►
From YouTube: AUG 29, 2018 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
We
need
to
oppose
two
different
sets
of
meeting
minutes
which
are
in
front
of
you.
As
you
remember,
we
had
a
bit
of
a
just
a
technical
posting,
our
last
meetings
that
we
were
unable
to
approve
the
July
9th
meeting
minutes
so
I
need
a
motion
in
a
second
to
approve
the
July
9th
meeting
minutes
Kathy
Leslie.
Thank
you
any
opposed,
okay,
all
in
favor,
let's
move
forward
same
for
the
August
13th.
A
C
Thank
You
Leigh
great,
to
see
you
all
again
here
tonight,
usual
protocol,
I'm
gonna
run
you
through
the
meeting
agenda.
We'll
talk
through
some
of
the
summary
notes
for
last
meeting.
We're
gonna
get
a
quick
update
on
processes
and
activities
to
date
and
talk
a
little
bit
about.
What's
the
cup
we're
also
gonna,
have
a
group
discussion
actually
I'm?
Sorry
what
next
we're
gonna
have
a
update
on?
What's
going
on
in
the
neutron
station
area,
give
you
a
quick
update
on
what's
happening
in
the
planning
department
and
everything
going
on
related
to
that
area.
C
We're
also
gonna
have
a
group
discussion
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
it
when
we
get
there.
But
that's
why
you
have
the
the
colored
note
cards
in
front
of
you
we'll
talk
about
what
that
means
shortly.
We're
gonna
have
a
fun
interactive
discussion
with
you
all
about
the
desired
outcomes
and
then
we're
gonna
have
time
for
public
comment.
As
always,
then
talk
a
little
bit
about
next
steps,
so
group
agreements
again
I'm
not
gonna
dive
too
deeply
into
these.
You
guys
have
been
fantastic
and
very
respectful,
open
or
different
perspectives.
C
Understand
that
were
very
diverse
community,
with
a
lot
of
great
ideas
and
again
we're
here
to
have
fun
and
make
new
friends
and
I
think
we've
done
that
after
ten
meetings.
So
it's
fantastic
to
see
you
all
here
again
tonight
so
very
quickly.
The
summary
notes
from
the
last
meeting
we
did
have
a
report
back
from
the
jobs,
education
and
economic
development
group.
There
was
some
points
raised.
C
I'll
just
highlight
a
couple
here:
potential
concern
that
the
city
is
being
maybe
too
stringent
on
google,
recognizing
that
maybe
we're
not
as
strange
over
the
city
might
not
be
stringent
on
other
developments
or
developers
in
the
area.
We
considered
benefits
that
Google
can
bring
recognize
that
Google
is
actively
listening
in
the
process.
I'm
really
capitalizing
on
Google
strings,
and
these
are
sorry
input
that
we
received
from
you
all
after
we
did
the
report
out
with
housing,
displacement
and
gentrification.
C
There
were
some
questions
I'm
around
acquiring
land.
How
does
that
actually
equal
or
how
does
that
not
equal,
converting
existing
neighborhoods?
How
do
we
do
that
without
impacting
surrounding
neighborhoods?
We
talked
a
lot
about
high-density
housing
and
we
talked
about
impact
fees
and
ongoing
basis
and
how
that
might
impact
the
process,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
great
discussion
around
housing
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
both
these
topics
and
the
three
or
four
others
brought
up
earlier
tonight.
So
we'll
have
a
chance
to
make
sure
that
we
got
it
right.
C
D
Does
staff
feel
like
that,
how
that's
presented
that
that
was
where
the
bulk
of
the
conversation
was,
because
that
seems
very
rather
unrepresentative,
I.
Think
of
the
conversation
that
was
actually
had.
It
doesn't
reflect
any
of
the
kind
of
support
and
conversation
about
what
the
solution
groups
actually
presented
in
the
jobs
group.
I
didn't
see
any
bullet
point
talking
about
the
issues
around
job
quality
and
subcontracted
workers,
but
that
was
the
bulk
of
the
conversation.
It
seems
a
little
bit
like
there
was
some
cherry
picked.
D
You
know
aspects
of
the
conversation
that
were
highlighted
and
placed
in
the
beginning
that
were
actually
pretty
minor
footnotes
in
the
overall
conversation,
I'm,
not
sure
that
those
as
presented
you
know
like,
for
instance,
even
the
issue
of
a
community
benefits
agreement
was
the
very
last
bullet
in
displacement.
But
there
were
plenty
of
comments
about
that
from
multiple
speakers.
C
I
mean
that's
a
highlight
from
kind
of
the
consultant
team.
At
least
we
thought
were
just
some
of
the
main
topics
that
came
up
there's
a
full
summary:
that's
posted
on
on
the
website.
That
gets
a
little
bit
further
in
the
detail
about
what
was
discussed,
and
this
is
really
just
after
we
presented
the
report
out
from
each
group
and
definitely
those
topics
came
up
in
the
report.
Outs
and
we'll
have
a
chance
to
talk
about
those
again
tonight,
but
we
weren't
meaning
to
overlook
any
major
topic.
D
Just
I
I
would
not
support
approving
those
particular
notes
to
be
presented
in
any
future.
Representation
of
what
that
conversation
was
I
would
really
appreciate.
Its
staff
would
have
a
look
back
at
the
conversation
that
took
place
and
try
to
record
what
was
actually
spoken
about.
It
seems
like
there
was
a
couple
of
small
critiques
that
have
an
oversized
role
in
what
was
recorded
there
versus
what
the
conversation
was
actually
about.
C
E
All
right,
so
we
have
now
completed
five
pop-up
workshops.
Most
recently
was
the
stroll
on
the
Alameda,
and
we
have
one
upcoming
for
September
23rd
at
Viva.
Calle
we've
completed
three
stakeholder
meetings
and
have
several
more
in
the
works
and
just
to
reiterate
those
are
meetings
that
a
community
group
is
hosting
and
they
have
invited
city
staff
to
come
present
on
the
dear
Don
Station
area
and
our
community
engagement
process,
and
so
we
attend
as
a
guest
speaker.
E
So
just
a
reminder,
we
completed
four
community
forums
back
in
June
and
we
have
three
community
meetings
scheduled
for
September.
Hopefully
you
all
saw
the
announcement
that
went
out
recently
and
can
help
us
spread
the
word
and
encourage
people
to
attend
these.
The
emphasis
on
the
outreach
in
September,
specifically
with
these
meetings
and
an
online
feedback
forum,
is
going
to
be
reporting
back
on
preliminary
desired
outcomes
from
engagement
process
and
get
additional
feedback.
So
it's
the,
whereas
the
community
forums
in
June.
E
F
Maria
Noelle
Fernandez,
Oh,
Silicon,
Valley,
rising
and
I
wanted
to
say
so.
I've
been
hearing
a
lot
from
our
base
from
Silicon
Valley,
rising
space
around
the
engagement
process
and
I've
been
holding
them,
but
I
wanted
to
raise
it
in
this
space
to
get
both
more
information,
but
also
see
how
we
can
make
the
next
process
of
engagement
better.
F
F
The
second
one
related
to
that
is
around
outreach.
My
understanding
from
the
past
forums
is
that
most
of
the
outreach
was
done
via
email.
Had
some
council
members
support
and
get
out
there
to
their
email
list,
but
what
we
all
know
is
that
not
everyone,
particularly
my
base,
is
not
on
email
list
necessarily
and
so
I'm
curious.
If
you
can
report
back
on
how
outreach
was
done,
did
we
have
any
you
know,
folks,
going
door-to-door?
F
Did
we
have
any
mailers
that
actually
went
out
and
what's
the
plan
moving
forward
for
these
for
them,
so
that
they're
better
and
then
just
two
last
items
I
think
one
I
would
love
details
on
what
the
agenda
will
actually
be
for
these
upcoming
forums.
I
think
one
of
the
concerns
that
we've
heard
is
that
the
forum,
the
way
that
the
structure
of
the
meeting
was
held,
the
first
piece
of
it
was
really
someone
called
it.
F
A
roadshow
for
Google
and
what's
hard
about
that,
is
that
people
don't
feel
like
they're,
actually
authentically
being
heard
versus
being
sold
a
project,
and
so
I
would
love
details
on
how
the
engagement
process
is
actually
gonna
look
moving
forward
and
if
it's
gonna
be
different,
because
I
only
went
to
one
of
them,
admittedly,
but
that's
what
I
felt
as
well,
and
so
how
do
we
actually
do
authentic
engagement
process
versus
just
saying
this
is
how
great
it
is.
This
is
what
is
being
addressed
on
housing
and
essentially
saying
y'all.
F
Don't
worry,
that's
what
a
lot
of
folks
have
shared
with
me
was
what
was
felt
in
some
of
those
spaces,
and
then,
lastly,
you
know
one
of
them.
The
positive
pieces
from
the
last
forums
was
that
one
was
held
on
the
east
side
and
that
it
was
I
think
the
intention
was
it
to
have
it
be
done
in
Spanish.
I.
Do
want
to
share
that.
F
Outreach,
how
has
it
been
done?
How
will
it
be
done
moving
forward
and
how
are
you
capturing
people
that
are
not
on
an
email
list?
So
are
you
doing
a
mailer?
Are
you
doing
neighborhood
canvassing?
What's
the
strategy
being
used
for
outreach
related
to
the
outreach
is
clarity
on
how
these
forums
are
being
advertised,
Dehradun
station
area
versus
just
you
know,
Google
and
how
that's
being
corporated,
so
people
are
clear
on
what
they're
getting
invited
to
so.
E
F
E
G
And
a
project
application
is
filed
with
the
city,
then
it
goes
through
a
very
specific
process,
where
certain
milestones
trigger
notification
of
people
within
X
geography
around
the
particular
project.
So
that's
not
what
we're
doing
here
and
we're
really
relying
on
you
and
on
the
networks
of
people
that
are
already
in
communication
with
people
who
care
about
this
to
work
with
us
to
to
get
the
right
people
who
care
to
the
forum
I
can.
F
Appreciate
that
and
I
think
I'm
actually
not
saying
that
this
should
be
following
the
typical
City
process.
I
think
everything
about
this
project
is
not
typical
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
actually
figuring
out.
How
do
we
build
the
best
community
engagement
process
possible,
given
how
important
this
is
for
our
city
for
the
future
of
our
region?
That's
what
I'm
talking
about
is:
are
we
actually
building
the
best
community
process
and
given
just
where
we
are
in
the
process
and
that
we're
adding
these
three
mix
forums
I?
F
I
H
A
A
Did
not
speak
Spanish
just
so
you're
aware,
that's
an
absolute
inaccuracy,
both
both
the
the
meeting
was
actually
translated
in
Reverse,
so
people
that
were
there
that
didn't
speak
Spanish
were
spoken
to
in
English,
so
the
whole
meeting
was
done
in
Spanish.
That
presents
the
presentation
and
the
facilitation
so
total
inaccuracy
on
the
second
and
how
these
meetings
are
going.
Granted
it's
easy
to
poca
process.
We
can
always
make
improvements.
A
J
A
A
F
Well,
two
things
that
come
to
mind:
one
is
that
this
isn't
actually
a
poke.
This
is
actually
someone.
That's
really
invested
in
figuring
out.
How
do
we
get
more
people
engaged
in
this
process
because
I
think
many
people
care
deeply
about
it?
So
it's
less
about
like
this
perfect,
it's
about.
Okay,
we
have
this
next
three
forums.
How
do
we
actually
make
them
better?
And
so,
if
there's
space
to
have
that
conversation
great,
if
there's
not.
F
It
and
then
I
think
the
other
piece
is
that
it
was
less
about
a
specific
question
that
I
heard,
but
more
about
the
front-end
of
particularly
OED
at
the
front,
just
really
talking
about
how
there's
already
a
path
that
the
city
is
taking
to
address
housing,
displacement,
gentrification
and
so
I.
Just
again
as
we
look
at
the
next
forums
and
the
agenda
and
how
they're
run
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
really
based
in
engagement
versus
anything
else,
yeah.
G
Put
the
presentation
together,
I
am
always
happy
to
accept
any
feedback
and
they
also
received
feedback
from
a
lot
of
people
that
gosh.
It
was
so
helpful
at
the
front
of
the
meeting
to
lay
out
all
of
the
history
and
the
process
and
the
timing
and
to
frame
these
challenging
issues
and
opportunities
that
are
here.
I.
Think
the
statement
that
you're
referring
to
I
recall
it
very
well
and
I,
actually
haven't
written
down
and.
G
They
they
of
the
I,
made
the
statement
that
and
of
course
more
needs
to
be
done,
and
in
the
context
of
these
conversations,
we
have
an
opportunity
to
think
more
about
equitable
development
and
economic
mobility
and
continue
to
do
innovation
in
that
area.
So
I
did
not
say
everything
is
done
already.
I
very
intentionally
wanted
to
acknowledge
the
good
work
that
people
in
this
community
have
done
together.
G
With
this
council
and
I
said,
then,
there's
room
to
do
more
I
welcome
any
any
feedback
just
taken
offline
on
that
present,
because
we've,
given
it
quite
a
bit
of
times
now,
just
intent
to
like
put
the
basic
facts
about
where
we've
been
while
we're
doing
what
happens
next
and
to
frame
some
of
the
challenging
issues.
That
was
the
intent
great.
F
E
E
I,
like
Kim,
said,
I'm
also
open
to
feedback
on
how
to
do
that.
The
flyer
does
have
in
the
first
bullet
of
the
objective
that
but
I
guess,
if
there's
more
specific
feedback
that
I'm.
Let's
talk
about
it
because
I
that
wasn't
our
intention,
it
was
to
have
Google
there
as
being
a
key
part
of
what's
happening.
E
J
E
B
E
May
not
be
convenient,
so
they're,
definitely
general
public
audience.
We
wanted
to
spread
them
out
across
the
neighborhood's,
so
the
gardener
community
center
I
think
is
pretty
close
to
the
dirt
on
station
area,
so
general
downtown,
North,
Willow,
Glen,
deer,
Don
area
I
think
is
probably
you
know
the
most
likely
audience,
but
they
are
open
to
everyone.
E
M
Eddie
Tron,
director
of
God
relations
for
the
silken
bye
organization,
I
just
want
to
make
a
few
comments
that
I
just
want
to
commend
staff,
particularly
Kim
Wallace,
for
your
work
in
presenting
to
our
70
member
board
directors
when
it
comes
to
community
engagement
process.
I
do
want
to
mention
that
I
believe
that
staff
are
doing
the
best
they
can.
M
But
the
thing
is
that
I
think
this
is
incumbent
upon
this
body
to
help
staff
out
if
we
need
to
do
better
community
engagement
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
put
skin
in
the
game
when
it
comes
to
that,
and
so
I
would
challenge
everyone
to
support
the
community
engagement
process,
to
bring
new
communities
out
here
and
to
share
all
the
feedback
that's
available.
If
anything,
I
really
would
like
for
us
to
move
forward
to
the
next
part
of
the
conversation
for
this
presentation-
and
these
are
my
comments
for
now.
A
Yes,
Oh
all
feedback.
Public
comment
is
being
captured
by
the
consultants
and
rolled
up
into
some
of
the
summary
things,
but
also
you're,
going
to
start
seeing
and
some
of
desired
outcomes,
and
some
of
the
reports
that
we
have
in
the
report
that
talk
about
the
larger
community
engagement
understand
that
this
room
is
an
ideal.
You
know
we've
thought
about
moving
that
across
the
street,
to
San
Jose,
State
and
Charlie's
offered
that
we
have
direction
to
make
sure
all
these
are
videotaped
and
recorded.
