►
From YouTube: CRB 042523
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
D
D
The
citizens
review
board
members
are
provided
the
investigative
files
in
advance
of
the
meeting.
The
citizens
review
board
will
hear
from
the
Department
whenever
matters
of
Interest
or
importance
are
requested
for
review
by
the
board
or
the
department.
The
coordinator
for
the
board
is
Captain
Patrick
Mesmer.
Any
person
who
wishes
to
make
a
complaint
concerning
a
matter
which
may
be
considered
by
the
Professional
Standards
Bureau
should
see
Captain
Mesmer
for
information
on
how
to
file
a
complaint.
And,
finally,
the
board
should
not
discuss
matters
with
the
city
or
the
department.
A
E
F
A
A
A
H
Hello,
my
name
is
Philip
groin
and
my
address
is
written
on
the
sign-in
sheet
of
paper
and
I'm
here
to
speak
about
the
case.
Number.
H
2020-Cf.000291
with
Kelsey
stormski,
and
we
want
it
to
be
reviewed
in
a
more
timely
manner
as
six
months
is
too
long
to
investigate
the
case,
and
considering
how
long
it's
been
that
Kelsey
has
been
demanding
Justice
that
that
the
crb
should
be
able
to
review
the
should
be
able
to
review
the
case
sooner,
and
if
the
purpose
of
the
crb
is
to
enhance
the
trust
between
the
community
and
those
that
it
serves,
then
it
would
be
crucial
that
that
they
take
heed
of
the
demands
being
presented
by
the
community
in
a
timely
manner.
H
D
A
I
I
A
perform
timed
I
have
attempted
to
contact
the
Ada
coordinator
to
request
additional
time
due
to
my
disability.
They
have
directed
me
to
ask
the
chairman
if
I
may
have
an
additional
minute
or
so
I
have
repeatedly
asked
for
extensions
in
the
past,
with
the
reason
being,
I
have
adhesive
arachnoiditis
and
a
cerebral
spinal
fluid
leakage
as
a
result
of
being
assaulted
by
a
doctor
in
which
these
medical
reports
and
documentation
have
been
provided
to
you
previously.
I
Please
keep
in
mind
that
I
am
in
severe
pain
and
yet
I
continue
to
actively
fight
for
my
rights
and
my
child's
rights.
I
have
resided
nursing
school
I
have
a
degree
in
medical
science
and
continuing
education
in
biomedical
science
to
go
into
law
and
medical
school
I
have
lost
the
child
as
a
result
of
this,
and
may
not
be
able
to
produce
more
babies
because
of
this
so
I'm
requesting
additional
time
because
of
my
disability.
A
We
as
a
board,
has
extended
public
comment
to
you
in
numerous
meetings
extending
various
time
at
that
time.
In
today's
meeting,
you
will
be
allowed
the
same
three
minutes
as
all
of
our
other
partners.
Your
time
has
already
continued.
So
if
I
will
please
continue
and
please
limit
your
comments
to
three
minutes
and
you
are
in
a
minute
and
a
half
of
that
privilege.
A
I
So
I'm
I'm
gonna
continue
and
I
would
like
to
have
that
honored,
because
I
have
a
disability
and
I
think
that
they
try
to
contact
the
legal
team
about
it
today.
So
that's
that's
very
unacceptable.
Okay.
A
You
will
please,
if
you
can
come
closer
to
the
microphone
for
our
audio
and
recording
okay,
allow
board
members
to
be
able
to
comprehend
what
you're
stating
thank
you.
I
Okay
under
eye
the
standard
of
procedures,
641.2,
complaint
review
board
and
cases
involving
multiple
allegations
against
an
officer
and
one
allegation
is
to
be
submitted
to
the
complaint
review
board,
the
entire
matter
and
all
the
allegations
so
I'll
be
submitted
and
considered
by
the
board
police
members
who
failed
to
take
legal
prescribed
action
when
confronted
with
misconduct,
shall
share
the
burden
of
the
guilt
and
would
include
officers
that
failed
to
take
action
with
reported
misconduct.
I
I
Florida
statute,
section
112.532,
section,
782.04
and
section
943.05-
requires
law
enforcement
agencies
to
investigate
allegations
of
criminal
activity
and
to
document
any
evidence
that
is
discovered
if
a
detective
ignores
handwriting
expert
reports
that
are
that
report
fraud,
it
violates
my
constitutional
rights
and
due
process
and
equal
protection
under
the
law.
