►
From YouTube: Quality of Life
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
D
C
A
A
D
A
E
A
Cuz
I
skipped
to
the
I,
always
do
that.
Alright
approval
of
the
minutes.
You
have
changes
yes
from
a
2020.
E
Yes,
so
if
you
look
at,
let
me
look
it
all
right,
so
I'm
page
starting
on
page
7,
when
we
get
to
item
7,
sorry
page
5
of
the
minutes.
If
you
go
to
item
7,
it
talks
about
city
funding
for
nonprofits,
so
that
that
conversation
happened
after
we
had
item
number
8
the
consideration
of
reopening
sent
of
him
with
our
guests
so
that
that
happened
first,
so
they
need
to
be
switched.
E
Does
that
make
sense
Linda
just
to
make
sure?
Yes,
okay
and
then
the
other
thing
is
it
says
when
I
left
at
6:59
I
guess
that
was
the
time
I
left,
but
it
probably
should
be
placed
where
it
happened,
which
would
be
on
page
6
right
after
what's
currently
page
6
right
after
or
right
before,
miss
Sanchez
reviewed
the
agency
they
fund.
That's
that's
where
I
left
before
that
I
left.
So
just
so,
you
know
where
to
place
that
and
that's
it
all.
A
D
C
A
A
This
has
been
a
big
week.
Four,
the
three
committees
of
the
governing
body,
the
three
main
committees
and
we've
heard
the
presentation.
The
the
big
overarching
presentation
on
the
budget
Monday
night
at
finance,
then
pub
the
Public
Works
and
Public
Utilities
Committee
heard
it
again
last
night,
I
did
not
attend
that
meeting,
but
I
did
listen
to
the
meeting
that
was
on
YouTube
and
I.
Think
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
for
the
budget
overview
I'd
like
to
break
it
into
two
pieces.
A
I
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
do
the
overview
presentation
for
a
third
time,
but
I
think
we
should
dive
into
a
couple
things.
So
on
that
one
we
we
will
start
with
a
conversation
about
what
what
I
think
we're
all
now
talking
about.
Is
the
bridge
plan
the
the
plan?
That's
going
to
get
us
through
July
and
August,
recognizing
that
the
furloughs
currently
in
place
expire,
the
end
of
June,
so
I
want
to
I
want
to
take
that
piece
and
and
there's
some
things.
A
I
think
we
need
to
talk
about,
and
then
the
second
piece
is
to
dive
into
the
FY
21
pay
plan
options
from
the
presentation,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
about
those
last
night
and
then
from
there.
I
want
to
go
to
the
second
agenda
item,
which
is
the
imagining
Santa
reimagining
Santa
Fe
survey
results
and
because
we're
the
quality
of
life
committee
we're
going
to
do
a
little
deeper
dive
and
I've
asked
Jennifer
to
share
her
screen.
She
has
a
presentation
that
will
walk
us
through
that
survey
in
greater
detail
and
I.
A
A
So
with
that,
I
would
like
to
go
to
the
conversation
about
the
bridge
plan
and
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
different
ways
we
can
go
forward
on
this
bridge
plan.
One
way
is
to
extend
the
current
furloughs
for
another
two
months.
That
certainly
would
be
one
path,
I
believe
there
was
conversation
last
night
at
public
utilities
and
public
works
about
an
idea
of
going
to
four-hour
furloughs
across
the
board
and
I
would
throw
in
that.
A
You
know
we
are
still
the
virus
is
still
with
us.
Is
it
a
smart
idea
for
us
to
be
opening
a
facility
with
the
public
health
concern
still
there,
and
if
we
can,
you
know,
maybe
it
makes
this
for
our
furlough
idea,
something
that
actually
is
something
that
we
should
do,
because
we
will
need
people
to
be
working
to
in
order
to
open
the
facility
or
facilities.
So
maybe
I
guess
it
would
be
helpful
to
hear
from
the
staff
about
you
know
what
we
could
do
if
we
did
a
four
hour
furlough
across
the
board.
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
house,
I
can
start,
and
then
we
can
turn
to
Mary
for
some
details.
What
you
mentioned
has
the
bridge
plan
I.
Think
again,
we've
we've
made
a
lot
of
progress
Monday
to
Tuesday
and
into
today,
and
so
I
think
seeking
you,
all's
feedback
and
clarity
about
what
you
would
like
to
see
in
this
so-called
bridge
plan
that
would
come
forward
for
a
vote
next
week
is
really
helpful.
F
Again,
as,
as
you
mentioned,
the
reason
we
did
what
we
did
it.
The
first
place
was
because
of
the
stay
at
home
order
and
the
need
to
close
particular
facilities
due
to
the
health
crisis.
Things
are
evolving
and
changing.
It's
still
we're
still
in
very
uncharted
territory,
but
there
have
with
some
changes
that
the
government,
with
the
governor's
order
there
are
there,
is
some
flexibility.
F
So
we
we've
all
been
the
recipients
of
a
lot
of
emails
around
rec
centers
and
what's
the
right
thing
to
do,
if
we
could
open
some,
if
we
could
open
all
of
them,
one
of
them
some
of
them,
they
would
all
still
be
in
limited
capacity
again
because
of
the
the
health
order
is
still
in
place.
But
I
think
if
that
is
certainly
that
certainly
becomes
a
an
option.
If
we,
as
we
move
forward.
A
So
and
if
we
had
a
four
hour
furlough
that
would
allow
us
to
bring
back
folks
and
give
some
hours
back
in.
That
would
allow
us
to
actually
open
again,
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
not
sure,
two
things
how
many
facilities
we
could
order
open
with
the
workforce
level
we
have
and
then
how
many
facilities
it
would
be
smart
to
open,
realizing
that
this
is
a
new
era
that
we're
in
and
we're
gonna
have
to.
A
F
A
D
D
Is
we
do
have
folks
who
were
eligible
for
unemployment,
but
then
we
have
folks
that
make
too
much
money
who
were
not
eligible
for
unemployment,
which
meant
they
were
still
going
to
see
a
40%
reduction
in
their
pay
and
to
have
our
team
members
not
only
go
through
these
past
two
months
with
this
current
structure,
but
another
two
months,
which
would
be
four
months
total
at
40%
pay
is,
is
unallowable
are
unacceptable
to
me.
I,
don't
think
we
it's
it's
not
fair,
that
we
do
that.
Just
quick
clarification.
G
D
Thank
thank
you
Mary
for
for
clarifying
that,
and
so
I'm
gonna
refer
back
to
the
numbers
Iran
and
they
for
five
pay
period,
so
I
mean
that
definitely
would
need
a
little
bit
of
adjusting
and
and
for
clarification,
I
think.
Last
night
it
was
I
didn't
ask
for
four
hours.
It
was
for
an
equitable
eight
hours
across
the
board,
but
but
I
would
even
look
at
an
equitable
six
hours
across
the
board,
which
would
mean
twelve
hours
per
pay
period
at
five
pay
periods.
D
That
was
one
and
a
half
million
dollar
savings,
which
was
almost
fifty
thousand
dollars
more
in
savings
than
the
plan
that
was
approved,
so
that
I
would
like
to
request
numbers
to
be
ran.
If
we
did
a
across
the
board
six
hour
per
week,
12
hour
per
pay
period,
furlough
for
folks
III
don't
want
I,
wouldn't
want
to
look
at
a
one
full
day.
I
think
six
hours
can
be.
D
Our
department
directors
can
figure
out
how
they
work
that
out,
whether
it's
split
up
three
hours
one
day,
three
hours
or
another
day,
I
think
that's
up
to
the
department
directors.
But
if
we
look
at
six
hours
per
week,
12
hours
per
pay
period,
it
still
saves
more
money
than
what
was
approved
last
time.
So
I
would
like
to
request
the
numbers
for
that,
but
but
that's
my
input,
I
think
we
at
least
we
need
to
look
at
different
figures
and
what
we
approved
last
time
with
that
madam
chair
I.
