►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 10102019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
C
Is
danny
console
your
plenti
Commission
staff
I've
been
sworn
in?
Our
next
case
brings
us
to
the
South
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
Port
Tampa
City
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit
stop
is
located
approximately
1500
feet
to
the
north
near
the
intersection
of
South
Kissimmee
Street
and
West
Idaho
Street
Southwest
Port
Tampa
Park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility,
which
is
generally
located
2300
feet
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
subject.
Site
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone.
C
C
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use.
Map
you'll
see
the
subject
site
is
here.
The
existing
future
language
is
residential
10.
It
was
previously
in
terms
of
residential
tens
I
believe
last
month,
so
this
trend
is
moving
towards
the
residential
10
in
this
area.
This
area
and
the
blue
is
MacDill.
Air
Force
Base
is
represented
by
the
blue
collar
public
and
then
there
there's
some
light
gray,
which
represents
which
represents
light
industrial
and
it's
brown
color,
which
is
at
the
industrial.
C
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
three
zone
from
industrial
general
to
a
plan
development
to
allow
the
development
of
seven
single-family
detached
residential
units.
West
portion
of
South
with
Scott
G
is
currently
under
development,
with
single-family
detached
residential
development.
Parcels
to
the
north
and
west
of
the
subject
started
to
develop
a
single-family
detached
some
our
informants
lot
size
to
what
is
proposing
the
plan
development.
The
proposed
PD
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
and
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
ten
feature.
C
E
C
D
B
B
B
This
PD
is
a
larger
PE
that
was
approved
approximately
two
years
ago
for
a
massive
redevelopment
or
not
redevelopment
development
of
large
sections
of
undeveloped
land
in
the
port
Tampa
area,
part
of
that
PD
approval
again
approved
two
years
ago.
That
developer
is
required
to
extend
and
improve
this
section
to
Muscat
Street
and
dedicate
it
to
the
city.
Once
that
is
completed,
and
there
are
notes
to
the
effect
on
this
site
plan,
then
the
applicant
can
develop
their
property.
With
this
seven
we
established
historically
padlocks.
B
Each
lot
is
at
least
50
by
a
hundred.
Each
mod
is
5000
square
feet
in
an
area
the
proposed
setbacks
are
24,
the
front,
seven
I'm,
sorry,
five
on
the
sides
and
15
in
the
rear,
with
a
maximum
height
of
35
feet,
there
are
trees
currently
on
the
property
due
to
the
elevation
of
the
site,
as
well
as
the
current
floodplain
regulations
and
the
grading
and
filling
that
has
happened
on
in
the
starting
area.
B
This
we'll
have
to
be
filled
with
approximately
two
to
three
feet
of
fill,
to
bring
it
up
to
grade
with
the
rest
of
the
surrounding
properties,
as
well
as
the
crown
of
the
new
improved
mascot
Street.
So,
to
answer
your
question,
mr.
Dean
filter,
yes,
this
site
will
have
to
be
filled
at
least
two
or
three
feet
other
than
that
there
are
no
waivers
being
requested
with
this
application.
B
There
are
some
minor
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
from
planning
design
and
development
coordination.
There
is
natural
resources
did
finally
consistent.
They
want
to
note
regarding
the
specifications
to
the
fill
the
fill
required
for
the
site.
We
require
the
removal,
the
majority
of
the
trees
on
site.
B
There
are
no
waivers,
so
the
development
review
and
compliance
staff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
land
development
code
in
the
venue
approved
this
application.
Please
include
the
modifications
between
first
and
second
reading
are
any
motion.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
for
me.
G
G
This
is
the
last
remaining
parcel,
and
this
entire
parcel
over
here
has
already
been
developed
by
Lennar
Homes,
and
this
parcel
is
in
the
process
of
being
redeveloped.
The
roadway
that
Mary
was
talking
about
is
extension
of
mascot,
which
will
go
south,
and
then
you
have
the
north
boundary
line
of
the
MacDill
Air
Force
Base.
This
is
really
a
project
in
response
to
McGill's
desire
to
provide
more
housing
for
its
employees
and
for
members
of
the
Armed
Forces,
and
that's
really
driving
the
demand.
G
G
The
the
project
basically
follows
the
development
pattern,
that's
already
surrounding
it
on
all
of
its
sites,
except
for
the
MacDill
side,
and
this
is,
as
I
said,
the
last
remaining
parcel
be
again.