So
this
room
is
really
our
solution.
A
A
We
we
put
in
the
meeting
minutes
that
the
meeting
I
think
our
third
meeting
that
was
interrupted
and
many
people
around
this
table
felt
that
that
was
a
jab
against
the
community.
So
that
is
specifically
why
there's
no
mention
of
a
protest
outside
last
time,
because
several
of
you
thought
that
that
wasn't
representative
of
you
guys
or
the
general
public
we're
here
to
discuss
under
public
comment,
so
I
didn't
put
it
in.
A
She
felt
that
it
should
have
been
recorded
because
it
was
part
of
the
public
engagement
and
I'm
fine,
putting
that
in
there
we
did
last
time
and
the
group
felt
that
it
wasn't
necessary
and
that
was
a
I
I
kind
of
felt
like
it
was
a
I,
don't
want
to
put
words
in
the
mouth
because
that
was
a
long
time
ago,
but
several
people
around
the
table
thought
it
was
staff
digging
at
the
community
for
us
saying
that
there
was
a
protest
and
the
meeting
was
interrupted
and.
A
F
Noel,
so
look
I'm,
not
everything.
Just
to
say
the
room
wasn't
ready
immediately
when
people
got
here
and
so
I
think
part
of
people
saying
we
don't
want
to
be
moved
is
because
the
doors
were
locked.
There
was
police
at
the
door
yelling
at
people.
People
were
angry,
so
does
it
warrant
them
not
wanting
to
go
to
the
next
room
and
give
their
testimony
I
don't
know,
but
people
were
not
feeling
heard
and
respected.
A
N
Also
would
I
disagree,
I
think
it's
also
an
issue
of
placemaking
the
protesters.
If
they
went
to
another
room,
they're
separate
but
they're,
not
equal,
they
would
not
be
able
to
be
seen.
They
would
not
be
able
to
be
heard,
and
so
I
think
it
was
why
some
on
there
to
sit
on
their
side
to
stay
in
this
room
and
so
I
disagree
with
your
comment.
I'm.
Sorry
thank.
J
F
You
no
just
my
only
last
comment
is
really
my
promise.
Y'all
cuz
I
know
we
all
want
to
move
on.
I
do
want
to
get
home.
My
only
comment
is
that,
but
again
I
will
say
what
I
said
already.
This
is
not
about
poking
or
jabbing.
We
have
new
forms
coming
up,
we
haven't
done
the
survey
that
we
said
was
gonna
happen.
So
as
we
think
about
the
next
phase
of
our
work,
how
can
it
be
better?
O
We
go
good
evening,
sorry
about
that
good
evening
again,
my
name
is
Rosalyn
Huey
I'm,
the
director
for
the
Department
of
Planning
building
and
code
enforcement.
What
the
city
and
glad
to
be
with
you
this
evening,
so
I
was
asked
to
share
some
information.
Some
overview
information
highlight
information
regarding
development
activity
in
the
downtown
Dehradun
area,
as
well
as
give
you
an
overview
of
a
project
that
our
department
is
working
on
regarding
updating
design
guidelines
for
downtown
and
darrid
on,
and
so
with
that
I
have
actually
a
hard
copy
of
this
map.
O
That's
included
in
the
presentation.
I
know
it's
pretty
hard
to
see,
but
just
very
generally
wanted
to
give
you
provide
an
overview
of
all
of
the
development
activity
that's
going
on
in
our
downtown.
It
is
quite
significant-
and
we're
very
excited
about
that.
So
this
particular
map
actually
shows
about
57
different
development
projects
represented
in
the
downtown
area,
an
overview
of
those
projects.
It
actually
includes
about
ten
thousand
seven
hundred
dwelling
units
or
homes
about
330,000
square
feet
of
retail
space
and
about
3.4
million
square
feet
of
office.
O
O
There
aren't
actually
official
development
projects
submitted
to
the
city,
so
we
have
a
handful
of
those
I
think
about
three
of
those
in
the
and
then
we
have
development
projects
that
are
currently
under
review
by
the
planning
department
in
other
city
agencies,
and
then
we
have
a
host
of
projects
that
have
just
been
recently
approved,
as
well
as
projects
that
are
currently
under
construction
or
just
recently
completed.
So
that's
a
full
comprehensive
list
of
development
activity,
but
it
shows
again
the
significance
of
development.
O
That's
going
on
in
our
downtown
and
Jen
just
wanted
to
break
that
out
in
terms
because
I
know
that
most
many
all
of
us
are
very
interested
specifically
about
development
activity,
that's
closest
to
the
dura
dawn
station
area
so
of
these
fifty-seven
projects.
If
you
look
at
the
map,
so
if
you
look
at
projects
that
are
west
of
highway
87,
we
have
about
19
development
projects
that
are
currently
under
review
or
recently
completed,
and
then
another
38
projects
on
the
other
side
of
highway
87.
O
O
It's
really
a
result
of
the
city's
focus
to
actually
rebuild
our
urban
design
program
and
expertise
throughout
the
city,
so
I'm
sure
man.
If
you
are
well
aware
that
for
many
years
we
haven't
had
the
type
of
professionals
planners
architects,
designers,
on
staff,
to
really
focus
on
the
design
element
of
reviewing
projects
of
working
across
city
department,
and
so
now
we're
really
thrilled
that
the
City
Council
has
made
this
a
focus
to
actually
rebuild
our
urban
design
program.
O
So
last
year
we
actually
received
some
initial
grant,
funding
and
city
actually
hired
its
first
principle,
city
designer
and
many
of
you
I'm
sure,
you've
met
Tim,
Ruud
I
hear
that
I'm
here
clap.
Thank
you.
We're
very
excited
to
have
Tim
on
board
he's
a
seasoned
design
professional
over
two
decades
worth
of
experience
in
urban
design
and
in
particular,
transit
oriented
development
project.
So
we're
very
glad
to
have
recruited.
Tim
and
Tim
is
building
his
team
of
professionals
on
our
staff,
and
they
are
now
working
across
city
departments
on
a
host
of
different
development
projects.
O
So
one
of
our
team's
first
task
is
to
actually
undertake
updating
all
of
the
design
guidelines
for
the
city.
So
we
have
a
host
of
existing
guidelines
that
have
not
been
updated
for
quite
some
time.
We
have
guidelines
and
actually
go
back
to
1999
and
obviously
many
things
have
changed
in
the
city
since
that
time.
So
this
particular
body
of
work
is
very
important,
so
we're
going
to
be
actually
updating,
citywide
guidelines
for
a
residential,
commercial
industrial,
as
well
as
our
historic
guidelines
and
this
body
of
work
actually
is
a
priority
of
the
City
Council.
O
So
just
to
share
with
you
a
little
bit
about
the
scope
of
work
for
the
project,
so
we're
actually
starting
phase
one
of
the
comprehensive
body
of
work
to
actually
update
the
guidelines
for
downtown,
and
we
also
obviously
want
to
include
the
Dehradun
area
in
that
work
effort
our
existing
guidelines
for
downtown.
So
they
think
back
to
2004
and
again
lots
of
change
since
that
time,
and
so
we're
also
taking
the
opportunity
to
actually
integrate
the
guidelines
for
the
Dehradun
station
area
plan
that
was
completed
back
in
2014.
O
So,
finally,
we'll
have
one
complete
comprehensive
document
for
design
guidance
for
the
downtown
area.
So
for
this
project
we
actually
kicked
off
the
process.
Earlier
this
year
back
in
April,
we
held
our
kickoff
community
meeting
and
this
month
we're
completing
some
focus
group
meetings
with
individuals
and
stakeholders.
For
example,
we've
met
with
design
professionals
across
the
city
developers,
the
Downtown
Association
other
organizations
and
and
obviously
we'll
be
doing
continued
outreach
to
neighborhood
groups
in
downtown
in
Dehradun.
O
O
And
then,
lastly,
just
wanted
to
talk
about
the
importance
of
getting
feedback
and
input
and
what
it
means
to
actually
to
provide
that
input
into
this
work
product
and
so
we're
glad
that
we're
already
getting
input
from
Zach,
so
the
land
use
and
the
urban
design
solution.
Group
I,
know
they've
had
a
couple
of
meetings
already
where
they've
talked
about
the
values
for
downtown
and
darrid,
on
some
of
the
guiding
principles
and
some
of
the
values
that
are
important
to
that
to
the
area.
O
It's
very
important
to
us
emphasizing
the
human
scale,
design
that
is
actually
safe
for
people
interesting
and
obviously
we
want
it
to
be
high-quality
and
attractive
and
then
finally,
including
design
standards
for
the
area's
skyline
for
parking
design,
guidelines
for
signage,
which
is
so
important
for
art
and
other
cultural
elements
and
obviously
for
quality
design.
So
again,
we
look
forward
to
your
continued
participation
in
this
work
effort
and
we
look
forward
to
many
of
you,
I'm
sure,
participating
in
the
upcoming
community
meeting
and
so
with
that
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
B
Coalition,
so
great,
this
is
a
nice
outline.
Thank
you,
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
like
for
someone
like
me,
just
take
what's
more
on
the
abstract
side
and
like
give
maybe
a
concrete
example
of
like
where,
where
are
the
current
design
guidelines
out-of-sync
like
how
and
how
would
it
Matt
like
is
there?
Is
there
a
particular
project
or
something
you
can
talk
about
and
how
that's
manifested
that
makes
it
just
a
little
more
real
for
someone
like
me,
it's.
O
I
O
Absolutely
so
it's
ten
thousand
seven
hundred
homes,
three
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
and
about
3.4
million
square
feet,
office
and
and
I-
should
share
with
you
for
each
one
of
these
projects
identified
on
the
map.
We
can
provide
specific
information
for
each
development
proposal
or
project
that's
already
completed.
I
This
group
has
been
made
aware
of
the
housing
imbalance.
A
woman.
Excuse
me
housing
shortage
in
the
area;
okay,
not
that
hasn't
done
its
share
of
building
housing
versus
building
jobs.
So
the
question
comes
to
us
is
how
many
housing
units
are
currently
authorized
within
the
general
plan
for
the
next
and.
P
I
Is
not
something
you
need
to
answer
today,
but
it
would
be
helpful
for
us,
as
we
begin
to
write
our
final
report,
to
show
where
the
housing
units
will
be
and
that
indeed,
as
Google
brings
in
all
kinds
of
workers,
not
just
the
tech
workers,
but
the
other
support
workers
that
there
will
be
places
to
house
these
people.
Great.
O
Know
this
information
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
some
data
that
I
do
know
and
can
share
with
you.
So
our
current
general
plan,
it's
a
plan
that
plans
for
growth
for
the
anticipated
growth,
so
our
projected
growth
to
2040
is
about
some
four
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
people
which
we've
equated
to
about
a
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
new
homes.
O
O
Will
you
also
be
incorporated
the
interface
between
new
dents
development
and
existing
single
family
homes
absolutely
great
point,
and
we
know
that
something
that
is
of
great
interest
really
to
all
of
us
in
terms
of
the
compatibility
with
higher
density
next
to
lower
density,
residential
neighborhoods.
So
definitely
that
is
definitely
a
consideration
in
the
guidelines.
Absolutely
thank
you
and
we're
looking
at
areas
that
we
can
use
for
transition
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
done
well
and
high-quality
and
respectful
of
the
existing
residential
character
that
surrounding
downtown.
Thank
you
great.
O
Question
so
yes,
the
city
is
currently
updating
the
downtown
strategy
in
a
IR
for
downtown
and
through
that
effort
we
are
adding
development
capacity
for
downtown,
so
we're
adding
2,000
jobs
and
4,000
housing
units
for
downtown,
and
this
body
of
work
has
actually
been
underway
for
quite
some
time.
We
are
actually
very
close
to
releasing
the
draft
EIS.
Q
O
C
R
In
ago
with
pact,
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
comment
on
a
lot
when
we
talk
about
the
human
scale.
Is
there
also
a
cultural
scale
as
well?
We
have
a
lot
of
different
cultures
in
community.
Let's
you
know-
and
this
was
a
very
large
presence
in
downtown
for
many
many
years,
and
one
of
the
comments
of
the
early,
because
I've
been
around
for
a
million
years
on
redevelopment-
is
that
a
lot
of
the
Latino
businesses
were
displaced,
and
there
was
just
the
kind
of
the
feel
of
downtown
with
that,
like
they
built
that.
R
What
was
that
first
thing
to
put
the
pavilion
of
what
not
to
do
but-
and
it
didn't
look
like
anything
that
really
spoke
or
resonated
with
with
the
community-
is
there
any
like
a
value
or
like
published
principles
or
values
that
were
looking?
That
would
really
reflect
some
cultural
sensitivity
to
API
folks
to
historically
you
know,
other
kinds
of
things
and,
and
the
other
piece
was
just
looking
at
how
that
would
touch
and
losing
that
as
well.
That's.
O
Great
point
so
I
think
that
definitely
speaks
to
our
desire
for
the
guidelines
to
really
speak
to
our
identity,
who
we
are
and
actually
to
celebrate
our
diversity
and
the
richness
and
that
in
the
different
culture.
So
absolutely
these
guidelines
will
take
that
into
consideration
and
I
will
also
add
that
the
department's
been
fortunate
enough
to
also
recruit
a
new
historic
preservation
officer
and
she
will
be
working
alongside
with
the
design
team
and
actually
providing
that
input
for
the
design
guidelines.
Yes,.
D
A
question
on
the
unrelated
to
the
design
standards,
but
on
to
the
development
projects
in
downtown
math
that
we
were
presented
and
sorry
for
the
members
of
public.
We
can't
actually
see
this
earlier
in
the
meeting
it
was
stated
and-
and
I've
heard
this
reiterated
a
couple
of
times
that
there
is
no
Google
development
project
in
terms
of
number
23
on
the
map.
It's
the
the
Deardon
transit-oriented
development.
D
It's
my
understanding
that
that's
a
project
that
Google
has
either
purchased
or
is
in
the
process
of
purchasing,
and
it's
listed
as
a
major
development
project
on
the
map.
So
is
it
fair
for
city
staff
to
be
characterizing
that
there
is
no
Google
development
to
speak
of
in
terms
of
some
of
the
the
public
conversation
going
forward?
Thank.
O
You
and
I
have
a
smaller
version,
so
23
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
it
says
dear
Don,
transit-oriented,
development
and
I
believe
that
that
is
referencing
and
I
can
double
check,
because
I
do
have
my
notes
on
what
this
particular
application
is,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that
this
is
destined
destination.
Dear
Adan
project,
the
Trammell
Crowe
office
development
that
was
previously
approved-
and
so
this
is
for
about
a
million
square
feet
of
development
and
again
I
can
give
you
the
accurate
information
on
that
development
program.
D
D
Certainly
it's
separate
from
a
future
proposal,
but
it
is
a
development,
a
major
development
I'm,
seeing
it
listed
as
in
Deardon
station
owned
by
Google,
so
I've
just
been
kind
of
troubled
that
we've
again
and
again
when
we're
having
conversations
about.
Why
should
we
be
having
a
public
conversation
around
this
potential?
Large
development
that
the
the
the
question
or
the
the
idea
has
been
put
forward
that
well,
there's
no
development
yet
so
we,
you
know,
the
level
of
conversation
should
be
different
than
if
there
were
development.
But
you
know
yes,
it's
a
development.
D
That's
been
approved,
but,
let's
you
know
not
fool
ourselves.
There's
already
a
plan
on
the
books
for
a
million
square
foot
development
where
Google
is
the
owner
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
clear
about
that.
It
wasn't
even
raised
in
this
conversation.
If
we
were
presented
with
this
map,
you
know
no
kata.
