►
From YouTube: TCC 8/31/23 PM
Description
Tampa City Council
A
A
A
B
C
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
F
F
All
right
at
this
time,
just
a
couple
of
announcements.
First
I'd
like
to
let
everyone
know
that
our
attorney
Martin
Shelby
will
be
virtual.
Until
then,
Miss
Andrea,
Zone
and
the
City
attorney
is
going
to
be
sitting
in
and
then
he
will
be.
Logging
in
and
I
would
also
like
to
recognize
Miss
Molly
Bieber
and
the
mayor's
Youth
Corps.
The
mayor's
Youth
Corps
is
sitting
in
the
back.
F
If
you
at
all
stand
up,
but
it
will
acknowledge
you
all
right,
a
great
group
of
students
from
throughout
Tampa
that
serve
and
take
part
in
the
mayor's
Youth
Corps
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
speaking
to
their
group
and
and
seeing
the
changes
over
many
years
and
they're
learning
How
the
City
Works
city
government
and
in
all
aspects
of
our
city.
So
thanks
for
joining
us
stay
as
long
as
you'd
like
it'll,
be
an
exciting
meeting
and
you'll
get
to
see
us
at
work
all
right.
A
F
F
H
F
H
F
B
F
All
right
any
opposed
anything
else,
sir.
All
right.
We
have
request
that
we
take
item,
number
9,
10
and
11
after
number
two.
Why?
Because
they're
alcoholic
beverage
hearings-
and
we
know
that
we
are
going
to
have
quite
a
bit
of
public
comment
on
the
the
others
just
to
keep
it
going.
May
I
have
a
motion
to
move
item
number
9,
10
and
11
to
be
heard
after
two.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
in
favor
motion
from
councilmember
Clinton,
councilman
Viera,
all
in
favor.
B
F
All
right
at
this
time
we
have
all
right.
We
we'll
go
to
well,
we'll
throw
everybody
in
once.
We
start
with
item
number
nine.
Everything
else
is
non
quasi-judicial.
So
at
this
time,
Miss
Johnson
Velez
motion
to
approve
the
agenda.
Don't
move
motion
from
councilwoman
her
attack
summer
councilman
Randall
in
favor
aye,
all
right.
Yes,
ma'am
item
number
12.
J
Thank
you.
Mr
chair
members
of
city,
council,
Susan
Johnson,
but
Les
legal
department.
Item
number
12
is
a
resolution
that
I
prepared
for
Council
based
on
your
direction
after
my
summary
and
report
on
the
EPC
proposed
rule
changes.
So
this
is
just
a
resolution
objecting
to
the
inclusion
of
maps
one
and
two
and
that
we
will
submit
it
to
the
EPC
if
Council,
if
it's
council's
pleasure,
to
approve
this,
this.
F
I
F
L
L
L
If
you
have
questions,
I
can
go
over
some
of
those,
but
generally
speaking,
as
we
just
saw
on
Tuesday
and
Wednesday,
this
was
a
code
change
to
27
149,
because
the
first
thing,
if
there's
an
event
of
a
public
of
a
local
state
of
emergency
declared
by
the
mayor
that
anything,
if
you
had
to
council,
cancel
your
meeting,
you
do
not
have
to
show
up
to
make
a
motion
to
move
all
those
cases.
They
would
automatically
be
moved
to
the
next
agenda.
L
20
27
149.
The
second
part
of
that
is
the
motion.
Is
the
amendment
to
require,
what's
not
currently
in
the
code,
people
to
put
the
number
of
their
application
on
both
the
letter
and
the
sign,
even
with
the
new
signs
that
are
that?
Were
we
showed
you
a
couple
of
weeks
ago?
The
record
number
will
still
be
on
there.
L
The
next
one
was
for
the
hype
in
a
residential
zoning
District
for
fencing.
If
one,
if
one
a
Residential
Properties
next
to
a
commercial
property,
they
can
go
to
eight
feet
by
right
versus
having
to
seek
a
design
exception
to
get
the
two
extra
feet.
The
commercial
side
already
has
the
ability
to
go
by
right
go
to
the
eight
feet:
adaptive
reuse,
which
is
allowed
in
Ebor
in
the
non-residential
zoning
districts.
Adaptive
reuse,
is
allowed
in
for
properties
that
are
either
in
a
local
or
National
Historic
District
or
a
local
or
national
landmark.
L
This
will
allow
them
not
to
parking,
would
be
based
on
Mobility
standards
instead
having
a
3.3
per
thousand,
for
instance,
it
may
be
able
to
be
reduced
if
there's
on
site
on-street
parking
in
front
of
the
property
and
such
the
next
one
was
the
definition
of
Courtyard
which,
if
you
recall,
we
had
a
couple
of
discussions
about
the
courtyard
issue
which
had
to
do
with
what
is
a
courtyard
right
now
in
the
chapter.
27
is
not
defined
it's
now.
L
L
One
was
for
the
West
Shore
overlay
District,
which
the
biggest
one
is
Green
Space
and
reduction
in
parking
make
parking
more
Westward
is
one
of
the
areas
of
the
city
that
is
actually
more
urban
in
nature,
so
that's
mimicking
the
downtown
and
the
City
Zoning
districts
of
some
of
their
requirements,
and
the
last
one
was
the
electronical
Electro
electronic
electric
vehicle
charging
stations.
Thank
you.
It
took
me
a
moment.
I
just
wasted,
like
five
minutes
of
your
time,
to
say
that
EV
capable
and
EV
ready,
cable
lemies.
L
F
F
L
I
I
L
I
L
F
A
I
Shcg
and
shci
development
amending
section
27-211.8
schedule
a
permit
used
by
District
amending
section
27-238.
Where
is
your
overlay?
District
development
standards,
amending
section,
27.283.12
off
street
parking
space
standards,
amending
section,
27,
slash,
288,
Solid,
Waste,
amended,
section,
27-290.1,
fencer,
regulate
fence
and
wall
regulations,
repeating
all
ordinance
of
parts
of
ordinance
and
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
D
Yeah
Clinton,
yes,
Henderson;
yes,
Vieira,
yes,
Miranda,
yes,
Carlson!
Yes,
her
attack,
yes,
Maniscalco,
yes,
motion
carry
unanimously.
Second
read:
second:
public
hearing
is
scheduled
for
September
21st
2023
at
10,
30
A.M
at
the
old
city
hall,
building
located
at
315,
East,
Kennedy,
Boulevard
third
floor
Tampa,
Florida.
L
Conde
will
make
coordination
item
number
two
is
specifically
to
the
east
Tampa
overlay
District.
It's
a
change
to
section
27156
adus
are
a
special
use
one.
This
is
to
amend
that
section
to
specifically
state
they're
allowed
in
the
East
Tampa
overlay
District.
That
was
a
neighborhood
initiated
request.
F
F
P
D
F
And
just
for
the
record,
Mr
Shelby
is
online.
I
see
him,
so
we
have
an
attorney
virtually
present
all
right
at
this
time,
we're
going
to
take
items
9,
10
and
11..
If
you
are
going
to
speak
on
9,
10
or
11,
please
stand
up,
raise
your
right
hand,
and
we
will
swear
you
in
because
these
are
now
quasi-judicial
9,
10
and
11.,
and.
B
D
L
This
request
is
ab23-12
for
a
property
at
101,
North,
Franklin
Street,
the
applicant
is
Robert
Rivera.
This
is
a
revised
staff
report
on
the
original
staff
report.
I
believe
he
received
had
a
wrong
first
name
on
the
application
on
the
applicant,
and
the
aerial
that
was
that
you
received
is
wrong.
This
is
that
101
Franklin
Street,
the
yellow
dot
at
Washington
and
Franklin
the
applicant
is
the
soft.
The
property
is
currently
wet
right.
Now
it
has
a
two
cop
which
is
basically
for
beer
and
wine.
L
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
add
regular
liquor
to
the
property,
which
is
for
consumption.
On
premise,
only
the
size
of
the
property
has
not
changed.
Is
1236
square
feet
indoors
and
815
square
feet.
Outdoors
parking
is
not
required
in
the
CBD,
so
this
is
the
the
Wet
Zone
survey.
You
can
see
the
property
outlined
in
yellow
again.
This
is
currently
being
operated.
L
Sales
hours
are
percussion
to
be
consistent
with
chapter
14.
and
the
applicant
is
asking
for
is
not
requesting
any
waivers.
There
are
some
corrections
that
need
to
be
done
to
the
site
plane
between
first
and
second
reading.
As
noted
in
the
staff
report
on
the
site
data
table,
he
needs
to
remove
the
term
for
cop.
It's
not
a
term,
we
utilize
anymore
and
he
needs
to
add
for
a
b
classification,
a
as
a
small
venue
and
just
some.
L
L
F
L
F
A
F
R
I
move
file,
number
A,
B,
2-23-1-2,
ordinance
being
read
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
approving
a
special
use
permit
S2
for
alcoholic
beverages,
beverages
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcoholic
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
track
of
land
located
at
101,
North
Franklin,
Street,
Tampa
Florida
as
more
particularly
described
in
Section
3,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
in
conflicts
are
repealed.
Repealing
ordinance,
number
97-57
providing
an
effective
date.
D
L
Eric
Cotton
development
coordination.
This
is
for
ab2320
for
the
property
at
709
South
Oregon
Avenue,
the
applicant
is
Cooper
Rosario.
This
is
within
the
Hyde
Park.
The
hype
Arc
PD
for
Hyde
Park
Village
there's.
Currently,
this
is
the
location
shown
in
red
there's.
Currently,
an
alcohol
permit
on
the
property,
but
not
for
this
location.
The
adjacent
property
has
is
a
special
restaurant,
which
is
for
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
L
L
This
applicant
is
asking
for
roughly
1921
square
feet
for
a
small
venue,
beer
and
wine
consumption
on
premise:
only
he's
in
the
Hyde
Park
Village.
They
have
a,
they
have
1026
parking
spaces
available
and
he
requires
to
have
20..
So
in
looking
at
the
numbers
for
Hyde
Park,
they
have
adequate
parking.
L
He
was
asking
for
a
waiver
there's
a
requirement
that
resistant
separation
from
another,
a
b
establishments
250
feet
as
I
showed
you
he's
directly
adjacent
to
one
so
he's
asking
who,
from
250
down
to
zero
and
the
adjacent
property.
Again
it
has
a
it's
a
special
restaurant
for
marijuana
liquor.
So
this
is
marijuana
liquor
as
a
special
restaurant.
This
is
going
to
be
beer
and
wine
for
a
small
venue.