Let
me
show
you
that
aerial
the
last
remaining
parcel-
that's
not
already
zoned
for
single-family
residential
and
it's
consistent
with
the
city
staff
review,
as
well
as
the
Planning
Commission
review,
and
we're
respectfully
requesting
your
approval.
G
We
do
have
to
add,
fill
to
accommodate
the
stormwater
issues
and
to
address
the
FEMA
height
regulations
regarding
flood
zones,
so
we'll
address
all
of
that
at
the
permitting
stage
and
we'll
be
required
to
meet
the
stormwater
requirements
for
the
city
at
that
time.
We're
not
asking
for
any
waivers
so
we're
respectfully
requesting
your
approval.
Yeah.
H
We're
getting
wet
when
it
rains
my
office
gets
flooded
with
calls
from
people
who
are
complaining
that
as
new
houses
come
in,
they
get
put
higher
and
then
the
water
runs
off
to
the
other
houses.
So
is
there
some
way
to
mitigate
that
in
advance
so
that
we
don't
have
the
neighbors
across
the
street
complaining?
Yes,.
G
Or
what
what's
already
happened
is
that
these
homes
here
and
these
homes
here
are
already
elevated,
so
the
remainder
that
would
be
getting
the
complaints
is
this
parcel
here,
which
is
now
lower
than
all
of
the
other
properties.
It's
surrounded
and
part
of
the
mitigation
plan
for
the
whole
area
is
there's
a
series
of
ditches.
It
will
take
the
stormwater
out
to
the
bay,
and
you
can
see
part
of
that.
Ditching
is,
is
here
and
part
of
it
is
up
in
here,
but
I.
G
D
A
A
Seventy-Five
orders
be
presented,
the
first
reconsideration
orders,
rezoning
property
general
vicinity
of
7702,
south
mascot
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
scribed.
In
section
one
from
zoning
district
specification,
IG
does
for
general.
Do
PD
plan
development,
residential
single-family,
detached
providing
an
effective
bait.
The
petitioners
met
the
burden
of
proof.
A
A
B
C
C
Planning
Commission
step
I've
been
sworn
in
next
cases
in
essential
temp
planning
districts
site
is
generally
located.
West
of
North
Boulevard
east
of
North
Myrtle
Avenue
on
Martin
Luther,
King
Highway.
The
site
is
in
proximity
to
transit,
with
it
with
service
to
the
Tampa
International
Airport,
less
Tampa
site
is
an
evacuation
V
zone.
C
C
C
C
Pedestrian
connections
have
been
provided
that
connect
building
entrances
to
public
rights
away
and
the
door
has
also
been
provided
oriented
towards
the
public
right
away.
Furthering
policy
relating
to
mixed-use
corridors
based
on
those
considerations,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
at
the
time,
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
Thank
you,
sir.
B
B
Here
is
a
shot
of
the
subject
property.
This
is
a
designated
non-hazardous
grande
tree
that
is
closed
for
removal,
which
is
one
of
your
waivers.
As
you
can
see,
this
part
the
boundaries
of
the
property
or
the
silt
fences
in
black,
and
you
can
see
the
span
and
the
size
of
the
tree.
It
goes
from
property
line
to
property
lines.
B
Here
is
commercial
property
to
the
east
of
the
application
site
near
the
doctor's
office
to
the
west
and
across
the
street,
a
single-family
residential
property
and
a
vacant
property
here
is
the
applicants
proposal
again
in
a
one-story
medical
office,
as
well
as
allowable
for
business
professional
office
use
as
well
the
total
size
of
the
project?
It's
a
three
thousand
square
foot
building
for
both
uses.
B
The
property
located
three
Lots
to
the
west
of
the
dr.
Martin
Luther,
King,
jr.,
Boulevard
and
north
boulevard
intersections
and
the
property
surrounded
it
as
I
showed
you
by
retail
and
office
uses
the
PD.
Setbacks
are
ten
feet
from
the
north
twenty
feet:
five
feet
from
the
South
five
feet
from
the
West
and
five
feet
from
the
east.
The
maximum
height
is
proposed
at
35
feet.
The
required
number
of
parking
spaces
for
medical
office
is
18
they're,
requesting
a
waiver
to
go
down
to
16
parking
spaces
that
is
11%
parking
waiver
reduction.
B
There
are
changes
to
the
waiver
table
between
first
and
second
reading.
