►
From YouTube: DEC 5, 2022 | Transportation & Environment Committee
Description
City of San José, California
Transportation & Environment Committee of December 5, 2022.
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=987827&GUID=54221444-EFED-4E75-832E-DAFC1744D1AE
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
Foreign,
the
driver's
seat
today,
let's
start
with
roll
call.
B
Okay,
thank
you,
I'm,
going
to
just
start
by
reminding
everybody
of
the
code
of
conduct
that
includes
commenting
on
specific
agenda
items
only
in
addressing
the
full
body,
no
individuals,
public
speakers
will
not
engage
in
a
conversation
with
the
chair
council,
members
or
staff.
All
members
of
the
committee
staff
and
public
are
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language
and
repeated
failure
to
comply
with
the
code
of
conduct
which
will
disturb,
disrupt
or
impede
the
orderly
conduct
of
the
meeting.
May
result
in
removal
from
the
meeting.
B
D
So
good
afternoon,
Joy
City
otter,
I'm
here
I'm
here
to
present
our
audit
tree
removals
and
Replacements
the
city
can
improve
processes
to
protect
and
grow.
The
community
Forest
Allison,
Paulie
and
Michael
O'connell
Jr
from
my
office
are
here
remotely
I'm.
Also
in
the
in
the
box
is
Chris
Burton
from
planning
building
code
enforcement.
You
understand
Rick
Scott
from
Department
of
Transportation.
D
Bear
with
me,
okay,
San,
Jose's,
Community
Forest
is
comprised
of
1.6
million
trees
on
private
and
public
property.
Most
trees
are
located
on
private
property,
however,
about
300
000
trees
are
on
public
property
or
rights
of
way,
including
about
270
000
Street
trees,
the
vast
majority
of
which
are
maintained
by
private
property
owners
in
February
2022.
The
city
adopted
Community,
Forest
management
plan
or
cfmp
to
grow
and
maintain
the
community
Forest.
D
How
and
whether
the
city
is
enforcing
tree
planting
conditions
on
development,
how
the
city
is
spending
tree
mitigation
funds
and
how
the
city
can
most
cost
effectively
plant
more
trees.
Multiple
City
departments
play
a
role
with
managing
or
overseeing
the
removal,
replacement,
planting
and
monitoring
of
true
related
activities.
D
For
purposes
of
this
audit,
the
Departments
of
Transportation
Dot
and
planning
building
code
enforcement
PPC,
where
the
primary
departments
we
worked
with
to
address
the
audit
objectives,
dot
houses,
the
City
Arborist
team
that
oversees
tree
planting
and
maintenance
for
public
trees,
excluding
Parks,
which
are
handled
by
the
department
of
parks,
recreation,
Neighborhood,
Services,
the
planning
division
of
PVC
processes,
applications
for
private
property
tree
removals.
Public
works
also
manages
landscaping
for
public
projects
and
reviews,
impacts
of
private
development
and
public
infrastructure
based
on
direction
from
Council
through
the
cfmp
and
budget
process.
D
Dot
is
working
to
scale
up
the
number
of
planting
projects
in
Prior
years,
dot
had
planted
roughly
a
few
hundred
trees
per
year
going
forward.
The
goal
is
to
plant
2
000
trees
per
year
and
to
accomplish
this
increased
scope
and
scale
of
tree
plantings.
Additional
funding
was
allocated
for
planting
and
pruning
in
last
year's
budget
process
in
San,
Jose
Property
Owners
need
a
permit
to
remove
trees
over
38
inches
in
circumference
from
single
family
or
duplex
Lots
or
of
any
size
on
other
property
types.
D
The
first
finding
was
that
private
property
tree
removal
permitting
requires
better
resources,
improved
processes.
The
city
requires
applicants
plant
replacements
for
trees
that
they
removed
per
the
city's
replacement
ratios.
However,
planners
have
not
been
consistently
applying
the
standard
replacement
ratios
correctly
when
approving
tree
removals
or
development
permits.
D
We
found
that
in
our
sample
of
34
permits,
we
noted
errors
in
nearly
one-third
resulting
in
142
fewer
trees
planted
or
about
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
in
the
fees
currently
planners
do
not
receive
standard
training,
nor
have
instructions
on
how
to
apply
the
replacement
ratios
or
make
technical
decisions
around
trees
to
ensure
that
tree
removal
processes
are
consistently
followed
and
updated.
We
recommend
PVC
should
develop
procedures
on
tree
removal,
permit,
processing
and
provide
planners
with
technical
guidance
about
trees
or
provide
further
access
to
certified
arborists.
D
We
also
noted
that
the
tree
removal
permit
fees
do
not
align
with
the
current
review
process
for
sample
projects.
The
average
time
to
review
a
live
tree
removal
was
longer
than
the
permit
fee
recovers.
We
all
should
note
that
recommendations
from
the
cfmp
may
impact
the
current
process
and
pbce
plans
to
review
the
fee
and
related
processes,
and
we
have
a
recommendation
about
this
as
well.
D
The
second
findings
of
the
city
can
better
ensure
replacement
trees
are
planted
in
regrowing
the
canopy.
The
purpose
of
the
city's
replacement
ratios
to
regrow
the
canopy
after
trees
removed
and,
as
noted
earlier,
when
applicant
removes
the
tree,
the
city
prefers.
The
replacement
tree
is
planted
on
the
property
we
found.
The
city
does
not
verify
that
applicants
planted
required
placement
trees
on
the
property
and
the
city
does
have
two
methods
to
verify
tree
plantings
depending
on
the
type
of
permit,
but
neither
is
routinely
done.
D
Lastly,
the
city
permits
are:
determines
the
replacement
ratio
based
on
the
number
of
trees
removed
without
counting
for
the
canopy
lost.
Nor
does
the
city
provide
guidelines
for
appropriate
tree
species
for
planting
to
to
ensure
replacement
trees
are
appropriately
planted
to
regrow
the
canopy.
We
recommend
PBC
develop
procedures
too
in
it
enforce
tree
planting
requirements
and
revise
the
tree
replacement
policy
to
incorporate
canopy
size
and
provide
guidance
for
tree
selection.
D
The
third
finding
is
that
dot
has
not
been
spending
in-lu
fees
timely
as
it
has
described
earlier.
The
city
collects
in
Luffy
when
applicants
remove
a
tree
and
do
not
have
room
to
plant
a
new
tree
on
their
property.
Duty
then
uses
these
revenues
to
plant
trees
on
the
applicant's
behalf
who
found
that
dot
has
spent
just
a
portion
of
the
in
Luffy's
collected
about
between
fiscal
year
2018-19
and
2122.
The
city
collected
over
1.5
million
dollars
in
fees,
but
only
spent
about
88
thousand
dollars.
D
But
we
do
note
that
defeat
the
funds
were
spent
for
planting
and
watering
costs.
We
found
that
dot
can
improve
how
they
track
in
degree.
Spending
they're
all
stand,
provide
clear
guidelines
on
where
and
how
to
spend
it
in
Luffy
revenues
so
to
better
spend
in
Luffy
revenues,
recommend
dot,
identify
planting
locations
or
uses
for
accumulated
fees,
create
guidelines
for
how
fees
should
be
spent
in
regular
review
information
on
fee
collection.
D
Our
fourth
finding
is
that
dot
should
evaluate
costs
and
establish
metrics
for
the
community
Forest
program's
objectives.
The
city
has
identified
numerous
objectives
for
the
community
Forest
program.
These
include
planting
2
000
trees
per
year,
achieving
a
20
canopy
covered
by
2051
and
prioritizing
tree
planting
in
designated
areas
of
need.
Costs
of
tree
planting
can
vary,
but
can
include
costs
for
procuring
and
planting
the
tree
site.
Preparation
or
traffic
safety
measures.
D
D
D
However,
city
data
on
tree
removals,
Replacements
and
tree
planting
is
limited
both
in
terms
of
cost
and
effectiveness,
such
as
survival
rates
for
different
planting
strategies
to
measure
how
well
the
city's
meeting
is
objective.
The
city
should
track
additional
data
related
tree
planting
removals
costs
and
Outreach.
D
The
report
has
10
recommendations
to
improve
the
city's
processes
to
protect
and
grow
the
community
Forest
I'd
like
to
thank
the
Departments
of
Transportation
Planning
Building
Code,
Enforcement,
Public
Works,
the
city
attorney's
office
and
the
city
manager's
budget
office.
As
you
accept
the
report
and
cross-reference
to
the
January
10th
meeting
of
the
city
council
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
administration
for
their
response
for
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you,
Joe
John,
ristow,
director
of
Transportation,
on
behalf
of
the
city,
Administration
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
the
Joe
and
the
audit
team.
It
was
really
a
productive
process
and
I
think
the
findings
or
recommendations
are
really
going
to
help
us
to
make
sources
much
more
effective.
F
Like
a
brief
summary
recap
of
what
you
said,
sure
John
risso
director
of
Transportation,
just
want
to
on
behalf
of
the
city
Administration
thank
the
audit
department
for
the
very
productive
process
and
product
that
came
from
I.
Think
we're
going
to
be
able
to
use
those
recommendations
and
finding
to
better
manage
tree
resources
throughout
the
city
and
also
want
to
say
that
we
accept
and
concur
with
all
the
findings
and
recommendations
in
the
report.
Thanks.
B
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
report
and
the
response
we'll
go
to
public
comment.
I
I
think
I
just
want
to
report
out
that
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
good
work
on
the
on
this
issue
of
trees
done
in
the
past
few
years.
You
know
the
issues
of
a
tree
canopy
for
the
east
side
has
been
quite
a
provided
quite
a
task
to
figure
out
how
exactly
to
to
work
a
tree
canopy
in
the
future
of
the
east
side.
I.
I
Thank
you
for
the
years
of
work
from
council
person
Carrasco
on
this
issue
and
just
a
whole
bunch
of
wrangling
wrestling
and
good
new
re-understandings
of
issues.
I
guess
is
a
way
to
put
it
so
so.
Thank
you.
I
I
was
always
interested
how
the
state
California
office
of
emergency
services
was
actually
a
part
of
the
planning
for
the
future
of
tree
issues
in
San,
Jose
and
I
think
they
can
offer
some
interesting
reports
and
Reporting
what
to
expect
of
ourselves
as
a
community
in
the
next
year
and
in
the
next
few
years
and
into
the
next
decade.
I
I
thought
I
would
just
mention
at
this
time
as
a
reference
for
yourselves
and
thank
you
again
for
the
work
on
this
issue
and
that
we
can
continue
a
good
practices
of
more
and
more
trees.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
any
of
committee
colleagues
have
any
questions:
if
not
I'm,
going
to
ask
a
few
I'm
going
to
start
at
the
beginning.
You
you
talk
about
something
like
34
permits
that
you
reviewed
and
that
led
those
34
permits
resulted
in
142
fewer
trees
planted
or
110
000
in
uncollected
fees.
What
is
that?
What
would
be?
The
total
number
then
permits
that
out.
D
I,
don't
have
that
number
specifically,
you
know.
One
of
the
challenges
we
had
in
looking
at
especially
the
development
permits
is
understanding
the
scope
of
trees
removed
over
time,
and
so
that's
why
we
used
a
smaller
sample.
Some
of
the
the
selection
was
based
on
the
availability
of
the
data.
I
can
come
back
to
you
on
the
tree
removal
permits.
We
might
have
a
larger
number
for
that.
I.
D
B
I
was
just
trying
to
put
a
handle
on
you
know.
This
is
the
front
of
these
34
permits.
What
do
we
think
the
total
number
of
yeah,
what
the
total
missed
opportunity
was?
Let's
assume
this
is
one
tenth
of
the
permits
out
there
or
is
it?
Is
that
reasonable,
or
is
that
that
we're
talking
about
potentially
a
million
dollars
in
uncollected
fees
or
a
thous
over
a
thousand
trees
that
were
implanted
right.
E
Yeah
I'm
sorry,
council,
member
Chris,
Burton,
director
of
planning
building
code
enforcement,
not
off
the
top
of
my
head.
It's
certainly
something
we
can
follow
up
with
and
give
you
a
sense
of
the
scope
and
scale.
B
And
I
don't
really
want
to
spend
much
time.
Looking
back
I
guess,
my
point
is
just
is
the
magnitude
of
this
problem
is
quite
large
and
we
ought
to
be
I'm
glad
to
see
that
we
now
are
on
the
same
page.
We
understand
the
problem
and
we're
going
to
try
to
work
on
that,
but
it.
D
Is
a
lot
of
missed
opportunity,
though
correct
it
is
a
larger
number
than
what
we
what
we,
what
we
reported,
but
we
were
interested
I
had,
like
I,
said
a
small
sample
right.
Thank.
B
You
John
so
there's
a
looks
like
there's
about
one
and
a
half
million
dollars.
Almost
that's
in
the
fund.
Do
we
have
a
strategy
for
how
we're
going
to
utilize
that
I
know?
We've
got
these
contracts
now
with
some
bigger
companies
to
do
more
planting
and
other
maintenance.
What
other
ideas
do
we
have
I.
F
Through
the
community
Forest
management
plan,
which
really
outlined
all
of
the
same
things
that
we're
going
to
be
trying
to
do
here
with
an
increase
in
level
of
planting
and
how
we're
managing
and
getting
input
from
other
community
resources
on
this,
so
yeah
we're
glad
to
see
that
there
is
some
additional
funding
for
this
and
we've
already
started
on,
locating
we're
finding
locations
where
we
can
do
the
2000
tree
planting
on
an
annual
basis
as
well
as
this.
So
we've
started
doing
that
already
so
I
guess.
F
J
Okay,
that's
fine
I
to
offer
a
comment.
Last
year
or
in
this
fiscal
cycle,
I
got
approved
a
budget
to
offer
tree
rebates
to
Residents
in
the
city.
Whoever
wanted
to
plant
a
tree.
They
could
come
to
the
my
Council
office
and
we
would
fill
out
a
little
bit
of
forms
and
then
we
would
give
them
a
rebate
of
up
to
a
hundred
dollars.
So
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out
there
and
have
the
public
and
the
community
aware
that
the
this
pot
of
money
is
available.
J
B
All
right,
thank
you,
I'm,
going
to
just
follow
up
on
that
comment
as
well.
It
occurs
to
me
that
this
kind
of
relates
to
my
other
question,
which
is
on
the
tree.
Removal
fees
that
we
charge
for
homeowners
I
know
that
there's
a
question
of
whether
we're
covering
our
fees
right,
whether
we're
covering
our
cost
with
these
fees,
is
that
that
that's
a
concern
is
that
correct,
so.
D
I
think,
ultimately,
that
you
know
has
the
the
fee.
Setting
process
is
ultimately
a
policy
decision.
We
were
just
really
talking
about
the
assumptions
underneath
that
under
underlying
the
calculation-
and
we
also
note
that
there
were
some
cfmp
recommendations
that
could
have
some
fee
impact
as
well.
Those
are
a
little
harder
to
kind
of
get
at,
but
our
understanding
what
we
reported
in
the
report
or
what
we
put
in
the
audit,
was
that
planning
billing
code
enforcement
was
going
to
be
looking
at
that.
B
B
They
don't
need
it
for
a
dead
tree
as
much,
but
for
trees
that
need
removal
or
trees
that
are
in
the
that
are
roots,
are
damaging
something
or
whatever
it
is,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
disincentivizing
as
much
as
we
are
assisting
the
process
and
I'm
just
wondering
whether
we
in
theory,
we
could
consider
some
of
these
leftover
fees
to
help
maybe
offset
the
cost
for
residents
so
that
they
are
helped
in
doing
this
process
correctly.
So
we
have
a
better
handle
on
what's
going
on
out
in
the
city.
B
Maybe
a
conversation
for
us
later,
as
we
bring
this
back
to
Council
next
month,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
think
about
ways.
We
can
utilize
that
money,
but
also
get
better
cooperation
from
our
residents.
We
do
often
hear
from
residents
too
about
the
cost
just
to
maintain
their
street
trees
and
how
difficult
it
is
for
them
when
they
have
to
trim
or
remove
or
repair
sidewalks
Etc.
So
I
think
we
ought
to
think
collectively
about
how
we
might
utilize
the
funds.
We
have
to
better
manage
this
overall
process.
B
So
I
look
forward
to
the
conversation
in
January
I.
Think
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
interesting
things
to
talk
about,
and
then
with
that
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
So
we'll
take
a
vote.
B
Problem.
Thank
you.
We're
moving
on
to
item
D2,
our
Municipal
Regional
stormwater.
Permit
reissuance
report
whose
carry
are
you
gear
board?
Thank
you.