L
A
L
Primarily,
they
need
to
list
the
waivers
on
the
site
plan
that
I
just
mentioned,
and
they
need
to
remove
this
lady
to
add
some
notes
to
the
site
plan.
Basically,
sales
area
shall
not
be
located
within
a
parking
lot
or
a
loading
space
and
all
permits
after
April,
1st
2011
shall
post
a
placard.
That's
provided
by
the
city
on
the
property,
basically
stating
that
what
they
were
approved
for
Council
have
any
questions.
L
L
This
is
the
site:
it's
currently
not
open
as
under
construction,
that's
the
parking
garage
and
when
LaShawn
went
out
to
toadas
this
morning,
there's
really
not
much
to
see
at
this
point
because
he's
not
ready
to
open
yet,
but
he
should
hopefully
be.
You
know,
I'm
sure
he's
trying
to
get
open
in
time
for
the
holiday
season,
which.
T
T
Community
focused
concept
office
photo
studio,
Auditorium,
Test
Kitchen,
so
it's
kind
of
the
modern
day
office,
and
this
will
be
an
extension
of
that
concept
to
provide
office,
tenants
and
members
with
an
experience
more
conducive
to
business.
So
somewhere
they
could
actually
go
and
order
a
beer
or
wine
and
actually
hold
a
meeting.
We
have
conference
rooms
there
available
as
well.
So
all.
F
L
P
An
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
and
ordinance
approving
a
special
use
permit
S2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beer
and
wine
at
or
from
the
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
709,
South,
Oregon,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
two.
Providing
that
all
ordinances
are
parts
of
ordinances
in
Conflict
are
repealed,
provided
in
an
effective
date.
We.
D
G
L
Intercontinent
development
coordination-
this
is
for
this
is
ab2-23-23
for
property
at
5232,
South,
MacDill
Avenue,
the
applicant
is
Mark.
Bentley
Council
just
saw
this.
Maybe
a
month
ago
for
rezoning
from
the
CG
to
a
plan
development.
The
applicant
is
seeking
there's
a
correction
in
the
staff
report.
The
applicant
is
seeking
a
restaurant
consumption
up
on
premise
of
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
L
The
previous
approval
that
this
property
had
was
at
ab1
14-55
they're,
adding
liquor
that
was
particularly
just
for
beer
and
wine
requested
hours
are
consistent
with
chapter
14
required
to
have
13
spaces
are
providing
13
parking
spaces.
The
correct
total
they're,
providing
2062.8
square
feet
indoors
and
889.86
square
feet,
Outdoors
for
a
total
of
29
52.66
square
feet,
they're
a
little
under
3
000
square
feet
of
for
the
ab
establishment.
L
They're
asking
for
two
waivers:
one
is
the
distance
separation
from
residential
uses
that
required
from
the
required
250
feet
down
to
3.8
feet.
The
residential
is
directly
behind
this
property
to
the
East
and
from
other
sales
other
a
B
Sales
establishments
from
250
feet
to
125
feet.
Another
sales
establishments
are
it's
a
food
mart,
so
it
probably
has
a
two
APS.
That's
further
south
on
MacDill
two
couple
of
chains
that
need
to
be
made
between
first
and
second
reading.
L
L
V
Manasseh,
thank
you
Council
good
evening,
Ryan
manassi
Johnson
Pope,
401
East
Jackson
Street.
Thank
you
for
having
me
thank
you
to
staff
and
I'll.
Try
not
to
be
as
redundant
with
the
information
if
you'd
like
on
address
I'll
address
that
first
comment:
I'll
save
it
towards
them,
but
just
so
you
know
we
are
proposing
to
address
the
outdoor
Amplified
sound.
That
was
brought
up
during
the
rezoning
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
it's
more
in
lines
with
you
know
typical
ab1
operating
hours.
V
V
F
F
N
Councilwoman
heart
attack,
thank
you.
File
number
ab2-23-23,
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
approving
the
special
use
permit
S2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
restaurant
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcoholic
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
5232,
South,
MacDill,
Avenue,
Tampa
Florida
as
more
particularly
described
in
Section
3.
Providing
that
all
ordinances
are
part
of
ordinances
in
Conflict
are
repealed,
repealing
ab1-14-55,
providing
an
effective
date.
F
C
F
D
F
H
Good
evening
this
is
Danny
Collins
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
tacpa
2303.
It's
a
map
Amendment
for
the
property
located
at
7,
400,
Interbay
Boulevard.
Just
a
quick
background.
This
is
a
privately
initiated
Amendment,
it's
small
scale
in
size,
the
subject's
size,
approximately
18.32
acres,
and
the
request
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
from
light
industrial
to
community
mixed
use.
35.
H
Here
is
the
general
location
map
the
subject
sites
within
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
It's
within
the
Gandy
Sun
Bay
South
neighborhood
on
portions
of
the
site
are
within
the
Cosi
Hazard
area
and
within
the
McDowell
Air
Force
Base,
clear
Zone,
and
it
is
located
here
on
our
locator.
Our
location
map
here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
a
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject.
Sites
highlighted
in
yellow
it's
just
south
of
the
intersection
of
South
Lois
Avenue
Interbay
Boulevard.
H
This
is
the
northern
boundary
of
mcdill
Air
Force
Base
to
the
South
there
is.
There
are
some
single-family
uses
to
the
west
of
the
site
and
as
well
as
north
of
Interbay,
you
have
some
single
family
as
well.
This
there's
a
storage
facility
just
to
the
West
on
Interbay
Boulevard,
and
then
this
is
South
Manhattan
Avenue.
Just
to
the
couple
blocks
to
the
east
of
the
site.
Here
is
an
image
looking
North
from
the
subject
site
towards
Interbay
Boulevard,
there's
an
image
looking
South
at
the
subject
site
from
Interbay
Boulevard.
H
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
As
you
can
see,
the
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
light
industrial
future
land
use.
Designation,
that's
represented
by
this
great
color
directly
to
the
west
of
the
site,
is
a
land
recognized
under
the
residential
10
designation
to
the
northwest
of
the
site
is
land
recognized
under
the
tu-24
designation
directly
to
the
north?
Is
land
recognized
under
the
residential
35
designation?
We
have
CMU
35
just
to
the
east
of
the
site
and
then
to
the
south
of
the
site.
H
F
H
H
Here
is
on
the
proposed
future
land
use
map
showing
the
subject
site
on
under
the
Community
mixed
use.
35
feature
land
use,
designation.
The
CMU
35
designation
allows
development
up
to
a
2.0
far
or
up
to
35
dwelling
units.
An
acre
well
allows,
you
know,
say
anything
from
single
family,
Town
Homes
and
as
well
as
commercial
General,
Uses
and
multi-family.
H
Here's
a
slide
showing
the
potential
impacts
of
the
proposed
change
So.
Currently,
under
the
light
industrial
designation
residential
uses,
are
not
permitted
under
under
the
light
industrial
designation,
just
under
1.2
million
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
can
be
considered
on
the
site,
so
anything
from
the
industrial
uses
or
commercial
uses,
as
proposed
under
the
cmu-35.
H
A
maximum
of
60
or
641
dwelling
units
could
be
considered
on
the
site
or
just
under
1.6
million
square
feet
of
non-residential
or
residential
uses
through
a
mixed-use
development
could
be
considered
under
the
CME
35
designation.
So
this
request
would
increase
the
non-residential
intensity
on
the
subject
site
from
a
1.5
far
to
a
2.0
far.
It
would
remove
consideration
of
industrial
uses
from
the
subject
site
and
it
would
also
introduce
the
consideration
of
residential
uses
on
the
site.
H
Bow
on
the
planet,
commission
staff
found
the
request
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
went
to
the
Planning
Commission
a
couple
weeks
ago
on
August
14th
on
the
planet.
Commission
found
the
request
consistent
with
the
following
policies
on
the
planet.
Commission
found
the
requests
consistent
with
policies
that
seek
to
encourage
compatible
compact
higher
density
development
on
the
planet.
Commission
found
the
request
consistent
with
land
use
policy,
2.1.2
that
encourages
infill
development
on
vacant
and
underutilized
sites.
H
And
finally,
the
planet
commission
found
the
request
consistent
with
housing
policy
1.3.1,
which
seeks
to
designate
sufficient
land
for
residential
development
based
on
those
considerations
on
the
planet.
Commission,
it
should
be
Planning
Commission
recommends
the
proposed
map
amendment
to
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
temple
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions
and.
F
W
X
H
We
found
it
inconsistent
with
policies
that
seek
to
the
supplantic
Christian
staff.
We
found
it
inconsistent
with
the
industrial
protection
preservation
policies
as
well
as
policies.
They
speak
to
development
in
the
coastal
Hazard
area.
This
would
introduce
a
significant
number
of
residential
uses
or
residential
square
footage
or
units
within
the
coal
sizard
area.
So
those
were
the
basis
so.
P
H
M
Evan
Johnson
with
City
Planning
staff
I,
did
want
to
also
following
up
the
Planning
Commission
as
well
mentioned
that
we
did
have
staff
objections
to
this
particular
Amendment
related
to
the
same
items
of
Planning
Commission
staff
brought
up
regarding
increasing
density
in
the
coastal
Hazard
area,
as
well
as
the
loss
of
industrial
land.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
to
put
that
on
the
record
with
you
all
as
well.
Since
I
said
that
we
didn't
have
a
staff
presentation.
C
C
Let
me
say
this
that,
what's
before
you
is
nothing
related
to
that
particular
project,
and
it
is
not
relevant
to
your
decision
and
the
fact
that
they
are
not
one
again.
What
you
should
look
for
in
a
comprehensive
plan.
Change
is
the
maximum
development
potential
for
that
property,
because
there
is
no
obligation
as
you
as
you
sit
here
today
or
for
the
developer,
to
move
forward
on
that
you're.
Looking
to
solely
as
amending
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
future
land
use
map
to
allow
whatever
development
is
allowed
under
that
category,.
B
C
C
Z
So
I'm
here
to
provide
some
context.
Okay,
that's
that's
what
I'm
here
not
to
talk
details
on
a
site
plan,
so
the
subject
site
represents
our
fourth
investment
in
the
city
of
Tampa
and
six
in
the
Tampa
Bay
Region
and
the
subject
side
is
representative
of
our
ongoing
development
of
new
homes
in
desirable
locations
throughout
this
region.
Z
Further
context
on
why
we're
here
requesting
a
land
use
change
the
the
subject
site
is
became
available
for
redevelopment
as
the
site
was
originally
utilized
as
a
waypoint
for
drywall
deliveries
from
the
Port
of
Tampa
Bay.
