►
From YouTube: TCC PM 1/20/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
members
of
tampa
city
council,
martin,
shelby
city,
council
attorney,
tonight's
quasi-judicial
and
other
land
use
related
matters
at
tonight's
meeting
is
being
conducted
with
a
live
in-person
quorum
present
in
city
council
chambers.
However,
in
light
of
continuing
covet,
19
government
issued
health
standards
or
guidance
in
effect,
members
of
the
public
shall
have
the
ability
to
participate
virtually
through
video
teleconferencing
referred
to
by
florida
statutes
and
rules
as
communications,
media
technology
or
cmt.
D
Tonight,
the
public
and
the
citizens
of
tampa
are
able
to
watch,
listen
and
view
this
meeting
on
cable
tv
spectrum,
channel
640,
frontier
channel
15
and
on
the
internet
at
tampa.gov
forward.
Slash
live
stream.
One
word
now,
please
note
for
quasar
additional
hearings.
It
is
necessary
to
pre-register
and
have
the
correct
device
that
does
have
video
capability.
D
Now,
members
of
the
public
can
participate
by
sending
in
comments
in
advance
of
email
no
later
than
5
p.m.
Two
business
days
prior
to
the
hearing
date
in
order
for
them
to
be
included
in
the
record,
reviewed
by
city
council
now,
just
for
the
public
to
please
note
that
please
do
not
email,
the
city,
council
or
communicate
with
the
city
council
electronically.
During
these
meetings,
city
council
cannot
and
should
not
read
emails
during
tonight's
meeting.
D
So
that
being
said,
also,
if
you
are
participating
in
the
go
to
meeting
hybrid
version
on
the
webinar,
please
note
that
the
chat
box
is
only
for
technical
issues
if
you're
having
technical
issues
to
use
the
chat
box.
Otherwise,
please
do
not
communicate
anything
relating
to
tonight's
hearings
on
the
chat
box
or
through
email.
During
the
hearing
in
progress,
the
this
meeting
in
progress,
written
comments,
petitions,
letters
and
other
documents
are
accessible
on
the
city's
webpage
at
tampa.gov
forward.
D
And
also
before
we
begin,
mr
chairman,
a
discussion
about
ex
parte
communications
relative
to
tonight's
hearings.
If
there
have
been
any
ex
parte
communications,
whether
they've
been
verbal
or
whether
there's
something
that
has
come
in
through
electronic
means,
perhaps
a
text
if
they
have,
and
they
have
not
been
disclosed
up
until
this
point,
please
do
so
at
this
time.
Before
the
hearing
of
that
matter
does
begin,
have
there
been
any
ex
parte
communications
that
need
to
be
disclosed?
B
B
B
Reference
to
the
fired
department,
citroen.
B
D
Okay,
so
so
well,
there's
not
really
no
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
but
you're
saying
that
it's
it's
by
unanimous
consent.
That
council
will
add
on
an
item
two.
B
Go
with
the
black
history
committee
president,
mr
les
gibbons
peoples,
so
we'll
take
up
the
fire
chief
with
the
request
chief
online.
Yes,
all
right
all
right.
F
Mr
chair,
if
I
may,
this
is
a
kind
of
time-sensitive
situation.
The
the
fire
rescue
was
going
to
purchase
two
new
emergency
vehicles
at
that
date
of
purchase.
They
would
cost
us
what
is
it
115
thousand
dollars
more
than
if
we
purchased
them
this
month?
Am
I
correct
on
that
chief
trip.
G
Good
chief
trip
to
the
you
are
correct,
due
to,
of
course,
that
economy
and
everything
is
going
up.
It
was
a
consistent
matter
they're
trying
to
get
this
approved
by
february
1st.
F
So,
mr
mr
chair,
without
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
council
members,
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
go
ahead
and
allow
staff
to
purchase
these
two
emergency
vehicles.
Second,
what's.
B
Wrong,
mr
matt,
mr
sitro
seconded
by
mr
miranda.
H
Oh,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chief
for
joining.
I
H
This
evening,
so
I
ran
this
by
by
purchasing
mr
spearman
this
afternoon,
but
I
just
wanted
to
get
it
get
it
on.
The
record
in
regard
to
the
resolution
speaks
to
single
source,
and
I
don't
know
if
you've
already
spoken
to
that
or
not,
but
but
what
I'm
looking,
I'm
looking
in
the
back
up
for
the
single
source
justification,
but
is
that
is
this
a
piece
of
equipment
that
that
we
already
have
others
that
we're
trying
to
match
or
or
how
does
this.
G
Old
work
we're
actually
trying
to
replace
that,
as
well
as
with
the
same
identical
vehicle
on
the
north
end,
whatever
there
is
just
an
extrication
or
a
serious
incident
that
require
heavy
duty
equipment,
we
feel
the
response.
Time
is
longer
because
we
only
have
one
unit
into
plane
right
here
in
the
city
which
is
downtown,
so
this
will
have
two
units
to
replace
the
one
that
we
currently
have,
which
is
identical,
of
course,
with
some
updated
changes
and
the
reason
I
trust
now.
G
G
D
G
H
B
C
Good
evening
council,
as
council
chair
good
said,
my
name
is
celeste
givens
peoples,
I'm
with
I'm
with
the
city
of
tampa
black
history
committee,
I'm
the
current
president
and
I
have
with
me
our
treasurer
debbie
mercer.
We
first
want
to
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
come
before
you
this
evening.
We
want
to
just
extend
a
personal
invitation
to
city
council
members
and
to
to
the
public
that
are
looking
to
attend
to
our
34th
annual
black
history
celebration.
A
To
have
one
this
year,
the
day
is
february.
C
C
H
Steve
phillip,
all
right
I'll,
take
the
gavel.
Take
the
gavel
over
mr
chairman
and
you'd
like
to
make
a
motion.
B
Oh
yes,
sir
motion
seek
at
the
council,
be
requested,
prepare
accommodation
to
the
city
of
temple
black
history
committee
inc
to
present
it
after
the
program
on
february,
1st
2022.
F
H
F
Moved
up
in
the
sessions.
B
The
situation
was
opened,
mr
miranda
segment,
all
in
favor
all
right.
Any
polls
most
regret
it.
Mr
the
shelby,
is
it
your
answer.
D
Yes,
thank
you.
I
believe
ms
barnes
is
present
to
do
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
before
we
begin
tonight's
hearing
all
right.
E
Good
evening,
council
andy
barnes
development
coordination.
There
are
a
few
items
to
clean
up
before
you
tonight
on
the
agenda.
First
item
is
item
number
four
rec
2190.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
continuance
to
be
heard
at
the
march
10
2022
hearing.
This
is
a
staff
supported.
Continuance.
Council
will
also
need
to
waive
the
required
180
days
in
section
27,
148.
G
D
B
D
D
Can
we
ask
that
speaker
and
inform
that
speaker
of
the
continuance
item?
Number
four
is
that
is
that
person
available
online.
B
J
G
Was
continued
so
that
I
could
be
there
if
the
if
the
agenda.
B
G
B
C
B
E
Amy
barnes
development
coronation
the
next
item
to
be
cleaned
up
on
the
agenda
is
item
number
six
rec
2194
the
application
was
not
properly
noticed.
Can
you
can
you
please
remove
this
application
from
the
agenda.
B
B
E
E
L
Jennifer
malone
with
the
planning
commission,
my
understanding
was
that
mr
mechanic
would
not
be
president,
but
somebody
from
his
team
would
be
on
the
line.
B
All
right
we
have
about
on
the
second
floor,
miss
rosario
for
this
item.
I
don't
know
13.
B
My
name
is
alfredo
grady
and
I'm
speaking
in
reference
to
the
project
at
211
out
north
albany.
Well,.
B
M
Council,
yes,
council,
I'm
here
to
represent
david
mechanic
for
the
with
jdb
architect,
ralph
schuler,
we're
also
on
the
team.
J
Tonight,
what
we're.
M
Basically
we're
trying
to
work
through
our
pe.
We
have
an
alley
vacation
right
away,
issue
that.
B
M
M
Okay,
sorry,
I
thought
I
thought
you
could
all
right
there.
B
B
M
Yeah
ralph
schuler
jv
arctic
20,
401,
north
howard
avenue.
He
here
for
item
13.
again
we're
we're
trying
to
at
the
same
same
evening,
request.
M
The
continuance
so
that
we
can
have
our
pd
heard
at
the
same
time
as
as
the
comp
plan
amendment,
we
are
trying
to
work
through
the
comp
plan.
I'm
sorry
the
pd
currently
is
in.
M
I
have
an
alley-
that's
been
vacated
about
20
years
ago,
but
we
have
some
easement
issues
that
we're
trying
to
work
through
with
barbara
lynch
in
right
away
and
where
I
think
we'll
resolve
those,
but
right
at
the
last
minute,
we've
had
our
grease
the
middle
that
this
came
up
and
kind
of
put
a
wrench
in
our
schedule.
E
Council,
andy
barnes
development
coordination.
At
this
time
we
do
not
until
that
issue
that
is
brought
up
in
the
erc,
is
addressed
once
it
is
addressed.
We
can
put
them
on
a
tentative
hearing
date
for
raz2185.
H
H
D
L
For
malone
with
the
planning
commission,
I
emailed
dave
mechanic
and
let
him
know
that
if
this
wasn't
continued
to
a
date
certain
that
there
would
be
re-notice
required,
and
he
acknowledged
that
and
was
aware
of
that.
H
G
No,
no,
I
just
I
will
echo
what
jennifer
said.
I
also
spoke
to
mr
mechanic
yesterday
and
he
did
acknowledge
the
need
to
re-notice
if
this
does
not
continue
to
a
time
and
date
certain
this
evening.
B
Can't
listen
to
the
applicant
first
of
the
the
second
floor,
lady.
J
M
B
D
Ma'am,
this
there's
been
a
request
to
remove
this
from
the
agenda
so
that
when
the
rezoning
is
ready
to
appear,
the
two
will
be
scheduled
for
the
same
night
and
you
will
get.
It
will
be
re-noticed
and
it
will
come
back
on
the
agenda
and
you
could
check
again
with
land
development
or
with
the
planning
commission
with
regard
to
the
date
to
stay
informed.
But
it
will
not
be
heard
on
tonight's
agenda.
I
L
Jennifer
one
of
the
planning
commission,
our
requirement
is:
there's
a
30-day
deadline
for
a
250-foot
mail
notice
and
a
30-day
deadline
for
signs
to
be
posted
on
the
property
as
well.
And
that's
in
addition
to
a
notice
in
the
legal
illegal
advertisement
in
the
newspaper.
D
So
you
will
it'll,
be
it'll,
be
re-noticed
and
there'll
also
be
notice
for
the
rezoning
at
the
same
night.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
D
Chairman
just
a
reminder
that
there
is
a
the
council
does
allow
a
rezoning
to
be
heard
the
same
night
as
a
plan
amendment,
but
we
remember
them
that
they
do
are
here.
They
are
heard
separately
and
because
they
have
different
criteria
and
different
code
applications
and
different
burdens.
But
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear
for
council
as
well.
Thank
you.
B
All
right,
so
it
was
a
move
to
mr
denver-
has
made
a
motion
on
the
floor
saved
by
mr
miranda.
All
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
granted
anything
else.
Miss
barnes.
E
Council,
before
we
begin,
can
we
please
swear
and
staff.
B
All
right
miss
madam
clerk.
C
G
E
L
Okay,
so
as
annie
on
purpose,
this
is
ruz2171.
It's
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
in
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
It
is
also
located
within
the
tampa
heights
neighborhood.
So
it's
here
at
the
corner
of
west
columbus
drive
and
north
ola
avenue,
I'm
in
the
starting
area.
We
have
the
villa
madonna
school
and
the
boys
and
girls
club
to
the
north
there's
also
some
single
family
detached
to
the
south
of
the
site.
L
The
subject
site
future,
ladies,
is
community,
makes
use
35,
that's
the
pink
color
on
the
map.
The
darker
brown
to
the
south
is
residential
35
to
the
north
of
the
subject.
Site
is
residential
20
in
the
lighter
brown
and
then
the
blue
is
recognizing
this
public
to
my
public
uses
such
as
the
boys
and
girls
club
and
that
school.
L
The
planning
commission
found
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
community
mixed-use
35
future.
Ladies
category
calls
for
this
type
of
development
pattern.
It
allows
for
a
mixture
of
uses,
but
it
does
not
require
a
mixture
of
uses,
so
the
attached
residential
is
definitely
in
line
with
that
future
land
use
category
and
the
requested
density
of
27.65
units
per
acre
is
below
the
density
anticipated
in
this
particular
designation.
L
I'll.
Just
once
again
reiterate
that
the
request
supports
many
of
the
policies,
including
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land,
which
the
comprehensive
plan
is
very
supportive
of
the
units
are
oriented
in
such
a
way
that
it
meets
the
design
component
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
Our
comprehensive
plan
promotes
urban
villages
to
have
the
greatest
year
of
growth.
So
all
of
that
to
say
this
is
consistent
with
the
plan
comparable
and
patable
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I
will
be
available
for
questions
thanks.
E
Thank
you,
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
great
again.
The
appliance
is
proposing
to
rezone
210
west
columbus,
drive,
2511,
north
old
avenue
and
2513
north
old
avenue,
from
rm24
to
pd
plan
development
to
allow
development
of
residential
single-family
attached
uses.
E
The
applicant
is
requesting
two
waivers,
as
shown
on
your
screen
here,
there's
a
correction
to
waiver
number:
three.
It
is
no
longer
needed.
Therefore,
staff
finds
the
overall
request.
Consistent
shown
here
is
an
aerial
map
in
the
surrounding
zoning.
The
site
is
surrounded
with
residential
uses
to
the
south,
west
and
east.
There
is
a
residential
and
commun
commercial
use
to
the
north.
The
subject
site
contains
a
lot
area
of
20
500
square
feet
or
approximately
0.47
acres
shown
here
is
an
aerial
map
in
the
surrounding
shown
here
as
part
of
the
site
plan.
E
The
proposed
project
is
for
townhouse
style
residential
buildings
with
a
total
of
13
dwelling
units.
Each
unit
containing
a
two-car
garage
proposed
setbacks
are
as
follows:
north
11.5
feet
south
11.5
feet,
east
10
feet
in
west
6
feet
proposed
maximum
building
height
is
38
feet.
A
total
of
20
nine
parking
spaces
are
required
and
29
are
being
provided.
E
E
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request.
Consistent
the
land
city
of
tampa
land
development
code,
modifications
were
made
to
eliminate
the
need
for
the
transportation
waiver.
The
third
waiver
that
was
struck
out
on
the
second
screen,
modifications
to
the
cycling,
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
in
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet,
if
approving
the
application.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Thank
you,
ms
barnes,
do
you
have
a
natural
resource
staff
on
the
line
tonight
to
speak
to
any
tree
removals
or
condition.
G
They
are
removing
approximately
16
trees
on
site.
Four
of
these
trees
have
been
deemed
dangerous
and
rated
a
d9
or
worse.
The
more
majority
of
the
trees
are
laurel
oaks
on
site
and
they
have
extensions
extensive
cavities.
They
haven't
been
maintained
over
the
years.
H
Can
you
can
you
I'm
holding
the
site
plan?
Can
you
some
identify
which
location
we're
talking
about
for
the
live
oak.
G
Yeah
and
there's
high
voltage
power
lines
along
columbus
drive
and
a
lot
of
the
trees
there,
like
most
of
the
trees,
are
campers
along
that
road
there
and
they
have
had.
You
know
some
questionable
pruning
due
to
the
wires
above,
and
so
there
are
a
lot
of
campers
and
a
lot
of
laura
lopes
on
this
site.
H
G
Yeah,
the
canopy
spread
is
quite
large,
and
it
would
have
taken
some
extensive
pruning
to
have
preserved
that
tree,
not
to
mention
the
underground
root
impacts
as
well,
and
the
amount
of
you
know,
construction
that
would
be
taking
place
on
the
site
it.
It
takes
a
significant
portion
of
that
site
up
with
this
tree,
they're.
G
Yes,
they
are,
they
have
agreed
to
plant
larger
caliper
trees
to
meet
mitigation
requirements,
so
they
are
planting
four
inch
and
six
inch
caliber
trees.
Even.
B
B
I
Can
we
get
the
sharing
privileges
there?
We
go.
I
I
So
anyone
as
annie
finds
out
it
is
located
at
210,
west
columbus,
250,
25,
11
and
25
13
north
ola.
They
have
three
congo
slots
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
tonight
as
they
previously
went
over
the
specific
location.
It's
just
south
on
columbus
drive.
L
I
Corner
of
columbus
and
north
ola
in
the
southeast
corner,
it
is
just
under
half
an
acre,
so
it's
0.7
acre
lot.
The
property
has
frontage
along
columbus
and
ola,
and
it
also
sits
right
next
to
a
very
wide
18
foot
unimproved
alley.
Most
specifically,
this
site
is
not
located
in
the
tampa
high
street
district
and
is
also
not
located
in
overlay
districts.
I
We
are
here
to
request
a
plan
development.
This
future
land
use
for
this
property
is
cmu
35,
which
encourages
a
lot
of
different
things,
but
we're
super
excited
about
it,
so
general,
commercial,
professional
office
and
multi-family
development,
the
based
on
the
sizes,
are
a
lot.
The
subject
site
under
cmu
35
would
allow
for
up
to
16
units.
I
Our
plans
that
we're
going
to
present
before
you
tonight
has
13
units
on
it
and
we're
excited
to
showcase
a
plan
that
we
believe
enhances
the
pedestrian
access
and
and
has
greatly
accurate
circulation
on
it
in
terms
of
the
existing
land
use
pattern
of
the
immediate
area,
as
we
previously
went
over
immediately
to
the
east.
Is
this
tampa
crossroads
health
facility
to
the
north?
There's
some
multi-family
development,
as
well
as
auto
body
shops,
further
to
the
east,
commercial
land
and
restaurants
to
the
immediate
south.
I
Sharing
the
alley
is
a
semi
single
family
attached
houses,
a
single
family
with
a
detached
apartment,
an
apartment
building
and
then
further
to
the
south,
just
south
of
amelia,
a
lot
more
multi-family
houses
and
then
in
the
vicinity.
There's
a
village
school.
The
boys
and
girls
club
is
also
pretty
centrally
located
and
close
to
highland
park,
robus
parks
and
waterworks
park.
I
Our
proposal
is
to
build
13
townhomes
on
this
lot,
oriented
with
six
towns,
oriented
towards
columbus,
avenue,
columbus
drive,
two
of
the
townhomes
oriented
towards
ola
and
then
five
of
the
town
halls
oriented
towards
south.
Our
goal
is
to
make
use
of
the
frontage
on
columbus
ola
and
that
lovely
wide
alley
that
we
hope
to
improve
through
this
project
and
then
overall,
this
pd
will
go
into
and
as
annie
point
out,
there
are
two
waivers
pd
which
we
will
also
detail
out.
As
mentioned
before.
I
We
were
previously
before
you
on
october
28th,
where
we
were
very
appreciative
of
the
continuance
that
you
granted
and
you
will
see
that
the
specific
change
that
was
made
was
that
we
dropped
the
unit
and
we
added
that
additional
egress
from
the
site
via
the
alley
which
we
know
was
really
important
to
counsel
in
terms
of
safety,
and
so
we
are
excited
to
be
back
with
this
change
that
you
see
on
the
bottom
right
hand
corner
of
your
screen
here
in
terms
of
going
a
little
bit
deeper
into
the
continuance
and
the
changes
that
we've
made
since
that
meeting.
I
When
we
were
here
on
october
28th,
we
were
requesting
a
waiver
from
the
transportation
department.
We
did
not
have
enough
of
a
backup
radius
for
the
bigger
parking
space.
We
have
eliminated
a
unit
added
in
that
additional
point
of
egress
by
the
alley,
and
we
have
maintained
all
of
our
green
space
requirements.
So
we
just
strike
the
need
for
this
waiver
from
the
transportation
department.
I
So
we're
very
excited
about
that.
Additionally,
on
the
tampa
hike,
civic
association,
vice
president
came
and
gave
their
conditional
approval
at
the
meeting.
Their
feedback
specifically
included
positive
feedback
on
the
porches
that
we
had
added
architectural
elements,
but
there
was
a
very
specific
app
to
add
additional
ali
access
to
disperse
the
traffic
flow.
I
We
maintain
all
of
the
things
that
positive
feedback
was
provided
for
on
the
building
materials,
the
opaque
balconies
that
we
had,
but
we
did
revise
the
site
plan
to
allow
and
add
that
additional
ali
access
to
disburse
the
traffic
flow
so
that
it's
all
not
happening
on
ola.
There
will
now
be
two
points
of
error
from
the
property
both
for
safety
and
then
also
just
the
first
of
the
card
in
terms
of
our
proposal.
This
is
what
the
elevation
would
look
like.
I
We're
super
excited
to
tap
in
and
be
part
of
the
camp
heights
community.
My
husband
and
I
live
in
this
community
we've
drawn
inspiration
from
a
lot
of
the
building
materials
that
have
used
our
youth
in
the
area,
so
you
will
see
bricks
on
the
first
floor,
a
hardy
siding
on
the
upper
two
floors.
A
couple
other
things
that
I'd
like
to
point
out
here
are
the
all
front
porches
on
each
of
the
units
to
really
encourage
that
neighborly
interaction.
I
This
property
will
see
us
at
250
feet
of
sidewalks
to
the
neighborhood
or
basically
on
two
of
the
bordering
lines
of
the
property
which
we're
really
excited
for
for
pedestrian
and
cycling
safety,
and
then
you
will
also
notice
those
are
opaque
balconies,
which
was
something
that
was
requested
by
the
neighborhood,
the
neighbors
directly
to
the
south,
to
help
improve
their
privacy,
but
also
the
privacy
of
the
people
in
the
the
eventual
inhabitants
of
these
units.
Hopefully-
and
those
are
also
planner
boxes
so
to
add
additional
privacy
and
greenery
to
the
project.
