►
From YouTube: Quality of Life for June 16, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Terrific
thanks
for
your
help,
all
right
at
five
o'clock.
I
will
call
the
june
16th
meeting
of
the
quality
of
life
committee
to
order,
and
we
have
jamie
ray
diaz
staffing.
The
committee
tonight
and
I
really
appreciate
her
help
if
she
could
call
the
role
that
would
be
great.
D
D
B
E
Okay
and
then
madam
chair.
F
G
G
D
G
Is
that
do
you
want
to
just
keep
going,
or
should
we
wait
for
carol.
A
What
item
was
it
counselor,
viadio.
G
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
because
it
we
we
talked
about
it
in
the
cdc
but
more
as
just
a
discussion
item,
because
the
pack
of
material
wasn't
ready
in
time.
And
so
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
pull
that
and
then
or
take
it
off
completely
from
the
agenda.
A
I
That
that
is
the
plan
to
take
it
off
for
tonight.
There
is,
it
does
not
need
to
be
heard
tonight.
F
A
Julie
sanchez
julie:
do
we
know
if
that
one
can
be
brought
back
at
the
next
quality
of
life
meeting,
or
does
it
need
to
be
heard
tonight.
J
Hey
you
know,
that's
a
good
question
I
didn't
realize
I
had
that
under
my
name.
I
think
kira
might
have
more
information
on
that.
Do
you
know
what's
happening
with
item
d,
the
resolution.
K
Counselors
are
members
of
the
committee.
We
were
aware
that
there
was
an
unsigned
item,
and
so
I
think
that
may
have
been
part
of
the
confusion,
so
we
can
bring
it
back
in
another
meeting
if
need
be.
G
Would
be
helpful
because
I
didn't
it
wasn't
actually
uploaded
at
all.
It
wasn't
just
a
signing
issue.
There
was
no
packet
material
until
I
don't
know
what
time
it
actually
came
in,
so
I
haven't
looked
at
it
at
all.
Okay,
apologies
for
that
and
we'll
bring
it
back
to
you.
Next
quality
of
life
meeting.
A
A
Thank
you
so
on
approve
the
agenda.
We
have
removal
of
items
d,
as
in
david,
f
and
frank
g,
is
in
george.
Do
we
have
a
motion
reflecting
the
changes
to
the
agenda.
L
A
D
M
M
A
We
councilwoman
we
just
removed
items
d,
f
and
g
from
the
agenda
staff
said
that
there
was
no
time
requirements
for
these
and
excuse
me,
since
we
got
packet
materials
late.
The
committee
wanted
ample
time
to
review
those
and
staff
agreed
to
those.
So
items
d,
f
and
g
have
been
removed
from
the
consent
agenda.
B
Okay,
I'm
sorry
my
power
went
out,
which
is
why
I've
that's
why
I
suddenly
disappeared.
I'm
and
I
know
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
vote.
I
just
would
wonder.
Did
you
discuss
it
all
talking
about
f,
just
in
concept
to
hear
about
what
it
is?
Even
if
we
don't,
you
know,
vote
on
anything
until
next
time.
A
B
Okay,
we
do
have
staff
prepared
to
speak
to
it
and
at
least
give
us
the
broad
outline
of
it.
Even
if
we
don't
take
action
on
a
resolution
because
I
I
agree,
we
haven't
heard
it-
we
haven't
seen
it
it
just
got
out
into
the
packet
and
I'm
sorry
that
my
internet
cut
out.
I
don't
know
what
to
do
about
this
at
this
point,.
A
I
think
we
could
probably
make
a
motion
to
re-re-hear
or.
A
B
I
I
I
guess
I
won't
vote
on
the
motion,
because
I
wasn't
here
to
add
that,
and
maybe
if,
if
I
could
make
a
new
motion
once
this
one
goes
through,
would
that
be
acceptable.
G
B
B
Yeah
that
that
would
that
would
work,
okay,
okay,
so
let
me
let
me
just
finish
so
I
won't
vote
on
this.
Can
we
just
let's
just
finish
this
out?
I
wasn't
here
and
then,
if
there
are
objections,
we
can
talk
about
that
because
I
don't
know
we're
too
far
along
really
to
to
fix.
A
B
Okay,
so
what
do
we
do
it
from
this?
Sorry,
why
don't
we
just
amend
the
the
problem?
Is
we're
already
voting
on
it,
we're
in
the
middle
of
it?
Yes,
I
mean
I'm
the
last
vote,
and
so
that's
that's
why
this
is
a
little
weird.
So
that's.
B
I
oh
here
maybe
this
is
what
we
do.
Oh
okay,
so
I'm
not
going
to
vote
on
this.
I
think
that
motion
passes
and
now
we
can
go
forward
and
we
can
vote
to
reconsider.
F
B
B
So
we
have
yeah,
so
we
we
so
that
that
motion
passed
jamie
just
so
for
your
records
and
now
councillor
cassid
is
making
a
new
motion
to
rescind
no
wait
to
rescind
approval
of
the
agenda
as
amended.
B
A
B
L
Madam
reconsider
would
be
at
a
subsequent
meeting.
B
Yeah,
okay!
So,
let's
so
motion
to
rescind
do
we
have
a
second.
B
B
D
All
right,
I
I
strongly
believe
we
don't
need
to
hear
this
tonight.
Given
we
don't
have
the
information,
we
can't
answer.
Ask
any
questions.
Ms
slatt
confirmed:
there's,
not
a
timeline
that
requires
us
to
adhere
to
the
current
schedule.
I
mean,
as
we
all
know,
these
schedules
can
be
modified,
even
though
it's
scheduled
for
a
governing
body
hearing
on
the
30th
there's
nothing
preventing
us
from
scheduling
it
rescheduling
this
to
be
heard
on
the
july
7th
calendar.
D
So
so
I
completely
understand
we
have
staff
here
to
present,
but
I'm
not
prepared.
Besides
going
off
of
a
presentation-
and
I
I
believe
we're
going
to
put
ourselves
in
a
predicament
where
we're
not
then
going
to
be
able
to
bring
it
back
to
the
quality
of
life
committee
meeting
for
a
thorough
vetting,
we've
all
heard
folks
say
the
the
work
needs
to
be
done
in
the
committee
level
and
not
at
the
the
governing
body
level.
Well,
let's
postpone
it
and
actually
give
it
its
due
diligence
and
thoroughly
bet
this
on.
B
I
mean
yeah
and
I
guess
we
can
do
the
you
know
the
I
all
I
wanted
is
to
get.
I
think
it
was.
It
was
noticed
as
something
that
we
were
going
to
hear
about
tonight.
I
understand
that
we
can't
act
on
the
resolution,
but
we
do
have
staff
here
to
tell
us
about
this
project,
which
I
think
people
are
interested
in
hearing
more
about,
and
there
would
be
nothing
wrong
with
doing
that.
Again.
B
We
won't
be
taking
action,
we're
just
hearing
a
presentation
and
asking
questions
about
the
presentation
like
we
do
on
so
many
other
things.
D
Counselor,
I
guess
I
guess
my
rebuttal
to
that
is
I
mean.
We've
got
two
other
items
that
we're
pulling
that
are
in
the
same
predicament
that
where
there's
staff
here-
and
I
think
we're
treating
this
one
differently
than
the
other
two
items
that
that
we
requested
to
be
pulled
and
be
placed
on
the
next
quality
of
life
committee
meeting.
I
Madam
chair,
I
wanted
to
just
clarify
what,
in
the
interim
when
you
were
knocked
off
the
call,
I
did
not
read
the
communication
from
jesse,
clearly
enough
to
understand
that
you
wanted
to
discuss
it.
So
I
answered
the
question:
is
there
a
timeline
constraint,
and
I
said
no,
so
I'm
sorry
that
I
didn't
I
just
did
not
did
not
follow
that
that
you
were
interested
in
the
conceptual
discussion.
I
B
Okay-
and
I
I
do
think
we
do
again,
this
doesn't
change.
I
understand
we
haven't
had
it
in
time
to
look
at
it,
but
the
final
version
is
in
the
packet.
It
won't
be
changed,
but
again
we
have
not
had
time
to
look
at
it.
I
still
think
that
we
could
at
least
I'm
interested
to
hear
more
about
this.
Even
if
we,
as
a
committee,
don't
take
action,
it
is
making
what
is
it
two
other
stops
in
other
committees,
so
you
know
in
terms
of
getting
the
work
done
in
committee.
B
That
can
still
happen
at
those
other
stops
council
via
rail.
You
have
your
hand
up.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Why
don't.
G
So
weird
that
announcement
zoom
announcement-
I
was
just
curious-
can
we
just
add
this
to
go
to
public
works
so
that
counselor
garcia
can
then
hear
it
then,
and
then
that
will
I
believe
that
could
be
possible
based
on
our
schedule
here.
Maybe
not
I'm
just
curious.
If
someone
could
verify
that
we
would
just
add
it
to
public
works.
B
Well,
we
do
have
the
chair
of
public
works
here,
councillor
rivera,
do
you
have
another
meeting
prior
to
the
governing
body
meeting,
but
you
may
you
may
not.
L
L
B
G
I
I
would
be
okay
with
that.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
just
because
staff
also
has
a
you
know.
It's
a
summer
time.
There's
also
this
like
time
frame
that
we're
looking
at
that
they're
trying
to
get
approval,
and
then
we
can
hear
it
in
committee,
but
I
to
go
into
july,
because
this
got
you
know
we
didn't
get
the
packet
material
which
I
wanted
to
see.
So
if
we
have
this
as
a
discussion
just
for
today,
not
voting,
I'm
okay
with
that.
B
Yeah
and
I'm
sorry,
that's
what
I
was
going
to
recommend
before
I
disappeared
all
right,
so
we
do
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
Is
there
other
comment,
or
can
we
go
to
voting.
D
D
G
B
Yes,
all
right,
the
motion
passes
to
rescind
the
approval
of
the
agenda
as
amended,
we
need
a
new
motion
on
approval
of
the
agenda.
F
I
believe
the
motion
that
I
now
need
to
make
is
to
that
somebody
needs
to
make,
but
I'm
happy
to
talk
as
I'm
doing
it
already.
We
is
to
remove
from
the
agenda
items.
F
B
B
G
F,
though,
for
ulta
no,
I
I'm
a.
I
was
the
one
that
initially
said
that
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
hear
it,
because
we
just
got
the
packet
material.
What
I
wanted
to
happen
after
this
conversation
is
that
to
make
sure
it
goes
to
public
works
so
that
other
counselors
on
this
committee
that
are
part
of
public
works
can
hear
it
before.
Okay,.
G
Item
f
for
item
d:
I'm
talking
about
the
property
635
property
property,
which
is
f
as
in
frank
to
not
hear
it
tonight.
Unless
we
have
interest
to
hear
it
as
a
presentation
which
okay.
D
And
madam
chair
again,
this
is
another
item
that
staff
confirmed
does
not
have
a
timeline,
so
I
think
we're
we're
putting
ourselves
in
a
mix.
I
mean,
let's,
I
don't
understand
why
we
can't
just
move
all
these
three
items,
as
we
initially
proposed
to
our
july
7th
meeting.
There's
not
a
rush
to
have
them
hurt.
D
We
we
do
not
have
to
adhere
to
the
committee
review
schedule,
there's
nothing
preventing
us
from
moving
it
out
two
weeks
or
whatever
it
is
to
the
seventh
that
we
can
have
a
fair
and
appropriate
hearing
as
as
well
as
item
f
and
item
g.
As
I
mentioned,
we're
treating
one
item
differently
and
I-
and
I
think
we
don't
want
to
set
that
precedent.
Let's
just
move
all
three
to
the
next
quality
of
life
committee
meeting.
K
Madam
chair,
I
am,
although
julie
sanchez
is
on
the
announcement
she
has
to
staff
the
women's
commission
tonight.
So,
okay,
you
may
need
to
jump
off
depending
on
when
it
gets
heard.
It'll
be
tag-teamed
or
I
can
take
it.
Okay,.
B
So
I
guess
the
can
you
speak
to
item
d
about
the
timing
issue
on
item
d.
This
is
a
we
have
to.
Is
there
a
timing
issue
on
item
d.
J
Madam
chair
romero
worth
so,
there
is
a
timeline
in
order
for
us
to
receive
funding
for
this
particular
project.
We
need
to
get
it
through.
The
committee
process
it
does
sound
like
potentially
having
it
on
public
works
might
be
the
best
case
for
moving
forward
but
yeah.
In
order
for
us
to
receive
funding
the
moa
and
the
resolution
you
know
must
be
signed.
B
Right
and
so
that's
why
I
think
that
we
do
need
to
hear
it
at
governing
body
on
june
30th,
and
there
won't
be
time
for
this
committee
to
talk
about
it
if
we
forego
that
opportunity
tonight.
So
again,
I
would
the
I
and
I'm
sorry
for
all
the
mix-ups.
The
item
that
I
still
would
like
to
hear
as
a
presentation
is
dee
and
I
don't
know
counselor
rivera
if
you
would
be
willing
to
hear
this
at
public
works
as
well,
just
to
again
make
sure
people
can
weigh
in
and.
B
Okay,
so
counselor,
do
you
want
to
try
a
new
motion.
F
A
Madam
chair,
before
we
do
that
right
when
you
right,
when
I
was
speaking
and
you
went
off,
I
said,
item
g
would
be
postponed
to
a
date
uncertain,
I'm
not
sure
how
long
it
will
take.
Council,
lindell
and
I'd
figure
out
what
changes
we
want
to
make.
B
Well,
we
we
don't
control
the
agenda
for
public
works,
public
utilities
so,
and
the
chair
said
he
would
put
it
on
there.
So.
D
L
B
I'm
seeing
it
on
our
side,
it
jesse
is
it
on
the
public
side,
it's
exhibit
a
in
our
on
our
side.
D
D
B
D
L
I
see
all
four
items,
including
the
moa.
B
B
We're
not
gonna
be
we're
not
voting
on
it
any,
and
it
will
go
to
public
works
and
public
utilities
and
to
finance
before
it
goes
to
governing
body.
B
F
Sure
d
is
going
to
a
presentation,
f
is
postponed
till
july.
7Th
and
g
is
postponed
indefinitely.
A
B
B
Okay,
item
h
and
item:
I'm
sorry:
council,
garcia,
a
correct
c.
B
M
B
Worth
yes
all
right
now
we
move
on
to
approval
to
the
minutes
of
the
june
second
meeting.
Are
there
changes
from
staff
to
those
minutes.
B
Second,
we
have
a
motion
from
councilwoman
viarelle
and
a
second
from
councilwoman
cassette
to
approve
the
june
2nd
quality
of
life
committee
minutes.