H
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
You
know
similar
to
what
you
were
saying:
I,
don't
think
that
we
are,
in
the
same
place,
to
continue
with
the
current
for
a
little
plan,
I'm,
not
in
favor,
with
continuing
with
the
current
brillo
plan.
I
am
really
interested
in.
What
we
have
right
now
is
I
believe
option
three
for
really
looking
at
that
from
the
furlough
perspective
of
four
hours
a
week
across
the
board
and
then
looking
at
those
pay
cuts
for
the
directors.
H
So
while
I
agree
with
councilor
Garcia
that
the
six
hours
a
week,
you
know
is
also
something
I'd
like
to
see
priced
out.
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
what
that
might
look
like
in
terms
of
being
able
to
keep
our
parks
and
our
trails
clean
and
our
solid
waste
being
able
to
get
everything,
as
well
as
the
interest
and
being
able
to
provide
some
services
and
some
rec
centers
and
seeing
that
will
allow
us,
knowing
that
with
work
in
the
rec
centers.
H
It's
going
to
be
more
timely
because
there
is
going
to
be
the
added
cleaning
there's
going
to
be
the
added
sanitation
that
is
going
to
add
some
hours
to
those
rec
centers,
so
that
is
where
I'm
really
leaning
towards
for
this
bridge
plan.
I
really
would
I'd
like
to
see
our
employees
get
off
that
16
hour
furlough
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
that's
where
I'm
at
right
now
I'd
be
interested
to
hear
my
other
counselors,
but
I
think
that
that
could
be
a
good
temporary
plan.
So
we
look
at
the
permanent
situation.
H
E
G
E
E
E
G
Well
then,
I'm,
chair
councillors,
this
is
I've
added
in
a
substitute
for
option
three
counselor
via
trial.
This
is
what
you
would
requested
last
night
and
I,
also
added
in
not
just
the
salaries
were
presented
previously,
so
just
being
displayed
and
in
column
three
for
each
of
these
tables,
it's
not
just
the
salary
savings,
but
also
the
benefits
savings.
All
of
these
salary
dependent
benefits
such
as
para
retiree
health
care,
FICA
that
that
type
of
salary
dependent
benefit
again,
options
have
three
columns.
The
first
is
the
percentage
and
the
dollar
annual
salary
that
it
impacts.
E
G
Correct-
and
so
here
we
took
one
example:
yes
did
you
send
this
to
us,
madam
chair
councillor,
Bri?
Oh
no,
we
can
go
ahead
and
email
you
this.
We
took
the
example
that
councilor
Ken
Sanchez
was
just
describing
the
first
15%
for
lower
pay
cut
for
directors
and
a
10%
for
lower
pay
cut
for
the
remainder
of
the
city.
Employees
and
we
cost
that
out
per
pay
period
and
to
councilor
Garcia's
question
is
right
on
how
many
pay
periods
this
would
be
effective
for
four
pay
periods.
G
The
proposal
would
be
to
continue
to
have
a
15%
temporary
pay
decrease
or
a
furlough,
which
would
be
the
six
hours
that
councilor
Garcia
was
referencing
earlier
for
directors
and
a
four
hour
option,
or
a
ten
which
is
equivalent
of
a
10%
pay
decrease,
but
in
the
form
of
a
furlough,
which
is
what
some
of
our
employees
are
currently
on
for
all
employees.
The
cost
savings
here
would
be
for
21
employees
per
pay
period
would
be
six.
Seventeen
point
six
thousand
and
for
the
total
of
four
pay
periods
would
be
70.3.
G
The
four
hour
furlough
plan
would
impact
nine
hundred
and
forty
employees
and
the
per
pay
period
estimate
would
be
two
hundred
and
thirty.
Six
thousand
and
total
for
four
pay
periods
would
be
nine
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand.
So
these
two
combined
would
be
just
over
1
million
for
the
two
month
period,
beginning
with
the
first
pay
period
in
July,
which
is
starts
on
July,
11th
and
continuing
or
for
pay
periods.
After
that,
through
September
4th.
E
Yeah
I
guess
does
that
meet
then
the
what
I
call
filling
the
budget
gap.
I
I
didn't
like
to
use
cost
savings
because
I
don't
feel
like
cutting
employees.
Your
salaries
and
furloughs
are
savings
in
any
shape
or
form.
So
I
guess
in
terms
of
filling
the
budget
gap
that
amount
calculated
right
now
for
this
bridge
proposal
fits
the
needs
that
we
had
initially
when
we
were
first
contemplating
furloughs.
A
Yes,
so
if
maybe
maybe
I
can
help,
so
when
we
were
first
talking
about
furloughs,
we
were
trying
to
get
to
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year
right,
which
is
through
the
end
of
June.
This
bridge
proposal
is
but
the
beginning
of
the
new
fiscal
year
while
we
develop
a
budget
which
won't
go
into
effect
until
September
1st.
So
it's
a
it's
a
different
period
of
time,
I
mean
and
it's
a
different
budget
right.
A
So
when
the
last
furlough
we
were
talking
about
was
the
last
fiscal
year
and
and
we
had
facilities
closed
and
stay
at
home
water,
so
it
was
sort
of
a
different
animal.
You
know
for
ease
I
mean,
maybe
ease
is
the
wrong
word.
I
mean
we
could
just
continue
that
one
or
we
could
tweak
it
because
we're
now
in
a
new
environment
where
we
are
not
under
the
same
level
of
stay-at-home
order,
the
economy
is
opening
up
a
little
bit
our
facilities.
We
could
decide
that
we
want
to
open
up
a
little
bit.
G
E
A
Thank
you,
yeah
and,
and
just
you
know,
to
make
sure
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
So
whatever
we
do
during
the
bridge
period
is
going
to
help
with
the
hundred
million
dollar
deficit
we
are
facing
in
this
fiscal
in
the
in
the
coming
fiscal
year,
FY
21.
So
you
know
at
this
point
it's
so
this
would
be
1
million
in
100
million,
but
basically
it's
a
stopgap
measure
to
get
us
to
that
point.
What
do
we
have
that
new
budget?
A
So
it's
not
like
we're
trying
to
hit
a
particular
number
we're
just
looking
at
here's,
our
new,
you
know
reality
and
the
fact
that
we
can
we
have
the
ability
to
the
economy
is
opening
up.
We
could,
if
we
think
it's
a
good
idea,
potentially
open
up
a
rec
center
or
two,
and
we
then
would
have
work
for
city
employees
to
do
and
therefore
it
kind
of
makes
sense
that
we
might
want
to
change
our
furlough
plan.
I
Were
you
raising
your
hand?
Yes,
how's?
My
audio
on
this
new
device,
good,
okay,
great
I,
was
just
gonna,
make
the
point
that
anything
we
don't
save
during
the
bridge
period
will
be
additional
savings
that
have
to
be
made
during
the
remainder
ten
months
of
the
fiscal
year.
So
it
just
puts
us
in
a
more
difficult
position
in
two
months
down
the
lane
so
I
just
just
to
keep
that
in
mind.
A
H
I
was
just
going
to
say
you
know
the
similar
piece,
if
that's
going
to
help
us
with
that
budgetary
shortfall
for
next
fiscal
year,
but
also
whatever,
if
we
you
know
we'll,
have
to
make
up
the
cost
somewhere.
So
if
it's
not
with
the
furlough
plan
here,
Mary
I'm,
sorry,
could
you
tell
me
what
the
total
for
that
plan
was
with
both
I
didn't
do
the
math
I
should
have
just
done
some
adding
up?
Let
me
pull
it
up
again
hold
on
one.
Second.
G
Can
you
see
that?
Yes,
okay?
So
it's
the
total
for
the
for
pay
periods?
We've
split
up
into
two
different
pieces:
the
15%
pay
decrease
our
furlough
for
directors
and
the
for
which
the
total
for
the
four
pay
periods
would
be.
