►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council PM 01312019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
D
D
It
is
generally
located
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
the
West
Tampa
urban
village,
just
west
of
downtown.
Here
you
have
the
aerial
of
the
subject
site.
You
can
see.
There's
the
subject
site
outlined
in
red.
This
is
Cass
Boulevard
willow.
These
are
the
railroad
tracks
heading
into
downtown
downtown
off
to
the
right-
and
this
is
the
campus
of
the
University
of
Tampa.
D
It
is
a
little
background.
It
is
privately
initiated.
It
is
small
scale.
It's
approximately
1.7
six
acres,
the
current
future
land
uses
that
general
mixed-use
24
that
allows
the
residential
commercial
and
industrial
uses
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
go
to
the
urban
mixed-use
60
future
land-use
categories.
D
Here's
some
pictures
of
the
site
here,
we're
looking
south
from
the
intersection
of
West
Carmen's
a
street
and
north
Gilcrest
Avenue
of
the
subject
site
is
on
the
Left
right
here
of
the
photo
here.
We're
looking
east
down
west
carmen
street
from
where
it
intersects
with
north
Gilcrest
avenue.
The
subject
site
is
right
here
on
the
right.
This
is
looking
toward
UT.
That's
the
parking
garage
with
the
University
of
Tampa
on
the
other
side
of
the
railroad
tracks.
Here,
we're
looking
west
down
west
big
Street.
D
The
subject
site
is
located
right
here
on
the
right
side
of
the
photo
here,
we're
looking
north
east
of
this
up,
the
CSX
railroad
right-of-way.
The
subject
site
is
located
over
here
on
the
left
side
of
the
photo,
and
this
is
the
parking
garage
and
with
UT,
and
these
are
the
railroad
tracks
here.
We're
looking
west
from
the
intersection
of
West
common
street
and
North
Gilchrist
Avenue.
D
D
Here
we
have
the
current
adopted
future
land
use
map.
You
can
see
the
subject
site
and
all
these
light.
Blue
color
are
that
general
miss
use
24
immediately
to
the
Northeast.
Is
that
I
I
guess
avender
color?
It's
that's!
The
urban
mixed
use,
60,
that's
located
all
along
the
west
side
of
North
Boulevard
to
the
east.
D
Is
the
blue,
the
public
quasi-public
for
the
University
of
Tampa,
and
then
you
in
here
these
the
light
Browns
are
residential
20
and
the
darker
brown
is
that
residential
35
and
then
the
Pink's
further
to
the
west,
around
Oregon
and
Rome
are
that
community
mixed-use
35
future
Landers
category
again,
there's
urban
mix
260
to
the
north
and
to
the
south,
and
then
this
is
that
regional,
mixed
use
100
this
light.
I!
Guess
it's
red
color
here
it's
kind
of
hard
to
tell,
but
here
is
the
map.
D
If
this
plan
amendment
is
approved,
the
site
has
gone
to.
That
program
makes
260
future
land-use
category
the
impacts
currently
under
that
general
mixed
use.
24
the
site
could
be
considered
up
to
42
dwelling
units
or
114,000
998
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
under
the
urban
mixed-use
60.
The
the
residential
unit
count
goes
up
to
105,
while
the
non-residential
square
footage
goes
up
to
two
hundred
forty
nine
thousand
one
hundred
sixty-three
square
feet.
D
There's
a
few
under
that
general
under
the
urban
mixed-use,
sixty
any
applicant
or
developer
of
the
site
could
use
the
square
footage
or
the
density
count
for
residential
development.
Whichever
is
more
beneficial
for
the
applicant.
It
also
removes
if
the
urban
makes
you
60
is
approved.
It
removes
any
consideration
for
industrial
general
uses
on
this
site.
D
D
Your
Planning
Commission
did
recommend
approval.
They
found
it
consistent
in
a
number
of
policy
areas,
the
promotion
of
infill
development
and
appropriate
areas
of
the
city
without
the
policy
directions,
supporting
investment
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
there's
even
policy
directing
residential
future
residential
development
to
locate
on
the
west
side
of
the
river
to
support
the
employment
center
of
downtown.
D
That's
captured
their
support
redevelopment,
the
West
Tampa
area
and
also
promote
a
form
of
development,
supporter
of
transit
and
walking.
The
planning
mission
find
that
the
urban
makes
you
16
the
development
that
does
come
with
that
category.
Typically,
it
does
usually
typically
support
more
transit
usage
through
its
density
and
form
so
based
on
that
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
Amanda
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagined
2040
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I,
don't
believe
the
city
doesn't
have
any
comments
public
here.
E
B
F
B
E
Anyway,
mr.
rubb
hay
is
succinctly
summarized
the
application
for
you,
I'd
like
to
read
one
finding:
that's
in
the
application,
there's
no
page
number
on
it,
but
the
second
of
the
last
page
of
their
referent
of
their
recommendation.
The
comprehensive
plan
supports
the
continued
transition
of
West
Hamlet
to
a
more
mixed
use,
development
pattern
and
recognized
the
University
of
Tampa
and
the
future
expansion
of
Tampa
General
Hospital
as
important
anchors
and
economic
engines
for
this
general
area
and
to
build
upon
to
support
these
investments.
E
In
summary,
you
have
two
big
economic
engines
here
and
they
need
some
housing,
and
this
is
a
superb
idea
to
have
a
walkable
city
to
have
less
transportation
problems
put
the
development
near
the
major
economic
engines.
This
is
next
to
the
four
fairgrounds.
Next
to
the
C
point
of
the
CSX
rail
line,
the
finding
is
consistent
and
the
conclusion
is
overall,
the
request
for
the
urban
mixed-use
category
at
you
64.
E
E
You
have
similar
findings
on
page
four,
based
on
the
historic
development
pattern
of
the
area
in
the
location
of
the
subject
site
the
requested
use,
sixty
land
use
category
is
in
the
best
interest
of
this
area
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
This
future
land-use
category
allows
for
Kent's.
A
consideration
of
the
maximum
fa
are
at
three
point
two:
five,
with
the
bonus
provisions.
E
We're
considering
an
application
for
a
plan
category
to
change
it
from
GME
2014,
you
60,
you
have
to
look
at
the
future.
What's
the
future,
bringing
the
future
is
bringing
demand
for
improved
housing,
improve
using
this
property,
no
longer
industrial
I
submit
to
you.
This
is
an
excellent
application,
is
consistent
with
the
plan
and
I
request
your
approval
this
evening.
Thank
you.
C
H
C
G
You
chair
I,
present
an
ordinance
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
generally
located
at
11:02
1112
1116
West
Carmen
street
from
general
mixed-use,
24,
GMU
24
to
mixed
use.
60
you,
you
60,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
B
D
D
D
It
is
small-scale,
it's
approximately
eight
point:
five
five
acres.
Currently
the
site
has
two
future
land-use
categories:
the
residential
twenty
and
the
transitional
use
24
us
in
coordination
with
the
school
board,
we're
seeking
to
change
it
to
the
public
semi
public
to
better
reflect
what
the
school
board
is
planning
for
that
site.
D
Here's
some
photos
currently
they're
using
it
for
their
driver
education
facility.
This
is
the
site
from
the
intersection
of
Lois
and
Rembrandt
we're
looking
Southwest
there's
the
site
from
the
intersection
of
Manhattan
Avenue
and
Rembrandt
Drive
we're
looking
south
east
across
the
subject
site
here,
we're
looking
north
from
the
intersection
of
Louis
Avenue
and
Rembrandt
Drive.
The
subject
site
is
out
of
frame
to
the
left.
D
Here
we
have
the
currently
adopted
future
land
use
map
you
can
see.
The
subject
site
is
that
residential
20
you've
got
residential
10
to
the
east
and
west
of
the
subject
site.
There's
the
public,
quasi
public
four
Robertson
high
school
immediately
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
and
then
the
transitional
use
24
to
the
south.
D
Currently
under
that
residential
20,
the
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
173
dwelling
units
or
a
total
of
two
hundred
fourteen
thousand
eight
hundred
eight
hundred
and
three
square
feet
under
the
public
quasi
public.
There
is
no
maximum
floor
area
ratio.
It's
guided
by
that
the
development
just
needs
to
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
So
if
any
development
did
occur
through
a
rezoning
process
that
would
be
of
one
of
the
determiners
of
what
was
appropriate
for
the
site.
D
The
Planning
Commission
looked
at
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
our
school
siting
and
available
availability
policies
to
promote
our
public
schools
and
also
allowing
for
compatible
developments
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
So,
based
on
that
at
the
November
19th
Planning
Commission
meeting,
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
that
this
map
amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
So,
if
you
have
any
questions,
any.
I
Why
would
they
improve
sidewalks
on
lowest
Avenue?
Well
they're
already
sidewalks
around
the
school
I
also
sent
a
letter
to
Amber
Dickerson,
with
the
same
concern
trying
to
find
out
what
it
is
that
they're
going
to
do
with
Rembrandt
Drive
today,
I
have
not
received
any
response
from
either
pop
party
in
regard
to
what
kind
of
development
or
what
they're
going
to
be
doing
on
the
red
line.
Thank
you.
C
I
Sidewalks
be
in
control
I'm
just
trying
to
find
out,
because
what
they're
actually
going
to
be
doing
with
Rimbaud's
Brant
job
they're,
not
saying
that
they're
putting
sidewalks
on
Grant
Drive,
they
got
in
contact
with
hard
line
to
have
ad
a
stipulations
put
on
Lois
Avenue,
which
is
the
front
of
the
school.
