►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
F
Yes,
so
I
had
the
same
problem
yesterday
with
a
lot
of
the
agenda
items.
It
seemed
like
if
their
attachments
weren't
there,
which
a
lot
of
them
there
are
now,
but
I
would
recommend
maybe
to
close
the
agenda,
that
counselor
b
hill
coupler
that
you're
accessing
close
it
go
back
in
and
reopen
the
agenda
and
it
might
populate
in
that
manner
that
that's
what
happened
to
me.
I,
I
noticed
a
lot
of
things
populated
today
for
some
reason,
all
right,
miss
diaz.
You
were
going
to
say
something
as
well.
B
A
Have
attachments
my
fault,
I
was
looking
at
7a
and
7b,
so
you
mean
6a
and
6b.
Those
are
both
presentations,
so
um
they
probably
don't
have
attachments
they're,
probably
just
again
presentations
and
we
can
ask
uh
questions
uh
as
they
go
or
they
may
uh
ask
to
um
share
their
content
with
us,
um
but
typically
presentations.
Sometimes
they
have
attachments,
sometimes
not.
H
A
So
after
you
share
your
screen
and
do
the
presentation
you
can,
you
can
send
that
to
all
the
community
members?
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct!
I'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
Okay,
so
6a
has
been
removed
to
the
next
meeting
and
6b
jesse
will
share
his
content
and
then
um
provide
a
provide.
His
presentation
to
all
the
members
after
the
meeting
is
that,
okay
with
you
counselor
vehicle.
D
I
C
A
F
D
F
I
K
F
F
E
F
A
A
E
H
6B
jesse,
mr
chair
members
of
the
committee.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I'm
going
to
present
the
september
update
and
again
this
is
available
on
our
website,
which
is
at
um
santafanm.gov
water.
uh
If
you
click
on
the
september
2021
supply
and
demand
it'll
open
up
a
pdf
uh
which,
for
the
sake
of
time,
I've
already
opened
um
I'm
gonna.
So
this
pdf
has
some
bulleted
text
and
some
figures
I'm
going
to
share
the
figures.
H
While
I
read
through
the
bulleted
text
associated
with
those
figures,
so
city
of
santa
fe
water
produced
306
million
gallons
of
potable
water
in
september,
83
of
that
production
came
from
surface
water
sources
or
our
rivers,
94
of
potable
water
produced
was
delivered
to
customers,
meaning
there
was
about
a
six
percent
unaccounted
water
loss
and
um
that
sort
of
the
this
figure
then
shows
millions
of
gallons
per
day
through
time.
The
gray
line
is
the
demand
and
the
light
blue
is
santa
fe
river
water
treated
at
canyon,
road,
water
treatment,
plant.
H
The
dark
blue
is
san,
juan
chamomile
water
treated
at
the
buckman
direct
diversion
and
the
yellow
is
city.
Well,
water
and
the
orange
is
buckman
well
water
um
and
I'm
kind
of
just
watching
the
screen
here.
So
you
feel
free
to
stop
me
with
questions
but
speak
up,
because
I
won't
see
you
raise
your
hand.
H
The
next
chart
shows
cumulative
production
through
the
year
through
20
through
september
and
through
september
2021.
We
have
we
produced
6940,
acre
feet
of
potable
water
74
or
the
5143
number
you
see.
There
has
come
from
river
water
and
26
or
the
1797
has
come
from
wells.
um
We
to
put
the
to
put
this
groundwater
number
in
in
context.
H
H
H
The
reservoir
storage
uh
for
the
past
two
years,
so
2019
in
yellow
2020
in
orange
and
again
on
the
san
juan
chamo
graph,
and
then
the
the
next
portion
of
the
presentation
um
is
in
response
to
some
questions
um
from
last
month
and
and
for
me
just
to
sort
of
distill
the
question
into
um
so.
Are
we
putting
all
of
our
eggs
into
one
basket
and
specifically
the
sort
of
return
flow
basket
and
um
the
short
answer
to
that
is
no.
H
We
have,
and
we
will
continue
to
consider
and
assess
a
wide
range
of
adaptation
strategies
to
assure
a
resilient
water
future
of
these.
The
return
flow
project
is
the
most
resource,
effective,
new
adaptation
strategy
available
and
therefore
it's
the
focus
of
much
of
our
current
attention,
but
existing
adaptation
strategies
which
are
conservation
and
water
rights
acquisition
remain
part
of
our
day-to-day
efforts
and
adaptation.
H
So
at
a
high
level,
the
main
threats
that
we
see
to
a
resilient
water
future
are
climate
change,
impacts
on
supply
and
then
demand
uncertainty.
And
when
you
put
those
two
things
together,
there's
the
potential
for
supply
shortages.
If
we
don't
do
anything-
and
that's
the
big
caveat
is
if
we
don't
do
anything,
I'm
gonna
zoom
in
on
a
lit
on
these.
Each
of
these
figures
in
the
next
few
slides
to
explain
them
a
little
bit
more
so
on
the
climate
change
specific
threat
uh
in
2013.
H
The
bureau
of
reclamation
projected
that
up
to
one-third
of
our
surface
water
sources
um
by
2100,
a
a
one-third
reduction
of
our
annual
water
supply,
and
although
an
update
is
currently
in
the
works,
this
remains
the
best
available,
published
estimate
of
the
potential
climate
change
impacts
on
our
water
resources.
So
we're
looking
at
a
quarter
to
a
third
potential
reduction
of
our
of
our
supply
by
2100.
H
um
If
you
add
in
that,
we
are
sort
of
there's
a
lot
of
uncertainty
as
to
what
is
the
the
demand
that
we
will
be
serving.
um
This
graph
shows
out
to
2070
estimates,
then
now
this
is
just
estimates
of
population,
and
so
we
can
see
that
the
estimates
of
population
that
we
used
in
this
last
round
of
planning
were
that
the
city
would
be
serving
somewhere
between
100
000
and
160
000
users,
and
that
the
county
utility
would
be
serving
somewhere
between
60
thousand
and
ninety
thousand
users.
H
There's
a
whole
lot
of
uncertainty
there,
and-
and
so
we
need
to
prepare
for
that
um
when
you
put
those
two
things
together,
a
potentially
diminishing
supply
and
a
potentially
growing
demand.
I
think
it's
clear
to
everyone
that
there's
uh
potential
for
shortage
so,
um
and
this
is
by
the
20.
Well,
let
me
explain
this
graph
a
little
bit
before
I
read
through
this
text.
H
So
what
we're
looking
at
in
this
graph
is
from
2010
through
2070,
what
sort
of
water
shortages
might
we
see
if
we
layer
that
climate
change
scenario,
those
climate
change
scenarios
and
those
demand
growth
scenarios
together?
And
we
don't
do
anything
so
that's
the
key
again
is
is
if
we
don't
do
anything,
we
are
likely
to
see
shortages
and
the
shading
represents.
H
On
the
other
hand,
if
the
climate
change
model
that
thinks
that
things
will
that
that
temperature
will
change
slower
than
the
others
is
correct,
then,
even
if
we
did
nothing,
we
wouldn't
see
shortages
until
the
late
2040s.
So
this
range
of
red
is
for
the
high
growth
scenario.
What
all
the
different
climate
change
models
put
together
show
as,
as
would
be
the
shortages
and
the
dotted
line
is
just
to
show
the
median
of
of
that
of
those
runs
same
thing
for
the
blue
shading.
It's
the
same.
H
Climate
change
runs,
but
now
for
a
much
lower
growth.
So
if,
if
if
the
community
grows
at
the
rates
that
were
lower
on
those
demand
projection
graphs,
then
even
if
we
did
nothing,
if
we
did
nothing
and
the
climate
change
scenarios
are
somewhere
in
the
middle,
we
wouldn't
see
shortages
until
the
2050s,
and
so
that's
what
this
this
graph
is
sort
of
showing
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
supply
uncertainty
in
these
models?
H
So
back
to
this
2015
santa
fe
basin
study
that
we
did.
We
looked
at
that
and
said:
okay,
there's
shortages
potential
shortages
are
coming.
What
can
we
do
about
those
and
the
jargon
that
we
use
for
that
is
adaptation
strategies?
What
can
we
do
to
reduce
those
potential
shortages
out
in
the
future
and
the
those
strategies?
H
Four
different
categories?
They
were
lumped
into
water
conservation,
direct
and
indirect,
reclaimed,
water,
reuse,
aquifer
storage
and
recovery
and
additional
surface
water
rights.
Those
were
the
four
bundles
that
we
looked
at
and
then
in
red
is
what
we've
done
since
2015
as
a
result
of
of
this
study
and
water
conservation
is
something
that
I've
shown
in
other
presentations
that
we've
done
a
tremendous
job
at
since
the
city
acquired
the
water
company
in
1995,
and
that
has
become
part
of
our
ethic.
H
It's
what
we
lead
with,
and
we
have
you
know
a
1.6
million
dollar
budget
each
year
to
support
it.
uh
It
is
ongoing
and
we'll
never
stop
doing
it.
um
Direct
indirect
reclaimed,
water
reuse.
This
is
this
was
the
the
one
that
that
we
looked
into
more
and
and
just
and
through
evaluation
concluded
that
the
san
juan
trauma
return
flow
project
was
the
the
best
project
to
maximize
our
potential
reclaimed
water
resource
and
we're
moving
actively
towards
that
aquifer,
storage
and
recovery.
H
and
then
finally
additional
surface
water
rights,
and
we
do
continue
to
purchase
those
and
require
large
developers
to
do
the
same
on
our
behalf
and
require
all
development
to
offset
their
added
demand
through
water
rights.
So,
in
conclusion,
city
of
santa
fe
water
has
and
will
continue
to
evaluate
all
reasonable
options
to
maintain
a
resilient
water
future
within
a
wide
range
of
potential
future
scenarios.
J
Thank
you
chair.
uh
It's
not
really
a
question.
I
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
mr
roach.
I
think
that
these
reports
have
been
really
comprehensive.
They've
been
really
understandable
and
uh
they've
been
extremely
helpful
to
me.
So
I
I
know
that
they're
a
lot
of
work,
but
um
they
are
really
really
valuable
and
I
appreciate
them.
E
E
H
E
Okay,
then,
the
the
second
question
I
have
is:
is
there
a
chart
because
it's
kind
of
a
moving
target?
This
is
how
much
water
we've
stored
and
we
have
available
for
use,
but
then
is
there
another
chart
that
shows
how
much
water
is
going
out,
meaning
real
time
use.
Is
there
any
kind
of
diagram
for
that.
H
um
Counselor
v
hill
koppler.
Thanks
for
the
question,
let
me
let
me
show
I
will
share
my
screen
again
and
jump
back
to
this
first
figure.
I
showed,
and
just
um
please
stop
me
as
I
go
with
clarifications
here,
but
what
this
chart
here
shows
is,
through
the
month
of
september
each
day
how
much
water
was
being
produced
is
the
is
the
the
shaded
um
colored
areas.
um
So
we
can
see.
H
And
then
we
dropped
our.
Probably
in
response
to
that.
We
dropped
our
production
down
to
maybe
eight
and
a
half
on
the
third
of
september,
and
we
sold
more
than
that
through
our
meters
that
day,
and
so
this
sort
of
interaction
between
how
much
we're
producing
and
how
much
we're
selling
each
day
um
is
is
is
what
we're
trying
to
show
on
this
graph
here.
Does
that
um
get
towards
your
question?.
H
Sure
so
on
the
30th
it
looks
like
we
produced
about
eight
and
a
half
somewhere
in
there,
a
million
gallons
of
water-
and
um
you
know
two
and
a
half
of
that
or
three
of
that
came
from
canyon,
road,
another
five
or
six
came
from
buckman
and
the
rest
of
it
came
from
city
wells,
and
that
was
almost
two
million
gallons
more
than
we
than
we
sold
through
our
meters
that
day.
