►
From YouTube: TCC PM 5/25/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
A
F
G
Ma'am
good
afternoon,
Madam,
chair
and
cre
board
today
this
what
we
have
before
you
is
approximately
2.7
Acres.
You
mentioned
that
this
acquisition
consists
of
four
Parcels.
This
is
within
the
Seminole
Heights
neighborhood.
These
this
particular
purchase
agreement.
G
I'll
give
them
a
second,
that's
all
right,
this
particular
contract
for
purchase.
It
provides
foreclosing
within
60
days
with
two
60-day
extensions
I
have
here
on
the
Elmo.
If
I
could
have
that.
B
G
Madam
chair
for
the
record,
Deputy.
B
Public
comments
should
go
first,
we
have
one
person
online
for
public
comments,
so
we
can
hear
them
now.
Is
that
correct?
H
Hello
Madam
chair.
Would
you
like
me
to
comment
now
then.
H
Okay,
thank
you,
hello,
Madam,
chair
and
members
of
the
board.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
publicly
on
this
matter.
My
name
is
Thaddeus
paraday
I
am
a
partner
of
a
property
development
firm
in
Tampa
called
Urban
reworks.
Our
goal
is
to
help
our
community
rethink
real
estate
and
I
would
like
to
speak
up
in
support
of
the
topic
of
affordable
housing.
H
Urban
reworks
is
a
property
development
and
property
management
firm.
We
are
focused
on
historic,
Rehabilitation
of
multi-family,
retail
and
residential
mixed-use
facilities,
and
we
are
committed
to
doing
property
development
in
a
correct
and
appropriate
manner,
consistent
with
historic,
Rehabilitation
responsibilities
and
Community
interests.
I
want
to
speak
in
support
of
property
development
firms
that
have
Community
stakeholders
in
mind.
H
H
I,
want
to
take
into
account
the
interests
of
the
community,
including
those
among
our
community
who
cannot
afford
or
attain
housing
and
I
want
to
encourage
property
development
firms
like
mine
to
consider
the
needs
of
affordable
and
Workforce
housing
in
everything
they
do
so.
I
know
that
this
proposal
involves
the
city
of
Tampa
acquiring
a
historic
church.
I
think
the
underutilized
church
properties
in
our
community
could
be
an
amazing
opportunity
to
create
more
affordable
and
Workforce
housing
units
and
I'd
like
to
encourage
the
council
to
keep
that
in
mind.
G
Now,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'll
start
over
and
I'll
I'll.
Take
it
from
the
top
here.
Thank
you
for
the
record
Elise
drumko
Deputy
Administrator
for
development
and
Economic
Opportunity.
What
we
have
before
you
today
is
proposed
acquisition
acquisition
of
four
Parcels
located
in
Seminole
Heights.
In
some,
the
parcels
are
comprised
of
approximately
2.7
Acres.
G
So
for
us
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
be
competitive
and
be
able
to
compete
with
private
developers
in
the
private
market,
and
so
this
was
the
purpose
for
the
special
call
today
in
some
we're
we're
seeking
it's
two
million
dollars
on
the
acquisition,
together
with
the
closing
costs
of
approximately
twenty
two
thousand
dollars.
I
do
have
the
the
parcels
up.
If
you
could,
on
the
Elmo,
these
properties
are
east
of
Nebraska
and
north
of
Dr
Martin,
Luther,
King,
Jr
and
again.
G
A
I
We
spoke
briefly
about
this.
This
is
a
property
we're
familiar
with
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
we
talked
about,
definitely
the
need
for
housing
and
the
type
of
housing.
The
concern
with
the
community
was
was
too
much
density,
concern
of
traffic,
and
so
just
to
let
them
know
that
we
would
be
working
with
the
community
to
figure
out
what
we
want
to
put
there,
but
we're
not
considering
like
four-story
high
rights.
G
So
you
you
make
a
great
Point
councilwoman,
and
so
this
particular
site
it
is
nestled
within
a
single-family
residential
community,
and
so
it
would
likely
not
be.
You
know
fit
with
the
context
to
put
in
a
multi-story
multi-family
Apartments.
So
for
us
we're,
you
know
we
we're
welcome
to
go
back
to
the
community
and
have
the
conversation
about
the
housing
typology,
and
you
know.
G
So
it's
a
it's
a
church.
Currently
there
was
a
there
was
an
attempt
to
rezone
the
property
before
in
the
past
for
approximately
40
units
I
believe,
but
that
did
not.
It
did
not
so.
G
It
is
currently
the
use
of
the
church
in
its
own
Seminole,
Heights
residential,
so.
E
B
D
D
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
L
K
L
You
never
know,
but
I
also
have
this
Gizmo
here
from
council
member
Carlson.
Please
be
advised
that
I
will
be
unable
to
attend
the
evening
city
council
meeting
on
Thursday
May
25th,
due
to
my
son's
graduation
I,
would
appreciate
this
information
regarding
my
absence,
be
reading
the
record.
So
here
you
go.
L
L
Motion
councilman
Vieira,
second
council
member
Miranda,
all
in
favor
aye
all
right.
Let's
clean
up
the
agenda
first
item
number
six
is
a
misnotice
and
will
not
be
heard.
May
I
have
a
motion
to
remove
that
from
the
agenda
motion
from
council
member
Miranda,
second
council
member
hertek,
all
in
favor
aye,
all
right.
We
go
to
number
one
Mr
Hussein.
Do
you
have
anything
or
was
that
just
take
it
off?
No,
you
handle
it
will.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
N
N
N
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
this
and
found
it
consistent
with
the
following
policies.
With
relating
to
promotion
of
the
compact
City
form
strategy
to
provide
greater
density
and
intensity
near
the
urban
Villages,
and
greater
flexibility
in
the
development
process
will
streamline
the
development
of
the
city
form
encouraged
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
N
In
the
Planning,
Commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
tax
amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
I
did
forget
to
mention
in
the
beginning,
this
was
transmitted
to
Deo
after
the
March
9th
hearing,
and
this
is
the
formal
first
adoption,
and
this
ends
my
presentation
in
the
applicant.