Transportation
did
find
this
application
inconsistent
because
of
the
11%
parking
would
reduction
from
18
spaces
down
to
16
natural
resources
found
this
consistent.
There
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
that
need
to
be
done
to
the
site
plan.
B
Another
way,
verse
27
to
80
4.4,
to
contribute
to
the
tree
trust
fund
for
mitigation
trees,
as
well
as
a
required
trees
and
the
last
waiver
request
is
27
to
eighty
four
point:
two
point:
five:
to
reduce
the
I'm:
sorry
to
remove
a
non-hazardous,
grand
chief
or
proposed
construction
activity,
saying
that
overall,
the
development
be
compliance
that
did
find
this
inconsistent
and
due
to
the
parking
waiver
request.
If,
in
the
event
City
Council
does
choose
to
prove
this,
please
keep
in
mind
the
waiver
request.
I'm.
E
B
G
E
But
by
the
time
they
get
across
that
it's
a
good
distance
of
at
least
what
15
15
feet
20
feet
before
they
get
to
the
building,
and
so
you've
got
to
rise.
To
put
that
put
the
picture
back
there,
you
got
to
rise,
a
rise
in
that
one
limb
doesn't
seem
to
have
lower
limbs,
and
we
don't
have
anybody
here
to
talk
to
us
about
the
ability
to
save
that
tree.
E
Part
of
my
concern
counsel
is
we're
going
to
be
losing
a
tremendous
amount
of
trees
because
of
what
the
state
did
with
preemption
and
now,
on
top
of
that,
you
know,
I
I
think
it's
it's
our
duty
to
try
and
save
the
trees
that
we
can
I'm
not
saying
we
shouldn't
approve
this
project.
I'm,
not
saying
saying
we
shouldn't
allow
them
to
build
a
the
building,
but
maybe
we
can
save
this
tree
and
built
and
let
him
have
the
building
to,
but
we
without
an.
E
B
E
That
testimony
here
in
front
of
us-
and
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
ask
those
questions
and
I'm,
not
gonna.
You
know
ask
you
those,
because
that's
not
your.
That's
not
your
deal
so
anyway,
with
all
due
respect
again,
I'm
really
uncomfortable
with
this
one.
Just
for
that
reason,
I'm
sure
everything
else
is
fantastic.
D
I
C
I
Property
line
the
property
line
and
it
sits
there,
as
was
pointed
out,
there
is
no
reasonable
reconfiguration,
it's
sitting
in
the
middle,
if
you,
if
you
all,
would
want
to
waive
all
parking
effectively
and
let
us
do
the
building
in
the
front,
then
that
would
be
a
way
to
save
that
tree.
I
love,
trees,
too
I
got
a
giant
one
in
my
yard.
That
I
take
really
good
care
of
this.
Just
not
it's
not
gonna
work.
This
time
we
already
have
the
waivers.
I
The
the
other
waivers,
the
use
buffer
and
the
vehicle
use
are
effectively
the
same
thing
because
it
comes
down
to
this
point.
There
is
a
10-foot
alley
behind
us
and
then
a
backyard
fence
from
their
rear
yard.
Neighbor's
so
I
mean
they
get.
They
get
all
that
extra
buffering.
I,
don't
think,
that's
an
issue
we
hadn't
heard
from
any
of
them,
so
I'm,
hoping
that's
a
non-issue
and
then
the
the
parking
reduction
is
slight
and
I
mean
candidly.
I
We
we
have
a
version
of
this
drawn
up
where
we
eliminate
this
this
tree
island,
but
that
would
be
a
place
where
we'd
be
putting
a
tree.
In
addition
to,
hopefully
we
can,
we
can
fit
a
couple
more
trees
on
here
and
and
the
and
we're
already
probably
going
to
have
to
pay
into
the
trust
fund.
Just
because
this
site
is
so
small,
and
that
is
that
is
where
we
are
I
would
point
out.
I
brought
this
because
I'm
just
gonna
start
saying.
B
I
I
This
is
our
medical
office
parking
ratio
compared
to
I,
don't
know,
however,
many
cities
I
grab
that
are
kind
of
benchmark
cities.
Five,
the
one
is
sort
of
the
standard
we're
running
six
to
one
you
can
see.
Minneapolis
actually
has
a
max
rate
we
meet
on
this
site.
Even
with
all
these
challenges,
we
meet
a
five
to
one,
so
I'm
not
gonna,
go
on
because
I'm,
tired
and
hungry,
but
we
think
we
meet
all
the
criteria
I'm
here
for
questions
any.