So
we
added
about
2
million
gallons
of
water
storage
to
our
tanks.
On
that
day,.
H
Sure
so
this
um
on
on
the
1st
of
september,
we
produced
4
million
gallons
of
water,
so
we
released
4
million
gallons
of
water
from
nickels
reservoir
and
directed
it
to
the
canyon
road
water
treatment
plant.
Where
we
set,
we
let
it
sit,
we
settled
it
and
filtered
it
and
added
some
chlorine
to
it
and
then
put
it
and
then
and
then
this
was
the
amount
that
we
actually
sent
out
of
the
treatment
plant
down
to
our
tanks.
H
H
Mr
chair,
um
I
I
may
not
completely
um
get
the
the
question,
but
the
reason
we
have
multiple
sources
certainly
is
is
so
that
we
don't
rely
on
anyone
at
any
any
given
point
and
the
the
the
foresight
of
the
city
to
bring
on
a
second
surface
water
source
has
really
allowed
our
wells
to
recover
so
that
in
periods
of
drought,
we
really
can
lean
on
them.
So
that's
sort
of.
H
In
a
nutshell,
our
our
our
strategy
right
now
is
to
use
surface
water
when
it's
available
and
rest
our
well
fields
um
as
sort
of
our.
I
liken
it
to
a
checking
account
and
a
savings
account.
I
mean
we
try
and
uh
we
know
exactly
what's
in
the
savings
account,
we
can
look
up
in
the
reservoirs
and
see
it.
We
can.
We
have
a
sense
of
the
snow
pack,
that's
in
the
mountains
and
on
the
other
hand
um
we
don't
understand
as
well
our
groundwater
resources.
H
A
Looking
more
at
um
aren't
there
chemicals,
um
not
chemicals,
I
guess
minerals
that
are
more
uh
abundant,
like
with
the
well
field
than
with
the
reservoirs
and
blending
that
water,
so
that
there's
not
as
much
minerals
and
added
or
taken
out
so
that
it
sort
of
balances
the
water
out.
Does
that
make
sense.
H
The
way
the
buckman
welfield
is
set
up.
All
of
that
water
is
moved
into
the
10
million
gallon
tank,
which
is
our
largest
water
storage
over
off
of
599
in
the
sort
of
in
near
the
latter
open
space.
All
of
that
water
goes
in
there
and
mixes
before
any
of
it
is
delivered
to
any
particular
meter.
um
So
that's
how
we
blend
um
that
water,
when
we
do
have
water
quality
concerns
associated
with
any
single
well.
A
H
H
A
A
A
E
E
So
my
reading
of
this
and
the
purpose
behind
this
is
to
recognize
a
minimum
wage
for
a
job
done
and
so
I'm
I
know
this
is
not
as
nowhere
in
the
resolution
or
in
discussion
that
I
am
aware
there
is
not
any
reference
to
this
as
a
merit
in
type
pay.
It's
a
minimum
wage
pay
so
uh
full
time
versus
I'll
start.
There
full-time
versus
part-time,
full-time,
generally
work
in
a
regular
schedule,
40
hours
a
week,
part-time
work
anywhere.
E
So
that
means
probationary.
Employees
are
not
covered,
but
nor
are
part-time
employees,
and
so
I'm
wondering
what
the
rationale
is
for
that,
because
you
could
potentially
have
a
new
hire
on
probation
being
a
parking
attendant,
whether
that's
I'll
just
use
it
as
an
example
who
is
probationary,
yet
they
get
less
money
than
the
15
an
hour
person
and
they're
doing
the
same
job.
uh
You
could
have
a
part-time
parking
attendant
doing
the
same
job
as
a
full-time
parking
attendant
and
their
their
salaries
are
not
the
same,
I.e
15
an
hour.
E
So
because
this
is
not
a
merit
increase.
I
don't
see
why
probationary
employees
are
excluded
and
in
the
re
it's
a
recurring
cost,
so
those
employees
will
potentially
become
classified
employees
passing
their
probationary
period.
I
don't
know
if
this
has
been
fully
budgeted
to
take
that
into
consideration,
and
I
see
this
as
is
punitive
against
part-time
employees
versus
and
and
non-pro
and
probationary
employees,
and
I
think
that
a
minimum
wage
should
apply
to
all,
including
temporaries
they're,
going
to
be
standing
side
by
side
by
their
colleagues
doing
the
same
job.
E
So
I
think
I
think
it's
wrong.
I
think
it
it
could
affect
morale.
I
think
it's
not
the
purpose
of
minimum
wage,
I
think
minimum
and
then
and
then
we
go
to
the
cadets
um
there's
discussion
on
page
one.
I
think
it's
the
fourth
bullet
city
increased
the
starting
wage
for
cadets.
Well,
cadets
are
generally
probationary
employees,
so
are
they
not
going
to
be
covered?
And
this
and
bullet
3
4
bullet
four
seems
to
apply,
seems
to
discuss
police
cadets,
but
we
also
have
fire
cadets,
so
this
doesn't
differentiate
between
what
cadets
they're
talking
about.
E
So
I
do
know
when
cadets
start
they
are
probationary
employees.
So
that
means
we
would
be
excluding
potentially
fire
cadets
and
police
cadets.
So
it
under
this
definition,
and
I'm
not
sure
that
was
the
intent
and
I
I
don't.
I
won't
go
for
this
because
I
I
think
it's
gonna.
I
think
it's
uh
kind
of
mixing
up
minimum
wage
with
merit
and
um
I
don't
know
I
would
go
for
it.
E
E
A
N
Mr
chairman
uh
counselor,
the
hill
coupler
I'll
start.
um
If
you
look
at
the
resolution,
we're
basing
it
off
of
the
current
rule,
six
of
the
city's
rules
and
regulations,
our
current
rules
do
not
allow
for
any
type
of
salary
increases
other
than
a
retention.
So
we
utilize
this
rule
to
try
to
make
this
happen
for
our
employees.
Part-Time
employees
are
covered,
they
are
definitely
covered
and
when
we
look
at
the
rule
of
the
current
rule,
6,
it
does
say
accept
those
in
a
temporary
status
who
have
completed
at
least
six
months
of
continuous
service.
N
So
the
idea
is
to
include
all
employees,
so
part-time
employees
will
be
definitely
covered.
Probationary
employees
uh
will
be
covered
um
consistent
with
this
current
rule.
Upon
their
succession
of
successful
completion
of
the
probationary
period,
temporary
employees
are
hired
um
in
six
months
uh
increments.
I
think
we
just
finished
a
six-month
session
of
our
forestry
technicians.
N
So
from
this
point
forward
we
will
definitely
be
hiring
all
temporary
employees
at
that
minimum
rate,
so
it
will
include
all
employees
um
with
your
reference
to
bullet
number.
Four.
I
think
what
this
memo
was
trying
to
describe
were
some
of
the
things
that
have
occurred
um
and
with
the
police
union
we
don't
have
anyone
who
will
be
earning
less
than
this,
so
they're
not
included
um
in
the
memo.
E
E
Okay,
so
um
you
know,
I
understand
your
your
discussion
about
the
the
personnel
rules.
I
think
that's
what
you
were
referring
to,
but
with
this
resolution,
if
we
really
behind
the
fifteen
dollar
minimum
wage,
wouldn't
this
resolution
approved
and
then
going
to
the
city
council
overall,
if,
when
approved,
uh
usurp
the
the
personnel
rule.
In
other
words,
this
is
what
would
supersede
that.
E
In
essence,
it's
kind
of
like
making
a
rule
change
in
a
way
for
this
particular
item,
so
I
I
still
have
a
problem
not
covering
probationary
employees.
I
don't
see
the
rationale
for
not
covering
them.
I
think
I
would
like
this
resolution
to
address
that,
specifically
for
the
minimum
wage,
because
um
you
know
minimum
wage
is
minimum
wage
for
a
job
done
and
it
shouldn't
apply
to
it.
E
Shouldn't
have
any
streams
attached
to
merit
and
probationary
is
really
its
merit
merit
for
for
doing
a
good
job,
and
if
you
do
a
good
job,
you
get
to
be
classified
when
the
time
runs
out,
that's
merit
and
so
tying
a
minimum
wage.
To
that
to
me
is
counterproductive
and
and
could
do
more
damage
to
morale.
We
saw
what
happened
at
the
em
at
the
golf
course
when
we
hired
23
an
hour
maintenance
workers
to
to
work
alongside
our
our
mrc
staff,
making.
E
What
maybe
I
don't
know
what
they
make
but
less
than
23
an
hour,
and
there
was
a
you
know
there
was
a
ruckus
there
about.
You
know
people
felt
bad
morale
for
that
uh
they
felt
bad
about
it.
So
I
know
this
is
just
maybe
some
I
don't
know
how
much
per
hour
difference-
maybe
40
cents,
maybe
a
dollar-
I
don't
know
you
know
one
to
the
other
probationary
versus
non-probationary,
but
I
don't
think
it's
worth
it
because
we're
talking
about
people
doing
the
same
job,
potentially
standing
side
by
side.
N
Mr
chairman,
councilor
b
hill
coupler,
all
the
new
hires
being
brought
in,
will
be
brought
at
that
15
an
hour
mark.
I
think
we
were
trying
to
ensure
compliance
with
rule
six,
um
and
so
there
are
a
few
employees
I
believe
there
might
be,
and
maybe
less
now
approximately
10
employees
who
are
in
that
period
where,
if
this
gets
approved,
they
may
not
have
come
off
of
probation
by
the
time
it's
implemented,
but
a
month
after
they
will
and
then
they'll
receive
it.
N
E
Well,
I
guess
I'm
I'm
kind
of
bringing
this
up
for
the
this
10
or
so
that
you
mentioned.
You
know
that
that
may
have
been
an
example,
but
um
you
know
I
believe
this
resolution
would
supersede
rule
six
and
I
really
don't
think
we
should
have
exclusions
that
that's
not
the.
I
I
don't
believe,
that's
the
intent
of
this
um
of
this
measure.
This
intent
is
to
pay
everybody
at
least
a
minimum
wage,
uh
regardless
of
their
their
status.
So
I
think
we
should
include
non.
E
uh
I
think
we
should
include
include
probationary
employees
because,
as
you
say,
uh
probationary
and
temporary
temporaries
will
work
their
stint
and
then
they'll
be
uh
they'll,
be
gone
and
but
they'll
get
they'll
get
the
pay
for
the
job
that
everybody
else
is
getting,
and
I
think
that
they
would
feel
that's
fair
uh
and
and
for
probationary
employees
I
mean,
I
think,
you're.
The
city
would
be
starting
out
on
the
wrong
foot
by
paying
a
probationary
employee
less
money
than
their
counterpart.
E
Who
gets
you
know,
even
if
it's
25
cents,
it
still
bothers
employees?
I
know
it
does.
uh
It
would
bother
me
you
know:
what's
I'm
doing
the
same
job
and
and
I'm
25
25
cents
less
valued,
you
know
I
I
think
we're
going
to
create,
even
if
it
doesn't
last
long
like
you
say,
the
new
ones
will
be
brought
in
at
15.
E
N
uh
We
were
also
at
the
same
time,
trying
to
conform
to
our
roles
that
need
significant
updates,
um
but
certainly
we
can
look
at
this
from
an
equity
standpoint
and
uh
work
through
it
that
way
and
ensure
that
these
employees
get
the
um
the
15
an
hour
uh
in
case
if
it
gets
approved
upon
implementation
and
not
have
to
wait
because
again,
it
affects
very
few
employees.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
huge
budget
impact.