Detectives
have
a
legal
obligation
to
investigate
allegations
of
Fraud
and
to
collect
and
consider
all
relevant.
A
I
I
F
A
A
Continuing
with
the
agenda
under
staff,
excuse
me
under
staff
and
board
response
to
public
comment.
I
would
now
open
the
floor
for
our
board
members
to
respond
to
any
of
the
public
commentary
that
we
received
here
today.
A
I
would
share
the
gentleman
that
took
advantage
of
being
first
in
the
public
commentary.
You
mentioned
the
case
of
Kelsey
sterinsky
on
today's
agenda.
There
is
a
presentation
in
reference
to
that
so
stay
tuned,
that
will
conclude
item
five
staff
and
staff
and
board
response
to
public
comment.
We
will
now
continue
with
the
agenda
of
item
to
be
reviewed
tonight.
We
are
viewing
case.
A
22F-003
sop538
response
to
resistance,
not
sustained
Mor
1603
reporting
response
to
resistance,
sustain
officer
was
alleged
to
have
used
unnecessary
force
during
an
arrest.
The
allegation
was
not
sustained.
However,
the
officer
failed
to
properly
document
his
response
to
resistance
when
a
when
authorizing
when
a
thought
she
was
authoring.
His
report,
the
officer
received
the
oral
admonishment
may
I,
have
a
member
of
the
Town
Police
Department
to
present
this
case,
and
please
state
your
name
and
rank
your
department
for.
E
All
right,
thank
you.
Captain
Patrick
mess
for
Tampa
Police,
Department,
Professional
Standards,
so
this
case
involved
a
arrest
that
occurred
back
on
4
8
of
2022
officer,
George
Clark,
who
is
on
our
street
anti-crime
Squad.
He
was
riding
as
a
passenger
in
a
vehicle.
His
partner
was
driving
other
officers
and
our
helicopters
observed
a
vehicle
traveling
at
a
very
high
rate
of
speed
in
excess
of
100
miles
an
hour
weaving
in
and
out
of
traffic
on
Hillsborough
Avenue.
E
The
helicopter
directed
our
undercover
Vehicles
into
a
position
where
they
attempted
a
traffic
stop
on
this
vehicle.
The
vehicle
subsequently
fled
the
traffic
stop
and
the
units
did
not
pursue
the
vehicle.
The
helicopter
maintained
surveillance
on
the
vehicle
until
it
stopped
and
was
abandoned
at
that
point
officers
or
excuse
me
until
it
was
stopped
officers
attempted
to
box
the
vehicle
in
the
vehicle
occupants.
Led
one
officer
chased.
The
driver,
Officer
Clark
began
a
foot
pursuit
of
the
passenger,
at
which
time
the
passenger
flees
from
him.
E
The
passenger
does
not
comply
with
commands
to
stop
and
get
on
the
ground.
They
end
up.
Jumping
some
fences
getting
into
a
the
yard
of
a
property,
and
at
that
point,
Officer
Clark
who's
tried
to
tase
him.
Previously
the
taser
was
ineffective.
Officer
Clark
gives
some
more
verbal
commands,
which
he
refuses
to
comply
with
at
what's
Point
Officer
Clark
approaches
him
and
takes
him
to
the
ground.
He
continues
not
to
comply
with
commands
to
show
his
hands
and
produce
his
hands
at
which
point
Officer
Clark
punches
him
several
times
in
the
face.
E
In
order
to
gain
compliance.
Eventually,
other
officers
arrive.
They
are
able
to
get
the
subject
handcuffed.
They
search
the
subject.
They
find
that
the
subject
is
carrying
a
firearm
sealed,
so
he
was
charged
with
resistant
violence
carrying
concealed
firearm.
He
subsequently
pled
guilty
in
court
to
that
as
well.
This
this
complaint
came
in
from
the
jail.
The
defendant
in
the
case
made
a
complaint
of
excessive
force
at
the
jail.
The
Sheriff's
Office
referred
that
to
us.
E
When
we
looked
at
the
report,
we
noticed
that
Officer
Clark
did
not
write
a
supplemental
report
which
is
required
by
policy
to
do
when
you
use
Force,
so
the
force
itself
was
documented
on
a
what's
called
a
use
of
force.
Detail
page,
that's
just
a
basically
a
statistical
document
that
that
says
what
level
of
force
was
used.
So
that
was
there,
but
the
actual
Narrative
of
him
using
the
force
and
the
reasons
behind
him
using
the
force
was
not
there.