D
A
D
E
D
E
E
It's
not
the
applicants
fault,
but
he
didn't
bring
it.
They
didn't
bring
an
arborist.
We
didn't
bring
an
arborist.
We
have
no
idea
what
the
height
of
those
branches
are
as
they
as
they
approach.
We
could
waive
a
couple
of
additional
parking
spaces
and
perhaps
save
that
tree,
but
I'm
speculating
because
I
don't
have
the
information.
A
B
If
they
thought
it,
if
they
thought
that
this
was
being
unnecessarily
removed
for
a
project,
they
would
have
found
that
inconsistent
that
the
tree
could
have
been
saved
or
that
changes
to
the
building
could
have
occurred
and
that
the
tree
could
have
been
saved.
They
would
have
then
found
it
and
consisted
they
do
that
very
often
right.
E
E
Because
they've
quote
found
it
consistent,
they're
operating
under
very
tight
constraints;
okay,
they
they've
been
given
a
site
plan.
The
developer
comes
in
and
says
here's
my
box,
okay
and
it's
really
close
to
the
tree
and
they
look
at
it
and
they
go
yeah.
It's
really
close
to
the
tree.
Okay,
it's
consistent!
That's
their
evaluation,
I.
B
A
Me
Amy
I'm,
honored,
I'm
honored,
let's
say
something:
I
my
26
years
of
public
service
I've
never
gone
to
the
audience
to
speak,
to
anyone,
petitioner
or
otherwise,
but
it
was
a
hearing.
I
have
witnessed
now
three
times
someone's
done
that
not
me
so
I
see
hearing
being
held
I've
seen
the
people
leave
that
were
in
opposition
and
I,
see
that
the
developer
leaving
and
he
calls
them
back
and
ask
him.
Oh,
we
can
work
this
out.
A
J
I've
got
a
big
tree
guy
right
here
in
town.
You
don't
really,
you
know,
do
a
lot
of
tree
issues
like
other
places,
but
I
I
know
that
trees
are
important,
but
what
I
do
see
on
a
consistent
basis
when
there
are
issues
about
for
waivers
or
inconsistencies?
Other
departments
are
here
for
that
particular
process.
J
I
see
miss
Galloway
in
the
back
she's
been
here
so
I
can
see.
What
mr.
Dean
fells
point
is
that
if
there
are
three
issues,
somebody
from
natural
resource
should
be
here
to
talk
about
an
issue
if
it's
brought
up
or
more
information
as
relates
to
to
the
tree
or
that
properly
so
I
do
see
his
point
as
it
relates
to.
If
there's
an
inconsistency
in
a
tree
is
the
issue,
somebody
for
that
department
should
be
here,
especially
if
you
have
someone
else
to
another
department.
J
E
Would
be
my
motion
of
the
same
motion
as
we
made
or
earlier
on
that
other
case?
It's
exactly
the
same
situation.
We
got
a
big
tree
that
potentially
it
has
impact,
but
we
don't
know
we
don't
have
the
information,
we
don't
have
the
testimony,
so
it
asks
for
a
continuous.
So
we
can
have
adequate
information.
Otherwise,
there's
no
way
you
guys
can
evaluate
or
I
can
evaluate
the
waiver.
Okay.
D
I
Also
be
held,
I
would
like
to
not
continue
this,
because
the
problem
is
not
limb.
Limb
height
will
not
affect
the
the
parking.
The
location
of
the
tree
is
patently
obvious
to
me
and
it
countless
countless
hours
have
been
spent
by
the
engineering
team
and
it
trust
me
the
tree.
People
are
not
easy
on
us
when
we
go
through
these
pre
application
application
processes,
we
get
raked
over
the
coals.
I
This
is
the
product
of
many
many
hours
of
configuring,
this
site
in
the
best
way
possible,
and
what
you
are
left
with
is
a
tree
that
touches
the
ground
to
limb
height,
not
withstanding.
The
tree
touches
the
ground
you
got
to
park,
it
and
people
have
to
back
in
and
out
and
come
and
go.
I
would
request.
No
continuance
and
I
would
have
request
your
approval.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
G
F
D
D
E
B
C
State
columns
the
Planning,
Commission
staff
has
been
swarmed
next
cases
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
The
site
is
at
7-eleven
South
dale,
mabry,
highway
transit
is
available
and
proximity
the
subject
site
transferred
south
Dale
Mabry
Highway
to
the
traffic
traffic
emphasis
corridor
and
a
mixed-use
corridor.