Seventy
point
three
thousand
and
the
for
our
furlough
for
approximately
nine
hundred
and
forty
employees,
so
that
is
nine
hundred
and
forty-five
thousand
for
those
four
pay
periods.
That's
about
a
million
fifteen
and
then.
H
H
Was
just
wondering
if
we
do
a
furlough
versus
a
pay
decrease
for
directors
if
it
changes
the
total,
you
know,
I
agree
with
counselor
Via
Rail
I
hate
the
words
cost
savings,
but
I
don't
have
a
better
one.
In
terms
of
you
know,
FICA
and
on
all
those
other
benefits
pieces
that
might
go
into
there.
Gotcha.
I
A
All
right
before
I
go
to
counselor
beta
counselor
Rivera.
Did
you
have
anything
dad
I.
C
Just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
the
options
that
we
looked
at
earlier
are
really
talking
about
for
next
fiscal
year
for
next
budget
session
and
really
the
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
sooner
than
later
for
the
bit
bridge
proposal.
So
whatever
it
is,
we're
going
to
give
direction
on
that
should
probably
be
are
pressing
focus
right
now
that
was
it
yeah.
A
Thank
You
counsel,
Rivera
I,
totally
agree
this.
This
is
the
bridge
proposal
is
what
we
need
to
have
in
front
of
us
to
vote
on
next
week,
and
so
why
I
wanted
to
start
with
that
and
then
we'll
circle
back
and
talk
about
the
slide
on
page
14
that
talks
about
the
FY
21
pay
decrease
options
and
that
that's
a
continuing
conversation
so
with
that
I'll
go
to
counselor
beta
Thank,
You
counselor
for
your
patience.
Thank
you.
B
Madam
chair,
this
question
is
for
Doral
when
we
considered
the
16-hour
furloughs
versus
the
four
hours.
The
rationale
was
those
that
were
given
16
hours,
weren't
having
to
report
to
work
at
all.
Even
they
didn't
even
have
to
telecommute.
Are
we
gonna
still
have
that
situation
with
certain
employees
where
they're
not
having
to
work
at
all
during
this
bridge
period,.
F
Chair
Abeyta,
thank
you
for
the
question.
I
think
that
was
again
a
key
component
of
where
we
were
where,
as
we
because
of
the
health
pandemic,
we
were
forced
to
close
particular
facilities
and
there
are
some
cases
where
jobs
are
not
able
to
be
done
from
home
or
otherwise
we
have,
for
the
most
part
in
alter
I'll,
look
to
Bernadette
for
additional
specifics,
but
we
have
eliminated
our
our
co
bid
leave.
We
are
no
longer
allowing
for
that.
F
B
Cuz
there
because
I
mean
when
we
talk
about
fair
and
equitable.
Some
of
the
comments
I've
received
in
emails
and
such
from
employees
have
been
well
I
still.
I
have
to
show
up
to
work
for
32
hours,
even
if
it
is
telecommuting,
I
still,
but
then
there's
other
employees
that
don't
have
to
do
it
all,
and
so,
but
if
you're
saying
now
that
over
this
bridge
period,
that
we'll
find
something
for
them
to
do
for
those
32
hours.
So
it
is
fair
and
equitable.
B
B
As
far
as
the
rec
centers
go
right
now,
under
the
governor's
guidelines
for
youth
and
youth
programming-
and
this
isn't
just
youth
programs,
but
even
the
high
schools
are
not
able
to
have
their
camps
because
for
one
you
can't
have
more
than
ten
kids
in
the
same
room,
regardless
of
the
size
of
the
room.
The
kids
cannot
share
a
basketball
or
football
or
soccer
ball.
They
cannot
scrimmage,
so
I.
Think
really.
The
only
thing
kids
can
do
right
now
for
now
is
swim
with
the
adults
in
the
lane
and
and
even
that's
gonna
be
limited.
B
So
my
concern
with
when
we
make
a
decision
or
you
do
to
open
a
rec
center
I,
don't
think
right
now.
It's
realistic
that
kids
are
gonna,
be
able
to
go
to
the
rec
center.
They
probably
could
to
swim,
but
even
and
one
or
two
at
a
time,
but
that's
it
so
I.
There's
this
perception
or
this
idea
that
kids
are
allowed
to
go
in
and
just
like
before
kovaydin.
That
is
absolutely
not
the
case.
B
Even
high
schools
have
canceled
their
traditional
summer,
programs
for
basketball
and
other
fall
sports
and
winter
sports,
because
it's
just
coaches
are
saying
it's
impossible
to
to
have
groups
of
kids
together.
So
I
just
want
you
to
be
aware
of
that
when
you,
when
you
make
your
determination
as
far
as
the
rec
centers,
that's
not
to
say,
though,
that
maybe
we
open,
we
don't
open
up
or
we
do
open
a
small
Center.
B
A
H
B
A
Okay,
so
yeah
so
I
think
these
are
all
things
that
we're
gonna
need.
You
know
that
have
to
be
considered
if,
if,
if
a
rec
center
is
is
opened,
who
would
be
able
to
use
the
rec
center
and
clearly
there
are
a
lot
of
rules
now
and
a
lot
of
things
that
have
to
be
done
in
order
to
keep
them
it's
safe
for
the
public,
and
you
know
we
do.
A
The
other
thing
that's
changed
since
since
in
this
year,
and
with
the
last
furlough
plan
is
the
fact
that
we've
got
our
parking
folks
who
are
now
working
which
we
didn't
have
we
are,
you
know
we
weren't
charging
for
parking,
so
there
were
a
lot
of
parking
people
who
it
wasn't
necessary
to
have
them
because
we
weren't
charging
for
parking.
So
councillor
BL,
you
have
your
hand
up.
E
Maybe
not
at
this
meeting
but
in
the
future
will
will
we
be
explained
and
given
kind
of
a
timeline
of
how
the
facilities
will
be
opened
and
what
the
parameters
will
be,
and
maybe
someone
knows
where
that's
gonna
go
right
now
so
because
people
have
been
asking
us
and
they
want
to
know
what
we're,
what
we're
doing
and
and
I
say.
Well,
I,
don't
know
yes,
so
can
you
give
us
an
idea
Jarell
about
what,
when
we
might
know,
Adam.
F
Chair
councillor
for
Al
I
appreciate
the
comments
and
we've
all
been
getting
them
and
we're
working
diligently
on
a
plan,
and
you
know
it's
becoming
more
clear.
As
the
health
piece
comes
more
clear
and
as
our
budget
piece
becomes
more
clear,
so
I
think
next
week's
vote
on
the
furlough
will
be
really
instructive
and
will
allow
us
we
can
have
a
plan
prepared
to
based
on
how
that
the
advice
you
give
us
tonight
and
how
we
present
that
vote
next
week
and
we
can
tie
that
all
in
together
and
so
then
it
would
be.
F
E
That
answer
your
question:
it
does
I
think
I
just
wanted
a
yeah
I
realized
that
there's
certain
there's
information
you
need
in
order
to
make
those
decisions.
At
the
same
time,
it
also
seems
flipped
to
because,
if
there's
parameters
that
we
have
to
follow-
and
we
can
only
have
certain
number
of
people
and
we
need
extra
staff
for
cleaning
and
there's
all
these
things-
procedural
things
we
have
to
do-
then
it
almost
doesn't.
E
It
almost
made
dictate
how
many
staff
would
be
able
to
be
utilized
and
if
we
even
open
at
all
like
if
the
cost
benefit
of
it
would
be
like.
Does
that
even
make
sense
and
actually
thinking
about
it,
the
public
and
how
they're
accessing
our
facilities
they
may
not
even
get
to
access
them,
because
we
have
this
like
number
limit
and
so
I'm
just
I'm,
just
speaking
out
loud,
because
I
just
can't
figure
it
out.
