►
From YouTube: Architectural Review Commission 9-22-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
present
a
project,
you
will
have
limited
time
to
make
your
presentation,
so
we
suggest
being
thorough
but
concise.
When
coming
to
the
microphone,
you
will
need
to
identify
yourself
and
your
relationship
to
the
project.
The
commissioners
will
not
ask
any
questions
during
your
presentation.
Your
project
should
be
presented
in
the
following
order:
site
plan,
elevations
architectural
details
and
wall
sections
staff
will
then
present
the
staff
report.
We
will
then
ask
for
any
public
comment
following
the
presentation.
A
The
commissioners
will
be
asking
questions
in
the
same
order
as
the
presentation,
please
state
and
spell
your
name
clearly.
If
you
are
here
to
speak
for
or
against
a
project,
your
time
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
So
take
some
time
now.
To
summarize
your
comments,
because
three
minutes
go
by
very
quickly
following
public
comment,
the
applicant
will
be
allowed
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
The
public
hearing
will
then
be
closed.
The
only
comments
which
will
be
allowed
after
the
public
hearing
is
closed
will
be
in
response
to
any
questions
from
the
commissioners.
A
The
commissioners
will
then
discuss
the
case
and
will
make
their
decision
based
upon
the
city
ordinance
chapter
27
of
the
city,
zoning
code,
the
design
guidelines,
the
secretary
of
the
interior
standards,
historic
preservation,
development
review
comments,
the
hpdrc
and
the
testimony
given
at
this
public
hearing.
The
arc
can
only
act
on
items
that
are
within
our
specific
jurisdictional
responsibility,
owner
and
agents
are
independently
responsible
to
obtain
any
and
I'm
sorry
to
obtain
any
appropriate
permits
and
or
approvals,
and
if
you
haven't
done
so
already,
please
sign
all
cell
phones.
B
E
Thank
you,
mario
ron,
vila
staff
for
historic
preservation.
Moving
down
our
agenda
item
addressing
continuations,
we
have
two
separate
motions
that
will
be
needed
this
evening
for
the
first
cases
arc
21-364
for
the
address
of
818
south
edison
avenue.
This
was
requested
by
the
agent
to
continue
to
november
1st
2021
public
hearing
at
6pm,
and
if
we
could
get
a
motion
for
that,
please.
D
E
Two
passes
can
be
left
together
because
they're
going
to
the
same
hearing
date
in
the
future.
The
first
case
is
arc
21-442-rez.
E
21-86,
this
is
for
the
address
of
1701
north
florida
avenue,
202
east
7th
avenue
1802
to
1808
north
morgan
street
and
208
east
oak
avenue.
This
was
also
requested
by
the
agent
to
continue
to
the
october
6
2021.
Hearing
at
6
pm
attached
to
that
request
is
a
vacating
which
is
arc
21-450,
slash,
vac
2109.
E
This
is
for
the
address
of
1701
north
florida
avenue
requested
by
the
agent
to
continue
to
the
october
6
2021
hearing
at
6
pm,
and
if
we
could
get
one
motion
for
both
of
those
continuations.
E
E
We're
ready
for
the
first
case
this
evening,
which
is
arc
21
dash
404.
This
is
for
the
address
of
1505
bay
shore
boulevard.
This
is
in
the
heist
park,
historic
district.
There
is
a
non-contributing
structure.
It
was
constructed
in
2004,
their
primary
structure
and
the
detached
accessory
structure
are
both
non-contributing
and
were
reviewed
and
approved
in
2000.
E
E
On
your
monitor,
you
have
the
sanborn
map
from
1929
property
that
we'll
be
reviewing
this
evening
is
highlighted
in
this
green
box.
In
1929
it
was
a
vacant
parcel
and
I
believe
it
was
vacant
all
the
way
to
2000
when
the
arc
approved
was
currently
there
and
the
photos
will
illustrate.
What's
there
now,
the
property
does
face
bayshore
boulevard
to
the
west.
You
have
dakota
and
to
the
north,
you
have
watchers.
E
There
is
a
very
challenging
alley
that
runs
behind
the
property,
it
hugs
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
then
it
heads
to
the
north.
E
This
is
our
vicinity
map
I
like
to
include
this
at
times
to
show
you
the
proximity
of
of
where
the
structure
is
and
the
site
is
compared
to
the
overall
boundary
district
lines.
The
local
district
is
indicated
with
the
red
highlighted
border
around
hyde
park,
so
this
is
in
the
southern
portion
and
and
it
does
face
bayshore.
E
E
This
is
the
masonry
vernacular
structure
that
was
approved.
This
is
the
front
elevation
that
faces
a
bayshore
boulevard.
As
you
go
around
to
the
eastern
portion,
the
front
facade
is
over
here.
This
is
looking
at
the
east.
You
see
the
the
compatibility
of
the
two
structures
and
the
difference
of
of
the
of
the
materials.
This
is
what
was
reviewed
by
the
arc
and
approved
and
what
was
built.
So
I
thought
I'd
share
that
with
you.
Looking
at
the
property
to
the
east.
E
E
E
E
You
have
this
void
in
between
the
structures
that
is
going
to
encompass
the
request
this
evening.
This
is
just
a
little
closer
shot
of
of
what's
there.
There
are
no
windows
in
discussion
this
evening
as
they
bring
in
the
roof
line
and
then
looking
at
the
deckiness
there.
This
is
the
area
that
they
want
to
enclose
as
well
and
looking
at
the
abutting
property,
and,
to
conclude,
this
is
just
another
shot
of
the
area
between
the
primary
structure:
the
detached
accessory
structure.
E
F
F
So
this
is
as
as
described
by
staff,
we're
asking
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
new
construction
and
site
improvements
to
the
principal
structure
and
rear
edition,
so
bringing
them
together
connecting
those
two
structures
with
a
roofed
enclosure.
That's
going
to
have
screen
on
those
two
sides
that
you
saw
that
are
open,
so
I'm
just
again
you've
seen
these
photos,
but
this
is
just
to
orient
you
to
what
we're
talking
about
on
the
site
in
relation
to
the
full
site
plan
that
I'll
show
you
in
a
minute.
F
So,
as
you
can
see
on
the
left,
you
have
that
the
side
of
the
property,
if
you
were
looking
kind
of
from
bay
shore
from
an
angle,
you've
got
that
open
deck
space
there
and
then
on
the
rear
of
the
property.
