►
From YouTube: Architectural Review Commission 06172020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
everyone
I'm
amber
Dickerson
and
I
will
be
filling
in
as
chair
of
the
commission
to
this
evening.
If
you
are
here
to
present
a
project,
you
will
have
limited
time
to
make
your
presentation,
so
we
suggest
being
thorough
but
concise.
When
coming
to
the
microphone,
you
will
need
to
identify
yourself
your
relationship
to
the
project.
The
commissioners
will
not
ask
any
questions
during
presentation.
Your
project
will
be
presented
in
the
following
order:
site
plan,
elevation,
architectural
details
and
wall
sections.
Then
staff
presents
a
staff
report.
A
We
will
then
ask
for
public
comment
following
your
presentations.
The
commissioners
will
be
asking
questions
in
the
same
order
as
the
presentation
please
state
and
spell
your
name
clearly,
if
you
are
here
to
speak
for
or
against
your
time
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
So
take
some
time
now.
To
summarize
your
comments,
because
three
minutes
goes
by
very
quickly
following
public
comment,
the
applicant
will
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
The
public
hearing
will
then
be
closed.
A
The
only
comments
which
will
be
allowed
after
the
public
hearing
is
closed
will
be
in
response
to
any
questions
from
the
commissioners.
The
commissioners
will
then
discuss
the
case
and
will
make
their
decision
based
on
the
city
ordinance
chapter
27
of
the
zoning
code,
the
design
guidelines,
the
Secretary
of
Interior
standards,
historic
preservation,
development
review
comments
and
the
testimony
given
at
the
public
hearing.
The
AARC
can
only
act
on
items
that
are
within
our
specific
jurisdictional
responsibilities.
Owners
and
agents
are
independently
responsible
to
obtain
any
permits.
A
F
E
At
this
time,
this
is
again
for
the
record
Kumari
Pettis,
now
from
the
City
Attorney's
Office.
At
this
time
can
any
of
the
commissioners
of
the
commissioners
please
state
whether
or
not
they
have
any
complicated
interests
for
any
of
the
items
that
are
listed
on
the
agenda
and
for
the
record.
I
here
know
that,
additionally,
in
commissioners,
please
state
on
the
record
whether
or
not
any
of
you
have
had
any
ex
parte
communication
regarding
any
of
the
matters
of
her
on
the
agenda.
No.
A
E
G
H
Good
evening,
commissioners,
Dennis
Fernandez
architects,
review
and
historic
preservation
manager
item
5
does
allocate
some
time
for
continuations.
However,
we
have
received
no
continuation
requests
for
tonight,
so
the
agenda
is
ready
to
move
forward
as
presented.
We
do,
however,
need
to
do
the
square
in
so
anyone
in
the
audience
that
is
planning
to
testify
today
or
present.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand,
including
staff.
G
Good
evening,
commissioners
Elaine
lund
his
sort
preservation
staff.
The
the
first
case
here
here
tonight
is
at
5:06
East
Amelia
Avenue,
which
is
in
the
Tampa
heights
historic
district.
This
application
is
for
an
addition
to
a
non-contributing
structure.
This
house,
that's
on
the
site,
presently
was
built
in
1995,
so
it's
a
an
info
project
that
was
built
to
look
like
it
would
fit
in
with
the
neighborhood.
However,
it
was
built
before
the
historic
district
was
established,
so
if
we
can
move
to
the
overhead,
please
thank
you.
G
So
this
is
the
1920s
Sanborn
map
of
the
the
area
showing
the
property
in
question.
In
green,
it's
on
Amelia
Avenue,
their
growth
Avenue
is
to
the
east
and
Central
Avenue
to
the
west.
You
can
see
that
there
was
a
house
on
that
they
site
at
that
time.
Obviously
not
the
one
that's
currently
there.
This
is
the
the
current
aerial
again
on
Amelia
Avenue.
You
can
see
the
proximity,
the
interstate
just
to
the
east,
beyond
Grove
al.
G
G
I
I
We're
looking
here
in
the
side,
plane
use
the
front
will
be
in
the
back
area,
approaching
the
wall
and
then
spinning
the
whole.
The
whole
master
suite
to
the
master
that
I
don't
know.
If
you
can
help
me
out
zooming
the
wall
in
this
area.
Here
we
pretty
much
matching
the
same
thing:
the
houses
being
built
right
now
as
a
wood
frame,
siding
wood
windows,
we're
doing
the
South
way
the
same
thing
but
saw
fit
with
the
12/12/12
ventilations
st.
jingles
same
color.
I
I
I
I
A
Okay,
did
you
have
any
Brenda
rings
to
place
up?
I
noticed
that
there
were
some
in
the
package.
A
I
Not
on
the
new
plan,
no
showing
the
firm
because
we're
not
working
on
the
front
we're
working
on
the
back,
so
the
house
at
least
right
now
you
see
the
throne.
You
got
the
back
area,
which
is
right
here,
and
this
is
the
space
that
we
spending
in
this
area.