No,
we
even
pointed
out
that
that's
a
Google
owned
project,
for
instance
I
I,
think
we
just
need
to
be
clear
about
the
where
we
are
in
some
of
the
decision-making
and
and
and
clarify
what
what
decisions
are
before
the
city.
N
Thank
You
Rosalyn
for
your
presentation
and
also
this
map
is
really
great.
So
thank
you
for
that.
I
just
had
a
quick
question
on
the
design
guidelines.
The
older
90s
version
of
the
design
guidelines
you
had
said
they
don't
really
is
it
that
they
don't
speak
on
urban
mixed-use
environments
or
are
there
elements
of
that
design?
Guideline
that
prevent
urban
mixed-use
I
just
wanted
to
understand
a
little
deeper
yeah.
O
So
I
would
probably
say
a
little
bit
of
both
of
that
right.
So,
in
terms
of
today,
the
high-rise
urban
type
projects
they're
being
developed.
There
are
many
components
of
our
existing
downtown
guidelines
that
just
just
don't
capture
some
of
those
elements
and
again
I
gave
you
the
example
of
the
importance
of
the
ground
plane
and
the
experience
for
the
pedestrian
and
making
sure
that
we
have
ground
floor
Heights
that
are
high
enough
to
accommodate
those
type
of
activated
uses
like
restaurants
or
other
active
uses.
O
So
those
are
the
types
of
things
and
then
to
your
point,
are
there
items
new
items
that
we
would
want
to
include
in
the
design
guidelines?
I
would
say.
Yes,
there
probably
are,
for
example,
and
I
mentioned
this
earlier
in
terms
of
and
and
the
solution
group
has
identified,
for
example,
our
skyline,
how
important
the
skyline
element
is
particularly
here
in
the
downtown.
We
really
do
want
to
encourage
distinctive
buildings,
really
iconic
buildings
that
have
a
variety
in
the
design,
particularly
at
the
skyline.
So
we
can
really
have
a
high
quality.
O
C
M
Chong,
director
of
government
relations
at
the
Silicon
Valley
organization,
hi
Roslyn
I,
have
a
question
given
that
we
are
currently
in
a
housing
crisis
and
we
are
looking
to
plan
growth
within
the
confines
of
the
existing
general
plan.
Is
there
any
interest
from
city
staff
towards
removing
key
policy
hurdles
in
order
to
accelerate
housing
production
and
to
furthermore
encourage
more
high-density
developments
with
the
interior
on
station?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
that.
O
Absolutely
yeah
so
there's
interest
by
staff,
obviously,
and
actually
we've
been
given
direction
by
the
council
to
kind
to
look
at
those
elements
and
things
and
our
policies
and
regulations
that
we
can
modify
to
actually
spur
more
residential
development.
So,
for
example,
I'll
throw
out
that
issue
of
parking
parking
and
development
projects
is
a
huge
cost.
O
That's
a
big
factor
right,
it's
a
huge
cost
for
for
developers
who
are
building
projects
and
it's
a
huge
cost
for
people
wanting
to
live
in
an
urban
environment
so
to
the
example,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
decouple
parking
from
residential
units,
that's
a
key
component.
We're
also
looking
at
modifying
our
parking
requirement.
So,
for
example,
currently
we
have
parking
minimums
in
our
zoning
code,
so
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
the
idea
of
actually
changing
that
and
having
parking
maximum.
So
there
are
many
cities
across
the
country.
O
They've
had
you
know
been
looking
at
changing
that
metric
for
requirements
for
quite
some
time
in
cities
that
have
been
quite
successful.
So
that's
an
example
of
one
thing
that
staff
is
looking
to
in
terms
of
spurring
additional
residential
development,
as
well
as
addressing
the
affordable
issue
as
well.
Great.
M
I
just
wanted
to
close
it
out,
given
that,
just
a
few
months
ago,
the
San
Jose
City
Council
hosted
a
study
session
that
showed
that
most
developments
are
practically
unviable
with
in
most
parts
of
the
city.
I
think
the
easiest
low-hanging
fruit
that
we
can
achieve
to
encourage
development
throughout
the
entire
city
is
to
look
at
those
policy
hurdles
and
to
encourage
as
much
development
as
we
can
for
residential
projects.
B
B
Shefte
NJ
Park
Neighborhood
Association.
Obviously
we
are
thrilled.
The
addition
of
Juliet
to
the
staff
was
a
big
thing.
The
other
thing
I
thought.
Perhaps
you
could
speak
to
the
the
timing
of
the
update
to
the
design
guidelines
and
the
completion
of
the
historic
resources
survey,
because
the
completion
of
that
obviously
could
move
some
projects
in
buildings
etc
from
the
non
historic
design
guidelines
to
the
historic
design
guidelines.
So
I
wasn't
sure
timeline
wise,
where
the
two
will
dovetail.
O
So
we're
working
on
both
at
the
same
time,
I
will
say
that
completing
the
historic
inventory
is
going
to
take
us
a
bit
longer
than
updating
the
downtown
urban
design
guidelines
they're,
both
like
I,
said
we're
working
on
both
concurrently,
but
while
we're
thrilled
to
have
Juliet,
she
still
is
pretty
much
a
one
person
or
two
person
team.
At
this
point,
so
we
know
it's
gonna.
Take
us
a
little
bit
longer.
O
I
know
that
we're
going
to
be
working
on
the
inventory,
probably
throughout
most
of
2019,
so
you
know
that
work
is
important
and
definitely
for
our
development
proposals.
We've
had
so
many
experiences
where
applicants
have
come
in
on
on
their
site,
initiated
their
sequa
and
historic
analysis
and
got
very
late
in
the
process
and
then
find
out
boots.
You
know
this
is
a
historic
element,
contributing
factor
so
again.
I
agree
with
you
to
the
extent
that
we
can
complete
that
historic
inventory.
It's
going
to
help
us
all
out.
O
O
J
O
Question
there's
not
specific
language
regarding
affordability
in
the
urban
design
guidelines
I
think
there's
many
places
many
policy
documents
where
that
that
information
is,
is
more
appropriately
suited.
So
the
guidelines
won't
specifically
address
that
and
then
to
your
previous
question
on
the
10,000
units
you
were
asking
or
any
of
those
going
to
be
affordable.
So
again,
the
10,000
units
were
adding
development
cassadee,
so
many
of
those
units
can
be
affordable,
but
we
at
this
point
in
terms
of
the
environmental
clearance
we're
clearing
up
to
those
10,000
units
and
for
the
environmental
clearance.
O
C
C
C
What
we
see
is
the
top
desired
outcomes,
and
now
we
want
to
have
a
group
discussion
with
you
all
and
we're
gonna
walk
you
through
a
little
bit
of
background
in
context
and
then
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
what
those
colored
cards
are
in
front
of
you
and
we'll
go
through
each
one
of
these
topics.
So
I'm
gonna,
let
Matt
get
a
starting.
H
What
we're
gonna
do
with
that
information?
Is
we
are
going
to
try
to
gauge
the
general
level
of
agreements
on
each
group
of
desired
outcomes?
We
want
to
identify
where
there
really
is
agreement
and
where
differences
exist
in
opinion,
and
then
what
we
have
always
said
in
this
process
is
our
job
here
is
to
listen
and
reflect
and
part
of
that
reflection
lost
microphone
again.
H
Okay,
so
what
we've
said
from
the
very
beginning
that
what
we
want
to
do
is
take
all
of
the
ideas
and
identify
where
there
are
commonalities
and
agreements
and
where
there
are
disagreements
and
where
there
are
disagreements.
We
want
to
reflect
where
those
disagreements
exist.
So
we
want
to
capture
everything
and
communicate
everything
and
where
there's
agreement
and
and
where
there
might
not
be
as.
H
H
This
process,
and
so
having
diverse
opinions
and
a
sense
of
agreement,
is
going
to
be
important
and
it
needs
to
be
communicated.
The
draft
outline
and
the
reason
I'll
come
back
to
questions
at
the
end
here.
The
the
draft
outline
that
we
have
here
and
there's
two
phrases
highlighted
in
red
here
that
I
think
are
gonna,
be
the
most
important,
so
we're
gonna
start
with
a
summary
and
executive
summary.
Have
an
introduction
talk
about
the
context
of
what's
been
going
on
in
the
area.
H
Development
projects,
other
plans,
other
activities,
we're
gonna,
summarize
the
community
engagement
process
and
then
we're
gonna
have
a
chapter
on
desired
outcomes.
Talk
about
what
those
are
in
just
a
minute,
but
these
are
essentially
the
overall
goals
direction
for
what
you
all
want
to
see
in
the
area
and
what
the
community
has
said
they
want
to
see.
Then
we're
gonna
have
a
chapter
on
potential
solutions.
These
are
ways
that
we
that
you
all
have
come
up
with
and
we
are
going
to
reflect
in
the
report
ways
and
that
the
outcomes
can
be
achieved.
H
We're
gonna
then,
have
conclusions
and
next
steps,
and
then
the
appendices
in
the
appendices
are
going
to
have
all
of
the
notes
from
all
of
these
meetings.
All
of
the
notes
from
all
of
the
community
engagement
processes
and
all
of
the
online
engagement,
so
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
try
and
have
all
of
the
actual
information
that
we
have
heard
and
that
we
have
taken
in
available
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
daylighting.
All
of
that,
as
you
know,
it
is
a
lot
of
information.
H
That's
coming
in
we're
doing
our
best
to
reflect
it,
but
we
also
want
to
make
sure
it's
all
out
there.
So
now
a
quick
definition
of
terms
here,
because
there
has
been
a
little
bit
of
confusion
over
all
about
what
these
terms
mean
and
what,
how
we're
using
them,
and
so
we
want
to
try
and
kind
of
clarify
this
for
everyone.
So
the
first
is
the
statement
of
a
desired
outcome.
This
is
kind
of
the.
What
the!
What
do
you
want
to
see
in
the
area?
H
There
are
high-level
statements
that
have
a
represented
desired
end
state.
Think
of
it
as
an
aspiration,
a
hope.
A
vision,
a
goal
we
didn't
want
to
get
into
the
what's
a
vision:
what's
a
goal
language,
we
just
called
it
one
thing:
it's:
where
do
you
want
to
get
to
and
and
what
are
the
really
the
values
that
you
all
have
reflected
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
get
at
in
the
desired
outcomes?
This
is
going
to
help
inform
the
mou
in
the
short-term
and
the
de
SAP
update
station
planning
project
review.
H
So
all
of
these
ideas
are
going
to
help
in
in
many
ways
not
just
from
the
potential
Google
project,
but
also
to
the
station
area,
the
downtown
area
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
The
next
is
the
potential
solutions,
and
this
is
the
how
how
and
how
are
the
desired
outcomes
going
to
be
achieved.
They
are
actions,
mechanisms,
policies,
programs,
projects,
partnerships,
they
are.
They
are
things
that
can
happen
and
that
can
be
done
in
order
to
achieve
the
what
or
the
desired
outcomes
some
of
them
as
and
you
all
have
come
up
with
these.
H
Some
of
them
are
pretty
specific
about
what
you
want
to
see,
and
some
of
them
are
a
little
bit
more
general
and
need
some
more
fleshing
out
to
be
clear.
The
report
is
not
going
to
analyze
the
feasibility
of
the
potential
solutions.
We
are
going
to
reflect
what
those
solutions
are,
and
we
are
not
going
to
analyze
and
say
that
one
at
this
point
one
is
better
than
the
other.
Our
job
now
is
again
to
to
what
what
is
there
and
what
we
have
heard.
So
then,
the
information
for
how
the
information
will
be
used.
H
H
We
are
starting
to
think
about
the
the
potential
solution
in
these
three
areas:
the
Google
project,
the
dirt
on
the
broader
D
rat
on
station
area
and
the
downtown
area,
and
then
the
city
in
the
region
and
the
information
for
example,
for
the
Google
project
will
be
used
for
the
memorandum
of
understanding.
Some
of
the
potential
solutions
can
go
into
the
project
design.
Some
can
go
into
the
development
agreement.
Some
are
specific
ideas
about
community
benefits
for
the
new
road
on
station
area.
H
The
D
rat
on
station
area
plan
is
going
to
be
updated
and
for
the
land
use
and
design
meeting
that
we
had
just
as
an
example
the
the
solution
group.
A
lot
of
the
ideas
that
came
up
are
things
that
are
reflected
more
broadly.
In
that
whole
area,
they
will
apply
to
a
Google
project
if
it
happens,
but
they're
also
really
more
broad
for
how
to
create
a
great
district
here,
and
so
that's
where
some
of
so
there's
other
development
projects
that
are
happening.
H
Implementation
will
go
into
the
work,
that's
being
done
by
the
city
on
the
housing
crisis,
work
plan,
the
affordable
housing
investment
plan,
the
economic
and
workforce
development
programs,
city
legislative
initiatives,
there's
a
lot
of
areas
that
may
not
feed
directly
into
the
the
Google
project
and
the
MOU,
but
they're
gonna
feed
in
other
places
and
and
as
Rosalind
said,
some
of
the
information
from
the
land
use
and
design
solution.
Group
has
already
been
part
of
the
thinking.
H
For
the
downtown
design
guidelines,
and
so
that
sort
of
vertical
integration
is
essentially
what
we're
trying
to
go
for
here
with
the
information,
because
we
don't
want
all
of
the
ideas
that
you
all
have
to
be
lost.
We
want
to
make
sure
they're
being
communicated.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
pause
here
actually
before
we
go
into
sort
of
the
next
step
and
I
want
to
want
to
see.
H
S
S
Not
it's
technology
in
one
of
your
previous
slides,
so
my
question
is
about
how
the
policy
recommendations
are
going
to
get
cracked
your
eyes,
understanding
that
there
is
no
additional
layer
of
analysis
or
on
feasibility.
That's
gonna
get
you
know
that
staff
has
the
opportunity
conduct.
How
are
you
gonna
parse
out,
or
are
you
gonna
parse
out?
The
solutions
at
all?
What's
sort
of
like
organizing
mechanism
is
gonna
exist
or
is
the
idea
to
just
present
them
all?
Equally
yeah.
H
So
I'm
a
good
question
and
something
that
we've
actually
struggled
with
a
lot
internally
at
this
point
it
is
about
documenting
rather
than
analyzing
and
I.
Think
if
we,
if
we
have
a
lot
more
time
because
there's
been
so
many
ideas,
if
we
had
a
lot
more
time,
we
would
analyze
all
of
the
different
options.
But
the
reality
is
that
for
the
process
we
have
right
now
we
don't
have
all
of
the
time
to
do
all
of
the
analysis.
That
is
not
to
say
that
the
analysis
is
not
to
happen.
H
It's
just
not
going
to
happen
as
part
of
this
report,
so
the
ideas
and
that's
why
it's
really
important
I
think
to
reflect
everything
and
not
to
have
things
drop
out,
because
there
might
be
ideas
that
actually
rise
up
later,
that
become
more
feasible
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
whether
it's
it's
you
know,
cost
or
politics
or
or
anything
or
desire.
You
know
outcome
that
proves
great
how
come
so.
We.
A
R
Go
packed,
I
guess
what
I'm
looking
at
gives
me
a
little
bit
of
concern
because
we've
a
lot
of
what
we've
talked
about
from
the
community
perspective
was
was
really
displacement.
And
what
are
we
going
to
be
doing
the
impact
of
a
or
the
effect
of
having
massive
unprecedented
development
in
a
fairly
short
period
of
time
and
how
that
effect
will
have
on
the
on
the
site
on
the
city
and
and
it
it
I
just
think,
there's
a
it
made.
