►
From YouTube: OCT 10, 2018 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
So
with
that
I
want
to
make
sure
we
have
enough
time
for
you
guys
in
the
groups
before
I
hand
it
off
to
Dave
and
Matt.
So
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
I
mentioned
the
validation
machine.
If
you
haven't
been
validated,
that's
far
your
parking
anyway,
please
go
to
the
back
during
a
break,
and
we
do
have
interpretation
services
in
the
back
that
if
anyone
in
the
public
would
like
to
partake
in.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
hand
it
off
to
Dave
one
more
thing:
keeping
we
do
need
to
approve
the
meeting
minutes
from
meeting
number
eight,
which
are
in
your
packet
and
we're
emailed
to
you
motion
to
approve
from
Charlie
anyone
opposed
okay.
We
will
move
forward
just
and
one
last
piece
of
housekeeping.
A
There
are
less
microphones
than
their
there
have
been
in
the
past
so
as
we
try
and
facilitate
this
out
so
that
everything
is
captured
by
TV,
because
this
is
being
broadcast
tonight
as
well,
as
you
know,
recorded
and
online
for
the
future,
please
make
sure
you
guys
pass
the
microphone
to
one
another
and
we'll
do
our
best
to
make
sure
you
have
a
microphone
as
well.
Here
you
go
Dave
Javon,
so.
E
Much
hi
all
great
to
see
you
again
tonight
as
usual.
I'll
take
us
through
the
agenda
key
takeaways
from
the
last
meeting
and
then
we'll
dive
into
the
fun
stuff.
So
we'll
do
a
quick
review.
Summary
notes.
We're
gonna,
give
you
an
update
on
the
engagement
process.
There's
been
a
lot
going
on,
including
the
online
community
feedback
forum.
That
will
give
you
some
feedback
on
as
well
of
what
we've
heard.
E
We've
got
a
tremendous
amount
of
responses,
we're
going
to
review
the
draft
chapters,
get
a
chance
to
talk
through
that
and,
most
importantly,
we're
gonna
break
out
into
small
groups.
So
we're
gonna,
keep
it
a
little
interactive
here
tonight.
I
will
give
you
an
overview
of
what
that's
gonna
look
like
as
well.
We're
gonna
give
you
an
update
as
well
on
the
airspace,
protection,
oai
and
downtown
development
capacity.
Study
update.
E
That's
a
lot
of
words.
One
sentence:
you'll
get
a
quick
overview
of
what
that
means.
Before
we
jump
into
it,
but
that
will
be
an
important
update,
as
always
we'll
have
public
comments
and
then
we'll
talk
through
next
steps
and
the
meeting
schedules
moving
forward.
So
Group
agreements.
Again,
you
all
have
been
great.
E
If
you
haven't
made
any
new
friends
after
10
meetings,
that
would
be
very
surprising,
I'm
sure
you
have
so
quick
overview
of
key
takeaways.
Again
remember.
This
are
very
high-level
key
takeaways.
From
the
past
meeting
last
month
we
talked
about
the
engagement
process
updates.
We
did
get
some
constructive
feedback.
E
The
engagement
should
continue
to
be
authentic,
inclusive
and
culturally
competent,
I'm.
Just
gonna
read
through
all
these
to
make
sure
you,
you
all
see
it
cuz
I
know
the
text
is
a
little
small,
be
sure
or
be
clear
about
the
process
of
the
meeting,
whether
it's
a
Google
project
or
the
dear
Don
stationery
that
we're
talking
about
encourage.
We
were
encouraged
by
sag
members
to
work
more
closely
with
their
constituents,
so
you
all
were
kind
of
giving
us
that
feedback.
We
were
giving
that
feedback
back
to
you
as
well.
E
As
you
know,
you
are
the
conduit
to
the
larger
community,
so
helping
bring
people
to
meetings.
Helping
bringing
those
perspectives
to
this
room
is
very
important.
Make
sure
that
public
comments
at
sag
meetings
are
captured,
and
we
did
remind
all
that
this
is
all
videotaped
it
is
captured
in
that
way.
We
also
do
include
it
in
the
summary
notes
that
they
get
posted
to
the
website
and
distributed.
So
that
was
a
very
important
comment.
E
We
talked
about
the
downtown
development
and
design
guidelines
is
where
there
was
some
questions
that
came
up
regarding
that
about
the
amount
of
development
currently
in
a
pipeline
and
under
evaluation
in
the
downtown.
He
is
the
rationale
for
updating
the
design
guidelines
and
their
relationship
to
other
adopted
guidelines,
the
timing
and
history
I'm.
E
So
a
key
part
of
the
conversation
last
time
was
to
go
through
desired
outcomes
and
some
insight
that
we
received
from
you
all
is
generally.
There
was
a
level
of
agreement
when
we
talked
about
the
design
in
public
spaces,
there
was
definite
disagreement
over
the
jobs
and
housing
outcomes,
or
there
was
mixed
opinion
there,
and
there
was
also
some
disagreement.
We
talked
about
transportation,
land
use
and
parking
outcomes,
and
these
all
fit
into
those
topic
buckets
that
you
all
are
very
aware
of.
E
E
We
didn't
have
that
in
your
packets.
We
had
handed
out
at
previous
meetings,
but
you
all
wanted
to
see
that
incorporate,
and
you
did
see
that
in
the
report
as
it
went
out
and
then
recognized
the
tension
between
several
the
outcomes
and
in
the
report.
Again,
we
tried
to
reflect
some
of
that
information
and
then
more
discussion
of
the
term
no
displacement.
There
was
some
confusion
about
exactly
kind
of
what
that
means,
if
that's
even
possible,
to
clearly
reach
no
displacement.
E
So
there
was
some
conversation
route
down
that
report
as
well,
we'll
talk
about
again
here
tonight,
so
with
that
I'm
gonna
hand
it
over
to
Lori,
to
give
you
a
quick
overview
of
the
engagement
process
actually
before
I.
Do
sorry
any
questions
on
those
I'm
so
excited
to
get
into
this
agenda
that
might
be
jumping
forward.
Any
question
on
what
I
just
gave
a
quick
overview
of
you
all.
Remember
you
guys
just
turn
your
name
cards
sideways,
No!
Okay!
Here
we
go
look.
F
Hi
everyone
thank
you
for
being
here
and
my
okay
oops
all
right,
so
just
a
quick
summary
of
the
engagement
process.
As
you
know,
we
completed
four
community
forums
back
in
June
six
pop-up
workshops,
most
recently
with
Viva
calle
on
September
23rd.
It
was
a
very
fun
event:
five
stakeholder
presentations,
I,
don't
have
the
right
angle
here
for
some
reason.
F
F
We
were
pleased
to
see
that
the
online
feedback
forum
got
almost
700
respondents.
So
I
was
going
to
summarize
here
a
couple
key
findings
from
that
we
haven't
done
the
full
analysis,
but
Survey
Monkey
does
give
you
a
nice
PDF
summary.
So
the
we
had
693
total
responses.
Most
of
them
lived
in
San
Jose.
A
lot
actually
hadn't
participated
in
any
engagement
effort,
so
there
was
300
respondents
who
hadn't
come
to
any
of
the
meetings.
F
So
this
was
a
really
good
way
to
reach
people
who
weren't
able
to
participate
in
other
ways
skewed
towards
male,
but
we
did
have
a
pretty
good
age
distribution
of
respondents,
not
many
people
below
the
age
of
25,
but
other
than
that
it
was
pretty
spread
out
and
the
other
age
groups,
mostly
homeowners,
and
mostly
people
who
identified
as
white
or
Caucasian
next
slide.
Please.
F
So
we
just
want
to
highlight
a
few
of
the
key
responses
here.
The
overall
there
was
a
strong
affirmation
for
the
desired
outcomes,
people
generally
selected
or
agree
or
strongly
agree
for
almost
all
of
the
desired
outcomes,
so
the
housing
displacement
one
you
can
see
here,
for
example,
there
was
strongly
agree
and
agree
for
everyone
taking
responsibility
to
address
the
housing
crisis.
So
next
slide
this
one
actually
had
the
most
people
a
disagree
and
disagree,
so
the
the
bar
graph
doesn't
skew
as
straight
up
as
all
the
other
desired
outcome
topics.
F
But
with
jobs
in
education,
the
desired
outcomes,
this
is
I
believe
the
general
principles
set
of
outcomes.
There
was
very
strong
agreement
and
very
little
very
few
people
who
said
strongly
disagree
or
disagree
to
these
principles.
I
believe
we
have
one
more
summary
slide
here:
Oh
networks,
so
parks
and
trails
was
the
one
that
had
the
most
people,
selecting
agree
or
strongly
agree
for
these
outcomes.
So
just
some
high-level
responses
there
we
can
send
out
the
full
responses
to
you.
We
just
got
them
recently,
so
you
can
check
them
out
in
detail
soon.
F
F
G
H
Good
evening,
everyone
I'm
gonna,
walk
us
through
very
quickly
what
we
have
in
the
report
in
the
the
draft
civic
engagement
report,
I
assume
that
everyone
received
a
copy
of
it
by
email
and
and
I'm
sure
has
read
it
multiple
times
over,
but
let's
just
sort
of
walk
through
where
we
are
with
the
with
the
organization
and
the
structure.
At
this
point.
H
So
what
we
sent
sent
out
to
the
group
was
the
the
introduction,
the
civic
engagement
overview
and
the
key
themes,
as
well
as
lots
of
information
from
community
engagement
in
the
appendix
what
has
not
been
sent
out
to
you
thus
far
is
the
executive
summary,
which
is
again
just
a
probably
a
three
or
four
page
summary
of
the
whole
report
and
then
a
brief
conclusion
on
on
direction
and
next
steps
also
what
was
not
sent
out.
But
what
was
handed
out
today
is
the
detailed
potential
solutions
that
the
solution
groups
came
up
with.
H
We
are
going
to
be
emailing
those
out
tomorrow
and
so
that
we
can
get
some
more
feedback
and
comments
on
those
as
well.
So,
let's
walk
through
the
chapters,
so
in
Chapter
one.
The
introduction
is
a
very
high-level
purpose
of
the
civic
engagement
programme,
as
well
as
the
purpose
of
the
report
and
the
planning
context
in
which
were
operating
and
we've
we've.