So
this
wind
will
go
away.
We'd
have
an
opening
and
that's
what
the
master
bath
bedroom
is
kind
of
continue
on
this
bar.
So
if
we're
looking
out
these
two
pictures.
I
When
you're
coming
out
when
you're
looking
the
house
on
the
back
in
the
house,
there
will
be
an
extension
on
this
bar
that
your
front,
so
on
the
back
in
the
house
on
the
left
side,
where
the
kitchen
would
be
right
here.
Does
the
kitchen
and
I
the
the
living
room
right
now
we'll
be
expanding
this
room,
the
two
windows,
this
door
on
the
back
of
the
house,
excuse.
E
I
I
G
Commissioner's
staff
did
find
that
the
application
was
consistent
with
the
Tampa
highs
design
guidelines
and
that
this
is
a
non
contributing
non
historic
building
and
the
addition
just
not
affect
the
original
appearance
of
the
house
from
the
visible
elevations.
However,
we
had
some
conditions
that
were
included
in
the
staff
report,
namely
that
the
addition
would
need
to
be
a
little
more
in
line
with
the
form
of
the
original
structure.
G
Additionally,
I
noticed
when
the
applicant
was
showing
the
exterior
wall
material
that
it
appeared
as
if
it
was
grained
and
I.
You
know,
I,
don't
have
a
close-up
enough
photo
to
know
whether
or
not
that
it's
the
case
on
the
existing
siding.
It
should
be
hardy
material.
That's
what
was
shown
on
the
the
prior
plans
for
the
building,
the
the
addition
would
need
to
match.
So
if
it's
smooth
side,
it
needs
to
be
the
smooth
side,
so
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
other
questions.
Thank
you
great.
A
C
C
I
I
C
I
I
J
J
I
J
A
Okay,
I
do
not
have
any
questions.
Any
additional
questions
last
call.
Okay.
The
applicant
is
allowed
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
Would
you
like
your
five
minutes
for
a
rebuttal?
Okay?
So
at
this
time
we
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
the
commissioners
can
discuss
the
case,
starting
on
my
right,
I.
J
D
A
C
A
K
You
I'm
Ron
veal,
I'm
staff
with
Historic
Preservation.
This
request
is
in
the
Hyde
Park
historic
district.
The
primary
structure
is
a
contributing
structure
that
dates
back
to
1920
to
the
underlying
zoning
is
rs.60.
The
request
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
for
a
north
east
side
yard
setback
reduction
from
seven
to
two
and
for
new
construction
for
a
pool,
usually
don't
see
a
lot
of
pools.
K
K
To
the
rear
of
the
property,
if
you
look
at
the
parcel,
you
have
the
front
yard.
You
have
the
vehicular
access
down
the
side,
you
have
an
accessory
structure
in
the
north
north
corner,
you
have
a
rear
yard,
a
small
rear
yard,
and
then
you
have
the
side
yard.
The
request
is
to
have
that
pool
on
this
side
over
here,
which
is
the
east
side.
K
K
K
This
is
off
the
alley
showing
you
the
tree
and
the
proximity
from
the
tree
to
the
rear
of
the
structure
and
just
another
shot
of
the
tree
and
showing
how
location
is
close
to
the
property
line.
I
wanted
to
go
through
the
site
plan
with
you.
Just
briefly,
the
request
is
from
seven
foot
to
two
foot
pools
by
code,
can't
be
5
foot
to
the
property
line.
K
L
L
This
specific
bond
in
a
hardship,
yeah,
okay,
alright
great
so
I'll-
do
that
as
I'm
showing
the
site
survey.
What
I
have
here
is
question.
One
looking
for
the
new
construction
pool
is
Ron
set
for
the
variance
side
yard,
northeast
reduction
from
the
seven
down
to
the
two
foot
code,
section
27,
two,
nine
zero
point:
three
response
to
question:
one:
the
alleged
hardship,
the
hardship
is
unique,
singular
and
requires
a
variance
due
to
a
grand
oak
tree
location
at
an
existing
site
dry
and
an
existing
side.
L
It
is
our
intent
to
preserve
the
grand
oak
tree
and
work
with
the
only
location
on
the
property
suitable
for
a
pool
response
to
question
three.
This
variance,
if
granted,
would
not
adversely
affect
any
of
the
adjacent
neighbors
or
be
visible
to
any
neighborhood
owners
or
visitors.
In
the
neighborhood
question
for
the
harmony
question,
this
variance
would
be
in
harmony
with
the
historical
vernacular
and
ensure
the
preservation
of
the
grand
okay,
as
well
as
allowing
for
the
full
enjoyment
of
the
owner's
home
and
question
five.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Then
here's
the
actual
pool
proposed
pool
design.
You
can
see
that
we
have
I'm
assuming
to
both
of
these
on
here.
At
the
same
time,
we've
maintained
in
this
drawing
here
with
Landscape
Architect.