R
An
alternative
frame
or
another
frame
is
really
impact
on
community
impact,
but
I
see
that
we
have
it
on
Google
and
dear
it
on
station
and
then
there's
this
kind
of
other
city
and
region.
So
I
just
voice
has
a
bit
of
a
concern
for
me
that
the
things
that
were
brought
up
in
the
subgroups
are
on
housing
and
and
economic
development.
R
Those
those
really
are
really
speaking
more
strongly
about
impacts.
Why
I
would
just
like
to
see?
You
know
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
would
be
captured
in
the
frame
that
you
have
presented
to
us
right
now.
So
I
just
raised
that
as
a
concern
as
an
alert,
something
that
I
think
we
ought
to
think
about.
I.
Think
some
of
us
at
the
table.
I
can't
speak
for
others,
but
I
could
just
see
for
myself
that
that
it
raises
it
raises
an
alarm
and
it
reflects
a
certain
fuss.
R
H
H
So
a
topic
like
displacement
or
gentrification
can
actually
flow
through
all
of
these
areas
and
and
I
think
our
job
is
actually
to
make
sure
that
the
important
ideas
and
and
displacement
and
gentrification
and
traffic
and
other
other
concerns
the
impact
on
small
businesses
that
it
really
does
actually
flow
through
all
of
these,
because
that
is
the
intent
of
it.
It
is
not
to
try
and
omit
it.
These
are
not
the
topics.
These
are
the
sort
of
the
geographic
categories
to
which
all
of
the
ideas
are
being
applied.
H
H
H
The
wrong
word
desired
outcomes
which
are
like
goals
or
vision,
see
I'm
even
confusing
myself
here
and
then
the
specific
ideas
to
achieve
that
that
have
come
out
in
the
process,
and
so
we
are
they're
gonna
be
done
topically
in
the
report,
but
they're
also
going
to
be
separated
out
at
this
point-
and
you
know
we
haven't
written
a
report
yet
so
we
actually
might
end
up
finding
those
to
be
honest.
So.
B
I'm
wondering
if
is
there
a
space
in
the
report
and
and
maybe
it's
included
under
identify
where
differences
exist
in
the
desired?
Well,
I,
don't
know,
I'll,
just
ask
the
question.
In
the
beginning
of
the
process
we
heard
about
some
of
the
other
different
planning
exercises
that
have
happened
either
with
some
overlap
or
adjacent
to
and
I
just
want
to
be
respectful
of
those
other
planning
processes
and
figure
out.
How
does
that
I
mean
either
acknowledge
them
and
the
report
in
some
way
or
also
talk
about
like?
H
Try
to
answer
that,
so
the
the
context,
the
the
background
context
section
section
is
supposed
to
is
going
to
address
all
these
things
that
have
happened
in
the
past
and
that
are
currently
going
on
the
analysis
of
how
much
overlap
is.
There
is
not
necessarily
something
we've
thought
about
yet,
but
it
certainly
is
something
we
can't
think
about.
I
think
it's
a
you
know
a
good
point
and
again,
with
the
land
use
and
design
solution
group
we
came
up
with
a
lot
of
ideas.
H
A
So
it
will
as
soon
as
we
are
done
with
the
report,
so
we're
gonna
talk
a
little
bit
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
The
the
next
saag
meeting,
but
99%
of
that
meeting
will
be
spent
on
kind
of
finalizing
this
report
and
you
can
see
where
we're
at
as
soon
as
we
move
forward
from
this
group.
It's
our
intent
to
forward
that
to
the
council
immediately
through
an
informational
memo
so
that
they
have
it
and
they're
aware
of
it
before
any
other
decision
points
come
up
in
this
project
or
any
other
decisions.
A
A
Think
we
I
don't
believe
it
would
be
going
to
council
for
a
formal
acceptance.
We
want
them
to
have
that
in
front
of
them,
and
it
is
what
it
is.
It's
it's
this
process
to
stand
on
its
own,
not
for
council
to
tweak
that
report
or
say
that
we
don't
want
to
accept
that
engagement
or
not.
So
at
this
point
in
time,
we'd
be
forwarding
it
to
them.
We
may
want
to
do
something.
A
You
know
informational
before
any
decisions
are
made,
whether
you
know
like
the
MOU
coming
before
the
end
of
the
year,
so
we're
open
to
that.
But,
as
I
told
you
guys
at
the
very
beginning
whether
it
was
votes
here
at
Council
I
want
that
to
kind
of
stand
on
its
own
and
and
not
have
another
body
say
we
want
to
take
something
out
or
put
something
in
can.
F
A
B
A
Know,
depending
on
how
this
meeting
goes
and
the
one
on
September,
27th
I,
think
you
know
sometime
in
October,
for
feeling
that
that
report
at
that
point
in
time
is
fairly
final.
We
would
forward
the
final
report
to
them
immediately,
so
that
there's
time
you
know
as
Matt
mentioned
besides
the
Google
MOU,
which
is
very
important,
and
we
want
the
report
to
be
final
before
that's
ever
mentioned.
Like
you
know,
I'm
up
there
with
the
legislative
guiding
principles.
A
Looking
at
like
the
inner
governmental
relations
program,
I
have
direction
from
the
report
that
I
should
consider
as
I'm
developing
that
and
that
actually
takes
place
in
October.
So
it'd
be
my
intention
and
I
think
Kim's
desire
to
get
that
in
front
of
Council
and
the
rest
of
the
department
is
relatively
soon
could.
F
We
request
that
we
get
a
date
sooner
rather
than
later,
because
I
know
I
am
I'm
just
to
say
a
super.
She
ate
the
understanding
that
we
want
to
get
it
sooner
and
doing
all
the
staff
work
to
make
that
happen,
but
it'll
be
helpful
to
just
know
when
to
expect
that
is
there's
a
lot
of
urgency
around
the
next
few
months
and
I
just
I
want
to
make
sure
it
gets
to
them,
and
then
the
City
Council
has
the
opportunity
to
really
read
through
and
reflect
on.
What's
in
there,
yeah.
N
Yes,
Nicole
laughs
on
the
Alameda
I
just
wanted
to
echo,
packed
about
community
impact,
maybe
I'm
thinking
this
isn't
too
crazy.
If
maybe
under
Google
project,
we
could
do
community
benefits,
Fitz,
slash,
community
impact
or
community
benefits
and
then
bullet
point
community
impact
just
to
really
get
that
conversation
on
the
table,
because
you
know
it
honestly
it
it
breaks
my
heart.
N
It
really
does
like
I'm,
not
even
kidding
that
it
was
just
said
that
the
protesters
are
not
a
reflection
of
our
community,
because
last
sag
meeting
I
went
to
I
was
so
excited
and
invigorated
to
see
them
because
I
was
like
this
is
America.
This
is
how
American
politics
work.
You
know
it
built
that
tension
in
the
room
of
things
I
need
to
be
said
and
I
think
that
those
things
needed
to
be
said
and
so
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
make
sure
that
we
discussed
them.
A
Just
to
clear
that
up,
I
I
did
not
say
that
they
didn't
represent
a
part
of
the
community
or
an
important
voice.
What
I
said
was
after
the
third
or
fourth
meeting
I'm,
forgetting
at
this
point,
which
one
was
actually
protested
in
the
meeting
minutes
we
put
that
the
meeting
was
disrupted
by
protesters
and
several
people
around
this
table
thought
that
that
was
me
digging
on
them
for
interrupting
the
and
trying
to
cause
a
political
tension
which
was
not
the
case.
A
So
when
we
went
through
and
did
these
minutes
I
took
that
as
a
signal
to
not
mention
that
the
meeting
continued
they
did
their
business
important
business,
raising
important
issues
outside.
We
accommodated
that
by
no
means
of
us
not
mentioning
that
the
minutes
is
them
for
me.
Since
you're
saying
what
I
said
was
saying
that
they're
not
an
important
voice
in
this
community,
so.
N
I
apologize
for
that
misunderstanding,
but
I
would
still
like
to
push
the
point
and
agree
with
PAC
that
we
should,
you
know,
include
community
impact
on
the
Google
project.
How
will
this
information
be
used
because
I
think
that
it's
it's
the
tension
in
the
room
and
it's
it's
very
important
to
our
community.
H
The
protesters
and
you
were
expressing
your
feeling
about
that
I'm
glad
you
brought
it
up
so
that
it
could
be
cleared
so
I
think
that's
really
important
to
do
and
I
appreciate
you
doing
that.
You
know
the
second
is
this
idea
about
community
impact
I
think
that,
oh
sorry,
I
was
in
the
way
again.
Yeah
I
told
her
to
throw
things
at
me
if
I
get
in
the
way.
So
this
idea
of
community
impact
is
is
a
really
important
one
and
you
know
I
think
the
the
conversation
we're
having
here
is
gonna
cause
us.
H
It
will
cause
us
to
go
back
and
look
at
the
outline
again
and
make
sure
that
what
we
are
doing
in
the
outline
and
how
we're
reflecting
it,
how
we're
writing
it
reflects
the
concerns
really
tries
to
really
accurately
reflect
the
concerns
about
community
impact
from
the
project
and
whether
it's
called
community
benefit
slash
impact,
whether
you
know
we
have
a
separate
category,
I
mean
again,
these
are
big
buckets
or
whether
we
have
a
chapter
called.
You
know
potential
benefits
and
impacts
of
the
project.
You
know
some
way
of
doing
that.
H
D
H
D
You
ever
be
cannon
with
what
working
partnerships
I'm
the
quit
I,
don't
know
if
I
Mike's
working
on
the
question
of
when
this
goes
back
to
council,
when
the
ene
was
first
being
debated.
Folks
who
were
there
may
recall
there
was
a
lengthy
discussion
about
whether
or
not
it
was
appropriate
to
give
staff
direction
about
community
benefits.
D
There
will
be
significant
pressure
on
the
council
to
make
a
decision
in
the
affirmative
because
of
the
timelines
around
the
compensation
agreement
and
thus
our
own
parcels
and
so
I'm
really
concerned
that
you
know
this
is
all
gonna
come
as
a
package
to
Council
in
November.
December,
there's
not
gonna,
be
a
whole
lot
of
time.
If
there's
any
question
about
what
is
or
isn't
in
the
MOU,
those
directions
should
have
came
from
Council
to
staff.
D
Basically
now
because
the
negotiations
are
ongoing,
so
any
delay
on
allowing
council
a
public
space
to
talk
about
direction
for
what
should
be
in
the
MOU
around
community
ballots
is
very
important
because
I
mean
to
my
understanding
conversations
about.
You
know
the
development
timeline.
The
MOU
community
benefits
they're
not
supposed
to
be
happening
in
closed
session.
That's
supposed
to
be
a
public
conversation
under
the
Brown
Act,
and
so
when
can
we
get
a
firm
YES
on?
Will
this?
Will
there
be
a
space
for
council
to
debate?
D
H
So
I
think
that
what
we
can
do
now
I
think
we,
my
guess,
is
we
can't
get
a
yes,
because
that
has
to
be
discussed
internally.
But
what
we
can't
say
is
that
we
I
think
very
clearly
here
the
desire
to
make
sure
that
this
information
goes
to
Council
and
that
the
council
has
space
to
discuss
it
and
direct
staff
on
what
should
be
done
for
the
MOU
in.
D
D
And
then
just
one
other
point
and
sorry,
I
got
to
grab
wait
for
tune,
but
just
in
terms
of
design
of
the
report,
I
really
encourage
you
again
going
back
to
the
ena
discussion
why
this
whole
body
was
created.
This
is
supposed
to
be
the
public
engagement
process
connected
to
the
decision-making
around
the
land
sale
and
that
eventual
development.
D
It's
all
connected
to
elements
of
that
private
agreement
that,
in
a
agreement
between
the
city
of
San,
Jose
and
Google,
we
really
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
emphasizing
that
first
orange
bucket
of
the
you
know
how
these
recommendations,
particularly
the
Google
project.
What
that
looks
like
the
when
council
directed
staff
and
entered
into
this
agreement
with
Google
about
creating
a
public
engagement
process,
it
wasn't
about
redesigning
the
the
dese
app.
D
It
was
about
getting
public
input
around
the
decision
for
that
possible
land
sale
and
this
you
know,
forthcoming
development
proposal
and
I'm
really
worried
that
if
we
it's
okay
to
include
these
things,
but
we
need
to
be
clear
about
what
the
priority
is.
So
it's
not
kind
of
like
washed
out
what
the
point
of
this
whole
thing
was
and
and
similarly
let.
D
That's
fine
and
then
you
know
on
that
point
a
lot
of
discussion
of
these
solution
groups.
You
know
I
attended
everyone
that
I
was
on
I.
Think
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
for
the
for
the
house
that
those
lineup
with
the
with
the
what's
I'm,
seeing
some
of
this
in
here,
where
you
know
some
of
the
outcomes-
are,
don't
really
reflect
the
discussions
of
what
led
to
the
operated
policy
decisions,
particularly
in
the
housing
and
the
economic
group
we'll
get
to
it.
D
But
I
think
you
when
we
start
when
you
start
to
look
at
you
laying
this
stuff
out,
think
about
what
those
top
rated
policies
were
and
then
within
the
outcomes,
are
you
seeing
the
the
discussion
that
preceded
those
kind
of
top
rated
decisions?
Isn't
there?
If
it's
not
there,
then
you
probably
got
to
go
back
and
edit
it
because
I'm
not
seeing
a
lot
of
that
reflected.
It
seems
rather
uneven
in
some
ways.
Okay,.
H
And-
and
you
know
we
can
get
to
that-
that's
certainly
kind
of
the
cot,
some
of
the
level
of
comment
we
wanted
in
it
and
again,
it
is
also
one
of
the
things
that
we
struggle
with
in
doing
this,
which
is
lining
everything
up,
and
so
we
certainly
want
to
try
and
do
that
as
best
we
can
not
to
say
that
we're
gonna
get
it
right,
the
first
time,
I'm.
Okay,
we
need
two
more
comments.
I
think
there's
only
two
more
over
here
and
I.
Think
that's
it
for
the
next.
E
Thank
You
Jean
Cohen,
with
the
building
trades
council
I
just
have
a
clarifying
question,
are
the
desired
outcomes,
a
distillation
of
the
solution,
groups,
discussions
and
the
ranking
that
you
asked
us
to
do
on
those
policies
because
it
doesn't
seem
like
the
desired
outcomes.
Here
are
reflected
in
the
notes
that
are
came
out
of
the
solution
group,
so
maybe
they're.
Two
different
sets
of
information
well,.
H
Well
again,
good
question,
so
what
we
tried
to
do
was
take
the
desired
outcome.
Take
the
information
that
we
got
at
a
high
at
a
high
level,
multitasking
at
a
high
level
and
represent
sort
of
the
the
overall
direction.
There
was
voting
that
happened
in
some
of
the
groups
and
that
voting
tended
to
be
more
on
the
solutions
and
the
details,
rather
than
necessarily
the
goals
in
the
direction.
H
So
it
again
was
one
of
the
things
that
we
struggled
with
was
to
try
and
step
back
and
create
an
overall
direction,
without
necessarily
the
specifics
and
then
support
that
with
the
specifics
of
the
of
the
potential
solutions.
So
you
know
it's
sort
of
yes,
and
no
with
that,
so
we
didn't
just
use
the
top
rated
potential
solutions
and
turn
those
into
desired.
Comes.
We
looked
at
the
whole
range
of
things
so.
E
B
H
Let
me
just
start
with
some
of
that,
so
the
report
is
not
just
high-level.
