►
From YouTube: TCC PM 2/23/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
E
C
E
E
C
C
Thank
you
very
much.
All
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed
motion
passes.
G
And
Mr
chairman,
if
I
may
I,
believe
city
council
got
an
email
as
to
what
was
happening
with
this
case,
so
I
just
want
to
State
for
the
public.
The
motion
to
continue
it
to
March
23
2023
at
501
pm
has
been
granted
and
there
will
be
no
further
notice
being
mailed
out
to
anybody
who
was
going
to
be
interested
in
that
meeting.
So
they
should
make
a
note
of
that.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
Shelby,
okay
found
jet
item
number
one
phone
number,
e2023-8
chapter,
27.,.
H
Good
evening,
Council
Eric
Cotton
development
coordination.
This
is
a
text
amendment
to
chapter
27.
I
have
a
very
quick,
quick
PowerPoint
to
run
through
just
to
highlight
the
changes.
If
you
were
first
introduced
to
Council
in
June
of
2022
Workshop
in
September,
October
and
December,
and
now
we're
before
you
for
adoption
of
the
hearing
for
the
first
reading
of
the
text.
Amendments
first
one
is
alternative
design
language
for
27-60.
This
would
require
notice
to
everyone
involved
is
a
city-wide.
Basically,
the
overlay
districts
and
Special
Districts
allow
for
design
exceptions
for
setback
requests.
H
As
you
recall,
there's
a
lot
of
the
code
requires
people
to
use
Alleyways
when
possible
when
they
come.
Sometimes
a
lot
of
people
do
ask
for
waivers
from
that
requirement.
If
there
is
a
waiver
granted
either
administratively
or
by
Council
on
an
appeal
from
a
denial
from
the
zoning
administrator,
this
sets
forth
code
requirements
and
the
last
one
is
access
onto
non-residential
axon
to
local
streets.
H
As
long
as
you're
within
150
feet
of
the
artillery
collector
roadway,
you
could
have
access
onto
a
local
Street
I
mean-
and
this
is
this-
is
the
example
that
we
use.
This
is
the
Tahitian
Inn
property
where
their
access
is
off,
is
within
150
feet
and
if
Council
has
any
questions,
I'll
be
more
than
happy
to
answer
them.
For
you
guys,
a
woman
heart
attack.
J
H
Well,
it's
an
amendment
that
said
it
refers
back
to
27
149,
which
is
the
public
note,
which
are
the
public
notice
requirements
for
the
city,
certainly
on
the
it's
versatility
for
setback
reductions
and
it
refers
back
to
doing
notice.
Pro
27
149.,
as
all
Public
Notices,
are
done
in
the
city.
K
H
J
First
thing
that
was
the
first
okay,
then
that
is
correct,
so
the
next
one
is
design
exceptions
and
I
was
talking
to
Mr
Benson
about
this,
not
the
downtown
district
design.
Oh
Mr
Benson,
which
one
would
I
was
I.
Were
we
talking
about
the
design.
H
J
We
not,
we
need
to
just
not
approve
for
setbacks.
We
need
to
do
it
for
everything
like
anytime
there's
a
design
exception
and
and
I
say
this.
As
a
former
neighborhood
leader,
I
was
actually
talking
to
Mr
Benson
about
a
very
particular
property
that
I
just
noticed
the
change
on
when
I'm
walking
my
dog
and
things
that
I
know
aren't
allowed
in
the
Seminole
Heights
overlay
district,
and
we
get
no
information
on
why
it
happened,
how
it
happened
so,
every
time
there's
a
design
exception,
the
neighbors
need
to
be
notified
of
it.
H
J
So
I'm
fine
with
the
setback
notification.
However,
this
needs
to
go
further.
I
would
like
to
put
in
additionally
a
a
and
and
Mr
Benson
and
I
talked
about
different
ways.
We
could
notify
the
public,
but
we
have
to
be
able
to
notify
the
public
and
neighborhoods
about
all
of
these
design
exceptions
until
we
have
a
better
handle
on
the
code
and
in
theory
the
Seminole
Heights
overlay
was
supposed
to
prevent
a
lot
of
these
design
exceptions
from
happening.
That
is
not
happening
in
our
neighborhood.
J
Therefore,
how
could
it
be
happening
throughout
the
city
that
doesn't
have
nearly
as
strict
standards
as
we
do?
So
it's
just
it's
just
very
frustrating
for
neighborhood
leaders
who
are
doing
this
on
their
volunteer
time
to
keep
up
with
what's
going
on
in
the
city.
J
So,
while
I
do
support
the
setbacks,
I
really
really
want
it
to
be
for
all
design
exceptions
going
forward
in
the
future.
We.
J
J
Yes
and
Mr,
Benson
and
I
spoke
about
that,
but
I
just
I
wanted
to
make
it
clear
that,
yes,
this
is
great
for
setbacks,
but
everyone
and
the
the
examples
I
was
giving
him
are.
You
know
in
in
overlay
District
in
Seminole
Heights
you're
required
to
have.
If
your
garage
is
attached
to
a
house,
it
has
to
be
a
certain
number
of
feet
behind
the
front
door
and
ribbon
driveways
I
mean
the
problem.
J
Is
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
definitions
in
the
code
for
some
of
those
things
and
that's
where
people
can
get
around
stuff?
So
we
just.
We
need
to
close
some
loopholes,
make
sure
that
neighbors
are
aware
of
these
design
exceptions
so
that
if
they
have
problems
with
them,
we
can
handle
it
before
they
just
see
it
being
built.
J
E
H
E
Me
why
you
why
you
showed
that
photo?
What
example
are
you
using
from
that
where'd
it
go?
It
was
the
last
a
page.
H
So
this
is
just
an
example
of
access
onto
a
local
Street.
This
went
through
a
planned
development.
What
this
would
allow
by
writing,
so
there's
a
discouragement,
By,
fdot
and
By
by
trans.
You
know
City
Mobility
to
take
people
off
to
not
have
so
many
driveway
Cuts
yeah.
This
would
put
this
would
force
people
to
go
onto
the
local
Street
to
access
the
streets
instead
of
having
making
a
quick
turn.
You
know
coming
in
down.
You
pass
this
exit
where
this,
what
is
this
on
on
Westdale,
Avenue
and
then
boom?
E
L
Carlson,
how
how
is
this
being
handled
now,
and
does
this
mean
that
all
these
would
just
be
approved
administratively.
E
H
This
would
be
allowed,
I
mean
this
would
be
if,
for
some
reason
they
cannot
have
access
to
a
to
either
the
state
road
or
a
main.
You
know
artillery
collector,
because
Mobility
is
recommending
against
having
another
curb
cut
50
feet
from
here
or
100
feet
from
here
it
would.
It
would
allow
people
to
have
access
onto
the
onto
the
the
local
Street
more
of
a.
L
M
Anyway,
I
have
problems
with
especially
the
design
exception.
A
text
Amendment
I
have
problems
with
the
public
notice
I.
What
Mr
attack
was
a
state
councilman
hertex
was
saying
is
true.
This
says
27-241.
It
is
just
General
on
public
notice,
but
if
you
hone
it
down
to
27
-24,
that's
241-c1,
it
covers
that
it
is
a
supplemental
notice
and
also
that
it
is
a
mailed
notice.
So
that's
the
first
thing:
I
think
that
should
be
edited
in
this
text.
Amendment.
M
M
This
department
is
part
of
City
Staffing
paid
for
by
tax
dollars
and
the
citizens
of
Tampa.
They
contribute
to
that.
We
have
a
right
to
know
when
someone
of
our
neighborhood
is
applying
for
an
exception.
The
handling
of
these
design
exceptions
that
need
to
come
out
of
the
closet
and
into
the
sunshine.
That's
why
we
ask
that
all
design
exceptions,
not
just
setbacks,
include
a
public
mailing
and
increasing.
It
won't
increase
the
amount
of
work
for
the
city
staff
if
they
have
20
design
exceptions,
they
still
have
20
days
on
exceptions.
M
The
burden
is
put
on
the
applicant
as
it
is
now.
Nothing
changes,
it'll
slow
down
the
process,
but
we
all
know
the
city
does
not
move
quickly.
So
what
I'm
asking
you
is
to
have
them,
send
this
back
and
come
up
with
some
of
some
revisions
that
will
make
everybody
happy.
If
you
vote
for
this
tonight
and
they
say
they're
going
to
come
back,
we'll
play
holy
hell
to
get
him
back
here.
So
please,
I,
know
it'll
delay
the
process
of
getting
the
public
notice
to
everybody,
but
it
shouldn't
be
setbacks.
M
Only
just
like
councilman
hertek
was
saying
it
has
to
do
with
everything
that
happens
and
the
surprises
that
come.
Sometimes
we
don't
even
know
a
piece
of
property
is
sold.
If
we
don't
have
a
design
exceptions,
we
have
nothing
so
I'm
asking
you
to.
Please
ask
them
to
research
this
and
change
this
particular
Amendment.
Any
questions.