L
M
You
know
we
can
understand
where
they
come
from.
If
you
look
at
our
waterways,
you
can
see
that
they're
not
as
healthy
as
as
they
could
be,
and
so
you
know
the
rules
are
really
amended
and
to
focus
on
improving
water
quality
and
and
preserving
the
health
of
this
critical
natural
resource
from
an
organizational
standpoint.
Esd's
role
in
this
process
is
to
provide
interpretation
and
Regulatory
advice
to
City
departments,
but
the
real
work
and
the
hard
the
hard
part
of
making
this
happen
is
really
done
by
departments
across
the
city.
N
Thank
you.
Thank
you
Carrie
good
afternoon,
chair
members
of
the
committee
in
public.
My
name
is
Regina
Nair
deputy
director
of
Environmental
Services
Department
in
today's
presentation,
we'll
provide
you
an
update
on
the
municipal,
Regional,
stormwater
and
PDS
permit,
commonly
known
as
the
stormwater
permit.
That
was
recently
issued.
N
Okay,
but
first
I'll
share
some
background
as
to
why
this
permit
exists.
The
city
of
San
Jose
has
two
separate
sewer
systems
like
most
cities,
with
the
exception
of
San
Francisco,
which
is
a
combined
system.
The
sanitary
sewer
system
shown
on
the
slide
is
a
series
of
connected
pipes
that
discharge
into
the
regional
Wastewater
facility
where
contaminants
are
removed
and
the
water
is
treated
then,
eventually,
clean
water
is
discharged
into
the
bay
for
the
city's
storm
sewer
system.
That
is
not
the
case.
N
N
N
To
ensure
water
is
treated
before
it
goes
into
our
the
waterways,
under
the
federal
Clean
Water
Act,
the
national
pollution
discharge
elimination
system
permit
that
npds
for
short,
was
created
for
that
purpose.
The
mpds
permits
administered
here
in
California
are
unique
in
comparison
to
the
rest
of
the
country.
The
US
EPA
authorizes
the
state
Water
Resource
control
board
to
administer
these
permits,
which
dates
back
to
a
1968
Port
of
cologne
act
and
keep
in
mind.
This
was
prior
to
the
Clean
Water
Act.
That
became
law
in
1972..
N
The
state
Water
Resource
control
board
is
divided
into
nine
regions
based
on
watersheds
throughout
the
state.
For
our
area,
highlighted
in
the
blue
circle
on
the
left
of
the
slide
is
called
the
region:
II
San,
Francisco,
Bay,
Regional
water
quality
control
board,
which
includes
Santa,
Clara,
Alameda,
San,
Mateo,
Contra,
Costa
and
Solano
counties.
The
mpds
permit
for
storm
sewer
system
was
relatively
recent
since
the
1990s
in
comparison
to
Industrial
and
treatment
plants
which
were
heavily
regulated
decades
before
Based
on
data
and
research.
N
Storm
sewer
systems
through
the
state
contribute
pollution
and
harming
our
waterways,
as
Kerry
mentioned.
This
permit
typically,
is
a
five-year
permit
term,
with
the
exception
of
the
last
one,
which
was
extended
two
years
ago,
the
latest
stormwater
permit
has
been
reissued
and
is
effective
as
of
July.
1St
2022,
both
Mary
and
I,
will
focus
on
some
of
the
specifics
with
the
new
permit.
N
So
in
this
Slide,
the
storm
water
permit
essentially
requires
all
180
square
miles
of
the
city
of
San
Jose
to
comply,
which
is
in
effect.
There
are
several
key
City
departments
listed
on
this
slide
responsible
to
implement
and
to
protect
our
storm,
sewer
and
waterways,
as
required
under
the
various
Provisions
also
listed
on
the
far
left.
Since
the
last
two
permits,
new
Provisions
have
been
added
to
address,
impacts
with
unsheltered,
homeless
populations,
cost
reporting
and
asset
management
that
will
be
discussed
towards
the
end
of
this
presentation.
So
now,
I'll
pass
to
Mary.
O
The
various
permit,
Provisions
detail,
specific
actions,
milestones
and
programs
that
the
city
must
Implement
to
achieve
this
compliance
provision,
C3
focuses
on
new
and
Redevelopment
projects.
The
new
stoneware
Department,
like
past
permits,
focused
on
installing
and
utilizing
green
stormwater
infrastructure
or
GSI
to
manage
polluted
stormwater
runoff.
For
those
who
may
be
new
to
the
concept.
O
Gsi
is
a
treatment
system
for
stormwater
runoff,
which
removes
sediments
and
other
pollutants
before
the
runoff
enters
the
storm
sewer
system
and
eventually
our
creeks
and
the
bay
examples
of
GSI
can
be
seen
in
the
photos
on
the
right
of
this
slide
for
commercial,
Municipal
and
multi-dwelling
units.
The
pass
permit
required
new
and
redevelopments
that
created
or
replaced
10,
000
square
feet
or
more
impervious
service
to
be
treated.
The
new
permit
now
requires
any
newer
Redevelopment
that
creates
or
replaces
5
000
square
feet
or
more
impervious
service
to
be
treated.
O
Single-Family
homes
had
been
Exempted
from
GSI
requirements
in
previous
permits.
The
new
storm
water
permit
requires
GSI
on
single-family
homes
that
create
or
replace
10
000
square
feet
or
more
of
impervious
surface
roadway
projects,
particularly
maintenance
projects
were
Exempted
from
GSI
requirements
in
the
past
unless
they
created
a
new
lane
of
travel.
The
new
stormwater
permit
requires
requirements
now
apply
to
any
roadway
project
that
includes
work
down
to
the
base
and
creates
or
replaces
one
acre
or
more
of
an
impervious
surface.
O
O
O
The
provision
C10
trash
load
reduction
details,
specific
actions.
The
city
must
take
to
comply
with
the
stormwater
permits,
discharge
prohibitions
and
to
address
trash
in
our
storm.
Sewer
system
and
waterways.
Actions
done
to
comply
with
C10
are
meant
to
ensure
that
our
Creeks,
don't
like
don't
look
like
the
picture
of
Coyote
Creek.
We
see
on
the
top
right.
O
The
stormwater
permit
requires
the
city
to
achieve
90
trash
flow
reduction
compared
to
our
2009
Baseline
by
July
by
June
30th
of
this
fiscal
year.
We
are
also
required
to
achieve
100
trash
load
reduction
by
June
of
2025..
We
are
on
track
to
achieve
this
through
a
combination
of
structural
controls
installed
in
the
storm
sewer
system
such
as
the
large
trash
capture
device
shown
in
the
bottom
right
photo,
Creek,
cleanups
and
other
trash
control
measures
and
the
direct
discharge
program,
which
needs
to
be
updated
next
month.
O
However,
after
June
of
2025,
we
will
no
longer
be
able
to
claim
credits
for
Creek
cleanups
or
for
the
direct
discharge
program,
so
the
city
will
need
to
implement
new
or
additional
controls
to
make
up
that
25
credit
shortfall
proposed
trash
controls
will
be
included
in
the
city's
revised
long-term
trash
plan,
which
will
be
submitted
with
the
fiscal
year.
2223
stormwater
annual
report,
a
new
requirement
in
c10,
pertains
to
private
lands.
This
requirement
applies
to
all
private
Parcels
that
meet
the
following
criteria.
O
They
also
must
be
in
an
area
that
is
not
treated
by
full
trash
capture
device
and
they
must
be
in
an
area
of
the
city
with
moderate,
high
or
very
high
trash
generating
levels.
These
private
Parcels
must
install
a
full
trash
capture
system
or
Implement
equivalent
trash
control
measures
by
July
1st
2025.
O
The
city's
direct
discharge
program
focuses
on
trash
and
pollutants
in
the
waterways
generated
by
the
encampments
and
the
actions
of
people
experiencing
homelessness.
The
city
was
the
first
to
implement
a
direct
discharge
plan
back
in
2016.,
and
the
new
stormwater
permit
requires
us
to
update
that
plan
by
January
of
2023..
N
Thanks
Mary
provision,
C12
polychlorinated
biphonels,
which
is
pcbs,
is
another
provision
in
the
stormwater
department,
and
this
has
evolved
the
most
and
is
more
complex
in
comparison
to
the
other
Provisions
that
in
the
new
permit,
which
are,
and
what
are
pcbs
in
particular
I
mean
these
are
chemicals
used
in
various
Industrial
and
Commercial
applications
such
as
electrical
and
hydraulic
equipment
or
plasticizers
and
paints.
These
were
domestically
manufactured
in
the
late
1920s
and
banned
in
the
late
1970s.
N
N
There
is
a
goal
set
forth
by
the
Water
Board
to
reduce
the
amount
of
pcbs
entering
into
through
the
storm
sewer
system
and
into
the
San
Francisco
Bay,
through
four
specific
programs
listed
on
the
slide.
The
first
program
identifies
properties
which
are
known
as
Source
properties
that
have
high
concentrations
of
pcbs
and
control
it
on
the
property
itself.
It
will
require
notification
to
the
water
board
and
may
require
City
resources
to
perform
operations
and
maintenance
work.
N
Such
as
inline
pipe
or
Inlet,
pipe
cleaning
or
Inlet
cleaning
near
these
Source
properties,
and
today,
we've
identified
nine
of
these
properties.
Second
program
focuses
on
Old
industrial
areas
in
Santa,
Clara
County.
There
is
about
600
acres
of
old
industrial
areas
and
about
half
of
that
falls
within
city
of
San
Jose's
jurisdiction.
The
goal
of
this
program
is
to
create
a
plan
and
schedule
as
to
how
the
city
will
address
these
Source
properties.
That
may
have
some
concentration,
but
no
clear
evidence
as
to
where
the
source
of
property
pcbs
are
located.
N
This
may
entail
similar
actions
as
the
first
program,
but
also
engineered
structural
control
systems
like
large
trash
capture
or
green
infrastructure
may
need
to
be
implemented.
The
city
needs
to
submit
a
plan
by
March
31st
2023.,
the
third
program.
This
was
the
noted
in
the
last
permit,
but
now
has
additional
requirements
for
the
building
building
demolition
program,
starting
in
July,
1st
2023.
The
permit
requires
more
notification
to
the
water
board
and
the
EPA
prior
to
any
demolition
work
for
buildings,
older
than
1980.
N
inspections
and
manifests
showing
where
the
material
is
disposed
will
be
required
and,
lastly,
requiring
controls
of
pcbs
for
any
Bridge
or
overpass
work
when
repaired
or
replaced
So.
Currently
what
has
been
done
today?
City
staff,
in
partnership
with
a
county-wide
Consortium
that
the
city
co-chairs
with
Valley
Water
called
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
Urban,
runoff
pollution
prevention
program,
our
evaluating
properties
that
have
been
redeveloped
future
projects
that
are
planned
to
address
other
Provisions
in
the
permit,
such
as
green
infrastructure
and
large
trashcapture
versus
where
remaining
old
industrial
areas
are
not
treated
and
that's
shown
in
yellow.
N
N
Finally,
there
are
the
remaining
Provisions
that
are
either
updated
or
new
requirements
for
provision
C15.
This
is
basically
pertaining
to
fire
activities
and
how
water,
including
potable
water,
is
managed.
During
and
after
a
fire
event,
the
water
board
is
requiring
fire
departments
throughout
the
Bay
Area
to
participate
in
a
regional
working
group
twice
a
year
throughout
the
permit
term,
to
further
evaluate
how
to
balance
fire
safety
needs,
while
protecting
storm
sewer
system
and
waterways.
The
last
two
Provisions,
C20
and
c21
are
new.
N
The
water
board
is
very
interested
in
knowing
how
much
all
this
is
going
to
cost
and
regionally
All
Counties
will
be
developing
a
framework
to
unify
how
this
information
will
be
collected
and
tracked.
This
will
be
new
work
for
all
responsible
departments
here
at
the
city
to
comply
and
in
asset
management
is
essentially,
the
goal
is
to
really
just
be
more
visible
and
transparent
about
the
work
that
we're
doing
to
help
improve
our
waterways.
N
So
for
next
steps
we
will
be
seeking
Council
approval
on
December
13
2022
for
the
direct
discharge
trash
control
program,
as
Mary
mentioned.
That
is
specific
as
to
how
we
manage
trash
in
our
waterways.
This
will
be
submitted
to
the
water
board
on
January
3rd
2023.
for
old
industrial
areas.
We
will
be
submitting
a
PCB
sediment
control
measures,
plan
and
schedule
to
the
water
board
on
March
31st
2023.
N
B
All
right,
thank
you,
rajini
and
Mary
and
Kerry
for
the
report.
A
lot
of
work
done
and
a
lot
of
work
ahead.
So
I
appreciate
that
we'll
go
to
public
comment.
First.
I
You
know
we
we
have
some
really
good
plans
in
store
for
ourselves
for
2024
and
25,
and
what
we
can't
be
working
on
in
2023,
2024
and
25
can
be
really
hopeful
years,
I
think
for
the
future
of
trees
and
I.
Think
for
the
future
of
how
you
talked
about
this
program
today,
it's
just
a
matter
that
we
work
our
good
practices
in
this
upcoming
year.
That
can
really
lead
to
a
good
good
place
in
24
and
25..
Thanks
for
your
time,.
B
Okay,
if
not
just
one
quick
question
the
the
we
a
couple
weeks
ago,
we
had
a
discussion
at
the
council
meeting
about
these
sewer
separation
system.
Now
trans
was
helping
fund
is
that
is
that
something
that's
related
to
this?
Was
it
required
by
this
or
just
something
separate.
B
Thank
you
that
was
about
putting
in
trash
capture
at
the
discharge
locations
right
so.
B
K
Thank
you,
I
had
a
couple
of
questions
so
also
work
work,
business
districts
are
we:
where
are
we
and
talking
to
the
businesses
that
about
what's
coming
their
way.
M
So
I'll
start
in
the
originally,
if
you
can
add
so
and
most,
if
not
all,
of
the
permit
requirements
are
for
new
development,
and
so,
as
the
new
development
begin
discussions
with
the
city,
we
we
talk
about
kind
of
what
the
new
requirements
for
any
any
city
project
is,
and
but
we've
also
done
a
bit
of
Outreach
and
notification
on
the
web
page
so
that
folks
understand,
as
they
begin
to
contemplate
new
projects,
how
how
the
many
Regulatory
and
developmental
rules
might
change.
But
originally,
what
would
you
add
to
that.
N
Just
just
to
add,
during
the
permit,
as
it
was
being
revised,
you
know
there
was
meant
multiple
opportunities
where
we
did
reach
out
to
the
local
businesses,
just
inform
them
and
new
and
developers
just
of
all
the
the
various
Provisions
that
are
being
implemented,
but
also
currently,
we
have
been
meeting
like,
for
example,
San
Jose
management,
Downtown,
Association
we've
been
meeting
with
them
just
to
let
them
know
some
of
these
Provisions
that
might
be
impacting
their
day-to-day
operations.
K
K
N
Right
now
we're
really
at
the
infancy
stage
of
this,
so
we
haven't
identified
other
than
the
nine
properties
that
have
been
contributing
to
high
levels
of
pcbs,
but
that
that's
the
extent
of
it,
the
the
second
part
of
that
program,
which
is
a
larger
scale,
that
300
acres.
That's
a
portion,
we're
still
in
the
planning
stage.
So
we
will-
and
we
are
working
closely
with
office
of
Economic,
Development
and
public
works
on
that.
K
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
I
have
another
question.
You
know
it'll
be
for
the
future
Council
to
really
you
know,
do
a
lot
of
this
work.
When
we
look
at
prioritizing
folks
that
live
within
500
feet
of
waterways,
what
does
that
do
to
some
of
the
other
yeah?
Let
me
let
me
step
back.
K
Departments
at
the
city
to
work
on
Columbus
Park,
for
example,
right
and
then,
and
then
we're
looking
at
waterways
within
the
city,
which
are
a
much
larger
region.
K
How
are
we
going
to
prioritize
folks
living
on
waterways
and
have
we
analyzed
what
that
means
for
the
rest
of
the
city
and
the
impacts
to
the
rest
of
the
city
and
have
we
sort
of
done
an
analysis
around
the
types
of
multi-departmental
resources
that
this
will
take
and
establish
sort
of
a
an
estimate,
dollar
figure.
M
Thank
you.
You
know
the
as
you
point
out,
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
different
departments
and
a
lot
of
internal
and
external
stakeholders
engaged
in
this,
and
you
know
the
real
answer
is
we
don't
know
yet
and
we
are
working
for
the
direct
discharge
plan
submittal,
but
this
is
this:
is
a
regulatory
mandate
that
we
must
prioritize
the
unhoused
along
the
waterways
as
I
think
we
mentioned
or
we'll
mention
more
next
week,
the
unhoused
contributable
80
percent
of
the
pollution
to
our
waterways.