However,
the
majority
of
those
facilities
have
since
relocated
to
the
Apollo,
Beach
and
Gibsonton
area.
Z
So
tonight
we're
here
regarding
the
change
in
land
use
the
first
step
in
the
approval
process.
In
conjunction
with
our
initial
submittal,
we
met
with
SOG
leadership
and
held
a
community
meeting
at
in
south
of
Gandy.
We
modified
our
land
use
application.
That's
before
you
tonight,
based
on
constructive
feedback
from
SOG,
specifically
SOG
requested
retail
uses
in
the
inclusion
of
unit
types
for
families
due
to
the
ongoing
housing
needs
at
mcdill.
Z
A
total
of
30
of
our
proposed
units
are
three
bedrooms,
which
is
significantly
higher
percentage
than
the
adjacent
communities
the
land
use
doesn't
require
this.
The
zoning
code
doesn't
require
this,
but
we're
providing
a
mix
of
housing
options
and
neighborhood,
serving
retail
in
our
community
adjacent
to
one
of
Tampa's
largest
single
site
employers,
and
we
view
this
as
a
win-win.
With
that
I'll
turn
it
back
to
Angela.
It'll.
Take
you
through
the
compatibility.
Y
So
we've
talked
a
little
bit
already
about
the
vicinity
where
this
is
located,
but
again
just
to
kind
of
reiterate.
It
is
south
of
Gandy
and
it
is
in
a
predominantly
mixed-use
neighborhood.
It
is
surrounded
on
three
sides
by
existing
residential
sites,
again
we're
asking
for
that:
Community
mixed
use,
designation,
which
is
consistent
with
the
transitional
uses
and
the
existing
uses
that
are
in
the
area.
Y
The
sites
was
found
to
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
in
support
of
that
they
reference
specific
housing
and
land
use
goals.
In
making
that
determination,
there
are
multi-family
Apartments
to
the
north.
There
are
multi-family
Apartments
to
the
east
of
the
site,
also
to
the
West.
There
are
existing
town
home
units
and
then
big
deal
Air
Force
Base
to
the
South.
Y
We
believe
that
this
you
know
as
Planning
Commission
found.
This
is
consistent
with
the
existing
mixed-use
neighborhood
I
won't
go
into
too
much
detail
about
the
existing
PD,
but
there
has
been
a
companion,
PD
zoning
submitted
again.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
cited
several
land
use
goals
that
in
support
of
its
consistency,
findings
for
land
use
and
housing.
Ultimately,
they
wait
in
favor
of
the
preservation
of
industrial
and
the
Coastal
High
hazard
area,
but
they
decided
numerous
land
use
and
housing
strategies
in
support
of
finding
of
consistency.
Y
The
existing
development
is
a
Trucking
terminal
currently,
which
is
utilizing
only
a
fraction
of
its
available
intensity
upon
that
res
on
that
industrial
Zone
sites.
One
important
point
is
that
these
subject
site
is
zoned,
light
industrial,
so
even
without
a
future
land
use
Amendment
live
local
would
allow
residential
uses
in
this
on
this
property.
Y
The
proposed
sites-
The
Proposal,
we
believe,
is
a
more
suitable
development
than
what
what
could
be
allowed
under
the
existing
future
land
use
category
and
as
for
Transportation
issue,
Urban
I'm.
Sorry,
as
for
industrial
uses,
this
site
is
it's
kind
of
incompatible
as
an
industrial
use
with
what's
grown
up
around
it
over
time.
Y
This
area
has
transitioned
from
its
industrial
character
to
a
mixed-use,
residential
and
Commercial
neighborhood
and
as
for
Coastal
management
policies,
that
there
is
nothing
in
the
the
comprehensive
plan
that
prohibits
increased
density
within
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area,
but
it
does
require
the
evaluation
of
evacuation
times.
Routes
and
shelter
available
shelter
capacity.
G
Thank
you
good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
Jim
Von
ringtone,
with
Joe
Evans
engineering,
I'm,
a
certified
emergency
manager
nationally
and
in
Florida,
as
well
as
a
certified
floodplain
manager
for
the
last
25
years,
also
15
years
of
experience
as
an
emergency
manager,
not
in
Collier
County,
where
I
oversaw
17,
evacuations
and
Sheltering
operations.
Most
of
a
major
I
was
asked
to
take
a
look
at
this
project
and
analyze
the
impact
on
evacuation
and
Sheltering,
and
my
detailed
analysis
is
in
your
report,
but
essentially
I
found
no
significant
impact
here.
G
AA
AA
Peak
hour
trips,
we
also
looked
at
the
live
local
act
which
could
allow
for
up
to
1800
residential
dwelling
units
that
had
very
similar
numbers,
8
000,
daily
trips,
666
amp
hour
trips
and
702
PM
peak
hour
trips,
and
then
we
also
looked
at
what
is
proposed
under
the
zoning
that
would
be
coming
after
this
significantly
last
trips,
27.66
151
am
peak
hour
and
235
p.m.
Peak
hour,
trucks.
F
B
F
Right
we
have
Gene
and
Benjamin
if
you
could
turn
on
your
cameras,
raise
your
right
hand
we're
going
to
square
you
in
and
oh
and
Cali
okay.
So
we
have
all
three:
oh
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
sorry,
yeah,
I'm,
sorry,
you
know
yeah,
we
got
rid
of
those.
So
if
you
have
any
speaker
waiver
forms,
my
legislative
Lisa
will
take
them
and
Lisa.
Do
you
want
to
read
the
names
out
or
do
you
want
me
to
read
the
names?
Yes,
okay,
so
we'll
go
to
the
three
register.
Speakers
first
up
is
Gene
Strohmeyer.
F
E
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Hey.
My
name
is
Gene
Strohmeyer
and
I
live
south
of
Gandy
for
32
years.
I
purchased
my
affordable
home
at
the
tender
age
of
23..
My
daughter,
who
just
turned
24,
unfortunately
felt
she
had
to
leave
Tampa
because
it
was
inaccessible
to
her
college,
educated
self
that
I
paid
for
and
moved
to
New
Jersey,
so
she
can
afford
to
live
somewhere.
Isn't
that
a
joke?
But
it's
true
so
this
property
interface
is
7400
is
a
light
industrial,
it's
not
residential.
They
don't
deserve
residential.
We
don't
need
residential.
E
B
E
E
She
didn't
lie
when
she
said
she's
going
to
fundamentally
change
and
our
city
would
be
unrecognizable.
That
was
the
truth.
The
only
one
I
know
back
to
the
issue,
my
neighborhood,
my
home,
for
so
many
years
is
unrecognizable.
It's
that
way
because
of
our
non-residential
properties
are
lost
due
to
the
Reckless
disregard
for
our
safety
and
quality
of
life,
which
is
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
Our
quality
of
life
counts.
E
Yet
built
approved
totaling,
eight
thousand
six
freaking
179
units.
You
double
that
by
the
people,
two
people
per
unit-
that's
17,
000
extra
people.
You
want
to
talk
about
trips,
it
doesn't
matter
if
they
have
a
trip
to
work.
It's
about
getting
out
of
here.
We
took
30
minutes
to
go
from
inner
bay
to
Gandy.
Just
two
days
ago,
when
we
were
stuck
here,
full
y'all
y'all.
Don't
listen
to
this.
Don't
let
them
lie
to
you.
It's
a
oh!
E
By
the
way,
we're
not
supposed
to
have
building
down
here
at
all,
that's
a
bull
and
if
you
pay
for
some
expert
to
tell
you
that
it's
okay
to
have
another
17
000
people
down
here,
they're
lying
because
they're
paid
for
this
is
zoned
light
index
drill.
It's
a
it's
occupied
by
Trucking
Company,
it's
used
daily,
but
they
don't
evacuate
from
their
job.
They
evacuate
from
Apartments
we're
talking
again
17
000
new
people.
Thank.
F
E
B
AB
AB
It's
there
wasn't
enough
time
notified
for
us
to
do
this
and
the
properties
and
the
vaccination
Zone
a
and
that's
always
a
big
issue
living
south
of
Tampa.
We
just
had
to
deal
with
the
evacuation
this
past
week
and
it's
always
a
problem.
It's
a
problem
when
we're
not
being
forced
to
evacuate.
So
this
just
adds
more
to
the
issue.
I
think
it
would
not
be
a
good
idea
to
have
this
and
is
all
I
have
to
say.
Thank
you.
I
see
you
back.
AC
Hi,
my
name
is
the
port
Tampa
civic
association.
President
and
I.
Ask
you
please
to
deny
this
request.
I've
been
around
the
past
two
weeks
after
this
storm
and
I,
all
the
permanent
resources
are
gone
are
most
and
the
apartments
that
have
been
built
up
and
it
caused
so
much
flooding
on
hungry.
That
need
to
not
be
during
the
storm
lived
here
for
years
and
years
and
I've
received.
AC
Like
continuing
to
go
home
at
all
their
plans,
I
ask
that
you
deny
it
and
don't
allow
double
what
is
currently
being
built
on
inner
bay.
The
infrastructure
down
here
just
can't
take
it
and
the
sewer
system
can't
take
it.
I
know
they
build
bigger
stores
when
these
apartments
go
up,
but
the
existing
infrastructure
just
can't
handle
all
of
it.
So
I
ask
you,
on
behalf
of
the
port
Tampa
civic
association,
to
deny
this.
F
AE
AB
AE
F
AF
We
live
in
Southtown
Park
in
the
neighborhood
adjacent
to
the
trucking
company,
where
I
also
happen
to
be
the
HOA
president
and
I'm
asking
you
this
evening
to
please
vote.
No
I've
lost
my
train
of
thought
being
that
I
have
the
baby
right
now,
but
just
some
of
the
main
points
that
that
come
to
mind,
we
don't
need
additional
Apartments.
We
need
retail.
We
need
things
that
are
going
to
bring
jobs
into
the
community.
AF
The
additional
Personnel
coming
into
South
Tampa
not
only
poses
a
hazard
from
an
evacuation
standpoint
and
congesting
Roads,
and
things
like
that.
But
some
of
the
other
effects
that
don't
seem
to
be
measured
in
this
forum
is
how
it
causes
contention
and
division
within
the
community,
because
what
you
don't
see
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
division
with
the
old
time
saugers
versus
the
new
time
folks,
and
when
you
just
constantly
allow
this
constant
building
you're,
causing
it
an
unattentional
consequence
of
division
in
the
community.
AF
Sorry
about
that,
but,
additionally,
again
back
to
retail,
no
one
is
driving
through
south
of
Gandy
and
saying
gee.
You
know
what
these
people
need
additional
Apartments
like.