That's
the.
L
O
Okay
good
evening,
Council
Alex
Shaler,
400,
North,
Ashley
Drive,
as
Emily
mentioned
here
with
a
comp
plan.
Texas
Amendment,
which
I
think
is,
is
an
amendment
that
you
guys
don't
see
as
often
obviously
as
map
amendments,
so
I
wanted
to
go
through.
Procedurally,
a
little
bit
and
Emily
did
a
great
job
setting
this
up,
where
we
were
with
this
amendment
and
where
it's
going
so
Tyler
Hudson
was
here
presenting
on
this
case
back
on
March
9th.
O
That
was,
as
Emily
mentioned,
the
transmittal
hearing
that
was
sent
up
to
the
state
in
Tallahassee,
and
they
had
no
objections
or
comments
on
this
application.
That
happened
last
month
in
April
and
then
today
again
we're
here
for
our
first
adoption
hearing
and
while
the
state
was
reviewing
this
text
Amendment
this
text,
Amendment
wasn't
necessarily
an
original
idea.
This
was
stemmed
by
a
rezoning
that
we
filed
both
a
PD
rezoning
as
well
as
a
map
Amendment.
O
So,
while
those
applications
are
separate
from
this
one,
they're
all
relatively
tied
together
and
in
both
of
those,
the
PD
rezoning
and
the
map,
Amendment
were
unanimously
approved
on
first
reading
again
here
for
the
adoption
hearing
on
the
Texas
Amendment,
and
if
we're
fortunate
enough
to
gain
your
approval
tonight,
we
will
be
back
again
with
all
three
first,
the
second
adoption
hearing
and
the
second
readings
for
the
other
two
applications
on
June
15th.
O
O
This
is
permitted
in
some
areas
of
the
city,
as
the
policy
reads
today,
however,
there
are
certain
areas
of
the
city
where
you
cannot
blend
so,
as
you
can
see
on
on
this
one
we're
using
the
example
site,
which
is
the
site
that
was
with
the
associated
PD
with
this
assemblage
as
the
language
reads
today,
you
could
not
blend
the
density.
You
would
have
to
take
your
higher
density
future
land
use
that
umu
60
along
Kennedy
and
develop
that
square
footage
on
that
parcel.
O
Where
it
is
there
and
then
you
would
have
to
take
the
R20
on
the
Northern
Parcels
adjacent
to
North,
A
Street
and
put
that
density
there
so
going
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
where
is
blending
allowed
today?
So
the
blending
is
allowed
in
the
urban
Villages
I
think
you
all
are
really
familiar
with
those
eboards
Channel
District.
O
It's
a
portion
of
Tampa,
Heights
and
blending
is
also
allowed
in
other
specific
areas
that
meet
these
four
criteria
that
are
listed
on
the
screen,
so
the
first
one
is
that
all
of
the
parcels
must
be
a
PD
I
think
this
is
very,
very
important
and
Tyler
noted
the
importance
of
this
as
well
back
in
March.
It's
that
this
amendment
to
the
language
is
not
going
to
allow
anything
by
right
that
somebody
would
get
if
they
came
in
tomorrow.
O
They
have
to
have
this
as
part
of
a
PD,
that's
one
of
the
criteria,
so
it
will
come
before
you,
you
will
review
it.
The
second
is
that
it's
an
essential
Tampa
planning
district
that
envelope
planning
district
around
the
downtown
core.
It
has
to
still
be
within
half
a
mile
of
an
Urban
Village
and
it
has
to
be
greater
than
an
acre.
O
So
the
fourth
criteria
is
the
one
that
we
are
proposing,
I'm
not
to
change
but
to
expand
upon,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
a
lot
of
these
larger
sites-
we
do
come
before
you
with
with
big
city
block
redevelopments,
but
there's
also
smaller
redevelopments.
These
50
unit
deals.
These
12
unit
deals
on
some
of
the
smaller
land
in
the
city-
that's
a
great
candidate
for
infill
redevelopment,
but
to
do
that
they
need
something
like
a
policy
like
this
to
blend
their
density.
O
So
this
came
about
like
I
said
this
is
related
to
this
specific
project.
2517
Kennedy
I
know
you
all
are
familiar
with
the
location.
It's
at
the
corner
of
Kennedy
and
tampania.
The
developer
Tim
Johnson
met
extensively
with
the
neighbors.
Whenever
we
were
designing
the
site-
and
there
was
a
very
vocalization
that
they
wanted-
the
density
along
Kennedy.
Obviously
they
don't
want
it
adjacent
to
their
neighborhood
and
adjacent
to
North
a
so
that's
that's
how
this
came
about
and
that's
how
you
could
see.
O
If
we
did
change
this
amendment,
that's
it
would
allow
the
density
to
push
towards
Kennedy
Boulevard.
So
what
we
are
proposing
with
our
specific
language
in
this
amendment
is
that
again
all
the
other
criteria,
one
through
three,
are
remaining
the
same.
Four
is
remaining
the
same.
We
are
proposing
that
if
the
site
is
not
greater
than
an
acre,
the
site,
for
example,
is
0.65.
So
it's
not.
You
know
about
halfway
there,
but
for
sites
that
are
not
greater
than
an
acre.
O
They
can
use
this
blending
policy
if
they're
located
along
an
arterial,
roadway
and
the
reason
for
that.
We,
you
know
going
back
to
before
we
file
this
application.
We
brought
the
supplanting
commission
and
said
hey.
We
think
that
there's
a
way
to
make
this
happen,
and
we
think
this
makes
sense
not
just
for
this
project
but
for
future
infill
Redevelopment
projects,
and
we
all
agreed
that
that
tying
this
to
arterial
roadway
Frontage
was
a
way
to
ensure
that
the
density
would
be
placed
where
it
needs
to
be
placed.