If
you
were
facing
the
garage
from
the
alley,
you've
got
that
open
portion
there,
so
the
patio
is
kind
of
nestled
in
between
those
two
open
on
two
sides
and
again
photos
that
you
saw
of
the
space
we're
talking
about
so
here
what
you
saw
was
the
existing
conditions.
F
F
This
is
the
survey
and
with
the
the
outline
of
the
proposed
roof
kind
of
drawn
in
over
it,
and
then
a
close-up
of
the
kind
of
an
aerial
view
of
what
is
proposed.
You'll
notice
that
the
that
aerial
view
is
actually
oriented
in
the
or
shown
in
the
opposite
direction,
but
it's
the
same
roof.
It's
just
shown
as
if
you
were
looking
towards
bayshore.
F
F
F
We're
not
adding
entrances
or
projections.
There's
going
to
be
a
screened,
a
wood
screen
door
on
the
back,
as
you
saw
in
the
elevations,
but
we're
not
changing
the
actual
entrance
of
the
structure.
Nor
are
we
adding
any
porch
projections
and,
as
I
said,
the
roof
form
is
gabled
and
it's
going
to
be
shingle
to
match
the
house
and
the
paint
is
going
to
be
colors
of
the
existing
trim.
F
F
These
are
sample
photos
from
the
builder
it's
going
to
be
painted
wood
frame
and
wood
post
enclosure
with
the
wire
mesh,
clear
view
screen
and
the
painted
wood
screen
door
with
a
single
panel
in
an
appropriate
style
for
the
district,
and
then
there's
going
to
be
a
tongue
and
groove
ceiling,
as
you
can
kind
of
see
from
that
photo.
What
the
ceiling
would
look
like.
F
F
F
F
Of
course,
in
the
guidelines,
most
roofs
are
gabled
or
hipped,
we're
doing
a
gabled
roof
and
keeping
with
the
existing
structure,
and
it's
going
to
be
shingle
we're
maintaining
the
existing
foundation
which,
in
the
rear,
is
slab
on
grade
and
on
the
side,
is
a
retaining
wall,
and
then
we're
doing
you
know
the
wooden
screen
door
and
wooden
screen
enclosure
rather
than
aluminum,
which
is
prohibited
in
the
district.
F
The
height
of
this
new
roof
and
enclosure
is
going
to
be
subordinate
to
the
primary
structure
and
to
the
rear
structure
that
exist
and
the
rhythm
of
these.
This
building
is
going
to
be
in
alignment
with
the
existing
buildings,
and
we,
you
know
the
way
it's
going
to
be
designed
is
to
ensure
transition
between
compatible
materials
with
maintenance,
maintaining
the
stylistic
emphasis
of
the
primary
structure.
G
Thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening
and
according
to
my
experience,
which
I've
worked
with
the
arc
over
the
years
many
times
and
many
projects
in
hyde
park,
I
believe
that
this
design
is
in
keeping
with
the
guidelines
for
the
hyde
park
district
and
also
complements
both
this
building
and
the
entire
district.
So
I
think
it
complies.
Thank
you.
F
So
with
that,
I
was
wanted
to
keep
it
brief
for
everybody's
time
tonight,
but
we
respectfully
request
approval
and
we're
all
here
to
answer
any
questions
show
any
photos
again
that
you
might
like
to
see
and
so
forth.
Thank
you.
E
Good
evening,
commissioner
ranville
I'm
staff
with
historic
preservation,
the
request
in
front
of
this
evening
is
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
It's
for
new
construction
and
addition.
This
is
going
to
be
infill
between
the
primary
structure
and
the
detached
accessory
structure.
There
are
no
variances
attached
to
this
request,
stats,
finding
that
this
application
is
consistent
with
the
hyde
park
design
guidelines.
E
A
B
And
there's
been
no
attempt
to
reference
the
the
either
the
prime
the
primary
structure
in
terms
of
the
location
of
the
supports
for
the
screen
wall
for
the
screens.
B
G
And
that
was
intended
so
that
it
wouldn't
so
so.
The
lightness.
B
G
The
two
structures
we
didn't
want
to
clutter
it
up
with
more
structure.
We
wanted
to
emphasize
that
it
is
a
separation
between
the
two
structures,
but
the
placing
of
the
vertical
supports
is
in
proportion.
I
feel
to
the
rest
of
the
east
elevation,
including
on
the
primary
structure,
and
so
I
mean
we
could
have
done
it.
As
you
know,
many
different
ways,
but
I
felt
like
this
was
more
compatible
and
sympathetic
to
the
existing
primary
house.
C
If
you
can
keep
those
up,
sir,
you
don't
mind,
there's
a
notation
on
that
elevation
that
says
painted
wood
pointing
to
the
lower
portion,
but
it
it
looks
like
the
screening
hatch
is
still
indicated
there.
So
what
is
the
material
at
that
lower.
G
C
No,
the
the
elevation
facing.
C
G
G
B
E
G
Well,
in
terms
of
the
the
frame
for
this
structure
in
between
is
going
to
be
wood,
as
the
siding
on
the
accessory
structure
is
yes,
ma'am,
but
that
siding.
This
is
more
of
a
framing
member,
but
it'll
be
painted
to
match
the
same.
B
G
A
I
have
a
question
in
terms
of
the
foundation
and
maybe
we
can
first
talk
about
the
images
on
the
left,
so
the
wood
decking,
that's
on
between
the
house
and
the
accessory
structure,
is
that
on
grade
or
is
that
lifted.
A
G
Yeah,
mr
greco,
that
is
a
retaining
wall,
and
it
currently
contains
the
fill.
That's
supporting
the
slab
on
which
the
elevate
the
deck
is
placed,
and
so
it
is
also
which
does
not
show
here,
but
it's
approximately
it's
at
least
12
inches
thick
has
a
brick
coping
on
top,
so
we
will
anchor
the
bottom
plates
to
that
and
we'll
lag
bolt
it
into
that
and
it'll
it'll
remain
back
from
the
edge
of
the
retaining
wall.
So
we
want
to
express
that
nice
brick
trim,
that's
there
now.
B
A
Okay,
was
there
any
consideration
given
to
the
again
on
the
left
side
where
that
screen
enclosure
stops
to
where,
instead
of
having
it
come
sort
of
flushed,
with
the
primary
structure
in
the
accessory
structure
that
it
was
pulled
in
to
kind
of
give
it
a
little
bit
more
separation?
Instead
of
truly
just
a
single
facade,.
G
If
you,
if
you
look
at
the
sections.
G
I
don't
know
how
you
do
that
at
any
rate,
it
does
show
it's
sitting
back,
whereas
on
the
floor
plan
it's
not
shown
correctly.
