►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities for July 27, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
B
A
A
A
F
D
A
A
A
C
A
A
D
A
D
A
A
E
E
And
I
think
that
would
just
help
versus
you
all
trying
to
open
what
I
sent
you
and
going
back
and
forth
the
the
um
document
I
sent.
You
is
a
red
line,
it's
um
it's
a
red
line
of
the
original,
which
was
in
your
packet
and
because
of
the
time
frame,
my
changes
were
not
given
to
you
all
um
there.
We
just
share
the
screen.
Now
it
says:
host
disable.
E
E
G
E
D
F
E
Yes,
okay,
I
don't
see
it
on
my
screen.
Okay,
so
let
me
start
from
the
beginning
um
the
section
about
where
we're
referencing
current
community
programs.
If
someone
were
not
part
of
the
city,
they
wouldn't
know
what
they
are,
so
I
spelled
them
out.
I'm,
instead
of
just
saying
me
how
I
spelled
out
mobile
integrated
health.
I
think
it's
office,
not
operation
um
thrive,
what
it
was
formerly
known
as
and
then
what
connect
is
with
a
footnote.
E
F
E
And
scroll
down
to,
therefore
be
it
resolved
by
the
governing
body,
um
ignore
my
question.
I
was
just
trying
to
figure
out
if
that
language
was
repetitive,
but
if
you
go
to
section
3
duties
and
responsibilities,
I
added
in
that
and
edited
because,
really
to
me
a
lot
of
some
of
the
priorities
that
we
would
decide
on
tackling
would
come
from
the
task.
E
E
E
C
G
E
G
E
Right
so
after
attending
the
state
police
academy-
well,
there's
probably
a
few
things
that
I
personally
would
like
to
know
in
trainings,
as
you,
as
you
heard
from
my
comments
during
budget
hearings,
is
that
I
also
want
to
know
about
um
implicit
bias,
anti-racism
trainings
and
that's
not
necessarily
part
of
the
next
phase
of
after
you
attend
the
police
academy,
so
I
generalized
it
to
trainings
and,
however,
you
think
makes
more
sense.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
capturing
all
aspects
of.
E
Assess
ways
that
for
be
actually
a
lot
of
these
are
just
language
adjustments.
um
It's
not
changing
what
we
had
initially
said
so
I'll
go
down
to
e
on
line.
I
nine
it
says,
explore
types
of
calls
for
service.
They
could
be
better
better,
better
handled
or
responded
to
by
human
service
or
social
science
field
professionals,
and
that's
essentially,
what
we're
talking
about
with
community
services,
because
folks
that
are
in
social
science
fields,
are
social
workers
and
counselors
and
such
so
that
was
the
only
language
I
could
think
of.
E
I
just
don't
want
us
to
disregard
people
that
are
community
members
that
are
active,
but
don't
necessarily
have
degrees
in
public
health
or
in
have
done
or
have
backgrounds
in
public
safety.
So
that
was
the
language
I
added
there
and
then,
if
we
move
on
I
this
is
kind
of
up
for
negotiation,
but
that
we
would
conduct
the
duration
of
these
meetings
that
we
would
conduct
at
least
twice
per
month.
E
You
know
when
we
first
envisioned
this,
we
thought
we'd
meet
weekly.
I
don't
know
how
realistic
that
is,
but
I
think
that
at
least
we
should
be
meeting
twice
a
month
um
because
in
to
answer
your
question:
counselor
b
hill
coupler.
The
idea
was
to
try
to
finish
this
work
in
three
months,
knowing
that,
if
it
goes
beyond
that
that
we
could
extend
it
through
the
governing
body.
But
again
the
time
frame
was
kind
of
three
to
six
months,
um
and
so
that
to
me
would
be
open
for
discussion.