So
what
are
the
city's
arterials?
O
O
So
these
are
where
the
city's
arterials
are
today
where
they
are
not.
There
are
no
arterials
currently
on
Harbor
Island
on
Davis
Island.
There
is,
but
as
as
the
Davis
Boulevard,
splits,
East
and
West,
that's
the
end
of
that
arterial
roadway
on
the
island.
O
So,
like
I
said
there
was
some
conversation
about
how
does
the
roadway
become
an
arterial
and
I
believe
that
staff
answered
that
during
the
transmittal
hearing?
But
if
we
need
any
bit
more
information
on
that,
you
know
we're
happy
to
elaborate
again,
it's
a
complex
formula
that
takes
into
account
speed
and
volume
and
roadway
design.
I
mean
it's
not
something
that
can
happen
overnight.
O
So
again,
the
most
important
Point
here
and
I'll
close
out
with
this
is
that
you
know
somebody
who's
looking
to
take
advantage
of
this
blending
policy
for
the
site,
that's
less
than
an
acre
would
have
to
come
before
you
with
a
PD
and
I
will
note
to
you
that
the
Planning
Commission
does
require
an
actual
physical
site
plan.
Note
on
the
site,
plans
that
says
this
project
is
taking
advantage
of
blending
policy
5.1.6.
O
So
you
would
even
be
directed
to
understand
that
they
were
employing
this
on
any
kind
of
PDs
that
come
before
you
as
Emily
mentioned,
Planning
Commission
staff
found
this
consistent
and
then
Planning
Commission
recommended
this
for
consistency
as
well.
So
I
am
available
to
answer
any
questions.
I
know
that
sometimes
the
text
amendments
can
be
a
little
bit
more
vague,
just
the
nature
of
of
the
Amendments.
But
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
E
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation.
That's
on
the
Channelside
District
correct
what
you're
talking
about
that!
You
want
this
done!
This.
O
Is
a
different
Amendment
than
the
one
I
was
here
on
last
week.
This
is
a
text
Amendment
to
the
comprehensive
plan
and
not
the
city's
code.
This
one
is
for
the
density
blending
and
not
the
over
you're
talking
about
the
multi-family
CBD
periphery.
O
It's
the
envelope
outside
of
the
city's
core
I,
can't
remember
it's
roadways.
It's.
M
P
J
K
O
Q
I
So,
even
with
this,
if
you
could
so
now
that
we
kind
of
have
a
visual
of
this,
take
a
look
at
then
again
the
the
roadways.
L
E
E
If
one
such
land
is
located
within
half
a
mile
radius
of
an
Urban,
Village
boundary
and
two
subject
subject:
prop
project
is
approved
through
a
plant
development
or
plan
development,
alternative
zoning
that
is
a
at
least
one
acre
in
size
and
b
or
maintained
Frontage
on
interior
roadway.
This
provision
may
not
utilize
any
land
outside
of
the
central
planning
district,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinance
and
conflict,
providing
her
ability
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
J
I'm
going
to
vote
no,
unless
we
were
able
to
amend
and
exclude
the
sections
on
Davis,
Island
and
all
properties
south
of
azile
other
than
that
I
think
I
think
it's
it's
it's
it's
it
kind
of
makes
sense.
But
again
these
areas
are
taxed
already
and
if
it's
not
areas,
we
want
to
encourage
density,
we're
not
going
to
have
transportation
corridors
in
those
areas
and
it's
just
the
wrong
direction
for
growth.
For
the
City
of
Tampa.
E
I
K
J
C
A
A
C
R
Afternoon,
David
Haye
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
I
just
want
to
confirm
the
their
agent
is
online.
Yes,
this
evening,
okay,
they
did
communicate
to
us
at
the
Planning
Commission.
They
may
seek
a
continuance.
So
if
we
could
maybe
ask
if,
if
that's
their
Direction
on
this
and
if
not
I'll
present,
it.
L
D
F
D
Well,
I'm
doing
a
rezoning
and
the
change
of
the
future
that
I'm
used
together
and
I
was
given
June
as
a
date
for
another
hearing
from
assuming
it's
a
zoning.
One.
S
You're
saying
development
coordination
I
can
reach
out
to
the
applicant
on
this.
One
I
do
not
believe
this
case
is
scheduled
for
June,
8th
I
will
double
check
and
I
could
let
the
applicant
know
if
that
can
go
forward.
June
8th
right
now.
We
have
14
rezoning
cases
going
for
that
night,
so
I'll
leave
it
to
cancel
as
a
decision
on
that.
L
I
mean
the
next
evening
session,
where
we
have
rezonings
is
July
20th
and
I.
Don't
see
how
many
items
we
have
then,
but
June
8th,
is
very,
very,
very
packed.
Would
you
consider
going
to
July
20th.
L
D
R
Council
members
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
applicant
is
clear
that
their
their
plan,
Amendment
and
Zoning,
don't
have
to
run
together.
She
could
if
she
would
like
she
could
proceed
forward
tonight
on
the
plan
Amendment
and
then,
if
the
zoning
is
actually
scheduled
on
the
8th,
that
still
could
be
heard
it
it's
yeah.
D
L
D
R
R
The
request
is
privately
initiated
is
small
scale.
It's
approximately
0.12
acres
in
size.
Currently,
the
subject
site
has
a
future
land
use
designation
of
light
industrial
and
the
applicant
is
looking
to
go
to
the
residential
10
future
land
use
category
a
general
location,
the
subject
site
it's
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
port
Tampa
City
neighborhood.
R
Here
we
have
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site.
You
could
see
the
subject
site
outlined
in
yellow
here
in
the
center
of
the
map.
This
is
South
O'brien
Street,
it
runs
South
and
dead
ends
into
MacDill,
Air
Force
Base.
This
is
the
fuel
tanks
for
mcdill.
As
you
could
see
by
this
area.