N
H
G
M
Floor
and
I
hit
on
some
of
these
points,
there's
some
of
them
that
I
didn't
hit
on
and
the
fact
that
I
think
that
there
should
be
out
in
the
open,
like
I,
said
that
this
department
is
extension
of
you.
The
decisions
that
they
make
are
decisions
that
you
should
have
made.
So
that's
what
we're
asking
for.
N
And
Miss
hertech
is
writing
writing
what
she's,
saying
and
I
do
think
that
staff
needs
to
take
a
look
at
what
what
Miss
Sanchez
has
written
us
I.
Think
it's
kind
of
important
I
do
think
it's
important
that
we
look
at
this
there's
some
valid
points
in
all
of
this
section.
One
first
part
second
and
again:
I
I,
assume
that
you
guys
that
received
it,
but
I
think
maybe
a
second
look
may
need
to
be
looked
at
a
reference
to
this
I.
M
N
I
will
concur
all
right,
I
just
want
to
see
Mr
cotton
and
saw
it.
You
have
any
pros
of
con
and
remember
what
Mr
said
she
had
to
say
no.
H
I,
don't
have
any
pros
or
cons
on
it.
I
mean
part
of
the
I
I
understand
where,
where
Miss
Sanchez
is
coming
from,
but
you
know
just
part
of
the
question
is:
when
you
give
notice,
what
are
you
accomplishing?
Is
it
to
give
the.
O
H
For
somebody
to
just
receive
notice,
or
is
it
to
give
the
ability
for
someone
if
a
roof
pitch
is
supposed
to
be
412
and
they're
doing
312
to
appeal
that
decision?
If
it's
approved
administratively,
you
come
to
council,
that's
what
the
notice
that's
part
of
the
notice
issue.
So
when
you
do
receive
notice,
if
you're
participating,
if
you're
a
degree
party
within
the
250
feet,
you
know
the
person
could
then
come
before
counseling.
H
M
I
get
a
notice,
and
somebody
tells
me
it's
the
proof
pitch
either
I
or
anybody
within
those
250
feet
can
make
the
decision
do
they
want
to
call
this
department
and
talk
to
them
and
ask
them
about
the
details
of
it
or
not.
But
as
it
is
now,
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
make
that
decision,
because
we
don't
know.
G
H
J
Another
issue
with
this
and
I
think
Miss
Sanchez
is
trying
to
reach
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
that
sometimes,
when
we
do
find
out
about
these
design
exceptions,
it
will
depend
sometimes
they're
approved,
sometimes
they're
not
approved,
and
we
don't
know
why
again
I
say
we
I
mean
talking
about
my
time
as
a
neighborhood
leader.
J
J
Try
to
fix
things
there
first,
because
we're
going
to
see
more
overlay
districts
I'm
predicting
when
we
look
at
Land
Development
code
in
the
future,
and
if
we
can
fix
the
Land
Development
code
we
already
have,
or
the
overlay
and
the
notification
process
in
more
specific,
detailed
overlays,
then
I
think
that
would
be
better
for
the
city
overall,
when
we're
looking
at
General.
If
that
makes
any
sense.
H
I
understand
I
just
want
to
make
Council
aware
we
still
do
publicly.
Tampa
cares
newsletter
that
lists
all
the
councils,
and
there
is
an
online
Source
on
our
web
page
that
you
can
narrow
down
to
your
neighborhood
and
see
every
time
something
is
applied
for
in
a
seller
as
a
design
exception
of
rezoning,
a
variance
whatever
you.
It
will
pop
the
minutes.
It's
accepted
by
staff
it
pops
up
on
the
gis
map.
M
Still
stumbling
over
it,
so
even
if
you're
familiar
you
don't,
but
the
biggest
thing
that
I
think
is
the
necessity
for
transparency.
You
all
have
push
for
it
within
the
from
the
administration,
and
we
should
push
for
it
now
because,
like
I
said,
this
is
an
extension
of
what
you
do
and
what
you
would
normally
be
approving.
Why
is
it
behind
closed
doors?
Why
aren't
we
notified
and
here's
the
other
thing
I
have
one
that
Mr,
cotton
and
I
have
been
talking
about
if
I
had
known.
M
The
only
reason
we
know
is
because
somebody
was
there
doing
a
survey.
If
this
had
gone
through,
we
would
have
gotten
a
setback
only.
There
are
four
other
issues
with
it.
Okay,
so
if
we
had
gotten
the
setback
only
at
least
it
gives
us
a
reason
to
look
at
that
file
and
to
see
what
the
other
things
the
other
waivers
would
be
needed
for
it.
So
it
doesn't
just
stop
there.
It
opens
up
the
discussion
for
the
entire
pod
project.
J
And
I
will
agree
with
that,
but
also
a
seller
right
now
is,
quite
frankly,
a
bit
of
a
hot
mess.
So
we've
had
the
Builders
Association
in
front
of
us
like
a
seller.
Right
now
is
not
something
that
I
would
really
encourage.
Neighborhood
leaders
to
I
mean
no,
it's
a
let's
be
honest,
it's
more
difficult
than
it
has
been.
J
It
can
get
better
and
they're
working
on
that
I
know,
but
we
really
can't
assume
people
a
know
how
to
use
it
and
B
that
it's
going
to
be
used
correctly,
because
right
now
again
we're
even
hearing
from
when
we're
hearing
from
the
builders
and
the
public
that
something
isn't
working.
That's
always
a
really
good
sign
that
it
isn't
so
I
tend
to
agree
that
that
we
really
need
to
look
over
again
the
the
the
ability
to
give
more
notice
for
design
exceptions.
J
That's
just
something
that
and
Miss
Sanchez
is
right.
It's
an
extension
of
what
we
do.
That's
a
really
good
way.
To
put
it.
Thank
you.
Mm-Hmm.
K
So
responsible
as
legal
department,
so
what
I
would
suggest
and
I
understand
council's
concerns?
You
want
to
expand
the
notice
for
all
design
exceptions
and
not
just
setbacks,
but
this
gets
up
one
step
closer
in
that
direction.
So,
while
staff
is
processing
another
amendment
to
pick
up
the
other
types
of
design
exceptions
that
can
be
requested,
you
will
still
have
the
notice
in
place
for
the
setbacks
as
it
stated
tonight,
so
that
you
don't.
G
The
way
the
code
is
structured,
it's
set
into
certain
Cycles,
so
the
question
would
be:
is
there
any
way
to
expedite
that
or
would
it
have
to
wait
and
and
if
it
is
not
if
it
if
Council
does
approve
this
tonight
as
as
it's
presently
structured,
how
soon
could
it
be
changed
and
implemented?
And
then
the
question
would
be
then,
if,
if
there's
any
way
to
be
able
to
expedite
that,
if
that's
council's
pleasure
well.
H
The
only
problem
with
that
is
so
next
so
on
March,
2nd
we're
supposed
to
come
back
Stephen
and
I
with
proposed
text
amendments
for
the
January
cycle,
and
those
are
then
scheduled.
If
Council
Blues
chooses
to
move
forward
on
those
late
March
we're
supposed
to
have
our
public
information
meetings,
then
it
goes
to
the
Planning,
Commission
I
believe
in
either
April
or
May,
and
then
because
back
for
adoption,
roughly
June,
this
would
not
be
able
to
be
on
that
cycle.
H
This
would
have
to
run
on
its
own
cycle
because
we
just
won't
be
able
to
get
it
scheduled
to
work
out
with
in
front
of
the
you
know
the
Planning
Commission
meetings
and
such
that's.
The
only
thing
I
mean
I
would
recommend
moving
forward
with.
What's
here,
which
is
the
notice
requirement
for
setbacks,
and
such
we
can
come
back
in
July,
which
is
a
typical
cycle
we
would
run
on
for
all
the
other.
All
the
other
notices
for
design
exceptions
now
keep
in
mind
when
we
do
design
exceptions.
H
That
includes
because
of
the
way
we
process
them.
Shared
parking
is
a
design
exception,
so
the
parking
lease
is
that
Susan
would
that
she
reviews
for
when
somebody's
doing,
off-site
parking
those
could
come
before
you
want
an
appeal
all
that's
all.
Those
kind
of
things
could
actually
come
before
Council
and
that's
up
to
your
discretion.
If
you
want
to
have
all
those
kinds
of
hearings.
G
H
J
H
J
H
Go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
that
it's
a
language
change
and
it
has
to
be
based
on
the
way,
Council
Council
rules
and
how
we
process
those.
You
would
have
to
go
back
to
play
the
Planning
Commission
for
their
recommendation.
We
would
have
to
have
at
least
a
public
public
information
meeting
about
it
like
we
do
for
all
these,
then
it
has
to
come
back.
H
G
G
That
I
I
remember
at
the
time
that
was
put
into
the
code
and
it's
it's
been
codified
that
process,
because
it
created
a
structure
that
allowed
staff
to
orderly,
be
able
to
present
by
groups
through
this
process
of
going
to
the
planning
agency
and
having
a
recommendation.
Then
it
come
back
to
Council
in
order
to
implement
it
by
ordinance
and
that's
been
codified.
G
So,
for
instance,
an
exception
to
that
is
procedural
matters.
