►
From YouTube: Quality of Life Meeting for June 17, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
Changes
from
the
committee,
madam
chair
council,
via
Rio
I,
have
a
change
I'd
like
to
postpone
item
six
Diaz
and
dog,
which
is
the
item
stating
the
resolution
supporting
the
closure
of
West,
San,
Francisco
Street
and
establishing
a
framework
for
the
closure
of
other
streets
and
the
reason
why
it's
not
because
I
don't
want
to
hear
this
item.
We've
been
anxiously
waiting
to
understand
this
particular
item,
but
I
believe
it
was
improperly
noticed
the
staff
uploaded
their
resolution,
the
revised
resolution
to
our
packet
material
and
to
the
website
yesterday
at
5:00
p.m.
D
D
I,
don't
think
24
hours
is
enough
time
for
the
public
to
be
able
to
see
that
it
adds
to
the
lack
of
transparency
for
the
four
community
members
and
I
for
myself,
especially
for
a
topic.
That's
been
very
I,
don't
say
I,
don't
want
to
say
controversial,
but
it
has
been
something
that
has
elicited
a
lot
of
curiosity,
emotion
and
so
I'd
like
to
make
that
motion
to
postpone
that
item.
All.
A
Right
counselor
via
rail
I
have
thought
part
of
the
reason
why
I
was
late
getting
on.
This
call
is
that
I
have
been
talking
to
the
city
clerk
and
the
City
Attorney's
Office
about
your
concern.
My
understanding
is
that
because
we,
the
only
thing
that's
required
by
the
Open
Meetings
Act-
is
that
we
caption
the
item
that
we'll
be
discussing
72
hours
in
advance
and
according
to
the
City
Clerk's
office,
the
caption
on
the
agenda
and
the
agenda
were
properly
noticed.
They
were
put
out
on
Thursday,
June
11th
well
in
advance
of
the
72-hour
requirement.
A
The
caption,
as
you
note,
has
changed
a
little
bit,
but
it
it
has
it's
not
like
I.
So
we,
the
the
the
first
caption,
said
the
closing
of
San,
Francisco,
Street
and
other
and
creating
a
structure
for
other
Street
closures,
the
one
but
the
resolution,
that's
actually
in
front
of
us,
takes
away
the
the
naming
of
a
particular
street.
A
So
it's
not
that
we
have
changed
anything
we
may
have
narrowed.
You
know
we
said
we're
talking
about
green
and
blue,
and
now
we
took
away
green
but
blues
still
there
and
we're
still
talking
about
blue,
so
it
was
properly
noticed
and
according
to
the
Open
Meetings
Act,
so
that
we
have
done
everything
has
been
completely
according
to
the
rules.
Well,.
D
I
appreciate
you
looked
into
the
issue
with
legal.
However,
I
still
don't
think
the
caption
reflects
what
item
were
actually
hearing
tonight
and
we're
not
specifically
focused
on
San
Francisco
Street.
We
were
looking
well
according
to
the
most
recent
version,
we're
looking
at
other
streets
generally
and
think
that
that
really
reflects
what
we
were
supposed
to
be
discussing
or
what
was
noticed
previously.
So
I'm
still
gonna
move
to
take
the
item
off
for
personal
postponement.
D
A
And
I,
just
one
final
note:
you
know
just
because
it
doesn't
say:
San
Francisco,
Street
anymore
doesn't
meet,
I
mean
it
does
say,
establishing
a
framework
for
the
closure
of
streets
to
vehicular
traffic
and
a
certain
period
for
a
certain
period
during
2020.
So
you
know,
San
Francisco
Street
could
still
be
a
street
that
you
know
under
the
guidelines
of
the
resolution,
could
be
closed.
A
F
E
To
make
a
comment,
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
Chancellor
Barrios
concerns
in
regards
to
getting
the
packet
information
extremely
late.
I
find
it
unacceptable
for
us
to
get
that
information
24
hours
prior,
especially
on
a
case
as
councilor
Bree
Arielle,
has
mentioned,
that
consider
and
expressing
their
concerns,
whether
it's
in
favor
or
against,
since
Wednesday
or,
if
not
earlier,
and
for
me
to
not
be
able
to
review
the
resolution
and
provide
feedback
to
them
is
acceptable
and
I
think
I
know
it's.
E
A
Our
agenda-
yes,
it's
the
caption
we
have
is
considering
consideration
of
resolution
number
2020
blank,
a
resolution
supporting
the
closure
of
West,
San,
Francisco
Street,
and
establishing
a
framework
for
the
closure
of
other
streets
to
vehicular
traffic
for
a
certain
period
during
2020,
okay
and
and
the
title.
That's
actually
on
the
resolution
that
we
got
is
a
resolution
establishing
a
framework
for
the
closure
of
streets
to
the
hick
Euler
traffic
for
a
certain
period
during
2020.
Now
again,
I
talked
to
the
City
Attorney's
Office
Aaron
is
on
another
call.
A
She
was
gonna,
try
to
jump
on
to
this
one.
It
looks
like
she's
unable
to
get
away,
but
essentially
you
know
what
we
said
was
we
will
be
talking
about
green
and
blue,
and
we
let
the
public
know
that
well
in
advance
of
the
72
hours.
That's
required
now
we're
saying
we're
not
going
to
talk
about
green
we're
just
going
to
talk
about
blue,
although
green
mate
might
still
happen,
but
blue
is
what
we're
going
to
focus
on
and
I
completely
understand
the
frustration
with
getting
Paquette
materials.
A
But
you
know
not
at
the
same
time
that
the
agendas
are
posted.
That's
you
know
something
that
it's
just
you
know
I
think
we're
all
under
a
lot
of
pressure
to
do
a
lot
of
things
and
we
did
get
it
last
night.
It's
three
pages
long.
It
took
me
maybe
ten
minutes
to
read
and
I
think
we
all
know
from
the
emails
that
we've
been
receiving,
what
we're
talking
about
and
that's
all
that's
required
by
the
Open
Meetings
Act.
It's
not
required.
A
F
Okay,
that's
thank
you
for
that.
Clarification,
I
think
I
both
share
the
frustration
and
also
want
to
talk
about
it.
So
I'm
a
little
yeah
I
I'm
a
little
torn
on
the
the
matter,
because
I
do
agree
that
it
would
be
nice
for
the
public
to
have
the
opportunity
to
read
this
in
advance.
Although
I
do
have
a
lot
of
questions
and
I'm
eager
to
have
answered
well.
A
And
I
think
we
could
you
know,
hopefully
in
our
discussion.
This
is
not
a
public
hearing,
we
can,
you
know,
get
into
it
a
little
bit
and
understand
what
the
resolution
is
providing
for
and
and
and
maybe
get
some
clarity.
We
have
staff
who
is
on
the
call
here
on
on
the
zoom
meeting,
who
can
help
provide
us
more
information?
And
you
know
again,
it
was
properly
noticed,
as
required
under
the
Open
Meetings
Act.
Okay,.
G
A
G
A
Still
a
street
that
could
be
closed,
but
it,
but
it's
one
of
many
streets
that
could
be
closed
under
the
resolution.
If
you
meet
the
right
guidelines
that
are
laid
out
in
that
resolution,
so
there's
that
council
right
I
don't
mean
to
interrupt
you,
but
Jesse
does
have
his
hand
up
by
one
if
he
might
help
us
provide
clarity.
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair
councillors,
in
regards
to
what
was
introduced
that
that
language
is
subject
to
change,
so
I
understand
the
concern
from
the
public
that
my
San
Francisco
Street
was
laid
out
in
the
introduction.
However,
at
the
points
that
it
was
introduced,
we
only
had
a
very
rough
draft
and
didn't
have
a
final
version,
so
once
we
did
have
that
final
version,
what
we
came
back
with
was
a
more
general
version
of
the
resolution
and
not
specific
to
any
particular
Street.
G
D
I'm
terrible.I
yes,
counselor
via
real.
You
know
what
bothers
me
about
all
of
this
is
that
you
just
stated
that
we're
trying
to
do
a
lot
of
things
right
now,
and
so,
therefore,
we
should
take
the
time
to
do
things.
Well,
it's
like
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
follow
the
track
that
this
is
on.
We
can
extend
it
for
the
time
we
need
to
make
the
right
decisions,
and
that's
what
bothers
me
about
this.
We
just
decide.
Oh
that's
our
timeline.
We
have
to
follow
it.
D
We
have
to
get
this
pushed
through
before
we
get
to
council
all
next
week.
Well,
that's
not
really
the
case
we
get
to
decide
if
that's
the
case
and
I
just
want
to
be
able
to
have
more
transparency
and
having
these
moments
where
we're
like.
Oh
my
god,
we
have
to
get
this
done
and
we
need
to
do
it
right
for
the
public
for
the
business
owners
for
ourselves
and
that's
why
I
wanted
to
postpone
this,
and
it
didn't
mean
that
we
wouldn't
necessarily
change
other
tracks
down
the
way.
D
D
D
Well,
you
know
ideally
we'd
postpone
this
so
that
we
can
actually
hear
it
at
our
next
meeting
and
but
I
realized.
We
have
this
time
frame
a
self-imposed
time
line
if
you
will
or
time
frame
postponing
it
in
case
we
were
able
to
meet
again
through
this
committee,
but
realizing
if
it
doesn't,
then
it
can
go
through
public
works
on
Monday
and
then
we'd
have
discussions
at
Council
on
Wednesday.
If
it
stays
on
that
track
and.
G
That's
what
my
concern
is
is
that
how
do
we
voice
our
concerns
about
the
new
resolution?
If
we
don't
talk
about
it
tonight,
so
how
do
we
get
our
concerns
out
there?
If
we're
just
gonna
move
it
forward,
because
I
guess
staff
could
just
put
it
forward,
as
is
the
public
works
without
any
direction
or
comment
or
input
from
us.
A
Sorry,
that's
that's
true!
So
in
our
process,
as
we
have
noted
before,
it's
not
linear.
If
we
postpone
this,
then
we're
pretty
much
postponing
our
ability
to
weigh
in
on
it
as
this
committee,
because
it
does
go
to
public
utilities,
public
works.
If
it
is
approved
there,
then
it
does
move
forward
and
it
doesn't
need
our
approval
to
be
heard
at
the
council
and
again
we
were
in
compliance
with
the
with
the
public
with
the
Open
Meetings
Act.
Sorry
multitasking
here,
yeah.
A
A
G
A
A
C
G
I
F
E
F
Madam
chair
councillor,
Garcia-
that
is
really
just
our
contracting
end
date,
so
we
want
the
contracts
to
be
in
place
for
the
duration
of
the
year.
We
don't
plan
to
be
well.
We
plan
to
be
supporting
some
continued
effort
to
house
folks
beyond
having
them
at
the
shelter,
but
right
now
the
Cure's
funding
that
we
have,
which
is
what
the
amendment
to
the
action
plan
is
about,
is
of
a
six-month
we
figure.
We
can
fund
partially
fund
those
shelter
for
six
months.
F
E
F
E
F
I
believe
we
will
have
spent
at
all
I.
You
know
it's
very
very
hard
at
this
point
in
time
to
make
any
plans,
because
our
world
has
turned
upside
down,
and
we
really
don't
know
what
its
gonna
look
like
in
three
months
or
six
months,
but
part
of
the
part
of
the
intention
behind
this
contract
and
part
of
the
reason
that
the
New
Mexico
Coalition,
then
homelessness
was
was
well
stepped
up.
F
To
do
it,
but
also
was
was
asked
is
because
it
gives
us
the
six-month
strategic
planning
timeframe
so
that
we're
able
to
really
look
at
what?
What
do
we
need
in
the
long
term?
You
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
the
the
shelter
has
shown
us
all
is
a.
We
can
do
this
and
be
how
helpful
it
is
and
how
it
lives.
F
I
think
about
120
people
have
gone
through
the
shelter
and
their
lives
were
changed
significantly
because
they
did
not
have
to
try
to
stay
safe
or
stay
uninfected
or
be
in
a
crowded
place
on
the
streets
or
recover
from
having
either
kovat
or
another
illness.
So
I
think
if
anything,
it's
been
a
great
demonstration
project.
F
We're
currently
talking
to
all
of
the
community
partners
and
collaborators,
so
the
County
of
Santa
Fe,
the
do
H
Christus
everybody
who's
currently
benefiting
from
this
system,
because,
prior
to
having
this,
if
somebody
had
to
leave
the
hospital
they
either
were
put
on
the
streets
not
ready
to
be
on
the
streets.
I
mean
nobody's
ever
ready
to
be
on
the
streets,
but
you
know
I'm
still
not
fully
well
or
the
hospital
would
just
have
to
keep
them.
E
Great
thank
you
for
proving
that
thorough
feedback
next
question
I
have
is
pertaining
to
the
proposed
budget
and
I
didn't
really
see
the
information
in
the
packet
and
I'm
going
out.
Those
information
I
signed
the
last
last
week's
presentation
regarding
the
supports
that
would
come
on
our
end
and
in
particular,
the
hiring
of
stats,
so
the
proposed
and
I
think
they
were
classified
as
front-desk
support
or
whatnot.
So
there
are
those
going
to
be
new
hires
or
existing
city
of
San
pay
employees
that
transition
into
those
positions.
How
does
that
work.