E
So
that's
that's
why
the
case
was
opened
subsequent
to
that
so
kind
of
the
way
it
works
when
we
use
Force
like
this
there's
a
mandatory
supervisor
review
so
at
the
same
time
that
we're
opening
up
the
case
officer,
Clark's,
lieutenant
and
Sergeant
are
also
reviewing
the
case
independent
of
us.
They
didn't
know
at
that
point
that
we
had
opened
up
an
internal
affairs
case,
so
they
noticed
that
he
did
not
write
that
supplement.
They
ordered
him
to
go
and
write
a
supplement
which
he
does
complete.
E
So
at
the
time
that
that
he
was
interviewed,
Internal
Affairs,
he
did
write
that
supplement.
He
just
did
not
do
it
in
compliance
with
policy.
So
what
what
the
captain
and
what
the
Command
Staff
sustained?
They
did
not
sustain
the
standard
operating
procedure,
538,
which
is
response
to
resistance,
but
they
did
sustain
a
violation
of
Mor
1603,
which
is
reporting
response
to
resistance.
The
reason
for
that
is
because
the
standard
operating
procedure
it
does
require
that
documentation
to
be
made,
but
it
does
not
not
actually
give
a
a
specific
timeline.
E
The
manual
of
Regulation
says
that
that
report
has
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
the
shift,
so
since
Officer
Clark
did
not
complete
that
required
report
by
the
end
of
the
shift,
the
captain
sustained
that
violation
instead
and
as
a
result
of
that,
he
was
given
an
oral
admonishment
and
I'll
answer
any
questions.
The
board
may
have
that.
A
J
Captain
I'm
sorry
could
not
hear
very
well
did.
Did
you
the
state
that
the
the
report
The
Narrative,
needs
to
be
written
by
the
end
of
shift
correct,
okay,
and
is
that
specific
within
the
manual
of
Regulation,
correct
by
the
end
of
shift?
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
and
it
took
him
11
days
to
amend
the
report.
If
I
remember
correctly
from
the.
C
Hi,
thank
you.
I
just
have
one
question
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
the
taser
I.
Think
that
stops
you
was.
He
not
was
the
taser
not
working
properly.
E
So
it's
very
difficult
to
pay
somebody
who's
running,
so
the
taser
was
not
effective.
So
what
what
I
would
imagine
happened
is
one
of
the
the
taser
prongs
hit
him
and
the
other
one
missed,
and
if
and
if
you
don't
have,
as
you
recall,
from
the
Citizens
Academy,
you
have
to
have
those
two
prongs.
So
there
has
to
be
that
that
connection
between
the
two-
if
it's
only
one
of
them,
it's
it's
not
going
to
give
you
that
neuromuscular
incapacitation.
So
in
this
case,
that's
what
happened.
E
A
Officer
Clark
I
was
riding
with
Rob
and
according
to
what
I
was
able
to
review.
In
the
case,
they
made
an
observation
of
the
vehicle
traveling
on
Hillsborough
and
was
recognized
as
speeding.
Were
there
any
speeding
device
or
were
there
any
probable
cause
to
support
the
allegation
of
speeding
to
create
that
initial?
Stop.
E
So
from
the
from
the
report,
what
was
written
in
the
aviation
unit?
You
know
they.
E
They
had
a
very
good
view
of
the
vehicle,
regardless
of
the
actual
speeding,
the
fact
that
it
was
weaving
in
and
out
of
traffic
causing
other
vehicles
to
slam
on
the
brakes,
that
that
would
be
enough
to
support
a
careless
driving
charge.
E
Now,
if,
if
this
was
a
something
that
would
result
in
some
sort
of
serious
injuries
or
fatality,
we
could
go
back
and
look
at
the
air
service
video
and
we
would
be
able
to
do
a
time
distance
calculation
about
and
specifically
know
how
fast
the
vehicle
was
going.
But
that
wasn't
done.
E
We
can
visually
observe
that
a
vehicle
is
going,
especially
in
a
case
like
this,
where
it
was
estimated
100
miles
an
hour,
we're
not
talking
about
45
instead
of
40
but
you're
talking
about
somebody
who's,
just
blowing
the
doors
off
any
other
vehicle
on
the
road.
It's
obvious
to
anybody.
Who's
been
trained
in
you
know,
speed
measurement
that
that's
severely
exceeding
the
speed
limit,
but
that
combined
with
the
failure
to
maintain
Lane
and
weaving
in
and
out
of
traffic
and
affecting
other
traffic
would
give
probable
cause
for
traffic.