We
and
you
all,
have
made
it
very
clear
that
a
lot
of
work
has
already
been
done
in
the
area
and
we're
building
on
that
work
rather
than
starting
over.
H
One
of
the
topics
covered
in
this
in
this
chapter
is
how
the
information
will
be
used
in
this
graphic.
Just
shows
that
the
desired
outcomes
and
the
potential
solutions
which
are
organized
by
topic
are
really
going
to
feed
into
three
buckets
of
information.
One
is
the
directly
for
the
potential
Google
project,
so
the
information
that
is
that
is
here
will
feed
right
into
the
work
that
the
city
is
doing
in
the
negotiation
with
Google.
H
The
second
is
any
updates
to
the
dirt
on
station
area
plan
and
work
going
on
in
the
downtown
and
also
other
potential
development
in
those
areas
in
in
those
sort
of
the
broader
area,
beyond
just
the
Google
project,
and
there
were
lots
of
comments
about
overall
form
and
character
of
the
dirt
on
station
area
that
are
reflected
in
the
report
and
then
the
third
bucket
is
the
citywide
citywide
and
regional
efforts.
You
know.
H
Clearly,
everyone
here
agrees
that
a
project
the
size
of
the
Deardon
station
area,
plan
and
development
that
could
happen
there
and
the
potential
google
development
would
have
citywide
and
regional
impacts
and
effects,
and
so
it's
sort
of
knowledge.
The
report
acknowledges
that
that
is
in
fact,
the
case
and
that
some
of
the
ideas
aren't
just
necessarily
for
the
road
on
station
area
or
the
Google
project,
but
some
of
them
really
have
a
much
broader,
a
broader
application.
H
The
preliminary
analysis
yesterday,
so
we're
just
kind
of
getting
into
that.
So
this
is
an
ongoing
process
of
this
chapter
will
be
updated,
but
you
know
that
throughout
the
engagement
effort
we've
we
have
had
interaction
with
over
1200
folks,
excluding
the
online
feedback
form.
We've
had
10
SOG
meetings,
11
solution,
group
meetings,
7
community
forum,
6,
pop-up
workshops,
5
stakeholder
meetings,
2
walking
tours
there's
got
to
be
some
partridge
in
a
pear
tree
at
the
end
of
this
going
through
the
list.
H
H
H
Which
are
organized
by
the
five
topic
areas
you
know
at
the
last
meeting,
we
we
sort
of
sprung
the
desired
outcomes
on
you,
guys
a
little
bit
and
asked
for
feedback
and
reaction,
and
we,
you
know
clearly
had
a
really
good,
robust
conversation
and
we
we
took
a
lot
of
that
information
and
tried
to
update
these
desired
outcomes.
We
want
to
know
whether
we've
we've
still
hit
the
mark
on
this
and
whether
we've
missed
the
mark
and
where
that
is-
and
that's
really
part
of
our
discussion
tonight.
H
So
what
we
did
do
was
we
expanded
the
description
of
some
of
the
desired
outcomes
to
make
them
clearer.
We
added
some
missing
outcomes
where
there
was
some
confusion
on
our
part
about
what
we
should
have
pulled
in
from
the
solution
groups,
and
so
we
tried
to
fix
that.
We
included
the
ranking
exercises
from
some
of
the
solution
groups
to
make
sure
that
that
was
reflected
in
this
portion
of
the
report.
We
we
tried
to
clarify
how
the
desired
outcomes
apply
to
Google
the
D,
wrote
on
station
area
and
citywide
or
regional
impacts.
H
The
three
buckets
that
I
talked
about
earlier
after
each
one
after
each
of
the
desired
outcomes.
We
added
some
discussion
on
what
we
had
heard
throughout
the
process
to
again
try
and
reflect
the
richness
of
the
conversation
rather
than
just
the
phrase
itself,
and
so
some
of
those
are
background.
Information
and
some
of
those
are
more
the
the
level
of
agreement
that
that
we
heard
from
the
group
again.
We
need
feedback
on
this.
H
Okay,
let's
see
before
so.
What
we
want
to
do
tonight
for
a
for
a
good
chunk
of
the
time,
is:
have
you
all
work
in
small
groups
and
give
us
some
feedback
on
how
we
did
and
how
this
and
what
changes
need
to
be
made
to
the
report,
we're
hoping
that
you
can
work
in
in
groups
of
four
or
five
with
folks
sitting
near
you.
If
you
want
to
work
with
folks
who
are
not
near,
you
feel
free
to
move.
We
are
not
going
to.
H
We
are
not
going
to
dictate
who
you
talk
to
and
who
you
sit
with,
so
what
we
we're
gonna
hand
out
a
worksheet
in
just
a
minute,
but
what
we
want
to
do
is
really
have
you
work
together
to
answer
some
questions
about
the
issues
and
opportunities
and
the
desired
outcomes,
and
then
we'll
have
you
all
report
back
by
group,
and/or
individually?
If
you
would
like
on
what
you
guys
talked
about
the
questions,
so
the
first
is
really
dealing
with
the
issues
and
opportunities.
H
We
want
to
know
what
we
want
to
hear
anything
that
you
want
to
tell
us,
but
a
question
that
we
came
up
with
was:
does
it
reflect
the
full
range
of
the
overarching
and
cross
topical
issues
and
opportunities
that
you
all
discussed?
Are
we
missing
anything?
Did
we
get
it
did?
If
what
are
we
missing
and
where
do
we
need
to
modify
it,
then
for
the
desired
outcomes?
We
want
to
gauge
your
group,
whatever
group
you're
in
the
sort
of
general
level
of
agreement
for
each
set
of
desired
outcomes.
H
So
is
there
agreement
in
your
group
that
the
set
of
desired
outcomes
is
correct
if,
if
you've,
if
there
are
differences
in
opinion,
we
want
to
know
what
they
are.
So
where
are
there
differences
in
opinion?
And
then,
if
the
group,
if
you,
together
or
individually,
have
recommendations
about
how
we
can
move,
how
we
can
revise
them
to
move
toward
more
complete
agreement
from
for
everybody,
then
then
we
would
like
that
feedback
as
well
again.
H
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
really
understand
with
this
group,
where
you
all
really
where
you
are
where
there
is
agreement
and
where
there
are
differences
of
opinion
and
I,
don't
want
to
say
disagreement,
I
think
it's
really
differences
of
opinion
about
how
about
the
desired
outcomes,
and
what
we
want
to
do
is
reflect
that
level
of
agreement.
Within
the
report
itself
and
as
I
said,
we,
we
tried
to
move
towards
that
with
our
the
commentary
below
each
of
the
desired
outcomes.
We
would
like
to
recommend
that
you
all
start
with
housing
and
displacement.
H
You
know
and/or
jobs,
education
and
economic
development.
The
reason
is,
it
was
our
feeling
that
that
those
two
categories
had
there
was
more
conversation
and
those
may
need
a
little
bit
more
refinement
than
some
of
the
other
topics
and
then
move
on
from
there.
That
said,
if
your
group
really
wants
to
start
with
Landy
in
design,
you
know
by
all
means
or
transportation,
transit
and
parking.
You
know
by
all
means,
go
ahead
and
start
there,
so
we
don't
want
to
constrict
how
we
get
comments
from
you.
H
H
E
Just
a
note
again
in
the
worksheet
itself,
it
has
those
prompt
questions
for
each
topic
and
therefore
you
feel
free
to
fill
that
out
and
use
that
as
a
resource,
because,
as
Matt
mentioned,
we
want
you
to
be
able
to
report
out
at
the
end
pick
one
person
or
you
could
all
report
out,
but
we
want
to
go
around
and
hear
what
each
of
you
talked
about
and
if
you
want
to
use
the
worksheet
as
a
resource.
That
would
be
great.
We'll
give
you
about
to
have
a
question.
However,
you
little
confused.
H
A
great
great
question:
you
know
there
are
that's
you
know
you
you
pointed
out.
There
are
three
letters
that
you
have
in
front
of
you,
and
these
are.
These
are
good
inputs
into
this
process
so
for
sustainability.
If
you
all
feel
that
it
is
missing
in
there,
then
then
bring
it
in
bring
it
up
just
because
it's
not
there
now
it
doesn't
mean
it's
not
going
to
be
I
mean.
H
So
if
you,
if
you
feel
that
the
concepts
and
ideas
in
the
Sierra
Club
letter
and
Audubon
letter
or
other
aspects
are
important,
and
you
want
to
include
them,
then
we
can
put
them
in
I
believe
that
it
was
the
parks,
open
space
and
actually
sustainability
was
was
originally
on
that
list.
Although
it
wasn't
talked
about
that
much
in
the
groups.
Okay,.
E
We
do
have
one
more
announced
a
week.
We
got
one
more
letter
from
pact
that
we're
gonna
pass
out
as
well
for
your
consideration.
That's
coming
around
right
now
so,
and
is
there
any
other
questions
about
what
we're
asking
to
do
here?
Yes,
if
you
want
to
flip
your
car
and
remind
us
who
you
are,
thank
you
very
much.
Glen.
E
That's
a
great
question:
we
we
definitely
thought
about
that.
I
think
there
are
extras
and
we
could
definitely
hand
them
out
for
anyone
who's
interested
in
taking
a
look
at
it
as
well,
so
that
you
can
kind
of
have
a
chance
to
during
the
public
comment
to
give
us
your
views.
That
would
be
get
we're
gonna
try
to
move
this
along
as
quick
as
possible,
so
it's
not
a
waste
of
anyone's
time,
but
we
definitely
are
back
sure
that
we
can
pass
that
great
question.
Nadia.
Thank
you!
Okay!
E
So
if
there
aren't
any
other
questions,
if
the
easiest
way
would
be
just
to
kind
of
pull
your
seats
back
and
get
in
a
group
of
four
or
five,
if
that's
okay
with
you
and
if
you
need
help
getting
group
that
could
help
you
out
with
that
and
then
we'll
let
you
know
we
have
about
a
five-minute
warning
and
if
you
need
more
time
we
can
give
it.
We've
actually
been
moving
along
to
the
agenda
fairly
quickly.
So
here
we
go.