F
Atom
share
counselor
to
new
employees,
because
the
idea
behind
the
the
cares
Act
funding
is
that
we
can
actually
expand
our
capacity
and
take
it
out
of
the
city's
system.
So
we
will
be
hiring
new
people.
Currently,
city
staff
is
providing
some
of
that
function
and
they
will
provide
the
city
will
continue
to
support
it
for
the
next
thing
for
the
next
six
months.
But
yet
the
idea
is
this
is
the
first
step
away
from
the
city
running.
It.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair
councillor,
Garcia
just
to
be
clear
on
its
director.
Ladd
is
correct
that
we
will
the
grant
allows
us
to
hire
new
staff
that
will
be
through
a
contract
with
the
fiscal
administrator
of
the
grant.
However,
the
front
desk
staff
will
continue
to
be
city
employees
whose
facilities
are
closed,
giving
them
meaningful
productive
work
for
the
city,
but
yeah.
Those
number
of
those
positions
will
continue
to
be
funded
by
four
I
mean
filled
by
city
staff.
J
E
And
I
think
you,
you
kind
of
got
where
I
was
looking
at,
because
there
are
the
two
different,
the
staff
that
we
would
be
able
to
hire
through
the
funding
of
the
grant.
But
then,
on
the
end,
where
the
funding
comes
from
the
city
that
staff
we're
going
to
be
using
existing
staff
for
for
those
positions.
So
that's
correct.
Okay
that
helped
to
clarify
no
additional
questions.
Madam
chair,
thank
you
Alexandre
and
Regina
for
the
information.
A
E
G
D
A
We
can
have
five
vacancies
all
at
once,
and
it's
really
hurts
that
the
committee's
work,
because
one
water
being
what
it
is.
It
takes
a
while
first
to
recruit
people
then
to
get
them
up
to
speed
and
then
to
get
them
to
be
contributing
committee
members,
it's
just
a
long
process,
so
we
want.
We
want
to
allow
for
a
little
bit
more
longevity,
and
we
also
want
to
the
way
it's
staggered.
Now
we
won't
have
so
many
roll-off
all
at
the
same
time.
So
that's
the
reason
for
doing
this.
D
A
They
established
it
and
then
each
and
then
I
can't
speak
to
the
details.
Maybe
Christine
Chavez
is
on
this
call.
If
you
want
to
know
the
details,
but
each
of
those
subsequent
resolutions
ask
the
committee
to
do
more
and
so
just
to
have
a
whole
picture
of
how
the
committee
works.
You'd
have
to
look
at
all
four
of
them,
and
it's
it's
just
you
know
it's
just
not
ideal,
it'd
be
better.
If
you
only
had
to
refer
to
one
right,
Christine
did.
K
You
want
to
say
anything
about
it.
Madam
chair
councilor,
vrl,
know
I,
think
councilor
mirth
covered
all
of
it.
It's
just
it's
been
in
existence
for
quite
some
time,
and
so
there's
just
been
resolutions
changing
some
of
the
experience
that
we
were
looking
for,
I'm
another
one
that
set
term
limits
a
couple
years
ago,
but
then
we've
had
trouble
as
councillor
O'meara
Worth
indicated
with
the
transition
periods,
and
so
this
is
meant
to
just
clarify
all
of
those
things
and
just
have
one
resolution
to
reference.
Okay,
that
makes
sense
thanks.
A
G
A
D
L
Madam
chair
counselor,
it
certainly
could
apply
to
that,
but
it
also
applies
to
the
current
sidewalk
and
park.
Let
use
that
that
is
not
related
to
item
D
on
on
the
consent
calendar
tonight.
So
without
regard
to
the
success
or
failure
of
that,
this
is
important
for
our
restaurants,
that
are
that
are
in
a
position
where
they
can
expand
their
a
floor
plan
a
little
bit
using
sidewalks
and
in
parklets,
which
are
also
city,
property
and.
D
L
D
E
A
E
A
Thank
you
all
right
now
on
to
item
D.
What
I'd
like
to
do
on
this
I
know
that
we
have
at
least
three
counselors
who
pulled
it,
who
will
probably
want
to
speak
to
it?
We
have
a
number
of
staff
here
to
help
us
understand.
What's
going
on
and
I'd
like
to
start
with
rich
Brown,
if
that's
okay,
to
give
sort
of
the
the
introduction.
M
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
good
evening
counselors,
but
we
recognize
that
the
merchant
and
restaurant
community
Street
closure
idea
and
resolution
is
put
forward
for
consideration,
has
ignited
curiosity,
frustration
and
fervent
opposition
and
approval.
Our
idea
is
to
create
economic
opportunities
for
businesses,
restaurants
and
merchants,
to
increase
their
ability
to
make
money
and
provide
a
food
and
shopping
experience
while
we've
fully
reopened.
M
Our
goal
was
not
necessary
to
place
a
stake
in
the
ground
for
any
particular
street,
but
to
create
a
nimble
framework
for
street
closures
to
put
into
action
and
provide
some
economic
vibrancy
after
everyone's
been
sheltering
in
place
for
about
90
days.
So
our
bigger
framework
really
focuses
on
bringing
people
back
to
work,
expanding
outdoor
dining
options
to
bring
people
out
to
enjoy
their
favorite
spots.
Helping
merchants
and
restaurants
make
needed
revenue
to
survive.
Keep
in
mind
that
you
know
right
now.
M
Restaurants
can
only
work
at
50
percent
capacity
and
some
very
tiny
being
being
quick
and
responsive
for
different
types
of
street
closure
options
and
also
to
adhere
to
state
and
city
health
protocols.
One
of
the
things
we're
doing
right
now
is
we're
actually
been
handing
out
almost
30,000
protective
coverings
and
masks
both
of
the
city
to
the
visitor
center
to
the
chambers
in
Turku
distribution.
M
So
we're
looking
at
the
health
aspect,
but
we're
also
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
reopen
safely
and
provide
some
economic
activity,
so
those
businesses
that
are
they
want
to
survive
and
they
want
to
be
a
part
of
Santa
Fe
and
the
experience
for
our
community
again.
We
are
not
wedded
to
any
particular
Street
to
be
closed.
M
We
want
to
offer
a
regulatory
efficiency
to
help
our
businesses,
restaurants
and
merchants,
to
really
create
a
pedestrian
out
for
experience
that
would
be
beneficial
to
the
for
community
and
if
there
are
the
street
ideas
that
should
be
considered.
We
welcome
that
discussion,
so
my
colleagues
are
reindeer
Andale
from
tourism
and
John
Romero
from
parts
of
Public
Works
are
available
to
answer
your
questions,
and
so
I
opened
the
discussion
for
you
and
thank
you
for
letting
me
know
ramble.
A
L
G
G
Right,
so
any
business
on
any
Street
can
apply.
I
know,
there's
certain
criteria
that
they
have
to
meet.
The
initial
discussion
was
about
San
Francisco
Street
we've
been
hearing
a
lot
about
Don
Gasper.
There
are
many
restaurants
around
around
the
that
surround
the
plaza.
If
they
all
applied
and
they
all
qualified
they
could.
We
could
be
closing
down
the
whole
area
potentially.
L
Madam
chair
accounts
are
probably
not
that
that's
why
public
works
is
is
very
involved
with
this
to
ensure
and
and
John
can
speak
to
it
as
our
street
engineer
that
to
ensure
that
traffic
continues
and
I
think
the
intent
was
to
definitely
not
deal
with
any
main
arteries
through
this
city
in
any
way.
That
would
be
overly
disruptive.
It
was
just
to
deal
with
generally
smaller
connector
kind
of
streets
that
could
be
closed
without
creating
major
interference.
It's
definitely
will
be
a
situation
where
every
restaurant
or
every
business
wouldn't
get
the
opportunity.
L
It's
where
it
would
be.
The
most
appropriate
was
the
consideration
that
would
be
used
for
for
this
resolution
and
I
might
add
that
San
Francisco
was
withdrawn
because
it
wasn't
intended
to
be
the
focus
of
this.
It
was
actually
a
later
add-on
that
the
businesses
brought
forward,
but
it
wasn't
intended
to
be
the
focus,
and
we
didn't
want
that
to
be
the
the
problem
that
that
would
prevent
it
from
happening
where,
where
it
would
be
most
appropriate.
L
Madam
chair
councillor,
I
have
not
been
given
that
yet
it
was
done
by
to
business
owners,
Jo
de
Bella
and
Joe
Garcia,
who
are
both
on
San
Francisco
I've
been
given
the
names
of
over
40
businesses
that
did
sign.
There
were
individual
sheets
that
they
used.
We
don't
have
a
particular
format
for
these
petitions,
so
I
do
not
have
that,
yet
they
have
not
presented
it
to
the
city.
Yet,
if
we.
L
Madam
chair
councillor,
I,
have
asked
mr.
de
Bella
for
the
list
and
in
a
court,
I
have
a
copy
of
the
actual
petition,
but
we
need
to
have
the
actual
signatures
and
I've
asked
him
for
that.
I
haven't
forgotten
it
yet,
but
we
will
make
every
effort
to
have
it
distributed
to
all
council
members
by
end
of
day
tomorrow.
Thank.
N
N
It
is
a
case
by
case
scenario,
and
you
know
it's
a
term
that's
always
thrown
around
in
the
engineering
community
and
it's
a
tough
home,
but
it
it
has
merit
because
it's
hard
to
develop
an
exact
matrix
for
everything.
So
it's
a
lot
of
it's
can
be
based
on
engineering
judgment.
But
again
we
won't
be
closing
major
arteries.
G
N
That's
not
heavily
used
the
areas
that
do
utilize
that
road
to
get
to
their
establishments
such
as
laFonda,
maybe
the
Cathedral.
We
feel
that
there
would
be
a
reasonable
route
for
them
to
utilize,
such
as
Water
Street,
that
brings
in
put
a
street
like
Water
Street.
That
would
be
a
little
more
difficult
to
close
again.
This
is
where
the
engineering
judgment
comes
into
effect,
but
we
have
a
parking.
N
N
Madam
chair
councillor,
Iveta,
you
know
the
answer
is
yes
and,
and
the
unfortunate
thing
is
that
that's
that's
in
our
job
description
on
a
day-to-day
basis.
We
do
issue
right
away
obstruction
permits
even
exclusive
of
all
this
discussion
and
we
have
to
make
those
decisions
on
a
constant
basis.
People
utilize
those
for
construction
to
stage
construction
cranes,
dumpsters
all
that
type
of
stuff,
and
so
it
would.
We
do
exercise
consistency.
So
in
any
instance,
if
we
do
approve
of
one
location
and
don't
approve,
another
will
always
have
justification.
N
G
G
N
N
Closure,
well,
what
I
mean
is
partially
use
of
the
right-of-way,
so
we
would
definitely
look
at
allowing
a
Parkway
or
maybe
utilization
of
the
the
Parkway
and
sidewalk
area
if
it's
feasible
in
that
area.
That
is
a
potential
but
closing
the
road
itself
to
to
make
a
pedestrian
area
on
one
loop.
It
may
not
as
feasible.
G
N
N
Have
not
considered
that
and
I'd
have
to
I
guess
it
would
if
they
have
a
legitimate
business
establishment.
You
know
we
probably
I
product
the
consult
with
land
use,
as
well
as
the
City
Attorney's
office,
to
make
sure
it's
it's
a
legitimate
use
of
their
property,
but
if
it
is,
we
would
definitely
consider
it
all.
G
G
G
G
So
I'll
allow
my
fellow
councillors
to
weigh
in
as
well
I.
Don't
want
to
take
up
too
much
of
the
time,
but
I
do
want
to
say,
for
the
record
that,
if
San
Francisco
were
to
close
down,
gasper
were
to
close
I
would
want
the
city
to
look
at
opening
up
palace
all
the
way
through
to
give
people
an
opportunity
to
continue
to
drive
close
to
a
place
that
they
find
so
sacred
to
them.
G
So
there's
no
other
way
for
me
to
get
that
on
the
record
in
case
this
passes,
so
I
want
at
least
that
to
be
known,
that
I
think
there
are
options
to
to
getting
people's
that
still
give
them
the
ability
to
still
drive
by
the
plaza
or
give
them
an
opportunity
to
park
for
free
and
walk
if
they
decided
to
do
that.
So
that's
all
I
have
for
now.
Madam
chair.
E
E
E
You
know,
as
council
Ribera
noted,
we've
got
a
lot
of
email
around
on
get
far
and
that
was
even
prior
to
I.
Think
even
this
resolution
fully
coming
out.
So
I
was
like
with
this.
It
wasn't
even
up.
There
was
San,
Francisco,
Street
and
now
San
Francisco
Street
is
not
the
main
focus,
but
it
still
could
be
I
think
it
was
unfortunate
detected
if
they
well
in
the
focus
not
on
techniques
associated
on
any
Street.
But
it's
still
possible.
E
I,
like
counselor,
regards
idea
of
opening
up
palette
but
I
know
historically,
there's
been,
you
know,
incidences
were
you
know
either
somebody's
breath
into
the
palace
of
the
governor's,
so
it
I
would
the
death
we
fell.
It
closed
and
keep
San
Francisco
Street
open,
it's
it's
so
that
leads.