The
report
is
the
high
level
direction
and
the
details,
so
it
is
everything
that
we
have
heard
and
in
the
some
of
the
ideas
that
we
have
heard
from
the
specific
solutions
can
absolutely
be
taken
as
recommendations
for
community
specific
community
benefits,
because
there
were
very
specific
things
that
have
come
up
very
specific
ideas
that
came
up
in
the
groups
which
we
are
going
to
reflect
in
that
report.
H
We
are
not
going
to
go
and
say
this:
one
is
a
community
benefit,
and
this
one
is
not
a
community
benefit.
We
are
merely
going
to
reflect
the
whole
range
of
ideas
that
have
as
we
have
them,
as
we
have
identified
them
and
heard
them
to
include
them
in
the
report
and
then,
in
terms
of
the
question
of,
is
the
saw
going
to
be
involved
in
the
MOU
I
think
the
SOG
is
going
to
be.
H
The
input
that
you
all
are
giving
here
is
going
to
feed
into
the
MOU
process
and
the
SOG
is
going
to
continue
on
into
the
future.
Will
the
SOG
review
the
details
of
the
MOU
before
it's
finalized
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
I
think
it
is.
That
is
not
going
to
happen!
Anything
it's
going
to
be
a
public
document
at
some
point
and
that's
when
everyone
is
going
to
be
able
to
comment.
G
Just
want
to
make
sure
expectations
are
all
aligned
right
and
we've
said
before
that.
Mou
is
a
very
high
level
document
and
it's
a
statement
of
intent
and
the
FA
cues
that
we
sent
around
and
I
have
some
hard
copies
here.
If
any
of
you
want
them
includes
the
major
topics
that
are
expected
to
be
addressed.
G
So
question
number
10
the
major
topics
that
are
expected
to
be
addressed
in
the
city,
Google
MOU
again
at
a
high
level,
so
topic
number
one
shared
vision
and
goals
for
the
Google
development
topic
number
two
goals
for
community
benefits,
contributions
and
commitments.
So
the
intention
is
that
the
MOU
would
sort
of
thematically
talk
about
areas
for
community
benefits
and
it
would
talk
about
the
process
that
we'll
go
through
to
determining
perhaps
the
specific
value
at
a
future
point.
G
Once
we
know
what
the
project
is,
and
we
know
all
the
value
that's
going
to
be
created,
but
you're
right
now
you
have
that
development
agreement,
which
is
probably
two
years
from
now.
That's
the
very
specific
legal
detailed
document
that
would
include
the
intention
is
that
would
include
a
very
specific
community
benefits
plan
that
both
parties
would
agree
to
would
be
enforceable.
G
Well,
we've
said
this
site:
we
we
and
as
a
station
area
Advisory
Group,
so
the
station
area
work
is
going
to
continue
for
decades.
The
intent
is
that
in
some
form,
an
advisory
group
will
continue
and
will
be
involved,
providing
input.
I
can't
say
specifically,
you
know
what
these
would
be
a
development
agreement,
but
certainly
the
conversation
about
community
expectations
and
community
benefits
will
continue
through
that
whole
period,
and
it
will
get
more
specific
and
more
specific.
Is
that
helpful
yeah.
G
F
H
F
F
T
H
F
And
and
my
other,
but
my
other
point
is
that
I
appreciate
that
we
all
have
binders,
but
you
know
we're
all
doing
this
on
our
volunteer
time
here.
So
if
it'd
be
helpful,
I
think
for
us
in
order
to
figure
out
if
they're,
actually
in
line
with
what
we've
already
talked
about
to
have
copies
of
that.
How.
C
Thank
you
Matt.
So
now
we
transition
to
the
fun
part.
We're
gonna
ask
you
for
your
input
and
to
your
point
Maria.
We
really
want
to
kind
of
get
one
final
feedback
from
you
all
on
the
desired
outcomes.
The
way
we've
characterized
them.
Recognizing
that
there's
a
whole
host
of
input
we
receive
for
potential
solutions,
desired
outcomes.
We
tried
to
characterize
those
that
that
rose
to
the
top
and
we're
here
tonight
to
get
your
input.
C
We
we
thought
we'd,
do
something
interactive
with
you
all
and
have
these
color
cards
in
front
of
you,
where
we're
gonna
go
through
by
topic.
We're
gonna
identify
the
desired
outcomes
that
you've
probably
seen
your
packets.
If
you
look
forward
and
as
we
go
through
each
topic,
we're
gonna
ask
you
to
raise
a
card
to
say.
If
you
fully
agree
with
everything.
That's
on
that
that
slide,
you
raise
a
green
card
if
you
mostly
agree,
but
you
have
some
potential
changes.
C
You
would
raise
a
red
card
and
there's
one
opportunity
where,
if
you
don't
have
any
input
at
all,
you
don't
have
to
raise
a
card
at
all
and
we're
doing
this
as
a
way
to
make
sure
that
we're
hearing
from
everyone
in
the
room
and
then
also
to
follow
that
up
with
a
discussion
to
find
out
a
little
bit
more
about
where
some
of
the
minor
changes
are
or
where
some
of
the
potential
points
of
disagreement
are
to
make
sure
that
we
have
everything
flushed
out.
So
to
your
point
again
Maria.
C
D
C
D
C
I
C
H
Alright,
so
Landy's,
this
is
the
work
that
came
out
of
the
land,
usin
design
solution
group.
We
have
two
really
two
topics
related
to
this:
that
we
broke
down
until
land
use
and
design
a
little
bit
arbitrary,
because
they're
so
related,
but
for
land
use.
What
came
out
of
the
group
was
to
maximize
density,
to
take
the
full
advantage
of
the
transit
investments
to
include
a
range
of
commercial
office
and
residential
uses
to
incorporate
ground-floor
retail
in
strategic
locations
and
amounts
to
have
a
coherent
development
pattern.
H
That
is
varied
and
interesting,
yet
has
a
consistent
feel
and
to
be
an
extension
of
the
downtown
core
rather
than
a
separate
district.
So
these
were
the
results
that
we
saw
at
a
high
level
that
came
out
of
from
land
use
from
the
land,
use
and
solution
group.
Ok,
so
we
do
these
all
together
as
a
group,
and
then
we
can
come
back
and
talk.
You
guys
ready,
I'm
doing
so
group.
H
H
So
what
I
want
to
get
is
a
sense
of
just
sort
of
quick
comments
from
folks
for
those
who
felt
like
there
needed
to
be
some
change
to
this,
whether
you
voted
red
or
yellow
what
what
it
is
that
was
missing
and
again
I
want
to
I
want
to
highlight
that
there
were
a
lot
of
detailed
comments
that
came
out
which
were
solutions
which
are
not
reflected
in
here,
but
they
will
be
reflected
in
the
report
decree.
Okay.
So
if
you
don't
see
a
detail
that
is
potentially
why
the
other
thing
is.
H
R
B
H
I
forgot
to
say
to
yellow
Z
equals
a
red
and
one
red
means
I'm
just
kidding
it's
not
a
soccer
trying.
T
K
H
Q
D
I
think
there
was
a
whole
conversation.
Well,
there's
been
a
lot
of
conversation
in
various
points
and
including
in
the
land-use
group
I
remember
in
the
notes
and
when
it
came
to
the
full
group
about
value
capture
and
I.
Think
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong,
there
I
don't
know
if
there
was
a
nuance
between
when
we
talk
about
density,
different
types
of
use,
I
know,
there's
been
talk
about
supporting
dense
housing,
certainly
but
I
think.
D
When
we're
talking
about
the
commercial
development,
there
was
a
substantial
conversation
about
how
if
we
are
going
to
up
zone,
how
are
we
capturing
that
value,
which
is
a
pretty
important
policy
point
for
this
whole
discussion
here
that
I'm
kind
of
not
seeing
reflected
like
if
it's
just
hey,
let's
just
let
you
know,
Google
or
whomever
build,
is
densely
as
they
like,
because
that's
the
value
that
runs
a
pretty
strong
conflict.
With
all
the
conversations
we've
been
having
about
value
capture.
H
H
J
H
C
Okay,
so
now
moving
on
to
design,
this
was
part
of
the
land-use
discussion.
We
broke
it
out
into
two
separate
sections.
We
talked
a
lot
in
about
design
and
promoting
a
human-scale
design,
and
we
gave
some
examples
of
what
that
means.
Looking
at
height
and
scale,
ground
floors,
placement
of
signage
and
entries,
sidewalks
furniture
and
overall
walkability
really
making
a
pedestrian
oriented.
C
So,
as
Matt
mentioned,
I'm
gonna
go
through
them
all
now,
so
you
can
see
what's
mentioned
in
each
one
of
these
there
and
see,
maybe
some
where
the
connections
are
and
we'll
come
back
and
we'll
do
some
voting
I'll
keep
going
Matt
I'll,
give
you
a
break
so
public
spaces.
This
covered
parks,
open
space,
plazas
and
trails
you'll
see
some
other
connectivity
measures
that
we
talked
about
transportation
as
well.
That
could
relate
here
so
I'll
go
through
these
quickly.
C
C
Excuse
me
link
the
Guadalupe
River
and
the
los
altos
creek
trail
system,
daylight,
Los,
Altos
Creek
at
Park
Avenue
to
restore
habitat,
allow
continuous
trail
systems
next
was
to
integrate
a
range
of
public
spaces
types
and
variety
of
scales,
so
pocket
parks,
rooftop,
rooftop,
gardens,
plazas,
linear
parks.
That
kind
of
had
that
sustainability
component
that
was
popped
up
both
in
the
land
use
and
in
this
topic.
C
D
is
ensure
areas
are
activated
in
both
short
and
long
term,
with
no
dead
zones
through
temporary
and
permanent
programming,
such
as
public
art,
pop-up,
retail
and
events
again
kind
of
those
short
winds
trying
to
show
temporary
improvements
and
how
that
can
change
and
innovate
and
live
in
an
area
and
then
maybe
become
a
long-term
permanent
fix
and
then,
lastly,
is
utilize.
Partnerships
with
the
business
community
and
neighborhood
groups
to
advance
projects
implement
programming
and
keep
spaces
maintained,
ok
next
transportation.
C
So
again
there
might
be
some
connections
between
this
and
the
other
topics.
Well
read
through
this
and
we'll
come
back
and
do
some
voting
so
design
pedestrian
friendly
streets
with
small
blocks,
safe
crossings,
wide
sidewalks
and
amenities
such
as
street
trees
and
benches.
You
might
have
heard
some
of
that
before
in
the
previous
topic.
Direct
street
trail
and
bike
connections
to
downtown
adjacent
neighborhoods
and
the
regional
network
support
a
high
quality
transit
system
that
is
affordable,
convenient
and
frequent
design,
transit
infrastructure
to
avoid
impacts
at
homes,
parks,
businesses
and
community
facilities.
C
He
is
improve
the
safety
of
major
intersections,
especially
the
bird
avenue
280
interchange
F,
is
minimized.
Traffic
congestion
during
construction
and
on
adjacent
residential
streets
and
G
is
to
strive
to
meet
city
goals
for
reducing
car
travel.
Matt
don't
go
far.
You're
gonna
get
it
back
here
soon.
Next,.
C
Kind
of
a
subtopic
underneath
the
transportation
that
we
broke
out
separately
because
that
did
come
out
under
the
transportation
of
land-use
topics,
a
manager
supply
of
parking
relative
to
demand,
adapting
the
to
changes
in
travel
patterns
over
time.
Medias
continue
to
implement
existing
parking
plans
and
programs
that
were
developed
with
community
input
and
respond
to
existing
needs
see
is
future-proof
parking
structures
to
design
them
to
allow
for
repurposing
if
no
longer
needed.
C
That
was
kind
of
related
to
talk
of
self-driving
cars
and
other
methods
that
might
take
the
need
away
for
parking
in
the
future
or
maybe
as
much
parking
minimize
the
amount
of
land
dedicated
to
single-use
parking
and
ensure
that
parking
is
not
visually.
Prominent.
A
prominent
aspect
of
the
built
environment,
housing.
H
We've
divided
this
one
up
four,
so
this
is
for
the
dirt
on
station
area,
maximize
resident
residential
density
to
provide
housing
opportunities
for
local
workers
and
commuters,
ensure
that
at
least
25%
of
housing
units
are
offered
at
below
market
rates
for
low-income
households,
ranging
from
extremely
low
to
moderate,
build
inclusionary
housing
units
on
site
rather
than
paying
in
lieu
fees
or
build
off-site,
avoid
direct
and
indirect
displacement
of
existing
residents
within
the
dura
don
station
area
and
nearby
neighborhoods.
An
e
provide
compensation
and
relocation
assistance
if
redevelopment
of
existing
housing
occurs.
H
And
this
is
for
city
wide,
desired
outcomes,
housing
citywide.
We
should
leverage
this
process
as
an
opportunity
to
address
the
regional
housing
crisis.
We
should
generate
more
addition
more
affordable
housing
throughout
the
city
focusing
on
urban
villages,
while
the
city
has
some
programs
in
Palo
is
to
help
fight
displacement.
It
should
develop
more
and
stronger
tools.
The
strategy
for
addressing
housing
issues
should
integrate
homeless
services.
The
ultimate
goal
is
no
direct
or
indirect
displacement
from
San
Jose
and
no
increase
in
homelessness.
H
H
Now
we're
on
design.
Okay
now
was
that
helpful
to
go
through
all
of
them
to
get
the
full.
The
full
flavor
I
see
some
some
head
nods
good.
Sorry,
we
didn't
do
that
at
first
all
right
how
about
we
take
a
second
and
go
through
the
design
here.
Do
you
guys,
ready
now
that
you
again
have
the
full
picture
you're
ready
to
give
our
your
sort
of
direction
overall
general
direction
on
whether
you
think
it
was
we
hit
the
mark
for
design
or
not?
H
Okay,
two
abstentions:
okay,
all
right!
So
just
a
couple
comments
either
on.
You
know
why
you
felt
this
was
on
the
mark
or
why
you
felt
like
it
was
it
was
we
or
where
we
missed
some
things,
and
so
again,
let's
try
me
really
quick,
so
we
can
go
through
it.
S
J
H
O
B
H
H
N
Voted
green
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
really
support
the
idea
of
maximizing
density.
I
was
just
in
Seattle
last
weekend
and
being
there
I
was
so
overwhelmed
like
this
is
the
city
that
deserves
tech.
This
is
a
city
that
can
build
right
and
you
know
sorry
I'm
a
little
sick,
so
my
voice,
so
it
but
I
think
that
we
need
to
maximize
density,
to
maximize
how
scene
to
maximize
opportunity.
N
R
B
I
A
couple
things
one
one
Rosalind
talked
about
a
little
bit
downtown
having
a
design
guideline
to
make
a
pedestrian
friendly
with
the
businesses.
So
we
talked
about
putting
the
proper
human
scale,
but
we
don't
have
the
interaction
with
the
street
so
somewhere.
We
need
to
get
an
interaction
with
the
street
kids
right
now.
San
Jose
feels
like
a
suburban.
J
I
H
Okay,
let's,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
is
public
spaces,
get
your
cards
ready,
okay
cards
up,
please.
H
H
Q
Q
N
P
I
Harvey
Darnell
northglenn
under
trails
we
say
you
link
Guadalupe
River
and
Los
Gatos
Creek.
We
also
have
the
three
creeks
trail,
which
just
opened
this
list
last
weekend.
Second
thing
is:
I
also
talked
a
lot
about
creating
community
gardens
urban
agriculture
and
rooftops
wherever
we
could
find
spaces,
and
there's
no
mention
of
that
here.
Okay,.