H
H
H
H
H
K
E
All
I'm
gonna
give
you
a
quick
five-minute
warning.
So
if
you
want
to
wrap
up
your
thoughts,
identify
who
your
report
out
persons
gonna
be,
that
would
be
great
and
members
of
the
public
that
goes
for
you
as
well
about
a
five-minute
warning,
we're
gonna,
let
you
all
do
a
report
out
as
well.
So
almost
there.
E
Okay,
here
we
go
so
the
format
of
this
report
out
is
going
to
be
we're.
Gonna
go
around
to
each
of
the
groups
and
those
that
want
to
report
out.
We
put
a
time
up
just
so
that
we
can
keep
it
moving
fairly
swiftly
and
get
through
the
agenda.
So
we're
gonna
generally
give
you
all
about
three
minutes
to
report
out.
Then
we're
gonna
come
to
the
public
and
actually
let
them
report
out
as
well.
E
There's
about
three
to
four
groups:
I
think
it's
over
to
the
public
and
just
to
kind
of
keep
it
consistent
with
a
public
comment
time.
We're
gonna
give
you
all
two
minutes
for
this
section
each,
but
then
there's
also
going
to
be
a
comment.
If
you
occupé
attention
sorry,
so
we
can
keep
rolling
here.
E
E
Great
point:
yeah
and
the
d2
any
detailed
comments
you
have
as
well.
Please
feel
free
to
write
them
down
we'll
collect
all
those
as
well
and
that'll,
be
part
of
the
summary
at
the
end,
and
you
have
comment
sheets
in
the
back
here
at
Genda.
You
could
put
those
on
it.
I
saw
a
bunch
of
people.
Take
a
note,
so
thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
so
I'm,
just
thinking
we
do
a
popcorn
style
to
start
I'll
ask
you
who
wants
to
go
first?
E
F
E
E
F
So
just
to
say
on
the
first
sheet
on
the
first
page
in
terms
of
things
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
it
gets
captured,
I
think
the
main
one
that
we
thought
was
not
captured
was
around
sustainability
and
the
environmental
impact
we
wanted
to
call
out,
particularly
making
sure
that.
However,
we
talked
about
this-
that
it's
grounded
in
some
of
the
work.
That's
already
happened
around
the
climate,
smart
San
Jose
work
as
well
as
making
sure
that
we're,
including
sustainable
and
urban
agriculture.
F
That's
a
big
one
for
us,
and
that
came
up
in
this
conversation
and
then
just
to
highlight
what
Glen
already
raised
is
making
sure
community
benefits.
Is
there
and
then?
Lastly,
is
an
area
around
the
impact
that
a
project
this
size
will
have
on
essential
city
services
around
fire,
police,
roads,
etc,
Parkland
moving
on
to
housing
and
displacement?
F
One
of
the
questions
that
we
discussed
was
around
the
zero
displacement
concept
and
a
desire
to
have
that
be
able
to
be
more
quantified
so
that,
as
we
were
developing
solutions
that
we're
making
sure
that
we're
actually
know
what
we're
talking
about.
When
we
mean
that
around
jobs,
education
and
economic
development,
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
around
how
this
relates
to
some
of
the
potential
smaller
pieces
of
the
derry-o
town
station
area,
and
so
particularly
thinking
about
some
of
the
policies
that
were
lifted
up
in
this
outline.
F
The
very
big
piece
that
was
not
captured
here
is
around
the
integrated
deer,
Don
mode
share
having
the
high
speed
rail
above
ground
and
going
around
the
neighborhood,
and
that's
something
that
came
up
a
lot
in
conversation
and
then
also
wanting
to
make
sure
we're
in
eluding
vision,
zero.
As
part
of
this
piece.
I
L
Gatos
Creek
is
an
untouched,
basically
on
the
engineered
Creek
at
this
point
in
time,
and
so
we
really
have
to
look
at.
How
do
we
address
those
types
of
issues
and
do
it
in
the
context
of
the
development
that
is
for
us,
and
so
I
really
agree
with
the
Sierra
Club
on
really
having
a
sustainability,
and
you
call
it
an
ecology
section
and
would
be
willing
to
work
with
other
members
and
in
this
group
to
really
address
that
issue.
L
There's
a
lot
of
water,
reuse
opportunities
at
this
site,
a
lot
of
energy
conservation
opportu
these
at
the
site
as
well.
That
could
be
incorporated
into
this
development
if
we
put
our
heads
together,
but
also
what
we
talked
about
in
the
group
in
terms
of
Housing
and
Development,
you
know
there
was
general
consensus
that
these
all
desired
outcomes,
sound
good.
But
you
know
in
terms
of
the
direct,
no
direct
and
indirect
displacement.
L
Still,
our
is
an
unknown
and
do
we
want
to
really
commit
ourselves
to
25%
or
do
we
want
to
commit
ourselves
to
something
that's
really
viable
and
to
try
to
leave
some
flexibility
for
us
there,
and
not
all
of
us
agreed
with
that
statement
and
I'm
just
telling
you
that
this
is
something
that
that
did
come
up
and
just
in
relationship
to
jobs.
One
thing
we
talked
about
sorry
now
know
that
we
we
talked
about
at
least
I,
had
a
concern
with.
L
We
talked
about
new
and
existing
jobs
and
developing
a
pipeline,
but
we
also
have
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
become
a
let's
say,
a
monoculture
of
business
types
that
were
depending
on
the
big
employer
in
the
area
that
we
need
to
have
a
diverse
industry.
A
diverse
opportunities
are
available
as
part
of
this
development,
and
a
lot
of
it
could
be
the
looking
at
trying
to
incorporate
not
only
tech,
jobs
or
other
environmental
jobs,
other
support
jobs
that
are
long-lasting
and
we'll
serve
the
community
and
develop
sustainability
for
the
long
term.
E
J
We
generally
agreed
with
the
housing
and
displacement
points.
I
think
we
had
similar
questions
about
how
to
interpret
some
of
the
bullets
that
talked
about
no
displacement
and
how
that
could
be
put
into
practice
was
still
something
that
we
had
real
questions
about.
I
think
we
were
of
two
minds:
on
the
one
hand,
it
needed
to
be
there
to
make
sure
that
it
was
a
priority.
J
Under
the
jobs
in
education,
we're
actually
most
concerned
here,
we
felt
like
the
whole
K
through
12
question
about
education
in
the
city,
was
sort
of
missing
it
away
from
the
documents
both
of
them
and
well.
That
was
generally
a
concern.
We
felt
in
particular
that
we
had
an
opportunity
for
getting
at
what
Google's
good
at
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
increase
and
improve
STEM
resources,
and
particularly
computer
sciences
and
local
schools,
and
that
we
recommended
adding
a
whole
new
bullet
around
k-12
education
and
leveraging
computer
science
resources.
J
Professional
development,
curriculum
development
hardware
under
land
use,
design.
I
think
we
were
supportive
of
what
was
there,
but
we
felt
like
in
some
ways
there
needed
to
be
more
recognition
of
the
public
space
creeks
trails
in
the
lane
use
section
as
well.
So
we
felt
like
you
almost
needed
to
include
a
couple
of
the
bullet
points
from
the
open
space
section
to
make
it
clear
that
that
needed
to
be
part
of
the
land-use
discussion
in
the
open
space,
creeks
and
trails.
J
We
thought
that
the
entire
section
should
be
renamed
public
space,
creeks
trails
and
environmental
sustainability
and
that
it
needed
to
integrate
things
that
were
already
required,
but
sometimes
were
negotiated
out
of
a
development
deals
like
the
climate,
smart,
San,
Jose
and
some
of
the
LEED
standards
as
high
priorities
in
the
area,
and
we
didn't
have
a
chance
to
talk
more
about
it.
But
I
think
we
had
higher
expectations
than
just
that.
That
required
level.
K
E
B
So
we
we
got
to
two
sections,
so
first
we
got
to
housing
and
displacement.
We
have
three
prongs,
I'll
start
with
the
first
one
is.
We
would
like
to
consider
a
different
process
for
all
development
process
projects
going
forward
which
would
be
to
engage
the
community
before
plans
are
made.
So
this
will
be
addressing
issue
of
mobilizing
the
community.
You
know
how
do
we
mobilize
them
for
more
dense
housing?
B
You
know
that
would
be
by
listening
to
what
the
needs
are
in
that
community
before
a
development
is
even
thought
of,
and
you
know
from
there
think
about
the
the
building
after
the
engagement
plan.
Second
prong
is
what
we
didn't
see
in
here
was
rent
control.
I.
Think
writing
control
could
be
a
great
short-term
fix
for
displacement.
B
So
we
we
talked
about
tighter
rent
controls,
maybe
a
max
of
2%
a
year,
and
this
would
be
on
older
structures,
and
so
the
third
prong
was
you
know,
while
we're
doing
really
tight
rent
control,
let's
think
about
a
faster
permit
process
and
more
density
for
newer
buildings,
so
that
we
can
add
more
housing
while
we're
restricting
you
know,
rents
and
older
housing.
As
well
and
then
for
jobs,
education
and
economic
development,
we
we
had
a
main
overreaching
point,
which
is
a
diversity
of
the
business
in
the
community.
B
So
when
Google
is
building,
you
know,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
small
businesses
have
a
chance
to
get
bids
and
be
competitive
and
by
small
business
we
mean
local
contractor
starting
companies.
Minority
business
and
something
we
threw
around
was
to
mandate
and
I
would
really
like
that
word
mandate.
A
percentage
of
contracts
go
to
black
Latino
women
and
other
underrepresented
groups.
M
Nathan,
the
Silicon,
Valley
leadership
group,
Nicole
I,
think
that
that
covered
a
lot
of
our
discussions.
You
can
tell
we
had
a
very
robust
sorry.
Let
me
get
better
good
that
we
had
a
very
robust
discussion
around
those
issues
around
the
concern
for
gentrification,
for
not
just
the
station
area,
but
also
other
parts
of
San
Jose
I.
M
M
We
wouldn't,
even
so
far
to
say
what,
if
this
body
in
several
meetings
from
now,
we
brought
this
up,
were
to
come
together
and
and
put
together
a
idea
for
a
community
process
for
the
station
area
together
and
have
the
commitment
of
the
folks
in
this
room
to
go
out
and
support
these
projects
as
they
go
forward.