If
there's
something
procedural,
then
then
that
could
be
expedited,
but
something
that's
substantive
like
this
has
to
as
Mr
says,
go
through
the
process.
That's
that's
been
codified.
It
must
be
what
15
years
or
no
more
by
numbers.
I
would
think
that
is
better
in
place.
I.
M
Remember
we're
I'm
talking
about
the
design
exceptions
that
go
to
be
reviewed
by
one
person,
not
the
ones
the
ones
that
are
coming
to
you
are
already
in
the
care
newsletter.
These
are
also
in
their
care
newsletter,
but
next
to
the
date
it
says
not
applicable.
So
you
don't
know
you
get
to
guess
or
you
get
to
call
Eric
and
ask
him.
N
H
N
H
There's
no
there's
we
have
Stephen
and
I
did
a
memo
to
actually
have
a
hearing
next
to
next
Thursday
on
the
second,
the
proposed
text
amendments
that
the
changes
that
we
were
going
to
be
proposing.
Those
with
that
if
this
went
through
that
would
be
part
of
that
cycle
which
would
be
adoption
sometime,
probably
August.
H
So
you
know
if,
if
we
go
that
route,
you
know
you
have
to
basically
counsel
those
two
options.
You
can
approve
what
we
have
and
we
can
initiate
the
other
text
Amendment
for
the
next
cycle.
We
can.
We
can
pop
it
on
that
March,
2nd
or
you
can
just
postpone
this
entire
thing
and
we
can
try
to
move
it
forward
for
that.
So
keep
in
mind.
We
talked
about
this
in
June,
September
and
October.
H
No
next
Thursday,
we
asked
for
to
come
before
city
council
for
the
Texas
amendments
for
the
next
cycle,
and
those
are
they
were
those
when
that
start
moving
through
the
Direct
General
hearing
cycle.
That
text
amendments
all
run
through
the
wicked.
If
Council
wants,
you
could,
like
I
said
you
could
adopt
this
tonight
and
we
could
we
could
initiate
when
we
come
back
the
next
cycle
and
that
would
go
through
the
the
change
to
include
every
kind
of
design.
Exception
could
be
put
into
the
next
cycle.
P
Just
want
to
add
this
is
Danny
Collins
with
the
Planning
Commission
staff,
because
there
is
a
change
in
the
language.
It
does
need
to
go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
their
review,
so
this
would
require
another
funding.
Commission,
hearing,
Council.
I
I
I
R
We
we
have
a
request
to
add
that
item
Stephen
Benson.
We
have
a
request
to
add
that
item
on
Thursday
to
bring
you
eight
amendments
as
part
of
the
January
cycle
and
present
them
in
concept.
I
think
we
have
discussed
in
concept
already
today
what
you
would
like
to
see
for
a
ninth
amendment,
so
we
can
bring
that,
but
it's
not
currently
in
the
memo
that
was
transmitted
to
request
next
Thursday,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
right.
G
The
seventh
one
back
next
week,
my
suggestion
is
this:
if
it's
council's
pleasure
to
go
forward
on
this
complete
this
public
hearing
you've,
if
there's
no
members
of
the
public
close
it
do
it
for
first
reading,
separate
motions.
J
J
For
the
next
cycle
and
and
we're
just
gonna,
we're
just
gonna
slide
it
in
there.
As
the
ninth
for
next
week
and.
G
H
G
J
Correct
I
have
I,
do
have
one
more
thing.
I
want
to
talk
about,
though,.
G
J
On
this
particular
change
for
the
text,
Amendment
I
do
I'd
be
remiss
to
to
go
forward
without
talking
about
the
West
Tampa
overlay
parking
situation.
J
I
am
concerned
about
this
because
I
know
the
goal
is
to
get
people
to
use.
The
alleyways
like
I
I,
mean
I,
know
that
is
the
overlay's
goal,
and
so
I
am
concerned
about
the
approvals
for
driveways
without
really
seriously
considering
the
alley.
J
J
Okay,
because
that's
my
only
big
concern
is
administrative
approval
for
driveways
when
we're
really
trying
to
encourage
Ali
access.
L
M
I'm,
okay
with
it,
if
you're
going
to
follow
if
they're
going
to
follow
through
with
it
I,
just
don't
want
to
be
money
to
be
dropped
by
the
wayside.
In
other
words,
oh,
we
can't
do
it
next
week
because
we
don't
have
time
I
I.
Just
don't
want
that
attitude
that
yeah
we'll
get
to
it
we'll
get
to
it.
It's
already
gone
on
too
long
I
mean
I
know
we
can't
I,
understand
the
procedure.
M
I
understand
why
what
can't
be
done,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they
don't
drop
the
ball
and
that
they
come
back
and
give
us
something
that
says
all
all
design
exceptions.
It's
only
fair
and,
like
I
said
that
also
cures.
The
misconception
about
this
department
that
decisions
are
made
on
a
flip
of
a
coin.
C
N
A
guy
you
heard
from
the
Sanchez
again
this
guy
was
going
to
ask
you.
You
know
and
she's
right
because
a
lot
of
times
we'll
say
in
the
night,
though
we
can't
get
that
done
because
run
with
time.
So
I
want
to
know
before
this
Council
votes.
Are
we
going
to
be
able
to
have
this
I'll
tell
you
anything
but
Mr
Benson.
H
Again,
Mr
councilman
Goose.
This
is
when
we
come
back
next
week.
It's
just
it's
all.
In
conceptual
I
mean
this
is
not
really
conceptual,
because
it's
sort
of
language
is
already
more
or
less
prepped
based
on
this
amendment.
But
yes,
as
long
as
the
motion
is
made
for
us
for
just
to
come
back
next
Thursday
and
that
you
have
nine,
this
will
be
number
ten.
H
C
C
C
T
G
C
S
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
item
file,
number
e
20238
chapter
27..
S
An
order
is
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
orders
to
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
relating
to
publicly
initiated
text;
amendments
making
revisions
to
the
city
of
Tampa,
Court
of
ordinances,
chapter
20,
27,
zoning
and
Land
Development
amending
section,
2760,
alternative
design,
exceptions,
amending
section,
27-181.2
compliance,
administrative
Authority,
General
procedures,
amending
section,
27-241,
West,
Tampa
overlay,
District
design,
development
design
standards,
amending
section,
27-283.12
off
street
parking
spaces
standards
providing
for
a
repeal
of
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
of
conflict
within
providing
preservability
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
J
D
L
Please
proceed.
I
I
would
just
like
to
make
a
motion
to
add
the
proposed
text,
amendments
for
the
January
2023
cycle
to
the
to
be
discussed
under
staff
reports
on
March,
2nd
2023,
adding
supplemental
notice
for
all
design
exceptions.
A
U
Is
Planning
Commission
staff?
This
is
an
adoption
hearing
for
ta
CPA
2208.
This
is
the
one
water
chapter
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
Plan
update.
Much
of
this
information.
You
heard
back
at
your
transmittal
hearing
in
December,
so
I
will
go
through
these
slides
quickly.
This
evening
the
one
water
chapter
is
the
first
portion
of
the
overall
Tampa
comprehensive
Plan
update.
It
incorporates
key
Concepts
from
the
community's
vision
that
was
adopted
by
this
Council
over
the
summer.
U
There
was
significant
public
and
stakeholder
engagement
throughout
the
process,
coordinated
implementation
with
City
departments
and
of
note
there
was
one
change
in
the
introduction
language
and
the
title
page
since
transmittal.
That
was
a
result
of
Deo
comments
for
for
clarity
for
the
public,
so
that
change
has
been
reflected
in
the
record.
U
U
U
We've
received
a
couple
of
rounds
of
agency
comments
for
the
update.
We
have
received
no
objections
on
the
one
water
chapter,
Deo
provided
a
technical
assistance
comment,
which
is
not
an
objection.
It's
a
suggestion
for
technical
assistance
for
us
to
add
a
statement
regarding
the
statutory
requirements
that
this
this
chapter
complies
with.
So
we
have
added
that
statement
into
the
updated
language
for
adoption
this
evening,
and
that
is
on
page
9
and
10
in
your
packet.
U
It's
consistent
with
the
adopted
resources
section
and
excuse
me
the
existing
adopted
Water,
Resources
sections
and
language
for
clarity.
There
are
some
representative
goals,
objectives
and
policies
here
on
the
screen
in
potable
water,
Wastewater
and
storm
water
management.
There
are
all
of
the
the
objectives
and
policies
are
available
in
your
packet
and
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
as
well
as
the
Planning
Commission
found
ticpa
22-08
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
and
adoption
is
recommended
this
evening,
I'm
available.
If
there
are
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Councilman.
C
J
U
J
R
N
T-A-Cpa
22-08
orders
members
in
it
for
first
reading
consideration
in
order
amending
the
Imagine
24
10
becomes
a
plan
to
amend
one
water.
Companies
are
planning
for
water
resources
that
replaces
the
potable
water
Wastewater
and
storm
water
management.
Sections
provided
for
repeal
of
all
ordinance
and
conflict
provide
accessibility
providing
effective
date.
We.