H
S
I
echo
the
comment
about
activating
spaces
vertically
and
not
just
kind
of
at
street
level,
so
it's
urban
okay
in
parks
on
top
of
the
reefs
and
then
another
thing,
I'm
not
taking
it
for
granted
and
actually
spelling
out
that
the
public
spaces
should
reflect
the
cultural
diversity
of
the
community.
Okay,.
H
I
H
B
For
G
says:
strive
to
meet
citywide
goals
for
reducing
car
travel,
which
is
wonderful
and
I'd
like
but
I'd
love
to
see
it
stronger.
Going
back
to
my
wonderful
presentation,
those
presentations
that
we
all
did,
one
of
the
things
that
I
mentioned
was
we
have
citywide
goals.
This
area
cannon
should
be
going
way
beyond
that,
because
it's
gonna
need
to
bring
the
rest
of
the
city
up
in
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
meet
our
citywide
goals
so.
H
B
Q
B
Edward
psalm
shefte
Henschel,
Park,
Neighborhood
Association
Melissa
covered
some
of
them
futures
capacity,
the
disc
concept,
especially
emphasizing
last
mile
towards
getting
to
transit
and
one
thing
kind
of
an
iteration
on
be
there.
Vince
there's
been
talk
about,
especially
around
deer
down
station
itself.
Some
have
advocated
raising
the
tracks
as
a
way
to
potentially
address
some
concerns.
That
and
of
itself
creates
other
concerns
for
those
immediately
adjacent
to
it.
So
kind
of
that
there
are
pros
and
cons
to
each
iteration
of
that
I
think
that's
something
yeah.
H
I
I
H
H
H
I
Its
San
Jose
State,
so
I
happened
to
be
on
the
parking
board
for
the
downtown
as
well,
so
just
full
disclosure
there
there,
with
this
station
being
where
it
is,
and
with
the
the
draw
it's
gonna
have
of
people
going
out
of
the
area.
There
needs
to
be
a
parking
garage
someplace
around
this
area,
dedicated
for
Cal,
train
high-speed
rail.
All
that
not
to
mention
you
know
the
Sharks
in
the
arena.
Having
the
events
you
know
for
150
events
a
year,
that's
got
to
be
parking
there
right
now.
There
is
not
a
solution
for
that.
H
K
Man,
the
Centers
Unified
School
District,
just
very
briefly,
to
give
context
to
my
comments
throughout
the
night.
There's
a
difference
between
poetry
and
recommendations.
I
just
feel
it's
important
to
get
these
as
accurate
as
possible,
because
people
weren't
in
this
room
and
who
read
it
five
years
later,
they
don't
have
the
context
of
the
conversation
and
for
this
one
I
voted,
yellow,
mainly
because
I'm
nervous
about
relative
to
demand
and
if
needed.
K
My
sense
is
that
we
want
to
change
people's
behaviors
regarding
to
using
cars
and
if
we
continue
to
build
parking
based
on
demand,
we're
likely
to
just
need
more
parking
always
and
that
there
isn't
enough
of
a
forcing
function
to
get
people
out
of
their
car.
So
if
we're
intention
designing
a
transit
hub
to
get
people
out
of
their
cars,
we
might
intentionally
design
less
parking
than
the
current
demand
and
always
a
little
bit
less
to
force
people
to
rethink
the
car
trip.
H
B
Just
want
to
underscore
what
was
just
said
that
was
poetic
and
profound.
Thank
you
and
then
I
also
want
to
make
kind
of
building
on
something
that
you
said
in
the
future.
Will
people
know
what
we're
talking
about
when
they
look
back
on
this
and
I'll
make
a
kind
of
snarky
comment,
and
that
is
parking
for
who
you
know.
We
may
look
back
on
this
in
just
five
years
and
say
well,
who
are
they
talking
about
cuz?
Nobody
drives
cars
anymore.
B
We
might
say
that
five
years
from
now
so
anyway,
either
we
say
desired
outcomes
parking
for
cars,
because
this
is
what
this
is.
This
is
what
this
is
about
or
then
the
other
question
I
would
ask
is
under
which
desired
outcomes?
Are
we
talking
about
parking
for
all
the
other
things
that
need
parking?
We.
N
N
I
voted
green
on
this,
but
I
just
wanted
to
take
an
opportunity
to
highlight.
This
is
why
we
need
to
maximize
density,
because
if
we
maximize
density
at
transportation
hubs,
then
we'll
have
more
accessibility
to
get
places
and
use
cars
less
so
really
support
this
maximize
density
to
maximize
transportation.
You
can.
B
B
Edward
Psalm
chef's,
the
headship
Park
Neighborhood
Association.
Now
one
of
the
things
that
I've
mentioned
was
what
Ken
just
mentioned,
that
the
legislative
requirement
to
address
the
concept
of
shared
parking,
so
parking
can
be
used
for
different
reasons
over
24-hour
period,
where
isn't
just
dedicated
for
individual
uses
or
buildings
and
the
other
a
clarification
on
B.
It
was
clear
it
wasn't
continue
to
implement
by
my
memory.
B
It
was
don't
throw
them
out,
because
a
lot
of
data
and
community
input
has
gone
into
existing
parking
plans,
but
it
also
wasn't
don't
take
them
as
gospel,
because,
even
just
in
the
last
few
years
there
have
been
enough
changes
that
we
can't
take
the
data,
then
as
a
given.
So
don't
pretend
that
community,
outreach
and
committee
input
hasn't
happened
regarding
parking
before,
but
don't
say
that
oh
we've
already
covered
this.
We
don't
need
to
re-examine
this
and.
B
H
H
B
A
C
High-Speed
rail
I
think
one
point
to
add,
and
this
gets
instance
of
the
points
that
see
one
others
that
made
but
proactively
managing
parking,
not
just
managing
it,
but
proactively.
Beaming
that
constantly
looking
at
that
question
and
then
in
there's
a
time
between
that
one
and
the
striving
to
mean
see
the
white
city,
white
goals
of
reducing
car
travel
and
so
using
that
as
a
as
one
of
the
mechanisms
in
the
toolkit.
G
H
Alright,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
topic,
which
is
housing
for
the
dirt
on
station
area.
Give
you
a
chance
to
just
read
it
for
quickly
for
a
second
and
then
okay,
you
all
ready,
okay
cards
up.
Please.
H
H
S
So
the
main
comment
that
I
wanted
to
race
was
on
a
I
would
strongly
suggest
that
we
reword
this
for
the
following
ways
or
with
consideration
two
ways:
number
one:
maximize
residential
density:
to
provide
housing,
affordability
across
all
income.
So
we're
talking
about
housing
opportunity
for
all
consistently
number
do.
I
have
a
fairly
strong
objection
to
the
word
local
workers,
because
I
think
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
this
process
as
in
terms
of
like
what
we're
trying
to
get
to
in
the
future.
S
So
I
think
that
we
should
have
language
in
there
that
reflects
kind
of
current
and
future
residents
and
workers
so
that
it's
not
extremely
limiting,
and
then
we
race
for
at
least
personally
I
races
at
the
housing
working
group.
I.
Think
the
idea
of
indirect
displacement
is
something
that
we
really
need
to
think
about
and
talk
about
and
define
a
little
bit
better,
so
that
there's
right
now
I
feel
like
it's
hard
to
really
know
what
that
means
and
what
the
solutions
are.
Gonna
look
like.
C
K
Steve
McMahon
with
the
sinners,
Unified
School
District
two
comments:
the
25%
goal.
I
understand
why
there's
a
specific
number,
but
if
we
looked
at
how
many
members
of
the
current
workforce
are
extremely
low
to
moderate,
and
should
we
benchmark
the
availability
of
housing
to
that
number?
So
two
extreme
example
is
a
50%
of
the
current
workforce
cannot
afford
market
rate.
25%
is
still
going
to
result
in
a
lot
of
displacement
if
only
10%
couldn't
afford
it.
25%
is
an
over
allocation,
a
below
market
rate.
K
I
am
nervous
that
if
we
read
this
5
to
10
years
from
now-
and
we
say
no
displacement
throughout-
is
that
really
the
10
in
10
I
mean
if
Willow
Glen
got
high
density
and
some
of
the
people
were
displaced
from
Willow
Glen
for
higher
density
neighborhoods
with
this
group
object
to
that
and
I
think
that's
a
very
important
point
to
make.
When
you
say
no
displacement,
it
literally
means
people
who
have
acres
of
home.
K
Ownership
would
potentially
never
have
an
eminent
domain
that
gets
a
higher
density
housing
because
of
the
right
next
to
high-speed
rail
train
station
right,
I.
Think
good
public
policy
would
say
you
can't
have
a
10-acre
home
next
to
the
high
speed
rail
station,
because
we
need
an
urban
village
there.
You
might
get
displaced.
That
makes
sense.
That
is
zero
displacement
in
all
circumstances,
overreaching.
H
H
K
Is
my
sense
of
the
groups
comments
throughout
these
meetings?
Is
that
we're
focused
on
ensuring
low
and
moderate
income
families
have
the
ability
to
live
here
and
we're
a
little
less
concerned
about
the
10
million
dollar
McMansion
and
the
displacement
to
maybe
an
urban
village
instead
of
the
McMansion?
Okay.
H
D
H
F
H
H
State
it
again
and
then
we're
gonna
move
on
I
didn't
want
this
to
be
a
big
thing.
I
thought
it
was
an
interesting
question:
I'm,
no
I'm
gonna!
Let
me
just
keep
going
with
this
for
a
second.
If
I
could
is
displacement
tied
to
a
lower
income
bracket
or
can
all
income
brackets
should
they
be?
Are
they
part
of
this
displacement
discussion.
G
G
N
N
First
of
all,
in
an
event,
domain
doesn't
exist
anymore,
so
a
property
owner
can
only
choose
to
sell
their
property
of
their
property
and,
as
we've
seen
in
the
Silicon
Valley
property
owners,
favor
immensely
My
partner
and
I
have
owned
a
property
in
two
years
and
it's
already
accrued
a
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
like
no.
This
doesn't
exist
for
wealthy
people
or
property
owners.
This
displacement.
R
B
Just
wanted
to
say,
I
was
a
part
of
this
working
group
and
when
this
was
said,
no
displacement.
I
was
one
of
a
few
people
in
the
room.
Maybe
the
only
person
in
the
room
said:
Gino
is
pretty
absolute,
so
I
just
wanted
to
underscore
I
think
this,
the
fundamental
concept
of
whether
we
agree
or
not
on
know
always
and
then
also,
if
it
is
know
who
that
know
applies
to,
is
actually
a
really
important
thing
for
us
to
come
to
a
decision
on
at
a
high
level.
Okay,.
F
F
I'm
looking
through
here,
I,
don't
see
the
word
gentrification
anywhere,
and
it
was
something
that
came
up
several
times
and
I
just
want
to
underscore
something
that
Steven
said
and
I
think
someone
else
echoed
of
just
the
these
details
and
words
matter,
and
so
I
will
go
through
point
by
point
and
submit
this
after
in
terms
of
the
housing
elements.
But
I
do
want
to
just
suggest
that
this
is
a
key
area
that
needs
fine
comb
going
through
and
going
through.
The
details
because,
what's
here
is
horribly.
B
C
D
A
citywide
bucket
or
Google
Bucket
during
stationary
bucket,
a
citywide
bucket.
We
have
discussions
about
each
of
those
three
kind
of
tracks
of
recommendations
and
I'm,
not
seeing
in
here
where
the
the
Google
track
of
those
con
stations
are,
which
again
is
is
the
whole
point
of
this.
How
this
exercise
began.
D
So
I'm
be
good
to
hear
your
reaction
to
that
question,
and
then
just
you
know,
when
we
look
at
the
top,
the
top
five
innocence
discussion
points
from
there,
which
I
think
are
pretty
reflective
of
where
the
bulk
of
the
conversation
in
the
solution
group
plus
you
know
we're
not
seeing
reflected
in
here.
Discussion
about
you
know,
creating
a
fund
for
the
acquisition
and
rehabilitation
or
preservation
of
housing.
In
fact,
this.
H
D
D
D
I
On
the
25%
of
the
housing
units,
I
think
we
really
need
to
make
sure
we
understand
what
the
number
of
jobs
the
Google
brings
in
and
the
number
of
support
workers
that
will
be
needed
to
support
those
workers
and
we
provide
enough
housing
somewhere
in
the
area.
So
those
people
can
get
there
everywhere.
I
go
now
retail
restaurants,
bakeries,
whatever
they
all,
have
helped
on
inside,
because
they
can't
get
enough
workers
there's.
No
one
can
afford.
H
H
H
Okay,
so
let's,
let's
give
get
some
comments
again.
If
a
comment
has
been
made,
you
know
again,
we've
heard
that
you
feel
like
it's,
not
reflective.
You
can
say
it
again,
but
we're
certainly
willing
to
take
more
comments
in
writing
later
as
well.
So
any
other
kind
of
what
other
comments
you
guys
want
to
make
about
city
wide
housing
here.
S
H
K
If
building
housing
for
low-income
families
resulted
in
displacement
of
high-income
families,
I
think
many
of
our
communities
would
support
that
again.
It's
not
a
policy
statement.
It's
clarifying
writing
the
statement.
The
ultimate
goal
is
know
if
the
City
Council
were
to
adopt
a
phrase
like
that,
they
literally
would
then
be
testing
everything
against
no
one
ever
moves
out
of
San,
Jose
and
I.
Just
it
is
exactly
either
what
you
said.
What
does
that
statement
really
mean
to
people
when
they
read
it
and
they're
not
sitting
in
this
room?
D
Yeah,
the
Jeffrey
we
can
work
in
partnerships,
I
mean
generally
Steven
I.
Think
I
would
agree
that
I,
just
I
would
I
think
with
the
Google
project
in
particular,
which
is
where
that
particular
statement
was
addressed
to
I.
You
know
in
the
group
I
think
the
idea
was
there
really
is
no
accountability
mechanism,
for
we
would
like
to
see
Google
make
a
a
commitment
with
a
plan
for
implementing
that
goal
around
ensuring
that
there's
no
displacement.
It's
a
part
of
this
project,
I
mean
generally.
D
Yes,
we're
talking
about
working
class
families,
we're
talking
about
lower-income
families,
I
I,
don't
think
I
would
have
to
see
what
it
looks
like,
but
I
don't
think
I
would
be
comfortable
with
you
know,
giving
Google
you
know
going
to
Sacramento
to
be
able
to
get
eminent
domain
powers
for
some
kind
of
authority
to
allow
Google
to
move
for
and
things
that's
not
on
the
table.
It's
not
in
debate
so
I
set
that
aside,
but
I
think
this
was
really
about
when
we're
kind
of
getting
away
from
it.
D
You
know,
is
Google
willing
to
say
as
a
part
of
this
development.
They
agree
to
no
displacement
in
a
plan
to
ensure
that
there's
no
displacement,
that's
really
what
we're
trying
to
get
to
here
and
so
I
think
that's
a
more
important
thing
and
unfortunately,
there's
no
no
vessel
for
that
in
this
outline
and
then
just
around
a
I
mean
you
know.
Yes,
he
was
working
partnerships.
We
do
a
ton
of
work
around
regional
housing,
but
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know.
D
Within
the
group
we
had
a
pretty
robust
conversation
that
the
conversation
that
yes,
we
need
to
address
this
as
a
region
that
that
shouldn't
yes,
we
need
to
do
that,
but
we
shouldn't
say
that
and
then
defer
on
looking
at
what
specifically
Google's
accountability
and
what
their
responsibility
to
address.
That
in
connection
of
this
project
looks
like
guess:
let's
do
that!
