►
From YouTube: Historic Preservation Commission 3-9-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
Good
morning
my
name
is
susan,
swift.
I
am
a
planner,
the
discipline
leader
for
florida
planning,
services
for
collier's
engineering
and
design,
and
I
have
just
after
25
years
of
being
in
tampa.
I
was
in
the
dc
area
for
16
years
and
I
am
thrilled
to
be
back
in
tampa
for
the
last
almost
two
years,
so
I
am
a
former
city
of
tampa
planner
and
I
was
very
interested
in
helping
maintain
our
beautiful
historic
resources
in
this
city
and
I'm
happy
to
take
a
part
of
that.
So
thank
you
for
having
me
thank.
A
E
Good
morning,
commissioners,
dennis
fernandez
architecture,
review
and
historic
preservation
manager
welcome
to
this
morning's
historic
preservation.
Commission
public
hearing-
we
do
have
a
few
items
on
the
agenda
that
I
think
are
very
interesting,
so
we're
going
to
get
into
those
in
just
a
moment,
but
I
did
want
to
just
on
top
of
commissioner
swift's
introduction
welcome
her
to
the
commission
and
thank
her
for
serving
she.
As
she
mentioned,
she
is
in
an
urban
planner
seat
that
was
appointed
through
mayor
castner's
office.
C
I'd
just
like
to
make
a
comment.
I
did
some
due
diligence
research
for
the
tierra
del
lago
cigar
factory.
I
don't
believe
that
there's
a
conflict
of
interest.
I
just
want
to
put
on
the
record
that
I
have
done
some
research
for
this
particular
property.
When
was
that,
I
would
say
that
was
probably
seven
months
ago.
C
C
No,
I
did
research
from
a
zoning
perspective
to
determine
which
types
of
uses
would
be
allowed
parking.
That
type
of
thing.
C
Okay,
I
just
will
need
one
more
moment
and
then
will
the
commissioners
please
state
whether
or
not
they've
had
any
ex
parte
communication
regarding
any
of
the
items
that
are
listed
on
the
agenda?
B
C
Commissioner
ortiz
just
just
to
clarify:
did
you
have
any
contact
with
this
particular
owner?
Mr
cedric
powell?
No,
no!
I
didn't.
I
had
contact
with
a
construction
company
who
had
questions
about
the
property.
Okay,.
A
E
B
E
Okay,
I
think
we
are
ready
to
move
forward
with
our
first
case,
which
is
hpc
2020-04.
It
is
a
request
for
local
historic,
landmark
designation
of
the
tierra
del
ago.
Cigar
factory
building
and
elaine
lund,
with
the
staff
will
make
the
presentation.
F
Good
morning,
commissioners,
elaine
lund
historic
preservation
staff.
We
have
a
powerpoint
presentation
for
you
this
morning
on
the
tiara
del
lago
cigar
factory
building.
If
we
can
get
that
up
on
everyone's
screens-
okay,
great
so
the
tierra
del
lago
cigar
factory,
building
located
at
1908
north
36th
street,
is
being
presented
to
you
today
for
consideration
for
recommendation
for
a
local,
historic,
landmark,
designation.
F
This
particular
cigar
factory
building
is
located
in
the
area
that
is
commonly
known
as
gary.
It
is
in
the
east
of
part
of
tampa.
It
is
east
of
ivor
city
and
east
of
you
can
see
on
your
map
there,
east
of
the
crosstown
I-4
connector,
it's
located
just
a
bit
north
of
I
believe,
that's
mckay
bay
to
the
south.
There
zooming
in
a
little
closer.
This
property
is
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
north
36th
street
and
east
9th
avenue.
F
You
can
see
some
of
the
the
railroad
tracks
that
are
in
this
area.
Gary
was
once
a
prime
agricultural
area,
and
it
was
conveniently
located
along
the
along
the
rail
lines
for
shipping.
F
At
that
point,
it's
a
three
and
a
half
story:
blonde
brick
cigar
factory.
The
half
story
is
the
basement.
You
can
see
the
basement
windows
at
the
the
ground
level
there
and
the
three
stories
above
that
this
particular
structure
is
very
typical
of
the
cigar
factory
form
with
its
east-west
orientation.
F
Sorry,
the
elevated
first-story
entrance
above
the
basement,
the
east-west
orientation
allowed
for
ventilation
for
the
workers
during
the
day
and
also
light.
It
was
very
important
for
the
scar
factories
to
have
these
large
windows,
particularly
when
many
of
them
were
originally
constructed
in
tampa
in
the
1880s
and
1890s
before
they
could
be
lit
with
electricity.
F
F
F
F
Sorry,
the
brickwork
around
not
only
the
parapet
but
also
running
long
beef,
the
band
running
under
the
windows
at
the
first
and
third
stories-
and
you
can
get
from
this-
photo
some
sort
of
indication
of
what
the
exterior
of
the
the
tiara
dilago
factory
probably
looked
like
originally.