M
So
so
the
Mandate
sort
of
makes
sense.
When
you
look
at
the
science-
and
you
know
how
we,
how
we
figure
out
the
each
component
to
that
is
something
that
we're
still
working
on.
But
it
is
something
that
we
need
to
comply
with
to
ensure
that
our
waterways
are
improved.
You
know
all
of
the
work
from
Green
infrastructure
to
to
trash
capture
devices.
M
Etc
are
all
designed
to
improve
the
health
of
our
waterways,
and
if
the
unhoused
are
contributing
the
largest
component
to
the
to
the
unhealthiness
of
The
Creeks,
then
we
do
need
to
prioritize
it.
But
but
we
are
all
working
together
and
and
frankly,
struggling
with
competing
priorities
for
that
and
I.
M
Think,
as
we
continue
to
finalize
our
plans
with
this
new
overlay
of
prioritization
I'm,
confident
that
we'll
get
there,
you
know,
there's
probably
going
to
need
to
be
some
more
money
as
with
any
new
requirement
and
that's
something
that
will
work
through
the
budget
process,
but
but
for
better
or
worse.
It
is
something
that
is
a
mandate
that
we
must
comply
with
and.
K
Are
we
working
with
partner
agencies
both
at
the
local
and
the
state
level
around
the
the
funding?
I
I
fully
recognize
that
we
do
not
have
a
dollar
figure
yet
because
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
that
goes
to
that.
But
are
we
having
those
discussions
with
partner
agencies
that
that
can
help
that
we
can
jointly
pay
for
these
types
of
solutions
which
are
very
expensive?
K
M
I'll
start
in
Reagan,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
add
anything,
you
know
the
housing
department
has
done
an
amazing
job
of
working
with
everyone
on
how
to
fund
these.
These
efforts,
and-
and
this
is
a
new
layer
on
top
of
that
which
makes
their
work
even
even
more
challenging
Reagan
I
think,
has
some
more.
H
Thanks
Reagan
Hettinger
with
the
housing
department,
I
would
just
add.
We
have
explicitly
brought
up
this
requirement
to
the
Federal
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
to
the
U.S
interagency
Council
on
homelessness
and
to
the
State
Cal
ich
just
bringing
it
to
their
attention
that
there
is
this
new
priority
or
requirement.
K
And
have
we
had
conversations
with
the
water
district
and
with
the
governor's
office
again
other
agencies
that
we
can
jointly
fund
potential
Solutions
with.
K
Okay,
okay,
thank
you.
I
I
think
this
is
going
to
cost
a
lot
of
money
and
as
a
city
on
January
31st,
the
council
will
need
to
make
some
choices
about
where
to
lobby
and
some
really
difficult.
Financial
decisions
in
the
coming
year.
Related
to
this,
with
that,
I
will
move
to
accept
this
report
and
refer
it
for
the
full
Council
consideration
on
January
31st.
Second,.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
So
we're
moving
on
to
D3
the
city,
initiatives,
roadmap,
Regional,
Transportation
activities,
semi-annual
report,
I
think,
John
and
Jessica
are
here
or
I,
see:
John
I,
don't
know
if
Jess
is
here,
oh
Jess
is
on
Zoom
so
and
also
somebody
from
VTA
is
presenting,
but
we'll
let
John
start.
L
F
Q
Hi
welcome
members
of
the
transportation
environment
committee
I'm
pleased
to
be
able
to
present
some
updates
on
the
BART
Silicon
Valley
program.
We've
been
in
a
very
close
partnership
with
all
our
partners
at
city
of
San
Jose
I'm
working
collaboratively
to
move
this
project
forward,
so
I
think
we're
ready
for
the
next
slide.
Q
Just
wanted
to
give
you
a
brief
overview
of
the
project,
a
reminder
of
the
elements
of
the
project.
It's
a
six
mile
extension
starting
at
the
recently
completed
Berryessa
extension.
Five
miles
of
that
extension
are
in
a
Subway
tunnel
which
we're
utilizing
the
single
bore
tunnel.
One
mile
is
at
street
level.
There
are,
we
call
them
a
three
underground
stations,
but
they're,
really
above
ground
stations,
and
we
call
them
underground
because
you
board
at
the
platform
level
underground.
Q
We
have
one
station
at
street
level,
that's
in
Santa
Clara,
but
all
three
of
the
San
Jose
stations,
you're
boarding
underground,
and
then
we
have
right
now
currently
in
the
scope,
our
two
mid-tunnel
facilities,
that's
part
of
the
Innovations,
so
we're
not
sure
if
those
will
remain
they're,
looking
at
Innovations
with
ventilation,
and
then
we
have
our
new
Hall
yard
and
maintenance
facility
in
the
city
of
Santa
Clara
next
slide.
Please.
Q
One
of
the
major
efforts
that
we're
working
on
right
now
is
our
construction
Outreach
Management
program,
specifically
our
ctmp
and
I'll,
go
over
some
of
the
details
of
that.
But
in
our
construction,
Outreach
Management
program,
we
have
our
education
and
Outreach
plan.
That
is
the
basic
guiding
principles
for
how
we
engage
with
key
stakeholders
in
the
public.
Q
It
really
is,
it
identifies
levels
and
tiers
of
stakeholders
like
one
two
and
three,
if
they're
directly
adjacent
to
the
project
activities,
whether
they're,
fairly
close
or
maybe
commuting
through
basically
impacted
by
any
kind
of
changes
to
any
type
of
Mobility,
whether
they're
biking,
walking
or
in
an
auto,
and
then
we
have
just
I
shouldn't
say
just
but
the
general
public,
so
we
classify
them
and
then
we
look
at
all
the
means
and
methods
in
the
best
ways
to
communicate
with
those
different
levels
of
stakeholders
in
the
timing.
Q
What
we're
going
to
go
into
some
detail
today
is
our
construction,
transportation
management
plan,
and
that
looks
at
how
we,
basically
once
we
have
means
and
methods
defined
by
the
contractors,
how
we
coordinate
with
circulation
and
access
needs,
basically
to
and
from
the
construction
areas
and
around
adjacent,
and
an
element
of
that
also
is
the
Emergency
Services
coordination
plan
and
that's
basically
making
sure
that,
during
construction,
that
the
time
for
emergency
responses
is
not
impacted
and
that
the
access
for
those
Emergency
Services
is
not
impact
during
construction.
Q
So
the
purpose
of
our
construction
transportation
management
plan
as
I
say
it's
to
coordinate
access
for
all
modes
during
construction,
so
we're
looking
at
at
the
bike
paths
we're
looking
at
the
sidewalks
we're
looking
at
the
roadways
and
streets.
Q
We
want
to
be
able
to
minimize
and
reduce
to
the
extent
possible,
and
that
is
what
I
want
to
emphasize,
reduce
to
the
extent
possible.
Construction
related
Transportation
impacts,
and
basically
it's
a
very,
very
careful,
Balancing
Act.
It
is
how
do
you
keep
the
project
moving
at
the
same
time,
minimizing
those
impacts?
So
I'll
give
you
an
example
on
our
phase
one
project.
Q
We
were
looking
at
some
areas
where
we
went
out
to
the
public
and
said
we
can
close
this
road
for
six
months,
all
the
way
closed,
or
we
can
leave
it
partially
open
for
a
year
and
do
some
changes
right
and
and
that's
where
we
can
get
that
input
from
the
public
like
do
you
want
a
bigger
impact,
maybe
for
a
lesser
time
or
maybe
a
less
significant
sort
of
change
in
the
way
you
move,
but
maybe
for
a
a
longer
duration.
Q
So
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
we're
going
to
be
sort
of
Weighing
on
we'll
first
vet,
these
things
with
our
partners
and
then
we
bring
it
to
the
public
and
I'll
go
over
some
details
on
the
process.
For
that
one
thing
that
the
ctmp
is
not
is:
it
is
not
a
mechanism
to
really
sort
of
halt
any
or
impede
construction
and
totally
eliminate
travel
and
access
eruptions.
Q
Q
So
we
are
in
the
construction,
transportation
management
plan,
we're
calling
them
cp2
and
we
are
going
to
be
doing
several
of
those
right
now.
We're
developing
and
we've
had
two
meetings,
I
think
to
date
with
the
city
of
San,
Jose
and
actually
a
joint
meeting
with
the
city
of
Santa
Clara,
because
one
of
our
first
areas
of
work
is
going
to
be
where
both
of
those
cities
merge
together
are
adjacent
to
each
other.
Q
So
the
first
part
of
putting
together
these
plans
for
the
traffic
plan
is
the
coordination
with
the
cities
and
our
stakeholders
and
our
partners.
We
will
have
the
contractor
develop
a
draft
plan.
We
in
our
Master
agreements
did
very
high
level
principles,
but
until
the
contractor
really
knows
how
they're
going
to
go
about
delivering
this
process,
this
project
with
means
and
methods,
we
couldn't
really
spell
out
any
of
the
specificity
needed
for
this
plan,
so
we're
now.
Q
At
that
point,
the
contractor
has
much
more
of
an
idea
and
and
of
the
upcoming
work
in
some
specific
areas
and
now
they're
presenting
their
draft
plan,
we'll
be
working
with
the
city
and
other
stakeholders
to
get
input
on
that
draft
plan.
Q
Once
we've
come
with
a
plan
that
we
feel
is
ready
for
presentation,
we're
going
to
be
taking
that
and
engaging
the
public
at
General
and
we'll
get
there
further
input
and
then
the
last
process
will
be
for
this
first
CT
cp2
Pacific
plan
we're
going
to
be
taking
it
to
the
San
Jose
City
Council.
So
it's
going
to
be
about
a
16-week
process
for
all
the
reviews,
input
and
then
coming
up
with
the
final
plan
for
the
city
council
approval
we
will
be
doing
and
I
think
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
Q
We
will
be
doing
several
of
these
ctmps,
so
they
are
really
geared
towards
the
contract
and
specific
geographical
areas,
and
that
way
we
can
really
focus
in
and
get
the
feedback
from
those
like
level,
one
stakeholders
that
I
mentioned
and
make
sure
that
they're
engaged
and
we
can
focus
on
the
movement
and
travel
patterns
in
that
area.
Q
So,
right
now
we
have
plans
for
five
construction
transportation
management
plans,
but
we
are
looking
at
maybe
even
subdividing
some
of
those
in
some
of
the
station
areas
based
on
the
specific
work
areas
and
the
design
packages
in
the
contract,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
these
plans
can
be
fluent
and
that
in
some
cases,
especially
like
at
Diridon
Station
in
downtown
that
we're
coordinating
with
some
of
the
other
development
that's
occurring
and
with
some
of
the
other
key
stakeholders.
Q
Next
major
effort
is
our
business
resource
program
and
in
that
program,
really
it's
about
preparing
and
helping
to
minimize
the
construction
related
disturbances,
specifically
to
small
businesses,
by
the
nature
of
what
we're
doing
with
this
project
with
the
single
board
tunnel,
it
really
did
reduce
the
level
of
surface
impacts,
but
it
doesn't
totally
eliminate
them.
Q
There
will
be
some
activity
happening
on
on
the
streets
and
on
the
sidewalks,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure,
through
this
plan,
that
we
can
ensure
visibility
and
access
during
construction,
and
then
we
also
have
an
environmental
commitment
that
we
developed
this
business
resource
program.
So
those
are
the
goals
for
the
program
next
slide.
Please.
Q
Foreign,
so
the
first
part
of
the
business
resource
program
and
it's
really
small
business
resource
program.
We
did
a
lot
of
analysis.
We
worked
actually
with
the
city
of
San
Jose
office
of
Economic
Development.
We
surveyed
businesses
we
needed
to
really
find
out
what
was
the
nature
of
these
businesses?
How
were
their
customers
accessing
them?
Things
have
really
changed,
especially
in
this
coveted,
related
World.
Q
Lots
of
businesses
have
already
become
much
more
communicative,
virtually
and
do
quite
a
bit
of
e-commerce,
but
there
are
a
significant
number
of
businesses
that
that
for
sure
definitely
rely
on
walk-in
traffic.
So
we
looked
at
this.
We've
also
engaged
a
consultant
that
put
together
the
small
resource
program
for
the
LA
Metro
project,
and
it
was
a
significant
program
and
they
worked
and
engaged
many
of
the
small
businesses
to
participate
in
the
program,
so
we're
taking
their
analysis
and
we
put
together.
Q
We
have
a
draft
plan
right
now
and
in
our
draft
plan
we
have
four
elements
of
that
plan
and
they
include
signage
and
wayfinding,
and
that
is
that
element.
We
talked
about
in
the
goals
of
ensuring
business
access
to
these
small
businesses.
Doing
some
marketing
shop,
local
marketing
campaigns
will
utilize
some
of
the
mechanism
and
fencing
and
signage
that
we
have
as
part
of
the
project
and
other
VTA
resources.
Q
Also,
some
technical
support
for
these
businesses
through
some
some
community-based
organizations
and
both
other
resources
to
help
a
small
business,
perhaps
build
a
website
help
with
some
of
the
advertising
Vehicles
they
may
not
be
familiar
with,
and
then
we
have
one
last
key
element
and
that
would
be
a
potential
Financial
Resources,
such
as
a
business
Interruption
fund,
and
that
would
be
very
much
not
a
one-size-fits-all.
Q
These
small
businesses
that
would
be
I
would
say
a
disproportionately
or
more
significantly
impacted
would
be
those
eligible
for
the
business
Interruption
fund
and
there
are
specific
criteria,
that's
being
developed
for
that
and
the
reason
we're
at
the
point.
We
are
right
now
and
we
will
be
presenting.
The
final
draft
is
that
once
again,
those
means
and
methods
really
determine
what
our
approach
will
be
both
for
traffic
management
and
this
business
resources
program
next
slide.
Please.
Q
So
the
next
steps,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
working
on
that
draft
plan.
We
plan
to
present
to
the
city
council
early
of
2023
sometime
in
the
first
quarter
and
then
we'll
finalize
the
development
and
begin
implementing
the
business
Reserve
program.
The
timing
will
coincide
with
our.
We
have
some
early
construction
Works
happening
in
2023,
but
for
sure
everything
will
be
in
place
for
the
major
construction
activities
in
2024.
Q
and
I.
Believe
that
is
my
last
slide.
Let
me
see
oh
station
or
find
this
I'm.
Sorry,
let
me
give
you
an
update
on
that
back
in
May,
the
board
requested
that
we
explore
and
make
public
the
findings
of
station
refinement
effort
with
the
goals
looking
at
enhancing
the
access
to
the
stations
and
both
the
passenger
experience
within
the
stations.
Q
Q
We
had
some
constraints
with
this,
and
that
was
to
look
at
these
possible
station
refinements
within
the
timelines
determined
by
the
Federal
Transit
Administration,
and
to
look
at
what
we
could
do
in
the
currently
approved
project,
not
impacting
the
project
as
related
to
significant
cost
increases
or
schedule
increases
next
slide.
Please.
Q
So
I
wanted
to
go
over
that
process.
As
I
mentioned,
it's
been
basically
an
effort
that
we've
been
working
on
since
May
very
comprehensively.
Over
the
summer
we
began
with
stakeholder
engagement
and
met
with
our
key
Partners
city
of
San
Jose
and
both
spur
and
looked
at
what
those
goals
of
the
problem
of
the
station
refinement
effort
were
that
I
just
discussed
with
you
about
enhancing
passenger
experience
and
access
to
the
stations.
Q
We
had
a
series
of
seven
workshops
focusing
on
each
of
the
individual
station
areas
and
different
elements
of
transit-oriented
development.
We
currently
are
right
now
in
the
process
of
technical
feasibility
evaluation.
We're
looking
at
both.
Can
this
be
delivered
by
the
contractors?
What
are
the
cost?
What
would
the
impacts
be
to
the
schedule?
Q
What
are
the
implications
environmentally
and
what
is
that
potential
Tod
and
the
opportunity
for
any
development
that
it
would
enable
to
actually
be
feasible
for
a
developer
once
we
advance
those,
we
had
initially
planned
to
present
that
maybe
in
December,
but
we
are
still
working
on
really
looking
at
some
of
the
more
intricacies
and
maybe
the
cost
benefit
of
each
of
these
proposed
station.
Q
Refinements
and
once
we've
got
that
level
of
detail,
we
will
be
presenting
to
the
VTA
board
for
feedback,
and
then
we
will
take
that
feedback
and
those
would
be
the
innovations
that
we
would
actually
incorporate
into
the
project
and
I.