It's
slightly
dated.
There
are
a
number
of
single-family
detached
residential
that
has
been
developed
on
these
vacant
Lots
this
area
over
here,
Still
Remains
vacant.
A
lot
of
that
property
is
City,
owned
the
woods
and
then
you
get
more
industrial
As.
R
It
will
have
some
photos
of
the
subject
site.
This
is
looking
toward
the
subject
side
from
South
O'brien.
You
could
see
those
vacant
lots
that
were
shown
are
developed
with
single
family
detached
here,
we're
looking
South
down
O'brien
Street.
These
are
the
the
residential
units
across
the
street.
The
subject
site
is
out
of
frame
on
the
left
and
MacDill
Air
Force
Base
the
boundaries
where
those
trees
are
at
the
end
of
the
road.
R
R
R
Here
we
have
the
subject
site
outlined
in
Black.
You
can
see
it's
that
light
gray.
That
represents
the
remaining
light
industrial
Parcels
that
are
located
down
there
in
Port
Tampa
City,
there's
been
numerous
plan
amendments
over
the
years
amending
these
sites
to
the
residential
10
future
land,
use
that
the
residential
10
is
the
tan
color.
So
the
residential
10
actually
surrounds
the
site
on
four
sides:
the
street
shown
to
the
north.
R
That's
actually
that
drainage,
Canal,
there's
not
a
street
there,
and
the
blue
represents
MacDill
Air,
Force
Base
and
then
the
green
represents
the
recreation
open
space.
The
the
Southwest
Port
Tampa,
City
Park,
is
located
there
here.
We've
got
the
map.
The
future
land
use
map.
If
the
subject
site
is,
is
approved.
R
So
currently,
under
that
light,
industrial,
there
is
no
residential
potential
on
that
site,
but
there
is
potential
for
light
up
to
light
industrial
uses
up
to
approximately
7
500
square
feet
under
the
residential
10.
The
light
industrial
and
the
heavy
commercial
use
potential
would
be
removed
off
the
site
and
one
dwelling
unit
could
be
placed
there.
Any
non-residential
uses
except
residential
support
would
need
to
meet
commercial
locational
criteria
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
square
footage
is
greatly
reduced.
R
R
M
D
Hello
just
wanted
to
thank
everyone
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
Savannah.
Ponce
I
am
representing
my
company
Ohio
Real
Estate
Group
LLC.
We
do
a
lot
of
real
estate
or
wholesaling.
We've
done
a
pixel
plan.
We
do
a
wide
range
of
our
real
estate
and
we're
good
today,
because
the
goal
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
from
my
industrial
to
residential
ten,
so
that
would
build
a
single
family
address
home.
There.
D
I
know
that
the
political
High
Hazard
made
obstacle
the
way
for
this,
but
like
if
but
is
surrounded
by
other
residential,
and
it's.
D
Neighborhood
the
plan
is
to
build
a
territory
home
of
about
three
thousand,
a
little
over
3
000
square
feet
in
living
space
and
about
a
little
over
four
thousand
square
feet.
L
You
thank
you
very
much
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
No,
do
we
have
anybody
in
the
public
that
wishes
to
speak
on
item
number
two
I
see.
No
one.
Do
we
have
anybody
else
register
for
public
College
may
I
have
a
motion
to
close
a
motion
from
council
member
Viera
council
member
Miranda
any
questions
before
we
close,
no
all
right
all
in
favor,
aye
aye
all
right!
Thank
you
very
much,
council
member
Vieira.
Would
you
mind?
Reading
item
number
two?
Yes,.
K
Sir
Mr
chair
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance
amending,
imagine,
2040,
Tampa,
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
7702,
South
O'brien
Street,
from
light
industrial
Li
to
residential
10
r10,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict
providing
for
separability
providing
an
effective
date.
C
L
T
T
Here
is
a
site
on
an
aerial
map
it's
outlined
and
read
and
highlighted
in
yellow.
It
is
just
to
the
west
of
the
Channelside
Drive
and
just
north
of
East
Twiggs
Street.
As
you
can
see,
the
area
is
very
Urban
and
high
intensity
and
density
in
nature.
Just
to
the
east
of
the
site
is
the
Ebor
Channel
and
Port
Tampa
Bay
As,
you
move
South,
you
have
the
cruise
ship
terminal
facilities
and
you
also
have
the
streetcar
stop
there.
Kennedy
Boulevard
is
just
a
little
bit
farther
to
the
South
As.
T
You
move
north
of
the
site.
You
have
the
Salman
Expressway
as
you
go
north
of
the
summit
Expressway
you
move
into
Ybor
City
and
the
Gas
Works
development
is
in
this
General
vicinity.
Right
here,
As
you
move
west,
you
have
new
Sierra,
Parkway
and
Tampa
Union,
Station
and
then
further
west
outside
of
the
pitcher,
is
downtown
Tampa.
T
I
would
like
to
note
this.
Ariel
is
a
little
outdated.
This
parcel
right
here
that
is
currently
showing
vacant
with
some
like
commercial
uses,
is
being
developed
as
a
mid-rise
residential
building
and
directly
across
from
the
site
that
is
now
a
mid-rise
residential
building
as
well,
and
that
will
be
reflected
in
the
pictures.
T
T
T
So
here's
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
you
can
see
the
subject
site
is
recognized
under
that
dark
gray
color,
which
represents
the
heavy
industrial
future
land
use
designation,
as
you
can
notice
in
the
map
that
there
is
not
very
much
heavy
industrial
left
in
the
channel
District.
There
have
been
quite
a
few
plant
amendments
over
the
years
to
change
this
from
heavy
industrial
to
Regional
excuse
100.
T
Additionally,
the
site
directly
north
of
it
came
before
some
of
this
Council
last
year
under
tacpa
2225,
and
that
was
changed
to
Regional
mixes
100.
The
maps
are
updated
quarterly,
so
that
has
not
been
reflected
on
this
map.
