►
From YouTube: NOV 7, 2022 | Transportation & Environment Committee
Description
City of San José, California
Transportation & Environment Committee of November 7, 2022.
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=987826&GUID=E7F9948B-7EC5-4B8B-859B-EE4D3D16480D
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
And
environment
committee,
to
order
and
before
we
begin
I
want
to
remind
committee
members
and
members
of
the
public,
whether
you
are
online
or
in
person,
although
there
doesn't
appear
to
be
anybody
in
person
to
follow
our
code
of
conduct
at
meetings.
This
includes
commenting
on
specific
agenda
items
only
and
addressing
the
full
body,
not
individual
members
or
staff.
All
members
of
the
committee
staff
and
the
public
are
also
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language
and
failure
to
comply
with
this
code
of
conduct
will
result
in
removal
from
this
meeting.
D
B
B
F
Yes
possible
from
a
horseshoe
good
afternoon,
council
members
I
would
like
to
draw
your
attention.
Their
needs
absolutely
to
be
discussion
about
this.
You
don't
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
meetings.
I
do
I
literally
go
to
every
single
meeting
that
this
city
conducts
and
the
county
every
single
one,
so
you're,
operating
from
a
position
of
ignorance,
I'm
operating
from
a
position
of
knowledge,
because
you
weren't
at
the
meeting
I
was
so
at
the
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
F
What
gets
discussed
when
these
developers
talk
about
these
mitigation
mitigation
issues
with
respect
to
sequa?
Is
this
same
specifically
that
people
are
going
to
catch
cancer
and
that
that
is
an
unavoidable
consequence
they
used
another
word:
I
can't
remember
what
it
was,
but
what
they're
saying
is
that
people
are
going
to
catch
cancer
and
you
do
not
want
to
get
on
the
record
of
that
issue.
That's
why
this
is
going
through
consent,
okay,
I
know!
That's
why
it's
going
to
consider!
F
F
G
All
right,
well
Beekman
here,
thanks
for
the
meeting
today,
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
that
council
president
Davis
very
brightly
and
sprightly
was
able
to
ask
for
public
comment
on
these
items,
and
it's
nice
that
for
consent,
calendar
and
work
plan,
deferral
items
to
for
yourselves
as
Council
people
to
to
know
how
to
ask
for
public
comment
at
this
time.
Thank
you
that
you
have
and
good
luck
and
a
good
meeting
today.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
B
C
I
I
Okay,
sorry
for
that,
so
today
we're
going
to
cover
we're
going
to
cover
a
number
of
items.
First,
just
a
as
a
reminder
what
our
strategic
plan
framework
recommended
last
year,
then
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
financial
status
and
then
we'll
get
into
the
cost
of
service
study.
We'll
cover
the
process
as
well
as
the
results
and
then
our
recommended
rate
strategy
for
this
year.
I
So
just
as
a
reminder,
you
saw
this
in
the
annual
report,
but
our
financial
position
has
improved
so
that
we
ended
21-22
with
80
million
just
over
in
unrestricted
fund
balance,
and
we
are
projecting
this
year
to
build
that
to
170
million
a
couple
reasons
for
that.
Improved
financial
position
is
number
one.
The
rate
adjustments
that
were
enacted
last
year,
but
I
would
say
the
main
driving
factor
is
lower
pcie
charges
which
we'll
talk
about
in
detail.
I
I
I
So
we
did
embark
on
a
cost
of
service
study
earlier
this
year.
This
is
a
very
industry
accepted
framework
for
utility
rate
setting,
there's
a
couple
components
to
it.
The
first
step
is
really
determining
our
annual
revenue
requirement.
So
we
took
a
look
at
all
of
our
costs
and
projected
revenues
for
the
next
three
years
and
came
up
with
our
annual
revenue
requirement.
I
We
also
looked
at
what
type
of
reserves
do
we
want
to
build
over
that
time
frame
as
well,
then,
the
next
step
was
really
cost
allocation,
so
assigning
those
costs
to
different
types
of
customers,
whether
they
be
residential
or
commercial
or
even
Street
lighting.
Each
of
those
customers
has
a
different
cost
framework
associated
with
it,
and
then
the
final
step
is
to
design
the
rates
and
bring
those
forward
for
Council
consideration.
I
So,
in
terms
of
the
revenue
requirement,
we
did
look
at
a
forecast
of
our
revenues
and
expenses
over
the
next
three
years
to
come
up
with
that
data
to
supply
the
consultant
really
important
to
note
that
our
power
supply
costs
and
most
of
our
costs
are
that
power
supply
it's
over
75
percent
of
our
operating
expenses.
I
I
So
in
terms
of
the
cost
to
service
process,
you
can
see
this
graphic.
It's
just
another
way
to
show
it
so
that
first
step
again
developing
all
of
our
Revenue
requirements.
The
second
step
is
functionalizing,
those
costs.
So
for
us,
it's
really
production
or
generation
costs
or
power
supply
costs,
another
way
to
say
it,
and
then
we
have
a
number
of
operating
administrative
expenses.
You
can
think
of
customer
service
meter
billing
reading.
I
All
of
that
is
in
that
category
and
of
course
we
do
not
have
transmission
and
distribution,
those
are
provided
by
other
providers
and
then
those
costs
are
allocated
to
different
types
of
customers.
So
you
can
see
the
examples
here:
residential
different
types
of
commercial
customers,
as
well
as
lighting.
I
But
we
know
the
environment
that
we
operate
in,
isn't
a
standard
utility
operating
environment
and
that
we
are
on
a
competitive
market.
So,
in
addition
to
doing
the
cost
of
service
study
and
looking
at
what
our
projected
costs
are
and
then
coming
up
with
rates
by
customer
class,
it's
really
important
for
us
also
to
take
a
look
at
where
PG
e
is
projected
rates
going
and
how
do
our
recommended
rates
compared
to
that?
So
that's
something
that
we
will
show
you
as
well
in
the
coming
slides
here.
I
It
also
improves
fairness,
so
rates
are
designed
to
recover
the
cost
of
the
customers
we
serve
among
those
different
customer
classes,
residential
commercial
Etc.
It
can
also
somewhat
improve
our
competitiveness,
although
this
life
is
both
ways,
you
know
now
that
we
are
recommending
that
we
are
not
pegged
to
PG
e.
I
It's
not
as
easy
for
the
residential
customer
or
commercial
customer
to
understand
our
rates
in
relation
to
that,
but
it
does
allow
us
to
set
rates
that
are
more
stable
and
competitive
over
the
long
term
and
it
improves
that
predictability
for
our
customers
in
understanding,
more
consistent
and
transparent
rates
and
then,
finally,
in
terms
of
the
Simplicity
there's
some
benefits
there.
One
drawback
is
again:
you
know
we
are
not
going
to
be
a
percentage
of
the
P,
the
PG
e
rate,
but
it
does
allow
us
to
create
more
simpler
rate
class
structures.
I
J
So
Lori
described
the
the
way
that
the
process
for
calculating
the
revenue
requirement
for
a
given
year.
J
You
can
see
here
in
the
table
that
our
power
supply
costs
are
by
far
the
largest
number
and
we
are
reflecting
uncertainty
there
at
several
cases,
because
that's
how
the
world
is
so,
even
though
we've
already
locked
up
a
number
of
our
our
our
contracts
for
next
year,
not
not
everything
and
things
change
and
regulatory
requirements
change,
and
so
that's
that's
what
you
see
there.
That
said,
we
do
expect
to
be
to
finish
between
the
expected
and
better
cases.
J
You'll
see,
also
that
we
have
explicitly
a
line
item
as
a
cost
to
cover
as
a
contribution
to
reserve.
So
we
asked
the
Consultants
to
include
in
the
the
modeling
getting
us
to
180
days
of
operating
expenses
no
later
than
two
years
later
to
the
end
of
calendar
year.
2024.
I'll
talk
more
about
that
in
just
a
moment.
J
So
as
a
reminder,
as
Laurie
talked
about,
we
are
in
a
competitive
environment
and
the
customers,
our
customers
pay
our
costs,
as
well
as
the
pcia
and
a
good
way
to
think
about
it,
as
shown
on
the
slide
here,
is
that
the
pcia,
which
stands
for
power
charge
indifference.
Adjustment
is
really
PG,
E's
stranded
above
Market
costs,
so
they
retain
a
portfolio
of
generation,
assets
themselves
and
contracts
that
they've
made
long-term
contracts
with
other
generators.
So
those
costs
those
those
assets
and
contracts
also
have
value.
J
So
the
difference
between
those
costs
and
the
value
is
what
we're
calling
stranded
costs
here
and
those
are
shared
by
our
customers
in
a
monthly
charge
per
month
on
a
per
kilowatt
hour
basis.
J
What
is
really
it
varies
year
to
year,
though,
because
market
prices
change
and
that's
really
the
the
portfolio,
what
dictates
the
portfolio
value
and
there's
a
very
defined
process
through
the
California
Public
Utility
Commission,
but
it's
annual
and
so
there's
this
annual
chew
up,
and
so
this
real
emphasis
on
short-term
market
conditions
and
results
in
some
significant
Market
swings
that
will
show
on
a
chart
in
just
a
moment.
J
So
it's
very
hard
for
staff
to
to
predict
and
plan
where
we've
made
great
strides
over
the
last
three
years
to
to
predict
better
and
we're
in
a
much
better
position
than
than
we
were.