I
As
pointed
out,
planning
commission
did
seem
this
project
consistent.
We
are
with
the
future
land
use
of
cnu
35.
We
are
coming
in
with
blessing
allowable
units.
It
does
address
the
mixed
use,
corridor
policies.
We
are
placing
high
density
close
to
arterial
roads
and
providing
entrances
along
public
streets.
I
We
are
very
happy
with
this
single
drive
outlet
on
the
property
to
really
make
sure
that
cars
are
coming
in
and
out
only
in
one
part
and
encourage
production
connectivity,
but
then
also
safety
by
having
two
points
of
egress
from
the
property.
So
if
you
can
imagine
god
forbid,
if
there's
a
fire
there
or
ambulances
show
up
to
the
property,
all
the
other
residents
in
the
in
the
development
would
be
able
to
have
a
point
of
egress
on
the
other
side.
I
So
we're
excited
about
that,
and
we
do
believe
that
this
helps
further
the
city
of
tampa's
demand
for
housing
supply
on
faker
and
underutilized
land.
Additionally,
we
are
very
grateful
for
the
planning
department
for
all
their
hard
work
to
re-review
this
plan
pretty
quickly.
We
know
it's
a
short
time
turnaround,
but
it
was
consistent
across
all
departments.
So
we
no
longer
need
that
waiver
from
the
transportation
department.
I
We
see
that
this
is
a
pretty
balanced
project
and
we
feel
that
it's
a
balanced
project.
We're
excited
about
the
courtyard
space
that
each
of
the
units
would
have,
particularly
because
this
is
so
close
to
columbus
ave,
and
then
we
would
be
improving
that
alley.
Each
of
this
private,
green
outdoor
space
would
allow
kids
to
play
without
any
coming
close
to
those
major
right-of-ways,
and
so
it
would
allow
families
the
private
space
to
play
in
the
front
of
their
houses,
but
also
encouraging
that
neighborly
interaction
for
a
project
this
size.
I
We
are
not
requesting
any
green
space
waivers.
We
are
meeting
all
of
our
green
space
requirements
and
we
have
an
aggressive
tree
planting
schedule
that
we've
worked
with
natural
resources
to
have
as
part
of
this
project.
The
only
shared
property
line
is
with
tampa
crosswords
to
the
east,
and
that's
we're
proposing
a
10
foot
step
back
there
and
then,
if
you
look
at
where
I
have
highlighted
the
gray,
this
is
all
of
the
sidewalks
that
we
will
be
adding.
I
remember
councilman
citroen
our
last
meeting.
I
You
really
did
like
the
sidewalks
and
the
addition
of
all
of
this
production
connectivity.
That
was
as
part
of
this
project,
and
so
we
made
sure
to
keep
that
in.
As
part
of
the
fight
plan
and
the
revision
here,
once
you
address
the
waivers
that
we
would
be
requesting,
the
first
waiver
that
we
would
be
asking
for
is
for
the
five
of
the
south
of
the
units
to
have
their
entrances,
not
face
the
street
right
away,
but
they
would
actually
save
the
alley.
There's
a
couple
of
reasons.
I
This
number
one
that's
going
to
enable
us
to
install
all
of
that
additional
sidewalk.
If
those
were
garages
that
would
all
become
just
plain
garages
where
people
were
back
in
the
mountain,
it
would
no
longer
be
a
safe
pedestrian
road,
particularly
because
it's
right
by
columbus,
if
you
can
imagine,
people
will
now
have
this
improved
value
where
they
can
walk
between
ola
and
highland
a
lot
more
safely.
It
is
an
extra
wide
alley.
Most
valleys
in
the
area
are
only
10
feet.
I
This
is
an
18
foot
alley,
so
we
want
to
tap
into
that
very
exciting
feature
of
this
lot.
We
have
spoken
with
neighbors
directly
to
the
south
of
this
property
and
their
strong,
strong
preference
was
that
we
did
not
orient
the
garages
right
next
to
theirs
that
we
made
use
of
the
single
vial
kept
all
of
the
garage
traffic
in
and
out
of
development
within
that
single
drive
out
and
then
have
that
additional
point
of
egress.
I
That
was
requested
by
the
tampa
high
civic
association
for
safety,
and
so
we
think
this
plan,
both
the
civic
association's
requests,
but
also
then
neighbors
that
are
immediately
going
to
be
impacted
by
this
project,
but
keeping
all
that
green
space
and
all
the
green
space
for
the
kids
to
play.
We
will
also
have
more
room
for
additional
trains,
which
is
a
great
thing,
and
then
there's
also
precedent
for
this
there's
a
similar
development
pattern
nearby.
I
This
waiver
has
been
grounded
to
five
other
developments
in
tampa
heights
recently,
and
three
projects
are
within
two
blocks
of
our
site,
which
I'll
go
into
next.
Specifically,
here
you'll
see
108
west
amelia
ave,
which
is
about
two
blocks
away
from
one
point
miles
subject
miles
away.
You
will
see
also
210
west
amelia,
which
is
here
on
the
upper
right
of
my
screen,
also
has
the
same
orientation
with
units
facing
the
alley
and
208
west.
I
Additionally,
we
drew
a
lot
of
inspiration
from
a
similar
layout
of
a
project
in
tampa
heights
that
was
approved
as
well.
Last
year,
you
will
see
most
of
the
construction
happens
in
two
major
buildings.
The
corner
units
do
face
that
additional
corner
the
additional
road
to
the
west.
This
project
couple
things
to
point
out
that
are
different:
they
have
one
single
drive
aisle
our
property
has
a
single
drive
out,
plus
that
additional
points
of
egress
in
the
alley
for
safety.
This
project
required
green
space
waivers.
I
Our
project
does
not
require
green
space
waivers
and
then
the
second
waiver
that
we
would
be
requesting
as
far
as
plan
development
would
be
to
reduce
the
rare
yard
distance
between
the
buildings
from
25
and
a
half
feet
to
19
feet,
ultimately
just
impacting
ourselves.
Our
goal
in
doing
this
was
to
maintain
all
of
the
green
space
requirements.
We
still
meet
all
transportation
requirements
for
various
turning
radius
for
each
of
the
garages
and
the
cars
will
be
able
to
get
in
and
out
of
each
of
their
dwelling
units
safely.
I
But
this
just
allows
us
to
have
a
lot
more
green
space
allows
us
to
have
a
much
more
aggressive
train
planting
schedule
and
ultimately
create
that
additional
green
space.
Additional
amenities
for
the
neighborhood,
that
was
all
of
those
torches,
are
possible
by
bringing
the
buildings
closer
together.
So
we
think
that
it's
a
good
thing
to
sacrifice
for
ourselves
in
the
betterment
of
all
of
this
green
space
for
the
community,
then
overall,
I
was
just
getting
to
here.
I
I
know
I'm
sure
in
time
I
ran
over
last
time,
but
in
conclusion,
do
you
want
to
reiterate
the
staff
found
this
application?
Consistent
with
the
land
development
code,
we
believe
that
this
furthers
the
goals
of
the
capital
comprehensive
plan.
It's
objective
policies,
it's
bringing
density
down
to
entity
housing
to
the
tampa
core.
We
have
character
of
the
architecture
within
vampires
with
the
brick
and
mortar.
I
We
hope
that
these
minor
waivers
you
can
see
that
they
really
are
meant
to
really
both
make
this
a
really
great
property
for
the
neighborhood
increase
the
amount
of
green
space
that
we
have
not
need
the
waiver
and
then
also
impact
the
neighbors
directly
to
the
south.
I
F
I
Our
goal
we
definitely
will
be
in
like
when
we
have
the
borders
and
stuff
our
goal
would
be
to
for
sure
install
one
of
the
mirrors
that
allow
you
to
be
around
corners
that
are
consistent
in
parking
garages
etc.
But,
right
now,
in
order
to
meet
the
green
space
requirements
like
it
won't
be
wide
enough
for
two
cars,
and
so
by
installing
one
of
those
mirrors.
We
hope
that
people
will
be
able
to
see
if
there's
oncoming
traffic,
but
still
also
have
that
additional
point
of
regret.
J
B
G
B
N
Evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
brian
seal
313
west
park
avenue,
and
I
am
the
tampa
heights.
Civic
association
president
in
three
minutes.
It's
very
difficult
to
summarize
the
saga
of
this
project,
as
well
as
this
applicant's
ongoing
relationship
with
the
civic
association
and
surrounding
neighbors.
But
I
will
do
my
best.
They
cite
that
at
the
previous
hearing,
where
a
continuance
was
granted
for
the
second
time
that
the
border.
N
Yes,
sir,
I
was
sworn
the
civic
association
did
write
a
conditional
letter
of
support
with
several
caveats
to
that
at
the
last
time.
That,
frankly,
was
a
significant
compromise
upon
what
the
neighborhood
had
desired
to
ask
for
this
applicant
is
very
active
in
projects
throughout
the
neighborhood
at
least
two
dozen,
and
we
felt
threatened
that
because
he
is
a
savvy
applicant
or
they
are
savvy
applicants.
N
They
know
how
to
work
around
the
very
loose
zoning
laws
that
are
in
place
for
tampa's
original
neighborhood,
and
so
we
felt
we
had
to
make
significant
compromises
at
that
time.
In
order
to
write
that
letter,
however,
that
night
council
told
them
to
get
the
neighborhood
on
board.
That
has
not
happened
since
that
time,
and
we
are
here
in
opposition.
Our
board
has
voted
to
oppose
this
project.
N
Now
again,
there's
a
lot
of
saga
to
this.
We
have
tried
to
create
compromise.
I
hosted
them
for
wine
in
my
own
backyard,
trying
to
hammer
all
of
this
out,
but
frankly,
it
has
not
happened.
There
are
alternative
site
plans
that
have
been
dangled
out
in
front
of
us
that
the
neighborhood
favors,
however,
as
soon
as
they're
dangled
out,
they
are
retracted
and
told
that
they
are
unwilling
to
make
that
happen.
N
So
there
there's
a
lot
to
unpack
here.
I'd
be
glad
to
take
any
questions.
However,
I
understand
there's
a
time
limit,
so
thank
you
for
your
time.
H
Well,
thank
you,
sir,
and
mr
shelby
wants
to
provide
you
and
anybody
who's
speaking
tonight,
a
little
a
little
information
about
competent,
substantial
evidence,
because,
frankly,
what
you
told
us
just
now
spoke
to
negotiations
that
might
have
fallen
apart
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
really
competent,
substantiate
substantial
evidence.
Ms
shelby,
you
can
correct
me
I'll
just
take
the
lead
is,
is
exactly
that.
It's
specifics.
H
So
if
you
don't
like
this
site
plan
and-
and
you
can
give
us
competent
reasons
as
related
to
that,
then
that's
something
that
council
could
or
could
consider
it
doesn't
make,
doesn't
mean
we're
going
to
or
anything
else,
but
those
the
competence
of
evidence
is
the
only
thing
we
consider
it's
not
a
popularity
contest.
Do
we
like
the
neighborhood?
Do
we
not
like
the
applicant
or
is
it
representative,
or
what
have
you.
N
I'm
sorry
about
that.
Thank
you,
councilman.
We
have
written
numerous
letters
to
city
council
about
this
that
have
gone
over
the
specifics,
but
in
summary,
we
have
had
serious
concerns
about
pedestrian
and
vehicular
safety,
as
well
as
the
city
and
fdot's
plan
to
bike
boulevard
on
ola
with
the
amount
of
traffic
that
has
been
concentrated
there.
We
do
not
believe
it
is
in
keeping
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
reads
about
tampa
heights
historic
development
pattern
in
the
urban
village.
N
We
do
not
believe
that
the
land
development
code
is
in
concert
with
that
comprehensive
plan.
At
this
current
time,
we
are
working
on
a
code
amendment
to
repair
that
that
our
neighborhood
has
had
to
take
the
lead
on
that
I've
spoken
to
several
of
you
about.
Similarly,
we
object
to
the
waiver
for
alley
facing
units.
We
do
not
find
that
consistent.
Some
examples
were
given
that
the
neighborhood
had
objected
to
design
decisions
that
were
granted
anyway.
That
is
not
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
of
tampa
heights.
N
O
O
Thank
you,
you're
welcome
just
a
few
things
about
this.
I
spoke
last
time
on
this.
Our
as
brian
mentioned,
our
approval
was
conditional
based
on
the
developers
collaborative
nature.
O
That
has
not
happened
yet
we
get
a
lot
of
obfuscication
lack
of
transparency,
it's
a
consistent
pattern,
and
it's
because
of
that
that
we
don't
feel
comfortable
giving
this
project
approval.
Furthermore,
yes,
the
city
did
mention
that
this
does
provide
very
much
needed
housing
units.
None
of
it
is
affordable.
It's
not
affordable
to
most
of
the
working
people
in
tampa
bay.
O
Because
of
that,
I
would
like
to
request
that
if
they're
going
to
get
a
density
waiver,
at
least
one
or
both
of
the
units
be
made
affordable
and
that's,
I
guess
a
request
that
I
would
like
to
make
as
a
member
of
the
civic
association
beyond
that.
Basically,
that's
pretty
much
it
other
than
the
stuff
that
brian
said,
which
is.
We
have
some
concerns
about
ola
avenue,
traffic
on
to
ola
avenue
and
the
rear-facing
alleys.
O
We
don't
think
it's
a
good
precedent
to
set
most
alleys
in
the
area
aren't
big
enough
to
really
accommodate
this
kind
of
development.
It's
just
not.
We
would
like
to
see
some
tweaking
and
a
little
bit
more
of
an
actual
collaboration
with
the
neighborhood
on
this
project,
as
well
as
many
others
that
he
has
in
the
neighborhood.
If
we
start
to
see
this
activity
and
the
actions
be
really
representative
of
him
wanting
to
work
with
us,
I
don't
think
there
will
be
any
issues
there's
he
has,
I
believe,
a
rezoning
later
tonight.
O
We
don't
have
any
reason
to
object
to
that.
I
think
it's
an
up
zone.
We
don't
have
any
problem
with
that,
but
we
do
have
a
problem
with
when
design
decisions
are
going
to
adversely
impact
our
neighborhood,
because
he
might
live
here
now.
I've
been
living
here
for
13
years
and
to
be
honest
with
you
with
with
with
council,
I
don't
really
feel
like
I'm
going
to
be
going
anywhere
anytime
soon.
O
C
O
O
I
would
be
happy
if
you
would
just
keep
the
existing
zoning.
We
have
zoning
people
that
work
for
the
city.
They
know
what
they're
doing
and
they've
come
up
with
good
ideas
and
we
I'm
afraid
we're
going
to
be
setting
a
a
bad
precedent
for
everything
being
pd,
because
they
can't
get
what
they
want
and
can't
make
enough
money
on
projects.
O
So,
specifically,
aside
from
the
zoning,
I
oppose
it
because
I
don't
like
the
idea
of
them
trying
to
squeeze
so
many
units
into
this
property.
The
the
concept
of
rear-facing
into
an
alley
is
laughable.
I
mean
we
used
to
have
garbage
pickup
in
the
alley.
O
People
don't
want
to
live
in
the
alley
anyway.
Also
the
the
waiver
for
the
distance
between
buildings,
changing
it
to
19
feet,
I
just
googled
how
long
an
suv
is
average
is
between
14
and
a
half
and
16
feet
that
doesn't
give
you
a
whole
lot
of
space.
O
So
pretty
much,
it
would
be
just
really
nice
if
we
could
keep
the
charm
of
the
neighborhood
and
use
the
existing
zoning
that
we
have,
which
will
allow
for
several
units
and
they
can
get
plenty
of
green
space.
I
know
she
started
talking
about
green
space,
trying
to
tell
you
buzz
words
if
she
wants
green
space
put
less
units
in
if
she
wants
a
safer,
safer
walking
and
riding
environment
for
the
residents
and
us
residents
who've
lived
here
over
20
years,
maybe
she
should
consider
less
units,
I
think
it'll
be
better
for
everybody.
O
P
Yes,
this
is
mike
scutt
at
311
west
park
avenue.
P
Yes,
I've
been
sworn
in,
so
just
a
couple
of
points
I
wanted
to
make
on
this
matter.
I
moved
to
tampa
heights
moved
in
two
years
ago,
purchased
property
in
there
about
five
years
ago,
and
and
when
I
decided
to
live
in
tampa
heights,
you
know
I
was
really
drawn
in
by
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
but
also
the
character
of
the
community
and
the
community
beyond.
Just
the
neighborhood
is
the
people
who
live
there
and
how
they
interact
with
each
other.
P
P
When
I
decided
to
live
in
in
the
neighborhood.
There's
zoning
in
place
that
that
the
city
has
established-
and
you
know
a
lot
of
experts-
have
determined
that
existing
zoning
and
so
for
my
property.
That
zoning
was
guidance
for
me
as
to
how
to
develop
on
that
property
to
be
consistent
with
the
neighborhood,
but
also
the
zoning
in
the
neighborhood
is
guidance
for
people
living
there
as
to
what
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
will
continue
to
develop
as,
and
so
I
think
the
existing
zoning
is
very
important
to
guiding
development.
P
P
So,
I
think,
there's
significant
safety
concerns
with
nearly
all
of
the
drive
access
being
channeled
onto
ola
avenue
so
close
to
columbus
avenue
and
instead
putting
units
facing
the
alley
where
the
alley
is
made
for
that
type
of
access.
It's
been
planned
for
that
type
of
access,
and
so
the
vehicular
access
should
be
directed
onto
the
alley
and
not
through
a
new
access
point
on
ola,
allowing
units
to
face
ola
to
integrate
with
the
community
build
the
character
of
that
community.
P
Allow
for
the
interaction
of
the
residents
with
people
who
are
walking
and
biking
down
ola
one
of
the
site
plans
that
was
dangled
by
the
developers
to
the
civic
association,
but
then
never
to
be
seen
again.
That
brian
mentioned
did
lay
out
the
units
in
that
way,
and
so
it's
unclear
to
me
why
that
was
proposed
or
put
forward
to
the
civic
association
to
try
to
gain
support,
but
then
ultimately
has
not
been
implemented
when
that
would
address
one
of
the
most
significant
concerns
about
this
property.
C
B
C
M
All
right
good
evening,
I
live
at
2504
north
highlands,
which
is
directly
behind
and
shares
the
alley
space
of
the
proposed
development.
I
do
want
to
provide
support,
as
I
do
know,
the
developer
firsthand.
He
built
my
home
he's
very
active
in
the
area
and
has
certainly
impacted
the
community
and
created
a
lot
of
change.
Even
with
me
living
here
the
last
year.
I'm
actually
excited
to
see
the
improvements,
especially
with
that
alleyway
being
such
a
dangerous
alley.
M
There
are
junkies,
there's
alcoholics,
there's
it's
dark,
it's
not
an
area
where
I
wouldn't
want
to
walk,
and
I
do
have
a
dog
and
I
take
an
indirect
route
to
avoid
that
alley.
The
proposed
inclusion
of
the
sidewalk
and
privacy,
trees
and
walkability
is
something
that
I
would
prefer
over
two-car
garages.
M
Also.
I
would
like
to
raise
the
issue
of
the
neighborhoods
association
and
the
state
tampa
heights
movement.
I
do
understand
their
concerns,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
they
created
a
website.
They
took
a
picture
of
my
home.
While
I
was
standing
in
the
home,
you
can
physically
see
me
and
have
negative
comments
just
making
it
very
divisive,
especially
when
I
walk
my
pet
and
I
walk
in
this
neighborhood
and
I'm
a
military
war
veteran
sir.
M
It
makes
me
feel
unwelcome
and
I
haven't
done
anything
wrong,
and
I
don't
even
know
the
people
that
posted
this
site
and
to
see
the
credibility
of
steve
and
his
wife
be
slandered
over
opinions.
Because
of
change,
which
I
understand-
and
I
I
understand
the
people
that
have
lived
here
for
a
significant
time
but
to
see
these
allies
be
clear
to
see
these
new
homes
and
the
junkies
and
the
homeless
people
kind
of
just
not
being
present.
That
makes
me
feel
safer
here,
and
so
I
again,
I
am
totally
in
favor
of
this.
M
G
Well,
hello,
so
I
am
actually
I
don't
live
there
yet,
but
I
am
a
property
owner
there
and
I'm
planning
on
building
a
house
there,
and
I
see
a
few
benefits
of
this
development
like
the
addition
of
the
new
sidewalk,
because
there
currently
is
no
sidewalk,
where
they
plan
on
putting
one
in
a
paid
alley
encouraging
well
also.
The
areas
comprehensive
plan
also
encourages
the
multi-family
development
along
those
quarters
like
columbus,
which
this
development
provides
the
13
units.
G
You
know
they
appear
to
be
designed
to
what
you
know
fits
into
the
neighborhood
and
I
think
it'll
a
lot
it'll
provide
more
safety
for
the
neighborhood
and
make
people
feel
safer
kind
of
like
what
roderick
said,
and
you
know
as
a
property
owner
there.
G
G
B
B
H
Q
G
H
B
C
Okay,
all
right
great
hi,
my
name
is
jason
burgess
3402,
north
jefferson
streets,
I'm
speaking
today,
I
just
want
to
voice
my
support
behind
the
development
at
210
columbus.
C
I've
been
watching
it
for
quite
a
while.
Now
I've
been
following
it
the
last
several
months,
and
I
think
that
the
changes
that
they've
incorporated,
including
the
porches,
the
courtyards,
the
private
green
space
and
in
addition
to
the
you
know
the
new
trees
as
well.
I
think
it
really
provides
for
really.
C
Pleasing
project
you
know,
and
one
that
fits
well
within
the
existing
landscape
of
the
area.
You
know
the
area
already
has
a
different.
You
know
mix
of
different
styles
and
design.
So
in
a
project
like
this,
where
they're
staying
beneath
the
density
allowance
maximizing
the
green
space,
I
think
it's
and
looking
at
the
plans,
I
think
it's
a
really
thoughtful
design.
I
think
it's
beneficial
to
future
residents
as
well
as
us
around
the
community.