E
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
and
I
know
our
staff
is
really
like
digging
in
you
know,
swim
swimming
pool
staff
really
have
figured
out.
At
least
they've
told
me
that
they
know
of
something
that
would
work
that
they
could
be
careful,
they'd,
follow
the
sanitation
requirements
and
then
be
able
to
open.
You
know
in
a
safe
way,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
that
out
and
I
guess.
E
A
So
I
just
just
emphasize
and
make
sure
we're
all
clear
about
this.
So
there's
two
components
to
this
right:
there's
the
the
ability
to
open
and
do
so
safely
and
within
the
rules
that
have
been
set
out
by
the
governor
to
keep
the
public
safe.
Then
there
is
also
you
know
our
budget
situation,
which
will
dictate
whether
we
can
you
know
whether
we
have
the
money
to
open
and
whether
long-term
you
know
some
of
these
facilities
will
be
closed
for
an
extended
period
of
time
or
an
indefinite
indefinite
period
of
time.
A
A
I
did
want
to
keep
it
to
two
hours
and
we're
already
at
quarter
of
six,
so
I
think
Darrell.
Do
you
have
that
direction?
I
think
you
know
for
next
week's
bridge
plan
kind
of
it
sounds
like
there's
not
a
lot
of
interest
in
extending
the
current
furloughs,
maybe
they're
there.
You
know.
There's
you
know
whether
it's
six
or
four
unclear
and
I
do
think.
A
Okay
with
that,
thank
you
yes,
he's
nodding,
yes
and
I.
Think
let's
go
quickly!
I
just
I
I
know
there
was
a
lot.
We've
had
a
lot
of
conversation
about
the
FY.
21
pay
decrease
options
and
that
was
on
page
14
of
our
of
our
of
our
packet
from
last
night
in
the
night
before
Mary
has
shown
us
an
another
option
that
tells
her
theory
all
had
had
brought
up
last
night.
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
put
that
screen
back
up.
A
A
A
I
think
why
we
need
to
while
we're
not
in
a
position
to
vote
on
any
one
of
these
options
next
week,
because
we
need
to
see
what
this
does
to
our
service
levels
and
and
and
that's
just
one
of
the
factors
that
goes
into
which
option
we
pick
I
mean
there
seem
to
be
last
night.
Some
some
some
support
for
option,
one
which
I
think
is
sort
of
a-
is
a
thought
that
we
want
people
who
make
higher
salaries
to
make
a
bigger
contribution.
A
A
J
Cherri,
yes,
this
is
burn
so
with
option
one.
Sorry
I!
Let
me
get
my
glasses
on,
let's
see
with
option
one,
because
the
the
differences
between
the
first
tier
and
the
second
tier
are,
the
difference
is
so
significant.
You
could
potentially
have
employees
who
are
directly
reporting
to
someone
or
two
or
three
tiers
down,
possibly
making
more
than
the
person
that
they
report
to.
So
that
would
be
an
example
of
of
inversion.
I.
Think
I
can't
remember
if
it
was
last
night
or
Monday
night.
J
Aaron
also
explained
a
challenge
that
we
could
have
if
we
have
someone
who
is
making
say,
eighty
nine
thousand
and
then
or
fifty
thousand
and
then
forty
nine
thousand
in
the
same
job
classification
and
it
kind
of
distorts
the
salary
that
they're
making
and
so
there's
some
inequity
there
for
the
same
position
and
the
same
job
that
they're
doing
so.
It
does
create
some
challenges
with
regard
to
our
classification
and
compensation
system.
D
Quick
question
on
that
point,
madam
chair.
Yes,
'burn,
do
we
have
any
instances
of
inversion
currently
happening,
I
know
and
I've
been
in
workforces
where
you
know,
there's
a
long,
tenured,
employee
and
just
due
to
increases
in
pay
over
their
tenure,
they
might
be
making
more
than
their
manager,
who
might
have
just
gotten
hired
a
year
ago.
So
do
we
have
any
instances
of
that?
Currently,
madam.
J
Chair
councillor
Garcia
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I'm,
not
sure,
but
I
would
imagine,
because
we
have
so
many
long-term
city
employees
that
that
could
be
the
case.
But
again
because
this
structure
is
the
percentages
are
so
vastly
different
based
on
the
tiers.
It
would
be
not
just
like
a
few
percentage
points
or
a
few
dollars
more.
It
would
be
significant
and
it
would
be
not
really
commensurate
with
the
level
of
responsibility
and
the
level
of
level
of
responsibility
and
job
duties.
J
H
Thank
you
so
much.
You
know.
I
also,
I
think
that
we
often
talk
about
this
kind
of
at
the
higher
end
of
the
scale.
But
one
thing
that
concerns
me
with
this
plan
as
well
is
that,
if
somebody's
making
thirty
five
thousand
then
with
it's
ten
percent
cut,
they
drop
to
31
thousand
five
hundred
where,
if
somebody
who
is
making
thirty
four
thousand
999
stays
there,
so
I
think
that
it
also
that
piece
is
also
happening
on
that.
H
C
G
Madam
chair
councillor,
option
3
was
the
option
that
councillor
Ivo
Terrell
actually
requested.
This
is
what
she
listed
out.
We
also
based
on
the
discussion
last
night
and
from
councillor
viho
cobblers,
request
added
in
the
benefits
as
well,
so
you
can
see
the
salary
dependent
benefit
savings,
so
you
can
see
the
fully-loaded
savings
for
any
of
these
options.
Those
are
the
only
items
that
we
had
the
opportunity
to
cost
out
all.
C
G
Madam
chair
counselor,
when
we
are
facing
a
hundred
million
dollar
decline
in
revenue,
31.5
of
that
which
does
impact
our
general
fund
and,
as
you
all
are
aware,
the
general
fund,
the
majority
of
the
expenses
and
the
general
fund
or
for
salaries
and
benefits,
would
be
very
difficult
to
imagine
a
scenario
that
did
not
involve
some
type
of
furlough
at
some
level.
For
a
pay.
You
know
a
pay
decrease
of
some
sort
going
into
the
September
through
June
30
period
of
FY,
21
and.
A
G
C
E
C
J
Madam
chair
councillor
Rivera,
we,
as
we
talked
about
this
before
Aaron
McSherry,
did
bring
up
an
idea
of
looking
at
it
by
salary
range.
So
employees
who
fall
in
say,
for
example,
arrange
20
or
are
20
to
24
would
receive
this
decrease,
for
example,
and
that
would
at
least
address
the
issue
of
people
performing
the
same
position
or
like
positions
in
a
in
an
equal
way.
So
that's
one
idea,
but
you're
right
I
mean
once
you
you,
you
draw
the
line.
J
J
I
There
was
a
contemplated
distribution
of
the
increase
that
had
to
be
negotiated
with
the
police
last
year
and
what
what
management
may
propose
might
not
be
what
we
actually
end
up
with.
Ultimately,
so,
even
if
we,
if
we
start
at
the
negotiation
table
with
one
of
these
plans,
we
might
not
end
up
with
it,
but
we
would
still
have
to
have
the
same
amount
of
savings
whatever.
That
was,
and
we.
C
A
B
You,
madam
chair
yeah,
as
I
as
I,
look
and
dig
deeper
into
the
options.
I
I
think
option
one
and
even
three
are
very
problematic
because
of
the
I
think
the
compaction
issue,
an
inverse
issue
would
be
a
lot
larger
than
we
think,
because
if
you
just
look
at
the
35,000
and
below
many
of
those
employees
are
ask
me
union
employees
and
if
you
do
just
a
rough
analysis
like
councilor
Casas
Sanchez
said
yet
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
a
semi
employees
who
are
then
making
less
than
other.
Ask
me.