Yet.
T
And
here
is
the
proposed
feature
land
use.
You
can
see
it
recognized
under
the
regional
mixes,
100,
designation
and
I
apologize
somewhere
between
here
and
County
Center.
My
pretty
slide
that
shows
the
development
potential
fell
out.
So
I
pulled
it
out
of
my
staff
report.
Currently
under
the
heavy
industrial
future
land
use
designation.
This
I
could
be
considered
for
a
little
over
65
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
residential
uses
are
not
permitted
in
the
heavy
industrial
under
the
regional
mixes
100
designation.
T
They
can
be
considered
for
100
dwelling
units
or
a
little
over
152
000
square
feet.
I
would
like
to
note
they
are
in
the
CBD
periphery,
though,
so
those
numbers
could
be
bonused
up
too
high
or
densities.
Intensities
foreign
was
found
consistent
with
policies.
They
call
for
designating
sufficient
land
to
accommodate
Tampa's
share
of
the
regional
growth
and
that
support
converting
non-residential
properties
along
mixed-use
corridors
to
residential
or
mixed
uses,
along
with
ensuring
that
development
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
land
uses,
promoting
density
that
supports
walking
and
uses
of
public
transportation.
T
B
Much
a
question
about
the
is
classified
as
the
hazard
area.
Did
you
take
that
into
consideration
at
all
the
because
it's
that's.
The
only
question
that
I
have
is
that
if
that
area,
although
there
is
a
lot
of
residential
there,
it
is
considered
that,
because
of
maybe
it
was
industrial
before.
S
T
Yeah
Planning
Commission
stop
dead,
take
into
account
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area,
and
that
was
reflected
in
our
staff
report.
The
Planning
Commission,
however,
disagreed
with
planning
commissions
staff
on
that
binding
and
decided
that,
even
though
this
is
within
the
coastal
Hazard
because
of
the
current
development
pattern,
it
made
sense
to
recommend
a
consistency
on.
B
This
okay,
okay,
thank
you
very
much
applicant.
O
Good
evening
again,
Council
Alex
Shaler
400
North
Ashley
Drive
I'm
back
with
a
map
amendment
in
the
channel,
District
I
won't
run
through
the
location
details,
but
I
think
this.
This
particular
block
will
look
very
familiar
to
you
at
the
northwest
corner
of
twigs
and
Channelside
I
use
a
little
bit
of
PowerPoint
magic
to
reflect
the
recent
complaint
Amendment
to
the
north
of
this
site.
So,
as
you
can
see
the
way
that
this
site
stands
today,
it
is
an
island
of
industrial
and
an
otherwise
rme
100
portion
of
the
channel
districts
there.
O
This
chart
goes
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
density.
The
main
point
here
is
just
that
heavy
industrial
obviously
does
not
allow
residential
uses
at
all
we'd
be
introducing
residential
by
changing
this
to
RMB,
100.
and
I.
Think
to
my
point
earlier,
regarding
that
this
is
creating
an
island
of
industrial
I.
Think
it's
important
to
recognize.
O
While
we
understand
that
it
is
important
to
preserve
industrial
lands,
I
think
there
is,
there
is
a
place
for
them
and,
unfortunately,
it's
no
longer
or
fortunately
no
longer
in
the
channel
district
and
leaving
this
piece
as
heavy
industrial.
Obviously
presents
some
serious
compatibility
concerns,
given
that
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
is
now
residential,
we're
not
going
to
put
a
big
manufacturing
facility
on
this
site
that
close
to
high
density,
mixed
use,
residential
and
so
again.
O
That
is
the
trending
pattern
of
the
district,
and
it
was
at
one
time
very,
you
know
classified
by
heavy
industrial,
but
it
is
it's
no
longer
been
that,
as
the
Sam
mentioned
it's
transitioned
over
the
years.
I
think
this
is
a
good
map
showing
all
of
these
green
dotted.
Hatched
areas
are
sections
of
land
that
have
been
amended
from
their
original
industrial
designation,
not
just
to
a
mixed-use
future
land
use
designation,
but
specifically
to
rmu
100,
so
high
density,
mixed
use
and
these
two
box
is
shown
in
green-
are
the
ones
that
Sam
referenced.
O
So
when
you
look
at
it,
creating
an
environment
for
successful
Urban,
Development
I
think
one
of
the
major
components
of
that
is
Transit
and
in
this
site
by
Tampa
standards,
has
very
good.
Trans
I
mean
the
tico
streetcar
line
runs
just
along
Channel
Side,
there's
heart
routes
along
Channel
side,
and
this
is
very,
very
close
to
the
salmon
and
to
Adamo
Drive,
some
major
connectors
as
well
as
Tampa
Union
Station.
O
We
would
be
remiss
not
to
address
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area.
That
was
that
was
a
great
question
and
you
know
we
deal
with
this
on
all
of
our
projects
in
the
channel
district-
and
you
know
you
all
have
heard
this
perspective
before.
But
when
you're
reviewing
the
comprehensive
plan,
you
have
to
look
at
the
plan
as
a
whole,
so
the
coastal
management
section,
while
it's
very
important,
it
is
one
small
section
and
an
otherwise
very,
very,
very
large,
comprehensive
plan.
So
you
know
we're
looking
at
some
of
these
other
supporting
policies
and
I.
O
Think
that's
what
the
Planning
Commission
was
looking
at
as
well.
There
are
so
many
policies
that
support
this
kind
of
development
in
this
District.
It's
hard
to
ignore
the
overwhelming
majority
and
so
I'll
run
through
these
kind
of
quickly.
I
know
Sam
had
mentioned
a
couple,
but
to
speak
back
to
Urban
Villages,
as
we
discussed
a
bit
earlier.
The
comp
plan
does
say
that
the
greatest
share
of
the
city's
growth
should
be
directed
to
the
urban
Villages.
This
is
fully
located
within
the
channel
District
Urban
Village.