But
it's
still
quite
challenging
and
there's
tremendous
volatility.
J
A
quick
graphic
here
to
show
how
the
relationship
between
our
rates
and
the
pcia
and
what
customers
pay.
So
we
use
the
term
customers,
pay
generation
charges
and
that's
the
sum
of
our
rates
and
the
pcia,
and
so
you
can
see
when
the
pcia
changes.
If
you're
holding
something
constant,
then
our
R
rates
would
need
to
change
if
we
were
not
going
to
change
the
rates
so
from
a
customer
perspective.
This
is
this
is
how
they
experience
it.
J
J
J
When
this
concept
first
got
going,
you
can
see
that
in
2022
there
was
a
big
step
down
and
then
the
latest
forecasts-
and
this
is
per
PG
E's
own
submission-
that
a
pcia
from
for
our
customers
would
be
actually
negative
for
for
now,
as
we
think
about
customer
bill
impact
where
it's
not,
it's
not
clear
that
that's
going
to
sail
all
the
way
through
and
and
there's
another
month
and
a
half
before
a
final
decision
at
the
cpuc.
J
J
J
So
the
top
number
here,
the
top
line-
that's
the
revenue
requirement
that
we
talked
about
a
little
bit
a
few
slides
ago.
J
Those
are
those
same
numbers
there
and
just
to
help
the
committee
think
about
you
know
what
what
does
this
mean
if
we
kept
rates
the
same
as
last
year,
that
would
allow
for
an
additional
operation,
an
additional
contribution
to
operating
reserves,
in
addition
to
that
which
we
are
already
baking
into
the
revenue
requirement,
so
that
the
the
total
potential
contribution
to
Reserves
at
current
rates
were
we
to
keep
current
rates.
The
same
would
be
between
80
million
and
127
million
over
calendar
year.
2023.
J
So
we
will
bring,
as
we
always
do,
a
recommendation
for
rate
setting
for
next
calendar
year
to
cancel
next
month,
but
to
give
a
preview.
Our
recommendation
is
to
follow
the
guidance
and
the
recommendations
that
we
heard
from
Deloitte
in
their
report
at
the
end
of
last
year
and
to
to
continue
to
build
and
use
this
use.
This
opportunity
this
year,
these
very
low
pcia,
to
continue
to
build
and
put
most
of
that
margin
towards
growing
reserves
in
calendar
year,
2023
to
hopefully
180
days
of
operating
expenses.
J
But
what
that
would
look
like
is,
is
here
so
the
and
these
are
ending
calendar
year,
2023
unrestricted
cash
balances
and
as
described
there
at
the
top.
That
is
based
on
where
we
finish
calendar
year,
2022
contribution
from
operations
in
2023
and
includes
paying
back
the
60
million
in
commercial
paper.
Loan.
J
So
we
are
are
hoping
that
the
expected
case,
and
that
would
be
with
a
little
room
for
error
the
180
day
Target
and
the
final
slide
is,
is
just
showing
that
on
a
fiscal
year
basis
for
fiscal
year
2022-23
and
then
and
then
the
following,
as
discussed,
there's
a
lot
of
uncertainty
in
the
pcie
pcia
every
year,
as
well
as
PG
e
rates,
and
we
want
to
take
those
into
account
or
recommend
that
council
do
so,
and
so
2024
is
somewhat
more
speculative.
J
J
So,
as
I
said,
we'll
continue
to
evaluate
this
as
well
as
monitoring.
What's
going
on
in
the
puc
regarding
the
pcia
proceeding
and
PG
E
Generation
rates
and
market
conditions
and
we'll
return
to
council
for
consideration
for
rates
and
power
mix,
December
6.
F
Yes,
Paul
solo
from
the
Horseshoe,
thank
you
for
the
report,
but
I'm
thinking
the
average
citizen,
which
these
are
public
meetings-
and
this
is
the
the
purpose
of
the
meeting-
is
to
inform
just
the
regular
average
citizen
about
City
business
and,
what's
going
on
and
I'm
afraid
that
a
lot
of
the
language
that's
being
used
in
these
meetings
is
very
esoteric
and
you
really
have
to
have
a
background
and
and
kind
of
like
a
be
versed
in
a
lot
of
information
prior
so
that
you
can
really
understand.
F
F
Thirdly,
is
that
we're
going
to
be,
as
as
we
start,
moving
to
electricity
and
the
deadline
for
creating
all
electric
vehicles,
2035
you're,
going
to
have
to
start
investing
in
a
in
a
culture
of
electricity
for
lack
of
a
better
term?
In
doing
so,
it's
going
to
create
this
disparity
and
that
disparity
is
going
to
continue
to
be
widened.
We're
going
to
say:
oh
well,
this
Drew
out
all
the
racial
Equity
disparities.
We
already
know
that.
So
what
my
question
is
to
this
commit
to
this
particular
report.
F
Why
is
there
not
a
a
cost
analysis
with
respect
to
racial
Equity?
How
come
we
are
not
using
a
racial
Equity
lens
in
order
to
determine
how
the
different
districts
are
going
to
experience
these
costs,
because
the
District
of
building
experienced
them
very
very
differently,
and
so
that
cost
analysis
with
respect
to
racial
Equity
needs
to
be
placed
in
this
report.
G
All
right
Beekman
here,
thanks
for
seeing
my
hand
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
offer
thanks
for
bringing
Community
energy
items
to
the
Community
Council
meetings.
I
think
is
this
memo
and
the
presentation.
It
wasn't
so
much
spoken
as
a
presentation,
but
the
memo
did
speak
of
ideas,
practices
that
you
can
actually
be
doing
in
the
next
few
years.
G
That
includes
solar
and
I,
wanted
to
comment
that
you
know
there's
new
things
going
around
to
to
limit
the
future
of
solar
and
take
away
its
it's
it's
practices
of
funding
that
it
can
have
for
local
people
and
just
everyday
residents,
and
it's
sad
that
that's
happening
I
can
understand
how
it's
happening.
I
wish
as
it
was
happening.
It
wouldn't
be
so
brutal
and
and
cut
throat
and
strong,
and
we
can
take
a
softer
approach
to
answer
these
solar
questions
in
the
future
to
to
allow
more
solar
for
more
individuals.
G
How
we
do
make
those
efforts
and
I
don't
want
to
lose,
that,
and,
and
and
people
are
doing
it
in
such
a
way
to
really
hurt
it
and
that
we
should
be
doing
things
that
note
that
we
have
to
make
some
changes
I
suppose,
but
from
that
to
not
hurt
residential
solar
use
and
how
more
and
more
people
can
have
rooftop,
solar
and
I
think
that's
a
great
concept
and
it's
more
important
than
the
solar
farm
issues,
I
think
and
it's
it's
a
real
sustainable
idea.
E
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
the
report.
It's
it's
good
news,
I'm
glad
to
see
we're
actually
going
to
be
able
to
reduce
rates
for
customers
this
year.
I
might
just
have
some
questions
about
long-term
planning.
First
first,
when
we,
you
said
that
pcia
we're
assuming
zero
and
that
it
could
be
negative
next
year.
When
do
we
learn
what
the
CIA
will
be.
I
So
there's
a
final
proceeding
that
typically
happens
in
December
and
then
you
know
depending
on
stakeholder
or
comment.
Typically
rates
are
implemented
in
January,
but
certainly
in
the
past,
we've
seen
things
get
delayed
till
March
or
later
in
the
spring,
so
somewhat
hard
to
know
until
a
little
bit
later
in
the
year.
So.
E
Pg
E's
rates
will
adjust
at
that
point
once
they
have
the
pcia
set
right.
So,
but
where
do
we
do
our
adjustment
once
a
year?
So
that
means
next
year.
We
would
take
into
account
or
do
we
have
the
opportunity
to
adjust
once
we
know
the
real
pcia.
I
Yeah
so
typically,
we
have
come
every
December
in
advance
of
that
PG
e
rate
change
and
the
reason
for
that
is.
Our
rates
have
been
pegged
to
PG
e,
and
so
you
know
we're
trying
to
set
our
competitive
position.
It's
been
challenging
for
the
obvious
reasons,
because
it's
not
a
done
deal
on
what
PG
E's
rates
will
be,
so
we're
going
to
continue
to
bring
this
forward
to
council,
but
in
terms
of
long-term
planning.
I
What
we
hope
to
do
by
going
to
cost
of
service
rates
is
then
actually
moved
to
taking
rates,
write
recommendations
in
the
spring
with
a
budget
process
so
that
we
can
align
with
the
fiscal
year
process,
which
is
a
little
better
for
the
city,
but
the
other
benefit
of
that
is
PG.
E's
rates
will
be
known,
so
that's
a
benefit
of
going
to
cost
of
service.
E
I
We
have
we
haven't
made
that
decision,
yet
you
know
I.
Think
a
couple
of
things
is
we'll
make
this
recommendation
in
December
just
that
rates,
and
then
we
need
to
monitor
revenues
and
and
see
what
happens
and
and
also
monitor
the
outcome
of
PG
eth
to
determine
whether
or
not
we'll
bring
forward
another
recommendation
in
June.
E
Okay,
good
the
we've
talked
about
the
reserves
before
the
the
goal
is
to
have
180
day
reserves
about
180
million.