F
So,
as
I
stated
before,
gary
is
in
the
east
part
of
tampa
this
map
from
1916
here
in
the
left
and
center.
The
left
is
a
map
labeled
the
east
part
of
city
of
tampa,
and
then
the
central
center
map
is
sort
of
a
zoomed.
In
section
of
that,
so
you
can
make
out
where
it
states
that
that's
the
gary
area
there
and
the
different
colors
that
are
shown
for
the
different
areas
on
that
map
are
different
subdivisions.
F
This
building
would
have
been
located
in
the
the
pink
area.
That's
if
you
can
see
it
under
the
r
and
y
there.
The
east
bay
subdivision.
F
Gary
was
actually
an
incorporated
city
from
1915
until
I
believe
1923
when
it
was
incorporated
into
the
city
of
tampa
or
annexed
into
the
city
of
tampa.
Rather.
F
So
this
is
the
1915
sanborn
company
map
of
this
portion
of
gary.
At
that
time
you
can
see
the
tierra
del
lago
cigar
company
building
at
9th
avenue
and
36th
street
there,
and
that
would
be
the
one,
the
cigar
factory
tier
right
there.
It's
a
sort
of
pink
a
red
color
indicating
that
it
is
a
brick
structure.
F
F
It
tells
us
that
there
was
storage
in
the
the
basement
and
office
and
packing
areas
and
on
the
first
story,
rolling
on
the
second
story
and
storage
on
the
third
story.
F
The
little
yellow
bits
you're
going
to
see
a
little
yellow
rectangle
with
a
dashed
line
around
it
facing
36th
street
there
on
the
right,
which
indicates
that
there
was
a
a
wood
entryway
there.
It
was
a
wood
structure,
it's
open
on
all
sides
and
there's
a
little
circle
on
that.
That
indicates
that
it
would
have
had
a
metal
roof.
F
Also
of
interest
in
here
you
can
see
there
was
a
restaurant
that
was
constructed
across
the
street.
It
was
a
cafe
to
help
serve
the
workers
in
the
factory
along
9th
avenue
to
the
north.
You
can
see
some
cigar
factory
worker
housing
that
was
constructed
and
then
on
35th
street
and
8th
avenue.
There
was
another
cigar
factory
that
was
constructed
around
the
same
time,
probably
a
very
similar
structure
as
well.
F
Now,
when
we
look
at
the
1929
sanborn
company
map
by
this
time,
there's
been
more
construction
in
gary,
but
you
do
notice
that
the
other
cigar
factory
has
been
demolished
and
the
tierra
del
lago
company
is
now
building
is
now
home
to
the
the
gary
masonic
hall.
F
So
at
the
peak
of
tampa
cigar
industry,
over
200
factories
were
producing
700
million
cigars
in
1910
tampa's
population
was
50
000
and
cigar
factories
employed
about
10
000
workers
generating
200
000
in
wages
representing
75
percent
of
the
city's
total
payroll.
At
one
point,
tampa
was
known
as
the
city
with
the
payroll.
F
Considered
to
be
a
very
reliable
place
for
people
to
to
move,
to
be
able
to
have
an
actual
income
and
not
have
their
wages,
be
something
they
had
to
worry
about,
whether
or
not
they
would
receive
or
worry
about
whether
or
not
they
would
be
paid
in
script.
F
Tampa
was
fortunate
to
have
good
banks
that
were
backed
by
many
of
the
the
city's
promoters,
mostly
the
board
of
trade
members
and
the
founders
of
ybor
city
themselves.
On
the
the
picture
on
the
top,
there
is
a
photo
not
of
the
interior
of
the
tierra
delago
cigar
factory,
but
another
cigar
factory,
just
showing
you
the
numbers.
This
is
a
pretty
pretty
long
building,
but
you
can
just
see
the
rows
and
rows
of
cigar
workers
there
and
india
the
stacks
of
boxes
in
the
lower
picture,
full
of
cigars,
ready
to
be
shipped.
F
Being
an
individual
local,
historic
landmark,
some
such
as
the
the
balban
brothers
factory
in
the
barramundi
morgan
factory
in
west
tampa
are
individually
designated
as
local
historic
landmarks
and
I
believe
the
majority
of
the
others
that
you
see
on
this
page
are
in
the
ybor
city,
historic
district
and
that's
how
they
receive
their
local
designation
and
thus
their
protection.
F
And
then
of
the
there
are
above
as
many
of
undesignated
cigar
factory
buildings
remaining
that
we
typically
think
of
as
cigar
factory
buildings.
Of
course,
they
came
in
not
only
the
usual
form
that
we
think
of,
but
some
others
as
well.