If
we
have
that
plan
in
place
for.
K
Housing
displacement.
We
felt
that
each
of
the
items
are
outcomes
with
at
least
mentioned
if
at
varying
levels
of
specificity,
the
displacement
definitions,
obviously
based
on
the
conversation
before
we're
a
bit
nebulous,
understandably,
because
the
rest
of
the
economics
of
the
area
doesn't
grind
to
a
halt
when
this
goes
forward,
so
kind
of
assigning
what
is
causing
specific
displacement
becomes
problematic,
but
it
needs
to
be
in
there
because
it
is
a
huge
problem.
K
Moving
on
to
jobs,
education
and
economic
development
emphasize
that
all
of
this
work-
and
it's
been
said
before,
but
isn't
explicit
in
here-
emphasized-
that
these
items
we've
discussed,
should
be
a
template
for
different
companies
at
a
variety
of
scales
that
are
looking
to
locate
to
San
Jose
kind
of
setting
the
standard
for
a
process
going
forward
rather
than
taking
this
and
kind
of
okay.
This
was
what
we
did
for
Google
and
then
starting
over
the
next
time,
something
this
comes
up.
K
One
question
that
came
up
was:
we
talked
about
support
for
local
schools
and
these
desired
outcomes.
The
exact
threshold
based
on
the
different
housing
units
that
have
been
tossed
out
a
question
for
San
Jose
Unified
at
what
point?
Is
the
number
of
housing
units
going
to
require
additional
school
construction?
Not
just
additional
support
for
the
schools
that
are
already
there.
K
Moving
on
to
land
use,
design
and
parking
apply.
The
climate-smart,
San
Jose
principles,
which
aren't
explicitly
mentioned
in
here?
One
thing
to
reiterate
what
was
mentioned
previously,
that
the
creeks
and
the
rivers
should
be
considered
just
as
much
of
existing
neighborhoods
and
existing
design
elements
to
be
incorporated.
Yes,
they
are
parks
and
public
spaces,
but
they
should
be
first
and
foremost,
part
of
any
design
as
well.
K
One
thing
that
was
mentioned
previously
was
the
idea
of
early
pre
activation
of
spaces,
not
just
once
a
building
is
done,
but
getting
spaces
that
are
currently
fallow
used
between
now
and
then
in
order
to
get
the
spaces
activated,
projects
should
be
environmentally
sustainable
and
especially
to
potentially
serve
as
a
template
for
how
a
project
or
of
this
size
or
an
area
of
this
size
can
be
a
sustainable
kind
of
inner
inner
working
process.
Parking
potentially
use
of
the
below
ground
area
throughout
the
site.
K
There
were
a
couple
laughs
when
I
mentioned
one
process,
ironically,
actually
the
Magic
Kingdom
at
Walt,
Disney
World,
when
you're
in
the
Magic
Kingdom
you're
on
top
of
a
three-story
building
a
lot
of
the
facility's
trash,
etc,
is
all
taking
place
below
grade.
If
we've
got
any
place
in
this
area,
where
a
street
has
nothing
being
used
beneath
it,
that
is
an
opportunity
that
we're
missing.
We
talked
about
using
as
much
height
as
possible,
but
you
can
go
down
just
as
easily,
not
just
underneath
building
footprints,
but
underneath
the
public
spaces
in
the
streets,
etc.
K
K
Mention
that
new
development
should
invest
should
provide
funds
towards
investments
in
long
term
care
and
maintenance
of
the
creek
in
the
river
people
pointed
to
the
rotary
play
garden
as
an
example
of
this
ability
of
public-private
and
charities
to
work
together
to
maintain
something
rather
than
just
build
a
capital
project
and
let
it
go
fallow
from
there
and
lasting
transportation
and
transit.
The
shovel
is
I
think
severely
missed
an
especially
an
example
and
opened
the
be
shuttle
something
where
we're
building
this
new
city
make
it.
K
N
To
the
questions,
but
once
we
got
to
the
questions,
some
of
the
top
lines
that
we
had
were
one
of
the
biggest
things
I
think
was
across,
particularly
for
the
jobs
and
education
and
for
the
housing,
but
across
all
of
the
ideas
to
start
early
that,
particularly
for
some
things
like
investment
in
our
K
through
12
education
system
or
you
know,
developing
affordable
housing.
You
know
we
shouldn't
wait
until
Google
has
put
a
shovel
in
the
ground
or
started
to
occupy
buildings.
We
should
try
to
have
some
of
these
things
in
place
prior.
N
That
was
a
common
agreement
in
terms
of
the
issue
areas
and
the
friend
sorry
I'm,
jumping
around
a
little
bit.
These
are
just
my
notes,
agreeing
that
the
the
section
and
the
report
around
what
Google's
responsibilities
were
that
we
should
be
really
trying
to
focus
on.
You
know,
certainly
not
Google,
solving
every
problem
that
we
have
as
a
community,
but
looking
at
that
Delta
or
perhaps
the
the
uplift
I
think
as
charlie
described
it,
of
how
some
of
our
challenge
rules
we
perhaps
amplified
by
this
development
and
looking
to
focus
on
that.
N
As
we
look
at
community
benefits
and
other
ideas
overall,
that
the
mix
of
ideas
were
somewhat
reasonable,
even
if
there
were
you
know,
maybe
some
ideas
on
shifting
of
some
wording
and
and
things
of
that
nature
and
that
the
report
could
be
strengthened
by
including
some
more
examples
so
examples
of
either.
You
know
development
scenarios
that
have
played
out
that
are
rather
similar
to
what
we
expect
will
happen
here.
N
For
instance,
Jim
and
Charlie
just
returned
back
from
Seattle
and
thought
that
that
might
have
some
ideas
that
would
be
helpful
to
shape
out
their
report
and
I
had
mentioned
that
we
had
had
pretty
robust
conversations
about
community
benefits.
Examples
in
other
cities,
including
Google's
experience
in
Mountain
View,
and
you
know
some
of
the
ideas
around
the
Oakland
army
base,
CBA
or
even
the
Facebook
CBA.
More
recently,.
E
Thank
you
so
much
Charlie,
I
didn't
know.
Okay,
I
believe
that
covers
all
our
groups.
Definitely
some
common
themes
popping
up
it's
great
to
hear
incorporating
public
voice
moving
forward
sustainability,
how
we
characterize
jobs
and
housing.
This
is
excellent,
so
we're
gonna
have
an
overall
discussion
with
you
all
about
this,
but
I
want
to
now
go
over
to
the
public
and
let
you
all.
E
C
Audubon
Society,
our
group
here
included
also
the
Sierra
Club
and
members
of
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
Native
Plant
Society,
and
we
look
for
integration
of
nature
and
really
looking
at
natural
phenomena
as
we
move
forward.
These
are
not
stable
times,
as
all
of
us
have
noticed,
there's
a
lot
of
issues
on
every
level,
social,
economical
everything
is
it
moving
and
biology
also
shifts.
So
when
we
look
at
phenomenon,
there
is
the
issue
of
flooding
and
how
do
you
deal
with
changing
climate?
There
are
these
things
that
are
natural
phenomena
like
migration.
C
What
do
you
do
about
migratory
birds
that
collide
into
windows?
So
we
think
that
all
these
things
need
to
be
considered
in
some
way.
We
think
there
is
a
transformative
opportunity
for
ecological
urbanism
that
looks
at
native
plants.
A
tree
oking
at
pollinator
corridors,
consider
habitat
overlays
in
areas
near
the
creak.
Definitely,
but
in
other
areas,
where
have
you
ever,
you
have
an
opportunity
to
enhance
the
ecological
habitat
value.
C
It's
important
to
do
so
so
definitely
a
priority
or
long
creeks,
but
also
the
green
fingers
that
were
discussed
at
some
point
and
other
opportunities
to
put
native
plants
and
really
limit
the
development
to
more
or
less
a
natural
ecosystem,
to
the
best
that
we
can,
the
smart
climate,
smart
projects,
direct,
sustainable
development
and
I'm
so
glad
so
many
of
you
responded
to
our
letter
and
so
that
it's
really
important
nature
is
more
difficult
to
pinpoint.
How
do
you
do
that,
and
so
we
can
provide
a
lot
of
advice.
Google
is
doing
it
already.
C
They
actually
provided
a
lot
of
resources
and
are
doing
many,
many
things
on
their
area
in
in
North,
Bay
Shore,
to
try
and
integrate
nature
into
their
master
plans
that
include
housing
and
include
office,
and
so
there
is
some
experience,
but
it
should
really
apply
to
all
the
developers,
green
buildings,
district
systems
that
are
ecologically
sustainable
and
can
face
changes
as
those
changes.
We
need
some
flexibility
built
in
there.
I
didn't
see
that
in
this
report
it's
not.
C
There
is
not
a
lot
of
resilient
movement
ability
to
what
do
we
do
about
those
natural
phenomenon
and
the
most
important
one
is
obviously
your
creeks
and
rivers,
and
if
you
even
you,
haven't
a
transformative
opportunity
here
to
create
something
that
really
is
iconic
in
how
it
relates
to
nature,
just
instead
of
or
in
addition
to
big
buildings.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
I
hope
I
got
most
of
the
comments.
I
may
have
missed
some,
so
maybe
some
of
my
friends
here
have
some
more.
D
Hello,
my
name
is
Susan
de
Chardin
I'm,
a
resident
of
San
Jose
I
live
in
North,
Willow
Glen,
which
is
very
close
to
the
dura
Don
Station,
so
I'm
really
concerned
about
mostly
environmental
impact,
the
sustainability
and
also
the
effects
it
has
on
communities
around
Dehradun
station
area.
One
thing
that
I
would
like
to
really
make
sure
that
we
take
into
account
is
that
all
of
the
transit
that
comes
in
and
out
of
that
area
should
be
a
hundred
percent
electrified.
D
We
shouldn't
have
any
kind
of
emissions
increase
because
of
this,
so
that
includes
any
kind
of
bus,
any
kind
of
things
that
link
to
the
rail
systems
that
are
coming
in
to
Dara
Don
I'm,
also
suggesting
that
we're
looking
at
building
that
that
all
of
the
buildings
be
a
hundred
percent
electrified,
no
natural
gas
at
all.