Could.
G
G
The
suggestion.
B
B
C
We've
had
discussions
in
the
past
about
setting
precedence,
and
if
this
is
allowed,
does
it
then
become
a
given
that
if
this
became
enclosed
with
glazing
that
it
would
be
more
or
less
allowed,
I
know
that
they'd
have
they
potentially
would
have
to
come
before
the
board,
but
because,
essentially,
what
is
happening?
The
infill
is
creating
the
potential
for
the
garage
no
longer
being
a
detached
accessory
structure
which
goes
against
the
guidelines.
E
In
this
particular
situation
is
site-specific.
Usually
when
you
attach
the
two
structures,
then
the
pr
the
accessory
structure
has
to
meet
primary
structure
setbacks
as
well,
and
this
can
in
this
particular
situation.
E
After
reviewing
with
the
zoning
department,
there
were
no
variances
that
were
needed
because
of
the
layout
of
the
parcel.
So
in
the
future,
if
somebody
were
to
connect
these
two
structures,
I
think
that
it
would
kick
into
a
varying
situation
and
then
you
would
look
at
the
hardship
for
the
variance
to
see
if
it's
unique
and
singular
and
met
that
criteria.
In
this
particular
situation,
no
variance
is
requested.
A
Any
additional
questions
all
right
at
this
point.
The
applicant
is
allowed
five
minutes
for
a
rebuttal.
A
C
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
they're,
through
the
mater
material
choices,
you
know
they're
being
sensitive
to
the
district
and
to
the
the
current
structures
on
site,
and
I
understand
that
you
know
the
need
to
have
some
enclosed
outdoor
space,
especially
along
bayshore,
where
you
have
the
water.
C
B
Is
it
the
roofline?
Excuse
me,
commissioners:
if
can
you
speak
a
little
bit
louder
and
make
sure
that
your
your
microphone
is
on,
because
that,
commissioner
said-
and
I
didn't
hear
what
you
just
said.
D
You
know
I
understand
what
you're
saying,
because
it's
filling
up
the
site,
it's
there's
a
certain
degree
of
clutter
already,
with
a
large
main
dwelling
and
a
large
accessory
structure
and
now
we're
doing
an
infill
between
the
two
of
them.
If
you're
really
filling
up
that
side
yard,
I
can
understand
the
claustrophobia
of
the
presentation.
C
C
Presence
that
you
would
know
whether
you're
walking
along
bayshore
or
you're
that
neighbor
next
door,
so
it
isn't
consistent
in
my
view,
with
what
we
would
typically
see
from
you
know:
alignment
with
the
district
standards.
B
B
Even
when
we
looked
at
the
site
plan,
it
looked
like
we
were
looking
at
the
existing
structure
and
just
like
sort
of
blocked
in
between,
like
there
was
very
little
separation
between
now.
What
is
now
sort
of
three
roof
structures,
and
we,
we
also
don't
typically
see
like
the
the
detached
garage
becoming
sort
of
a
plan,
view
form
of
the
house.
A
So
I
think
the
the
only
thing-
and
I
completely
agree
with
both
the
comments
for
me.
I
think
it's
we'll
have
to
kind
of
see
this
as
most
people
will
not
experience
this
house
from
a
planned
view.
So,
even
though
there
is
that
kind
of
large
volume,
you
don't
typically
see
that
or
you
won't
experience
it.
A
For
me,
I
think
that
would
help
alleviate
it
now
is
eight
inches
additional
eight
inches
enough.
I
don't
know
to
me
I'd
almost
like
to
see
it
pull
back
two
three
feet
to
even
where
you
have
the
overhang
you
you
know
for
the
roof.
It
still
reads
is
separate.
A
So
for
me
I
I
personally
think
if
we
could
do
that,
I
think
that's
better.
I
think
that
might
come
in
and
you
know
there'll
be
some
things
that
will
need
to
change
kind
of
along
that,
but
I
think
that
will
help
kind
of
solve
that
issue.
I.
C
Agree,
I
think
I
think,
if
it,
if
it
can,
if
it
can
be
reworked,
so
that
the
overhang
of
the
gable
end
indeed
pulls
back
as
well,
rather
than
aligns
or
projects
from
the
two
existing
facades,
it
will
lend
itself
to
feeling
more
removed
from
that
realm
of
creating
a
mass,
that's
just
out
of
sorts
with
the
districts.
So
I
would
agree
with
that
as
a
condition.
A
So,
as
a
as
a
commission
do
we
feel
that
a
condition
on
this
for
that
setback
and
then
to
create
kind
of
maybe
state
what
we
feel
that
setback
should
be
would
be
sufficient
to
work
with
staff.
C
C
Because,
based
upon
the
finding
of
fact,
the
proposed
project
is
consistent
with
the
hyde
park,
design.
Guidelines
of
the
city
of
tampa
for
the
following
reasons
for
its
height
and
width
for
its
orientation
and
its
alignment
rhythm,
maintaining
materials
within
the
districts,
its
trim
and
detail
and
its
roof
forms
and
for
maintaining
quality
within
the
district.
A
And
then
with
the
applicant,
I
just
come
on
record,
come
up
to
the
microphone
and
just
do
you
understand
the
condition
that
was
added
and
do
you
agree
to
it.
E
E
E
E
E
If
you
look
at
the
the
outline
of
the
primary
structure
in
1929,
it
shows
the
vernacular
of
the
primary
structure,
with
a
very
generous
porch
that
wraps
around
to
the
south,
which
is
currently
still
there
in
1929.
They
had
two
accessory
structures
on
site.
E
This
is
looking
from
above
just
wanted
to
point
out
in
this
illustration
from
above
you
see,
the
pool
is
on
the
south
side
of
the
property.
It's
no
longer
there
as
part
of
the
modification
to
to
the
accessory
structure
or
not
really
a
modification,
but
the
new
accessory
structure.
Part
of
that
was,
the
pool
orientation
was
relocated
to
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
the
photos
will
show
that.
E
This
is
looking
at
the
front,
facade
very
generous
porch
notice.
The
columns
here
they're,
going
to
pick
up
some
of
the
details
on
the
porch
in
the
rear
and
the
portion
of
the
front
porch
that
wraps
around
has
been
screened
in
in
a
sensitive
manner
that
meets
our
criteria:
high-end
craftsman,
style,
home
with
dormer
to
come
break
up
the
roof
line
on
the
cross,
cable
from
the
front
elevation.