Stop.
G
Quick
question,
as
it
relates
to
the
pensions
that
were
thrown,
we
do
see
on
the
video
I
appreciate
you
sending
that
out.
It
helped
clear
the
the
scene
for
me:
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
more
or
less
how
many
punches
were
thrown?
You
do
hear
on
the
video
a
sound
of
gasping
for
air.
G
At
what
point
do
we
would
determine
that
this
can
be
maybe
a
case
of
excessive
fours
or
or
that
would
have
been
something
that
would
have
been
sustained
at
what
point
would
we
be
able
to
determine
something
of
that
nature
that
magnitude
so.
E
I
believe
there
were
a
total
of
I
believe
it
was
three
punches.
It
was
either
three
or
four
punches
I.
Think
three
is
what
the
defendant
said
in
his
complaint,
so
I
believe
that's,
probably
accurate,
and
when
he
was
punching
the
defendant,
he
kept
giving
the
defendant
orders
to
give
him
his
hand,
and
he
wouldn't
do
that
now,
once
he
was
able
to
grab
the
defendant
and
and
get
him
into
custody.
E
At
that
point,
any
subsequent
punches
would
have
definitely
been
excessive
force,
but
he's
still
trying
to
gain
control
of
the
hand
which
at
the
time
he
didn't
know,
but
in
reality
that
hand
was
on
the
firearm
that
he
had
concealed
on
his
person
whether
or
not
he
was
going
to
pull
that
out
or
he
was
just
trying
to
to
keep
it
in
his
waistband.
So
it
didn't
come
out.
E
I
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
I,
don't
think
any
of
us
do,
but
as
long
as
he's
still
making
a
reasonable
effort
to
overcome
the
resistance,
then
it
would
be
justified
now.
If
other
officers
arrived
on
the
scene-
and
you
know
they
were
able
to
each
grab
hands
and
then
he
still
continued
to
punch
him
anyway.
That
would
probably
not
be
justified
either.
So,
when
he's
by
himself
when
the
the
subject
is
has
already
resisted
by
running
when
he's
already
on
the
ground,
then
he's
refusing
to
give
his
hands
to
be
handcuffed.
E
D
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
cam,
Messmer,
how
you
doing
good
I've
got
a
question
about
the
the
disciplinary
action
taken.
The
oral
admonishment
in
as
part
of
our
packet
I
also
saw
that
there's
a
history
with
the
with
the
officer
on
past
disciplinary
situations.
D
In
all
of
those
past
situations,
he
received
something
in
written
form
whether
it
was
a
letter
of
counseling
or
written
reprimand,
but
on
this
one
he
received
an
oral
admonishment.
Can
you
kind
of
to
help
the
court
or
help
the
board
kind
of
better
inform
us
on
what
are
the
standards
and
the
level
the
incremental
level
of
disciplinary
procedures
that
you
take,
and
what
do
you?
What
kind
of
factors
you
take
in
consideration
and
the
reason
why
I
mentioned
that
specifically
is
I'm.
D
Looking
at
I
won't
say,
there's
a
pattern,
but
I
noted
in
here
there's
several
other
previous
incidents
where
he
had
some
issues.
He
could
just
kind
of
address
that.
E
Yeah,
so
the
oral
admonishment
is
the
first
step
in
formal
discipline.
So
even
though
it's
there,
it's
actually
I
think
I.
Think
you
were.
You
received
the
written
oral
admonishment
in
the
packet,
so
there
is
written
documentation
of
it,
but,
but
still
it
is
the
first
step
in
discipline.
So
normally
they,
the
totality
of
the
circumstances
and
any
previous
discipline
specifically
related
to
that
Mor
or
related
event,
would
be
taken
into
consideration.
E
So
I
don't
believe
he
had
any
prior
discipline
involving
any
kind
of
use
of
force,
be
it
fail
to
document
or
I
know
he
had
some
traffic
crashes
I
think
there
were
some
other
things.
Let
me
let
me
see
if
I
can
pull
that
document
up
right
here
to
look
at
it.
E
Right
there
was
a
vehicle
crash
that
occurred
back
in
2017.
There
was
another
off-duty
incident
that
occurred
in
2017
and
then
a
courtesy
charge
and
then
another
vehicle
crash
in
in
2020.