You
could
have
solar
photovoltaic.
You
have
battery
technologies,
there's
no
reason
to
put
in
natural
gas
in
infrastructure,
and
by
no
means
should
there
be
any
kind
of
a
gas
station
in
that
area.
D
So
the
other
things
that
I
want
you
to
think
about
is-
and
some
people
have
mentioned
these
so
having
a
centralized
recycling
water
system
so
that
we
reduce
the
amount
of
water,
that's
necessary,
also,
a
centralized
composting,
organic
waste
digesters
that
can
actually
generate
gas
to
make
electricity
thinking
about
permeable
pavements
and
being
able
to
recharge
the
groundwater
when
you're
putting
in
hard
scape
and
things
like
that
and,
of
course,
I
want
to
support.
Also
what
Shaunie
said
about
having
wildlife
corridors
for
birds.
D
D
So
three
specific
items,
the
first
one
is
for
the
when
we
start
construction,
what
kind
of
safety
we're
going
to
have
for
pedestrians?
So,
for
example,
if
we're
blocking
a
walkway,
how
can
we
or
a
sidewalk?
How
can
we
have
a
now
turn
inside
work
for
pedestrians
and
also
notice
now
notices
that
are
being
sent
for
people
who
live
in
the
neighborhood?
What
kind
of
construction
is
going
to
happen?
There's
going
to
be
a
very
long
project?
The
second
item
is
in
terms
of
Joe.
D
Dobbs
is
the
color
jobs
protections
so,
for
example,
people
who
are
contractors
people
who
work
in
so
in
the
service
industry?
What
kind
of
protections
were
going
to
have
for
them?
What
kind
of,
if
the
city
can
do
anything
to
have
oversight
of
the
way
that
contract
the
contractor
companies
work
because
I
don't
know
how
much
is
being
done
right
now?
And
the
third
item
is
for
the
public
spaces,
RVs
and
mobile
homes.
So
what
kind
of
sanitary?
D
E
E
E
This
is
just
the
report
back
yeah
yeah,
so
we'll
have
a
public
comment
section
after
we
have.
This
discussion
is
one
more
item
and
then,
after
that,
we'll
have
a
public
comment.
Section
don't
definitely
be
time
for
it.
What's
it
at
the
end,
yeah
we'll
have
that
we'll
have
that
opportunity,
yeah
and
go
ahead.
Please
give
us
your
comment
card
just
so.
We
know
that
you
do
want
to
speak
and
we'll
make
sure
you
get
an
opportunity.
E
E
I
Coming
up
with
the
standard
I
thought
that
was
brilliant
I
think
that
that's
what
we
were
in
the
process
of
doing
of
establishing
this
policy
for
this
area
and
and
saying
that
we
can
duplicate
this
around
the
city
and
because
of
the
time
and
energy
that
we've
put
in.
If
we
come
up
with
a
good
product
to
be
able
to
do
this
and
make
it
easier
for
developers
and
easier
for
communities
to
to
accept
it,
I
thought
that
was
really
something
that
came
out
of
our
group.
Thank.
E
N
With
the
report
we
didn't
talk
about
in
the
small
group,
but
I
thought
the
the
graphic
that
you
guys
have
been
using
in
the
power
of
the
kind
of
distinction
between
google,
the
Deardon
station
area
and
the
city.
It's
a
helpful
graphic.
I
was
kind
of
surprised
not
to
see
it
in
the
draft,
because
I
think
it's
a
good
kind
of
way
of
organizing
our
thinking
and
perhaps
how
to
organize
the
the
solutions
and
outcomes.
N
Google,
otherwise
I
know
it's
a
Deardon
area
of
development,
so
presumably
Google+
other
development
in
the
you
know
in
the
Deardon
area,
and
then
it
has
like
citywide
benefits
for
Google
and
other
developers
and
so
I
in
written
comments
that
I
submitted
before
the
meeting
just
recommend.
Thinking
about
that
graphic
that
you
had
of
like
starting
with
Google
going
to
Deardon
station
than
anything
else,
that's
broader
and
trying
to
think
about.
N
E
M
One
piece
as
well
as
I,
was
reading
the
revitalization
of
the
Dehradun
station
area,
section
that
I
was
reminded
of
our
first
session
together
and
how
excited
folks
were
around
visioning.
What
that
might
be
and
I
don't
think
we
ever
said
the
revitalization
of
the
daran
geared
on
stationary,
but
more
Weavile,
ization
of
the
downtown
and
now
there's
a
description.
M
O
Okay,
good
evening,
everybody,
my
name
is
blog-
is
Alec
and
I'm
with
the
office
of
economic
development,
working
with
a
number
of
city
staff
and
stakeholders
on
a
challenge
that
we
have
before
us,
which
is
the
development
of
development
capacity
over
downtown,
with
our
Airport
capacity.
So
you're
going
to
become
very
familiar
with
this
term
one
engine
inoperative
and
we're
here
today
to
give
you
an
update
on
the
work
that
our
community
group
and
our
consultants
have
been
doing
on
this
issue
so
downtown
and
the
airport
are
two
of
the
city's
primary
economic
priorities.
O
The
FAA,
the
federal
Administration
Federal
Aviation
Administration,
protects
air
surfaces
around
the
airport
through
the
application
of
a
number
of
regulations,
and
the
two
that
we
are
are
most
specifically
dealing
with
here
are
called
part
77
and
turps
regulations.
And
basically,
what
happens
with
this
is.
O
And
so
the
city
last
took
a
look
at
this
Oh,
a
I
study
in
2008,
and
they
mapped
out
airline
protection
surfaces
and
associated
building
elevation
impacts
on
those
surfaces
around
the
airport
under
certain
weather
conditions,
airplanes
depart
to
the
south,
and
this
happens
about
13%
of
the
time.
So
not
not
a
significant
amount
of
time
overall,
but
from
the
airlines
perspective.
If
it
happens,
13%
of
the
time
it
happens
all
the
time
right,
they
have
to
plan
for
it
and
during
that
2008
study.
O
Basically,
we
established
two
corridors
in
which
the
airlines
would
be
able
to
utilize
their
emergency
procedures.
One
corridor
is
called
the
straight
out
corridor.
It's
right
over
the
downtown.
The
second
is
called
the
West
corridor,
which
is
just
west
of
87
over
the
Deardon
station
area
and
different
airlines
use
different
corridors
for
their
safety
procedures
again
based
the
type
of
aircraft
that
they
utilize
in
the
destination
that
they're
flying
to
and
so
in.
O
June
of
2017
staff
was
directed
by
Council
to
revisit
this
2008
study
and
basically
update
it,
because,
since
2018,
some
of
the
instrument,
procedures
and
and
other
devices
that
the
airlines
are
using
have
obviously
been
updated,
and
so
that's
kind
of
the
process
that
we're
going
through
right.
Now,
you
can
see
sorry,
you
can
see
from
the
diagram
on
the
top
right
kind
of
the
proximity
of
both
the
airport
and
the
runway
is,
on
the
left
hand,
side.
You
can
see
the
airport
runways
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
diagram,
the
top
right.
O
The
the
graph
on
the
bottom
kind
of
shows
you
the
trajectory
of
an
airplane,
because
the
normal
should
the
obstruction
on
the
bottom.
The
Purple
Line
is
obviously
what
you
want
to
clear
the
35
feet
above.
That
is
the
minimum
that
the
FAA
says
that
you
must
clear,
but
the
safety
margin,
kind
of
the
yellow
up
to
the
orange
line
is
where
the
airlines
feel
more
comfortable
flying,
because
that
just
gives
you
more
of
a
margin
of
safety,
and
so
basically,
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
when
they
lose
one
engine.
O
O
They
can
decide
that
they
are
going
to
make
a
refueling
stop,
and
so,
therefore,
they
take
less
fuel
with
them
again,
making
the
plane
lighter
but
having
to
stop.
They
can
cancel
their
flight
that
day
or
they
can
request
another
runway,
which
is
very
difficult.
When
you've
got
a
busy
report
on
growing
airport,
like
San
Jose
International
in
the
long
term,
airlines
can
choose
to
change
the
type
of
aircraft
that
they
use
out
of
out
of
the
airport.
O
So
we
have
a
group
of
community
representatives
that
are
serving
on
the
project
steering
committee
and
you
can
see
the
names
of
those
folks
appear
on
the
slide,
along
with
city
staff,
from
the
airport,
economic
development
planning
and
mayor
and
council
office
that
have
been
engaged.
In
this
conversation,
the
consultants
that
we
are
using
for
this
issue
or
Landrum
in
Brown
with
Jones
Lang
LaSalle,
is
our
Economic
Analysis
sub
consultants.
On
the
on
the
matter
now,
the
steering
committee
has
met
about
six
times
to
date
and
has
kind
of
guided
us
through
this
process.
O
At
the
beginning
of
the
steering
committees
time
in
the
prize
process,
we
kind
of
worked
out
a
workflow
and
worked
out
kind
of
the
locations
or
the
places
along
the
timeline
where
we
would
have
stakeholder
conversations
and
report
out
to
the
community
about
what
progress
to
date
is
so
right.
Now
we
are
in
number
three
the
trade-offs
and
impacts
section
of
the
the
work.
O
And
these
aircrafts
that
you
see
listed
here
were
selected
for
a
variety
of
different
reasons,
primarily
because
either
they
are
the
ones
currently
being
used
most
often
at
the
airport,
or
they
are
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
used
kind
of
the
next
generation
going
to
be
used
in
the
very
near
future.
So
we
try
to
not
just
take
a
look
at
what
we
were
doing
now
and
how
we're
operating
now,
but
also
how
we
would
be
operating
in
the
near
future.
O
As
far
as
the
scenarios
go,
the
numbers
of
the
scenarios
don't
mean
anything
to
you,
they're
just
for
us
trying
to
keep
consistency
sake,
but
the
first
scenario
that
the
consultants
took
a
look
at
was
removing
all
of
the
protections
for
one
engine
and
operative
that
the
individual
airlines
determined
themselves
and
going
to
the
minimum
or
the
maximum
FAA
determined
or
mandated
height
building
height.