We
had
it
at
26,
but
we've
actually
accommodated
20
foot
9
inches,
so
we've
been
able
to
achieve
the
location
of
the
pool
and
not
disturb
the
roots
of
the
tree
and
still
be
able
to
have
that
full
canopy
over,
as
well
as
be
able
to
maintain
the
setback
off
of
the
foundation
or
the
fully
integrated
seat.
L
That
allows
us
to
preserve
that
full
stem
wall
foundation
and
get
to
as
close
to
the
house
as
possible
without
reinforcing
that
bottom
foundation.
Wall
on
that
angle
of
repose
there,
but
then
allows
us
to
have
a
9
foot
wide.
Basically,
a
lap
pool
running
the
distance
of
that
adjacent
lot
line
in
being
2
feet
off
with
a
wood
deck
surround.
K
Commissioners,
he
opened
up
the
variance
and
the
seat
together
on
this
small
request.
So
I
would
ask
you
to
discuss
the
variance
first
vote
on
the
variance
and,
if
the
variance
gets
approved,
then
then
move
forward
on
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
just
to
provide
you
with
additional
information
that
Natural
Resources
did
go
out.
They
evaluated
the
location
of
the
pool
and
this
meets
their
criteria.
Other
locations
were
were
looked
at
a
little
closer
to
to
the
tree
and
the
protective
radius
that
he
provided
today.
They're
comfortable
with.
A
D
L
Pool
equipment
will
be
here
so
here's
our
site
survey
here.
Here's
the
existing
AC
there's
also
an
existing
gas
meter
here
that
we've
already
had
to
go
out
and
assess
that
it
can
be
moved
forward
to
allow
for
that
mechanicals
to
be
moved
forward
here
and
then
we'll
be
providing
screening
of
all
the
mechanicals
here
and
the
pool
equipment
here.
A
K
C
J
J
A
L
E
L
K
J
I
will
move
to
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
drawings
and
documents
presented
at
this
public
hearing
in
a
RC
21:55
before
the
property
located
at
1715
West
Hills
Avenue,
because,
based
upon
the
finding
a
fact
of
proposed
project,
it's
consistent
with
the
hypothesis
or
district
design
guidelines
of
the
city
of
Tampa
for
the
following
reasons
that
the
pool
in
this
location
does
not
it's
not
visible
from
the
road.
It's
consistent
with
the
high
park
design,
a.
G
G
G
Okay,
so
this
is
the
1920s
Sanborn
map
of
on
this
portion
of
Tampa
Heights.
This
is
a
pretty
close
to
the
north
end
of
the
historic
district
and
Seattle
II
is
one
of
the
more
northern
streets
in
the
district
there
and
on
the
west
side
you
have
the
the
red
lines
showing
the
boundary
at
the
historic
district
and
just
the
west
of
the
properties.
That
way
is
Florida
Avenue,
so
Morgan
Street
we
have
floor
abrasca
Avenue
just
to
the
south
there,
so
this
property
of
Morgan
Street
is
currently
vacant.
G
G
This
house
is
located
on
just
to
the
north
of
the
alley
on
Morgan
Street,
and
this
is
across
the
street
on
Morgan
on
the
east
side
of
Morgan.
This
photo
is
looking
south
on
Morgan
Street
looking
toward
floor.
Abrasca
there's
also
some
more
recent
construction
on
the
corner.
There,
the
blue
house
and.
G
We
have
a
few
photos
in
here
of
the
alley
running
north
the
property
here.
I
believe
this
is
the
adjacent
side
to
the
just
to
the
west.
This
is
looking
at
the
north
northern
parcel
from
the
alley.
So
you
see
the
south
side
of
that
house,
and
here
we
are
looking
along
the
alley
toward
Florida
Avenue
and
we
have
one
more
shot
here:
looking
east
along
the
alley
back
toward
Morgan
Street.
G
M
M
I
do
thank
you
very
much
well,
I'm
actually
going
to
work
in
partnership
with
peach
soup.
Here,
our
director
of
construction
I'm,
more
the
site
plan
person,
so
I
just
gotta
go
through
that
and
appreciate
staffs
input.
What
you've
gotten
here
and
you
saw
that
vacant
site
in
front
of
you.
Oh
thank
you!
So
there's
Morgan,
you
know
North
that
direction
there
as
Ali
we
spoke.
Oh
that's
a
15-foot
alley,
perp
lat,
here's
a
house
oriented
towards
North,
Morgan
Street
and
the
rear.
We've
got
a
a
basically
a
proposed
concrete
parking
pad.
M
If
you
will,
with
just
the
typical
flares
coming
off
the
alley
in
the
rear,
because
we've
built
a
couple
of
these
and
they
look
great
from
the
curb
that
speaking
out,
there
was
a
condition
in
the
questions
regarding
curb
and
sidewalk.
You
know
if
there's
any
damage
to
the
sidewalk
or
curbing
that
we
need
to
address
or
replace
we'll
take
care
of
that
while
we're
there,
of
course,
and
really
that's
about
it.