Can
we
get
a
roll
call?
Please.
A
A
B
Yes,
all
right
from
there
we
are
moving
to
our
presentations.
We
will
start
with
the
housing
security
overview
and
director
ochoa
is
here
with
us
for
that
presentation,
and
I
do
you
have
a
powerpoint
on
this
one.
I
can't
remember
I'm
cherry
yes,
I
do.
I.
B
K
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair
members
of
the
quality
of
life
committee
with
me,
as
alexandra
ladd,
director
of
the
office
of
affordable
housing,
anna
cal,
I
believe,
had
to
step
off
to
share
the
women's
commission
and
today
we're
going
to
talk
to
you
about
housing
and
security
in
santa
fe
and
what
we
know
about
it.
K
One
of
our
biggest
challenges
in
about
housing
and
security
is
measuring
housing
and
security
in
santa
fe.
We
have
put
you
know
we
can't
solve
a
problem,
in
other
words,
until
we
know
the
scope
of
the
problem.
We
know
there
is
housing
and
security
here
and
we've
been
able
to
get
a
handle
somewhat
a
handle
on
it
through
our
connect
program,
which
is,
as
you
know,
a
network
of
non-profit
providers
that
ask
the
people
that
they
serve
and
in
the
county
and
the
city
fund.
K
This
project
questions
about
their
social
determinants
of
health
and
the
navigators
who
serve
these
folks
then
can
make
appropriate
referrals
if
they're
in
need
and
the
question
I
thought
might
be
interesting
for
you
to
know
that
every
non-profit
provider,
who's
funded
in
the
connect
network
and
now
that
numbers.
I
think
60,
plus
programs
and
100
plus
navigators,
is
asking
folks
these
questions.
What
is
your
living
situation
today
and
people
are
answering?
I
have
a
steady
place
to
live.
K
I
have
a
place
to
live
today,
but
I'm
worried
about
losing
it
in
the
future
or
I
don't
have
a
steady
place
to
live
and
I'm
temporarily
staying
with
others
in
a
hotel
et
cetera.
You
see
the
different
options
you
see
on
a
beach
by
the
way,
which
is
a
little
absurd
for
our
context,
but
these
are
nationally
vetted
and
validated
questions,
and
so
they
feed
into
a
whole
national
database.
K
Potentially
that's
one
way
we
track
and
measure
housing
and
security.
The
other
way
is
through
the
hmis
system,
which
is
the
homeless
management
information
system
and
that's
a
data
system,
that's
mandated
by
hud
the
federal
housing
agency,
which
maintains
data
for
projects
that
serve
people
that
are
experiencing
homelessness,
in
shelters
and
housing,
programs
and
outreach
projects
and
on
our
coordinated
entry
system,
which
we'll
tell
you
more
about
here
in
new
mexico,
our
hmis
is
managed
by
new
mexico
coalition
to
end
homelessness.
K
K
It's
notable
that
the
number
of
services
provided
is
a
395
increase
from
the
previous
year.
Most
of
that
went,
it
happened
during
the
pandemic.
As
you
can
see.
In
quarter
four
of
2020
quarter,
one
of
21.
We
were
serving
just
exponentially
more
people
and
30
percent
of
all
the
people
were
serving
were
housing
insecure.
They
had
answered
either
I'm
in
danger
of
losing
my
housing
or
I
am
homeless.
K
Our
coordinated
entry
system
is
a
project
that
is
exists
for
the
coordination
and
management
of
crisis
response
for
people
experiencing
homelessness,
that's
kept
in
the
hud
hmis
database
and
it's
managed
by
staff
at
the
coalition
to
end
homelessness
in
new
mexico
coalition
time
and
homelessness.
Anyway.
The
process
of
coordinated
entry
allows
folks
to
make
consistent
decisions
about
the
people
that
are
in
the
system.
K
They
know
who
these
folks
are.
They
meet
bi-monthly
to
talk
about
them
case
by
case,
and
the
goal
is
to
efficiently
connect
people
to
housing
and
end
homelessness,
ensuring
that
they
have
the
resources
they
need
to
either
have
a
voucher
in
their
apartment,
or
they
need
a
different
kind
of
housing
that
can
happen,
and
in
order
for
the
coordinated
entry
system
to
work,
the
data
has
to
be
comprehensive
and
every
partner
in
the
community
has
to
participate
in
that
process.
K
So
by
one
of
the
things.
We're
working
to
do
is
make
sure
that's
happening
with
supporting
by
supporting
the
coalition,
but
also
we
want
to
create
a
bridge
between
connect
and
the
new
mexico
coalition
to
end
homelessness's
data
system,
because
connect
is
serving
as
a
larger
funnel
and
there
are
so
many
navigators
out
there
that
are
kind
of
collecting
that
basic
information
about
housing
and
the
pathway
is
that
they
then
send
a
referral
to
the
coalition.
We
need
to
ensure
that
all
that
data
is
getting
into
the
coalition
system.
K
This
is
a
little
wonky,
but
we'll
stand
for
questions
on
at
the
end,
and
hopefully
they
can
clarify
anything.
The
big
point
here
is
that
data
is
what
we
need
to
really
change.
What's
going
on
with
housing,
security
and
housing
and
security
in
santa
fe,
we
really
need
to
perfect
our
data
collection
systems,
and
by
doing
that,
we
can
work
to
shape
the
interventions
that
are
needed.
You
know
some
how
many
people
need
permanent
supportive
housing
case
management,
behavioral
health
services?
We
really
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
right
now.
K
So
should
we
build
you
know,
200
units.
Should
we
build
100
units?
We
really
need
to
determine
that
before
we
can
come
up
with
what
needs
to
be
done.
So
thinking
of
the
data
as
a
resource
and
using
it
as
a
tool
helps
us
support
understanding.
Our
immediate
housing
needs
determining
the
gaps
in
funding,
identifying
opportunities
for
long-term
investment
and
mitigating
ongoing
risks
during
times
of
crisis.
So
one
of
the
things,
as
you
know,
we
did
was
join
this
national
built
for
xero
movement
a
few
years
back
and
they've.
K
Given
us
a
lot
of
tools
to
help
tackle
this
problem,
one
of
the
tools
is
their
scorecard.
It's
called
a
built
for
zero
scorecard
and
our
goal
is
to
complete
some
of
the
tasks
on
that
scorecard
by
the
end
of
the
calendar
year
and
I'll.
Tell
you
a
little
bit
more
about
that
scorecard.
K
It's
both
a
data
collection
system
and
it's
also
really
a
tool
and
a
system
in
and
of
itself
that
ensures
that
we
can
again
know
who
is
in
and
out
of,
moving
in
and
out
of
homelessness
in
santa
fe.
We
need
to
know
who's
moving
in
and
who's
moving
out
and
where
they're
moving
out
to
some
people
get
housed.
And
then
it's
heartbreaking.
You
hear
case
managers
talk
about
how
they
couldn't
stay
housed
because
they
didn't
have
proper
support
and
they
went
back
into
the
shelter
system
or
back
into
the
street.
K
So
we
really
need
to
be
able
to
track
that
flow
with
reliable,
accurate,
meaningful
data.
If
we
can
complete
our
scorecard,
it
means
we're
really
confident
that
our
data
can
be
used
to
inform
what
we
need
to
do
to
shift
programming
and
services
and
better
serve
people
that
are
in
need.
This
is
a
little
snapshot
of
our
our
scorecard
as
it
exists.
Now
some
of
the
questions
we
have
to
ask
ourselves
and
once
we
get
to
all
of
the
questions
being
yes,
that
means
our
scorecard
is
completed.
We
have
made
progress
on
this.
K
You
know
when
we
joined
built
for
zero.
Our
scorecard
was,
you
know,
only
13,
I
think,
and
now
we
have
out
of
20
items,
28
items,
but
com,
complete,
we've
made
progress
and
we
have
20
of
the
28
complete
and,
as
I
said,
we're
we're
our
goal
and
we
believe
we
can
meet.
K
It
is
to
get
a
perfect
score
card
of
28
at
the
end
of
the
year
and
then
that
will
really
help
to
get
us
where
we
need
to
be
in
terms
of
solving
the
problems
that
we
see
with
housing
security.
K
So
a
lot
of
things
are
in
the
works
to
get
us
there
and
some
of
these
things
you
may
you
already
know
about.
We
have
increasingly
we're
requiring
participation
in
data
collection
for
all
the
city,
contracts
and
agreements
that
we
have.
So
this
includes
the
interfaith
shelter
pete's
places.
Lease
agreement,
which
you
may
recall,
includes
a
requirement
that
25
of
their
folks
are
entered
into
coordinated
entry
and
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
contracts
are
now
having
has
have
language
that
requires
data
participation.
K
As
you
know,
we've
we've
purchased
with
the
karzak
funds,
the
mobile
hygiene
unit
and
our
rfp
is
ready
to
be
released
in
the
summer.
One
of
the
things
that
we
haven't
had
is
really
good
street
outreach
to
give
us
a
sense
of
how
many
people
are
out
there.
K
You
all
know
because
of
the
emails
you
get
from
your
constituents,
that
there
are
a
lot
of
encampments
out
there,
how
many,
how
many
people
are
out
there
and
where
are
they
in
terms
of
readiness
to
be
housed
in
terms
of
readiness
to
be
sheltered
or
even
to
be
case
managed
or
given
services?
K
The
coalition
to
end
homelessness
is
recovering
from
a
severe
staffing
shortage
and
we're
supporting
that
to
ensure
capacity
to
operate
the
coordinated
entry
system
internally
at
the
city.
We're
now
reviewing
our
encampment
policy,
which,
as
you
know
during
the
pandemic,
was
altered
to
not
remove
encampments
on
city
property,
excluding
parks
and
when
they
were
not
presenting
environmental
hazards
and
waterways.
K
We're
looking
at
that
again
now
now
that
we're
sort
of
out
of
the
woods
with
the
pandemic
and
seeing
what
makes
sense,
we're
doing
a
multi-um,
departmental
collaboration
bi-monthly
to
really
tackle
that
issue,
we're
looking
at
just
a
really,
I
mean
we've
done
so
much
meeting
with
partners
around
all
of
this
and
a
lot
of
partners
are
coming
up
with
creative
solutions
and
and
and
wonderful
input.
K
I
want
to
mention
in
particular
in
quorum,
saint
vincent,
which
has
really
stepped
up
to
the
plate,
thinking
about
how
to
solve
the
our
housing
issues
in
santa
fe
and
our
homeless
issues,
which
of
course
impact
the
hospital
system
tremendously,
both
in
terms
of
workforce,
but
also
in
terms
of
the
people
that
they
that
rotate
through
the
er.
So
they
are
really
a
great
partner,
as
our
you
know,
so
many
of
the
provider
partners
that
we
work
with
to
really
think
about
how
we,
how
we
get
our
arms
around
this.
K
This
difficult
problem
and
and
really
coordinate
our
resources
in
a
smart
way,
of
course,
we're
going
to
see
also
the
cash
disbursement
of
our
arpa
funds,
hopefully
through
the
connect
program
that'll
that
we
know
will
go
a
long
way
to
keep
people
housed
and
who
are
already
house.
So
that's
the
on
the
prevention
end
and
with
that
I'll
also
turn
this
over
to
alexander
ladd,
to
talk
about
what
she's
got
in
the
works
out
of
affordable
housing.
I
Thank
you,
director,
ochoa
members
of
the
committee.
We
are
looking
at
extending
the
current
contract
with
the
new
mexico
coalition
and
homelessness
to
keep
it
in
line
with
the
other
leases
at
midtown,
but
to
provide
another
12
months
of
non-congregate
shelter.
There
we've
found
in
the
time
that
folks
have
lived
there.
Many
of
them
have
become
stabilized
and
are
able
to
move
to
more
permanent
housing
as
a
result
of
that.
How
that
housing
situation
and
being
somewhere
where
case
managers
can
reach
them
and
they
can
get
services.
I
So
we
want
to
continue
that
that's
still
sort
of
an
after
effect
of
of
the
pandemic,
and
we
don't
want
anyone
to
be
unhoused.
We
are
still
working
with
the
santa
fe
suites
to
get
to
a
full
lease
up
population
there.
I
That
is
still
in
progress
as
we
refine
the
programming
happening
at
the
property
and
we're
working
with
another
group
to
purchase
or
to
to
help
purchase
fund
the
purchase
of
another
motel
property
based
on
the
santa
fe
suites
model
as
a
mixed
income
property,
and
so
that
will
open
up
quite
a
few
rooms
for
some
of
the
folks,
either
at
midtown
or
currently
housed
in
hotels
and
right
now
we
are
work,
continue
to
work
with
lifelink
with
the
one
of
the
hotel
properties
where
they
have
set
up.
I
They
have
staff
there
all
the
time,
helping
folks
who
are
staying
there
so
we'll
can
that
that's
a
current
contract
we'll
continue
that
contract
and
then
now
we're
really
seeing
folks
who
have
managed
to
squeak
by
during
the
pandemic,
but
they're
getting
to
the
point
where
they
are
at
risk
of
foreclosure
if
they
can't
pay
off
mortgage
payments.
I
So
homewise
has
been
working
quite
extensively
with
a
lot
of
their
client
past
clients
to
make
sure
that
folks
who
are
in
the
danger
zone
of
foreclosure
are
assisted,
and
so
we
will
continue
that
contract
as
well.
K
So
final
slide
here:
how
do
we
solve
for
housing
and
security?
First
of
all,
we
really
need,
as
I've
hammered
home,
a
functioning
data
system
that
tells
us
how
to
plan
the
types
of
shelters
we
need.
You
know
how
many
case
managers
do
we
need
what
kind
of
behavioral
oops
sorry
I
was
trying
to
get
the
box
out
of
my
corner,
so
I
could
actually
read
my
slides
and
you
know
just
what
kind
of
supports
I
needed,
how
many
units
and
what
types
of
units
are
needed.
K
This
is
this
doesn't
mean
we're
not
as
alexander
says,
moving
forward
with
creating
units
we
are,
but
you
know
we
we
have
to
understand
exactly
what
we
need
to
to
really
get
our
hands
around
the
problem.
So
cobit
19
was
really
intense.
K
It
required
us
to
really
pivot
and
pivot
quickly
in
thinking
about
the
ways
that
we
provided
shelter
to
people,
and
I
think
what
it
showed
us
is
that
people
can
really
thrive
in
alternative
environments.
That
we
didn't
expect.
I
mean
thrive
may
be
a
strong
word
to
say:
people
are
thriving
in
sanctioned
encampments,
but
you
know
when
you're
not
being
told
to
move
along
every
other
day.