If
we
get
what's
expected,
or
we
may
even
do
better
than
that,
we
could
end
up
with
Reserves
well
over
180
already
this
year
and
I
know,
we've
talked
before
about
once
we
get
to
that
point
using
those
reserves
for
subsidies
and
other
incentives
for
customers
to
to
do
more
Energy
Efficiency
and
help
pay
for
Energy
Efficiency
projects
around
the
city.
E
Now
that
we're
close
to
that
point,
are
we
beginning
to
map
out
what
we
might
do
as
a
program.
I
Yeah,
it's
a
it's
an
exciting
position
to
be
in
so,
if
you're,
a
qual
we've
actually
for
the
last
three
years
since
our
startup
we've
had
a
programs
roadmap
that
it
that
comes
to
this
committee.
Typically
in
the
spring
and
to
date
our
programs
have
mostly
been
funded
by
external
funding
sources,
mostly
cpuc
funds
or
or
other
funding
sources.
I
But
in
that
program's
roadmap
it
does
identify
the
program
areas
that
we
would
focus
on
once.
There
are
additional
revenues
to
spend
on
those
types
of
programs,
so
we
envisioned
this
spring,
bringing
that
forward
to
tne
again
to
getting
your
input
and
we
do
Envision
it
being
a
much
more
robust
conversation,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
policy
decisions
to
be
made
on.
I
E
You
answered
my
next
question,
so
that's
good,
so
so
you
would
do
some
kind
of
mix
of
potential
further
discounts
for
customers.
In
addition
to
beginning
to
implement
things
off
the
roadmap,
there's
no
triggers
that
automatically
do
things
off
the
roadmap.
They
would
have
to
come
back
and
be
approved
by
council
at
that
time.
E
B
I
did
have
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it
is
good
news
that
the
pcia
may
be
going
away.
I
hope
it
stays
away,
but
we
we're
not
going
to
fund
programs
until
we
have
that
Reserve
at
the
180
Day
level.
Is
that
right,
Lori.
I
Yeah
so
so
we
have
recommended
some
vending
of
programs
the
next
week
we
are
bringing
forward
an
EV
pilot
with
a
very
limited
amount
of
spending.
As
you
know,
we've
also
recommended
some
programs
that
leverage
external
funding,
our
Energy
Efficiency
programs
and
the
Cal
evip
program,
which
is
largely
funded
through
the
energy
commission.
I
So
we
are
going
to
stay
the
course
with
that
very
limited
program
funding
until
we
build
that
Reserve,
but
yes,
very
good
news
that
we
expect
to
have
that
Reserve
built
by
this
time
next
year,
December
2023,
and
so
that
does
present
opportunities
for
additional
programs.
But
again
our
very
strong
recommendation
is
to
build
the
reserve
first
and
I
would
say
that.
Yes,
that's
good
news
that
the
pcia
is
negative
next
year.
The
reason
for
that
is
that
power
supply
costs
are
high.
The
market
value
is
high
of
PG
E's
portfolio.
I.
I
Don't
expect
that
to
stay
the
case
forever.
Usually
market
prices
will
settle.
Market
prices
are
high
right
now
for
a
number
of
reasons.
When
the
drought,
you
know
the
heat
waves
and
extreme
weather
events
that
we've
seen
over
the
summer
and
also
the
cold
weather
event
in
Texas
and
then
finally,
the
Warner
Ukraine.
D
I
Really
pushing
natural
gas
prices
up
so
I,
don't
think
those
things
you
know
they
may
certainly
continue
into
2023
and
2024,
and
so
we
may
see
a
low
pcia
for
a
few
years,
but
it's
still
something
we
have
to
stay
very
focused
on
and
also
continue
to
focus
at
the
commission
and
in
the
legislature
for
a
longer
term
solution.
B
Yeah
has
there
been
any
any
developments
on
the
cpuc
setting
a
timeline
for
a
sunset
of
the
pcia,
because
I
think
we
we
know
from
your
work
that
these
contracts
aren't
Evergreen
right.
They
don't
last
forever,
there's
a
time.
There's
a
timeline
on
these
contracts
and
there's
some
point
where
I
would
hope
the
cpuc
would
say
to
PG
e.
You
are
now
in
a
competitive
environment.
I
Yeah,
unfortunately,
that
that's
a
very
common
sense
argument
and
we
share
it
and
I
think
we
need
to
continue
continue
to
make
it
absolutely
very
supportive
of
that
and
I
I
think
there
are
some
areas
where
we'll
see
that
and
then
there's
some
areas
where
we'll
continue
to
have
challenges.
So
let's
take
it,
you
know
where
I
you
know,
the
good
news
is
where
they
are
contracts.
I
You
know
solar
contracts
other
those
early
when
they
do
fall
off,
there
should
roll
out
of
the
pcia,
and
so
that's
good
news
and
the
more
challenging
side
of
it
is
PG
E's
own
generation
assets
and
so
unfortunately,
on
the
the
utility
owned
generation
assets.
Those
can
go
on
in
perpetuity.
So
they
continue
to
make
investments
in
that,
and
you
know
to
the
extent
that
those
generation
assets
are
not
are
not
operating
within
the
market.
I
We
could
still
continue
to
see
issues
in
the
pcias,
so
that
is
something
we're
going
to
continue
to
need
to
Advocate
on
that
you
know
they
shouldn't
be
making
above
Market
Investments
and
those
types
of
generation
supplies
and
then
counting
on
recovering
that
in
the
pcia.
That
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense,
but
we're
going
to
need
to
continue
to
build
coalitions
and
and
work
both
at
the
cpuc
and
the
legislature.
On
that
issue
and.
B
That
our
ratepayers
don't
have
to
pay
twice
for
right
resource
adequacy,
for
example,
right.
Okay,
thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
other
hands
up
so
can
we
have
the
role.
B
K
Well
everybody's
coming
down,
John
risto,
director
of
transportation
and
we're
going
to
be
presenting
Vision,
zero
task
force
and
its
report
and
with
me
here
today
is
Lily
limsa.
My
deputy
director
in
charge
of
traffic
safety
and
operations,
lamb,
Cruise
division
manager,
Jesse
mince
Roth
program
manager,
program
manager
for
business,
zero
and
Sergeant
gates
from
the
San
Jose
police
department.
So
I'm
going
to
get
go
we'll
get
going
right
away
with
presentation,
I
think
Jesse.
You
know.
L
Okay,
yes,
I
think
you
can
all
hear
me
great,
yes,
I'm,
Justin
Roth
and
thank
you
for
the
introduction
and
I
guess.
I'll
just
jump
in
so.
L
Today,
we'll
be
speaking
to
you
about
three
topics:
the
2022
traffic
collision
data
Trends,
the
recent
accomplishments
and
upcoming
work
and
project
evaluation.
L
The
first
one
is
2022
traffic
collision
data
Trends
and,
as
I
begin,
this
section,
which
is
about
traffic
fatalities
and
data.
I,
would
like
to
acknowledge
that
these
numbers
in
the
graph
are
our
fellow
San
joseans,
our
neighbors
and
our
friends.
L
So,
in
the
last
10
years,
traffic
fatalities
have
doubled
from
29
in
2012
to
60
in
2015,
2019
and
2021..
In
the
pandemic
years,
we've
seen
a
lot
of
variability.
2020
was
a
low
year,
as
was
the
first
half
of
2021.
The
second
half
of
2021
into
2022
have
seen
much
higher
fatalities
than
usual.
The
yellow
line
on
the
chart
on
the
right
shows
a
steeper
slope
than
usual
from
January
to
April.
L
This
period
included
two
double
pedestrian
fatalities,
one
at
the
intersection
of
Almaden
Expressway
and
Foxworthy
Avenue
in
January
and
another
on
Ocala
Avenue
at
Oakton
Court
in
April.
We
are
seeing
similar
findings
from
other
cities
and
states
in
National,
Data,
the
national
highway
traffic
safety,
administration
or
Nitsa
reported
a
seven
percent
increase
in
traffic
fatalities
in
the
first
quarter
of
2022
compared
to
the
previous
year
and
a
20
increase
from
from
quarter
1
2020
reaching
a
20-year
High
California
was
up
six
percent
in
the
first
quarter
of
2022
over
the
previous
year.
L
L
Looking
at
traffic
fatality
trends
for
2022
we're
trending
to
a
record
high
for
traffic
fatalities
and
more
of
them
involve
people
hit
while
walking
now
over.
50
percent
of
the
total
59
occurred
in
darkness,
many
of
them
in
the
first
few
months
of
the
year
that
started
off
2022
higher
than
usual
and
has
also
been
the
darkest
time
of
the
year.
L
So
since
2019,
the
city
has
been
using
changeable
message,
signs
on
major
roadways,
particularly
those
designated
as
priority
safety
corridors,
to
alert
drivers
to
slow
down
in
coordinating
with
the
police
department
to
do
enforcement.
In
this
time
of
year,
November
to
March,
which
just
began
in
2022,
we
started
working
with
prns
and
the
housing
department
to
distribute
flashlights
and
reflective
safety
vests,
which
I've
had
here
so.
H
J
L
Some
of
our
best-
and
we
also
have
these
two
types
of
flashlights
which
have
our
new
logo
on
them
and
we're
still
confirming
the
numbers
for
this
year,
but
so
far
we
believe
there
to
be
10
or
11
people
experiencing
a
homelessness
among
the
traffic
fatalities,
streets
with
posted
speed
limits
of
35
miles
or
above
represent.