My
question
is:
is
San
Francisco,
Street,
John
they're,
not
determined
a
major
artery
I
mean
I,
think
that
Street
probably
gets
some
of
the
most
traffic
downtown?
N
Mister,
madam
chair
councillor,
Garcia
I,
have
to
look
at
count
maps
this.
The
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
managers
average
daily
count
maps
throughout
the
city,
but
the
way
we
designate
roadways
is
not
necessarily
based
on
volume
but
based
off
of
purpose
and
need.
So,
for
instance,
a
primary
arterial
would
be
considered
a
road
that
connects
cities
that
goes
through
cities
to
connect.
Other
cities
like
San
Francisco,
even
through
this
road
secondary
arterioles,
are
the
main
routes
to
get
you
around.
The
city
such
as
Zia
and
Rodeo,
so
an
analogy
I
always
use
is
I.
N
Forget
what
US
highways
out
there
believe
it's
US
Highway,
but
if
you
drive
to
Fort
Sumner,
there's
probably
a
handful
of
cars
that
drive
through
there
a
day,
but
it's
an
art,
it's
a
primary
material
because
it
provides
a
connection
across
the
state.
So
it's
not
again
family.
It's
not
based
on
volumes.
It's
based
on
function,
so
San
Francisco,
Street,
I,
consider
to
be
a
feeder
street
I.
Consider
and-
and
this
is
explained
on
our
roadway
classification
map-
that
the
city
in
conjunction
with
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization,
establishes
so
in
the
downtown
area.
N
At
the
top
of
my
head,
the
arterioles
that
we
have
would
be
Guadalupe
in
Paseo.
The
Peralta
sand
of
all
is
one
because
it's
used
to
get
through
around
town
through
town,
not
to
it
not
to
a
specific
designation.
So
I
hope
that
answers
your
question,
but
I
would
not
consider
to
be
an
arterial
or
okay.
E
N
If
you
can
give
me
one
second,
if
you
could
well
well,
you
guys
ask
any
other
questions.
I'll
try
to
find
that
so
I
don't
hold
you
guys
up
and
then
I'll
raise
my
hand
once
I
find
that
data.
E
For
you,
okay,
thank
you.
I
would
really
appreciate
that
John,
just
because
I
would
like
for
us
to
look
at
closing
streets
that
would
have
the
least
impact
on
behavior
vehicle
traffic.
You
know
I
think
you
know,
given
that
San,
Francisco
and
I
would
be
shocked
if
it's
not
the
most
use.
If
not
one
of
the
most
you
streets
downtown,
we
would
want
to.
E
We
would
want
to
ensure
that
we
don't
disrupt
that
I
think
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
are
working
with
our
local
businesses,
but
the
local
businesses
also
I,
don't
have
to
understand
that
it's
a
road,
that's
highly
used.
I
know
the
proposal
is
to
drum
up
business
so
to
speak.
But
my
question
is:
how
is
business
now?
I
know
that,
due
to
the
governor's
order,
you
know
I
think
retail
business
is
at
25
percent
capacity.
Restaurant
is
at
50
percent.
I'd
like
to
you
know,
find
out.
Are
we
seeing
capacity
issues?
E
I
know
I've
been
out
recently,
not
necessarily
to
sit
down
and
eat,
but
when
I
go
pick
up
food
at
a
restaurant?
To
me,
there's
not
folks,
waiting
outside
when
I
go
to
a
retail
establishment,
there's
not
a
line
for
folks
to
get
into
the
business,
so
either
they're,
not
policing
their
capacity
or
there's
not
a
capacity
challenge,
and
so
that
to
me,
I
want
to
ensure
that
if
we
do
shut
them,
free
we're
dealing
with
the
challenge
and
we're
doing
it
because
we're
addressing
the
talent,
I
I,
know.
E
E
Should
we
go
that
route
and
in
the
sense
where
we're
not
causing
disruption
and
on
closing
streets,
and
we
are
making
it
most
beneficial
for
those
restaurants
that
participate
in
such
an
opportunity,
because
it
does,
it
will
be
an
additional
hop
on
that
business
to
either
have
an
individual,
be
security
for
their
retail
business
on
the
street
or
you're
going
to
need
the
supplies
for
restaurants
to
keep.
You
know,
for
example,
their
food
warm
as
they're
taking
it
to
their
table.
You
need
that
system
in
place
and
do
we
have
those
systems
in
place
now?
E
E
Should
San
Francisco
Street
be
the
highest
travel
tree
in
downtown
when
we
hear
from
John
I
would
like,
for
there
an
exception,
see
made
to
not
have
that
Street
be
included
in
this
resolution.
I
think
and
and
we
we
need
to
take
that
into
consideration
with
any
of
the
highly
traveled
Street.
Downtown.
Tennessee,
though,
should
be
granted
exception,
and
not,
and
I
and
I
understand
and
sympathize
with
the
business
owners
on
those
three,
but
that
we
want
to
ensure
that
we're
moving
forward
in
a
direction.
That's
that's
smart
and
will
lead
to
success.
L
I'm
chair
councillor:
did
you
want
any
as
to
the
volume
a
business
in
town?
I
could
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
if
you,
if
you'd
like
what
you
know,
Thank
You
counsel,
in
talking
to
probably
more
hotels,
specific
but
also
restaurants,
outdoor
dining
is
definitely
far
more
popular
than
indoor
dining
right
now,
but
I've
seen
through
webinars,
quite
a
bit
of
statistics
that
show
that
people
are
reluctant
to
go
back
indoors
but
they're
very
anxious
to
get
out
to
dine
at
their
restaurant
in
an
outdoor
environment.
L
So
part
of
this
was
to
to
help
restaurants
create
added
floor
plan,
but
also
to
have
that
added
floor
plan
be
in
an
outdoor
environment.
I
do
know
that
a
few
of
the
hotels
are
hitting
their
their
cap
on
weekends
right
now,
a
few
were
full.
This
laFonda
rosewood,
Hotel
Santa
fan,
who
were
all
filled,
filled
to
their
50%
this
this
past
weekend
during
the
week
they're
running
between
10
and
20%,
maybe
30
at
laFonda,
but
the
and
and
the
retail
has
a
flow
restaurants.
People
go
it,
they
sit
down
and
they
take
more
time.
L
The
retail
has
a
flow.
So
I
don't
think
that
24,
the
25%
restriction
is
quite
as
harmful
to
them
as,
frankly,
it
is
for
the
restaurants
as
to
their
ability
to
serve
the
outside
area
it.
If
the
restaurant
wants
to
extend
alcohol
service,
it
has
to
be
contiguous
to
their
their
restaurants.
So
a
restaurant
can't
operate
down
the
street.
L
L
All
of
this
would
go
away
by
the
31st
of
October
unless
council
were
to
like
the
idea
and
want
to
continue
and
extend
it
in
any
place,
but
this
resolution
would,
with
sunset
on
October
31st
and
the
ABC
to
support
this
idea
across
the
state
has
come
up
with
a
temporary
ability
for
a
restaurant
to
expand
its
floorplan
by
25%
to
accommodate
the
expansion
of
their
their
floor
plan
for
the
additional
alcohol
service,
the
street
in
street
areas.
A
restaurant
might
want
to
go
beyond
that.
L
25%
and
ABC
has
indicated
a
willingness
to
look
at
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
again
recognizing
the
extreme
economic
concerns
that
the
restaurants
are
in
right
now.
So
I
hope
that
answers
the
questions
and
as
to
excluding
any
particular
Street.
I
am
fully
supportive
that
that
council
represents
the
the
people
of
the
of
our
city
and,
if
council,
in
its
greater
wisdom,
feels
that
a
particular
street
should
be
excluded.
E
Thank
You
mr.
Randall,
and
you
kind
of
brought
up
some
additional
questions
for
me
because
you
you
brought
up
that
it's
mostly
the
restaurant
business.
That's
that's
looking
for
the
additional
capacity,
not
necessarily
retail,
and
so
my
question
is,
you
know
and
I'm
looking
towards
the
future.
You
know
four
years
from
now
when
our
economy
is
back
in
order
and
should
we
move
forward
with
closing
some
streets
and
it's
highly
successful.
E
How
do
we
deal
with
potential
I
guess
which,
for
lack
of
better
words,
leasing
the
street
because
they
are
basically
expanding
their
business
footprint
onto
city
property?
So
then,
do
we
start
to
charge
for
space
on
the
street,
the
curb,
etc,
because
they're
they're
expending
outside
of
their
brick
and
mortar
building?
What
what?
How
do
you
foresee
that.
L
Mr.
chairman,
council
I
be
glad
to
give
you
my
opinion
on
it.
I
think
that
this
is
being
instituted
and
it's
been
brought
forward
by
the
restaurant
and
it,
and
it
has
been
primarily
brought
forward
by
restaurants
that,
because
they're
restricted
at
50%
and
I've
been
in
I'm
on
a
subcommittee
for
the
economics
Council
that
advises
the
governor
and
all
feedback
we've
been
given
is
that
the
restrictions
beyond
50%
will
probably
not
be
lifted
fully
until
there
is
a
vaccine
in
place.
So
this
the
concept
of
this
is
to
get
it
through
this
season.
L
If
it
was
highly
successful
and
it
was
very
successful
to
restaurants-
and
they
still
wanted
to
do
it
after,
they
could
use
100%
of
their
original
floor
plan.
I.
Think
of
it.
If
the
council
wanted
to
continue,
I,
definitely
think
a
charge
should
exist,
because
then
they're
getting
added
value,
as
opposed
to
to
this
being
able
to
try
to
compensate
for
the
50%
loss
of
floor
plan
that
they're
getting
but
I
I
totally
agree.
I
think
it
would
be
a
revenue
source
for
the
city
and
it's
unfortunate
that
we
don't
have
a
a
street.
L
Like
many
cities
have
where
there
really
is
a
high
concentration
of
restaurants,
our
restaurants
are
are
more
scattered
and
probably
the
cost
of
rents,
on
the
plaza
make
it
even
more
difficult
that
you
have
to
move
away
from
the
plaza,
but
I
think
I
think
it
could
be
a
future
revenue
source
if
it
was
successful.
And
if
council
felt
it
was
a
good
idea
to
continue.
E
Okay,
I
think
that's
something
we
should
consider
as
we're
moving
through
the
the
committee
process
to
amending
this,
that
this
resolution
is
in
alignment
with
the
governor's
50%
restaurant
capacity
order,
and
it
only
applies
during
that
timeframe
that
it's
sunsets
after
because
then
should
it
be
successful.
Like
I,
said,
I
think
it's
a
great
idea,
I
think
it's
it's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
expand
on
how
not
only
our
visitors,
but
our
local
local
people
can
can
experience
an
estate
and
I
think
we
want
with.
Should
we
move
forward
with
this?
E
We
wanted
to
be
successful,
but
we
want
to
ensure
that
we're
not
taking
away
from
from
the
community
as
well,
and
so
you
did
sparks
and
so
I
I
definitely
want
to
look
into
having
that
added
into.
You
know
this.
This
would
sunset
once
the
50%
capacity
mandate
from
the
governor
expires.
This
then
would
expire.
We
can
bring
forth
the
new
resolution
that
would
have
stipulations
such
as
you
know
what
it
would
cost
in
regards
to
to
rent
so
to
speak.
Should
a
business
or
a
restaurant
want
to
move
forward
with
this
type
of
opportunity.
L
Madam
chair
accounts
are
the
one
thought
on
that
might
be
that
it
would
be
when
restaurants
are
able
to
get
back
to
100%,
because
I
could
see
that
there
could
be
a
a
situation
where
the
governor
would
say:
restaurants
could
be
at
60%
or
70%.
The
whole
idea
would
be
when
they're
back
at
full
capacity,
then
that
this
could
this
could
sunset.
That
might
be
the
way
to
state
that
okay,
thank.
A
Just
want
to
point
out
that
the
resolution
on
page
3
does
say
in
the,
whereas
section
it
says,
closing
certain
streets
in
Santa
Fe
until
the
end
of
October
2020
will
allow
more
restaurants
and
businesses
to
take
advantage
of
state
and
city
opportunities
to
expand
their
footprint
and
would
allow
for
greater
access
to
those
businesses
by
non
vehicular
travel
traffic.
And
then
it
says
in
the
be
it
resolved.
A
Temporary
street
closures
may
only
be
implemented
between
July,
1st
and
October
31st
unless
extended
by
adoption
of
the
resolution
by
the
governing
bodies.
So
it
does
have
an
end,
although
it
doesn't
say
2020
like
it
implies
in
the,
whereas
clauses
so
probably
need
to
have
an
amendment
that
either
I
mean
I
think
this
was
just
looking
at
July
to
October
of
this
year,
not
tying
it
to
the
governor's
pulling
back
on
on
the
the
occupancy
standards.
So
just
to
point
that
out
as
we
move
forward
on.
E
A
Problem
is
is
that
in
these
resolutions,
it's
you
know
it.
The
rules
should
be
set
out
in
the
be
it
resolved
section,
not
in
the,
whereas
the
warehouse
is
really
those,
whereas
clauses
are
kind
of
setting
the
stage
setting
the
table.
If
you
will
for
what's
what's
going
to
be
resolved,
what
we're
going
to
do
so,
if
there's
substance,
rules
that
we
want
to
see
followed
in
the,
whereas
as
I
think
we
need
to
bring
them
down
into
the
be
it
for
the
result.