O
The
next
set
is
in
regards
to
City
Planning
I
mean
the
comp
plan
is
very
clear
on
further
developing
these
bacon
or
underutilized
sites
and
I'll.
Note
that
a
little
bit
later
in
Greater
detail
couple
slides
from
now
and
there's
some
policies
related
strictly
to
multi-family
residential,
and
although
this
is
a
mixed
use
category,
you
know
it's
very
possible
that
there
will
be
a
high
percentage
of
multi-family
residential
there
and
in
the
comp
plan,
notes
that
you
know
we
should.
O
We
should
allow
multi-family
in
areas
that
are
predominantly
occupied
by
multi
and
in
the
channel
District.
As
we
all
know,
it's
very
prevalent
in
multi-family
development
and
there's
policies
that
support
mixed
use.
Corridors
as
well,
specifically
converting
non-residential
development,
which
has
the
site
exists
as
it
currently
is
today,
and
then
the
housing
stock
we've
had
this
discussion.
O
You
know,
time
and
time
again
there
are
150
people
moving
to
our
city
every
day
and
we
have
to
have
a
place
to
put
them
and
in
the
channel
district
is
a
very,
very
desirable
place
to
live.
It's
close
to
downtown.
O
You
don't
have
to
own
a
car
to
live
in
the
channel
District
you
can
bike,
you
can
walk
to
restaurants,
it's
essentially
that
link
between
Water
Street
and
what
will
be
the
future
Gas
Works
development
and
it's
on
the
water-
and
you
know,
there's
they've
done
a
really
good
job
of
you
know:
congregating
their
Green
Space,
it's
a
great
place
to
live,
and
you
know
I
think
that
you
know
it's
evident
by
the
current
population
in
the
district
that
people
want
to
be
there.
O
Although
this
area
is
governed
above
by
the
comprehensive
plan
you
know
given,
it
is
in
its
own
CRA,
the
CRA
produces
their.
You
know
quote:
neighborhood
plan
is
really
what
it
is
with
their
visions
and
their
goals
for
the
district,
and
this
is
a
direct
quote
from
the
plan
and
I've
used
this
before
you
all
have
seen
this
I
think
it's
a
really
great
way
to
show
or
the
channel
District
was
and
where
it's
going.
O
You
know
it
says
in
the
future,
it's
going
to
be
limited
industrial
uses,
which
we've
already
seen
today
in
a
large
and
growing
residential
component.
Three
specific
sections
from
the
plan
I
wanted
to
note
on
again.
You
know:
I'd
mentioned
that
this
is
an
underutilized
site,
and
the
plan
recognizes
that
it
has
this
shaded
in
green,
which
is
their
code
for
areas
that
are
that
are
currently
underutilized
in
the
district
and
the
second
one
is
a
chart
that
numerically
shows
what
you
know.
O
The
future
land
use
map
shows
you
graphically
it's
that
you
know
this
area
is
predominantly
rmu
100
and
you
know,
even
those
acreages
are
even
more
increased,
because
this
is
back
in
2021,
so
it
hasn't
reflected
some
of
the
recent
plan
amendments
in
the
adjacent
area
and
then
number
three
I
thought
was
really
important
to
note
that
the
channel
District
CRA
plan
actually
has
a
picture
of
this
site
and
the
conditions
of
blight
section
in
their
plan.
So
you
know
that
that
just
goes
to
speak
that
this
is.
O
This
is
a
site
that
needs
to
be
redeveloped,
that
this
is
a
great
candidate
to
put
something
really
really
great
here,
and
to
do
that,
you
know
we
need
this
rmu
100
designation.
So
again
the
Planning
Commission
voted
to
recommend
this
consistency,
and
then
that
is
the
end
of
my
presentation,
so
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
Any
questions
you
guys
have
a
question
since
you're
wanting
to
go
from
Industrial
girl
to
mix
use.
Could
there
be
an
opportunity
for
attainable
and
affordable
housing
in
this
development
and.
O
I
will
note
too
I
mean
this
is
a
little
bit
beyond
the
scope
of
this
specific
plan
Amendment,
but
this
the
applicant
or
the
developer
that
we're
filing
this
application
for
also
developed
the
two
or
entitled
the
two
Parcels
directly
north,
both
of
which
have
10,
affordable
housing
set
aside.
So
it's
very
possible
that
this
this
could
do
the
same.
B
Well
outside
and
it's
on
the
heart
line,
so
that
would
be
of
great
interest.
You
know
to
people
who
need
affordable
housing.
Thank
you.
E
O
Yeah,
the
General
District
current
parking
ratio
is
0.75
per
unit
for
multi-family
I,
believe
it's
0.5
per
thousand
for,
like
retail
commercial
uses,
that
is,
that
was
changed
recently
with
the
overhaul
of
the
parking
code
of
the
CBD
and
channel
District,
and
then
your
other
question
regarding
what
was
it
again
remind
me?
Any.
O
T
You
want
an
answer,
sure,
yeah,
okay,
so
the
with
the
bonus
provision,
the
max
the
maximum
they
could
attain
on
this
side
would
be
200
dwelling
units
or
a
little
under
305
000
square
feet
of
residential
or
non-residential
200
units.
Yeah.
T
I
have
to
apologize.
The
parking
ratio
is
outside
of
my
scope,.
O
I
can
I
can
calculate
it.
Probably
yeah,
like
I,
said
it's
0.75
per
unit.
There
is
no
visitor
parking
requirement.
What
yeah.
K
O
E
L
J
M
C
L
S
Zane
Hussein
development
coordination
agenda
item
number
four
case:
ab2
2311
is
a
request
for
our
special
use,
two
for
a
small
venue,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor
consumption
on
premises.
Only
at
the
location,
7107,
North,
Florida,
Avenue
I
will
first
go
ahead
and
share
the
aerial
view
of
the
property.