C
I
think
you
know
what
what
has
been
done
already
has
already
been
greatly
beneficial
for
the
community
in
regards
to
the
the
alley.
I'd
also
like
to
say
it,
I'm
really
excited
to
actually
see
the
improvement,
mostly
valleys.
A
lot
of
the
time
end
up
being
underutilized
and
overgrown.
Q
With
brush
and
trees
and
basically.
C
Are
are
never
used
anyway,
so
you
know
tampa
heights
tampa,
as
everybody
knows,
has
seen
a
large
influx
of
new
residents
and
people
coming
into
the
area.
So
in
my
opinion,
you
know
the
location
for
a
townhome
project
like
this
really
seems
quite
appropriate,
and
I
think
you
know,
I
think
I
think
the
developer
has
been
mindful
to
the
design
and
architectural
styles
of
the
area,
and
you
know
I
just
want
to
say.
I
think
it's
definitely
great
for
tampa.
C
No,
that's
it.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you
counselors,
and
I
appreciate
you
guys
during
this
long
presentation.
So,
as
you
mentioned,
definitely
want
to
focus
on
the
facts
and
the
facts
of
this
case.
So
in
terms
of
our
repo
first
off,
I
do
think
that
this
is
a
moving
target.
The
psta
gave
us
their
conditional
approval.
We
made
the
changes
in
the
plan
that
were
requested
in
the
10
28
meetings.
B
I
can't
understand
what
is
she
saying
t
I
I
ctdb:
can
we
put
the
volume
up,
so
I
can't
hear
what
she's
saying.
I
I
Okay,
awesome.
Apologies
for
that
so
definitely
want
to
focus
on
the
facts.
So
the
first
part
is,
it
seems
like
this
is
now
a
moving
target
with
the
neighborhood
association
they
came
on
10
28.
They
gave
us
their
conditional
approval
with
the
reinstating
of
the
ali
access.
We
did
that
we
eliminated
the
unit,
and
so
tonight
it's
just
another
moving
target.
So
we
really
want
to
look
at
the
fact
of
the
case
tonight
and
so
the
first
is
a
lot.
I
There's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
zoning,
the
current
density,
future
density,
we're
looking
to
tap
into
the
comprehensive
plan,
which
is
the
future
land
use
for
tampa
temperature,
a
surge
of
people
moving
here,
a
surge
of
development,
and
we
want
to
help
be
a
part
of
that,
and
so
we
would
like
to
tap
into
that
cmu35
density.
We
will
be
under
the
allowable
density
on
that
lot,
which
is
13
units
versus
the
16
units
under
cme
35,
and
so
we
do
find
it.
We
are
excited
to
do
that.
I
We
will
be
keeping
density
low
while
tapping
into
what
all
of
the
researchers
all
the
people
hard
at
work
in
the
city
have
really
determined
if
that
should
be
the
future
language
for
that
lab.
Secondly,
is
that
we
are
excited
that
all
of
the
staff
departments
found
this
lot
found
the
way
that
we
wanted
to
orient
these
structures
and
the
various
requirements
they
found
it
consistent
across
all
departments.
So
I
meant
also
the
planning
department
found
this
project
consistent
in
keeping
with
the
development
pattern
of
the
area
we
worked
with
the
various
city
departments.
I
We
worked
with
the
adjacent
neighbors
attempts
to
work
with
the
neighborhood
association
who
set
them
the
revised
icon
on
november
4th,
followed
up
again
on
november
15th
had
to
get
it
over
to
planning
and
development
on
december,
2nd
as
freedom.
The
first
time
we
heard
about
their
opposition
was
january
17th
on
monday,
and
so
very
unfortunate
that
there's
just
this
pricing.
This
is
such
an
amazing
neighborhood,
very
unfortunate
and
we're
having
you
guys
are
having
hair
tonight.
We
really
want
to
get
back
to.
I
We
think
that
this
is
a
plan
that
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
It's
consistent
across
all
departments.
It
brings
urban
density
to
these
corridors
and
we're
excited
to
bring
it
with
all
of
the
not
needing
any
changes
from
the
department
hopefully
and
bring
this
forward
for
the
city
of
canada.
I
H
Okay,
so
the
you
you
heard
all
the
the
folks
for
for
and
against,
but
specifically
a
couple
of
people
said.
You
know
why
don't
you
face
that
those
back
units
seem
to
be
the
biggest
issue?
Why
don't
you
face
us
some
of
those
backish
back
units
toward
ola?
H
It
appears
to
me
that
if
you
did,
I
don't
know
I
I
guess
it
would
cut
down
the
number
of
units
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
ask.
I
don't
know
what
what
they
said.
You
had
an
earlier
site
plan
that
that
did
that.
I
don't
know
how
many
units
that
earlier
side
plan
showed
for
this.
It
might
not
be
totally
relevant,
but
it
was
since
some
of
the
people
brought
it
up
and
said
there
was
an
alternative
to
the
waiver
that
you're
seeking.
H
I
guess
perhaps
that
makes
it
relevant.
So
if
you
want
to
discuss,
discuss
that
issue.
J
H
J
All
I
got
right
now,
okay,
so,
in
regards
to
your
first
question,
you
know
there
was
a
lot
of
collaboration
as
brian
and
I
we
did
apologize
because
I
think
we
were
dropped.
So
I
we
didn't
hear
his
entire
his
speak
speech,
but
in
either
case
there
has
been
collaboration
for
about
six
months
now
between
the
neighbors,
the
neighborhood
association.
On
this.
So
there's
a
lot
of
different
moving
pieces.
J
J
So,
yes,
there
was
a
plan
that
had
more
units
along
ola,
but
when
we
talked
to
some
of
the
immediate
surrounding
neighbors,
those
neighbors
were
very
opposed
to
this,
because
all
that
traffic
flow
would
have
been
coming
right
to
their
rear
yard
and
they
were
worried
about
their
own
safety
and
the
amount
of
traffic
flow
that
would
have
been
just
pumped
out
right
in
front
of
them.
So
we
were
trying
to
balance
a
lot
of
the
sides
as
it
related
to
the
the
project.
I
J
Case
you
know
we
were
playing
with
a
lot
of
things
as
we
would
we're
not
trying
to
go
with
one
plan,
but
the
plan
that
we've
had
that's
been
consistently
presented
for
the
last
four
or
five
months.
You
know
we've
been
continually
making
refinements
to
it,
so
we
you
know
today
having
absolute
consistencies
across
the
board.
You
know
we
couldn't
have
said
the
same
thing
about
any
other
project.
Okay,.
J
We're
well
the
waivers
we're
asking
for
again
will
provide
the
the
setbacks
and
the
separation.
Because
again,
the
the
comp
plan
does
suggest
that
these
should
be
built
closer
to
the
street,
and
this
will
allow
for
us
to
create
that
additional
green
space.
So
you
are
correct
that
under
an
rm24
that
that
would
allow
for
less
density.
But
we
believe
that
you
know
we're
finding
that
balance.
We're
not
going
to
the
maximum
density
that
would
be
allowable
under
the
cmu
35.
I
J
Some
push,
I
think,
during
the
last
meeting.
They
almost
wanted
us
to
have
additional
densities.
They
could
maximize
it
as
much
as
possible,
given
the
huge
need
in
the
city
for
for
additional
housing
units.
So
you
know,
I
hope
that
answers
the
question
I
mean
we
did
play
with
a
lot
of
different
options:
the
initial
plan
we
had
had
15
units
in
it,
so
you
know
we've
since
made
a
lot
of
changes
and
compromises
and
now
we're
at
the
13
that
we're
presenting
here
to
tonight.
B
D
Ms
rosario,
did
you
say
that
somebody
did
they
come
in
now
during
the
hearing
to
sign?
Yes,.
D
Mr
chairman,
I
would
recommend
that
you
do
listen
to
him.
He
did
come
in
and
then
we
give
the
opportunity
for
rebuttal
as
much
now.
D
G
S
Good
evening
my
name
is
mohammed
azam
sheikh
I
have.
I
live
on
2302
north
highland
avenue.
I
do
have
a
rezoning
on
my
property
as
well.
I
did
work
with.
I
had
to
continue
my
hearing
from
a
hearing.
I
think
it
was
in
august
or
september
and
because
of
the
neighborhood
association,
the
neighborhood
association
worked
with
me.
S
You
are
I'm
just
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
neighborhood
association.
They
did
help
me
out.
I
did
the
work
with
them.
They
they
met
with
me.
They
even
came
to
my
house.
They
helped
me
with
my
rezoning
plan.
They
had
a
objection
to
it
and
they
we
worked
together
and
basically
they
removed
their
objection.
I
had
to
continue,
but
they
worked
with
me
and
we
got
a
side
plan
to
that.
They
would
agree
on.
D
I
Consistency
with
that
the
crying
department
found
which
is
tapping
into
the
comprehensive
future
cmu
35
and
hopefully
leave
all
of
that
here,
stay
behind
and
look
at
the
facts
of
the
case
and
what
we're
ahead,
presenting
to
you
tonight
for
what
that
future
land
can
be
used
under
our
proposal
this
evening,
get
back
to
the
fact
developing
for
the
city
of
tampa
leave
the
drama
behind
us
all.
B
T
Legally,
mr
shelby,
if
I
make
a
motion
for
am
I
obligated
to
vote
yes.
D
T
T
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
darn
it.
I
lost
my
agenda
here
that
there
were
inconsistencies
found
in
the
in
the
stack
report,
correct
I'm.
If.
F
To
27-136,
the
proposed
use
does
not
promote,
in
effect
the
substantial
use
of
land
for
its
infrastructure.
A
H
I
think
they're
they're
they're
pretty
close
to
the
to
their
allowable
density
on
the
rm24.
It's
about
a
half
acre
on
the
alarm24.
I
think
there's
testimony
they
could
have
done
11
units
they're
asking
for
13,
which
is
not
not
not
that
big,
the
typically
and
in
the
past,
in
this
neighborhood.
I've
opposed
multi-family
projects
that
intrude
into
the
neighborhood.
H
The
building
itself
doesn't
start
until
about
30
feet
away
from
the
property
line.
So
so
these
even
these
rear
buildings
units
8
313.
H
While
you
know
the
neighborhood
might
not
be
thrilled
with
them,
you
know
where
they
are
and
what
they're
doing.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
I
don't
really
see
how
they're
that
intrusive-
and
I
think
a
common
driveway
coming
in
and
out
of
13
units
is
better
than
13
individual
driveways
on
these
various
streets,
because
at
least
it's
one
single
place
of
ingress
and
egress
that
everybody
knows
about,
as
opposed
to
you
know
constantly.
H
I
was
sort
of
urging
the
neighborhood
to
give
us
confident
substantial
evidence
to
oppose
it,
but
I
didn't
hear
a
lot.
I
just
heard
a
lot
about
the
fact
that
this
developer
has
a
lot
of
projects
going
on
in
the
neighborhood
and
and
they're
not
happy
with
him
working
working
or
not
working
with
them
on
various
projects.
But
we
can't
look
at
various
projects.
H
We
can
only
look
at
the
project
in
front
of
us,
mrs
kate
wells,
if
you
disagree
with
me
on
any
of
this,
feel
free
to
jump
in,
but
for
the
record,
that's
our
lawyer,
who's
looking
on,
but
anyway,
so
with
with
all
of
that
and
and
I
apologize
for
being
long-winded,
I'm
I'm
going
to
vote
no
on
the
motion.
O
D
It's
after
six
o'clock-
and
it
was
brought
to
my
attention
and
my
apologies
to
council,
but
item
number
13-
was
noticed
for
six
o'clock
and
not
five
o'clock.
We
took
took
it
up
before
six
o'clock.
D
D
B
Second
by
mr
miranda,
all
in
favor
aye,
any
opposed
is
anybody.
There.
G
B
Opposed
motion
granted
before
we
get
to
item
two-
I
I
know
we've
got
some
land
use,
hearing
things
coming
up
in
the
future,
but
what's
troubling
to
me,
is
when
I
sit
here
and
I
it's
going
on
6
30.,
I
sit
and
I
hear
all
these
hearings
and
I
hear
what
the
developer
wants.
The
community
is
not
satisfied,
there's
no
collaboration,
it's
like
a
missing
piece
somewhere
and
I
talk
about
these
design
exceptions.
B
How
that
they're
not
approved
the
neighborhood
gets
upset
and
I'm
just
hoping
that
staff
is
listening
and
you
know
it's
late,
but
I
think
when
growth
managers
come
back,
I
think
we
need
that.
We
did
talk
about
them,
making
sure
the
neighborhood
is
included
in
some
of
these
things
and
making
sure
that
there's
a
cohesive
plan
with
everybody,
even
with
the
developers
and
that
way
we
don't
sit
here.
B
Hearing
all
this
stuff
and
to
me
I
think
it's
it's
upsetting
to
the
people
who
are
opposing
the
people
who
are
trying
to
get
their
project
through.
I
think
there's
going
to
be
another
process
before
it
comes
away
to
council.
We
waste
all
this
time.
So,
mr.
H
H
But
if
we
had-
and
I
I've
looked
into
this
and
there's
other
communities
around
the
nation
that
employ
this
method
and
and
and
and
I
don't
know-
I
can't
remember.
Unfortunately,
ms
post
is
leaving,
I
don't
know
if
she's
handing
this
on
to
somebody
else
to
discuss
and
and
what
have
you,
mr
job.
D
I
miss
wells
wants
to
say
something,
so
I
I
just
want
to
if
I
can
before
she
speaks
just
to
remind
you
counsel,
rather
than
bring
this
up
tonight.
My
suggestion
would
be
certainly
miss
feely
and
her
team
are
going
to
be
coming
back
to
council
for
the
february
workshop,
which
is
going
to
focus
on
land
development
issues.
D
Council
has
talked
about
the
concept
of
what
may
be
referred
to
as
a
neighborhood
compatibility
meeting
or
the
like
of
having
what
the
councilman
is
proposing,
but
the
time
to
do
that
would
not
be
tonight
to
take
up
your
agenda
with
policy
discussions,
and
I
appreciate
council's
desire
to
do
that.
But
you
do
have
that
opportunity
on
february
17th
and
I
would
ask
you
and
remind
you
to
bring
it
back
at
that
time.
Ms
wells.
E
F
This
is
that
the
positioner
has
heard
the
concerns
and
if
they
want
to
come
back
with
this
same
site
plan,
they
would
have
to
wait
a
year
if
there
is
a
major
difference
in
the
site
plan.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
miss
wells,
they
can
come
back
repetition
before
that
year,
so
it
it.
It
would
behoove
them
to
go
back
to
the
neighborhood
association
and
if
they
deem
necessary
change
their
site
plans,
and
then
they
can
repetition.
F
So
they've
heard
us
and
they've
heard
the
the
neighborhood
association.
B
G
B
E
L
Thank
you,
annie,
jennifer
malone
with
the
planning
commission.
As
she
stated,
this
is
21.75
we're
going
to
travel
up
to
the
university
area
and
the
university
square
neighborhood.
L
The
closest
transit
stop
is
within
a
quarter
mile
of
the
site.
Part
route
9
connects
subject
site
to
downtown
tampa
university
area
copeland
park
is
the
nearest
public
recreational
facility
and
the
site
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
As
we
can
see,
there's
a
variety
of
uses
along
east
fowler
avenue.
We
have
the
university
square
mall
to
the
north,
which
is
in
unincorporated
hillsborough
county
there's.
L
Some
industrial
uses
east
of
north
30th
street,
there's
multi-family
residential
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site,
which
then
transitions
to
single-family
detached
residential
further
south
of
the
subject
state
on
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
property
is
community,
commercial,
35,
that's
the
red
and
that's
predominant
along
east
fowler
avenue.
The
white
to
the
north
is
because
those
properties
are
within
unincorporated,
hillsborough
county.
The
blue
is
university
of
south
florida
under
the
public,
semi
public,
the
gray
and
the
dark
gray
are
the
light.
L
Industrial
and
heavy
industrial
to
the
east
of
north
30th
street.
To
the
south
of
the
subject
site,
we
have
residential
35,
those
are
your
multi-family
designations
and
then
that
salmon
color
further
south
is
residential
10.
That's
your
single
family
detached
neighborhood,
that's
within
the
surrounding
area!
Plenty!
Commission
staff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
I
do
have
one
correction
to
make
on
the
record.
L
Our
report
stated
that
the
four
area
ratio
of
the
plan
development
was
at
a
1.29
far,
but
it
was
actually
a
1.37
far
for
the
record
and
I
believe,
annie
will
speak
on
that
further.
In
her
presentation.
I
also
need
to
state
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
vertically
mixed
use.
Development.
It
is
located
on
an
arterial
roadway
and
over
it
is
the
site,
is
over
0.35
acres.
L
Thus
the
applicant
is
allowed
up
to
a
1.5
far
without
the
need
for
a
bonus
agreement
with
city
legal.
So
the
applicant
is
proposing
that
1.37
today
it
is
meeting
those
three
conditions
within
the
comprehensive
plan
and
that
bonus
agreement
is
not
required
for
you
to
tonight,
so
that
applicant
is
providing
that
vertically
mixed
use
on
the
arterial,
which
is
supported
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
L
The
applicant
is
also
providing
or
the
plan
development
is
also
meeting
the
mixed
use,
centers
and
corridors
policies
by
orienting,
the
multi-family
and
retail
structure
close
to
the
public
right-of-way
on
east
fowler
avenue.
We
also
found
good
sidewalk
connectivity
as
well,
I'm
just
and
again.
This
is
consistent
with
the
compact
city
forum
strategy,
which
seeks
to
have
increased
availability
of
housing
densities
that
promote
walking
and
transit,
use,
your
employment
concentrations,
residential
services
and
amenities.
The
university
square
mall
is
right
to
the
north.
L
That's
your
those
are
your
employment
concentrations
as
well
as
the
university
of
south
florida
to
the
northeast,
and
this
is
an
area
that
makes
all
of
those
factors.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Any
question
from
miss.
E
Thank
you
annie,
gardens
development
coordination.
I
will
share
my
screen
again.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
2701
east
valler
avenue
from
ci
and
cg
to
pd
to
allow
the
development
of
retail
sales
convenience
goods
and
residential
multi-family
uses.
The
applicant
is
requesting
six
waivers
shown
on
your
screen
here.
There
is
a
correction
to
waiver
number.
Two
number
two,
as
shown
on
the
screen,
the
percentage
shown
here
is
a
survey
of
the
property
as
it
currently
is.
Approximately
6.57
acres
in
size
shown
here
is
part
of
the
site
plan.
E
The
proposed
project
is
a
residential
multi-family
use
with
approximately
with
277
dwelling
units
and
1780
square
feet
of
retail
sales
convenience
goods.
Building
setbacks
are
proposed
as
follows:
north
10
feet,
south
46,
feet,
east
126th,
street
or
26
feet
and
west
44
feet
proposed.
Maximum
building
height
is
60
feet,
a
total
of
550
parking
spaces
are
required
and
a
total
of
552
parking
spaces
are
provided.
E
E
The
proposed
project
can
develop
at
a
1.5
far
in
the
current
future
land
use
and
therefore
allows
for
the
consideration
of
a
far
of
1.37,
not
1.29,
as
shown
in
the
stack
report.
E
These
are
the
elevations
that
were
provided
by
the
applicant
shown.
Here's
an
aerial
map
in
the
surrounding
zoning
property
directly
north
of
subject
property
across
east
fowler
avenue
is
zoned
cg
and
developed
with
mixture
of
commercial
uses,
property
directly
west
of
the
subject.
Property
is
zone
ci
and
cg
enveloped
with
a
hotel
as
well
property
directly
south
of
the
subject.
Property
is
zoned
ci
and
dealt
with
a
railroad
track,
and
probably
adjacently
east
of
the
site
is
owned.
Ci
and
developed
with
a
restaurant
shown
here
is
part
of
the
subject.
E
Property
south
on
yeah,
facing
south
on
east
valor
avenue
again
shown
is
the
existing
hotel
use
and
further
west
along
east
fowler
avenue
that
that
hotel
used?
E
This
is
property
directly
east
of
the
subject
site,
and
this
is
facing
north
from
the
subject:
property
across
east
valler
avenue,
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent.
Please
refer
to
transportation,
natural
resources,
solid
waste
and
development
coordination
commons
for
overall
inconsistency.
Finding
modifications
to
the
sec
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
in
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
of
the
revision
sheet,
if
approving
the
application.
F
E
So
the
total
square
footage
is
one
second.
E
1780
square
feet
of
retail
sales
and
then
the
additional
200
I'm
sorry.
E
I
believe
it
shows
that
on
the
site
and
the
total
square
footage
come
in
one.
Second,
let
me
try
and
go
back.
E
So
the
total
square
footage
is
300
in
91
423
square
feet.
F
F
B
C
A
K
Good
evening,
good
evening,
council,
I
would
like
permission
at
this
point
to
share
my
screen.
If
that's
possible.
B
C
K
Very
good
and
mr
sitro,
we
will
get
back
to
your
question.
Certainly
this
is
an
application
to
change
an
existing
hotel
use
into
a
student
housing
use
with
a
very
small
retail
component
as
well.
The
applicant
or
the
developer
will
be
landmark
development
out
of
athens,
georgia
and
you
may
be
familiar
with
landmark.
They
have
two
existing
properties
in
this
area.
K
One
read
on
bruce
b
downs
across
from
the
panera
right
near
usf,
and
one
down
the
street
on
on
fowler
and
46
called
the
retreat
they've
been
very
successful
in
tampa
over
the
past
couple
of
years,
they're
familiar
with
the
city
and
its
requirements,
so
we're
looking
here
to
go
from
ci
to
cg
ncg
to
a
pd,
multi-family
residential
277
units
and
then
that
small
retail
sales
component,
which
we
anticipate
being
some
sort
of
coffee
shop
or
other
complementary
use
to
the
residential.
Much
like
exists
at
the
standard
right
down
the
street.
K
I
want
to
briefly
go
through
the
waivers
first
before
we
jump
into
showing
the
pictures
and
giving
you
some
character
of
why
we're
requesting
them.