82
percent
of
the
fatalities
and
32
percent
of
the
fatalities
have
occurred
on
the
roads
that
we've
designated
as
priority
safety
corridors
with
numbers
changing
and
to
ensure
action
plan
is
evolving.
With
the
latest
data.
L
It's
important
for
us
to
review
the
most
recent
five-year
data
to
make
sure
our
action
plan
evolves
with
the
data
dot
staff
is
working
with
our
data,
dashboard
consultant,
Urban
logic
to
update
and
likely
expand
our
vision,
zero
priority
safety
corridor
Network,
the
existing
map
of
17
streets,
totaling
70
miles,
was
released
in
2017
and
is
based
on
crashes
and
injuries
that
occurred
in
the
five-year
period
from
2011
to
2016..
The
2022
update
in
progress
will
use
data
from
the
most
recent
five-fold
data
years
2017-2021.
L
L
245
safety
infrastructure
projects
were
completed
in
fiscal
year
2021-2022
on
the
next
Pages,
we'll
discuss
the
two
Corridor
safety
projects
that
were
built
in
quick,
build
materials,
but
we
also
want
to
call
attention
to
the
many
smaller
safety
projects,
the
Tod,
the
dot
staff
works
on
every
year.
One
of
the
new
project
areas
is
sideshow
reduction
projects.
These
locations
were
selected
in
coordination
with
the
police
department,
pedestrian
safety,
enhancements
traffic,
calming
projects,
Traffic
Safety
construction
and
retiming
projects
and
bike
lane
projects
all
have
Street
safety
benefits.
L
The
Story
Road
Project
is
a
two
mile
long
project
from
Knox
Avenue
to
White,
Road
and
shown
here
in
these
pictures
before
and
after
dot
built
new
pedestrian
Refuge
areas
along
new
high
visibility,
crosswalks
that
shorten
the
crossing
distance
and
improve
visibility
of
people
crossing
the
street
on
foot.
The
project
also
includes
curb
extensions
before
radar
speed
signs,
71
LED
street
light
fixture
upgrades
and
Edge
line
striping
that
visually
Narrows,
the
outer
Lane
width.
L
Hillside
Avenue
is
a
2.2
mile
long
project
from
Albany
Expressway
to
Ross
Avenue
the
project
leveraged
the
pavement
program.
Together
with
the
fund
for
clean
air
grant
from
VTA
to
build
and
quick
build
materials,
we
removed
one
excess
traveling
in
each
direction.
We
installed
a
quick,
build
Center
median
Island
to
reduce
vehicle
conflict.
We
installed
bike
Lanes
with
green
pavement
treatments
and
added
bicycle
detection
to
signals
to
add
at
Major
intersections
improvements
were
made
at
six
signalized
intersection,
including
high
visibility,
crosswalks
curb
extensions
and
high
visibility,
yellow
signal
back
plates
as.
L
For
the
upcoming
fiscal
year,
2022
to
2023
213
safety
projects
are
currently
scheduled.
Six
safety
projects
are
on
five
priority
safety
corridors
which
are
Branham,
Lane,
McKee,
Road,
White,
Road,
Saratoga,
Avenue
and
Tully
Road
58,
pedestrian
safety
and
traffic.
Calming
projects
are
on
the
list,
as
well
as
five
Sideshow
reduction
projects,
109
traffic
signal
projects
and
35
bike.
Network
projects.
L
Moving
on
to
Grant
applications,
dot
recently
submitted
multiple
applications
for
three
major
grant
opportunities
staff
applied
for
projects,
totaling
331
million
dollars
for
one
Bay,
Area,
Grant
or
obag
funding,
anticipate
receiving
59.5
million
dollars,
of
which
36.8
million
dollars
is
on
three
of
division.
Zero
priority
safety
corridors
and
22.7
million
dollars
is
a
non-vision,
zero
Corridor
locations.
L
We
applied
for
450
000
from
the
Federal
Highway
Administration,
highway
safety,
Improvement
program,
known
as
hsip
the
location
at
Ocala
Avenue
in
Oakton
Court.
We
applied
for
a
450
000
median,
which
I
previously
mentioned
it's
one
of
the
locations
that
had
a
double
pedestrian
fatality
earlier
this
year.
It's
also
located
across
the
street
from
a
school
that
has
a
School
site
with
multiple
schools
in
it,
including
the
DCP
Alum,
Rock,
middle
school
and
Ocala
steam
Academy.
L
We
also
applied
to
a
new
Grant,
which
is
the
U.S
department
of
transportation's
new
program,
called
Safe
Streets
for
all
the
implementation
grant
program.
This.
L
This
application
includes
also
a
big
data
subscription,
which
we
could
use
to
evaluate
for
all
projects
city-wide
before
and
after,
and
also
seed
money
for
a
local
chapter
in
the
South
Bay
of
families
for
Safe
Streets.
We
anticipate
hearing
the
official
results
of
all
these
applications
in
early
2023.
L
Moving
on
to
the
vision,
zero
strategic
communication
and
Outreach
plan,
which
includes
these
new
slide
templates
and
also
this
new
logo
that
you'll
see
on
our
materials
we
completed
phase
one
which
was
developing
a
communication
strategy
and
in
phase
two,
which
included
identifying
an
issue
for
a
big
campaign
to
do
safety
messaging
for
Behavior
change.
Speeding
reduction
was
selected
as
the
subject
for
San
Jose
division,
Zero's
first
branded
campaign.
We
did
focus
groups
in
English,
Spanish
and
Vietnamese,
and
they
reviewed
four
ad
Design
Concepts.
L
The
key
finding
is
that
San
Jose
participants
do
not
identify
themselves
as
Speeders,
which
makes
it.
You
know
why
it's
important
to
have
a
professional
marketer
come
up
with
the
message,
and
so
they
will
be
presenting
the
campaign
strategy
Overview
at
the
next
division.
Zero
task
force
meeting
on
November,
30th.
L
Looking
at
setting
speed
limits
for
safer
streets
assembly,
Bill
43
became
effective
on
January,
1
2022,
and
it
gives
local
agencies
more
flexibility
in
lowering
the
speed
limit
in
business
activity
districts
if
it
meets
very
specific
criteria.
The
posted
speed
limit
was
lowered
to
20
miles
per
hour
for
six
business
business
activity,
districts
which
are
Evergreen
Village
Square
portions
of
Almaden
Avenue
Jackson,
Street,
Post,
Street,
Santa,
Clara,
Street
and
Willow
Street,
we'll
be
working
with
a
consultant
to
identify
more
streets
that
meet
the
Bill's
Pacific
eligibility
requirements
in
the
coming
year.
L
As
part
of
the
new
bill,
engineering
and
traffic
surveys
may
be
extended
to
14
years,
as
opposed
to
the
10
years
that
they
were
previously
able
to
live.
This
allows
the
police
department
to
enforce
with
Radars
on
corridors
where
no
major
changes
have
been
made,
but
surveys
were
previously
considered
to
have
been
expired.
L
With
significant
Investments
going
on,
we
strive
to
do
our
best
to
evaluate
projects
in
August
2022,
at
division,
zero
task
force
meeting
we
presented
before
and
after
project
evaluations.
We
intended
to
show
if
projects
are
meeting
their
goals.
Typically
we'd
like
to
use
one
year
of
after
data,
but
we
did
some
of
these
projects
with
less
particularly
Center
Road.
We
only
had
six
months
of
after
data
because
we
were
applying
to
a
large
Grant.
We
wanted
to
know
where
we
wanted
to
make
potentially
more
improvements.
L
So
among
the
projects
that
we're
discussing
here,
there's
three
different
kinds
of
projects
on
this
slide.
Center
Road
is
a
quick,
build
Corridor
and
it
has
a
capital
median
and
interest
and
I'm
sorry.
The
second
project
which
is
McLaughlin
is
a
capital
median
project
and
the
third
section
which
is
White
Road,
is
intersections
where
we
have
installed
flashing
beacons
so
just
to
talk
about
Center
Road,
it
was
the
first
major
Corridor
Safety
project,
completed
in
quick,
build
materials
under
the
2020
Vision,
zero
action
plan
and
true
to
the
material
strategy
name.
L
The
project
was
quicker
and
cheaper
to
build
than
capital
projects,
which
is
a
particularly
good
strategy
match
for
a
program
with
the
goal
to
build
safety
improvements
before
more
injuries
occur.
The
Center
Road
evaluation
focuses
on
the
3.1
mile
Corridor
project
built
in
quick,
build
for
about
365
thousand
dollars
completed
in
August
2021,
that
is
based
on
a
consultant-led
grant
funded
project
and
that
planning
process
was
completed
in
2020.
The
project
area
includes
a
3.6
million
dollar
Grant,
funded
median,
which
is
also
completed
in
June
2021..
L
So
going
to
results
all
project,
all
injuries
for
all.
Road
users
decreased
in
all
these
projects.
However,
this
slide
is
very
focused
on
fatal
and
severe
injuries,
which
we
call
KSI,
and
they
are
the
focus
of
the
vision,
zero
initiative,
so
comparing
five
years
before
average,
so
an
average
of
five
years
before
two
in
each
of
these
cases,
Center
Road,
with
six
months
of
after
data
White
Road,
has
nine
months
of
after
data
and
McLaughlin.