K
That's
a
lot
better
and
and
street
outreach
can
reach
you,
our
mijo
teams-
and
you
know
some
of
the
other
providers-
were
able
to
make
contact
with
people
in
encampments
and
get
them
into
shelter,
get
them
into
hotels,
hopefully
get
them
into
housing.
So
that
was
really
informative.
K
The
idea
that
people
could
thrive
in
non-congregate
shelters
like
midtown
consuela's
place
where
they
had
their
own
space,
their
own
rooms
and
that
began
as
a
process
of
them
sort
of
shifting
in
the
way
they
they
were
able
to
take
care
of
themselves
and
and
look
at
what
they
needed
to
do
in
their
lives
to
to
get
into
the
next
step,
which
was
sometimes
housing,
hotels
that
were
also
a
really
important
piece
of
that
puzzle.
K
And
now
you
know
we
meet
with
the
shelter
providers
and
we
sort
of
ask
these
very
fundamental
questions
with
each
other,
which
is
you
know?
What
does
shelter
need
to
look
like
in
in
santa
fe
moving
forward?
Does
it
need
to
look
the
same
as
it
did
before
the
pandemic?
Should
it
so
that's
something
that
is
really,
I
think
promising.
So
more
than
anything,
though,
I
think
what
we've
got
going
in
santa
fe
is
a
very
exciting,
coordinated
and
collaborative
planning
process
among
the
funders
and
the
partners.
K
K
You
know
it's
whose
territory
is
what
and
who
belongs
to
which
and
what
label
do
we
put
on
it,
but
there's
just
such
a
genuine
sense
of
hope
and
ability
to
think
creatively
around
this
problem
and
collaboratively
that
I,
for
one,
am
very
hopeful
that
we
can
continue
to
make
incredible
progress,
as
I
think
we
have
had
the
slide
on
the
graphic
on
the
bottom
is
really
from
built
for
zero,
which
is
their
steps.
You
know
first,
it's
this
real-time
data
idea.
K
We
really
need
to
get
that
comprehensive
by
name
list.
We
want
to
reduce
that
to
zero,
how?
How
can
we
do
that?
You
may
have
heard
me
talk
about
other
communities
that
have
ended
chronic
homelessness
or
veteran
homelessness.
K
K
I
don't
think
that's
what
they
did,
but
that's
the
kind
of
thinking
that
we're
engaged
in-
and
I
just
want
to
say,
although
that
built
for
xero,
is
focused
primarily
on
homelessness-
the
principles
about
apply
to
people
who
are
just
housing
insecure
as
well.
You
know
getting
that
sense
of
how
many
there
are
and
what
they
need
to
be
stabilized
and
then
getting
to
xero
is
really
about
maintaining
the
system
of
being
able
to
track
people.
It
doesn't
mean
there'll,
never
be
anybody
on
the
streets.
K
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Questions
from
the
committee.
F
B
Other
questions
comments,
thoughts.
All
right,
thank
you
for
being
here.
Thank
you
for
that
presentation
very
interesting,
and
that
leads
us
into
our
next
presentation,
and
I
think
is
tomas
here
is
kathy
garcia
is
here,
can
we
promote
her
and
may,
and
maybe
maybe
tomas
is
on
chain
breaker
collective
in
the
attendees
room?
B
Jamie,
do
you
have
that
power
there
we
go
you
do.
I
do
just
read
it.
Thank
you
all
right.
So
our
second
presentation,
I'm
just
pulling
it
up
here,
is
a
presentation
on
a
report
entitled
evictions
in
the
covet,
19
era,
successes
and
limitations
of
moratoria
to
keep
people
housed
and
healthy
in
santa
fe
part.
Two
and
again
we
have
the
folks
from
chainbreaker
here,
kathy,
garcia
and
tomas
rivera,
and
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you
who
who
will
be
leading
that
presentation.
B
Okay,
great
and
I
did
see
this
afternoon-
I
think
you
sent
over
a
presentation.
Do
you
have
the
ability
to
share
your
screen
now,
or
did
you
need
our
staff
to
do
that?
Yes,
it
looks
like
I
do.
Have
screen
share
permission,
so
I
can.
O
Thank
you
and
good
evening
to
the
quality
of
life
committee,
madam
chair
romero,
worth
and
all
of
the
council
members
for
being
here
and
as
well
as
all
the
city
leaders
on
the
call
for
inviting
us
to
present
at
this
meeting
we're
going
to
be
saying
a
lot
of
things
in
this
report
that
might
sound
familiar
because
we're
going
to
be
repeating,
I
think,
some
of
the
same
thematic
ideas
that
directors,
ochoa
and
lad
just
shouted
out
in
their
presentation,
we're
going
to
be,
of
course,
very
hyper,
focused
on
tenants
and
renters.
O
But
very
similarly,
if
you
folks
have
any
questions,
we
will
take
them
at
the
end.
So
please
just
take
note
of
it
and
I'm
happy
to
also
slow
down.
If
there's
parts
where
we
need
more
detail
or
folks
are
needing
more
detail,
let
me
go
to
the
next
one.
O
Okay,
so
we
are
going
to
present
today
a
little
bit
of
information
on
our
second
report,
so
just
to
back
up
a
little
bit
chain.
Breaker
is
a
transportation
and
housing
equity
organization.
We
are
member
based
and
remember,
lad.
We
have
been
working
on
a
series
of
reports
around
the
eviction
and
the
emergency
protections
that
were
put
into
place
as
a
result
of
the
pandemic.
O
Our
first
report,
which
was
released
back
in
december
of
last
year,
really
just
detailed
the
existing
landscape
of
housing
in
santa
fe
in
march,
right
as
the
pandemic
hit
our
second
report,
which
is
the
one
we're
going
to
be
explaining
our
findings
of
today,
was
released
earlier
this
year
in
april,
where
we
looked
at
up-to-date
court
data
from
the
state
of
new
mexico
to
really
analyze
how
impactful
and
how
effective
the
emergency
protections
were.
I
want
to
clarify
here
that
there
are
three
emergency
protections
for
tenants.
O
Soon,
we
will
be
releasing
our
third
report
in
the
series,
which
is
really
highlighting
the
recommendations
and
our
suggestions
for
city
policy
moving
forward
as
we
go
into
the
recovery
process
and
beyond
that
report
is
going
to
be
coming
out
later
this
month
next
month.
Where
is
our
target
date?
We've
already
been
chatting
about
some
of
these
recommendations.
O
We've
had
the
opportunity
to
present
some
our
own
findings,
our
own
press
releases,
and
have
had
the
opportunity
to
also
present
to
other
city
committees
as
well.
So
again,
we
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
just
re-highlight
all
of
these
issues.
O
So
I'm
going
to
start
just
by
highlighting
some
numbers
as
far
as
what
the
state
of
the
situation
is
right
now,
preliminary
estimates
say
that
anywhere
from
3
000
to
up
to
600
households
in
the
city
alone
are
at
risk
of
eviction.
O
We
say
these
numbers,
I
think,
just
to
really
emphasize
that
throwing
money
at
the
problem
will
is
insufficient.
It
won't
be
enough
even
assuming
that
we
have
all
of
this
federal
money
to
just
spend.
However,
we
want
the
underlying
causes
that
are
contributing
to
the
instability
of
our
tenants
and
our
families
here
in
santa
fe
need
to
be
addressed.
One
of
the
other
things
that
really
impacts.
That
is
how
these
policies
are
engaging
with
each
other.
O
Here
are
some
other
numbers.
We
know
that
it
during
the
pandemic
and
during
the
emergency
protections
evictions
in
the
city
overall
were
reduced
by
about
half
almost
exactly
half.
If
you
look
at
the
second
figure,
you
will
actually
see
the
fluctuations
in
eviction
filings
through
the
month.
I'm
sorry
throughout
the
year
month
by
month,
there's
a
couple
things
I
want
to
highlight
here.
As
far
as
the
timeline
in
july,
you
will
see
that
there
was
a
new
spike
in
case
on
in
evictions.
O
O
I
want
to
highlight
that
the
state
and
the
city
moratorium
were
in
place
starting
in
march
and
were
in
place
throughout
the
entire
year
and
remain
in
place,
but
what
we
see
is
that
what
the
federal
government
was
doing
had
an
impact
on
whether
landlords
were
making
decisions
or
making
moves
to
try
to
evict
their
tenants.
The
very
existence
of
a
federal
protection
chilled
their
ability
or
like
just
made
them
not
want
to
do
it.
Of
course,
we
still
have
the
state
and
the
city
protections
and
those
still
were
protecting
tenants.
O
We
have
no
way
of
knowing
how
many
rental
agreements
are
not
in
writing.
We
have
no
idea
how
many
folks
have
been
pushed
out
of
eviction
pushed
out
of
their
homes
through
evictions
that
never
made
it
to
court.
We
also
know
that
many
folks
simply
don't
understand
their
rights,
because
a
lot
of
information
is
not
available
in
their
home
language.
O
Many
documents
are
very
difficult
to
attain
in
languages
other
than
english,
and
then
we
also
know
that
there
are
also
just
gaps
in
the
moratorium.
For
example,
if
someone's
lease
expired,
they
were
also
at
risk
of
eviction,
maybe
not
eviction,
because
they
didn't
pay
their
rent,
but
eviction
in
the
sense
that
they
may
be
forced
to
move.
When
that
lease
expires.
O
O
As
you
can
see,
there
are
some
neighborhoods
that
are
remain
disproportionately
impacted
by
evictions.
These
maps
coincide
with
a
lot
of
the
intersections
of
our
communities
that
also
show
challenges
folks,
who
are
low
income
people
of
color
folks,
who
might
be
undocumented,
essential
workers,
service
or
tourism
workers
who
lost
their
jobs
during
the
pandemic.
O
These
are
areas
that
have
also
seen
disproportionate
rates
of
covet
infections.
Certainly,
we've
been
working
and
in
collaboration
with
the
city
and
the
department
of
health
to
promote
vaccine
events.
We
just
had
a
vaccine
event
recently
at
the
southside
library
this
past
june.
What
was
that
june
22
the
12th
just
a
few
days
ago.
O
We
have
a
next
vaccine
event,
also
planned
for
the
southside
library
on
july
12th
again,
because
we're
recognizing
that
a
lot
of
the
folks
who
are
experiencing
this
disproportionate
receiving
the
brunt
end
of
the
health
emergency
are
also
experiencing
addictions.
We
see
these
as
very,
very
connected.
O
One
of
the
other
things
that
we
learned
in
doing
all
of
this
research
and
all
of
this
writing
was
really
seeing
how
the
laws
interacted
with
each
other
and
how
the
different
levels
of
protection
impacted
tenants.
This
also
led
us
to
just
analyze
what
are
the
best
ways
to
protect
tenants.
How
are
some
of
these
mechanisms
more
effective
than
others?
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
too
much
detail
at
this
moment
as
far
as
what
the
steps
of
a
court
or
legal
process
are.
O
What
this
essentially
means
is
that
the
way
that
tenants
can
access
these
protections
varies
wildly
depending
on
which
one
they're
calling
upon
the
cdc
moratorium
was
the
weakest
of
all
of
the
protections
it
required
tenants
to
actually
present
an
affirmative
document
before
any
eviction
proceedings
even
began.
If
they
did
not
do
that,
then
they
were
not
protected.
O
The
santa
fe
was
the
santa
fe.
Moratorium
was
the
strongest
in
that
it
acted
also
before
any
eviction
proceeding.
There
were
some
challenges
to
the
santa
fe
moratorium,
namely
that
tenants
needed
to
initiate
a
defense
process
by
filing
a
police
report.
Again
when
we're
talking
about
folks
who
are
at
the
intersection
of
these
vulnerable
situations,
escalating
to
law
enforcement
immediately
was
not
always
the
best
idea.
O
Finally,
we
have
the
new
mexico
moratorium,
which
was
also
very
strong
and
helped
protect
tenants
in
that.
Even
if
a
judge
issued
an
eviction
ruling
and
the
tenant
was
like
lost,
what
was
happening
in
new
mexico
was
that
tenants
were
not
actually
being
forced
out
through
a
sheriff's
removal
order,
so
there
was
a
judgment
being
entered,
but
the
actual
removal
from
the
home
was
not
being
is
not
being
enforced
at
the
moment
that
protection
remains
in
place
up
until
the
supreme
the
new
mexico
supreme
court
lifts
that
particular
order
when
they
lift
that
order.
O
O
So
some
of
the
other
findings
we
saw
as
far
as
evictions.
It
is
really
important
to
note
that
the
only
evictions
prohibited
by
the
emergency
orders
are
evictions
for
non-payment
of
rent.
That's
the
three-day
notice.
So
if
I
fall
behind
on
my
rent
as
terrifying
as
that,
is
it's
actually
protecting
me,
but
what
that
meant
was
that
landlords
started
finding
other
causes
of
action
to
find
ways
to
evict
tenants.
What
the
data
shows
from
the
pandemic
year
is
that
no
fault
evictions
increased
seven
times
over
what
the
average
was
in
the
previous
years.
O
O
The
second
one
that
was
also
the
second
cause
of
action
for
eviction
that
was
not
protected
by
the
pandemic.
Moratoria
was
non-rent
debt
so
because
sometimes
utilities
are
included
as
part
of
the
whole
contract.
O
If
I
fall
behind
on
my
rent,
I'm
protected,
but
let's
say
I
fall
behind
on
landscaping
fees,
which
are
part
of
the
of
my
rental
contract.
If
I
fall
behind
on
that
that
doesn't
protect
me
and
I'm
liable
to
be
evicted,
even
if
I
keep
managing
to
pay
my
rent,
if
I
fall
behind
in
those
things,
I'm
subject
to
eviction
under
those
types
of
notices,
the
third
type
of
notice,
which
is
usually
when
a
tenant,
initiates
a
complaint
against
a
landlord.
Let's
say
for
health
or
safety
concerns.
O
O
So
those
numbers
are
very,
very
critical
because
it
shows
how
folks
were
maneuvering
the
protections
and
how
they
were
trying
to
avoid
kind
of
living
up
to
the
spirit
of
those
tenant
protections.
O
So
the
other
concerns,
of
course,
is
the
in
addition
to
rates
of
covet
infection
and
its
relation
to
evictions.
We
also,
of
course,
are
very
concerned
about
the
ongoing
accumulation
of
back
rent
and
fees.
Again,
none
of
the
moratorium
forgive
the
accumulation
of
the
debt
it
is
building
and
building
and
building
the
challenge
of
having
criminal
versus
civil
enforcement
of
these
again,
it's
impacting
the
effectiveness
of
those
protections
and
those
policies.