E
E
O
O
E
E
E
A
E
A
E
A
J
E
A
P
A
J
I
guess
for
me,
in
this
top
five
we've
got
a
couple
of
items
that
I
don't
consider
any
of
these
particularly
luxury
items.
I
think
that
they're
items
that
over
the
course
of
time
need
to
happen,
but
I
think
that
in
our
top
five
we
have
a
couple
of
other
items
that
for
me
belong
because
we
have
no
choice
with
them.
One
of
let
me
just
talk
about
a
couple
of
the
items
that
are
in
the
top
five
the
swan
park
project.
J
J
J
Library,
um
design.
That
means
we're
talking
about
a
20
million
dollar
library
project,
and
we
all
know
that.
That's
optimistic
because
if
we
say
two
million
it'll
end
up
being
two
and
a
half
to
three
and
if
we
say
it's,
a
20
million
dollar
library
it'll
end
up
being
25
to
30..
Now
the
items
that
I've
looked
at
that
for
me,
we
really
have
no
choice
on
are
items
34,
which
is
a
uh
new
city
hall
project,
we're
at
a
point
with
city
hall,
where
I
think
we've
got
to.
J
J
Expanding
a
park
right
now,
considering,
like
I
said,
we're
really
not
able
to
take
care
of
the
parks
that
we
currently
have,
and
we
never
look
at
these
projects
as
to
fiscal
impact
over
time,
the
other
project
and
it's
the
west
alameda
project
it
happens
to
be
in
my
district.
I
wish
it
wasn't
it's
it's
a
project
that
we
don't
have
much
choice
on
that
project.
J
I
don't
know
what
what
much
else,
what
to
say
about
it,
chair,
um
I'd
love
to
have
a
whole
bunch
of
the
projects
on
there,
but
I'm
looking
at
things
that
are
absolute
necessities
and
I'm
bothered
by
city
hall
that
we
can't.
We
can't
fix
our
mechanical
because
we're
so
far
out
of
electric
code
on
it.
J
A
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
thank
you
councillor,
lindell
for
bringing
up
your
concerns.
I
you
know
I
share
a
lot
of
the
same
concerns
and
sentiments
that
you've
shared.
um
You
know,
and
this
is
what
I
think
my
second
go
around
with
the
cip
lists
and
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around.
Why
why
we
fund
a
project
and
we
just
let
money
sit
there
and
it
can
be
years
until
we
project
or
we
want
it
to
be
fully
funded.
F
J
Thank
you
counselor
very
much.
I
I
want
to
mention
that
on
that
particular
project,
yeah
we've
been
pushing
it
for
years
and
years
and
uh
counselor
via
real,
and
I
have
both
put
that
again
is
our
number
one
district
project,
so
we're
very
hopeful
that
that
one
gets
taken
care
of
this
year,
but
I
appreciate
you
bringing
that
up,
I'm
just
trying
to
shed
light
on
that
particular
one.
J
F
um
I
mentioned
this
during
our
the
meetings
we
had
with
ms
wheeler
a
couple
weeks
back
in
regards
to.
We
know
that
there's
going
to
be
some
more
than
likely
some
some
major
infrastructure
dollars
coming
down
from
the
federal
government
and
which
of
these
projects
would
fit
into
that
pool
and
rank
them
lower,
because
we
don't
want
to
then
be
pulling
resources
from
a
pool
of
money
that
can
be
paid
for
resources
elsewhere.
F
um
I
I
think
re-prioritizing
the
list
is
essential.
I
brought
up
my
concerns
with
item
number
four,
which
is
the
median
beautification
project.
I
think
we
can
all
agree
that
our
medians
need
to
be
relooked
at
and
re-redesigned,
but,
as
I
was
beginning
to
unpill
that
onion,
I'm
not
in
agreement
with
putting
together
a
design
that
costs
70
thousand
dollars
per
medium,
I
mean
70
000
per
median
is
excessive.
F
When
we've
got
much
more
needs
throughout
our
city
and
we
can,
we
can
figure
out
a
much
more.
uh
I
guess,
cost
effective
manner
to
to
redesign
our
medians,
so
I
would
rank
that
one
a
lot
lower
than
top.
I
wouldn't
even
put
it
at
top
20
with
that
type
of
price
tag.
I
won't
even
put
it
on
the
list,
I'm
actually
kind
of
disappointed.
We
would
look
at
something
for
seventy
thousand
dollars
per
median,
um
and
I
so
I
guess
my
question
is
next
steps.
How
do
we
begin
to
work
to
re-rank
this?
C
C
The
first
five,
the
top
five
projects
do
get
special
attention
by
the
legislature,
but
all
the
other
orders
after
that
are
meaningless.
So
it's
only
one
through
five.
That's
a
meaningful
order,
um
and
actually
our
normal
process
is
that
we
approve
this
icip
list
in
this
sort
of
quote
draft
form,
that's
been
updated
by
staff
and
has
been
already
submitted
to
dfa.
This
particular
resolution.
We're
looking
at
with
this
item
is,
is
just
to
approve
that
submittal
of
our
infrastructure
capital
improvement
plan,
as
required
by
the
legislature
on
an
annual
basis.
F
F
C
F
um
So
then
I
guess
the
follow-up
to
that
is
just
going
through
the
committee
process,
as
we
through
each
committee
determine
what
we
might
want
to
see
the
movement
and
changing
in
the
rankings,
um
because,
as
I
mentioned,
I
I
don't
believe
the
median
beautification
should
be
top
five.
I
think
there's
much
more
pressing
needs,
especially
at
a
price
tag
of
what
it's
currently
at.
F
um
So
I
don't
know
how
we
go
about
if
it's
making
motions
in
this
agenda
item,
um
but
I
mean
that's,
that's
something
and
I
completely
agree
with
council
lindell
in
regards
to
bumping
up
uh
re
looking
at
city
hall,
I
think
that's
that
to
me
is
has
always
been
um
the.
Can
we're
kicking
down
the
road
and
we
just
need
a.
We
need
to
address
it
and
we
need
to
figure
out
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
with
with
that
space
and
what's
the
future
ms
wheeler.
C
C
um
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
price
tag
of
the
uh
medians
is
it's
50
to
70.
000
will
certainly
be
developing
a
design
that
makes
it
as
cost
effective
as
possible,
but
the
situation
is:
is
that
there's
no
infrastructure
going
to
our
median,
so
in
many
cases
we'll
be
having
to
bring
irrigation
in
order
to
at
least
even
establish
native
plants,
um
and
so
there's
it's
quite
a
bit
of
uh
it's,
not
just
planting
plants
um
or
just
covering
them
with
concrete.
C
But
we,
um
the
the
design
of
the
project,
is
to
have
a
designer
come
up
with
multiple
designs
and
then
do
proof
of
concept
of
those
designs
and
then
select
our
standards,
and
so
that
will
give
us
an
opportunity
to
balance
uh
cost
uh
aesthetic,
um
and
I
did
also
want
to
point
out
about
the
median
as
it
sounds
like.
It
is
just
a
beautification
project,
but
there
is
safety
implications
as
well.
C
The
overgrowth
in
the
medians
and
the
massive
amount
of
manual
labor
that
it
takes
to
maintain
them
at
this
point
um
does
cost
us
uh
labor
costs.
It
costs
us
impacts
on
our
ability
to
maintain
our
parks,
and
it
also
does
in
uh
introduce
some
um
uh
safety
issues.
But
certainly
there
are
many
issues
to
address
and
and
that's
what
this
conversation
is
for.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
A
And
thank
you
real
sorry,
uh
councillor
garcia,
miss
wheeler
real
quickly.
um
The
top
five
or
four
are
typically
for
those
larger
dollar
city
items.
Is
that
correct
and
then
the
the
council
or
the
district
priorities
are
for
those,
for
uh
I
want
to
say
typically
250,
000
and
less
so
harrison
road
would
fit
into
that
district
party,
where
um
the
top
five
is
looking
at.
Those
larger
dollar
priorities
is
that
correct.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
uh
appreciate
that
and
I
appreciate
the
additional
context
from
ms
wheeler,
but
I
still
think
even
at
the
cost
of
fifty
thousand
dollars.
That's
that's
way
too
much
money.
um
You
know
I
think,
there's
I
I
would
be
hard-pressed
that
we
can.
We
could
find
and
work
with
local
vendors
and
local
designers
to
get
meetings
done
for
a
fraction
of
that
cost.
F
um
I
know
you're
speaking
about
vegetation
and
plants
and
whatnot
well,
there's
another
route
where
we
can
go
and
doesn't
require
that
installing
new
infrastructure
yeah,
of
course
that's
going
to
cost
that
much
money,
but
why?
If
it's
going
to
cost
that,
why
go
that
route?
Why
water,
something
that's
going
to
just
bring
in
more
much
more
weeds?
F
I
think,
if
you
look
at
what
a
lot
of
the
challenges
we
have
with
our
medians
is
the
siberian
elm
invasion
and
by
watering
that
you're
just
watering
weeds
that
turn
into
trees
that
just
spread
more
more
weeds
in
my
opinion,
so
I
think
that's
where
we.
We
really
need
to
wrap
her
head
around.
How
we're
going
to
do
this,
because
if
it's,
we
don't
have
dedicated
help
like
we
do
with
some
of
the
nicer
medians
that
we
have?
You
know
in
particular
around
the
downtown
area.
F
Well,
then,
let's
make
it
much
a
much
more
manageable
process
where
we
won't
need
folks
that
will
have
to
provide
the
upkeep.
um
We
won't
have
to
waste
critical
resources
like
water
um
and
and
do
it
still
in
a
manner
where
it's
safe
and
it
helps
to
beautify
the
neighborhood.
I
think
that's
one
thing
where,
if,
if
we
can
get
a
control
on
that,
um
you
will
see
the
support
that
will
come
from
the
community
and
I
think
we
we
need
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
table
at
this
one.
F
F
The
next
step
I'm
hearing
is
I'll
have
to
introduce
an
amendment
to
the
next
agenda
item
to
remove
the
medium
beautification
project,
because
I
think
there's
much
more
pressing
needs
that
than
that
right
now,
um
with
that
I'll
take
a
look
at
the
list
and
I
think
that's
where
uh
again,
I
guess
the
next
gen
agenda
item
is
where
we
really
need
to
tackle
what
the
city's
priorities
are.
No
other
questions.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
C
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
question
mr
chair
counselor
beta.
Actually,
um
the
legislative
uh
grants
are
a
special
kind
of
grant
that
actually
could
reimburse
the
city
for
some
of
the
extra
investment
that
it's
offered.
It's
going
to
contribute
to
the
airport
expansion
right
now,
um
and
so
the
legislature
had
provided
10
and
a
half
million
dollars
towards
the
project.
K
C
um
Thank
you,
mr
chair
councilor
beta.
It
actually
is
seeking
additional
funding,
um
so
there
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
funding
on
hand
and
funding.
um
Construction
is
scheduled
to
start,
but
there
is
additional
funding.
um
One
thing
that
happened
this
year
with
this
icip
list
is
that
we
had
the
project
managers
update
every
single
project
on
the
list,
so
the
numbers
that
you
see
as
funded
and
requested
are
current
um
agua
fria.
South
meadows
is
also
eligible
for
impact
fees
um
and
other
d.o.t
funding
as
well.
C
um
I
did
want
to
let
the
public
works
committee
members
know
that
we
did
think
about
the
other
funding.
That's
going
to
be
available
with
the
expectation
of
the
federal
infrastructure
money,
uh
the
expectation
of
an
upcoming
grt
bond
and
the
expectation
of
an
upcoming
geo
bond,
and
so
it
is
with
all
of
those
things
in
mind
um
that
when
we
had
the
discussions
to
think
about,
you
know,
for
instance,
the
buses
that
are
on
the
list
are
extremely
important
and
expensive.