The
bus
does
not
run
on
Lois.
They
want
through
ways
and
things
on
Lois,
Avenue
I
just
want
to
know.
What
are
they
going
to
do
with
Rembrandt
drive
when
membrane
browser
is
a
way
to
get
to
the
bus,
stop
on
Manhattan.
D
David
Haye
Planning
Commission
staff
I
do
not
have
any
knowledge
of
this.
My
understanding
that
this
plan
amendment
was
initiated
by
us
in
coordination
with
the
school
board
when
we're
reviewing
appropriate
land
uses,
we
were
looking
at
since
the
school.
It
was
an
identified
site
owned
by
the
school
that
did
not
was
not
in
a
public
quasi
public
category.
Our
understanding
from
the
school
board
is
that
there's
no
long-term
plans
for
that
they're
using
it
for
their
driver
education
facility
any
any.
D
J
B
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair
I
move
Norden
incented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
future
land
use
map
to
the
property
generally
located
at
42.
28
Monat
Court
from
residential
20
are
20
and
transitional
use,
2014
24
to
public
semi
public
PSP,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
in
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
for
an
effective.
C
A
C
K
This
is
located
in
the
university
planning
district,
more
specifically
within
the
neighborhood
of
old
Seminole
Heights.
According
to
your
neighborhood
map.
There
is
some
background
on
this
amendment.
It
was
privately
initiated.
It
is
a
regular
amendment
because
it's
greater
than
10
acres,
which
means
that,
after
its
heard
here
it
has
to
go
to
the
state
for
their
review
and
before
it's
adopted.
So
it's
about
16.8,
five
acres
and
the
request
before
you
is
to
go
from
light
industrial
to
community
commercial
35.
We
might
remember
that
this
had
a
previous
request
on
it.
K
16-14
that
came
before
you
on
February
27th,
3:17
yeah.
This
board
did
vote
to
transmit
that
to
the
state.
However,
that
amendment
never
had
the
adoption
hearing,
so
it
was
never
adopted,
so
it
was
transmitted
to
the
state.
But
then
adoption
hearing
has
to
be
held
within
180
days
per
state
statute,
and
since
that
was
never
held,
it
was
null.
So
this
is
back
before
you
to
tonight.
Under
those
circumstances,
this
is
the
subject
site.
This
is
along
Rowlett,
Park
Drive,
and
this
is
a
slide.
I
have
a
city
water
facility
over
here.
K
Some
industrial
uses
some
single-family
homes,
and
this
is
a
Chico
facility
right
here
and
to
the
north
is
the
Rogers
Park
Golf
Course
here
are
some
sight.
Pictures
is
the
subject
site
so
vacant
heavily
wooded
area,
so
I
took
it
this
time
and
pictures
from
the
road.
This
is
Rowlett
Park
Drive
facing
south
towards
slide.
K
These
are
the
CSX
tracks,
lokay
to
the
west
of
the
subject,
site
kind
of
a
cross,
relat
Park
Drive-
and
these
are
just
some
examples
of
the
businesses
that
you
find
the
long
Rowlett
Park
Drive.
This
is
a
marble
and
granite
business
located
to
the
north.
With
the
subject
site.
These
are
single-family
homes
located
west
of
the
subject
on
the
subject
site
along
North,
30th
Street.
K
This
is
also
located
one
North
30th
Street,
the
precision
electrical
repair
services,
and
then
this
is
that
city
of
Tampa
water
treatment
facility
located
on
30th
Street
along
the
river
and
the
vicinity
of
this
epic
8.
This
is
the
exhausted
future
land
use
map
I
have
it
outlined
here.
This
is
the
subject
site.
It's
light
industrial
as
adopted
today.
These
are
the
single-family
homes.
I
showed
you
a
picture
of
their
kind
of
facts
here,
tucked
away
their
residential
ten.
The
public
is
that
water
treatment
facility
there's
a
Chico
facility
down
here.
K
That's
also
light
industrial
and
then
the
reddest
community,
commercial
35-
and
this
is
the
Rogers
Park
Golf
Course
and
record
open
space
to
the
north,
and
then
this
is
the
proposed
future
land
use
map
before
you
tonight,
I'm
changing
to
community
commercial
35,
which
is
the
red
so
currently,
under
the
light
industrial
there.
No
residential
desi
is
allowed
its
allotted.
So
that's
zero
dwelling
units
until
the
adopted
future
land
use,
but
this
has
the
potential
up
to
589
dwelling
units
under
that
community,
commercial
35.
K
We
did
receive
objections
from
the
city
of
Tampa
on
this
amendment
and
I'm
sure
LaShawn
will
further
explain
those
after
I
conclude
my
presentation.
However,
the
Planning
Commission
did
find
this
consistent
and
they
cited
specific
policies
and
that
motion
and
those
are
included
in
the
resolution
in
your
packet
at
length,
but
on
based
on
the
presentation
by
the
applicant.
K
They
also
found
it
consistent
with
Lu
policy.
Six
point
one
point:
one:
to
promote
the
redevelopment
of
automobile
oriented
corridors
to
create
a
more
attractive
pedestrian
friendly
district,
as
well
as
on
Lu
policy.
Eight
point:
nine
point:
two:
two:
continued
intensification
of
the
industrial
warehousing
distribution
facilities
since,
under
that
community
commercial,
thirty-five
there's
still
some
potential
for
those
uses
under
the
proposed
deployment
and
that
was
provided
in
their
justification.
So
the
Planning
Commission
did
find
this
consistent
and
as
it
is
reflected
in
your
resolution,
that
was
a
seven
to
two
vote.
K
G
K
G
K
K
Difference
was
that
proposed
future
land
use
category
the
first
time
it
was.
This
community
makes
these
35,
and
today
it's
community
commercial
I,
believe
the
applicant
is
slightly
different.
The
representative
might
be
the
same
before
you
gonna.
Let
him
explain
that
further,
but
those
of
these
is
it.
Okay,.
L
Good
evening,
chairman
council
on
dock
planning
and
urban
design,
council
city
planning
staff
review
the
request
and
has
objections
to
the
request.
You'll
find
the
city's
comments
within
your
packet.
The
objections
were
mainly
relating
to
the
industrial
zoning
and
land
use
which
surrounds
the
property
on
this
map.
This
is
the
property
that's
identified
on
Rowlett
Park
Drive.
This
is
my
Avenue
just
to
orient
you.
So
this
is
the
property,
that's
under
request
and,
as
you
can
see,
all
of
the
areas
that
are
located
within
the
map
that
are
gray
have
the
industrial
general
zoning.
L
But
this
property
is
zoned
industrial
general,
the
parcels
to
the
north,
the
south
and
the
west,
and
further
north
east
all
have
the
industrial,
general
zoning.
So
staff
has
concerns
regarding
the
requested
CC
35
ranges
category
in
the
allowable
uses
under
that
language.
Category,
there's
a
concern
regarding
it
possibly
being
an
inconsistent
used
to
loud
with
a
CC
35
next
to
the
industrial
zoning
and
you'll
find
those
policies
listed
and
those
concerns
listed
within
the
city
staff
report
and
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions,
counsel
may.
J
L
L
G
G
G
L
K
L
K
K
C
K
I
believe
and
you'll
have
to
forgive
me
going
off
the
memory
that
this
is
the
location
of
one
of
the
pictures.
I
showed
you
that
was
on
the
precision
electrical
repair,
I
believe
based
off
this
aerial
I
believe
that
this
is
the
ahem
laboratories
right
here
and
then
those
this
is
a
lot
of
autumn-like
marble.
K
B
K
I
have
it.
This
goes
back
to
the
exact
show.
This
is
the
Planning
Commission.
That's
also
in
your
in
your
staff
report.
This
is
a
green
for
recreational
open
space,
which
is
the
same
land
use.
It
has
today,
because
we
did
recognize
that
Park
back
in
1979
when
the
Planning
Commission
did
this
preliminary
sub-sector
plan
and
the
subject
site
was
light
industrial.
So
this
development
pattern
is
is
we're
still
kind
of
seeing
the
same
development
pattern
today.
N
D
L
B
B
O
Mr.
chairman,
council
members
have
a
PowerPoint
for
you.
If
we
can
pull
that
up,
please
Milo
comes
up.
Let
me
tell
you,
mr.
chairman
and
council
members,
Todd
Pressman,
three,
three
four
he's
like
road
number
102
home
are
with
Florida
in
my
25
plus
years
appearing
before
you
at
the
county
and
other
jurisdictions.
I
have
never
had
a
greater
honor
or
more
respect
for
a
group
of
people
that
I've
worked
with
and
what
they
do.
O
Then
this
organization
they
are
doing
phenomenal
work
in
this
community,
have
done
it
for
over
century
you'll,
hear
tonight
from
dr.
Jerry
Hague
he's
the
president
CEO
of
one
more
child
in
Florida,
Baptist
children's
home
you'll,
hear
from
pastor
Ken
wit,
news,
the
pastor
of
Idlewild
Baptist,
Church
and
you'll,
hear
from
keypad
director
of
Hope
Street,
one
more
child
and
if
I
may,
if
I
may
I'd
like
to
ask
everyone
here
who
is
for
this
request
tonight,
they
came
down
here.
If
you
would,
please
stand
up
giveaway.
O
Let
me
go
over
some
points
for
you.