E
E
E
E
E
This
is
looking
at
that
screened
in
porch
enclosure
from
the
rear,
as
the
aerial
show
this
is
was
the
location
of
the
pool
that
has
been
relocated.
That
this
is
that
south
elevation,
you
see
the
the
sawtooth
in
here.
As
far
as
the
siding
goes,
some
of
the
dental
molding
details,
the
large
overhangs
and
the
brackets.
E
E
This
is
looking
at
that
same
elevation
from
a
different
vantage
point,
talk
about
the
pool
that
was
relocated
to
the
rear,
so
there
is
some
distance
between
the
back
of
the
house
and
where
the
pool
is-
and
this
was
the
new
detached
accessory
structure
and
then
to
conclude
just
looking
at
the
rear
yard.
This
is
where
the
accessory
structure
when
the
contributing
accessory
structure
was
removed.
E
H
Good
evening
my
name
is
eves
radimus
kulke.
I
am
the
designer
and
also
friend,
of
john
and
whitney
henry,
who
are
the
owners
and
reside
at
832
south
boulevard,
I'm
going
to
switch
over
here.
So
I
can
start
showing
you
guys.
The
presentation.
H
As
as
hello,
can
you
hear
me
as
as
ron
mentioned
john
and
whitney
you
know
after
buying
the
house,
I
believe
in
2014
they
immediately
began
to
you
know,
address
some
of
the
some
of
the
accessory
structures
that
needed
some,
some
taking
care
of,
and
they
moved
that
guitar-shaped
pool
back
into
the
rear,
and
so
here's
the
existing
sight
plan
and
I'm
just
gonna
kind
of
address
that
you
know
we
have.
H
We
have
the
back
face
of
of
the
structure
in
its
relationship
to
the
existing
structures
and
really
the
only
place
that
we
can
add
to
the
house
is
here,
and
I
will
say
that
john
and
john
and
whitney
really
want
to
kind
of
add
this,
this
portion
to
make
the
the
existing
kitchen
functional
right
that
right
now
we're
not
really
sure
exactly
what
happened
in
the
history
of
the
house.
But
the
way
the
kitchen
is
laid
out
is
is
kind
of
haphazard.
H
It
doesn't
function
well
on
a
day-to-day
basis,
and
they
are
you
know.
Since
they've
moved
to
tampa.
You
know
six
years
their
kids
have
began
to
to
grow
up
and
have
friends
and
also
they.
You
know
kind
of
are
part
of
the
community
as
well
and
like
to
host
and
and
have
family
and
friends
over.
So
part
of
this
is
to
try
to
you
know,
enhance
that.
H
You
know
that
kind
of
their
way
of
life
and
and
host
people,
so
in
enlarging
the
kitchen
here
on
this
side
and
and
making
it
functional,
is,
is
really
the
the
goal
of
this
project
and
also
they
want
to
expand
one
of
the
bat,
the
bedrooms
into
a
master
suite,
so
that
the
children
can
have
the
the
second
story
to
themselves
and
I'll
just
shift
this
over
to
and,
as
you
know,
ron
mentioned
this
house
is,
this
house
is
beautiful,
it's
it's
craftsman
is
or
the
craft
that
was
taken
to
to
build
the
house
is,
is
pretty
superior
and
anyway
that
you
know
there's
there's
this
siding,
that's
very
unique,
you
don't
see
it
very
often
and
that's
you
know,
really
brings
the
the
beauty
of
the
house
out,
but
as
we
as
we
move
around
the
the
back
of
the
house,
I
think
you
know
these
door,
the
door
and
the
window
here.
H
H
Are
the
these
three
windows
here
next
to
the
bedroom,
as
we
move
around
everything
else
on
this
side
is
pretty
original,
so,
let's
just
start
presenting
here
the
the
proposed
site
plan.
What
we
want
to
do
is
add
into
the
back
about
ten
to
three
feet.
H
Sorry,
ten
foot
three
to
the
back
and
also
out
into
the
side
yard,
but
stay
shy
and
you
know,
respect
the
the
existing
porch
wall
line
and
also
add
the
this
small
porch
in
the
back,
so
that
they
can
have
a
view
to
the
to
the
pool
here
are
some
three-dimensional
renderings
of
what
what
it
will
look
like
and
I'll
just
go
I'll
just
kind
of
skip
over
these
and
go
into
the
into
the
elevations.
H
I
would
I
would
like
to
just
go
through.
I
know
I
know
it's
not
part
of
it.
I
would
like
to
go
through
the
plan
just
on
the
perimeter
of
the
house
as
it
relates
to
the
plan
we
are.
We
are
proposing
to
remove
two
existing
windows
on
this
side
so
that
we
can
shift
them
and
you
know,
arrange
them
appropriately
to
fit
the
bedroom
and
and
the
layout
of
the
new
bedroom
we
will.
We
will
remove.
H
Here
we
have
the
entry
and
I
will
show
the
the
front
of
the
house
we're
proposing
to
do
a
french
door
like
this.
Not
you
know
nothing
anywhere
close
to
what
the
main
entry
door
to
the
house
is
and
there's
another
door
on
the
side
here
that
you
can't
see
because
it's
enclosed
by
the
closed
off
porch
but
we're
you
know
we're
proposing
a
french
door
similar
to
that
here
and
then,
as
you
come
around
in
the
porch,
these
windows
and
this
third
window
here
again
I'll
bring
this
facade
or
the
front
facade.
H
We
have
this.
It's
a
five
foot
by
four
foot,
six
window,
which
doesn't
happen
really
anywhere
else.
All
the
other
windows
as
you
go
around
the
perimeter
of
the
house,
our
three
three
foot
by
five
foot
and
so
we're
proposing
that
so
that
there's
views
and
to
the
pool
and
also
you
know
natural
light
coming,
certainly
coming
through
here
and
diffused
light
coming
in
from
the
porch
into
the
into
this.
H
Breakfast
or
you
know,
gathering
space
I
did,
I
did
want
to
say
that
there
is
a
little
mud
room
here
so
that,
as
they
come
in
during
the
rain,
the
kids
can
drop
off
their
their
soccer
equipment,
their
backpacks
shoes
things
like
that,
but
this
space,
this
kitchen
will
really
be
more
of
a
informal
gathering
space
for
friends
and
family.
H
As
you
come
back
on
this
side,
you
know
that's
kind
of
a
utility
wall.
Utility
utility
wall.