O
There
are
very
few
ways
to
guarantee
that
renters
are
not
retaliated
against
for
exercising
their
rights
again.
The
data
gaps
that
we
don't
know
if
there
are
written
contracts.
If
there
are
protectual
evictions,
few
emergency
resources
exist
as
far
as
getting
that
information
out
to
tenants
again
whether
that's
and
that
includes
in
languages
other
than
english
and
another
concern
is,
of
course,
once
the
state
lifts
its
moratoria,
the
burden
on
the
courts.
O
That
will
happen
when
all
of
those
folks
who
haven't
been
filing
for
eviction
suddenly
show
up
in
the
court
and
start
doing
that.
So
those
are
some
of
the
overall
general
concerns
that
are
also
happening
in
the
here
and
now
chain.
Breaker,
of
course,
is
very
solution
oriented,
so
we
have
of
course,
been
developing
ideas
for
how
to
address
these
issues.
O
We've
essentially
been
bucketing
them
into
things
that
can
be
immediately
and
quickly
implemented
on
a
city
level
through
mayoral
action
or
city
council
action,
and
we're
also
contrasting
that
with
policy
recommendations,
which,
of
course
are
more
medium
or
long
term
will
require
strategic
planning
and
maybe
even
collaboration
with
other
government
agencies
and
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
the
city
has
already
done
in
response
to
the
pandemic.
O
O
The
budget
response
of
the
city,
of
course,
has
also
already
been
quite
positive.
We
know
that
the
affordable
care
housing
trust
fund
has
been,
but
more
investment
has
been
placed
into
it.
We
know
that
the
city
has
already
approved
about
75
000
for
a
tenant
eviction
hotline
which
we
would
love
to
collaborate
with
the
city
on.
We
know
that
more
funds
have
been
allocated
for
prevention
of
violence
and
domestic
domestic
assault
and
to
further
support
mental
and
behavioral
health.
O
So
we're
really
grateful
for
those
things
that
have
already
been
included
in
the
in
the
city's
budget
and
the
city's
response.
But
of
course
we're
also
thinking
not
just
beyond
in
the
immediate,
but
for
long
term.
How
can
we
really
transform
the
housing
situation
for
families
here
and
our
neighbors
here
in
santa
fe?
O
So
here
are
some
of
our
recommendations,
which
are
both
short-term
long-term
here
they're
all
together,
we
would
like
to
see
an
extension
of
the
emergency
order
and
the
moratorium
both
at
the
city
and
at
the
state
level,
and
we
would
like
to
see
how
we
can
replicate
some
of
those
ideas
into
more
permanent
protections.
O
We
would
also
love
to
see
how
we
could
shift
enforcement
of
these
types
of
things
from
a
criminal
law
enforcement
situation
to
a
more
civil
situation,
as
far
as
maybe
it's
building
health
and
safety
inspectors
who
are
making
sure
about
the
suitability
of
the
dwelling
to
make
sure
that
contracts
are
being
provided
as
required
by
new
mexico
state
law.
In
writing
things
like
that.
We
would
of
course,
want
to
see
more
and
greater.
O
Investment
in
outreach
and
education
for
the
public
again,
including
in
languages
other
than
english,
to
address
the
data
gap
situation.
We
really
believe
that
a
landlord
registry
situation
could
be
established.
This
would
give
us
a
lot
of
the
data
that
we
need
as
far
as
where
the
renters,
where
the
landlords
are
where
the
renters
are,
what
their
market
rates
are,
what
their
rental
rates
are,
the
student
again,
the
suitability
of
the
dwelling.
Have
they
passed.
O
Again,
we
want
to
see
the
expansion
of
direct
cash
assistance,
we'd
love
to
figure
out
a
way
to
forgive
city
water
utility
debt.
When
tenants
fall
behind
in
their
utilities,
it's
the
canary
in
the
coal
mine
of
evictions,
it's
the
first
sign
that
danger
is
ahead,
so
if
we
can
really
help
stabilize
families
in
their
homes
with
their
utilities,
then
that
really
makes
a
tremendous
difference.
And
again
I
want
to
highlight
that
the
new,
the
state
of
new
mexico
through
rent
help
renthelpnm.org
and
the
department
of
finance
administration
does
recognize
internet
service.
O
As
a
public
utility
that
they're
willing
to
subsidize
as
far
as
that
help,
I
mentioned
that,
because
that
is
one
of
the
I
think
shifts
that
has
happened
for
us
as
a
society
and
the
pandemic
that
we're
really
coming
into
realizing
how
critical
these
things
are
for
the
stability
of
a
family.
O
Again,
we
need
to
address
the
accumulation
of
background
fees
and
and
really
improve
access
to
legal
representation
and
mediation.
Again,
there's
a
lot
of
challenges
for
tenants
if
they're,
already
falling
behind
in
their
rent
chances
are
they
can't
afford
a
lawyer.
There
are
also
income
requirements
for
legal
aid
and
residency
like
citizenship
requirements
for
legal
aid,
so
that
makes
it
challenging
for
our
undocumented
neighbors
to
also
access
legal
help.
O
We
would
love
to
see
just
cause
eviction
policies,
in
other
words,
very
similar
to
the
mobile
home
park,
act
here
in
new
mexico,
which
lists
only
just
a
certain
amount
of
reasons
that
a
person
can
be
forced
to
to
move
eviction
for
a
mobile
home
park
is
listed
to
like
only
four
reasons,
and
if
it's
not
one
of
those
reasons,
then
you
can't
we'd
love
to
see
something
similar
for
tenants
source
of
income.
Non-Discrimination
was
something
that
came
up
at
the
new
mexico
legislature.
O
Many
we've
heard
stories
from
many
tenants
who
have
said
you
know
it's
really
challenging.
My
landlord
doesn't
want
to
help
finish
that
rent
help
new
mexico
application
because
they
are
landlords,
are
required
to
complete
a
certain
portion
of
that
application.
So
we've
been
hearing
things
like
that
that
the
landlord
doesn't
want
to
participate
in
that
program.
O
Source
of
income
discrimination
also
applies
to
federal
benefits.
Some
folks
are
able
to
say
no.
I
don't
want
to
rent
to
you
and
for
folks
who
are
on
that
list
for
federal
housing.
You
know
that
wait
list
is
incredibly
long.
Fair
chance,
housing
is
like
banned
the
box.
I
know
again,
we've
chatted
about
some
of
these
things
at
the
state
legislative
level
around
voting
and
things
of
that
nature,
but
we
believe
these
are
also
things
that
the
city
can
implement
limits
on
security
deposits,
assistance
to
help
tenants
relocate
if
they
are
evicted.
O
Some
cities
have
required
a
certain
amount
being
given
to
a
tenant
who
is
who
who
is
being
evicted
so
that
they
can
relocate
again?
Sometimes
those
are
there's
other
qualifiers
on
that.
Finally,
we
urge
the
city
and
city
leaders
to
also
push
on
some
of
those
other
government
actors
who
impact
this.
We
don't
act
solely
as
a
city
like
I
mentioned
right,
there's
all
kinds
of
government
interaction
that
happens
at
those
levels
so
really
trying
to
work
with
those
groups
and
entities
to
really
brainstorm.
O
How
can
we
really
all
be
pulling
in
the
same
direction?
Transformative
tenant
protection
to
us
also
includes
community
stewardship
of
land
and
housing.
Overlaid
districts
that
prioritize
development
without
display
displacement,
so
that
folks,
who
are
developing
those
areas,
do
are
committed
to
community
investment.
Local
hires
and
things
of
that
nature
and,
of
course,
in
alignment
with
the
residence
bill
of
rights
which
was
passed
by
the
city
council
back
in
2015..
O
What
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
at
this
moment
in
the
chat,
I'm
going
to
drop
a
link
to
the
reports
that
we
have
and
I'm
going
to
drop
a
link
to
the
residence
bill
of
rights
and
if
you
folks
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
take
them.
And,
of
course,
tomas
is
also
here.
To
answer
questions.
B
Thank
you
and
if
you
could
stop
sharing
your
screen
for
a
bit,
I
wonder
so
we
don't
just
for
your
information.
We
don't
tend
to
use
chat.
I
think
you
may
not
even
be
able
to
do
that.
Sorry,
yeah
so,
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
another
way
to
provide
that
information,
especially
so
the
public
could
have
those
resources
as
well.
I
don't
know,
do
you
wanna,
maybe
just
call
out
those
two.
O
Things
yeah
we
can,
we
can
also
post
them
on
our
facebook,
and
I
can
all
I'd
also
be
happy
to
email
them
to
to
the
committee.
Madam
chair,
I
know
that
I
have
some
email
addresses
from
this
invite,
so
I
can
reply
all
and
share
it
with
folks.
That
way,
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
other
okay
and
are
they
on
your
website.
O
They
are
on
the
human
impact
partners
website.
Okay,
we.
N
Have
links
also
on
our
website
under
the
resources
tab,
there's
it
says
reports
and
then
all
of
those
are
accessible
there
and
we
have
shared
these
with
all
of
all
of
the
counselors
and,
of
course,
several
city
staff,
including
who
were
on
this
call,
helped
contribute
to
it.
So
yeah.
B
Great
yeah,
so
there's
two
there's
two
two
audiences
here,
one
the
counselors
and
staff
and
then
the
other
one,
of
course,
is
any
anybody
in
the
public
who
might
be
listening
or
watching
and
wanting
to
access
that
information.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
Counselor
cassette.
You
have
your
hand
up.
F
Thank
you
so
much,
madam
chair,
and
and
thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation,
a
lot
of
information,
so
I
appreciate
it.
I
just
want
to
confirm
you
guys
have
a
part
three
coming
out
that
was
going
to
really
dig
into
the
the
policy
recommendations.
Am
I
correct
that
we
can
look
forward
to
receiving
that
from
you.
O
Yeah,
yes,
absolutely
that
is
actually
in
the
middle
of
being
drafted
and
edited,
and
we
do
hope
to
have
a
more
deep
dive
into
some
of
those
policy
recommendations,
including
some
others,
with
examples
of
other
cities
who
have
implemented
types
of
programs
of
this
type
that
we're
recommending
again
from
a
variety
of
locations
and
sizes
of
cities.
The
name
of
the
game
is:
how
do
we
really
hyper
localize
it
so
that
it's
santa
fe,
who
benefits
from
all
of
these
ideas.
F
Okay,
wonderful!
Thank
you.
I'm
definitely
looking
forward
to
seeing
that
a
bit
more
and
having
those
in-depth
conversations
when
that
comes
out.
So
I
really,
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
doing
that
work
there.
I
did
have
a
question
with
the
note,
the
no
fault
evictions
and
have
you
guys
been
able
to
find
and
I'm
going
to
guess,
based
on
your
presentation.
The
answer
is
no
but
data
on
how
many
individuals
had
their
lease
and
that
were
not
paying
rent,
as
opposed
to
those
that
that
were
and
I'd
be
really
interested
in
those
numbers.
O
So
that
is
right
to
the
heart
of
the
data
question.
We
have
no
idea
beyond
whatever
we've
accumulated
either
through
our
hotline
or
through
kind
of
whatever
I'll
say,
whatever
ad
hoc
data
collection
systems
we've
developed
in
the
midst
of
the
pandemic,
that
we
would
know
when
those
leases
expire,
how
long
the
terms
were
what
the
actual
reasons
for
that
are
again.
We
have
no
way
of
knowing.
O
We
believe
that
a
licensure
or
registry
would
really
help
us
get
to
that,
because
that's
where
we
would
know
so
and
so
rented
to
this
person
on
this
date.
They
have
a
year-long
contract.
We
know
what
to
expect
something
of
that
nature,
but
until
we
have
that
kind
of
data
collection,
I
think
we're
always
going
to
be
somewhat
guessing
and
really
only
being
able
to
make
our
best
choices
based
on
anecdotal
evidence.
F
Yeah,
that's
that's
what
I
that's
what
I
assume
the
answer
to
be,
I'm
sorry
tomas
did
you
have
something
to
add
to
that.
N
No
just
cheryl,
meadowworth
and
counselor
cassette.
I
think
the
what
we
can
assume
that
we've
been
in
a
year
and
three
months
into
the
pandemic
is
that
most
people's
leases
have
expired.
Who've
had
it
during
that
time,
or
at
least
a
high
amount
of
people
have
so
if
they
haven't
been
paying
rent
during
that
time,
their
their
landlord
will
have
had
to
renew
their
lease.
Given
that
context-
and
you
know
I'm
sure
that
that's
happened,
I'm
sure
that
hasn't
happened
but,
like
kathy
said,
that's
a
guess.
N
Just
kind
of
wanted
to
give
that
framework
is
that
most
leases,
if
they
exist,
are
are
for
a
year
or
so
in
in
this
grouping,
and
so
that
year
has
definitely
come
and
gone.
F
F
Data
really
really
is
a
helpful
tool
that
I'd
like
to
get
some
more
of,
and
I
think
my
my
last
question
is
actually
for
director
ochoa.
I
don't
know
if
you
are
here,
I
apologize.
You
are
not
expecting
to
speak
to
that.
Thank
you.
Hi
thanks
for
popping
on
you
know,
kathy
said
something
interesting
about
the
failure
to
pay.
F
Public
utilities
frequently
is
kind
of
that
canary
in
the
coal
mine,
and
it
really
made
me
think
about
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
with
connect,
and
this
look
at
at
prevention,
and
you
know
finding
those
early
signs
of
housing
and
security,
and
I
was
wondering
if
that
is
especially
you
know.
We
have
access
to
that
information.
Is
that
something
that
we've
been
able
to
utilize
through
connect
to
really
start
to
see
if
we
can
prevent
some
issues
early
on
as
opposed
to
waiting
until
it
snowballs?
K
Madam
chair
counselor,
casa,
that's
a
great
question.
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
it's
it
varies.
I
think
you
know
kathy
is
absolutely
right.
It's
a
canary
in
the
coal
mine
indicator.
At
the
same
time,
we
learned
that
many
people
paid
their
rent
because
they
were
so
afraid
of
losing
their
housing,
that
they
didn't
pay
their
utilities
and
they
didn't
eat
and
they
didn't
pay
their
car
payment
and
they
didn't
pay
any
of
their
wi-fi
or
other
bills.
K
So
some
people
for
some
people
that
would
be
a
canary
in
the
mine
indicator
that
they
and
it
is
really
because
if
they
can't
do
all
that
they're
very
likely
to
not
be
able
to
pay
their
rent
the
next
time
around
so
yeah
we
can.
We
can
also
do
a
deep
dive
into
connect
to
find
how
many
people
we,
as
assisted
with
utilities,
were
they
also
assisted
with
rent.