We're
all
engaged
a
lot
of
us
spend
a
lot
of
time
there,
but
let's
not
put
that
out
there
as
a
rationale
for
hey,
let's,
let's:
let's
let
these
guys
off
the
hook
so
and.
H
R
Pedego
pact
I
think
that
just
a
couple
things
one
is
that
we
should,
when
it
says
a
we
should
leverage
this
process.
It's
really
about
the
process,
we're
leveraging
but
leverage
the
opportunity
of
massive
development.
I
think
we
need
to
be
very
clear:
it's
not
about
the
process,
but
about
the
impact
of
massive
development.
R
K
K
J
Kevin
crystalline
Gardner,
Neighborhood,
Association
Gardner
is
really
unique.
In
that
we
can
walk
to
downtown
San
Jose.
We
can
walk
to
the
shark
tank.
We
can
walk
to
downtown
Willow
Glen.
If
you
move
us,
there's
no
place
you're
gonna
move
us
that
we
can
do
those
same
things.
The
other
thing
that
it
wanted
to
make.
My
Wayne
point
is.
J
See
this
to
be
a
bit
of
a
class
form,
because
a
lot
of
the
people
in
Gardner
have
owned
their
homes
for,
say
three
four
generations,
so
they
bought
a
long
time
ago
had
very
low
housing
prices.
Stayed
there
for
years,
raise
their
families,
give
it
to
their
kids.
That
sort
of
thing
there's
no
way
if
these
people
were
able
to
if
they
lost
their
homes.
Now,
there's
no
way
they'd
be
able
to
buy
that
same
home
anywhere
else
in
San,
Jose
have
to
move
out
of
the
area.
J
So
even
though
they
are
low-income,
they
may
be
house
rich,
but
their
cash,
poor
and
so
you're.
Creating
a
situation
here
where,
if
you
move
people
out
of
the
nearby
neighborhoods
through
displacement,
there's
they're
gonna
have
to
go
to
Lowe's,
Bono's
or
anywhere
else
like
anybody
else.
So
it's
yeah
I
think
some
of
the
comments
I
hear
are
kind
of.
J
Disarming
to
me,
because
it's
shows
a
bit
of
class
warfare
and
I,
don't
like
that
I
mean
it's
displacement
is
displacement,
whether
you
I
have
no
money
or
a
whole
bunch
of
money.
You
know
I
just
kind
of
I
I'm,
just
kind
of
at
a
loss
for
words
on
some
of
that
and
I'm
kind
of
disappointed
in
the
group
that
they
would
stoop
to
that
class
war.
Thing.
H
Okay,
that's
I
think
we
have
everyone's
comments
for
this.
Let's
move
on
to
our
last
section,
I
think
we
have
four
or
five
public
comments.
Public
comment
cards
if
you
haven't
ended
in
a
card.
Please,
please
do
so.
Oh
yeah,
this
was
a
thanks.
I
was
trying
to
get
people
if
they
haven't
done
the
card
to
come
on
up
and
do
it
so
jobs
in
education
to
get
a
sense
of
direction
here.
First
and
then
some
comments.
T
I
I'm
concerned
I've
been
saying
this
over
and
over
I
want
to
ensure
that
there's
participation
in
the
whole
construction
in
the
economic
process
of
developing
this
area
of
the
local,
small
and
and
unengaged
business
communities
I
want
to
put
that.
I
would
like
for
that
to
be
to
come
out
of
this
room
that
we
are
concerned
about
the
development
of
the
we.
Don't
we
try
to
move
away
from
everybody
moving
in
the
big
companies
moving
and
get
all
the
money
and
leave
the
more
money
that
that
we
can
get
to
staying
in
San
Jose.
T
E
M
Metatron
from
the
Silicon
Valley
organization,
Eddie
trunk,
with
the
Silicon
Valley
organization,
I
just
want
to
say
that
for
heart
a
whether
it
says
it
ensures
that
new
jobs
offer
living
wages,
I
think
it's
premature
to
put
some
kind
of
a
requirement
that
they'll
be
living
wages
without
understanding
the
type
of
jobs
or
the
types
of
industries
that
we
represented.
Not
only
would
there
be
tech
jobs
in
the
Dehradun
station,
there
will
also
be
service
jobs,
support
positions,
and
we
don't.
M
We
shouldn't
be
putting
some
kind
of
a
requirement
or
a
mandate
ahead
of
time
without
understanding
what
is
out
there.
Furthermore,
there's
no
policy
that
requires
that
there's,
a
specific
living
wage
is
different
from
minimum
wage.
Those
two
issues:
there's
no
policy
existing.
That
requires
that
a
living
wage
is
mandated
for
a
sub
region
of
the
city
of
San
Jose.
It
should
be
consistent,
citywide
or
regionally,
but
not
so
much
as
a
sub
region.
Those
are
some
of
my
comments
and
I
won't
hold
out
everybody's
time.
C
K
Santa
Clara
I
have
a
concern
with
letter
B,
which
is
provide
employment
and
business
opportunities
that
benefit
longtime
lower-income
residents.
I,
certainly
don't
have
a
concern
with
benefiting
lower-income
residents
with
employment
and
business
opportunities,
but
I
don't
understand
the
long
time
distinction
I
think
whether
someone's
been
here
for
a
short
time
for
a
few
years,
whatever,
if
their
lower
income,
they
have
needs
and
I
hate
to
see
us
divide
each
other.
By
how
long
have
you
lived
here.
H
T
Set
policies
and
yes,
I-
think
every
wage
should
be
a
living
wage
I,
don't
care
what
businesses
it
is
and-
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
stuff
coming
out
of
the
National
Chamber
saying
that
these
type
living
wage
jobs
help
hurt
small
businesses,
and
that's
just
not
the
fact.
The
facts
is
that
all
the
more
expendable
income
your
community
have
the
people
in
San
Jose
will
have
the
better.
It
is
for
small
companies,
small
businesses,
every
small
business
makes
money
off
of
off
of
exposed
expose
above
in
income.
T
So
I
think
that
I
hope
that
policy
is
something
that
we
are
putting
in
stone
here
know
something
that's
gonna,
be
that's
gonna
come
from
this
committee
from
this
AG
group.
That
will
say
this
is
what
we
want
to
do
in
San
Jose
going
forward.
We
got
too
many
people
living
under
the
bridge
that
have
jobs
living
in
their
cars.
Every
wage
should
be
a
living
wage.
Q
Real
quick
I
feels
like
kind
of
ran
in
a
steam
when
we
got
here
just
a
steam
tonight,
I
feel
like
there's
a
real
strong
opportunity
for
innovation
here
and
innovative
partnerships
where
capital
Silicon
Valley
we've
got
a
long
lead
time
running
up
to
when
Google
will
be
putting
a
shovel
in
the
dirt.
Let's,
let's
get
innovative
here.
Let's,
let's
set
the
pace
for
the
rest
of
the
country.
You
show
them
how
it's
done.
K
Go
me
good
Marcus,
with
the
County
of
Santa
Clara.
What
prompted
my
red
car
on
this
is
C,
which
is
explore
economic
development
and
educational
strategies
or
I'm.
Sorry
that,
as
a
type
of
woman,
its
economic
development
and
educational
strategy
should
focus
on
strengthening
existing
programs
that
we're
creating
new
ones.
I,
don't
understand
that
to
me,
we
should
focus
on
those
programs
that.
B
H
Okay,
so
we're
we're
gonna
move
on
to
public
comment,
but
before
we
do
I,
just
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
the
comments.
You
know
we
we're
moving
through
this
process
quickly.
We
expected
a
lot
of
comments
and
we
got
a
lot
of
comments,
and
so
we
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
You
know
absolutely
if
you
want
to.
If
you
want
to
write
additional
comments
to
this
and
you
know
submit
them
to
us,
we
absolutely
would
welcome
it.
H
If
you
want
to
have
a
phone
conversation
about
some
of
this,
you
know
we
can
do
that
as
well.
You
know
our
intent
here
again
was
not
to
too
upset
but
was
to
try
and
pull
a
lot
of
information
together
and
bring
it
up,
and
you
know
we
were
clearly
got
it
got
it:
okay
in
some
areas
and
not
okay,
not
as
well
in
other
areas
and
and
that's
okay,
because
what
we
want
to
do
is
get
it
right.
C
Okay,
thank
you
all
for
sticking
with
us,
I'm
gonna
read
off
three
names
at
a
time.
I
ask
you
to
be
ready
to
pop
up.
Thank
you.
So
much
and
again,
excuse
me
if
I
mispronounced,
your
name
now
we're
gonna
start
with
Teresa
Castellanos
and
then
we're
gonna
go
to
Blair
Beekman,
followed
by
I,
believe
ish
on
her
Elle.
G
Good
evening
today,
casinos
San
Jose
Unified
School
District
trustee
I,
am
here
to
express
the
concerns
of
what
is
taking
place
in
the
area
that
I
represent
I
represent
the
downtown
area.
Last
year
we
had
a
discussion
on
the
table
discussion
at
Lowell
elementary
school.
We
had
25
immigrant
mothers
show
up
and
they
were
talking
about
paying
$2,500
for
a
garage
with
no
bathroom
and
no
kitchen.
G
They
also
talked
about
competing
with
San
Jose
State
students
in
which
a
3-bit
landlord
or
rather
rent
to
a
three-bedroom
house
to
six
students,
because
they
can
charge
a
thousand
to
a
thousand
five
hundred
per
student
and
have
two
students
in
each
room:
that's
6,000
to
8,000
dollars
a
month
that
they
are
competing
with
as
families,
and
so
this
is
before.
Google
is
a
rival,
and
a
lot
of
the
families
were
talking
about
how
they're
gonna
lose
community.
They
were
gonna
lose
school.
G
They
could
tell
me
off
the
top
of
their
head,
that
they
had
lost
a
hundred
kids
that
year
and
that
they
had
lost
150
kids
a
year
before.
So
this
housing
crisis
is
extreme
and
I
urge
you
to
not
only
come
and
limit
public
comment
to
this
space,
but
please
come
to
Washington
Elementary
School,
please
come
to
Lowell
Elementary
School.
Please
come
to
the
schools
that
are
being
impacted
by
this
discussion
so
that
you
can
hear
what
families
are
suffering
and
what
students
are
suffering,
no
matter
what
we
do
as
a
school
district.
G
We
cannot
make
up
for
the
socio-economic
difficulties
that
this
new
economy
has
created.
That
has
created
the
very
rich
and
everybody
else
and
I
heard
the
discuss
the
discussion
about
middle
income.
There
is
no
middle
income
left
in
Silicon
Valley.
There
is
everyone
that
is
struggling
to
stay
here
and
then
there's
a
very
rich
and
we
will
become
San
Francisco.
Based
on
what
you
do
here.
G
This
will
define
whether
there's
there's
ethnic
diversity
here
or
not,
and
I
think
the
commitment
has
to
be
more
than
the
art,
because
the
art
will
remember
who
we
were
not,
who
we
are.
That
commitment
has
to
be.
How
do
we
saying
the
ethnics
of
diversity
that
has
given
the
richness
and
the
wealth
to
what
is
Silicon
Valley?
Thank
you
thank.
G
P
You
yeah
reiterate
the
words
just
spoken
that
I
was
very
nice.
That
was
a
perspective.
I
really
need
you
know
my
feelings
about
the
downtown
area.
There's
a
certain
gentrification
process
already,
starting
with
the
mayor
that
they're
already
working
on
and
they're
using
technology
and
what
I
feel
is
the
real
wrong
way
to
do
it.
P
It's
got
a
whole
bunch
of
things
to
it
that
you
know
I
don't
want
to
argue
about,
but
it
one
of
its
purposes
is
to
keep
poor
people
out
of
the
first
in
Santa
Clara
area,
and
that's
not
cool,
that's
not
good!
So
there's
there's
questions.
There's
problems
as
a
group,
you
softened
your
touch
up
a
bit
in
your
in
how
to
talk
about
this
you're
you're
gonna
work
on
this
to
try
to
bring
it
back
a
bit
and
I.
Thank
you
for
that.
P
It's
just
a
few
more
thoughts,
I'm
really
worried
about
oh
I,
guess
just
to
mention
now
the
idea
of
Google
is
important
to
me.
Maybe
it's
time
they
become
a
bit
more
involved
in
this
process.
And
finally,
one
of
your
first
sentences
was
maximum
density
to
take
full
advantage
of
transit
investments.
I'm
a
bit
worried
that
you
are
going
to.
P
With
your
transit
investments,
you're
going
to
that's
just
front
and
center
there,
the
transit
industry
grew
PTAs
and
such
are
a
bit
too
strong,
I,
just
one
more
second,
if
you
can
help
me
here
there
bit
too
strong
right
now,
they
need
to
learn
how
to
back
off
a
bit
and
we
need
to
respect
that
about
them
and
build
them
up
with
time
and
they've
pushed
you
strong
right
now.
They
need
to
learn
to
back
off.
That's
my
two
cents.
Thank
you.
Thank.
T
P
Robert
Aguirre,
here
and
I
believe
I'm
a
voice
for
houseless
individuals
throughout
the
city
in
the
county.
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
we
have
ten
neighborhood
associations
here,
one
of
which
is
its
downtown
residents,
which
has
three
representatives.
One
of
them
is
not
here
who
also
happens
to
represent.
P
The
house
was
people
in
the
city
in
this
process
and
when
you
were
all
conducting
your
votes,
that
vote
was
missing,
and
this
is
the
second
time
that
I've
talked
about
actually
the
third
time
I've
talked
about
this,
and
everyone
else,
I
believe,
has
an
alternate
that
if
you
can't
make
it
here,
you
have
somebody
who
can
take
your
place.
We
don't
have
an
alternate
for
the
houseless
people
here.
P
We
don't
have
a
voice
and
I
think
that
that
is
something
that's
very
sadly
missing
here,
because
there
are
people
that
are
going
to
be
severely
impacted
by
whatever
happens
out
of
this
and
I've
brought
this
up
before,
like
I
said
and
I
think
we
need
to
have
an
alternate.
It
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
me.
P
G
Hi
I'm,
Tessa
Woodmansee
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
been
thinking
about
is
how
Google
can
be
helping
our
community
and
I
was
thinking
of
a
comparison
of
Cisco.
My
husband
works
Francisco
and
how
they
just
recently
spent
like
50
million
for
homeless,
and
so
I
want
Google
to
really
help
with
our
roads
to
make
them
more
pedestrian
and
bicycle
friendly
and
the
whole
network
of
roads
around
the
dirt
on
station
area.
G
So
we're
talking
about
Stockton
we're
talking
about
Taylor
all
the
way
to
Winchester
we're
talking
about
Julian
that
currently,
as
it
goes,
eastbound
is
not
even
what
is
it
called
accessible
ad
a
accessible
because
there's
there
I
saw
the
guy
with
the
pot.
You
know
there
was
selling,
you
know
ice
cream.
G
You
know
we
talked
about
280,
but
it's
really
bird
has
been
coming
up
a
lot
and
we
need
to
get
all
these
streets
to
be
worked
out
so
they're
they're,
pedestrian
and
bicycle
friendly
and
traffic
calming,
and
you
know
so.
That's
that's
what
I
say
that
Google
has
to
do,
but
you
know
it
should
be.
All
companies
that
are
building
in
our
neighborhood
should
have
a
like.
G
Like
we
have
the
parkland
fees,
we
should
have
traffic
and
green
the
bike
lanes
and
making
our
roads
more
bicycle
and
pedestrian
friendly
as
part
of
all
companies
that
come
into
our
neighborhood
should
have
that.
We
should
have
that
as
a
you
know,
a
fund
that
is
developed
and
they
say
that
that
they
only
have
to
deal
with
what's
in
front.