Excuse
me
with
refrigerator
and
range
and
as
you
get
to
this
corner,
there's
two
windows
that
we're
adding
where
the
kitchen
sink
is
and
just
to
finish
off
here,
we're
removing
this
existing
door,
which
we
don't
think
was
original.
H
There
may
have
been
a
window
there,
but
we
don't
think
that
that
was
really
an
original
component
of
the
house,
but
we're
closing
this
off
for
a
pantry
that
allows
to
as
a
staging
area
for
their
formal
dining
room,
which
is
sorry
which
is
about
right
here,
or
it
is
right
here
and
that
allows
them
to
to
cook
and
stage
and
have
you
know,
formal
events
or
large.
You
know
thanksgiving
dinners
and
christmas
dinners
things
like
that.
So.
H
Sorry
there
you
go:
here's
the
existing
and
and
the
proposed
elevation.
Where
again
since
we
ended
at
the
pantry,
we'll
start
there
again,
here's
the
the
existing
door
that
we'll
be
removing,
and
this
this
comes
out
towards
towards
the
side
house
or
the
side
yard
into
the
side
yard,
and
we
have
the
kitchen
window
and
also
a
that
other
kind
of
front
porch
proportion
window
on
this
side
and
as
we
turn
well,
I
will
say
this:
we
do
have
these
columns
that
ron
mentioned.
We
are
we're
introducing
these
columns.
H
They
are
smaller
and
subordinate
to
the
original,
but
you
know
in
keeping
with
the
style
of
the
house
the
roof,
I
think,
I
believe,
was
replaced.
H
The
whole
roof
was
replaced
a
couple
years
ago,
and
so
I
think
we're
just
into
I
think
it's
an
ass
asphalt,
shingle
roof
and
it
will
replace
or
not
replace
but
we'll
we'll
match.
Sorry.
H
This
will
all
be
removed
to
make
room
for
the
expansion
and
again
here
we
have
here
we
have
the
the
columns
that
we're
introducing
subordinate
to
the
front,
but
in
keeping
with
the
style
of
the
house,
much
like
the
front
and
I'll
show
you
a
picture
towards
the
end
of
the
front
porch
and
the
architrive
and
the
dentille
freeze,
freeze
and
teal,
when
we
can
argue
about
what
we
can
call
it,
but-
and
we
have
these
prominent
knee
braces
that
we'll
be
also
introducing
in
in
like
to
the
existing
the
roofs,
do
have
these
eased
edges
which
we'll
introduce
on
the
the
new
gable
end.
H
Here,
let's
see,
there's
a
you
know,
shingle
faced
guardrail
that
from
the
front-
and
you
know
I
showed
it
in
the
existing-
bring
this
image
out
again,
so
you
guys
can
see
it,
but
you
know
we're
gonna.
You
know.
Basically,
you
know
in
like
have
have
the
same.
H
You
know
detailing
where
it's
a
shingle,
a
shingle
guard
rail
with
a
wood
top
that
stops
just
underneath
the
base
of
the
column
and
I
haven't
mentioned,
but
we're
not
going
to
copy
the
the
same
shingle
pattern
so
that
that's
going
to
be
the
delineating
piece
that
shows
the
difference
between
the
the
historic
and
and
the
new,
and
I
will
kind
of
address
that
in
the
next
elevation
as
we
move
across
the
the
elevation.
H
Here's
the
you
know
french
doors
into
the
mudroom
and
then
the
two
replaced
windows
that
are
in
keeping
with
the
style
we'll
we
can
talk,
we'll
talk
about
the
windows
and
door
detailing.
Let
me
get
to
the
details
so
this
this
elevation.
H
This
is
kind
of
the
to
me,
the
the
most
important
one,
we're
removing
these
two
windows
and
replacing
them
here
and
along
the
the
line.
That
kind
of
starts
the
the
new
and
finishes
the
old.
We're
gonna
propose
to
put
a
six
inch
wood
band
so
that
we
can
stop
the
the
old
shingle
pattern
and
start
the
new
shingle
pattern,
and
but
also
to
do
this
addition.
We
need
to
also
address
the
ceiling
height
on
the
interior
and
to
really
get
that
to
happen.
H
I
have
this
elevation
and
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
it.
I
kind
of
marked
where
the
breaking
point
will
be.
It
will
be
just
underneath
and
where
this
odd
shaped
window
ends
and
we're
proposing
that
you
know
to
get
that
elevation
height
on
the
interior.
We
have
to
break
it
about
right
here
and
to
and
and
it'll
create
an
odd
vertex.
So
we're
gonna
propose
to
put
a
one
of
the
knee
braces
there
and
put
a
new
one
at
the
very
end
in
liking
with
the
rest
of
the
house.
H
I
apologize
he's
got
mixed
mixed
up,
there's
a
section
through
through
the
porch
again,
here's
a
shot
of
and
I'll
try
to
zoom
in
a
little
bit
for
you
guys
there.
This
is
this:
is
we
measured
the
the
existing
column?
This
is.
These:
are
the
measurements
of
the
existing
column,
this
one's
going
to
be
smaller,
subordinate,
but
also
you
know
in
in
keeping
with
with
the
style
of
of
the
house
back
to
the
section.
H
Again,
you
know
essentially
the
porch
we're
we're
taking
a
lot
of
notes
from
the
the
existing
porch
and
we're
you
know
facing
all
the
all
the
surfaces
on
the
inside
and
outside,
of
course,
as
with
the
with
the
new
shingle
pattern,
but
also
we're
you
know
we're
taking
taking
the
same
wood
guard,
the
top
of
the
guardrail
trim
and
again
stopping
at
the
base
of
the
column.
H
But
you
know
this
column
is
really
showing
that
that
it's
not
it's
not
what's
subordinate
to
the
new
or
to
the
existing
there's,
a
we're,
also
introducing
knee
braces
and
also
board
bead
bead
board
under
under
the
eve
like
the
existing,
and
then
this
is
just
a
little
bit
more
zoomed
in
detail.
H
You
know
because
we
we
shrunk
the
size
of
the
column,
our
depth,
our
our
architrave
depth
or
the
the
you
know.
The
beam
coming
across
will
be
will
be
shallower.
But
again,
we'll
I'll
show
you
the
detail
at
the
end,
but
you
know
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
recess
it
with
bead
bead
board
and
also
clad
it
with
wood
and
paint
it
white
to
match
the
the
existing.
H
Oh,
okay,
all
right,
sorry
I'll,
try
to
wrap
this
up
here
and
then
you
know
the
doors
and
windows
we
did
our
best
to
measure
the
the
trim
and
there's
been.