The
first
one
is
pretty
simple:
requesting
the
loading
burst
to
go
from
four
to
three.
This
type
of
use.
We
just
don't
need
four
loading
bursts
so
that
that's
a
pretty
straightforward
request.
Number
two
reduce
the
required
tree
retention
to
18.
K
K
16
of
them
are
external
nine
to
the
north,
seven
to
the
south.
Those
will
be
preserved.
The
third
waiver
is
the
15
foot
use
buffer
and
masonry
wall.
This
we're
requesting
to
allow
for
functional
drive
aisles.
The
adjacent
uses,
don't
need
that
much
buffer
and
the
buffer.
Actually
reduction
is
consistent
with
how
it's
working
right
now
we're
not
asking
for
more
than
anything
that
is
functional
at
the
moment.
Just
maintain
the
status
quo.
K
Number
four
is
related
to
the
trees.
Again
we're
asking
just
to
put
into
the
mitigation
fund.
The
site
is
not
appropriate
for
replacing
trees,
we're
keeping
the
ones
that
can
be
kept.
Let's
find
some
some
spaces
in
the
city
where
a
canopy
can
really
be
utilized.
K
Multi-Family
green
space.
We
are
going
to
provide
over
10
000
square
foot,
more
green
space
than
exists
on
the
site.
Now
a
net
increase
over
10
000
square
feet.
The
code
requires
350.
we're
looking
for
a
little
less
than
that
and
then
lastly,
again
reducing
the
vehicular
use
area
buffer
on
the
west
side.
Again,
that's
maintaining
the
status
quo
as
to
what
is
there
now
it's
functional?
K
It's
parking
lots,
a
parking
lot
and,
as
you
heard
ms
barnes
say,
there's
a
44
foot
building
buffer.
That's
how
much
space
is
in
between
the
buildings,
even
though
the
parking
lots
will
touch
each
other.
So
we
have
some
revisions
before
first
and
second
reading,
we're
aware
of
them.
We've
tracked
them
on
the
staff
report.
We've
had
extensive
meetings
with
solid
waste
and
we
will
make
those
updates
between
first
and
second
reading.
K
Again,
here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
site.
You
can
see
its
location
on
the
fowler
corridor
across
from
usf
across
from
the
rhythm
which
used
to
be
university.
Mall
we're
about
300
yards
or
three
football
fields
from
the
usf
campus
directly
to
the
north.
I
want
to
emphasize
here
it
has
direct
signalized
pedestrian
access
to
the
university
collection,
shopping
plaza
where
there's
a
winn-dixie
and
other
amenities.
K
K
Here's
some
pictures
of
what
the
site
looks
like
now
on
the
top
left.
What
you
can
see
is
the
southeast
corner
of
the
existing
elevation.
The
top
right
is
the
northeast
corner.
That's
nearest
to
fowler
avenue.
The
bottom
left
is
the
eastern
property
line.
Then
the
drive
aisle
and
then
the
bottom
right
is
the
southern
property
line
or
the
rear
of
the
existing.
K
This
is
that
crosswalk
I
was
just
referring
to
from
the
side
entrance
crossing
fowler
heading
north
to
the
winn-dixie
you're.
Looking
also,
then,
at
the
northern
portion
of
the
existing
quality
inn.
The
bottom
left
is
the
sidewalk
heading
east
from
the
entrance
and
then
the
bottom
right
from
the
north
side
of
fowler.
Looking
to
the
south.
K
K
K
Again,
just
for
the
record
cc35
we're
not
asking
for
any
bonus.
The
1.37
far
is
below
the
1.5
that
would
have
been
required.
You
can
see
the
zoning
ci
and
cg
2pd.
K
This
is
going
to
be
a
four-story
project
with
a
fifth
level
parking
garage,
there's
gonna
be
a
pool
deck.
On
the
fifth
floor
again,
the
required
parking
is
552.
They
more
than
meet
that
there's
going
to
be
four
open
space,
courtyards,
which
you
can
see
in
green
one,
two:
three:
four
internal
to
the
housing
units
in
that
white
portion
separating
the
courtyards.
That's
open
air,
but
covered
amenity
space
for
the
residents.
So
it's
kind
of
like
a
breezeway
for
gathering
for
students,
visitor
parking
or
situated
outside
any
of
the
restricted
parking
garage
gates.
K
K
This
is
an
existing
area
of
the
site,
and
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
important
slides
to
take
notice
of
when
we're
talking
about
the
trees.
I
told
you
that
the
interior
trees
are
the
ones
we're
seeking
to
remove,
take
a
look
at
the
middle
of
the
site.
Those
are
no
grand
trees
and
they
simply
would
not
survive
any
construction.
K
K
K
This
shows
the
other
corner
perspective
from
fowler
and
right
here.
What
you're
looking
at
is
the
retail
component
as
well
the
coffee
shop
or
other
amenity
that
will
be
available
to
the
residents.
K
We
have
worked
with
the
innovation
alliance.
They
are
supportive
of
this
project.
As
you
can
see
from
mr
sharp's
letter.
I
asked
him
if
he
thought
this
was
positive
for
the
neighborhood
and
for
the
area,
and
he
said
to
me
david.
It's
not
only
positive,
it's
very
exciting,
and
so
for
those
of
you
that
know
mark
sharp.
He
is
very
excited
about
this
project
and
wanted
me
to
make
that
clear
as
a
positive
contributor
to
this
corridor,
we've
also
interfaced
with
usf.
They
are
supportive
of
student
housing.
K
They
have
offered
no
objection
to
this
project.
They
are
familiar
with
landmark,
but
due
to
their
policies,
they
they
will
not
come
out
and
and
support
a
particular
development,
but
they
are
supportive
of
student
housing
and
raise
no
objection
here.
I
wanted
to
be
brief
in
the
presentation
to
allow
time
for
you
all
to
ask
questions.
K
K
Usually
we
are
independent,
but
on
this
one
we've
been
able
to
collaborate.
Mr
horner
is
here
and
on
the
line
and
we'll
assist
with
answering
your
questions,
we
have
the
applicant
with
us.
We
have
the
applicant's
engineer
with
us.
So
at
this
point
I
will
conclude
my
presentation
with
telling
you
we
have
no
known
opposition
to
this
from
the
community
and
we're
here
to
answer
your
questions.
F
F
I'm
sure
it's
probably
going
to
have
something
like
you
said,
a
coffee
shop,
a
gym
or
one,
but
that's
for
the
residents
and
mr
singer,
you
and
I
have
known
each
other-
and
I
I
I
mean
this
somewhat
ingest
but
that's
point:
zero,
zero,
six
percent.
That
would
be
like
me,
taking
a
shoe
box
and
put
it
in
my
1700
square
foot
condo,
calling
it
a
bedroom.
K
Mr
teacher,
I
appreciate
the
question.
This
is
a
business
decision
on
the
part
of
the
applicant.
This
is
how
they
model
their
developments
around
the
country
and
they
have
been
successful.
K
It
certainly
meets
the
definition
by
our
tampa
city
standards,
and
I
would
ask
the
applicant
himself
who's
with
us,
mr
powell,
to
talk
about
how
they
came
to
this
calculation
and
why
this
amount
of
square
footage
for
this
amount
of
housing.
B
Go
ahead
that
was
going
to
be
my
question,
mr
citro,
I'm
you
know
I
very
familiar
with
file
avenue.
I
tell
you
chick-fil-a,
it's
probably
thrilled,
but
enough
if
something
goes
right
next
to
it,
but
I'm
very
familiar
with
that
area
in
that
property.
That's
a
huge
piece
of
property
and
another
another
restaurant
is
closed
down
on
that
property.
I
don't
know
if
the
hotel's
doing
well
at
all,
but
it
was
used
for
covet
at
the
time
hillsborough
county.
B
But
when
I
look
at
this
project-
and
I
see
retail
or
when
I
listen
to
the
presentation-
I'm
not
hearing
about
retail
at
all,
so
I
guess
that's.
My
question
would
be
along
with
mr
citro
and
especially
next
to
the
university
over
there
when
we
say
mixed
use,
so
that'd
be
part
of
my
listening
ear
with
the
developer
or
the
agent
to
to
kind
of
give
us
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
about
the
project.
O
Mr
chairman,
while
mr
powell
is
getting
his
microphone
corrected,
may
I
have
just
a
moment
to
comment
on
that.
We've
represented
student
housing
developments
through
a
number,
both
county,
initiated
and
city
of
tampa
rezoning
project.
You
may
recall
the
city
project
that
we
just
went
through
student
housing
at
the
university
of
tampa
and
that
retail
space
for
about
a
similar
size
structure.
Similar
number
of
units
was
approximately
fifteen
hundred
square
feet.
The
goal
is
not
to
add
more
retail
on
fowler
avenue.
We
already
have
plenty
of
retail
on
fowler
avenue.
O
The
goal
here
for
the
planning
commission
and
to
our
developer
directive
is
to
allow
for
our
ancillary
retail
uses.
It
will
not
only
capture
the
internal
shopping
needs
of
the
students,
that's
clearly
part
of
the
design
process,
but
just
as
important
and
brought
about
by
the
mandate
and
the
planning
commission
to
allow
for
that
connectivity
to
the
sidewalk
to
the
public
who
want
to
access
that
retail
as
well.
So
we
had
initially
that
retail
located
on
the
eastern
side.
It
did
not
face
fowler
avenue,
planning,
commission,
david,
haye
and
jennifer
responded.
K
And
while
he's
getting
you
know,
backlogged
on,
I
would
add,
this
is
a
housing
property.
This
is
a
student
housing
project.
Student
housing
is
needed
at
this
university.
It's
a
clear
upgrade
of
the
site
as
it
is.
As
mr
horner
said,
retail
is
not
lacking
in
this
corridor,
so
you
know,
please
don't
be
distracted
or
fooled
by
the
label
of
mixed
use.
K
That
is
a
legal
planning
situation
that
our
code
calls
for
when
there
are
two
uses
that
are
simultaneous,
but
this
is
a
student,
housing,
development
and.
B
To
mr
miranda
and
mr
dingfel.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
I
have
a
different
view
from
it.
Two
extreme
colleagues
who
have
spoken-
and
that
is
this
retail-
is
great,
wonderful
and
needed.
A
But
before
you
have
retail,
you've
got
to
have
a
lot
of
density
of
people
to
buy
something
and
when
you
look
at
retail,
ybor
city
and
downtown
was
the
only
two
areas
of
shop.
When
I
was
a
young
man
125
years
ago,
and
then
you
look
at
that,
what
happened
brent
plaza,
opened
up,
northgate
opened
up,
retail
fell
in
downtown
and
ybor
city.
Then
what
happened
to
southgate,
I
mean
northgate
into
print
plaza,
new
malls
came
in
a
new
word
maul.
A
A
What's
going
to
happen
in
brit,
I
mean
in
west
shore
mall
it's
not
going
to
be
the
washroom
all
we
know
it
will
have
some
retail
it'll
have
some
restaurants,
but
it's
going
to
change
also
to
what
residential
units
and
some
retail
and
some
restaurants,
not
primarily
just
retail.
You
see
the
change
that
we
have.
A
A
A
So
that's
the
new
mode,
a
new
mod,
whether
I
like
it
or
not.
It's
another
question,
but
that's
not
here
before
me.
It's
the
changing
of
a
public
perception
of
what
they
want
to
do
and
how
they
want
to
live,
and
I
appreciate
that
cars
are
no
longer
going
to
be
fueled
by
petroleum
to
some
degree
and
you
have
a
changing
world
all
together.
A
I
I
see
this
project
as
a
boost
to
the
retail.
That's
there
now,
because
it's
a
highly
traveled
area
at
rate
of
speeds
at
35,
45,
even
50
miles
an
hour.
That's
why
you
have
it
now
controlled
by
many
many
different
avenues
that
weren't
there
10
years
ago-
and
I
know
louis
vieira
worked
very
hard
to
get
some
of
those
things
put
in
and
mr
goods
in
that
district
that
he
bought
us
with
mr
riera.
A
I
have
grandchildren
who
rent
apartments,
although
they
have
beautiful
houses,
and
I
still
can't
figure
that
damn
thing
out,
if
you
think
I'm
gonna
pay
that
kind
of
rent
in
an
apartment.
When
I
got
a
room
at
my
house,
my
father
would
turn
over
in
his
grave.
If
I
did
that,
and
my
mother
was
still
putting
a
weapon
on
me,
so
what
I'm
saying
is
things
have
changed
and
that's
the
way
it
is.
People
want
liberty,
they
want
to
make
decisions
earlier
in
life
than
later
in
life,
and
and
that's
how
I
see
it.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
So
about
two
years
ago
we
had
a
project
in
front
of
us
at
the
corner
of
macdill
and
gandy
with
a
similar,
tiny,
tiny
mixed-use
component,
and
we
pointed
it
out.
Ultimately,
we
turned
down
the
project.
I
can't
remember
on
what
basis.
Maybe
that
was
part
of
it,
and
now
I
think,
that's
the
location,
as
I
recall,
of
the
the
proposed
car
wash
that's
coming
for
better
for
worse.
H
But
the
point
is,
I
pointed
out
two
years
ago
that
this
mixed
use
issue
is
in
our
code
and
it
has
strange
results
in
that
particular
location.
I
didn't
appreciate
the
result
because
it
allowed
for
a
greater
density
and
a
greater
intensity
of
residential
development,
even
though
they
were
providing
just
a
little
farce.
H
Okay,
it
says
the
cc35
future
land
use
designation
is
comprised
of
mid
blah,
blah
blah
blah
blah
blah.
The
cc35
designation
allows
for
a
maximum
of
30
dwelling
units
per
gross
acre
and
a
maximum,
far
floor
area
ratio
of
1.0,
the
applicant's
proposing
vertical
mixed-use
development
on
a
site
located
on
an
arterial
roadway,
greater
than
.35
acres
in
size.
Therefore,
the
proposed
project
can
develop
at
a
far
far
of
1.5,
in
other
words
they're
using
a
bonus.
That's
part
of
our
comp
plan
to
bump
it
from
1.0,
far
florida
ratio
to
1.5
far
the
subject.
H
Property
is
286
000
square
feet,
6.5
acres
in
size
and
therefore
allows
for
consideration
for
the
proposed
far
of
1.29
so
because
they
they've
called
it
mixed
use
and,
as
you
indicated,
joe
they've
provided
a
little
shoe
box
at
.6
of
the
total
project.
They
can
call
it
mixed
use
because
we
allow
them
to
we
allow
them
to
in
our
code.
Okay,
that's
why
we
need
to
revisit
that
code,
so
we
can
sort
of
get
a
greater
handle
on
where
we
want.
H
H
You
know
kids
or
graduate
students
or
what
have
you
who
knows
who
cares?
The
bottom
line
is,
I
think,
goods
you
pointed
out,
there's
a
lot
of
retail
along
there
already.
It
doesn't
bother
me
that
they're
not
really
contributing,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
and
we
are
coming
into
staff
reports,
which
I
won't
get
into
mr
shelby,
but
we're
coming
into
some
staff
reports
in
the
next
couple
of
months.
Where
we're
going
to
be
discussing
this
mixed-use
concept
some
places,
I
think
it's
fine
to
give
them
a
bonus.
H
If
there's
any
neighborhood
opposition,
I
kind
of
doubt
it.
I
think
we
need
to
get
to
that,
mr
chairman,
before
midnight,
but
but
the
bottom
line
is,
is
at
this
location
on
fowler,
I
don't
have
any
problem
with
it.
T
Very
much
I
appreciate
it.
No
just
I
I
I
wanted
to
speak
and
and
to
echo,
especially
what
councilman
miranda
said
that
I
mean
for.
For
me,
the
issue
of
commercial
use
is
a
is
a
what's
that
term,
a
rabbit
hole
or
whatever
that's
not
really
relevant
to
what
we're
talking
about.
T
This
is
for
student
housing
in
an
area
that
needs
good
quality
student
housing,
that's
quality,
hopefully
affordable,
I'm
sure
it
will
be,
but
but
obviously
is
going
to
be
very,
very
quality
from
mr
singer's
assertions
on
this
builder
and
then
with
regards
to
the
commercial
use,
I
find
that
a
very,
very
limited
relevancy
in
the
in
the
quality
of
this
project
and
compatibility
with
the
area
I
mean
you're
going
to
be
dealing
with
kids
here
I
I
can
say
that
now,
because
I'm
43
but
you're
going
to
be
dealing
with
kids
here,
18
19,
20
year
olds,
and
for
them
all
the
commercial
they
need
is,
is
right
here
on
their
cell
phone.
T
F
O
You,
I
think,
I
think
all
the
commissioners
here
for
the
most
part
kind
of.
O
Took
away
everything
that
I
was
gonna
say,
but
I
would
just
point
to
the
standard
across
the
street
from
this
project
is
a
perfect
example
of
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
here.
O
Property
is
going
to
be
very
much
in
line
with
what
you
see
at
the
standard
across
the
street.
We
currently
have
a
similar
size
space
there.
That's.
Q
Filled
by
a
company
called
mogi-t,
they
do
bubble
tea,
and
it's
really.
You
know
something
that.
Q
Retail
use
and
will
be
leased
accordingly.
You
know
everyone.
Q
The
area
already
retail
is
a
use
that
is
harder
to
develop
right
now
in
current
market
conditions.
Just
given.
Q
Next
door
to
us,
so
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
We
want
to
make.
O
Sure
that
whatever
we're
adding
here
is
accretive
to
the
city
of
tampa
and
to
the
surrounding
uses,
and
we
can
be
good
neighbors
here
and
part
of
that
is
knowing
what
the
market
can
actually
hold
and
sustain.
And
so
we
feel
that
the
1780
square
feet
is
completely
justified
in
what
will
be
able
to
be
leased
in
this
market.
C
B
T
B
T
I
I
saw
mr
singer
not
his
head
in
this
regard.
I
just
want
to
state
for
the
record.
There
is
no
opposition
from
any
neighborhood
association.
I
would
assume
not,
but
just
for
the
record.
K
For
the
record,
there
is
no
opposition
that
we
are
aware
of
from
any
neighborhood
association
or
from
any
neighbor
and
before
mr
chair.
If
you'll
just
grant
me
one
consideration
before
anyone
makes
a
motion,
I
would
like
to
say
that
it
warms
my
heart
to
share
councilman
dingfelder's
sentiments
on
this
project.
H
B
Mr
singer's,
no
one
else
registered
madam
clerk.
No
one
else,
all
right
right.
In
that
case,
we'll
move
close.
This
man
has
moved
it,
mr
scott,
the
second
all
in
favor
all
right
and
impose
motion
granted.
Mr
barry,
am
I
taking
this
sure.
F
Gentlemen-
I
I
am-
I
am
going
to
support
this,
but
let's
call
it
what
it
is
multi-use.
I
I
don't
know
about
that.
I
I
I
feel
that
we
really
need
to
revisit
that
term
multi-use.
F
C
E
Thank
you,
council,
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
Item
number
three
is
raz
2181.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
4701
north
armenia
avenue.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
cgmpd
to
pd
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation
to
the
planning
commission
and
after
their
presentation.
I'll
conclude
mine.
L
Jennifer
mullen
with
the
clinic
mission
again
as
annie
introduce,
it
gave
a
great
introduction.
This
is
2181
on
north
armenia,
avenue
we're
traveling
to
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
wellswood
neighborhood.
This
is
within
a
mixed-use
and
transit
emphasis
corridor.
L
There
is
a
transit,
stop
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
providing
service
heart
route.
17
wellswood
park
is
the
closest
public
recreational
facility
and
it's
the
subject.
Site
is
within
evacuation
zone
d.
Here's
an
ariel
of
the
subject
site.
As
you
can
see.
We
have
some
medical
offices
in
the
surrounding
area
to
the
north
and
the
west.
There's
multi-family.
L
To
the
west
as
well
and
then
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
are
the
single
family
detached
the
adopted
future
of
land
use
is
community
mixed
use,
35
that
is
predominant
along
north
armenia
avenue
and
then
to
the
south.
L
East
is
residential
10,
that's
the
orange
color,
and
that's
where
that
single
family
detached
neighborhood
is
there's
also
some
residential
50
to
the
west
and
residential
35
to
the
southwest
as
well.
Planning
commission
staff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
the
youth
is
consistent
with
the
underlying
future
land
use
designation
of
community
mixed
35.
L
So
with
that
I'll
just
conclude
by
stating
that
we
found
it
consistent
with
the
plan
and
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I
am
as
always
available
for.
E
E
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
waiver
to
reduce
the
required
use
to
use
buffer,
as
shown
on
your
screen
shown
here
as
an
aerial
map
in
the
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
site.
Again
as
a
medical
office
to
the
west
of
the
site
as
medical
office
and
east
of
the
site
is
the
school
and
to
the
south
is
the
store
and
residential
single
family
dwelling.
E
The
subject
site
is
approximately
sixty.
Seven
thousand
square
feet
in
size
shown
here
is
part
of
the
site
plan
submitted.
The
proposed
project
is
for
nine
thousand
four
hundred
and
forty
six
square
feet
of
business
professional
office
office.
Building
use
setbacks
are
proposed
as
follows:
10
feet
from
the
north
10
feet
from
the
south
20
feet
from
the
east
and
25
feet
from
the
west
proposed
maximum
building
height
is
35
feet,
a
total
of
31
parking
spaces
are
required
and
38
parking
spaces
are
provided,
vehicular
access
will
be
off
of
armenia.
E
Avenue
shown
here
are
the
north
and
south
elevations,
as
well
as
the
east
and
west
elevations
shown
here
is
the
subject
site
as
well
as
a
property
north
of
the
site,
property
east
of
the
site,
as
well
as
south
of
the
site,
development
review
and
compliance
death
has
reviewed
the
application
and
overall
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
atlanta
development
code
modifications,
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
in
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet
approving
the
application.
That
conclude
concludes
my
presentation.
B
All
right,
gentlemen,
have
you
I'm
sure
mr
azar's
already
sworn
you
in.