The
second
scenario
we
took
a
look
at
was
protecting
the
Oei
surface
on
the
straight
out,
so
right
over
the
downtown
core.
O
The
last
scenario
that
we
took
a
look
at
was
kind
of
a
wild
case
scenario,
no
Oei
protection,
so
no
emergency
procedure,
protections
and
the
FAA
actually
lifting
their
limits
on
on
height
restrictions,
which
we
thought
was
was
going
to
be
crazy
and
would
probably
take
a
lot
a
lot
of
work.
But
we
wanted
to
take
a
look
at
what
the
impact
of
that
was
all
the
same.
O
So
the
scenario
that
we
have
really
been
focusing
on,
which
seems
the
most
realistic,
I
think
to
everybody-
that's
been
taking
a
look
at.
This
is
the
scenario
in
which
we
take
a
look
at
adjustments
or
no
oai
protection
over
either
the
downtown
core,
the
straight
out
or
the
Deardon,
the
West
Corridor,
and
raising
the
height
limits
up
to
the
FAA
kind
of
turps,
height
limits,
and
so
in
this
scenario
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see
in
this
graph.
O
But
in
this
scenario
you
would
get
a
little
bit
of
additional
height
over
the
downtown
core,
which
is
the
orange
kind
of
the
two
shades
of
orange.
You
could
potentially
gain
anywhere
from
five
to
35
feet
kind
of
in
that
dark,
orange
and
light
orange
coloring
and
over
the
the
West
Corridor
in
the
Deardon
area.
You
could
potentially
gain
somewhere
from
70
to
150
feet,
depending
on
proximity
to
the
ends
of
the
runways.
O
O
Preliminary
findings
after
we
went
back
and
talked
to
kind
of
the
five
or
six
primary
airlines
that
fly
the
most
out
of
SJC.
There
are
still
16
airlines
that
fly
out
of
the
airport,
so
we
have
more
airline
conversations
to
be
had,
but
some
preliminary
findings
where,
where
we
now,
which
is
with
transcontinental
flights,
payload
penalties,
so
meaning
having
to
offload
cargo
or
having
to
offload
passengers,
only
exists
at
very,
very
high
temperatures.
O
So
when
we're
looking
at,
you
know,
91
to
97
degrees,
Fahrenheit,
that's
when
those
those
penalties
pick
and
kick
in
so
not
very
often
with
Hawaiian
and
European
flights
or
flights
to
Hawaii
in
Europe.
We
really
have
no
impact
to
current
operations
in
most
of
the
scenarios.
This
is
very
good
news
and
flights
to
Asia,
primarily
because
they
are
the
longer
haul
flights
and
because
of
the
types
of
airline
or
aircrafts
that
are
flying
to
Asia.
O
So
as
far
as
next
steps
go,
we
are
taking
a
look
at
part
of
the
work
plan
for
the
committee
was
to
take
a
look
at
some
case.
Studies
of
other
airports
that
are
in
close
proximity
to
their
downtown's.
So
we're
taking
a
look
at
Miami,
Washington
and
Las
Vegas,
and
doing
some
some
compare
and
contrast
between
the
situation
here
in
San
Jose,
as
I
mentioned
before,
we
have
met
with
the
five
or
six
top
airlines
that
have
the
most
frequent
flights
out
of
SJC
and
so
on.
O
Our
on
our
to-do
list
is
to
meet
with
the
remaining
11
airlines,
which
is
no
small
feat,
but
to
gain
their
insights
into
what
these
different
scenarios
would
mean
for
the
aircrafts
that
they
operate
and
the
destinations
that
they
fly
to,
as
I
mentioned
previously.
Economic
impact
kind
of
weighing
the
economic
trade-offs
between
taller
building
heights
and
then
airline
and
airport
operations
is
part
of
our
scope
of
study.
O
For
for
this,
for
this
work
plan,
and
so
Jones
Lang
LaSalle
is
doing
that
economic
in
Packt
analysis
currently
and
then
potential
solutions
based
on
the
economic
impact
and
the
remaining
airline
meetings.
And
then
going
to
City
Council
with
any
potentially
new
recommendations
that
would
come
out
of
this
discussion
and
we're
looking
at
that.
Probably
early
in
2019
January
February
timeframe
is
our
anticipated
return
to
Council
with
any
potential
recommendations,
and
so
with
that
great.
E
F
O
So
it
is
not
that
cut
and
dry
I
mean
typically
like
in
our
economic
impact
analysis.
We're
looking
at
15
foot
415
feet
heights
for
one
story,
but
it
it
kind
of
depends,
because
these
surfaces
are
not
there
and
they're
not
actually
kind
of
just
straight
out
there
in
this
kind
of
conical
shape,
and
so
you
might
have
certain
locations
of
the
building
where
you
gain
more
height
than
others,
and
so
you,
you
might
have
to
even
that
out,
and
so
you
might
not
where
you
might
gain.
O
Let's
say,
15
feet
in
height
that
doesn't
necessarily
make
you
gain
an
entire
story.
There
might
be
other
locations
where
all
you
need
is
five
additional
feet
to
gain
a
whole
another
floor.
So
unfortunately,
it's
not
as
cut-and-dry
but
part
of
what
we're
doing
with
the
economic
analysis
is
taking
these
ranges
and
trying
to
put
them
into
a
methodology
that
makes
some
assumptions
and
come
up
with
some
of
these
answers.
Great.
B
O
D
O
N
For
the
the
scope
of
this
study
will
primarily
just
be
looking
at
the
the
extent
of
different
scenarios
of
what's
possible
in
terms
of
increasing
heights
or
or
will
be,
there
be
recommendations
around
policy
and
particularly
around
you
know,
its
use
of
value
capture
as
the
the
heights
increase.
That's
one
question,
and
then
the
second
question
in
the
was
that
the
Deardon
planning
reserve
and
service
reimbursement
agreement
memo
that
council
passed
back
in
I
think
was
February.
N
N
O
I
think
it's
going
to
depend
on
what
we
ultimately
find
out
like
right.
Now
we
have.
We
did
the
updated
instrument
procedures
we
have,
and
so
we
have
this
new
map
of
where
the
surfaces
land
we
have
gone
back
to
the
airline's
talked
to
some
of
them
about
what
their
procedures
are
now
versus
what
they
were
in
2008,
based
on
the
aircrafts
that
they're
flying
and
then
our
next
step
now
is
to
see
what
the
economic
analysis
shows
us.
O
What
the
trade-offs
are
so
at
this
point,
I
would
say
that
it's
probably
a
little
bit
premature,
premature
to
actually
determine
what
our
potential
recommendations
are
and
like
the
breadth
of
them,
I
think
as
we
we
will
continue
to
meet
with
this
project,
steering
committee
and
bring
another
updates
of
community
and
economic
development
and,
as
kind
of
the
the
data
becomes
more
apparent
to
us,
we'll
be
able
to
narrow,
in
kind
of
where
the
recommendations
really
need
to
be
made.
Thank
you.
C
O
C
Beyond
that,
the
city
has
discretion
to
spend
the
resources
as
we
needed
to
see
fit
on
other
kinds
of
especially
analysis.
So
the
agreement
said
we
could
envision
spending
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
if
we
need
it
to
of
this
money
to
support
this
work,
the
entire
project
is
about
it's
over
four
hundred
thousand
dollars.
C
This
is
very
expensive
effort
because
of
the
consultants,
the
highly
technical
consultants
that
are
involved
and
so
far
we
have
funded
it
with
airport
funds,
but
if
we
need
to
use
the
funds
from
Google,
we
have
the
flexibility
to
we
haven't
at
this
point.
We
may
have
other
needs
for
those
funds.
Thank.
E
E
Alright,
thank
you
very
much
fog
a
so
now
we're
gonna
transition
to
the
public
comment
segment
of
our
agenda.
I
have
about
thirteen
folks
on
the
list
and
we're
gonna
remind
you.
We
have
about
two
minutes
for
each
comment.
So
I'm
gonna
read
the
first
three
eight,
so
we
can
start
to
get
ready.
Now
we
have
Mary
Buxton
Kat
Baumgartner
and
Susan
Dez,
our
Jane
Dez
jari.
G
I
I
Hi
good
evening,
I'm
James
Eggers
I
am
a
resident
of
San
Jose,
Japan
town
and
district
3
and
I'm.
Also
the
executive
director
of
the
Sierra
Club
Loma
Prieta
chapter
that
has
I
think
last
count
was
about
24,000
members
and
supporters
in
San.
Jose
I've
been
encouraged
to
hear
so
many
of
you
tonight,
referring
to
the
letter
from
the
Sierra
Club
in
the
Audubon
Society
referencing.
Our
concerns
about
things
that
were
missing
in
the
plan.
I
Sierra
Club
supports
the
vision
of
a
high
density,
mixed
use,
vibrant
transit,
centered
neighborhood
and
the
Deardon
station
area,
and
we
appreciate
the
work
done
by
the
SAG
members.
We're
disappointed
that
the
same
sustainability
in
ecology
or
nature
have
been
conspicuously
absent.
Discussion
of
creeks
parks
and
open
space
focuses
has
focused
on
trails
and
urban
classes
and
not
on
the
habitat
aspect,
especially
riparian
habitats.
I
Google
offered
nature
as
part
of
the
four
building
blocks
of
a
vibrant
urban
place
and,
together
with
community
innovation
and
economics,
Google
proposed
a
better
design
for
an
urban
area
to
us
and
to
Google.
Nature
means
sustainability,
as
as
read
sustainability
and
at
a
minimum
should
include
the
nine
principles
of
the
climate.
Smart
San
Jose
document,
on
which
we
also
had
a
lot
of
comments
and
should
include
recognition
of
urban
ecosystems
that
support
and
protect
healthier
neighborhoods.
We
hope
it
is
not.
We
trust
it
is
not
too
late
to
include
these
into
the
report.
J
Larry
Ames
I'm
generally
happy
with
all
the
draft
report.
The
topics
that
you
list
here
I
want
to
reiterate
some
of
them.
What
I
think
are
an
important
ones
and
I
feel
like
a
broken
record
here,
but
daylight,
the
Los
Gatos
Creek.