C
K
That
was
something
that,
unfortunately,
was
uh
uh
got
caught
up
in
covid
and
the
loss
of
budget,
and
when
you
look
at
the
development,
that's
going
up
in
that
area,
there
was
a
reason
we
had
planned
that
fire
station
there,
and
I
think
we
may
even
have
committed
to
santa
fe
county
to
put
the
fire
station
there
as
part
of
the
annexation
agreement.
So
we
uh
we
may
want
to
put
that
fire
station
back
in
the
top
five,
especially
if
something
like
medians
ultimately
gets
removed.
K
E
E
um
We
don't
have
a
parking
lot
yet
uh
and
we're
asking
for
more
money.
So
I'll
save
my
discussion
on
this
for
later,
but
I
have
a
concern
for
going
back
to
the
legislature
for
more
money.
When
we
haven't
shown
much
progress,
uh
I
agree
with
councillor
lindell
about
you
know
beefing
up
parks
when
we
have
parks
that
are
falling
apart.
E
E
um
Medians
are
not
more
important
than
our
children
and
our
children
should
have
places
where
they
can
go
and
have
baseball
dugouts
where
they
can
play
games
uh
not
have
to
worry
about
pothole
I
mean
puddles,
whatever
gopher
holes
or
whatever
those
are,
and
you
know
we
just
need
to
have.
I
mean
look
at
regal
park
and
the
playground
equipment
and
such
so
I
don't
think
we
need
to
be
medians
are
more
important
than
our
children.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Without
this
discussion
and
without
council
approval,
and
then
the
resolution
you
know
should
match
it,
and
so
I
think
we're
a
little
bit
behind
behind
the
ball
here,
because
if
this
has
already
gone
to
dfa,
I
mean
what
kind
of
planning
does
that
say
about
us
as
a
governing
body
when
we
just
submit
it
just
to.
Is
it
a
placeholder?
I
don't
know
it
makes
it
seem
like
we're,
not
really
serious
about
our
priorities.
E
So
I
would
like
to
have
healthy
discussions
like
this
and
then
we
all
come
to
agreement,
and
then
we
submit
our
top
five
and
and
that's
the
way
I
would
like
to
see
it.
But
for
now
I
I'm,
along
with
uh
my
colleague
I
I
can't
support
this
list,
the
way
it
is,
and
so
um
let
me
see
if
I
covered
everything.
E
E
I
just
want
to
mention
it
because
our
tennis
courts
need
help,
and
every
time
I
can
mention
it,
I'm
going
to
mention
it
because
you
know
I
I
have
to
have
a
level
of
trust
that
it
that
those
will
be
completed,
the
herb
martinez
park
and
the
watergoethe
one.
uh
We
can't
lose
sight
of
it
and
regina.
You
know
I've
already
told
you.
I
will
always
bring
this
up
until
I
see
them
complete,
they're,
dangerous,
they
haven't
been
shut
down
or
have
they
been
shut
down.
Let
me
ask
you
that
question.
E
E
uh
Councilman
hill
copley:
no,
they
have
not
been
closed.
So
are
we
waiting
for
a
work,
an
accident
so
that
the
city
can
be
sued?
I
mean
these
things
are
pretty
dangerous
and
there's
still
kids
running
around
playing
on
them.
uh
You
know
we
need
to
encourage
our
youth.
You
know,
I'm
all
about
children
having
things
to
do,
there's
potholes
in
those
tennis
courts,
and
you
can't
really
play
tennis
and
watch
your
feet
at
the
same
time
going
into
a
pothole.
E
E
A
C
A
uh
So
it's
meaningless
to
the
state,
but
it's
still
important
to
the
legislature
and
to
other
organizations
that
may
be
wanting
to
find
funding
for
their
particular
projects,
because,
as
long
as
it's
on
our
icip
list,
they
can
still
request
funding.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct,
yeah!
Thank
you.
um
So
you
adjusted
the
numbers
which
which
you're
talking
about
the
dollar
numbers
you
didn't
adjust
the
rank.
C
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
um
Yes,
those
numbers
that
you
pointed
out
on
the
200
000
is
a
space
study
um
to
understand
what
um
city
uh
functions
that
we
can
co
uh
co
ability
in
a
new
building.
You
know
we're
spread
out
over
a
hundred
buildings
in
our
city
operations.
Now
it's
a
very
expensive
way
to
do
business.
um
It
has.
C
uh
It
introduces
inefficiencies
in
energy
as
well
as
in
staff
time,
so
a
study
would
be
done
to
evaluate
what
functions
could
be
put
together
in
the
new
consolidated
city
services
center
and
to
uh
confirm
where
it
should
go.
um
The
second
chunk
of
money
is
a
design
amount
and
then
the
third
chunk
of
money
is
the
construction
and,
yes,
it
would
be
a
new
building
at
a
new
location.
C
C
C
C
um
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
for
that
question
that
really
relates
to
um
private
uh
roads
and
uh
developed
roads
by
the
private
developers.
So
it's
really
about
private
roads.
Before
they
come
to
the
city,
they
have
to
be
inspected
to
meet
the
city
standards
it.
I
don't
think
we
have
the
same
regulations
on
annexation,
agreement,
communication
with
the
county,
all
right.
D
A
Okay,
all
right
and
then
with
regards
to
south
meadows
and
our
free.
I
agree
with
what
council
beta
said,
but
I
think
the
amount
is
low
enough
that
we
can
probably
look
at
it
as
a
district
party
and
then,
as
far
as
fire
station
number
two.
I
agree
um
if
we
move
things
off
that
should
move
up
again.
Part
of
the
annexation
agreement
meant
that
we
would
uh
provide
a
fire
and
ambulance
service
for
that
part
of
town.
A
The
counties
agreed
to
stay
there,
but
at
any
time
they
could
they
could
pull
out.
I
think
they
had
that
ability
several
years
ago
and
um
have
agreed
to
stay
there.
So
um
you
know
it
is
something
that
that
I
would
like
to
see
moved
up.
So
what's
the
miss?
What's
the
process
for
us-
and
it
may
be
up
to
me
to
get
to
with
together
with
the
other
counselors,
to
try
to
develop
the
the
top
five
priority.
C
Thank
you
so
much,
mr
chair.
um
First
of
all,
as
I
said,
we
actually
would
like
to
pass
this
resolution
just
to
accept
the
submittal
of
the
city's
infrastructure
capital
improvement
plan
to
the
state
as
required,
and
it
is
the
next
item,
which
is
where
the
amendments
are
required
to
move
around
top
five
in
district
priorities,
so
that
that
would
be
one
uh
suggestion
and,
um
and
then
amendments
to
the
resolution
and
the
legislative
priorities
is
how
we
normally
adjust
the
priorities.
And
so
that
say,
um
I
think
it's
a
wednesday
night.
A
C
um
Thank
you
for
that
question,
mr
chair.
What
it
affects
is
our
meeting
of
a
deadline
of
dfa's
deadline
to
submit
our
general
capital
request.
um
They
don't
have.
They
don't
have
that
same
kind
of
constraint
on
our
priority
establishment
and
um
last
year
we
didn't
pass
the
legislative
priorities
resolution
until
almost
december,
um
but
the
the
capital
improvement
plan
is
required
to
be
submitted
uh
timely
um
for
dfa.
A
Tonight,
it's
just
basically
a
random
list
from
one
to
85
or
whatever,
and
then
we
just
adjust
our
top
five
priorities
based
on
uh
the
resolution
that
we'll
see
in
item
e.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct,
mr
chair,
all
right.
So
if
we
decided
to
move
the
last
item
on
the
list
up
to
number
one,
that's
not
a
problem,
no
problem
at
all
all
right
as
long
as
it's
on
the
list,
it
can
be
adjusted
any
way.
We
want
right.
A
C
Yes,
that's
correct,
mr
chair.
A
good
example
of
that
would
be
uh
cerro
gordo
road
reconstruction
is
on
the
list
and
we
know
that
that
community
um
a
couple
of
years
ago,
was
successful
in
getting
an
appropriation,
even
though
the
item
wasn't
any
in
our
top
five.
So
that's
correct.
Other
organizations
may
support
these
and
and
get
um
appropriations
to
these
uh
projects.
A
E
C
The
dfa
um
required
that
we
have
the
um
the
the
icip
entered
into
the
list
like
two
weeks
ago
at
the
end
of
september
at
the
end
of
september,
and
we
did
make
that
date.
I
think
it
was
september
27th
and
we
did
make
that
date,
but
they
do
require
a
resolution
to
accompany
that
and
that's
what
this
resolution
is
and
what's
the
deadline
for
the
resolution,
it's
uh
as
close
to
september
27th
as
possible.
E
C
The
resolution,
uh
thank
you
for
the
question
um
they're
they're
working
with
us.
They
know
exactly
what
our
status
is.
We've
um
attended
the
training
we've
been
in
communication
with
the
director
in
charge
and
they're
completely
fine
with
our
providing
the
resolution.
As
soon
as
that,
we
can
so
there's
I
mean.
E
C
C
E
E
E
K
But
if
it's,
if
so
it
sounds
like
d
then
could
be
approved
this
evening
and
where
we
really
need
to
spend
our
time
and
focus
is
item
e,
which
is
our
where
we
actually
take
item
d
and
prioritize,
especially
the
top
five.
So
it's
possible,
we
can
pass
d
tonight,
let
that
go
through
the
process
and
then
just
continue
to
work
on
e.
As
you
had
stated.
Maybe
it's
you
get
together
with
us
individually
or
we
postpone
it
and
we
have
a
more
thorough
discussion
next
time.
C
A
F
We've
got
a
passive
resolution
that
confirms
the
prioritizations,
but
now
we're
hearing
that.
Well,
it
doesn't
really
matter,
but
I
think
it
does
matter
to
dfa,
because
my
concern
is
what
is
dfa
going
to
hold
us
to
because
they
might
say:
well,
here's
your
top
five!
You
passed.
Your
resolution
have
proven
this.
F
C
Every
year
we
submit
the
entire
capital
plan
first
by
their
deadlines
and
the
reason
they
need
a
little
extra
time
is
the
director
of
dfa
actually
does
go
through
every
project
and
review
it
to
make
sure
that
our
submittal
is
complete,
so
they
have
quite
a
bit
of
work
to
do
before
they
prepare
reports
for
interim
committees,
um
and
so
we
always
pass
a
resolution
about
this
time,
submitting
our
capital
plan
in
whatever
order
it's
in,
and
then
we
always
pass
another
resolution
later.
That
is
the
priority.
The
top
five.
F
Right,
no,
I
I
agree.
I
understand
that,
but
let's
just
say
hypothetically,
that
the
next
item,
which
is
the
legislative
priorities,
is
a
completely
different
five
items
where
dfas
now
sent
out
the
interim
committees.
This
is
what
santa
fe
is
going
to
be
requesting,
but
then
our
delegation
gets
a
completely
different
list
and
they're
not
matching
and
again
to
to
counselor
b
hill
coupler's
point
earlier.
It
makes
us
look
like
if
we're
not
doing
our
work
correctly.
C
R
R
A
A
I
imagine
they
probably
could,
but
typically
it
should
be
on
our
list
in
order
for
them
to
do
it
and
for
the
city
to
be
the
fiscal
agent
to
get
it
done
so
that
that's
really
what
this
list
is
is
announcing
us
as
a
fiscal
agent.
I
think
for
some
of
these
projects
that
um
other
organizations
may
may
be
interested
in,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
helps
or
not,
but
um
that's
sort
of
the
way
I
look
at
it.