F
F
Additionally,
there
are
some
buildings
that
are
located
in
the
eboor
city,
national,
historic,
landmark
district,
but
that
are
not
included
in
the
boundaries
of
the
local
newborn
city,
historic
district.
F
There
are
several
here
that
are
in
west
tampa
and
are
located
in
the
west
tampa
historic
district,
but
that
particular
historic
district
only
has
a
national
register
listing
that
does
not
have
a
local
historic
district
designation
and
then
there
are
there's
at
least
there's
one
in
here.
That
is
in
a
palmetto
beach,
which
similar
also
has
the
the
national
register
listing,
but
not
a
local
historic
listing
or
protection.
F
So
we
received
an
application
for
the
designation
of
the
structure
in
august
of
2020
and
presented
it
to
this.
This
commission,
which
made
a
motion
to
add
the
tierra
del
lago
cigar
factory
to
the
historic
preservation
commission
work
plan
last
november
notice,
was
provided
to
the
the
owner,
the
nearby
property
owners
and
registered.
F
F
The
one
that's
commonly
accepted
nationally
and
per
our
code
is
50
years.
This
building
was
constructed
in
1908,
so
it
definitely
is
eligible
under
the
the
age
criteria.
F
A2
is
the
this
is
included
in
the
staff
report
here
a2
is
the
the
part
of
our
code
that
discusses
whether
the
building
site,
structure,
object
or
district
has
a
certain
significance,
and
these
mirror
these
significance
criteria
that
are
found
in
the
national
register
of
historic
places.
Guidelines
for
this
particular
structure.
F
It
is
associated
with
events
that
have
made
significant
contribution
to
the
broad
patterns
of
our
history,
which
is
national
register
criterion
a
or
number
one
under
our
code,
and
also
it
embodies
the
distinctive
characteristics
of
a
tight
period
or
method
of
construction,
or
represents
the
works,
work
of
a
master
or
possesses
high
artistic
values
or
represents
a
significant
and
distinguishable
entity,
which
is
a
national
register
criteria
c
or
number
three.
In
the
criteria
listed
in
the
cities
code.
F
This
structure
is
significant
under
national
register
criterion,
a
in
the
area
of
industry
for
the
its
role
in
the
cigar
manufacturing,
history
of
the
city
of
tampa
and
under
national
register
criterion
c
in
the
area
of
architecture,
for
its
building
form
as
a
recognizable
distinguishable
cigar
factory,
and
also
for
its
romanesque
revival.
Architectural
detailing.
B
B
Thank
you
good
morning,
cedric
powell
acquired
this
building
back
in
last
year,
and
this
is
all
first
of
all,
born
and
raised
here
in
tampa
as
well
as
my
my
parents
were
born
and
raised
in
west
tampa,
and
this
is
the
historical
cigar
factories
were
part
of
the
pieces
of
tampa.
They
always
brag
to
their
friends
that
were
from
other
parts
of
the
country
about.
So
this
is
one
of
their
dreams
so
as
they
passed
then
in
the
previous
years.
B
I
I
wanted
to
pursue
that
dream
and
it
and
preserve
as
much
as
the
the
culture
of
these
historical
cigar
buildings
is
possible.
So
that's
the
only
thing
I
wanted
to
add
so
doing
this
kind
of
in
memory
of
my
mom
and
dad.
A
F
Commissioners,
elaine
lon
to
start
preservation
staff.
I
believe
this
property
was
recently
occupied
by.
I
was
gonna,
see
if
I
had
the
name
of
the
church,
but
there
there
was
a.
F
A
Well,
I
for
one
would
like
to
commend
you,
mr
powell,
on
stepping
forward
to
take
this
leap
of
faith.
Quite
frankly,
and
I
understand
your
passion
and
and
would
like
to
add,
on
behalf
of
the
entire
commission,
our
gratefulness,
that
you
are
willing
to
step
up
and
and
saved
this
historic
building
for
the
benefit
of
not
just
yourself
but
for
the
community.
E
Commissioner
salaga,
just
before
we
get
to
the
motion,
I
did
want
to
point
out
that
there
is
a
letter
of
support.
C
Please,
okay,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
petition
based
on
demonstration
of
compliance
with
the
designation
criteria,
a
and
d
which
speak
to
events
that
have
made
a
significant
contribution
to
our
history
and
property,
which
embodies
the
distinctive
characteristics
of
a
time
period
and
method
of
construction,
kamaria
pedisnacker
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
Thank
you,
commissioner
ortiz
for
the
for
the
the
motion.
It's
a
recommendation
to
city.
C
Council,
it's
criteria
c,
not
d,
and
it's
a
recommendation
to
city
council.
It
is
okay.
Would
you
like
me
to
restate
that?
Okay,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
recommend
we
pass
this
to
city
council
based
on
demonstration
of
compliance
with
designation
criteria,
a
and
c
which
speak
to
events
that
have
made
a
significant
contribution
to
our
history
and
properties,
which
embody
distinctive
characteristics
of
a
type
period
and
method
of
construction.