Think
now
that
is
my
last
slide
and
I
apologize
for
getting
and
happy
I.
Don't
know
if
this
is
question
answer
time
haven't
answered
any
questions
should
you
have
them.
F
Thanks
Bernice
is
a
genre
so
again,
I
think
what
we're
going
to
do
is
finish
up
the
other
presentation
with
Neil
and
then
offer
to
have
questions
thanks.
Sure.
R
All
right
good
afternoon,
chair
committee
and
members
of
the
public
today
I'll
be
showcasing
the
exciting
progress
that
has
been
made
on
two
of
our
regional
projects
that
are
currently
in
construction.
The
one
one
Blossom
Hill
and
one
one
Trimble
De
La
Cruz,.
R
Before
I
start
just
want
to
emphasize
the
goals
that
our
team
has
when
it
comes
to
implementing
all
our
projects.
First
goal
is
to
modernize
our
existing
infrastructure
that
weren't
originally
designed
to
handle
the
growth
occurring
in
our
city.
Second,
freeways
have
acted
as
major
barriers
between
communities,
businesses,
schools
and
Recreations.
So
we
want
to
change
that
perception
by
providing
safe
and
direct
connections
through
our
interchanges,
third,
providing
connections
to
our
trails
and
by
ped
Network,
in
which
the
gaps
typically
occur
at
the
interchanges
due
to
the
old
designs
being
more
car
Centric.
R
The
first
project
is
the
US
101
Blossom
Hill
interchange,
located
in
South
San
Jose.
The
main
improvements
include
constructing
a
class
one
bike,
ped
path
along
the
north
side
of
the
Interchange
to
connect
Sanders
Crossing
in
the
west
to
Coyote
Creek
Trail
in
the
East.
We
are
also
widening
the
vehicular
bridge
to
accommodate
additional
Lane
in
each
Direction
and
make
room
for
the
bike
to
head
path
on
the
bridge.
Lastly,
we
modified
the
on
and
off
ramp
intersections
and
the
Monterey
Blossom
Hill
Intersection
For
Better
traffic
operations
and
multimodal
connectivity.
R
So
this
project
started
construction
back
in
September
2020
and
has
progressed
the
past
two
years
with
the
completion
of
the
major
construction
for
the
bike
ped
under
Crossing
and
over
Crossing
structures
and
the
vehicular
overcrossing
structure.
As
we'll
be
seeing
with
with
the
next
couple
of
slides.
R
The
first
set
of
pictures
are
the
construction
progress
from
beginning
to
completion
of
the
two
bike
ped
under
Crossing
structures.
This
was
designed
for
bikes
and
pets
to
go
underneath
both
the
on
and
off
ramps
instead
of
conflicting
with
vehicles
at
the
intersection.
R
The
next
set
of
pictures
showed
the
construction
progress
from
beginning
to
completion
of
the
bike
ped
over
crossing
bridge
over
the
on-ramp.
Again,
this
was
to
design
to
have
bikes
and
pads
go
over,
so
that
vehicle
is
trying
to
enter
northbound.
101
won't
conflict
with
them.
R
Last
set
of
pictures
showed
the
widening
of
the
vehicular
Bridge
structure
to
provide
additional
lanes
and
make
room
for
the
bike
ped
path,
separated
by
the
concrete
barrier.
Previously
there
were
two
separate
Bridge
structures
with
empty
space
in
the
middle,
so
the
project
filled
in
the
Gap,
with
a
new
structure.
R
With
the
major
construction
completed,
we
celebrated
the
ribbon
cutting
ceremony
on
November
18th,
with
our
partners
at
VTA,
Caltrans,
Consultants
contractors
and
former
city
staff.
We
also
had
our
elected
state
and
local
officials
attend
as
guests
speakers
and
attendees,
which
include
former
council
member
of
District
2
and
current
State
Assembly
member
ashkara
city,
mayor
Sam,
licardo
and
current
council
member
Sergio
Jimenez
of
District
2..
R
R
Although
we
completed
the
major
construction
aspects
of
the
project,
there
are
still
some
work
to
be
done.
Unfortunately,
there
was
a
delay
in
the
fabrication
of
the
visual
screens
that
provide
privacy
for
the
homes
that
run
behind
the
overcrossing.
So
we
put
temporary
fencing
with
slats
as
we
wait
for
the
final
product
to
be
installed.
R
Landscaping
is
still
being
done
throughout
the
project,
both
state
and
city
right
away.
And,
lastly,
we
need
to
activate
the
modified
and
new
signals
at
the
intersection
of
Monterey
and
Blossom
Hill.
We
anticipate
completion
of
the
remaining
work
by
early
2023
with
an
extra
year
for
the
plant
establishment
period.
R
Foreign
next
project
is
the
us-101
Trimble
De
La
Cruz
interchange,
located
in
the
North
San
Jose
next
to
the
airport
and
border
of
City
and
County
of
Santa
Clara.
The
main
improvements
include
constructing
a
class
one
bike,
ped
path
along
the
north
side
of
the
interchange,
using
the
same
elements
as
Blossom
Hill.
This
will
connect
the
Guadalupe
River
Trail
system
at
the
East
to
De
La,
Cruz,
Boulevard
and
Central
Expressway
in
the
west.
R
Foreign,
so
this
project
broke
ground
in
September
2021
and
has
been
progressing
with
most
of
the
work
concentrated
on
the
bridge.
The
bridge
is
actually
being
built
into
two
phases
in
order
to
avoid
closing
the
full
overcrossing
for
traffic
by
constructing
the
north
side
of
the
bridge.
First,
as
highlighted
and
keeping
the
existing
bridge
on
the
south
open
for
traffic,
once
the
north
side
of
the
bridge
is
completed,
we
will
shift
traffic
onto
the
newly
built
North
Bridge,
while
they
demolish
the
existing
bridge
and
construct
the
new
south
side
of
the
bridge.
R
R
R
So
I'm
not
sure
if
this
will
play
a
video-
hopefully
oh
no,
it
doesn't
anyways.
There
was
a
quick
time
collapse
that
we
were
hoping
to
show
to
you
all,
but
that
was
prepared
by
VTA
and
their
team.
That
shows
a
four
night
period
in
August,
in
which
several
75-foot
beams
were
lifted
in
place,
as
the
main
supports
for
the
new
North
Side
bridge.
R
This
north
side
of
the
bridge
is
expected
to
be
completed
by
early
next
year
for
traffic
to
switch
over
so
that
the
existing
Bridge
can
be
demolished
and
the
construction
of
the
new
South
Bridge
can
begin.
The
whole
project
is
expected
to
be
completed
by
2025,
with
work
also
being
on
the
bike.
Ped
path
with
the
under
Crossing
structure,
as
well
as
modifications
of
the
local
intersections
and
with
that.
That
concludes
our
presentation
and
we're
happy
to
take
your
feedback
or
questions.
B
Thank
you
Bernice
and
Neil
for
the
presentation.
Those
are
great
projects.
I'm,
looking
forward
to
the
Trimble
101
project
got
me
to
completion.
It's
going
to
be
great
for
North,
San,
Jose,
I'm
thinking
about
something
similar
on
the
east
side.
When
we're
talking
about
the
connection
from
San
Jose
to
Santa
Clara
bike
with
safe
bike
routes,
we
need
something
like
that.
Over
on
680
side,
maybe
the
Montague
880
interchange
will
give
us
that
opportunity.
Okay,
let's
go
to
questions
from
the
public.
S
Yes
possible
from
the
Horseshoe
I
wish.
We
could
ask
questions.
I,
wish
the
questions
from
the
public,
not
from
our
Representatives
but
from
the
public.
S
What
you
have
decided
should
be
the
best
benefit
for
my
life,
but
yet
you
accept
no
input.
You
accept
no
ability
for
me
to
ask
them
direct
questions,
and
that
is
not
democracy.
You
people
do
not
represent
me.
Nor
do
you
represent
the
interests
of
the
Chicano
communities
that
have
been
impacted
by
Transportation
issues,
two
burial
grounds,
one
in
South,
San
Jose,
when
the
85
was
being
built
and
then
the
VTA
running
the
light
rail,
two
native
orloni
burial
grounds
just
dug
up.
What
do
you
guys
do?
S
Oh,
that's,
okay,
we'll
just
bring
in
and
call
in
the
elders
they'll
come
in
there
do
the
ceremonies
and
we're
gonna
Breeze
right
through
that.
That's
the
kind
of
cavalier
attitude
that
this
city
has
and
it
and
it
disrespects
it
disrespects
the
very
people
whose
lives
are
impacted
by
those
Transportation
decisions,
and
you
don't
accept
any
kind
of
input
from
us
so
that
what
that
means
is
that
these
meetings
are
a
sham
they're,
a
sham
and
a
perversion
of
democracy,
they're
they're.
H
I
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here
thanks
for
the
words
of
Paul,
about
the
concepts
of
always
wanting
to
consider
open
democracy
I
for
this
item
to
speak
of
open
democracy,
this
the
VTA
they
have
a.
They
beat
the
board
of
directors
public
meeting
at
the
beginning,
Thursday
of
each
month.
They
just
had
their
December
meeting
this
past
week
and
there
were
issues
each
item
each
each
month.
I
Now
this
fall,
they've
been
addressing
issues
of
the
BART
extension
and
and
the
eminent
domain
is
used
and
and
the
purchasing
of
land
for
the
homes
in
the
area
and
or
or
businesses
and
buildings,
and
there
was
just
simply
some
really
beautiful
buildings
over
on
the
corner
of
a
third
and
Santa
Clara
that
they
claimed
that
they
were
going
to
own
and
tear
down
to
make
way
for
the
BART,
and
these
were
very
nice
buildings.
I
hope
that
it's
gotten
a
bit
of
press
and
that
it
can
be
reconsidered.
I
How
to
work
around
these
I
mean
old
buildings
in
San.
Jose
should
be
a
treasure
and
good
luck
to
address
that
issue,
and
this
will
be
an
ongoing
item
for
issue
in
VOD
meetings
for
the
next
few
months.
I
think
good
luck
on
how
to
work
on
that
and
to
speak
simply
to
the
future
of
Transportation
issues.
I
I
didn't
speak
at
that
meeting.
I
I
wish
I
did
about
the
importance
of
learning
how
to
centralize
the
future
of
Light
Rail
service
for
transportation
issues
in
the
future
of
the
area
by
centralizing
and
making
it
the
focus
of
Santa
Clara
County
Transit.
We
can
then
have
buses
that
radiate
radiate
around
the
Light
Rail
cancer
stops,
and
that
creates
a
different
form
of
transportation
that
we
need
a
bit
of
inspiration.
I'll
talk
more
later
on
this
item.
Thank.
B
Thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
hands
from
my
colleagues.
I
have
one
question
for
Bernice.
It's
actually
I
think
a
similar
to
what
Blair
just
raised,
but
at
the
on
between
89
and
97
Santa
Clara
Street,
there's
a
building
where
there's
supposed
to
be
ventilation
and
some
surface
entry
points
to,
but
not
a
station
was
that
what
is
there?
Was
there
a
discussion
about
how
that
can
be
located
without
having
to
use
that
pet
building?
I
mean
I
know
that
probably
happened
at
VTA
meeting.
Q
Yeah
there
was
there
was
extensive
discussion
and
there
was
a
resolution
of
necessity
that
the
board
voted
on
I
think
you
said:
97
Santa,
Clara
Street.
If
I
heard
you
correctly
right,
so
all
of
the
properties,
you
know,
there's
extensive
analysis.
They
were
evaluated
in
the
environmental
document
and
then
further
analysis.
Q
But
I
just
want
to
emphasize
like
that.
That
is
a
process,
that's
handled
through
vta's
real
estate
department
and
they
work
very
closely.
They
have
Federal
requirements
for
relocation
plans
and
just
compensation,
so
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
that
they
do
work
with.
If
there's
a
business
in
a
location
or
there
are
tenants
in
a
building,
they
work
with
them
for
relocations,
and
we
have
relocation
plans
that
are
developed
for
each
of
those
properties.
B
B
I
I
didn't
I,
don't
I,
don't
doubt
that
the
process
will
be
handled
appropriately.
I
just
was
curious
because
that
building
has
space.
There's
some
space
next
to
the
building
and
I
was
just
curious
about
the
decision
making
about
the
about
the
location
of
the
vent
ventilation
and
whether
it
was
necessary
to
utilize
the
building
or
not
and.
Q
Yeah,
they
did
extensive
analysis
to
look
what
could
fit
on
each
of
those
parcels
and
there
was
just
not
a
way
because,
in
addition,
you
know
to
egress
facilities,
the
ventilation
facilities.
There
was
above
ground
and
basement
level
facilities,
and
they
just
could
not
fit
it
and
there
were
implications
to
impacts
to
the
next
property.
So
there
was
not
a
way
to
eliminate
the
use
of
that
property.
C
B
Okay,
thank
you
on
to
item
D4
major
Local
transportation,
planning
status,
report,
I,
think
Wilson,
or
is
it
Ramsey's?
One
of
you
is.
F
Thank
you
again,
chair
John,
ristow,
director
of
transportation,
and
this
item
will
highlight
some
of
the
major
transportation
planning
that
we're
doing
and
with
me
is
Ramses
madhu
division
manager
and
Wilson
Tam.
Our
planning
manager
for
planning.
Thank
you
and
I
think
you
guys
are
ready
to
go
thanks.
T
John
Ramses
madou,
a
division
manager,
planning
policy
and
sustainability.
T
T
This
year
has
been
a
very
big
year.
There
we
go
for
Transportation
Planning
in
San
Jose
we've
brought
to
you
the
downtown
Transportation
plan,
the
emerging
Mobility
plan,
the
move,
San
Jose
plan,
which
is
the
Citywide
Transportation
plan
and
we'll
be
bringing
you
West,
San
Jose
tomorrow,
as
well
as
some
big
policy
moves
as
well.
T
Overall
we're
working
ourselves
into
this
structure
here,
where
using
the
guiding
policies
of
the
city,
such
as
in
the
general
plan
and
climate
smart,
we're
then
constructing
the
the
the
big
plan
Museum,
which
you
already
adopted
to
kind
of
guide.
All
of
the
other
plans,
such
as
our
modal
plans,
like
our
better
bike,
waste
plan
and
emerging
Mobility
plan,
which
then
inform
our
multimodal
transportation
Improvement
plans,
which
are
our
transportation
area
plans,
it
all
kind
of
comes
into
one
big
system.
T
That
makes
sure
that
everything
is
evaluated
from
a
single
perspective
and
projects
are
being
evaluated
equally
and
made
sure
we're
bringing
everything
forward
to
the
which,
which
ones
move
the
needles
the
best
all
of
this
is
under
the
root
the
there
we
go.
The
goals
of
move,
San,
Jose,
just
kind
of
reminding
the
the
committee
about
this.
T
These
are
the
overall
goals
that
we,
as
dot,
will
be
using
or
are
using
to
evaluate
and
drive
our
work
when
looking
at
new
projects
and
which
efforts
we
should
be
prioritizing
next
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
pass
it
off
to
Wilson
who's,
going
to
talk
a
bit
about
our
upcoming
efforts.
L
L
U
Thank
you,
Wilson
Tam,
Transportation,
Planning
manager,
at
Dot
and
as
Ramsey
said.
So
all
these
hierarchy
of
planning
processes
were
stamped
from
the
idea
that
the
city
has
a
very
ambitious
climate
goals
and
we
really
want
to
create
a
community-based
planning
process
to
identify
strategies
and
Associated
projects
and
programs
to
be
implemented
in
the
city
over
the
next
20
and
30
years.
U
So
what
is
presented
to
you
in
front
of
you
right
now
is
you
know
some
of
the
existing
area-wide
Transportation
plans
that
the
city
have
either
adopted
or
about
to
be
adopted,
and
so,
as,
as
you
know,
East
San
Jose.
The
council
has
adopted
the
mofumiendo
plan
in
2021
and
also
adopted
the
downtown
Transportation
plan
just
last
month,
and
we
are
about
to
present
to
the
council
the
West
Jose
M
tip
next
tomorrow.
U
You
know,
I
forgot
to
mention
about
mtep
stands
for
multimodal
transportation,
Improvement
plans,
which
are
actually
the
companion
Transportation
plan
for
areas
in
the
city
where
the
city
envisions
intensified
growth
I
mean
so.
These
M
tips
are
meant
to
identify
a
list
of
prioritized
projects
and
programs
to
be
implemented
to
accommodate
future
growth,
as
well
as
addressing
the
existing
Community
Transportation
needs.