They
really
need
more,
no
they're
saying
that
we
need
businesses.
We
need
stuff
to
actually
sustain
the
people
that
we
constantly
bring
into
the
community,
and
that's
all
I
have
thank.
F
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
Carol
Ann
Bennett,
the
Planning
Commission
board
had
to
vote
on
this
twice,
because
the
first
vote
was
a
tie
for
some
reason.
The
board
members
kept
asking
about
the
evacuation
time
for
just
this
specific
neighborhood.
They
couldn't
get
that
answer
because
evacuation
times
are
evaluated
by
Zone
A
B
C
Etc.
Q
This
really
seemed
to
confuse
them
and
I
believe
some
of
them
voted
for
this
as
consistent
because
of
that
confusion,
both
the
city
staff
and
Planning
Commission
staff
found
this
amendment
inconsistent
and
one
of
the
things
they
cited
was
the
fact
that
we
are
already
failing
the
current
evacuation
level
of
service
required
by
the
state.
Unfortunately,
the
board
missed
that
fact.
At
least
one
member
admitted
they
hadn't
read
the
staff
reports.
I
reiterate
that
both
the
city
staff
and
Planning
Commission
staff
found
this
amendment
inconsistent
I.
Q
Ask
that
you
also
recognize
that
this
is
a
very,
very
bad
idea.
I
want
to
remind
you
that
this
is
a
legislative,
not
quad
quasi-judicial
and
the
bar
for
legislation
is
much
lower.
You
do
not
have
to
rise
the
level
of
competent
and
substantial
evidence,
and
the
applicant
does
not
have
the
same
legal
tool:
tools
of
retaliation,
no
matter
how
many
units
they
say
they
will
build.
This
change
will
allow
641
dwelling
units
and
that
right
travels
with
the
land.
Q
If
they
change
their
mind,
if
it
is
sold,
they
can
build
641
units,
that's
641
units
in
evacuation,
Zone,
a
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area,
special
flood
zone,
AE
the
100-year
flood
plain
and
the
sfha
special
flood
Hazard
area.
It
violates
comp
plan
objective
1.1,
which
calls
for
no
net
increase
in
residential
density
in
chha
the
chha,
that's
recognized
by
the
comp
plan.
It
would
eliminate
the
potential
for
Industrial
and
Commercial
development.
Many
municipalities
are
belatedly
realizing
the
short-sightedness
of
allowing
the
loss
of
their
industrial
land.
Q
The
South
Tampa
Community
wants
this
property
to
remain
industrial
because
it
provides
jobs
and
it
does
not
harm
evacuation
times.
People
evacuate
from
their
homes,
not
their
workplaces.
So
keeping
this
non-residential
is
a
win-win
for
South
Tampa,
the
two-step
the
staff
analyzes
said
this
request:
conflicts
with
the
comp
plan's
industrial
protection
and
preservation
policies.
The
request
is
inconsistent
with
the
policy
which
seeks
the
preservation
of
industrial
lands.
The
plan
recognizes
industrial
lands
as
key
economic
engines
and
seeks
to
strengthen
Tampa's
role
as
a
regional
employment
center.
Q
The
proximity
to
Old,
Port,
Tampa
and
related
industrial
uses
makes
the
subject
site
still
viable
for
Port
related
industrial
uses.
This
request
will
remove
18.32
Acres
of
light
industrial
land
staff
cited
in
City
staff,
cited
inconsistencies
with
lu
policies,
8.9.1.2
and
0.3.
It
is
inconsistent
with
policies
to
maintain
industrial
areas
and
encourage
the
continued
existence
of
industrial,
warehousing
and
distribution
activities
to
provide
a
range
of
employment
opportunities.
Q
Staff
said
the
preservation
of
industrial
lands
and
Public
Safety
outweigh
the
benefits
of
a
medium
density.
Mixed-Use
development
on
this
site
that
is
not
located
in
an
Urban,
Village
or
employment
center
staff
stated
maintaining
and
improving
evacuation
times
is
critical.
Considering
the
county
is
not
meeting
its
evacuation
level
of
service
CM
policies,
1.1.2
and
0.6
on
September
30th
2021,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
in
the
city's
playing
Department
made
a
presentation
to
city
council.
Please
play
the
first
video.
S
Comprehensive
plan
establishes
unique
Visions
for
the
New
Tampa
cleaning
district
and
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
Those
excerpts
are
shown
on
your
screen,
and
these
are
based
upon
what
the
plan
refers
to
as
limited
growth
opportunities
in
these
areas
and
the
research
that
we
performed
you
can
see.
This
slide
displays
the
residential
growth
that
has
occurred
in
the
city
over
the
past
10
years.
The
most
recent
10
years
of
growth
is
broken
into
five-year
increments.
The
2010
residential
units
are
shown
in
Gray
and
the
growth
that
occurred
from
2010
to
2015.
S
That
increase
is
shown
in
dark
blue
in
the
growth
that
occurred
from
2015
to
2020
is
shown
in
red.
The
two
districts
that
have
seen
the
highest
residential
growth
in
that
period
are
the
new
Tampa
planning
district
and
the
South
Tampa
cleaning
District.
This
trend
is
not
in
line
with
the
comprehensive
plans
of
vision
for
growth,
which
is
supposed
to
be
limited
in
these
two
districts.
S
Looking
at
the
New
Tampa
Trend,
it
appears
that
the
rate
of
growth,
the
residential
growth
is
decreasing,
since
the
growth
from
2010
to
2015
was
significantly
more
than
the
earth
from
2015
to
2020.
So
the
the
red
is
smaller
than
the
blue.
You
see
the
growth
is
actually
decreasing,
whereas
in
the
South
Tampa
District,
the
opposite
is
true.
The
the
red
the
growth
in
the
last
five
years
is
more
than
the
growth
that
occurred
in
five
years
prior.
AG
Based
on
the
district
characteristics,
the
comprehensive
plan
have
viewed
these
two
districts
as
providing
quote
limited
growth
opportunities.
Unquote,
there
are
also
references
in
the
comp
plan
calling
these
two
areas
quote
areas
of
stability.
Unquote,
this
the
comp
plan
really
envisions
The
Three,
core
districts,
Central
West,
Shore
and
University
as
having
the
most
growth
opportunities
within
the
city
of
Tampa.
Q
Foreign,
so
you
heard
them.
The
development
in
South
Tampa
is
not
in
line
with
the
comp
plan.
The
majority
of
Transit
and
employment
opportunities
are
found
in
the
West
Shore,
Central
and
University
districts.
Therefore,
growth
should
be
highest
in
those
districts
and
lowest
in
the
South
Tampa.
Unfortunately,
the
exact
opposite
has
happened.
Q
If
you
look
at
this
graph
again,
you'll
see
that
that
new
Tampa's
growth
got
smaller
as
those
big
new
housing
develops
were
finished,
where
the
exact
opposite
was
true
of
South
Tampa,
the
red
is
bigger
than
the
blue,
because
our
rate
of
residential
growth
is
actually
increasing.
We
are
the
fastest
growing
one.
We
should
be
the
lowest
growing.
This
is
the
opposite
of
the
comp
plan's
vision
for
growth.
The
University
District
should
have
the
highest
growth
in
population
employment,
but
instead
it
had
the
lowest
growth.
One
percent-
that's
one
percent
growth
in
10
years.
Q
I
want
you
to
look
at
this
map.
This
is
the
University
District.
This
is
the
central
district.
This
is
part
of
the
the
other
District
I.
Want
you
to
notice
that
this
they
don't
need
to
evacuate.
You
need
to
think
about
how
important
that
is
think
about
how
much
it
costs
a
person
to
evacuate
for
days.
Think
about
how
much
damage
is
done
to
their
cars
and
their
homes.
Q
Think
about
how
hard
it
has
been
for
Hurricane
Ian's
victims
in
Fort
Myers
to
get
insurance
companies
to
pay
out
and
how
high
their
deductibles
are
think
about
the
pictures
of
flooding
from
Adalia.
Think
about
how
Dahlia
didn't
even
come
close
to
us.
Yet
the
damage
from
flooding
is
going
to
be
very,
very
expensive,
Urban
Tampa
Bay
said
it
best.
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
allow
new
development
in
locations
which
are
at
high
risk
of
inundation
flooding
during
flood
events.
Each
property
developed
in
such
locations
is
another
property.
Q
The
rest
of
us
will
be
subsidizing
in
perpetuity
with
our
insurance
and
disaster
relief
payments.
Both
SAS
said
this
is
inconsistent
and
that
is
the
opposite
of
what
the
city
needs.
Please
vote.
No.
Thank
you.
Oh
our
one
other
thing:
if
you
all
saw
this
I
put
it
in
your
packets,
this
was
presented
by
Gene
Duncan
on
February
6,
the
city
council
and
again
she
act
emphasized
from
a
transportation
point
of
view
where
the
growth
is
I,
don't
see
a
circle
down
here.
Thank
you.
B
B
AE
AE
This
gentleman
back
here
behind
me,
threw
one
up
there
that
only
showed
the
ve
and
the
FEMA
flood
zones.
No
wonder
the
Planning
Commission
decided
that
it
was
okay,
because
this
is
my
neighborhood
and
all
of
you
have
been
to
my
neighborhood
at
one
time
or
another,
and
this
property
is
in
the
chha
again
here's
my
house,
this
Orange.
AE
This
is
the
property
there's
350
Apartments
going
in
here,
there's
216
going
here,
there's
205
there
and,
as
Gene
pointed
out
to
you
all
of
these
stole
places
to
work
from
our
community
people,
don't
evacuate
from
their
work
when
they
take
this
trucking
company
that
works
I
guarantee
you
they
work
because
I
see
the
trucks
going
in
and
out
of
there
every
day.
Another
little
issue
is
this
is
one
of
the
few
ways
out:
Robinson
High
School
and
it's
already
a
death
trap
trying
to
get
out
of
there.
AE
I
would
like
to
remind
you
that
we've
got
all
these
apartments
coming
6300
and
some
okay
and
the
yellow
ones
aren't
finished
yet
This
Is
My
Fabulous
little
map.
This
guy
made
it
for
a
ghs
and
please
if
this
gentleman
gets
up
here
and
shows
a
PowerPoint,
please
let
us
come
back
up
because
I
have
more
issues
with
what
they
said
and
I
have
proof.
AE
AE
AE
First
of
all,
this
isn't
going
to
be
live
local.
We
asked
this
gentleman
right
here
for
affordable
housing
that
guy
right
there
and
his
buddy
back
there.
We
asked
them
for
affordable.
They
said
nobody
wants
affordable
next
to
them.