B
Employees
and
I
know,
though,
that
Union
has
fought
hard
for
their
employees
to
be
where
they
are
at
and
so
I
I
think
that
any
of
these
options
are
gonna
take
a
lot
of
work
as
far
as
the
negotiations
go
with
our
unions
and
really
that's
why
I
think
option
for
was
put
in
there,
because
it's
to
use
an
analogy.
It's
like
a
bow
on
water,
everybody
just
the
rowboat
Rises,
either
up
or
down,
and
that
might
be
the
only
way.
Unfortunately,
to
be
fair
about
this.
A
And
I
guess
just
to
throw
out
another
idea
as
we
look
at
these
these
options:
1,
&
3,
the
other
thing.
We're
gonna,
have
to
take
a
really
hard
look,
as
as
who
are
those
people
in
the
upper
brackets
who
are
taking
those
bigger
cuts
and
is
part
of
the
reason
they're
paid
at
the
level.
They
are
because
they
have
certifications
that
you
know
the
market
demands
that
they
be
paid
at
a
particular
level
in
order
for
them
to
even
consider
coming
to
the
city.
A
So,
for
instance,
Engineers
can
make
a
lot
more
money
in
the
private
sector
than
working
for
for
the
city.
We
we
struggle,
I,
believe
to
be
competitive
and
I
do
want
to
draw
one
line
in
the
in
a
slide.
Presentation
that
that
mary
has
given
us
one
of
the
revenue
assumptions
and
her
swoosh
recovery
is
that
Landon's
growth
will
drive
construction
sector
10%
of
Santa
faz
economy,
and
that
also
speaks
to
the
fact
that
lana
was
growing
and
doing
very
well.
A
They
need
engineers
and
they
will
be
in
competition
for
people
that
we
need
as
engineers
and
if
we
don't
do
right
by
by
those
folks,
there
are,
you
know,
greener
pastures,
for
them
to
go
to.
So
that's
another
thing
that
we're
gonna
have
to
keep
in
mind
as
we
look
at
these
these
kinds
of
spectrums,
of
salary,
cuts
and
or
furloughs,
even
if
they're
temporary,
all
right,
it's
about.
Let's
see
it's
a
little
after
6
I
would
like
to
we're
going
to
continue
this
conversation.
A
E
G
E
The
other
thing
is
that,
because
it
involves
the
Union
and
they
had
put
together
a
proposal
of
a
tiered
system
and
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
these
options
were
included
in
that
utilize.
Their
breakdown
I
can't
remember
what
it
was,
but
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
see.
I,
don't
remember
what
it
was,
but
it
was
similar
to
these
options.
I
just
wanted
us
I
mean
they
were
the
ones
that
put
that
forth.
So
we
might
as
well
run
the
numbers
and
see
what
it
looks
like
on.
A
G
Adam
chair
councillor,
Garcia,
that's
a
great
question.
It's
not
indicated
in
the
slide,
so
I
will
update
that
15%
furlough
or
pay
cut
is
for
the
21
directors,
the
director
level
with
director
in
their
title
and
the
10%
furlough,
or
pay
cut
option
for
13
a
little
over
1,300
employees
would
be
for
the
remainder
of
those
positions.
G
A
With
that,
I
just
want
to
thank
our
staff,
who
have
hung
in
there
with
us
three
nights
in
a
row.
This
is
a
lot
of
work
and
I.
Just
I
know
these
are
hard
times.
I
know
you're
all
working
around
the
clock.
I
certainly
woke
up
in
the
middle
of
the
night
Monday
after
Monday's
finance
meeting
reeling
with
all
the
information
you
provided
for
us.
So
I
can
only
imagine
what
your
life's
feel
and
look
like
and
I
just
want
to
say.
Thank
you
and
we'll
we'll
continue
this
conversation
as
we
move
forward.
A
So
with
that
I
would
like
to
go
to
Jennifer
favi
on
and
go
get
into
a
little
bit
of
detail
for
the
next.
You
know
I'd
like
to
call
this
meeting
adjourned
by
about
7
o'clock
and
sooner
if
that
works,
but
just
but
I
do
want
to
give
a
fair
amount
of
time
to
really
dive
in
to
the
survey
that
we
sent
out
and
we
got
pretty
good
response,
5,000
people
Jennifer.
Do
you
want
to
you
want
to
dive
in
on
that
yeah.
K
K
And
so
please
feel
free
to
you
know.
Stop
me
as
I
go
happy
to
answer
questions
or
further
elaborate
as
we
go
so
I
wanted
to
discuss
a
little
bit
kind
of
how
we
went
about
this
survey.
It
was
an
online
survey,
basically
asking
people
what
services
facilities
functions,
that
they
deem
essential.
As
we
look
forward
into
the
coming
months
and
possibly
years
of
city
services,
there
was
an
English
version
and
a
Spanish
version.
They
were
both
available
for
seven
days.
K
Given
the
time
crunch,
we
wanted
to
get
the
survey
out
as
soon
as
possible,
and
so
it
wasn't
translated
when
we
first
released
it,
but
they
are
both
open
over
a
weekend
and
they
were
both
open
for
the
same
amount
of
time.
It
was
a
label
available
online.
For
anyone
who
wanted
to
take
it,
each
person
could
only
take
the
survey
once
per
device,
so
this
survey
actually
tracked
kind
of
the
IP
number
of
the
computer.
So
we
didn't
have
people
kind
of
need,
a
ballot
stuffing,
I
guess
and
we
advertised
on
social
media.
K
E
K
Conversations
about
some
of
these
limitations-
and
we
are
very
aware
of
them
and
I
just
kind
of
want
to
go
through
them
and
tell
you
kind
of
how
we
are
addressing
them.
So
the
first
is
that
this
was
not
a
random
sample,
given
the
urgency
of
when
this
information
was
needed,
I
mean
we're
making
these
decisions.
Now
we
really
didn't
have
time
to
conduct
a
full
random
sample
survey.
Those
types
of
surveys
take
months
to
put
out.
K
They
cost
a
lot
of
money,
usually
they're
done
by
third
party,
so
we
kind
of
went
with
this
convenient
sample
approach
where
it
was
pretty
much
just
blasted
out.
Anybody
could
take
it.
So
this
type
of
survey
is
not
representative
of
the
underlying
population
and
knowing
that
and
knowing
that
this
was
our
survey
approach,
that's
kind
of
why
we
asked
those
demographic
questions
because
we
wanted
to
see-
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
we
at
least
knew
who
answered
so
that
we
could
appropriately
wait
the
responses.
K
Additionally,
you
know
separate
from
it
not
being
a
random
sample.
There
is
also
some
selection
by
its
in
any
type
of
voluntary
survey.
So,
basically,
the
type
of
person-
that's
willing
to
take
a
survey
like
this
and
it
that's
gonna,
opt
in
and
seek.
This
out
is
probably
fundamentally
different
than
someone
who
doesn't
and
so
we're
only
getting
the
responses
from
that
type
of
person
and
not
necessarily
a
general
average
Santa
Fe
resident.
K
It
was
also
had
a
limited
outreach
approach.
We
only
had
it
open
for
seven
days.
We
didn't
have
time
or
resources
to
really
get
this
out
in
multiple
forms.
We
did
not
have
a
physical
version.
We
did
not
conduct
phone
surveys.
These
types
of
things
are
again
expensive
and
take
a
lot
of
time,
and
so,
given
our
constraints,
we
approached
it
just
kind
of
doing
this
self-response,
but
given
all
those
limitations,
we
think
it
was
a
really
really
great
success.
K
So
the
fact
that
we
gathered
over
5500
responses
directly
from
our
residents
in
seven
days
is
pretty
incredible
and
pretty
unheard
of
I
think
it
really
speaks
to
the
engagement
of
our
citizens,
one
of
our
residence
that
many
people
responded
to
a
survey
like
this.
Another
great
thing
is
that
we
have
really
big
sub
samples.