You
know
it's
been
painted
many
many
times,
but
you
know
we're
trying
to
you
know
address
that
and
and
not
make
it
exactly
the
same,
but
we'll
find
a
molding
that
that
is
similar
in
dimensions.
H
I
think
that's
really
it
for
the
windows
and
doors
and
the
so
the
finishes,
and
I
apologize.
I
think
I
wrote
it
in
here
that
you
know
the
pictures.
The
images
and
the
color
didn't
really
come
out,
but
you
know
if
you
go
to
the
site:
they're
they're,
both
the
same
in
terms
of
color.
H
Of
course,
taking
notes
from
these
details
of
of
columns
and
and
beams
and
knee
and
knee
braces
and
underneath
the
eaves
we're
gonna,
you
know
do
do
don't
want
to
say
the
same,
but
in
like
of
the
same
of
the
those
details,
the
the
deck
will
be
tongue
and
groove.
Much
like
the
existing
and
the
stairs
that
go
up
to
the
deck
are
concrete
in
the
front
and
will
be
the
same
in
the
in
in
the
rear,
and
I
think
that's
really.
It.
H
It
does
not
I'm
sorry
and
when
we,
when
we
sorry
when
I
have
one
two
more
little
photographs
to
show
you,
I
think
our
hardware
in
our
in
our
lighting.
We
only
really
have
one
door
and
there
aren't
really
any
other
there
isn't
any
other
lighting
really
around
around
the
house
other
than
the
chandelier
and
the
in
the
front
in
which
we're
not
gonna.
Try
to
you
know,
replicate
or
anything
like
that.
So
you
know
we're
proposing
a
you
know:
craftsman
style
lighting
at
the
door.
H
Much
like
you
know,
there's
braces,
and
you
know
simple
hardware
for
for
the
one
door
that
we're
adding
all
the
other.
You
know
the
window
hardware
will
be
from
the
inside.
There's
nothing
really
on
the
exterior
to
to
address,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
E
Good
evening,
commissioners
ron
avila
staff
with
historic
preservation.
The
request
in
front
of
this
evening
is
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
new
construction
in
addition
to
the
primary
structure
sas.
Finally,
this
application
is
consistent
with
the
hyde
park
design
guidelines
under
conditions.
E
There
was
the
second
bullet
item
that
I
wanted
the
applicant
to
revisit
the
window
proportions
that
were
presented
on
the
south
and
east
elevation
through
the
presentation
tonight
he
alluded
to.
There
is
a
proportion
that
is
consistent
with
what
he's
presenting
on
the
front
porch.
So
it
looks
like
any
regular
shaped
window,
but
the
structure
does
have
the
proportions
in
the
window
that
he
has
so
that
satisfies
staff's
concern.
A
H
Yeah,
so
there
is
a
mechanical
yard
right
here,
there's
a
small
bump
out
on
the
side
of
the
building,
and
just
after
that,
there's
there's
a
mechanical
yard.
Where
there's
ac
units
there
we're
proposing
to
put
it
there
and
and
likely
we're
gonna
have
to
replace
some
of
those
units
anyway,
and
I
think
that's
an
opportunity
to
size
up
the
units
that
are
there
to
to
accommodate
the
additional
square
feet
that
we're
adding.
H
H
So
right
now
you
can
see
there's
a
fence
around
it.
If
we
need
to
extend
a
little
bit
out
a
couple
feet
to
to
fit
it.
I
I
don't
imagine
that
we
did
those
two.
Those
two
units
are
quite
large
already
but
we're
you
know
we'll
use
the
same
thing.
That's
that's
there.
They
will.
They
will
be
fenced
off.
If
that's
the
question,
yes,.
D
I
would
like
to
address
your
large
format,
punched
windows,
which
you
have
around.
I
guess
your
kitchen
eating
area.
Yes,
if
you
could
pull
up
those
elevations,
if
you
would
please,
sir,
I
would.
D
Now,
for
both
the
east
and
your,
I
guess
it's
your
south
elevation.
You
have
those
large
punched
windows
and
I
understand
where
you're
generating
those
from,
but
it
still
seems
a
bit
odd
in
their
proportion
and
the
question
I
have
for
you
is:
had
you
considered
other
arrangements
of
windows
in
here
as
an
example,
instead
of
one
large
punch
have
two
of
a
more
proportional
pair
of
windows,
ganged
together
in
each
of
these
particular
locations
or
a
whole
row
of
windows.
Because
of
your
intention
to
bring
in
natural
light
to
this.
H
Part
of
the
house:
yes,
we
did
actually.
We
originally
had
windows
that
are
similar
to
the
the
dormer
up
here
with
they
have
styles
in
in
in
between
them
and
they
actually
push
out,
but
because
the
the
porch
area
isn't
that
large
pushing
out
a
window
would
would
you
know,
make
make
the
porch
a
little
less
useful,
and
so
we
we
went
with
a
single
hung
window
and,
and
that
kind
of
you
know
kind
of
started
to
beg
the
question:
okay.
Well,
what?
Where?
What?
What
size
window
is
this?
H
And
so
we
looked
at
the
porch
and
used
that,
for
you
know,
sort
of
that
proportion?
Well,
it's
not
really
the
same
proportion,
but
you
know:
we've
made
it
more
square
as
opposed
to
more
rectum
rectilinear.
C
Typically,
historically,
you
would
see
the
rear
and
side
porches
be
more
diminutive
to
the
primary,
and
so
the
the
feel
of
the
columns
and
their
their
bases
seem
a
little
off
in
terms
of,
and
even
as
you're
as
you're
moving
through
the
back
it.
It
feels
like
you
want
to
be
lighter
and
it
still
has
a
heavy
presence.
So
was
there
consideration
for
other
alternatives
to
the.
G
H
I
don't
want
to
say
no,
but
I
think
really
what
what
the
the
issue
was
is
the
roof
and
again
back
to
the
breaking
breaking
that
roof.
H
With
a
different
roof
form-
and
so
this
this
kind
of
was
was
what
led
us
to
it.
So
we,
you
know,
we
tried
this
cable,
it
looked.
It
looked
a
lot
better
in
terms
of
the
different
options
of
roofs
and
it
worked
better.
So
that's
that's.
H
I
know
I
I
understand
it's
okay,
and
so,
when
we
came
to
this,
you
know
we
looked
at
the
front
porch
and-
and
you
know
it
kind
of
spoke
to
us
to
say
you
know:
okay,
we
we
should
kind
of
make
it
in
like
of
that
and
and
we
originally
did
have
the
same
columns.