G
E
Made
right
the
way
I
envisioned
this,
um
I
wasn't,
I
think
my
colleague
knows
I
wasn't
thrilled
that
we
were,
in
my
opinion,
kind
of
rushing
this
to
get
it
on
the
agenda
for
wednesday
and
that's
why
it
was
in
introduced
at
a
budget
hearing.
But
that's
why
I'm
trying
to
get
these
changes
in
before
we
actually
meet
um
on
wednesday.
G
A
G
A
I
think
um
we're
looking
at
at
least
six
months
to
be
able
to
go
through
what
we
need
to
meeting
twice
a
month.
I
think
is
realistic
and
um
I
think
we
could
probably
get
some
good
work
done
in
six
months.
I
don't,
I
think,
there's
some
flexibility
in
there
to
extend
it
if
we
need
to
or
shorten
it.
If
we
don't
need
to
go
that
long.
So.
E
G
G
I'm
not
sure
where
I
mean,
if
that's
even
the
purpose
of
this
task
force,
so
I'm
not
quite
clear
about
the
task
force
overall,
that's
why
I
ask
these
questions
um
and,
and
the
other
part
of
it
is
like
uh
you
know,
recruitment
how
they
recruit.
What
what
the
internal
operations
uh
stand
for.
I
know
uh
someone.
There
was
an
email,
maybe
by
one
of
the
counselors
asking
for
the
their
operations
procedures
to
be
posted
on
the
internet.
A
uh
I
believe
that
was
asked
for,
and
um
you
know
I
don't
think
it's
it's
a
problem.
I
think
uh
the
committee
will
look
at
all
that
and
I
think
the
committee
itself
made
up
of
the
community
will
decide
really
what
they
want
to
delve
into
and
if
they
want
to
try
to
look
into
internal
affairs
again
not
into
every
specific
uh
case,
that's
happening,
but
maybe
how
we
handle
internal
affairs
moving
forward.
A
G
So
that's
something
that
I
think
would
be
uh
not
only
external
how
these
public
safety
issues
affect
the
public.
But
how
do
these
items
affect
the
internal
organization?
Because
we
do
lose
officers
and
we've
got
an
issue
with
retention,
so
I
think
the
more
we
can
delve
into
that
to
to
keep
our
officers,
uh
maybe
through
this
committee,
as
part
of
something
that
they
look
at.
It
might
be
very
helpful.
A
G
E
All
right,
thank
you
good
point.
Actually,
I
think
that's
a
good
point
that
we
could
add
to
the
next.
um
Maybe
as
another
amendment
um
I
don't
know
what
it
would
look
like,
because
I've
also
heard
of
people
interested
about
internal
affairs
investigations
and
if
they
should
even
occur
within
the
police
department
versus
a
separate
entity.
A
I
think
we
should
leave
it
up
to
the
committee,
because
there
may
be
some
legal
aspects
as
to
whether
we
can
make
any
changes
or
I'm
not
sure
about
the
whole
internal
affairs
protocols
or
how
that
goes.
So
there
may
be
some
legal
issues
around
it.
So
maybe
we
should
leave
it
up
to
the
committee
and
then
we
can
have
some
discussion
with
the
city
attorney's
office
and
and
decide
how
we
want
to
move
forward.
E
That's
why
I
was
trying
to
kind
of
make
it
more
broad,
because
we
don't
necessarily
we
have
ideas
of
things
that
we've
heard
from
community
members
about
things
and
also
nationally,
what's
shifting
in
terms
of
um
looking
at
community,
policing
and
public
safety
in
a
different
way,
and
some
of
these
came
up
in
that
regard.
But
you
know
I
kind
of
see
feel
like
there
may
be
some
other
pieces
um
that
we
would
look
at
and
it
may
not
be
necessarily
what's
listed
here.
G
There's
a
place
I
mean,
I
consider
this
to
be
internal
operations
and
not
even
having
to
use
the
word
internal
affairs,
and
if
you
look
at
uh
page
two
item,
starting
with
line
18
on
under
a
uh
assess
santa
fe
police
department,
you
could
say
operations,
procedures,
policies
and
practices
just
turn.
