►
From YouTube: Thousand Oaks City Council Meeting - January 10, 2023
Description
Agenda and Request to Speak at the Meeting:
https://www.toaks.org/departments/city-clerk/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas
Thousand Oaks City Council Meeting - 1/10/23
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
D
B
Here,
thank
you.
We
don't
have
any
requests
tonight,
but
we
have
a
special
presentation.
B
E
E
Moreover,
tarantula
Hill
demonstrates
to
our
small
business
Community
the
importance
of
agility
as
a
key
to
resilience
and
thriving
in
the
midst
of
an
ever-changing
economic
climate.
With
that
said,
mayor
McNamee
I
would
like
to
invite
you
to
the
podium
to
share
a
few
additional
words
and
to
present
the
award
on
behalf
of
the
city.
Thank
you,
foreign.
B
B
B
It
represents
and
celebrates
much
of
what
we
love
about.
Thousand
Oaks.
You
had
a
vision
and
you
made
it
come
true.
Your
namesake
honors
the
beauty
of
our
natural
surroundings.
Here
in
this
wonderful
city
of
Thousand
Oaks,
you
have
a
vibrant
atmosphere
in
the
restaurant
and
provides
an
opportunity
for
its
customers
to
enjoy
the
climate
while
sipping
our
delicious
locally
brewed
beverages
and
favorite
bites
as
local
owners.
You
exemplify
the
entrepreneur's
spirit
to
our
residents
and
your
commitment
to
the
community
as
well
enhances,
as
well
as
your
ability
to
adapt
and
meet
challenges
of
operating.
B
A
successful
small
business
serves
as
a
model
for
other
aspiring
businesses
here
in
Thousand
Oaks.
We
are
honored
to
have
you
as
part
of
our
community.
Thank
you
so
very
much
for
being
a
part
of
this
tonight.
We
are
celebrating
as
a
council
as
a
city,
your
success,
you
celebrate
in
that.
We
wish
you
many
many
more
years
of
great
success
here
in
Thousand.
Oaks
I
would
like
to
ask
by
the
way,
did
you
bring
anything
for
samples
here
by
chance,
no
I
just
just
afterwards
after
party
Council?
B
A
B
Taylor
Adam
we've
ready
good.
Okay,
we
have
another
special
presentation
this
evening.
We
would
like
to
recognize
the
fine
work
of
our
Public
Works
Department
city
of
Thousand.
Oaks
was
the
first
city
in
Venture
County
in
2010
to
be
nationally
accredited
by
the
American
public
works
Association
apwa.
B
F
Good
afternoon
or
good
evening,
council
members
I'm
sorry
I'm,
not
there
in
person,
my
jade
my
day,
job
is
in
the
San
Francisco
Bay
area
and
and
I'm
sure,
with
the
rains
that
you
guys
have
had
down
there
in
the
rains
that
we've
had
up
here.
We've
we're
dealing
with
some
emergencies,
Public
Works
deals
and
touches
almost
every
aspect
of
our
lives
and
I'm
so
proud
to
be
here
before
you
to
present
this
plaque
and
this
reacadation
to
the
city
of
Thousand
Oaks.
F
This
is
no
small
feat
and
being
in
public
the
public
sector
myself
for
over
25
years.
I
could
tell
you,
as
as
you
know,
when
we
don't
do
a
good
job.
We
we
get
the
calls
from
the
citizens
and-
and
they
tell
us
and
and
we're
not
able
to
service
them.
The
question
always
comes
up.
Are
we
doing
the
best,
or
can
we
do
better
or
are
we
doing
exactly
the
the
the
the
least
minimum
that
that's
required?
F
I
could
tell
you
resoundly
with
this
accreditation
that
the
city
of
Thousand
Oaks,
is
in
the
upper
echelons
of
Public.
Works
I
represent
the
4
000
members
of
apwa.
In
the
state
of
California
and
there's
only
18
18
agencies
in
the
entire
state
that
are
accredited
178
in
the
entire
nation.
This
is
a
very
difficult
task
to
go
through.
It's
not
easy,
it's
not
a
rubber
stamp
and
it
should
be
celebrated.
I,
congratulate
you
and
the
city.
151
separate
practices
were
reviewed
in
the
public
works
department.
F
They
were
analyzed
to
make
sure.
Not
only
do
they
meet
the
minimum,
but
they
exceed
that
minimum
three
model
practices
in
the
city
of
Thousand
Oaks
will
be
shared
throughout
the
nation
with
other
agencies
and
I
want
to
point
those
out,
because
they
highlight
the
great
work
that
your
public
works
department
is
doing
and
I'm
going
to
read
these
off,
just
to
make
sure
I
get
them
right,
but
the
first
one
is
your
Human
Resources
management
and
employee
recognition.
F
F
The
next
model
practice
that
will
be
sharing
is
a
risk
management
and
workers
comp
workers,
compensation
claim
to
injury
and
illness
document
is
a
great
example
that
shows
how
important
employees
are
to
the
organization
and
employee
safety
is
the
utmost
importance
and
finally,
the
Emergency
Management
and
emergency
exercises,
so
true
in
in
today's
in
in
the
last
rainstorms
excellent
job
on
after
action
reporting.
The
document
includes
exercise
objectives,
aligning
core
capabilities
and
performance
ratings.
I
can't
emphasize
how
important
that
last
item
is
in
getting
funding
through
FEMA.
F
B
G
Thank
you,
mayor
and
Council
good
evening
on
behalf
of
all
of
the
Public
Works
staff,
which
was
definitely
a
team
effort
working
on
this
reaccreditation
program.
I
want
to
say
thank
you,
but
what
I
really
want
to
thank
is
the
council,
because,
without
your
support
and
your
recognition
of
the
the
work
that
we
do,
we
would
not
be
the
public
works
department
that
we
are
so.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that.
B
B
Let's
move
on
to
special
presentations
and
announcements,
we're
going
to
get
we're
going
to
go
to
public
comments
at
this
point,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
clerk
Madam
clerk.
If
you
would
please.
C
Yes,
I
will
announce
public
comments.
This
is
the
time
and
place
for
public
comments.
All
remarks
should
be
addressed
to
the
council
as
a
whole.
Speakers
are
requested
to
State
their
name
and
community
of
residence
for
the
record.
Three
individuals
have
requested
to
speak
and
pursuant
to
council
standards.
Speakers
are
allowed
three
minutes.
B
Thank
you,
madam
clerk
I'm,
going
to
clarify
something
that
she
may
have
said.
I'm
going
to
put
it
in
Kevin
language
is
that
your
comments
are
meant
to
be
directed
towards
the
council
in
general,
which
means
you
do
not
name
specific
council
members
or
mayors.
You
dress,
address
it
to
the
council
in
general.
I'm,
very
protective
about
my
council
members
here.
B
B
H
Thank
you,
mayor
McNamee
and
council
members.
My
name
is
Adam
haverstock
I
am
the
director
of
government
Affairs
and
tourism
for
the
Greater
Conejo
Valley
Chamber
of
Commerce.
Here,
with
a
few
updates
from
your
chamber.
First
I
wanted
to
tell
you
about
a
new
event.
We
are
doing.
The
Chamber
of
Commerce
has
a
new
breakfast
event
series
that
we
are
launching
in
2023.
we
are
replacing
four
of
our
traditional
structured
networking
breakfasts
with
new
programming.
These
events
will
feature
panel
discussions
and
speakers
discussing
various
Civic
and
Community
issues.
H
H
Our
second
event
is
going
to
be
a
Civic
leaders
breakfast
and
will
feature
a
panel
discussion
of
elected
leaders
in
local
government,
mayor
Kevin,
McNamee
of
Thousand
Oaks,
mayor
Ray,
Pearl
in
Westlake,
Village
and
mayor
Chris,
anstad
and
Agora
Hills
will
all
be
panelists.
Additionally,
supervisor
Jeff,
Garrell
and
Ventura
County
will
be
participating
and
we
have
invited
supervisor
Lindsey
Horvath
in
Los,
Angeles
County,
to
be
part
of
the
panel.
H
This
Civic
Leader's
breakfast
will
be
on
Friday
February
3rd
at
the
Courtyard
by
Marriott,
in
Agora,
Hills,
more
information
and
registration
for
both
of
those
events
is
on
the
chamber
website
at
Conejo.
Chamber.Org
next
I
wanted
to
tell
you
about
a
new
project
we're
working
on.
H
We
have
a
small
business
development
Workshop
series
that
we
are
putting
together
and
we're
calling
it
elevate.
Conejo
Valley
this
program
is
a
comprehensive
training
for
entrepreneurs
to
learn
how
to
start
and
grow
an
effective
business.
It
will
take
place
as
a
series
of
seven
educational
workshops
led
by
industry
experts,
discussing
topics
like
marketing,
Human,
Resources
technology,
Finance
and
Accounting
operations,
legal
and
the
importance
of
relationships.
We
are
partnering
with
EDC
the
economic
development
collaborative
and
each
participant
will
also
get
one-on-one
Consulting
Services
through
EDC.
H
This
program
will
be
starting
in
March
with
a
capacity
of
up
to
30
entrepreneurs.
Registration
information
will
be
up
shortly
at
the
chambers
website.
Conejo
chamber.org
and
I
did
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Mayor
Kevin
McNamee.
This
program
was
his
brainchild
and
we're
very
much
looking
forward
to
bringing
the
idea
from
concept
to
reality,
and
with
that
that
does
conclude
my
comments
this
evening.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
B
I
I
I
was
so
upset
that
I
made
a
save
the
Wetland
sign
and
stood
on
Wendy
Drive
near
the
wetlands
protesting
I
spent
the
next
year
researching
the
borchwood
Wetland
I,
compiled
and
presented
information,
I
made
slide,
shows
and
videos
for
each
time
the
Mac
met.