K
You
know,
I
think
the
cash
assistance
that
we
gave
is
just
another
area
that
we
hope
to
be
able
to
connect
the
dots
on
the
data
on
next
time,
because
you
know
during
the
cares
act
funding
we
gave
out
so
much
and
it
was
super
useful
because
it
was
flexible,
but
we
didn't
always
know
what
people
used
it
for,
whereas
this
time
around
we're
looking
at
tying
it
a
little
more
closely
to
the
connect
navigator
network.
K
So
they
can
sort
of
make
some
notes
they're
working
directly
with
their
clients,
the
clients
still
get
the
are
empowered
to
use
the
funds
the
way
they
need
to,
but
they
can
kind
of
report
back
to
a
navigator
on
how
they
used
it
and
we
can
get
a
little
better
sense
of
what's
going
on
there
as
well.
I
hope.
F
F
Yeah,
it
did
I
mean,
and
you
also
brought
up
the
point-
that
even
though
somebody
may
pay
rent
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
they,
you
know
they're
they're,
choosing,
rent
over
food
or
they're
choosing
rent
over
whatever
other
necessities
they
have
for
life.
So
so
I
think
that's
an
important
piece
to
remember
here
that
somebody
somebody
may
have
kept
up
with
their
rent,
but
but
there
are
other
issues
that
we
are
looking
at
and
and
again
tapping
into
some
of
those
indicators
and
where
they
come
up.
K
And
madam
chair
counselor
casa,
we
have
also
worked
with
the
utility
department
of
the
city
to
get
a
sense
of
the
scope
of
their.
You
know
the
folks
that
they
have
in
arrears:
we've.
Certainly
given
them
they've,
put
out
information
about
connect
and
utility
bills,
and
you
know
for
people
who
are
looking
for
help
with
your
utility
bills.
Those
people
are
getting
information
and
that
would
actually
be
an
interesting
data
presentation
on
the
changes
in
the
utility
bills
at
the
city.
I
think
that's
a
great
follow-up,
maybe
to
this
presentation
as
well.
F
Yes,
I
I
would
be
I'd,
be
very
interested
in
hearing
more
about
that
and
looking
at
some
of
that
alignment,
so
thank
you
for
for
looking
into
those
connections
and
doing
that
work.
I
don't
believe
I
have
any
other
questions
again.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation.
I
really
am
looking
forward
to
that
next.
That
next
report
that
you
guys
will
be
putting
out-
and
I
think
that
at
that
point,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
meat
to
bite
into
so
thank
you
so
much.
G
G
And
the
sobering
information,
the
pieces
of
the
puzzle
that
we
don't
typically
get
the
fact
that
you
were
able
to
track
down
this
data
and
even
in
the
report
that
in
this
presentation,
but
what
you
had
sent
to
us
in
our
packet
material
material
was
very
helpful,
because
I
think
what
we
don't
do
well
in
the
city,
for
various
reasons,
is
really
use.
Utilizing
data
to
make
a
case
for
why
we
need
to
do
what
we
need
to
do
and
we're
getting
better
at
it.
G
I
just
think
we
still
need
to
to
push
that
envelope
and
get
the
systems
that
work
for
us,
and
so
what
I
took
from
that
is
like
I
keep
thinking
about
this
new
data
portal
that
we
keep
talking
about
that
hasn't.
It's
been.
It's
been
implemented
in
the
city
with
other
partners
in
the
community
and
I'm
not
quite
sure
like.
G
We
don't
even
have
data
because
the
courts
don't
track
demographics
as
it
relates
to
to
eviction
so
we're
lacking
in
that
area,
and
so
I
don't
know
who
could
answer
this.
If,
if
director
ochoa
knows
anything
about
that
new
data
portal
that
we
launched
and
if
there's
ways,
we
can
utilize
that
to
understand
better
housing
as
it
relates
to
evictions
and
other
areas,
do
you
know
anything
about
that.
P
Oh
thanks
yeah,
madam
chair
council
villarreal.
I
can
speak
a
little
bit
to
our
data
platform.
It
is
collecting
data
from
various
sources.
So
what
you
just
saw
on
the
presentation
here
we
can
actually
add
to
that
portal
because
I
think
you're
right
that
data
can
inform
policy
ultimately,
so
we're
expanding
some
of
the
sort
of
indicators
so
to
speak
on
that
platform.
So
what
she
has
collected
today,
what
champions
has
collected
today
could
be
something
we
can
integrate
with
jennifer
phobia
she's,
helping
us
on
the
city
staff
side.
G
P
Yes,
council
viral,
that
that's
correct,
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
passive
data
platform.
For
now
we
don't
have
the
capacity
to
go
out
and
sort
of
look
at,
as
I
call
them
the
indicators
look
at
the
indicators
and
make
sure
that
it's
updated,
because
some
of
the
data
comes
from
census,
community
services,
information,
workforce
development,
tourism,
et
cetera,
and
so
until
we
have
some
capacity
to
actually
focus
on
it
on
a
weekly
monthly
quarterly
basis.
P
But
it
is
really
just
passive
information
that
comes
in
or
we
work
with
partners
in
the
community
to
upload
their
data,
and
you
know
just
get
it
so
we
can
update
it
as
we
see
fit
or
as
we
need
it.
G
Thank
you.
Can
you
add
to
that.
K
Madam
chair
councilwoman,
the
connect
network
and
the
united
s
platform
has
flexibility,
so
what
I
would
want
to
look
into
since
it's
being
widely
used
with
so
many
groups
and
chain
breaker
used
it
as
well
during
the
pandemic,
is
what
can
we
add
a
module?
You
know
if
somebody
answers.
Yes
to
the
the
question
that
I
showed
you
about,
I'm
worried
about
losing
my
housing
or
I've
lost
my
housing.
K
Then
we
can
do
a
deeper
dive
in
that
within,
unite
us
and
hopefully
pull
pull
that
data,
and
that
can
be,
you
know,
sort
of
cold.
So
that
would
be
my
suggestion
for
once.
We've
we've
got
the
mechanism
for
how
we
want
to
ask
that
question.
We
can
work
with
chain
breakers
on
whether
that
works
for
them,
but
I
think,
because
it's
being
pretty
widely
used,
that
would
be
a
natural
place
to
add.
We
already
have
some
of
those
sort
of
special
modules
within
connect
that
we
can
pull
things
out.
G
G
So
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
if,
if
you
all
are
willing
to
from
chainbreaker
to
kind
of
participate
in
that
way,
so
that
we
can
improve
what
we're
collecting
from
community
members
that
are
vulnerable
and
are
in
situations
that
need
support
and
it's
related
to
housing.
So
the
piece
that
my
colleague
brought
up
about
no
fault
councilwoman
cassette
brought
up
that
has
continuously
worried
me
concerned
me
because
it's
also,
you
know
it's
a
form
of
eviction
and
it's
not
it's
coming
in
so
many
different
angles
and
I've
heard
it
anecdotally.
G
We
don't
have
data
to
back
it
up,
but
anecdotally,
I'm
hearing
people
say
and
it's
not
about
their
lease
being
up.
It's
people
that
are
also
selling
their
homes,
and
so
people
that
have
been
renting
for
long
periods
of
time.
Those
owners
have
decided
to
sell
and
that's
another
whole
another
level
of
housing
and
security.
G
So
many
people
I've
grown
up
with,
do
not
have
that
scenario
going
on
and
they're
not
able
to
find
another
rental
place,
and
so
I
don't
know
how
we
track
that
data
because
it's,
I
just
think
it's
so
important
to
try
to
figure
that
out,
because
it's
not
just
the
housing,
p
or
the
rental
side
and
not
getting
not
having
your
lease
renewed.
But
it's
also
the
your
house
is
no
longer
going
to
be
a
rental
because
they're
selling
it
so
do
you
all
have
thoughts
on
that
or
have
you?
G
O
O
These
are
some
of
these
programs
that
have
been
implemented
in
other
places,
dc
chicago
la
one
of
the
thing
I
know
we're
always
saying
like,
but
those
aren't
santa
fe.
One
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
really
see
is
the
comparisons
aren't
just
about
population.
O
What
we're
also
seeing
is
that
the
boom
in
the
rental
and
housing
markets
in
santa
fe
are
not
unique
to
santa
fe,
we're
seeing
these
same
booms
in
albuquerque
in
rio,
rancho
right
so
even
before
in
the
before
times,
we
would
say:
oh
folks
are
being
displaced
from
santa
fe
to
the
outskirts,
whatever
that
meant,
then
that's
even
happening
even
more
right,
so
even
more
so
so
I
think
it's
just
about.
How
is
that
the
problem
has
gotten
more
acute.
G
O
Yes
and
again,
there
are
various
again,
not
just
large
cities,
but
even
mid-sized
cities
right
we
would.
There
was
one
that
I
saw.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
actually
pull
a
couple
of
names
here.
G
The
reason
why
I
asked
that
is
because
people
always
assume
that,
at
the
municipal
level,
that
we
don't
have
control
over
landlord-tenant-related
policy
when
there
are
examples
elsewhere,
I
guess
I
would
you
don't
have
to
find
it
now
kathy.
If
you
don't,
if
you
maybe
let
me
know
later,
but
I'm
just
going
well.
O
There
are,
I
did
find
a
couple
like
boulder.
Colorado
has
been
doing
it-
concord,
california,
right
these
are
like
smaller
municipalities,
but
they're,
also
experiencing
some
of
these
like
high
tourist
high
zoom
boom
booms.
So
again,
those
are
where
we're
seeing
those
analogies
as
far
as
how
do
we
really
track
what's
going
on.
I
would
also
like
to
draw
an
analogy
to
the
registry
that
we
have
already
in
santa
fe
around
short-term
rentals
right
like
so.
These
aren't
brand
new
ideas
either.
O
I
think
it
would
just
be
a
way
of
figuring
out
how
to
expand
or
scale
out
some
of
those
existing
policies
and
just
making
it
more
expansive
for
all
tenants,
not
just
short-term
tenants
right
right.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
counselor,
via
real.
We,
I
started
talking
about
landlord
licensing
years
and
years
ago
with
susan
toretsky,
who
ran
the
lyndler-tenant
hotline
and
she'd,
come
here
from
michigan,
and
she
was
shocked
that
we
didn't
have
landlord
licensing,
because
it's
a
business,
you're
running
a
business
and
we
make
businesses
get
licenses
and
go
through
all
sorts
of
inspections,
and
they
have
to
have
insurances
and
they
have
to
have
fire
inspections
and
all
sorts
of
stuff.
Yet
we
don't.
I
We
don't
require
landlords
to
do
that
when
they're,
offering
sort
of
so
much
more
of
a
intimate,
meaningful
service
to
the
community-
and
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
punitive,
I
think
it
can
be
structured
so
that
there
are
benefits
for
the
landlord
as
well.
So
I
you
know,
I'm
very,
very
supportive
of
that
idea.
I
think
it
helps
with
data.
We
would
get
better
data
from
it.
It
would
help
with
getting
housing
assistance
too
out
into
the
community.
G
Thank
you
for
that
yeah.
I
feel,
like
that's
a
low-hanging
fruit
item
in
terms
of
policy
change
and
then
speaking
of
the
policy
piece
you
all
are
launching
that
in
july,
and
you
presented
some
of
those
findings
or
some
ideas
right
now,
and
so
that
that
report
will
have
more
details
as
to
how
that
could
be
accomplished.
G
And
would
it
give
examples
as
well
as
maybe
other
places
that
have
have
those
structured,
either
policy
or
or
you
know,
some
kind
of
way
to
like
relate
it
back
to
something
that's
already
been
done,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
duplicate
efforts
or
reinvent
the
wheel.
So
I
think
that's
the
key
for
me
anyway
and
for
probably
my
colleagues
to
find
examples
of
things
that
can
fit,
and
we
did
that
with
the
short-term
rental
improvements.
G
O
Like
to
councilwoman
via
rail,
I'd
just
like
to
shout
out
in
in
regards
to
that
that
these
reports
that
chain
breaker
has
been
working
on
have
been
written
in
collaboration
with
a
variety
of
national
and
state
and
local
partners,
including
policy
link,
the
university
of
new
mexico
clinical
law
program,
the
health
equity
partnership,
human
impact
partners.
O
I
say
that
because
that's
exactly
how
we're
able
to
kind
of
pull
on
some
of
these
expertise.
Definitely
one
of
the
goals,
we'd
and
we'd
love
to
hear
from
the
quality
of
life
committee
and
other
council
members
as
well
is
what
kind
of
model
legislation
or
model
resolutions
you
folks
might
be
interested
in.
We'd
have
to
be
very
happy
to
do
some
research
on
that.
O
Certainly,
we've
been
looking
at
again
other
cities
and
their
their
legislation.
The
things
that
they've
brought
up
in
their
councils
again
to
see
and
we're
talking
with
the
unm
folks
again
to
see
how
do
those
things
also
match
up
with
state
law
what
the
legislature
is
trying
to
do?
What
the
governor
wants
right
all
of
the
things,
so
we're
very
excited
about
those
possibilities
as
well
and
again
we're
very
looking
very
much
so
looking
forward
to
working
with
the
city
and
the
council
members
on
how
to
move
forward
on
those
things.
Excellent
yeah.
O
G
This
question
is
for
director
ochoa
as
it
relates
to
the
funding
that's
coming
to
us
for
the
american
rescue
plan,
act
arpa
and
I'm
curious.
I
think
she
there.
You
are
sorry
if
you
could
just
let
us
know
if
the
arpa
funds
would
be
able
to
support
aspects
around
housing
as
it
relates
to
evictions.
K
So,
madam
chair
on
councilwoman
bieter
director
brown
has
actually
been
the
one
to
really
delve
deep
into
this.
My
initial
answer
to
you
is
yes
and
I'll
I'll
see
if
I'm
correct
or
not
when
ritual.
P
Director
brown-
is
it
from
here?
Thank
you,
madam
chair
council.
Verial,
you
are
correct.
The
arpa
funds
are
do
have
eligibility
around
that.
What
we're
looking
to
do
right
now,
though,
with
our
funds,
is
to
provide
revenue
replacement,
so
the
the
funds
will
come
into
the
general
fund
and
then
mr
choa's
group
can
look
at
programs
that
can
be
funded
through
that,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
follow
through
with
all
the
grant
management
paperwork
that
comes
with
it.
P
So,
but
from
the
standpoint
of
what
the
opera
funds
can
do,
it
is
one
of
the
areas
that
would
be
eligible.
G
At
least
I
think
it's
tentative,
because
we
haven't
seen
it
yet
at
the
council
level,
but
the
plan
for
the
arpa
funds
would
it
would
go
through
the
general
fund
so
that
we're
able
to
have
more
flexibility
for
program
implementation
through
either
existing
community
partners
like
non-profit
partners
or
through
our
own,
like
systemic
or
system
facilities?