That's
what
developers
only
have
to
deal
with
what's
in
front
of
their
building?
Well,
that's
wrong.
G
I
So
hi
I'm
concerned
about
how
you're
trying
to
maximize
the
housing.
Yes,
the
area
overall
has
a
housing
shortage,
but
San
Jose
itself
has
a
surplus.
It's
a
bedroom
community
I've
been
going
to
these
various
budget
meetings
and
I
keep
on
hearing
about
how
there's
0.8
jobs
for
employed
resident.
Here
we
have
San
Jose
actually
has
too
many
houses.
What
we
want
to
emphasize
here
is
the
employment.
We
need
to
help
solve
San
Jose
structural
budget
imbalance.
Otherwise
we
can't
pay
for
the
police
and
parks
and
libraries
and
so
forth.
I
Our
transit
system
here
is
fixed
up
as
a
hub
and
spokes.
So
dear
Don,
all
the
tracks
lead
to
Darrow
Don.
So
you
want
to
have
the
employment
there
have
housing
around
out
in
the
spokes.
People
come
in
from
Sunnyvale
people
come
in
from
Lapidus
and
also
from
all
the
urban
villages
that
you'd
be
building.
That's
you
have
the
housing
out
there
and
have
them
come
in
to
the
area
here.
I
So
you
want
to
have
a
vibrant
mix,
some
of
the
other
employment
other
things
miss
I've,
then
also
to
high-speed
rail
meetings.
I
keep
on
hearing
about
how
you
want
to
connect
to
the
San
Jose
Airport
I'd
haven't
heard
any
mention
of
that
here.
You
want
to
have
parking
at
the
airport.
Have
the
parking
lots,
rental
cars
up
there
and
have
people
commute
there
rather
than
having
parking
at
the
airport
at
the
dear
Don
sation
area?
Here
no
mention
of
San
Jose
State
University.
A
lot
of
people
will
be
walking
from
there
to
here.
I
You
want
to
make
it
so
people
who
want
to
walk
through
the
areas
and
come
here
you
want
to
make
it
so
people
can
walk
to
the
transit
station.
I've,
not
heard
the
connections
to
the
place,
just
how
to
get
to
the
Train
session.
You
want
to
emphasize
that
to
make
it
you
think
it's
a
beautiful
area
but
make
if
they
can
get
there
and
I
am
very
glad
to
hear
you
talking
about
the
Los,
Gatos,
Creek
and
daylighting
it.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank.
G
Wanted
to
thank
Norma
and
Leslie
for
mentioning
the
creeks
and
the
creeks
are
a
really
important
part
of
this
area
and
I
think
that
considering
the
creeks
as
part
of
the
design
have
to
come
in
much
stronger
than
we
ever
put
a
trail
trail
next
to
the
creek.
It
has
to
be
a
stronger
element
and
it
has
to
be
to
look
at
the
riparian
vegetation
and
not
only
as
a
transportation
corridor.
G
The
creeks
are
not
going
to
ever
have
the
type
of
creeks
that
they
have
in
Europe,
so
the
rivers
with
a
lot
of
water
that
you
can
have
kayaking
on
there,
but
there
is
still
important
both
for
the
spiritual
and
in
the
sense
of
place
and
the
beauty
of
the
place
other
than
that.
I
wanted
to
say
that
green
roofs
are
becoming
more
and
more
evident
as
important.
Both
people
in
wildlife,
birds
and
other
creatures
use
them.
G
B
Geneva
that
was
pretty
good,
so
Janica,
Clem,
lifelong
resident
and
native
of
San,
Jose
and
I
wanted
to
say
I
find
it
really
interesting
that
these
problems
that
we're
talking
about
have
been
decades
in
the
making
housing.
A
lot
of
the
issues
that
we've
been
discussing
have
been
decades
in
the
making
and
a
corporation
we've.
Never
looked
you
to
solve
our
societal
problems
before
I.
B
Do
understand
that
there
is
an
opportunity,
though,
and
so
I
appreciate
what
Google
is
doing,
I'm
actually
very
proud
that
they
chose
our
city
in
the
most
transit
rich
area
to
choose
their
next
big
campus.
So
thank
you.
I
am
actually
really
looking
forward
to
that,
because
it's
gonna
do
two
things
for
the
city:
one.
It's
gonna
deal
with
that
jobs,
housing
imbalance,
we're
gonna,
get
a
lot
of
jobs
coming
in
to
San
Jose,
which
is
something
that
the
city
desperately
needs.
B
B
I
also
want
to
make
fact
that,
what's
actually
gonna
be
even
more
beneficial
is
the
tax
and
revenue
that's
going
to
come
in
from
this
development,
so
the
community
benefit
is
important,
but
having
this
come
in
is
going
to
do
twofold
for
the
city,
it's
going
to
deal
with
that
jobs,
housing
imbalance
and
it's
also
really
going
to
bring
some
desperately
needed
tax
revenue
into
the
city
to
help
with
the
things
that
we've
all
been
discussing
today.
So
I
am
absolutely
excited
about
Google.
Coming
into
my
hometown.
Thank.
Q
Q
I
wanted
to
start
by
reinforcing
that
several
people
said
regarding
the
parking,
which
is
that
in
the
interest
of
sustainable
transportation,
managed
parking
for
where
the
city
wants
to
be
rather
than
where
it
has
been
in
the
past
or
is
today
there
were
some
numbers
on
early
slides
up
in
the
beginning
about
the
mix
of
development
to
date
in
the
downtown
Dehradun
area,
with
ten
thousand
seven
hundred
homes
and
3.4
million
square
feet
of
office,
which
is
maybe
17,000
jobs.
So
significant.
Q
You
know
jobs
going
ahead
of
housing,
so
that
suggests
a
few
different
things,
one
that
is
potentially
within
the
ability
of
San
Jose
to
address,
which
is
to
have
a
policy
to
have
housing,
the
transit
shed,
which
means
not
only
being
in
an
urban
village
somewhere
but
being
in
an
urban
village
somewhere
that
you
can
get
to
some
of
these
jobs
within
a
nice
short
transit
or
non
driving.
Commute.
Q
That's
something
that
San
Jose
can
optimize
its
policies
to
achieve,
but
then,
overall,
with
you
know,
San,
Jose,
historically
being
a
bedroom
community
and
wanting
to
catch
up
on
homes,
I'm,
seeing
a
pattern
starting
here
that
I
see
working
on
the
peninsula
corridor
with
cities,
accepting
a
ten
to
one
or
five
to
one
jobs,
to
housing,
balance
continuing
and
ongoing,
and
that
is
causing
catastrophic
impact
on
a
regional
level.
So
and
so
now,
speaking
as
an
individual
with
various
housing
advocacy
hats.
Q
Q
Hello,
Mary,
Dee,
Bosley,
Thank,
You
volunteers,
you're
all
very
bright,
very
invigorating
to
be
here,
I'm
a
gardener
resident
I.
Thank
you,
Kevin
and
I'm
shocked
that
I
was
sitting
here
for
hours
before
her
to
peep
about
small
businesses.
I
am
a
business
consultant
and
advocate,
and
my
office
is
on
Mike.
Had
five
offices
downtown
why
right
now
I'm
on
Julian
and
autumn
expressway
and
have
been
there
for
14
years?
We
are
losing
our
space,
of
course,
to
Google
coming
in,
as
are
many
other
companies
which
are
the
lifeblood
of
San
Jose
in
an
area.
Q
That's
been
there
very
long
established
a
lot
of
family-owned
companies.
They
have
now
been
selling
out
parcel
by
parcel.
The
last
sliver
has
recently
sold
so
the
Monopoly
game
continues
and
now
what
we're
seeing
is
we're
seeing
all
different
timelines.
Some
people
are
gone,
they're
disappearing,
they're,
going
to
be
disappearing,
they've
lost
their
employees,
they've
lost
their
space,
their
ability
to
sell
their
business
to
pass
it
down
to
family
members.
All
of
that
has
been
wiped
out.
Q
Q
In
the
meantime,
the
area
is
being
constantly
evacuated,
but
we
have
a
decline,
a
very
rapid
decline
in
in
the
area
that
would
include
that
would
include
garbage,
homeless,
vandalism,
crime,
everything
it's
out
of
control,
it's
filthy
and
it's
very,
very
dangerous
to
be
there
evenings
when
I
work
and
I
we're
all
unable
to
hire
anyone
willing
to
come
and
work
in
that
area.
So
I'm
just
here
to
say
that
it's
already
begun
and
we're
talking
a
lot
about
impact
and
displacement.
It's
in
Full,
Tilt,
boogie
right
now
we're
being
displaced,
we're
disappearing.
Q
All
the
small
businesses
are
looking
for
smaller
spaces
that
are
no
longer
affordable,
can't
afford
to
relocate
and
are
all
struggling.
None
of
this
we've
all
been
through
this
before
I
used
to
be
the
consultant
for
the
downtown
Association
and
did
the
very
first
work
on
retail
retention
and
recruitment.
There
has
been
no
proactive
forethought
to
how
to
preserve
these
businesses
or
relocate
them
and
preserve
the
jobs
we
need
in
this
area.
Thank
you.
Thank.
L
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
there's
been
some
wonderful
surrounded
by
brilliance
and
not
just
in
the
city,
the
Bay
Area
period
from
the
East
Bay
to
the
South
Bay.
We
literally
created
the
computer
chip.
There
was
no
religion,
no
school
of
thought,
no
belief
system
involved
in
that
idea
across
that
table
or
every
nationality
literally,
if
every
origin
had
a
part
in
putting
that
together,
the
computer
chip
in
itself,
San
Jose,
is
a
very
heart
of
Silicon,
Valley
I'm.
L
Think
the
last
piece
of
paper
that
I
was
signed
that
invented
the
computer
chip
was
1947,
so
move
somewhere
along
lines,
just
a
piece
of
paper
and
the
ideas
came
together
and
it
was
signed
at
San,
Jose
State
across
that
very
table.
We
connected
the
world
internationally,
all
over
the
world
instantaneously.
L
Through
brilliance,
ideas,
research,
lost
failures,
I
mean
losses,
I
mean
people
have
lost
their
lives
literally
in
one
general
aspect
or
another.
Across
that
table.
We
connected
everybody
instantaneously.
Across
that
very
same
table,
we
can
correct
everything
else
going
on
realms.
This
is
my
belief.
I'm
an
addict
I'm,
32
years
of
addiction.
I
am
also
a
father
and
son
I'm.
Many
other
things.
Don't
you
know
who
I
think
I
am
you
know?
Let
me
tell
it,
but
at
the
same
time,
I'm
surrounded
by
inspiration.
These
inspirations
have
also
got
me
back
to
my
children.
L
They
got
me
clean
and
sober
as
many
times
without
falling
I've
gotten
up,
I
fall
down,
I
get
the
okay,
and
please
forgive
me
for
expression.
This
is
the
last
moment
that
I,
probably
ever
get
an
opportunity
to
express
something
and
I
just
happenstance
coming
through
here,
getting
ready
for
another
venue,
I
produce
music
as
hanging
right
in
my
daughter,
my
son.
They
do
the
same
before
my
son
and
my
daughter.
They
worked
for
Amazon.
L
Her
daughter
drives
my
son
packages,
he's
19,
she's,
23
and
I
was
nowhere
around
missing
their
lives
up,
but
I
was
in
preparation
to
get
back
to
them
and
have
the
right
conversations
with
my
daughter,
my
son,
being
inspired
by
what
I
seen
around
here.
Having
lost
my
mother
and
going
through
that
emotional
rollercoaster
I've
come
to
believe
that
there
are
families
that
have
literally
fed
me
when
I
didn't
know,
I
was
hungry
and
they
looked
out
for
me
and
didn't
know
me.
L
So
what
I'm
basically
saying
is,
and
one
in
a
nutshell,
basically,
what
I'm
saying
is:
there
are
mom-and-pop
stores
that
have
literally
given
their
lives
and
sacrifices
and
all
the
challenges
and
everything
of
30
40,
50,
60
70
years,
raising
kids,
grandkids
and
great-grandchildren
in
this
very
community.
Why
would
Google
Google
come
not
to
say
anything
negative
about
what
it
is,
that's
going
on
for
us
and
everything
and
I'm
looking
at
it,
not
just
in
the
Bay
Area
or
San
Jose
I'm
school-based?
Basically,
what
I'm
asking
is
this?
L
Why
not
incorporate
the
community
in
the
idea,
instead
of
forcing
them
out
and
raising
the
prices
of
things
that
they've
literally
been
spending
their
pennies
on
it's
a
build
and
I'm
pretty
sure
Google
has
benefited
somewhere
along
the
lines
of
all
the
customers
that
are
now
going
to
be
left.
You
know,
without
these
attachments
to
these
families
in
these
communities
and
these
companies
and
these
stores
and
whatever
it
whatever
it
is,
why
not
incorporate
them
in
the
idea?
Okay,.
J
L
A
Alright
folks
I'm
going
to
sit
I'm
tired,
like
you
just
a
few
things
and
I'll
get
you
out
of
here,
I,
do
think
as
we
move
forward
with
the
the
next
two
meetings.
I
do
apologize
for
the
lateness
of
the
hour.
I
think
you
know
we're
gonna,
look
at
how
we
manage
the
agenda
and
time
a
little
bit
better.
So
we
don't
put
you
guys
through
this
three
and
a
half
hours
on
a
meeting
and
and
something
of
the
significance
and
depth
of
policy
is
is,
is
tough
for
you
guys
and
tough
for
the
community.
A
Second
follow-up
item:
I
am
gonna,
ask
Laurie
just
a
show
of
hands.
Some
of
you
did
want
to
discuss
some
of
the
kind
of
outreach
methods
and
strategies
and
and
possibly
some
assistance
with
us
trying
to
promote
the
next
few
meeting.
So
if
you
guys
can
at
least
just
touch
base
with
Laurie
on
the
way
out,
we'd
like
to
take
you
guys
up
on
that
to
make
sure
that
the
next
three
forms
and
the
online
stuff
we're
doing
is
be
able
to
be
impactful
as
possible.
I
get
that
you
know.
A
There's
many
of
us
around
the
table
here
that
do
policy
making
for
a
living.
You
know
many
of
us
know
that
can
be
a
frustrating
process
met
with
my
team
this
morning.
Talking
about
a
variety
of
policy
items,
we're
gonna
be
working
with
and
we
were
all
frustrated
with
each
other
at
the
end
of
that
meeting.
So
it's
frustrating
as
this
was
for
some
of
you
and
you
know:
I
talked
to
you
off
to
the
side.
A
There's
a
little
frustrating
for
us
as
well
and
I
think
that's
that's
a
good
thing
because
it
means
the
next
meeting
and
the
me
after
that,
as
we
get
forward
to
the
report.
Some
of
this
is
flushed
out
and
refined.
So
a
lot
of
this
was
an
attempt
to,
as
Kim
mentioned,
with
the
Google
MOU.
It's
it's
gonna
be
high
levels,
and
we've
done
really
good
work
on
some
of
those
groups
with
the
solutions.
A
A
lot
of
creativity,
a
lot
of
agreement,
some
disagreement
that
we
needed
to
flesh
out
but
having
those
desired
outcomes
in
that
conversation
tonight.
So
we
have
something.
More
high-level
is
really
important
for
us
and
it's
going
to
be
important
for
the
group
as
we
move
forward
with
these
particular
items
so
get
that
it
was
frustrating
I'm
gonna
actually
ask.
If
any
of
you
that
said,
you
wanted
to
do,
send
in
a
letter,
form
or
comment.