B
F
You
can
see
that
particular
property
on
this
aerial
map.
Here
this
is
a
modern
ariel.
The
palm
avenue
is
on
the
north
side
of
this
block,
angela
liba
senior
street
on
the
west
and
19th
street
on
the
east,
and
then
9th
avenue
is
the
streets
on
the
south
side,
the
property
where
these
structures
are
located.
F
F
F
The
wooden
cigar
factory
that
I
mentioned,
and
by
previously
owned
by
the
oliva
family
and
has
been
rehabilitated
for
adaptive,
use
as
apartment
building
and
apartment
building
on
the
just
to
the
south
of
that
along
19th
street
in
east
9th
avenue
at
the
corner.
There
is
a
1920's
era
bungalow.
This
actually
was
relocated
to
the
site
in
2003
and
redesignated
as
a
contributing
structure
following
its
relocation.
F
Just
to
the
west
of
the
relocated
bungalow
is
the
frelita
or
broadway
bakery
building.
This
is
one
of
the
original
structures
to
the
site,
as
was
the
the
wooden
cigar
factory,
and
it
was
the
actually
the
impetus
for
creating
the
ibor
city
museum
state
park.
F
F
Workers,
cottages
or
casitas
all
facing
east
9th
avenue,
and
then
in
the
sort
of
northwest
portion
of
the
block
are
three
more
relocated
casitas.
These
were
all
relocated
in
the
1980s
and
we'll
have
a
little
more
information
about
that
as
we
go
along
here.
So
this
is
a
an
aerial
map
of
ybor
city
or
aerial
map.
Actually,
it's
a
sort
of
a
panoramic
photograph.
Excuse
me
of
yvore
city
from
1926..
F
You
can
see,
let's
see
the
street,
that
is
on
the
left
side
of
your
screen,
we're
kind
of
looking
north
east
here,
the
street,
that's
on
the
left
side
of
your
screen
going
up
would
be
about
where
12th
avenue
was,
and
you
can
make
out
the
railroad
tracks
kind
of
curving,
along
from
the
foreground
of
the
picture,
often
to
the
to
the
east
there,
and
then
we
have
fourth
avenue,
would
be
the
main
street
that
you
see
heading
off
to
the
the
right
side,
the
right
corner
of
the
photo
there.
F
This
picture
shows
kind
of
a
variety
of
not
only
the
more
prominent
structures
in
university,
but
of
also
the
different
workers
houses.
So
these
were
three
rather
small
little
cottages.
There
are
other
other
residential
structures
you
can
see
in
this
photo.
Some
are
two
stories
or
probably
multi-family
housing.
F
Of
workers,
cottages
that
were
built
together
in
groups
all
at
once,
the
size
and
format
of
the
smaller
casitas
varies.
But
typically,
these
were
the
early
ones,
at
least
were
shotgun
structures,
meaning
that
they
were
one
room
wide
and
about
three
to
four
rooms.
Deep,
as
ebar
city
grew,
the
form
of
its
vernacular
cottages
began
to
vary
a
bit.
So
we
see
a
few
different
forms
and
floor
plans
as
a
as
ybor
city,
developed
and.
F
Different
industries
and
different
supporting
commercial
activities
came
into
play
here.
This
is
a
1957
aerial
map
of
emory
city.
F
F
A
large
portion
of
uber
city
between,
I
believe,
that's
15th
on
the
the
west,
the
interstate
I-4
on
the
north
22nd
street,
on
the
east
and
6th
avenue
to
the
south
there,
which
is
about
parallel
with
the
railroad
track.
F
F
Park
again,
this
is
looking
at
a
an
aerial
of
the
area
in
1973,
and
you
can
see
this
is
the
the
initial
boundary
of
the
ivor
city
national
register,
historic
district.
That
was
as
it
was
listed
in
1974.
F
So
it's
pretty
easy
to
draw
the
boundaries
there,
based
on
the
remaining
structures
that
were
located
along
seventh
avenue
and
just
a
bit
to
the
north
on
8th,
it
was
sort
of
a
funny
little
leg
that
they
they
drew
to
extend
the
boundaries
of
that
district
in
1974
around
the
block
containing
the
bakery
building
and
the
wood
cigar
factory.
F
So,
looking
at
this
site,
this
is
a
initially
the
1976,
the
1984
ariel.
You
can
see
the
the
park
on
the
courtyard
that
was
constructed
directly
to
the
the
bakery
then
and
then
in
1987.
The
site
is
nearly
and
silently
before
the
site
is
nearly
built
out
with
the
relocated
casitas
on
the
west
side
of
the
property,
and
you
also
note
that
centennial
park
is
under
construction
at
that
point
directly
to
the
south.