If
we
go
back
to
the
PowerPoint
I'm
going
to
cherry-pick
a
little
bit
because
of
the
zoning
and
land
use
together.
So
this
again
is
one
more
child
and
I
want
Baptist
Church.
We
have
tremendous
community
support,
I
know
you've
received,
but
hundreds
of
emails
and
support.
We
have
the
Planning
Commission
support.
We
have
the
zoning
staff
support
for
Zoning.
O
We
have
a
long
list
of
city
departments
and
agencies
that
support
it,
and
these
folks
have
a
great
community
mission
now,
whether
it's
providing
goods
primarily
food
for
families
in
the
community.
This
organization
has
a
number
of
different
missions.
They
have
a
specific
mission
that
they
followed
in
their
century
work
which
is
proposed
for
this
site.
They
do
outstanding
work,
including
serving
over
a
million
meals.
They
don't
serve
hot
meals,
they
don't
do
homeless
meals,
they
don't
house
homeless.
O
They
strictly
pick
up
and
deliver
food
hard
goods,
canned
goods,
non-perishable
goods
I'll,
get
into
a
little
bit
deeper,
but
they
do
and
provide
other
community
services
so
Orient's
at
the
site
and
the
issues
you're
aware
we,
the
future
land,
use
amendment
tonight
from
Industrial
CC
35,
it's
located
in
somewhat
mid,
tampa
Jennifer.
Oh
it
does.
A
good
job
has
outlined
the
site
for
you.
It's
sixteen
point,
eight
four
acres
they
have
already
purchased
and
they
own
the
property.
That's
their
commitment
to
the
site
into
the
city,
there's
residential
areas
of
budding.
O
You
also
heard
to
the
north
as
a
recreational
area
which
has
clients
and
folks
who
are
using
that
recreation
use
as
a
golf
course.
So
the
mission
at
this
site
is
approximately
85%
warehousing,
chuckling
trucking
up
mostly
non-perishable
foods.
They
will
have
five
six
seven,
maybe
eight
individual
singer,
mother
homes.
They
have
a
program
where
they
bring
single
mothers
in
who
or
having
difficulty.
They
work
with
them
on
a
program
to
make
them
self-sufficient
and
have
the
baby
for
the
community.
So
it's
a
small,
very
small
residential
use.
It's
primarily
a
warehousing
and
trucking
view.
O
So
what
they
do
is
they
send
out
trucks.
So
a
lot
of
supermarkets
and
stores,
as
you
can
see,
they
bring
them
back
to
one
more
child,
Hope
Street,
and
then
they
distribute
those
goods.
They
are
not
serving
meals,
they're,
not
surei,
homeless,
they're,
not
in
housing.
Folks,
their
primary
mission
is
shown
here,
so
they
don't
cook
server,
prepare
meals,
it's
not
a
soup
kitchen.
That's
never
been
their
mission,
it's
not
their
mission.
Now
homeless,
shelter
never
been
their
mission,
it's
not
their
mission.
Now
they
again,
the
meals
had
never
been
their
mission.
O
So
we
give
you
a
lot
of
that
idea.
This
is
their
Lakeland
property.
This
is
the
Herrick
luxans
comparison
Center
and
give
you
an
idea.
What
it
looks
like
this
is
the
food
operation
where
they
bring
in
warehouse
foods
as
you
can
see,
and
they
store
them,
warehouse
them
and
then
again
truck
them
out.
You
can
see
some
of
their
efforts
here.
Some
of
their
efforts
of
building
the
big
efforts
is
backpacks
for
kids
at
elementary
schools,
and
the
guys
will
talk
about
that.
O
But
you
can
see
they
have
trucks,
and
you
can
see
that
they
have
warehousing
facilities
stackable
there
and
a
lot
of
major
industrial
type
uses
to
handle
that
to
handle
activity,
and
this
is
the
small
residential
component.
That's
in
Lakeland,
as
you
can
see,
it's
very
residential.
Looking
again,
it's
very
regulated.
It's
very
regulated
in
terms
of
a
program
to
work
with
these
folks.
So
points
and
support
premise
points:
premise
points.
As
you
already
know,
city
council
did
vote
once
already
to
eliminate
the
light
industrial
future
land-use
category
I
represented
that
case.
O
It
was
a
totally
different
group
of
people.
Those
are
the
folks
who
were
first
looking
to
do
the
shipping
containers,
so
it
was
going
to
be
very
intense
residential
use.
That's
primarily
in
fact
that
was
what
the
whole
site
was
going
to
be,
so
the
council
approved
it.
It
went
up
to
the
state
came
back,
but
their
business
deal
fell
through.
So
we
was
left,
as
is
so.
O
Industrial
type
uses
will
remain,
there
will
be
economic
support
and
there
is
other
CC
35
future
laners
category
very
close
by
so
previa
it
was
TAC,
PA
16-14,
light
industrials
CMU
35.
As
far
as
I
recall,
it
was
approved
unanimously
on
first
reading,
and
this
is
the
letter
from
the
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity
approving
it.
So
this
is
the
site
and
you
can
see
to
the
south
almost
immediately
to
the
south.
There
is
plenty
of
CC
35
even
before
you
cross
the
street.
O
So
it's
not
just
the
only
sees
the
35
this
being
requested
community
support.
This
is
a
letter
from
the
state
of
Florida
partment
of
juvenile
justice
from
Judy
Royston
who's,
their
chief
officer.
She
knows
one
more
child
Polk
Street
are
vital
to
the
community.
We
hope
you
strongly
consider
their
land-use
change.
They've
made
an
incredible
impact
and
support
positive
growth
in
the
area
and
help
families
we're
very
proud
of
a
letter
from
Jeff
Ekans
who,
as
you
know,
leads
Hillsborough
County,
Public
Schools.
O
He
tells
you
that
he
hopes
that
you
will
consider
the
land-use
change
the
CPA
1811
he
knows
says
her
strong
desire
for
you
to
support
it.
They
firmly
believe
it
will
strengthen
the
community
one
more
child's,
providing
nearly
six
hundred
thousand
meals
to
students
and
families
in
the
state,
their
strong
belief
that
community
partners,
like
one
more
child
Hope
Street,
are
vital
to
the
well-being
of
the
children,
our
schools
there's
a
lot
of
complaint
policies
that
support
that.
That's
why
the
Planning
Commission
did
approve
and
recommend
to
you
to
support
this
land-use
category.
O
Two
point:
one
point:
two
use
limited
resources
more
efficiently
pursue
a
development
pattern
that
is
more
economically
sound
by
encouraging
infill
development
on
vacant
land.
That's
underutilized,
which
is
what
this
site
is.
Eight
point:
nine
point
to
encourage
the
continued
intensification
and
existence
of
industrial
warehousing
and
distribution
facilities
and
provide
opportunities
for
new
warehouse
industry
in
distribution
in
select
locations
to
provide
a
range
of
employment
opportunities
to
Tampa
residents.
That
actually
is
a
policy
that
one
of
the
planning
commissioners
pulled
up
and
I
may
be
wrong,
but
I
think
that's.
O
A
policy
of
the
city
staff
is
using
in
support
of
opposition
to
this
case.
There's
a
lot
of
other
policies,
including
housing.
You
can
read
about
work
with
nonprofit
organizations,
collaboration
with
housing
agencies
and
again
faith-based
organizations
with
these
folks.
Our
work
in
coordination
with
private
organizations,
development,
permanent
and
transitional
housing,
that's
affordable
and
last
policy.
Again,
eight
point:
nine
point:
five
I
bring
that
up
again
because
one
of
the
planning
commissioners
raised
that
as
support
for
the
request.
O
Planning
Commission
report
tells
you
that
this
would
be
consistent
with
the
overall
mix
of
uses
in
the
surrounding
area
and
development
pattern.
Cities,
developments
in
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed.
The
application
finds
the
request
consistent
with
zoning,
make
a
point
of
that.
They
find
it
was
zoning.
All
the
apartments
of
the
zone
report
also
notice
consistent.
So
in
summary,
we
have
tremendous
community
support.
This
entire
room
is
filled
for
folks
who
came
down
here
tonight,
you've
heard
from
the
community
this
we
go
back
to
that
last
page,
please.
O
So
this
is
an
organization,
that's
community,
supporting
with
the
tremendous
reputation
of
saying
what
their
mission
is
and,
following
through
for
literally
last
century
last
century,
since
1904
in
this
community,
they
work
in
many
areas
of
needed
social
assistance.
They
have
complete
staff
agency,
a
community
support,
not
not
your
tampa
staff
in
the
land
use
city
council
in
the
state
approved
a
prior
change
away
from
industrial
few
challenges.
Category
previously
many
complaint
categories
actually
support
the
application,
as
reported
and
recommended
to
you,
and
it
will
still
maintain
industrial
use
with
that.
O
O
J
H
H
So
we've
made
a
tremendous
impact
on
the
community
that
we
love
at
the
those
those
operations
and
all
those
services
will
continue
at
the
existing
site
on
the
new
site
that
has
been
vacant
for
decades.
That
is
contingent
to
both
commercial
and
residential
it'll
be
an
ideal
site
for
what
we
intend
to
build
there.
We
plan
to
build
a
compassion
center
within
that
compassion,
centers,
you
saw
we
take
shipments
from
large
individuals
and
we
work
with
partners
like
Publix
Walmart,
comm,
us
food
winn-dixie.