So
uh
thank
you,
mr
jones,
uh
any
other
questions
from
the
counselors
council
linda.
A
F
A
Thank
you
so
now
this
is
again
where
the
rubber
meets
a
road.
We
can
make
amendments
if
we
think
there
are
amendments
that
need
to
be
made.
It
would
be
nice
if
this
committee
could
agree
to
the
top
five
before
it
moved
on
and
before
amendments
were
made
so
that
you
know
at
least
this
committee
could
support
the
uh
top
five,
but
um
we'll
leave
it
up
to
discussion,
and
this
was
pulled
by
councilman
coppler.
A
E
E
Told
that
we
haven't
spent
the
other
money
we
haven't.
I
I
guess
I
would
reserve
for
later,
but
I
don't.
I
haven't
driven
out
there,
so
I
don't
even
know
if
the
parking
lot's
done,
but
I
know
we've
had
several
questions
about
the
parking
lots
and
have
always
seemed
to
me
that
we
were
making
progress,
but
I
don't
know
um
so
and
sorry
counselor
beta,
but
I
would
move
swan
park
a
little
bit
lower
as
well.
E
S
E
K
Mr
chairman,
we
uh
councilman
v
hill
koppler.
She
talked
about
the
different,
the
top
five
and
things
she
would
remove
and
then
and
potentially
replace.
So
I
had
just
requested
that
she
give
us
her
top
five
and
the
top
five
is
midtown
one.
Then
fire
station
two
harrison
road:
three,
a
royal
chamiso
crossing
four
and
the
transit
vehicles
as
five.
A
J
Oh
sure-
and
I
would
just
um
ask
counselor
v
hill
copler-
to
be
thinking
about
a
substitute
for
your
uh
harrison
road,
because
councilor
villarreal
and
I
have
agreed
that
that's
our
district
uh
number
one,
it's
a
pretty
small
amount
of
money
and,
as
we
had
said
before,
we
usually
go
kind
of
big
items
on
these,
so
we
feel
like.
Hopefully
we
have
that
covered.
J
So
if
you
have
another
uh
big
money
item
that
you
would
want
to
put
in
your
um
top
five,
I'm
just
letting
you
know
that
we
feel,
like
um
we've,
been
pretty
successful
with
getting
money
for
that
and
hopefully
we'll
get
it
finished
up
this
year.
Is
our
district
priority,
so
just
throwing
that
out
there
to
you.
J
J
I
think
that
in
deference
to
the
things
that
counselor
garcia
was
talking
about,
um
we
can
make
that
money
go
further,
but
for
as
long
as
I've
been
sitting
here,
we
haven't
made
that
much
progress
with
medians
and
we
hear
about
it
mightily
every
year
and
it
would
be
nice
to
once
and
for
all
get
that
issue
taken
care
of,
and
I
think
we
could
and
my
last
one
would
be
midtown.
So
those
are
my
five.
F
Sure-
and
I
guess
it's
a
little
challenging
in
the
sense-
we
don't
know
what
what
what
we
can
spend
the
money
on
in
regards
to
what
the
an
infrastructure
bill
can
cover,
and
I
think
that's
where
it'd
be
nice
to
know
what
staff
is
already
kind
of
strategizing
around
on
that
front,
um
because
I'd
hate
to
put
something
in
a
top
five.
That
staff
is
already
trying
to
put
some
strategy
and
muscle
behind
uh
through
what
would
be
potentially
built
back
back
better
planned
resources.
I
C
Mr
chair,
um
I
could
um
counselor
garcia
to
answer
your
question
about
um
what
staff
is
thinking
about
from
the
federal
infrastructure
bill.
It
is
a
really
really
important
question.
um
One
of
the
things
we
thought
for
sure
we
could.
We
felt
confident
that
transit
would
be
one
of
the
things
that
would
be
a
highlight
in
the
infrastructure
bill
and
so
the
buses
we
felt
like.
That
would
be
a
good
thing
to
put
there.
It's
pretty
straightforward
we'd
spend
the
money
quickly
um
we
can
submit
quickly.
C
We
also
thought
the
broadband
for
disadvantaged
neighborhoods
that
that
was
very
likely
because
they've
talked
a
lot
about
digital
infrastructure,
um
we're
confident
they'll
be
road
and
bridge
money
as
well,
um
but
our
road
and
bridge
our
road
money
uh
needs
are
extensive,
uh
so
it
wouldn't
hurt
to
get
some
funding
towards
some
of
our
good
projects.
um
But
that
was
our
thoughts
at
this
point,
but
it
is
it's
relatively
unclear,
as
you
know,
what
what
they'll
be
um
allowing
funding
for.
F
I
mean
those
if
folks
have
tripping
on
those
roads
lately,
they
would
clearly
understand
the
dire
need
for
reconstruction
in
that
particular
part
of
town,
and
um
you
know
our
friends
at
the
legislature
use
those
roads
every
january
march
and
february.
I
think
they
would.
They
would
benefit
from
the
reconstruction
of
those
roads
as
well.
um
But
to
get
to
the
question
of
what
would
my
top
five
be?
F
F
F
K
A
I
C
I
could
thank
you
so
much.
um
This
is
uh
such
a
robust
discussion
and
thank
you
guys
all
so
much
for
your
feedback
and
thoughts
on
this.
um
I
did
want
to
remind
the
governing
body
that
we
are
currently
putting
together
a
list
for
our
grt
bond
um
and
it
will
be
at
least
20
million
dollars,
we'll
definitely
putting
significant
funds
towards
rehabilitation
of
many
roads
across
the
city
recommending
you
know
probably
5
to
10
million
of
that,
but
there
will
also
be
significant
funds
for
some
of
these
others.
C
A
C
C
The
governing
body
approved
city
funds
to
approve
to
encumber
to
the
contract,
um
but
the
legislative
1.8
million
will
be
used
in
place
of
the
city's
money
when
we
do
again
get
that
grant
agreement,
and
so
the
same
procedure
could
be
used
with
the
airport.
We
that
would
only
be
recommended
if
we
do
award
the
contract
certainly,
and
that
would
because,
as
councilor
b
hill
coupler
has
noted,
that
the
legislature
is
going
to
be
looking
for
significant
progress
on
the
project
before
allocating
additional
funds.
A
C
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
question.
It's
really
an
excellent
one
that
the
buses
are
safe.
The
challenge
that
we
face
is
we
bought
seven
buses
at
once
with
a
loan,
and
um
so
we
don't
want
to
be
faced
with
the
cost
of
seven
buses
that
to
replace
them
all
at
once
to
keep
them
safe,
and
so
we
would
be
trying
we
put
it.
C
C
E
E
C
Are
the
funds
for
that?
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
question.
It's
worth
a
little
bit
of
a
conversation
about
harrison
road.
um
So
what
happened
was
because
the
legislature
provided
us
funding
twice
in
a
row
on
that
project
and
they've,
provided
a
lot
of
the
funding
that
you
see
there,
but
the
governing
body
also
allocated
some
of
the
grt
bond
reallocation
because
we
use
legislative
money.
C
E
Because
you
know,
uh
I
think,
even
though
it
is
in
council
lindell's
district,
it's
I
think
it's
all
of
our
issue,
because
we've
had
enormous
issues.
There,
big
big
issues,
and
I
think
that
neighborhood
deserves
attention,
and
I
I
would
say
that
we
shouldn't
always
look
for
big
ticket
items,
because
sometimes
the
legislature
is
looking
for
pockets
where
they
can,
you
know,
are
contingent.
E
E
A
You
know
council
councillor
veo
cover,
I
think,
that's
what
the
district
priorities
are
for
to
give
those
small
pockets
of
money
that
legislators
may
want
to
fund
with
their
own
allocations.
Where
uh
and
council
lindell
said
that
her
and
councilwoman
viettel
have
been
very
successful
in
getting
funding
for
harrison
road
based
on
those
small
pocket.
E
C
C
um
Mr
chair
uh
councillor
b
hill
koppler,
if
I
understand
your
question
um
we
have,
we
did
receive
a
million
dollars
towards
our
parks
from
the
legislature.
uh
In
the
last
session.
We
haven't
gotten
the
money
yet,
but
we
exp
you
know
when
they
sell
the
bonds
and
get
the
agreement
to
us
we'll
have
that.
We
also
have
impact
fees
that
we've
been
using
significantly,
so
they
were
used
actually
and
here's
um
director,
melissa
mcdonald,
and
maybe
she
could
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
T
Thank
you
chairman
uh
councillor
villarreal,
I
mean
councillor
avil
koppler.
uh
Yes,
we
are
planning
on
funding
the
or
coming
to
you
to
fund
the
uh
reconstruction
of
several
uh
the
courts.
So
we
have
the
herb
martinez,
the
lara
goyte
and
the
adelaide
courts,
which
we
are
recommending
be
completely
replaced
and
that
money
is
coming
from
we're
recommending
the
legislative
monies
and
we
are
also
looking
at
impact
fees.
E
T
C
E
A
A
Those
seem
to
be
some
cross-section
areas
that
we
all
had
in
common.
So
um
if
the
committee's
okay,
with
this,
I
can
submit
all
those
as
our
as
our
list
and
put
them
as
an
amendment
and
uh
put
them
all
out
to
the
entire
governing
body
which
in
the
past,
I
found
that
this
list,
uh
once
you
involve
the
whole
governing
body,
changes
some
of
it
stays
the
same.
A
A
lot
of
it
changes.
So
um
you
know
probably
the
top
one
two
or
three
may
remain
the
same,
and
there
may
be
some
minor
changes
to
to
the
last
two,
but
if
we
can
at
least
give
the
top
priorities
that
we've
sort
of
all
agreed
upon
um
and
and
again
not
every
every
everything
that
we've
all
mentioned
is
going
to
be
on
this
list.
But
those
are
the
the
commonalities
between
um
all
five
of
us.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
place
to
start.
J
J
um
She
she
told
me
what
a
good
project
that
would
be
and
explained
what
it
might
be
and
how
the
city
might
really
really
benefit
from
that
project.
So,
um
as
I
said
in
the
spirit
of
cooperation,
I
was
the
only
one
that
had
west
alameda
on
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
take
that
one
off
and
put
on
the
south
side
library
plaza.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
do
that
chair
sure.
A
Those
are
things
that
they
funded
when
you're
looking
at
small
things,
not
small
things,
but
things
like
city
hall,
which
only
impact
really
city
government
and
in
the
employees
that
go
there
and
governing
body
members
in
the
mayor,
they're
less
inclined
to
do
that
because
it
doesn't
affect
the
majority
of
the
population.
So
just
keep
that
in
mind.
As
as
we
go
forward,
I'm
not
saying
I'm
not
for
it.
You
know.
Clearly
I
would
love
to
have
a
brand
new
city
hall.
A
A
So
um
with
that,
if
everyone's
okay
with
so
I
have
eight
items
on
the
list
and
I'll
submit
those
all
as
an
amendment
for
discussion
and
again,
the
governing
body
as
a
whole
may
change
that
list.
But
we'll
have
that
discussion,
but
at
least
us
as
a
group
have
come
up
with
at
least
eight
items.
We
can
start
with
the
discussion.
E
A
F
F
A
F
F
A
E
Before
I
get
into
my
question,
I
I've
been
noticing
these
vote
summaries
in
our
attachments,
that's
kind
of
different,
and
I'm
wondering
why
these
are
the
are
here
and
because
then
we
also
have
the
the
chart
of
the
votes
and
whether
it
was
taken
off
consent
or
whether
it
was
discussed.
So
what's
the
purpose
of
these
little
vote,
summon
summaries
and
they've
been
on
several
of
our
agenda
items.