F
And
then
just
another
little
comparison
here
on
the
left
side
of
your
screens,
the
1976
sanborn
map,
showing
the
subject
block
where
preservation
park
is
and
then
the
1987
aerial
map
of
that
area.
In
1976,
you
see
all
of
the
buildings
with
the
little
x's
on
there,
which
were
buildings
that
were
demolished
under
urban
renewal
and
then,
as
you
saw
on
the
the
aerials,
the
majority
of
the
block
was
vacant
and
then
to
recreate
the
turn
of
the
century
or
early
20th
century
streetscape.
F
F
This
larger
map,
let
me
go
back
and
look
at
that
again
was
produced.
An
interesting
thing
about
this
map
is,
it
shows
the
extent
of
the
area
and
only
the
extent
of
the
area
that
was
under
the
supervision
of
the
barrio
latino
commission.
At
that
time,
the
barrio
latino
commission
was
created
in
mid
20th
century
to
assist
with
the
redevelopment
of
ybor
city,
its
boundaries
of
the
area
under
its
jurisdiction,
where
columbus
drive
to
the
north
fourth
avenue
to
the
south.
F
It
lives
in
nebraska
avenue
to
the
the
west
there
and
22nd
street
to
the
east.
F
And
then
again,
that's
the
this
is
just
the
detail
from
the
same
map
showing
that
particular
block
in
1979,
the
darker.
The
black
footprints
indicate
that
the
building
was
considered
contributing
to
the
historic
district.
F
The
gray
buildings
were
considered
to
be
contributing,
but
had
had
some
alterations
and
then
the
the
buildings
would
just
be
the
black
outline,
but
the
the
white
inside
them
were
considered
non-contributing
structures,
and
these
generally
were
buildings
that
had
been
were
beyond
had
been
constructed
after
the
the
period
of
significance
for
ybor
city,
which
is
1886
through
1940..
F
F
The
one
difference
on
this
block
that
you'll
see
is
that
the
house,
the
the
1920s
bungalow
that
you
saw
a
picture
of
earlier,
which
is
at
the
southeast
corner
of
that
block
1820
9th
avenue,
is
showing
as
a
contributing
structure
to
this
to
the
historic
district.
At
this.
F
Point
so
this
is
a
present-day
aerial
and
let's
jump
ahead
on
this
a
little
bit.
It's
not
quite
around,
so
just
showing
the
this.
How
we
are
currently
how
everything
is
currently
cited
on
the
parcel
today.
F
F
So
in
1985,
as
part
of
the
overall
project
for
the
ybor
city
state
museum
park,
the
florida
department
of
natural
resources
relocated
those
houses
which
I,
which
you
saw
on
the
panoramic,
photo
earlier
from
fifth
avenue
to
the
1800,
1802
and
1804
east
9th
avenue.
F
The
photo
in
the
middle
is
a
picture
of
some
buildings
on
fifth
avenue,
not
exactly
sure
where
they
were,
but
they
do
look
an
awful
lot
like
the
the
houses
that
were
relocated.
That
was
taken
in
1976
during
one
of
the
surveys
of
the
the
historic
structures
in
the
ybor
city
area.
F
And
then
the
picture
on
the
right
is:
are
the
the
three
casitas
on
that
face
east
9th
avenue
in
their
present
position?.
F
So
these
three
buildings
are
all
nearly
identical:
they're
all
shotgun
houses.
This
is
a
particular
vernacular
that
you
would
often
see
in
throughout
the
u.s,
but
often
more
so
in
the
south,
as
it
industrialized
in
the
late
19th
century,
and
these
are
simple
wood
frame
buildings
that
were
easy
to
construct
and
then
decorative
mill
work
could
be
applied
to
them.
F
F
F
So
once
you
enter
the
building
you're
able
to
look
into
the
the
rooms
in
the
house
and
see
the
you
know
how
people
would
have
lived
at
that
time,.
F
Those
those
three
houses
were
relocated
facing
east
9th
avenue
by
the
department
of
natural
resources
and
then
in
1994
through
1986,
tampa
preservation,
inc
and
the
historic
tampa
hillsborough
county
preservation,
board,
relocated
and
rehabilitated
the
other
three
houses
or
three
casitas
to
the
site.
F
With
angel
leave
a
street
to
your
your
left
there
on
the
west
side
of
the
the
park,
I
believe
it
was
just
called
18th
street,
then
and
paul
avenue
to
the
north.
You
see
some
of
the
the
details
from
the
elevations
showing
the
rehabilitation
work
that
was
to
was
to
be
done
on
these
buildings.
F
F
These
are
a
little
later
from
about
1905
through
approximately
1923.
I
believe
so.
You
see
the
building
on
the
the
left
side
of
your
screen
there.