With
a
site
plan,
the
open
front,
porch
concrete,
walk
scoring
on
there,
a
really
it's
a
it
fits
a
lot.
M
N
N
D
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
G
Thank
You
commissioners,
Elaine
lund,
historic
preservation
staff.
We
found
this
application
to
be
consistent
with
the
Tampa
Heights
design
guidelines.
As
the
applicants
noted
this
project,
this
product
has
been
constructed
in
the
neighborhood
in
the
historic
just
particularly
at
least
a
couple
of
times
before,
so
where
staff
is
familiar
with
it,
we
have
reviewed
these
plans
multiple
times
and
because
we
keep
reviewing
them,
that's
the
only
reason
we
have
any
additional
comments.
G
Really,
there
are
a
couple
of
notes
on
some
of
the
details
in
the
plans
that
you
know
we've
through
our
experience
with
the
construction
process
and
inspection
process
and
staff
visits
to
the
site
during
construction,
there's
just
some
things
that
can
be
sort
of
interpreted
one
way
or
another,
so
we're
requesting
that
the
details
be
clarified
to
be
more
specific,
so
other
than
that
I'm
available
with.
If
you
have
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
B
B
M
B
M
G
L
M
Along
with
that
to
just
appreciate
staff
input,
as
this
is
a
we
love
working
with
staff
on
these
projects
and
they're
so
helpful
and
want
to
let
them
know
it,
and
during
a
previous
mean,
we
did
pick
up
to
enlarge
that
cap
on
the
columns
appreciate
the
suggestion
on
that.
We've
already
adjusted
that
on
this
detail,
which
you'll
see
pour
concrete
gap
with
two
inch,
reveal
so
appreciate
that
input.
M
C
M
C
D
A
G
M
M
Be
this
you
get
this
over
here,
excuse
my
area
so
right,
elevation
here
is
what
you'll
see
on
the
alley.
We
did
put
the
AC
on
the
left-hand
side.
Not
so
it
wouldn't
be
exposed
in
the
alley
side
make
it
a
little
nicer.
D
A
M
A
H
B
A
D
A
G
Again,
commissioner,
C
language:
this
is
a
another
application
in
the
Tampa
Heights
historic
district
for
new
construction
on
a
vacant
site.
Before
we
get
into
it
any
further
I
will
go
ahead
and
enter
into
the
record
that
we
did
receive
the
affidavit
to
authorize
agent.
Exhibit
beef
allowing
peach
soup
to
this
makes
part
of
the
presentation
today.
G
G
So
this
is
the
Sanborn
map
from
the
1920s
era,
showing
the
subject
site
in
green.
You
see
there
was
a
residence
on
that
property
at
the
time.
Sorry,
this
is
so
jumpy,
okay,
so
by
15,
Hughes,
Street
and
East
Central
Avenue
to
the
west
and
Elmore
to
the
east,
the
red
line
there
that's
running
along
Elmore
and
up
to
a
de
lis
above
that's
showing
you
where
the
district
boundaries
are.
G
This
is
the
present-day
aerial
photograph
of
the
property.
You
can
see
its
proximity
to
the
interstate
there
and
the
interstate.
An
exit
ramp
is
actually
showing
labeled
pretty
well
on
this
particular
map,
so
the
exit
from
the
interstate,
if
you're
southbound
merges
with
Elmore
Avenue
in
that
point.
G
G
G
M
Thank
you
very
much:
Elaine
Fred,
Henry,
five,
seven,
zero,
three
South
McGill
Avenue
domain
home,
zinc
and
I
have
been
sworn
and
I'm
just
gonna
run
the
site
plan
down
real,
quick
and
I'll
toss
it
to
Pete
here.
But
basically
this
is
the
same
one
you
saw
previously
at
Morgan,
with
the
exception
of
the
poor
cachet
as
Pete
spoke
to
the
difference
on
this
one
is
that
we've
actually
got
the
Porto
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
property.
M
On
the
you
know,
street
side
is
this
kind
of
busy
street
and
give
a
little
bit
of
a
buffer
there,
you'll
notice,
the
you
know.
Basically,
we've
got
a
few
trees
coming
out.
We've
already
visited
Natural
Resources,
we're
excited
for
this
project
to
get
going
clean
up
that
corner,
like
Elaine,
was
saying
it
has
been
vacant
for
some
time.
M
I
will
point
out,
and
you
saw
in
the
picture,
there's
an
existing
concrete
apron
near
the
back
of
the
property,
we're
going
to
remove
that
and
restore
the
right-of-way
back
to
the
way
it's
supposed
to
be,
which
is
a
grass
area
down
there.
You
did
see
the
handrail
here
and
then
a
guard
rail
transportation
that
weighed
in
for
a
design
exception
for
the
core
clearance,
but
obviously
you
can't
access
that
for
obvious
reasons,
so
that
won't
be
an
issue.