K
Some
of
them
are
too
small
because
it
has
to
be
basically
to
normalize,
but
for
that
ethnic
groups
and
for
most
of
the
age
groups
and
for
all
of
the
districts,
our
subsamples
are
big
enough
to
draw
conclusions
and
to
increase
their
weight
to
kind
of
account
for
those
imbalances.
Another
great
thing
is
now
we
have
this
data
set.
K
We
have
this
huge
data
set
that
speaks
directly
to
residents
priorities
and
we've
never
done
anything
like
that
before
and
they
think
it's
really
powerful
and
I
think
we
really
cared
about
this
imbalance
issue,
which
is
why
we
ask
the
demographic
questions
so
that
now
we
know-
and
we
can
account
for
those
imbalances
by
weighting
the
data.
We
can
also
monitor
how
we
performed
reaching
different
groups.
So
now
we
know
and
moving
forward,
we
can
kind
of
track
our
progress
to
see.
If
we're
getting
better,
are
we
reaching
the
spanic
population
more?
K
Are
we
reaching
those
younger
age
groups?
Are
we
doing
a
better
job
at
that?
So
now
we
have
this
data
to
work
from
which
I
think
is
really
great,
and
then
the
last
thing
I
think
that's
been
really
cool
about
this
data
is
that
we
made
the
results
completely
public.
We
want
to
be
a
transparent
and
accountable
City
and
we're
also
hoping
this
type
of
information
can
be
helpful
for
community
organizations
or
just
members
of
the
public
when
they're
looking
to
provide
services
or
looking
to
learn
about
their
own
communities.
E
I
can
counsel
I
just
have
a
couple
questions
on
this
slide
and
I
guess:
I
need
to
understand
what
it
really
means
and
the
technical
sense
about
sub-samples,
because
if
you're
a
beauty,
that's
majority
people
of
color,
yet
they
were
the
very
the
lowest
percentage
of
participation
right
was
that
really
still
representative?
So.
K
It's
not
representative,
but
given
how
large,
even
that
subset,
was
we're
able
to
wait
their
responses.
So
basically
we
can
add
weight
to
their
responses
kind
of
make
them
worth
more
within
the
data
set
so
that
it
accounts.
So
basically
we
can.
We
can
wait
there
so
that
it
matches
their
actual
representation
in
the
population.
I
haven't
run
those
numbers,
yet
it's
kind
of
a
hefty
statistical,
lift
I
just
haven't
gotten
to
it
yet,
but
we
can
do
that
and
I
think.
K
The
point
is
that,
given
that
we
had
almost
a
thousand
responses,
that's
a
large
data
set
in
and
of
itself,
so
we
can
kind
of
pull
those
conclusions
out
from
the
and
that's
just
one
example.
We
also
have
data
sets
for
different
age
groups
in
different
districts,
so
it
would
be
different
if,
like
50
people
from
this
manic
population
responded,
because
that
would
not
be
large
enough
to
really
draw
conclusions.
But
given
that
there's
almost
a
thousand
responses,
that's
pretty
incredible
and
we
can
actually
use
this
data.
Okay,.
E
Thanks
for
that
clarity,
and
then
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
clarify,
we
kept
saying
that
we-
this
is
the
first
time
we've
ever
done
this,
but
maybe
with
this
current
administration,
but
last
administration.
We
did
do
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
Commissioner,
sorry,
commissioner
councilor
Rivera,
we
did
one
and
I
want
to
say
2017
about
what
residents
priorities
or
interests.
E
K
E
A
better
platform
than
what
we
used,
we
use
this
company
and
they
sucked
I'm
sorry
to
say
they
had
it
all
over
the
place
and
they
weren't
clear
about
the
what
the
result
they
had
results,
but
it
wasn't
helpful,
I,
guess
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify.
We
did
something,
it
wasn't
great
and
this
is
better.
So
thank
you.
Cool.
K
Yeah
and
I
think
this
was
kind
of
this
is
one
of
those
examples
where
kovat
kind
of
brought
out
innovation,
and
we
had
to
act
quickly
and
act
on
our
feet
and
try
to
get
these
responses
very
quickly
and
I
think
it
went
really
well
and
I.
Think
the
cool
thing,
too,
is
that
we
learned
a
lot
from
doing
this
and
I
think
moving
forward.
K
We're
only
gonna
get
better
and
I
think
it's
also
great
that
we
have
this
demographic
data,
so
we
can
track
to
see
if
we
are
doing
better
if
we
are
reaching
those
populations.
We
didn't
reach
as
well
this
time
and
we
can
kind
of
focus
our
attention.
I
think
we
know
you
know
older
populations
from
district
1
that
our
way
we
don't
have
to
do
as
much
outreach
for
we
need
to
work
harder
to
reach
those
other
populations
that
aren't
as
plugged
in
that
aren't.
You
know,
as
that
we're.
E
Know
sometimes,
having
obviously
we
know
if
people
are
retired,
they
have
more
time
to
be
able
to
participate
in
these
days
yeah.
We
need
to
figure
out
because
surveys,
one
one
option
that
doesn't
it
gives
us
a
snapshot.
It
doesn't
serve
all
our
needs
as
to
really
getting
into
the
nitty-gritty
of
what
people
are
thinking.
Thank
you
exactly.
K
Okay,
so
let's
talk
about
this
population,
the
survey
versus
the
underlying
population,
so
this
is
really
the
discussion
on
representation,
so,
as
we
mentioned
before,
populations
over
55
years
of
age
represented
60
percent
of
the
survey
respondents
which
definitely
does
not
track
to
our
population.
So
here
in
these
graphs,
the
pink
purple
color
is
the
the
census
data.
So
this
is
basically
the
most
accurate
population
data
that
we
have.
K
E
K
Typically,
the
census
data
is
the
most
accurate
and
it's
the
most
widely
available
and
the
most
used
data
to
measure
population
in
different
areas.
So
basically
I
just
took
that
as
the
most
credible
population
data
that
we
have
for
our
city
liked
and
wanted
to
compare
that
with
our
survey.
And
there
are
issues
with
the
Census.
A
lot
of
groups
are
under
counted,
but
it's
kind
of
it's
the
best.
We
can
do
it's
the
most
accurate
data
that
we
have.
These.
E
K
Okay
household
size
was
interesting
to
basically
one-person
households
were
really
underrepresented,
so
single
people
living
in
their
own
home
and
then
couples
or
two-person
households
were
vastly
over-represented.
The
rest
were
fairly
close.
Family
is
larger
than
you
know
three
and
higher
we're.
Oh,
we
were
almost
there.
We
had
almost
captured
them.
There
isn't
a
huge
discrepancy,
so
this
is
one
that
kind
of
puzzles
me
I.
Don't
really
know
why.
K
Next
is
the
districts,
so
almost
a
quarter
of
our
of
all
the
respondents
didn't
do
not
live
in
the
city.
They
either
live
in
the
county
or
outside
of
the
county
majority,
where
County
residents,
20%
of
those
that
do
live
in
the
city
districts
one
and
two
had
the
most
responses.
But
when
you
actually
compare
it
to
the
demographics
into
the
underlying
population,
districts,
one
and
three
are
actually
over-represented:
district
1,
more
than
district
3
and
districts,
2
&
4,
are
underrepresented,
again,
district
4,
much
more
underrepresented
than
district
2.
K
Any
questions
on
the
districts
and
again
this
district,
the
fact
that
the
population
is
so
much
lower,
even
in
the
census
data,
makes
me
question
if
it's
being
under
counted
or
how
we
came
up
with
our
districts.
But
this
is
what
the
what
the
population
data
shows
is
that
district
3
does
just
have
a
smaller
population
which
makes
sense
as
to
why
they
would
have
so
many
fewer
responses
to
the
survey.
Madam.
E
K
And
again,
most
of
them
are
County
residents,
which
I
think
is
okay,
that
we
we
are
getting
their
responses.
Cuz
we're
you
know
where
their
county
seat.
You
know
they
use
the
city,
maybe
just
as
much
as
our
city
of
residents,
but
we
can
parse
that
out.