That
photo
is
of
2011
angel
oliva
senior
street,
and
this
is
a
very
small
shotgun
house,
it's
narrower
than
the
three
that
face
ninth
avenue
and
then
the
other
two
houses
that
are
wider
structures
than
the
typical
shotguns
there.
F
The
flat
jigsaw
cut
trim
is
very
typical
of
that
era,
so
the
I
believe,
the
pattern
that
you
see
on
these
structures
was
taken
from
some
of
the
original
materials
that
were.
F
Remaining
but
they
do
all
share
the
same
novelty,
siding
and
the
same
windows
and
window
and
door
trim
generally.
Also,
these
structures
are
all
all
sitting
on
brick,
pier
foundations
and
do
have
the
same
sort
of
wood
frame,
lattice
screening,
the.
F
Consistent
with
the
memorandum
of
agreement
in
which
the
city
of
tampa
was
a.
F
F
This
was
memorandum
of
agreement,
was
done
in
1996
and
was
put
in
place
regarding
the
tampa
interstate
project,
the
expansion
of
the
interstates
through
the
city
of
tampa
disrupted,
not
only
the
ewar
city,
historic
district.
We
had
the
national
historic,
landmark
district
was
in
place
at
that
time,
but
also
the
tampa
heights
historic
district
and
the
west
tampa
historic
district.
F
So,
as
part
of
this
memorandum
of
agreement,
the
florida
department
of
transportation
was
required
to
relocate
and
rehabilitate
several
structures,
and
additionally,
the
city
of
tampa
was
partnered
to
that
in
either
supplying
the
sites
for
the
houses
to
be
relocated
or
excuse
me
and
then
following
the
relocation
to
make
sure
that
the
buildings
were
redesignated
as
contributing
to
the
historic
district.
F
So
going
back
to
looking
at
the
the
buildings
at
their
original
locations,
what
we're
looking
at
here
is
the
1976
sanborn
map
on
the
left
side
of
your
screen
and
then
that
early
circa,
1979
ybor
city
historic
district
map,
so
the
buildings
that
are
highlighted
in
green
are
the
buildings
in
their
original
location.
F
Here
you
see
the
three
that
were
relocated
to
east
9th
avenue
in
their
original
grouping
on
east
5th
avenue
and
the
the
small
shotgun
house
that
was
located
at
1502
east
4th
avenue
but
moved
to
2011
angel
oliva
senior
street.
You
can
see
that
these
were
shown
as
contributing
buildings
to
the
district.
At
that
time,.
F
F
Angel
oliva
senior
street
was
not
in
the
that
particular
area
that
was
part
of
the
barrio
latino's
jurisdiction
at
that
time,
so
it
was
east
of
22nd
street.
So
therefore
it
was
not
shown
on
this
map,
but
it's
presumed
that
it
was
selected
for
its
historic
integrity
and
its
ability
to
convey
the
role
of
the
vernacular
housing
and
the
lives
of
the
ivor
city
residents.
F
So
in
the
1989
york
city,
national,
historic,
landmark
district
report,
the
buildings
that
were
relocated
to
preservation
park
are
discussed
in
that
report
under
the
contributing
buildings
and
features
heaven.
So
we
know
that
at
least
five
of
the
six
relocated
casitas
were
considered
contributing
structures
prior
to
their
relocation,
and
these
buildings
are
maintained
as
museum
quality
structures.
F
In
fact,
the
maintenance
plan
for
the
inverse
city
museum
state
park
specifically
talks
about
how
they
are
to
be
maintained.
Under
the
secretary
of
the
interior's
standards
for
the
treatment
of
historic
property,
with
the
the
one
tour
house
being
maintained
under
the
restoration
treatment
and
the
others
being
maintained
under
the
preservation
treatment.
F
But
for.
F
But
what
we
do
know
as
far
as
how
they
are
treated
on
our
map.
The
casitas
have
been
shown
as
non-contributing
on
all
of
the
maps
from
the
the
national
historic
landmark
district
and
our
local
e
varsity
historic
district
maps,
since
they
were
relocated
to
the
site.
F
So
in
march
of
last
year,
the
historic
preservation
commission
directed
staff
to
begin
work
on
the
looking
into
the
change
in
status
of
these
buildings,
so
that
they
may
be
considered
contributing
structures
to
the
locally
designated
uber
city,
historic
district
staff
consulted
with
the
florida
division
of
historical
resources
and
the
florida
division
of
recreation
and
parks.
F
So
our
city
of
tampa
code
of
ordinances
provides
the
criteria
for
review
for
the
redesignation
of
building
structures
or
objects
that
are
relocated
into
or
within
historic
districts,
and
that
directs
us
to
the
national
register.
Bulletin
number
15
how
to
apply
the
national
register
criteria
for
evaluation.
F
F
F
Not
considered
to
be
eligible
for
listing
in
the
national
register,
however,
there
are
certain
qualifications
that
allow
these
properties
to
be
considered
eligible
for
listing,
and
there
is
a
discussion
under
christ's
criteria.