S
S
As
you
see
the
property
right
here
outlined
in
red,
this
is
to
the
right:
you'll
have
SHRM
zoning
to
the
West,
you'll
have
shci
and
shpd.
The
current
zoning
of
this
lot
is
shci
Seminole,
Heights
commercial
intensive.
Looking
around
it,
you
have
a
commercial
you'll,
have
a
storage
unit.
You'll
have
a
a
car
lot
to
the
north,
to
the
South.
You'll
have
Tampa's
Bose
ice
cream,
you'll
have
residential
to
the
east
and
also
to
the
South.
You
will
have
a
a
baseball
field,
as
you
see,
to
the
South.
S
S
The
proposed
use
is
for
a
restaurant.
The
hours
of
operation
will
be
Monday
through
Friday
9,
30
a.m,
till
10
p.m,
Saturday,
10,
30
a.m,
till
10
p.m,
and
Sunday
10
30
a.m,
till
4
pm
the
required
parking
for
the
site
is
14
parking
spaces
and
the
applicant
is
providing
16
parking
spaces,
and
this
is
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
and
also
to
the
South
where
the
parking
will
be
provided.
S
S
As
you
see
the
the
site,
this
will
be
a
Bamboozle
in
the
Heights.
S
S
S
Development
review
and
compliancef
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code
should
be
the
pleasure
of
city
council
to
approve
the
application.
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
to
the
revision
sheet,
which
is
within
the
staff
report
between
first
and
second
reading.
Here.
I
P
Thank
you
Mr
chairman
and
Council
Jim
Porter
I'm,
with
the
Akerman
Law
Firm
401
East
Jackson
Street
Tampa
I'm,
here
we're
playing
the
applicant
I
was
going
to
do
the
big
reveal
and
tell
you
it
was
Bamboozled,
but
Zayn
beat
me
to
the
punch,
we're
very
excited
about
this
project.
As
you
know,
bamboozle
was
a
long
time
downtown
classic
restaurant
now
we're
moving
to
the
heights.
P
P
Okay,
there
we
go,
there's
Bose
councilman!
Thank
you.
That's
perfect!
Councilman
hertek
I
want
to
show
you.
This
is
a
close-up
of
the
patio
area.
It
is
facing
Florida
and
directly
to
the
north
and
I
want
to
show
you
what's
directly
opposite
of
that.
Just
so
you
get
an
idea,
because
that
is
obviously
always
going
to
be
a
concern.
P
This
is
the
lovely
view
directly
opposite,
where
the
patio
will
be
that's
immediately
to
the
north.
It's
an
auto
body
repair
shop.
So
it's
a
very
heavy
commercial
use.
We
are
not
aware
of
any
opposition,
and
this
is
a
rarity
I
think
for
most
applications.
Certainly,
for
me
we're
asking
for
no
waivers,
so
we
respectfully
ask
for
your
approval.
We
concur
with
the
staff
recommendation
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Any.
L
On
this
item-
item
number
four:
we
have
most
nobody
to
register
correct.
Is
there
anybody
on
the
next
item
either?
Oh,
it's
a
real
good
motion,
close
from
council
member
Miranda,
second
council
member
Clendenin,
all
in
favor
all
right
all
right,
any
opposed
council
member
Clendenin.
If
you
would
like
to
read
number
four.
J
I
move
file
number
ab22311,
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use,
permit
s-2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcohol
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
track
of
land
located
at
7107,
North
Florida,
Avenue,
Tampa
Florida,
as
more
particularly
described
in
section
2.
Providing
that
all
ordinances
are
parts
of
ordinances
in
Conflict
are
repealed.
Providing
an
effective.
J
M
C
S
Item
of
the
night:
that's
the
last
item
is
any
saying:
development
coordination
agenda
item
number
five
case:
ab2
23-13
now
I
just
want
to
clear
for
the
record
that
there's
a
correction
to
the
agenda
item
language.
The
ordinance
language
is
correct,
but
the
agenda
item
language
needs
revisions.
So
there's
a
request
for
a
special
use,
two
for
a
small
venue
for
consumption
on-premises.
Only
at
the
location,
1501,
West,
Swan,
Avenue,
the
ordinance
language
is
correct.
S
I
will
first
go
ahead
and
show
the
aerial
view
of
the
property.
This
is
in
Hyde
Park.
As
you
see
it's
on
West
Swan,
the
property
is
to
the
South
you'll,
have
a
commercial
you'll?
Have
a
restaurant
use,
you'll
have
different
types
of
mixing
establishments
to
the
north,
you'll
have
residential
to
the
West
you'll
have
more
commercial
establishments
and
restaurants
and
to
the
east.
You
will
have
a
commercial
and
also
residential.
S
The
proposed
use
is
for
36
room
Hotel,
the
property
will
have
hours
that
are
consistent
with
chapter
14..
S
There
is
currently
an
ab1
at
the
site
of
on
Swan,
which
is
on
the
first
floor
that
A
B
Sales
area
is
approved
via
ab115-28
and
that
is
for
3969
square
feet
indoors
and
271
square
feet,
Outdoors
for
a
total
of
4240
square
feet
total.
Now
this
A
B
Sales
is
ab2
for
upstairs.
So
the
downstairs
was
on
Swan,
which
we'll
stay,
which
will
remain
the
proposed.
A
B
Sales
era
is
for
upstairs,
and
that
is
for
ab
sales
area.
For
the
second
floor
indoors
only
for
23
149
square
feet.
S
The
proposed
parking
for
this
one
site
and
the
hotel
is
required
for
46
parking
spaces
and
the
applicant
is
providing
46
parking
spaces.
The
Establishment
downstairs
compared
to
upstairs.
There
are
two
different
applicants
and
tenants
that
are
operating
each
establishment.
S
As
you
see
here,
where
the
intersection
of
West
Swan
you
have
South
Oregon
here,
you'll
have
on
Swan
is
here
at
the
corner.