S
Okay,
my
name
is
alvaro
rodriguez
and
I
am
the
architect
of
the
project.
The
request
is
to
resume
the
property
located
at
4701,
nor
armenia
avenue
tampa
from
planned
development.
It
was
a
all
regions
bank,
and
we
will.
We
will
respond.
The
property
to
plan
development
for
a
business
professional
office
will
be
for
a
lawyer
office.
S
The
proposed
building
will
be
9446
square
foot
and
the
proposed
use
would
be
for
a
lawyer,
firm,
lorenzo
and
lorenzo
the
subject.
Side
is
within.
The
community
makes
use
35
future
lens
development,
designation,
the
cmu
35
future
land
use,
support,
general
commercial
retail
service,
professional
office
and
residential
uses.
S
S
S
S
I
S
H
B
T
Sir,
just
out
of
an
abundance
of
caution
for
mr
shelby,
mr
lorenzo
I'm
a
defense
attorney,
so
I've
I
have
had
cases.
I
think
I
have
one
with
his
firm,
mr
shelby,
that
just
for
the
record
that
does
not
produce
any
conflict,
correct.
T
Get
the
relationship
that
I
have,
I
I
believe
one
active
case
with
mr
lorenzo's
firm,
where
I'm
supposed.
T
D
Representing
something
you're
you're
representing
someone,
you
see
your
attorney,
so
you
have
no
financial
interest
in
the
subject
of
this
case.
Absolutely
not,
and
you
can
be
fair
and
impartial
and
judge
it
on
the
competent
substantial
evidence.
Absolutely
well.
Thank
you,
then,
in
my
opinion,
you
would.
M
H
A
T
The
other
building
next
door
councilmember,
is
we're
going
to
move
into
the.
M
A
M
And
and
so
that,
for
the
record,
the
waiver
that
we're
asking
is
regarding
an
existing,
a
retention
pond,
so
they
retain
we're,
not
changing
anything,
there's
an
existing
retention
pond
there
already.
We,
we
don't
want
to
change
the
the
wall
structure
on
the
on
the
existing
retention
pond
and
that's
why
the
waiver
of
the
two
feet
that.
J
M
Up
to
the
the
school
that
that
you
see
there
and
it's
where
the
driveway,
where
the
old
driveway
to
the
teller
is
the
the
final
project
is
going
to
give
us
a
significant
amount
of
more
green
space,
because
all
that
all
that
section
in
the
front
of
the
building
that
used
to
be
a
driveway,
it's
going
to
be
turned
into
all
green
space.
Thank
you,
sir.
J
B
Opposed
motion
granted,
mr
maniscal,
can
we
do
off
on
user.
C
Much
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading:
consideration
ordnance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
4701
north
armenia
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
were
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification,
cg,
commercial,
general
and
pd
plan
development
to
pd
plan
development,
business
professional
office
providing
effective
date
and
including
that
revision
sheet
between
now
and
a
second
reading.
Second,.
B
H
C
B
E
L
Thank
you,
annie,
jennifer
malone
here
with
the
planning
commission.
This
is
2191.
We
are
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
It
is
located
on
just
east
of
north
florida
avenue,
which
is
a
transit
emphasis
corridor.
Fernando
mesa
park
is
400
feet
to
the
northeast
of
the
subject
site.
There's
a
transit
stop
about
350
feet
to
the
south
of
the
site
and
it
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation
zone.
So
here
is
an
aerial
of
the
site,
as
you
can
see,
we're
just
east
of
north
florida
avenue.
L
We
have
the
ymca
and
the
metropolitan
ministries
in
this
vicinity
to
the
south
is
the
armature
works
development?
We
found
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
site
is
within
the
tampa
heights
urban
village
and
it
is
surrounded
by
a
mixture
of
light
commercial
office
uses
residential
and
vacant
rehearsals.
L
So
the
request
for
residential,
multiple
family
24
zoning
district
primarily
provides
for
medium
high
density,
multiple
family
residential
development,
which
is
consistent
with
that
underlying
residential
83
future
land
use,
designation
and
then-
and
so
that
is
what
the
plan
calls
for
in
this
area.
And
then
you
can
see
to
the
east
west
of
the
site.
Is
the
community
commercial
35
along
north
florida
avenue
and
then
to
the
north?
Is
that
residential
20.?
So
the
residential
multi-family
24
is
consistent
with
the
underlying
future
land
use.
L
E
Thank
you,
amy
barnes
development
coordination.
This
is
rec
2191
or
1909
north
florida
avenue
river.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
reason
from
ci
commercial
intensive
to
rm
24.
There
are
no
waivers
associated
with
the
standard
rezoning
request
shown
here
is
the
subject:
property
approximately
0.23
acres
in
size.
E
E
E
E
Property
west
is
owned.
Ci
commercial,
intensive
and
developed
as
a
private
recreational
facility
shown
here
is
the
subject
property
facing
south
on
ross
avenue
shown
here
is
the
intersection
of
north
florida
avenue
and
ross
avenue
west
of
the
subject
site,
and
this
is
east
on
ross
avenue
along
about
where
the
subject
site
is
vantage.
Point
is
this
is
the
alley
that
runs
behind
the
subject:
site
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
and
development
code,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
ms
barnes,
going
back
to
your
first
photograph.
Did
I
okay
so
so
that
tree
is
in
the
in
the
city,
right-of-way.
E
E
E
That
is
my
understanding,
aaron
mayer,
I'm
not
sure
if
she
has
gone
out
to
the
site.
I
can
ask
her
as
well
erin.
Are
you
available.
H
E
It'll
have
to
be
in
the
time
of
permanent
any
natural
resources
requirements.
H
J
J
We
will
make
sure
that
when
we
go
through
permitting
that
we
have
the
proper
setback
from
that
tree,
if
it's
deemed
to
be
in
good
condition
and
worth
saving
just
go
through
the
slideshow,
so
it
unites
has
been
highlighted.
We
are
asking
to
do
a
euclidean
rezoning
from
ci
to
rm
24.
J
The
address
of
the
property
is
1909.
North
florida
rear
unit
just
want
to
make
sure
we
clarify
that
this
product,
or
this
particular
property,
is
not
located
on
florida
avenue
at
one
point
in
time
it
was,
and
the
address
has
not
yet
been
reflected,
and
that
will
be
done
so
in
during
a
future
permitting
process.
So
this
particular.
A
J
You
know
the
current
zoning
map
here
has
shown
that
you
know
this
property
is
ci
at
that
point
in
time
that
it
was
maybe
a
pers
initially
part
of
this
lot
along
florida,
avenue,
maybe
more
understandable,
but
we
are
asking
for
the
euclidean
zoning
to
have
our
zoning
of
rm24
or
change
to
rm24
to
be
consistent
with
every
single
one
of
the
residential
surrounding
properties,
with
the
exception
of
those
that
ended
up
going
through
a
plan
development.
J
So
this
particular
area
in
blue
is
our
particular
subject:
property
and
we're
asking
for
that
to
be
exchanged
to
the
rm24
zoning
tonight.
As
I've
been
alluded
to
with
staff,
it's
been
consistent
across
the
board,
with
every
single
one
of
the
departments
about
our
request
for
the
euclidean
zoning
chain.
J
Just
a
couple
of
the
comprehensive
plan
policies
that
this
will
meet
this
the
goal
is
to
use
some
limited
land
resources
more
efficiently
and
pursue
a
development
pattern,
that's
more
economically
sound
by
encouraging
infill
development
on
vacant
and
under
utilized
sites
and
as
well
as
land
use
policy.
5.1.4
development
projects
in
urban
villages
must
be
oriented
integrated
and
in
scale
with
the
surrounding
community
and
again
we're
asking
for
our
rezone
arizona
to
be
consistent
with
all
those
surrounding
residential
laws.
J
J
G
N
N
I
know
we
had
a
little
bit
of
a
confrontational
and
controversial
issue
earlier
in
the
night,
but
I
do
want
to
reassure
council
and
everyone
that
our
neighborhood
organization
does
look
at
each
rezoning
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
and
this
is
one
that
our
land
use
committee
examined
and
found
consistent
everything
around
it.
Residentially
is
rm.
24
is
not
facing
north
boulevard.
Therefore,
a
commercial
intensive
zoning
is
just
not
appropriate
to
the
area,
and
so
it's
in
keeping
with
character
it's
a
euclidean
rezoning.
N
So
we
support
the
application
and
also
have
the
reassurance
that,
because
of
the
historic
overlay
district,
we
can
be
assured
that
the
development
that
will
follow
under
euclidean
rezoning
will
be
in
keeping
with
that
character
of
the
neighborhood.
So
we
are
confident
that
we
will
be
pleased
with
the
outcome
of
this
process
and
we
ask
for
your
support.
Thank
you.
C
C
O
B
For
record
again,
mr
marshall,
yes,
sir.
O
Jeffrey
marshall-
and
I
I
don't
have
an
objection
or
an
opposition
to
the
exact
rezoning,
like
the
civic
association
indicated
from
intense
commercial
to
residential.
O
J
J
Or
yard
space
for
people
to
be
in,
I
walk
across.
O
The
street
and
I
trim
that
tree
a
little
bit
the
brush
pile
that
you
see
is
from
my
chainsaw
so
that
cars
can
park
under
there.
So
a
lot
of
these
homes
were
built
before
automobiles
and
they
don't
have
our
driveways,
sometimes
no
garages,
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
it'd
be
difficult
to
imagine.
Townhomes
going
up
in
this.
H
Thank
you,
and
just
for
the
record.
This
must
be
public
defender
night
because
mr
marshall
who's
on
camera
there,
mr
young
jeffrey
marshall,
is
actually
my
supervisor,
but
but
there,
but
there
is
no
bias
or
prejudice
on
my
part.
He
was
a
very
kind
and
fair
supervisor
in
the
public
defender's
office,
but
on
on
a
honest
on
a
serious
note,
mr
marshall,
the
I'm
sure,
you've,
you've,
noticed
or
you've
seen
in
the
report
that
the
land
use
category
was
residential
83.
H
For
that
that
whole
block,
I
think,
which
theoretically
allows
80
83
units
to
the
to
the
acre
and
they're
asking
for
20
a
24
unit
to
the
acre
category.
So
arguably-
and
I'm
sure
mr
ashkenazi
can
argue
this
himself
but
anyway,
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
that
arguably
you
know
this
is
significantly
lower.
H
So
we
just
we
just
view
it
on
the
basis
of
being
rm24
and
we're
not
allowed
to
ask
any
questions
about
the
details
and
the
front
porches
and
the
garages
and
or
anything
else,
because
it
is
euclid
euclidean,
so
they
just
have
to
meet
the
standard
euclidean
code.
But
anyway,
that's
my
little.
My
little
primer,
my
little
land
use
primer
and
it's
good
to.
J
Sir
yeah,
so
just
a
quick
conclusion.
You
know,
as
mr
ding
felter
pointed
out,
you
know
to
tonight's.
What
we
are
solely
asking
for
is
the
euclidean
zoning
change
from
the
ci
zoning,
which
we
believe
was
an
incorrect
classification
given
this
is
not
located
on
a
arterial
or
main
road
to
the
rm24
zoning.
J
Any
future
plans
will
be
reviewed
and
make
sure
that
they
be
consistent
with
the
zoning
codes.
I
can
say
that
you
know
we
will
be
well
below
the
rm24
which
again,
as
mr
dingfield
also
pulse,
pointed
out,
you
know
there
would
be
an
allowed
use
of
r83.
So
not
only
what
we're
asking
for
tonight
is
lower,
but
anything
that
we'd
be
submitting
would
also
be
significantly
lower,
but
in.
J
You
know
we
want
to
focus
on
the
facts.
You
know
the
facts.
Are
that
we're
asking
for
our
lot
to
be
rezoned
to
be
consistent
with
all
the
surrounding
immediately
surrounding
properties,
and
we
believe
that
as
the
city's
and
the
planning
commission
have
all
found
it
consistent
and
the
comprehensive
plan
that
shows
it
is
consistent.
So
we
asked
the
council
to
approve
this
rezoning
tonight.
Thank.
H
You
quick
quick
question.
Mr
ashkenazi
is
I'm
looking
at
the
original
plot
map
from
1890,
something
or
other,
but
is
that
ally
still
has?
Has
it
been
vacated
or
is
it
still
an
active
or
theoretically
active
alley
behind
this
property?
H
J
H
Rear
loaded,
rear
loaded
units
is
that
what
you
said.
J
No,
the
garages
will
have
will
be
oriented
towards
the
alley,
so
the
alley
is
in
the
rear
of
the
our
lot
is
still
an
active
valley,
and
that
will
be
the
where
the
parking
will
be
oriented,
but
the
alley
to
the
west
is
no
longer
an
active
valley.
H
Okay,
all
right,
I
encourage
you
to
go
knock
on
the
door
and
mr
marshall
is
a
nice
guy
you're
about
the
same
age
and
talk
to
him
about
your
project.
I
will.
E
Mr
chairman,
just
kate
wells
for
the
record
in
the
event
that
city
council
is
inclined
to
approve
this
project,
I
would
ask
that
when
the
ordinance
is
right
into
the
record
that.
E
Rear
unit
and
then
that
correction
will
be
made
prior
to
second
reading.
O
G
E
B
I
believe
mr
maniscalco
moved
to
close
second
with
all
in
favor
all
right.
Any
opposed
motion
granted
mr
carlson
number
five,
please,
sir.
Yes.
O
In
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
ci
commercial,
intensive
to
rm,
24
residential
multi-family
providing
effective
date,
complex,
substantial
evidence
was
presented
that
the
density
proposed
by
the
development
does
not
exceed
the
density
anticipated
under
future
land
use
category
will
not
alter
the
character
or
development
pattern
in
this
portion
of
the
neighborhood.
The
map
was
shown
that
this
is
very
consistent
with
the
immediate
surrounding
neighborhood.
O
It's
it's
also
consistent
with
land
use
policy
2.1.2
and
the
proposed
development
promotes,
or
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility.
The
surrounding
neighborhood,
as
presented
by
the
applicant
and
the
neighborhood
association
leader.
C
E
Thank
you,
council,
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
Item
number.
Seven
is
rec
21108.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
3921
by
state
street.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rs
50
residential
single
family
to
pd
plan
development,
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation
to
the
planning
commission
and
after
theirs,
I'll
money.
L
Thank
you,
annie,
jenner,
from
along
with
the
planning
commission,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
as
soon
as
I
get
the
permission.
Thank
you
so
much
so
this
is
rec
21
108,
we're
traveling
to
the
west
shore
planning
district
and
the
north.
Bon
air
neighborhood
jim
walter
park
is
the
closest
public
recreational
facility
serving
the
area
heart
route
10
service,
subject
site.
It
is
within
evacuation
zone
d.
L
It
is
just
south
of
west
cypress
street
and
we
have
the
lowest
I-275
north
ramp
within
the
vicinity
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site
into
the
east
of
the
subject.
Site
are
some
a
variety
of
housing
types,
mostly
single-family,
detached
on
the
future
atlantis
map.
We
can
see
that
the
property
is
residential
20.
That's
that
lighter
brown
color
to
the
north
and
west
is
community
commercial
35,
that's
the
red
allowing
those
commercial
uses
further
north
is
regional
mixed-use
100.
L
That's
that
purple
magenta
color
that
we
see
further
north
of
the
site
further
south
on
that
orange
color
is
residential
10,
that
is
single
family.
Detached
pretty
much
strictly
single
family
detached,
so
the
request
before
you
is
for
a
planned
development
or
two
single-family
semi-detached
dwelling
units
that
is
consistent
with
the
underlying
future.
Ladies,
the
residential
20,
this
west
state
street.
This
portion
is
planned
for
housing
at
slightly
higher
densities
than
just
your
regular
single
family
detached.
L
So
this
is
going
to
be
developed
at
a
density
of
17.39
units
per
acre,
and
it
is
consistent
with
what
is
planned
for
this
subject
site
the
this
would
also
provide
a
transition
in
density
from
those
commercial
uses
to
the
east
of
the
site,
and
so
we're
seeking
that
transition
intensity
from
the
commercial
to
the
single
family
attached
through
that
residential
20,
future
land
use
and
the
zoning
before
you
so
again.
L
E
E
E
shown
here
is
part
of
the
site
plan
provided
by
the
applicant.
Again,
it's
for
one
structure
with
a
semi-detached
uses.
So
two
residential
dwelling
units
proposed
building
setbacks
are
as
follows:
north
20
feet
south
25
feet
east
seven
feet
in
west
seven
feet
proposed
maximum
principal
building.
Height
is
35
feet,
a
total
of
five
parking
spaces
are
required
and
four
parking
spaces
are
being
provided.
E
E
Shown
here
is
an
aerial
map
with
surrounding
zoning
properties
surrounding
the
site
are
developed
with
a
mixture
of
residential
single
family,
detached
and
commercial
uses.
Property
north
is
zoned
ci
and
developed
with
a
restaurant.
Probably
south
and
east
is
owned.
Rs50
and
developed
with
residential
single
family
detached
uses
and
property
west
of
the
subject
site
is
zoned
rs50
and
remains
undeveloped.
E
Shown
here
is
the
subject
site
facing
north
on
west
state
street.
E
Here
is
property
west
of
the
subject
site
towards
looking
towards
the
interstate
shown
here
is
property
further
south
south
on
west
state
street,
looking
towards
the
interstate,
and
then
this
is
property
east
on
west
state
street,
showing
both
sides
of
the
street
from
near
the
subject's
property
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Please
refer
to
transportation
and
development
coordination
commons
for
overall
inconsistency.
E
Finding
modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
in
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision,
the
revision
sheet,
if
approving
the
application.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Any.
H
Barnes
on
page
three
of
the
staff
report
under
development
requirements
c1,
it
speaks
to
the
the
front
doors
facing
the
street
right.
E
E
I
think
the
applicant
is
muted,
but
very
parking
on
site.
Four
spaces
are
being
provided
and
five
are
required.
The
single-family
summit
attached
to
science
standards
are
separate
standards
for
parking
as
or
other
standards,
but
include
parking
as
well.
E
B
B
C
O
So
this
is
a.
This
is
a
lot
that
I've
owned
for
about
10
years
now
and
for
about
the
same
amount
of
time,
I've
tried
to
decide
what
to
do
with
it.
And
ultimately,
it
came
down
to
the
fact
that
I
managed
some
properties
around
tampa,
similar
to
what
we're
trying
to
develop
here
and
I
get
a
text
or
call
from
a
tenant
or
a
friend
of
a
tenant
from
at
least
once
a
week
about
do.
O
I
have
any
availability,
any
units
coming
available
and
almost
every
time
at
the
no
this
area
when
we
bought
it
was,
you
know
not
nearly
as
far
along
it's
still
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
ungentrified
two
of
the
houses,
the
to
the
west
of
the
site,
have
boarded
up
windows
or
vacant
and
just
not
not
fully
utilized.
Yet
so
with
the
addition
of
midtown
and
everything
else
going
on.
O
We
think
it's
probably
time
to
to
make
a
move
with
it
and
have
no
doubt
that
I
can
rent
these
out
and
it's
really
just
a.
H
So,
mr
cavaliers,
your
your
four
parking
spaces
are
just
going
to
be
slots
coming
off
of
state
straight
state
street,
just
side
by
side;
no,
no,
no
covered
parking
or
anything
like
that.
O
That's
correct,
they'll
just
be
just
facing
the
building
or
just
nose
in,
but
there's
going
to
be
pavers
and
it'll.
Be
you
know.
B
Green
none.
Anyone
on
the
second
floor
to
speak
on
this
island.
B
Motion
granted
mr
lucky
number
seven,
mr
cedro.
F
Excuse
me,
file
number
raz
21-108
an
ordinance
being
presented
first
reading,
consideration
orders
resulting
property
in
general
vicinity
of
3921
west
state
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
section,
one
from
zoning,
district
classification,
rs50
residential
single
family
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
detach,
providing
an
effective
date
with
waivers
and
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading,
as
the
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof.
F
F
C
E
L
Jennifer
blown
with
your
planning
commission
as
annie
entered,
gave
that
nice
introduction.
This
is
rec.
L
We've
2111
to
the
central
tampa
planning
district,
the
tampa
heights
urban
village
in
the
tampa
heights,
neighborhood
there's
a
transit,
stop
approximately
two
blocks
northwest
of
the
subject
site.
Robert
c
gardner
senior
park
is
about
a
half
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject
site
and
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
L
L
The
adopted
future
land
use
is
residential
83.
The
request
before
you,
as
I'm
sure,
annie,
will
go
into
more
detail,
is
for
a
business
professional
office,
so
in
the
residential
83
designation
it
allows
limited
neighborhood
serving
commercial
and
office
uses
if
this
is
consistent
with
the
vocational
criteria.
L
L
So,
in
short,
this
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
it
supports
landing
subjective
19.1,
which
seeks
to
protect
and
preserve
the
city
of
campus
historic
resources.
Census
is
going
to
be
a
and
I'll.
Let
annie
speak
to
the
how
that's
implemented.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
60
seconds.
E
E
The
subject.
Property
is
comprised
of
lot
six
and
half
of
lot
five
block
two
of
henderson's
plan
of
tampa
heights,
subdivision
plastic
platted
in
1890
shown
here.
Oh
my
apologies
shown
here.
The
prior
slide
was
a
survey
of
the
subject
site
and
it's
approximately
0.29
acres
in
size
shown
here
is
part
of
the
site
plan
provided
by
the
applicant.
The
proposed
project
is
for
business
and
professional
office
use
principal
building.
Setbacks
are
proposed
as
follows:
north
10
feet,
south
65,
feet,
east
15,
feet
and
west
10
feet
proposed.
E
E
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject,
site
property
directly
north
of
the
site,
is
on
cn,
probably
directly
west
of
the
subject.
Site
and
across
north
mortgage
street
is
on
pde.
The
property
was
recently
rezoned
for
storefront
residential
retail
sales.
Shoppers
shoppers,
goods
and
residential
multi-family
uses
property
directly
south
of
the
subject.