Those
around
turn
those
words.
B
G
G
G
D
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
uh
One
of
my
questions
was
in
regards
to
the
time
frame
as
well,
because
I
didn't
know
if
three
months
was
going
to
be
sufficient
and
I'm
glad
that
it's
getting
extended
to
six
months
on
a
meeting
on
a
twice
a
month
by
monthly
basis,
which
I
think,
given
the
amount
of
work
ahead
of
this
task
force.
D
A
D
D
D
No,
I
I
completely
agree-
and
I
think
just
having
um
it
written
out
who
the
recommendations
be
made
to,
I
might
hate,
to
get
an
instant
in
a
situation
where
the
the
recommendations
are
made
to
the
mayor
when
the
governing
body
feels
they
should
have
the
recommendations
made
to
them,
or
vice
versa.
So
I
think
just
having
it
clearly
written
out
who
who
they
go
to,
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
have
a
time
frame,
as
you
mentioned,
as
they
come
up
with
these
recommendations
they
get
sent
to
the
appropriate
body.
D
E
Completed
not
because
the
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is,
though
there
may
be
recommendations
that
can
be
adjusted
and
the
policies
and
procedures
are
changed
internally
and
it
doesn't
have
to
go
to
the
governing
body
um
and
then
there's
some
bigger
pieces
that
probably
would
go
to
the
governing
body.
So
we
do
need
to
add
some
language
in,
though
about
it,
because
if
there
are
recommendations,
we're
not
just
here
to
provide
ideas
that
we
actually
have
recommendations
and
where
do
they
go
to
actually
get
right,
considered
and
implemented.
So.
D
A
A
A
E
G
D
G
A
Right-
and
I
think
in
that,
I
think
it's
important
that
if,
if
the
department
can
make
uh
administrative
changes
without
going
back
to
the
governing
body,
that's
a
great
thing,
but
I
think
the
governing
body
should
still
be
aware
of
the
work
that
the
task
force
is
doing
so
that
that's
going
to
be
the
word
smithing
part
of
it.
So
uh
I'm
glad
you
guys
are
taking
that
on.
So
thank
you
anything
else,
counselor
garcia!
A
A
G
I
A
I
A
D
D
B
A
G
G
G
Okay,
so
uh
I
just
encourage
uh
the
the
public
who
has
any
comments
uh
pro
or
con
to
get
their
comments
ready
and
in
in
the
timeliness,
that's
required
for
presenting
public
comment
and
um
and
then,
of
course,
to
provide
a
information
on
when
the
public
hearing
will
be
so
august.
29Th
right.
So
um
uh
that's
why
I
pulled
it
just
so.
The
general
public
can
understand.
A
All
right-
and
uh
you
know
if
there
is
general
public
uh
watching
this-
I
would
uh
remind
them
that
there's
a
procedure
for
getting
your
public
comment
into
the
record,
which
is
presented
along
with
the
agenda
on
the
city's
web
page.
So
I
believe
you
have
to
do
it
24
hours
in
advance.
You
have
to
whether
you
want
to
make
public
comment
or
submit
it
in
writing.
You
have
to
you,
have
to
do
it
well
in
advance
and
that's
published
on
the
agenda
with
the
city
meetings.
G
A
D
A
A
D
A
G
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
well
the
first
part
of
it
is
it
says,
annual
operating
budget
and
organizational
chart
and
there
is
no
organizational
chart
provided,
uh
but
the
other,
the
bigger
part
of
this
is,
uh
you
know,
we're
still
in
budget
hearings
and
I'm
not
I'm
not
so
sure
that
that
it's
a
the
timeliness
of
this
is
right.
I
mean
I,
I
don't.
G
There
are
some
decisions
that
still
have
yet
to
be
made,
and
so
I
will
just
say
that
I
I
I
guess
rather
than
voting
no
and
and
I'm
like
well
that
or
abstain,
but
the
part
about
the
organizational
chart
bothers
me
because
I
don't
know
what
that
means.