Side.
A
G
A
N
A
F
F
N
F
Thank
you,
I
think
that
you
know
as
this
as
this
moves
through
and
as
we're
considering
it,
it
would
be
useful
for
me
to
see
what
the
streets
are
in
downtown
Santa
Fe.
That
would
be
because
I'm
guessing
that
this
primarily
would
would
be
impacting
the
downtown
I
know
it's
very
possible
that
there
might
be
some
other
areas
that
would
apply,
but
in
terms
of
having
enough
streets
where
it
looks
like
there
would
be
some
interest.
I
believe
it'd
be
downtown.
Santa
Fe
I'd
be
interested
to
see
what
streets
would
be.
F
A
list
of
what
streets
would
be
completely
off
the
board
that
we
consider
to
essential
in
terms
of
traffic
flow
in
downtown,
and
then
it
also
might
be
interesting.
You
know
like:
is
this
a
first-come
first-serve,
so,
whichever
the
first
Street
comes
in
or
is
there
really
is
there
some
streets
that
we
would
find
to
be
more
beneficial
than
others?
That
would
have
a
greater
general
impact
on
business
for
the
city?
I,
don't
know
if
if
mr.
Randol
or
mr.
F
Brown
might
have
some
information
on
you
know,
since
we're
closing
down
the
street,
that's
impacting
one
or
two
businesses
versus
a
street.
That's
closing
or
they'd
be
impacting
15
businesses
I
think
we'd
want
the
most
bang
for
our
buck.
Considering
that
we
know
there
would
be
some
challenges
with
with
traffic
at
some
point
that
there
will
definitely
be
some
adjustments.
Does
anybody
on
the
team
have
any
thoughts
about
that.
L
Madam
chair
councillor,
there's
it's
definitely
important
that
any
street
clothes
has
the
full
support
of
the
businesses
that
are
on
the
street
that
it
that
it
benefits
more
than
just
a
business.
If,
particularly
if
it's
a
fairly
long
street
I
know
that
there's
some
interest
and-
and
it's
been
expressed
to
me
interest
of
of
closing
Marcy
between
Lincoln
and
Washington
only
after
5:30
each
evening,
where
restaurants
would
then
move
furniture
out
onto
the
street,
it
would
be
after
the
business
flow
of
the
day
they,
and
there
are
three
restaurants.
L
There
I
believe
that
could
benefit
from
that.
So
I
know
that
I've
heard
that
they
were
interested
in
that
the
owner
of
LP
Otto
has
expressed
that
to
me.
I,
don't
I
haven't
seen
a
a
petition
on
it
yet,
but
there
are
a
few
situations
like
that,
which
would
be
just
timely
closures.
Now
that
puts
a
lot
more
burden,
obviously
on
the
restaurants,
and/or
the
businesses
to
to
set
up
and
tear
down
and
set
up
and
tear
down.
L
L
There
they're
very
much
missing
the
traffic
that
Mia
Wolfe
brought
in
for
the
last
couple
of
years,
and
and
they
feel
that
if
they
were
able
to
close
a
street
out
there
that
that
it
would
be
able
to
attract
more
people,
not
just
visitors
to
the
city
but
but
residents
as
well,
and
make
it
kind
of
a
residential
hub
for
more
outdoor
dining
and
excitement.
So
I
have
heard
expressed
there.
F
Well,
that's,
and
that
kind
of
brings
me
to
my
other
question
about
where
the
final-
the
final
approval
for
this
so
John,
would
you
make
the
final
recommendation
and
then
is
the
final
approval
for
a
street
closure?
Does
that
go
to
the
city
manager?
Does
that
come
to
us?
How
does
that
process
play
out?
Because
again
there
seems
to
be
a
point
where
there
potentially
might
be
a
need
for
balance.
N
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair
councillor.
Mr.
Sanchez
I
would
be
the
ultimate
approval
and
the
reason
for
that,
at
least
at
this
time
you
know
I
know:
we've
mentioned
whether
time
is
of
the
essence
or
not,
and
you
know
we're
already
into
our
summer
season,
so
it
as
rich
Brown
exclaimed
in
his
preamble.
N
You
know
we're
wanting
to
try
to
make
a
nimble
process
during
this
time,
and
we
understand
that
it
comes
with
someone
certainty,
but
in
order
to
completely
vet
every
single,
every
single
closure
through
every
single
approving
body
by
the
time
we
do
that
it's
going
to
be
October,
31st
I
do
think
you
know
again
it's
just
this
summer.
We
could
learn
a
lot
from
it.
If
we
do
close
streets
and
there's
not
that
many
people
out
on
them,
we
can
understand
it
that
what
the
benefit
is
of
it.
N
We
can
maybe
get
some
real-life
data
regarding
traffic
to
see
how
it
impacts
traffic
I.
Think
now,
during
this
summer
you
know.
As
we
all
know,
the
traffic
in
general
is
just-
and
you
alluded
to
this
earlier-
traffic
is
just
there's
not
that
much
traffic,
so
I
do
think
right
now,
if
we
do
do
some
closures,
there
is
less
potential,
at
least
this
summer
for
there
to
be
traffic
issues,
and
these
as
it
pertains
to
the
closures
that
we
approve.
L
Madame
chair
and
councillor
I'd
also
like
to
add
that
the
restaurants,
particularly
if
we're
talking
about
restaurants,
they
have
to
make
an
investment
in
chairs
and
tables
that
can
withstand
the
outdoor
climate
in
the
event
of
rain
or
and
that
get
the
Sun
on
them
during
the
day
and
they're
making
making
that
investment.
It's
important
that
we
give
them
the
maximum
length
of
time
that
we
can
to
or
ties
that
cost
for
their
business.
L
I
know
a
lot
of
a
couple
of
restaurants
that
were
considering
the
the
park,
let's
even
when
it
was
offered
to
them
at
no
cost
because
of
the
cost
of
the
of
the
barriers
that
have
to
be
put
around
those
parking
spaces.
Like
you
see
out
in
front
of
the
rosewood
Anasazi
right
now,
it
almost
makes
it
cost
prohibitive
form,
so
they
have
to
have
a
maximum
length
of
time
to
amortize
the
cost
of
the
investments
that
they
have
to
make
for
the
outdoor
expanded
service.
F
L
Madam
chair
accounts
are
out,
add
a
little
say
something
and
then
rich
can
add
into
I
know
for
a
fact
that
the
restaurant
tours
that
I've
spoken
with
feel
that
the
ability
to
have
outdoor
dining
will
be
far
more
beneficial
than
right
now,
indoor
dining,
as
I
mentioned
before,
there's
a
reluctance
on
the
part
of
many
individuals
to
go
into
into
the
indoor
spaces.
A
lot
of
statistics
are
out
there
that
suggest
one
is
safer
in
an
outdoor
and
than
an
indoor
environment.
L
Where
there's
no
air
conditioning
recirculate
circulating
the
air
that
that
people
are
breathing
and
so
I
think.
There's
no
question
that
expanding
their
floorplan
and
get
it
allowing
them
to
get
back
at
least
close
to
what
they
might
have
had
before
the
pandemic
and
having
that
expansion
being
an
outdoor
environment
will
result
in
increased
traffic
to
the
restaurants
and
an
increased
hiring.
There's
no
question
they're
all
anxious
to
bring
back
employees.
They
just
can't
do
it
right
now
they
can't
afford
to
do
it.
M
I'm,
chair
and
counselor
Santa
Casa
Sanchez
in
the
bigger
picture.
They
a
lot
of
these
small
restaurants
and
businesses
applied
for
the
PPP
loan
through
the
federal
government
and
they
have
to
employ
their
employees
in
order
to
have
the
loan
take
effect,
and
so
now
that
we're
in
sort
of
our
tourist
and
high
season,
they
really
want
to
get
folks
back
to
work,
because
the
federal
government
just
two
days
ago
or
five
days
ago,
change
the
percentage
of
money.
M
You
could
get
your
loan
to
use
for
operations,
and
so
they
see
it
as
a
way
to
sort
of
take
advantage
of
the
time
that
the
the
city
is
now
opening
and
there's
business
to
be
had,
and
they
want
to.
You
know,
keep
people
employed,
so
there's
kind
of
a
motivation
for
them
to
get
back
into
action
so
that
these
these
loans
that
they've
actually
applied
for
that
they
don't
get
the
sort
of
stuck
with
money
that
they
have
to
bring
back.
M
L
Also
expanded
the
length
of
time
they
have
to
consume
that
those
payroll
dollars.
So
that
really
ties
in
well
to
the
allowing
the
restaurants
to
be
out
the
out
there
until
the
end
of
October.
It's
really
whether
that
came
up
with
the
October
31st
date.
It's
also
a
date
that
ABC
picked,
so
we
felt
it
made
the
most
sense
to
align
the
approval
that
they
were
getting
from
the
state
for
alcohol
service
to
line
up
with
the
approval
they
might
get
from
the
city
for
the
dining
service.
F
Yeah,
but
that
does
make
sense,
so
thank
you
so
much
so
I
know
what
San
Francisco
Street
will
see,
but
I
some
concerns
that
were
brought
up.
That
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
thinking
about
some
people
mentioned
individuals
who
may
be
in
wheelchairs
who
can't
walk
and
and
it
if
we
were
to
close
in
Francisco,
that
it
would
limit
access
to
the
plaza
I
know
that
we
actually
probably
have
some.
F
We
have
some
plans
in
place
because
we've
we've
closed
streets
before
for
fiestas
for
pride
for
Spanish
and
Indian
markets.
How
do
we
address
some
of
the
a
DEA
concerns
making
sure
that
people
do
still
have
access
if
they
cannot
park
far
away
and
and
walk
up
and
I
know
that
councillor
Rivera
did
have
the
suggestion
of
the
sand
of
all
a
lot,
but
but
I
think
that
some
people
were
really
concerned
about
not
being
able
to
get
very
close.
If
San
Francisco
Street
were
to
be
budged,.
N
Madam
chair
councilor
Sanchez,
as
far
as
removing
accessible
spaces,
close
to
the
plaza.
If
we
had
significant
closures
that
eliminated
a
certain
amount
of
parking
spaces,
we
can
definitely
look
at
relocating
them
as
we
do
during
our
major
festivals
it.
There
is
a
potential,
though,
for
a
positive
effect
on
on
a
da
and
here,
and
the
way
it
happens
is
a
lot
of
our
sidewalks
themselves.
N
So
if
the
intent
is
for
the
people
just
to
go
downtown
to
the
plaza
and
only
the
plaza,
then
that's
where
you
know
getting
a
park
is
close
to
the
plaza
is
ideal,
but
if
they're
wanting
to
shop
in
all
the
plaza
restaurants
that
that
the
array
outside
of
the
plaza
a
lot
of
our
sidewalks
are
old
and
are
very
difficult
for
them
to
maneuver.
So
if
we
have
streets
closed,
they
can
use
those
as
areas
to
move
around
in
the
plaza
area.
If
you
consider
the
plaza
area
and
beyond,
just
the
grass.
F
Thank
you.
That's
a
I
forgot
about
this
I
Felix
downtown
and
then
counts
Rivera.
Maybe
maybe
you
are
the
individual
to
help
me
understand
this.
Is
it's
a
bit
of
historical
knowledge,
but
I
know
that
there
was
a
councillor
Garcia
brought
this
up
the
discussion
of
crews
nights
and
that
this
was
something
that
was
implemented
in
the
people
to
the
plaza
it's
what
it
I
read
there
counselor
Theory
Alice
shaking
her
head.
No,
so
those
did
not
happen.
I.
G
A
What
we
were
talking
about,
designate
cruise
nights,
which
will
permit
all
four
streets
surrounding
the
plaza
to
be
sigh
to
be
along
I,
just
lost
the
white
page
to
be
open
during
the
designated
cruise
nights.
So
it
sounds
like
under
this
resolution
we
could
still
designate
cruise
night,
and
this
suggests
that
the
entire
plaza
could
be
open
for
those
but
I'm
sure
we
could
also
designate
you
know
part
of
the
plaza
to
be
opened
on
those
nights.
F
Thank
You
councillor,
O'meara,
Wirth
and
I
were
those
analyses
done
because
I
think
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
very
useful
for
us
to
have.
Is
this
smooth
soon
we're
looking
at
making
those
decisions,
so
whoever
might
be
able
to
pull
those
up
for
us
and
and
send
them
our
way?
I'd
be
really
interested
to
to
see
those
I
know
that
we
would
be
looking
at
some
different
factors,
but
I
still
think
it'd
be
interesting,
interesting
to
see
them.
F
All
right,
I
think
that
all
those
questions
have
been
answered.
I
will
say
that
the
majority
of
emails
that
I've
received
about
Don,
Gaspar
and
Shelby
have
been
in
favor
of
closing
those
streets,
but
you
know
councillor
be
Arielle's
earlier
point.
I
I
agree
that,
while
we
maybe
did
not
violate
the
Open
Meetings
Act
I
do
I
wish
that
there
had
been
more
time
for
people
to
see
what
was
being
considered.