U
U
So
you
know,
as
we
know,
that,
like
after
the
East,
San
Jose,
downtown
and
West
San
Jose
areas
are
or
or
about
to
have
a
Transportation
plan
that
serves
a
very
good
East-West
directional
backbone
for
the
city
and
what
comes
next
is
to
work
towards
the
north-south
direction.
So,
as
you
can
see
here,
you
know,
after
these
three
area
plans
are
adopted.
U
Dot
is
ready
to
embark
on
two
additional
M
tips
in
the
city,
including
the
Berryessa
M
tip,
as
well
as
the
North
San
Jose
m-tip.
It's
worth
mentioning
that
Berry
SM
tip
was
actually
a
project
that
have
started
a
few
years
ago
and
due
to
staff
shortage
and
other
issues,
we
would
like
to
prioritize
the
development
of
the
pre
aforementioned
three
plans.
First,
before
mating
the
process
for
the
Berryessa
area.
U
So
after
the
M
tips
are
developed,
the
next
step
is
for
duty
to
Embark
the
design
phase
for
some
of
the
projects
identified
it
in
the
area,
plans
and
most
of
the
plants.
Most
of
the
corridors
can
be
designed
internally
by
dot,
but
there
are
also
other
major
corridors
that,
due
to
the
multi-jurisdictional
nature,
and
also
that
they
there
are
many
stakeholders
along
the
corridor,
may
require
a
multi-agency
effort
to
really
conduct
a
more
detailed
design
phase
for
these
projects.
U
So
if
I
can
direct
our
eyes
onto
just
the
blue
lines
on
this
map,
you
will
see
that
the
city
is
about
to
kick
start
on.
You
know
a
few
corridors
that
have
been
identified
by
the
M
tips
to
have
a
big
Transportation
projects
coming
forward.
So
including
you
know,
as
you
can
see
here,
Steven's
Creek
vision
and
study.
U
We
have
product
with
a
city
of
Cupertino,
the
county
of
Santa
Clara,
the
City
of
Santa
Clara,
the
VTA
and
us
to
to
to
work
on
this
Transit
priority
projects
on
Stevens,
Creek,
Santa,
Clara
Street
is
a
project
that
is
identified
as
a
big
move
in
the
downtown
Transportation
plan,
and
so
after
the
council
adoption
of
the
plan
just
last
month,
we
are
ready
to
kick
start
on
moving
forward
with
one
of
the
big
moves:
Santa
Clara
Street
to
work
with
the
VTA
board
and
other
stakeholders
to
really
maximize
the
transportation
potential
that
these
Transit
infrastructure
have
presented
on
Santa
Clara,
Street,
King
Road
is
also
worth
mentioning
here
as
the
M
tips,
as
you
can
see
on
the
screen
right
here.
U
That
only
covers
a
segment
of
King
Road.
It's
really
important
for
us
to
acknowledge
that
there
are
also
other
parts
of
kingroot
that
have
not
been
studied
as
an
m-tip,
but
with
that
area
have
a
lot
of
like
disadvantaged
communities,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
plan
out
the
cane
Road
Corridor,
that
it
deserves
a
subsequent
planning
process,
especially
in
the
south
side
of
of
King
Road.
U
So
we
have
secured
a
grant
to
conduct
a
code
or
study
on
Cane
Road
in
particular,
focusing
on
the
area
of
Cambridge
south
of
280..
Monterey.
Road
is
also
a
Transit
study
that
we
are
going
to
Kickstart
next
year.
With
the
idea
of
you
know,
implementing
quick,
build,
Transit
priority
features
as
well
as
along
the
southern
side
of
Monterey
Road.
U
We
have
partnered
with
Peninsula
open
space,
trust,
Santa,
Clara,
County,
open
space
Authority,
as
well
as
the
candle
of
Santa
Clara
to
to
work
on
a
wildlife
Crossing
study
along
the
southern
side
of
Monterey
Road
between
Metcalf
and
Bailey
Avenue,
to
really
figure
out
how
to
improve
the
streets
and
the
existing
Wildlife
Crossing
structures
to
improve
Wildlife
Crossing,
and
that
could
mean
some
reconfiguration
proposals
along
the
street
infrastructure.
T
And
we
want
to
say
a
huge
thank
you
to
the
Monterey
working
group
for
initiating
the
thought
and
and
work
on.
That's
motivating
the
Monterey
Road
Transit
study.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
We'll
move
to
comments
from
the
public.
I
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here
thanks
a
lot
for
wanting
to
be
considering
the
future
of
Transportation.
I
I
I,
don't
think
we're
quite
in
that
same
space,
thankfully,
and
I
think
we've
prepared
kind
of
some
interesting
things
based
on.
Actually
you
know
Muni
and
Bart
services
so
for
years,
has
been
a
a
real
thing.
We
can
count
on
and
so
a
thank
you
to
that.
I
I
hope
we
can
help
Barton
this
time
and
and
Muni
Regional
issues
of
Transit
I
hope
can
be
hopeful
in
the
in
the
coming
years
and
that
we,
this
is
a
time
to
really
start
the
focus
that
we
can
bring
back
the
concepts
of
mass
transit
if
we
can
in
certain
ways
and
not-
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
totally
fearful
good
luck-
how
we
can
do
that
in
such
a
sad
time
with
this
covid
good
luck,
how
to
really
do
that
we're
trying
to
patch
things
together
and
I
think
we're
doing
some
interesting
work
in
San
Jose.
I
Thank
you
for
the
the
VTA
issues
I
mentioned
earlier,
oh
and
of
course
the
first
mention
good
luck
in
in
offering
open
and
accountability
with
all
the
tech
that
will
be
in
the
future.
I
These
Transportation
projects
that
really
helps
the
concepts
of
community
Harmony
a
lot
and
open
democratic
practices,
good
sustainability,
positive
feelings
with
all
that
in
mind
to
quickly
offer
the
VTA
ideas
Light
Rail,
to
make
that
the
center
of
our
future-
and
you
know,
to
have
buses
travel
in
in
Five,
Mile
concentric
circles
around
the
light
rail
Transit
stops
is
a
way
to
refocus
our
feelings
and
and
attention
towards
a
good
light
rail
system
in
the
future.
I
I
think
and
it
can
save
you
know,
wear
and
tear
on
buses,
gas
and
it's
it's
over
how
good
practices
that
I
hope
can
be
considered.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
S
Yes,
Paul
something
from
the
Horseshoe,
where
do
I
start
number
one:
it's
disgusting,
that
this
city
continues
to
neglect
the
historical
injustices
that
were
experiencing
subsequedes,
which
is
all
the
area
in
which
you
were
talking
about.
South,
King,
Road
I,
know
that,
because
my
father
grew
up
my
mother
by
abuelitas,
my
grandmothers
all
grew
up
in
tense
in
Nevada
and
the
reason
why
they
called
it
sarsi
puedes
was
because
there
was
no
infrastructure,
absolutely
none
dirt
roads
and
these
kids
during
the
winter.
S
This
time
of
year
would
have
to
walk
in
the
mud,
and
then
they
went
to
school
and
were
called
Dirty
Mexicans.
Okay
and
the
Mexicans
that
that
supposedly
Mexicans
on
this
Council
that
they
claim
rasa
where's
your
rasa
advocacy
now
I,
don't
see
it
in
these
policy
decisions.
Okay,
because
you
were
I
want
to
know
one
thing.
Let
me
give
you
statistical
facts.
You,
like
data
points,
I'm
going
to
give
you
a
data
point
37
of
traffic
fatalities
happen
on
three
percent
of
the
land
mass
in
San
Jose.
S
Let
me
repeat
that
30
of
the
fatalities
happen
on
three
percent
of
the
land.
Mass
I
want
to
know
the
answer
to
one
question:
did
you
use
that
statistical
fact
in
order
to
get
this
grant
money?
That's
what
I
want
to
know
and
I
want
to
know
that
from
the
D.O.T.
Oh,
you
answered
to
me.
Homeboy,
you
don't
answer
the
council.
D
F
You-
and
we
will
continue
with
our
street
sweeping
overview
and
with
me
today-
is
Rick
Scott.
My
deputy
director
of
infrastructure
management
infrastructure
maintenance,
along
with
Eric
Cohen
and
Jennifer
Sagan,
so
Rick,
anytime,
you're,
ready
I
think
we
can
start.
X
Of
Transportation
for
the
seditarian
storm,
sewer,
operation
and
maintenance
program
and
our
ESD
colleagues
did
a
great
job
of
teeing
us
up
today
with
their
earlier
discussion
of
the
municipal
Regional
stormwater
permit.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
So
I'll
skip
down
to
the
purpose
of
street
sweeping
is
to
prevent
pollutants
from
entering
the
storm
drains
and
waterways
pollutants,
including
things
in
provision
C10
through
C
13
of
the
permit,
including
sediment
trash
nutrients.
Toxic
Metals
such
as
Copper
from
vehicle
brake
pads
and
organic
material.
X
A
lot
of
people
think
street
sweeping
is
for
beautification,
but
really
the
Genesis
of
it
is
for
pollutant
removal
off
the
streets.
Next
slide,
please.
So
in
San,
Jose
street
sweeping
is
delivered
by
two
teams.
The
residential
streets
are
swept
once
a
month
by
the
residential
contractor
green
waste.
X
They
also
deliver
up
to
20
enhanced
sweeps
per
year,
where
signs
are
posted
in
areas
impacted
by
parking
to
remove
the
cars
to
give
the
sweeper
access
to
the
curb
in
the
residential
areas.
Approximately
20
percent
of
the
routes
are
367
miles,
have
parking
restrictions
and
they
sweep
approximately
36
000
curb
miles
per
year,
which
is
about
54
of
all
the
street.
Sweeping
the
other
side
of
the
program
is
delivered
by
City
in-house
Crews.
X
They
sweep
a
higher
frequency,
so
downtown
is
swept
nightly.
Our
business
districts
are
swept
twice
per
week
and
arterial
streets
and
bikeways
are
swept
two
times
per
month,
although
we
overlay
during
The
Leaf
Drop
season
and
try
and
remove,
leaves
from
bike
Lanes
a
lot
more
frequently.
X
The
in-house
City
crews
are
employed
by
the
department
of
transportation
we
actually
own
the
sweepers
for
the
streets
and
the
bike
Lanes.
You
can
see
in
the
picture
to
the
right,
a
narrow
bike,
lane
that's
being
swept
by
the
street
super
that
we
specifically
purchased
for
narrow
areas
we
routinely
sweep
and
respond
to
calls
when
needed.
Since
the
sweepers
are
in-house.
V
Thank
you
Jennifer
good
afternoon,
members
of
the
committee.
My
name
is
Eric
Hahn
and
I'm.
The
landscape
and
traffic
maintenance
division
manager
within
Dot's
infrastructure
maintenance
division.
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
residential
street
sweeping
program
provides
monthly
street
sweeping
in
residential
streets
throughout
the
city
using
green
waste,
DOT
inspection
staff
oversee
the
in-field
sweeping
inspections,
while
the
Environmental
Services
Department
ESD
manages
the
actual
green
waste
contract,
Dot's
Inspection
Team
ensures
the
neighborhood,
sweeping
routes
are
getting
swept,
meaning
every
route
is
completed
and
sweepers
are
being
effective.
V
Getting
up
against
the
curb
inspectors,
also
identify
obstructions
such
as
parked
cars,
low
hanging,
tree
branches
and
items
left
in
streets
such
as
recycling,
bins,
basketball,
hoops
cones
for
parking
in
some
areas.
Inspectors
also
assist
Property
Owners
by
providing
information
on
sweeping
frequencies
and
responding
to
questions
or
concerns,
and
we
also
work
very
closely
with
the
parking
compliance
team
to
ensure
coordination
is
conducted
prior
to
any
enhanced
sweeps
and
other
special
cleanup
efforts.
Lastly,
the
inspection
team
tracks.
V
The
request
for
street
sweeping
signage
and
conduct
parking
impact
studies
to
determine
if
the
requested
locations
meet
the
street
sweeping
signage
criteria.
Next
slide,
please,
the
images
in
this
slide
show
some
of
the
most
common
issues
that
impact
street
sweeping
large
debris.
Piles
must
be
avoided
by
sweeper
operators
because
there
can
be
hidden
items
within
the
piles
that
can
damage
equipment
or
cause
other
problems,
for
example
on
the
picture
to
the
left.
You
never
know
what's
actually
in
there.
V
If
something
is
buried
within
there,
the
sweeper
brooms,
when
they
sweep,
could
actually
send
that
you
know
undefined
object
out
into
the
street
and
so
forth.
So
we
always
avoid
those
we
use
other
measures.
Sometimes
it
could
be
other
programs
to
go
clean
up
the
debris
so
that
the
sweepers
can
continue
resuming
getting
up
against
the
curb
another.
Calming
sweeping
issue
are
the
trees
with
branches
that
hang
below
14
feet,
and
you
can
see
that
on
the
picture
on
the
right,
the
sweepers
cannot
get
under
the
low
hanging
branches
and
risk
damaging
the
sweepers.
V
When
there's
low
hanging
trees,
the
inspector
will
forward
the
location
to
the
arborist
staff
within
dot
who
generated
notice
to
the
property
owner,
letting
them
know
that
tree
pruning
is
needed.
The
middle
picture
shows
the
impacts
of
parked
Vehicles
parked.
Cars
are
probably
the
greatest
impediment
to
street
sweeping
one
parked
car
results
in
nearly
three
car
lengths
of
space
that
can't
be
swept
because
the
sweepers
are
not
maneuverable
street
sweeping
signage
is
one
way
to
address
the
issues
with
parked
cars.
However,
signage
can
only
be
installed
when
funding
is
available.
Enhanced
sweeps
are
another
option.
V
The
street
sweeping
program
as
a
whole
largely
delivers
what
it
is
funded
to
do.
The
effectiveness
of
the
sweeps
is
determined
by
using
a
five-point
scale.
A
score
of
five
indicates
an
effective
and
complete
sweep.
If
there
are
barriers
that
prevent
sweepers
from
coming
close
to
the
curb,
then
this
will
result
in
a
lower
rating,
sweeping
inspection
staff,
actively
inspect
sweeping
routes
and
are
instrumental
in
working
with
proper
owners
to
eliminate
sweeping
barriers,
and
that
concludes
my
portion.
W
Okay,
thank
you
Eric
and
Jennifer.
My
name
is
Rick
Scott
deputy
director
dot
infrastructure,
maintenance
division.
In
addition
to
the
measures
that
Eric
just
discussed,
we
track
the
miles
of
per
miles
completed
by
our
sweepers.
Again.
This
is
two
separate
groups.
We
have
the
city
Crews
and
the
contractor
residential
street
sweeping
for
the
city.
W
Cruise
route
completion
is
tracked
via
a
system
called
telematics,
so
we're
able
to
see
where
a
sweeper
is
at
all
time
at
all
times
to
ensure
that
the
work
is
completed
and
if
there
are
missed
areas
they
are
typically
completed
on
Fridays,
not
an
extra
shift
for
RSS.
We
do
have
inspectors,
as
Eric
mentioned,
that
inspect
every
route
on
each
day,
they're
not
on
every
single.
They
don't
follow
the
sweeper
on
the
entire
route,
but
they
do
spot
check
each
route
and
the
the
contractors
are
obligated
to
complete
every
route.
W
So,
as
you
can
see
from
our
completion
percentages,
we
have
had
some
challenges
in
particularly
last
year
with
Staffing
and
equipment,
and
we
were
able
to
make
some
improvements
in
2122
and
hope
to
continue
that
trend
of
completing
all
the
miles
that
are
assigned
to
our
sweepers.
W
There
also
was
an
audit
back
in
2016.
There
were
14
recommendations
and
13
of
14
of
those
have
been
implemented
fully.
As
of
today.
We
have
one
in
progress
that
is
largely
dependent
on
the
procurement
of
equipment,
and
that
this,
this
recommendation
in
particular,
was
there
were
street
sweeping
debris
that
was
emptied
onto
the
street
as
a
staging
area
before
it
could
be
taken
away
for
its
final
resting
place.
W
We
are
currently
again
in
the
process
of
procuring
the
hook,
Lift
Truck
and
bins
to
be
able
to
complete
that
recommendation,
but
we
are
close
to
having
that
closed
out
and
just
as
a
reference
for
any
residents.
That
might
be
curious.
If
you
want
to
look
up
when
your
sweep
day
is
here
is
the
website.
This
is
just
an
example
of
what
you
would
see.
It
provides
many
different
service
cycles
and
days
for
you,
but
right
there
is
street
sweeping.