The
city
has
put
new
sidewalks
out
in
this
area,
which
is
exciting
as
well.
N
This
one's
gonna
be
little
bit
easier,
it's
the
same
house
same
plan
except
it
has
the
Porticus
share
on
it
and
that
protocol
shares
list
shown
here.
This
one
is
a
it's
on
the
less
on
the
right-hand
side,
the
house
or
organ
straight.
It
will
be
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
house.
That's
pretty
explain.
N
N
G
G
The
other
one
item
I
would
like
to
note
this
is
that
the
Tampa
Heights
design
guidelines
call
for
properties
how
new
construction
on
corner
properties
rather
to
have
a
wraparound
porch
in
this
particular
instance,
with
the
intersection
not
being
particularly
functional
or
pedestrian
friendly,
and
since
the
application
does
include
a
porkers
share
along
the
street
side.
We
feel
that
that
that
porkers
share
serves
as
a
very
nice
buffer
for
the
house
at
that
location
in
lieu
of
the
porch
okay,
and
if
you
have
any
other
questions
I'm
available.
Thank
you.
D
D
B
K
Good
evening,
commissioners
Ron
Vila
staff
of
historic
preservation,
so
the
primary
structure
was
constructed
in
1925
in
the
High
Park
historic
district.
It
is
a
contributing
structure.
There
is
currently
a
detached
structure
there,
it's
a
shed,
it
is
non-contributing
and,
as
part
of
this
request,
staff
has
already
reviewed
that
and
that
structure
can
be
demoed.
Administrative
Lea
and
the
location
for
the
new
accessory
structure
will
be
an
approximate
that
same
location.
The
request
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
an
accessory
structure.
K
K
K
This
is
the
that
sits
on
some
sleepers
there.
This
is
the
other
side
of
the
property,
which
is
this
Southside.
That
also
has
that
notch
in
the
facade
moving
to
the
windows,
the
installation
is
that
the
trim
is
applied
over
the
siding.
So
you
get
that
nice
shadow.
The
windows
are
a
multi
pane
over
a
single.
K
F
Think
testing
yeah
Thank,
You,
Marco,
Suarez,
homeowner,
803,
South,
Fremont
Avenue
last
name
is
su
AR
easy
good
evening.
Everyone,
sorry
I'm
a
little
nervous,
but
what
my
wife
and
I
are
trying
to
do
is
just
build
an
assessee
structure.
We
want
to
be
able
to
get
the
best
use
of
our
property
and
because
we
have
growing
boys,
we've
kind
of
outgrown
the
little
shed
that
we
have
there.
So
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
build
a
garage
that
they
can
store
there.
F
The
current
items
that
we
have
in
there
like
bikes
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
as
well
as
create
a
space
that
they
can
use
outside,
get
out
of
the
house
so
that
we
can
have
some
peace
in
there.
But
we
have
some
unique
details
with
this
property.
If
you
guys
can
zoom
in
on
this
original
structure
or
this
site
plan,
our
house
butts
up
to
the
Crosstown.
So
that's
why
this
corner
here
is
notched.
The
way
it
is
that
is
our
property
line.
F
It's
not
that
that
we
have
any
choice
as
to
how
the
property
is
situated,
but
because
of
that
on
this
side
here,
where
we
want
to
build
the
garage
and
the
exact
same
location
as
the
shed,
the
garage,
hopefully
will
be
notched
as
well.
The
reason
that
is
is
because
of
the
shape
of
our
current
roof,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
five-foot
setbacks
from
Eve
Eve,
so
the
best
fit,
because
our
lot
is
rs.50
and
we're
allowed
to
potentially
construct
something
as
large
as
750
square
feet.
F
This
is
going
to
be
below
that
because
of
that
notch,
and
so
that
we
can
get
that
roof
overhang
that
we
need.
We
would
also
like
to
redo
the
ribbons
that
are
cracked
and
and
deteriorated,
but
we
want
to
restore
them
to
their
original
glory.
If
you
will
and
right
here
where
there
used
to
be
actually
I
can
show
you
a
little
bit
better
here,
because
there's
no
structure
on
there.
This
concrete
is
a
typical.
It's
got
a
little
hump
to
it
and
everything.
F
The
next
picture,
I'd
like
to
show
you
is
like
Ron,
had
just
showed
you
the
picture
of
the
house.
What
we're
trying
to
accomplish
is
replicate
the
the
pergola
that
we
have
here,
the
roof
details,
the
outriggers,
the
vents
and
everything
that
part
of
the
reason
why
we
love
this
neighborhood
is
the
charm
that
it
already
had.
F
So
we
tried
to
paint
it
a
certain
way
so
that
you
could
see
those
details
a
lot
better
and
I
want
to
show
you
the
actual
proposed
structure
so
that
you
guys
can
see
that
we're
trying
to
match
that
I'd
like
to
you
to
call
your
attention
to
this
right
here.