But
you
know
in
speaking
with
ron.
You
know
I
we
think
it
was
a
good
suggestion
to
to
make
them
a
little
bit
more.
H
We
kind
of
let
the
the
architecture
tell
us,
you
know
what
we
should
do
and
if
that
you
know
if
we
should
have
had
different
options,
I'd
I'd
I'd
certainly
take
suggestions
on
what
what
might
that
be?
Okay,.
H
Oh,
you
mean
in
terms
of
the
renderings
or
the
elevations,
since
we
weren't
doing
anything
to
the
front
elevation.
We
didn't.
We
didn't
provide.
B
One,
but
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
it
looks
like
that
addition
actually
comes
out
further
than
the
original
house.
It
looks
like
the
addition
will
stick
out
a
little
further
from
the
front
elevation
than
the
original
house.
The
the
line.
H
Yes,
it's
it's
a
it's
like
one
and
two.
H
We
are
well
yeah,
so
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
do
a
asphalt,
single
shingle
roof,
but
we'll
likely
have
to
double
layer
the
the
waterproofing
to
get
that
to
work.
B
You
mentioned
that
you
mentioned
that
you're
going
to
move
existing
windows,
but
the
note
that
you
have
is
kind
of
confusing
you're
actually
going
to
use
new
windows
in
the
whole
in
in
in
the
new
construction.
Is
that
correct.
H
Correct,
yes,
and,
and
they
will
be,
you
know,
wood.
You
know
the.
B
H
B
H
Sure
we
we
could
but
from
you
know,
if
energy
efficiency
standpoint,
maybe
not,
but
you
know,
there's
the
house
is
already
you
know
it's
it's
pretty
old
and
the
windows
lead
a
lot
of
cool
air
out
during
the
summer.
So
I
think
if
we
could
use
the
you
know
a
newer
but
wood
window.
A
If
we
have
the
proposed
north
elevation
up
right
now,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
just
the
the
modeling
of
this
or
photos
are
a
little
bit
off
or
something
so
the
way
that
the
existing
roof
line
right
now
is
running
up
onto
the
second
floor
on
the
rear
side.
So
we
have
those
windows,
I'm
assuming
the
the
roof,
truly
doesn't
cut
that
corner
of
the
window
off
correct.
A
So
as
you
pull
that
new
roof
up,
will
you
have
to
do
anything
similar
to
that
to
the
windows
that's
kind
of
closer
to
the
corner,
or
are
those
going
to
be
able
to
stay
the
same
dimensions?
When
you
look
at
you
know
the
flashing
and
everything
as
it
comes
up
that
roof
or
that
wall.
H
Well,
that
that
is
actually
a
flashing
piece,
the
the
bottom
of
the
window.
You
can't
see
really
because
that's
pieces
painted,
but
yeah
our
you
know
we're
proposing
to
take
a
point
there
and
come
out.
Okay
and
flash.
You
know
flash
it.
Similarly,
yeah
I
mean.
H
H
H
So
we
didn't,
I
mean
we
had
windows
there.
We
had.
We
had
windows
in
different
configurations
of
the
kitchen,
but
you
know
where
we
landed
was:
was
a
function
of
the
window,
not
the
windows,
but
the
the
plan
and
the
rest
of
sort
of
the
rest
of
the
edition
that
led
us
to
this
point.
But
I
think.
A
H
Yeah
I
apologize,
we
don't
have
it
and
and
it's
you
know
it's
a
it's
I'll,
show
you
the
plan,
but.
H
It
you
know
it
will,
it
will
be
similar,
and
I
know
that
I
know
I
don't
want
to
see
this
but
it'll
be
similar
to
the
elevation
here
with
the
same
size,
window
centered.
A
B
H
That's
a
good
question.
I
think
we
were
planning
to
dye
the
two,
the
two
shingle
patterns
together,
but
we
can
certainly
add
a
another
wood
piece
similar
to
the
other
side,
where
it
begins
and
have
a
finishing
point
for
for
the
historic
shingle
pattern
and
the
neo.
C
G
H
First,
the
they're
they're
milled,
and
you
can
see
the
the
sort
of
the
pattern
of
the
blade.
Okay,
two,
the
the
proportions
are
different.
These
are.
H
Opposed
to
rectilinear-
and
I
don't
I
don't
believe,
they're
keystone
or
anything
like
that-
I
think
they're
they're
straight
okay,.
A
H
Oh
okay!
Yes,
no
and
one
yeah.
No!
For
for
anything
that,
like
the
window
or
the
door,
we
would
we
would
take
whatever
we
would.
You
know,
certainly
salvage
what
we're
taking
from
the
from
the
rear
facade
that
we're
removing
and
replace
it
for
those
openings
that
we're
closing
off.
A
A
B
H
A
B
Was
there
consideration
given
to
using
the
same
I'm
sorry,
my
brain,
exciting
as
what's
on
the
existing
structure,.
H
Yeah
and
I
think
that's
without
that's
our
intent
and
to
you
know
to
you'll
you'll,
be
able
to
tell
the
difference
between
the
the
historic
and
and
the
new,
but
also
without
making
it
so
different
that
it's
you
know.
It
sticks
out
like
like
a
sore
thumb.
So
that's
kind
of
the
intent
yeah.
B
D
With
respect
to
the
shingles
almost
appears
that
the
real
big
differentiation
between
the
new
and
the
olds,
the
new
one,
is
a
manufactured
product,
it's
very
uniform
and
it's
in
it's
in
its
size.
It's
face.
It's
with
the
existing
almost
looks
like
it's
hand,
split.
H
H
D
D
B
Yes,
you
made
a,
I
just
want
to
clarify
the
the
new
trim.
The
trim
on
the
new
windows
and
doors
will
match
the
existing
in.
B
A
H
Yes,
it
was
just
a
smaller
addition
and
you
know
the
kitchen,
wouldn't
we
wouldn't
have
had
you
know
much
more
kitchen
yeah.
I
mean
I
think,
mrs
ample
for
for
gathering
a
gatherings,
because
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
the
goal.
B
All
right,
I
have
one
one
last
quick
question
that,
and
that
has
to
do
with
the
with
the
crawl
space
underneath
in
the
photo
that
you
have
up.
They
have
left
some
of
the
bricks
out,
so
that
there's
attic
so
that
there
is
some
attempt
at
ventilation
under
there
now
you're
going
to
have
a
slab
on
grade
for
the
addition
is
that
how
that's
going
to
work.