It's
once
a
lifetime
opportunity
here
build
a
San,
Jose
style
Riverwalk
like
the
Los
Gatos
Creek,
a
natural
habitat
with
walk
bike,
transit
amenities,
exciting
gathering
place
for
environment,
historic
preservation,
use
the
bones
and
structures
that
you
have
here
to
add
character,
variety
to
the
area,
high
density.
J
This
is
the
best
place
in
the
city
to
do
it
with
all
the
transit
that
you
have
here.
Mesh
it
into
the
fabric
of
the
city,
make
it
inviting
no
walls,
no
barriers,
so
it
folds
into
the
whole
city
have
an
inviting
walkway
to
City
Hall
in
San,
Jose,
State,
University
and
all
sorts
of
walk
away
from
the
city
into
Bart
and
high-speed
rail
I.
Think
San,
Fernando
Street
would
make
a
100
make
a
wonderful
Street
there.
You
want
a
quick
connection
to
the
airport.
J
You
want
to
be
able
to
share
the
long
term
parking
and
the
rental
car
facilities
make
this
a
vibrant
area.
Monotony,
you
want
it
to
be
fun.
Other
people
have
mentioned
this
to
sustainable
design,
design
the
buildings
to
be
energy.
Efficient
bird
safe.
You
want
to
manage
the
water.
Runoff
won't,
have
green
space
and
restore
the
riparian
habitats.
You
you
wanted
well,
not
necessarily
24/7
district,
but
maybe
eighteen,
seven
or
something
like
that,
make
it
day
and
night
residential,
but
with
emphasis
on
employment
and
transportation.
J
You
need
that
to
help
with
the
city
finances
you
want
it
to
enhance.
You
want
the
whole
development
to
enhance
San
Jose
overall,
so
hopefully
the
developers
will
I
mean
the
company
will
help
improve
the
area's
housing,
but
also
with
the
education,
employment
and
the
arts
and
the
environment.
I
wanted
to
help
improve
San
Jose
I
want
I,
wanted
to
become
a
welcome
addition
to
San
Jose,
so
I
think
you're
all
in
the
right
direction.
Just
emphasizing
the
points.
Thank
you
thank.
J
K
Evening
my
name
is
dasha
weeds,
I,
love,
walking
along
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
and
Guadalupe
River
I've
walked
the
banks
since
I
was
a
child
and
will
continue
to
do
so.
It's
amazing
to
me
that,
despite
years
of
degradation,
there
are
still
steelhead
trout
in
the
water
waves,
mergansers
beautiful
ducks
still
raise
their
young
and
the
Beavers
still
survive.
The
Deardon
station
area
plan
is
our
best
opportunity
to
clean
the
creeks
and
allow
a
little
more
space
for
nature
to
regenerate.
K
To
this
end,
please
install
a
significant
setback
for
new
buildings,
consider
transferable
development
rights
to
allow
the
widening
of
the
setback
from
waterways,
and
please
require
bird
safe
design
for
all
new
buildings,
as
well
as
day
lighting.
Please
do
not
forget
the
sad
shape
of
the
low
SCOTUS
Creek.
All
the
way
from
the
confluence
point
upstream.
I
am
also
concerned
with
the
potential
displacement
caused
by
the
Deardon
plan.
I
believe
that
access
to
affordable
housing
is
a
human
right
and
that
we
should
protect
the
Latino
and
african-american
communities
that
are
affected
the
most
by
displacement.
E
G
You
good
evening,
everyone,
my
name
is
Geeta
dev
I'm,
a
representative
of
the
sustainable
land
use
committee
of
the
Sierra
Club,
as
we've
been
involved
with
the
dirt
on
stationary,
a
plan
from
the
very
beginning,
I
think
it
was
2013
that
we
got
actively
involved
and,
as
you
can
see,
a
number
of
us
have
noticed
and
I'm
very
pleased
to
notice
that
you
all
have
noticed
that
the
nature
in
the
cities
has
not
received
the
same
attention
in
this
report
that
we
would
have
hoped
to
see.
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
cities
need
nature.
G
We
all
know
that
we
need
the
clean
air,
the
clean
water,
the
urban
heat
island
effect,
flood
control.
There
are
so
many
reasons,
aside
from
the
sheer
beauty
of
the
plants
and
trees,
but
what's
less
understood
is
that
nature
needs
cities
these
days.
These
days
are
bees
and
our
birds
and
our
butterflies
are
not
doing
so
well
in
the
vast
monocultures
of
our
agricultural
areas.
In
fact,
our
cities
and
our
vast
suburbs
provide
more
diversity
in
ecology
to
support
habitats
and
plant
life.
G
So
we
ask
you
to
please
consider
adding
a
section
or
a
subsection
to
the
report
that
could
maybe
use
the
habitat
guidelines
as
a
tool,
but
that
we
feel
that
the
urban
ecology
could
be
addressed
to
be
very
resilient.
I
think
someone
mentioned
the
green
fingers
that
were
mentioned
in
the
specific
plan,
but
really
a
structure
on
which
to
build.
It
would
be
really
important
in
this
report
and
we
think
that
that's
entirely
possible.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
My
name
is
Stacy
Peralta
I
am
a
third
generation
Bay
Area
native
I
reside
in
San
Jose
I
am
a
home
owner
in
Almaden,
Valley
and
also
a
member
of
the
Sierra
Club.
The
development
is
very
concerning
to
me,
and
it
is
concerning
to
me,
because
I
am
also
a
mother
of
two
young
children
and
I-
think
of
the
future
of
San
Jose.
D
This
development
in
this
development
I
would
like
to
see
an
in-depth
discussion
of
the
natural
assets
of
deer,
Don
area
and
the
ways
we
can
protect
them
and
integrate
and
enhance
habitat
for
migratory
birds.
As
our
climate
changes
I
think
we
must
include
a
robust
sustainability
discussion
that
looks
at
how
climate
smart,
San
Jose
will
be
incorporated
into
building
design
and
into
eco
district
planning.
I
think
these
sustainability
principles
must
be
augmented
by
a
native
plant
palate,
enhancement
of
habitats
along
the
creeks,
as
we
mentioned
earlier
trails
and
have
a
safe
bird
design.
D
The
deer
Don
area
has
the
potential
to
become
a
unique
iconic
ego
district,
and
we
should
not
waste
this
opportunity.
I
think
we
should
all
require
these
requirements
for
these
developments
in
Dehradun
Station
and
should
incorporate
these
ecological
nature
and
sustainability
principles.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
I'm
a
volunteer
with
the
California
Native
Plant
Society
and
I'm
a
resident
of
San
Jose
district
number
one,
the
Native
Plant
Society
is
a
large
statewide
organization.
Our
local
chapter
has
more
than
900
members
and
I
am
here
to
speak
on
their
behalf,
our
neurological
system
developed
in
the
context
of
the
natural
world.
There
is
a
huge
body
of
scientific
literature
that
delineates
the
vast
neurological
and
health
benefits
of
interacting
with
nature
brain
wise.
C
Among
other
things,
we
are
better
problem,
solvers
and
more
creative
in
the
presence
of
nature
health-wise
we
have
lower
blood
pressure,
slower
heart
rates
and
overall,
better
health.
The
amount
of
green
space
that
you
set
aside
and
the
choice
of
the
plant
materials
that
you
put
in
will
determine
the
quality
of
the
habitat
you
create
put
in
a
bush
from
elsewhere,
and
you
get
a
bush
put
in
an
appropriate
mix
of
California
native
plants,
and
now
you
have
habitat
you
have
birds
and
butterflies.
C
You
have
nature,
as
you
compress
more
and
more
people
into
smaller
and
smaller
spaces.
The
quality
of
the
surrounding
open
space
becomes
critically
important
for
their
health
in
order
to
function.
Our
best
as
humans,
we
need
nature.
Nature
should
surround
us
in
our
everyday
life.
It
should
not
be
something
we
have
to
get
into
our
cars
to
go
visit.
Thank
you.
Thank.
P
Hi,
thank
you.
This
October
meeting
has
really
been
about
nature
and
about
walking
very
nice.
You
know
I
hope
we
can
all
take
it
to
heart,
I'm,
the
accountability
with
technology
person
and
how
to
transition
into
a
new
era
of
peace
and
better
democracy
and
leave
the
era
of
911,
which
is
just
a
relief
and
a
hallelujah,
and
you
know
with
that
in
mind.
It's
important
for
me
that
things
are
clear
and
that
we
have
like
a
very
good
list
of
things.
P
So
I
really
really
appreciate
the
ebb
and
flow
that
you
guys
are
working
with
to
create
a
good
policy
of
the
public
here
and
that
we
can
present
to
say
the
you
know,
the
the
architectural
reports
and
all
those
very
sophisticated
reports
to
have
a
good
public
view.
Point
of
view
is
important.
At
night,
I
I've
been
thinking
other
work
cognitive
lately.
It
may
not
be
the
greatest
word,
but
I
really
think
the
report
you
know
to
give
to
the
City
Council
has
to
be
cognitive
and
and
what's
spoken
here
last
time
at
the
meeting.
P
P
You
know
the
the
residential
issue
in
the
Gardiner
area.
It
looks
like
you're
really
starting
to
build
something
new.
You
know,
let's
it's
okay,
to
to
build
good
narratives
and
to
try
to
practice
good
narratives
that
you're
not
normally
used
to
that
we
can
hear
with
each
other
and
let's
practice,
what
can
be
really
good.
Google
is
doing
things
in
Toronto
right
now.
P
Q
Q
What
I
would
like
to
say
is
I
would
love
to
see
how
we
can
look
at
this
as
both
an
opportunity
for
artists,
as
well
as
potential
challenges
that
can
be
addressed
now
in
order
to
do
that.
I
think
it's
important
that
somebody
who
can
advocate
for
these
arts
organizations
most
of
them
are
less
than
$50,000
in
annual
budgets,
but
they
contribute
to
our
the
vibrancy
of
San
Jose.
E
G
Evening
my
name
is
Mary
Helen,
Dougherty
I'm,
a
downtown
resident
and
I
wanted
to
draw
your
attention
to
a
couple
of
points
in
the
letter
that
you
received
for
impact
people
acting
in
the
community
together
that
you
received
tonight
when
we
were
starting
our
small
group
process.