I
urge
you
all
to
look
at
the
exhibit
photos,
videos
and
documents.
I
As
part
of
this
project
and
this
reading
of
the
letter,
important
takeaways
from
the
letter
r,
the
Mac
confirmed
that
the
primary
job
of
the
orchard
Wetlands
is
for
flood
control
with
the
county
easement
in
place
that
since
1978,
any
changes
to
the
easement
would
endanger
Newbury
Park,
the
Mac
confirmed
the
existence
of
the
orchard
Wetland,
a
public
record
search
uncovered
documents
confirming
it
is
a
USF
and
W
seasonal
Wetland.
So
from
now
on
everyone,
everyone,
please
call
it
the
orchard
Wetlands
for
real.
I
The
Mac
confirmed
that
Tio's
own
existing
housing
elements
placed
restrictions
on
development
at
the
borchard
Wetland.
It
says,
and
I
quote,
the
housing
capacity
was
reduced
from
a
theoretical
capacity
of
more
than
150
dwellings
to
only
20
dwellings,
because
most
of
the
site
is
constrained
by
existing
wetlands
and
future
flood
control
improvements,
close
quote
in
the
final
letter.
The
casa,
canao
Mack
recommends
that
zoning
should
remain
unchanged.
I
The
current
zoning
with
the
housing
limited
to
20
single-family
residents
should
remain
in
place.
That
is
with
no
increase
in
the
density
and
no
structures
being
higher
than
two
stories.
This
will
be
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhoods
around
it.
No
development
is
going
to
happen
in
the
next
year,
so
I
propose
a
win-win
for
the
owner
of
the
butcher.
Wetlands
and
the
Newbury
Park
neighborhood
stop
plowing
under
Mowing
and
scraping
the
butchered
Wetlands.
I
The
owner
will
save
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
and
by
doing
so
by
doing
nothing
by
letting
nature
take
its
course.
He
will
be
helping
the
environment
and
helping
the
drought
by
allowing
the
vegetation
to
grow.
The
Roots
will
help
the
soil
regeneration,
water
retention
and
it
will
help
regard
recharge.
The
groundwater
Basin
15
seconds
the
orchard
Wetland
can
can
help
us
with
the
drought.
In
order
to
be
resilient
to
floods
and
drought,
we
need
to
be
able
to
adapt
to
the
new
normal.
That
means
significantly
expanding
recycling,
capturing
storm
water
and
modernizing
conveyance.
B
J
Here
to
ask
the
City
to
put
a
petition
on
the
city's
website
for
people
to
sign
who
would
support
the
construction
of
an
interstate
water
pipeline
from
Washington,
Idaho,
Montana,
North,
Dakota,
Minnesota,
Wisconsin
and
Illinois
to
California,
and
the
southwestern
States
I
had
another
bullet
points
paper
with
me,
but
it's
lost
in
the
shuffle
papers
in
my
car.
But
this
part
this
pipeline
is
the
only
thing
that
is
ever
going
to
guarantee
California
and
the
southwestern
States
a
minimum
amount
of
water.
J
J
There
have
been
several
articles
in
the
acorn
who
support
in
support
of
this
water
pipeline,
and
there
was
one
or
two
people
within
the
last
two
months
who
said,
and
these
were
water
officials
in
La.
They
said
that
they
may
not
have
enough
water
to
transport
the
human
waste
through
the
sewage
Pipelines.
J
So
I
would
like
the
city
council
to
create
this
position
and
who,
in
the
city,
could
I
bring
my
bullet
points
presentation
to
about
15.
B
K
Thank
you
so
much
mayor,
McNamee,
Public,
Works,
director,
Cliff
Finley,
is
here.
Actually
he
can
step
down,
give
you
a
copy
of
his
business
card.
He
Public
Works,
director,
Cliff
Finley,
is
here,
he's
going
to
step
down
and
give
you
a
copy
of
his
business
card,
and
that
would
be
the
best
individual
to
pass
that
information
along
to
that
concludes.
My
phone.
B
C
B
You
we
have
a
Community
Development
report
from
our
director
call
up:
Tim
Giles
Tim.
L
Good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
Tim
Giles
Human
Resources
Director
pinch
hunting
for
community
development,
director
Kelvin
Parker
to
introduce
tonight's
presentation.
Team
staff
have
prepared
a
high
level
status
on
the
Community
Development
Department's
work
plan.
We
understand
that
there
are
significant
ongoing
efforts
which
are
important
to
the
council
and
the
public.
L
These
check-ins
are
a
way
for
us
to
maintain
transparency
with
what
the
city
is
doing.
The
department
provided
council
with
a
report
in
the
past
year
being
the
start
of
a
new
year
and
with
two
new
council
members.
It's
a
good
time
to
check
in
on
what
has
been
accomplished
and
what
is
coming
forward
this
year.
This
presentation
is
intended
to
be
a
broad
overview,
but
Council
will
have
the
opportunity
to
weigh
into
the
details
on
these
items
as
they
come
before
you.
L
The
item
will
be
presented
by
some
of
the
leaders
of
our
community
development
efforts.
Patrick
heer
Chief
assistant
City
attorney,
will
present
a
few
new
legislative
items
that
will
impact
the
city,
Ian,
Holt
interim
Advanced,
planning,
division
manager,
we'll
talk
about
our
efforts
to
update
the
city's
development
rules
and
plans
and
Steve
Kearns.
Current
planning
division
manager
will
begin
the
presentation
to
address
some
of
the
significant
work
on
projects
affecting
the
public.
M
As
you
are
aware,
one
of
the
city's
council's
priorities
for
the
2021-202
fiscal
year
was
implementing
a
new
landmaster
system.
This
was
accomplished
and
went
live
for
public
use
in
November
of
last
year,
as
the
public
and
staff
continue
to
utilize
the
software.
We
will
be
working
on
configuring,
additional
processes,
implementing
system
improvements
and
utilizing
the
system
for
managing
reporting.
M
M
It's
gone
from
about
400
permits
in
2018
to
1150
this
past
year,
rise
in
the
number
of
adus
over
over
the
years
has
contributed
this
increase,
which
is
about
35
total
over
that
five-year
period.
Staff
anticipates
the
number
of
Adu
permits
increasing
over
the
years,
particularly
with
the
ever-changing
legislation
designed
to
encourage
these
units.
M
M
M
M
Now,
looking
forward,
the
department
will
be
reviewing
six
new
residential
proposals
comprising
919
apartment
units,
which
include
175
units
in
an
affordable
category.
This
includes
the
city's
Hillcrest
Christian
site
that
was
purchased
and
it's
going
to
be
a
100,
affordable
project
we'll
also
be
processing
a
contemplated
hotel
at
the
former
Marshall's
clothing
store
building
in
the
Jan's
Marketplace,
a
new
medical
building
at
the
former
young
set
Club
on
Rolling
Oaks,
Drive
15,
new
industrial
buildings
of
the
Rancho
Conejo
and
Conejo
Center
Drive
location.
M
M
M
Showing
in
this
slide
is
a
graphic
of
the
permits
issued
by
the
building
division
over
the
past
five
years.
It
demonstrates
an
uptick
in
the
permits
issued
from
2018
to
last
year.
We've
seen
it
in
approximately
30
percent
increase
in
the
activity
over
that
period.
So
in
2018
we
issued
7418
permits.
Last
year
it
was
increased
by
about
2
000
to
9
500.
M
M
N
All
right,
thank
you.
Steve
mayor
council
members,
I'd
like
to
just
touch
upon
some
highlights:
we've
had
in
the
current
playing
division,
as
you
heard,
from
Mr
Kearns,
we
had
over
1100
planning
applications
processed
and
approved
also
another
stat
in
terms
of
customer
service.
Over
6
000
people
have
been
helped
with
the
public
counter.
Those
are
the
ones
that
have
been
logged
in
and
also
you
know,
a
lot
of
phone
call
inquiries
as
well
in
terms
of
the
advanced
planning
highlights
for
2022.
N
First
off
we'd
had
work
going
with
the
general
Plan
update.
You
know
the
general
Plan
update
is
the
first
comprehensive
update
that
cities
embarked
on
since
its
initiation
back
in
the
early
70s.
That
includes
the
nine
mandated
elements,
including
some
of
the
new
requirements
such
as
environmental
justice
in
September
13th
of
2022.
The
city
council
approved
a
contract
Amendment
for
Raymond
Associates
for
additional
work
required
for
the
general
plan,
housing
element
and
the
environmental
impact
report.
That
would
cover
those
elements.
N
The
environmental
impact
report
was
also
scoped
to
include
evaluation
of
the
climate
environmental
action
plan
that
the
public
works
department
is
currently
working
on.
So
that
would
follow
concurrently
in
process
with
the
general
Plan
update
staff
continues.
The
ongoing
drafting
of
the
general
plan
for
purposes
of
internal
consistency,
as
well
as
other
statutory
requirements,
and
we
continue
our
coordination
with
the
public
works
department
on
integrating
the
climate
environmental
action
plan
with
that
work.
N
In
terms
of
highlights
for
the
housing
element
update
in
2022
on
the
onset
of
2022,
the
city
council
adopted
the
housing
element
on
January
25th.
We
quickly
turned
around
and
submitted
it
to
hcd
on
February
5th
and
now
we've
received,
we
received
a
letter
from
hcd
on
April,
7th
2022
and
we're
working
on
those
revisions
of
which
that
contract
amendment
has
enabled
us
to
commence
on.
N
Another
item
that
has
been
initiated
and
is
ongoing
is
the
inclusionary
housing
and
linkage
fee
update.
We.