This
is
in
a
sea
evacuation
zone.
C
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
site
is
currently
designated
commercial.
Mixed
use,
35
that's
shown
in
the
color
pink
on
the
future
land
use
map.
Smu
35
goes
up
down.
Henderson
Boulevard,
so
I'll
tell
Navy
highway
as
you
move
away
from
Dale
Mabry
you'll
see
residential
20
in
the
green
and
in
the
tan
colors
residential
10.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
from
the
plan
development
comparable
to
the
existing
development
pattern
found
along
South
Dale
Mabry
Highway.
C
The
PD
is
very
supportive
of
comprehensive
plan
policies
relating
to
sidewalks
internal
pedestrian
connections
and
design
material
sidewalks.
A
crosswalk
spittle
facilitate
a
safe
pedestrian
connection
from
sale
from
South
Dale
Mabry
Highway
to
building
entrances
in
the
elevation.
So
it's
a
transparent
and
friendly
pedestrian
pedestrian
friendly
entrance
based
on
those
considerations.
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
Thank.
B
B
This
property
was
originally
developed
as
a
plan
development
back
in
2004.
It
was
kz0
464
to
allow
for
a
bench
with
the
dragon
window
that
project
was
developed
and
that
project
is
currently
on
site.
The
applicant
is
proposing
with
this
current
plan
development.
You
have
two
options
and
these
are
reflected
in
site
plans.
So
there's
option
one
and
option
two
option:
one
is
to
keep
the
existing
entitlements
that
were
fruit
under
z0
for
64,
so
that
would
be
option
1
that
they
could
retain.
B
There's
entitlements
previously
approved
option
is
a
slight
reconfigured
remodeling
of
the
property.
The
parking
garage
will
stay
the
same.
The
main
buildings
would
remain
the
same.
They
would
do
a
very
small
addition
to
the
front
and
two
minor
remodeling
additions,
kind
of
interior
between
the
part
and
garage
and
the
building.
Those
increased
square
footage
would
be
approximately
3000
square
feet
of
additional
building.
B
Also,
the
existing
retention
pond
would
be
covered
and
there
would
be
a
vault
system
in
place
or
stormwater
and
the
additional
parts
and
would
be
in
place,
but
basically
the
parking
garage
would
stay
the
same.
The
majority
of
the
building
would
be
the
same,
the
Bing
drive-in
window
would
be
drive-through,
lane
would
be
removed
and
a
small
addition
and
then
option
2
would
allow
for
business
professional
office,
uses
medical
offices
and
clinic.
B
For
the
newly
proposed
plan
develop
option,
2
the
setbacks
are
10
from
the
front
0
from
the
side
and
14th
from
the
rear.
The
maximum
building
height
is
40
feet.
The
existing
option,
one
required
88
parking
spaces.
Sixty-One
were
provided
in
the
combination
of
the
surface
parking
in
a
parking
garage
with
option
number
two,
which
is
the
one
you
see
before
you,
which
is
for
the
new
construction
182
spaces
are
required
in
183
are
provided.
There
are
some
minor
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
with
planning
and
development
and
design.
B
There's
one
change
between
first
and
second
reading
from
transportation
transportation
did
find
this
inconsistent
because
of
access
to
a
local
Street,
McKay
Avenue
is
considered
a
local
street
and
because
they
are
adding
uses
to
this
plan,
development
reconsideration
to
all
driveway
cuts
are
required
by
code.
So
the
City
Council
must
re-evaluate
and
waiver
requests
for
access
to
this
local
street
for
non-residential
traffic.
B
Saying
that
the
previous
approved
waiver
is
listed
on
your
site
plan,
I'm,
sorry,
your
staff
report
and
then
new
waivers
are
access
to
the
local
Mackay
Street
to
reduce
the
required
number
of
loading
bursts
from
three
loading
berths
to
zero
and
to
contribute
to
the
tree
trust
fund
for
any
applicable
mitigation
of
required
trees,
saying
that
overall,
the
development
will
be
in
compliance.
Stuff
did
find
this
inconsistent
with
the
City
Tampa
development
code,
primarily
for
the
access
to
the
local
or
non-residential
traffic.