The
front
elevation,
which
would
be
if
I,
can
put
this
right
next
to
it
then
move
this
over
for
you,
which
would
be
right
along
this
way
here,
and
this
would
be
at
the
end
of
the
driveway.
F
We
want
it
to
look
like
it's
been
there
for
the
last
eighty
years,
so
we're
trying
to
put
the
pergola
on
there.
We
want
the
same
notch
details
of
the
roof.
We
want
the
same
outriggers,
the
same
vents
the
same.
If
you
can
look
here
actually
let
me
slide
that
down.
This
is
a
little
notched
right
there.
We
even
want
that
detail
included
like
I
said
so
that
it
looks
like
it's
been
there
for
a
considerable
amount
of
time
here,
we're
going
to
show
on
the
elevation
the
height
of
the
building.
F
We
want
to
be
able
to
build
it
22
feet
up
I
believe
20
to
6
to
make
sure
that
it's
within
the
guidelines,
but
also
it
looks
age-appropriate,
because
some
people
will
kind
of
distort
the
original
shape
and
we're
trying
to
maintain.
All
of
that,
this
is
the
left
elevation.
So
this
would
be
the
side
of
the
yard.
If
I
can
compare
that
to
the
site
plan,
it
would
be
on
this
side.
F
The
left
elevation,
of
course,
the
right
elevation.
Let
me
move
this
over
for
you.
This
would
be
the
side
that
would
be
along
I
can
compare
here
along
this
edge
here.
Let
me
bring
that
down
along
this
edge
here,
see
if
I
can
fold
this
that'll
make
more
sense,
so
the
right
elevation
this
image
here.
Let
me
move
this
up-
would
be
this
side.
The
rear
elevation
would
actually
fit
the
face.
The
Crosstown,
and
this
is
the
notch
that
I
was
referring
to
earlier.
F
So
we
only
put
one
window
there,
because
we
do
love
some
natural
light,
but
we
don't
want
to
stare
at
the
cross
down.
Of
course,
we're
trying
to
continue
on
with
the
the
notched
outriggers
here
and
here
to
make
sure
they're
symmetrical
with
what
the
house
has
as
well
as
what
the
the
stairs
that
we're
putting
in.
We
want
it
to
match
the
same
design
as
what
we
have
in
our
helm.
F
F
First
floor,
so,
if
I,
if
it
because
I
like
to
orientate
everything
so
that
it
makes
sense
to
me,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
this
way,
just
so
that
you
understand,
this
is
the
way
the
property
faces
with
the
rest
of
the
site
plan.
This
is
the
first
level
the
stairs
I
go
up
to
the
second
level.
There's
the
notch
that
I
mentioned
before.
F
Let's
get
that
in
there
how
the
trusses
are
gonna
be
engineered,
how
everything
is
gonna,
lay
on
the
first
floor
for
the
the
wood
floor,
trusses
that
are
gonna
make
that
first
level
for
us,
as
well
as
the
floor
for
the
second
floor,
and
then
this
is
how
the
roof
is
going
to
be
designed.
That's
the
notch
that
I
was
referring
to
earlier.
That
would
match
the
existing
home
for
this
detail.
F
F
To
compare
to
the
excuse
me
the
original
floor
plan
here
or
the
excuse
me
the
original
elevations
of
the
proposed
elevations.
This
is
what
I'd
like
the
garage
door
to
be
we're
hoping
to
use
a
club
play
style
garage
door
so
that
it
looks
like
period-accurate
as
well
as
functional
it'll
have
the
same
amount
of
side
lights
as
the
the
design
that
we're
picking
here.
F
F
F
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
did
that,
especially
because
this
structure
is
going
to
be
that
much
closer
to
the
Crosstown
and
then
the
the
doors
they're
going
to
be
two
doors
in
the
structure,
one
down
below
and
one
above,
and
we
picked
this
style
because
we
currently
have
that
on
our
home
right
now,
and
this
is
the
rear
door
of
our
home,
and
so
that's
why
I
chose
this
style
to
kind
of
match
it
as
much
as
I
could.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
now
it's
staffs
turn
to
present
this
deck
good.
K
Evening,
commissioners,
Ron
Vila
Marco
myself
have
been
working
on
this
project
from
the
beginning
of
this
year
and
through
the
condition
that
we're
in
kept
on
getting
continue.
So
we
made
some
modifications
along
the
way
we
had
one
concern
about
the
location
of
the
mechanicals.
He
had
it
on
the
north
side
of
the
structure
and
it
was
it
within
the
setback
and
it
did
not
meet
code,
so
he
relocated
it
and
today
he
showed
that
is
under
the
stairs.
A
J
F
We
want
the
same
asphalt,
shingles,
the
same
pitches,
the
home
as
well
as
when
we
were
designing
it.
The
draftsman
had
it
off
and
I
said
that
doesn't
look
symmetrical,
so
we
raised
the
roof.