I
D
A
D
C
C
D
W
W
W
This
is
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
it's
outlined
here
in
blue
and
the
surrounding
site.
This
is
called
Rattlesnake
Point,
the
peninsula
and
to
the
east.
This
has
been
redeveloped
as
the
sorry
I
lost
my
point:
Westshore
Marina
District
and
it's
south
of
Gandy
Boulevard
and
West
Shore
Boulevard
is
to
the
east.
W
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
outlined
here
in
black
and
is
represented
by
the
heavy
industrial
designation.
The
pink
around
the
subject
site
is
the
community
makes
use
35
designation
further
to
the
east
in
the
purplish
color
is
the
urban
mixed
u60
and
along
Gandy
Boulevard?
Is
the
public
semi-public
designation.
W
This
amendment
would
allow
for
residential
development
on
the
subject's
site
that
is
currently
prohibited
under
the
h.I
designation.
If
approved,
there
could
be
up
to
228
dwelling
units
and
it
would
increase
the
square
footage
under
the
far
from
about
400
000
to
500
000
square
feet.
The
applicant
has
the
ability
to
use
floor
area
ratio
for
residential
development,
so
the
228
dwelling
units
of
the
potential
could
be
higher
if
the
applicant
chose
to
propose
a
mixed-use
development.
A
C
I
do
have
one
Clinic
staff
found
it
inconsistent
with
the
planning
board,
found
it
consistent,
correct.
V
Thank
you
good
evening,
Elise
Bonsall
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
Southeastern
development
here
for
this
comp
plan
Amendment.
This
is
actually
the
first
time
we've
heard
the
industrial
comment
and
the
staff
report.
It
indicated
that
they
understood
that
rattle
State,
Point
transitioned,
so
just
wanted
to
make
a
point
of
that,
because
what
we're
presenting
to
you
tonight
is
what
we
presented
to
the
Planning
Commission.
And
it's
really.
How
do
you
weigh
when
you
have
conflicting
Provisions
in
the
comprehensive
plan
and
I
think
this
was
very
helpful
as
you
make
your
decision
tonight.
V
V
So
you've
already
heard
where
this
is
located.
I
won't
go
back
through
this.
This
is
the
chemical
formulator
site
that
you
have
all
heard
about
Ad
nauseam
over
and
over
in
the
many
applications
that
you
have
had
I
want
to
take
you
back
just
a
minute
to
last
May.
If
you
recall,
we
came
before
you
and
we
gave
you
sort
of
this
project
Vision.
V
The
first
step
was
this
approved
rezoning,
which
you
did
approve
in
May
of
2022
phase,
one
and
phase
two
and
three
would
be
the
Redevelopment
of
the
chemical
formulator
site
consistent
with
the
rest
of
rattlesnake
points.
So
this
is
number
two.
This
is
the
future
land
use
map
amendment
that
we
contemplated
when
we
originally
came
to
you
so
I
think
it's
really
important
to
understand.
Rattlesnake
Point,
objective
8.11.
V
So
just
remind
you
about
the
transition
of
this
area.
This
before
we
talk
about
the
application,
the
peninsula
began
to
transition
all
the
way
back
in
2002..
Everything
that
you
see
in
pink
is
CMU
35.
It
is
already
transitioned
I.
Think
most
of
us
in
this
room
would
agree
that
it's
not
about
to
transition
it.
It
has
already
transitioned
and
there
are
three
pieces
that
are
left
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
those
in
just
a
moment.
V
So
this
is
one
of
the
last
of
the
proposed
areas
to
transition.
The
remaining
heavy
industrial
that
you
see
is
actually
not
being
used
for
heavy
industrial
purposes
to
the
north.
Is
the
army
training
facility,
that's
directly
to
the
east
of
this
property
and
to
the
South
is
Hula
Bay,
which
is
actually
being
used
as
a
commercial
Marina.
So
the
only
heavy
industrial
use
on
this
site
is
this
particular
site
that
we're
talking
about
today.
V
In
fact,
if
you
look
statistically
at
the
acreage
the
percentage,
the
area
designated
CMU
35
without
this
site
is
82.6
percent
of
the
Rattlesnake
Point
Peninsula,
whereas
the
area
designated
heavy
industrial
under
the
land
use
category
today
is
only
17.4
percent,
so
the
Planning
Commission
recommendation
I
contemplated
that
you
might
ask
that
question.
Mr
chair
and
the
pivotal
question
was
what
happens
in
a
comprehensive
plan
when
two
policies
conflict.
V
Fortunately,
we
have
a
road
map
and
it
is
two
documents
that
you
have
to
look
at.
One
is
Florida
law.
What
does
Florida
law
say
about
when
comprehensive
plan
Provisions
conflict
with
one
another
and
the
other
is
your
comprehensive
plan?
You
actually
address
this
in
the
text
of
your
comprehensive
plan,
I'm
going
to
walk
through
that,
for
you,
there
are
four
components
of
Florida
law
and
Mr
bear
can
probably
pipe
in
being
a
lawyer.
V
The
first
is:
if
there
is
ambiguity
or
conflict
between
two
Provisions,
the
more
specific
has
to
control
over
the
more
General.
That's
number
one
number
two:
they
have
to
be
read
in
harmony
to
avoid
one
of
the
provisions
being
rendered
meaningless.
Basically,
the
third
is
that
you
have
to
avoid
unreasonable
or
absurd
results,
and,
finally,
the
expression
of
one
thing
typically
means
the
exclusion
of
another.
It's
also
really
important
that
the
Florida
Supreme
Court
has
said
that
inherent
inconsistency
in
land
use
regulations
must
be
construed
in
favor
of
the
landowner.
V
So
let's
talk
about
this
specific
over
the
general
really
briefly,
Rattlesnake
Point,
all
of
those
policies
and
I
believe
there
are
11
12
policies
under
8.11.
They
all
apply
just
to
this
small
geographic
area,
whereas
other
policies
that
we
talk
about
the
coastal,
High
Hazard
or
the
industrial
they
apply
to
a
much
larger
area
of
so
here
the
specific
policies
of
Rattlesnake
Point
have
to
rule
they
have
to
govern
the
other
thing
that
is
important
and
I
made
this
slide
last
night,
very
late.
V
V
Then
how
would
we
ever
Implement
all
of
those
policies
around
listening
point?
It
says
you
have
to
encourage
the
transition
from
industrial,
heavy
industrial
and
light
industrial
to
commercial
and
residential
uses
to
interpret
the
comprehensive
plan
in
this
way
would
really
render
those
meaningless
provisions
and
I
have
to
thank
Melissa
zornida
for
this,
because
during
the
Planning
Commission
hearing,
she
brought
up
something
that
I'd
not
even
considered,
and
that
is
if
we
are
transitioning
from
heavy
industrial
to
light
industrial.
Like
the
comprehensive
plan
says
we
have
to
do
in
Rattlesnake
Point.
V
V
Do
you
know
how
many
commercial
only
categories
we
have
in
the
future
land
use
in
the
future
land
use
plan
in
the
comp
plan
zero?
There
is
not
a
commercial
category
that
we
could
transition
to.
So
again,
this
is
sort
of
avoiding
that
absurd
result
to
interpret
it
in
a
way
would
render
all
of
this
meaningless
and
absurd.
V
V
You
know
we
talk
about
the
coastal
High
Hazard
and
we
talk
about
public
health
safety
and
Welfare
and
I'm
sure
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
more
tonight.
But
if
you
look
at
all
of
the
provisions
that
the
staff
report
says
support
this
application,
those
are
all
on
the
left.
City
design,
population
increase,
mixed-use
corridors,
Rattlesnake,
Point,
the
need
for
housing,
efficient
use
of
facilities,
and
you
weigh
those
against
this
sort
of
litmus
test.
V
We're
not
saying
that
it's
the
policy.
You
have
to
say
that
it
is
a
policy
to
be
considered
I
kind
of
want
to
talk
really
very
quickly
about
something
that
we've
talked
about
a
lot
in
the
past
and
that
is
the
Practical
public
benefit
of
getting
heavy
industrial
off
of
Rattlesnake
Point.
When
we
came
to
you
in
May,
during
the
priority
zoning,
we
promised
that
we
would
be
back
to
you
with
this
future.
V
Land
use,
designation
change
and
we're
back,
but
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
did
not
point
out
from
a
public
health
and
safety
issue
that
there
is
a
significant
benefit
here
to
removing
the
ability,
the
ability
to
ever
have
another
super
heavy
industrial
site
user
on
this
particular
site.
This
is
just
the
map
that
shows
the
chemicals
that
are
trucked
in
for
the
chemical
formulators
use.
It
could
be
chemical
formulators.
It
could
be
some
someone
with
a
worse
chemical.
X
Good
evening,
council
members
for
the
record,
Tina
akblad
director
of
planning
with
Stearns
Weaver
Miller,
also
for
the
record
I,
am
a
certified
planner
through
the
American
Institute
of
certified
planners
and
from
a
land
use
perspective.
As
you
consider
this
request
tonight,
there
are
a
few
things.