W
So
you
can
see
when
your
day
is
again
about
13
percent
of
our
miles
are
signed,
so
the
rest
of
them,
you
know,
relies
on
residents
being
aware
of
when
that
sweep
is
occurring
for
their
neighborhood
for
the
sweep
to
be
effective.
So
that
concludes
our
report.
We
are
all
standing
by
for
your
questions.
I
Here,
I
just
wanted
to
thank
yourselves
for
this
item
in
in
myself,
transitioning
down
to
San
Diego.
I
There
is
some
beautiful
old
buildings
and
old
architecture
here
that
actually
the
same
Architects
used
to
work
in
San,
Jose
and
there's
similar
buildings.
So
it's
sad
I
would
hate
to
lose
some
buildings
in
San
Jose,
and
it's
been
a
good
experience
for
me
on
that
and
from
that
in
San,
Diego
they're,
also
working
on
these
street
sweeper
issues
and
they're
dipping
into
their
general
fund
to
pay.
I
For
you
know
the
program
and
for
you
know
in
what
case
for
like
Revenue
in
in
tickets
and
their
new
ticket
prices,
you
know
the
the
big
issue
was
that
I
mean
they're
raising
them
by
about
15
20
bucks
for
a
ticket
violation,
and
you
know
in
parking
in
Sweet
street
sweeping
areas.
I
I
I,
just
I've,
warn
yourselves
at
this
time
as
a
way
to
head
and
work
on
those
good
practices.
You
know
it
is
part
I.
Think
of
the
future
of
developing.
You
know
future
practices
where
people
don't
have
to
be
ticketed.
So
much
or
not,
you
know
fine,
so
much
steeply.
You
know
for
such
violations
so
and
it's
it's
it's
it's
related
to
the
general
fund.
L
I
S
Yes,
also
from
the
two
you
have
data
to
provide
to
me
as
a
as
a
citizen.
Your
job
is
predicated
on
my
tax
dollars,
and
so,
when
you
come
to
these
meetings,
I
want
to
know
exactly
my
data
points
which
one's
getting
the
most
service.
I
I,
don't
want
the
work,
that's
what
I
pay
you
to
do.
I
pay
you
to
come
to
these
meetings
and
give
data
that
I
need,
because
you
have
that
at
me.
S
Okay,
so
what
I
want
to
know
is
buy
a
code
who's
getting
the
most
service,
also
by
neighborhood
in
my
neighborhood,
getting
ticketed
the
most
for
these
street
sweeping
issues,
because
these
are
a
pretty
issue
and
they'll
put
up
on
the
equity
roads,
councilman
paralysis,
councilman
paralysis
about
three
years
ago,
gave
a
presentation
about
streets
and
seeing
how
certain
skit
service,
sooner
than
others,
and
how
the
lack
of
service
with
respect
to
streets
accelerates,
the
wear
and
tear
on
vehicles
on
cars,
and
so
that
was
just
specifically
towards
the
infrastructure
in
terms
of
the
streets
and
the
roads.
S
But
that's
what
this
topic
is,
and
so
what
that
did?
Is
it
taught
me
on
the
different
applications
of
equity,
okay,
and
so
the
other
question
that
I
have
for
you
is:
do
you
think
that
equity
is
relevant
to
this
topic
issue
and
if
it
is,
why
isn't
it
here
an
equity
analysis,
and
if
it
is
not
here,
the
answer
to
that
question
needs
to
be
answered.
Why?
Why
is
it
also
or
you
use
any
Grant
monies
that
is
predicated
to
form
the
debts
of
those?
S
Is
there
any
money
that
is
being
used
to
Grant
monies
that
are
being
used,
that
is
predicated
upon
the
deaths
of
homeless
people
in
this
city?
These
are
relevant
questions
and
it's
getting
really
sickening
in
the
entiresome
of
the
dehumanization
that
you
continue
to
perpetuate
in
these
meetings
by
not
thinking
that
you
have
to
answer
them
because
I
represent
the
public
and
the
Chicano
community
and
the
homeless
community.
B
Okay,
well,
thank
you
for
the
report.
It
rocked
our
world.
Obviously
we're
gonna
go
on
to
comments
from
from
colleagues
we'll
start
with
councilmember
Davis.
G
Thank
you
Vice
chair
and
thank
you
for
sharing
today.
I've
tested
positive
for
kova
this
morning
and
didn't
want
to
try
to
do
this
on
Zoom,
so
I
appreciate
you
doing
that
in
person
and
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
the
report.
I
really
appreciate
you
putting
this
together.
I
have
some
questions
about
about
the
the
residential
street
sweeping
in
particular
you
I
think
Rick.
You
said
that
the
the
contractor
is
contractually
obligated
to
complete
street
sweeping
what
are
the
criteria?
Is
it
just
a
pass
fail?
G
Either
you
go
through
the
street
or
you
don't,
because
we've
I've
personally
seen
and
I
know
many
other
of
my
residents
have
personally
seen
them
going
very
quickly
and,
and
sometimes
it
doesn't
even
seem,
like
they're
they're,
going
to
be
able
to
pick
anything
up
because
of
how
fast
they're
going,
whether
it's
against
the
curve
or
not
against
the
curve,
which
is
a
separate
issue
and
I,
know
that
there
are
reasons
why
they
might
not
be
against
the
curb.
W
V
You
Rick
and
thank
you
councilmember
Davis.
The
contractor
is
required
to
sweep
every
curb
in
every
route.
So
when
this
happens,
if
this
is
happening,
I
would
encourage
residents
and
yourself
and
your
team
to
call
this
into
our
residential
street
sweeping
program
phone
number
I
can
provide
that
for
you
later.
It's
4087.
V
Great,
so
what
happens
is
we
would
need
to
do
the
assessment
and
kind
of
follow
up
if
there
is
a
Miss
sweep
the
contractor?
If
it's
within
before
by
about
two
o'clock
in
the
day,
they
can
actually
go
back
out
and
sweep
that
same
day.
Typically,
we
will
make
it
up
within
the
same
week.
So
it's
really
incumbent
upon
us
to
be
made
aware
of
the
the
issues
with
the
sweeping
routes,
and
then
we
can
follow
up
directly
with
the
reporting
party
as
well.
G
Is
there
any
plan
to
put
the
same
tracking
on
the
contractors
Vehicles
as
we
have
on
our.
V
G
Okay,
I
and
I
I
just
like
to
I
guess
we
we
report.
G
That's
I
think
that's
an
equity
issue,
honestly
that
we
need
to
address.
W
Yes,
councilmember,
that's
a
that's
a
good
point.
You
know,
in
addition,
I
think
we
when
we
get
a
report,
you
know
sometimes
of
the
of
the
sweeper
going
fast
down
the
middle
of
the
street.
We
investigate
each
of
those
cases
that
come
in
you
know
and
almost
always
it's
a
situation
where
they
weren't
able
to
access
the
curb,
but
it
is
really
a
case-by-case
basis
as
far
as
what's
occurring,
and
we
have
a
really
good
relationship
with
green
waste
and
we
talk
to
them
almost
every
day.
W
So
we're
able
to
call
it
like
Eric
said
call
them
back
if
it's
within
a
certain
time
and
really
when
it
comes
to
you
know
installing
telematics
on
the
sweepers
it
is,
there
is
a
provision
for
it
in
the
contract.
It
is
something
we
could
potentially
do.
I
think.
The
question
we
always
have
to
ask
is:
what
what
is
it
telling
us
you
know?
Is
it?
Is
it
actionable
information
that
can
make
the
program
more
effective?
G
I
hope
that
the
next
time
you
bring
this
street
sweeping
report
to
this
committee
that
you
bring
us
some
options
for
that
and
some
pros
and
cons,
and
what
the
what
the
available
information
will
be
on
the
on
that
telematics
I
mean.
Clearly,
we
think
it's
useful.
We
have
it
on
our
own
city-owned
on
our
own
city-owned
Vehicles.
G
Points
I
have
not
seen
a
great
job
being
done
and
I
know
it's.
It's
part
of
a
throwaway
part
of
their
contract
because
it's
more
about
garbage
than
it
is
about
street
sweeping
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have.
We
continue
to
have
these
discussions
with
them.
G
I'll
move
on
I
have
other
questions,
enhanced
sweeps.
We
do
20
a
year.
How
how
are
these
streets
chosen
and
are
they
being
evenly
distributed
across
across
the
districts
or
how?
How
do
we
get
them.
V
Usually
this
is
actually
the
requests
come
from
the
community.
It
can
actually
come
from
the
council
offices
from
all
over,
so
we
don't
have
a
set
number
of
streets
that
we
go
out.
We
do
that,
based
on
our
own
observations
and
the
reports
that
we
get,
that
sweeps
are
not
happening,
that
there's
a
large
debris
build
up.
G
Okay,
so
the
20
per
year
is
not
they're
obligated
to
do
20
enhanced
sweeps
per
year.
It's
just
we
do
about
20
per
year.
We.
V
Have
been,
we
are
contracted
up
to
20,
but
since
the
contract
actually
renewed
in
2021,
we
were
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
the
pandemic.
We
actually
did
not
do
any
enhanced
sweeps
in
the
previous
fiscal
year,
because
parking
compliance
was
not
able
to
staff,
provide
the
Staffing
support
plus.
We
also
recognize
that
there
were
a
lot
of
folks
who
did
work
from
home,
so
we
did
not
want
to
further
kind
of
add
to
the
chaos
in
the
streets,
but
we.
V
To
sorry,
we
are
looking
to
begin
resuming
the
enhanced
Suites
beginning
January
of
2023.
G
Okay,
again,
I
would
like
to
to
request
that
the
next
time
this
report
is
brought
to
this
committee,
that
there
is
information
about
how
many
sweeps
have
been
done
in
each
of
the
past
say
five
years
with
the
most
recent
year,
the
streets
being
listed
out
and
I'm
making
that
part
of
my
motion
to
accept
this
report.
G
With
these
with
these
requests
and
then
my
third
question
is
about
signing
more
streets,
so
we
have
some
areas
of
town
where
people
move
in
and
out
quite
a
bit,
there's
and
and
they
might
live
in
multi-family
units,
so
they
live
in
apartments
where
they
may
not
know
how
to
even
find
out
what
the
street
sweeping
schedule
is.
Is
there
any
plan
for
signing
streets?
Do
we
have
anything
about
adding
more
signage
to
streets
about
what
the
street
sweeping
day
is.
W
You
know
to
add
signage,
physical
signage,
there's
a
significant
cost
and
again
it
becomes
a
policy
decision
and
a
desire
not
only
to
allocate
the
funding
but
within
the
community.
It's
often
a
very
unpopular
decision
to
add,
signed
sweeping
routes
because
it
impacts
parking
in
a
severely
impacted
area.
So
that's
again
we
do
have
a
queue.
W
I,
don't
know
how
many
are
in
the
queue
right
now
we
do
have
a
queue
of
several
areas
that
we've
done
received,
a
request
and
a
parking
assessment
figured
out
the
impact
and
then
upon
availability
of
funds
were
able
to
potentially
add
that
both
to
the
sign
inventory
and
then
there's
also
the
parking
enforcement
issue-
that's
quite
expensive,
but
there
is
again
without
without
specific
direction
or
funding.
W
There's
no
way
for
us
to
expand
that
program
and
then
there's
also
an
element
of
renegotiating
a
piece
of
the
contract
with
green
waste
when
those
areas
are
requested.
So
there's
I
think
we
mentioned
the
memo.
Don't
have
it
offhand,
but
they're
I
think
for
every
100
miles
it's
what's
that
781!
It's
about
eight
eight
hundred
thousand
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
every
100
miles
signed
that
we
would
add.
G
V
Additional
36
000
to
the
contract
for
the
sweeper
because
sign
miles
trigger
a
higher
rate
for
the
contractor
because
they.
W
The
elements
are
again,
you
know
that's
the
desire
of
the
community,
which
is
not
always
a
sure
thing,
even
if
there's
parking
impact
and
then
the
availability
of
funds
and
the
desire
to
fund
that
work.
G
G
So
for
I
I'll
I'll
make
a
motion
to
accept
the
report
with
a
request
for
the
next
report
that
comes
to
counts
to
this
committee,
to
include
kind
of
a
cost-benefit
analysis
and
discussion
about
telematics
on
the
the
contractors
vehicles
for
street
sweeping
with
information
about
the
last
five
years
of
the
number
of
enhanced
sweeps
that
have
happened
with
a
list
of
the
streets
that
have
been
enhanced,
gotten
an
enhanced
sweeping
for
the
previous
year
and
then
in
addition,
I'm
just
going
to
add
the
and
it
the
queue.
G
Please
also
publish
in
that
report.
The
cue
of
people,
that
of
places
that
have
been
requested
for
street
sweeping
signage
and
what
the
estimated
cost
per
Street
would
be
to
add
that
so.
B
All
right,
councilmember,
Foley.
J
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
the
report.
I
appreciate
it.
I
have
a
question
about
basic
street
sweeping
and
how
it's
accomplished
on
our
major
streets
as
it
relates
to
the
bike
paths.
We
have
bike
paths
that
are
protected
by
lanes
and
it
looks
like
it
might
be
difficult
for
the
street
sweepers
to
get
through
there,
but
it's
important
that
we
clear
the
path
so
the
bicyclist
can
get
through.
So
what's
our
process
for
addressing
debris
in
the
bike
paths
in
a
protected
bike
lane,
we
have
some
downtown.
X
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
question
and
it
is
quite
difficult
to
keep
them
clear
during
The
Leaf
Drop
season,
but
in
general,
all
bikeways
are
swept
at
least
once
a
week
in
the
downtown
area.
They're
swept
twice
a
week
and
we
can
respond
to
requests.
So
if
people
call
in
an
obstruction
which
we
do
get
we'll
go
and
take
care
of
it,
the
there
have
been
circumstances
where
the
sweeper
went
by
in
through
the
bike
lane
cleared
it
off
and
two
hours
later
we
went
back
and
it
was
looked
like
we
hadn't
been
there.
X
So
Leaf
Drop
season
is
particularly
challenging,
so
we're
trying
to
do
the
best
we
can
with
the
resources
we
have,
but
the
we
have
one
sweeper,
that's
narrow
enough
to
get
into
a
bike
away
with
a
clearance
of
at
least
seven
feet,
and
we
have
a
few
in
the
city
that
are
more
narrow
than
that,
and
so
we
either
go
out
with
a
blower
and
then
have
us
blow
the
debris
out
of
the
lane
and
then
have
a
sweeper
pass
immediately
to
pick
it
up
or
do
hand
work
with
some
of
the
crews.
J
Oh,
so,
okay,
so
so
seven
feet,
you
have
a
sweeper
that
can
pass
through
a
seven
feet.
Corridor,
can
you
tell
me-
and
maybe
you
don't
have
this
information
you
can
get
it
to
me
later-
is
Hillsdale
one
of
those
that
it
seems
like
those
protected
bike
lanes
are
fairly
new
they're.
They
I
feel
they're,
probably
not
seven
feet,
I
feel
they're,
probably
narrower
than
seven
feet.
W
J
Okay,
thank
you
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
That's
not.
The
only
question
I
had
other
than
the
street
sweeper
came
by
my
house
today
and
to
councilman
council
member
Davis's
point.
They
drove
by
very
quickly
I
observed
them
and
they
didn't
do
a
very
good
job.
In
my
street,
I
mean
it's
fine,
it's
there's
leaves
out
there
and
it's
rainy
now,
so
you
can't
couldn't
have
tell
pulled
anyway,
but
I
was
out
there
watching,
just
because
I
was
curious
and
I
knew.
J
B
Okay,
councilmember
parallels.
P
Yeah,
thank
you
actually
based
on
that
last
comment.
There
do
we
beef
up
services
on
street
sweeping
during
the
the
leaf
fall
season
or
right
kind
of
you
know
around
this
time
frame
where
we
know
we
have
heavy
Leaf
fall,
and
we
know
that
there
may
be
rains.
Is
that
something
that
we
do
regularly.
W
W
Especially
in
the
underpasses
anything
else,
dad,
okay,.
P
Okay,
so
that's
something
that
we
we
budget
for
and
we
do
regularly
than
every
year.
That's
good
to
hear
actually
in
regards
to
the
the
bike
Lanes
that
councilmember
Fuller
was
talking
about
as
well.
Have
we
done
done
any,
not
necessarily
like
an
official
audit
with
the
auditor
I
know?
We
just
did
that
on
the
whole
program
recently,
but
have
we
done
any
internal
auditing
on
the
bike
Lanes
specifically
because
I
know
once
we've
for
as
we
started
to
to
implement
more
of
these
protected
bike.