Property
is
on
pd
and
currently
developed
with
the
server
service
parking
lot.
E
E
Showing
here
is
a
subject
property
in
the
building.
That's
actually
moving
to
this
site.
E
Development
review
and
combined
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
their
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Please
refer
to
transportation,
natural
resources
and
develop
coordination.
Comments
for
overall
inconsistency.
Finding
modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
in
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
provision
sheet.
If
approving
the
application
available
for
any
any
questions,
miss
barnes.
M
Hi,
my
name
is
sean
pearson,
and
I
am
agent
for
the
applicant
with
us.
Speaking
behind
me
will
be
the
architect
andrew
matson
of
a.I
collaborative
andrew
matson,
aia,
the
landscape,
architect
and
international
society
of
arboriculture
certified
arborist
ricky
federica,
mr
predorica,
by
the
way,
has
a
professional
office
in
pd
zone
in
the
same
block
as
our
applicant.
M
Only
a
few,
only
a
few
lots
away,
and
then
we
have
the
applicant
harvey
schonbrunn,
esquire
harvey's
daughter
is
also
here
with
us.
She
won't
be
speaking,
though
amber
schonbrunn,
mcdonnell
harvey
and
amber
practice
law
together.
M
The
pertinent
request
here
today
is
that
we
have
a
a
building
a
lot
right
now,
that
is
vacant
and,
as
you
saw
in
the
zoning
map,
that
lot
is
surrounded
by
pd
zoning,
we're
sort
of
a
little
residential
rm24
zoned
lot,
an
island
surrounded
by
the
cfpd
zoning
zoned
lots
and
the
request
is
to
relocate
a
building
which
is
across
the
street
in
a
currently
pd
zone
that
houses,
a
a
law,
firm
professional
offices
and
we'd
like
to
take
the
same
building
with
the
same
use
and
the
same
zoning
and
relocate
it
across
the
street.
M
I
can
tell
you
that
most
clients
would
not
be
interested
in
in
saving
this
building,
but
it
is
a
labor
of
love
for
our
applicant
and
so
with
that
I'll
I'll,
introduce
harvey,
schoenberg
and
he'll.
Give
you
a
little
background
and
let
you
know
why
he's
doing
what
we're
requesting
thanks
so
much.
O
My
existing
law
office
is
not
this
contributing.
When
it's
a
it's
another
law
office,
my
existing
office
will
be
demolished
for
the
320
rental
units.
That's
going
to
go
there.
I
need
to
move
the
building,
but
I
don't
want
to
leave
the
neighborhood.
I
was
born
across
the
street
at
the
old
saint
joseph's.
O
O
B
C
Okay,
so
the
this
is
just
the
this
is
the
the
existing
location
of
the
house,
so
I'm
just
going
to
go
quickly
into
you
know
where
it
is
and
and
the
the
existing
elevations
of
it
and
where
it
currently
sits
the
proposed
relocation
property,
and
that
highlighted
that's
the
existing
house
and
the
json
site.
Next
to
it
is
the
one
that's
the
pd
that
is
being
changed
has
been
approved,
we're
proposing
to
relocate
it
over
here
just
across
the
street.
C
This
these
are
the
proposed
renderings
with
all
the
adjacent
the
approved
pd
townhomes
that
are
just
to
the
south
of
it.
C
Again,
this
is
as
the
as
sean
had
talked
about
you
could
see.
This
is
the
the
current
site
is
a
pd
site
and
when
we're
relocating
it,
we
want
to
relocate
it
with
another
p
as
the
same
pd
and
it
is
currently
surrounded
by
pds,
and
this
is
the
the
development
that
was
just
approved
for
the
multifamily.
C
C
The
back
half
will
be
actually
a
10
foot
landscape
buffer,
we're
asking
for
a
reduction
in
the
rear
buffer
along
the
alley
from
a
from
an
eight
foot
to
a
four
foot
that
is
to
add
actual
to
get
to
the
the
required
parking
which
we're
still
too
short
from
I'm
gonna
skip
to
the
the
parking.
Because
part
of
that
was
the
the
parking
requirement.
C
We
are
actually
gonna
build
a
basement
before
we
relocate
the
house.
So
we're
going
to
dig
a
basement
in
there
and
part
of
the
the
law
office
is
to
require
them
to
store
a
certain
amount
of
files.
O
O
O
As
you
can
see,
on
the
on
the
site
plan
we
or
or
or
saw
in
the
renderings
we'll
fit
in
as
much
as
we
can,
but
there
may
be
a
possible
remainder
of
a
few
trees
and
the
way
to
address.
O
O
Due
to
the
proposed
building
proposed
basement,
proposed
access,
egress,
sidewalk
and
adjacent
the
adjacency
of
all
those
elements
and
the
structure
of
the
tree
which
I'll
just
I'll
try.
O
C
C
So
the
these
are
the
existing
elevations
as
it
currently
sits
when
we
relocate
the
building,
we're
also
going
to
improve
it
and
we're
going
to
lift
it
up
a
little
bit
to
help
with
the
basement
we're
going
to
add
ada
access
points,
because
the
current
house
does
not
have
proper
ada
access,
so
we're
going
to
build
a
ada
ramp,
ada
an
elevator
to
get
to
all
levels,
including
the
basement,
and
then
you
know
revamp
the
house
to
bring
it
back
to
what
it
you
know
should
be
paying
it
and
we're
going
to
be
working
with
the
arc
again
to
create
the
materials
list
to
be
appropriate
with
the
neighborhood.
N
Hello
councilman,
thank
you
for
having
me
again,
brian
seal
313
west
park
avenue,
president
of
the
tampa
heights
civic
association
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
civic
association
in
favor
of
the
rezoning
application
under
consideration.
N
It
doesn't
get
much
better
than
this.
The
neighborhood
association
has
had
an
ongoing
good
relationship
with
the
applicant.
You
know
we
talk
about
the
basis
of
the
case
here.
We
are
helping
preserve,
historically
designated
building.
We
are
also
allowing
with
the
movement
of
this
for
the
development
of
the
underlying
parcel
that
was
previously
approved
under
the
rezoning
for
that
block,
which
creates
a
mixed-use
development
that
includes
affordable
and
workforce
housing
that
includes
ground
floor
retail
that
is
appropriately
sited
on
north
florida
avenue.
N
N
This
particular
applicant
for
this
rezoning
has
been
forthcoming,
proactive
and
communicative
with
the
civic
association
in
this,
and
we
believe
it
accomplishes
a
great
historic
preservation
goal,
as
well
as
keeping
an
existing
building
and
office
and
business
within
this
neighborhood.
So
we
would
ask
for
your
support
on
this.
Thank
you.
B
C
H
So,
in
a
nutshell,
I
support
this.
I
support
this
item
as,
as
did
the
neighborhood
association.
H
I
think,
of
course
it's
always
unfortunate
to
lose
a
grand
tree
an
old
tree,
but
in
this
case
it's
a
laurel.
It's
a
laurel
oak,
which
our
experts
often
tell
us
are
not
going
to
last
that
much
longer,
and
mr
petering
mentioned
that
it
has
does
not
have
a
good
growth
pattern
but,
more
importantly,
we're
losing
an
old
tree,
but
to
save
an
old
house
and
mr
schonbrunn
and
your
daughter.
H
We
appreciate
we
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
are
saving
this,
this
beautiful
old
home,
slash
office
with
that,
mr
chairman
I'll
move
the
following
ordinance:
rec
21-1!
H
No
excuse
me
yeah,
that's
it
dash
111,
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
or
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
general
vicinity
of
301
east
oak
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classifications,
rm24
residential
multifamily
to
pd
plan
development,
business
professional
office
provide
an
effective
date.
I
believe
that
they've
met
all
the
criteria.
Second
criteria
they
have
staff
support.
H
B
C
E
L
Good
evening,
jennifer
malone
again
to
present
on
rec
21
113.
This
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
within
the
west,
tampa
urban
village
and
the
mcfarland
park.
Neighborhood
heart
route
14
serves
as
subject
site.
It
is
within
evacuation
zone
e.
I
have
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
it's
located
at
the
corner
of
north
armenia,
avenue
and
west
union
street
north
armenia
is
primarily
characterized
by
resident
by
commercial
uses.
L
The
adoptivity
for
land
use
is
community
commercial
35,
that's
the
red
color
that
allows
all
the
way
up
to
commercial
intensive
uses.
Further
north
is
light
industrial,
that's
the
cigar
factory
that
I
pointed
out
to
the
west
of
the
citrix
site.
The
lighter
brown
is
residential
20.,
so
that
allows
for
housing
at
slightly
higher
density.
L
So
we
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
community
commercial
35,
as
I
stated
before,
can
go
all
the
way
up
from
to
commercial,
general
and
commercial
intensive
uses.
So
the
request
before
you
of
commercial
neighborhood
is
very
much
in
line
with
what
that
future
land
use
category
plans
for,
and
we
also
found
that
that
would
be
consistent
with
the
single
family.
That's
located
to
the
east
of
the
site.
L
I
apologize
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site,
and
so
we
did
find
that
it
would
be
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
character
this
yearning
uses
and
it's
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
community
commercial
35.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
questions.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
again,
council.
This
request
is
to
rezone
1802
north
armenia
avenue
from
rm16
to
cn
commercial
neighborhood.
No
waivers
are
requested,
we're
standard
rezoning.
This
is
the
subject
site
currently
about
0.12
acres
in
size.
E
The
subject
property
is
comprised
of
lot.
24
block
44
of
revised
map
of
mcfarland's
additions
to
west
tampa
flighted
in
1906.
E
shown
here
is
an
aerial
map
and
surrounding
zoning
property.
Darkly
north
is
zone.
Pd
developed
with
the
business
professional
office,
property
south
is
zone,
ci
and
developed
commercial
uses.
Harvey
east
is
zoned
rm16
and
developed
with
single
residential
single-family
detached
and
residential
multi-family
uses
property
directly
west
is
known
rm16
as
well
and
developed
with
a
multi-family
dwelling
shown
here
is
the
subject.
Property
along
north
armenia
avenue
here
again
is
the
subject:
property
looking
further
farther
south
towards
the
interstate,
and
then
this
is
looking
north
on
north
armenia
avenue.
E
R
R
Code
enforcement,
fines
that
was
taken
care
of
and
I
rehabbed
the
property.
I
was
going
to
rent
it
and
I
decided
I
wouldn't
want
my
grandkids
to
live
at
that
location
and
I
decided
to
try
and
rezone
to
do
something
other
than
residential
and
I'm
basically
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
any.
H
When
you,
sir,
when
you
circulated
the
notice
letter
or
mr
bentley
did
did,
do
you
know
if
any
any
of
the
folks
in
the
in
the
notice
circle
responded.
G
C
B
A
The
proposed
owning
district
would
allow
for
development
that
is
compatible
to
the
carriage
of
surrounding
areas
and
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
current
land
use.
It
proposed
also
zoning
categories
consistent
compatible
with
the
existing
development
panic
pattern
in
its
surrounding
neighborhoods.
P
C
C
E
L
This
is
located
in
the
greenfield
temple
planning
district
art
route
19
serves
as
subject
site
is
within
evacuation
zone
c.
The
closest
public
recreational
facility
is
hyde
park,
which
is
about
two
blocks
to
the
south
of
the
city
site
and
it's
within
the
courier
city,
oscar
wanna
neighborhood.
So
here's
an
ariel
the
subject
site.
You
see
that
it's
at
the
corner
of
west
horatio
street
in
south
melville
avenue
host
tide
park
is
located
to
the
east
of
the
site,
as
well
as
the
salman
expressway.
L
Slightly
higher
density
to
the
east
is
residential
50,
that
is
the
post
high
park
apartment
development
further
north,
the
pink
and
a
little
bit
to
the
south
is
community
nexus
35..
So
the
planning
commission
found
this
consistent.
L
The
residential
multi-family
24
zoning
district
will
provide
a
range
will
provide
the
potential
for
a
range
of
housing
options
for
tampa's
growing
population.
This
zoning
district
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern,
which
largely
consists
of
single
family
attached
multi-family
some
detached
some
single-family
detached
units.
L
I
would
also
note
that
the
average
dens
existing
density
of
this
portion
of
south
melville
avenue
between
west
horatio
street
and
west
de
leon
street
is
at
19.82
units
per
acre,
which
is
below
that
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
35
future
of
ladies
designation,
but
it
it's
getting
there.
It
is
kind
of
getting
to
what
the
plan
has
planned
for
under
this
future
landis
designation.
L
So
in
short,
the
proposed
reasoning
further
several
comprehensive
plan
policies
such
as
promoting
residential
infill
in
appropriate
areas,
and
especially
within
areas
in
proximity
to
employment
and
transit
options,
and
it
is
going
to
further
the
future
and
ladies
and
residential
35..
So
that
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
E
E
From
rm16
to
rm24,
no
waivers
are
requested,
because
this
is
the
standards
euclidean.
Zoning
reasoning.
This
is
a
survey
of
the
subject
site
approximately
0.1818
acres
in
size.
The
subject
property
is
comprised
of
lot
12
lot.
14
career
city
subdivision,
flattened
in
1902
shown
here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
with
surrounding
zoning,
I'm
probably
north
and
it
north
of
the
subject
site
is
zoned,
rm24
and
developed
with
residential
multi-field.
Oh
I
apologize
multi-family
uses
at
property.
East
is
zoned
rm16
developed
with
residential
single-family
detached
dwelling
property.
E
South
is
zoned
rm16
and
developed
with
a
residential
multi-family
uses
as
well:
property
west
and
across
south
melbourne.
Avenue
is
owned,
pd
and
it
also
develops
with
residential
multi-family
uses.
The
proposed
zoning
of
rm24
is
compatible
with
the
existing
development
pattern,
with
the
surrounding
zoning
majority
of
rm24
and
rm16.
E
This
is
the
existing
single
family
dwelling
on
the
site
and
shown
care
is
properly
directly
south
and
adjacent
of
the
subject:
property
facing
south
melbourne
avenue
and
further
along
south
of
the
subject
site,
showing
both
sides-
development
on
both
sides
of
the
street
of
south
melbourne
avenue.
E
H
H
Factor
in
let's
say
03
to.
I
H
There
was
a
big
rush
in
this,
this
horatio
street
ozil
street
area,
to
build
a
lot
of
quads
and
that's
what
that's
what
we
call
them
quads
back
then
four
units
on
on
a
traditional
lot.
This
lot
looks
a
little
bit
bigger,
but
you,
your
staff
report,
still
indicates
four
four
units
as
a
maximum.
Is
that
correct.
H
So
it's
hard
to
tell
looking
at
the
zoning
map
the
existing
zoning
map
because
it
just
shows
pdpd,
I
see
four
pds,
you
know
very
close
to
this-
are
all
four
of
those
developed
out
as
quads
or
or
what.
H
E
East,
the
pd,
the
two
pds
here
and
then
to
the
west
two
pds
there.
I
know
it
appears
to
be
at
least
four
dwelling
units
per
acre,
but
they
are
all
developed
with
residential
multi-family
uses.
R
E
No,
that
was
actually
directly
south,
that
is
rm24.
So
let
me
show
you
this
is
directly
south
in
rm24
as
well.
E
Apologies.
Okay,
so
this
is
the
site
directly
south
of
the
subject
site
I'll
go
back.
I
was
pointing
to
the
the
map
as
well.
I'm
not
sure
if
you
saw
that
probably
not.
D
O
C
O
O
J
Walkable
and
very
vibrant
I'm
here
to
take
any
questions
that
you
might
have
if
I
can
shed
light
on
on
anything,
that's
unclear.
B
Any
question
from
the
applicant
request
from
the
advocate:
all
right
being:
none
do
we
have
anybody
on
the
second
floor
to
speak
on
this
item.
B
C
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman.
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading:
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
502,
south
melville
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
40,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rm16
residential
multifamily
to
rn
24
residential
multi-family,
providing
an
effective
date.
Miss
shelby
was
there
a
revision
sheet
with
this?
C
B
C
E
Thank
you,
annie.
Barnes
development
coordination
item
number
eleven,
it's
rec,
21
118,
the
subject
property
is
located
at
3112
and
3116
west
north
east
street.
The
request
is:
raising
the
property
from
rs50
to
pd
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation
to
jennifer
walnut
plain
question.
L
Thanks
annie,
this
is
rec
21
118,
as
annie
stated
we're
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
in
oakville
park.
Neighborhood
villa
brothers
park
is
the
closest
public
recreational
facility
about
0.7
miles
from
the
northeast
of
the
site.
It
is
within
the
evacuation
zone
d.
There
is
transit,
almost
adjacent
to
the
site
at
the
south,
at
the
corner
of
west
kennedy,
boulevard
in
north
mcdill
served
by
heart
route
30..
L
L
The
adopted
featured
land
use
is
urban
mixed
60,
that
is,
the
predominant
future
land
use
along
west
kennedy
boulevard.
That's
that
purple
light
purple
color
to
the
north
of
the
subject.
Site
is
residential
10.,
that
is
the
single
family
detached
future
land
use.
That's
in
that
that
orange
salmon
color,
so
urban
mix
260
is
very
intense.
It
allows
for
a
very
high
floor
area
ratio
and
up
to
60
dwelling
units
per
acre.
The
request
before
you
today
is
a
plant
development
at
only
eight
units,
and
that
is
not.
L
I
think
that,
under
the
adopted
future
land
use,
the
applicant
would
be
able
to
have
up
to
43
dwelling
units
at
60
million-
that's
an
acre,
so
it
is
a
very
intense
future
land
use
category
that
that
just
happens
to
be
placed
here
just
north
of
west
kennedy
boulevard
now,
but
it's
planned
for
that
intensive
residential
development
pattern.
So
the
comprehensive
plan
does
encourage
the
development
of
a
variety
of
housing
types
to
meet
the
needs
of
present
and
future
populations.
L
The
plan
also
states
that
it
should
allow
for
the
consideration
of
attached
units
on
the
periphery
of
established
single-family
detached
neighborhoods
to
provide
that
transition
in
density.
That's
lu
policy
9.3.5,
and
we
did
find
that
it
was
compatible
with
the
surrounding
character,
which
is
encouraged
by
lu
policy
2.1.1.
L
It
is
providing
that
transition
from
that
single
family,
detached
stepping
down
to
the
single
family
attached
and
then
further
south
is
those
are
those
commercial
uses.
So
this
is
supported
by
the
plan.
This
is
on
that
infield
development
that
the
plan
seeks
to
provide
and
we
did
find
it
consistent
and
we
found
that
it
would
be
compatible
with
the
long-range
development
pattern
in
this
portion
of
the
oxford
park.
Neighborhood
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
B
All
right
any
questions
for
mr
loan,
ms
barnes.
E
Thank
you
again.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
3112
3116
west
north
8th
street,
from
rs50
to
pd
for
residential
single-family
detached
uses.
The
applicant
is
requesting
two
waivers
council.
There
is
a
correction
to
the
first
waiver.
As
the
strikethrough
shows.
It
was
determined
that
the
waiver
is
not
required
based
upon
the
current
zoning
lot
being
platted
into
individual
lots
in
a
note
being
placed
on
the
site
plan
accordingly.
E
Therefore,
overall,
the
the
request
is
consistent.
Not
inconsistent
so
shown
here
is
survey
of
the
current
property
about
0.74
acres
in
size.
E
E
E
Two
parking
spaces
for
a
dwelling
unit
are
provided
within
each
detached
and
enclosed
garage.
Vehicular
access
is
provided
either
from
north
mcdill
avenue
via
the
rear
south
alley
or
north
the
tanzas
avenue.
E
These
are
the
elevations
provided
by
the
applicant
shown
here
is
an
aerial
map
and
surrounding
zoning
properties
surrounding
the
subject.
Site
are
dealt
with.
Residential
single-family,
detached
and
commercial
uses.
Property
north
is
zoned
rs50
and
developed
with
a
residential
super
family
detached
use,
property
west
is
also
zoned.
E
E
E
This
is
facing
or
continuing
west
along
west
north
a
street
with
the
subject
site
on
the
left.
This
is
facing
east
along
northwest
north
a
street
with
subject
site
on
the
right,
and
this
is
the
alley
that
runs
behind
the
subject:
site
development
review
and
client
staff
has
reviewed.
The
application
finds
the
overall
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Initially,
staff
found
the
request
inconsistent
based
on
the
waivers
requested.
E
However,
upon
further
review,
it's
determined
that
there
will
be
individual
zoning
lots
and
therefore
a
waiver
is
not
required
for
minimum
distance
separation
building
separation.
If
approving
this
rezoning
request,
an
additional
note
must
be
provided
on
the
site
plan
denoting
that
the
lots
will
be
fee.
Simple
modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
in
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet
of
approving
the
application,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Q
This
is
the
applicant's
team
ready
to
answer
questions
for
you
all.
We
won't
be
having
a
group
presentation.
B
Q
Thank
you
so,
as
staff
pointed
out
the
location
of
the
property
just
west
of
macdill
avenue
on
north
a
street,
it's
one
a
lot
away
from
kennedy,
boulevard
just
near
henderson,
boulevard
intersection,
also
as
noted
by
staff.
The
future
land
use
category
is
umu.
60
anticipates
high
intensity
density
development,
including
residential
and
commercial
development.
Q
The
mix
of
building
heights
can
be
up
to
10
stories.
That's
not
really
applicable
for
what
we're
discussing
here,
but
what
is
applicable
is
that
resonance
to
the
rs50
zoning
classification
are
discouraged
by
the
land
use
category.
The
language
category
itself
discourages
single
family
zoning,
which
is
what
exists
there
today,
I'm
looking
at
the
zoning
map
the
you
can
see
that
the
pink
there
is
the
kennedy
corridor,
the
area
in
red.
Q
There
is
the
proposed
site,
which
is
surrounded
primarily
by
commercial
uses,
and
then
you
have
the
mcdill
corridor
and
some
commercial
development
along
henderson
in
the
area.
Q
Looking
more
closely
at
the
the
uses
around
the
block
composition,
you
can
see
here
the
property
subject:
property
in
orange
and
then
you
have,
the
yellow
properties
are
all
commercials,
so
the
block
is
primarily
commercial
development.