H
B
B
Okay,
yeah
and
also
the
same
for
the
area
under
the
back
porch,
because
you've
shown
a
concrete
stem
wall
there
all
the
way
around
it.
No,
no
ventilation.
H
B
B
The
the
one
that's
closer
to
the
sink
kitchen
sink.
H
This
one,
yes,
oh
I
mean
the
answer,
is
yes
we're
going
to
have
a
smaller
upper
cabinet.
B
B
H
I
think
what
they
have
right
now
is
is
a
gap,
and-
and
you
know
I'm
sorry,
mr
myers-
I
don't
I
don't
know
all
your
names,
I'm
so
sorry.
You
mentioned
that
these
are
broken
up
for
for
venting.
H
H
A
Okay,
we'll
close
this
portion
of
the
public
hearing
the
commissioners
can
now
discuss
the
case.
Would
a
commissioner
like
to
begin.
D
I
would
like
to
address
my
fellow
commissioners
comment
on
the
diminutive
nature
of
the
rear
porch.
I
understand
exactly
the
idea
of
where
that
that
comet
is
coming
from
there's
so
much
detailing
in
terms
of
its
mass
that
relates
to
the
front
porch,
which
of
course,
is
the
major
portrait
of
the
entire
building.
Why
replicate
it
all?
D
Even
if
it's
somewhat
smaller
than
than
the
front
for
the
rear-
and
I
think
maybe
you
know-
I-
I
think
that
comet
is
right
on
point
and
there's
an
aesthetic
challenge
between
this
building
with
its
major
front,
porch
and
minor
rear
porch.
I
think
the
rear
porch
needs
to
become
a
little
bit
more
minor.
D
I
understand
how
the
designer
had
knocked
down
the
scale
of
the
columns.
I
think
the
detailing
is
fine.
I
think
the
scale
needs
to
come
down
even
further.
Instead
of
being
two-thirds
the
size
in
the
front,
it
should
be
more
like
a
half
of
the
size,
make
it
much
much
smaller
than
the
existing.
But
still
with
the
same,
you
know
accomplishment
of
detailing,
but
the
other
part
of
the
comment
which
I
think
was
really
spot
on
was
the
nature
of
the
low
wall
for
the
porch
matching.
D
What's
happening
in
front,
I
think
we
missed
a
a
an
opportunity
here
where,
instead
of
having
a
low
solid
wall,
we
can
do
a
heavy
top
rail
and
pick
it
for
the
enclosure
of
the
porch
in
the
rear.
Much
in
the
same
vein
as
you
have
a
heavy
rail
and
pick
it
for
the
stairs
to
the
accessory
structure
and
tie
everything
in
the
backyard
in
that
fashion
as
well
too,
because
the
element
does
exist
somewhere
on
the
site.
D
C
And
I
I
do
think
the
size
of
the
roof,
which
was
one
of
the
reasonings
for
being,
is
it's
really
quite
a
small
roof
when
you
look
at
it
head
on
and
the
gable
end
from
the
rear,
it's
not
a
massive
roof.
So
I
do.
I
do
think
the
columns
are
a
little
bit
oversized
still
in
terms
of
opening
up
the
ballast
strut
or
the
knee
wall
for
that
porch
area.
C
C
Additionally,
just
as
a
as
a
parent
with
a
pool
and
knowing
how
quickly
one
can
lose
sight
of
someone
in
the
pool.
Anything
you
can
do
to
reduce
those
barriers
really
would
be
a
something
to
talk
about
just
with
your
client
about,
but
from
that
from
an
aesthetic
and
historical
perspective.
D
Yeah
to
me
this
is
the
only
real
sore
thumb
for
for
the
whole
of
the
the
proposal,
because
I
understand
where
all
the
bits
and
pieces
are
coming
from.
I
can
understand
how
the
roof
forms
are
melding
into
the
existing
roof.
I
understand
how
you
don't
see
this
from
from
the
front
street
line
or
even
obliquely
from
the
front
street
line.
This
is
well
shielded
to
the
rear
of
the
house.
C
C
You
know
strolling
with
the
baby
bunny
whatever
they
may
not,
but
you
certainly
will-
and
I
celebrate
the
fact
that
people
come
to
us
and
say
I'm
not
gonna
match
that
exactly
because
you
know
there's
two
sides
to
that
coin:
of
being
able
to
tell
and
existing
from
a
new
condition
on
a
property,
and
we
often
see
people
tread
that
lie
very
lightly
and
then
others
very
heavily
and
I
think
by
adding
those
vertical
bands.
It
certainly
helps
with
that.
D
C
A
A
E
A
Clearly,
new
to
me,
it
just
looks
completely
attached
and
added,
and
if
the
the
porch
was
still
kind
of
open,
which
it's
not
on
that
side,
then
I
think
you
would
even
it
would
be
even
more
extreme
and
chances
are
that
porch
was
not
closed
when
it
was
created.
So
in
my
opinion,
I
do
have
an
issue
with
that,
but
I
can
understand
where
it
could
look.
B
B
D
C
So,
typically,
I'm
one
of
those
proponents
of
the
wraparound
corner
of
porch
and
doing
everything
you
can
to
make
sure
that
it
always
reads,
but
I
feel
like
with
the
addition
being
as
as
far
removed
as
it
is.
It's
it's
definitely
within
that
realm,
where
it
feels
like
it's
far
enough
away,
and
as
long
as
it
is
no
further
than
the
line
of
that
outside
on
that
on
that
elevation,
it
seems
to
be
working.
C
B
But
I
also
would
remind
you
that
very
frequently
we're
complaining
about
sidewalls,
because
there
is
only
seven
feet
between
the
residents
in
the
property
line.
Here
we
have
a
really
nice
wide
side
yard.
I'm
assuming
I
don't
know
what
the
depth
of
it
is,
but
it
used
to
have
a
pool
in
it.
So
it
has
to
be
substantial
and
so
that
the
the
addition
seems
to
sit
pretty
easily
in
that
site.
B
B
D
C
I
want
to
ask
one
question:
are
we
all
okay
with
the
windows
discussion
on
the
south
elevation,
does
anybody
I.
C
Move
to
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
drawings
and
documents
presented
at
this
public
hearing
in
arc
21-433
for
the
property
located
at
832
south
boulevard
for
the
prop,
with
the
following
conditions
that
that
the
rear,
porch
proportions
of
the
columns
and
the
balustrade
system
be
reviewed
with
staff
and
reconsidered
in
terms
of
its
mass
and
scale
and.