H
We're
able
to
take
large
donations
from
them,
break
it
down
into
smaller
packages
and
be
able
to
get
that
out
to
children
and
families
that
are
struggling
and
that
are
in
need
as
you,
when
we
look
at
that
through
the
feeding,
those
hungry
families
and
then
also,
you
saw
some
statistics
from
superintendent
Eakins
regarding
our
backpack
feeding
program,
where
we're
able
to
help
feed
children
that
have
been
hungry
over
the
weekends.
So
to
give
you
an
idea
of
that
impact,
one
that
be
most
similar.
H
This
is
a
compassion
center
in
Lakeland
Florida
sixteen
thousand
square
feet.
This
would
be
20,000
square
feet
so
as
to
be
larger.
We
on
average,
approximately
500,000
pounds
of
food
that
we're
able
to
both
bring
in
from
those
donors
and
then
be
able
to
redistribute
out
to
children
and
families
that
have
those
needs.
In
addition
to
those
feeding
programs.
You
also
heard
about
our
single
moms
program
howl,
which
is
fantastic.
H
We're
able
to
do
that
to
a
12-month
program
which
we
work,
also
in
conjunction
with
Department
of
Children
and
Families,
on
the
outcomes
of
those
programs
and
we're
able
to
make
a
tremendous
impact
on
their
lives
I'm,
not
only
that
we've
had
fantastic
success
there,
but
within
this
commercial
area,
also,
within
this
residential
community,
we'll
have
beautiful
green
spaces.
We
talk
about
all
the
statistics.
It's
all
about
a
little
eight-year-old
girl
named
Asia,
who
are
able
to
send
a
backpack
home
every
weekend.
That's
full
of
food
like
this.
H
P
Good
evening,
chairman
and
good
evening,
City
Council
I'm
Keith
Bob,
the
director
one
more
child
Hope
Street
I,
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
make
mention
of
and
I
think
there
was
a
slight
under-representation
of
the
depiction
of
the
community
around
the
subject
site.
If
you
look
north
of
the
subject
site
that
sulfur
springs,
if
you
look
south
of
that
site,
that's
East
Tampa.
P
One
of
the
things
that
was
also
failed
omission
mention
is
that
that
subject
site
is
surrounded
by
three
area:
schools,
one
being
Sulphur
Springs
K
through
8
community
school,
the
other
being
Van
Buren
Middle
School,
which
has
now
have
become
a
community
school
as
well
serving
kids
from
K
to
8th
grade
and
also
slide
middle
school.
So
those
are
community
schools
where
our
subject
site
is
centered
and
I.
Think
our
president
also
mentioned
that
our
desire
is
to
help
children
and
families.
P
If
you
know
anything
about
those
communities
that
I
just
mentioned,
you
know
that
they're
underserved
they're
under-resourced
and
we
simply
want
to
bring
resources
to
those
children
and
families
in
that
community.
One
of
the
letters
of
support
that
was
presented
in
our
presentation
stated:
the
Department
juvenile
justice
we've
been
serving
young
people
through
the
Department
of
Juvenile
Justice
since
2016
at
our
site.
Here
in
Tampa
Florida,
we've
served
over
150
young
people
that
being
girls
and
young
men
that
have
found
themselves
in
a
little
bit
of
trouble.
P
One
of
the
things
that
was
also
failed
to
mention
one
of
the
setbacks,
and
one
of
the
reasons
that
there
were
some
concerns
from
the
city
staff
is
that
that
we
would
probably
put
young
people
are
those
in
residential
facilities
in
danger.
One
of
the
things
that
our
president
mentioned.
We
serve
kids
in
foster
care.
P
One
of
our
main
goals
is
to
mitigate
danger
from
young
people
that
are
ended,
the
Department
of
Juvenile
Justice,
as
well
as
the
child
welfare
system,
so
we're
going
to
ensure
that
we
made
foot
plans
in
place
to
not
put
them
in
extinct
and
imminent
danger.
My
plea
to
you
is:
allow
us
to
continue
to
serve
communities
that
are
underserved
and
under-resourced
and,
as
you
can
see,
by
the
representation
behind
us,
the
community
wants
us
to
do
this.
As
well,
Thank
You.
C
F
Mr.
McLean,
he
has
one
two
three
four
five
days.
Please
acknowledge
your
presence
here.
If
I
mispronounce,
your
name,
I'm,
sorry,
John,
Theophilus
I
feel
thank
you
Michael
Maniscalco.
Thank
you,
sparrows
Cialis,
Thank,
You,
Brady
leduc.
Thank
you
and
Neil
chambers.
Thank
you.
Five
additional
minutes.
Eight.
A
Council
look
Steve
Mecca,
Lainey
I'm,
representing
Theo
Kim
and
John
Theophilus,
and
his
family,
who
owned
that
facility
I
also
have
a
petition
signed
by
eleven
other
industrial
users
that
surround
this
site,
who
were
opposed
to
this
plan
amendment.
Let
me
start
by
saying
this
is
not
about
the
good
work
that
these
folks
do.
This
is
about
whether
or
not
an
industrial
site
should
be
converted
to
allow
residential,
and
if
you
noticed,
every
comment
that
that
was
made
to
you
focused
on
the
warehousing
the
services
to
the
community,
the
putting
together
of
the
backpacks.
A
They
can
do
that
as
it
sits
right
now
with
the
industrial
zoning
and
the
industrial
land
use.
Without
making
a
single
change,
there
was
no
identification
regarding
the
residential
component,
which
is
really
what's
behind.
All
of
this.
Let
me,
let
me
show
you
you
know
again
this.
This
is
the
the
site
they
go
in
here
this
this
facility,
which
they
alluded
to,
was
an
immediately
adjacent
to
it.
On
the
north,
this
is
peel,
kill
a
chemical
manufacturing
facility.
There
are
15
loading
docks
with
trucks
to
come
in
and
out
of
that
facility.
A
The
distribute
those
products
all
over
the
all
over
the
state
over
here
is
warehousing
their
storage
in
here
there's
the
electrical
repair
services
here,
they're
using
all
kinds
of
electrical
components
to
repair
electronic
equipment.
There's
warehousing
all
down
here
there
are
four
houses
that
abut
the
residential
side
of
this
property
way
down
here
out
of
a
16.8
five
acre
site,
and
so
you
asked:
why
are
they
changing
a
request
for
the
entire
site
to
be
allowed
for
CC
35?
A
They
told
you
80
to
90
percent
I
thought
it
was
90
percent,
but
of
their
effort
are
related
to
warehousing,
not
residential
components.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
servicing
the
children
giving
meals
to
kids.
It
has
not
one
thing
to
do
with
that.
It
has
to
do
those
who
are
allowed
right
now.
They
can
build
anywhere
in
this
property
that
warehousing
and
that
distribution
center
anywhere.
What
they
can't
do
is
they
cannot
put
residential
properties
anywhere
else.
A
The
only
you
know,
one
of
the
discussions
I
had
was
they
only
had
40
units
that
they
were
proposing,
and
then
somebody
said
five,
six,
seven
and
eight
for
single
moms,
I,
don't
know
if
that
means
five,
six,
seven
and
eight
houses
I,
don't
know
what
that
means
green
space.
This
this
is
a
hazard
area.
This
is
a
Tico's
distribution
and
warehouse
center.
They
have
transformers,
they
have
big
trucks.
They
this
this
site
is
huge.
Let
me
show
you
on
another
aerial,
just
how
big
that
site
is.
A
This
is
our
two-lane
roads
and
I.
Think
that
it's
it's
very
interesting
that
one
of
the
land
use
classification,
one
of
the
citations,
was
automotive,
enhancing
an
automotive
corridor.
Nobody
would
ever
call
sly,
Avenue
and
Rowlett
Park
an
automotive
corridor
that
needed
to
be
enhanced.
You
can
barely
traverse
it
now.
A
When
you
talk
about
the
objections
the
city
laid
out
and
the
stand,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
laid
out
a
number
of
objections,
and
it's
not
just
about
removing
industrial
property.
It's
the
proximity
of
the
industrial
users
who
are
established,
who
have
been
there
for
many
many
years
and
who
don't
want
to
accept
the
liability?
They
don't
want
to
accept
the
risk
they
don't
want
to
put
any
child
in
harm's
way.
If
you
remember
just
last
week,
there
was
a
facility
in
Dade
City
that
wasn't
even
dealing
with
chemicals
it
caught
on
fire.
A
It
took
them
three
days
to
put
the
fire
out.
Do
you
really
want
to
put
women
and
children
and
at
risk
in
that
kind
of
environment?
The
land-use
objectives
are
and
I
gave
you
a
series
of
I
gave
you
a
list
of
all
that
recognized
industrial
lands
to
support
the
key
economic
engines.
We
are
having
a
declining
amount
of
space
for
true
industrial
parks.
True
active
industrial
parks,
which
these
are
maintained,
industrial
areas
that
provide
manufacturing
goods.
They
do
it
I've.
A
Given
you
a
list
of
all
the
ones
that
are
there
and
I'm
going
to
give
you
a
list
of
every
one
of
them
objecting
to
this
land.
Use
change
continue,
assists
in
the
conversion
of
existing
industrial
warehousing
and
distribution
for
flex-space
incubators,
light
industrial
uses.
They
can
do
every
bit
of
that
warehousing
just
the
way.
It
sits,
they're
not
being
forthright
when
they
tell
you
that
the
entire
site
has
to
be
residential.