It
has
one
year
of
after
data.
L
We
agree
is
confusing,
but
we'll
update
these
when
we
have
more
data
in
the
after
period
for
Center
Road,
there
were
two
fatal
and
severe
injuries,
and
we
have
already
applied
to
Capital
grants
to
make
these
places
safer.
The
intersection
of
Center
and
umberger
road.
We
have
applied
to
one
Grant
to
build
a
protected
intersection
there
and
the
intersection
of
Center
Road
and
keys.
We've
also
applied
to
another
Grant
to
make
that
area
safer
on
McLaughlin
Avenue.
L
Since
the
project
was
completed,
there
have
been
two
fatalities:
north
of
the
intersection
at
Tilly
Road
and
two
severe
injuries
at
the
intersection
of
glenfinion,
which
is
a
T
intersection
where
the
new
median
was
built
in
the
north
leg
in
these
locations.
We
need
to
go
back
and
look
to
see
what
more
we
can
do.
Staff
continues
to
evaluate
projects
to
determine
if
additional
enhancements
are
warranted
on
White
Road
we're
looking
at
the
rectangular
flashing
beacons,
and
we
see
that
they
have
worked
so
far
at
those
intersections.
L
F
Yes
possible
to
put
the
Horseshoe
the
one
thing
that
is
very
odious
about
these
reports
is
the
monetization
of
the
killings
of
my
fellow
citizens
of
the
city.
It's
like
you,
get
more
grant
money,
the
more
murders
that
are
committed,
I
mean
these
are
dollar
signs
you
see
and
and
it's
it's
sickening
to
think
that
that
person's
life,
which
the
majority
of
the
populations
that's
being
slaughtered
on
our
streets,
are
people
that
are
experiencing
being
unhoused
and
probably
which
I
would
say,
is
a
very
accurate
assessment.
F
Generational,
poverty,
okay
and
you
just
you
you're,
talking
very
Cavalier
about
monetizing
their
debts,
because,
if
they're
killed,
then
you
get
three
million
dollar
Grant
to
build
a
something
that
should
have
been
there
in
the
first
place
to
prevent
the
death.
That's
number
one
number
two
is
that
15
million
dollars
has
already
been
paid
out
through
Vision
zero
and
the
body
count
continually
increases.
F
So
it's
it's.
It's
a
failed.
It's
a
failed
proposition
to
continue
to
finance
business
zero.
It's
a
failure.
Number
three
is
that,
and
this
is
a
fact
that
30
of
the
fatalities
are
experienced
on
three
percent
of
the
land.
Mass
in
San
Jose-
this
is
a
fact.
What's
being
done
about
that,
we
don't
need
any
more
data.
Okay,
we
don't
need
a
computer
to
tell
us
what
we
already
know.
F
Maybe
you
do,
but
we
do,
and
so
I'd
like
to
something
to
be
said
with
regard
to
the
issues
that
I've
just
raised
and
I'm
like
once
again:
I'm
sick
of
the
monetization
of
the
poverty
that's
being
experienced
in
this
city,
because
the
people
that
are
being
slaughtered
are
homeless
and
their
life
wasn't
worth
housing
when
they
were
alive
but
to
work
Millions
dead.
Thank
you.
G
Hi
well
here,
thanks
for
this
item,
I
guess
first
off
a
reminder
that
Vision
zero
in
this
country
was
based
on
European,
designs
and
and
designs
of
like
Guadalajara
Mexico.
You
know
that's
kind
of
like
what
Viva
San
Jose
is
about
each
year.
That's
you
know
it's
concepts
of
community
Harmony,
not
not
law
enforcement
technology.
That's
obviously
the
American
concepts
of
these
things.
Good
luck!
How
we
can
do
more
towards
a
more
organic,
harmonious
concept.
Division!
G
Zero
with
that
said,
a
reminder
that
you
know
the
statistics
that
we're
using
about
KSI
and
such
we
made
a
commitment
to
good
racial
Equity
ideas
a
few
years
ago
in
the
future
of
KSI
statistics
and
to
start
counting
homeless
people
into
those
KSI
statistics,
and
we
need
to
have
those
open
conversations
as
you're
talking
about
these
items
about
that
subject.
I
know:
there's
a
pretty
intense
battle
going
on
back
and
forth
about
how
to
get
funding
and
how
to
read
into
statistics
of
the
past
few
years.
G
We
really
have
to
be
honest
and
truthful.
You
know
that
we
are
now
including
homeless
people
into
KSI
statistics
when
we
did
in
the
past
and
that's
important
I
know:
Gail
osner
she's
got
some
ideas
and
really
wants
to
work
on.
You
know
how
do
we
address?
You
know
homeless
deaths
out
of
these
Vision
traffic
is
traffic
issues,
so
good
luck
and
working
on
these
things
and
with
30
seconds
left,
you
know
I
can't
say
enough
that
we
we
have
to
practice
openness
and
accountability
in
in
all
the
new
technology.
G
That's
going
to
be
used
for
these
projects,
it
can
be
done,
it
shouldn't
be
fearful
and
obviously
you
know
the
aopr
issue
went
really
badly
back
in
October.
We
have
to
be
really
honest
in
our
future.
How
to
address
those
sort
of
concepts
with
ourselves.
Accountability
is
so
important
at
this
time.
Good
luck
with
that.
Thanks.
M
We
did
vote
at
the
council
to
to
do
a
swap
of
myself
and
and
who
was
vice
chair,
Pam
Foley,
so
the
next
Vision
zero
meeting
I
will
be
twice
I,
believe
I'll,
be
the
vice
chair
and
she'll
be
the
chair,
but
as
the
outgoing
share
of
vision,
zero
I
will
respond
to
some
of
the
the
comments
when
I
did
want
to
just
make
a
couple
comments
of
my
own.
So
first
off
Vision
zero
is
an
aspirational
goal
for
those
that
aren't
totally
aware.
M
It's
something
that
a
number
of
cities
across
the
country
have
adopted,
and
it
absolutely
is
an
aspirational
goal.
It's
one
that
is,
we
hope
to
to
be
able
to
achieve.
I
know
I,
certainly
do
it's
why
we
have
a
task
force,
we're
going
in
the
absolute
wrong
direction
and
it's
it's
a
goal
for
our
entire
city
to
be
able
to
drive
these
traffic
related
fatalities
down
to
zero
and
I.
Think
it's
a
very
worthy
aspirational
goal
and
then,
secondly,
in
place,
it's
not
clear.
M
We
would
much
rather
not
have
to
apply
for
or
receive
any
Grant
dollars
for
vision,
zero
projects.
We
would
much
rather
have
these
incidents
not
occur.
This
is
not
about
monetizing
death
or
fatalities
in
case
that's
not
clear,
and
for
those
that
are
listening
and
and
just
for
myself.
Some
of
the
the
comments
I
will
say
that
I'm
really
appreciative
of
the
comprehensive
list
of
projects
I
think
that's
very
helpful.
We
get
a
lot
of
questions
at
times
from
community
members
on
you
know.
M
What
is
it
that
she
is
doing
you
know
in
in
you
know
we
get
that
amongst
our
districts
and
I
know
that
we
look
at
some
of
the
projects
that
we'll
have
just
in
our
district
alone,
and
it's
not
common,
where
we'll
have
such
a
comprehensive
list
to
go
on.
I
think
this
list
that
you
provided
here
is
extremely
helpful
for
all
council
members
to
be
able
to
take
back
to
their
communities
and
show
really
how
big
the
need
is.
M
M
Secondly,
in
regards
to
ab43
I,
do
think
that
it
is,
it
is
not
going
to
be
as
beneficial
I
hope
that
our
lobby
or
excuse
me
our
consultant-
can
help
us.
But
my
request
is
that
we
engage
in
some
lobbying
efforts.
We
engage
our
sacramental
lobbyists
and
maybe
try
to
see
if
there's
an
interest
from
cities
across
the
state
to
do
more
I
know.
I
have
an
interest
to
do
more.
I
know
my
colleagues
do.
M
What
we've
found
is
that
that
tool
is
not
going
to
be
as
useful
for
us
as
we
had
initially
hoped,
and
we
see
the
number
of
intersections
and
and
corridors
where
we're
able
to
implement
it
right
now
and
it's
just
it's,
it's
not
very
significant
and
so
I
would
like
to
see
if
there's
a
way
that
we
could
initiate
some
lobbying
efforts
on
ab-43
and
all
that
staff
to
respond
to
that.
After
my
my
final
comment
here.
M
Lastly,
as
the
outgoing
chair
of
divisions
or
task
force,
I
did
want
to
make
the
full
comments.
I
will
make
these
at
the
last
Vision
zero
task
force
meeting
that
I'll
attend,
but
I
do
believe
that
considering
the
direction
we're
going,
We've
we've
had
this
task
force.
We,
you
know
engaged
in
this
because
we
were
going
the
wrong
direction.
Well,
it's
still
getting
worse
and
this
may
be
the
worst
year,
yet
I
think
that
we
absolutely
need
to
double
down
and
consider
making
this
a
much
more
longer
term
effort.
M
It
has
been
helpful.
It's
been
helpful
to
stay
on
top
of
some
of
these
things
and
helpful
to
look
at
these
more
collaboratively
with
Partners,
across
the
county
and
and
across
the
city
and
I
think
we
should
consider
moving
advancing
it
from
a
task
force
to
something
like
what
we
do
with
our
smart
cities
committee
and
actually
consider
evolving
it
on
its
own,
at
least
in
in
the
near
term.