With
a
couple
of
single-family
detached
lots
there
in
blue,
that
are
remaining,
as
the
block
has
transitioned
from
single
family
over
the
years.
Q
Q
We
had
to
withdraw
that
application
because
it
had
already
been
continued
significantly
because
of
the
2020
shutdown,
and
it
just
took
too
long
to
get
the
engineering
done
for
the
site
plan
to
meet
those
requirements,
so
it
made
more
sense
to
reapply
and
we
believe
we
addressed
city
council's
concern
through
a
site
plan
zoning
district,
given
that
the
application
was
continued
and
then
withdrawn.
We
didn't
have
a
ruling
of
the
council
to
go
off
of
so
what
I've
done
is.
Q
I
went
back
and
looked
at
the
transcript
to
try
and
confirm
what
council's
concerns
were,
and
so
I
have
a
couple
quotes
here
from
that
transcript
and
what
they're
really
pointing
out
here
is
that
the
concern
was
having
a
bulk
in
mass.
That
is
not
compatible
with
the
development
pattern
to
the
north
and
over
park
neighborhood,
and
what
we
really
identify
here,
I'm
gonna
read
the
quotes
quickly
is
this
is
about
whether
or
not
you
should
be
here
with
a
pp
or
not
here's.
My
problem
with
that.
Q
You
said
it's
our
intent
to
build
four.
You
know
duplexes
that
would
have
space
between
each
one.
You
have
a
50-foot
lot,
five
or
seven
feet
on
either
side
before
you
get
to
the
next
instead
of
town
on
duplexes,
which
is
what
we
were
proposing
that
we
would
build,
and
the
concern
from
council
was
because
you
are
coming
in
euclidean
with
your
rm12.
You
could
build
this
if
it
was
approved,
you
could
build
this
as
a
single
monolithic
building
without
any
break
whatsoever
in
between.
So
so
what
we've
done
here?
Q
The
request
today
is
a
pd
from
rs50
to
pd
for
four
duplexes
over
four
lots.
It's
eight
units
comprehensive
plan
would
allow
for
36
units
and
that's
not
a
per
acre.
That's
the
the
per
acre
density
is
under
12.,
so
we're
significantly
below
what
the
comprehensive
plan
allows.
Q
The
site
plan
was
worked
with
staff
to
make
changes
during
the
drc
process
so
that
we
could
come
before
you
today
with
a
consistency
finding
and,
as
ms
bars
noted,
the
the
change
with
the
last
waiver
being
tied
to
a
plan,
condition
that
will
require
these
to
be
fee.
Simple
lots,
further
discussing
the
requests,
as
stated
it's
four
duplexes,
these
duplexes
fit
on
50
foot
lots
by
right.
If
this
was
the
euclidean
rezoning.
Q
These
are
the
units
we
wanted
to
build
and
we
could
have
built
them
by
right
under
euclidean,
but
that
didn't
provide
the
protection
that
the
council
was
concerned
with.
Additionally
alley
access
is
provided
so
that
the
impact
to
the
neighborhood
to
the
north
is
further
mitigated
and
to
provide
a
bit
of
buffer
between
the
commercial
uses
or
across
the
alley.
Q
Further
discussing
the
request,
I'm
anticipating
that
the
biggest
concern
today
is
going
to
be
compatibility,
and
so
we're
going
to
discuss
that
in
the
next
number
of
slides.
But
the
elevations
that
we
propose
are
compatible
because
they're
they're
very
similar,
in
fact
they're
nearly
identical
to
the
massing
and
bulk
of
nearby
development
and
that
nearby
development
is
the
new
trend
in
the
neighborhood.
Q
The
picture
you
have
here
is
not
in
a
rendering.
This
is
an
actual
constructed
site.
That's
built
with
the
same
plans.
You
can
see
exactly
what
you're
getting
with
what
we're
proposing
here
today,
so
discussing
consistency
for
the
next
few
slides.
We'll
start
with
the
consistency
you
know,
via
the
text
and
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
you
already
hear,
from
staff
found
it
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
for
a
number
of
land
use,
objectives
and
policies.
Q
Some
that
I
found
pertinent
were
land
use,
subjective,
93,
land
use,
objective,
212
and
housing
objectives,
one
three
and
one
three,
four,
two
one
two
I
wanna
quote
because
it
encourages
the
use
of
limited
land
resources
more
efficiently
and
pursue
development
pattern
that
is
more
economically
sound
by
encouraging
infill
on
vacant
underutilized
sites
and
a
vacant
site.
Zoned
rs
50
in
the
umu
mixed
use.
Q
Category
fits
that
definition
perfectly
and
additionally,
as
noted
here,
128
asks
the
new
development
to
promote
a
range
of
uses
in
close
proximity
to
each
other,
to
include
not
limited
to
mixed
density
housing
with
a
variety
of
housing
options,
and
what
this
proposes
is
a
a
different
housing
option
on
the
periphery
of
a
neighborhood
in
a
higher
land
use
category
than
the
center
of
that
neighborhood.
And
so
we
focused
on
on
those
portions
of
the
comp
plan
for
our
proposal.
Q
Also
discussing
consistency
with
land
development
code,
one
thing
not
on
the
slide
that
we'll
come
to
later
is
that
the
this
plan
is
developable
without
any
any
special
waivers.
If
you
go
in
euclidean,
the
land
development
code
also
specifically
for
the
umu
60
category,
doesn't
allow
large
lot
single
family
detach
and
discourages
single
family
detached
and
smaller
lots.
Q
The
the
language
category
really
wants
the
the
minimum
density
to
be
for
multi-family
uses,
and
it
wants
multi-family
uses
in
general
in
this
land-use
category,
shifting
away
from
the
text
compatibility
and
discussing
compatibility
as
it
pertains
to
the
pattern
of
development
in
the
neighborhood,
the
massing
in
bulk
is
nearly
identical
to
new
nearby
development
and,
as
I've
already
stated,
these
plans
work
without
work
by
write
in
rm
categories.
Q
That's
that's
more
compatible
than
single
family
detached
in
this
location
and
you'll,
hear
me
say
this
again
later,
but
this
backs
up
to
commercial
uses
and
it
is
more
compatible
to
put
a
multi-family
duplex
next
to
commercial
uses
than
it
is
or
single
family
detached,
and
that
is
amplified
when
that
multi-family
duplex
use
goes
in
between
single
family,
detached
and
commercial
and
then
the
two
waivers
that
are
mentioned
we
will
discuss,
but
they
don't
they
don't
impact
compatibility
so
now
getting
to
some
visuals
for
the
massive
bulk
and
really
you
know
the
the
bulk
of
the
evidence
as
to
this
fitting
with
the
development
pattern.
Q
What
you
have
on
the
left
council
is
the
the
closest
house
to
the
property
across
north
a
and
what
you
have
on
the
right
is
the
the
proposed
property
you
can
see.
The
massing
steel
is
nearly
identical
as
I've
suggested
and
if
you
look
at
the
development
pattern
of
that
block
and
these
all
being
new
homes
in
the
neighborhood
that
development
pattern
continues
all
the
way
north.
Q
In
the
block
such
that
this
mass
and
bulk
and
separation
that
we're
proposing
exists
as
the
new
development
pattern
in
the
neighborhood,
you
can
see
the
same
block
from
from
the
other
side
so
that
you
take
a
quick
look
there
and
I'll
move
to
the
next
slide.
Q
But
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
can
see
it
well
and
then
to
give
orientation
for
you
all
to
understand.
How
close
this
really
is.
The
block
that
I
pictured
is
there
in
pink
and
then
the
property
there
in
green.
So
it
fits
in
very,
very
well
development
pattern
and
that's
why
we
have
proposed
these
duplex
uses
further
compatibility
from
from
massing
in
bulk
perspective.
Q
This
example
here
this
is
the
same
type
of
development
built
on
203,
south
albany
avenue,
and
this
was
built
in
an
rm
zoning
district
under
euclidean
rights,
and
it's
actually
an
excellent
example
because
to
the
right
you
have
a
commercial
use
and
to
the
left,
you
have
single
family
detached
and
so
we're
talking
about
a
transitional
use
nearly
identical
to
what
we're
proposing.
Q
Obviously,
there
are
additional
lots
in
our
application,
but
the
the
limitation
in
the
mass
and
bulk
are
are
the
same,
such
that
you
don't
have
a
monolithic
building
and
you
don't
have
you
don't
have
an
incompatible
use
just
discussing
the
intermediate
use
with
a
visual
here,
the
the
property
having
the
commercial
uses
on
the
on
the
south
side
across
the
alley.
Q
This
transitional
use
makes
it
more
compatible
than
single
family
detached
because,
typically,
the
goal
is
to
not
have
single
family
detached
against
commercial
uses,
so
you
want
some
sort
of
use
buffer,
whether
that
be
a
less
intense
commercial
use
or
typically
a
multi-family
use
and
right
here
on
the
kennedy
corridor
near
transit
is
in
a
umu
category
that
wants
more
density.
This
is
the
the
you
know
the
best
place
to
have
that
additional
density.
Q
What's
also
worth
noting
here
is
that
this
is
on
the
periphery
of
the
opher
park,
and
so
it's
not
just
a
transitional
use
from
what's
existing
there
today,
but
it'll
it'll
stay
that
way,
because
the
perimeter
of
the
neighborhood
will
remain
consistent
based
on
the
land
use
categories,
the
two
waivers,
the
first
one
is
to
pay
into
the
street
trust
fund.
Q
We
actually
worked
with
natural
resources
staff
and
have
a
finding
of
consistency,
and
so
this
just
has
to
do
with
the
the
fact
that
the
site
is
old
and
and
not
developed,
and
so
we
have
to
work
with
staff
to
develop
the
with
those
trees
under
the
code,
and
we
presented
evidence
that
staff
has
accepted
to
make
us
consistent
and
the
other
waiver.
This
is
the
same
waiver
that
you
saw
earlier
tonight
on
rec
2108,
which
you
all
approved.
Q
This
waiver
is
a
duplex
design
standard,
so
so
that
application
was
a
duplex
use
and
what
the
duplex
design
standard
asks
for
is.
Basically,
it
wants
a
place
to
park
a
car
and,
in
the
other,
rezoning
application,
no
garage
was
provided.
No
carport
was
provided
in
our
application.
We're
not
asking
to
waive
that
requirement.
What
we're
asking
to
wave
is
that
it
be
detached
instead
of
attached.
Q
The
reason
for
that
is
for
one
we
think
it's
a
better
development,
but
but,
more
importantly,
it's
a
better
development
in
this
location,
because
the
detached
use
will
create
a
buffer.
If,
if
the
garage
was
attached
to
the
back
of
the
house,
the
backyard
would
have
butt
the
alley
and
those
commercial
uses
directly
by
putting
the
garage
in
between
the
primary
unit
and
the
and
the
alley
and
those
commercial
uses.
The
backyard
is
buffered
so
that
they
can
be
enjoyed
by
the
family
members
with
a
little
bit
of
extra.
Q
Yeah,
so
I'm
gonna
talk
about
opposition
on
the
next
slide.
Actually,
chairman
and
the
property
is
also
over
parked,
so
we
have
had
opposition
at
this
application
and
previous
application,
and
what
we
primarily
heard
from
the
neighborhood
was
that
they
don't
want
this
used
to
start
taking
over
their
neighborhood
and
we
had
a
lot
of
opposition
and-
and
we
also
heard
that
we
don't
want
townhomes.
Q
We
think
that
the
pd
mitigates
those
risks
and
we
also
have
some
opposition
that
just
doesn't
want
this
to
be
changed
from
a
single
family
zoning,
but
but
the
confidence
essential
evidence
is
that
that's
preferred
by
the
comp
plan
and
zoning
code.
We
have
a
pd
that
doesn't
allow
town
homes
that
should
satisfy
that
issue
and
we
provided
a
development,
that's
similar
in
bulk
and
size.
Q
As
far
as
free
of
creep
is
concerned,
I'll
go
quick
here.
Council,
you
all
control
the
future
land
use.
This
is
the
only
property
on
the
periphery
that
can
be
developed
with
these
uses.
If
you
go
into
the
neighborhood,
it's
all
r10
r10
doesn't
allow
any
future
or
any
multi-family
uses.
It
would
require
a
future
language
to
have
change.
Q
You
all
would
have
great
discretion
with
that,
because
it's
a
it's
a
legislative
action
that
you're
aware
of
that's
different
than
the
quasi
judicial
action
we
have
here
so
in
conclusion,
pde
plan
provided
in
response
to
counsel
limits
the
uses
to
duplexes
the
waivers,
don't
impact
compatibility
and
the
council
has
understood
that,
because
they've
approved
the
same
waivers
this
evening.
Transitional
use
that's
more
compatible
than
single
family
detached
and
provides
the
diverse
housing
that
the
city
needs
and
with
that
I'll
I'll
ask.
If
there's
any
questions.
B
G
T
T
My
name
is
john
diorio,
I'm
speaking
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
oakwood
park
community
as
their
current
president,
and
I'm
also
speaking
to
you
as
a
long-time
member
of
this
community
as
a
near
20-year
teacher
at
hp,
plant
high
school
as
someone
who
understands
the
importance
of
strong
neighborhoods
of
strong
communities
and
strong
families,
and
this
is
why
we've
continued
to
come
here
to
discuss
this
issue
with
you,
because
we
strongly
as
a
neighborhood,
oppose
multi-family
units
being
built
within
a
neighborhood
that
is
almost
entirely
single-family
homes,
as
I
present
this
to
you,
you'll
see
from
the
breakdown
from
the
gis
map
from
the
appraisers
website
that
we
are
near
90
single-family
homes,
and
we
want
to
keep
it
that
way
that
this
is
not
something
that
as
a
neighborhood
as
a
whole,
we
support
that's
not
something
that
we
want
to
be
a
part
of
our
neighborhood
for
the
safety
and
security
of
the
neighborhood.
T
For
yes,
the
fear
of
the
creep,
but
more
so
all
the
other
issues
that
it's
going
to
bring.
We
know
that
tampa
is
growing
and
changing,
and
with
that
we
know
the
importance
of
strong
neighborhoods.
We
hear
mary
talk
about
it.
We
hear
you
all
talk
about
it
all
the
time
and
that's
why
we're
here
to
reach
out
for
your
support
to
maintain
the
strength
and
safety
of
our
neighborhoods
and
that's
why
we're
here?
That's
with
the
growth
it
brings
changes,
and
we
know
that
we've
seen
the
changes
already
in
oakford
park.
T
We
see
it
consistently
with
old
homes
being
knocked
down
with
with
parcels
being
split,
new
homes
being
built
all
the
time
on
the
perimeter.
Just
like
this
one.
We
see
it
on
cass
street
we've
seen
it
on
heims
we've
seen
it
on
mcdill.
We
see
it
further
down
on
north
a
yet.
This
is
the
only
one
that
doesn't
want
to
continue
and
build
on
the
consistency
of
our
neighborhood
with
single-family
homes
and
has
a
strong
desire
to
change
that,
and
we
simply
don't
want
that
change.
T
T
It's
not
the
look
that
matters
it's
who
we
are
that
matters,
and
it's
and
again
it's
the
single
family
home
aspect
that
matters
more
on
top
of
the
issues
of
the
parking
they
mention
the
alley
in
the
increased
parking.
While
it
looks
good
on
paper,
we
all
know
practically,
that's
not
what's
going
to
happen.
They're
going
to
be
parking
in
the
street.
North
ay
is
narrow.
This
neighborhood
simply
isn't
built
for
that
kind
of
traffic.
Where
are
they
going
to
park?
T
They're
going
to
go
up
north
woodland
they're
going
to
be
on
all
those
single-family
homes
that
they
showed
and
their
slides
I'm
for
I'm
one
of
those
homes
they
that
they
showed
I'm
four
houses
away
from
this,
where
our
kids
go
out
in
front
and
play
every
single
day
now.
You're
gonna
have
eight
units,
eight
families,
that
much
more
traffic
coming
down
our
street
because
they
have
nowhere
else
to
go,
there's
not
anywhere
for
them
to
park
they're
going
to
either
be
cutting
through
a
krispy
kreme
or
trying
to
jam
into
an
alley.
T
It's
not
going
to
work
they're
going
to
be
out
on
north
a
they're
going
to
be
backing
up
cars
in
north
woodland.
This
is
not
going
to
fit
into
our
neighborhood,
it's
not
going
to
work.
We
know
this.
We
see
this
coming
and
that's.
Why
we're
here
to
oppose
this
and,
more
importantly,
we
had
the
opportunity
recently
to
sit
down
with
representatives
and
with
mr
morris,
the
landowner,
who
very
honestly
and
candidly
told
us
that
his
sole
purpose
for
doing
this
is
to
pad
his
retirement.
T
He
could
easily
build
four
single-family
homes,
he
simply
doesn't
care,
and
I
respect
that
great
everyone
wants
to
make
a
little
more
in
their
retirement,
but
thank
you
at
what
cost
right
at
our
cost
as
a
neighborhood
as
a
families,
it
shouldn't
come
at
our
cost.
N
N
Then
the
reason
for
this
is
that
we
want
to
preserve
the
single
family
homes
and
nature
of
this
neighborhood.
The
concerns
about
the
president
that
it
may
set,
if
approved,
for
future
development
and
the
impact
of
the
neighborhood
from
an
operational
and
physical
infrastructural
standpoint
as
a
neighborhood
association,
our
vision
and
goals
include
remaining
single-family
detached
homes.
As
the
current
90
majority
of
oakridge
park's
residential
dwellings
are
our
vision
and
goals
align
with
the
city
of
tampa's
plans
as
follows:
develop
community
plans
for
those
areas
of
the
city
expected
to
experience
significant
growth.
N
Each
plan
should
reflect
the
neighborhood's
history
character.
Current
conditions
needs
values,
visions
and
goals.
Oakford
park.
Neighborhood
is
history.
Is
a
single
family
detached
homes,
our
character
is
single-family
detached
homes.
Our
current
condition
is
91
single-family
detached
homes.
Our
vision
and
goals
are
to
remain
single-family.
Detached
homes
maintain
the
character
of
single-family
residential
areas
and
discourage
the
demolition
of
single-family
residences
into
place
and
displacement
of
residents
in
a
way
that
encourages
rehabilitation
and
provides
housing
opportunities
throughout
the
city.
The
character
of
single-family
areas
includes
use
development
and
density
characteristics
oakford
park.
N
Furthermore,
with
the
growth
seen
across
the
tampa
area,
single-family
neighborhoods
are
becoming
less
common.
Oakford
park
grows
more
unique
and
special
as
a
majority.
Single-Family
neighborhood
with
more
multi-unit
family
developments
across
tampa.
We
request
to
preserve
oakford
park,
neighborhoods
specialness
as
a
detached
single-family
home
zone,
as
it
aligns
with
the
city
of
tampa
2040
comprehensive
plan,
page
171,
honoring
residents,
sense
of
identity
and
belonging
and
respect
differences
to
help
neighborhoods
neighborhoods
become
part
of
a
socially
cohesive
region.
N
Residents
n
know
who
we
are
and
how
we
work
together,
so
that
their
participation
is
essential
to
define
the
needs
of
the
city's
diverse
neighborhoods.
The
city
will
help
residents
preserve
their
specialness
and
will
not
use
a
one-size-fits-all
approach
to
community
planning
and
development.
Thank
you,
gentlemen.
R
O
R
R
R
My
grandmother
came
here
shortly
after
that
my
parents
bought
a
home
and
built
a
home
in
this
neighborhood
in
1960,
as
a
newspaper
boy
in
in
the
late
60s
and
early
70s
walked
into
wtvt
when
we
delivered
to
to
them
as
well.
That
was
part
of
our
neighborhood,
the
adjacent
building
to
wtvt
used
to
be
a
doctor's
office.
R
I
don't
know
if
you've
been
to
krispy
kreme
lately,
but
if
you,
if
you
go
through
that
alleyway
and
you
start
to
have
a
large
development
like
that
right
behind
them,
it's
just
going
to
create
congestion
and
it's
difficult
enough
already
with
macdill
and
kennedy,
and
and
that's
just
that
surrounding
that
circle
of
a
block.
S
M
Andrew
aubrey
3612
west
carmen
street
this.
T
M
The
third
time
that
I
appear
before
you
guys
on
this
property.
I
was
the
past
president
of
oakford
park
and
I'm
just
here
to
also
voice
my
opposition
with
this
property
and
and
the
way
that
it's
been
going.
The
last
time
we
had
a
situation
similar
to
this
was
in
2015.
M
We
worked
for
three
years
with
the
property
owner
to
find
a
solution,
and
that
was
the
last
time
we
actually
rezoned
something
in
oakford
park
for
higher
density,
but
we
worked
again
with
that
property
only
for
three
years
and
we
came
here
to
support
it.
What
we
cannot
do
with
this
project
is
support
it
when
somebody
that
lives
out
of
state
wants
to
just
profit
on
the
backs
of
the
people
that
live
here.
As
you
can
see
on
this,
this
chart
over
here
that
was
taken
from
the
gis.
M
C
O
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight.
My
name
is
john
samaha.
My
property
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
property
up
for
rezoning
on
the
east
side
at
3106,
west
north
a
street
I've
owned
and
operated
this
property
for
over
30
years.
It's
my
business
address
in
that
time.
30
years
in
oakford
park,
I've
watched
this
neighborhood
grow
and
blossom,
and
I'm
truly
excited
to
see
the
direction
that
it's
headed
with
the
single
family
homes.
I
see
families
out
walking
their
dogs
jogging
strolling,
their
kids
walking
their
kids
to
school.
O
There's
been
a
dramatic
change
in
this
neighborhood
and
it
is
supported
by
families
owning
single-family
residences
and,
in
all
difference
to
kevin,
making
analogies
to
the
bulk
and
mass
of
a
home.
That's
right
across
the
street
from
the
property
in
question.