B
F
Good
evening,
Morris
Massey
101
East
Kennedy
Villard
suite
3700
here
in
TANF
I've,
been
sworn
here
representing
the
applicant
in
connection
with
this
petition.
First,
the
reason
for
the
to
site
plan
alternatives
are
contractually.
We
have
the
property
under
contract
to
contractually.
This
is
the
GT
Federal
Credit
Union,
building
on
South
del
Mabry
and
GT
is
asked
that
we
keep
the
remaining
PD
in
place.
In
the
event
we
don't
close
so
that
they
have
exactly
what
they
was
approved
back
in
2004
without
any
additional
requirements
or
our
conditions
applicable
to
that
pet
project.
F
So
that's
the
reasons
we're
alternative
one
relative
to
alternative
two,
which
is
really
the.
Why
we're
here
tonight
we're
proposing
to
convert
an
existing
26,000
square
foot,
building
from
financial
and
bank
offices
to
a
medical
office
building
with
the
potential
of
in
the
future,
adding
a
2500
square
foot
urgent
care
facility
in
the
front
between
the
existing
building
and
Elmira
Highway.
One
of
the
great
attributes
of
the
site
is
with
the
150
space
parking
garage
in
the
rear
on
the
west
side
of
the
building
and
the
parking
that's
available
in
the
front.
F
Let
me
put
up
the
site
plan
here
in
this
office,
maybe
being
the
easier
way
to
walk
through
this
I've
highlighted
in
yellow
the
the
possible
expansion
in
the
future.
This
is
the
parking
area
that
would
be
added
where
there's
a
bright
retention
pond.
Now
we
are
not
changing
the
access
driveways
as
exists.
Now
this
is
what
was
approved
in
2004.
The
property
does
face
dale
mabry.
There
is
one
driveway
from
Dale
Mabry
into
the
site.
F
F
Now,
in
this
alternative
one
or
alternative,
you
have
to
be
able
to
exit
the
parking
lot
onto
Mackay
here
and
there's
an
existing
driveway
and
we're
indicating
this
would
be
an
exit,
only
driveway
location,
then,
obviously
the
parking
garage
which
faces
in
the
K.
The
only
way
you
can
access
this
parking
lot
is
from
Mackay.
So
and
again
we
are
agreeing
to
certain
modifications
to
the
driveway
here,
so
it
would
be
an
entry
only
in
this
location,
this
segment
of
Mackay
between
dehl,
mabry
and
Church.
There
are
no
residential
uses
whatsoever.
F
We're
the
GT
building
occupies
most
of
the
northern
side
of
the
property.
There
is
a
small
law
office
building
here
that
faces
Church
Street,
but
it's
all
non
residential
uses.
On
the
north
side.
On
the
south
side,
it's
Christ
the
King
school
in
Church
in
school
we
met
with
them
early
on
the
process
in
the
process.
They
have
no
objection
to
our
application
or
our
current
driveway
connections
to
Mackay.
We
also
held
a
neighborhood
meeting
at
Christ,
the
King
Turks
about
30
days
ago,
and
you
had
one
person
show
up
so
I.
F
Don't
think
this
is
a
major
issue
for
the
neighbourhood,
the
other
way
we're
involved
the
loading
dock
area
requirement
in
the
code
for
these
types
of
uses,
medical
office.
We
really
don't
need
major
trucks
coming
in
and
that
would
be
disturbing
to
the
neighbors.
So
we
don't
really
need
that
at
all
and
so
we're
asking
that
to
be
waived.
The
other
requirement
of
the
the
other
way
where
we're
seeking.
F
We
think
that,
in
the
event
that
we
do
this
small
addition
here
and
do
put
this
part
in
here,
we
will
have
to
remove
some
protected
non
grand,
but
a
couple
protected
trees.
We
may
be
able
to
replace
them
on-site,
but
you
know
the
with
the
parking
garage
in
the
building
and
the
driveway
into
the
site.
We
are
limited
where
we
can
plant
the
tree,
so
we're
asking
the
ability
to
pay
into
the
tree.
Trust
fund
with
that
Billy
is
my
presentation.
If
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
I'm
here
to
answer
them.
D
D
H
File
number
are
easy:
1979
moving
ordinance
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
7-eleven
south
dome
a
highway
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
PD
plan
development
bank,
with
drive-in
in
business
professional
office
to
PD,
plan
development,
banquet
drive-in
medical
office
business
professional
office
clinic
providing
an
effective
date.
Okay,
we.