We
can
take
them
out
of
our
population
set
when
we're
doing
analysis,
but
we
wanted
to
account
for
it
and
see
kind
of
if
County
residents
had
different
opinions
than
density
or
even
people
that
are
outside
the
county,
then.
K
E
Chair
on
that
point,
so
we
we
can't
breakdown
County
as
to
where
it
came
from,
it
doesn't
say
specifically
like
pocket
or
Pecola.
Sir
no.
K
It's
something
we
can
include
on
the
next
survey.
We
didn't
really
think
that
far
and
we
didn't
know
that
we
would
necessarily
want
that
information.
There's
always
a
balance.
Mr.
day's,
of
having
too
many
questions
and
too
many
details,
cuz
in
it,
people
get
disinterested
and
stop
answering.
So
we
kind
of
kept
it
simple.
If
that's
something
that
we
feel
like
is
important,
we
can
certainly
start
including
that
information
on
future
surveys,
I.
E
K
Just
gonna
continue:
if
someone
has
more
questions
about
the
districts,
I
can
certainly
okay,
ethnicity.
We've
talked
about
this
problem
with
the
Hispanic
population
being
under
counted,
even
though
they
represent
the
majority
of
our
population.
I
think
we
have
talked
about
this
a
lot.
This
was
kind
of
our
largest
under-representation
and
one
I
think
we
really
really
want
to
focus
on
as
we
move
forward,
not
just
with
surveys,
but
with
all
city
engagement
with
public
communications
of
public
engagement.
K
K
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna
move
on
to
the
actual
results
of
the
questions.
I'm
gonna
go
fairly
quickly.
You
just
please,
you
know
pause
if
you
know
help
me
if
you
want
to
take
a
deeper
look,
this
is
just
gonna.
Be
data
as
a
whole.
I
have
not
separated
this
out.
I
haven't
waited
anything,
so
this
is
just
kind
of
the
data
at
first
glance.
Of
course,
the
dashboard
is
there
and
I've
showed
you
how
to
use
that.
So
you
can
kind
of
play
around
if
you
wanted
to
still
some
more
insight.
K
Okay,
so
this
was
kind
of
our
really
broad
overarching
questions.
So
what
should
be
the
highest
priority
of
the
city
and
you
could
only
select
one
and
day
to
day
functions
and
operations
was
far
in
a
way.
The
most
popular
choice,
with
sixty
percent
of
respondents
choosing
that
option
a
very
distant
second
was
livability
and
then
city
employees,
depending
on
how
you
filter
the
data,
those
that
second
and
third
option
might
switch.
K
You
you,
okay,
so
these
graphs
basically
are
on
a
sliding
scale
from
not
important
to
very
important,
so
the
darker,
the
color,
the
more
important,
and
so
you
can
kind
of
just
glance
and
see
kind
of
the
darker,
the
bar
and
the
further
along
to
the
left
that
the
dark
slides
the
more
importance
people
placed
on
this
item,
so
four
priorities
planning
and
basically
allocating
resources
for
recovery.
K
So
really
looking
to
the
future
again,
people
really
prioritized
basic
city
services
with
almost
80
percent,
labeling,
that
as
important
or
very
important,
which
are
that
those
top
two
categories
or
top
two
choices.
They
also
really
valued:
creating
safety
nets
for
at-risk
populations
and
innovating
city
government.
Those
were
the
three
that
that
had
the
highest.
K
K
Basically
like
what
what
approach
to
facilities
would
you
prefer
and
again
far
and
away?
It
was
a
blended
approach.
People
don't
want
us
to
close
all
of
one
thing
and
keep
all
of
another
open.
They
prefer
to
have
options
and
to
kind
of
do
a
blended
approach
to
the
facilities
you
and
then,
when
we
asked
about
capital
and
infrastructure
projects.
Specifically,
these
didn't
come
in
very
high
and
they
were
pretty
middle-of-the-road
or
low
importance.
The
most
important
that
people
chose
was
Street
and
intersection
improvements
and
then
the
the
least
important
surprisingly
work.
K
Some
of
these
kind
of
special
projects,
though
Airport
the
fire
station
and
the
Teen
Center
and
I,
would
like
if
we
have
time
at
the
end.
This
is
an
interesting
one
to
play
with
the
demographics
with
on
the
dashboard.
Some
of
them
don't
change
like
you
think
they
might
so.
For
example,
the
SAS
18
Center
would
go
in
district
3,
but
the
district
3
residents
did
not
put
any
more
importance
on
it
than
other
districts.
K
Okay,
so
the
employee-related
cost-savings
very,
very
much.
What
we
were
just
talking
about
these
were
not
popular
overall
in
general,
but
most
favored
were
to
reduce
salaries
for
the
mayor
and
city
council
and
to
evaluate
the
benefit
policies,
and
then
the
least
favored
by
far
was
to
reduce
the
health
insurance
package.
So
70
percent
said
that
they
put
it
in
the
bottom,
two
of
our
favorable,
the
bottom
two
favored
with
over
half
placing
it
in
the
very
very
bottom.
K
K
Okay
and
then
on
to
actual
city
services.
So
this
is
the
general
city
maintenance,
trash
and
recycling
came
in
high
with
85
saying
that
curbside
trash
was
important
and
66
saying
that
the
drop-off
centers
are
important,
Street
maintenance
again
shows
up
very
high
and
then
the
least
important
were
animal
services
and
weeds
and
medians
and.
K
Community
services,
these
were
fairly
popular
people,
deemed
them
I
like
to
kind
of
just
look
at
this
50
percent
bar
and
see
kind
of
what
color
it
tends
to
be,
and
most
of
these
are
in
the
top
two
importance
categories,
library,
services
and
homeless
homelessness
services
came
in
really
high,
and
then
the
least
important,
which
you
can
kind
of
see
here
is
kind
of.
The
lightest
bar
was
financial
support
for
housing,
but
overall
it
was
still
pretty
much
in
the
middle
in
terms
of
how
people
rated
its
importance.
K
Economic
development,
this
one
there
was
a
clear
winner,
which
is
this
dark
bar
here
for
locally
owned
stores
all
over
the
city.
So
people
are
really
wanting
to
support
our
local
businesses
and
our
local
business
owners.
The
rest
were
pretty
much
in
the
middle
and
very
similar
to
each
other.
There
wasn't
really
any
clear
least
importance.
You
know
options.
They
were
all
very
similar.
K
You
in
terms
of
transit-
and
this
is
a
bit
of
a
mixed
bag-
it
was
some
that
came
in
really
Heinz
and
they
came
in
lower
people
really
want
to
want
to
preserve,
saying
I've
a
ride,
that's
kind
of
our
our
regular
bus
routes,
a
lot
of
people
commute
on
that
bus
system
and
then
walkability
in
all
neighborhoods
and
walkability
is
one
that's
interesting
on
the
dashboard.
If
you
break
it
up
by
districts,
I
think
it
was
two
and
four
really
drove
that
importance.
Level
and
I.
K
District
1
did
not
rate
it
very
high
and
I
think
that
might
be
because
it's
already
walkable
at
least
the
downtown
area
and
the
least
important
was
the
Santa
Fe
pickup,
which
is
the
kind
of
tourist
bus
that
goes
from
museum
hill
to
Canaan
Road
in
downtown,
and
the
modified
bus
service
came
in
low
and
bikeability
came
in
low.
K
K
You
tourism
came
in
pretty
high
over
50%,
for
both
questions
came
in
at
important
or
very
important,
including
the
Convention
Center
in
marketing.
This
is
another
one.
That's
fun
on
the
dashboard,
because
by
age
group,
with
the
Convention
Center,
with
populations
under
the
age
of
45,
significantly
drops
and
then
in
its
importance.
So
that's
kind
of
an
interesting
one
to
play
with,
especially
with
age
group.