Are
you
kidding
me
and
I'm
like
well?
You've
never
met
with
us,
then
have
you
and
they
said
no.
In
order
for
it
to
be
live
local,
don't
let
this
chick
Buy
sell
you
a
bill
of
goods,
because
in
order
for
it
to
be
affordable,
it
has
to
be
affordable
at
least
40
percent.
AE
AE
I'm
sorry
I
did
not
bring
my
maps.
I
forgot
my
PowerPoint
when
I
came
back
these
folks
here
this
guy
right
here
in
his
Compadre
who's
back.
There
said
that
there
are
10
shelters
within
10
miles
of
us
now.
Five
of
those
are
in
South
County,
Apollo,
Beach,
Riverview
I'm
like
excuse
me,
are
we
supposed
to
swim
across
the
bay?
How
are
we
supposed
to
get
there,
but
listen?
This
property
is
Right
flat
in
the
middle
of
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area.
AE
Here
it
is
so
I
I
have
not
spent
my
time
digging
into
this,
but
I
want
to
remind
you
one
thing:
you
have
absolutely
no
obligation
whatsoever
to
approve
this.
This
is
not
a
rezoning.
This
is
a
plan
Amendment.
These
people
think
that
they
know
better
about
what
we
need
in
our
city
than
what
our
future
land
use
says
and
I
think
we
all
know
better.
AE
The
bottom
line
is
these
folks
can't
just
come
to
our
city
they're,
not
from
here
they're
from
Orlando.
They
can't
just
come
to
our
city
and
make
changes.
Nobody
wants
these.
You
have
the
emails.
You
have
the
people
who've
reached
out
to
you.
You
know
what
there
were
a
bunch
of
them
who
were
supposed
to
be
here
with
us
tonight.
AE
You
know
where
they're
at
they're,
home,
they're
cleaning
out
their
houses
because,
like
Cali
was
saying
I,
don't
know
if
you
understood
that
or
not
Cali
lost
four
more
affordable
housing
units,
four
duplexes
over
there
by
the
legion
because
of
the
flooding
just
like
we
did
with
Etta
that
never
happened,
15
for
the
15
years
before
those
485
units
were
built.
When
do
we
stop
putting
folks
lives
in
danger
when
I
talk
to
the
city?
This
time
we
have
two
affordable
housing
complexes.
AE
Already
the
city
said
we
will
send
Vans
down
to
get
those
people
do
you
know
we
had
four
apartment
complexes
that
turned
off
the
electricity
and
turned
off
the
water
to
those
apartment
complexes
because
they
said,
oh,
you
have
to
you,
have
to
evacuate
so
the
people
who
did
what
they
were
supposed
to
and
evacuate.
They
came
home
to
refrigerators,
full
of
ruined
stuff,
and
these
were
affordable.
These
were
people
who
were
homeless
in
the
last
six
months,
or
so
we
have
got
to
stop.
AE
Camp
is
full.
Sog
is
even
more
full
they're,
not
building
what
MacDill
needs
I
don't
care
if
they
built
30
percent
in
their
little
world.
Okay,
if
they
wanted
to
build
a
hundred
percent
that'd
be
a
different
conversation,
because
that
might
be
what
we
need.
We've
got
all
these
additional
units
that
I
showed
you
7,
000
of
them,
and
94
of
them
are
one
and
two
bedroom
which
nobody
at
MacDill
wants
to
live
in.
AE
I
wish
that
Ben
had
had
a
minute
to
tell
you
that
I
wish
you
would
go
back
and
listen
to
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
I
wish
I
could
show
that
whole
video
to
you
where
Tony
Rodriguez
said
we
don't
need
one
and
two
bedrooms.
Please
deny
this.
There
is
nothing
to
stop
you
from
denying
it,
because
all
it
is.
Is
a
comp
plan
change.
It's
not
a
rezoning.
F
Y
F
G
Only
map
that
I
spoke
to
was
this
one.
This
is
the
NOAA
Coastal
High
Hazard
area.
This
is
the
one
that's
applicable
to
the
comp
plan.
It's
essentially
models
of
worst
case
surge
predictions
for
each
category
of
storm.
Okay,
so
it's
worst
case
situation.
It's
not
absolute!
It's
a
planning
tool
that
emergency
managers
use
to
try
to
gauge
the
storm,
the
worst
possible
storm
surge
per
storm.
G
In
this
case,
FEMA
uses
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area
to
talk
about
their
maps
and
flood
zones,
and
it
specifically
talks
about
V
zones
and
Coastal
a-zones,
which
are
where
the
wave
action
RNA,
and
that
requires
certain
construction
standards.
So
there's
the
two
differences
and
if
we
confuse
anybody,
I
apologize,
but
the
only
thing
I
was
referring
to
with
regard
to
evacuations
and
Sheltering
was
the
Noah
Coastal
High
Hazard
area,
which
has
to
do
with
surge
modeling.
G
You
know
this
is
what
emergency
managers
use
so
with
regard
to
any
confusion
in
any
risk
that
you
should
be
considering.
I
would
just
refer
you
to
your
staff.
Emergency
managers
who
have
the
same
analysis
I
do
with
this
particular
project
and
that
they
don't
see
any
specific
increase
to
the
evacuation
or
shelter.
W
Jennifer
Malone
at
the
Planning
Commission
I
was
going
to
ask
Sean
College
from
the
Planning
Commission
is
here
and
he's
our
resident
expert
on
everything
Coastline
housing
area.
He
actually
was
the
one
to
clarify
this
to
the
planning
Commissioners
at
the
hearing.
So
I
was
just
going
to
invite
him
up
to
clarify
it.
The
the
difference
in
these
Maps,
because
I
think
that
there's
just
a
fair
amount
of
confusion
tonight.
Thank
you.
F
K
Be
very
brief:
Sean
College,
Planning,
Commission
staff.
What
was
said
was
just
said
was
accurate.
The
FEMA
Coastline
Hazard
zone
is
not
the
Zone
all
that
that
is
applicable
to
your
comprehensive
plan.
Your
comprehensive
plan
is
dealing
with
Florida
statute,
which
is
to
Coastal
Hazard
as
it
as
defined
by
Florida
statute
and,
as
is
applicable
to
your
comprehensive
plan.
It
is
this
map
and
this
property
is
in
the
Coastal
Eye
Hazard
area
relevant
to
your
comprehensive
plan,
and
it
is
also
accurate
that
we
do
not
city
of
Tampa.
Y
I
do
want
to
say
that
the
reason
this
other
the
the
FEMA
modeled
chaa
was
presented
was
in
rebuttal
and
the
emergency
preparedness
line
that
we
presented
is
applicable
because
when
a
plan
Amendment
proposes
higher
densities.
According
to
your
comprehensive
plan,
you
are
supposed
to
take
into
consideration
whether
there
is
sufficient
evacuation
times
and
shelters,
and
that
is
what
we
presented
tonight.
F
P
I,
you
know
I
appreciate
the
applicant
requests
to
change
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
you
know
I
have
no
doubt
that
what
what
you're
asking
for
is
a
good
development
I
would
encourage
you
to
look
elsewhere
in
the
city.
We
have
many
areas
and
opportunities
in
the
city
for
development
and
increased
in
density.
P
I
mean
Lots,
I,
think,
there's
lots
of
opportunities
in
the
city,
we're
going
to
create
a
city
that
is
worthy
of
the
people
that
live
here
and
and
economic
opportunities
for
developers
and
folks
that
can
make
money.
There's
plenty
of
money
to
be
made
and
there's
the
money
left
on
the
table
in
so
many
areas
of
the
city
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
This
is
not
one
of
those.
You
know
if
I
could
go
back
and
and
recreate
prior
decisions
on
some
of
those
other
properties.
P
You
know
I
I
would
but
I
can't,
but
you
know
sometimes
you
just
have
to
say
this
enough
is
enough,
and
this
is
where
we
draw
the
line.
You
know
it's
it's
it's
beyond
my
comprehension
that
we
continue
to
improve
projects
in
in
these
Coastal
High
Hazard
areas
and
beyond
that
in
in
taking
some
of
this
valuable
industrial
land
next
to
an
Air,
Force
Base.
P
You
know
some
of
those
wiser
people
than
I
that
initially
created
these
industrial
zones
as
a
buffer
between
the
Air,
Force,
Base
and
and
other
Residential
Properties,
and
so
it
just
it
makes
it
makes
common
sense
to
me
because
you
know
one
day
there
may
be
Fighters
there
again
and
it's
going
to
sound
like
Vietnam
and
and
South
part
of
Tampa.
But
you
know
again:
there's
lots.
P
I,
I,
look
forward
to
you
doing
business
in
the
city
of
Tampa
and
making
lots
of
money
in
the
city
of
Tampa
South
Tampa
is
full
and
we
we
need
to
look
elsewhere
and
look
for
economic
opportunities
and
for
anybody
else,
that's
listening.
That
wants
to
apply
for
this
type
of
development
in
South
Tampa
look
elsewhere,
I
mean
we
were.
You
saw.
We
have
areas
of
Sulfur
Springs,
the
university
areas,
Westbury
Drew
Park,
there's,
there's
tons
of
areas
that
are
wonderful
opportunities
that
for
people
to
make
money
in
this
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
AH
R
Yes,
I
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
I
agree
with
the
staff
report
in
finding
this
inconsistent.
There
are
other
opportunities
for
your
organization
to
go
elsewhere.
East
Tampa
is
willing
and
waiting
for
you,
but
South
Tampa
is
full
and
because
it's
a
high
Coastal
area
that
tends
to
even
add
more
of
a
no
for
me
as
I
continue
to
learn
in
this,
and
also
the
fact
that
you
know
there
should
be
opportunities
for
those
areas
to
remain
as
Regional
employers
and
I.
Just
can't
support
you
at
this
time.
Councilman
Vieira.
O
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chair,
yeah
I
wanted
to
give
my
thoughts
always
on
on
controversial
things,
whether
about
yay
or
nay.
You
know
a
lot
of
times
on
some
of
these
I'll
always
point
to
the
staff
reports
and
go.
We
have
a
positive
staff
report,
no
waivers
blah
blah
blah
our
hands
are
tied
Etc.
This
is
the
opposite,
where
I
think
our
hands
are
tied.
100
against
this,
you
read
the
staff
report
in
in
just
going
over
the
planning
commission's
findings.
O
It
says,
quote
the
potential
introduction
of
potentially
to
potentially
introduce
641
dwelling
units
of
residential
unit
uses
on
the
site,
conflicts
with
the
policy
direction
of
the
plan
to
direct
potential
or
strike
that
population
increases
away
from
the
coastal
High
Hazard
areas.