M
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
be
getting
down
to
to
zero
anytime
soon
and
quite
frankly,
we
need
to
just
turn
this.
This
trajectory
around
and
and
I
think
that's
gonna
require
a
little
bit
more
effort
and
focus
and
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
we've
had
over
the
last
couple
years
with
the
task
force,
but
I
do
think
that
it
will
need
to
be
that
up
in
the
year
to
come,
and
so
that'll
be
my
comments
again
in
that
final
task
force.
M
B
Jesse,
do
you
have
an
update
on
council
member
proles's
question
about
ab-43
and
the
lobbying
effort
to
really
be
able
to
expand
that.
L
I,
don't
know
that
I
can
directly
comment
on
the
lobbyists
on
the
lobbying
effort,
but
one
thing
that
I
would
say
is:
there's
a
provision
in
ab43
which
is
not
yet
enacted,
which
is
referred
to
as
safety
corridors,
so
the
I
believe
Caltrans
has
until
2024
to
Define
what
safety
corridors
are,
but
cities
will
be
able
to
designate
up
to
20
of
their
roadway
as
safety
corridors,
and
once
that
happens,
there's
more
ability
to
I
believe
lower
speeds
on
those
places.
B
Rather
than
waiting
to
find
out
are
we
involved
in
assisting
with
the
rule
making
on
that.
H
Information,
yes,
yes
thank
you,
councilmember
Davis,
Lily,
themsel,
deputy
director
of
traffic
operations
and
safety.
Yes,
we
are
actively
engaged
in
that
conversation
with
Caltrans,
in
fact,
which
has
had
a
meeting
last
week
where
Laura
Wells
represented
dot
in
identifying
the
characteristics
of
our
streets
in
comparison
to
other
city
streets,
and
they
are
very
different
and
with
Caltrans
focused
on
certain
regions
of
the
state,
they
have
very
much
a
very
different
perception
of
what
a
safe
Street
would
be.
H
I
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
I
want
to
thank
and
Echo
the
words
of
my
colleague,
council
member
Perales
for
first
for
acknowledge
his
leadership
on
the
vision,
zero
task
force,
but
also
his
concern
about
our
growing
numbers
of
pedestrian
fatalities,
on
our
streets
and
and
for
those
members
of
the
public
who
believe
that
we're
monetizing
death
and
we
think
that
that's
okay
I
want
it
to
be
stated
very
clearly
that
we
don't
think
it's
okay.
We
are
pouring
lots
of
funds
into
Vision
zero,
but
unfortunately,
some
of
it
may
not
be
successful.
D
So
we
need
to
keep
it
evaluating
it
and
keep
working
in
efforts
to
make
our
streets
safer
for
all
of
our
pedestrians,
be
they
bicyclists,
be
they
house,
be
they
unhoused.
Just
in
my
district
last
week
there
was
a
fatality
of
We
Believe,
an
unhoused
person
on
Cherry
Road
near
Almaden
Expressway.
So
that's
that
it's
it's
a
very
serious
thing.
Every
count
every
Vision
zero
task
force
meeting.
D
We
start
with
actually
reading
the
names
of
the
individuals
who
have
been
who
have
passed
on
our
streets
as
pedestrians,
and
it's
very
very
sad
for
for
that
to
occur.
The
numbers
are
not
acceptable
at
all.
We
need
to
do
better.
I
think
this
report
shows
some
of
the
things
that
we're
doing,
but
we
need
to
do
better,
I'd
love
to
see
us.
D
D
The
data
that
that
what
we've
done
as
far
as
the
quick
build
is
concerned
is
actually
successful
in
achieving
the
goals
that
we
have,
but
I
have
to
say
that
people's
driving
behavior
is
really
appalling,
and
while
people
listening
to
this
meeting
right
now
may
not
believe
their
their
driving
is
is
appalling,
but
I'm
sure
they're
witnessing
appalling
Behavior
I
I
witnessed
the
other
day.
We
have
these
candlesticks
in
the
middle
of
Hillsdale
road
that
makes
it
almost
impossible
to
cross
over
it.
D
D
People
need
to
be
willing
to
listen
to
the
message
and
and
be
concerned
about
keeping
each
keeping
themselves
and
each
other
safe
I
have
a
husband
who
rides
his
bike
to
and
from
work
every
day
and
I
worry
about
him
when
he
comes
home
in
relation
to
the
traffic
and
and
bad
driving,
so
I
I
would
encourage
everyone
who's
listening
to
this
to
really
drive
safely,
and
please
be
really
careful
out
there
because
there's
it's
not.
D
We
are
tracking
the
unhoused,
but
it's
members
of
the
disabilities
that
senior
citizens
who
have
a
harder
time
crossing
the
street.
It's
there's
a
lot
of
conditions
on
our
streets
that
making
make
driving
easier
but
make
the
fatalities
easier.
Also,
and
that's
just
appalling.
We
need
to
do
better.
We
need
to
do
a
hundred
percent
better
and
and
that's
what
Vision
zero
is
all
about.
So
I
look
forward
to
us,
convening
and
and
moving
forward
and
coming
up
with
ideas
and
trying
things
we
just
we
try
things,
they
don't
work.
D
We
keep
trying
more
things
that
will
work
and
we
learn
from
other
cities.
So
I
will
leave
it
with
that,
except
that
I
really
hope
our
lobbying
efforts
with
ab43
are
successful.
We
need
to
do
something
to
reduce
the
speed
limits
in
in
our
streets
and
then
we
need
to
hire
more
police
officers,
which
I
know
we're
all
focused
on.
D
We
just
need
to
get
the
officer
individuals
to
apply
to
go
through
the
process
and
then
to
become
police
officers
and
particularly
in
our
traffic
enforcement
unit,
with
that
I'll
I'll
leave
the
discussion,
but
I
really
appreciate
the
presentation
and
I
look
forward
to
the
the
last
Council
last
Vision
zero
meeting
for
council
member
Perales
November
30th.
A
Thank
you
so
ditto
on
everything
accounts,
member
Perales
and
Foley.
What
they
said.
I
I
also
really
really
wanted
to
thank
the
dot
team
for
really
working
so
diligently
and
putting
a
lot
of
thought
into
the
different
projects
that
we're
moving
forward,
different
strategies
that
were
trying
out
because
I.
A
Whatever
doesn't
work,
we
move
on
to
the
next
strategy
and
there
have
been
a
lot
and
that
clip
is
a
really
comprehensive,
great
to
see
great,
to
see
the
different
strategies
that
we're
taking
in
different
environments.
That
I
think
is
necessary
to
look
at
it.
That
way
and
and
I
also
wanted
to
and
I'll
leave
it
to
the
lobbying,
because
I
can't
I
can't
even
I'm
so
disappointed
the
bill,
didn't
move
forward
and
and
why
it
didn't
move
forward.
A
But
I
I
also
wanted
to
bring
up.
One
issue
is
I
still
think
we
are
under
counting
the
number
of
homeless
individuals
that
have
been
have
lost
their
lives
or
been
severely
injured
as
a
result
of
of
these
horrendous
accidents,
and
so
I
also
wanted
to
highlight
the
need
for
an
interdepartmental
effort.
As
far
as.
A
Are
the
only
ones
that
have
gone
into
the
creek
s
to
do
that
Outreach,
and
we
also
really
need
to
look
at
where,
if
you
know
it
just
does
not
make
sense
to
have
encampments.
If
it's
in
the
middle
of
a
Cloverleaf,
then
we
can't
it
can
be
shocked
if
folks
are
getting
hit,
trying
to
cross
an
expressway
every
day,
and
so
we
really
need
to
look
at
that
differently.
It's
much
more
than
dot.
A
We
have
to
try
multiple
strategies
where
some
there
are
some
areas
that
are
just
too
unsafe
to
have
encampments,
and
then
you
need
to
do
that
Outreach
needed
and
bring
those
strategies
into
play
so
that
folks
can
come
and
stop
life
and
not
live
next
to
an
expressway
and
I'll
stop
there.
But
thank
you,
there's
and
thank
you
to
council
members,
Foley
and
Morales
for
their
leadership
on
the
vision
series
out.
Of
course,.
E
Thank
you
mainly
I
have
one
question,
but
maybe
I
want
to
thank
thank
everybody
on
the
team
for
the
work.
I
I
noticed
245
traffic
improvements
in
that
I.
Don't
know
if
it
was
the
last
fiscal
year.
I
guess
that's
what
it
was.
That's
that
means
one
a
day.
That's
a
lot
and
I'm.
It's
impressive
work
and
I
know
a
lot
of
it
is
reactive
because
we,
as
Council
offices,
are
just
you
as
a
department,
know
where
things
are
happening
and
know
where
things.
E
What
needs
to
be
upgraded
and
I
know
that
the
work
you're
doing
is
making
streets
safer
in
general
and
also
want
to
thank
the
police
department
for
for
the
work
that
you're
doing,
even
though
the
traffic
enforcement
unit
is
short,
staffed,
I
know
that
when
we
ask
and
say
Here's
a
place
where
we
would
should
have
some
enforcement,
there
are
teams
that
are
going
out
and
doing
that,
and
it
makes
a
difference
when
people
see
have
that
visibility.