Does
that
mean
we're
approving?
Well,
I
know
we
have
to
get
the
based
on
the
discussion
before
we
have
to
get
the
the
reorganization
approved,
but
I
don't
um
I
don't
know
what
this
organizational
chart
means.
Maybe
uh
counselor
beta
can
address
that.
H
Counselor
beta,
you
want
to
take
a
stab
at
that.
um
I
I
agree
with
the
councilwoman
v
hill
coppler.
I
don't
I
I
don't
know
why
the
organizational
chart
is
in
there
or
why
they're.
Referring
to
that.
um
So
I
would
think
that
we
just-
and
I
think
the
reason
the
caption
is
on
is
so
that
you
have
the
two
committees
that
look
at
something
before
it
goes
to
governing
body.
H
Yeah
we,
the
only
one
we
don't
have
done-
is
the
utilities
department
budget.
All
the
others
have
been
concluded
with
a
recommendation
for
approval
so,
like
I
said,
I
think
this
was
in
hopes
that
the
budget
hearings
would
have
been
done,
maybe
even
by
last
week,
because
monday
was
uh
when
this
was
scheduled.
Monday
was
just
a
carryover
day,
so
I
think
they
were
just
trying
to
get
ahead
of
it
and
making
sure
public
works
got
to
act
on
the
resolution
itself.
So.
G
D
A
A
D
A
uh
Thank
you,
emily
we're
on
uh
item
g,
which
is
a
item
that
uh
I
pulled
um
and
it's
to
change
the
start
time
of
afternoon
sessions
of
governing
body
meetings
to
four
and
evening
sex
sessions
to
six
uh
beginning
august
12th.
The
reason
I
pulled
it
is
um
historically
we
used
to
have
meetings
at
four
o'clock.
A
um
We
never
had
evening
sessions
at
six.
They
always
started
at
seven,
but
the
afternoon
did
start
at
four
and
I
think
it
was
moved
because
uh
once
you
allow
more
time,
there's
um
usually
more
discussion
and
usually
more
things
thrown
into
the
agenda,
so
it
may
start
out
going
really
well
and
then,
in
the
end,
we
may
be
in
the
same
situation
that
we're
currently
at
and
then
the
other
thing.
With
moving
meetings
up
to
six
o'clock,
the
people
that
I
represent
um
typically
have
uh
full-time
jobs.
A
Some
of
them
are
single
single
parents,
um
a
lot
of
them
commute
from
los
alamos.
So
by
the
time
they
get
home
it's
it's
six
o'clock.
Then
they
have
to
think
about
dinner.
Think
about
children,
think
about
other
things,
and
um
that
may
be
pushing
it
a
little
bit
from
moving
it
up
from
seven
to
six.
So
that's
my
concern
for
me
personally,
it
doesn't
matter.
um
I
have
the
flexibility
to
do
either
and
again.
If
we
want
to
try
it
that's
fine,
but
um
that
is
my
concern.
A
I
uh
Thank
you
chair.
um
I'm
gonna
support
this.
It's
um
got
a
time
frame
on
it
through
the
end
of
the
year.
um
You
make
me
chuckle
a
little
bit
chair
that
uh
you
give
counselors
more
time
to
talk.
They'll
talk
more
um
it'll,
allow
us
a
chance
to
show
some
self-discipline
and
uh
some
self-awareness
come
come
prepared
and
uh
maybe
talk
less
and
say
more,
so
I'm
I'm
willing
to
give
it
a
try
um
and
if
it
doesn't
work
we
can
all
it
has
an
end
time
on
it.
We
can.
I
I
B
D
As
I-
and
I
mentioned
this
when
uh
council
via
real
brought
this
up-
that
once
we
get
to
that
11
o'clock
12
o'clock
hour,
we're
not
developing
quality
policy,
we're
we're
getting
tired,
we're
getting
hungry
we're
getting
grumpy,
and
I
think
at
that
point
we
just
want
to
kind
of
get
it
on
with
and
get
through.