It
also
says
proposed.
Plan
amendments
that
would
increase
densities
within
the
coastal
planning
area
shall
demonstrate
no
negative
impacts
on
Hurricane
evacuation
times
routes
and
shelter
demands.
This
applicant
does
not
address
or
demonstrate
if
the
amendment
will
have
no
negative
impacts
on
Hurricane
evacuation
times
and
routes
maintain
and
improving
evacuation
times
is
critical.
O
Considering
the
county
is
not
meeting
its
evacuation
level
of
service
those
things
and
we're
obviously
dealing
with
this
hearing
just
a
couple
of
days
after
a
very
scary
event
for
Tampa,
which
makes
it
very
very
emotional
for
all
of
us
I
think
these
findings
take
away
the
emotion
which
is
very
reasonable,
very
normal,
obviously
and
and
I
think
give
us
a
very
clear,
Direction
Where
We
need
to
go
on
this
in
opposing
this.
Obviously,
we
want
more
housing
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
O
F
And
I
appreciate
the
comments
by
councilwoman,
Henderson
and
council
member
clenden
when
they
say
South
Tampa
is
full
and
there
are
other
parts
of
the
city
and
I
always
talk
about
East
Tampa.
There
are
parts
of
the
city
that
are
neglected,
that
we
need
the
housing
that
we
welcome
the
housing
and
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities.
We
saw
this
hurricane
the
other
day,
I've
been
here.
My
whole
life
I've,
seen
many
near
misses
and
I
see
how
narrow
the
streets
are.
A
lot
of
two-lane
streets
evacuation.
F
We
see
the
flooding
flooding
from
what
was
a
minor
event
compared
to
the
catastrophe
that
we
could
have
faced
with
a
direct
hit.
This
is
we've
been
lucky
for
102
years
and
sooner
or
later,
something's
going
to
happen
and
we're
going
to
see
the
true
negative
impact
of
overbuilding
in
these
areas
and
the
issues
with
the
evacuation
and
all
the
hazards
that
go
with
them.
Councilwoman
her
Tech.
N
Thank
you.
You
know
I'm
going
to
Echo
what
my
fellow
council
member
said
about
flooding
the
thing
about
that
map.
We
can
argue
about
that
map,
but
that
map's
only
going
to
get
redder.
It's
not
ever
going
to
back
up
and
become
Orange.
It's
going
to
only
get
redder
and
as
I
looked
at
that
Peninsula
I
was
just
thinking
to
myself.
N
But
you
know
what
would
be
great
on
that
site.
Is
the
retail
that
this
that
the
neighborhood
is
begging?
For
you
know
a
a
large
grocer
a
you
know
anything
that
surrounds
that
they
are
desperately
in
in
need
of
and
what
I,
what
I
truly
did
not
appreciate
was
threatening
what
I
felt
like
was
a
threat
to
counsel
and
and
citizens
about
live
local.
N
N
Yes,
you
are
allowed
to
do
that,
but
coming
and
basically
threatening
us
is
not
a
successful
strategy
and
I
would
recommend
no
one
come
to
us
and
try
to
tell
us
that
they're
just
going
to
go
around
us
and
do
live
local,
because
if
you
did
live,
local
you'd
have
to
put
40,
affordable
housing
and
that's
not
affordable.
I
know
how
much
that
land
costs
it's
not
cheap.
I
I
I
mean
there's
other
areas
of
the
city
that
that
this
could
go
into
I'm,
not
telling
you
where
to
go.
I,
don't
have
that
right,
but
it's
yours,
your
your
your
graph,
your
your
deal,
you're,
finding
a
fact
and
defining
a
fact.
This
time
from
the
beginning
didn't
show
much
positive
at
all
and
reading
the
reports
and
reading
other
things
like
the
rest
of
us
have
it
showed
there
was
a
tough,
sell
and
I
think
the
developer
knew
this
I
could
tell
you
about
just
looking
at
you.
I
F
Z
W
C
U
I
I
like
to
move
to
the
knife
item
number
four
file:
number
tacpa
23-03
for
the
reasons
discussed
by
my
colleagues
also
just
reading
from
the
staff
report.
The
subject
site
does
not
meet
the
general
character.
Description
of
a
traditional
neighborhood
land
use
policy.
9.3.8
is
the
intent
of
the
city
that
new
residential
Redevelopment
project
shall
be
minimally
disruptive
to
adjacent
areas.
To
achieve
this,
the
city
shall
assess
the
potential
positive
and
negative
negative
aspects
of
residential
development
policies.
R
F
N
F
AH
F
F
R
AF
AI
R
R
R
AD
AD
Starting
off
a
brief
introduction
on
the
mobility
section,
it
is
a
portion
of
the
overall
Tampa
comprehensive,
Plan
update.
It
implements
key
components
of
the
adopted
Vision
that
that
includes
six
key
Vision
themes,
including
that
transportation
is
safe,
accessible
connected
and
convenient.
Neighborhoods
are
complete
with
a
walkable
environment.
AD
Resiliency
enables
the
community
to
recover
and
mitigate
climate
change,
weather
and
other
hazards,
as
well
as
several
other
themes
throughout
it.
Also,
we
had
significant
public
and
stakeholder
engagement
for
this
update
and
implementation
was
coordinated
closely
with
City
staff
and
various
departments,
and,
as
you
can
see
here,
we
have
a
project
page
for
this
section.
AD
The
mobility
section
is
a
portion
currently
a
portion
of
the
places
section
in
the
city
of
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Their
current
goals
include
land
and
transportation
system
coordination,
walk
bike,
Network,
Transit,
neighborhood,
livability
and
safe,
convenient
and
efficient
roadway.
This
section
updates
and
modernizes
Mobility
related
language
and
provides
a
framework
for
Mobility
related
initiatives.
AD
There
are
several
proposed
topic
area
updates,
with
new
language
proposed
to
most
areas.
Notable
topic
areas
include
context,
classification
context,
classification
considers
the
use
of
the
land
surrounding
a
road.
For
example,
a
road
surrounded
by
large
natural
areas
may
be
considered
rural
for
its
context,
so
C1.
In
contrast,
a
road
in
downtown
Tampa
would
be
considered
Urban
or
C6.
AD
We
also
have
language
on
development's
impacts
on
the
transportation
system,
so
many
of
the
policies
direct
or
support
development
to
include
multimodal
improvements
wherever
possible
and
feasible,
including
sidewalks
bicycle
facilities
connecting
to
Transit
Etc.
We
have
policies
on
parking
and
curb
Space
Management,
so
those
direct
the
implementation
of
parking
and
curb
space
standards
that
Reserve
curved
space
for
the
highest
and
best
use.
This
includes
adopting
parking
policies
within
the
LDC
reduced
parking
by
transit
and
parking
that
facilitates
safe
and
convenient
walking
to
buildings.
We
have
language
on
emerging
Technologies.
AD
These
policies
support
the
city,
reviewing
new
technologies
and
strategies
such
as
autonomous
connected
and
electric
vehicles,
enhanced
Traffic
Systems
and
coordination
with
companies
such
as
Uber
and
Lyft.
We
have
policy
language
on
Transportation,
Investments,
That,
improve
resilience
and
health.
These
policies
encourage
evaluation
of
roadway
impacts
to
the
environment,
neighborhoods
and
Commercial
areas,
the
capability
for
evacuation
and
a
focus
on
the
health
improvements
of
Transportation
projects.
AD
Finally,
finally,
we
have
a
focus
on
Vision,
zero
and
the
Safe
Systems
approach,
so
these
policies
coordinate
with
the
city's
Vision
zero
action
plan.
Vision
zero
aims
to
eliminate
all
severe
injuries
and
fatalities
on
our
roadways
and
a
safe
systems
approach
focuses
on
how
both
human
mistakes
and
human
vulnerability
and
Designs
a
system
with
many
redundancies
in
place
to
protect
everyone.
AD
Thank
you.
Other
updates,
for
this
section
include
that
the
language
language
better
suited
to
other
other
sections
has
been
proposed
to
be
moved.
We've
removed
Regulatory
and
programmatic
language,
as
well
as
streamlining
and
the
language
and
removing
duplication,
we've
also
updated
maps
and
data
to
meet
chapter
163,
State,
Statute
requirements
for
comprehensive
plants
and
we've
included
minor
definition,
additions
and
clarifications.
AD
We
had
extensive
stakeholder
and
public
Outreach
in
May
2023.
We
had
formal
announcements,
the
as
well
as
a
project
website
and
our
public
Outreach
kickoff.
This
included
email,
social
media
and
in-person
Outreach
campaigns.
We
created
reference
documents
to
enable
greater
transparency
and
stakeholder
review.
Specifically,
this
is
what
we
call
a
crosswalk,
so
it
shows
you
the
adopted
language
and
then
what
we're
proposing,
whether
that
was
a
minor
change,
a
substantial
change,
a
movement
of
a
policy
or
deletion
of
a
policy
in
June.
We
also
had
two
public
meetings,
one
in
person
and
one
virtual.
AD
We
did
have
public
comment
on
the
mobility
section.
The
official
public
comment
included
comments
on
ADA
compliance
and
inclusive
terminology
staff
reviewed
and
include
included
that
were
appropriate.
We
heard
from
the
Sierra
Club,
including
comments
on
walking
biking,
public
transit,
Vision,
zero
and
electric
vehicles
for
the
city's
Fleet
I'm
happy
to
say
that
the
mobility
section
addressed
all
of
those
comments
with
a
new
language.
We
also
had
a
city
of
Tampa
social
media
post,
where
we
received
hundreds
of
comments
on
that
post.
AD
AD
For
our
consistency
review,
this
was
found
consistent
with
adopted,
adopted
mobility
and
land
use,
sections
and
the
language
here.
I've
listed
representative
goals,
objectives
and
policies
for
both
the
mobility
section
and
land
use
section.
So
that
includes
Mobility
goal,
one
objective:
1.1
and
policy
1.1.2,
as
well
as
land
use,
goal,
1,
objective,
1.2
and
policy
1.29.
So
the
these
policies
include
a
multimodal
transportation
system,
that's
in
line
with
the
city's
growth
and
development,
again
referencing
those
Mobility
policies
and
objectives.
AD
AD
F
G
AK
AK
So
agenda
number
five
says
to
update
the
language
of
the
five
main
goals
in
the
future
land
use.
One
of
them
includes
the
word.
Equity
I
recently
attended
a
future
land
use
meeting.
It
was
on
the
same
day.
Unfortunately,
as
the
mayor's
budget
meeting,
the
main
topics
repeated
in
the
flu
presentation
were
housing
and
transportation.