Actually,
we
raised
the
ceilings
and
the
roof
just
so
that
we
could
maintain
the
proper
pitch
the
side,
we're
not
going
to
build
the
siding
itself
out
of
wood
because
it's
you
know,
we've
got
lots
of
termites
in
South
Tampa
and
so
we're
hoping
to
just
do
some
Hardy,
the
smooth
hardiplank
on
the
side.
F
F
J
F
F
C
F
F
C
F
A
F
K
A
A
J
C
To
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
drawings
and
documents
presented
at
this
public
hearing
a
RC
2161
for
the
property
located
at
803,
south
Fremont
Avenue,
because,
based
upon
the
finding
effect,
the
proposed
project
is
consistent
with
the
Hyde
Park
historic
district
design,
guidelines
of
the
city
of
Tampa.
For
the
following
reasons,
the
alignment
rhythm
and
materials
are
consistent
with
the
guidelines.
I'll.
Second.
L
G
Commissioners,
Elaine
lawns
historic
preservation
staff,
this
application
at
five
thousand
two
north
Salani
Avenue
in
case
a
RC
20
181,
is
located
in
the
Seminole
Heights
historic
district.
This
particular
property
was
vacant
in
the
1920s,
as
you
will
see
when
we
get
the
Sanborn
map
up,
but
the
building
that
is
there
now
is
a
ranch-style
house
that
was
built
in
1953.
G
G
G
G
Moving
on
to
violet,
we
are
looking
to
the
east,
so
swanee.
The
intersection
with
Suwannee
is
in
about
the
middle
of
the
photo
and
then
looking
West
Florida
Avenue
is
in
the
distance
there.
We
have
just
a
couple
of
quick
shots
of
the
alley.
G
This
one
is
facing
south
along
the
alley.
The
subject
side
is:
has
this
wood
fence
here
on
the
left
and
then
looking
north?
The
subject
site
would
be
on
the
right
and
the
commercial
structures
on
Florida
Avenue
are
there
on
the
left
side
of
the
alley?
So
this
time
I'll
ask
the
applicant
to
you
begin
this
presentation.
E
O
You,
yes,
the
packet
that
you
have
in
your
hands
is
the
same
one
that
I'm
presenting
this
evening.
My
name
is
Patrick,
Thorpe,
allegedly
and
the
architect
of
record
on
this
project,
and
we
will
begin
with
the
site
plan
where
we
see
the
existing
building
on
the
property,
as
described
the
minimal
traditional
ranch-style
residence.
We
have
an
existing
pool
in
the
rear.
We
have
a
20
inch,
elm
tree,
that
is
in
the
back
of
the
property
that
we
will
not
be
in
conflict
with,
as
we
are
well
outside
of
the
protective
tree
radius.
O
As
you
see
for
the
new
single-story
addition
in
the
rear
of
the
property,
we
are
also
widening
the
driveway
in
the
front
of
the
property,
not
the
entire
length.
We
are
keeping
the
single
apron
and
widening
the
driveway
in
order
to
provide
a
wider
garage
door
which
we
will
see.
These
are
the
existing
elevations,
starting
with
the
South
elevation,
which
is
on
violet
Street.
Then
we
have
the
West
elevation,
which
is
the
back
of
the
house
facing
the
alley,
the
North
elevation
and
the
East
elevation,
which
faces
Suwannee.
O
So
with
those
we
have
the
new
proposed
elevations,
as
you
can
see
the
South
elevation,
we
have
the
new
addition
pushed
further
back
in
the
rear,
which
is
behind
a
fence
and
also
not
visible
from
the
street.
There
is
a
pergola
as
well
as
a
fence
from
the
street
view,
so
this
would
not
really
be
visible
in
any
way.
D
O
Wall
section
is
routes
relatively
simple:
we
have
a
four
and
twelve
pitched
roof
with
dimensional
shingles.
We
have
a
two-foot
soffit
overhang
on
the
sides,
but
not
at
the
rear
as
depicted
in
the
elevations.
This
is
a
vinyl
soffit
and
then
we
have
block
construction
with
stucco
applied
directly
to
the
block
sitting
on
top
of
8
turned
down
concrete
slab
that
basically
meets
the
grade.
O
We
were
asked
by
staff
to
provide
a
historic
example
of
the
two-car
garage
door.
So
this
is
a
map
of
the
historic
district
and
you
can
see
the
5
0
0
to
North.
Suwannee
is
located
right
in
this
area,
so
within
proximity
of
our
residents,
I
have
pictures
of
other
residences
that
have
two
car
garage
doors.
In
this
example,
at
five
one,
zero,
nine
North
Central
Avenue
is
also
on
a
minimal
traditional
ranch-style
home,
and
we
also
have
on
Central
Avenue
three-car
Garage
Doors.
O
Close
up
of
the
building's
elevation-
this
is
a
long
violet
Street.
You
can
see
that
there's
some
cut
brick
precast,
concrete
window,
sills,
very
simple
windows,
stucco
on
block,
and
then
we
have
the
final
soffit
as
well
as
gutters
and
a
cupola
above
on
the
front
of
the
home.