I
would
ask
you
to
keep
in
mind,
and
that
is
that
your
comprehensive
plan
includes
a
number
of
descriptor
sentences
and
policies
that
discusses
the
conflict
between
heavy
industrial
and
residential
uses.
That,
quite
frankly,
have
occurred
through
the
transition
of
Rattlesnake
Point
consistent
with
objective
8.11.
X
Should
you
decide
to
maintain
the
heavy
industrial
use
given
the
on
the
ground
use
of
of
the
army
adjacent
to
us
to
the
East
and
Hula
Bay?
This
would
be
the
only
truly
industrial
site
left
on
the
island
effectively
creating
an
island
of
heavy
industrial
inside
Rattlesnake
Point,
and
it
would
be
contrary
to
that
that
objective
and
that
Vision
to
transform
the
point.
X
The
city,
as
was
mentioned,
does
not
have
a
commercial
only
future
land
use
policy
and
where
that
really
comes
into
play
and
becomes
very
important.
Is
this
conversation
about
public
health,
safety
and
Welfare
and
incorporating
residential
in
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area?
We
have
no
choice
but
to
introduce
residential
on
this
site
if
we
are
going
to
transition
it
away
from
heavy
industrial,
because
a
commercial
only
future
land
use
category
does
not
exist,
and
so
we
would
ask
you
to
keep
that
in
mind
as
you
go
through
your
decision
making
process
tonight.
X
If
we
do
not
do
this,
the
transition
of
Rattlesnake
Point
will
not
be
complete
and
when
it
comes
to
additional
Provisions
ensuring
that
public
health,
safety
and
Welfare
are
considered
and
maintained.
That
is
protected
by
this
amendment
number
one
through
the
transition
of
the
land
use
category
itself
and
then
number
two.
There
are
still
very
specific
policies
under
the
Rattlesnake
Point
objective
that
require
any
development
on
the
island
to
mitigate
its
own
impacts,
and
then
there
are
additional
specific
policies
regarding
transportation
and
hurricane
evacuation
and
Sheltering.
X
These
requirements
are
not
just
words
in
your
comprehensive
plan.
They
have
also
been
implemented
into
your
Land
Development
code,
ensuring
that
that
mitigation
takes
place
and
that
public
health,
safety
and
Welfare
will
be
maintained
and
insured
in
the
future.
That
concludes
my
remarks
regarding
land
use
tonight,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
We
would
respectfully
request
your
approval
of
this
amendment
tonight.
Any.
Y
Hi,
my
name
is
Carol
Ann
Bennett
I'm,
a
lifelong
resident
of
Tampa.
This
council
is
well
aware
that
I
and
many
other
neighborhood
leaders
have
fought
fiercely
to
keep
Rattlesnake
Point
an
industrial
area.
Industrial
companies
provide
good
paying
jobs
which
are
just
as
important
as
housing
with
all
the
supply
chain
and
logistic
issues.
This
country
is
facing.
I
predict.
Tampa
is
going
to
regret,
giving
away
land
that
has
both
water
and
railroad
access
and
replacing
it
with
multi-family
residential.
Y
They
gave
away
something
rare
and
irreplaceable,
and,
unlike
many
neighborhoods
SOG
neighborhoods
have
been
quite
happily
cohabitating
with
industrial
properties.
For
decades
we
love
commercial
and
Industrial
Development
for
the
jobs
and
because
people
evacuate
from
their
homes,
not
their
workplaces.
Therefore,
commercial
and
Industrial
doesn't
impede
emergency
evacuations.
Y
Unfortunately,
we
lost
the
fight
for
our
industrial
zones,
so
we
now
must
deal
with
the
reality
of
where
we
are
today
and
today
we
have
an
industrial
property
on
Rattlesnake
Point
in
the
chha.
That,
unfortunately,
is
not
a
company
we
can
live
with.
It
is
chemical,
formulators,
otherwise
known
as
CFI,
and
it
is
a
very
hazardous
chemical
plant.
Y
I
want
you
to
imagine
an
accident
or
terrorist
attack
or
Sabotage
by
an
employee
that
went
off
their
meds
I.
Want
you
to
imagine
those
images
at
the
CFI
property
surrounded
by
thousands
of
residences.
It
is
obvious
the
CFI
must
go
the
developer
for
before
you
today.
Southeastern
is
doing
things
the
right
way.
Y
Y
All
of
our
Lives
will
be
so
much
easier
if
every
Builder
had
the
same
attitude
attitude
toward
being
a
community
partner.
This
is
a
very
rare
instance
where
the
neighborhood
leaders
want
a
developer's
change
of
future
land
use.
We
ask
that
you,
please
approve
this
comp
plan
change
and
I
just
want
to
note
that
you
probably
got
an
email
from
Stephanie
Poyner
saying
the
same
thing
she
had
surgery
today,
so
she
couldn't
appear
in
person.
Thank
you.
Z
Rhodes
Seeger
Southeastern
development,
Stephanie
Poynter,
asked
me
to
read
the
following
letter
on
her
behalf
good
evening.
Council
I
had
surgery
today.
Otherwise
you
know
I
would
not
miss
this
hearing.
I
have
asked
Elise
to
have
one
of
the
representatives
from
Southeastern
or
Elise
batsel
to
read
my
speech
for
me,
because
that
is
how
much
I'm
devoted
to
their
erasing
the
threat
from
CFI
from
our
city
February
3rd,
the
train
derailment
in
a
town
of
180
people
caused
a
mass
evacuation.
Z
A
leak
of
chemicals
from
CFI
could
do
the
very
same
thing
in
our
city
of
400
000,
plus
people.
When
the
train
wreck
in
Graniteville
South
Carolina
with
the
same
chemicals
manufactured
at
CFI
in
2005
10
people
died
in
a
nearby
textile
mill.
I
called
the
Graniteville
fire
department.
They
said
the
mill
was
less
than
a
football
field
away
from
the
train
wreck.
Z
Think
about
how
the
same
kind
of
spill
could
impact
the
million
square
feet
of
residential
already
in
place
in
West
Shore
Marina
Marina
District
Mr
James
Hunt
paid
for
the
a
scientific
report
about
CFI
from
firm
full
of
dura
process.
That
report
said
this
isn't
safe
within
14
miles
of
CFI
I
emailed
it
to
you
again
this
morning.
Z
All
of
you
know
that
I'm
against
the
new
apartments
in
our
community.
You
also
know
that
I
have
done
my
homework.
This
PD
is
a
no-brainer
I,
don't
like
Apartments,
but
CFI
is
way
worse.
The
folks
at
Southeastern
have
worked
very
hard
in
our
community
to
make
CFI
go
away.
It
is
the
best
for
everyone
in
our
city,
not
just
sod.
This
vote
to
support
this
comp
plan
change
isn't
about
CFI.
It
is
about
the
safety
of
every
person
in
our
city.
Z
C
J
C
L
Yeah
Marty
will
cut
me
off
again
here
we
go,
but
just
to
go
along
with
what
what
the
members
of
the
public
said.
This
developer
and
consultant
have
spent
a
couple
years,
maybe
working
very
closely
on
so
many
different
things
and
have
you
saw
the
hazard
goes
all
the
way
through
South,
Tampa
and
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
thank
them
for
all
the
hard
work
they've
done.
There's
some.
L
D
C
W
Emily
Phelan
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
map,
Amendment
2227
and
it's
multiple
folios
generally
located
west
of
North,
Myrtle,
Street
and
North
of
East
97th
Avenue.
W
This
is
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
it's
outlined
here
in
pink
and
in
fronts:
East,
97th,
Avenue
and
further
to
the
east.
The
blue
line
is
the
jurisdictional
boundary
between
the
city
of
Tampa,
on
the
West
in
Temple
Terrace,
on
the
east
and
in
the
surrounding
area.
It's
surrounded
by
a
single
family
detached,
and
there
are
some
multi-family
uses
directly
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site
further
to
the
South,
the
South
East
and
along
here
as
well.
W
W
This
is
the
adopted
future
and
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
outlined
here
in
black
and
it's
represented
by
the
residential
10
designation.
The
surrounding
area
of
the
subject
site
is
also
with
the
residential
10
further
to
the
South
and
the
East
is
the
residential,
20,
designation
and
further
to
the
East
and
further
to
the
South
with
the
dark
brown
is
the
residential
35
designation.
W
The
potential
impacts
of
the
site
would
allow
for
an
increase
in
the
number
of
dwelling
units
in
the
maximum
square
footage.
Currently,
the
site
can
be
considered
for
14
dwelling
units
and
slightly
over
22
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses.
If
locational
criteria
is
met
and
under
the
on
under
the
proposed
r-35
designation,
the
site
could
be
considered
for
50
dwelling
units
or
slightly
over
37
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses.
If
locational
criteria
was
met
and
also
under
the
residential
35
designation,
it
would
allow
for
the
consideration
of
multi-family
on
the
site.
W
AA
AA
It's
not
visible
in
the
console
room
or
in
the
by
the
visitors.
E
AA
There
we
go.
Thank
you
for
patience,
Mr,
chairman
council
members.
This
is
tacpa
2227,
1.45,
Acres,
seeking
res
10
to
Res
35..