AK
So
I
spoke
to
the
inequity
across
our
city
and
housing,
particularly
of
low-income
seniors
and
some
failures
of
Transportation.
The
presenter
there
told
me
the
future
land
use
wasn't
about
equity
and
that
there
were
various
other
avenues
within
the
city
to
address
those
issues.
I
am
glad
you
do
have
the
word
equity
in
your
language
and
I
was
listening
to
what
was
just
said,
but
more
so
I
hope
it
is
an
abiding
principle.
If
people
are
calling
for
housing
and
transportation,
then
it
simply
must
be
a
priority.
Going
forward.
AK
I
also
asked
about
Sulfur
Springs,
it's
not
a
CRA
and
I
was
told
it
wasn't
an
Urban
Village.
So
what
is
it?
It
seems
It's
a
historic
Community,
much
ignored
a
while
back
I
brought
pictures
of
the
various
sidewalk
treatments
granted
by
variances
over
the
years.
What
the
city
and
county
have
allowed
as
abysmal.
If
Nebraska
Avenue
is
Sulfur,
Springs,
Main
Street,
it's
one
of
the
crappiest
main
streets
I've
ever
seen
in
my
life.
AK
Can
future
land
use
clean
up
some
city
codes
and
create
a
real
Main
Street,
no
shelter,
no
bench
bus
stops
have
to
go.
I
was
at
the
last
tpd
Tuesday
meeting
where
a
grandmother
said
that
her
grandchild
was
terrified
to
walk
even
with
her
to
school.
Our
chief
said
somebody
would
be
there
to
walk
them
the
next
day.
Why
is
it
like
this
through
codes
and
allowing
only
good
variances?
AK
Can
you
clean
up
Main
Street,
unlike
the
city's
inability
to
clean
up
the
Hillsborough
River
I
was
listening
intently
this
morning
or
get
a
clean
energy
goal
worth
anything
equity
needs
to
be
in
the
flu.
Please,
if
you
can't
attend
Community
meetings
in
the
future,
send
an
aide
hear
the
voices
of
struggling
people,
since
this
meeting
is
about
dining
and
drinking,
which
was
earlier
just
a
reminder
that
Sulfur
Springs
has
a
river
just
like
Riverwalk.
AK
F
AD
F
I
F
D
D
R
A
Apologize,
it's
been
a
long
night
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
Diego
Guerra
Planning,
Commission
staff.
This
item
is
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
23
attack
11.
the
update
to
the
environmental
section.
This
update
would
replace
the
environmental
section
with
the
proposed
language
in
your
packets
and
again
this
is
an
update.
The
environmental
section
is
a
separate
section.
Apart
from
the
environmental,
apart
from
the
future
land
use
element
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
A
little
bit
of
background,
the
environmental
section
is
housed
within
the
natural
natural
spaces
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
A
Its
current
context
includes
language
on
natural
resource
management,
Tampa,
Bay,
Estuary
and
Coastal
High
Hazard
area,
there's
minimal
language
on
urban
forestry
and
Wildlife
corridors,
and
what
are
resource
language
that
did
exist
in
the
section
is
now
incorporated
into
the
one
water
chapter
which
was
became
effective
in
April
of
this
past
of
this
year.
The
language
was
developed,
collaboratively
with
City
staff
and
EPC
and
is
consistent
with
their
programs.
It
also
incorporates
feedback
from
the
public
and
stakeholders
an
update
to
this.
So
an
update
to
the
proposed
language.
A
We
retained
the
important
components
of
the
existing
plan,
updated
and
modernized
and
updated
modernize.
These
components
20
of
the
proposed
language,
is
new,
with
the
remaining
80
percent
of
the
proposed
language
includes
the
existing
language
of
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies.
Again,
all
we
did
was
go
ahead
and
modernize
these
components
streamlined
and
removed.
A
Regulatory
and
programmatic
language
we've
reduced
the
size
of
the
section
from
over
200
goals,
objectives
and
policies
247
in
the
environmental
sustainability
section
that
is
being
proposed.
The
new
section
updates
and
modernizes
the
language
and
provides
a
framework
for
environmental
related
initiatives.
A
So
what
are
the
proposed
changes?
The
proposed
changes
include
a
new
language
and
alternative
energy,
which
supports
the
city
of
Tampa's,
recently
released
climate
action,
Equity
plan,
there's
new
language
on
Wildlife
corridors,
there's
new
language
that
supports
the
urban
Forest
management
plan
and
the
Tampa
Bay
Estuary
and
Coastal
related
language
that
currently
exists
is
being
proposed.
With
this
update
to
be
moved
to
Coastal
management
section,
which
is
more
appropriate
for
that
language.
A
A
In
terms
of
stakeholder
and
public
Outreach,
we
announced
a
public
Outreach,
a
in
May
June.
We
launched
a
website
to
ensure
that
the
public
was
informed.
We
put
reference
documents
on
the
website
to
enable
great
greater
transparency
and
stakeholder
review.
We
also
had
targeted
Outreach
to
State
environmental
organizations
and
the
final
version
that's
presented
before
you
reflects
this
Outreach
and
incorporates
their
feedback
as
well.
A
A
In
terms
of
consistency,
the
section
update
is
consistent
with
the
current
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
currently
adopted
environmental
section
in
addition
to
the
goals
objective,
in
addition
to
the
objectives
and
policies
in
the
recreation,
open
space
section
and
the
governance,
governance
objective
and
solid
waste
policies,
Next
Step,
should
you
choose
to
transmit
this?
This
update
would
be
brought
forth
to
you
again
tentatively
on
26
October
for
its
first
adoption
hearing.
A
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
the
Planning
Commission
found
tacpa
23
Tech
11,
consistent
with
the
goals
of
fixes
and
policies
of
the
Tampa,
comprehensive
plan
and
recommend
city.
The
city
council
transmit
for
state
and
Regional
review
concludes
my
presentation
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
may
have
any.
A
F
F
AG
B
AG
D
F
B
B
H
H
H
Currently,
under
in
the
under
the
adopted
plan,
projects
are
eligible
for
a
density
intensity
credit
if
Esa
lands
exceed
20
of
a
total
project
area,
as
proposed.
Through
this
amendment,
a
50
percent
or
more
of
a
site
are
deemed
Wetlands.
The
applicant
will
be
allowed
to
weigh
the
density
and
or
intensity
throughout
the
entire
site
through
a
plan
development
zoning
districts.
This
amendment
would
only
apply
to
the
West
Shore
planning
district,
so
it
would
not
apply
Citywide.
H
For
this
amendment
tool
for
a
developer
to
use
this
amendment,
there
are
some
conditions
that
are
provided
in
the
language.
All
portions
of
the
site
must
be
contiguous.
The
25
percent
ESA
Credit,
that's
currently
adopted
by
the
plan,
cannot
be
clustered
from
Land
outside
the
coal
High
Hazard
area
to
land
inside
the
coastalized
area.
H
The
calculations
of
density
and
intensity
can
only
be
applied
to
the
Upland
acreage
of
the
site
and
the
combined
total
number
of
dwelling
units
and
or
far
possible
under
all
plan
categories
within
the
project
will
be
used
as
the
ceiling
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
where
the
esa
lands
are
within.
The
West
Shore
planning
district
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
esa
lands
are
probably
they
make
up
less
than
I
believe
one
percent
of
all
land
within
the
West
Shore
planning
district.
So
it
is
a
small
area
within
the
district.
H
H
The
affected
areas
where
this
provision
would
apply
would
be
likely
these
areas
that
are
adjacent
to
Esa
land.
So
you
have
just
south
of
Courtney
Campbell
Causeway.
You
have
land,
that's
adjacent
to
light
industrial
and
public
semi-public.
There
is
some
yesterday
lands
adjacent
to
community
commercial
35
designated
Parcels
As.
You
move
up
along
Rocky
Point.
There
is
land,
Esa
lands
adjacent
to
CMU,
35
and
urban
mixed
use,
60
up
along
on
Rocky
Point.
H
H
H
The
clinic
commission
found
it
consistent
with
policies
that
seek
a
no
net
increase
in
residential
density
within
the
coal
size
of
area.
So
this
would
not
increase
density
within
the
coal
size
area,
and
that's
because
you
cannot
move
you
know
the
density
credit
from
Outland
outside
the
coal
size
area
and
use
it
within
the
coal
sizard
area.
And
finally,
the
planet
commission
found
it
consistent
with
land
use
policies,
2.1.2
and
housing
policy
1.3.4,
which
seek
to
use
limited
Land
Resources
more
efficiently.
H
H
I
H
H
P
H
There's
no
increases
in
density.
Essentially,
what
happens
is
there
is
Esa
lands
on
a
site?
So
if
you
get
a
PD,
they
might
have
Esa
lands
in
it
and
it
often
makes
it
difficult
to
develop
some
parcels,
so
this
would
allow
them
to
actually
move
some
develop
development
rights
away
from
the
esa
lands
and
it
would
actually
help
to
could
actually
help
preserve
some
of
the
esa
lands
by
not
putting
buildings
right
up
against
some
of
these
lands.
AL
True
at
Gardner,
400,
North,
Ashley,
Drive,
actually
I.
Think
by
answering
those
two
questions
you
asked
might
give
the
whole
presentation,
but
I've
got
Addie
Clark
who's
going
to
walk
through
the
mechanics
and
Abby
Naylor
who's,
our
environmental
consultant
Mr
Miranda
to
your
question.
This
does
not
involved
submerged
lands,
only
Esa
lands
and
then
Mr
clenden
to
your
question.
AL
What
this
does
is
if
you've
got
a
site
that
has
a
high
degree
of
Esa
on
it,
then
the
reason
why
we
think
this
is
a
very
good
policy
instead
of
trying
to
shoehorn
a
development
in
the
remainder,
then
that
portion,
that
is
the
remainder
that
density
could
travel
down
to
an
adjacent
site
through
a
PD
which
then
would
provide
the
enforcement
mechanism
to
make
sure
that
Esa
site
is
protected
in
full.
So,
instead
of
having
these
sites
that
are,
in
this
case,
51
environmental
49
Upland.
AL
Instead
of
trying
to
make
a
development
work
on
the
49,
you
can
take
that
49
and
apply
that
to
an
adjacent
site
within
a
PD.
So
there
was
actually-
and
it's
funny-
Miss
Naylor
will
will
speak
to
the
presentation
that
was
just
done.
This
furthers
that
and
then,
as
you
might
have
read,
there's
a
recent
Supreme
United
States
Supreme
Court
decision
Sackett,
which
basically
is
limiting
the
ability
to
protect
Wetlands
that
are
not
contiguous.