Basically,
we
went
through
a
selection
process
for
consultants
and
did
a
contract
award
and
we
had
the
first
Workshop,
the
city
council
on
November
1st,
and
it
will
continue
to
work
on
that
as
I
go
over
the
2023
work
plan.
N
N
These
basically
are
in
response
to
a
variety
of
legislation
such
as
SB,
35,
SB,
330
and
other
bills
that
just
continue
to
reference
objective
standards
as
the
primary
tool
that
cities
can
use
to
evaluate
residential
development
and
eliminate
subjectivity
from
the
decision-making
process.
Another
highlight
in
reaction
to
State
legislation
of
the
California
home
act
sb9.
N
We
adopted
the
ordinance
for
that
so
amended.
The
municipal
code
that
enabled
applicants
to
go
through
that
process
ministerially,
as
required
by
state
law,
which
allows
up
to
four
unit
developments
in
urban
lot
splits
and
that
was
adopted
by
City
Council
on
October,
25th
foreign,
so
looking
forward
into
2023.
N
One
of
the
foremost
priorities
of
my
team
is
responding
to
hcd's
review
of
the
adopted
housing
element
by
city
council
and
just
as
a
little
bit
of
a
background
for
the
the
housing
element.
You
know
the
work
on
the
housing
element
really
couldn't
commence
until
you
know
the
city
council
endorsed
the
preferred
land
use
map
back
in
May
of
2021,
because
that
basically
allowed
us
to
evaluate
where
we
could
put
housing
sites.
N
Moving
forward
so
and
just
for
perspective,
you
know
as
part
of
the
housing
element
process,
it's
not
uncommon
for
jurisdictions
to
go
up
to
go
through
three
rounds
of
review
with
hcd
right
now
we're
responding
to
our
second
letter
from
hcd.
N
But
overall
you
know
in
terms
of
Ventura
County.
Only
three
jurisdictions
are
certified
at
this
point
in
time
and
if
you
were
to
look
at
the
whole
skag
region,
which
includes
Imperial,
La,
orange
Riverside,
San,
Bernardino
and
Ventura
counties
86
out
of
147
jurisdictions
are
certified,
so
we're
we're
not
alone.
In
this.
You
know,
process
of
seeking
certification
of
our
housing
element.
N
N
N
One
of
the
tools
that
the
city
will
have
to
adopt
to
actually
get
full
certification
is
a
rezoning
program
and
since
the
majority
of
the
housing
sites
identified
in
the
housing
element
aren't
currently
zoned
for
residential,
the
plan
is
to
bring
forward
a
mixed-use
zoning
ordinance
because
currently
we
do
not
have
one
in
our
municipal
code
for
adoption.
At
the
same
time
that
the
housing
element
is
presented
to
the
city
council
for
adoption,
so
that,
in
turn,
with
the
adoption
of
a
mixed-use
zoning,
we
could
get
a
quick
turnaround.
N
So
that's
the
first
and
foremost
priority
in
terms
of
2023.
However,
at
the
same
time,
we
will
be
working
forward
on
our
path
to
adopting
the
general
plan
within
the
year,
so
staffs,
currently
we're
working
on
drafting
the
general
plan,
all
the
various
required
elements
and
so
forth.
In
terms
of
you
know
the
statutory
requirements,
internal
consistency
and
also
working
with
our
consultant
on
drafting
the
program.
Eir,
you
know
two
of
the
kind
of
Benchmark
time
periods
moving
forward
is
spring
2023.
N
That's
when
we
anticipate
releasing
the
draft
general
plan
and
the
climate
environmental
action
plan
in
concert
for
a
public
comment
period
in
review.
During
that
time,
we
anticipate
doing
a
variety
of
public
engage
activities
reaching
out
to
stakeholders
and
variety
of
other
groups
who
we've
met
with
during
the
land,
use
map,
alternative
processes
and
then
also
presenting
the
draft
general
plan
to
the
general
plan
advisory
committee,
as
well
as
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
city
council
for
workshops
during
that
kind
of
public
review
period.
N
You
know
adjusted
as
needed
into
the
draft
general
plan
and
make
sure,
then
that
would
be
consistent
with
following
release
of
eir
for
public
review,
so
kind
of
a
two
phase
for
the
spring,
in
terms
of
really
getting
the
general
plan
out
there
and
getting
feedback
from
the
public
as
well
as
yourselves
and
then
moving
forward
to
the
eir
and
then
with
an
anticipation
of
bringing
forward
the
general
plan,
the
housing
element
and
the
mixed
use.
Zoning
package
I've
mentioned
previously
for
public
hearing
and
adoption
foreign.
N
There
will
be
a
department
report
coming
up
soon,
tentatively
seleated
for
the
end
of
February,
where
the
consultant's
financial
feasibility,
as
well
as
Nexus
studies,
will
be
presented
to
the
council
as
well
as
some
initial
staff
recommendations
in
that
first
quarter
ultimately
would
return
to
the
council
for
the
draft
ordinance
adoption
of
the
inclusionary
housing,
ordinance
and
Nexus
I'm.
Sorry,
not
the
Nexus.
The
linkage
fee
ordinance
come
spring
as
well.
So
a
lot
going
on
in
Spring
the
other
items
we
have.
The
following.
Four
bullet
items
are
really
actually
kind
of
post.
N
General
plan
work
program
items
you
know
after
the
general
plan
is
adopted.
There
are
a
variety
of
specific
plans
throughout
the
city
will
need
to
be
updated
for
internal
or
consistency
with
the
general
plan,
as
well
as
new
specific
plans
for
certain
Geographic
areas.
That
would
be
considered
as
part
of
that
draft
general
plan.
You
know
for
those
to
implement
the
vision
of
the
general
plan
and
we
anticipate
you
know
as
well
as
what's
identified
in
the
housing
enrollment
already,
with
a
variety
of
code
updates
in
response
to
State
legislation.
N
O
You
Mr
Holt
good
evening,
mayor
members
of
the
council,
so
the
2022
California
legislative
session
in
Sacramento
resulted
in
a
slew
of
new
land
use
bills
that
continue
the
state's
strong
push
to
address
the
housing
crisis.
While
there
are
at
least
20
bills
that
could
impact
our
City's
development
strategy
or
our
development
processes.
Tonight,
I
will
Briefly
summarize
a
few
significant
ones
and
as
I
go
through
these
bills,
I
think
you
will
see
the
continual
theme
that
the
state
legislators
have
created
regarding
creating
new
incentives
for
developers
to
build
more
housing,
including,
affordable
housing.
O
So
the
first
bill
I
would
like
to
address
is
ab2011.
This
is
development
on
commercially
zoned
lots,
and
this
is
significant
because
it
is
a
streamlined
process
bill.
It
allows
buy
right
or
ministerial
Housing,
Development
and
commercially
zoned
properties
based
on
certain
criteria
and
as
you're
going
to
see
with
all
these
bills.
O
There
are
a
number
of
criteria
that
a
developer
would
need
to
meet,
but
if
they
meet
those
things,
those
item
items
then
they're
going
to
be
able
to
have
a
streamlined
process
to
develop
housing
so
under
in
there
are
two
options
a
developer
may
have.
The
project
in
one
option
must
be
located
in
a
Zone
where
office,
retail
or
parking
are
principally
permitted
use,
and
in
that
option
one
it
would
be
100
affordable
to
lower
income
households.
It
cannot
be
located
within
500
feet
of
a
freeway
and
it
must
meet
the
city's
objective.
O
Standards
next
slide
the
second
option,
and
if
a
project
is
in
the
same
type
of
Zone
and
the
site
about,
say
Commercial
Street
between
70
to
150
feet
wide
with
Frontage
of
at
least
50
feet
again.
This
partial
cannot
be
more
than
20
acres
and
then
they
go
through
a
different
and
scenario
based
on
whether
the
Project's
going
to
be
for
sale
or
for
rent.
O
Again,
if
it's
for
rent,
which
we
would
typically
see,
you
have
again
the
same
inclusionary
housing
requirement
if
they
meet
that
or
they
can
do
rent
at
50
for
lower
income,
eight
percent
for
very
low
and
five
percent
for
extremely
low
income-
and
again
this
is
where,
as
part
of
this
project,
they
must
pay
prevailing
wages
on
all
Construction
and
as
far
as
the
inclusionary
housing,
it
will
depend
on
whether
the
inclusionary
housing
percentage
is
higher
or
the
state
law
under
AB
2011
is
higher.
O
Whichever
is
higher,
they
must
produce
the
next
bill
on
the
plate
is
ab2334,
and
this
is
a
density
bonus,
bill
and
I
know.
Most
of
you
are
familiar
with
the
density
bonus
law.
We
have
it.
It's
been
on
the
books
for
decades
now
our
code
has
an
ordinance
that
reflects
the
state
law
and
again,
this
is
another
change
to
the
density
bonus
law
that
the
state
is
implementing.
O
The
existing
law
also
requires
that
the
cities
must
provide
development,
incentives
or
waivers,
and
that
number
of
how
many
they
get
whether
it's
one
up
to
four
it
just
depends
on
the
number
of
affordable
Provisions
that
they're
meeting.
Basically
the
percentage
that
they're
meeting
for
the
density
to
the
left
of
this
screen.
You'll
see.
This
is
just
a
sample
under
government
code,
section
65915,
which
is
our
density
bonus
law
under
the
state,
and
this
is
just
a
very
low
income
example.
O
Now
the
new
law,
the
new
law
updates,
the
definition
of
maximum
allowable
density
to
determine
the
base
density,
and
this
is
defined
as
a
maximum
number
of
units
allowed
under
the
zoning
ordinance
specific
plan
or
the
general
plan.
Significantly.
The
total
units
excludes
units
added
by
the
density
bonus
next
slide.