A
It
did
just
aren't
art,
I
mean
it's
either
40
units
or
I
mean
if
they
have
two
acres
on
the
southern
end,
that's
70
units
of
residential
property,
that's
not
immediately
adjacent
to
the
heavier
industrial
uses
that
are
already
existing
for
one
of
those
industrial
users,
just
one
of
them
relocating
their
business
is
a
ten
million
dollar
impact,
just
one
of
them.
I
didn't
even
go
through
all
of
them.
A
One
of
the
other
uses
here.
It
says
that
a
land
use
objective
is
preserved,
lightning
and
heavy
industrial
uses
which
are
appropriately
located
in
terms
of
traffic
accessibility.
Do
you
want
to
mix
residential
traffic
more
residential
traffic
with
industrial
traffic,
with
all
of
these
heavy
trucks
that
you
know
we're
coming
in
there?
A
Thus
right
and
reference
again,
the
city
report,
the
site
is
surrounded
with
commercial
industrial
uses
to
the
north,
north
east,
south
and
west.
The
potential
introduction
of
uses
and
the
requested
CC
35,
is
inconsistent
with
the
existing
development
pattern
of
the
surrounding
area
and,
if
approved,
the
CC
35
will
remove
industrial
land
use,
eliminating
opportunities
for
manufacturing
and
other
industrial
uses.
I
gave
you
a
list
of
there's
14
items
and
I
also
gave
you
a
list
of
all
of
the
industries
that
are
there
and
the
value
of
their
properties.
A
A
C
L
To
the
council,
my
name
is
Debra
Kay
Barnes
I
am
the
president
of
Gamma
theta
Omega
incorporated.
We
are
a
501c3
organization,
we
serve
Tampa.
Tampa
knows
us:
we've
been
serving
the
city
of
Tampa
or
over
75
years.
We
conduct
our
programs
and
hold
our
meetings
on
the
corner
of
7th
and
Central
Avenue.
We
have
partnered
with
many
organizations
like
one
child
with
mr.
Keith
Babb.
He
allowed
us
collaborate
with
them
on
a
backpack
giveaway
for
kids.
We
heard
about
their
mission.
L
We
heard
about
this
ministry
and
because
of
who
we
are
and
Tampa
knows
us,
the
city
of
Tampa
even
gave
us
a
building
on
our
property
free
because
they
knew
what
kind
of
service
we
do.
We
are
very
serious
and
passionate
about
serving
our
communities,
some
of
our
members
and
we're
251
strong,
live
in
that
community
and
to
have
the
opposition
sound
like
they
care
about
our
children
at
risk.
We
have
schools
there.
Our
children
go
to
schools
to
some
of
those
schools
right
there
in
that
area.
L
L
Our
members
are
all
college-educated
all
walks
of
life
from
housewives
from
teachers
we
have
judges,
we
have
attorneys,
we
have
chemists
pharmacists,
we
have
doctors,
we
are
serious
about
rolling
up
our
sleeves,
we
invest
in
our
city,
we
invest
in
our
community
and
we
invest
in
people.
This
is
a
people
project
and
for
Tampa
to
be
one
of
the
leading
cities
in
the
future.
We
better
pay
attention
to
the
investment
in
people
and
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
C
F
Q
Chairman
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Stephanie
Theophilus
and
our
family
business
is
the
chemical
manufacturing
plant
that
you
heard
about
the
ochem
laboratories.
Our
business
was
started
in
1962
right
here
in
Ybor
City.
We
moved
to
Raleigh
Park
about
30
years
ago
and
have
maintained
a
strong
identity
within
the
city
of
Tampa.
In
fact,
my
grandfather
had
the
opportunity
on
many
occasions
to
move
and
he
refused
maintaining
that
it
was
important
to
him
to
stay
within
the
city.
We
firmly
believe
in
this
charity
and
their
honorable
intentions.
Q
Q
They're
doing
it's
about
rezoning
an
industrial
park
to
allow
for
potentially
over
589
residential
units
in
the
center
of
an
industrial
park
where
all
four
directions
of
the
neighbors
are
currently
being
used
in
industrial
capacities,
placing
women
and
children
immediately
adjacent
to
a
mile
of
exposed
over
a
mile
of
exposed,
railroad
tracks,
a
huge
tico
facility,
a
chemical
plant,
a
container
yard,
numerous
warehouses,
heavy
mechanical
and
automotive
repair.
Centers
and
heavy
industrial
traffic
routes
is
inappropriate.
Q
You
wouldn't
allow
a
warehouse
to
built
to
be
built
in
the
center
of
a
residential
neighborhood,
so
why
would
you
place
homes
in
the
center
of
an
industrial
park?
The
data
gate,
the
negative
implications
for
the
owners
and
employees
of
the
industrial
park
will
be
aggressive
and
unfaltering
quite
simply,
building
this
campus
that
allows
for
so
much
residential
housing.
Whether
or
not
they
plan
to
do
it
immediately
makes
no
sense.
It
seems
an
improper
choice
for
both
the
existing
community
and
the
prospective
community
as
the
industrial
zones
in
Tampa
grow
smaller
and
smaller.
Q
It's
important
to
protect
these
employment
lands
for
both
economic
growth
and
stability.
I
sincerely
appreciate
all
of
the
wonderful
people
who
have
come
here
today
to
support
this
great
charity
and
I
commend
their
work
and
their
humanitarian
efforts,
but
council
members,
this
is
the
wrong
location
to
allow
for
so
many
residences
to
be
built.
Thank
you.
C
N
Like
to
hear
from
the
petitioner
on
rebuttal
on
these
number
one
on
the
up
to
five
hundred
eighty
nine
units
and
what
I
don't
know
what
the
proper
term
buffer
is
or
could
be
done
for
the
surrounding
businesses
I
in
my
other
job,
outside
a
City,
Council
I'm,
also
a
tort
defense
lawyer,
so
risk
management's,
always
always
on
my
mind.
You
know
how
that
is,
but
thank
you
just
enough.
Thank
You,
mr.
chairman.
R
Good
evening
Council
cami
Corbett
for
the
record.
Seventy
four,
oh
six,
Park
Drive
I
live
about
a
mile
from
this
site.
This
is
my
neighborhood.
This
is
my
community
I
support
the
good
work
that
the
charities
are
doing
and
hope
they
continue
and
was
very
excited
to
hear
about
the
the
community
and
campus
concept
when
the
app
when
I
heard
about
this
application.
But
when
I
looked
into
it
further
and
I
saw
the
way
they
were
approaching.
The
land-use
approvals
I
got
very
alarmed
and
there
are
a
lot
of
red
flags
for
me.
R
I've
met
with
the
applicants
representative
and
asked
them
if
they
would
consider
filing
at
campus
PD
to
allow
them
to
have
a
campus
PD
and
be
able
to
address
the
issues
of
compatibility
with
the
industrial
and
the
residential
and
limit
the
uses
in
the
way
that
they
have
stated
to
you.
They
intend
to,
but
they've
refused
to
do
that
and
they've
declined
to
do
that.
I
wasn't
present
at
the
meeting
when
they
explained
to
the
old
Seminole
Heights
neighborhood
association.
They
simply
didn't
have
the
funds
to
do
that.
R
R
So
I
do
think
there
are
some
things
that
this
applicant
can
do
to
work
with
the
community,
both
the
industrial
and
the
residential
people
in
the
in
the
surrounding
area,
to
make
this
a
better
application
and
actually
produce
the
result
that
they're
promising
as
it
stands
right
now,
you
have
nothing
to
hold
them
to
their
word
and
you
will
have
nothing
once
you
approve
the
land-use
and
one
to
prove
the
zoning,
your
hands
will
be
tied.
You
won't
be
able
to
limit
them.
R
C
R
My
name
is
Jillian
co.
Bride
I
live
at
11:07,
East,
Patterson
Street.
My
home
is
two
miles
from
this
site.
I
first
heard
about
project
Polk
Street
project
last
Tuesday
night
at
the
ocean,
a
meeting
which
made
me
very
excited
to
hear
about
it.
My
if
you
travel
north
on
Rowlett
drive
across
the
river,
they
level
of
poverty
jumps
from
ten
percent
to
thirty
seven
point:
four
percent,
just
a
few
miles
up.
It's
fifty
two
point:
two
percent
the
population
is
below
the
poverty
level,
so
we
do
need
a
warehouse
there.
R
It
is
false
to
say
that
there
are
no
residence
adjoining
this
property
on
the
south
east
side
of
the
property.
There
is
a
residential
community.
I
agree
that
maybe
we
should
work
with
this
group
a
little
bit
more
to
bring
about
that
change
in
permit.
But
if
we
stop
them,
we
have
a
whole
community
of
people
that
are
losing
ours.
R
Poverty
brings
domestic
violence.
Domestic
violence
brings
a
need
for
emergency
housing.
We
cannot
just
simply
say
don't
do
this,
don't
change
this
from
industrial,
too
late
housing.
We
need
to
make
room
for
women
who
are
in
need
of
a
place
to
escape.
My
best
friend
is
a
single
mother
with
two
children
she
has
adopted
well,
she's
a
foster
parent.
She
drives
40
miles
to
Lakeland
to
get
the
support
she
needs
for
dry
goods.
A
community
just
two
miles
south
of
our
house
is
gonna,
make
a
huge
difference
to
her.
R
H
H
C
C
O
C
H
H
Thank
you
very
much.