P
Lanes
I
have
heard
from
a
lot
of
bicyclists
that
not
not
even
just
during
the
the
leaf
fall
season,
but
year-round,
essentially
that
they
have
been
pretty.
You
know
full
of
trash
and
so
curious.
If
we've
done
any
internal
auditing
specific
to
just
the
sweeping
of
the
bike,
Lanes.
W
You
know
I
wouldn't
use
the
word
auditing,
but
we
certainly
produced
analysis
and
kind
of
tried
to
figure
out
how
to
meet
those
needs
and,
as
a
result,
we
procured
that
smaller
sweeper
to
kind
of
do
that
focused
work
and
I.
Think
we've
got
another
one
in
the
pipeline
right
now
to
try
to
meet
those
demands.
So
it
is
a
a
type
of
infrastructure
that
was
not
originally
scoped
out.
You
know
when
the
contract
was
produced
and
kind
of
when
this
program
was
built
and
that's
one
of
the
areas
that
we're
growing.
W
P
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
saw
that
and
the
report
made
it
sound
like
we
were
acquiring
a
new
Sweeper
for
specific
for
the
bike
land.
It
wasn't
clear
that
we
already
had.
One
I
was
personally
aware
that
we
had
one
so
but
I
guess
we're
adding
to
that
which.
P
That's
good,
I
I
would
say
likely.
We
need
to
beef
that
up,
as
we
continue
to
add
to
our
bike
infrastructure,
Network
right,
our
ability
to
keep
those
bikeways
clean
is
going
to
be
the
next.
You
know
unusable
rising
to
be
the
next
important
step
to
our
community
and
so
I
think
this
absolutely
has
to
be
a
major
component
there.
P
P
Remembered
it
correctly
it
that
would
likely
be
the
best
opportunity
to
try
and
make
some
enhancements
like.
Maybe
what
our
chair
was
saying
on
you
know:
do
we
want
to
have
some
tracking
devices
on
these
vehicles
where
we
wouldn't
have
to
pay
for
it?
Is
there
any
other
opportunity,
like
that
kind
of
Midway
through
contract
or
open
it
to
say,
hey?
If
you
know
we
didn't
want
to
pay
for
that
type
of
infrastructure?
P
Is
there
an
opportunity
for
that,
or
are
we
just
on
the
hook?
If
we
want
to,
we
want
to
add
these
to
it.
We're
just
gonna
have
to
pay
for
it.
W
It's
quite
a
long
contract.
You
know
like
lengthwise,
but
I,
you
know
I'm.
There
are
some
ways
you
know
in
particular.
Telematics
is
one
of
the
items
that
we
can
kind
of
reopen
so
we'll
work
with
our
colleagues
who
manage
the
contract
and
kind
of
see
what
the
options
are.
But
you
know,
in
particular,
most
of
the
bike
lanes
are
on
streets
that
the
city
maintains
so
like
the
in-house
Crews
provide
the
sweeping
Force
so
that
that's
why
we're
adding
in-house
capacity
to
our
Fleet?
W
P
Yeah,
yeah
and
I'm
sorry
I
switched
topics
a
little
bit
on
the
bike
Lanes,
but
but
in
general
my
interest
was
similar
to
Joe
Davis
on
the
telematics,
and
rather
than
maybe
have
a
discussion
next
year
on.
How
can
the
council,
you
know,
maybe
find
something
like
that
I
would
like
to
see?
P
Could
we
reconsider
opening
the
contract,
and
you
know,
is
that
something
that
we
would
like
them
to
to
implement
on
their
vehicles
or
see
how
quickly
right
that
they
could,
because
I
would
have
to
Echo
my
colleagues
that
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
the
the
residential
street
sweeping
is
very
effective
and,
in
fact,
I
have
a
suggestion
that
I
think
you
know.
Maybe
we
want
to
explore,
but,
for
instance,
I
I
have
been
in
my
current
home
for
for
two
years
and
in
the
prior
residences.
P
That
I
had
been
in
sort
of
saw
the
same
thing
so
over
the
last
eight
years
that
I've
been
on
Council
I've
been
at
three
different
neighborhoods
and
blocks
each
one
of
them
has
been
more
or
less
the
same.
This
this
one
that
I'm
in
now
is
the
most
impacted
with
vehicle.
P
Was
on
the
street,
but
even
the
ones
that
were
not,
as
impacted
still
had
several
vehicles
on
the
street
during
the
Sweet
street
sweeping
day
and
and
the
main
reason
and
I
know
dot
staff
we've
gone
back
and
forth
on
this
over
the
years
is
you
know,
obviously,
residents
aren't
really
aware
right.
We
don't
have
signage,
there's
no
requirement
to
move
the
vehicle,
it's
sort
of
just
if
you
know
you
know
and
as
we've
heard
right
away,
but
neighborhood
different
reasons.
P
A
lot
of
people
don't
know
when
their
street
sweeping
day
is,
and
that's
just
that's
that's,
you
know,
I
think
more
standard
than
not,
and
so
what
you
get
is
you
get
a
lot
of
these
vehicles,
as
as
the
report
has
noted
in
the
audit,
did
that's
the
biggest
impediment
to
the
street
sweepers
and
and
I
think
you
know,
I
think
we
may
have
some
drivers
that
you
know
they
drive
down
a
block
and
they
see
there's
a
ton
of
cars
and
they
may
you
know
if
they
were
to
go
slower.
P
I
think
maybe
they'd
hit
an
extra
space
or
two,
but
I
I
would
agree
that
for
the
most
part,
the
reason
that
they
don't
is
because
they're
you,
you
know
they're
zooming
down
a
block
because
you
know
70
of
it
or
so
60
of
it
or
so
is
is
full
of
you
know
of
cars
and
and
I
know
that
for
certain
again
in
the
neighborhood,
now
is
extremely
impacted
with
vehicles
and
I
had
the
suggestion
that
I
have
is
that
I
would
almost
say
we're
wasting
our
time
and
we're
wasting
our
money
with
these
with
the
contractors
with
Greenways
that
we're
saying
hey,
can
you
just
zoom
down?
P
You
know,
however
many
blocks
every
once
a
month
and
and
really
not
clean
this
you
know
the
gutters
I
would
suggest
that
if,
if
we're
going
to
continue
this
same
process,
we
might
as
well
stop
doing
that
kind
of
wasting
our
time.
Sending
these
these
street
sweepers
down
a
block
where
they're
not
cleaning
anything
and
rather
say
how
are
we
going
to
actually
get
out
to
a
street
and
and
and
get
a
street
sweeper
out
and
where
they
can
clean
it?
P
Is
it
redirecting
some
of
those
funds
that
we
may
save
on
these
regular
street
sweeping
to
to
the
enhanced
Street
Suite
me,
as
you
pointed
out,
maybe
it's
only
on
average
20
a
year
I
know
my
office
is
taking
advantage
of
that
over
the
year
trying
to
request.
You
know
a
couple
at
least
every
year
within
the
district
at
least
before
covet.
P
Is
it
more
of
those
right?
Is
it
as
councilmember
or
a
chair,
chair
Davis
was
saying?
Is
it
looking
at
that
list
of
streets
that
have
requested
signage
and
I
know
I've
helped
a
couple
streets
in
D3
do
that
over
the
years?
Is
it
getting
more
of
them
on
the
list
and
getting
them
signed?
You
know,
and
and
are
you
exchanging
that
I
think
that's
a
conversation
worthy
of
the
council
to
say
hey?
Do
we
want
to
talk
about
that
trade-off
and
again,
I?
P
P
Not
once
has
it
cleaned
my
street
just
because
it
just
it's
a
shorter
block
right
on
14th
Street
and
it
just
kind
of
drives
right
by
because
there's
so
many
cars,
and
so
you
know
two
years
worth
of
wasting
time
and
that's
all
I've
seen
I'm
imagining
it's
been
going
on
a
lot
longer
in
neighborhoods
like
mine,
that
are
impacted
with
a
lot
of
cars,
so
I
think
that's
a
worthy
conversation
as
well.
P
Maybe
that
the
council
can
explore
next
year
is,
as
they
look
at
this
program,
that
we
have
a
street
sweeping
sounds
like
my
colleagues
are,
are
interested
too,
and
you
know
sort
of
furthering
that
dialogue,
so
I
am
excited
to
see
where
it
goes
next
year,
as
this
comes
back
thanks.
B
K
Had
a
couple
of
comments,
one
I
agree,
I
think
most
folks,
don't
know
when
Sweet
street
sweeping
day
is
and
I
think
we
all
deal
with
a
lot
of
constituent
calls
about
that.
K
I
I
wanted
to
also
just
bring
up
the
issue
of
Outreach
and
recognize
that
a
lot
a
part
of
the
part
of
her
motion
of
looking
at
signage,
and
but
more
than
that,
we
also
really
need
to
communicate
with
folks,
because,
particularly
in
overcrowded
areas
and
areas
where
there
are
a
lot
of
shift
workers,
you
know
there
are
parking
is
in
demand,
as
we
all
know,
and
so
really
how
we
communicate
with
residents
is
just
as
important
as
what
we
communicate
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
B
All
right
that
brings
us
to
the
final
item
on
the
agenda.
D6
reach
code,
update
with
to
increase
multi-vehicle
EV
charging
stations
carrying
your
team.
Thanks
for
your
patience
and
sticking
around.
M
M
Environmental
services
and
we're
going
to
try
and
move
through
some
of
the
material
pretty
quickly.
So
we
don't
lose
you
all,
and
we
have
time
for
for
your
questions
Etc
so
with
that
must
get
my
intro
and
hand
it
off
to
Julie
benabente
to
walk
us
through
the
materials.
Y
So
just
quick
background
on
this
topic:
climate,
smart
and
the
pathway
to
carbon
neutrality,
both
set
accelerated,
Enviro,
electric
vehicle
and
local
renewable
goals.
California
also
adopted
some
rules
around
100,
zero
emissions,
car
sales
by
2035,
and
we
have
an
existing
building
reach
code
that
does
require
extra
EV
charging
equipment
and
infrastructure.
L
Y
Yeah,
okay,
so
Council
provided
us
with
direction
to
return
before
the
end
of
2022,
with
an
estimated
marginal
per
unit,
cost
of
expanding
multi-family
EV
charting
infrastructure.
They
also
asked
us
to
look
at
updating
roof
space,
design,
standards
and
and
ways
to
mitigate
embodied
carbon
from
building
materials.
Y
We
did
return
in
June
2022,
with
an
update
on
the
carbon
mitigation
strategies
and
some
top
design
synthesis
returning
with
some
more
information,
so
just
to
set
a
little
bit
of
the
structure
here
before
we
jump
into
the
cost
analysis.
I
wanted
to
provide
a
basic
understanding
on
some
of
the
terms.
Ev
capable
means
that
there's
an
electrical
panel
capacity
that
allows
for
future
installation
of
EV
charging
equipment,
whereas
EV
ready
goes
a
step
further
and
requires
installation
of
a
charging
Outlet.
Y
The
term
evse
or
electric
vehicle
service
equipment
is
the
actual
installation
of
a
charging
station
and
those
evse
can
be
level
one
level
two
or
fast
Chargers,
depending
on
what's
installed,
there's
also
an
automated
load
management
system
that
can
allow
for
power
sharing
across
multiple
stations
and
there's
a
low
power
level.
Y
Two
charging
options
which
charge
at
a
slower
rate
than
the
standard,
L2
level
2
Chargers,
but
provide
cost
Savings
in
terms
of
electrical
infrastructure
needs
and
there's
also
a
term
called
networking
or
networked
Chargers,
so
that
just
means
that
it's
linked
to
Wi-Fi
next,
so
in
the
city's
cost
analysis,
we
looked
at
four
scenarios.
The
first
is
just
a
comparison
of
our
current
reach
code.
The
option
1A
is
Council
direction.
Y
Looking
at
five
percent
evse
the
rest
EV
ready,
the
1B
option
is
an
actual
Regional
model
reach
code
that
came
out
where
Santa
San
Mateo
the
rest
of
Santa
Clara
County
and
the
Alameda
County.
Both
work
together
are
all
three
work
together
to
create
that
and
option.
1C
is
a
networked
option
of
that
model.
Reach
code,
so
option
1A,
which
was
the
council,
Direction
and
The
1B,
are
both
cost
comparable
in
terms
of
the
total
percentage
of
total
construction
costs
to
the
city's
current
reach
code.
Y
Y
So
these
are
for,
since
this
is
going
to
apply
to
new
developments
for
the
embodied
carbon
item,
that
is,
the
embodied
carbon
is
estimated
to
be
about
2.7
percent
of
a
consumption
of
San
Jose's
consumption-based
emissions,
however
embodied
carbon
is
not
included
currently
in
the
city's
greenhouse
gas
inventory,
since
it
is
consumption
based.
So
we
don't
use
that
model
for
doing
inventories.
Y
Existing
Statewide
legislation
and
local
policies
require
or
encourage
use
of
more
environmentally
friendly
materials.
So
this
issue
is
becoming
part
of
some
of
the
codes
that
are
coming
out.
Some
of
the
direction
such
as
both
Timber
and
low
carbon,
concrete
and
also
Cal
green,
which
is
a
part
of
the
city
part
of
the
building
code,
does
have
voluntary
measures
for
low
carbon
concrete
mixes.
There's
also
a
regional
working
group
that
San
Jose
is
a
part
of
and
we're
continuing
to
look
at
developing
a
regional
policy
guide
around
embodied
carbon
on
the
solar
side.
Y
As
you
know,
we
have
quite
a
bit
of
solar
installed
in
San
Jose,
but
we
still
have
a
lot
of
opportunity
here
and
we
do
have
a
goal
of
one
gigawatt
by
2040.
Through
the
climate
smart
plan,
we
do
have
a
reach
code,
which
does
require
electric
I'm
sorry,
solar,
ready
infrastructure
and
also
have
a
pretty
model
online
City
permitting
for
solar,
as
well
as
a
lot
of
the
federal
tax
credits
were
extended
to
incentivize
solar
installations.
Y
So
City
staff
hosted
five
public
webinars
where
we
talked
with
contractors
developers
and
we
invited
labor
organizations,
affordable
housing
developers,
landlords
HOAs
property
managers
and
community-based
organizations.
Generally,
there
was
support
for
expanded
EV
infrastructure,
particularly
if
the
cost
remains
similar
to
the
city's
current
reach
code.
We
did
have
some
feedback
around
three
themes
again
talking
about
managing
the
cost,
so
there's
ways
to
do
that
either
through
considering
the
lower
power
or
the
L1
charging
requirements.
Y
Also,
there
was
a
suggestion
to
reframe
the
EV
charging
around
Equity
concerns
and
just
looking
at
connecting
directly
to
the
electrical
service
panel,
so
that
individuals
could
Monitor
and
manage
their
own
charging
directly
rather
than
having
a
management
company
charging
back
pricing
to
them.
There
was
also
suggestion
for
the
city
to
assess
EV
ownership
data
in
multi-family
housing
to
support
the
need
for
additional
infrastructure.
S
Yes,
Paul
something
from
the
Horseshoe.
You
just
knocked
off
15
minutes
of
my
time,
but
I
mean
15
seconds,
but
that's
cool.
Go
ahead,
keep
it.
The
analysis
that
is
being
done
with
respect
to
EVS
is
going
to
be
completely
inaccurate
and
here's
why
Mexicans
aren't
going
to
aren't
going
to
participate
in
these
numbers?
Okay,
so
deferring
this
to
your
CBO
language
and
deferring
to
somos,
Mayfair
and
SV,
rising
and
CC
puede
is
collective
and
all
these
other
organizations
that
are
already
corrupted
okay
and
you're
in
the
cities.
S
Yes,
people,
okay,
the
numbers
are
going
to
be
inaccurate.
That's
number
one
number
two
is
that
this
is
an
absolute
Equity
issue,
because
the
major
consumers
of
this
infrastructure
that
you're
building
and
you're
using
monies
from
not
only
the
general
fund
but
you're,
also
using
Transportation
dollars
in
transportation
grants
to
do
this.
Those
Transportation
grants
are
predicated
upon
the
debts
of
people
that
are
experiencing
poverty
in
this
city.
S
So
when
you
connect
all
these
dots
together
and
see
it
from
my
perspective,
instead
of
the
cbo's
myopic
view,
then
you
see
a
more
comprehensive
view
of
what
I'm
talking
about.