We
are
located
in
the
University
planning
area.
You
can
see
the
location
near
Temple
Terrace.
This
is
the
future
land
use
map.
You
can
see
that
there
is
a
lot
of
intents
in
the
area
from
R35
and
R20
to
CMU
35.,
two
main
points
with
great
respect
to
your
staff.
AA
First
of
all,
in
regard
to
retention
and
parking
and
buffers
and
setbacks,
the
maximum
yield
at
the
site
is
going
to
be
about
44
units.
Of
course,
the
Planning
Commission
uses
a
hypothetical
maximum
without
consideration
of
those
elements,
so
this
is
requesting
per
our
math
just
about
30,
more
units
than
would
be
allowed
now.
AA
The
Planning
Commission
makes
a
very
strong
point,
as
a
young
lady
did
is
that
this
is
in
an
established,
detached
single-family
residential
neighborhood.
They
indicate
that
again,
it's
utilized
by
single
family,
which
we
found
to
be
a
mischaracterization
of
the
area.
This
is
a
site
located
here,
I'm,
going
to
walk
you
around
the
block
immediately
on
the
south,
which
staff
pointed
out
to
was
multi-family.
You
can
see
it
here
with
the
number
of
mailboxes
and
units
next
door
to
that
right
at
the
corner
is
a
number
of
multi-family.
AA
AA
And
buildings
continue
up
the
street,
as
you
can
see
here
again
coming
around
the
same
block
multi-family,
you
can
see
the
units
here,
the
mailboxes
you
can
see
you
have
about,
or
you
should
be
able
to
see,
has
six
different
units
and
those
two
separate
buildings
and
the
multi-family
continues
all
the
way
around
the
block.
This
is
a
major
multi-family
area.
It
is
a
mixture
with
single
family
and
if
you
look
way
to
the
East
and
to
the
South,
it
is
a
tremendous
multi-family
and
these
are
directly
across
the
street
again.
AA
The
mailbox
would
show
you
that
there's
multiple
units-
and
you
can
see
that
here
as
well.
So
again
as
you
heard
from
the
young
lady
and
the
statements
in
the
theft
report-
is
that
it
is
single-family
detach
which
is
not
correct
for
this
media
vicinity.
Now,
when
you
look
at
the
2040
City
of
Tampa
comprehensive
plan-
and
we
consider
this
area,
this
area
is
a
median
household
income
of
thirty
five
thousand
seven
hundred
nine
dollars.
AA
We
look
for
the
type
of
housing,
which
is
what
the
applicant
has
come
forward
to
not
officially
affordable,
but
homes
that
are
matching
the
area
that
people
need
this
level
type
of
housing,
mixed
income,
residential
neighborhood
under
Lane,
subject
to
9.9.
Efforts
to
attract
residents
to
live
in
Tampa
must
include
the
promotion
of
mixed
income
residential
development,
particularly
in
the
University
planning
area,
which
is
underlined.
AA
We
are
in
the
University
planning
area,
and
this
is
specifically
what
this
land
use
category
or
this
land
use
policy
calls
for
multi-family
residential
areas,
increase
the
diversity
and
improve
the
sustainability
of
multi-family
residential
areas.
That's
exactly
what
this
application
does
encourage
the
development
and
retention
of
a
diversity
of
multi-family
housing
types
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
citizens
of
Tampa.
You
have
not
been
presented
in
any
of
these
policies,
as
you,
as
you
were
presented
today
by
the
young
lady
from
the
Planning
Commission.
AA
More
Lane
subjected
9.7
provide
opportunities
for
infill
development
already
characterized
by
low
to
medium
density,
multi-family
development,
which
is
what
I
showed
you
that's
what
this
area
is
in
the
university
community
area.
They
want
specifically
to
provide
greater
flexibility
and
land
use
and
density
for
future
development,
while
ensuring
a
wide
range
of
housing
types
policy
9.8.1
from
your
comp
plan,
encourage
info
products
again,
which
are
compatible
to
the
mix
of
homes
and
small
to
moderate
scale
apartment
buildings,
which
is
what
I
showed
you
over
and
over
again
on.
AA
The
slides
provide
new
Resident
development
at
moderate
densities,
which
can
fill
vacant
or
undeveloped
sites,
and
that
what
that's
what
this
site
is.
It
is
an
infill,
a
vacant
and
undeveloped
sites
and
finally,
policy
Lange
policy,
9.8.2
standards
for
moderate
density
multi-zones
and
provide
a
scale
of
development
ability
that
differs
from
those
of
single
family
and
low
density.
Multi-Family.
That's
what
this
particular
area
is
as
I
showed
you
single-family
low
density
multifamily.
AA
A
few
other
minor
points:
the
site
has
tremendous
access
routes
through
numerous
roads
to
North,
56
or
Bush
Boulevard.
The
roadway
going
to
the
site
is
extremely
well
signed,
noting
speed
and
notice
a
curve
coming
up,
and
that
curve
is
well
barricaded
and
well
marked.
AA
So,
in
summary,
we
do
feel
the
site
has
been
terribly
mischaracterized
with
respect.
It
is
supported
by
many
many
housing
comp
policies
that
I
presented
to
the
net
increase
of
units
is
really
low,
as
I've
indicated
to
you,
it'll
be
about
30
units
provides
a
needed
housing
option
and
transportation
is
safe.
So,
with
that,
we
appreciate
your
consideration
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
N
N
W
That
are
along
here
on
East
97th.
The
two
that
he
showed
directly
in
front
of
the
subject
site
would
be
non-conforming
and
City.
Staff
can
speak
on
that,
if
it's
council's
pleasure
for
that,
but
they
would
be
non-conforming
for
the
plan
and
as
well,
is
probably
predated
the
plan,
but
the
multi-family
that
he
is
referring
to
is
not
adjacent
to
the
subject
site.
So.
N
W
N
Q
J
Said
looking
at
what
he
said
that
currently
there
are
15
unit
11
units
that
could
go
on
that
site.
It's
14
14.,
okay,
but
with
the
change
So.
Currently
you
could
put
14
units
just
the
way
it
is
correct,
and
by
increasing
the
density
he
could
they
could
be
44
and
potentially
up
to
50.
potentially
up
to
50..
What?
What
would
that
look
like
no
I
mean?
Is
that
an
apartment
is
that
townhouse
I
mean
like
1.5
acres
is
just
that's
really
I'm,
it's
vague
to
me.
K
P
Okay,
can
I
can
I
time
them,
Danny
Collins,
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
our
calculations,
when
our
deter,
those
are
the
maximums
that
can
be
considered
in
those
categories.
So,
while
he's
saying
44
units,
these
are
the
maximums
based
on
the
density,
so
the
density
in
the
R35
allows
35
volumes
per
acre
under
the
adopted
residential
10
maximum
is
10
billion
years
per
acre.
So
that's
why
there
may
be
a
difference
in
the
number
of
units.
C
C
Because
no
okay,
I'm
just
is
there
any
questions
for
the
petitioner
councilwoman
heard
that.
J
Is
there
a
reason
that
you
didn't
go
for
residential
20.,
which
would
be
a
a
little
closer
to
the
residential
10
that
surrounds
it?
Well,.
AA
It
would
certainly
be
closer,
but
evaluation
is
made
as
to
how
many
units
really
could
go
here
and
what
type
of
Demands
is
going
to
be.
It
is
a
it's
a
nice
Community,
but
it
is
a
lower
median
income
community.
So
the
question
is
how
big
are
the
units
and
that
transpires
into
how
many
would
be
fit
reasonably
on
the
site,
so
the
res
35
would
have
a
maximum
of
50,
but
of
course
you
never
build
50,
because
again
you
have
to
provide
setbacks,
Landscaping
buffers
parking
retention.
AA
S
AA
Well,
unfortunately,
I'm
a
zoning
guy.
The
best
answer
I
can
give
you
is
that
it
would
match
the
median
income
of
the
area
which
is
39
000.
Oh.
G
S
K
So
Susan
Johnsonville
has
legal
department,
so
I
did
yes
to
Mr
Shelby
to
follow
Mr
Shelby's
comments.
This
is
a
comp
plan
Amendment.
The
question
for
Council
is
as
a
policy
matter
whether
the
current
land
use
of
r10
continues
to
be
appropriate
in
this
area
or
whether
there's
some
change
in
circumstances
that
would
justify
changing
it
to
the
higher
density
category
that's
requested,
and
so
there
is
no,
you
know
again.
You
have
to
you,
do
have
to
consider
the
maximum
potential
and
I
believe
this.
Well.
W
N
W
N
A
N
N
Do
you
mean
this?
It
was
a
diagram
and
had
the
the
layout
of.
K
G
C
K
G
And
if
I
could
follow
up
on
Ms,
Johnson
Velez,
just
a
reminder
Council
that
comprehensive
plan
amendments
are
not
quasi-judicial
competent,
substantial
evidence
is
not
a
factor
here.
It's
a
fairly
debatable
standard.
It's
a
legislative
matter.
It's
a
policy
matter.
AA
AC
I'm
Clayton
Chapman
5011
97th
Avenue
I
have
some
documents
I'd
like
to
pass
around
for
for
the
record.