D
D
B
C
C
C
The
site
is
shown
here
in
outlined
in
purple
as
to
future
land
use
categories,
its
commercial
mixed
use,
35,
which
is
shown
in
pink
I'm
in
then
and
then,
and
that
dark
green
colors,
a
residential
35,
which
is
shown
on
the
east
portion
of
the
subject
site.
This
site
is
surrounded
by
the
residential
35,
the
CMU
35
along
South
MacDill,
and
then
this
yellow
south
of
Swann
is
residential.
Six
Planning
Commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
found
the
request
supportive
of
many
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
policies.
C
The
proposed
PPO,
ultimately
revitalized
and
results
develop
an
existing
building,
which
is
encouraged
by
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
The
PD
will
not
alter
this
established
development
pattern.
The
orientation
which
promotes
several
the
plans
policies,
the
proposed
PD,
is
also
providing
an
8
foot
masonry
wall,
eastern
portion
of
the
subject
site,
which
would
buffer
the
site
from
any
residential
uses
to
the
east.
Based
on
these
considerations,
the
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
Thank
you.
B
B
If
you
can
see
the
existing
property
and
I'm
going
to
show
you
pictures
is
a
serie
is
a
retail
building
that
has
been
added
on
to
several
times
over
the
course
of
the
of
the
years.
This
is
the
length
of
the
subject.
Property
with
the
applicant
is
proposing
is,
in
effect
to
demolish
a
portion,
the
rear
portion
of
the
existing
building
and
then
rehabilitate
the
front
portion
for
medical
and
business
professional
office
uses.
So
like
I
said,
the
building
currently
goes
back
into
this
area.
B
They're
asking
for
business
professional
medical
office
uses
based
on
the
square
footage
of
the
proposed
building,
which
is
8,500
square
feet.
The
total
25
parking
spaces
are
required
for
medical
office
uses
they
are
proposing
24
spaces.
That's
a
4%
parking
reduction.
Transportation
did
find
this
inconsistent
for
the
parking
reduction
and
then
the
only
other
waiver
that's
being
requested.
Is
they
used
to
use
copper
along
the
East
property
line
because
it
is
up
against
a
multi-family
development?
B
The
code
requires
15
feet
of
a
landscape
buffer
with
a
6-foot
high
masonry
wall
and
it
attempts
to
bring
the
site
as
close
to
compliant
for
partying
as
necessary.
The
15
foot
buffer
word
eliminated,
in
effect
that
whole
world
parking
in
lieu
of
that
requirement.
Instead
of
a
15-foot
landscape
buffer
with
a
six
foot
high
wall,
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
waiver
to
do
a
six
foot
landscape
buffer
with
an
8
foot
high
CMU
wall,
subject
to
payment
to
the
district
in
lieu
payment.
B
B
Transportation,
like
I
said,
did
find
this
can
inconsistent
for
the
the
one
parking
space
reduction
and
Natural
Resources
does
have
a
couple
of
clarification
for
notes
that
are
on
a
site
plan
saying
that
overall,
the
developer
view
of
compliant
stuff
did
find
this
inconsistent
based
on
transportation
inconsistency
for
the
parking
waiver.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
any
questions?
I
The
again
I'm
gonna
skip
to
the
waivers
because
I
wanna
go
home.
The
waiver
on
the
youth
buffer
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
I'll
actually
show
you
this
real,
quick,
married
sort
of
described
it.
It's
really
hard
to
catch
in
a
picture,
but
the
current
structure
is
an
industrial
building,
and
these
are
all
like
lean-to
metal
buildings
and
whatnot.
I
The
current
laws
are
there's
already
an
8-foot
law
in
place.
It
runs
down
to
this
masonry
building,
which
is
right
up
on
the
property
line.
As
a
result,
we
we
show
on
this
plan
we're
patching
that
eight-foot
wall
very
nice
couple
owns
both
this
duplex
and
this
duplex
and
I
had
a
nice
chat
with
them
and
there's
a
support
letter
in
the
file.
They're
excited
that
this
is
gonna,
get
a
lot
nicer.
C
I
E
I,
you
guys
have
to
indulge
me
so
when
I
was
16
years
old
I
worked
in
this
building
and
I,
don't
know.
If
Charlie
remembers
there
used
to
be
a
laundry
and
and
I
worked
in
there
and
we
it
was
the
laundry
and
we
got
sheets
I
guess
from
Tampa
General
Hospital
and
I
literally
had
no
fingerprints
by
the
end
of
the
summer,
because
those
sheets
were
so
hot
they
burned
it
off.