So
I
want
to
thank
you.
E
The
question
I
have
there's
a
there's
that
I
thought
that
was
a
really
interesting
table
on
one
of
the
slides
I.
Don't
have
in
front
of
me
to
know
which
page
it
was,
but
the
one
that
showed
what
percentage
of
fatal
accidents
were
occurring
in
various
situations,
whether
it
was
due
to
speeding
or
pedestrians
or
bikes
or
whatever
it
was,
do
we
have
that
broken
down
in
that
same
manner
for
all
accidents
and
not
just
the
Fatal
ones,
because
I
was
wondering
if
we
can
learn
from
that.
E
You
know.
Obviously
the
fatal
accidents
are
important,
but
sample
size
is
small
and
I
often
think
we
can
learn
more
from
the
complete
set
of
of
where
accidents
are
occurring
and
I'm
not
asking.
If
we
have
it
today,
I'm
asking
more
generally,
do
we
have
access
to
that
data,
and
how
do
we
use
that
data
that
more
that
more
holistic
data,
when
we
do
look
at
where
we're
going
to
make
traffic
improvements.
K
E
L
We
have,
we
don't
have
a
slide
that
looks
that
way
for
all
injuries.
It
would
be
possible
to
do
one
just
as
though
the
way
that
the
data
comes
into
us.
We
know
the
information
about
traffic
fatalities
faster.
So
if
we
were
to
do
this
for
all
injuries
or
other
types
of
just
other
types
of
crashes
in
general,
it
would
it
would
lag
by
about
three
months.
Yeah.
G
E
That,
if
there's
something
can
be
learned
because
there
might
be
clusters
of
streets
that
are
dangerous
with
accidents
that
occur
regularly,
but
may
not-
and
maybe
it's
true,
maybe
those
are
lower-
speeds.
Their
thoroughfares
they're
happening
in
in
ways
that
won't
be
necessarily
lead
to
fatality.
But
but
they
are
areas
that
have
more
accidents
in
theory
and
they
may
not
have
risen
to
the
top
on
this
list,
but
they
may
come
by
using
other
sets
of
data,
and
I
was
just
asking
wondering
if
we
it's
a.
L
Great
question
I'd
say
that
in
the
work
we've
currently
been
doing
to
update
the
priority
safety
corridors,
we
have
been
really
deep
in
the
data
and
so
has
our
data
consultant.
So
we
do
very
likely
have
the
underlying
data
to
do
that.
We
just
haven't
put
together
a
slide.
That
looks
like
this
to
explain
it.
Okay,.
M
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
thing
based
on
what
councilmember
Coley
had
said
in
regards
to
the
sort
of
the
the
marketing
that
maybe
we
could
do
and
and
to
tie
that
into
her
last
comment
or
regards
to
teu
would
be
from
our
traffic
enforcement
I
I.
M
Just
look
back
to
when
I
was
a
a
young
kid
in
the
first
first
time,
driver
I
ended
up
with
three
tickets
in
six
months
and
had
my
license
suspended
running
a
stop
signs
beating
right
and,
and
it
really
what
what
what
got
me
was.
That
right
was
was
the
enforcement
and
I'm
not
saying
that?
That's
what
everybody
needs
and
you
would
hope
that
that's
not
what
people
need,
but,
unfortunately,
I
think
that's
that's
a
tool
that
we
have
that's
the
best
type
of
marketing
we
have
is
our
Police
Department.
M
Our
police
officers
are
trafficking
enforcement
unit,
I
think
if
we
were
to
to
get
back
to
the
numbers
that
we
had,
which
would
be
got
nearly
a
quad
quadrupling
of
the
numbers
today,
when
we
had
about
44
members
in
in
teu,
I
think
that's
the
kind
of
marketing
that
would
make
a
difference
to
say
that
that
we
have
beefed
up
our
traffic
enforcement
unit
and
that
we
are
taking
Vision
zero
series
that
we
know
that
the
the
number
one
cause
is
speed
or
or
excessive
speed.
M
That's
the
number
one
cause
and
that
we're
taking
it
serious
and
we're
going
to
go
out
there
and
we're
going
to
enforce
it.
I
think
that
would
make
a
huge
difference
and
we
could
Market
that
if
we
were
to
put
that
investment
out
there
and
for
for
what
it's
worth,
you
know
to
add
some
marketing
to
it.
This
this
former
Vision
zero
task
force
chair
and
about
to
be
police
officer.
M
B
Thank
you
we'll
stay
on
that
that
topic
for
the
sergeant
Sergeant
Gates,
how
many
traffic
enforcement
officers
are
out
there
now
and
what's
your
sense,
I
know
in
Western
Division
some
Patrol
officers
are
writing
tickets.
Now.
Is
that
happening
in
all
the
divisions
so
to
kind
of
help
with
the
teu?
Well,.
O
The
first
question
is:
we
have
14
enforcement
offers
in
the
unit
as
far
as
Patrol
officers
writing
tickets
in
every
division.
That
is
the
expectation
for
them
too,
in
their
free
Patrol
time,
when
they're
not
answering
calls
for
service
absolutely,
whether
that's
being
then
or
not,
I
really
can't
say.
C
B
O
Okay,
I
I,
don't
know
with
our
current
system:
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
break
it
down
by
division
or
by
District.
I
can
give
you
overall
accounts
of
tickets,
no
problem
I.
B
O
Last
month
we
wrote
653
speeding
tickets,
that's.
B
Great,
it
would
be
great
to
see
some
trends
for
that
I
I.
That
kind
of
goes
along
with
the
communications
plan
to
reduce
speeding.
I
think
there
needs
to
be
an
enforcement
part
of
that.
Unfortunately,
our
social
fabric
is
not
as
strong
as
maybe
it
once
was,
and
our
sense
of
responsibility
toward
others
is
not
as
great
as
it
should
be.
B
I
think
we're
just
not
in
a
place
right
now,
where,
where
people's
sense
of
social
responsibility
is
very
high,
and
so
the
avoidance
of
a
ticket
is
going
to
be
more
impactful
and
the
fact
that
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
enforcement
right
now,
I
think
is
contributing
to
the
problem
again.
That's
because
of
where
we
are
right
now,
culturally
I
did
have
a
question
about
the.
If
we
could
go
back
to
that
slide,
six.
B
I
think
there
was.
That
was
the
slide
that
mentioned
the
the
Fate,
the
fatalities
that
were
and
were
not
in
crosswalks
and
I,
just
wanted
to
the
outside
of
crosswalks
are
in
the
roadway.
Does
that
mean
that
they
weren't
they
weren't
in
marked
crosswalks
or
that
they
weren't
in
at
what
we
all
consider?
You
know
they.
L
Weren't
at
a
corner,
it's
everything
it's
you
know
they.
It
could
have
been
close
to
a
marked
crosswalker.
It
could
have
been
really
far
from
one.
B
Okay,
but
not
every
so
so
when
you
say
crosswalk,
you
mean
a
marked
crosswalk,
yes,
okay,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
was
clear
on
that,
because
I
know
that
you
it's
supposed
to
be
safe
to
cross
at
any
corner
right
at
any
intersection,
and
so,
if
we're
we're
not
assuming
that
in
this
we're,
assuming
that
it
has
to
be
a
marked,
we're
saying
that
it's
a
marked
crosswalk.
B
Thank
you,
and
that's
all
just
to
get
that
stuff
kind
of
straight
in
my
head,
that
what
we're
talking
about
I
did
want
to
ask
also
about
the
the
request
for
funding
for
a
big
data
subscription.
B
It
was
only
mentioned
once
in
the
in
the
memo,
and
you
mentioned
it
a
little
bit.
What
are
what
are
the
details
of
that?
What.
L
So,
in
order
to
do
the
data
evaluations
for
any
Corridor
project,
you
could
do
individual
small
contracts
to
get
different
types
of
data,
or
you
could
have
a
so-called
Big
Data
subscription
which,
to
give
you
an
example,
there's
a
company
there's
several
companies
that
take
the
data
from
moving
cell
phone
signals
and
basically
accumulate
it
and
then
sell
it
back
to
cities
or
other
city-like
entities
and
create
a
map
where
we
can
look
at
the
volume
of
all
people
traveling
on
different
modes
on
every
street
in
town
over
time,
historical
and
current,
so
that
type
of
data
subscription
would
allow
you
to
highlight
any
individual
Street
and
say
that
a
project
was
built
there
in
for
a
year.
L
And
then
you
could
basically
look
at
all
of
the
data
that
has
happened
since
that
year
and
all
the
data
they
have
on
file
that
happened
before
that
year
and
compare
them.
So
it's
a
a
rather
expensive
type
of
subscription.
That
would
be
nice
to
build
to
a
grant,
because
you
know
it's
it's
money
that
we
may
not
have
around
to
to
subscribe
to
get
that
type
of
data.
B
And
who
would
be
doing
the
analysis
on
this
I
mean
big
data?
Is
I've
worked
with
it
a
little
bit,
it's
very
hard
to
work
with,
because
it's
so
overwhelming
and
you
have
to
it's
pretty
specialized
so
so
who
do
we
have
someone
on
staff
who
is
capable
of
doing
that
or
is
part
of
the
grant
having
a
consultant
who
would
be
working
with
the
data
to
help
us
answer
questions?
How
would
that
work.