F
F
Restaurants,
make
sense
to
me,
but
I'd
be
really
curious
to
hear
what
shop
keepers
are
thinking
and
how
they
might
be
able
to
utilize
this,
as
well
as
I've
been
asking
people
the
employee
question
so
Randy
and
rich
as
you're
speaking
with
shopkeepers,
in
conjunction
with
this
I,
would
really
be
interested
in
hearing
how
many
feel
that
they'd
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
this
and
and
how
it
would
be
impactful
I.
Think,
overall,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
need
to
look
at.
I
would
like
to
find
a
way
to
make
this
work.
F
I
would
be
in
favor
of
but
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
this
has
done
well
in
regards
to
the
traffic
flow
to
other
uses
of
the
street
that
are
really
important
to
you
know,
making
sure
we
don't
hit
that
critical
mass
and
seeing
if
there
are
some
really
interesting
configurations
where
you
know
maybe
Marcy's
closing
starting
at
5:30
and
another
Street
is
opening
so
that
we
could
get
confusing,
but
I
think
that
we're
going
to
need
to
get
creative
as
we
are
looking
at
this.
So
oh
yeah,
thank
you.
D
You
Madame
chair
and
thanks
to
my
college
colleagues
for
asking
questions
that
I
had
regarding
this
process.
Again,
my
concern
was
about
the
process
and
procedures
of
how
we
communicate
what
we're
trying
to
do,
and
it's
been
very
confusing
for
the
public
about
what
Street
is
being
considered.
What
the
what
the
actual
resolution
said
since
we
didn't
see
it,
so
that
was
my
concern.
I
want
to
make
clear
that
it
wasn't
about
not
considering
any
streets
for
possible
closures
or
temporary
closures.
D
I
think
what
was
interesting
is
this
whole
conversation
I've
had
even
with
restaurants
like
two
months
ago,
where
we
were
looking
at
and
considering
closing
sidewalks
and
parklets
and
I
was
very
much
in
favor
of
that
and
wanting
to
work
with
our
business
owners
about
what
that
could
look
like
with
staff
I.
Think
what's
happened,
is
the
communication
dropped
off
completely
with
me,
letting
me
know
about
what
was
going
to
be
happening
and
moving
forward,
and
it
puts
me
in
a
very
compromising
position
to
not
be
able
to
communicate.
D
Hey
what's
happening
what's
being
considered
so
now
we
consider
streets
and
that
was
never
part
of
the
conversation
before
I
mean
and
I'm
open
to
that
dialogue.
I
think
when
we've
been
through
throwing
out
certain
streets,
they
make
sense
to
me
the
small
ones,
particularly
Don,
Gaspar
and
Shelby,
because
they're
very
narrow,
and
there
are
businesses
that
are
located
on
that
street
I.
Think
what
I
was
trying
to
understand
and
put
him.
You
know,
I
the
reason
why
I
found
out
about
even
San
Francisco
wasn't
even
through
this
resolution.
D
So
it's
helpful
to
know
where
people
stand
with
this
with
business
owners
and
understand
what
what
they're
considering
and
how
much
support
they're
getting
on
particular
streets,
because
it
doesn't,
if
I
don't
hear
from
people,
then
I
just
assumed
that
there's
only
one
person,
that's
supportive
of
it
with
dungus.
But
we
got
the
petition
from
business
owners
this
morning,
and
so
that
was
helpful
and
I
wrote
the
folks
that
saying
that
this
makes
sense.
But
we
just
have
to
procedurally
do
things
correct
so
that
people
understand
how
we're
moving
forward.
D
D
What
I'm
wanting
to
understand
better
and
I
and
I
agree
with
my
colleague
about
how
we
can
continue,
having
the
plaza
accessible,
at
least
on
one
side
and
I'd
like
for
language,
to
be
included
in
that
that
we
would
have
at
least
one
Street
can
take
one
Street
on
the
plaza
that
would
be
open
to
vehicular
traffic.
Only
because
of
the
mobility
issues.
I
see
with
our
community,
it's
not
about
somebody
wanting
to
stroll
the
plaza
if
they
can't
stroll
the
plaza
and
they
want
to
be
able
to
drive
by
I.
D
Think
that's
important,
so
I'd
like
to
know
understand
better
about
this
designated
cruise
nights,
because
that
resolution
it
didn't
seem
like
we
actually
acted
upon
it,
designating
cruise
nights
anyway.
We've
actually
eliminated
a
lot
of
cruising
streets,
one
of
them
back
in
the
days
with
Alameda.
That
was
our
favorite
cruising
street
because
it
was,
it
could
flow,
and
you
could
see
people
crossing
you
and
and
actually
communicate
with
cars
that
are
passing
you
on
the
other
side.
This
wouldn't
necessarily
allow
it
having
one
side
of
our
plaza
open.
L
Madam
chair,
that's
a
good
question.
I've
been
with
the
city
since
that
resolution
was
established
and
I've
never
heard
of
the
committee
that
it
suggests
being
set
up
so
I,
don't
think
there
is
a
program
to
do
it
right
now,
unless
rich
or
John
have
other
information,
but
I.
So
I've
never
heard
about
that
committee
executing
any
of
the
being
set
up
to
execute
any
of
the
items
that
the
chair
read
during
the
as
she
is.
She
reviewed
the
resolution.
A
So,
on
that
point,
counselor
area
I
mean
we
could
change
the
resolution
so
right
now
it
says
that
this
that
now,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
city
shall
apply
the
following
framework
when
evaluating
the
temporary
closure
of
streets
to
vehicular
traffic
and
number
six
is
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
resolution
number
twenty
fourteen
49
all
streets
surrounding
the
plaza
shall
be
open
to
vehicular
traffic
traffic
during
designated
cruise
nights
and
then,
of
course,
you'd
have
to
refer
back.
This
is
the
problem.
This
is
like
the
water
conservation
committee
right.
A
So
then
you
have
to
refer
back
to
this
resolution
to
figure
out
how
you
designate
cruise
nights.
Maybe
I
mean
if
this
is
something
that's
really
important
to
us,
rather
than
refer
back
to
that
resolution.
Just
in
the
resolution
specify
that
designated
cruise
nights
should
be
created
by
whoever
the
city
manager
or
a
team
or
what,
however,
we
want
to
designate
that
and
that
on
those
nights,
all
four
streets
are
open
for
for
that
activity.
If
that's,
you
know
again,
what's
important
to
the
community
and
to.
D
The
governing
body,
yeah
I,
think
we
need
language
that
establishes
when
those
cruise
times
are
and
I
say
times,
because
people
don't
necessarily
want
to
cruise
just
at
night.
So
I'm
wondering
about
that
like
when
are
the
cruise
times,
how
they,
how
will
they
be
a
stab?
And
then
that
would
also
be
based
on
which
Street,
which
streets
are
temporary
temporarily
closed.
So
does
anyone
have
any
suggestions?
D
Because
again,
this
is
these
are
like
changes
that
I
want
to
be
able
to
make
and
I
don't
feel
like
right
now,
timewise
we're
trying
to
like
wordsmith
things
to
add
to
this
resolution.
So
I
guess.
Let
me
be
clear:
I
want
to
look
at
ways
to
have
Ling,
which
I
would
say
at
least
one
Street
should
be
open
at
the
Plaza,
not
sure
where
to
place
that
how
we
would
be
more
specific
about
establishing
cruise
days
or
times.
D
Also
that
we
need
language
that
would
be
clear
about
the
temporary
basis
of
this
resolution
and
that
it
would
also
be
contingent
on
the
states
the
governor's
orders
on
standards
on
occupancy,
I
guess,
I,
don't
know
how
else
to
phrase
that,
like
about
the
relocation
of
handicapped
parking,
are
we
going
to
be
doing
that
across
the
board?
When
we
look
at
these
streets,
big
closures,.
N
Madame
chair
councillor
vrdr,
it
really
depends
on
the
closure
itself.
What
stalls
exist
there
and
what
what
we
feel
they're
being
used
for
so
it'll
be
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
But,
yes,
we
will
take
that
into
consideration
if
we
are
eliminating
a
stall
to
see
if
we
can
relocate
it
somewhere
within
close
proximity
or
if
it
needs
to
be.
D
D
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
our
business
owners
understand
we
we
know
this
has
been.
This
is
a
difficult
time
and
we're
trying
to
be
able
to
accommodate
something
that
we've
never
had
to
deal
with
before
in
the
past
about
ways
to
safely
open
and
I
agree
with
my
colleague.
You
know,
workers
are
the
most
important
piece
to
this,
because
they're
they're
what
makes
businesses
go
round
and
if
we're
not
keeping
them
safe,
then
we
really
don't
have.
D
Then
we
don't.
We
are
risking
just
our
economic
opportunities
to
be
able
to
thrive.
So
I
think
that's
a
big
piece
of
this
and
it
doesn't
say
anything
about
working
workers
being
protected.
I
think
it
probably
should
say
something
of
that
effect,
not
just
businesses
opening,
but
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
workers
are
protected
and
that's
why
we
want
to
expand
out
into
streets
for
temporary
closure.
D
D
I
just
want
us
to
be
transparent
about
what
we're
considering
and
if
there's
folks
on
San,
Francisco,
Street
or
any
other
Street
for
that
matter,
to
really
communicate
that
with
well,
particularly
the
councillors
that
represented
that
the
district
would
be
helpful,
but
all
of
us,
you
know
in
some
way
so
yeah
I,
guess
those
changes
in
terms
of
languages.
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
add
in
some
way
with
an
amendment
and
I
feel
like
right.
Now,
it's
a
little
bit
challenging
to
try
to
do
that
at
this
moment,.
A
Councillor
tonight,
would
you
mind,
yielding
the
floor,
and
maybe
I
can
build
off
of
what
you're
talking
about
John,
if
you
could
so
your
the
the
buck
stops
with
you
guy
is
that
in
your
cassadee
as
Public
Works
Director
interim
public
works
director
or
as
in
your
capacity
as
a
traffic
engineer
for
the
city,
which
hat
are
you
wearing
when
you
are
the
the
decision-maker
and
the
final
decision-maker
on
street
closures,.
N
So,
madam
chair,
currently
right
away
obstruction
permits
are
issued
through
the
engineering
division.
I
believe
the
ordinance
that
allows
us
to
regulate
the
closure
of
streets
designates
it
to
the
public
works
director
or
designee.
So
my
division
is
currently
that
designee
and
we
currently
do
have
that
by
ordinance
have
I've
been
delegated
that
authority
to
approve
street
closures.
If
we
approve
street
closures
through
two
different
mechanisms,
one
is
a
right
away:
obstruction
permit
and
they're
very
similar.
N
We
almost
got
consolidating
them
into
one,
but
the
right
away,
obstruction
permit,
which
this
falls
underneath
and
managed
by
my
office,
the
other
one
our
street
cut
permit
so
any
times.
Anyone
anyone,
including
utility
companies
or
construction
projects,
cut
into
the
streets,
our
streets
and
and
drainage
division
manages
those
permits.
So.
N
A
And
so
just
to
be
clear,
so
this
resolution
the
way
it's
currently
written.
It
says
now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
city
shall
apply
the
following
framework
when
evaluating
the
temporary
closure
of
streets
to
vehicular
traffic.
So
it
lists
six
things
that
have
to
be
evaluated.
One
temporary
street
closures
will
be
established
through
the
issuance
of
obstruction
of
streets
permit
issued
by
the
city
of
Santa
Fe
public
works
department.
If
that's
the
right-of-way
thing
you
were
just
talking
about.
A
A
So
the
other
thing
that
has
to
be
evaluated
is
temporary.
Street
closures
may
only
be
implemented
through
between
July,
1st
and
October
31st,
unless
extended
by
adoption
of
resolution
by
the
governing
body.
Now,
we've
already
suggested
that
this
is
temporary.
It's
for
this
year,
so
I
think
we're
gonna
need
to
add
20
20
in
here
to
be
clear
that
we're
only
talking
about
this
this
year.
So
that's
one
one
change.
We
know
that
has
to
be
made.
A
Then
another
thing
that
has
to
be
about
evaluated
at
least
75%
of
the
businesses
and
residents
whose
primary
access
is
on
the
proposed
street
must
support
the
proposed
Street
closure
so
who
who's
the
burden
on
there
is
it?
Is
it
the
restaurant
that
wants
to
close
the
street
who's
got
to
go
around
and
find
75%
of
its
surrounding
neighbors
in
agreement,
or
is
that
something
the
city's
going
to
do?
Who
wears
the
burden
on
that
piece
of
this
evaluation?.
A
Okay,
so
we
might
want
to
say
that
and
then
and
I'm
gonna
come
back
to
that
in
a
minute
and
then
number
four.
The
fourth
thing
that
has
to
be
evaluated
is
the
terms
of
the
closure
shall
ensure
adequate
emergency
access
verified
by
the
city's
police
and
fire
departments
and
John.
You
already
suggested
that
you'll
be
the
point
person
who
will
work
with
our
our
police
and
fire
to
make
sure
that,
if
we're
gonna
close
this,
it's
not
going
to
affect
response
times
in
the
area
that
they'll
still
be
able
to
move
around.
That's
correct!
A
And
then
number
five,
the
terms
of
the
closure
shall
accommodate
accessible
parking
ad,
a
compliance
and
adequate
access
for
deliveries
before
10:00
a.m.
each
day
and
again
that
would
fall
on
you
John
correct
to
make
sure
that
we're
accommodating
the,
as
has
been
spoken
about
earlier
folks
needing
you
know,
accessible
parking
and,
and
then
businesses
needing
deliveries
that
that
would
you
would
be
coordinating
that.