U
um
uh
Mr
chair
counselor
v
hill
copler-
um
I
I
have
seen
these
from
time
to
time
as
well.
My
understanding
and
I
could
be
mistaken,
but
I
believe
the
admin
manager
in,
uh
for
example,
for
this
item.
The
admin
manager
in
the
finance
department
would
have
filled
out
that
form
and
passed
it
along
with
the
packet
I
know
in
in
the
past.
I
have
uh
once
or
twice
been
asked
by
the
city
clerk
for
those
vote
logs
before
she
would
uh
record
a
contract
for
me,
but
nobody's
formally
ever
explained
the
process
to
me.
E
E
U
O
Chair
counselor
vehicle
coupler,
thank
you
for
the
question.
um
The
proposed
revenue
to
fund
the
bicentennial
pool
renovations
it
was
earned
in
the
prior
fiscal
year
in
fy
21.
we
did
have
a
grt
estimate
and
the
revenues
that
were
actually
received
in
fiscal
year.
21
came
out
higher
than
what
we
had
originally
estimated
when
the
budget
was
passed,
the
original
budget.
O
Initially,
when
we
were
budgeting
fiscal
year
21,
we
did
take
a
conservative
approach
which
the
revenue
was
down
for
the
first
seven
months
of
the
fiscal
year.
The
gross
receipts
tax
revenue
was
down
year
over
year,
so
from
july
to
january
of
2021
july
2020
to
january
of
2021
uh
gross
receipts.
Tax
revenue
did
decline
year
over
year,
and
so
that
conservative
estimate
really
did
carry
us
through
the
first
seven
months
when
we
noticed
an
increase
in
um
in
the
economy
and
all
of
the
economic
indicators
uh
starting
in
uh
february.
O
That's
when
we
were
able
to
start
making
budget
adjustments
to
plan
to
bring
back
services.
If
you
recall
there
was
an
adjustment
that
council
we
brought
to
council
and
council
voted
on
for
increase,
using
increase
increases
in
grt
to
support
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
so
very
similar
to
that
uh
we
have
been
able
to
prioritize
uh
repair
work
on
and
the
renovations
to
bicentennial
pool
to
be
able
to
have
that
ready
for
next
summer.
E
O
E
E
U
F
F
U
U
F
We've
got
the
excess
resources,
we're
going
to
use
the
excess
resources,
and
I
think
that's
what
causes
causing
a
lot
of
the
frustration
here
on
top
of
not
following
the
process
we
set
out
is
I
mentioned
it
during
our
governing
body
meeting?
Is
I
found
out
about
this
process
these
resources
through
non-city
channels?
C
C
F
F
I
think
again
the
resolution
that
we
all
approved
unanimously
was
disregarded,
and
I
think
that
is
unfortunate.
It
is
it
was
miss
willer,
I'm
sorry
it
was
it.
We
laid
out
a
path.
I
I
told
you,
the
verbiage,
it
says,
provide
a
presentation
to
the
governing
body
to
discuss
the
assessment
and
potential
options
for
next
steps,
we're
being
we're
not
being
afforded
the
opportunity
to
discuss
the
options
for
next
steps.
F
F
And
that's
not
the
way
it
should
work,
I
think,
as
a
governing
body.
We
should
all
be
working
in
this
together
and
I
think
that
that
when,
when
the
the
work
that
whiz
governing
body
put
forth-
and
we
all
agree
and
it
gets
disregarded-
is
unfortunate-
and
I
think
that's
again
bad
government-
that's
not
how
we
should
be
operating
as
a
city.
F
In
that
sense,
it's
like
your
car
is
making
a
funny
noise,
but
let's
go
put
some
oil
in
it.
That's
that's
what
we're
going
to
need
to
do
when
we're
not
properly
diagnosing
the
challenge,
and
I
think
that's
what
the
assessment
is.
Therefore,
it's
to
properly
diagnose
the
situation
and
for
the
city
to
invest
its
resources
accordingly,
and
so
to
hear
that
there
is
no
assessment
behind
this
decision.
U
uh
Mr
chair
uh
counselor,
garcia,
the
uh
the
pulitz
shell
itself.
I
would
I
need
to
look
and
see
what
the
duration
of
the
warranty
on
that
is.
uh
You
know
there
are
other
portions,
the
it's
a
pretty
complex
um
set
of
uh
there's
a
lot
of
pieces
to
a
pool,
for
example
the
uh
the
stainless
steel
gutter
system,
I
believe,
comes
with
a
five-year
warranty.
F
U
We've
had
um
that
I
can
think
of
off
of
the
top
of
my
head
at
least
six
contractors:
um
a
ver
from
various
disciplines,
two
pool
specific
contractors
um
wescon,
which
is
a
really
a
regional
um
leader
in
pool
construction
and
leisure
pool,
which
is
a
leader
in
pool
maintenance
and
repair
in
in
northern
new
mexico,
have
both
been
part
of
that
team.
We've
had
b
and
d
industries
assess
the
plumbing
and
the
electrical
work
davenport
construction
management,
a
general
contractor,
has
gone
through
the
site.
We
have
done.
U
We
we
have
done,
uh
we've
actually
board.
Six
uh
excuse
me,
seven,
four
foot
by
four
foot
holes
all
the
way
around
the
pool
and
dug
you
know
six
seven
feet
into
the
ground
to
investigate
the
exterior
of
the
shell,
the
plumbing,
but
like
act
rather
than
just
with
cameras,
actually
excavating
plumbing
to
check
it.
U
F
I
I
really
appreciate
that
sam
and
I
think
what
you're
explaining
is.
Is
this
some
a
form
of
an
assessment
and
it's
not
an
assessment
by
an
external
partner,
but
it
sounds
like
through
the
coordination
and
collaboration
with
external
partners,
there's
assessments
that
were
conducted
that
could
be
compiled
and
be
given
to
as
a
report
to
the
governing
body,
and
I
think
that
that
is
not
there.
It
could
have
that
all
that
information
could
have
been
compiled
and
said,
look
through
all
this
extensive
work
internally
and
with
external
partners.
F
F
Okay,
well,
I
mean-
and
I
think
maybe
then
we
just
hold
off
on
having
this
approved
potential
at
the
governing
body
for
two
weeks
to
afford
you
that
two
weeks,
because
I
think
again,
we
as
the
governing
body
asked
for
a
presentation
on
the
matter.
We
didn't
ask
for
a
contract
for
a
new
pool
to
be
constructed
to
come
to
us.
We
asked
for
an
assessment
and
the
next
steps
forward
and
that's
not
what
was
what
has
been
given
to
us.
F
F
F
I
can't
this
document
doesn't
read
to
me.
Oh
yeah
vote
count
four
five,
so
it
seems
like
it
did
pass,
so
it
will
be
going
to
governing
body,
but
I
would
like
to
postpone
the
hearing
of
this
until
the
latter
part
of
october
to
afford
mr
burnett
the
opportunity
to
present
the
information
that
was
collected
during
the
internal
investigation
and
working
with
our
external
partners.
A
F
E
You
know,
I
think,
I
think,
having
this
on
the
agenda
and
having
it
ha
even
at
finance
committee.
I
think
we're
out
of
order,
because
we
have
a
resolution
passed
by
the
governing
body
which
has
the
force
of
you
know,
law
in
a
way,
and
I
think
I
think
we're
out
of
order,
because
we
are
not
following
the
resolution,
and
so
that's
the
real
issue
here
we're
we
are
totally
usurping.
E
E
You
know
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
whether
we
should
rebuild
the
pool
and
if
we
rebuilt
it,
is
it
in
the
right
location.
I
mean
there
was
a
lot
of
uh
discussion
about
that,
and
so
that
to
me
was
why
I
supported
that
resolution
is
because
I
thought
it
was
important
to
discuss.
Cost
benefit
is
the
pool
if
we're
going
to
rebuild
the
pool.
Is
it
in
the
right
location?
E
That's
the
city
manager,
that's
the
mayor
and
that's
the
department
director
and
somebody
ought
to
create
a
tickler
sheet
about
what
needs
to
happen,
because
then
we're
all
spinning
our
wheels
and
that's
not
what
we
got
elected
to
do,
and
I
know
the
public's
wanted
to
weigh
in
on
the
bicentennial
poll.
I
think
the
majority
of
public
opinion
that
I
I
see
anecdotally
as
people
want
it.
A
F
E
J
J
J
That
this
pool
really
was
not
repairable,
the
way
that
we
thought
it
was
and
that's
why
we
had
to
move
forward
and
go
into
a
much
bigger
project
than
we
had
hoped
for.
Initially
we
had
conversations
that
it
was
leaking
water
and
that
was
through
the
I.
I
guess
it
was
the
gutters,
but
then
the
information
was
that
they
weren't
repairable.
A
A
E
E
uh
You
know
I
I
appreciate
this
is
in
your
district.
You
probably
you
know,
learned
a
bunch
about
it,
but
uh
I
haven't
been
privy
to
any
of
that
and
I
haven't
just
based
on
tonight.
What's
been
presented.
This
is
the
first
I
hear
of
it.
However,
we
still
have
the
issue
of
a
resolution
and
I
don't
know
what
practices
council
lindell
and
your
past
administrations
that
you've
been
involved
in.
But
if
I
I
recall,
I
think
resolutions
were
taken
pretty
seriously
and
that's
part
of
our
government.
E
What's
said
about
this
poll,
I
want
to
get
on
with
it,
but
we
still
have
the
resolution
and
I'm
not
in
favor
of
just
saying:
oh
well,
just
throw
it
to
the
side,
that's
a
very
dangerous
precedent
and
it's
happened
one
too
many
times
including
tonight
and
I'm
not
about
you,
know
running
even
being
a
part
of
an
administration
that
thinks
that's:
okay,
because
that's
not
good
governance,
and
so,
if
something
can
be
salvaged
here,
uh
I
don't
see
what
two
more
weeks
uh
is.
Gonna
is
gonna.
Harm
on
this
uh
contracts
have
been
amended.
E
We've
done
that
before,
but
I
think
it
it's
it's
important
for
the
public
to
be
informed
as
well
and
how
many
people
are
on
this.
We
can't
even
tell
uh
yet-
but
um
I
think
it's
important
for
for
the
whole
discussion
to
be
presented
at
city
council
as
the
resolution
intended
and
that
we
ask
the
questions
that
that
all
of
us
should
ask
and
that
we
move
forward
as
quickly
as
we
can,
but
I'm
not.
I
don't
think
we
should
just
ditch
the
resolution
because
we
don't
like
it
or
some
of
us
don't
like
it.
E
That's
what
we
passed
before
and
again.
I
don't
think
this
governing
body
has
jurisdiction.
To
do
that.
I
mean
this
committee
has
jurisdiction
to
do
that.
Somebody
wants
to
do
that
tomorrow,
so
be
it,
but
I
don't
think
this
committee
is
the
place
to
to
just
say,
forget
the
resolution
and
that's
my
discussion
on
the
motion.
Thank
you.
A
F
V
A
E
T
C
E
K
Segment,
counselor
abate.
The
discussion.
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
state
that
I
participated
in
the
safe
routes
to
school
walk
last
week.
We
walked
from
the
south
side
library
to
cesar
chavez
and
then
capitol
high
and
ninotero.
We
were
escorted
with
the
police,
children
from
the
schools,
teachers,
and
this
is
just
this-
is
a
great
program,
and
uh
I
just
want
to
thank
melissa
mcdonald
for
bringing
this
forward
and
everybody
who
participated
in
the
safe,
walk
to
school
last
week.
Thank
you.
F
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Just
uh
given
that
I
am
the
b
pack
chair,
um
I'm
trying
to
rack
my
mind
to
remember
when
we
did
hear
this
and
um
I'll
go
through
to
answer.