First
point
and
I
just
want
to
highlight
two
paragraphs.
G
One
is
we
continue
to
appreciate
that
you
engage
in
conversation
about
displacement,
in
particular
for
our
low
income
in
diverse
communities
and
we
believe,
that's
a
citywide
impact
that
continues
to
need
to
be
considered,
and
the
second
thing
is
more
about
what
the
SAG
report
and
the
impact
and
the
timing
of
its
presentation
to
the
City
Council
I
know.
I
read
in
one
place
that
the
purpose
of
the
report
was
to
inform
thinking.
G
So,
since
the
result
of
the
report
are
expected
to
expect
the
terms
of
the
MOU,
we
request
that
the
city
initiate
the
extension
process
and
that
the
SAG
report
may
be
fully
considered
and
acted
on
by
the
City
Council
before
they
take
action
on
the
MOU.
So
please
give
some
thought
to
that
when
you
have
this
discussion
about
what
can
the
impact
of
your
work
have
on
the
future
of
our
city?
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
Hi,
my
name
is
Laura
Sanchez
de
Bona.
We
volunteer
with
the
Audubon
Society
and
sitting
amongst
the
Sierra
Club,
like
the
other
speakers
in
my
group.
I,
think
that
that
we
should
add
the
protection
and
expansion
of
the
habitats,
as
well
as
sustainable
and
bird
safe
building
design
to
the
draft
of
the
radion
station.
I
love
the
birds
and
the
creeks
and
the
fish,
and
the
Beavers
and
I
think
it
was
find
a
solution
to
help
the
homeless
that
are
living
in
the
waterways
and
to
return
the
creeks
to
nature.
K
I
want
a
way
to
reduce
light
pollution
along
the
creeks
as
well.
We
should
be
able
to
be
proud
of
the
waterways
and
we
should
minimize
even
allow
them
eliminate
hazards
to
birds.
I
strongly
believe
that
they're
done
area
plan
and
all
future
development
via
Google
or
other
developers
should
incorporate
these
elements
that
are
to
create
truly
sustainable,
integrated
and
a
beautiful
district.
Thank
you.
E
F
F
But
this
will
be
the
chance
to
really
dive
deep
into
that,
and
as
part
of
that,
we
will
go
over
what
the
public
outreach
and
community
engagement
strategy
that
will
go
along
with
the
disc
will
we'll
go
over
that
strategy
at
that
meeting
and
provide
opportunity
for
you
all
to
provide
your
feedback
on
this
initial
phase.
So,
after
that
we
do
not
have
a
meeting
scheduled,
but
the
this
group
will
live
on
and
we
will
reconvene
you
as
things
arise,
that
we'll
be
asking
for
feedback
on.
F
So
immediate
next
steps
are
that
we
will
be
taking
additional
written
comments
on
the
report
through
October
17th.
So
we
really
appreciate
the
handful
of
comments
that
we've
received
so
far,
including
some
today,
but
we
recognize
that
we
are
giving
you
additional
lists
of
potential
solutions
and
the
survey
results
or
the
online
feedback
forum
results
will
be
sent
to
you.
So
we'll
give
you
a
little
bit
more
time
to
digest
it,
and
if
you
have
any
final
thoughts
on
the
report,
please
send
them
to
us
by
october
17th.
F
So
we
will
be
updating
the
report
and
revising
it
and
plan
to
have
it
out
before
the
end
of
the
month.
We
put
the
week
of
october
29th
there
as
a
target
for
us
in
terms
of
the
MOU
and
PSA
that
is
tentatively
scheduled
to
go
to
City
Council
on
December
4th
and
the
staff
report,
along
with
the
draft
agreements,
are
the
recommended.
Agreements
of
the
MOU
and
PSA
will
be
available
on
November
16th.
Based
on
this
schedule.
F
So
in
the
the
future,
there's
still
a
long
ways
to
go
here
in
terms
of
the
dirt
on
station
area
and
the
Google
project.
So
we
know
the
exclusive
negotiation
agreement
was
adopted
in
June
2017.
We're
approaching
this
milestone
here.
The
next
steps
would
be
for
Google
to
submit
a
planning
application
and
go
through
the
entitlement
process,
and
that
would
include
a
development
agreement
during
that
time.
Frame.
Design
and
construction
of
course
goes
into
the
future
and
Community
Engagement
goes
along
the
way.
F
F
E
E
R
Then
I
think
remember.
Reverence
really
mentioned
was
that
we
did
talk
about
something
that
we've
been
working
at
pact
and
other
other
groups.
Catholic
Charities
and
some
of
the
other
few
organizing
groups
is
looking
at
a
proactive
community
engagement
process
that
is
not
project,
oriented
or
reactive,
to
or
getting
the
community
to
react
to
a
given
project,
but
to
really
prepare
housing,
ready
communities
and
I'm
we're
working
with
destination
home,
like
other
places
as
well.
To
look
at
that
peace
and
anticipation
of
really
what
will
hopefully
be
a
lot
of
development
in
the
area.
R
But
it's
I
just
think
that
we
ought
to
this
whole
process
really
begs
that
question
I'll
be
really
going
to
have
housing
by
the
communities
because
there
is
gonna,
be
a
large
displacement,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
just
in
the
Deardon
area.
It'll
just
be
outside
areas,
so
but
other
other
parts
of
San
Jose
and
the
county
need
to
be
ready
for
development
of
of
a
whole
range
of
incomes
for
housing.
R
So
it's
just
something
that
I
was
wondering
if
that,
if
that
is
something
that
would
be
a
continuing
occasion
for
some
thought
around
around
that
it
around
that.
What
that
look,
what
that
might
look
like
and
is
the
city
giving
any
thought
to
creating
RFPs
for
existing
groups
that
are
doing
this
work,
but
are
really
reaching
a
level
of
their
own
organizational
capacity.
So
maybe
that's
something
that
we
can
can
look
at
in
the
future.
Great.
A
How
we
kind
of
collaboratively
do
that
and
I
think
pulling
in
partners
such
as
pact
and
others
just
to
kind
of
set
the
stage
to
figure
out
how
we
do
that
collectively,
because
I
think
it's
gonna
require
some
orthodox
and
unorthodox
or
untested
ways
of
community
engagement
that
we've
kind
of
discussed
in
here,
but
also
kind
of
on
a
much
broader
scale.
So
I
think
maybe
I
can
follow
up
with
you
on
that.
But
we'd
love
to
kind
of
engage
in
that
conversation.
B
You
know
references
to
pull
for
him
on
how
to
engage
the
community
and
how
to
like
break
out
into
neighborhoods
and-
and
it's
been
really
cool-
how
hard
you
guys
have
worked,
and
the
results
of
that
also
a
part
of
that
weird
dynamic
world
of
community
engagement,
I
I
think
it
was
also
really
cool
to
see
served
the
people
San
Jose,
they
weren't
able
to
get
a
seat,
but
they
definitely
came
with
us
there
the
whole
process-
and
we
definitely
they
had
a
seat
at
this
table.
So
you
know
I
just
think
it
was
interesting.
B
I
I
One
thing,
I
very
much
agree
that
we've
added
this
evening
is
a
lot
of
sustainability
components
that
was
missing
so
III
think
that's
a
wonderful
addition.
I
think
it's
extremely
important
for
us
to
engage
Google
and
I'll
say:
Google
immediately
start
them
working
now
on
improving
things
in
our
community
and
not
wait
till
they
put
that
shovel
in
the
ground,
get
them
working
with
our
challenged
youth
in
the
areas
get
our
youth
ready
for
stem.
Have
that
happen
today?
I
Don't
wait
10
years
that
way,
those
youth
that
are
12
to
15
years
old
are
ready
to
get
those
jobs
at
Google
when
Google
gets
here
and
then.
Lastly,
we
need
to
separate
the
current
issues
that
our
city
is
faced
with,
and
you
know
I
look
at
that
as
housing.
You
know
we
have
million
dollar
average
houses.
That's
a
reality
today.
All
right
it
has
nothing
to
do
with.
Google
has
nothing
to
do
with
dirt
on
station.
That
will
increase
it.
I
don't
disagree
with
that,
but
we
have
problems
today.
I
We
have
problems
with
the
creeks
with
the
trails.
All
those
things
are.
Today's
issues
that
we,
the
city
of
San
Jose,
needs
to
solve.
It
doesn't
mean
Google
needs
to
solve.
It,
though,
will
gladly
take
their
help,
but
those
are
things
that
we
have
to
figure
out
and
how
we
solve
those
things.
Thank
you
thank.
B
J
Changed
as
far
as
I'm
my
vision
and
that
sort
of
thing,
I
did
not
know
what
to
expect
from
Google.
Actually,
when
this
whole
thing
started
and
I
think
the
neighborhood's
were
quite
pleasantly
surprised
by
their
responsiveness
and
the
care
that
they
took
in
some
of
their
presentations
and
I'd
like
to
thank
Google
for
listening
to
what
we
had
to
say
and
I
think
that
we
can
use
you
as
a
model
for
any
other
businesses
that
come
into
the
area
and
want
to
engage
in
in
this
process
as
well.
E
B
I
Thinking
of
not
saying
anything,
cuz
I,
my
mouth
is
running
all
the
time.
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody
in
this
process.
I
mean
everybody
sitting
in
this
room.
What
we
did
in
this
process
is
what
we
accomplished
in
about
four
years
with
the
general
plan.
It
took
us
52
meetings
and
we've
done
this
in
ten
or
nine
right
so
far
and
I
really
thank
you
for
your
your
helping,
keeping
us
on
track.
I
I
think
the
community
for
coming
out
it's
a
very
difficult
thing
to
come
again
and
again
and
again,
and
keep
feeling
like
you're
reinventing
the
wheel
over
and
over
again
and
seeing
change,
become
so
incremental,
I
think
Google
for
coming
through
and
becoming
a
catalyst
for
making
some
massive
change
and
I.
Think
I'm
just
delighted,
I
moved
in
35
years
ago,
I
thought
the
arena
was
going
to
make
the
big
change
in
that
area
and
look
where
we
are
now
so.
Thank
you.
Thank.