currently
an
eligible
ballot
initiative.
All
ballot
initiatives
will
become
qualified
on
june
30th.
This
is
an
opportunity
really
for
san
jose
to
take
some
leadership.
It's
aligned
with
our
legislative
program
on
extended
producer
responsibility
and
in
our
environmental
and
climate,
smart
initiatives
and
the
other
pieces
here
are
that,
if
enacted,
this
measure
would
prohibit
food
vendors,
including
restaurants
and
grocery
stores,
from
using
styrofoam
and
other
plastic
foam
takeout
containers.
I
I
C
B
D
I
don't
wanna,
I
don't
need
to
take
more
time.
Twenty
percent
of
the
money
for
the
one
cent
fee
comes
back
to
local
governments,
which
will
be
helpful
in
things
that
we're
doing,
implement
composting
and
other
things
that's
valuable
to
us.
We
have
a
styrofoam
band,
but
the
state
does
not,
so
this
would
sort
of
align
the
state
before
california
with
what
san
jose
is
doing.
D
It
also
would
wouldn't
allow
would
require
that
people
get
for
takeout,
don't
automatically
get
plastic
ware
as
part
of
their
takeout,
for
example,
and
you'd
have
to
you
know,
people
would
have
to
request
it
and
what
you're
given
would
then
have
to
be
reusable,
recycle
or
compostable,
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
use
plastic
utensils
as
part
of
take
out
there's
a
lot
of
elements
that
are
good.
This
is
important.
D
This
is
on
the
ballot
because
for
years
the
legislature
has
been
having
discussions
about
doing
these
things
and
keeps
getting
stymied
by
opposition
from
plastics
industry
and
hasn't
been
able
to
come
to
an
agreement.
So
it's
on
the
ballot
there's
a
reason
to
do
this
now,
and
that
is
because
the
legislature
is
talking
about
a
bill
that
would
do
some
of
these
things
now
and.
D
And
therefore
remove
it
from
the
ballot.
If
the
legislature
can
can
actually
do
this
before
june
30th,
then
it
would
be
removed
from
the
ballot
november.
So
by
endorsing
this
measure,
we're
signaling
that
it's
important
to
us
and
we
hope
that
the
legislature
will
actually
put
these
actions
in
legislatively
and
it
won't
end
up
on
the
ballot.
So
I
think
that
so
that's
the
reason
to
bring
it
forward
and
support
it
ahead
of
june
30th.
A
B
Okay,
and
just
just
so,
everyone
knows
the
reason
why
I
asked
the
question
about
the
process,
because
you
know
we.
We
often
have
some
of
these.
These
items
come
before
us
in
rules
and
I
just
want
to
be
consistent
in
terms
of
which
one
so
we
move
forward
and
which
ones
we
refer
back
to
igr,
to
do
a
further
analysis
and
and
exploration
on
and
then
come
back
with
the
recommendations.
So
I
just
want
to
try
to
be
consistent,
and
so
we
have
a
motion
a
second
on
the
floor.
C
B
E
Yeah
hi
martha
o'connell,
some
I
infrequently
say
this,
but
it's
applicable
to
this
topic.
I
wish
the
government
would
act
more
like
private
in
enterprise.
I
have
alerted
housing
to
the
fact
that
there
is
a
number
nine,
seven,
five,
four,
four,
eight
zero.
That
is
impossible
for
the
residents
to
navigate.
E
I
had
a
chapter
president,
whose
first
language
is
english,
try
it
and
she
said
she
about
gave
up
after
five
minutes.
So
if
you
could
ask
housing
to
please
make
that
number
more
user-friendly.
When
mobile
home
park
residents
are
trying
to
get
help,
it
would
go
a
long
way
to
make
their
lives
a
lot
easier
and
once
again,
that
number
call
it
yourself
and
see
what
I
mean:
nine
seven,
five,
four,
four:
eight
zero!
Thank
you
very
much
for
considering
that.
J
Perfect
retention,
you
lose
something
really
important.
That's
how
I
lost
my
you
know.
I
didn't
check
my
feed
correctly
and
there
was
just
one
thing
that
was
off
about
it.
Everything
else
fit,
and
you
know
they
had
me
lined
up
and
I
was
going
to
get
a
new
housing.
They
had
me
ready
to
move
and
then
they
told
them.
They
handed
me
a
piece
of
paper
told
me
after
that
happened.
J
I
was
viewed
like
I
was
a
piece
of
trash
and
I'm
not
holding
that
to
anybody
here,
but
it's
very,
very
damaging
and
they
are
after
mobile
home
parks.
They
want
to
convert
mobile
home
parks
even
with
all
the
fine
things
you
put
in.
They
still
want
to
do
that,
but
doing
that
you
have
to
make
it
really
easy
for
people
to
communicate.