Councilwoman
bill,
poppler's
question
I'll,
go
through
the
last
couple:
agendas
that
I
that
we
had
and
to
give
you
confirmation
whether
this
went
in
front
of
the
committee
or
not.
I
don't.
A
T
V
A
Thanks
so
uh
before
we
go
on,
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
quick
announcement
before
too
many
people
get
off
of
this
uh
meeting.
But
um
at
our
last
meeting
I
asked
counselor
uh
lindell
to
cover
for
me
because
I
found
out
that
I
had
covered
and
it
was
the
worst
probably
five
six
days
of
my
life
with
uh
just
head
congestion
and
feeling
dizzy
and
that
whole
fogginess
that
you
hear
about
and
just
want
to
encourage
anyone
that
might
still
be
on
to
please
get
vaccinated.
A
I
know
people
that
weren't
vaccinated
that
got
the
variant
and
um
were
in
the
hospital
for
up
to
three
weeks.
Some
people
um
didn't
make
it
through
uh
being
in
the
hospital.
So
um
it's
just
a
call
out
for
anyone
out
that
that's
listening
and
I'll
probably
make
this
announcement
tomorrow
at
city
council.
Again,
it's
very
uh
personal,
but
I
think
it's
very
important
that
please
get
the
the
vaccination.
It
could
have
been
so
much
worse
for
me.
So
just
want
to
thank
you
all
for
being
present
at
the
last
meeting.
A
E
R
A
V
A
E
R
P
A
B
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
have
uh
a
lot
of
questions
about
this,
but
I
guess
the
I'll
begin
with
asking,
because
most
this
is
a
major
major,
multi-million
dollar
project
and
I'm
very
concerned
that
this
didn't
go
to
the
finance
committee,
and
you
know
the
the
purpose
of
public
works.
I
I
would
want
to
concentrate
questions
on
the
facility
itself
and
get
into
diagrams
and
get
into
all
that.
But
uh
without
that
I
mean
before
that.
E
So
I
am
um
that's
where
I'm
headed
with
this
before
I
waste
a
lot
of
people's
time
with
all
these
financial
questions
that
I
don't
think
should
be
answered
here
and
uh
I
I
don't
like
this
kind
of
maneuvering,
um
I'm
not
about
you
know
this
committee
doing
this
kind
of
discussion,
uh
so
I'm
gonna
yield
the
floor,
but
that's
I
just
wanted
to
give
this
committee
a
heads
up
that
that's
where
I'm
going.
I
want
this
to
be
uh
sent
to
the
finance
committee
for
a
real
discussion
that
should
occur
at
that
level.
J
J
F
F
I
just
don't
understand
that,
um
but
uh
I
agree
it
needs
to
be
in
front
of
finance
and
I
would
say
it
comes
back
to
this
body
for
questions
after
the
finance
committee.
Does
their
uh
fiscal
review
and
approval
of
the
of
what's
in
front
of
us
guess
my
question
more
so
relies
around.
You
know:
we've
got
10
million
dollars
allocated
for
this.
F
We've
got
10
million
on
our
legislative
uh
priority
list.
My
question
is:
have
we
been
reached
out
to
the
delegation
if
they're
going
to
even
support
this,
I
mean
I
think
that
that
should
be
stance
one
and
we
we
all
we're
all
all
of
the
governing
body.
That's
here
we're
all
on.
We
were
all
in
that
legislative
delegation
meeting
this
january
when
we
we
got
a
verbal
spanking
on
the
airport
and
now
we're
putting
ourselves
more
out
there.
I
just
can't
understand
we're
taking
this
path.
C
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
thank
you
uh
councillor,
garcia
for
the
question.
I
I
thought
exactly
the
same
thing
um
as
soon
as
we
received
the
bids.
I
did
actually
reach
out
to
the
speaker
of
the
house.
um
Speaker
e
golf,
um
because
I
know
that
this
project,
as
he
communicated
to
us
at
the
last
session,
was
extremely
important
to
him,
and
I
wanted
to
let
him
know
what
we
were
facing
and
um
he
he
is.
F
Okay,
so
that's
not
a
confirmation
for
me.
Oh
it's
very
concerning.
I
think
this
is
something
we
we
shouldn't
be
getting
in
front
of
unless
we
have
the
commitment
from
our
delegation
that
they're
going
to
fight
tooth
and
nail
to
ensure
that
this
happens,
and
it
sounds
like
that
that
hasn't
happened.
F
F
C
uh
Thank
you,
councillor,
garcia
chairman
for
the
question.
Actually,
this
is
a
much
bigger
project
than
the
teen
center.
It
includes
circulation
roads,
a
new
parking
lot
uh
remodeling
of
the
original
terminal,
which
is
ten
thousand
square
feet,
an
addition
of
eight
thousand
square
feet.
um
We
do
have
moles
and
corbin
here
who
could
speak
to
uh
the
scope,
comparison
um
and
pricing
if
you'd
like
uh
to
have
more
information
from
them.
F
P
F
F
K
Counselor.
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
I
do
support
this
project
going
to
the
finance
committee
on
the
18th,
um
though
I
do
want
to
clarify.
I
do
believe
that
the
state
um
allocation
has
already
been
committed,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
discussion
will
be
based
on.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
the
other
half
that
that
we're
coming
up
with
um
I,
so
I
will
see
that
it's
on
the
agenda
for
the
18th
and
then,
if
the
committee
public
works,
wants
to
hear
it
on
the
25th
and
then
potentially
governing
body
on
the
27th.
K
I
do
think,
though
we
should
act
on
it
uh
sooner
rather
than
later,
because
I
think
we
we
should
have
this
under
contract
before
our
next
meeting
in
december
with
the
delegation,
because
that
was
the
frustration
last
year
was
you
know
we're
meeting
again
and
you
haven't
spent
that
or
had
aren't
constructing
that
airport.
So
I
think,
there's
enough
time
to
do
that
going
to
the
18th
isn't
going
to
delay
that
at
all
to
finance.
So
I
I
would
be
amenable
to
that.
Mr
chairman,
thank
you.
A
O
Mr
chair
counselor,
I
can
go
ahead
and
take
a
first
haven,
uh
regina
and
uh
this
uh
folks
from
moles
and
corbin
are
also
here
joining
us
to
provide
some
additional
information
and
insight
to
the
timeline
in
discussions
about
fire
station
number
two
uh
earlier
this
evening.
uh
One
of
the
counselors
did
indicate
that
projects
can
get
more
expensive.
O
um
That
being
said,
there
is
those
considerations
uh
similar
cost
escalation
concerns
where
uh
were
a
reason
to
move
the
airport
to
the
public
works
and
the
governing
body
without
first
going
to
the
finance
committee.
So
I
will
defer,
at
this
point
to
the
folks
from
moles
and
corbin
that
are
joining
us
to
provide
some
additional
insight
into
those
cost.
Escalation
concerns
not
just
with
the
contract
or
bradbury
sam,
but
with
some
of
the
subcontractors
that
are
working
with
bradbury
stam
as
well.
Go
ahead
guys
mr
chair.
E
I
would
like
a
point
of
order.
uh
You
know
I
expressed
earlier
that
I
think
uh
some
of
the
discussion,
especially
now
with
what
ms
mccoy
has
said.
This
is
really
something
that
needs
to
be
vetted
by
finance,
and
so
I
would
like
to
make
my
motion
now.
I
would
like
to
remand
this
to
finance
committee
and
then
have
it
come
back
to
the
public
works
department
so
that
these
specific
discussions
can
get
in
front
of
the
committees
where
they
belong.
F
A
V
A
V
The
city
procurement
department,
um
obviously
the
bids
are
the
bids-
are
high.
We
all
understand
that
and
if
you've
been
watching
bids
be
opened
over
throughout
the
pandemic,
you'll
see
that
things
have
gotten
very,
very
expensive,
mainly
because
of
supply
chain
issues
and
also
manufacturing
is
not
geared
up
to
recover
as
quickly
as
we're
trying
to
build
buildings
and
and
infrastructure
out
there.
V
So
what
I
discussed
with
them
is
how
much
of
that
bid
was
actually
subcontractors
saying
well,
if
you're
not
going
to
buy
this
for
90
days,
I
don't
know
what
it's
going
to
cost
in
90
days,
so
I'm
going
to
put
a
premium
on
that
and
so
what
we
one
item
of
discussion,
they
said
that
they
could
save.
Quite
a
bit
of
money
is
if
we
could
get
a
contract
signed
by
october,
14th
um
contract.
V
V
It's
the
realignment
of
aviation
drive
that
was
had
to
be
done
once
design
had
already
started
uh
the
connecting
point
to
what
the
future
jaguar
drive
connection
would
be
uh
for
master
planning
purposes,
to
get
a
direct
access
to
the
freeway
from
her
to
veterans
memorial
from
and
to
the
airport
uh
the
expansion
of
the
parking
lot.
That
was
uh
clearly
uh
needed
to
be
expanded
to
an
estimated
600
cars,
um
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
it
was
a
uh
you
know.
I
V
Project,
it's
attaining
leed
silver
and
if
we
move
along
on
this
course,
we
might
even
get
to
lead
gold
um
and
those
things.
So
if
you
break
that
down
the
site,
costing
10
million
800
000
that
left
the
building
cost
of
uh
eight
million
nine
hundred
thousand,
that
worked
out
to
327
dollars
per
square
foot
for
renovation
of
the
building
and
the
addition
and
the
relocation
of
the
uh
modular
building,
which
will
be
the
temporary
baggage
claim
and
all
of
the
associated
parts
of
the
building
alone.
V
And
uh
you
keep
that
in
mind.
That's
326
dollars
a
square
foot.
We
recently
lee
county
hobbs
airport
just
to
give
you
some
context
uh
recently
opened
and
that
came
in
at
443
dollars
a
square
foot,
and
so
we
felt
as
though
the
price
per
square
foot
on
the
building
was
appropriate
and
um
given
this
day
and
age
and
being
able
to
save
money
by
trying
to
speed
up
the
process
so
that
contractors
could
actually
encumber
and
purchase
those
third-party
issues.
V
Subcontracting
manufactured
goods,
things
that
needed
to
be
shipped
here
long
lead
items
um
by
being
able
to
purchase
those
not
taking
90
days
to
do
that.
But
getting
that
done
in
the
first
month
after
the
bid
opening
was
in
fact
a
big
money
saver,
um
and
I
fear
that
that
discount,
for
lack
of
a
better
word
will
go
away
if
this
isn't
awarded
soon.
A
Sorry,
so
is
there
room
for
savings
there
you
said
uh
subcontractors
probably
bid
the
premium,
but
let's
say
they
can
get
um
prices
or
they
can
purchase
materials
for
less
than
than
the
premium.
Is
there
still
that
ability
to
save
some
money
within
the
contract
as
we
move
forward?
If
we
move
forward.
V
um
Well,
first
of
all,
we
already
took
out
1.7
million
out
of
the
initial
bid
and
got
us
to
this
19
million
741
thousand
dollar
bid.
So
uh
that
was
taken
into
account
that
that
those
long
lead
items
they
wouldn't
put
an
acceleration
premium
on
those
items
if
they
could
get
commitments
in
the
first
month.
um
So
uh
is
there
more
money
to
be
saved
after
an
award
of
contract?
A
A
T
V
V
V
I
don't
know
if
you've
flown
out
of
there,
but
the
regional
jets
nowadays
have
about
75
passengers.
We
could
only
fit
about
50
people
in
the
gate
area,
now
get
them
through
uh
security
and
get
them
into
the
gate
area.