AL
AL
AJ
Perfect,
thank
you
good
evening
for
the
record
Addie
Clark
400
North
Ashley
Drive.
So
as
Truitt
mentioned,
the
purpose
of
this
text
amendment
is
to
encourage
developers
to
make
a
more
thoughtful
development
that
is
more
appropriately
located
and
has
fewer
Wetland
impacts,
and
this
slide
here,
I
thought
Danny
did
a
great
job
of
going
through
the
criteria
that
must
be
in
place
for
this
kind
of
clustering
effect
to
be
activated.
AJ
But
I
did
want
to
to
focus
again
on
that
the
requirement
of
50
or
more
of
the
site
being
deemed
Wetlands
by
the
Environmental,
Protection
commission
and
then
as
well.
The
site
must
be
included
in
a
plan
development
or
a
plan,
development
alternative
approved
by
this
Council,
and
so
here,
I'm
a
visual
person.
So
I
think
this
will
help
explain
by
this
example
here.
So
you
can
see
here
that
this.
AJ
In
this
example,
the
developer
owns
these
two
Parcels
parcel
one
and
parcel
two,
and
they
are
contiguous
and
located
in
the
West
Shore
planning
district
parcel
one
on
the
top.
Just
has
a
few
small
areas
of
Upland
that
are
designated
umu
60
in
purple
and
the
rest
of
parcel
ones
you
can
see
in
the
green
in
this
case
is,
has
been
deemed
Esa
land
or
Wetlands
by
EPC.
AJ
So
today
the
density
that
is
currently
allowed
on
parcel
one
cannot
be
relocated
away
to
parcel
two
from
the
wetlands
and
parcel
one
since
parcel
2
is
designated
CMU
35
and
not
umu
60,
and
so
in
basic
layman's
terms.
You
can't
cluster
purple
onto
pink
right
now.
The
way
the
comp
plan
is
written-
and
this
proposed
amendment
intends
to
to
allow
us
to
better
protect
those
Wetlands,
as
true
had
mentioned
by
clustering,
the
10
000
square
feet
and
the
20
000
square
feet
of
entitlements.
All
on
that
southern
parcel
away.
AJ
From
the
wetlands
that
exist
on
par
on
parcel
one
again,
this
is
proposing
to
Cluster
the
density
all
within
the
site
plan,
controlled
plan,
development
or
PDA.
This
is
not
proposing
to
increase
any
entitlements,
but
rather
relocate
them
away
from
that
sensitive
area,
and
you
can
see
here
in
that
first
scenario
which
can
exist
today.
The
total
entitlements
of
30
000
square
feet
do
not
differ
from
the
proposed
30
000
square
feet
just
located
away
from
those
wetlands
now
here,
I
will
turn
over
to
Abby
nealer.
X
Hi
Abby
Naylor,
14706,
Tudor,
Chase
Drive,
so
up
on
the
screen,
Addie
had
mentioned
a
had
created
this
slide.
That
shows
how
we're,
in
compliance
with
the
comprehensive
plan
with
this
proposed
policy,
I'm
going
to
speak
more
to
the
wetlands
and
the
protection
so
clustering.
The
entitlement
supplements
to
avoid
the
Wetland
impact
has
significant
benefits.
In
addition
to
supporting
the
Environmental
Policy
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
we
believe
this
proposed
policy
incentivizes
retaining
essential
Wetlands
that
benefit
our
community.
X
P
So
two
questions
one.
So
if
I'm
gonna
hear
you
correctly
the
the
land
entitlements
from
the
land,
that's
around
the
Wetland
area
transferred
to
the
other
parts
that
we're
going
to
develop,
and
so
that
means
no
future
develop
developer
will
be
able
to
exercise
any
kind
of
right
of
entitlement
in
that
land.
AL
Correct
and
I
know
you're
not
a
fan
of
PDs,
but
I
think
this
is
the
one
where
a
PD
is
very
beneficial
because
that's
going
to
be
the
document
that
ensures
that
these
densities
are
leaving,
that
environmental
site
or
the
Uplands
that
are
on
the
environment,
environmental
site
and
being
transferred
to
the
Upland
site
and
those
entitlements
will
never
be
able
to
go
back
to
that
Wetland
site.
So
it
would
preserve
those
in
place.
AL
We
think
it
actually
is
good
for
the
entire
city
plan
in
talking
with
the
Planning
Commission.
This
was
almost.
Let's
start
it
here
not
to
compare
City
Tampa
with
Hillsborough
County,
but
this
spreading
or
clustering
of
density
is
allowed
county-wide.
If,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
maybe
there's
some
rare
instances,
but
for
the
most
part
you
can
this
one
limits
it
only
to
sites
that
have
this
high
level
of
of
wetlands
on
site
or
esa's
on
site,
and
then
two
just
to
start
it.
AL
AL
AL
F
R
F
P
I
F
I
Yes,
sir
I
have
a
couple
here:
Mr
chairman
and
council
members
on
August,
the
24th
of
2023
I
made
a
motion
to
move
two
items
from
the
831
2023
agenda
to
be
heard
at
the
December
Workshop.
Unfortunately,
there
is
not
a
workshop
in
December.
I
would
like
to
reinstate
the
motion
and
ask
that
it
be
heard
in
the
February
22nd
Workshop.
We.
A
B
F
O
You
know
it's
funny:
I
I
wasn't
gonna
do
any,
but
I
did
have
one
I
I
did
some
research.
We
were
when
I
heard
some
discussion
on
the
USF
University
Square
area
and
I'm
gonna
motion,
I'll,
I'll,
preface
or
predicate
my
motion,
I
guess.
If
you
will
about
eight
to
ten
years
ago,
we
had
the
University,
Square
and
Terrace
Park
study.
That
was
done
at
the
request
of
then
councilwoman
Lisa
Monteleone.
O
O
I
should
say
this
plan
addresses
issues
such
as
traffic
in
the
University
Square
in
Terrace,
Park
area,
housing
density
as
well
as
crime,
code
enforcement,
pedestrian
safety,
Etc
and
and
I
would
like
for
staff
to
brief
us
on
this
study.
That
was
done.
10
years
ago,
and
then,
for
you
know,
potential
consideration.
I'll
obviously
talk
to
you
all
before
about
it
all,
because
I
I
I
I
I
hate
to
do
motions
when
I
think
about
it
on
the
spot.
But
this
one
I
I
thought
was
just
a
good
idea.
O
F
F
R
O
R
F
AI
N
We
all
ought
to
be
there.
I
just
want
to
say
if
you
want
to
go
to
the
CRA
conference,
Erica
can
get
you
in
I'm.
Sure
I
I
didn't
clear
this
with
her,
but
this
October
Workshop
session.
We
can
move
these.
We
have.
We
have
the
possibility
to
learn
so
much
I
learned
so
much
in
the
last
two
days
about
housing
and
I
was
so
disappointed.
N
I
mean
I,
know,
I
mean
everybody
has
their
reasons,
but
I
would
really
encourage
people
to
go
to
either
a
housing
or
a
CRA
conference,
and
we
we
just
have
so
much.
We
can
learn
from
other
cities.
I
know
we're
looking
outward,
but
also
looking
at
what
other
people
are
doing
in
this
state
with
our
crazy
laws
is
helpful.
How.
N
N
N
N
From
diff
in
different
areas
with
housing,
I'll
speak
about
it
quite
a
bit
on
Tuesday,
but
the
big
takeaway
for
me
in
that
conference
is
that
we
are
so
far
behind
Community,
Land,
Trust
I
was
kind
of
embarrassed.
I
really
didn't
realize
it
I
didn't
even
know
it
was
going
to
be
a
part
of
the
conference.
It
just
turned
out
that
every
single
session
I
went
to
talked
about
Community
Land
trusts.
I
asked
a
lot
of
good
questions
and
I
was
really
impressed
by
what
teeny
tiny
towns
are
doing.
N
Yeah
I
I
I
was
I,
was
shocked.
I
did
not
expect
as
much
conversation
as
I
got
I
mean
like
it's
Fort,
Walton
Beach
or
something
no.
It
wasn't
that
it
was
just
a
tiny
little
town
had
done
millions
of
dollars
and
and
they
had
people
and
they're
they're
per
capita
or
their
their
sale.
Prices
now
were
six
hundred
thousand
and
they
had
Community
Land
Trust
houses
selling
and
that
people
were
able
to
be
in
them
for
like
180.
N
I'm,
sorry,
it
was
down,
it
was
down,
it
was
down
near
Fort
Lauderdale,
so
it
was
very
expensive
area,
but
they
had
managed
to
really
hold
on
to
some
of
their
land
and
turn
it
into
some
really
phenomenal
mixed-use
developments,
one
city
had
done,
and
these
were
all
Beach
communities.
So
these
were
all
cha.
F
R
N
U
U
U
I
U
U
Then
the
the
Tampa
scorecard
this
morning
it
seemed
like
there
was
some
interest
in
having
asking
USF
USF
in
the
past,
has
offered
Business
Schools
offered
for
free
to
do
the
the
data
analytics
and
so
I
would
just
like
to
to
ask
them
to
help
us
with
at
least
the
poverty
rate
and
Home
Ownership.
Based
on
the
feedback.
U
N
U
F
U
U
And
yeah,
and
so
that
we
had
several
today,
so
we
we
put
a
limit
on
one
but
not
the
other.
I
talked
to
Ms
Johnson
Velez,
it
seems
like
staff,
is
open
to
or
or
even
likes
the
idea
of
putting
a
limit
on
the
others.
I
don't
have
the
motion
to
make
tonight,
but
if
you
all
have
any
interest
you
could
talk
to
her.
She
may
come
back
to
us
with
it.
We.
F
U
So
if
anybody
has
an
interest
in
that,
but
the
public
keeps
asking:
why
are
these
all
grandfather
and
why
are
we
having
these
and
because
they're
two
different
categories?
The
other
thing
is
regarding
the
tax
since
since
council
member
Vieira
mentioned
it
I
think
it's
the
job
of
the
staff
to
find
the
cuts.
I
I've
mentioned
multiple
times
even
before
they
they
made
the
proposal
I'm
going
to
vote
against.
U
It
I
hope
that
to
make
the
meeting
simple
on
on
Tuesday
night,
you
all
just
vote
against
it
and
we'll
ask
the
staff
to
find
the
46
million
we've
got
several
we've
all
got
recommendations.
We
can
give
them
privately.
The
simple
thing
would
be
to
call
the
meeting
vote
against
it
and
then
and
then
let
staff.