The
difference
here
is
that
that
home
is
owned
by
the
person
who
lives
in
it,
not
a
renter,
not
a
developer,
and
so
there's
a
big
difference,
and
this
neighborhood
is
so
I'm
sorry.
O
I
oppose
this
rezoning
and
I
believe
it's
not
consistent
with
the
character
or
future
evoke
her
heart,
and
you
know
what
we've
all
heard
this
saying.
If,
at
first
you
don't
succeed,
try
try
again,
maybe
try,
try,
try
again.
First,
it
was
rm12
that
was
rs.
You
know
to
go
to
rm
18.
Now
it's
pd.
Where
will
this
end?
You
know
at
some
point:
we've
got
to
decide
what
we
want
in
this
neighborhood,
and
I
cannot.
O
My
hope
is
that
this
property
gets
developed
and
gets
developed
according
to
the
current
zoning,
which
is
rs50,
and
we
could
get
four
new
families
in
this
neighborhood.
That
would
add
to
the
content
and
character
of
the
neighborhood
people
who
would
address
their
homes
from
the
north,
a
street,
not
the
alley
and
be
part
of
the
community.
Why
is
it
so
difficult?
O
O
But
this
neighborhood
is
flourishing
in
the
way
that
is
currently
comprised
and
zoned,
and
I
implore
you
to
please
deny
this
request
and
let's
get
four
nice
family
homes
on
these
properties
and
move
on,
because
this
is
a
great
neighborhood,
it's
growing
and
it's
flourishing
and
the
rental
units
that
you're
proposing
will
not
add
in
any
way
to
this
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
C
Q
Thank
you
chairman
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
cross-examine
jennifer
malone.
If
I
could
please
jennifer
you
available.
Q
Ms
malone,
are,
you
are
a
certified
planner?
Is
that
correct?
That
is
script?
You
are
an
expert,
a
staff
member
on
planning
principles,
correct.
C
D
T
Q
Q
Council,
the
the
proposal
here
has
competent
substantial
evidence
that
the
use
is
compatible.
The
bulking
and
mass
is
compatible.
It's
nearly
identical
to
what's
around
the
code
and
the
comprehensive
plan
both
prefer
a
duplex
use
over
single
family
detached
it's,
a
transitional
use
which
the
comprehensive
plan
prefers.
Q
The
the
opposition
discussed
91
single-family
detached,
but
this
is
on
the
periphery
in
a
different
land
use
category
than
the
entirety
of
roper
park.
So
the
comprehensive
plan
expects
this
transitional
use.
The
evidence
offered
by
the
opposition
is
speculation
or
opposing
change.
Opposing
change
isn't
competent,
substantial
evidence.
General
claims
about
traffic
is
not
competent,
substantial
evidence.
Q
The
the
property
is
over
parked
by
78
according
to
the
code,
as
ali
access
is
compatible,
and
if
you
deny
this,
then
you
all
will
be
setting
this
property
up
to
where
a
umu
property,
the
only
use
available,
is
single
family
detached.
Thank
you.
B
Finished,
sir,
any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
close
citrus
move.
I
think
mr
pierre
was
second
all
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
granted.
Mr
cross,
would
you
like
to
take
this
one.
B
All
right
anyone
else
care
to
take
this
item.
T
Here
I
move
an
ordinance
well
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
general
vicinity
of
3112
and
3116
west
north
a
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs50
residential
single
family
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
semi-detached,
providing
an
effective
date
as
the
applicant
has
met
its
proof.
T
D
B
B
O
O
For
the
property
located
at
3112
and
3116
west
north
a
street
due
to
the
failure
of
the
applicant
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
has
conditioned
and
shown
in
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
city
code
and
the
applicant's
failure
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof.
With
respect
to
requested
waivers,
and
particularly
in
particular,
proposed
development
has
shown.
The
site
plan
does
not
promote
and
encourage
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location
character.
O
A
Development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
proposed
use
does
not
promote
the
efficient,
substantial
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
Also,
if
there's
any
waivers,
the
need
to
desire
for
waivers
necessarily
support.
The
fact
that
the
development
proposed
developed
is
not
appropriate
for
the
site
and
does
not
comply
with
a
land
development
code.
The
applicant
did
not
provide
evidence
that
the
proposed
sign
is
unique
in
order
to
justify
the
waivers.
C
B
C
D
Thank
you,
martin
shelby
city
council
attorney
and
I
believe
the
council
members
were
sighting
to
section
27-136
and
with
regard
to
the
waivers,
they
were
slighting
to
section
27-139.
C
E
L
Okay,
so,
as
annie
stated,
this
is
21-35
we're
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
in
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
I
will
be
briefed
because
I
believe
that
the
planning
commission
has
made
many
put
more
than
one
presentation
on
this
item,
because
I
know
it's
been
continued
a
couple
times.
Robert
gardner
robert
c
gardner
park
is
located
directly
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
we're
in
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
The
surrounding
area
is
characterized
by
a
mixture
of
housing
types
and
some
commercials.
L
The
adopted
future
landish
is
residential
35
to
the
east.
That
green
color
is
recreational
open
space.
That's
the
park
that
I
pointed
out.
This
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
we've
reviewed
each
site
plan
to
come
in
with
all
of
the
changes
that
have
come
each
time
and
and
it's
still
consistent.
L
The
the
surrounding
area
is
developed
predominantly
with
single-family
detached
residential
units,
but
the
residential
35
is
within
the
surrounding
area
and
allows
more
than
just
the
single
family
detached
if
approved
the
subject
site
will
have
an
overall
density
of
21
dwelling
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
35
return.
Land
use
designation,
it's
also
within
the
tampa
heights.
Urban
village
and
the
plan
states
that
these
open
villages
are
where
it
should
direct
the
greatest
share
of
growth.
So,
in
short,
we
found
that
it
would.
L
The
pd
would
provide
a
development
pattern
that
would
be
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
existing
development
pattern,
while
also
being
consistent
with
the
long
term
pattern
anticipated
under
the
residential
35
future
land
use
designation
and
will
cause
no
adverse
impacts
on
the
surrounding
nucleus.
I'm
available
for
questions.
Thank
you
so
much.
G
E
All
right,
great
again,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
2302
north
highland
avenue,
from
rm24
to
ped
plan
development
to
allow
villain
with
residential
multi-family
uses.
E
The
applicant
is
requesting
four
waivers,
as
shown
on
the
screen
here
shown
here
is
an
arrow
map
of
the
this
or
the
ceramic
or
the
of
the
subject:
property
and
the
surrounding
zoning.
The
subject
site
is
approximately
9940
square
feet
in
size.
E
Setbacks
are
as
follows:
north
three
feet:
south
60,
east
25
feet
in
west
18
feet
on
the
first
floor
and
10
feet
on
the
upper
floors.
Vehicular
access
to
the
parcel
is
from
park
avenue
in
an
alley
on
the
west
side
of
the
parcel.
E
The
property
is
surrounded
by
rm24.
Zoning
to
the
north
and
south
of
property
is
single-family.
Residential
uses
to
the
west
is
vacant
land
and
to
the
east
is
a
city
park
shown
here
as
part
of
the
site
plan.
Again,
the
proposed
project
is
for
residential
multi-family
building.
There
are
five
units
proposed.
Maximum
principal
building.
Height
is
38
feet,
not
including
roof
access.
E
Here's
property
sell
the
site
as
well
as
north
of
the
site
again
north
and
east
of
the
site
as
well,
and
development,
review
and
client
staff
has
read
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request.
Inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tml
land
development
code.
Modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet,
proving
the
application,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
R
Her
yes,
sir,
I
have
been
sworn
in
since
this
was
last
heard.
In
august,
we've
worked
very
closely
with
the
homeowner
association,
develop
a
plan
which
was
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
and
consistent
with
their
objections
that
they
previously
had
and
concerns.
Regarding
this
particular
development.
R
R
R
R
R
We
have
found
at
least
the
staff
has
found.
The
planning
commission
continues
to
find
it
consistent.
However,
some
of
the
changes
that
the
neighborhood
association
wanted
has
made
the
city
side
of
our
equation,
made
it
inconsistent
previously.
Our
other
petition
was
consistent
with
both
the
city
and
the
planning
commission.
R
R
The
neighbor
to
the
north
here
has
filed
a
letter
that
I
have
with
me
indicating
that
they
have
no
objection
and
the
homeowner
association
will
be
presenting
their
own
report
to
you
momentarily,
but
we're
very
happy
to
say
that
we've
worked
very
closely
with
them
over
an
extended
period
of
time
to
refine
this
plan
and
come
back
to
you
with
something
that
is,
we
believe
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
it
is.
It
maintains
the
correct
urban
and
human
scale
that
was
proposed.
R
It's
efficient
use
of
land
resources,
it
strengthens
the
neighborhood
commitment,
it
recognizes
historic
development
pattern,
it's
efficient
use
of
the
alley
and
the
approaches
for
the
access
it
recognizes
the
traditional
uses
in
the
area.
It
supports
the
urban
village
concept,
as
the
planning
commission
has
pointed
out,
is
compatible
in
size
and
scale
it
integrates
compatible
uses.
R
It
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant,
land
and
underutilized
properties,
and
it
ensures
that
adequate
housing
for
future
demand
development
and
land
land
projects
so
anyway,
we're
pleased
to
come
back
to
you
with
a
site
plan
and
one
which
we
find
is
compatible
and
one
which
the
neighborhood
association
has
been
fully
engaged
in
in
developing
it
with
us,
and
with
that.
I
would
respectfully
turn
this
over
to
to
the
comments
from
the
neighborhood
and
I'll
be
happy
to
to
respond
to
any
comments
that
they
may
have.
R
G
P
D
If
we
just
ask
the
the
applicant,
if
they
could
just
step
outside
until
it's
time
for
a
bottle,
please
thank
you
and
sir.
If
you
could
just
the
gentleman
behind,
if
you
could
just
wait
until
the
gentleman
is
done.
Thank
you.
N
I
know
we're
all
eager
to
get
out
of
here
this
evening.
Councilman.
Thank
you
again
for
the
opportunity
to
address
you
tonight.
Brian
seal
313
west
park
avenue,
president
of
the
tampa
heights,
civic
association,
and
I
have
been
sworn
the
civic
association
has
removed
our
prior
opposition
to
this
project.
N
Mr
mickelini
referenced
that
following
our
prior
opposition
when
the
continuance
was
granted,
they
did
meet
with
us
thoroughly
and
worked
on
many
of
the
objections
to
which
the
neighborhood
had
which
we
found
inconsistent
with
our
neighborhood
plan
and
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
zoning
code
and
the
historic
character
of
tampa
heights
development
pattern.
That
includes
moving
the
vehicular
access
to
the
existing
alley.
N
Increasing
the
front
setback
addressing
how
the
south
elevation
of
the
new
structure
addresses
the
public
right-of-way
from
a
pedestrian
safety
and
pedestrian
access
standpoint,
and
I
may
I
will
admit
there
are
several
things
that
folks
are
still
have.
Some
division
on
the
neighborhood
association
did
not
vote
to
support
it
outright,
but
did
vote
to
move,
remove
the
opposition
and
appreciate
the
applicant's
willingness
to
take
our
comments
into
consideration
and
work
towards
something
that
is
more
appropriate
to
the
neighborhood
and
works
towards
that
development
pattern
that
we
find
appropriate.
C
I
stay
directly
across
the
street
from
the
property,
that's
requesting
the
zoning
I
know,
and
I'm
here
to
oppose
the
the
application
to
rezone
the
property
I
met
with
the
applicant
this
morning,
azam
we,
we
know
each
other
on
a
first
name
basis
and
I
wouldn't
say
we're
buddy
buddies,
but
we're
cordial
to
each
other.
C
C
R
They
wanted
us
to
move
those
driveways
and
move
the
garages
off
a
park
and
put
the
building
facade
facing
park
so
that
it
had
the
same
look
instead
of
the
garages
being
out
there.
So
we
did
the
best
that
we
could
do
and,
as
I
said,
that
the
waivers
that
we
have
a
result
of
of
relocating
those
garages
and
driveways
to
the
alleyway
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
more
questions
you
might
have.
But
we're
respectfully
requesting
your
approval.
B
F
21-35
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
or
as
rezoning
the
property
of
the
general
vicinity
of
2302
north
highland
avenue
in
the
city
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
describing
section
1
from
the
sony
district
classification,
rm
24
residential
multifamily
to
pd
planned
development,
residential
multi-family,
providing
an
effective
date,
as
the
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof,
and
this
is
with
the
waivers
and
the
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading
under
excuse
me.
The
density
proposed
by
the
development
has
not
exceeded
the
density
anticipated
under
the
future
land
use
categories
compatible.
F
C
R
D
T
Yes,
sir,
just
really
quick.
If
I
may,
I
want
to
withdraw
a
motion
I
made
a
couple
weeks
ago
on
that
whole
pension
issue,
and
I
there
was
an
add-on
specifically
to
that
with
having
our
state
representatives
come
to
us.
You
know
it
appears
from
further
looking
at
this
issue
that
this
is
something
that
can
be
handled
on
a
council
member
by
council
member
basis
with
the
administration
at
this
time,
but
especially,
you
know
getting
folks
in
just
too
many
entanglements,
and
I
wish
to
withdraw.
B
I'm
going
to
say
a
few
words
on
that,
mr
vera.
Yes,
sir,
a
person
who
knows
about
the
pension
very
well,
I
did
receive
some
phone
calls
on
that
issue
and
I
think
the
pension
board
kind
of
got
this
council's
a
word
of
encouragement
to
look
at
some
of
the
processes,
and
I
think
that's
very
noble
to
do
that
versus
going
sing
a
letter
to
the
state
and
ask
them
to
look
into
the
process
and
knowing
the
fire
department
and
police
they're
going
to
kind
of
look
at
making
some
changes
from
my
understanding.
B
So
with
that
we'll
entertain
a
second
to
withdraw
the
motion.
O
I
I've
had
one
or
more
of
the
folks
who
came
before
us
say
that
they're
still
having
problems
and
they're
still
calling
us,
so
whoever
is
in
charge
of
it.
Please
we.
We
had
an
open
discussion
about
this
a
couple
months
ago
and
we
still
have
people
who
you
know
put
their
lives
at
risk
for
us
and
they're
still
having
problems
getting
their
their
their
funding.
But
there
are
things
that
we
can't
do
legally,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
treat
them
with
respect.
Thank
you
and.
B
I
didn't
get
a
call
from
the
pension
president
chairman
I've
got.
I
received
a
call
from
the
union
president
that
say
that
they
are
actually
working
to
make
some
changes
and
hopefully
they'll
bring
those
changes
to
us
just
to
let
us
know
what
they're,
what
the
what
they're
doing
what
they
have
planned.
B
I
know
mr
citro
is
over
the
public
safety
committee.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
add
anything
to
that.
F
Not
at
this
time,
but
I'm
agreeing
with
councilman
vera
that
that
we
will
be
informed
council
person
by
council
person.
T
T
I
think
that's
so
important,
but
unfortunately,
as
as
I
think,
councilman
carlson
said-
and
I
agree
with
this-
that
the
the
methods
that
city
council
has
to
formally
look
at
this
issue
are
inapplicable
and
and
put
us
in,
and
I
don't
want
to
use
the
word
trouble,
but
but
certainly
acting
outside
of
scope
and
the
most
effective
way
is
one
on
one,
and
I
certainly
have
been
doing
that,
and
I
know
we
all
will
do
that,
because
that
is
a
real
pressing
issue.
That
is
a
real
pressing
issue.
T
It's
there's
a.
There
appears
to
be
a
significant
gap
between
a
time
when
an
employee
or
a
first
responder
could
qualify
for
benefits
and
then
when
they
get
a
determination
from
the
board,
like
I
said,
I
think
we
need
more
case
nurse
case
managers
and
folks
who
can
push
this
along
to
get
determinations
on
on
disability,
from
the
authorized,
treating
doctors
but
but
again,
things
that
are
probably
outside
of
our
scope
and
would
just
you
know
not
work
effectively.
I
think,
but
I.
B
Say
that
with
regular
I
was,
I
would
agree,
mr
vera,
as
far
as
the
state
concerned,
the
way
that
the
state
handles
the
pension,
I
would
say
some
of
the
other
issues
that
were
raised
as
it
relates
to
also
not
only
police
and
fire,
but
also
right
to
general
employees,
sure
are
hr
issues
and
contractual
issues,
so
those
things
kind
of
are
in
our
approval
to
look
at
when
those
contracts
come
to
us
in
the
near
future.
So
I
would
say
we
look.
B
We
have
two
different
items
that
we're
looking
at,
but
I
know
the
state
item
is
something
that
may
not
be
in
our
purview,
but
I'm
glad
that
they're
all
looking
at
it
together
to
make
sure
it's
good
for
our
public
safety
workers
out
there,
because
I
do
know
people
people
get
hurt
so
with
that.
Well,
mr
maniscalco
gave
a
second
on
that
to
withdraw
all
in
favor.
T
T
I
moved
for
february,
8th
accommodation
to
gentlemen.
Many
of
us
know:
matt
nasif,
n-a-s-s-I-f
otherwise
known
as
joe
foto
for
february,
8th
the
recommendations
for
his
10
years
in
business.
N
C
I
have
a
motion
I'd
like
to
present
a
commendation
off-site
to
an
event
called
italy
expo
at
the
sons
of
italy,
and
this
will
be
on
february
5th,
which
would
be
a
saturday.
I
believe
it
will
be
in
conjunction
with
the
mayor
for
her
schedule
permitting
she'll
do
the
proclamation
I'll,
do
the
commendation
and
that'll
be,
of
course
off-site
and
it's
open
to
the
public.
So.
C
In
coming,
it's
to
showcase,
it's
vince
pardo,
who
was
with
the
city
for
many
years,
had
requested
this,
so
it'll
be
showcasing
products
from
italy,
all
sorts
of
stuff
and
and
whatnot.
So
that's
my
emotion.
E
B
O
This
morning
I
made
two
motions
at
the
end
of
the
cra
meeting
and,
and
miss
van
loan
said
that
I
need
to
make
the
same
motions
at
city
council.
So
unless
you
all
check
I'll,
just
read
it,
I
just
turned
this
the
words
around,
so
it
says
city,
staff
and
cra
and
said
the
other
way
around.
O
I
first
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
request
that
city
staff
collaborate
with
the
cra
and
work
with
friends
of
tampa
union
station
potentially
create
a
short-term
lease
that
would
enable
the
cra
to
save
time
and
money
by
outsourcing
renovations
to
friends
of
tampa
union
station
consistent
or
similar
to
the
friends
of
tampa
union
station
agreement
with
hillsborough
county
following
standard
legal
guidelines.
Second,.
B
Second
by
mr
central
all
in
favor,
any
opposed
motion
granted.
O
Thank
you
second
one.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
ask
that
city
staff
work
with
cra
to
request
that
friends
of
tampa
union
station
develop
a
concept
plan
and
cost
estimates
for
renovations
required
at
tampa
union
station
to
add
the
coffee
shop
and
co-work
space
additionally
request
that
city
staff,
cra
and
friends
of
tampa
union
station
report
back
to
the
cra
board
at
march
10
meeting
on
the
updated
budget
and
timeline
with
the
intent
to
save
time
and
money
while
limiting
disruption
at
the
station.
B
F
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chair.
I'd
like
to
present
the
accommodation
posthumously
to
miss
adele
sandra
burnette.
She
came
to
the
bay
area
back
in
1957.
F
She
was
employed
with
the
university
of
south
florida
for
many
years,
associate
comptroller
in
finance
and
accounting
afterwards,
a
daily
work
with
the
moffitt
candice
cancer
center
as
the
director
of
finance.
Sadly,
she
lost
her
battle
with
pancreatic
cancer
october
19
2021,
her
legacy
is
living
on.
Her
estate
has
given
to
many
many
charitable
causes:
big
brothers,
big
sisters,
boys
and
girls
club
cure
camp
kids,
cancer
feeding,
tampa
bay,
humane
society,
metropolitan
ministries.
F
But
more
importantly,
we
have
seen
the
great
things
that
she
has
done
for
the
tampa
firefighter
rescue.
We
saw
last
accommodations.
She
presented
a
thousand
dollars
each
the
firefighters
in
the
quarter
for
charities
in
their
name.
I
would
like
to
have
present
this
to
mr
simon
canassi,
who
is
the
executor
of
her
estate,
and
I
would
like
to
do
that
on
march,
8th
2022.
A
Right,
I
have
very,
I
have
two
very
distinct
accommodations,
something
that,
in
both
cases
are
really
amazing
what
these
young
people
have
done.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
a
combination
to
thomas
weiss
ii,
who
has
done
something
that
has
never
been
done
before.
He
is
the
first
triple
eagle
scout.
I
had
the
pleasure
of
presenting
a
combination
to
thomas
when
he
was
here
at
age
13..
He
earned
his
first
eagle
scout
award.
Then
I
would
like
to
make
the
combination
to
thomas
on
tuesday
february
2022..
Second,.
A
And
the
next
one's
the
same
as
mr
thomas,
another
young
person,
doing
something
that
it
takes
a
fortitude
to
understand
what
life
is
about
and
and
planning
ahead.
She's
gonna
be
a
fantastic
person
I
can
tell
by
what
she's
done.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
a
combination
of
february,
the
8
20
22
to
evangeline
marlo
arasi,
who
is
nine
years
old.
She
recently
wrote
a
letter
to
mayor
castro
to
let
her
know.
A
The
diplomacy
of
little
league
has
only
one
field
for
girls
softball,
and
it
was
important
for
girls
to
play
that
port
sport
too.
The
mayor
is
seeking
that
evangelina
gets
her,
wish
more
softball
fields
everywhere,
not
just
in
her
home
park.
The
princeton
university
rowing
team
was
in
town
and
joined
in
the
effort
by
volunteering,
a
day
of
service
for
practicing
in
tampa
for
the
winter
and
help
repair
the
field
evangeline
has
has
been
playing
on
the
field
for
the
next
six
weeks.
I
would
like
to
recognize
evangeline
for
her
tenacity
and
getting
things
done.