I,
don't
know
if
younger
ages,
just
don't
use
the
kini
center
or
don't
attend
events
there.
K
Arts
and
culture
and
again
fairly
popular
and
the
most
important,
was
just
kind
of
general
arts
and
culture
events.
While
the
least
important
was
the
the
culture
connects
art,
equity
initiatives,
but
again
it
kind
of
came
in
in
the
middle.
You
can
see,
there's
pretty
much
equal
representation
in
either
side
of
the
distribution
and
then
public
engagement.
Again.
This
one
came
in
fairly
high
moderate
to
high
importance
with
public
communications
at
52%
people
labeling
it
important
or
very
important,
and
then
City
Council's
support,
just
under
50%
at
47.
A
K
A
So
let
give
the
committee
members
a
minute
to
digest
Thank
You
Jennifer,
that's
very
helpful
to
get
us
sort
of
started,
and
you
know.
Certainly
we
can
all
play
with
the
dashboard
on
our
own
and
and
and
the
public
at
large,
for
anybody
listening
would
encourage
you
to
go
there.
One
thing
I
would
just
like
to
suggest
is
that
you
know
some
of
these
things
that
maybe
didn't
rank
as
high.
K
You
and
while
we're
waiting
for
to
come
back,
I'll
just
share
that
I
do
have
all
of
this
data
in
a
report
that
I
just
finalized.
Today,
it's
where
I
drew
all
of
this
information
and
that
will
be
distributed.
It
will
be
posted
at
some
point
on
the
city
website.
It
also
kind
of
goes
into
the
methodology
a
little
bit
in
the
limitations
of
this
survey,
so
that
will
become
available
shortly.
E
Jennifer
had
a
question
for
you
about
her.
When
I
first
saw
the
survey
results
that
you
all
had
sent
us
in
a
PDF
and
I'm
trying
to
find
the
numbers
there.
There
was
a
percentage
breakdown
for
priority
or
people's
important
Sun
on
tourism
and
I.
Remember
the
numbers
actually
being
reversed.
What
you
just
showed
us
that
the
way
we
had
seen
was
that
actually
people
didn't
think
they
were
as
important,
and
this
one
says
it's
very
important.
Yeah.
K
K
It's
it's
the
level
of
importance,
because
this
is
very
important,
important,
so
I,
don't
know
what
you
saw,
or
maybe
it
was
just
a
little
more
confusing
on
the
other
graph,
but
it
is
kind
of
it
is
coming
in
fairly
high
in
terms
of
importance.
There
might
be
other
questions
that
include
tourism,
so,
for
example,
maybe
you're
thinking
does
this
one
have
tourism
in
it.
K
Maybe
there's
this
one
so
this
this
question
here,
where
it's:
what
should
the
city
prioritize
been
planning
and
allocating
for
economic
recovery,
but
tourism
came
in
lower
than
it
did
on
the
tourism
questions,
so
this,
maybe
is
what
you're
talking
about
that's
exactly
it.
It's
a
lot
addicting
and
it
might
be
because
it
was
next
to
some
of
these
other
items
that
might
feel
more
important,
really
like
in
relation
while
the
other
tourism
question
kind
of
stood
on
its
own.
E
C
Jennifer,
isn't
that
one
of
the
faults
of
really
any
surveys,
question
about
arts
in
general
and
it's
really
low
on
the
survey?
But
then
you
ask
a
specific
question
about
arts
with
only
a
couple.
Questions
to
answer
specifically
deal
it
related
to
arts
itself
and
it's
gonna.
Look
like
arts
are
really
important,
but
it
was
just
how
the
question
was
done
right.
K
And
I
think
that's
why
we
kind
of
wanted
to
have
a
couple
questions
that
are
phrased
differently.
So
we
have
this
kind
of
planning
for
economic
recovery.
We
have
highest
priority
and
then
we
have
all
of
these
rephrase
the
exact
same
way
the
the
kind
of
services
questions,
so
that
we
could
kind
of
check
that
and
see
one
that
I
found.
Interesting
too
was
the
employee
cost
savings,
one
where
the
health
insurance
package
came
in
very
unfavorably.
While
benefit
policies
came
in
very
favorably.
K
Well
to
me
they
are
very
related,
and-
and
you
know
this
almost
encompasses
the
other,
so
yeah
it
is
interesting
and
surveying
is
very
difficult
and
people
are
very
much
swayed
by
the
way
things
are
phrased
and
the
way
questions
are
asked.
We
were
mindful
of
that
when
we
were
creating
the
survey
trying
to
be
objective
and
trying
to
you
know
kind
of
cross
check
by
asking
things
in
different
ways.
C
H
A
question
with
this:
first
of
all,
I
really
I
really
enjoyed
this
presentation.
Thank
you
so
much
for
putting
this
together.
It
kind
of
brought
me
back
to
grad
school
and
I
started
to
have
a
panic
attack
until
I
realized.
The
doctor,
Bork
will
not
be
grading
me
on
this
and
then
I
never
relaxed
a
little
bit.
H
Not
as
hard
as
she
is
trust
me,
but
I
was
curious,
is
with
the
system.
Do
we
have
a
way
to
randomize
questions
or
randomize
the
order
that
answers
are
in
because
I
know
that
that
that's
also,
you
know,
as
part
of
we're
controlling
to
some
of
the
bias
that
we
know
is
inevitable,
with
just
the
creation
of
a
survey
that
can
be
helpful.
Do
we.
K
Have
that
capability,
I,
don't
I'm,
not
sure
I
would
have
to
check
with
the
program
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I,
don't
know
that
it
that
capability
or
that
feature
there
are
ways
you
can
get
around
it.
You
can
put
out
multiple
surveys
at
different
times,
open
and
close
them
at
random.
I,
don't
know,
I'd
have
to
look
into
it,
but
that's
a
great
idea:
yeah.
Okay,.
H
Thank
you,
and
then
this
was
actually.
This
was
a
request
from
a
constituent
who
called
who
they
were
curious.
How
many
city
employees
versus
not
city
employees,
answered
and
I
think
that
that
would
also
be
you
know
interesting
to
see
as
well.
Our
city
employee
is
definitely
having
you
know.
They
will
know
what
culture
K'nex
is
more
likely
than
others.
I.
H
K
I
agree
and
I
think
that
was
one
that
we
had
thought
of
kind
of
once
we
started
looking
at
the
data
and
once
we
had
closed
the
survey
and
gotten
all
the
results
back,
it
was
one
of
those
like
oh
I,
wish.
We
knew
how
many
of
these
were
employees,
or
how
many
of
them
were
employees
that
commute
which
you
could
do
if
we
just
added
that
one
question
so
I
think
that
isn't
we
would
want
to
include
a
demographic
question
on
the
next
survey,
just
a
checkbox
to
work
for
the
city,
yeah.
H
K
A
C
K
K
But
again
that
could
be
skewed
if
they
work
in
the
city
and
they
took
the
survey
at
work,
it
would
capture
it
kind
of
incorrectly
I
think
we
would
still
ask
them
to
self-report,
because
I
think
it
would
end
up
being
more
accurate
than
if
we
just
captured
that
information
and
I
think
there
have
been
a
lot
of
studies
that
people
are
generally
truthful
on
surveys.
It's
not
common
for
people
to
lie
and
to
try
to
kind
of
scheme
and
and
stuff
the
ballot.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions,
so
it
looks
like
everybody's
good,
so
thank
you
Jennifer.
Thank
you
for
all
the
work
that
you
and
Christine
put
into
this,
and
this
was
very
interesting,
so
I'm
glad
we
took
the
time
to
go
through
it
a
little
bit
and,
of
course
we
can
play
with
it
more
on
on
the
dashboard,
as
you
say,
so
we
will.
We
will
look
to
that
with
that.
I
will
go
to
matters
from
staff.
Do
we
have
any
matters
from
the
staff
that
we
haven't
heard
already?