O
O
The
next
item
is
ab2097,
and
this
is
the
elimination
of
certain
parking
requirements
and
again
this
is
the
theme
of
trying
to
incentivize
the
Development
Across,
the
state
under
ab2097.
It
prohibits
the
city
from
imposing
any
minimum
parking
requirements
on
any
residential,
commercial
or
other
development
that
is
located
within
the
half
mile
of
a
major
traffic
stop.
There
are
some
limited
exceptions
that
apply
now
under
this
bill.
The
city
can
still
impose
Ada
parking
on
the
site,
as
well
as
EV
charging
Supply
equipment
requirements.
O
Next
bill
is
a
combo
bill
of
ab221
and
SB
897,
and
this
is
accessory
dwelling
units
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
this
is
a
significant
bill
is
because,
if
you
saw
this
Mr
kearns's
presentation
in
2019,
we
had
21
applications
for
adus
in
our
city.
In
2021
we
had
114
and
in
2022
we
had
149.
so
adus
across
the
state
and
in
our
city
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
applications
for
that
use.
O
So
under
these
two
bills
it
prohibits
the
city
from
imposing
certain
lot
coverage
limits,
such
as
floor
area
ratio
or
open
space
or
even
front
yard
setbacks
minimum
lot
size.
We
we
can
impose
that
if
the
owner
cannot
build
an
800
square
foot
Adu
on
the
property
through
our
regular
processes,
for
example,
we
have
the
four
foot
setback
in
the
rear,
the
forefoot
setback
on
the
side.
So
if
they
can't
fit
in
that
we
have
to
under
this
new
law,
we
are
prohibited
from
denying
a
project.
O
O
An
Adu
that
is
detached
from
the
primary
dwelling
may
also
now
be
included
in
a
detached
garage,
and
why
is
that
significant?
Because
if
you
think
about
you
know
five
or
eight
years
ago,
people
would
take
their
garage
and
they
would
convert
it
into
a
room.
If
you
remember
those
type
of
situations
and
then
what
we
would
do
is
we
would
require
them
to
create
a
detached
garage.
Now.
O
Another
thing
that
this
bill
does:
is
these
two
bills:
it
increases
the
maximum
height
from
16
feet
to
up
to
25
feet
of
certain
criteria
are
met
such
as
proximity
to
Major
Transit.
Stop
for
the
example
of
25
feet.
It
would
be
a
two-story
if
it's
an
attached
Adu
to
the
primary
residence
next
slide
so
ab2668.
This
is
a
cleanup
legislation
to
SB
35.,
so
SB
35,
just
for
your
recollection,
was
effective
in
2018..
This
was
again
a
streamlined
permit
process
if
they
meet
all
these
requirements.
O
There's
a
very
strict
guidelines
that
the
city
must
follow
in
approving
the
process
project.
It
is
zoned
for
residential
use
or
mixed
use.
It
must
comply,
of
course,
with
the
city's
objective
standards
as
Mr
Holt
was
mentioning.
It
again
requires
that
preventing
wage
component
and
10
of
the
units
are
required
to
be
affordable.
O
So
with
those
these
are
just
some
of
the
several
bills
that
we
have.
They
are
very
complex
there.
They
have
a
number
of
processes
you
have
to
follow,
and
staff
is
going
to
be
challenged
in
going
through
those
new
bills
and
making
sure
that
when
we
get
in
such
an
application,
we're
going
to
follow
it
correctly.
But
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Mr
Powers,
as
he
might
have
some
concluding
remarks.
K
And
thanks
team,
just
a
couple
of
quick,
close
out
remarks
for
this
and
I
know.
There's
some
questions
from
the
council
and
I
think
this
presentation
was
designed
to
elicit
some
of
those
questions
as
we
set
the
table
for
the
for
the
year
ahead.
K
First
and
foremost,
I
just
want
to
credit
the
Community
Development
Department
extraordinary
efforts
over
the
past
year.
It's
really
remarkable
when
you
look
back
over
what
we've
been
able
to
to
achieve.
We
first
checked
in
I
know
at
least
three
of
you
up
here
will
remember.
We
checked
in
with
you
in
Fall
of
2021,
when
we
were
seeing
these
numbers
really
start
to
get
to
a
level
that
was
almost
unsustainable.
Now
we
put
a
number
of
measures
in
place.
K
We're
seeing
sort
of
record
development
volume,
not
just
residential,
our
the
development
in
our
industrial
sectors,
often
overlooked
every
one
of
those
new
biotech
buildings
and
designs
that
come
in
and
go
through
the
15
buildings
that
Chappelle's
bringing
forward
all
of
those
have
have
to
run
through
a
planning
process
and
so
all
that's
hitting.
And
then
we
have
our
Advanced
planning
processes,
which
are
extremely
complex.
First
time,
we've
done
a
comprehensive
update
since
1970
and
there's
a
lot
of
nuance
to
that,
especially
in
this
day
and
age.
K
So
all
of
those
things
taken
and
taken
together
really
some
key
themes:
huge
and
sustained
increase
in
our
processing
volume,
solar
Adu,
our
homeless
activities,
which
weren't
on
the
radar
necessarily
I'll,
require
a
planning
touch
a
lot
of
industrial,
an
ever-changing
legislative
landscape
that
we
put
on
top
of
all
of
this.
The
bills
that
Mr
Heater
just
mentioned,
just
that
that
was
just
a
quick
summary
of
a
few
of
the
most
significant
ones.
But
if
you
imagine
every
one
of
those
have
to
be
addressed
with
some
processes
and
procedures.
K
Fortunately,
we
are
well
underway
on
our
general
plan
process,
because
we
can
incorporate
a
lot
of
this
in
there
that
commercial
conversion
Bill
much
of
what
the
council
contemplated
in
your
land
use,
alternative
map
sort
of
aligns
with
that
and
so
I
think
we're
well
positioned
as
opposed
to
cities.
That
may
not
have
gone
down
that
path
already.
K
As
we
you
come
into
2023,
we
felt
it
was
important
to
set
the
table
for
all
of
you,
especially
since
we
have
two
two
new
members
here,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
Community
Development
items
from
a
pure
volume
standpoint,
Public
Works
will
probably
went
out
in
numbers,
but
in
terms
of
consequence
of
big
policy
related
items
and
and
considerations,
there's
going
to
be
just
a
tremendous
amount
throughout
the
entire
year,
and
so
we
wanted
to
kind
of
lay
that
out
for
you
and
you
have
everything
from
residential
and
Industrial
to
hotel
and
medical
buildings.
K
We've
got
follow-up
on
the
Hillcrest
side.
We've
got
our
consideration
for
our
homeless
navigation
Center.
All
of
those
things
will
be
coming
forward
in
the
in
the
year
ahead
and
then
a
lot
of
really
interesting
policy
discussions
from
inclusionary
housing
to
our
general
plan
study
policy
study
sessions
and
then
the
eventual
consideration
culmination
of
that
in
the
in
the
fall
as
we
go
through
that
this
year
and
we're
coming
into
a
budget
year.
K
K
We
haven't
changed
that
resource
allocation
from
a
staffing
perspective,
so
our
finance
director,
Jenny
boscarino
and
our
other
leadership
in
Community
Development
we're
going
to
be
looking
very
very
closely
with
our
financial
strategic
plan
to
make
some
determinations.
If,
if
now
is
the
time
to
look
at
augmenting,
you
know
small
way,
some
of
those
resources
and
Community
Development
so
make
sure
we're
set
up
in
a
way
to
deliver
going
forward
and
also
being
mindful
of
our
fiscal
resiliency.
B
P
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
to
the
entire
Community
Development
Department
staff,
for
this
comprehensive
report
and
and
for
all
you
do.
Thank
you
just
a
few
points
of
clarification
and
and
what
what
we
just
walked
through
in
Mr
kearns's
report.
There
was
a
reference
to
the
very
considerable
amount
of
construction,
the
value
of
all
that
being
256.6
million
dollars,
and
my
question
is:
does
that
reflect
the
period
2018
to
2022,
or
is
that
just
last
year's
Construction.
M
P
P
All
right,
thank
you,
I
think
this
is
a
question
for
Mr
Holt.
Regarding
the
changes
to
mixed-use
zoning,
you
mentioned
that
there
would
be
a
new
zoning
class
for
that
law
and
it
sounded
from
the
time
tail
table
timetable
as
if
the
spring
period
is
already
very
busy
with
other
items.
So
number
one
do
I
presume
correctly
that
the
mixed
use
zoning
changes
would
come
after
that,
after
the
housing
element
would
be
voted
on.
N
Well,
for
the
time
being,
and
ideally
we
would
take
it
as
a
package
at
the
same
time
that
the
housing
element
is
adopted,
I
think
that
would
look
well
in
terms
of
ACD.
As
far
as
our
efforts
to
you
know,
Upon
A,
you
know
an
adoption
of
us
conditionally.
Certified
housing
element
also
adopt
a
mixed
use.
Zoning
ordinance
that
would
basically
enable
a
developer
to
come
in
and
apply
for
a
project
per
the
zoning
regulations
for
those
housing
sites
identified
in
our
housing
element.
P
Part
of
the
reason
I'm
asking
about
the
order
of
operations
is
whether
we
as
a
council
in
reviewing
General
Plan
update,
need
to
be
aware
of
any
changes
that
need
to
be
made
so
that
we
can
do
these
zoning
changes
to
do
this
new
class
of
mixed
use.
Sony
does,
in
other
words,
does
the
general
plan
or
the
housing
element
need
to
change
in
any
way
for
this
zoning
change
to
happen.
N
No
because
I
mean
the
general
plan
and
the
housing
element
are
the
basically
the
policy
documents
that
would
drive
the
need
for
that
mixed
use.