If
you
have
two
planes
leaving
within
an
hour
of
each
other,
that's
potentially
150
people
that
have
to
fit
into
the
space
of
50
people,
it's
untenable,
it's
not
safe
and
it
needs
to
be
fixed
now,
there's
all
there
is
to
it.
V
um
I
mark
could
speak
much
further
to
that
than
I
because
he's
in
it
every
day,
but
we
haven't
analyzed
it.
We've
analyzed
the
employments
and
uh
that's
that's
the
way.
It
is.
It's
just
the
way
it
is.
The
airport
has
unfortunately
not
had
big
investments
in
it
over
the
growth
of
santa
fe.
uh
There's
a
big
demand
to
be
flying
directly
into
santa
fe
and
avoid
the
albuquerque
leak.
um
So
with
that
I'll
stop
talking.
V
Most
of
them
will
tell
you
they
won't
guarantee
it
for
a
week.
But
this
is
a
big
job
and
people
want
to
work
on
it,
and
people
are
going
to
be
proud
of
this
job
because
it's
a
nice
job
and
so
um
they're
trying.
I
actually
thought
it
was
quite
impressive.
The
general
contractor
saved
1.7
million
dollars
off
their
bid
thanks
from.
A
O
Mr
chair,
that's
a
really
difficult
decision.
When
we're
talking
about
1.7
million
um
dollars,
uh
I'm
I'm
not
certain
and
again
I
would
defer
to
molson
corbin
who's
worked
in
this
field
much
more
extensively
than
I
have
about
the
potential
for
decreasing
uh
the
cost.
If
we
go
out
to
re-bed
uh
john
and
team,
do
you
want
to
address
that.
A
O
uh
Mr
chair,
I
do
not
believe
we
would.
I
believe
we
still
have
time
um
to
continue
the
negotiations
if
we
did
decide
to
reap
it.
For
any
reason,
um
I
don't
believe
it's
um
in
our
the
other
and
our
favorites.
You
have
a
lower
price.
um
John.
Do
you
want
to
address
that?
I
know.
We've
talked
about
that
as
well
yeah.
um
If.
V
Then
they
have
the
opportunity
to
go
back
to
their
original
price,
which
is
1.7
million
dollars
more
than
the
price
that
I
you
you're
looking
at,
um
so
that
that
option
is
still
on
the
table.
um
I
don't
know
how
much
more
we
could
get
it
down
if
we
had
to
go
into
renegotiations,
but
we
would
certainly
put
every
effort
into
trying.
V
Should
it
come
to
pass
that
you
would
have
to
rebid
the
project.
The
only
way
you're
going
to
save
any
money
is
to
start
slashing
scope
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
fluff
in
this
project.
To
slash
to
tell
you
the
truth.
um
It's
a
difficult
project
for
a
contractor,
you're
working
with
tsa
you've
got
the
secure
side
of
the
airport
and
a
non-secure
side
of
the
airport.
V
You
have
to
make
sure
that
all
the
construction
activities
that
happen
on
the
secure
side
of
the
airport
are
with
cleared
personnel
and
they're
being
watched
all
the
time
and
no
one's
ever
unattended
in
the
secure
part
of
the
airport.
When
there
is
construction
there,
you
have
the
old
tower,
which
is
ancient
and
has
not
had
improvements
done
to
it
in
many
years,
and
we
have
to
get
um
sprinklers
and
fire
detection,
heating
and
cooling
and
everything
up
in
the
into
that
old
tower
without
demolishing
the
historic
character
of
the
inside
of
the
airport.
V
V
A
E
I'm
yellow
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
you
know,
I'm
going
to
say
the
same
thing
I
said
I
uh
I
think
some
of
these
items
and
need
to
be
discussed
at
finance
committee.
This
is
a
multi-million
dollar
project.
I'm
concerned
that
this
bid
was
only
let
out
for
20
days,
uh
but
you
know
if,
if
this
this
is
uh
this
contract
before
us
uh
is
worth
uh
consideration,
I
think
it
needs
to
be
vetted
by
finance
committee.
E
I
am
deeply
concerned
about
this
short
amount
of
time
for
this
very
large
project.
There
are
other,
uh
I
think
there
would
be
potential
bidders
had
they
been
able
to
invest
in
the
time
to
put
a
bid
together
of
this
magnitude,
not
to
say
that
the
current
people
on
on
this
meeting
right
now
aren't
worthy.
But
you
know
when
you
have
competition,
it's
amazing
how
prices
can
be
negotiated,
but
uh
this
was.
This
is
a
little
bit
too
off
rfp
base
for
my
taste.
Nevertheless,
that's
not
for
me
to
decide.
E
We
have
a
committee
that
the
chair
on
uh
who
sits
on
with
the
chair
of
that
committee.
Finance
sits
on
this
committee
right
now,
who
said
there
is
time
to
do
this
and
uh
I'm
not
even
asking
that
this
got
to
rebid,
but
I
am
concerned
about
the
bidding
and
I
like
healthy
competition.
I
like
giving
people
a
fair
chance.
uh
I
know
that
you
know
typically
rfps,
don't
move
this
quickly
and
I
I
stand
by
my
motion.
E
E
V
V
V
It's
not
something
I
suggest
that
is
something
they
suggested
and
the
reason
they
suggested
is
because
they
we
have
a
subcontractors,
fair
practices
act.
This
is
a
public
works
project
right,
so
they
get
prices
from
subcontractors,
so
subcontractors
have
their
price
and
they
say
that's
my
price
today.
V
I
can't
hold
this
price
for
90
days,
even
though
the
spec
book
says
I
have
to
hold
my
price
for
90
days,
so
I'm
adding
this
premium
onto
it.
So
that
was
that
90
day
premium
is
part
of
how
we
got
some
money
out
of
this
by
being
able
to
uh
suggest,
obviously
we
can't
do
it
without
the
city.
Council's
approval
suggests
that
they
have
a
contract
by
the
14th.
V
F
V
F
Right,
no,
I
I
understand.
Thank
you
so
much.
I
really
appreciate
that
clarification
on
where
that
number
was
coming
from.
It
definitely
helped,
um
but
my
I
guess
we
were
speaking
earlier
about
what
happens.
If
we
go
out
to
bed
again,
um
I'm
somebody
who
doesn't
see
that
as
a
bad
thing
in
some
senses,
I'm
not
again,
I'm
not.
uh
This
is
in
no
way
disrespectful
for
the
entity
that
was,
uh
I
had
applied
it
and
is
in
front
of
us
tonight.
um
I
think
competition
is
good.
F
um
You
know
the
thing
that
happens
is
um
there's
a
baseline
now
set.
You
might
have
somebody
that
says
well,
we
can
do
a
better
job
at
a
lower
cost,
and
you
would
be
surprised,
I
think,
that's
where,
um
as
I've
mentioned,
as
my
colleague
mentioned
earlier,
to
have
something
like
this
of
this
magnitude
open
for
20
days.
F
um
I
am
surprised,
even
even
with
the
short
turnaround.
There
was
only
one
bitter
on
this
process.
That,
to
me
is
very
surprising,
as
I
think
there's
very
very
much.
We
have
a
great
pool
of
talented
folks
that
would
apply
so
I
think
that's
why
again,
it
should
go
back
to
finance.
These
are
things
we
really
need
to
look
into
um
and
if
we
go
back
and
and
the
entity
says
well,
it's
going
to
cost
1.7
million
more
well,
I
think
then
it
doesn't
hurt
to
go
back
out
to
bid
in
that
sense
again.
F
V
uh
What
I
wanted
to
say,
first
of
all,
just
to
clear
up
a
couple
of
things.
uh
That
period
was
ultimately
28
days.
uh
We
had
six
general
contractors
who
uh
were
actively
pursuing
the
plans,
um
but
only
one
actually
submitted,
so
they
would
not
have
known
that.
So
there
was
competition.
There
were
six
contractors,
um
but
only
one
had
the
nerve
to
actually
submit.
V
V
Additionally,
the
contractor,
who
submitted
the
low
bid
the
first
time,
probably
won't
re-bid,
because
now
everybody
knows
their
secrets,
so
to
speak,
so
you
lose
that
benefit
right
there.
um
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
say,
and
I
feel
very,
very
confident
in
saying
this
to
you.
If
we
rebid
this
project,
we're
going
to
have
to
reduce
the
scope.
A
Yeah-
and
I
I
want
based
on
what
you
said-
accounts
for
this
year-
moles
and
carbon
is
not
the
bidder
they're,
not
representing
the
bidder
or
the
contractor.
They
work
for
the
city.
They
work
for
the
airport,
um
so
they're
not
they're,
not
part
of
the
bradbury,
stam
or
they're,
not
part
of
the
the
uh
persons
that
were
awarded
the
bid
they
they
work
on
the
city's
behalf.
K
Beta,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Given
what
uh
corbin
stated,
I
don't
think
this
should
go
back
to
finance.
Maybe
the
governing
body
tomorrow
will
feel
different,
um
but
I
think
uh
1.7
million
dollars
is
a
lot
I
this
was
very
informative.
This
is
why
we
have
moles
and
corbin
on
staff.
So
it's
not
just
staff
telling
us,
but
it's
a
third
party
that
is
telling
us
who
does
this
for
a
living.
K
J
J
Try
to
send
this
back
to
finance,
I
think
we're
being
pretty
risky
with
1.7
million
dollars,
which
is
quite
a
lot
of
money
and
um
the
way
that
you
explain
this
bid
process
and
six
different
contractors,
and
I
think
you're
right,
you
send
it
back
out
to
bid
and
um
this
bidder's
not
going
to
bid
again
and
everybody
knows
um
where
they
were
at,
and
I
think
we
do
end
up
cutting
the
scope
of
this
project.
So
um
you
know
I'm
horrified
at
the
price.
J
A
F
F
A
P
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I'm
abstaining
because
I
believe
that
the
process
uh
committee
process
was
uh
overlooked
uh
for
such
a
multi-million
dollar
project.
uh
I
also
uh
want
to
say
that
I
have
deep
concerns
for
the
short
time
period
offered
in
the
rfp
process.
20
days
is
uh
not
customary
for
this
this
project,
and
I
I
am
in
disagreement
with
how
that
rfp
was
handled
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
um
Send
me
an
email
and
say
is
that,
okay,
if
we
bypass
public
works
or
public
safety
um
to
move
things
on
because
of
time
frames
and
those
are
typically
allowed,
so
I
imagine
this
is
one
of
those
situations
um
like
to
thank
molson
and
corbin
for
being
here
and
for
uh
staff
to
um
give
us
all
the
information
that
they
did
as
well.
So,
thank
you
all.
C
Thank
you
chairman.
um
Thank
you.
uh
Thank
you
so
much.
Yes,
I
wanted
to
um
communicate
to
the
governing
body
that
um
this
street
light
project
installation
is
going
to
begin
soon,
so
it
will
be
time
to
begin
the
meeting.
The
um
reports
to
the
public
works
committee
at
every
meeting
on
the
status
of
that
project.
um
The
contractor
has
been
doing
some
of
the
before
flyovers
we've
been
coordinating
with
pnm,
um
but
uh
since
I've
been
directed
to
provide
uh
status
updates
at
every
public
works
committee
meeting
that
will
start
at
the
next
meeting.
F
Council
garcia,
uh
thank
you,
mr
chair,
just
want
to
say
I'm
glad
to
hear
you're
on
the
mend
from
catching
covet,
and
hopefully
you
and
anybody
else
uh
is-
is
on
the
path
to
recovery.
um
But
then
I
uh
director
wheeler,
did
mention
the
street
lights
and
I
did
send
a
question
to
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
got
it
in
regards
to
do.
We
have
a
certified
uh
engineer
working
on
the
streetlight
project
as
required.