When
I
came
to
Tampa
thirty
years
ago,
I
found
love
of
this
city
and
and
I
still
do
today
and
I
want
you
to
know
that
when
we
discovered
this
piece
of
property,
we
saw
it
empty,
had
been
empty
for
over
40
years,
and
we
knew
that
it
had
already
been
approved
for
even
a
greater
population
and
what
we
were
proposing
so
I
think
we're
not
against
the
light.
Industrial
industrial
and
that's
not
our
purpose
here
to
is
to
hurt
anybody
in
Silver
Springs.
H
We
love
Silver
Springs,
but
it
is
our
desire.
When
we
came
to
you
four
years
ago,
we
asked
you
about
the
Bartholomew
Center.
You
graciously
awarded
that
we
put
$100,000
into
that
building
where
we
have
now
a
GED
program
and
also
what
we
call
an
evening,
Reporting
Center,
where
we've
had
over
a
hundred
and
thirty
of
juveniles
who
have
been
arrested
and
been
on
probation
and
have
not
seen
any
of
those
been
repeat
offenders.
Now
we
have
a
girls
program
of
thirty
that
are
going
on
at
that
Bartholomew
Center.
H
We
put
$100,000
ourself
into
that
building
to
improve
it.
We
put
a
million
dollars
in
a
church
at
80209,
North,
19th,
Street
and
Silver
Springs,
to
show
the
commitment
that
the
people
there
are
worthy
of
that
and
we're
not
going
anywhere
we're
not
about
profit.
We're
about
people
we're
not
about
land.
We're
about
lives,
we're
about
rescue,
we're
about
relief.
H
We
our
desires
to
build
a
compassion,
Center,
a
compassion
center
that
has
about
20,000
square
feet
that,
in
that
compassion,
Center
is
not
just
a
food
distribution
of
clothing
distribution,
but
it's
also
a
help
to
those
who
are
aging
out
in
orphaned
care.
We
just
simply
believe
this.
Whoever
owns
the
family
owns
the
future,
and
so
we
would
like
to
be
a
part
of
helping
make
a
difference
in
Silver,
Springs,
internet.
C
P
Okay,
good
evening,
my
name
is
Tim,
keep
words
I'm
the
president
of
the
old
Seminole
Heights
neighborhood
association.
I,
would
like
to
just
speak
to
you
a
little
bit
about
the
matter
before
you.
This
is
a
tough,
a
tough
one.
Obviously
we
have
a
lot
of
people
in
support,
but
we
also
have
some
concerns.
The
old
Seminole
Heights
neighborhood
association
did
host
the
gentleman
behind
us
behind
me
and
one
Street
at
a
public
community
meeting
and
we
asked
them
for
a
depiction.
We
asked
him
for
a
site
plan.
P
We
asked
them
for
a
visual
and
what
was
shown
to
us
was
the
Lakeland
facility
which
looks
fantastic,
and
we
would
encourage
a
compassion
center
be
placed
on
this
property.
The
problem
is,
we
don't
know
for
sure.
That's
what's
gonna
actually
happen
so
as
Miss
Korbut
just
explained
to
you,
if
you
make
the
conversion
of
this
land,
there's
nothing
tying
Hope
Street
or
this
group
to
actually
install
a
20,000
foot
warehouse
facility
and
up
to
eight
housing
units,
that's
what
they've
said
and
I
do
believe
them.
P
The
problem
is:
there's
nothing
that
ties
their
hands
to
it.
As
Miss
Korbut
said,
if
things
fall
out
and
they
do
do,
I
have
any
funding
at
this
point.
We
did
ask
them
at
the
public
meeting
and
they
said
they
currently
do
not
have
any
funding.
They
need
to
do
fundraising
if
they
were
to
change
and
the
property
was
then
sold
to
another
organization.
P
Again,
your
hands
are
now
tied.
The
city's
hands
are
tied,
we
don't
know
what
would
be
put
on
this
property
could
be
another
facility,
that's
even
better.
It
could
be
a
light
industrial
use.
But
again
we
don't
know
so
it
asked
city
council
to
continue
this
discussion
to
a
future
time
so
that
we
can
have
more
discussion
about
this
and
to
solidify
allow
the
applicant
time
to
present
a
site
plan.
There
are
a
couple
of
other
options
that
we
can
look
at.
That
would
be
either
a
voluntary
land,
deep
restriction
or
campus
plan
development.
P
The
last
thing,
I
would
say,
is
I
was
looking
ahead
at
tonight's
agenda
and
I
note
item
9
is
a
continuation
of
this
petitioners
request
to
Council
to
rezone
the
property
to
CI.
This
was
a
surprise,
as
we
were
not
noticed
of
this
change.
I
would
request,
counsel
continue
that
hearing
to
a
later
date,
so
that
we
can
actually
see
a
site
plan
as
it
would
be
developed
to
provide
proper
public
notice
and,
if
not
previously,
provided
that
that
would
be
presented
to
the
public.
Thank
you.
S
Hi,
my
name
is
Lynn
her
jack
I
am
the
land
use
chair
for
old
Seminole,
Heights,
neighborhood
association,
I'm
at
five
nine
one
for
North,
Tampa,
Street
Ulta
mental
Heights
does
oppose
this
requested
land-use
change
for
the
Hope
Street
project
as
it
currently
stands,
there's
currently
no
site
plan
or
funding
for
the
proposed
project,
which
leaves
the
properties
future
in
question.
This
is
the
problem
for
our
neighborhood.
We
have
no
problem
with
what
they
actually
want
to
do.
We
just.
S
We
would
like
a
reassurance
that
that's
actually
what's
going
to
occur,
there's
no
visual
plan
or
funding
per
their
presentation
at
the
associations
membership
meeting
last
week
for
this
plan.
We
cannot
be
assured
that
an
entity
will
make
good
on
its
promise
without
any
concrete
plans
or
funding
behind
it.
Although
we
don't
generally
prefer
the
use
of
plan
developments
within
our
boundaries,
this
is
an
example
of
when
it
would
be
appropriate.
S
In
this
instance,
a
PD
would
be
the
only
control
the
city
has
to
limit
the
uses
that
may
develop
on
the
property.
If
Hope
Street
applied
for
a
rezoning
of
PD,
which
would
require
a
detailed
site
plan,
Oceana
would
be
more
than
likely
to
support
the
project.
I
I
can't
imagine
if
we
knew
what
we
were
getting.
Everything
sounds
wonderful.
S
Otherwise,
in
addition,
city
planning
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
found
that
the
request,
or
rather
the
city
planning
staff,
found
the
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
not
only
because
it
goes
against
the
plan
requirement
to
preserve
the
historical
industrial
land
uses,
but
also
because
it
is
inconsistent
with
the
form
of
development
plan
for
the
area
and
introduces
intense
commercial
uses
into
a
predominantly
residential
area
to
the
south.
We
respectfully
request
that
you
deny
the
use.
L
Oh
see
console
my
name
is
avi
guy
I'm,
a
resident
of
2511
with
snow
report
and
I
said
it's
no
Tampa
Florida.
As
someone
who
has
grown
up
within
this
city
and
someone
who
is
a
member
of
the
organization
who
has
spoken
I
thoroughly,
believe
that
the
effort
at
hand
needs
to
be
taken
into
severe
consideration.
Serious
consideration
by
this
council
simply
because
the
land
that
we
are
speaking
about
has
been
underdeveloped
and
is
a
state
previous
to
in
a
severe
area
of
poverty.
L
This
community
needs
the
reassurance
of
this
council
that
we
will
present
the
best
opportunities
available
to
move
forward
and
present
those
things
that
are
necessary
for
the
financial
growth,
the
community
growth
and
the
stability
of
our
city
overall.
I
believe
that
if
we
take
into
consideration
the
things
that
this
organization
has
presented,
whether
it
be
a
continuance
so
that
there
can
be
more
discussion,
and/or
an
approval
so
that
we
can
move
forward
with
the
things
that
have
been
requested.
L
I
believe
that
at
least
there
will
be
some
sort
of
progression
made
within
this
community
as
a
whole.
Given
that
we
do
serve
the
communities
that
that's
surrounding
this
area
and
that
it
is
the
the
responsibility
of
this
council
to
represent
the
welfare
of
our
community
as
a
whole,
I
think
they're,
leaning,
just
acres,
take
a
step
back
and
just
realize
that
at
times
we
may
see
as
profit
being
a
factor.
L
O
Mr.
chairman
of
board
members,
we
appreciate
your
consideration
tonight,
but
this
request
is
no
different
than
many
zones
that
come
across
your
desk,
whether
it's
a
standard
or
PD,
there's
no
guarantee
with
either
one
sure
with
a
PD
law
higher
standard,
but
many
peopie's
come
back
to
you
and
they're
changed
and
they're
modified.
What
should
we
have
here
is
better.
You
have
the
test
of
time.
You
have
over
a
century
of
an
organization
stating
what
their
mission
is
and
doing
it.
Just
like
the
site
that
you
prove
four
years
ago.
O
They
told
you
what
they
were
going
to
do
and
they
did
it
I
think
that's
better,
but
the
root
of
the
issue
before
you
is
not
zoning.
It's
not
about
a
PD
plan.
It's
about
about
it's
about
a
land
use
amendment,
it's
not
about
putting
attachments
on
to
a
future
land
use
amendment
you've
heard
for
the
Planning
Commission
that
the
policies
are
supported,
you've
heard
from
us
the
policies
we
believe
support
it
you've
heard
from
the
community
that
it's
supported
you've
heard
from
my
friend
mr.