The
meeting
which
to
me
doesn't
lead
to
quality
policy.
A
uh
So
um
I'll
start
with
that,
and
just
say
to
my
knowledge:
no,
um
it's
always
up
to
the
chair
or
to
the
mayor
in
the
case
of
the
governing
body,
to
set
the
agenda
either
limit
or
or
add
items
uh
as
needed.
So
but
I
don't
think
there's
ever
been
a
a
policy
or
um
ordinance
or
resolution
that
limits
the
amount
of
agenda
items.
E
E
I
think
it's
short-sighted
to
think
we're
going
to
continue
functioning
the
same
way
that
we
did,
as
we
did
in
person
in
person,
meetings
and
we've
never
adjusted
that,
and
you
know,
there's
been
times
that
when
we
were
in
in-person
meetings,
we'd
go
very
close
to
that
like
going
way
over
the
time,
but
for
the
most
part
we'd
keep
that
we
have
been.
We
were
better
about
it,
I
think
in
the
past
few
years.
E
I
just
think
that
now,
with
covid
and
being
virtual,
it's
not
the
same
like
we
shouldn't
expect
to
have
the
same
kind
of
level
of
ability
um
to
be
in
virtual
meetings,
it's
very
different
than
being
in
person.
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
language
for
that
aspect,
but
simon.
I
also
want
to
mention
that
um
counselor
carmichael
dominguez
looked
at
ways
that
we
could
shorten
even
the
time
period
that
people
would
speak
and
it
wasn't
because
he
was
trying
to
censor
people,
but
it
actually
says
in
robert's
rules
of
time
frame
limits.
A
I
think
the
the
way
we
have
it
now
um
has
to
deal
a
lot
with
respect
towards
one
another
and
really
giving
each
other
the
amount
of
time
that
we
need
to
speak
and
also
uh
you
know
when
you
get
to
the
11
30
midnight
hour,
and
you
have
a
group
of
people
that
have
been
waiting
for
five
hours
to
speak.
It's
hard
to
tell
I'm
sorry.
You
know
you've
been
waiting
that
long,
but
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
move
you
to
the
next
meeting,
so
that
becomes
difficult.
A
D
No,
that
was
it.
I
it
just
kind
of
struck
me
that
um
you
know,
I
think,
to
the
point
that
counts
of
rio
real,
but
I
had
brought
up
or
I
think
it
was
you,
mr
chair,
that
you
know
these.
It's
it's
becoming
more
and
more
packed
and-
and
I
think
not
only
is
it
unfair
to
the
the
art,
the
workers
that
are
presenting
this
language
in
front
of
us,
but
especially
when
we
get
to
public
hearings
and
we're
having
public
hearings
at
10
11
12
o'clock
at
night.
D
I
understand
that
that's
just
business,
but
we
can
plan
business
better
to
where
we
can.
When
we
do
have
public
hearings,
we
we
put
forth
in
front
of
us
something
that
is
not
going
to.
We
know
that's
like
the
budget,
where
we're
going
to
debate
the
budget
for
a
time
period,
and
then
we
have
other
public
hearings
after
the
fact.
D
So
I
think
we
just
need
to
strategically
figure
out
how
we
can
develop
these
agendas
better
and
if
that
might
be
limiting
the
amount
of
agenda
items
and
once
it
hits
a
certain
threshold,
then
we've
got
a
plan
for
the
backup
meeting
um
and
that's
where
we
just
planted
advance
that
how
when
we
have
the
backup
second
council
meeting,
just
because
there's
so
much
work
to
be
done.
So
that's
all
I
had
thank
you,
mr
chair.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
wonder
uh
since
we're
gonna
be
meeting
at
six
uh
and
then
with
the
discussion
with
councillor,
lindell
and
and
yourself,
mr
chair,
um
did
we
think
about
moving
the
cutoff
date
to
10
30
in
anticipation
that
the
more
time
you
have
the
more
you
take
any
I'm
serious?