Consideration
b
is
regarding
moved,
moved
properties
specifically
and
reading
into
that
section
in
the
national
register.
Bulletin
and
staff
finds
that
this
is
not
applicable
for.
F
Individual
we
listed
properties
that
are
being
looked
at
for
individual
listing
or
to
components
of
districts
that
are
the
the
main
focal
point
of
the
districts.
So
these
casitas
are
six
six
of
the
buildings
that
are
out
of
the
865
contributing
structures
that
we
have
in
the
ybor
city,
local
historic
district.
So
this
is
a
very
small
number
of
buildings
that
we're
looking
at
here.
A
very
small
component
of
the
overall
historic
district.
F
B
Chantal
haveya
2703,
west
conrad
and
tampa.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
blc
for
putting
this
very
impressive
presentation
together.
I
only
have
one
thing
to
offer
and
that's
that
I
work
in
one
of
those
buildings
and
what
we
observe
every
day
is
that
this
is
a
living
history
that
people
come
to
they
enjoy.
They
ask
questions
about
it.
They
take
pictures
with
it
and,
needless
to
say,
it
adds
so
much
to
the
entire
historic
nature
of
everything.
That's
on
9th
avenue
angel
11
19th
street.
A
D
Apologies,
I
don't
know
who
the
questions
were.
I
have.
D
D
Do
we
think
it
it
being
shown
as
non-contributing
since
89?
Was
that
a
philosophical
decision
because
they
were
moved
or
was
it
an
error
or
do
we
know.
F
And
elaine
lund,
historic
preservation
staff.
Unfortunately,
we
don't
really
have
any
great
insight
into
that.
We
have
assumed.
Staff
has
assumed
that
it
was
just.
F
Sort
of
an
oversight
and
that
the
structures
were
originally
shown
as
being
contributing
structures,
but
that
following
their
relocation,
that
just
was
not
relayed
for
some
reason.
At
that
point,
let's
see
they,
as
as
noted
in
the
that
national
historic
landmark
district
report.
They
are
called
out
that
preservation
park
is
called
out
under
the
the
section
on
the
significant
buildings
and
resource
types
yeah.
E
D
E
Add
to
that
to
dennis
fernandez,
architecture,
review
and
historic
preservation
manager.
These
properties-
I
think
I
mentioned
this
when
we
began
the
discussion
to
add
it
to
the
work
plan
had
been
sort
of.
E
On
my
you
know,
a
radar
for
quite
a
while
and
as
we
began
to
update
maps
and
and
really
delve
down
into
the
different
structures
that
composed
the
historic
district,
I
often
was
kind
of
left
in
a
position
of
where
to
wonder
why
why
these
were
left
non-contributing
as
well,
but
having
you
know,
got
to
the
ability
to
to
move
them
forward
for
consideration
and
looking
into
them
does
seem
somewhat
that
the
state
in
our
discussions
with
the
state
agencies
were
somewhat
surprised
that
they
were
non-contributing
as
well
as
somewhat
adhering
to
their
maintenance
plan.
E
So
in
their
eyes
they
were
already
meeting
the
secretary
of
interior
standards
for
the
maintenance
and
their
classification
was,
it
was
kind
of
secondary
to
how
they
were
being
treated.
E
So
you
know,
as
ybor
city,
particularly
in
the
last
few
years,
has
begun
to
significantly
redevelop,
and
obviously
these
structures
are,
I
think,
in
their
original
form
and
in
their
current
form,
do
contribute
to
the
district.
We
felt
that
there
was
a
need
to
formalize
that
protection
through
the
change
in
status.
C
Before
we
ask
for
another
question,
madam
chair,
can
you
please
reopen
the
hearing
you?
I
think
you
did
a
motion
to
close.
I
think
there
was
a
motion
to
close.
Can
you
please?
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
motion
to
reopen
the
hearing.
A
Second,
second,
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
motion
passes
unanimously
and.
D
Okay,
thank
you.
It's
kind
of
a
follow-up
question,
mr
fernandez,
to
to
what
you
were
just
saying:
what
are
the
implications
for
reclassifying
these
versus
not
or
a
benefit?
I
assume.
E
Dennis
fernandez,
with
the
staff-
I
I
you
know,
I
believe
that
you
know
I
reference
that
it
formalizes
the
the
classification
and
gives
the
properties
more
protection.
E
You
know
I
I
I
don't
foresee
in
any
immediate
terms,
you
know
any
sort
of
action
that
would
lead
to
the
demise
of
these
structures,
but
that
being
said,
I
think
a
lot
of
our
protective
ordinances
are
in
place
to
plan
for
the
unexpected
as
well.
So
you
know
the
entire
block,
with
the
exception
of
the
the
patio
area
of
the
museum,
you
know,
I
think,
contributes
to
the
district
in
a
historic
way.