Zoning
ordinance
I
mean
it's
and
essentially
a
tool.
That's
consistent
with
the
general
plan.
Land
use
designations
for
implementating
implementing
implementing
those
zones,
so
I
mean
basically
the
the
zoning
would
yeah
facilitate
the
production
of
housing
anticipated
under
the
general
plan.
So
no,
it
wouldn't
I
mean,
and
that's
part
of
I
mean
when
the
draft
general
plan
goes
out.
I
mean
you
know.
N
The
descriptions
of
the
land
uses
a
lot
of
those
things.
I
mean
for
at
this
point
in
time,
really
just
the
land
use
map
and
the
makeup
of
the
you
know
the
city,
all
the
other
kind
of
more
specific
policies
for
those
designations
would
be
discussed
at
the
time
of
the
draft
general
plan
being
out
for
public
review,
and
you
know
considered
by
Planning,
Commission
and
city
council.
Okay,.
P
Very
good,
thank
you
and
then
I'll
wrap
up
with
a
couple
of
legal
questions
for
Mr.
He
her
in
your
presentation
on
the
density,
bonus
law,
ab2334.
P
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
pull
out
your
crystal
ball,
if,
if
we
have
enough
information
yet
to
anticipate
what
changes
might
result
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
that
there
was
a
fair
amount
of
figuratively
speaking
hair
pulling
at
the
time,
we
voted
on
sb9
on
changes
to
bring
us
into
alignment
with
sb9.
But
staff
was
careful
to
point
out
that,
while
there
was
significant
interest
in
sb9,
there
were
very,
very
few
I
think
one
at
the
time
applications
that
that
would
actually
make
use
of
sb9
and
so
I'm
asking.
P
O
So
I
I
think
not
to
use
a
crystal
ball,
but
to
to
just
anticipate
that
part
of
this
ab2334
was
to
clarify
for
some
for
some
localities
that
they
were
possibly
mixing
up,
how
you
measured
it
right,
and
so
this
was
one
to
clarify
that
you
look
at
the
density
as
a
whole.
O
First,
before
you
go
to
the
bonus
that
you
would
receive
for
the
for
the
size
of
the
property
but
I
think
again,
this
is
this
is
going
to
be
taken
in
with
a
number
of
these
other
possible
projects
or
a
paths
to
a
project,
and
so
the
density
bonus-
and
this
is
what's
important-
is
that
the
density
bonus
is
going
to
be
used.
In
addition
to
all
these
other
new
incentives
like
the
parking,
for
example.
O
Now
under
the
density
bonus,
you
do
see
a
capability
even
currently
of
reducing
parking
or
getting
incentives
or
waivers
of
something
setback,
for
example,
you've
seen
that
before
so
you
see
those
type
of
opportunities,
I
think
the
density
bonus
change
is
significant
in
the
sense
of
it's
going
to
again
reflect
this
is
how
we're
going
to
measure
density.
This
is
going
to
be
how
we're
going
to
anticipate
the
bonus
of
units
and
then
to
combine
that
I
think
is
what
we
would
anticipate
to
combine
that
with
other
another
type
of
Regulation.
P
O
I
want
to
be
careful
with
that,
one
that
question
and
I'm
not
trying
to
deflect
it
other
than
I
think
we
we
gave
a
very
high
level
kind
of
review
of
these
bills.
That
one
is
particular
is,
is
have
very
complex,
so
you
have
a
lot
of
area.
We
just
hit.
Some
of
the
highlights
of
the
bill.
I
mean
each
of
these
bills.
Are
you
know
20
30,
40
pages,
just
to
build
text
alone,
so
we
highlighted
some
of
those.
O
O
Think
part
of
this
is
to
find
locations
that
might
be
a
little
bit
smaller
than
than
maybe
they
would
normally
consider
and
they
go
oh
if
I
build
100
affordable
and
it's
within
a
half
mile
of
a
major
Transit,
stop
boy
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
build
three
stories
higher
than
what
is
there,
but
again
I
don't
want
to
do
a
hypothetical
in
the
sense
of
until
we
know
all
the
facts
of
a
particular
project.
We
have
to
analyze
it,
but
that's
what
we
will
be
doing.
Q
Q
The
housing
crisis
has
been
well
documented
and
the
state
has
decided
that
they're
going
to
force
us
or
try
I
guess,
try
divorces
to
to
build
more
housing
and
build
a
denser
and
build
it
higher
I
kind
of
get
that
in
the
sense
that
you
know
in
the
history
of
the
last
couple
of
decades.
In
California,
there's
been
many
cities
that
have
fought
growth,
adamantly
and
I
might
even
say
that
Thousand
Oaks
might
have
been
guilty
of
that
then.
But
I
do
think.
Q
In
the
last
couple
of
years
we've
turned
the
corner,
and
just
last
year
we
approved
1100
units
here
in
the
city,
125
or
so
were
affordable.
I
think
Thousand
Oaks
understands
that
there's
a
housing
crisis
in
this
state
and
we're
responding
and
I
think
if
Sacramento
had
looked
at
just
us
versus
some
other
cities.
Maybe
these
laws
might
not
have
come
into
play,
but
unfortunately
there's
400
plus
cities
in
the
state
of
California.
Not
just
us,
so
we
have
to
contend
with
this.
This
business
I
mean
for
the
10
odd
years.
Q
I've
sat
on
this
Council
up
until
the
last
couple
of
years.
Land
use
decisions
were
virtually
left
to
us
almost
entirely
and
that
that
is
changing.
So
we
have
to
contend
with
that
on
the
first
one,
that
a
b,
what
was
the
development
on
Commercial
Lots,
ab2011
yeah?
Well
in
our
city?
What
would
be
an
example
of
a
commercial
lot
that
that
might
be
subject
to?
O
Have
to
be
a
you
have
to
have
it
as
one
of
the
options
a
Commercial
Street
with
between
70
to
150
feet
wide,
so
that
is
a
component
to
it.
So
again,
this
is
where
I
was
talking
about
the
high
level
kind
of
just
depends
that
that's
certainly
a
possibility.
We'd
have
to
look
at
the
project
and
see
if,
if
it
would
meet
those
categories
and
again
for
one
of
them,
it
would
be
100
affordable
for
another
one.
O
It's
going
to
be,
whether
for
sale
or
rent,
then
it's
going
to
have
these
numbers
that
would
be
attached
to
it.
But
again,
this
these
bills
are
have
a
number
of
little
elements
to
it.
Again,
it
can't
be
more
than
20
acres.
That
kind
of
thing,
so
it
just
depends
on
where
you're
looking
at
and
it
has
to
be
with
a
Commercial
Street
between
70.
A
O
Q
I
mean
some
of
the
word.
It
seems
almost
impractical,
for
example,
on
the
density
bonus
that
you
could
add
three
stories.
If
you're
100,
affordable
did
I
get
that
right.
I
have
yet
to
meet
anybody
that
could
build
a
hundred
percent
affordable
project
and
make
it
pencil
out.
You
know
profit-wise
to
do
so.
Q
Maybe
it's
possible
I've,
never
seen
it,
but
so
when
you,
when
you
talk
about
the
extra
three
stories
in
in
our
city,
that
could
mean
if
it
was
a
win
within
a
half.
A
mile
of
a
Transit
Center
I
think
was
one
of
the
stipulations.
We
could
look
at
something
in
maybe
the
six
to
seven
story
range.
O
You
know
teal,
you
know
Kmart
site,
for
example,
just
some
beautiful
complexes
that
we
are
going
to
have
developed
in
the
near
future.
I.
Q
I
couldn't
agree
more
yeah.
We've
worked
with
the
developers
to
put
together
good
projects,
I'm,
not
sure
that
Sacramento
is
going
to
exempt
us
from
from
these
laws.
Because
of
that,
but
I
guess
we'll
have
to
see
how
time
goes
on
and
then
the
last
one
adus
could
be
up
to
25
feet.
O
Yeah,
so
that
is
a
big
change
that
is
going
to
be
where
you
have
there's
a
number
of
factors
again:
I
hate
to
say
that
repeatedly.
But
it's
basically
it's
going
to
be
more
than
two
uni
two
bedrooms
in
the
in
the
Adu.
It
has
to
be
attached
to
the
primary
residence.
O
If
you
have
a
two-story
building
and
you
can
attach
an
Adu,
that's
two:
that's
25
feet
up
to
25
feet:
high
okay,
but
it
also
it's
important
that
it
goes
back
to
the
parking
and
the
and
the
bus
service,
because
it
does
have
that
qualifier
as
well.
That
has
to
be
near
a
bus.
Stop
right!
So
you
within
half
mile,
because
you're
thinking
you're
going
to
have
multiple
people,
because
also
they're,
limiting
the
with
adus
they're,
limiting
the
parking
that
you
can
require
so
they're
trying
to
balance
that
make
it
a
little
bit
bigger.
O
Q
Sometimes
you
wonder
because
of
the
reaction
of
some
in
the
cities
to
these
new
laws,
for
example,
a
couple
of
cities
trying
to
subvert
I
guess
is
the
right
word
sb9
in
certain
ways,
you
wonder
if,
if
Sacramento
doesn't
look
at
that,
and
some
of
these
new
laws
are
almost
retaliatory
in
a
sense
because
of
some
of
the
you
know
the
reluctance
the
cities
have
had
to
cooperate,
but
whatever
they
are,
what
they
are
so
we're
gonna
have
to
contend
with
it.
Thank
you.
R
You
mayor
I,
have
a
question
more
about
capacity
I'm,
going
to
kind
of
direct
it
to
you
drew
you
mentioned,
leveraging,
Tech
and
Outsourcing,
where
we
can.
If
we're
expecting.