Does
that
make
sense?
Yes,.
P
Ma'am
yeah
man,
chair
of
yeah
councillor,
that
that's
correct.
The
archer
funds
do
have
some
restrictions
through
the
treasury,
where
you
can
only
really
spend
it
in
these
qualified
census
tracts.
There
are
four
of
them
in
the
city
of
santa
fe,
so
having
that
as
a
revenue
replacement,
allows
us
to
take
all
the
funding
into
our
general
fund
and
then
use
it
citywide.
So
so
ms
ochoa
would
have
the
flexibility
to
use
it
based
upon
our
full
city
and
its
needs
versus
just
in
the
qualified
census,
tracts.
P
I
don't
have
the
numbers
on
them,
but
you
could
think
of
them
as
the
five
opportunity
zones
we
had.
So
one
is
in
the
hobo
man
neighborhood.
P
Another
is
to
the
west
of
cerrios,
where
cylo
ruffina
is
and
then
another
one
is
just
south
of
that
up
to
about
airport
road
and
then
the
fourth
one
is
just
below
bellamar.
I
think
that
area-
I
don't
have
them
in
front
of
me,
but
those
are
the
four
but
but
keep
in
mind
that,
because
we're
bringing
the
money
into
the
general
fund
using
a
revenue
replacement
grant,
we
have
a
lot
more
flexibility
to
use
it
for
the
whole
city.
P
We
don't
have
to
really
focus
on
just
the
census
tracts,
so
that
provides
mr
cho's
group
with
a
lot
more
flexibility
to
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
look
at
the
entire
city
versus
just
those
census,
tracts.
G
G
I
guess
I'm
saying
those
are
areas
that
are
most
marginalized
under
resourced,
and
so
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
focus
on
those
qualified
census
tracts
and
the
only
reason
why
we
wouldn't
is
so
that
we
can
kind
of
break
that
bureaucratic
red
tape.
Is
that
what
I'm
here?
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
not.
P
I
want
I
want
to
clarify
between
the
past
presidential
administration
and
the
current
presidential
administration.
They
changed
the
census
tracts.
So
in
the
past,
through
the
other
tax
act,
we
had
five
opportunity
zones
that
have
high
unemployment
high
poverty,
but
in
the
new
administration,
what
the
u.s
treasury
has
done
is
designate
new
census,
tracts,
there's
two
of
them
that
are
the
same,
but
there
still
are
a
lot
more
in
our
city
that
have
high
unemployment
and
high
poverty.
So
having
it
go
through.
The
general
fund
and
procurement
allows
her
to
do
both.
P
She
could
do
the
qualified
census
tracts
and
she
could
also
focus
on
those
opportunity
zones
that
we
knew
still
had.
You
know:
high
poverty
and
high
unemployment
throughout
the
city.
Okay,.
G
Thanks
for
clarifying
that
director
brown
and
that's
helpful,
I
think
that's
it
just
appreciate
chain
breakers
work
and
and
all
the
involvement
you've
had
directly
to
our
community
members
and
being
able
to
serve
them
where
and
meet
their
needs
where
they're
at
and
in
person,
and
so
I
just
think,
I'm
thankful
that
you're
our
partner
in
the
community.
I
think
it
helps
us
as
a
city
to
be
able
to
get
resources
to
where
we
need
where
they
need
to
go
with
the
help
of
partners
like
you
and
others
in
the
city.
B
Thank
you
all
for
having
us
here,
okay,
so
I
have
just
a
quick
question.
I
got
a
call
last
week
from
a
woman
who
said
she
was
being
evicted
because
her
landlord
said
that
the
pandemic
was
over.
Can
you
speak
to
you
mentioned
that
the
federal
moratorium
ends
the
end
of
this
month?
B
O
Yes,
thank
you
for
that
question,
madam
chair.
The
the
moratorium
at
the
federal
level
had
a
built-in
expiration
date
and
it
had
been
put
in
place
during
the
prior
presidential
administration
and
then,
when
the
new
administration
came
in,
they've
continually
been
extending
it.
O
However,
the
current
presidential
administration
did
indicate
that
they
would
not
extend
it
beyond
june
30th.
There
have
been
some
court
challenges
to
the
federal
moratorium,
but
they
didn't
survive
so
as
of
right
now.
O
The
belief
is
that
when
it,
when
the
federal
moratorium
ends
on
june
30th
that
the
biden
administration
will
not
be
further
extending
that
the
state
moratorium
does
not
have
a
built-in
expiration
date
or
a
sunset
clause,
the
way
that
the
new
mexico,
the
way
that
the
state
of
new
mexico
did
the
moratorium
is
they
acted
through
the
new
mexico
supreme
court,
and
I
mentioned
that
that
that's
again,
in
contrast,
it
was
in
an
executive
order
and
it
wasn't
legislative.
O
It
was
the
courts
so
in
the
state
of
new
mexico's
moratorium
that
one's
going
to
be
in
place
until
the
new
mexico
supreme
court
reconvenes
puts
it
on
their
calendar
and
hears
it
again
to
actually
lift
it.
When
that's
expected
to
happen,
I
don't
think
anyone
really
knows.
We,
of
course,
can
only
go.
I
think
by
maybe
some
indications
that
you
know
the
governor
has
said
things
in
the
news
that
they
expect
the
state
to
reopen
by
such
and
such
a
date.
O
I
would
expect
that
maybe
that's
when
those
state
orders
would
also
lift
right
around
that
time,
but
again,
there's
no
expiration
date.
O
Our
urging
is
that
those
particular
that
state
moratorium
should
stay
in
place
as
long
as
possible,
even
beyond
whatever
the
biden
administration
chooses
to
do
again,
whether
and
how
they
do
that
that's
up
to
them,
but
certainly
that's
our
urging
the
city's
order,
which
is
a
mayoral
proclamation
that
one
is
in
its
language,
tied
to
expire
when
the
state
one
does.
So.
If
the
supreme
court
lifts
it
tomorrow,
then
ours
will
expire.
O
At
the
same
time
again,
we
urge
the
city
and
to
find
ways
to
extend
that
moratorium
and
again
to
build
on
what
we
were
saying
as
far
as
really
focusing
on
the
more
vulnerable
neighborhoods
in
our
city,
if
it's
possible
to
do
tiered
lifting
tiered
protections
to
really
protect
those
particular
neighborhoods
and
census,
tracts
that
are
seeing
the
disproportionate
evictions
that
are
seeing
the
disproportionate
infections,
that's
where
we
think
it
could
also
be
really
really
effective
again.
O
What
that
might
look
like
is,
I
think,
a
big
question
exactly
what
that
looks
like,
but
we
believe
that
there
are
ways
to
make
those
those
emergency
protections
more
permanent
and
more
more
robust
for
tenants,
not
just
for
the
pandemic
right,
we're
seeing
that
this
emergency
existed
before
it
was
made
worse
and
now
is
incredibly
acute
right.
So
we
need
to
really
think
big.
I
think.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
That's
helpful.
I
don't
see
any
other
hands
up.
I
again
really
appreciate
you
coming
back
to
the
committee
with
your
second
report
as
as,
as
has
been
said
tonight,
I
think
we
are
looking
very
much
forward
to
your
third
report
and
I
look
forward
to
scheduling
you
when,
when
you're
ready,
so
that
we
can
hear
about
your
recommendations
and
and
the
deeper
dive
that
that
you'll
have
so
again,
thank
you
for
your
work
really
appreciate
you
being
here
tonight.
O
B
Great,
thank
you
all
right.
We
have
one
more
presentation
which
again
we
added,
which
is
item
7d.
We
are
just
going
to
hear
a
presentation
about
the
resolution
relating
to
income,
disparity
and
inequity,
authorizing
the
execution
of
a
membrane
of
understanding
with
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
and
the
santa
fe
community
college,
to
assist
with
launching
a
pilot
project
to
support
young
parents
enrolled
at
the
santa
fe
community
college
and
the
build
support
and
to
build
support
for
a
guaranteed
income
in
the
city
of
santa
fe.
I
I
don't
think
we
have
julie.
B
I
hope
we
didn't
just
lose
director
ochoa.
B
B
Who
we
need
all
right?
We
will
go.
Let's
go
to
item
c,
I
believe
counselor
garcia,
jamie
ray.
Do
you
want
to
introduce
item
c
on
the
consent
agenda.
D
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
like
to
recuse
myself
from
this
agenda
item.
As
I
work
for
the
federal
agency
that
administers
the
foster
grandparents
and
your
companion
and
retired
senior
volunteer
program.
B
Okay,
you
need
to
jump
off
yes,
so
he
can
jump
off
and
we'll
we'll
text
him
and
then
jamie
ray.
If
you
could
take
the
role,
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
this
item
for
approval.
B
A
B
Yes,
all
right,
let's
see
we
need.
B
That
and
terry
you're
muted
sorry,
we
need
to
text
counselor
garcia
to
come
back
and
I
did
connect
with
director
ochoa.
Hopefully
she
will
be
rejoining
here.
B
Sorry,
just
didn't
want
you
to
say
anything.
You
didn't
want
us
to
hear
all
right
still
waiting
for
director
ochoa.
So
we
will
go
to
item.
B
H,
okay:
item
h,
councilwoman
via
real,
you
pulled
this
item
jamie
ray.
Could
you
just
read
the
caption.
B
Okay,
mr
randall,
oh
no
did
he
did
we
lose
him
too.
P
B
Terrific,
so
thank
you,
director
brown,
if
you
wanna,
oh
yeah
or
yeah,
I
got
it
and
whoever's
doing.
G
G
Downtown
but
there's
an
area
where
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
pedestrians
and
their
access
and
then
the
ada
compliance
of
that
so
director
brown.
What
are
how
can
we
resolve
this
issue?
Because
I've
seen
a
couple,
I
don't
want
to
name
out
the
restaurants
per
se.
I
think
it's
just
they
were
trying
to
make
accommodations,
but
it's
becoming
a
problem
now
that
there's
more
cars
on
the
road,
so
just
wondering
what
the
plan
is
into
the
future
about
that
particular
issue.
P
Madam
chair
council
verial,
I
don't
have
an
answer
right
now.
I
have
to
check
in
with
our
land
use
folks
because
that's
sort
of
where
they
they
enforce
that
regulation,
but
we
are
seeing
a
a
huge
increase
in
tourism,
and
so
you
are
correct
that
there's
more
pedestrian
traffic
and
so,
while
it's
great
to
have
this
alfresco
dining,
it's
becoming
a
little
bit
more
problematic
and
a
safety
hazard.
P
So
I'll
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
an
answer
I'll
check
in
with
mr
isakson
and
the
team
with
the
code
enforcement.
From
from
that
standpoint,.
G
That
would
be
great.
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
only
not
just
ada
compliant,
but
also
we're
just
protecting
all
pedestrian
ways
with
these,
especially
in
areas
that
are
very
narrow
streets
and
we
can
talk
offline.
I
can
give
you
those
examples
that
I'm
concerned
about.
So
I
think
that's
been
my
main
concern
in
general
about
this,
but
I
think
overall,
it's
worked
well,
most
areas
related
to
allowing
for
restaurants
to
have
outdoor
patio
space.
So
that's
all.
G
F
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
rich
for
being
here.
I
just
had
a
quick
question.
It
does
mention
in
that
structures
erected
for
longer
than
90
days,
we'll
need
landis
approvals
and
anything
in
the
historic,
we'll
need
each
board
approval.
F
I
believe
that
this
has
already
occurred,
as
I'm
thinking
about
some
of
the
areas
downtown
and
and
have
we
already
started
that
process
have
we
seen
this
happen
yet,
where
they've
gone
through
the
approvals
where
they've
gone
through
h
board,
or
will
this
now
have
to
start
occurring,
because
I
mean
some
of
them
have
already
been
up
for
months
and
months
and
months
so.
P
Yeah
yeah
amendment
chair
councillor
cassette.
I
might
ask
jesse
maybe
to
go
in
to
answer
the
question,
but
I
think
you're
right
they've
already
gone
through.
This
is
just
extending
their
period,
but
this
turns
it
from
temporary
to
sort
of
semi-permanent.
So
so
there
is
some
enforcement
or
review
that
needs
to
happen.
Ultimately
when
they
apply.
P
So
you
are
correct
that
that
does
change
the
sort
of
type
of
structure,
but
keep
in
mind
that
this
is
for
city
property,
so
the
thunderbird
grill,
the
plaza
cafe,
and
I
think,
there's
another
one.
That's
that's
on
city
property
that
this
would
apply
to
so,
but
others
still
would
have
to
go
through.
You
know:
they'll
come
to
the
city
get
their.
You
know
permit
extended.
So
that's
when
they'll
have
that
additional
code
enforcement.
F
P
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
it's
eighth
for
review.
I
think
it's
a
reply.
Maybe
mr
gaine
could
could
give
some
legal
opinion
on
that.
L
I
wouldn't
say
thank
you,
madam
chair
rich.
I
don't
know
that
would
be
legal
opinion
and
I'm
certainly
no
land
use
expert,
but
I
did
talk
to
sally
a
little
bit
about
this
and
a
temporary
structure
which
needs
less
approvals
is
for
something
that
is
up
for
90
days
or
less.
L
So
if
a
restaurant
wanted
to
have
a
longer
lease
in
the
city's
right
of
way,
my
understanding
is
that
they
would
need
to
come
to
the
land
use
department.
If
it's
deemed
more
of
a
permanent
structure,
there
would
be
some
state
inspections
that
would
be
required
and
then
again,
if
it's
in
the
historic
districts,
then
there
would
be
they're
possible
to
be
some
h-board
approval
needed
as
well.
L
So
there's
there's
more
of
a
process
to
it
in
what,
in
this
more
permanent
consideration
of
it
than
what
we've
been
doing
during
covet.
F
G
L
Madam
chair
counselor,
the
current
provision
that
we
have
in
code
expires
at
the
end
of
october.
I
believe
so
that
will
remain
in
place
until
that
time
and
I
believe
that
the
state
states
provisions
expired
at
the
end
of
october
as
well
and
so
for
going
forward.
It
would
be
this
this
new
provision.
B
D
D
B
All
right
we
have
director
choa
back
and
sorry
about
that
and
we
are
going
to
go
to
what
was
item
7d
on
our
agenda
about
a
resolution
relating
to
income,
disparity
and
inequity,
authorizing
the
execution
of
an
ammo
mou
with
the
mayors
of
guaranteed
income
in
the
santa
fe
community
college,
to
assist
with
the
launching
of
a
pilot
project
to
support
young
parents
enrolled
at
santa
fe
community
college
and
to
build
support
for
a
guaranteed
income
in
the
city
of
santa
fe.