L
Conceptually
this
is
for
our
staff
to
learn
how
to
use
it,
but
we
don't
necessarily
have
a
specific
vendor
in
mind.
Although
I
do
know
other
cities
that
use
this
type
of
subscription,
so
I
know
that
the
platforms
themselves
have
been
developed
to
do
this
type
of
study
and
make
it
relatively
intuitive,
although
I'm
sure
they
can
still
be
improved.
So
I
agree
that
it's
it's
a
lot
of
data
and
it's
a
challenge
to
learn
new
platforms.
We
definitely
agree
with
that.
L
I
guess
we'll
have
to
see
whether
we
get
this
grant
Etc
and
whether
we'll
be
able
to
do
this.
But
in
the
current
idea
we
are.
Our
own
staff
would
probably
learn
how
to
do
it,
because
that
would
be
a
more
sustainable
option
than
getting
Consultants
to
do.
The
analyzes
for
us
do.
L
Have
one
person
in
an
adjacent
group-
and
we
also
have
one
person
in
actually
one
growing
to
be-
maybe
two
people
in
my
group
who
are
doing
a
lot
of
data
work,
so
I'm
going
to
go
with
yes,
you're
going
to
go
with
no
okay.
D
H
B
Thank
you.
That's
helpful,
just
at
a
very
basic
level,
if
we
already
have
people
looking
at
data
going
to
slide
18.
B
B
B
If
we
know
the
number
of
people
traveling
by
that
mode
has
increased
by
more
than
the
number
of
KSI
has
gone
up.
So
if
people
feel
safer
right
because
of
these
interventions,
they
may
be
more
likely
to
shift
modes
into
a
more
environmentally
friendly
mode,
such
as
bicycling
or
walking,
and
so
we
might
have
in
the
short
term
the
raw
numbers
of
KSI
again
I.
Don't
want
that,
but
I'm
just
saying
it's
a
possibility
going
up,
because
we
have
the
the
overall
rate
of
people
in
shifting
into
that
mode
is
going
up.
L
That
would
be
more
easily
answered
in
the
peak
data
subscription
because
that
you
know,
for
example,
the
thing
about
the
collected
cell
phone
signals
can
tell
how
fast
they're
moving
so
I.
Don't
know
that
in
the
current
data
that
we
have,
for
example,
Center
Road,
that
we'd
be
able
to
tell
you
whether
there
are
more
people
walking
there
in
the
after
period.
But
that's
one
of
those
products
would
be
able
to
tell
you
that.
B
Obviously,
and-
and
you
might
think
that,
where
the
green
arrows
are
that
we
we
right,
we've
done
our
job,
but
if
we
haven't
gotten
more
people
shifting
into
the
modes
which
is
a
different,
it's
a
different
issue,
but
also
part
of
our
goals
as
a
city,
then
we
may
not
have
completed
the
job
in
one
place
where
we
think
that
we
have
okay,
that's
it
for
me,
I
really
appreciate.
B
All
of
this
I
am
you're,
probably
not
going
to
be
surprised
to
hear
that
I'm
really
excited
about
the
the
possibility
of
having
big
data
and
to
be
able
to
answer
a
little
bit
more
complex
questions
and
and
even
to
get
to
the
level
of
like
the
questions
that
that
councilmember
Cohen
had
I
think
are
really
important
for
us
to
have
a
full
picture,
and
maybe
even
might
be
when
we're
talking
about
just
crashes
that
aren't
leading
to
KSI,
maybe
issues
that
are
leading
indicators.
If
crashes
are
going
up
in
one
area.
A
I
A
G
G
So
much
hi
Blair
Beekman
thanks
a
lot
for
the
meeting
today,
thanks
a
lot
for
the
words
oh
hold
on
thanks
a
lot
for
the
words
of
council
person,
Esparza,
who
I
felt
did
a
an
incredible
job
to
describe
homeless
issues
with
vision,
zero,
I
think
that
can
really
address
the
community
Harmony
issues
that
we're
trying
to
address
and
and
really
focus
on
on
a
serious
problem
that
homeless
people
are
dying
in
pretty
large
numbers.
Good
luck!
G
How
you
can
work
on
that
and
I
wanted
to
take
this
time
to
just
overall
thank
the
work
of
Gail
osmer,
who
really
wants
to
work
on
these
issues
and
to
apologize
to
both
her
and
to
Sean
Cartwright,
who
I
used
a
few
words
last
week.
I
may
not
have
quite
been
interpreting
situations
fully
correctly
and
I
just
wanted
to
apologize
for
that.
G
It's
my
own
intention
to
figure
out
whatever
good
practices
we
currently
do
in
San
Jose
about
notifications
of
homeless
sweeps
that
we
can
just
take
a
look
at
how
we're
doing
those
good
practices
and
update
them.
If
we
need
to
a
bit
at
this
time,
if
it's
necessary,
hopefully
that's
a
better
way
to
say
it.
G
So
good
luck
on
how
we
can
work
on
these
issues,
it's
my
hope
that
in
the
future
of
the
Ukraine
area,
I'm
going
to
take
a
different
approach
with
this
and
just
simply
offer
today
that
I
hope
that
you
know
Health
and
Human
Services
and
racial
Equity
can
really
be
ways
to
address
Peace
for
that
area
and
I
think
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that
today
and,
as
with
that
said,
that
you
know
we're
pretty
gung-ho
and
seriously
focused
on
war
in
this
country
and
and
law
enforcement.
G
These
days,
you
know
with
what
you
talked
about
today
about
Vision
zero.
We
have
to
be
very
careful
to
like
just
totally
go
into
more
and
more
Tech
and
more
and
more
law
enforcement.
Let's
be
cautious
and
really
think
of
community
Harmony
and
green
sustainability.
As
the
initial
ideas
of
vision,
zero,
thank
you.
N
Hi,
my
name
is
Daniela
Castaneda
I
am
a
resident
of
District
Six
and
also
a
community
organizer
with
Silicon
Valley
Bicycle
Coalition
I
really
appreciate
the
update.
As
a
community
organizer
I
am
working
around
making
streets
safer.
It
has
been
frustrating
in
what
sometimes
feels
right,
like
lack
of
transparency,
of
not
really
knowing
what's
what's
happening,
especially
knowing
that
we're
at
I
believe
58
deaths
this
year,
but
since
2015
we're
at
more
than
437
deaths
of
traffic
fatalities.
N
I
do
want
to
encourage
to
continue
the
transparency
and
seeing
how
we
can
measure
and
have
very
specific
goals
over
the
years,
just
because
I
think
council
member
Perales
mentioned
it.
It's
such
a
it's
such
a
grand
goal
to
have
and
being
able
to
measure
that
on
a
year-to-year
basis,
it
will
definitely
help
with
the
transparency
and
the
accountability,
ensuring
that
what
we
are
doing
is
working
as
someone
else
mentioned.
I
believe
we've
done
all
these
improvements,
but
yet
our
numbers
are
still
really
really
high.
N
I
also
want
to
encourage
that
in
many
of
the
plants
that
have
been
mentioned,
they
talk
about
how
a
lot
of
the
things
are
out
of
the
scope
of
what
the
Department
of
Transportation
is
able
to
do
that.
It's
not
it's
out
of
their
wheelhouse
I
think
this
is
a
really
important
place
to
see
that,
when
we're
trying
to
solve
problems,
it's
important
to
have
a
collaborative
approach
in
that
it's
not
just
one
thing,
but
there's
other
things
as
well,
so
also
recognize
that
Vision
zero
is
much
bigger
and
just.
F
Yes,
also
for
the
Horseshoe
I
just
like
to
note
it
for
the
records,
if
it
was
two
people
that
from
the
public
that
had
directly
addressed
its
council
members
by
name
okay,
so
it's
a
it's,
the
hypocrisy,
the
bias
and
the
Prejudice
in
these
meetings
was
just
outlined
right
then,
and
there
no
one
checked
him.
No
one
checked
them
at
all.
Okay,
so
you
can
get
your
rules
and
just
just
toss
them
because
they're,
a
joke.
Third
joke,
where
the
height
of
hypocrisy.
F
The
church
at
384,
Willow,
Street,
Sacred
Heart
Church,
is
now
a
historical
landmark
because
of
the
work
of
Paul
Soto
from
the
Horseshoe
I
am
extremely
proud
of.
That.
Lowrider
magazine
is
coming
down
to
to
visit
me
tomorrow
and
I'm,
going
to
create
a
documentary
about
all
that.
That's
going
to
be
my
gift
to
the
city,
so
irregardless
of
what
the
city's
opinion
May
build
me.
Okay,
I
am
doing
legitimate
work
in
the
community,
and
I
am
effective
in
the
community.
I
am
able
to
go
through
all
of
these
committees.
F
All
of
these
local
historians
that
are
a
joke.
April
haverstadt,
is
a
joke.
It's
a
she's,
a
mockery.
She
mocks
the
history
of
San,
Jose
and
I'm,
dispelling
all
of
what
it
is
declined.
Our
Buckle
had
done
much
of
the
damage
that
I
am
undoing
now
was
done
by
Clyde
Arbuckle,
so
I'm
very,
very
proud
of
that
accomplishment,
and
it
was
specifically
noted
that
the
council
member
for
District
3,
was
absent
from
that
meeting.
They
were
asking
why
why
was
he
absent?
He
was
over
here
saying
that
he
was
for
this.