Whenever
I
talk
about
Equity
within
the
context
of
EV
placements,
you
are
not
going
to
have
Mexicans
that
are
going
to
transition
to
EV
Vehicles,
because
that
those
this
infrastructure
is
being
created
in
order
to
service
people
that
aren't
even
citizens
of
this
city.
S
Yet
and
that's
a
fact,
it's
going
to
be
most
of
the
populations
that
are
inside
the
marketweight
housing
developments
is
going
to
be
the
homeboy
over
there
on
Orlando
or
or
over
there,
by
a
Pensacola,
Apartments
they're
not
going
to
be
the
ones
that
are
the
major
consumers.
It's
going
to
be
people
of
a
certain
economic
status.
S
I
All
right,
thank
you,
as
I
have
been
offering
boy
Beekman
here,
as
I
have
been
offering
a
public
meeting
this
week.
There
seems
a
newfound
maturity
in
humanity
or
last
week,
I
was
offering,
but
it
seems
a
newfound
maturity
in
humanity
and
depth
that
may
be
taking
place
throughout
San
Jose
City
government
departments
at
this
time
and
what
seems
a
current
better
study
of
the
past
several
years
in
the
continual
ongoing
issues
of
San
Jose.
I
These
are
practices
of
government
that
simply
include
better
listening
and
dialogue
with
everyday
community
in
the
transitional
year
of
2023
good
ideals.
Better
listening
and
cooperation
from
all
sides
can
be
important
steps
to
the
more
Progressive
good
future.
Many
are
planning
and
hoping
for
in
2024
and
25..
I
These
can
also
be
the
good
ways,
adjustments
and
adjustments
towards
our
better
human
ideals
and
practices
for
all
sides
that
can
be
easier
for
us
in
2024
and
25
as
well
from
this
I
hope.
Mail
Accardo
can
learn
to
take
the
heart
in
his
future
endeavors.
What
may
be
his
more
lasting
Legacy
of
helping
to
build
a
Civic
Innovation
staff
that
is
currently
dedicated
to
learning?
I
How
to
work
more
openly
with
everyday
community
and
with
tech
ideas,
I
hope,
mayor-elect
Mahan
will
want
to
respect
these
concepts
of
legacy
and
to
Simply
allow
city
government
staff
to
continue
to
work
in
a
lot
that
can
be
possible
at
this
time
in
their
current
interesting
good
direction
and
to
quickly
speak
to
the
mayor's
questions
from
last
Thursday
Smart
City
committee,
as
law
enforcement
technology,
usually
can
take
first
priority
in
our
current
local
communities.
It
is
from
this
that
the
future
of
tech,
open
public
policies
and
accountability.
I
Questions
can
then
begin
to
better
ask
exactly
and
realistically
to
ask
how
important
is
the
need
and
questions
like
if
there
is
already
ample
surveillance,
Tech
and
debt
and
data
collection
in
the
neighborhood
or
area
responsible
questions
of
how
much
is
enough
and
minimum
use
and
deployment
ideals
should
be
start
to
become
more
clear
as
a
shared
holistic,
Community
Vision.
Thank
you.
Z
Yes,
this
is
Lillian.
You
talked
about
carbon
reserves
and
I
was
a
little
bit
stuck
on
that,
because,
when
you
uproot
trees,
especially
trees
that
have
been
here
for
hundreds
of
years,
if
not
longer,
you
actually
uproot
the
carbon
Reserve,
so
I'm
wondering
how
that
will
interact
with
your
report.
Thank
you.
C
Z
Z
AA
Okay
hi:
this
is
Linda
Hutchins,
Knowles
I'm,
a
San,
Jose
resident
and
I'm,
calling
in
with
my
ACT
Tara
hat
on
where
I'm
the
e-mobility
and
advocacy
your
manager
I
also
am
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
Ed
charging
for
all
Coalition
I'm
one
of
the
co-leaders.
This
is
a
broad
and
diverse
Coalition
of
many
organizations
and
elected
officials
and
individuals
who
are
united
in
our
mission
of
ensuring
Equitable
access
to
EV
charging
for
all
residents,
whether
they
live
in
single-family
homes
or
multi-family
housing.
AA
So
I'd
like
to
first
thank
so
much
the
mayor
and
the
city
council
members
and
the
staff
for
doing
this
marginal
cost
analysis
to
understand
what
extra
costs
there
might
be
to
make
San
Jose's
code
more
comprehensive
and
Equitable,
and
we
are
delighted
to
see
that
the
results
are
that
for
approximately
the
same
cost
and
in
some
cases
even
a
little
less
than
San
Jose's
current
reach
code.
San
Jose
could
replace
the
70
of
quote
EV
capable
parking
with
actual
eating
ready
charging
I
want
to
emphasize
that
EV
capable
is
actually
incapable
of
charging.
AA
It
just
seems
it
will
updated
labor,
but
at
Great
expense
and
great
hassle
for
the
residents
such
that
it
very
rarely
happens.
So
if
you
want
residents
to
actually
be
able
to
charge
in
these
communities,
they
need
to
have
EV
ready.
Charging.
I
also
want
to
comment
that
green,
Latinos
and
other
groups
did.
A
study
have
found
that
communities
of
color
and.
AA
Communities
are
highly
interested
in
obtaining
electric
vehicles
and
that
the
biggest
barrier
to
charging
is
not
just
the
cost
of,
but
it's
actually
the
lack
of
affordable
charging,
and
why
is
it
not
affordable
because
it's
not
at
home,
if
you
don't
have
access
at
home
if
you
live
in
an
apartment
or
condo
and
have
to
use
the
charging,
the
rates
are
much
higher,
and
so
we
urge
you
to
please
update
Santa
fe's
reach
code.
This
is
going
to
be
good
for
every
resident
and
Transportation
Security
is
part
of
equity.
B
The
committee-
thank
you,
I
do
have
some
questions,
as
you
probably
knew
I
would
so
I've
always
been
concerned
with
the
idea
of
the
EV
capable
because
just
like
with
the
solar
ready,
which
also
bothers
me,
because
I
don't
think
anyone
ever
then
goes
back
and
puts
solar
on
the
roof
of
a
building
after
it's
been
built,
maybe
very
rarely
EV
capable
you're
spending
all
that
money,
and
then
you
have
to
spend
more
later
to
do
extra
work
and
I'm,
not
sure
anyone
will
ever
get
the
charging
station.
B
So
this
looks
like
a
no-brainer
to
me
right.
The
cost
is
the
same:
to
go,
EV
ready
for
all
the
spaces
and
or
for
all
the
units
so
are,
are
we
coming
are
we?
Are
you
going
to
come
back
to
the
council
with
a
recommendation
to
update
the
reach
code
at
some
point?
What's
the
plan
for
how
we
adopt
one
of
those
other
options.
M
Thank
you,
and,
and
thank
you
for
your
comments
and
interest.
Frankly,
and
you
know
we
we're
looking
for
some
feedback
and
then
certainly
we'll
come
back
with
recommendations
and
we
haven't
established
a
clear
timeline.
We
do
intend
to
have
a
study
session
on
climate,
smart
in
the
start
of
2023-ish,
but
but
looking
for
some
feedback
and
kind
of
what
what
interests
the
the
committee.
Certainly
we've
learned
a
lot
from
talking
with
our
community
as
well.
B
B
So
I
hope
we
come
back
sooner
rather
than
later
to
up
to
at
least
get
direction
on
this
item.
If
it
me,
if
it's
needed,
because
I
wouldn't
want
buildings
to
go
in
and
then
not
end
up
with
the
capability
to
do,
EV
charging
yeah.
M
We
we
agree
with
that,
and
you
know
with
with
some
of
the
callers
that
talk
about,
particularly
in
in
certain
parts
of
town,
where
there's
not
a
lot
of
commercially
available
charging.
Really,
if
you
don't
have
the
charging
at
home,
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
get
an
EV
and,
and
it
is,
it
is
more
affordable
and
so
yeah.
We
have
a
keen
interest
in
having
EV
charging
ready,
fully
functional
EV
charging
for
every
resident.
That's
interested
in
the
city.
B
So
my
other
question,
then,
is
when
I
look
at
the
differences
between
the
various
options.
1A1B,
the
difference
is
in
the
different
in
using
EV,
ready
versus
actual
charging
stations.
Ev
ready
to
me
is
I
mean
is
adequate
as
far
as
charging
Vehicles.
You
don't
need
to
have
a
charging
station
to
charge
a
vehicle.
I
know
that
the
state
requirement
still
has
some
percentage
that
need
to
be
actual
charging
stations,
as
opposed
to
receptacles.
Y
Yeah
correct,
so
that's
why
we
don't
have
options
that
go
with
zero
EVS
yeah.
B
I
mean
you
can
charge
with
it
for
sure
that,
and
that
I
mean
that's
what
it's
very
straightforward.
So
we
have
to
go
with
evse.
Why
would
we
go
with
anything
other
than
well
I
guess
on
option
1A?
Why
would
we
go
with
10
of
the
40
amp
Chargers
versus
and
85
20
amp,
rather
than
all
20,
amp
or
I
mean
how?
How
would
you
get
around
the
differences
in
the
equity
issues,
with
some
some
having
faster
charging
than
others?
Why
would
we
not
just
go
with
all
one
kind
of
charging
station.
B
Y
B
B
If
this
analysis
is
correct,
it's
not
even
more
expensive,
so
I
mean
I,
know
if
you're
asking
for
sort
of
Direction
my
own
personal
interest
and
I,
don't
know
what
the
rest
of
the
committee
is
going
to
say,
but
my
own
interest
is
certainly
one
one:
a
or
one
b,
one
b
is
a
little
cheaper,
but
probably
that's
it.
B
That's
within
the
noise
of
the
cost
at
that
point,
but
we
wish
we
should
be
pushing
quickly
to
get
there
and
I
hope
he
comes
back
soon
with
a
recommendation
that
the
council
can
discuss
so
that
we
can
move
in
that
direction.
B
Thank
you
one
other
just
one
of
the
question
well
back
on
the
equity
question,
so
so
I
know
that
when
you,
you
know
charge
without
Smart
when
you
charge
when
you,
when
you
have
it
all
running
in
through
one
breaker
one
breaker
system,
you,
you
can't
necessarily
tell
who's
using
the
electricity,
and
you
have
to
have
a
third
party
doing
that
analysis
for
you
and
we'd
have
to
have.
It
would
be
a
more
costly
installation
in
order
to
have
it
go
into
the
individual
unit.
M
Y
So
in
terms
of
an
additional
cost
going
directly
to
the
panel
yeah,
we
we
actually
are
looking
at
an
analysis
on
that
as
well,
since
that
was
kind
of
an
issue
that
was
brought
up
and
so
we're
running
that
analysis
right
now,
but
it
looks
like
it
could
be
around
a
thousand
dollars
per
dwelling
to
do
that,
which
is
it's
not
that's,
not
super
substantial
in
terms
of
the
big
picture
of
costs,
but
it
still
is
an
additional
cost
to
do
that.
B
Right,
okay,
so
I
guess
we'll
hear
all
of
those
options
when
it
comes
back
to
Council
in
the
future.
Right
is
that
correct,
and
then
this
this
reach
code?
This
installation
applies
to
Affordable
developments,
just
like
it
does
to
the
others
right.
So
there's
not
there's
no
difference
in
terms
of
market
rate
versus
others.
Having
this
every
unit
would
have
EV
ready
charging
and
then
what?
How
does
this
apply
to
commercial
buildings
in
parking
is?
Does
it
apply
there.
Y
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
much
do
we
need
to
add
something
in
motion
about
bringing
back
this
item
at
a
certain
date,
or
do
we
just
we'll
just
wait
until
January
and
see
when
you
wanna.
M
B
So
I'll
entertain
a
motion
or
make
a
motion
myself.
I
guess
to
make
it
easier
to
accept
the
report
and
and
bring
this
back
to
council
by
I
would
I
would
hope
for
I
end
of
January
if
possible.
Okay,.
B
N
Heard
a
second
so
we'll
move
on
clarify
your
chair.
Did
you
want
it
to
back
to
the
committee,
or
did
you
want
something
to.
B
M
AA
Yes,
hi
again,
it's
Linda
Hutchinson
I
wanted
to
just
thank
you
for
supporting
that
motion
and
I
know.
This
is
not
on
the
agenda
today
and
it's
not
going
to
be
possible
to
be
genderized
today,
but
I
do
want
to
remind
you,
with
my
mother's
out
front
hat
on
that.
I
Hi
Blair.
L
I
Here,
thanks
for
the
meeting
today,
I
thank
you
for
your
patience
as
I
may
lack
a
certain
depth
on
the
on
this
issue.
Around
December
15th,
the
cpuc
will
be
voting
to
possibly
and
end
the
future
of
solar
Powers
subscribe
subsidies
for
everyday
persons
at
the
residential
level
to
save
money
on
on
solar
use.
It
is
a
program
I
I
spoke
I
spoke
previously
on
the
previous
item.
I
gave
a
very
long
speech.
I
It
was
actually
meant
for
public
comment
time
and
I
wanted
to
speak
on
this
one
on
on
on
previous
item.
So
that's,
okay,
I
would
just
simply
say
thank
you
for
the
meeting
today
and
let's
have
hope
that
Governor
Newsom
is
working
on
fossil
fuel
issues,
solar
power
issues
that,
by
the
cpuc
vote
in
mid-December,
we
can
have
some
compromise
in
the
Solar
subsidy
future
that
works
positively
for
local,
low-income
communities
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
S
Yes
also
become
a
horseshoe.
I
could
probably
count
on
one
hand
how
many
times
I've
agreed
with
councilwoman
Davis,
and
this
is
one
of
those
times
I
want
to
thank
you
for
seeing
the
the
wisdom
and
providing
that
particular
piece
of
analysis.
I
think
with
respect
to
speaking
about
data
in
general.
Is
that
the
ability
for
us
to
move
forward
as
a
city
and
predicating
those
decisions
on
data
those
decisions
are
going
to
be
insufficient
and
inadequate
if
the
proper
data
is
not
presented
at
these
meetings.
That
is,
that
is
very
simple.
S
It's
very
basic,
and
sometimes
the
truth
is,
is
just
that
simple,
it's
not
complex.
You
know.
The
greatest
scientist
in
the
world
have
told
us
time
and
time
again
that
the
most
adequate
answer
and
the
most
truest
answer
and
sufficient
answer
is
the
most
simplest,
and
that
is
just
bring
the
data
man
so
that
we
can
make
informed
decisions
about
what
we
as
a
city
or
or
are
building
our
policies
on
it's.
This
is
very
basic.
S
You
know
I,
don't
it's
a
waste
of
my
time
as
a
citizen
to
come
to
these
meetings
and
have
inadequate
data
points
given
and
then
okay,
well,
we'll
we'll
take
care
of
that
later.
We'll
take
care
of
that
later,
we'll
take
care
of
that
later,
not
Charlie.
We
take
care
of
that.
Now.
We
take
care
of
that
right
here
right
now,
that's
why
you
need
to
come
prepared
to
these
meetings
so
that
those
decisions
can
be
made,
because
these
are
money.
These
are.
S
These
are
millions
and
millions
of
dollars,
okay,
that
are
being
being
spent
out
of
general
fund
or
the
the
the
the
the
money,
the
grant
money
that
is
being
used
from
the
deaths
of
people
that
are
experiencing
poverty,
those
Transportation
dollars.
It's
me
it
is
sickening
the
way
that
the
city
exploits
the
poverty
by
modern.
Z
Yes,
this
is
Lillian
from
District
three
I
used
to
live
in
District
Six
I'm,
making
a
comment
earlier
on
the
street
sweeping
because
I
was
not
able
to
comment
earlier,
but
the
800
000.
Was
it
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
I
heard
correctly?
Z
That
would
be
used
for
signage,
so
people
would
know
when
the
street
sweeper
was
coming
or
was
it
80
000,
because
if
it
was
near
a
million
I
would
find
that
very
disliking
personally
I,
don't
think
that's
a
necessity
and
the
other
comment
I
had
was
when
the
gentleman
mentioned
20
a
year.
Did
he
mean
20
Street
swept
a
year
20
areas,
20.
I
I,
couldn't
understand
where
the
20
came
from.
Z
So
if
you
could
clarify
that,
but
Deb
Davis
does
want
to
put
that
into
the
next
meeting
with
the
street
sweeping
signage
and
I
believe
Mr.
Perales
also
agreed
to
that.
My
my
open
Forum
question
really
is,
and
my
comment
really
is:
if
you
can
give
800
000
for
signage,
for
people
to
move
their
cars
to
have
street
sweepers
come
in.
Why
can't
you
use
that
money
for
an
open
election,
such
as
in
District,
10
and
8.?
Thank
you.