E
D
Mine
was
cash-and-carry;
okay,
anybody
here,
that's
funny.
Anybody
here
to
comment
public
on
item
number
11,
and
so
please
come
forward
at
this
time.
E
I'll
move
rezoning,
follow
our
easy
1980
item.
11
moved
the
ordinance
for
approval
for
first
reading,
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
general
city
of
624,
South,
MacDill
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particular
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
to
district
classifications,
CG
commercial
general,
an
RM
24
residential
multi-family
PD
plan
development.
D
D
H
There's
a
there's
something
that
came
up
during
the
break
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up.
Sorry
I
know
it's
late,
but
the
the
Tampa
Hillsborough
Economic
Development
Corporation
has
proposed
today
or
yesterday
that
they
changed
the
name
to
Tampa,
Bay
EDC
and
it's
set
off
a
firestorm
in
the
region.
The
other
ADCs
are
angry
about
it,
and
the
reason
is
that
the
term
Tampa
Bay
has
always
meant
to
represent
the
region
and
the
Tampa
Bay
partnership.
Remember
even
was
controversial
20
years
ago,
but
they
were
representing
the
region.
H
In
this
case,
there
is
a
very
good
EDC
in
Pinellas
County,
that's
probably
even
better
than
the
one
in
Hillsborough
and
and
they
take
offense
to
it.
They
part
they
say
we
have
a
great
relationship
partnering
and
we
don't
want
them
to
to
imply
that
they
represent
the
whole
region
when
they're
only
representing
Tampa
Hills,
where
I
bring
this
up,
because
we
give
them
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year
and
I
just
saw
this
so
I.
A
D
H
We,
at
least,
if
we
put
it
in
the
new
you
all
typically
will
do
a
action
notice
and
if
we
just
have
that
we
can
forward
it
to
them,
but
but
if
we
could
just
make
a
statement
that
we
recommend
them
to
do
it
it's.
It
goes
back
to
the
thing
about
regional
cooperation
collaboration.
It's.
It
sends
a
very
aggressive
negative
signal
to
the
region.
I.
E
H
Some
marketing
person
is
probably
saying
is
a
good
idea
by
the
way
the
Tampa
chamber
is
could
doing
the
same
thing,
but
we
don't
give
money
to
them
that
was
announced
today
too,
so
we
don't
have
any
influence
over
that.
But
if
we're
putting
500,000
and
I
think
we
should
not
be
supporting
something.
That's
going
to
hurt
our
partners
across
the
bay.
D
A
H
Gonna
happen
is
that
the
term
Tampa
Bay
is
gonna,
have
no
value,
because
I
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
st.
Pete
they're.
Already
pushing
and
you'll
see
in
this
story,
they're
pushing
for
a
Tampa
st.,
be
clear
water,
again
they're
going
to
stop
using
Tampa
Bay
because
they
they.
They
think
that
if
Tampa
Bay,
if
the
Tampa,
Chamber
and
Tampa
economic
development
groups
can
use
Tampa
Bay,
that
means
to
them.
It
represents
Tampa,
not
not
the
region,
it
won't
have
its
meaning
anymore.
So.
D
D
A
D
J
Have
a
discussion
with
Jeanne,
Duncan
and
Brad
earlier
this
week,
a
lot
of
constituents
talking
about
these
roundabouts
in
the
communities
and
I
told
my
foods
are
gonna,
make
a
motion
tonight
for
a
overview
of
it.
So
tonight,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion:
the
director
of
transportation
coming,
for
example,
City
Council,
and
give
a
detailed
overview
of
the
roundabout
project
slated
for
each
Tampa
and
the
city
of
Tampa
as
home
overview
point
of
this
concept,
which
starts
what
starts
with
start
dates
and
completion
dates,
cost
overview
and
fun
sources
for
each
Tampa
project.
D
E
D
D
And
then,
in
this
and
gentlemen,
I
apologize
for
springing
was
very
controversial.
Late
at
night,
I
know
we're
going
to
debate
this.
I
motion
for
a
commendation
for
friends,
a
non-profit
founded
by
the
parents
of
children
with
Down
syndrome,
West
Florida
for
their
Buddy
Walk.
That's
a
joke,
copies
further.
That
said,
commendation
he
presented
about.
There
were
26
that
their
event.
We.