O
MacLean
E
and,
quite
frankly,
he
tells
you
he's
concerned
about
residential
being
there
or
more
residential.
But
the
fact
is:
there's
entire
residential
community
to
the
west.
Tampa
Sports
Authority
runs
a
golf
club
with
membership
and
restaurants
amelie
to
the
north.
So
it's
already
there
we've
told
you
and
shown
you
on
their
land.
You
categories.
There
is
plenty
of
CC
35
in
the
K
in
the
area
and,
most
importantly,
this
console
voted
for
a
very
similar
category
for
a
future
land
use
amendment.
O
C
C
N
Yes,
on
the
589
residential
units
that
were
referenced
by
mr.
somebody
there,
what
are
the
potential
buffer
zones
and
that's
probably
a
improper
term
that
you're
looking
at
for
those
with
some
of
these
businesses.
Well.
O
O
I'm
happy
to
find
anything
you
like,
but
the
Planning
Commission
does
something
very
interesting
which
I'm
they
do
great
work,
and
this
is
not
a
criticism
of
them,
but
what
they
choose
to
do
is
they
come
before
you
and
say
here
is
the
absolute
maximum
that
can
happen.
They
don't
count
retention
areas.
They
don't
come
parking.
They
don't
count
what
your
footprints
gonna
be.
They
give
you
the
nightmare
scenario
of
what
can
occur
there
so
myself,
only
being
a
zoning
guy
on
my
site
playing
guy
there's
no
way.
O
589
units
are
going
to
go
here
but,
as
I
explained,
Express
to
the
console
and
I'll
put
this.
In
short,
what
you
have
you
have
many
zones
come
before.
You
have
standards,
U
of
P,
DS,
they're,
different
levels
of
trust,
but
what
you
have
here
is
better.
You
have
an
organization
that,
for
over
century,
has
said
what
they're
gonna
do
when
they
do.
It.
N
N
And
and
I
and
I
agree
with
you
in
this
sense
that
you're,
the
the
petitioners
and
the
Associated
different
groups
are
certainly
I,
don't
want
to
use
the
word
trustworthy.
That
sounds
almost
naive,
but
you
know
obviously
Idlewild
Baptist,
pastor,
Whitten,
etc.
Their
reputation
to
community
is
second
to
none
on
matters
of
compassion
and
character.
N
G
K
G
K
So
we
have
those
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
the
encouraged
sentence,
if
ocation
of
our
industrial
lands.
We
did
have
some
background
analysis
in
that
report
that
we
are
losing
industrial
lands
in
the
city.
So
we
we
do.
Staff
did
field
based
on
the
policies
and
based
on
the
inventory
of
industrial
lands
that
it
would
be
consistent
with
the
policy
direction
to
preserve
those
industrial
lands
within
the
city
and
now
so
we
did
find
it.
K
Inconsistent
I
also
pulled,
as
I
showed
earlier,
the
pro
lunar
preliminary
sub-sector
plan
from
that
the
1970-something
and-
and
that
was
a
historical
pattern
than
it
has
been
industrial
for
many
many
years
in
this
and
as
well
as
the
surrounding
area.
That
kind
of
played
into
the
analysis
as
well
and.
G
The
other
question
I
have
is
that
and
I
asked
you
about
this
earlier,
which
is
that
the
requests
of
future
land-use
previously
had
been
CMU
35,
because
we
knew
that
we
were
going
to
have
I
think
there
was
container
apartments
or
something
like
that.
If
I
recall
correctly,
I,
don't
remember
how
many
units
it
was,
but
it
was
significantly
less
than
what
the
intensification
could
be
under
that
particular
land
use
category.
If
I'm
not
mistaken.
Well,.
J
G
G
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
that
the
difference
between
the
two
land
use
categories
the
CC
35
versus
CMU
35?
It's
only
because
of
the
other,
the
other
use
sits
there,
which
is
the
warehouse
use.
It's
been
a
it's
been
said
that
that
warehouse
you
is
already
allowed
under
this
particular
land-use
category.
Is
that
correct
under.
K
G
Differential
there,
okay
and
the
reason
I
was
asking
you.
That
is
because
a
member
of
the
bar
someone
who
has
a
land
use
attorney,
came
up
during
public
comment
and
made
the
the
question
asked
a
question
as
to
why
would
they
not
split
up?
You
know
part
of
the
of
the
land
in
order
to
zone
one
versus
the
other.
Now
this
is
not
a
zoning
case
at
this
time,
but
there
is
some
thought
behind
it.
G
So
I
mean
to
me
there's
that
gives
me
a
little
bit
of
a
pause
because
I'm
not
really
sure
why
that
would
not
have
been
done,
because
it
would
have
made
more
sense
and
probably
would
be
a
lot
easier
for
everyone
involved.
But
that's
just
that's
just
my
thoughts
based
on
everything
I've
seen.
So
it's.
K
C
O
I
think
we
presented
everything
to
you.
I
think
you
could
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
this
I
just
like
to
place
emphasis
again
that
the
Planning
Commission
did
fine
very
strongly
in
their
vote
and
support
staff.
Both
times
were
against
it
and
that
again
has
been
approved
by
you
so
or
have
been
approved.
So
you
the
precedent
for
pretty
much
the
same
thing.
You
have
the
good
word
of
these
folks
and
you
have
outstanding
community
support.
Thank
you
again.
J
Along
the
same
statements
that
mr.
Saur
is
growing
up,
it
would
have
seemed
to
me
and
I
I'm
trustworthy
of
all
of
you
on
both
sides.
However,
there's
some
reservation
in
my
mind
if
the
work
that
you've
done
is
fantastic
for
young
people
and
for
people
in
need,
there's
no
doubt
about
that.
But
what
question
here
is
as
not
anything
else
and
when
well,
when
I
look
at
this
and
what
was
brought
up
earlier
about.
J
Why
not
say
that
all
the
16
acres
there
were
going
to
be
13
acres
of
14
acres
regarding
the
warehousing
of
food
and
the
distribution
of
food,
and
then
you
have
two
and
a
half
acres
whatever
it
was
to
divide
it
and
say
this
is
what
exactly
we're
gonna
do.
It
reminds
me
of
one
that
I
had
that
I
we
had
about
a
month
ago,
beautiful
buildings
and
I'm,
not
gonna,
elaborate
too
much
in
case
it's
a
lawsuit
there,
but
the
buildings
were
great.
However,
the
property
owner
didn't
own
the
other
building.
J
It
was
somewhere
in
the
vicinity
close
by
it
was
a
beautiful
building
and
it
would
have
been
a
great
asset
to
the
city.
How
fortunate
to
us
that
we
just
said
you
know
what,
if
you
have
brought
this
building
combined
with
one
we
would
have
taken,
but
when
you
divided
it
creation
of
the
problem
and
and
I'm
not
gonna
mention
the
buildings
because
I'm
afraid.
What's
going
to
happen
tomorrow,
people.
O
O
J
One,
that's
really
against
it.
I've
heard
people
that
have
concerns
as
to
why
the
system
was
used
in
this
system
and
the
way
was
brought
to
our
attention
other
than
brought
it
and
separate,
but
with
one
unit
one
whole
piece
of
land.
That's
for
this,
and
this
is
for
this
and
I
think
you
wouldn't
have
no
objections
at
all
before.
C
O
C
O
Say
that
it's
becoming
apparent
that
I
think
we
need
to
perhaps
look
at
moving
in
a
different
direction.
I
just
want
to
say
that
if
I
may
that,
as
these
things
evolve,
they
just
don't
always
come
forward
with
a
ribbon
and
tie
it
all
up
in
that
regard,
so
we
would
be
happy
to
work
with
City
College,
whatever
direction,
you
are
comfortable
that
we
can
move
forward.
I.
J
O
J
D
F
F
B
Them,
together
than
you
do
have
to
continue
the
second
reading
out,
I
would
say
on
this.
It
is
somewhat
unique
and
that
I
am
told
by
your
staff
that
the
zoning
that
is
on
your
agenda
tonight
can
go
forward
without
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
so
they're
not
tied
like
they
typically
are
like
you
can't
hear
their
zoning.
Until
you
hear
the
comp
plan,
you
could
deny
the
comp
plan
and
they
can
still
go
forward
with
the
zoning,
but
but
if
the
comp
plan
were
to
go
through,
wouldn't
they
come
back
then
for
another
zoning?
B
B
B
J
B
F
Mr.
chairman,
just
to
edit
for
the
record,
and
also
for
some
people
in
the
audience
who
made
reference
to
site
plans,
item
number
nine
tonight,
the
rezoning
that's
associated
with
this
is
a
Euclidean
rezoning
and
it
is
not
site
plan
controlled.
It
is
not
necessary
under
our
code
for
them
to
have
to
provide
a
site
plan
in
order
to
go
forward.
I.
O
F
B
Curt
legal
department
I
did
tell
mr.
Pressman
that,
if
you
put
it
in
a
ban
sand,
they
would
have
to
do
a
full
Reno
tiss.
The
cleanest
way
is
to
continue
this
out
a
few
months
and
at
least
do
a
status,
and
then
you
can
see
where
they
are
and
if
they
need
additional
time,
and
they
can
do
it
for
there,
if
not
it,
it's
very
hard
to
track.
C
C
O
O
B
C
F
F
O
F
Sir,
and
if
I
could
just
afford,
inform
the
public
that
the
date
that
you've
heard
tonight
is
the
only
notice
you
will
get,
you
will
not
be
able
to
get
any
other
you
all,
but
not
be
getting
any
notices
in
the
mail
or
any
postings
of
the
like.