Yes,.
N
A
And
then,
finally,
six,
the
other
thing
that
has
to
be
evaluated
in
this
is
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
the
resolution.
Number
2014
49,
which
we've
just
been
talking
about
all
streets
surrounding
the
pot
Plaza,
shall
be
open
to
vehicular
vehicular
traffic
during
designated
cruise
nights,
and
we've
already
suggested
that.
Maybe
we
need
to
change
that
language
to
be
clear
to
make
it
so
that
we
actually
do
designate
cruise
nights
where
all
four
would
be
open,
but
I
guess.
My
question
is
now
understanding
this
framework.
N
N
A
So
I
guess
the
other
thing.
The
baby.
This
this
framework
needs
to
talk
about
is
that
we
we
wouldn't
close
a
street
that
was
a
major
artery
and
major
arteries
are
defined
by
the
MPO
or.
However,
we
looked
at
that
because
again,
I
would
hate
for
a
business
to
realizing
the
burden
is
on
them
to
figure
out
that
their
neighbors
agree
that
the
street
should
be
so
they
should
be
closed.
They
do
all
this
work
and
then
they
they
get
to
your
door.
John
and
you're
like
up
no
you're
a
major
artery.
A
A
Maybe
we
want
language
in
it
that
that
is
very
clear
that
some
some
access
to
the
plaza
should
be
required
at
all
times.
If
that's,
what
we
want
to
do
so
I
would
just
I
think
those
were
the
things
I
wanted
to
add
and
to
clarify
and
to
make
sure
people
understood
and
councillor
Rivera
has
been
very
patiently
waiting
again
with
his
hand
up
so
I'd
like
to
go
to
him.
If
that's
okay,.
A
D
G
G
Alright,
so
I
agree
with
the
that's
chair
that
I
think
the
July
through
October
date
needs
to
have
2020
on
it.
Randy.
If
you
could
ask
the
restaurant
between
now
and
when
this
moves
on,
what
would
restaurants
do
in
the
instance
if
the
weather
changes
and
they
have
reservations
outside,
would
they
cancel
those
reservations
or
would
they
move
people
inside
and
I?
Don't
know
if
you
have
a
sense
of
what
they
might
do,
but
might
be
important
to
find
out.
I
have.
L
L
What
restaurants
do
find
if
people
have
reserved
outdoor
tables
and
it's
rains-
we
have
bad
weather
there.
No-Show
rate
goes
way
up,
so
they
do
get
a
bunch
of
cancellations,
but
it
also
backs
up
and
they
use
the
weather
as
their
excuse.
I
know.
Lee
Nino
at
Osteria
has
about
six
outdoor,
maybe
eat
outdoor
tables
in
his
little
courtyard.
L
He
he
then
forces
people
upstairs
where
they
don't
want
to
go,
but
each
restaurant
kind
of
has
their
own
backup
weather
plan.
The
beauty
is,
our
weather
makes
it
less
of
a
problem
than
it
would
be.
If
we
were
in
a
in
a
really
rainy
climate,
but
in
Florida
they
they
get
rain
pops
through
they
shut
down,
and
then
they
open
up
again
once
it
stops
raining,
so
each
one
would
have
to
work,
but
I
will
definitely
discuss
that
before
Monday
and
get
some
input
from
specific
restaurants.
Thank.
G
L
Man,
I'm
chair,
counts,
a
good
question.
No,
not
really.
The
idea
was,
it
would
be
closed,
I
guess
through
the
evening
and
then
the
next
morning
is
when
the
deliveries
would
come
in
so
and
and
the
deliveries
would
all
be
done
through
the
fire.
Access
roads
that
are
allowed,
so
there'd
have
to
be
a
moveable
portion
of
the
gate,
which
is
why
the
the
it
has
to
be
verified
that
that
gate
is
put
back
in
as
well,
but
it
would
be
during
the
who
is.
L
G
If
you're
rich
could
have
some
discussion
with
the
restaurants
about
that,
what's
a
good
time
to
end
so
that
we're
not
keeping
barriers
up
or
when
I
keep
you
roads
closed
until
2:00
a.m.
if,
if
they
only
want
till
9:00
o'clock
at
night
and
then
probably
suggest
that
into
the
resolution
somewhere
so.
N
Because
they're,
so
yes,
so
the
the
the
ordinance
it's
under
chapter
23
of
city
code
grants
us
quite
a
bit
of
latitude.
It's
pretty
general,
it
basically
says,
except
as
otherwise
provided
any
person
desiring
to
place
any
obstruction
on
any
public
street
alley
or
way
in
the
city
shall
make
application
to
the
Public
Works
Department
for
a
permit
to
do
so.
Such
permits
he'll
be
granted
compliance
with
the
terms
as
Miam
as
may
be
imposed
by
a
city
engineer
and
on
the
payment
of
a
fee
of
$100.
N
G
Lastly,
if
there
could
be
some
communication,
I
guess
with
and
the
restaurants
that
come
to
mind,
pass
quails
and
Tia
Sophia's
who
only
are
open
in
the
morning.
So
if
we
went
block
streets
until
10:00
a.m.
to
allow
for
deliveries
and
they
closed
it,
you
know
for
breakfast
at
1:00
in
the
case
of
Tia
Sophia's.
Does
that
really
give
them
much
time
to
really
benefit
from
this
change?
Would
it
even
be
beneficial
for
them
to
move
things
out
of
ten
and
then
bring
everything
back?
L
Madam
chair
counselor,
I
I,
did
hear
from
Tia's.
They
felt
that
opening
being
able
to
expand
their
capacity
from
10:00
until
they're
closing
it
too
would
be
beneficial
to
him,
and
the
intent
was
that
they
wouldn't
have
to
move.
Furniture
in
and
out
of
the
street
was
closed,
that
the
the
access
lane
would
and
it's
it's
it's
a
second
issue
with
San
Francisco
Street
you've
got
restaurants
on
both
sides
and
how
the
fire
lane
is
is
done.
L
We
were
gonna,
try
to
work
with
the
with
the
fire
chief
to
see
what
what
would
be
acceptable
and
allowing
the
fire
access
could
preclude
a
restaurant
from
being
able
to
use
it
now.
If
you
matías
didn't
need
to
serve
alcohol,
then
they
could
go
across
the
fire
lane
and
they
could
serve
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
If
alcohol
service
it
has
to
be
contiguous-
and
we
made
a
request
to
ABC
that
they
allow
a
fire
lane
to
interrupt
the
contiguous
requirement
and
they
rejected
that
they
did
approve
the
5-foot
walkway.
L
G
Right
think
that
was
my
other
question
about
businesses
on
both
sides
and
how
the
delivery
or
the
fire
lane
would
work
in
I.
Don't
know
if
going
straight
down
the
middle
would
be
an
option,
but
something
to
look
at
so
we've
given
a
lot
of
chain
in
sorry,
go
back
to
my
original
proposal
about
keeping
at
least
palace
open,
I
do
remember
and
I
think
councillor
Garcia
for
reminding
me
that
there
were
some
pedestrian
incidents
there
at
all.
G
Santa
Fe
Trail
in
Palace
and
I
think
it
would
be
okay
to
keep
that
side
of
the
plaza
closed
as
well
as
long
as
Palast
were
available
for
people
to
drive
by.
That
is
a
tricky
intersection
with
Washington
old,
Santa,
Fe,
Trail
and
Palace.
It's
a
we've
had
some
incidents
here
in
the
past,
so
I
would
be
amenable
to
that
and
Thank
You
councillor,
Garcia
and
I
think
counter
Romero,
where
it's
also
brought
it
up
as
well.
So
that's
all
I
have
madam
chair.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
A
I
think
you
know
we
we've
gotten
a
lot
of
clarity
about
what
this
does
and
what's
still
needed
in
order
to
get
it
where
it
needs
to
be,
and
you
know
we
we
probably
need
to
leave
it
for
tonight
and
get
to
our
last
gen
item,
but
I
do
want
to
go
one
more
time
to
councilor
Ken
Sanchez,
because
she's
been
patiently
waiting.
Thank
you
thank.
F
You
I
will
be
very
quick.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
discussion
about
where
the
boundaries
of
business
owners
property
is
essentially
when
we
extend
them
outside,
because
we
will
have
to
make
if
they're,
both
kind
of
on
the
lines
of
their
exact
buildings.
We
do
have
some
social
distancing
issues
that
we
need
to
look
at
so
as
we're
creating
those
parameters
to
be
thinking
about
the
space
that
they'll
be
able
to
occupy.
F
A
H
A
So,
back
to
councilor
via
rails
point,
it's
moving
right
along
so
I
guess
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
clearly
I.
Don't
think
any
of
us
is
happy
with
where
this
is
as
written.
So
wonder
what
our
options
are.
Can
we
move
it
forward
in
concept
recognizing
that
we'd
like
to
see
some
changes
that
reflect
what's
been
listed
here
by
by
everyone
is?
Is
the
committee
comfortable
with
doing
that,
or
do
you
want
to
take
move
it
forward
with
no
action?
What's
what's
the
pleasure
of
the
committee
councillor
Cassatt
Sanchez.
F
I'm
happy
to
move
it
forward,
knowing
that
it's
coming
back
to
Council
and
with
the
understanding
that
we
will
want
to
be
seeing
changes
and
seeing
amendments
and
I
feel
comfortable
with
that.
As
this
is
not
the
final
vote
and
there
will
be
opportunities
for
some
of
you
to
see
it
at
public
works
and
then
we
will
all
see
it
again
at
Council
and
so
I
feel
comfortable
moving.
It
forward,
I
feel
comfortable,
approving
it
in
concept,
essentially,
with
the
caveat
that
there
are
those
changes
that
we
would
like
to
see
in
the
final
version.
E
Want
to
ensure
that
we
have
in
councilor
Ken
Sanchez
motion
and
it's
up
to
her
that
we
include
our
recommendations
for
the
amendments,
because
I
think
it's
critical.
We
we
list
out
what
we
want
to
see
changed
and
the
resolution
it's
it's
to
me.
It
I'm
fine
with
moving
it
along,
but
there
are
critical
components
that
we
are
recommending
that
are
moving
it
along.
E
A
E
A
F
H
A
A
E
A
Thank
you
and
thank
everybody
for
this.
For
the
conversation
I
think
it
was
very
helpful
in
lots
of
ways
with
that.
I
am
going
to
move
to
our
next
and
final
agenda
item,
which
is
an
informational
piece
to
Marcella,
Diaz
marsala.
Very
sorry,
to
have
kept
you
all
waiting
for
so
long,
but
very
interested
in
hearing
from
you
and
the
folks
that
you
represent
who've
joined
us
about
the
impacts
that
this
pandemic
has
had
on
the
immigrant
community
in
in
the
broader
SantaFe
communities.
So
with
that
I'll
just
turn
it
over
to
you.
Thank
you.
O
So
much
I
just
want
to
remind
folks
that
some
of
the
presenters
will
be
presenting
in
Spanish,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
hear
the
English
speakers
speak
and
the
Spanish
speakers
interpreted,
then
you
should
all
go
to
your
interpretation,
global
or
your
globe
on
the
right-hand
side
and
put
it
into
English,
so
that
you
can
hear
the
whole
thing.
Of
course,
if
you're
bilingual,
you
won't
have
to
do
that,
and
you
can
hear
us
all
speaking
for
ourselves.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
all
counselors.
O
P
Nobody
Maria
Reina
/,
said
so:
bro
de
somos,
un
polo
Nido
pun
organization,
estatal
que
representa
loan
interests
de
la
clase,
trabajadora
y
la
comunidad
y
Miren
tengo
mexico,
desde
hace
veinticinco,
a
nose
somos
en
un
centro
de
trabajadores
que
se
initio
en
la
nota,
mil
OG
o
con
el
propósito
deep
remover
protección
s,
para
los
trabajadores
en
santa
fe,
desde
entonces
hemos
venido
impulse,
ando
area,
campaña,
como,
la
l,
ro
s,
Ilario
c
de
santo,
REO
ciudad,
a
near-miss
enzo
siempre
Tommo
buck
and
omar
protección
apparel
los
trabajadores
urea.
Q
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Maria
and
I
work
at
the
worker
center
of
somos
un
Pueblo
nido
I
will
give
some
information
about
the
immigrant
population
in
Santa.
Fe
immigrants
are
driving
growth
in
many
rural
and
semi-rural
communities
in
New,
Mexico's
counties
in
Santa
Fe
is
no
exception.
Immigrants
in
Santa
Fe
play
a
key
role
in
various
industries,
including
hospitality,
restaurants,
construction
home
health
care,
child
care,
landscaping,
housekeeping
retail
and
more.
We
pay
taxes
just
like
everyone
else,
and
we
continue
to
grow
deep
roots
in
Santa,
Fe
and
throughout
the
state.
Q
It
is
estimated
that
immigrants
make
up
15%
of
Santa,
Fe
and
13%
of
Santa
Fe
County,
with
a
2020
population
of
eighty
five
thousand
five
hundred
and
two.