You
have
other
commercial
establishments
also
within
this
shopping
center
and
this
the
proposed
a
B
Sales
will
be
on
the
second
floor
as
I'll
show
you
in
pictures
to
come.
S
All
right
here,
you're
at
the
intersection
of
South
Dakota,
Avenue
and
West
Swan
Avenue,
and
this
picture
here
on
South
Oregon
and
west
Swan
Avenue,
looking
right
at
the
site
on
Swan
and
then
upstairs
will
be
where
the
proposed
Hotel
will
be.
S
I
am
standing
in
front
of
the
restaurant
here,
looking
down
on
the
the
strip
of
commercial
establishments
and
upstairs
you'll
have
the
proposed
a
B
Sales
area.
S
S
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
Land
Development
code
should
be
the
pleasure
city
council
to
approve
the
application.
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
to
the
revision
sheet,
which
is
within
the
staff
report
between
first
and
second
reading.
The
one
waiver
triggered
a
inconsistency
overall.
Finding
that's
a
reason
and.
U
Good
evening,
Council
David
singer
with
the
law
firm
of
older
Lundy,
1000
Cass
with
my
able
colleague,
Colin
rice.
My
presentation
is
extremely
short
and
I
would
like
to
just
take
a
moment
because
of
the
shortness
of
our
presentation,
and
this
being
my
first
time
in
front
of
this
new
Council
to
say.
Congratulations
to
all
of
you
on
your
re-election
and
a
special
hello
and
congratulations
to
councilman
Clendenin
councilwoman
Henderson.
We
look
forward
to
working
with
you
over
the
course
of
the
next
four
years.
U
This
is
an
ab2
special
use:
approval
for
a
boutique
hotel
called
Pali
house,
but
it's
not
for
the
hotel
itself.
The
hotel
itself
is
already
approved
through
a
previous,
resulting
this
is
just
the
A
B
Sales
area
in
the
hotel,
small
venue
under
100
rooms,
beer,
one
and
liquor
consumption
on
premises.
Only
as
Zane
said,
we
are
in
the
Hyde
Park
Urban
Village,
which
is
north
of
Swan
and
west
of
South
Oregon
second
floor
of
an
existing
structure.
There
is
no
exterior
walls
being
modified.
There
are
no
outdoor
spaces
being
requested.
U
There
is
no
change
in
the
building
height
whatsoever.
Here
we
are
facing
north
on
Swan
again.
The
hotel
is
currently
undergoing
that
build
out.
In
the
second
floor,
the
on
Swan
restaurant
is
on
the
Eastern
edge
of
that
same
structure,
and
this
hotel
sits
directly
above
existing
retail,
and
you
can
see
the
primary
entrance
along
Swan
is
at
the
center
of
this
image.
U
This
is
the
approved
PD
SI
plan
back
from
2008.
I've,
just
called
out
via
the
Highlight
that
the
hotel
use
has
already
been
approved.
The
allowable
uses
are
to
the
right.
The
build
out,
as
I
said,
is
underway.
Tampa's
Land,
Development
code
definition
of
Hotel
includes
the
provision
quote
typically
accessory
uses
to
a
hotel
include
such
things
as
a
restaurant
or
a
bar
lounge,
that's
section
27-43
again,
alcohol
is
available
for
consumption
on
premise:
only
no
package,
no
off-premise
zooming
in
on
the
site
plan
again
only
in
the
existing
second
floor,
subject
to
the
application.
U
The
primary
guest
entrance
is
along
the
south
of
the
building
facing
Swan,
with
the
rear
entrance
for
the
parking
area
again
entirely
an
indoor
request.
It
will
be
36,
boutique,
hotel
rooms,
there's
a
small
Lounge
area
and
a
kitchen
adjacent
to
check-in
the
lounge.
Really.
This
is
for
an
amenity
for
the
hotel
guests
and
food
will
be
available
from
the
kitchen
when
the
lounge
is
open.
U
The
total
Hotel
occupancy
is
152.,
which
is
well
under
the
large
venue
threshold
of
300..
This
is
Comfortably
by
definition.
A
small
venue-
and
the
reason
that's
important
for
me
to
share
with
you-
is
hotels
over
a
hundred
rooms
are
available
and
eligible
for
an
administrative
alcohol
approval,
but
because
we're
small
offering
only
36
rooms.
We
have
to
process
this
as
an
Su
too,
and
so
we're
here
tonight
in
front
of
you
we're
requesting
one
waiver
as
Zayn
said,
and
thankfully
it
is
not
a
parking
waiver.
We
are
within
the
Urban
Village.
U
U
In
fact,
we
have
a
letter
of
support
from
on
Swan,
which
will
be
submitted
into
the
record
again:
Hyde
Park
Urban
Village.
We,
which
encourages
vertically
integrated
uses
through
the
comp
plan
I
will
put
them
up
just
so.
You
could
see
the
policies,
but
I
don't
need
to
belabor
this
and
go
through
them.
To
conclude,
the
request
we
believe
is
consistent
with
Hotel
use
consistent
with
the
area
compatible
with
the
area.
We're
excited
about
the
Pali
house,
joining
Hyde,
Park
Village.
U
L
E
I
Yes,
thank
you
file
number
ab2-23-13,
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use,
permit
S2
for
alcohol,
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcohol
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
1501,
West,
Swan
Avenue
second
floor.
M
C
E
M
L
Aye
aye
any
opposed
councilmember
Miranda
yeah
I
have
a
motion,
sir
councilman
I'd
like
to
present
accommodation
off-site
to
Henry
achezabel,
who
is
I,
believe
90
years
old
and
just
for
his
many
contributions
over
the
years
and
volunteer
service
motion.
F
We
have
a
correction.
I
was
reminded
that
it
was
out
of
order
to
present
these
resolutions
during
the
Workshop,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
that
be
rescinded,
and
that
council
tonight
then
ratified
Dominica
Cobb
as
a
member
of
the
HPC
and
Samantha
Decker.
As
a
member
of
the
vrb.