Did
anybody
discuss
that
counselor
via
deal.
E
G
E
G
G
A
I
don't
know,
maybe
we
can
do
something
like
uh
10
30
and
then
with
a
hard
cutoff
of
midnight
and
because,
if
we
go
to
midnight
anything
after
midnight
we're
just
not
functioning.
I've
been
in
those
meetings
and
um
they're
rough.
So
you
know
I'd
be
open
to
you
know,
cutting
it
off
at
10
30,
with
a
hard
cutoff
of
midnight.
A
G
G
G
A
A
um
We've
moved
things
around
on
this
committee,
so
that
public
I
heard
from
the
public
that
they
wanted
to
speak
before
we
actually
voted
on
items,
so
they
have
that
ability
to
do
so
now
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
So
um
again
the
chair
or
the
mayor,
I
think,
can
adjust
the
agenda
anyway,
any
way
they
want.
G
A
E
A
D
A
D
D
So
I
spoke
to
the
city
attorney
procurement,
the
chief
procurement
officer
and
the
city
manager
about
this
issue,
and
we
proposed
this
resolution
that
would
allow
give
basically
a
longer
grace
period
of
time
that
would
allow
the
departments
to
extend
contracts
that
would
otherwise
expire
for
up
to
90
days
during
the
pendency
of
this
covet
emergency
and
and
that
that,
in
a
nutshell,
is
really
the
the
genesis
of
this.
It's
um
a
lot
of
concern
on
on
the
part
of
many
departments,
with
many
many
contracts.
G
D
um
Let
me
I
would
just
point
you
to:
um
I
guess
the
first
um
be
it
resolved
clause
on
the
second
page,
and
this
is
on
line
14
through
17
states
that
the
governing
body
of
the
city
of
santa
fe,
that
departments
may
bring
contracts
to
be
amended
or
extended
for
up
to
90
days
after
the
end
of
the
contract
term.
If
the
renewal
has
been
delayed
by
the
covet
pandemic,
so
we
don't
want
people
just
who
forgotten
their
contracts
to
just
use
this
as
a
get
out
of
jail
free
card.
G
D
Well,
I
I
think
that
90
days
is
a
long
time
to
allow
an
expired
contract,
so
I'd
rather
not
have
this
contin.
My
you
know
my
recommendation
would
be
not
to
have
this
continue
um
longer
than
that,
because
if,
if
there's
just
no
end
to
when
the
departments
are
going
to
know
what
their
budgets
will
be,
I
think
the
city's
got
larger
problems,
and
maybe
those
contracts
should
be
terminated.
G
D
D
G
D
Well,
the
um
um
I
guess,
that's
correct:
the
ability
to
extend
the
term
only
goes
until
september
2020.
These
were
for
contracts
that
would
have
otherwise
expired
in
june
of
2020
and
again
the
departments
have
been
scrambling
for
what
to
do.
What
is
their
budget
going
to
be?
I'm
hoping
that
all
the
departments
will
know
what
their
budgets
will
be
and
be
able
to
um
knowingly,
amend
and
or
extend
those
contracts
by
the
end
of
september.
G
A
A
D
B
A
See
none
uh
matters
from
the
chair.
I
just
wanted
to.
You
know
we're
pretty
hard
on
waste
water
during
all
the
the
issues
they
had
with
uh
delivery
of
effluent
to
the
golf
courses
and
knock
on
wood.
I
haven't
had
or
heard
of
any
problems,
so
um
shannon
just
wanted
to
give
them
uh
the
props
for
um
getting
uh
things
squared
away
as
much
as
possible
and
really
not
having
any
issues
as
of
late.
So,
uh
if
you
can
extend
that,
thank
you
to
them.
I
would
appreciate
it.