AC
Okay,
so,
as
I
mentioned,
I
live
on
97th
Avenue
and
pretty
much
directly
across
the
street
from
the
proposed
site.
If
you
look
at
the
first
three
pictures,
this
shows
you
looking
on
97th
Avenue,
looking
West
towards
50th
Street,
and
the
proposed
side
is,
on
the
right
hand,
side
with
the
orange
Finch
I'd
like
to
note
that
97th
Avenue
Avenue
is
just
0.1
miles
long.
It's
not
a
long
stretch.
It
has
two
90
degree
turns
at
each
end
of
the
road.
G
AC
Okay,
bye,
okay,
so
this
was
one
of
the
first
three
pitchers
that
I
that
I
mentioned
looking
towards
50th
Street
on
97th
Avenue,
foreign
looking
West
towards
97th
or
50th
Street.
This
photo
is
on
the
corner
of
50th
Street.
Turning
onto
97th
Avenue,
the
proposed
side
is
20
yards
from
that
turn.
AC
On
the
left-hand
side
there,
where
the
orange
fence
is
here's
another
photo
from
the
same
corner
just
at
a
different
angle
and
here's
a
third
photo
of
the
same
corner
and
the
next
photo
will
show
you
how
tight
that
corner
is
with
two
cars
trying
to
pass
that
corner.
There's
very
little
room
on
this
corner
with
the
proposed
site
right
next
to
where
that
white
SUV
is
coming
through.
AC
So
my
concern
is:
it
is
a
significant
safety
concern
for
the
street
with
the
length
of
the
street
and
the
amount
of
traffic
that
is
currently
on
the
street.
The
presenter
before
me
mentioned
that
there
are
R35
on
this
block
that
is
the
next
block
to
the
west
and
to
the
South.
There
are
no
r-35
dwellings
on
this
street.
AC
AC
This
is
the
last
photo
shows
the
corner
on
97
or
on
97th
Avenue.
The
fence
has
been
hit:
Time
After,
Time,
After,
Time,
been
torn
down,
run
through
and
run
over.
The
the
other
concern
is
drainage.
The
drainage
you
see
right.
There
is
the
only
drainage
on
97th
Avenue,
so
the
water
flows
west
to
east
and
it
flows
south
to
North,
where
the
proposed
side
is,
is
going
to
be
right
in
that
conversion.
AC
AD
Good
evening
council,
member
Stephen
Walters
resident
of
5117
and
5106
East
97th
Avenue,
the
concerns
I
bring
before
you
this
evening
are
due
to
the
request
for
the
increase
in
the
amount
of
buildings
on
5006
East
97th
Avenue
to
be
built.
Our
street
97th
Avenue
measuring
in
at
1.1
mile,
is
a
connector
for
both
Myrtle
and
50th
Street.
Both
ends
of
our
street,
both
East
and
West,
have
Sharp
90
degree
turns
both
of
them
posted
with
two
10
mile
an
hour
signs
one
on
each
corner.
AD
AD
You
cannot
see
oncoming
traffic
20
to
35
Plus
multi-family
units
coming
out
onto
97th
Avenue,
at
that
blind
Corner
would
mean
up
to,
if
not
exceeding
40,
to
70
chances
for
accidents
per
day
with
cars
coming
in
and
out
of
that
location.
The
original
14
units
granted
is
more
than
plenty
for
this
small
neighborhood
with
a
street
measuring
0.1
mile,
that
is,
that
is
used
more
as
a
drag
strip.
AD
For
many
years
the
Terrace
Park
neighborhood
association
has
asked
and
presented
to
pass
City
council's
proposals
to
make
our
little
neighborhood
Road,
safer,
speed,
tables,
speed,
cushions
and
speed.
Bumps
have
all
been
denied
reason
being
not
enough
traffic
on
the
street,
adding
more
houses
to
the
small
area
isn't
the
answer.
AD
The
association
also
presented
can
connecting
50th
streets
straight
through
adding
a
three-way
stop
at
50th
and
97th
Avenue
Tacoma,
Trail
and
Linebaugh
Avenues
have
a
four-way,
stop
Tacoma,
Trail
and
Serena
Drive
just
got
a
three-way
stop
put
in
with
Crossing
Lines
if
or
when
buildings
are
built
on
that
property.
The
corner
of
50th
and
97th
Avenue
will
definitely
need
to
be
addressed.
My
next
concern
that
I
am
bringing
to
you
tonight
is
the
water
drainage
in
that
area,
and
also
the
soil
health
of
that
property.
AD
The
West
Side
properties
of
East
97th
Avenue
have
all
these
heads
standing
order
during
heavy
rains
over
our
rainy
season.
The
neighbor
to
the
west
of
the
property
being
spoke
of
has
stated
when
she
walks
in
her
yard
days
after
a
rain.
She
can
still
see,
feel
and
hear
the
rain
water
in
her
yard,
from
the
poor,
drainage
and
Rain
flowing
down
from
the
street
and
proposed
property
next
door,
that
area
of
land
used
to
be
trees
and
swamp
area
back
before
2017..
The
field.
AD
In
the
back
of
where
the
four
duploxaces
reside,
5012,
East,
97th,
Avenue
used
to
be
a
sand
field
and
full
of
trees
in
2017.
99
of
the
trees
were
knocked
down
without
permits.
Some
of
those
trees
that
used
to
help
retain
the
rain
water
and
help
with
erosion
are
still
lying
on
the
ground
from
being
knocked
down
and
upper
it
and
more
I'm.
More
than
positive,
with
the
film
dirt
that
will
have
to
be
brought
in
to
build
up
or
cover
up
for
the
poor.
AD
AD
C
AA
Mr
chairman,
with
great
respect
to
neighbors,
who
are
here
I,
was
a
great
respect.
Folks,
come
down
to
council,
40
notices
were
sent
out
to
the
neighborhood,
and
only
two
individuals
are
here.
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
pretty
good
accounting
of
the
area
in
regards
to
staff
comments.
AA
The
young
lady
pointed
out
to
multi-family
just
on
this
area
here.
What
I
was
trying
to
demonstrate
is
on
the
Block,
as
they've
indicated,
there's
multi-family
here
all
the
way
down
here
all
the
way
up
here,
approximately
half
the
block
of
multi-family,
so
the
character
of
the
area
is
multi-family
and
single
family.
Second
of
all,
the
gentleman
spoke
about
an
eight-story
building
well
from
zoning.
What
he
didn't
tell
you
is
that
anything
over
30
feet
requires
the
two
for
one
setback.
AA
Now
this
property
has
a
lot
of
linear
element
to
it,
so
those
setbacks
are
going
to
severely
restrict
anything
from
an
eight-story
building.
I
would
suggest
you
that
would
be
another
mischaracterization
there's
been
no
technical
presentation
of
Transportation
issues.
In
fact,
the
gentleman
said
that
the
city
was
not
even
going
to
put
in
humps
or
other
elements,
because
there
wasn't
enough
traffic
on
the
roadway.
The
roads
are
well
signed,
as
I
showed
you,
they
are
barricaded
so
they're,
very
safe
in
that
respect,
but
I
think
I
think
what
you
really
need
to
with
great
respect.
AA
I
think
what
you
really
need
to
consider
are
the
housing
comp
policies
which
tell
you
to
attract
residents,
promote
mixed
income,
residential
development,
mixed
income
in
the
University
planning
district,
which
is
this
is
within
the
university
Planning
District
increase
the
diversity,
a
multi-family
residential
areas.
This
is
a
residential
area,
encourage
development
retention
of
multi-family,
provide
opportunities
for
infill
in
areas
characterized.
Just
like
this
today,
the
university
planning
district
specifically
and
the
over
the
university
community
plan
specifically
talks
about
flexibility
for
development,
for
these
type
of
uses,
encourage
infill
for
compatibility.
AA
Standards
for
moderate
density.
Multifamily
zones
should
be
on
a
scale
that
differs
from
those
of
the
single
family
and
low
density
multi-family.
They
want
a
difference
of
housing
in
areas
not
just
the
same.
So
finally,
I'll
just
say
again
that
the
area
has
routes
for
transportation
to
the
north,
south,
east
and
west,
to
all
the
major
arterials
they're,
not
just
relying
upon
one
particular
stream.
So
with
that
again,
in
summary,
we've
looked
at
the
site
as
to
what
would
fit
best
what
the
demand
is
and
what
the
housing
needs
are
in
the
immediate
area.
C
G
Chairman,
if
we
could,
if
we
could
bring
up
Mr,
Viera
councilman
Vieira
on
the
screen,
please.
T
You
are
thank
you,
okay,
I'm,
sorry,
yeah,
maybe
yeah,
but
I'm
here,
motion.
F
Good
evening,
Council
Amy
Barnes
development
coordination.
The
next
item
before
you
use
item
number
six
ab2
2306.
F
C
F
The
site
plan
is,
there's
require
10
parking
spaces.
However,
a
waiver
was
previously
approved
through
v1380
to
reduce
four
parking
spaces
to
only
require
six
parking
spaces.