So
he
didn't
have
any
discipline
specifically
related
to
lack
of
documentation
or
anything.
You
know
on
the
on
the
four
spectrum
and
I
think
too.
E
In
this
case,
the
reason
why
it
was
an
oral
admonishment
and
not
a
letter
of
counseling
was
because,
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
do
have
a
a
system
in
place
to
where
these
types
of
incidents
automatically
get
reviewed
by
a
supervisor,
and
in
this
case
the
system
worked
in
the
sense
that
the
supervisor
caught
the
mistake-
and
you
know,
ordered
him
to
write
the
supplement
and
in
the
original
report.
While
he
didn't
write
his
narrative
about
what
he
did,
he
did
write
the
detail.
E
What's
called
it,
we
call
it
a
detail
page,
it's
the
page
that
says
you
know.
Yes,
I
use
my
Taser,
yes,
I
use
punches,
so
he
did
document
that
he
punched
somebody
in
and
tase
somebody.
So
it's
not
like
he
was
trying
to
hide
the
fact
that
he
used
Force
I.
Think
if
that
was
the
case,
the
discipline
would
have
been
a
little
bit
higher
if,
if
it
looked
like,
he
was
trying
to
hide
the
fact
that
he
was
using
Force,
but
in
this
case
he
actually
documented
in
that
format
that
he
used
the
force.
E
He
just
didn't
write
out
the
complete
narrative
and
the
sergeant
caught.
It
ordered
him
to
do
it
so
had
Internal
Affairs
gotten
the
complaint
two
weeks
later.
This
probably
would
not
have
been
an
internal
affairs
case.
This
probably
would
have
been
a
case
that
we
reviewed
the
body
camera
with
the
chief
of
police
and
the
legal
advisor
in
major
determination
that,
based
on
the
facts,
the
use
of
force
was
justified
and
it
didn't
appear
that
there
was
any
policy
violation.
E
So
I
think
that's
probably
what
what
goes
into
the
low
level
of
discipline
in
this
case
is
because
it
wasn't
like
he
was
trying
to
get
out
of
reporting
use
of
force.
It
was
just
that
it
was
a
little
bit
late
in
doing
so,
but
the
system
that
we
have
to
catch
incidents
like
this
worked
on
its
own.
D
Looking
at
the
the
past
record
of
previous
violations
that
Officer
Clark
had
I
guess,
my
question
is:
when
you
have
other
reported
instances
of
violations,
what
is
the
police
policy
with
regard
to,
in
addition
to
giving
oral
or
written
reprimands
or
counseling?
Is
there
any
like
retraining
or
any
kind
of
stand
Downs
if
you
will
where
the
force
comes
together
and
they
review
policies
again,
and
they
kind
of
do
that
retraining,
I'm,
just
curious
as
to
how
the
police
department
handles
that?
Yes,.
E
And
especially
in
in
a
few
instances
if
there
would
ever
be
a
sustained
violation
of
use
of
force,
if
it
was
determine
that
that
his
force
was
not
was
not
justified,
in
addition
to
any
discipline,
assuming
that
it
would
not
result
in
termination,
there
would
be
training
provided
for
response
to
resistance
and
defensive
tactics.
So
the
mistake
wouldn't
be
repeated
again
in
instances
of
traffic
crashes,
which
is
typical.
That's
going
to
be
what
you
see
in
a
lot
of
officers:
disciplinary
histories
as
traffic
crashes.
E
If
they
have
preventable
traffic
crashes,
there
is
a
procedure
in
place
for
them
to
get
remedial
driving
training.
If
there's
officers
who
have
sustained
violations
with
courtesy
to
the
public,
there's,
usually
a
training
aspect
to
that
as
well.
If,
if
the
officer
has
something
going
on
in
their
home
life,
that's
maybe
causing
them
to
lash
out
of
people
at
work.
There's
also
things
that
we
can
do
to
get
that
officer.
E
Employee
assistance,
things
of
that
nature
as
well,
so,
regardless
of
what
it
is,
if
there
is
something
that
could
be
addressed
with
training,
then
training
is
also
incorporated
into
discipline.
You
know
we
every
once
in
a
while,
we
do
have
officers
who
have
negligent
discharges
from
their
firearms,
regardless
of
the
discipline
that
always
is
associated
with
remedial
firearms
training.
So
just
anything
High
liability
like
that.