You
know
as
we're
seeing
over
the
years
the
rise
in
adus
and
we're
talking
about
incentives
that
ultimately
make
I
think
it's
a
realistic
expectation
that
that
we
may
see
more
and
more
build.
If
that's
the
case,
do
we
have
the
capacity
to
handle
that?
If
not,
what
is
the
plan
so
that
we
can.
K
So
it's
a
some
of
a
nuanced
answer
and
I'm
going
to
turn
to
Mr
Collins
here
in
a
minute
to
give
a
little
bit
more
technical
detail,
but
the
council,
and
when
we
began
to
see
these
numbers
the
council,
we
brought
them
a
suite
of
actions
to
provide
opportunities
for
outsourced.
Review
of
different
plan
sets
to
look
at
outside
planning
assistance
for
individual
planners
on
projects
that
it
made
sense
to
do
that
in
and
that's
been
really
helpful
for
us.
K
That
said,
the
planning
profession
in
general-
it's
it
is
a
pretty
tactical
in
nature,
and
it's
really
rooted
in
the
policies
of
the
city.
Council
city
council
has
established
these
policies,
and
so
it's
our
team
that
understands
there's
no
other
city
that
has
oak
tree.
Regulations
like
we
do
and
so
to
understand,
what's
happening
in
somebody's
backyard,
and
that
requires
a
person
on
our
team
we're
one
of
the
Cities.
K
We
have
policies
regarding
intrusion
into
25
slope
and
so
it's
very
difficult
to
Outsource
a
play
planning
application
that
has
those
kinds
of
factors
in
it,
and
so
that's
why
it's
one
of
the
few
departments
that
we're
going
to
take
a
hard
look
at
adding
some
additional
assistance.
It's
also
a
succession
planning
piece.
It's
this
is
a
competitive
industry.
K
There's
a
lot
of
private
sector,
pull
for
this
industry
as
well,
and
so
that's
we're
going
to
be
in
the
budget
process
here
or
likely
have
a
conversation
with
you
about
that,
and
probably
not
just
about
this
one
or
two
year
budget
cycle,
but
kind
of.
What's
our
Horizon
look
like
because
we
probably
want
to
plan
on
ramping
towards
that
as
we
move
forward,
but
Steve
I'll,
let
you
add
any
additional
color
onto
that.
M
Thank
you
drew
a
very
good
question:
councilmember
Taylor.
What
are
the
things
about?
The
Adu
ordinances
and
the
legislation
by
the
state
is
that
it's
very
subjective
or
objective
legislation.
So
there's
not
a
lot
of
subjectivity
staff
can
use
to
evaluate
these.
It's
really
a
checklist
thing
if
they
meets
all
the
standards
we're
obligated
to
approve
it.
That
doesn't
mean
that
they
can
wipe
away
all
of
our
development
standards.
Our
tree
protection
and
that
kind
of
thing
that
Drew
just
mentioned
they
still
have
to
adhere
to
certain
development
standards.
The
local
ordinances.
M
However,
the
there
is
a
large
volume
of
these,
although
they
are
objective
and
use,
checked
boxes
and
you
approve
it
or
denied
or
whatever
the
result
is
there's
still
activity
and
because
large
volume
there
is
a
lot
of
work
on
and
demand
on
staff.
But
we
are
managing
that
capacity.
We
do
have
Contract
Services,
we
use
and
that's
helping
us
with
the
volume,
including
the
other
applications
that
we
have
in
the
mix.
I
K
I
need
to
I
want
to.
You
know,
process
a
build
on
this,
and
so,
if
you
think
about
that,
that's
increased
volume
at
the
counter,
interacting
with
folks.
That
would
never
come
to
the
planning
counter
before,
and
so
that's
another
piece
that
we
have
to
plan
for
from
a
customer
service
standpoint.
How
do
we
get
these
things
into
the
right
pathway
so
that
we're
getting
answers
to
questions
and
not
taking
those
folks
that
need
to
be
processing
electrical
plans
away
from
that
task?
Thank
you.
B
Foreign
Mikey:
let's
go
over
to
the
veteran.
D
Mr
Engler,
thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
a
couple
of
comments
and
questions,
I,
think
director
to
the
entire
staff
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation
for
your
answer
so
far
tonight
it's
a
very
Illuminating,
the
one.
D
I
had
is
a
lot
of
the
a
lot
of
the
new
laws
seem
to
be
tied
to
locations
near
Transit,
centers
and
I'm,
wondering
in
our
town.
Can
you
define
what
a
Transit
Center
is?
Is
it
a
bus?
Stop?
Is
it
or
does
it
have
to
be
a
regional
Hub
of
some
sort?
How
do
they?
How
do
they
Define
it
in
the
code
now
and
do
we
have
any
of
those
in
our
town.
O
Okay,
so
typical
with
statutory
interpretation,
you
see
statutes
that
sometimes
refer
to
another
statute,
for
definition
and
in
these
new
slew
of
bills,
you
see
a
lot
of
that
happening
when
it
comes
to
the
transit
and
so
I
think
I
was
very
specific
in
saying
major
Transit
stop,
because
that
is
defined.
It's
defined
in
two
sections
of
the
code:
they're
both
public
resources,
code,
sections,
21064.3
and
section
two,
one
ones.
O
Five,
five
and
I
say
that,
because
when
you
look
at
the
definitions
of
those
two
codes
at
this
time,
I
do
not
believe
that
the
city
has
any
area
in
our
city
with
the
bus
service
that
we
have
that
meets
that
definition
at
this
time.
I
do
not
believe
we
have
any
Transit
Center.
That
would
be
the
one
that
you're
thinking
about
I
would
be
thinking
about
and
looking
at
the
definitions
as
written
down
on
these
two
coach
sections,
I
do
not
believe
that
we
have
a
major
Transit
stop
as
defined
by
these
two
codes.
O
Now
some
of
the
codes
talk
about
bus,
stop
and
some
of
those
say,
bus
stop
is
defined
as
a
major
Transit
stop
right.
So
you
just
have
to
look:
some
of
them
are
silent.
It
says
bus
stop,
so
it
just
depends
on
which
Bill
you're
looking
at
what
code
you're
looking
at,
because
it
does
change
a
little
bit,
but
for
the
major
ones
that
I
brought
out.
It
is
talking
about
a
major
Transit,
stop
and
under
the
definitions,
I
believe
at
this
time.
I
do
not
believe
that
we
have
one
that
qualifies.
D
Okay,
so
it's
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
in
the
gray
area,
but
by
by
some
definition,
correct.
O
And
I
say
that
gray
area
is
a
perfect
way
of
saying
it,
because
we
have
had
opinions
from
outside
sources
who
disagree
with
that
assessment
right,
but
again,
looking
at
the
definitions
and
talking
to
our
staff
about
our
transit
system
that
we
have
and
the
frequency
which
is
another
key
component
to
it,
the
frequency
it
has
to
be
every
at
least
every
15
minutes.
We
don't
meet
those
standards.
D
Okay,
now
there's
also
another
modifier
in
some
of
the
some
of
the
codes,
the
new
codes
having
to
do
with
objective
standards
and
those
types
of
things
now
last
year,
I
believe
we
put
into
effect
new
objective
standards
at
the
council.
Can
you
go
a
little
bit
into
some
of
the
how
the
nuances
might
work
between
what
our
objective
standards
are
and
how
these
new
codes
might
interact
with
them?.
O
Mr
Holt
talk
about
this
as
well,
but
I
will
say
initially
that
we
have
adopted
our
city
objective
standards
and
that's
what
we
are
applying
and
the
codes
do
say.
Does
the
city
have
objective
standards?
If
the
answer
is
yes,
then
then
we're
looking
at,
we
are
applying
those
that's
how
we've
changed
it.
N
Yeah
I
I
would
basically
Echo
that
I
mean
the
the
primary
purpose
of
adopting
those
objective
standards
were
in
response
to
laws
such
as
SB
35,
SB
330,
that
mentioned
the
objective
standards
and
as
Patrick
went
over
a
much
of
the
legislation,
keeps
referencing
objective
standards
as
the
tool
for
our
evaluation.
So
you
know
the
adoption
of
what
we
did.
This
past
year
was
primarily
for
that
intent
to
address
these
bills
or
projects
that
come
in
using
these
bills.
As
far
as
our
evaluation
gets,
the
projects.
S
Foreign
I
could
just
add
one
thing.
Just
one
caveat
to
that
is
that,
yes,
we
have
our
objective
development
standards,
but,
to
the
extent
the
legislation
is
very
clear
on
one
of
our
objective
standards
and
and
this
new
piece
of
legislation
conflicts
with
that
objective
standards.
Maybe
it's
a
setback
standard
or
something
like
that.
We
would
have
to
comply
with
the
state
law
provision.
Yeah.
D
I
remember
the
discussion
on
that.
In
no
way
do
I
want
our
objective
standards
to
hinder
development
of
needed
residential,
but
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
there's
get
some
clarification
on
which
has
Primacy.
Unless
what
you're
saying
is
less,
it's
specifically
spelled
out
in
any
one
of
these
laws.
P
Thank
you
mayor.
Just
a
quick
follow-up
on
the
pair
of
Adu
bills,
again
I
thought
of
a
concern
around
this
in
in
2021.
We
don't
have
the
22
stats
yet,
but
in
2021
it
is
a
popular
concept.
P
Fully
80
percent
of
all
the
building
permit
system
in
the
city
were
for
adus,
but
a
hundred
percent
of
those
were
in
the
above
moderate
income
category
and
if
I
understand
correctly,
this
new
set
of
bills
increases
the
size
of
permissible
adus
in
a
in
general,
not
always,
but
in
general,
a
larger
structure
is
a
more
expensive
structure
to
build
so
with
that
Preamble.