B
And
we
are
not
taking
action
on
this
item
tonight,
just
in
case
anybody's
joining
us
late.
But
we
are
hearing
a
presentation
about
what
this
resolution
seeks
to
do.
So,
director
ochoa.
You
can
help
in
this.
K
In
this
item,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee.
What
you
have
before
you
is
represents
about
six
months
of
work
that
we've
done
to
first
of
all,
work
with
community
partners
at
the
santa
fe
community
foundation
and
the
community
college
to
apply
for
this
opportunity
that
was
presented
by
the
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
weber,
joined
the
joined.
The
effort
in
I
believe
it
was
november,
and
we
worked
with
community
partners
to
identify
a
population
that
we
thought
could
benefit.
In
particular,
from
a
guaranteed
income
pilot.
K
We
were
awarded
the
500
000
grant
from
mayors
for
guaranteed
income,
which
enables
us
to
participate
in
their
nationwide
project
to
each
community,
selects
100
people
to
receive
a
guaranteed
income
for
a
year.
We
hope
to
extend
that
with
some
fundraising
to
two
years
and
to
increase
the
monthly
amount.
The
community
college
has
been
a
wonderful
partner,
as
has
the
expanding
opportunities
for
young
families
project
at
the
community
foundation,
which
we
originally
worked
with
to
develop
the
proposal.
K
K
You
know
often
people
are
working,
multiple
jobs
and
have
to
drop
out,
and
that
was
confirmed
by
the
community
college
folks,
and
this
will
really,
we
hope,
get
100
families
over
over
the
hump
in
terms
of
being
able
to
stay
in
school,
complete
a
certificate
or
a
degree
and
really
support
their
families,
and
with
that
I
can
open
it
up
for
questions.
B
Great,
thank
you.
Are
there
questions
from
the
committee.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
I
looked
through
the
materials
quickly
that
that
was
given
to
us
and
it
kind
of
conflicts
with
what
was
reported
in
the
media
today.
D
In
regards
to
the
what
I
would
call
a
commitment
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
santa
fe,
because
as
it
was
explained,
there
would
be
a
500
000
commitment
from
the
city,
and
I
don't
see
that
as
part
of
the
fir
and
in
conjunction
with
that,
I
don't
see
the
this
additional
staff
time
that
will
be
necessary
to
support
this
grant
included
in
the
fyr.
D
So
just
any
clarification
on
that
because,
as
this
moves
forward,
I
want
to
make
sure
I
fully
understand
what
we
are
committing
the
city
to.
K
K
We
don't
have
a
match
to
this
grant
in
any
way
shape
or
form.
So
it's
a
five
hundred
thousand
dollar
grant.
It
goes
to
the
santa
fe
community
college
foundation,
they're
the
fiscal
agent.
They
are
committed
to
helping
us
gather
additional
funds
through
fundraising
efforts
that
the
mayor
will
make
and
partners
will
make
to
contribute
to
growing
the
amount
of
money
that
can
be
given
to
the
families,
as
well
as
the
length
of
time
that
they
can
have
really.
K
The
the
guaranteed
income
project
also
comes
with
a
20
20
000
additional
funding
from
the
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
for
a
fellow
and
a
really
cool
feature
of
the
program.
This
is
on
another
a
phd
or
student
at
unm
we've
identified
somebody
that
we
that
we
would
like
to
present
for
this
opportunity
who
will
actually
coordinate
the
program
substantially.
So
that's
not
additional
staff
time
for
us.
The
staff
time
we've
put
in
is
you
know
part
of
writing
the
proposal.
We
considered
it
part
of
our
work
in
community
services.
K
Kind
of
an
extension
of
you
know
what
we
had
done
in
connect
with
direct
cash
reimbursements,
and
we
worked
with
the
community
foundation,
as
I
mentioned,
the
expanding
opportunities
for
young
family
folks
who
helped
us
with
the
proposal
as
well.
So
once
the
once
the
project
launches,
we
don't
anticipate
really
any
additional
staff
time
that
isn't
what
I
would
consider
part
of
our
normal
duties
as
community
services,
department
partners
and
with
community
partnerships.
I
hope
that
answers
your
question.
D
It
does
thank
you
so
much.
I
really
appreciate
that
because
I
was
not
aware
of
the
fellow
that
comes
along
with
this
project
to
support
it.
Is
there
a
way
and
for
and
maybe
it's
we
can't
redraft
the
fiscal
impact
reports,
but
is
there
a
way
to
document
the
not
only
the
the
revenue
coming
in
the
500
000,
but
the
20
000?
D
That's
supporting
that
because
I
think
that
those
those
are
critical
numbers
that
we
should
be
proud
of
in
that
sense,
should
we
accept
and
improve
this
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
I
said,
I
want
to
make
sure
not
only
us
is
the
governing
body,
but
the
broader
public
fully
understands
what
what
we're
getting
into
and
who's
receiving
what
etc.
D
I
I
guess
the
second
question
I
have
is
you:
you
had
mentioned
additional
commitments,
and
I
know
that
there's
the
the
going
to
be
the
fundraising
component,
but
do
we
anticipate
the
city
commission
committing
any
additional
resources.
K
K
I
know
there's
already
some
interest
from
philanthropic
partners
in
in
climbing
on
board,
and
it
may
just
be
that
for
this
100
people,
you
know
we
don't
have
a
we
don't.
The
city
doesn't
have
to
commit
any
revenue.
I
did,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
previous
presentation,
anticipate
using
some
of
the
rescue
plan
funds
to
infuse
those
funds
into
connect
and
not
to
get
off
subject,
but
I
think
we
could
provide
a
similar,
maybe
not
guaranteed
monthly
income,
but
maybe
look
at
a
regular
income
for
some
vulnerable
people
who
are
benefiting
from
connect.
K
But
no
to
answer
your
question.
I
didn't
anticipate
that
any
city
funds
would
would
be
needed
to
match
this.
I
think
it
sort
of
has
a
momentum
of
its
own
in
that
way,
and
okay
question
council
garcia
about
how
to
how
to
document.
I
think
we
could
have
done
a
better
job
in
the
memo
of
laying
that
out.
So
if,
if
you'd
like,
I
could
attempt
to
revise
that
as
it
goes
through
committee
to
council,.
D
Sure
that
would
be
great,
given
that
it
from
my
understanding,
it'll
now
go
to
public
works
and
utilities.
That
way,
some
of
us
will
have
a
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
fully.
I
guess:
go,
have
a
go
through
the
the
process.
D
I
guess
my
last
question
is
given
that
this
is
currently
for
one
year,
we're
hoping
for
two
years.
I
I
I
come
from
a
world
of
sustainability
and
I
don't
want
to
put
our
community
members
in
a
position
where
they
become
accustomed
to
these
resources
for
whether
it
be
a
year
or
two
and-
and
I
like
I
said-
I
haven't-
really
looked
at
this-
and-
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
in
the
packet
materials.
Maybe
this
is
something
to
be
added
for
next
presentation.
D
D
We
begin
to
provide
them
with
the
supports
from
the
onset,
knowing
that
these
resources
do
have
a
timeline
and
because,
as
we
all
know,
if
we
put
them
in
a
position
where
we
take
away
that
500
and
they've
been
planning
on
it
for
the
past
year,
it
can
put
them
in
a
much
worse
position,
and
so
I'd
like
for
us
to
really
really
put
that
into
our
planning
process,
as
we
potentially
get
this
project
off
the
ground,
because
I'd
hate
to
have
a
hundred
of
our
community
members
benefit,
but
then
100
being
a
were
far
worse
off
place
because
they
became
reliant
on
a
non-sustainable
source
of
income,
so
so
just
putting
that
seed
in
there
as
this
potentially
project
gets
off
the
ground.
D
B
Okay,
that
was
sort
of
a
question
director
ochoa.
Did
you
want
to
respond
to
that.
K
Madam
chair
counselor,
garcia,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
we're
benefiting
from
is
that
you
know
other
guaranteed.
Income
projects
have
been
launched
throughout
the
country
and
we
we
already
know
from
some
of
the
research,
for
example
from
the
stockton
california
project,
that
in
fact
I
well
first
of
all,
absolutely
I
think
the
the
parameters
of
the
project
need
to
be
very
clearly
communicated
to
all
of
the
participants.
So
they
don't
expect
something
that
is
not
going
to
occur
for
them,
and
I
think
that's
well
point
well
taken.
K
What
we
have
learned
from
from
other
guaranteed
income
projects
is
that
this
really
is
bridge
funding
for
folks
who
then
get
stabilized
that
you
know,
people
come
out
of
a
year
or
two
years
of
guaranteed
income
in
many
cases
employed
where
they
weren't
able
to
get
employed
before
having
been
able
to
finish
degrees
and
then
get
other
jobs
that
were
out
outside
of
maybe
service
industry
jobs
that
they
wanted
to
move
out
of.
So
some
of
the
research.
K
The
existing
research
has
already
shown
that
far
from
creating
dependency,
this
actually
creates
great
and
greater
independence
for
most
participants,
and
some
of
the
some
of
the
findings
are
very
stark
and
dramatic,
and
I'd
be
happy
to
share
that
with
the
council
as
well.
We're
hoping
to
see
that
replicated
and
the
project
is
being
evaluated
by
the
university
of
pennsylvania
and
they're,
keeping
us
to
a
very
rigorous
sort
of
research
model,
with
the
intention
that
a
federal
policy
can
be
developed
for
these
kinds
of
projects.
B
Okay,
I
think
councilor
garcia
was
done,
you
his
hand
is
still
up,
but
he's
just
nodded
that
he
is
done
so
councilwoman
via
real.
You
have
your
hand
up.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'm
supportive
of
this
project,
this
initiative,
it's
actually
an
initiative
that
was
not
called
guaranteed
income
in
the
past.
It
was
universal
basic
income
that
has
been
around
for
a
while
and
happy
to
see
that
the
former
stockton
mayor
started
really
moving
it
forward
and
getting
backing
and
funding
around
it.
It
would
be
great
in
our
country
if
they
actually
combined
this
with,
like
increasing
our
minimum
wage,
what
a
concept
so
I'm
supportive
of
this.
I
was
just
curious.
G
If
there's
I
hadn't
heard
of
this
app
steady
app,
it's
the
mechanism
to
distribute
the
cash
payments
to
participants,
have
who
vetted
that
and
how
did
they
was
it
fully
vetted?
Do
I'm
just
curious
if
that
was
that
just
told
that
that
was
their
mechanism
from
the
overall
overall
arching
entity
or
mgi?
K
Sorry,
madam
chair
councilwoman,
bial
steady.
It
was
the
app
that
was
recommended
by
the
mayors
for
guaranteed
income.
We
were
not
mandated
to
use
them,
our
team
did
meet
with
them
and
they
presented
to
us
and
we
were
very
comfortable
with
what
they
were
presenting.
As
you
all
recall,
we
had
partnered
with
the
family
independence
initiative
for
our
cash
discussions,
and
initially
we
thought
that
we
would
partner
with
them
for
this
project.
Steady,
doesn't
charge
any
administrative
fee
so
that
more
income
can
go
directly
to
the
participants.
K
In
addition,
the
university
of
pennsylvania
is
able
to
partner
with
steady
to
pull
data
more
easily
and
we
thought
it
would
just
be
going
with
the
grain,
so
it
was
a
little
bit
of
both.
It
was
the
recommended
one,
but
we
were
given
the
opportunity
to
make
sure
that
we
were
comfortable
with
them
as
well
and
from
their
presentation.
We
were.
G
Good
good
to
know,
and
I'm
wondering
if
steady
could
be
used
for
other
platinum
platforms
pathways
for
us
to
get
money
out
or
our
partners.
I'm
just
curious.
K
K
Idea
of
guaranteed
income
basic
income
is
taking
over
federally
across
the
nation.
There
are
lots
of
these
different
ways
of
getting
direct
cash
out
to
folks
and
it's
kind
of
exciting
to
see.
We
are
the
first
city
and
community
in
the
state
of
new
mexico
to
be
offering
a
guaranteed
income
project,
and
I
think
it's
one
of
the
ways
in
which
santa
fe
is
you
know
trailblazing
some
of
this
and
we're
excited
about
it.
G
K
Madam
chair
councilman
vr,
that's
correct
they're
they're
students,
they've
students,
who
are
also
parents
and
below
200
federal
poverty,
of
which
75
of
the
students
at
community
college
are
below
that
level.
B
F
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
director,
ochoa
for
being
here
and
talking
about
this.
I'm
really
very
excited
about
this
pilot,
and
I
really
emphasize
the
word
pilot
here
as
I
do
hope
that
this
can
expand
into
more
permanent
programming.
You
know,
as
you
mentioned,
there
really
is
this
piece
about
bridge
funding
and
what
this
can
do
for
individuals
in,
in
specific
time
periods,
a
couple
questions
one's
a
bit
of
a
technical
question.
I
believe
you
mentioned
this
yesterday
at
the
press
conference.
F
As
this
was
being
announced,
I
was
chasing
my
tiny
human,
so
I
may
have
missed
it,
but
there
is
a
difference
between
ubi
and
ugi
of
universal
basic
income
and
universal
guaranteed
income,
and
could
would
you
be
able
to
provide
any
more
information
on
that
for
my
own
edification.
K
Adam
chair,
counselor,
cassette
I'll,
do
my
best,
I'm
not
an
expert
in
this
realm,
but
I
think
councilwoman
vietral
kind
of
alluded
to
this-
that
you
know
a
universal
basic
income
has
to
do
with
living
wages,
and
you
know
establishing
that.
K
What
is
the
cost
of
living
in
a
community
and
what
do
people
need
in
order
to
be
able
to
to
survive
in
that
way
and
sort
of
it's
more
of
a
global
like
community-wide
definition,
whereas
this
universal
or
guaranteed
income
is
more
targeted,
you
know
to
a
specific
you're
guaranteed
a
certain
amount
of
income
for
a
certain
amount
of
time
which
to
counselor
garcia's
question
enables
you
ideally
to
have
less
income
volatility
at
a
time
which
can
really
take
you
off
track
in
terms
of
meeting
some
of
your
goals
toward
employment
or
education.
K
K
F
Okay,
thank
you
that
was,
that
was
a
very
good
basic
understanding.
So
I
appreciate
that
and
then
so
we
have
a
hundred
we'll
be
able
to
support
a
hundred
students.