E
If
somebody
identify
in
this
case
I
think
he
just
he
just
forgot
to
do
it,
so
it
didn't
really
appear
that
there
would
be
any
reason
to
send
him
to
remedial
report
writing
training
if
his
his
answer
is
I
just
I
just
got
busy
that
night
and
I
forgot
and
I
should
have
done
it,
but
I
forgot
to
I've
done
it
before
another,
and
we
can
see
in
other
reports
where
he's
done
it.
If
you
just
forget,
then
maybe
you
don't
need
that
training.
E
But,
yes,
we
do
have
processes
in
place
where
training
or
Employee
Assistance
or
other
things
can
be
incorporated
into
discipline
as
well.
Thank.
D
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
K
A
Before
continuing
the
annual
report,
presentation
of
the
crb
to
city
council
is
scheduled
for
May
18
2023
I
encourage
all
members
of
the
crb
of
availability
to
be
present
as
I
present
the
annual
report
to
city
council
and
again,
if
there
are
any
concerns
or
statements
or
questions,
please
forward
to
miss
kamaria,
Pettis,
Michael
and
I
will
share
your
thoughts
with
the
city
council
on
May
18th.
I
A
Next
meeting
is
scheduled
on
May
23rd
back
at
the
Old
City
Hall
of
315
East,
Kennedy,
Boulevard
third
floor
Tampa,
Florida
33602
and
our
regular
schedule
at
6
pm
before
I
adjourn.
This
meeting
I
would
like
to
give
an
opportunity
to
our
board
members
to
for
any
final
statements
or
comments
or
concerns.
At
this
time,
are
you
will
Carlos
Valdez.
G
Yeah
I
just
would
like
to
say
to
council
member
Luis.
Thank
you
for
being
here
tonight.
It
is
election
night,
so
thank
you
to
any
council
member
that
won't
be
with
us,
come
May
depending
on
the
results,
and
we
appreciate
your
professionalism
and
partnership
in
the
work
that
we're
doing
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
building
new
relationships
with
Future
Leaders
and
being
able
to
work
with
them
in
this
capacity
in
this
Arena.
So
thank
you.
C
I
was
talking
to
the
microphone
this
time.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
Tampa
Police
Department
for
doing
the
front.
Porch
roll
calls
it's
showing
up
on
Facebook
what
I'd
like
if
I,
can
get
the
information
and
and
show
that
there's
a
way
to
ask
for
these
front.
Porch
roll
calls
that
I'd
like
to
put
it
on
next
door,
because
you
know
the
Tampa
Police
Department
gets
a
whole
lot
of
recognition
on
next
door
and
I
think
this
is
I'm,
sorry
I'm
losing
my
voice.
L
Hey
just
to
clarify
you're
asking
for
tpd
to
come
back
for
with
a
report
on
what
we're
doing
with
regards
to
the
front
porch
roll
house
or
no.
A
In
addition
to,
if
you
live
in
Dr
Carolyn
Collins.
M
M
Oh
I
know
the
other
was
the
any
update
or
reply
from
the
state
attorney.
Those
three
items.
K
Kamaria
petosnaco
from
the
legal
department
I
do
not
have
an
update
regarding
the
crb
survey.
Yet
I
do
not
have
you
asked
about.
I
did
have
communication
with
the
state.
Attorney's
office
and
I
will
be
able
to
provide
the
board
an
update
regarding
that
before
the
next
meeting,
so
I
did
communicate
with
the
office
State
Attorney's
office,
but
Dr
Collins.
You
had
asked
me
about
one
more
thing:
the
survey
I
don't
have
an
update
about
that
and
something
else.
M
K
Do
not
have
an
update
about
the
mayor's
process
yet
about
her
selection
for
the
chief
of
police,
but
your
request
was
forwarded
to
her.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
I
also
would
like
to
extend
a
courtesy
out
to
our
city
councilman
who's
present
tonight,
if
you
like,
you
would
like
to
say
a
few
words
to
the
board.
N
Real
pleasure
to
be
here,
everybody
and
just
wanted
to
thank
everybody.
I
see
a
lot
of
friends
and
and
whatnot
and
just
real
pleasure
to
be
here
tonight.
It's
a
kind
of
a
quirky
Forum
with
the
air
conditioned
there,
but
we
we
all
just
really
thank
you
guys
for
all
y'all's
hard
work
for
the
City
of
Tampa,
because
you
all
occupy
a
really
important
role
and
you
all
do
it
really
well
with
really
good
precision
and
temperament.
So
we
just
appreciate
you
guys.
So
that's
all.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.