F
The
site
plan
indicates
the
proposed
hours
of
operation
which
are
not
changing
from
the
previously
approved
ab2
Monday
through
Friday
4
to
11
pm,
Saturday,
12
P.M
to
12
a.m
and
Sunday
at
12
P.M
to
9
pm
the
subject.
Property
is
located
in
the
mixed
use,
quarter,
Village
and
therefore
assistant
separation
requirements
is
250
feet
from
residential
uses
and
a
B
Sales
establishments.
F
F
F
J
J
O
O
C
Okay,
okay,
I
have
I
have
issues
with
these
types
of
things
wishing
no
ill
will,
but
if
the
business
owner
goes
out
of
business,
this
is
still
going
to
be
a
package
store,
which
then
means
it
could
turn
into
selling
Bud
Ice
Pabst,
Blue,
Ribbon
and
Smirnoff.
So
I
I
sometimes
have
a
problem
with
changing
these
things
in
unforeseen
event,
issues
that
happen
to
all
of
us
any
other
comments
or
questions
like
clarify.
There's.
C
C
L
Like
to
move
file,
number
ab23-06
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
improving
a
special
use,
permit
su-2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
service
and
package
sales
operas
consumption,
making,
lawful
a
sale
of
beverages
regardless
of
alcoholic
content,
beer
wine
and
liquor
at
or
from
that
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
6401
North
Florida
Avenue
is
more
particularly
scribed
in
section
three,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
project
ordinances
in
conflict
or
repealed,
repealing
ordinance,
number
2013-106
providing
effective
date.
D
C
C
D
F
Any
Barnes
development
coordination
item
number
seven
is
ab2
2307
for
property,
located
4308
West,
Gandy
Boulevard.
The
request
is
for
a
small
venue,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor
consume
consumption.
On
premise,
only
the
use
is
a
bar
lounge
approximately
for
a
total
approximate.
There
is
some
indoor
and
outdoor
space
for
2628
square
feet.
F
The
subject
site
is
required
to
have
148
parking
spaces.
A
design
exception
was
previously
approved
to
only
require
105
parking
spot
spots.
Space
and
the
proposed
operations
operation
will
be
consistent
of
chapter
14..
F
The
subject
property
is
located
with
the
mixed
use:
Corridor
Village
and
the
distance
separation
requirements
is
250
feet
from
residential
uses
and
other
a
B
Sales
establishments.
The
applicant
is
requesting
one
waiver
to
reduce
the
required
distance
separation
to
other
a
B
Sales
establishments
from
250
feet
to
zero
feet.
The
adjacent
adjoining
building
has
that
a
B
Sales.
F
Oh,
it
didn't
show
up
okay,
all
right,
so
this
is
directly
south
of
Guinea.
This
is
the
subject
site
directly
east
of
the
subject
site.
You
can
see
that
adjoining
building
west
of
the
subject
site-
and
this
is
probably
directly
north
of
Gandy
staff-
did
find
it
inconsistent
based
on
the
waiver
requested
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
C
F
F
AB
Good
evening
Mr
chairman
members
of
council,
my
name
is
Mark
Bentley,
401,
East,
Jackson,
Street,
Tampa,
33602
and
I
represent
represent
the
applicant
Mr
Jeff
Barnes
who's
seeking
an
S2
special
use
permit
to
allow
for
a
small
venue
at
the
subject-
property
similar
to
the
last
case.
You
heard
this
property
is
already
wet
zoned
for
beer
and
wine.
So
if
this
is
successful,
it
would
add
a
liquor
component
to
the
use
of
the
property.
AB
AB
AB
Here's
the
tenant
space
in
question,
the
proposed
a
b
request
relates
to
this
tenant
space
right
here,
there's
going
to
be
a
400
square
foot
outdoor
area
on
the
west
side
of
the
location.
Here
is
the
Carrabba's
that
was
closed
down.
Carrabba's
Outback
carryout.
Okay,
however,
that
a
b
is
still
active.
AB
In
summary,
the
request
meets
the
intent
of
the
LDC
regarding
the
general
and
specific
standards.
It
will
not
set
a
precedent.
It's
consistent
with
Land
Development
regulations
regarding
site
development.
It's
compatible
with
the
existing
zoning
pattern,
development
pattern,
character
of
the
area
and
it's
received
community
support.
We've
received
three
letters
and
support
and
I
believe
one
from
this
pointer,
and
hopefully
they
filter
down
to
your
offices.
That
concludes
a
presentation.
Unless
you
have
any
questions,
sure
any.
E
AB
Okay,
there
will
be
outdoor
Amplified
music,
but
it
will
adhere.
All
activity
will
adhere
to
the
city
of
Tampa
noise
ordinance
and
here
again,
if
you
know
this
area
I
think
that's
probably
the
there's
no
Residential
Properties,
that
would
be
impacted.
Gandy
Boulevard
is
you
probably
couldn't
hear
the
music
over
all
the
traffic
on
Gandy
and
the
elevated
expressway?
Then
we
have
a
Jiffy
Lube
and
a
Wendy's
next
door
with
a
Squawk,
Box
or
speaker
to
make
orders.
AB
A
C
AE
AE
AE
AE
Be
here
with
so
many
people,
I
worked
with
for
so
many
years.
I,
don't
have
any
friends.
So
it's
great.
We.
AB
C
Down:
okay,
if
we
have
any
other
questions,
questions
or
comments
for
the
petitioner,
anyone
the
anyone
in
the
audience
in
the
in
the
chambers
wish
to
speak.
Too.
Agenda
item
number
seven
file:
number
ab2,
23-07
.!
Do
we
have
anybody
online
motion
to
close
by
councilman,
maniscaka,
okay
seconded
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor?
Thank
you.
Councilman
Miranda.
S
According
to
be
the
first
reading
presentation
consideration,
an
order
is
approving
a
special
use,
permit
Su
for
alcohol
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premise
only
and
making
law
for
the
sale
beverage
regardless
of
alcohol
content,
beer,
wine
and
liquor
at
or
from
that
certain
Dot,
Plot
or
track
of
land
located
at
4308,
West,
Gandy,
Boulevard,
Tampa,
Florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
Section
3,
providing
that
all
ordinance
or
parts
of
ordinance
and
conflicts
are
repealed,
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
S
K
S
Sorry
orange
repeal
repeat
repeating:
ab1
slash,
18,
slash,
35,
providing
an
effective
date.
Thank
you,
sir.
You
threw
me
a
curveball.
C
A
D
AE
C
E
C
T
Okay,
thank
you.
I
moved
for
a
workshop
on
Bush
Boulevard,
including
speeding
on
Busch
Boulevard
and
different
mobility
issues
for
Bush
Boulevard
and
including
asking
fdoc
to
come
for
workshops.
Let's
say
in
let's
do
Jude,
please.
C
J
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
have
Stephen
Benson,
coordinate
with
staff
and
report
on
funds
that
are
collected
by
the
city
that
are
related
to
trees,
specifically
one
how
many
different
funds
exist,
two,
how
much
money
is
collected
in
each
three?
What
are
the
expenditures
in
each
for
the
average
contribution
to
each
fund?
Five,
how
many
trees
are
purchased
and
planted
in
each
fund
are
from
each
fund
six,
the
cost
of
maintenance
for
the
trees
and
seven
anything
else
that
money
is
spent
on
from
each
fund.
I
spoke
already
to
Stephen
and
I'm
gonna.
C
N
Yes,
sir,
that
the
devil
city
council
give
accommodation
to
the
Mazda
Nazareth
for
the
fifth
annual
awards
banquet
be
given
off
site
for
a
24th.
That's
tomorrow,
they've
got
the
colonel
they'll,
be
yes
speaker
tomorrow
and
I'll,
be
the
presentation.
C
Motion
made
by
councilman
good
seconded
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
Is
there
any
opposed
motion
passes
I.
N
So
this
week,
as
I
was
doing
my
travels
in
the
city,
there
was
supposed
to
be
a
meeting
for
the
mobility
over
at
Tampa
Heights,
as
I
came
across,
I
saw
the
small
little
sign
on
the
roadway,
as
I
was
putting
out
some
signs.
This
is
what
I'm
talking
about
that's
unacceptable,
because
people
can't
see
that
and
you're
talking
about
a
meeting
for
the
community.
N
They
just
can't
see
that
so
Mr
chairman
I'd
like
to
request
that
staff
report
back
for
information
regarding
any
type
of
zoning,
as
it
relates
to
enlargement
of
the
signs
for
the
right
of
ways
for
any
any
all-time
City
table
communication
for
meetings,
and
then
he
brought
back
in
the
staff
report
if
they
can
March
2nd.
Okay.
E
G
And
again,
Mr
Goods.
Your
motion,
just
to
be
clear
reply
is
goes
beyond.
Zoning
goes
to
community
meetings
as
well.
Yes,.
N
C
Okay,
there's
a
motion
made
by
councilman
good
second
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
Any
opposed
motion
passes
yes,
councilman
Miranda;
nothing,
no
I,
don't
without
objective
motion
to
receive
a
file.
My
Maniscalco
seconded
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
any
opposed
without
objection.