According
to
the
world
population
review,
two-thirds
of
Santa
Fe's
residents
live
in
a
mix
at
his
household
additionally,
median
age
for
Santa
Dillons
is
41
years
and
the
vast
majority
of
immigrants
are
under
the
age
of
50.
Therefore
we
are
Santa
PEZ
younger
population
immigrants
in
Santa
Fe
are
increasingly
starting
small
businesses
and
are
mainly
student
communities.
Q
O
You
Maria,
so
what
we
want
to
talk
more
specifically
about
today
is
just
the
impact
of
kovat
on
immigrant
families.
Mixed-Status
families,
as
Maria
has
mentioned
in
our
community,
the
impact,
obviously
on
our
on
our
health
and
the
health
of
and
well-being,
and
particularly
the
mental
health
issues
that
are
sort
of
coming
up
within
our
communities,
particularly
for
children,
who've
been
sort
of
locked
in
their
homes
for
a
while.
It's
something
that's
come
up.
We
just
recently
did
a
survey
that
we
will
be
releasing
very
soon
with
Latinos
decisions.
O
We
surveyed
480
immigrant
families
with
children
in
their
households
about
their
economic
conditions,
as
well
as
their
learn
as
their
ability
for
their
kids
to
learn
through
online
practices,
and
so
we're
gonna
be
posting
information
publicly,
but
also
to
superintendents
throughout
the
state,
including
ours
and
the
public
education
department.
So
please
look
out
for
that.
Obviously,
this
has
had
an
economic
impact
that
folks
will
talk
about
the
lack
of
federal
relief
for
families
that
have
seen
dramatic
decreases
in
their
incomes
as
a
result
of
Cova
nineteen.
O
There
is
also
an
impact
on
essential
workers
that
have
been
working
during
this
time
period.
Zulema
will
speak
a
little
bit
about
a
survey
that
we've
done
for
essential
workers
in
some
poll
who
are
membership
and
through
facebook,
health
and
safety
is
a
real
concern
there
and
obviously
it
has
impacted
our
ability
to
get
an
accurate
census
count.
So
it's
almost
important
Tony,
though
I
had
a
very
robust,
a
door-knocking
campaign.
O
We
knocked
on
13,000
doors
before
March
15,
Santa,
Fe,
City
and
County
are
lucky
that
we
got
out
there
very
early
with
information
about
the
census,
but
a
lot
of
that
outreach
on
the
doors
stopped
and
we
focused
on
phone,
banking
and
other
ways
of
reaching
the
community
about
the
census.
And
so
it's
it's
a
problem.
The
Colvin
has
posed
obviously
a
problem
and
for
folks
who
live
in
Santa,
Fe
County
in
rural
areas,
with
post
office
boxes.
O
As
you
all
know,
it's
not
really
been
until
last
week
or
this
week
that
they've
even
received
their
census,
so
their
census
questionnaires
and
then
obviously
the
impact
on
families
and
children
through
through
through
the
reduction
of
income
and
and
sort
of
just
the
lock
down
and
hope
in
the
houses
and
so
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
now
to
two
Zulema
I
think,
yes,
yeah,
Colleen
I'm.
Sorry
I
should
have
written
that
down
on
my
notes.
Yeah
elaine
was
gonna
talk
about
the
economic
impact
of
the
pandemic
on
our
families,
hi.
R
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Jacqueline
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
worker
centers
of
samos,
my
blue
needle.
It
is
important
for
us
as
workers
that
you,
our
elected
officials,
know
how
this
pandemic
has
affected
us,
especially
to
those
workers
that
don't
have
an
immigration
status,
because,
even
though
we
contribute
to
the
economy
in
many
ways
we
can
access
to
many
benefits
available
for
the
rest
of
the
community.
R
Mass
of
us
are
mixed
status.
Families,
even
if
there
is
a
citizen
exposed
in
the
families,
we
don't
know
qualify
for
the
federal
stimulus
check.
Our
contributions
must
be
recognized
and
they
and
the
important
role
we
apply
with
in
the
recovery
of
the
economy
and
the
commented
workers,
don't
qualify
for
unemployment,
neither
they
qualify
for
the
federal
stimulus
check.
They
are
beloved
a
available
resource
for
us
in
our
community.
R
We
in
our
community
are
skirts
and
they
were
never
enough.
Having
food
on
the
table
is
great
for
we
for
for
us,
we
also
have
to
pay
bills,
rent
school
tuition
for
the
children's
etc.
Our
workers
center
receives
hundreds
of
calls
for
the
immigrant
community
asking
for
research,
food
cash,
assisting
to
pay
bills.
Most
of
us.
Our
families
have
already
explained
their
savings
and
are
asking
for
lunch.
Now
that
we
are
reopening
the
economy,
many
of
us
are
going
to
have
to
pay
the
depths.
R
In
my
personal
experience,
I
lost
my
job
since
March,
18,
19
and
since
then,
I
haven't
been
able
to
get
work.
Go
back
to
work.
I
was
working
for
two
restaurants,
doing
catering
I,
don't
have
any
other
income.
I
have
two
children
that
live
with
me.
My
children,
sorry
students
within
Whittingham,
we
didn't
have
internet
and
coolant
for
the
internal
service,
was
crucial
for
my
kids
in
students,
for
so
my
daughter
finally
get
the
internet
from
school.
We
still
have
many
needs
and
I
haven't
been
able
to
go
back
to
work.
R
I,
don't
know
when
we'll
go
back.
My
workers,
my
employers,
haven't
called
me.
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know
qualify
for
an
employee
on
this
stimulus
check.
I
am
anxious
because
even
if
I
go
back
to
work,
it's
going
to
be
difficult
to
get
back
on
track.
Also
I
am
afraid
of
getting
sick
and
not
been
able
to
support
my
family.
Thank
you
and
I
pass
the
word
to
the
Marcela.
O
Thank
You
Jacqueline.
We
really
appreciate
that
information
I
do
want
to.
Let
folks
know
on
the
call
that
we
and
in
the
meeting
that
we
have
really
been
for
those
hundreds
of
people
that
have
been
contacting
somos.
We
have
been
sending
them
to
the
city
and
the
county.
Santa
Fe
connect
program,
because
it's
such
a
great
program
and
we're
a
statewide
organization
and
in
other
places
there
is
no
such
connector.
That
way,
there
aren't
those
kinds
of
resources
in
places
like
Rob's,
Roswell
and
Hobbs
New
Mexico.
O
That's
income
tax,
as
many
of
us
as
you
know,
who
don't
have
security
numbers,
pay,
use
an
individual
tax
identification
number
that's
given
to
us
by
the
IRS
to
pay
our
state
and
federal
taxes
due
to
mixed
status.
Family
exclusion
from
the
cares,
Act
30,000,
New,
Mexico
adults
and
38,000
of
their
children
were
denied
more
than
55
million
dollars
in
stimulus
rebates.
That
money
did
not
come
into
our
family
budgets
as
mixed-status
families,
and
they
did
not
come
into
our
cities
and
our
counties,
and
so
again,
Santa
Fe
has
a
high
percentage
of
immigrants.
O
They
really
missed
out
and
we're
gonna
see
the
impact
of
that
as
we
try
to
recover
and
reopen
our
economy.
In
addition
about
16,000
low-wage
workers
who
work
whose
employers
pay
into
the
unemployment
Venom
insurance
system,
they
did
not
qualify
and
do
not
qualify
for
unemployment
benefits,
which
means
that
more
than
two
million
dollars
per
week
in
unemployment
insurance
benefits
are
not
reaching
our
state,
our
cities
in
our
counties,
and
so
that
has
a
really
big
impact
on
our
city
as
well.
O
The
great
thing
is
that
New
Mexico
Voices
for
children
has
also
put
together
some
numbers
per
city
and
per
county
in
Santa
Fe
stimulus
dollars
that
did
not
come
to
households
really
have
an
impact,
and
so
in
the
city
of
Santa
Fe,
more
than
two
million
dollars
bypassed
adult
I,
10
filers,
just
in
our
city,
about
two
million
I
passed
our
US
citizen
children.
So
this
is
this:
is
us
not
getting
the
1200
dollar
stimulus
per
adult
in
household
and
not
getting
the
500
dollar
stimulus
per
child
in
our
household?
O
O
That
did
not
come
into
Santa
Fe
County,
and
that
really
has
a
big
impact
as
we
try
to
recover
as
a
city,
and
it
also
has
an
impact
on
these
families
who,
in
addition
to
not
spending
that
money
in
our
economy,
paying
their
bills
buying
goods
going
to
the
restaurants.
That
are
a
reopening
now
doing
those
sorts
of
things.
It
also
means
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
higher
reliance
on
private,
as
well
as
public
social
benefits
in
our
community.
So
this
really
is
a
problem
for
a
city
and
county
like
Santa
Fe.
O
S
Good
evening
my
name
is
sue
Lee
Machado,
and
can
you
hear
me
we
can
I'm
sorry.
My
name
is
Willa
Machado
and
I'm,
a
community
organizer
with
the
workers
center
of
so
no
super
blue
need.
Oh
thank
you
for
having
us
today.
As
all
of
us
know,
workers
are
facing
many
challenges.
Coming
back
to
work
in
our
worker,
stander
is
conducting
a
survey
among
immigrant
workers
in
Santa
Fe
about
these
challenges.
S
In
addition
to
this
survey,
we
have
received
key
information
from
our
immigrant
community
in
general
and
from
the
different
groups
of
workers
that
we
have
organized
in
the
coronavirus
era.
I
would
like
to
share
a
little
bit
of
what
we've
heard
so
far.
Immigrant
workers
have
a
lack
of
information
about
safety
in
health.
Also,
they
lack
information
about
the
copy
19
test.
They
are
not
getting
enough
information
about
what
to
do
in
case.
They
get
a
positive
test,
a
positive
result
in
a
test.
S
In
many
cases
there
is
no
training
available
on
the
new
way
of
working
and
keeping
themselves
safe.
Some
workers
don't
even
have
safety
equipment.
There
is
a
lack
of
information
about
the
rights
coming
back
to
work
in
the
coronavirus
era.
Many
of
them
are
concerned
about
not
getting
paid
sick
leave
and
about
retaliation
for
complaining
about
their
working
conditions.
They
are
afraid
of
losing
their
work,
their
jobs.
S
Many
workers
have
been
affected
by
which
theft
layoffs
resubmitting
documentation
to
go
back
to
work
with
the
same
employer,
reduction
of
wages,
cut
up
working
hours
in
retaliation,
lawyers
most
allow
their
employees
to
wash
their
hands
as
many
times
as
necessary,
provide
masks,
provide
enough
space
to
keep
social
distance
at
work,
etc.
The
restaurants
are
allowing
their
customers
to
enter
without
a
mask
just
because
they
want
their
business,
but
they
are
pulling
workers
at
the
end.
The
feminists,
at
risk,
essential
workers
need
protections.
S
The
recommendations
that
they
all
share
in
the
CDC
have
issued
are
not
are
not
mandatory.
Right
now
we
have
to
rely
on
whatever
the
employer
decides
to
do
a
few
days
ago.
We
got
a
call
from
our
worker.
He
said
that
he
was
leaving
work
getting
in
his
car
when
his
employer
saw
him
taking
off
his
mask.
At
that
moment,
the
employer
approached
him
and
told
him
that
he
was
cool.
He
was
going
to
charge
him
$50,
fine,
a
$50
fine
for
taking
off
the
mask
in
that
the
next
time
the
fine
would
be
$1,000.
S
S
P
S
P
No
steph
holland,
ms
couch,
are
impaired.
Oh
please,
Aviva
doc
en
Santa
Fe
poured
Oceanos
me
December
elbow
trabajando,
como,
cosa,
naira
y
es
de
entonces
mi
familia
y
hemos,
trabajado
muy
duro,
para
salir,
adelante,
dez
de
trabajar,
Keane,
say
auras
dee
areas,
yeah
see
poder
lograr,
el
sueño
de
comprar,
nuestra,
propia
casa,
apis,
tarde,
no
tener,
UN,
seguro,
social
and
Austin;
a
salt;
oh
poor,
achievable
Unova,
VN
de
y
por
supuesto,
a
port
on
dole
upon
omean
de
este
país
é
esse
fortune
demente
y
de
bead.
P
O
Gracias,
Reyes
Thank,
You,
ryos,
so
I
did
want.
We
did
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
effort
with
the
Department
of
Health
and
the
governor's
office
to
do
outreach,
not
just
in
Santa
Fe,
but
other
parts
of
the
state
targeting
vulnerable
communities
that
have
high
in
health
disparities
such
as
refugees
and
immigrants.
There
are
other
communities
that
are
also
targeting
with
information
and
kovat
19
testing
events
there,
as
you
know,
and
as
ulema
mentioned
a
lot
of
misconceptions
about
testing,
does
it
cost
some
people
have
been
charged?
Do
you
you
know?
O
Is
it
is
it
confidential?
Is
it
private
do
people
what
happens
if
you
test
positive,
if
you're
quarantined
for
three
weeks?
How
are
you
gonna
make
ends
meet
so
part
of
our
task
is
to
really
help
dispel
some
of
those
myths
learn
where
people
are
at
when
it
comes
to
as
essential
workers
when
it
comes
to
testing,
because
it's
such
an
important
tool
for
our
communities
as
we
to
keep
ourselves
safe
to
keep
our
family
safe
to
promote
public
health,
as
as
we
reopen
our
city.