E
Some
of
those
buildings,
the
bakery
and
the
cigar
factory
building
have,
you
know,
been
on
the
site
and
have
anchored
the
redevelopment
of
that
site,
whereas
the
2003
location
we
saw,
we
saw
a
you
know
that
one
structure,
but
there's
an
additional
six
structures
that
were
relocated
there
by
the
fdot
on
the
east
side
of
19th
street.
That
really
was
an
effort
to
bring
that
look
and
feel
back
to
the
core
of
the
district.
E
But,
as
I
said,
I
mean
we
have
an
owner
right
now
I
mean
you
can
just
tell
by
the
the
fact
that
they're
maintaining
them
to
a
museum
quality
that
you
know
understands
the
significance
of
the
structures
as
well.
A
F
Yes,
elaine
lund,
historic
preservation,
staff,
all
of
the
the
buildings
on
this
property
are
under
the
ownership
of
the
state's
internal
improvement,
trust
fund,
board
of
trustees
and
the
museum.
F
F
A
No,
if
there
are
no
further
questions
of
the
staff,
then
I
now
would
ask
for
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing.
A
All
those
in
favor
raise
your
hand.
There
hasn't
been
a
second.
A
B
I
moved
that
we
approved
the
change
in
status
of
the
six
buildings
mentioned:
an
application
hpc
2021-02
from
non-contributing
to
contributing
properties
for
the
ybor
city,
historic
district
and
amend
the
ivor
city,
historic
building
inventory,
to
reflect
this
change
in
the
steps.
A
C
A
E
Thank
you.
I'd
like
to
commend
elaine
does
obviously
an
excellent
level
of
research
in
building
the
presentation,
so
we
certainly
appreciate
and
hope
that
the
process
benefits
from
that
effort.
D
It's
very
it's
kind
of
fun
for
me
to
have
this
on
my
first
meeting,
because
I.
D
Spent
many
hours
with
miss
farrell
and
those
one
of
those
buildings
or
two
of
those
buildings
many
years
ago,
so
it's
very
nice
to
see
them
being
protected
and
had
several
family
events
in
the
courtyard
which
is
not
part
of
it,
but
I'm
very
familiar
with
that
site.
So
it's
very
nice
to
see
it
protected
properly.
E
Moving
on
on
the
agenda,
I
wanted
to
get
just
to
provide
a
brief
update
on
the
progress
made
with
the
revisions
to
the
ybor
city,
local
historic
district
guidelines.
I've
been
bringing
you
these
on
a
pretty
routine
basis,
the
last
time
that
we
met
in
january.
We
had
the
consultant
s
and
me
who
attended
the
hearing
and
provided
somewhat
of
an
overview
of
their
development
and
outreach
process.
E
Since
we've
met
in
january,
we
have
been
working
this.
The
the
city
staff
has
been
working
with
the
consultant
on
developing
the
outline
framework
and
sort
of
pertinent
details
that
we
feel
are
necessary
for
this
effort
to
be
a
success.
We
most
recently
met
with
him.
I
believe
it
was
last
week
on
a
number
of
issues
and
we
have
provided
them
a
a
number
of
contacts
that
should
be
integrated
into
the
engagement
process.
E
Currently,
our
next
step
is
to
be
me
to
be
meeting
and
reviewing
some
of
the
details
with
the
city
legal
department,
which
we
are
currently
scheduling
that
and
then,
following
that
they
will
begin
public
outreach
with
the
stakeholders
and
organizations
that
are
affected
and
that
utilize,
the
the
district
guidelines.
E
As
part
of
that
outreach
phase,
they
will
be
coming
back
to
the
hpc
and
would
be
reaching
out
to
the
barrio
latino
commission
for
input
and
to
provide
sort
of
periodic
information
that
they've
developed
for
your
review
and
guidance.
So
we're
anticipating
for
our
next
meeting
in
may
that
we
will
be
having
them
on
the
agenda.
A
combination
of
of
the
consultants
and
the
staff
presenting
you,
with
with
information
related
to
that
their
outreach
and
development
will
extend
into
the
summer
time
july,
is
anticipated
with
much
of
the
outreach
still
being
conducted
virtually.
E
But
we
will
be
taking
up
opportunities
through
our
public
hearing
process
to
invite
it
members
of
the
public
to
to
attend
if
they,
if
they
so
choose
to
and
then
towards
the
end
of
the
summer.
Moving
into
late
july
and
august
we'll
be
looking
to
bring
a
draft
document
back
to
the
hpc
and
begin
a
formal
adoption
process
that
would
hopefully
conclude
by
default.
E
So
that's
a
general
overview
for
you,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
It's
a
pretty
fast
moving
project
in
that
everyone
is
now
engaged
and
the
vision
has
been
somewhat
refined
over
the
last
few.