My
question
is:
is
there
anything
in
this
pair
of
bills
that
will
make
edu's
more
affordable
or
provide
increase
the
supply
of
affordable
housing,
adus
or
otherwise?.
O
I'd
have
to
go
through
them
Page
by
Page
and
line
my
line,
but
I
will
say
this
that
one
of
the
incentives
that
you've
seen
at
common
theme
of
is
is
about
parking
right
and
parking
is
a
cost
to
development,
and
so
for
these
adus
increasing
one
of
those
tangents
or
elements
to
it
is
that
you
have
to
be
within
a
certain
proximity.
O
Usually
it's
a
half
mile
walking
distance
to
a
bus,
stop,
and
so
I
think
that
is
part
of
the
plan
is
that
they
are
saying
we're
going
to
eliminate
some
of
the
costs
that
you
might
experience,
typically
as
a
builder
such
as
parking
for
example,
or
you
might
have
a
limitation
on
the
setback,
for
example,
they've
kind
of
changed
those
numbers
a
little
bit
too
so
I
see
what
you're
saying
I
understand
what
you're
saying
it
seems
like
they
were
all
bigger.
I.
S
S
That
and
maybe
Ian
you
can
correct
me.
I-
could
be
wrong
on
this,
but
I
believe
that
the
designation
for
them
as
being
all
above
moderate
is
because
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
us.
Knowing
what
rents
are
charged,
it
could
be
for
a
family
member,
but
unless
there's
a
recorded
deed
restriction
or
some
other
affordability
provision
in
it,
we
are
precluded
from
identifying
it
as
a
lower
in
community.
A
N
Sure,
generally
I
mean
the
the
adus
yeah.
They
do
fall
in
the
above
moderate
or
the
market
rate
category,
and
that's
because,
as
a
single
family
property,
you
don't
typically
even
enter
into
some
level
of
deed
restriction
on
an
individual
unit
for
a
homeowner,
because
then
they
you
know,
have
to
go
through
that
process.
A
N
Are
I
mean
it's
really
production
based?
That's
the
intent.
I
mean
it's
kind
of
Silent
on
requiring
cities
to
make
them
affordable.
It's
just
more
of
increasing
the
supply
and
then
the
variety
of
housing
is
by
default,
helping
affordability
in
general.
But
it's
not
a
restricted
aspect.
Now
I
mean
it's
part
of
the
housing
element.
There
will
be
incentives
in
education
as
far
as
homeowners
or
people
going
through
the
age
Adu
process
and
ways
that
we
can
maybe
incentivize
them
to
do
some
of
the
more
deed,
restricted,
affordable,
housings.
N
Now
I
mean
there
are
as
part
of
the
housing
element
and
what
skagg
has
adopted
they
have
adopted.
You
know
certain
ranges,
so
we
can
possibly
consider
you
know
as
far
as
how
we
project
out
the
production
of
adus,
a
certain
level
of
affordability,
but
then,
at
the
same
time
we
have
to
commit
to
incentivizing
them
and
really
following
through
and
trying
to
get
people
to
do
those
deed
restriction
units.
So.
K
You
know
we're
not
we're
getting
a
lot
of
regulations,
we're
not
getting
a
lot
of
specifics
as
it
relates
to
that
and
they
will
come
back
and
say
well,
you
know
we're
going
to
change
this
law.
It'll,
allow
you
to
to
get
rid
of
front
yard
setback.
If
you
can't
do
800
feet
anywhere
else
in
their
ideas.
K
Well,
then,
you
don't
have
to
Crane
a
unit
over
the
back
and
but
I
think
one
of
the
things
we've
seen
anecdotally
and
just
from
conversations
around
town,
we
have
to
classify
them
all
As
Above
Market,
but
in
many
cases
they
in
these
days
are
resulting
in
daughters
and
sons
coming
back
in
and
living
at
home,
probably
rent
free
to
a
regard,
and
so
that's
that
is
in
the
conversations
at
the
counter
that
I've
witnessed
down
there
and
otherwise
that's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
what
we're
seeing
so
I
think
that
is
being
achieved
to
some
degree.
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Powers.
If
no
one
else
has
any
other
questions,
I
have
some
staff
I'm,
not
sure
who
to
direct
this
to
so
feel
free
to
step
in
seven
of
them.
One
is
ab2011.
If
we
look
at
option
one,
it
says:
100,
low
income
and
100
low
income
in
my
understanding
is
that
they
pay
what
would
be
below
Market
rent
and
that's
usually
below
the
cost
of
construction
or
a
profit
margin.
B
O
It
could
be
non-profit
type
of
build
a
complex
or
could
also
be
just
the
fact
that
they
have
so
many
units,
for
example
in
maybe
to
a
2011.
You
can
have
this
option
where
you
can
build
higher
right
and
build
more,
and
so
it
pencils
out
when
you
have
so
many
more
with
the
density
bonus
that
you
might
be
able
to
add,
maybe
less
expenses
in
the
development
of
it
because
of
the
various
incentives
that
the
receiver,
the
waivers
that
they
receive.
O
B
O
Me
an
example
sure
so
if
you
look
at
a
and
I
might
need
some
help
with
the
math.
But
if
you
look
at
a
project,
that's,
for
example,
three
acres
and
it's
30
units
per
acre.
That's
90
units
for
that
for
that
parcel
right
and
they're
going
to
build
they're
going
to
build
based
on
the
90
units,
they're
going
to
make
15
of
those
units
very
low
income
units.
O
O
O
People
in
a
smaller
appreciate
your
wording,
but
their
wording
is
they're
clarifying
that
the
density
that
you
you
calculate
is
based
on
the
the
Acres,
the
units
per
acre,
that
you
have
not
that
the
bonus
doesn't
count
and.
S
New
state
law
is
clarifying
it
because
there
are
some
cities
that
do
their
zoning
on
form-based
codes
or
other
types
of
zoning
standards
that
there
leaves
room
for
ambiguity.
The
way
that
we
have
always
calculated
is
precisely
with
this
new
state
law
says:
there's,
there's
no
change
in
that.
From
our
perspective,
the
biggest
change
under
the
density
bonus
law
is
again
the
additional
incentives
for
the
100,
affordable,
housing.
Okay,
that's
the
biggest
change.
Third.
O
So
I
will
say
that,
as
we
repeatedly
said
in
the
past,
when
we
talk
about
these
state
laws
that
come
down,
you
have
a
state
legislature,
that's
looking
at
the
state
as
a
whole,
and
these
legislators
are
creating
laws
that
are
broad-based,
right,
they're,
not
they're,
not
for
Thousand
Oaks.
They
are
applied
Statewide.
O
So
you
look
at
cities
such
as
San,
Francisco,
Los,
Angeles,
San
Diego,
maybe
San
Jose,
the
Bay
Area,
some
of
those
cities
that
have
light
rail
systems
through
the
city,
but
looking
at
those
as
a
component
of
building
up
and
not
having
parking
requirements,
and
that
you
would
see
that
happening
in
cities
such
as
San
Jose
again
right
now,
I
will
say
that
we
don't
qualify
under
the
definition
as
I
read
it.
So
that's
an
important
part
that
we
would
have.
But
again,
if
you
meet
these
elements
and
again,
there's
many
of
them.
O
I
just
did
the
highlights
of
them
frankly,
but
if
you
meet
these
elements,
yes,
that
is
why
this
is
why
it's
incentive
right.
This
is
why
they're
they're
saying
build
this
and
we're
going
to
allow
you
to
say
no
parking
or
limited
parking
in
some
situations
right
and
that's
why
they're
doing
that.
So
those
are
the
factors
yeah.
S
Least,
for
this
random
legislation,
it
is
specifically
defined.
It's
a
specific.
You
know,
term
of
art.
What
is
it
a
a
major
Transit
stop,
so
it's
not
any
bus
stop,
at
least
at
this
point.
K
K
K
Are
not
going
to
want
to
live
there
and
so
I?
That's
I!
Just
try
to
look
at
that
from
that
that
standpoint
I
sure
could
they
and
could
you
know
we
would,
you
know,
have
a
lot
of
dialogue
back
and
forth,
but
I
I
don't
see
it
as
yeah
I
certainly
see
it
being
leveraged
in
Bay
area,
maybe
in
San
Diego
and
in
cities
where
that
makes
sense,
probably
just
like
sb9,
probably
less
so
here.
B
What
I
Envision
is
that
they
will
in
a
city
like
Thousand,
Oaks,
a
mid-side
city
or
a
small
City,
is
that
this
project
goes
in
100
percent
no
parking
whatsoever
and
that
the
city
is
looked
at
as
part
of
well.
Why
don't
you
put
a
parking
lot
next
door,
because
the
Assumption
from
Sacramento
is
that
people
don't
have
vehicles?
They
don't
need
to
do
that
because
they're
next
to
a
Transit
Hub,
that's
not
reality!
That's
not
going
to
happen
and
to
your
point,
Mr,
Powers,
I,
agree.
B
O
So
just
the
way
that
they
wrote
this
it
there
are
required
setbacks.
It
was
five
feet
now.
It's
four
feet
for
side
and
and
backyard
setbacks.
What
this
law
does?
What?
What
are
the
changes
that
they
do?
Is
they
say
that
they
need
to
be
able
to
build
a
800
square
foot
Adu
on
the
property?
So
if
you
cannot
build
it
in
the
backyard,
for
example,
but
there
is
room
in
the
front
yard
that
would
meet
this
requirement.
That
is
something
that
they
would
set
aside.
O
The
front
yard
setbacks
right
now,
for
example,
typically
in
residential,
it's
a
20-foot
front
yard
setback
right,
so
that's
kind
of
how
they're
addressing
that
or
open
space.