O
It's
also
really
important
for
us
to
promote
in
the
community
a
really
important
piece,
which
is,
if
you
don't
have
insurance
and
you
do
have
coated
and
you
do
require
hospitalization.
The
state
will
find
resources
for
you
not
to
have
to
pay
for
your
care
in
relation
to
that.
These
are
the
promises
that
have
been
made
to
us
as
we
promote
this
by
the
administration,
and
so
we
just
thought
it
was
important
for
you
to
know
that
and
that
we
are
teaming
up
to
do
that.
O
A
big
big
piece
of
reopening
and
keeping
essential
workers
safe.
One
of
the
other
things
that
we
would
like
to
emphasize
is
that,
in
the
surveys
that
we've
done
most
immigrant
were
essential.
Workers
do
not
know
that
if
their
employer
asks
them
to
be
tested
and
take
a
day
off
or
if
they're
symptomatic
in
the
workplace
and
they're
sent
home
and
asked
to
be
tested
and
stay
at
home
until
they
get
their
results,
the
employer
by
federal
law
has
to
provide
them.
O
They
have
to
pay
them
for
those
days
through
sick
leave
and
they
will
be
reimbursed
by
the
federal
government
when
they
do
their
taxes,
and
that
is
really
important
for
workers
to
know.
But
it's
really
important,
we
exhort
I,
don't
know
if
Randi
is
still
on
the
call.
It's
really
important
that
employers
know
that
as
well,
because
that
is
a
really
big
barrier
for
our
fan,
our
communities
when
they
are
so
hard
up
and
really
having
a
hard
time
making
enemies
because
of
the
lack
of
unemployment
and
relief
in
these
last
few
months.
O
So
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
on
Friday.
We
will
be
with
the
Department
of
Health.
Doing
a
facebook
live
15
minute.
Facebook
live
like
the
nine
that
we
did
with
the
city
of
Santa
Fe
about
all
questions
in
relation
to
testing.
What
is
the
process
like?
Why
is
it
important
to
continue
to
promote
public
and
also
protect
our
families
and
our
workplaces?
What's
the
recommended
frequency,
the
it
sounds
like
the
administration
is
interested
in
continuing
to
do
what's
called
surveillance
testing.
You
probably
all
know
this
I
know
councillor
Romero
worth
you
do.
O
Cuz
I've
been
on
some
of
the
same
calls
as
you
to
really
be
able
to
provide
testing
on
an
ongoing
basis
for
immigrant
essential
workers
and
other
immigrant
vulnerable
families
in
our
communities.
So
this
is
what
we're
doing
this
flyer
is
in
English,
but
the
whole
thing
will
be
in
Spanish
and
it's
going
to
be
on
Friday
June
19th
at
5:00
p.m.
O
and
so
it'd
be
great
if
the
city
could
help
promote
that
as
well
in
conclusion,
and
then
we'll,
if
anybody
wants
to
have
questions
of
any
of
the
folks
that
are
on
the
call,
we
just
really
want
to
emphasize
that
what
we
we
are
pushing
for
and
what
we
need
our
city
allies
to
push
for,
and
some
of
you
have
already
signed
on
to
a
sign
on
letter
of
local
elected
officials.
Thank
you
is
that
we
need
to
include
cash
assistance,
stimulus
funding
to
mixed-status
families
in
future
federal
relief
legislation.
O
We
also
support
providing
funding
to
cities
and
counties
with
less
than
500,000,
because
we
know
that
that'll
help
free
up
money
at
the
local
level
to
continue
to
bolster
programs
like
Santa,
Fe
Connect,
which
are
so
important
for
all
families,
not
just
immigrant
families.
So
the
heroes
Act
contains
these
provisions,
which
is
great.
O
The
heroes
Act
passed
the
house,
but
obviously
we
expect
without
a
massive
effort
across
the
country
that
those
will
be
stripped
out
of
any
Senate
version
if
the
Senate
ever
takes
comes
up,
and
so
we
are
doing
as
much
out
of
advocacy
as
we
can,
but
really
it
would
be
great
for
cities
and
counties
to
also
advocate
in
the
name
of
their
immigrant
constituents
and
in
the
name
of
their
economic
recovery
effort.
The
other
issue
that
we
want
to
bring
to
your
attention
is
that
we
need
cash
relief.
O
We
need
cash
assistance,
everybody
who
has
status
and
who
doesn't
live
in
mixed
status.
Families
got
their
3400
musclemen,
owes
funding
and
and
to
be
able
to
help
bolster
the
financial
budgets
of
their
families.
We
did
not
right
now,
there's
a
real
emphasis
both
at
the
state
level
and
at
the
city
and
county
level,
frankly,
for
lots
of
different
reasons
for
rental
assistance,
utility
assistance
and
mortgage
assistance.
All
of
those
things
are
fine,
however,
we're
getting
a
lot
of
folks
who
are
calling
us
who
we've
sent
to
the
Santa
Fe
Connect
program.
O
We
know
there's
no
money
at
the
city
level,
but
we
are
working
to
with
the
administration
to
identify
ways
of
using
Cara's
act,
money
and
using
general
assistance
program
funding
to
help
the
neediest
folks
who
qualified
for
no
other
relief
and
who
also
experienced
great
reductions
in
income
any
support
and
help
in
that
effort.
On
behalf
of
the
cities
and
our
caprica,
our
economic
recovery
efforts
would
be
really
really
helpful.
We
also
clearly
need
more
critical
information
in
Spanish
earlier
in
the
meeting
someone
talked
about
the
paycheck
Protection
Act.
O
The
truth
is
there
still,
and
you
know-
and
this
is
across
the
board-
not
just
for
Spanish
speakers.
There
are
a
lot
of
immigrant
business
owners
that
we've
talked
to,
who
don't
necessarily
understand
the
program,
don't
know,
especially
if
they're
I,
10
business
owners,
and
so
any
additional
support
that
the
city
could
give
to
immigrant
business
owners
would
be
great
and
obviously
folks
talked
about
more
protections
for
essential
workers.
O
We
want
to
believe
and
and
and
for
the
most
part,
it's
true
that
if
these
are
not
obligatory
regulations
around
PPE
around
health
and
safety
and
the
jaw
on
the
job,
that
people
are
gonna
step
up
and
do
it.
But
we
need
to
make
sure
that
for
those
that
don't
there
are
things
in
place
that
the
city
can
do
to
help
encourage
that,
and
if
that
doesn't
work
eventually,
we
think
that
it's
going
to
have
to
be
mandated
and
because
the
Trump
administration,
certainly
it
certainly
isn't
doing
that.
O
So
that
is
the
information
that
we
have.
We
have
a
lot
of
this
information
on
our
website.
We
have
a
Cova
19
resource
page
on
our
website.
You
should
all
go
to
it
and
get
more
information
and
with
that
I'm
gonna
stop
share
and
if
you
have
any
comments
or
questions.
Thank
you
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
share
this
information
with
you
all
great.
A
D
You,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
thank
all
of
you
individually
for
being
with
us.
The
Somoza
says
they're
strong
and
in
Santa
Fe
and
I
really
appreciate
that
you
all,
let
us
know,
what's
happening
in
the
community
and
to
be
informed
and
that
you
share
your
lived
experiences
with
us.
It's
very,
very
important
to
me
and
to
my
colleagues,
I
know
it's
late
and
we
went
way
longer
in
this
meeting
than
we
anticipated,
but
I
was
I.
Just
had
a
couple.
Questions
for
anybody
that
can
share
was
just
curious.
O
D
Thank
you
for
that
information.
Nice
yeah,
I'm
feeling,
like
that's
gonna,
be
the
next
wave
of
the
issues
that
we're
gonna
be
encountering
as
it
relates
to
housing,
insecurity
and
situations
with
a
lot
of
different
community
members.
So
I
just
want
to
flag
that
and
try
to
figure
out
where
the
city
are
see
the
attorneys
fit
into
this
and
I.
Don't
know
the
answer
right
now,
but
just
wanted
to
flag
that
the
other
issue.
I,
don't
know
if
it's
an
issue
but
I'm
just
curious
your
thoughts.
D
You
may
know
that
we
passed
the
resolution
for
the
mask
or
face
covering
resolution.
Oh
sorry,
ordinance
requiring
masks,
and
you
know
it's
I
think
people
are
still.
We
need
to
do
better
job
communicating
that
regulation.
What
I'm
curious
about
is
how
the
mask
requirement
affects
workers
and
having
to
be
all
day
in
a
mask
and
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
if
there's
some
way
to
communicate
to
employers
that
that
staff
people
have
to
employees
that
have
to
have
a
time
given
to
be
able
to
take
a
break
to
take
off
a
mask.
D
It's
just
not
feasible
for
someone
to
be
wearing
a
mask
all
day
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there
are
health
implications
if
you're
wearing
all
the
time
without
a
break.
So
I
guess
I'm
more
curious
about
the
break
aspect
and
if
you
all
have
been
hearing
anything
about
that
and
what
we
can
do
to
help
with
that.
O
O
O
It
is
important
that
people
it's
it's
important
for
a
lot
of
our
members
not
to
have
to
be
the
ones
to
enforce
it,
and
so
you
can
go
to
one
grocery
store,
for
instance,
or
restaurant,
and
it's
in
management
is
enforcing
it
and
and
then
you
go
to
another
and
it's
not
and
that
and
we
understand
why
they
may
not
want
to
enforce
it
because
they
want
business.
But
it's
it's
really
hard
for
employees
to
constantly
be
asking
people
and
putting
themselves
in
that
position,
and
so
that's
some
of
the
feedback
that
we've
gotten
dilemma.
O
K
S
Nobody
said
I
think
you
just
said
the
most
important
part
of
this
and
I
in
about
the
mask.
The
none
of
these
recommendations
are
mandatory.
That's
why
we
are
letting
you
know
what
what
it
meant,
what
it
means
for
workers
not
to
have
regulations
on
these
kind
of
situations.
Like
I
said
we
got
this
call
from
this
worker
and
he
really
didn't
know
when
to
take
off
the
mask
or
when
to
keep
it
on.
So
there
is
no.
D
Like
I
guess,
I
just
want
to
know
if
there's
something
the
city
can
do
with
that,
it
is
confusing
and
employers,
I
think
don't
even
know
in
some
cases
and
some
do
know
and
they're
just
taking
advantage
of
the
situation.
So,
if
you
all
could
just
let
us
know
maybe
later
on,
if
you
think
about
it,
how
we
can
help
with
that,
because
I
think
it's
important
to
wear,
masks
and
also
be
able
to
take
breaks
from
masks
and
also
know
that
the
employees
should
not
have
to
enforce
the
masks
ordinance
you're,
absolutely
right.
E
G
Just
same
thing,
thank
you
to
Marcela
and
some
lawsuit
loony,
though,
for
again
I've
spoken
with
you
before
I
understand
the
issues
I
wish.
We
had
the
money
now
to
help
out.
Marcela
I
did
want
to
know
if
you're
asking
the
state
for
anything
during
the
special
session
and
if
there's
anything,
we
can
do
to
support
that
through
a
resolution.
O
O
This
kind
of
work
is
to
really
have
new
voices
and
new
new
advocates
advocating
at
the
state
level,
and
so
you
know
that
the
administer
the
the
legislature
doesn't
have
apparently
general
fund
money
to
give
to
programs
like
this
right
now.
So
it
really
is
incumbent
on
both
legislators
and
the
administration
to
really
think
through
and
we're
helping
with
this
to
think
through
what
we're
funding
can
come
from
for
people
who
are
the
neediest
and
who
did
not
receive
any
federal
relief
or
unemployment
and
saw
dramatic
reductions
of
income.
O
And
that
and
it's
you
know
it's
not
an
astronomical
number
and,
and
so
there
is.
There
are
proposals
right
now
and
what
the
city
could
do
to
help
is
pass.
A
resolution
is
directly
advocate,
as
as
counselors
and
as
commissioners
with
the
administration
saying
this
impacts
our
families
and
it
impacts
the
children
in
our
families.
G
A
F
A
K
A
All
right
matters
from
the
chair
matters,
I'm
staffing
matters,
madam,
thank
you,
medicine
staff.
Jennifer.
Do
you
have
anything
for
us?
I
do
not
just
echo
my
thanks
to
some
us
great
matters.
Committee,
great
matters
for
the
chair.
Oh,
we
have
a
matter
from
the
committee.
Yes,
counselor
Rivera,
very.
G
Really
the
issue
around
the
police
and
and
maybe
presenting
having
them
present
may
be
the
start
of
maybe
what
what
they
do
and
some
of
their
policies
and
how
it's
bit
affected
by
the
things
in
our
nation
over
the
last
couple
weeks
and
if
I
can
get
together
with
chief
Padilla.
Would
you
be
open
to
allowing
them
to
make
a
presentation
at
the
beginning
of
a
meeting
yeah.
A
All
right
with
that
I
think
we
are
adjourned.
Thank
you
all
really
appreciate
good
conversation
and
sorry,
we
went
three
hours
tonight
we'll
try
to.
We
keep
trying
to
massage
this
trying
to
get
it
into
a
two-hour
block,
but
I
think
it
was
a
good
meeting
nonetheless.
So,
thank
you
all
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Can
I'd
everyone.