We
have
similar
language
where
we
have
the
cut
brick
on
the
bottom,
very
simple
windows:
some
additional
trim,
the
dimensional
tile.
If
you
see
in
the
reflection
of
the
window,
there's
a
1993
Volvo
240.
O
That
is
a
classic
station
wagon,
but
it
is
much
like
this
housing
non-contributing
structure
and
to
the
rear
of
the
house.
We
see
that
again.
This
is
again
very
simple:
we
have
a
minimal
overhang
on
the
North
elevation
and
a
two-foot
overhang
towards
the
back
facing
the
alley.
The
cut
brick
does
not
repeat
itself
around
the
back
of
the
property
and,
as
you
can
see
at
some
point,
there
was
a
change
out
of
doors
and
windows
in
the
rear
to
a
simple
vinyl
system.
O
So
we
are
proposing
to
move
forward
with
a
similar
for
the
overhang
portion
of
the
new
addition.
We're
going
to
continue
with
a
vinyl
soffit
that
is
vented
to
keep
with
the
keep
consistent
with
the
existing
language
of
the
structure,
and
we
are
now
proposing
also
simple
single
hung
windows,
as
well
as
simple
picture
windows
and
French
doors
for
the
new
addition,
along
with
a
simple
dimensional
tile
that
meets
all
wind
code
regulations,
and
that
is
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
G
We
requested
the
historic
reference
for
the
two-car
garage
door.
This
particular
garage
I'm,
not
not
certain,
that
the
applicant
made
it
clear
in
the
presentation.
The
garage
is
already
a
two
car
sized
garage.
The
space
within
is
adequate
for
that,
but
the
there
has
only
been
one
garage
door
on
the
exterior
of
it.
So
that's
why
we
requested
some
additional
information
about
that
pattern
in
the
area
I'm
available.
If
you
have
questions,
thank
you.
A
O
O
That
is,
as
you
see,
there
are
steps
throughout
the
facade
all
around
the
building,
so
we
felt
that
one
keeping
it
in
line
would
create
additional
structural
concerns
based
on
the
loading
of
that
corner,
and
we
also
wanted
to
maintain
the
language
of
the
building
by
faceting
that
facade
a
little
bit
more.
Thank.
O
The
applicant
is
planning
on
upgrading
the
existing
windows
in
the
home.
These
are
single
pane,
metal
windows.
What
we
considered
junk
windows,
they
have
very
poor
insulation
qualities,
so
the
intent
is
that
all
the
windows
will
be
upgraded
to
a
style
that
is
similar
to
the
vinyl
windows
we
are
proposing
at
this
time.
As
far
as
the
dimensionality
of
the
window,
I
am
happy
to
discuss
with
the
client
revising
the
width
of
this
opening
in
order
to
match
those.
C
J
I
had
a
similar
concern
with
the
wind
that
one
window
on
the
West
elevation
I.
Think
for
me,
the
width,
if
you
it
appears
to
match
in
height
if
it
matched
one
of
the
existing
windows
and
width
I,
think
proportionally,
it
would
match
a
little
bit
better.
Is
that
something
you'd
be
willing
to
entertain.
O
J
A
O
Correct,
if
you
look
at
the
East
elevation,
you
can
see
that
we
have
a
single
garage
door
and
a
window,
so
the
wall
for
that
garage
from
conditioned
space
to
non
conditioned
space
actually
falls
between
these
two
windows.
So
it
is
a
two-car
garage
as
staff,
as
stated,
so
we
are
only
proposing
that
we
remove
that
window
and
allow
full
access
for
the
vehicles
can.
A
You
please
show
the
examples
of
the
historic
ones
that
you
were
referencing
fees.
O
A
O
O
O
J
A
Yes
and
I,
I
guess
I,
don't
really
have
an
issue
with
the
the
door
being
enlarged.
It's
just
the
fact
that
it's
a
solid
garage
door
in
the
front
facade,
so
even
if
it
had
like
a
window
element
or
something
to
visually
break
up
that
facade,
because
it's
like
a
wall
of
garage
door
right
in
the
front.
So
that's
just
my
thoughts
so.
E
C
C
To
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
drawings
and
documents
presented
at
this
public
hearing
a
RC
2181
for
the
property
located
at
five:
zero:
zero,
two
north
swanee
Avenue,
because
based
upon
the
finding
effect
with
the
following
conditions,
that
staff
approves
the
final
width
of
the
West
elevation
new
window.
As
well
as
the
final
specification
for
the
garage
door.
Can
we
say
that.
C
The
that
staff
approves
the
final
drawing
with
a
West
elevation
new
window
matching
an
existing
window
with
from
the
existing
structure,
because,
based
upon
the
finding
of
fact,
the
proposed
project
is
consistent
with
the
Seminole
Heights
design
guidelines
for
the
city
of
Tampa.
For
the
following
reasons.
The
additions,
mass
and
scale
are
consistent
with
the
existing
structure.