So
you
look
at
open
space,
for
example,
that
might
be
a
a
deck
or
a
balcony
of
some
kind.
We
consider
that
open
space
in
some
situations,
so
it's
that
type
of
situation.
O
Where
they're
saying
hey
we're
going
to
make
you
build
an
Adu
or
allow
the
city
we're
going
to
make
the
city
allow
at
Adu
of
800
square
feet
if
they
can't
fit
it
perfectly
in
the
backyard.
For
example,
again
I
mean
very
high
level
here
as
an
example,
because
you
can
have
all
kinds
of
hypotheticals,
but
that
is
I
think
what
they're
doing
with
that
they're.
B
Very
good,
my
sixth
question
is
that.
B
We
are
looking
at
prevailing
wage
in
ab2668,
SB,
35
and
ab2011,
and
for
the
people
at
home,
prevailing
wage
is
actually
Sacramento
telling
the
developer.
How
much
to
pay
people
to
work
on
a
project.
When
I
speak
to
developers
who
develop
Schools
public
buildings
and
so
forth,
they
communicate
to
me
that
it
is
usually
three
times
more
expensive
to
have
prevailing
wage
for
what
they
pay
the
workers
than
if
they
would
do
it
on
the
open
market.
O
So
you
mentioned
public
works
or
public
projects.
So
when
we
have
a
public
works
project,
we
do
pay
preparingly
wage
again
for
the
public.
This
is
a
wage
that
the
director
of
the
of
the
industrial
relations
they
set
for
each
area,
and
so
it
is
typical
union
wages
a
lot
of
times.
Generally
people
talk
about
union
wages
or
prevailing
wages.
There
is
a
component
to
ensuring
that
there's
a
piece
of
that
number
that
goes
to
continual
training
for
journeyman
and
continual
training
for
apprenticeships.
O
That's
part
of
this
program
there's
also
certified
payroll
that
they
have
to
follow.
So
to
your
point,
there
are
a
number
of
requirements
for
it,
but
yes,
overall
it
is
a
a
set
wage
that
is
definitely
higher
than
you
would
say.
Maybe
just
out
in
the
public
I
agree
with
that
statement.
But
again
this
is
again
a
process
to
incentivize,
but
also
to
get
Workforce
there
too,
to
build
it
right.
So
that's
one
of
the
other
challenges
that
you
might
have
is
getting
the
workforce
to
to
build
it
and
find
the
workforce
to
do
that.
B
B
S
So
I
think
that's
my
guess
as
to
it.
That's
how
I
read
the
legislation
so
take
that
for
what
it's
worth.
B
I
appreciate
the
thoughts
I
look
at
as
another
way
in
which
Sacramento
intent
is
good
to
provide
affordable
housing,
but
because
of
the
legislation
and
prevailing
wage
they're
now
driving
it
up
to
making
it
not
affordable,
anyways.
Those
are
my
last
questions
for
for
staff.
So
let's
do
the
following.
If
we
can
move
into
public
comment
but
I'm
not
seeing
any
someone
signed
up
so
Madam
clerk,
no
one
for
public
comment
at
this
point,
terrific,
with
staff
like
to
comment.
B
B
Do
now,
let's
do
Mr
Engler,
because
Mr
Adam
had
the
one
previously.
C
R
B
As
mayor
I've
got
the
responsibility
of
creating
our
annual
City
committee
commission
assignment
list
and
in
your
packet
to
my
Council
member's
consideration
for
2023
lists,
I
strive
for
balance
and
your
expertise
in
the
various
areas
and
I
think
we
with
city
managers,
help
I,
think
we've
done
a
pretty
decent
job,
based
on
your
expertise
and
interests.
I'm.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
accept
that
list.
B
Here
with
that,
did
you
have
a
question
Mr
Newman
before
we
do
the
motion,
or
were
you
looking
to
make
the
motion.
P
Both
I
have
I'm
happy
to
defer
to
my
colleague,
Mr
Engler,
on
the
motion.
It
really
had
more
of
a
comment:
I'm
overall,
very
pleased
with
the
committee
assignments,
I
think,
city
manager
and
and
you
Mr
Mayor,
for
dividing
up
the
labor
so
nicely.
The
comment
errors
is
a
question.
I
got
from
a
couple
of
our
residents
who
noticed
that
the
ad
hoc
committee
on
homelessness
has
gone
away
and
they
they're
they're
dismayed.
They
were
dismayed
by
that
and
saying
so.
P
That
means
you're
going
to
stop
working
on
homelessness
and
I.
Just
wanted
to
reassure
as
long
as
I'm
sitting
in
this
chair
and
I'm
I'm.
Only
speaking
for
myself,
but
I'm
sure
Others,
May,
I,
see
I
see
some
other
nodding
heads
here.
This
is
not
going
away.
P
They're
set
up
to
do
specific
things,
but
I
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
this
Council
every
year
revisits
its
priorities
and
the
number
one
priority
this
year
is
addressing
homelessness
and
there
are
three
specific
action
items
under
that:
the
77
unit
project
at
AT,
Quality
Inn,
which
we
are
standing
up,
we've
already
broken
ground
on
the
navigation
Center
out
in
Newbury,
Park
Rancho
Conejo
area,
which
is
also
in
process,
and
then
the
third
point
is
exploring
other
Partnerships
to
support
homeless
services
and
no
one.
P
No
one
is
suggesting
homelessness
has
gone
away
or
is
done
or
we've
solved
it
or
anything
like
that.
We're
not
saying
that
and
it's
I'm
sure
many
of
us
have
thought
about
our
homeless
neighbors
these
past
few
days
in
the
cold
and
the
rain,
and
they
are
still
there
and
we
are
still
working
on
that
and
that
will
continue
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
point
about
what
what's
reflected
there.
Thank.
K
Mr
Powers
and
it's
a
good
one,
councilmember
Newman
and
I-
think
the
public
can
sometimes
misread
those
things.
Actually,
the
work
of
the
the
on
homelessness,
as
you
mentioned,
is
a
top
Council.
Priority
will
continue
to
be
so
and
it
it
now
becomes
even
more
so.
The
work
of
the
entirety
of
the
five,
the
ad
hoc
committees
are
a
tool,
a
vehicle.
K
That's
the
state
allows
utilization
for,
in
certain
circumstances,
for
two
members
of
a
body
to
work,
and
in
this
case
these
these
groups
meet
and
they
usually
deal
with
highly
sensitive
issues,
and
so
in
this
case
there
was
a
lot
of
contract
negotiation
that
occurred.
Those
contract
negations
can't
can't
easily
happen
in
an
environment
like
this
on
the
dice.
So
in
this
case
we
were
very
fortunate.
In
the
last
year
with
two
major
successes:
the
Quality
Inn,
you
referenced
the
navigation
Center,
which
is
advancing
forward.
K
K
We
have
a
lot
of
work
left
to
do
as
we
as
we
move
forward
to
get
these
facilities
open,
we'd
love
to
have
the
large
Drive
facility
up
and
running
if
we
could,
before
we
get
into
the
next
rainy
season
next
year,
so
that
our
folks
that
are
out
in
the
field
are
not
out
having
to
to
notify
encampments
and
in
advance
of
big
rains
like
we
did
over
the
last
few
days.
Thank.
Q
Thank
you
mayor.
The
council
is
definitely
concerned
about
the
future
when
it
comes
to
homelessness,
and
that's
evidenced
by
the
fact
that
when
we
voted
for
the
30
units
at
the
navigation
center
for
the
modular
housing,
we
also
voted
to
be
able
to
expand
up
to
50.
as
needed
and
I
suspect
that
will
be
needed.
So
we're
thinking
about
the
future.
Definitely.
D
Yeah,
just
real
quickly,
I
want
to
tag
along
a
little
bit
with
with
council
member
Newman
had
said.
Is
that
because
we
in
the
past
three
or
four
years,
the
homeless
committee,
the
ad
hoc
committee
was
able
to
move
things
forward
to
where
we
are
now?
D
That
does
not
mean
that
one
that
we're
done
with
the
job,
but
that
as
Mr
power
says,
we
are
now
as
a
group
approaching
it,
we
all
embrace
the
idea
that
we
need
to
take
active
steps
to
address
homelessness
and
to
to
help
those
who
are
unhoused.
Now.
The
fact
that
the
committee
dissolved
and
is
now
resident
with
the
entire
Council
does
not
preclude
us
from
taking
further
action.
B
B
B
B
K
Thanks
so
much
mayor
back
to
me,
we
will
have
another
meeting
in
two
weeks
on
the
24th
of
January.
Right
now
we
have
a
special
presentation
announcing
our
one
city,
one
book
program
for
the
year
ahead.
We
actually
have
two
public
hearings
currently
slated
for
that
evening.
One
a
municipal
code,
Amendment
relating
to
columbariums
for
a
a
religious
use,
I
believe
and
then
a
a
zone
change
over
on
Crescent
way
to
former
Mana
facility
on
Crescent
way.
K
We
also
anticipate
having
exclusive
negotiating
agreement
returning
to
council
for
the
Hillcrest
property,
along
with,
depending
on
how
interviews
go
the
potential
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
traffic
Transportation
Commission
appointments.
That's
what
we
have
currently
slated
for
the
24th
I
hope
everyone
has
a
wonderful
evening.
B
Before
we
adjourn,
I
would
like
to
officially
welcome
council
member
Mikey
Taylor
Mr
David
Newman
I,
look
forward
to
your
insights,
your
energy
and
enthusiasm
here
to
bring
solutions
to
the
city
of
Thousand
Oaks.
Welcome.
Until
then,
we
adjourn
until
our
regular
meeting
January
24th.
We
are
adjourned.