K
So,
madam
chair
counselor
cassette,
we
began
in
our
research
design
with
our
partners
at
the
expanding
opportunities
for
young
families,
project
which
lives
at
the
community
foundation
and
20,
or
I
think
it's
18
of
those
students
will
participate
and
they
get
a
certain
level
of
supports
through
that
program.
One
of
the
nice
things
about
this
was
that,
in
order
to
get
a
control,
group
or
experiment
group
excuse
me
of
100,
we
had
to
ensure
that
the
community
college
would
duplicate
the
same
level
of
supports
that
that
group
is
getting.
So.
K
F
Okay,
thank
you
that,
and
that
is
great,
that
those
students
will
also
then
be
getting.
Those
additional
supports,
so
that'll
be
good
to
see,
and
then
I
know
payments
are
going
to
start
going
out
in
the
fall.
Is
the
plan
to
have
completed
fundraising
so
by
the
time
that
people
are
actually
starting?
The
program
we
will
be
able
to?
F
You
know
very
succinctly,
say
this
much
for
this
many
months
or
is
it
going
to
be
you
get
it
for
a
year
and
then
we'll
be
letting
you
know,
because
I
you
know
to
counsel
garcia's
point
that
could
be
a
little
bit
challenging,
especially
if
somebody's
starting
a
two-year
degree
program.
K
So
counselor,
madam
chair
counselor
cassette.
We
would
love
that
if
we
can
get
the
fundraising
you
know
completed
by
that
time.
At
the
same
time,
we
don't
want
to
close
the
door
on
folks
who
would
like
to
jump
in,
and
the
nice
thing
about
this
is
that
we
can
add
to
the
amount
they
receive
and
we
can
lengthen
the
amount
of
time
they
receive
it.
What
we
will
start
with
is
a
very
clear
communication
that
you
know
as
of
the
day
we're
ready
to
disperse.
K
If
we're
able
to
do
more
fundraising
and
then
we
hope
that
we
can
extend
that
to
two
years,
if
we're
able
to
do
more
fundraising,
what
we
do
know
right
now
is
if
we,
if
we're,
not
able
to
raise
a
penny,
100
people
will
be
getting
400
a
month
for
one
year
and
the
families
that
they
are
part
of
will
be
impacted
by
that.
So
at
bare
minimum,
it's
going
to
be
an
additional
400
a
month,
but
we're
already
seeing
a
lot
of
interest
from
area
partners
on
this
and
we
think
it'll
be
more.
F
K
Madam
chair
counselor
casa,
let's
dream
big
and
you
know
all
who
support
it
talk
to
those
who
they
think
would
support
it
financially.
I
think
we
could
do
something
like
that
and
it's
it's.
K
You
know
public
private
partnership
in
this
case.
It's
not
actually
it's
private
private
partnership
because
of
mgi
is
part
of
private
money,
but
you
know,
I
think,
with
the
city
sort
of
championing
this
and
looking
into
policy
implications
of
this.
I
think
that
that's
one
of
the
wonderful
I'm
glad
we
had
the
opportunity
to
present
a
quality
of
life,
because
I
think
what
we
will
need
your
guidance
on
is
how
do
how
might
we
want
to
convert
this
pilot
into
local
policy
change?
And
so
we
look
forward
to
continued
conversations
about
that.
F
Thank
you.
I
look
forward
to
those
conversations
as
well
and
I
I
do
really
want
to
thank
you
and
your
team.
I
know
I
know
that
you
guys
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
getting
this
application
and
to
really
bringing
this
opportunity
to
the
city,
and
thank
you
I
mean
this
is.
F
This
is
really
this
is
really
very
exciting
and
I
do
hope
that
it
is
a
springboard
rather
than
just
a
blip
of
a
program,
but
really
something
that
we
get
to
expand,
and
I
know
that
you
guys
will
continue
to
to
be
working
on
that,
and
I
I
just
cannot
thank
you
enough
for
this
effort,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
was
passed
along.
B
Thank
you.
I
I
too
just
want
to
add
my
support
to
this.
I
I
signed
on
to
this
bill
because
of
the
partnerships
that
are
involved.
The
fact
that
it
is
a
pilot
which
I
think
will
help
us
understand
the
benefits
of
this
kind
of.
B
I
think
you
called
it
bridge
funding
and
help
us
build
understanding
about
what
it
is
and
what
it
isn't
and
the
power
that
this
kind
of
a
resource
could
provide
to
changing
the
the
trajectory
of
people's
lives,
and
so
I
I'm
very
excited
to
see
where
it
leads
us
and
what
it
does
for
these.
These
first
families
that
that
have
the
opportunity-
and
I
I
think
it's
very
exciting,
and
I
I
want
to
applaud
you.
B
I
know
you've
had
a
very
long
day,
and
I
appreciate
you
hanging
in
there
with
us,
but
just
want
to
say
that
I
I
do
think
this
is
very
exciting
and
yeah
I'll
leave
it
there
for
now.
So
all
right,
I
don't
see
any
other
questions,
so
I
I
think
we're
done
have
a
have
a
good
evening
director
and
thanks
for
for
rejoining.
B
Oh,
you
were
fine.
We
marched
on
and
looped
back
around
all
right,
so
we're
at
the
end
of
our
agenda.
We
have
no
action
items
for
discussion
matters
from
staff.
Jamie
ray
did
you
have
anything
to
tell
us.
B
Okay,
thank
you
again
for
being
here
tonight,
really
appreciate
it.
Matters
from
the
committee.
B
Seeing
no
matters
from
the
committee
matters
from
the
chair,
our
next
meeting
is
wednesday
july
7th
and
we
will
see
you
at
the
next
meeting.
So
thank
you
all
for
hanging.
F
B
G
Can't
wait
I
just
I
just
want
to
make
a
statement.
We
would
part
of
the
reason
why
we've
had
so
many
back
and
forth
today
is
because
we
have
items
that
do
not
have
their.
I
packing
material
in
time
and
that's
what
creates
not
just
mistrust
but
frustration,
because
some
of
us
cannot
jump
on
quickly
and
review
something
at
the
last
minute
when
we
have
other
jobs
or
other
meetings,
and
I
think
that's
just
been
this
ongoing
saga.
G
I
don't
know
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
that
we
can
avoid
this,
because
it
would
be
it'll
prevent
less
stress
and
tension
for
our
committee
discussions
and
also,
as
it
goes
on
to
governing
body.
I
I
know
we
all
know.
This
is
just
really
frustrating.
We
had
three
items
like
that.
Well,
two:
okay,
two
items!
B
So-
and
I
I
hear
you
and
I
s-
and
I
I
said
this
afternoon
to
the
powers
that
be
that
we
didn't
have
the
packet
material
on
the
two
items
and
that
that
makes
for
grumpy
counselors
and
again,
I'm
sorry.
The
power
went
out
at
my
house,
because
I
was
prepared
to
hit
this
head
on
and
I
I
knew
that
we
didn't
have
the
packet
material
and
couldn't
take
action.
But
I
did
know
that
this
one
presentation
about
guaranteed
income
was
an
important
one
and
I
was
prepared
to
say
look.
B
We
won't
act
on
it.
Let's
just
hear
a
presentation
so
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
get
more
information
out
into
the
public
sphere
about
what
it
is
and
what
it
isn't
and
develop
some
understanding
among
this
very
important
committee
in
this
very
important
pilot.
So
I
I
the
problem
is
made
worse
by
the
fact
that
I
disappeared.
So
I
I'm
very
sorry
about
that.
But
I
I
hear
you
and
yeah.
B
Because
yeah
well,
one
way,
one
way
that
we
could
avoid
this,
and
this
is
something
that
you
know
we
may
want
to
think
about-
is
that
we
don't
introduce
things
until
they're,
ready
that
they're
they've
been
signed
off
by
by
the
city
attorney
and
they're
ready
to
go.
So
that's
that's
something
in
our
policies
and
procedures
that
we
may
down
the
road
want
to
change
that.
You
can't
introduce
something
until
you've
got
the
the
hard
copy
in
your
hand,
that
that's
a
final
version.
That's
that's
one
part
of
the
problem.
B
I
think
this
guaranteed
income
thing.
I
I
don't
know
you
know
it
seems
like
it's.
It's
happened
very
quickly
and
I
don't
know
you
know.
I
didn't
see
the
resolution
until
you
did
so
I
don't
know
how
that
all
went
down,
but
sometimes
we're
also
in
a
hurry,
and
so
we
don't
get
everything
as
fast
as
we
as
we
need
it.
So,
but
other.
G
Stuff,
you
know
there's
that
and
there's
actually
times
that
things
are
ready
to
go
and,
and
it
just
gets
delayed
for
other
reasons
I
won't
mention,
but
I'm
just
there's
a
lot
of
factors.
I
just
think
that,
like
in
terms
of
trying
to
build
trust
with
each
other
that
it
helps
to
have
that
so
that
we're
not
like.
Why
is
this
being
done
now
and
what's
the
deadline,
and
why
is
it?
Why
is
there
a
deadline?
B
Well,
one
easy
fix,
I
think,
would
be
you
can't
introduce
something
unless
you
have
a
signed
version
from
the
city
attorney's
office
and
that
may
slow
things
down
in
some
ways.
I
mean
this.
This
guaranteed
income
thing
is
a
little
bit
of
a
special
thing
because
we're
dealing
with
outside
partners-
and
you
know
how
that
all
comes
to
gel
at
the
right
time-
is
probably
a
separate
kind
of
deal.
Counselor
cassette
your
hand
as
well.
I'm.
F
Kind
of
kind
of
to
that
point
there
also
might
be
just
this
piece
where
we
need
to
go
off
of
the
baseline
assumption
that
we're
not
trying
to
trick
each
other,
as
opposed
to
the
baseline
assumption
that
we
are,
I
mean
the
part
of
it
is
just
I
like
it
there's
I
agree.
Yes,
we
need
to
have
our
packet
materials,
they
need
to
be
there,
but
it's
not.
I
don't.
F
I
don't
think
that
it's
always
we're
trying
to
slide
something
under
the
bus,
as
opposed
to
I
mean
things,
aren't
getting
done
as
fast
as
they
need
to
be,
which
is
definitely
a
problem,
but
I,
I
think,
kind
of
the
the
thoughts
and
motivation
there
there
you
know,
so
it's
not
that
the
problem
isn't
there
and
not
that
we
don't
need
to
make
sure
the
packing
materials
are
there,
but
but
the
assumption.
F
To
pull
the
wool
over
one's
eyes,
as
maybe
we
can
challenge
ourselves
a
little
bit
on
that.
B
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point,
all
right,
other
thoughts
on
this
counselor
rivera.
Yes,.
G
Last
in
the
last
administration,
we
didn't
have
this
many
last
minute
things
given
to
us,
so
I
know,
there's
different
factors
covet
has
a
factor
to
play
into
it.
It's
just
that
when
I
compare
things
I'm
like
god,
why
is
it
happening
so
often
this
time?
So
I
have
something
to
compare
it
to
you.
Don't
because
you
haven't
been
here
that
long.
So
it's
just
hard
to
there's
just
things
that
play
in
too.
B
A
Encounter,
I
think
that
if
you
don't
mind,
I
think
you
know
it
looks
a
little
weird
when
all
the
packing
materials
are
in
there
in
prime
go
for
some
of
us,
but
like
counselor,
garcia
can't
pick
up
certain
things
it
just.
I
don't
know
why
that
happens.
It's
happened
to
me.
I
think
it's
happening.
Councilwoman
bnail,
I
think
it
happens.
Councillor
cassette
said
it
happens
to
her,
but
that
just
doesn't
doesn't
look
right
and
it
doesn't
feel
right,
especially
if
you're
on
the
receiving
end
of
it.
So.
B
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Maybe
my
colleagues
could
help
clarify
something
for
me
when,
when
I've
tried
to
introduce
something
in
the
past,
I
was
told
that
I
would
have
to
hold
off
on
introducing
something
because
everything
needed
to
be
ready
by
the
friday
after
it
got
introduced,
and
so
is
that
not
true,
because
that
would
have
alleviated
this
situation.
D
I
understand
there
might
be
certain
circumstances
that
maybe
one
but
but
two
items
to
that
were
introduced
last
week
to
not
have
that
and
not
follow.
That
protocol
is
that
is
so
is
like.
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
there
a
formal
rule
that
we
have
everything
has
to
be
by
that
friday
or
is
that
internal
staff
decision?
B
What
we
what
we
aspire
to,
I
don't
know
that,
there's
a
rule-
and
you
know
that's
why
I'm
saying.
Maybe
that
is
something
in
our
in
our
procedures.
We
want
to
put
in
place,
and
you
know.
Sometimes
there
is
a
draft,
that's
that
of
something
like.
B
I
can
think
of
several
things
where
we
have
had
the
draft
ready
to
go
and
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
it's
ready
to
go
and
but
it
hasn't
been
signed
off
by
the
city
attorney's
office,
and
you
know
they
won't
put
it
in
the
in
the
official
packet
until
it
is
and
but
they
will
let
it
be
introduced.
B
So
I
think
you
know
if
we
put
something
in
our
procedures
that
says
until
the
city
attorney
signs
off
on
it,
you
can't
introduce
it
so
I
I've
certainly
had
resolutions
that
are
written
and
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
they're
done.
They
haven't
been
signed
off
by
the
city
attorney's
office,
but
they're
done
in
my
mind
and
they've
been
introduced
and
then
sometimes
you
know,
there's
a
bottleneck
in
the
city
attorney's
office
and
it
you
know,
doesn't
get
the
sign
off
in
time
for
the
meeting.
B
So
and
I
don't
know
what
all
goes
on
you
know
or
where
I
mean
my
assumption,
is
the
sign
off
the
bottleneck
is
there,
but
there
may
be
other
space
places
where
it
gets
bogged
down,
and
you
know
I
think
this
is
something
that
you
know.
We
probably
need
to
look
at
and
I
and
I
know
it
makes
us
grumpy
and
rightfully
so,
because
you
can't
be
voting
on
something
when
you
don't
have
all
the
information.
A
Fair
and
I
think
when
you
have
a
staff
trying
to
meet
the
hipper
requirements
of
of
having
to
have
an
agenda
out
72
hours
in
advance,
that
puts
them
in
a
position
where
most
of
them
don't
work
saturday
and
sunday,
so
they
try
to
get
it
done
as
quickly
as
possible.
So
they'll
put
the
agenda
out
sometimes
without
all
the
all
the
materials
they
want,
all
the
materials.
I
think
they
ask
for
all
the
materials,
but
you
know
things
happen
and
they
aren't
always
readily
available.
B
Okay,
we
will
pledge
to
do
better
and
again
sorry
my
power
went
out
which
exacerbated
everything.
So
if
there's
no
other
comment,
we
will
be
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
tonight.