So
please
do
make
note
of
that
date.
If
you're
interested
in
following
that
at
that
continuance,.
C
E
E
J
N
N
My
son
was
Cub,
Scouts
pack
180
and
you
know,
scouting
is
all
about
values
and
the
all
by
coming
here
tonight,
you're
seeing
local
government
at
work
and
I
would
just
encourage
you
all
to
keep
on
doing
what
Scouts
do,
which
is
to
do
the
right
thing
and
put
your
community
first
and
have
good
values
and
and
keep
on
being
involved
in
civic
affairs.
Things
like
this
tonight.
So
thank
you
guys
for
all
your
work
and
just
want
to
do
good
things.
Thank
You.
G
C
F
C
J
K
B
F
D
D
B
When
is
to
let
City
Clerk's
office
I'm
rereading
the
motion
for
the
transmittal
continuance
for
item
number,
three
Moshe
was
presented
by
Councilman
Cohen
seconded
by
Councilman
Maniscalco.
The
motion
is
that
file
number
pa-18
11
be
continued
to
march
14th
2019
at
5:30
p.m.
further.
That
said,
item
be
placed
first
on
the
agenda
motion
carried
unanimously.
B
F
F
B
K
Comrades
displaying
math
amendment
here,
1814,
is
also
in
middle
public
hearing
has
been
a
district
more
specifically
within
the
East
Tampa
urban
village.
It
is
the
Middleton
high
school.
We
have
used
to
Auburn
Avenue
41
up
here,
there's
a
Walmart
Supercenter
to
ignore
this
is
a
publicly
initiated
small
scale
amendment
it's
just
under
50
acres.
There
are
several
future
land
use
designations
on
the
property
community,
commercial,
35,
community,
mixed-use,
35,
residential
10,
residential
35
president
till
50
there's
a
right
of
way
and
then
there's
transitional
use
24.
K
K
This
is
looking
south
from
Osborne's
out
22nd
Street
to
the
railroad
tracks,
looking
south
from
Oz
Borden.
This
is
the
future
land
use
map.
As
I
said
this,
it's
a
the
black
hashes
and
there's
a
variety
of
land
uses
that
took
this
as
the
transitional
use
24,
which
is
that
salmon
color,
the
residential
10,
which
is
the
orange
I,
have
residential
20
and
residential
35
and
to
the
north
is
community
commercial
35.
That's
that
red
color
and
we
see
it's
kind
of
surrounded
by
some
single-family
homes
in
that
residential
10.
K
K
K
It
is
consistent
with
our
school
siting
and
availability
policies,
as
well
as
our
compatible
compatible
development
policy
and
the
Planning
Commission
did
find
this
consistent
at
their
November
19th
Planning
Commission
hearing
about
available
for
any
questions.
Let
me
get,
this
is
a
transmittal
hearing.
It
will
go
to
the
state.
K
G
K
C
C
B
C
M
F
C
C
M
Sorry,
my
apologies
7a
rhymin,
st
city
of
tampa
land
development
item
number
7
is
av.
219
3,
it's
located
at
500,
South,
Howard,
Avenue
Suite,
a
the
current
zoning
on
the
properties,
commercial
general,
the
future
land-use,
his
community
mix,
use
35
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
review
the
application
and
finds
it
inconsistent,
applicable
city
of
Tampa
land
development
regulations.
If
approved
tonight.
Between
first
and
second
reading,
there
are
minor
Corrections
that
would
have
to
be
made
the
petition
before
use,
requests
and
especially
use
approve.
M
It
will
allow
the
sale
of
alcohol
beverages
as
a
restaurant,
beer
and
wine
consumption
on
premises.
Only
city
historical
records
show
the
current
use
on
the
property
as
retail
sales.
The
total
AV
sales
area
is
2066
square
feet,
which
is
all
indoor
and
on
the
first
level,
the
required
parking
for
the
entire
site
is
31
spaces
and
the
site
proposes
16
spaces.
That's
a
48
percent
reduction
required
parking
parking
was
calculated
using
the
building
life
safety
code
for
restaurant,
which
is
0.25
times.
M
The
occupancy
would
give
you
the
required
spaces
for
Suites
a
and
Suite
C,
and
the
remaining
suites
in
the
development
would
be
in
E
and
F
were
calculated
using
the
retail
sales,
which
is
four
per
thousand
square
feet.
The
distance
separation
requirement
for
this
property
is
250
feet
from
other
ad
sales
establishments
and
250
feet
from
residential
uses.
The
proposed
hours
operation
are
consistent
with
chapter
14.
M
The
site
plan
states
that
the
sales
area
shall
not
be
located
within
a
parking
or
loading
area
or
space
and
no
I'm
sorry
outdoor
amplified
sound
is
permitted
until
11:00
p.m.
all
permits
issued
after
April
1st
2011
shall
be
kept
on
site,
a
copy
of
adopted
ordinance,
an
Associated
site
plan
for
the
alcoholic
beverage
sales
permit.
M
M
Again
this
is
it
is
before
you
as
a
restaurant,
so
they
will
have
to
serve
food
continuously,
while
alcohol
sales
are
being
conducted.
I'd
like
to
show
you
this
is
the
site
plan
that
would
require
the
corrections
between
first
and
second
reading.
As
you
can
see
minor
adjustments
to
the
suite
labeling
as
well
as
a
folio.
That's
page
1,
page
2.
It
reflects
the
suite
labeling
correctly.
M
T
Good
evening
my
name
is
Z:
aka
drew
nice,
rich
cows
cos
thanks
for
having
us
here
tonight.
I
would
like
to
introduce
my
team.
Before
we
start,
we
have
a
ed
Sandoval
he's
the
director
of
operations
for
Shula
Restaurant
Group,
and
we
have
Charles,
who
is
an
architect
who
assisted
us
in
the
application
process
in
the
surveying.
I
also
have
an
attorney
Norman,
Harris,
who's
representing
us
and
last,
but
definitely
not
least,
my
boss.
My
supervisor,
my
wife,
Erin
she's,
also
an
attorney
with
the
bay
area,
legal
services
parks
level.
T
Approximately
one
year
ago,
me
and
Erin,
and
a
four
year
old,
daughter,
Gianna,
investing
all
of
our
life
savings
and
purchase
a
Shula
burger
franchise
from
a
Shula
burger,
Restaurant
Group,
which
is
currently
located
on
a
500,
saw
Howard
Avenue.
Today
we
are
here
asking
you
to
consider
and
approve
beer
and
wine
license
for
our
business
would
like
to
point
out
a
few
highlights
from
our
first
year
in
business.
T
We
also
participated
and
won
the
sandwich
hunt,
competition
with
which
was
organized
by
Tampa
magazine
in
2018
calendar
year.
Our
restaurant
led
shoeless
brand,
not
just
a
shoe
a
burger
concept,
but
the
whole
brand
in
three
different
categories.
One
of
them
would
be
mystery.
Shop
results
second,
would
be
online
customer
reviews
and
third,
there
was
a
brand
audit
score
which
we
managed
to
get
a
highest
bueno
de
score.
The
Shuler
burger
concept
had
in
the
seven
years
of
existence.
T
We
also
partnered
with
many
different
community
organizations
in
South
Tampa,
to
name
the
few
would
be
a
South
Tampa
Chamber
of
Commerce,
which
we
are
member
of
the
Florida
Aquarium.
We
held
a
fundraising
with
them
supported
that
cause
that
they
would
they
wanted
to
promote.
We
also
partnered
with
bait
area
legal
services
and
their
fundraising
with
them,
and
we
partnered
with
a
couple
of
the
middle
schools
and
elementary
schools
in
the
area
to
do
fundraising
for
them,
as
well
being
wine
licenses
imperative
for
our
business
for
multiple
reasons.
T
One
of
them
is
that
we
would
like
to
even
competition,
the
even
the
playing
field
with
all
other
competitors
in
the
area
and
I'm
talking
about
a
fast
casual
restaurants
and
other
gourmet
burger
concepts
in
the
area.
Burger,
five
burger,
21,
burger,
monger,
fours
garage
and
a
couple
others
served
their
burgers
in
in
addition
to
they
serve
beer
and
wine
in
addition
to
their
burgers.
So
that
would
be
reason
one
and
probably
the
most
important
reason.
Why
is
that
we
want
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
Shula
standards?
T
Shula,
burger
concept
was
created
with
a
burgers
beer
and
wine
and
mic
all
of
our
burgers
at
chef
inspired
burgers
and
the
menu
was
created
that
combines
the
burgers
the
beer
and
the
wine
to
make
sure
that
we
we
satisfy
all
of
our
guests
and
and
again
to
date,
which
is
almost
one
year
in
existence.
We
have
been
out
of
compliance
with
the
standard
brand
standards,
so
we're
here
today
asking
for
y'all
for
your
pool
on
beer
and
wine
license,
and
thank
you
thanks
for
your
time.
T
C
B
You
very
much
mr.
chairman,
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
what
ordinance
approving
a
special
use
permit
as
true
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
restaurant
consumption
on
premises
only
in
making
waffle
the
sale
of
beer
and
wine
at
work
from
that
certain
law
o'clock
we're
attractively
located
at
500,
South,
Howard,
Avenue
Suite,
a
Tampa
Florida
as
more
particular
described
in
section
2,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
you're
repealed
providing
for
effective
date.
Okay,.