►
Description
December 14, 2020
A
A
B
C
A
E
A
B
B
B
Also
related
to
that
matter
is
a
supplemental
packet
which
was
distributed
to
the
planning
commission
this
afternoon.
This
supplemental
packet
contains
correspondence
related
to
the
starbucks
application.
This
material
will
be
presented
to
the
planning
commission
as
part
of
the
packet
of
january
11th
meeting,
and
this
is
all
I
have
for
now.
A
A
For
that
I
know
we
have
one
public
speaker,
mr
cox,
if
you
were
going
to
speak
on
that
item,
you
can
drop
off
at
this
point,
because
again
it's
been
moved
to
january
11th.
If
it's
a
general
public
comment,
you
have
as
to
something
else
we'll
get
to
you
and
as
part
of
our
agenda,
I
did
want
to
have
a
few
announcements
myself.
A
I
initially
wanted
to
congratulate
our
former
mayor,
al
adam,
for
re-election
in
getting
what
I
believe
was
the
most
votes
by
a
city
council
person
and
to
congratulate
our
newest
city
council
person,
kevin
mcnamee.
I
look
forward
to
both
of
their
leadership
on
the
next
four
years,
especially
as
to
the
general
plan
update
and
amendment
we're
going
to
be
doing.
A
So
again,
thank
you
for
that
and
to
also
congratulate
our
new
mayor
pro
tem
bob
engler,
and
to
thank
mr
angler
and
also
our
council
member
ed
jones,
for
I
thought
was
a
very
congenial
and
amazing
display
of
of
coming
together
by
both
nominating
each
other
for
mayor
pro
tem.
So
thank
you
for
that
moment
for
both
of
you.
Lastly,
thank
yous
and
congratulations
to
mark
town,
our
community
development
director
who
has
been
retiring.
A
Although
the
seats
may
be
changing
a
little
bit,
including
the
very
one,
I'm
sitting
in
the
city
has
continued
run
by
fantastic,
dedicated,
very
knowledgeable
people
and
to
always
try
to
make
sure
our
city
is
as
good
as
they
can
be
with
that.
Let's
go
on
to
item
six,
the
consent
calendar
commissioners.
Any
comments
about
this
consent
calendar.
A
A
D
A
A
B
B
D
G
This
is
the
area
photo
of
aerial
photo
of
the
proposed
site
to
the
north
of
the
property
is
a
self
storage?
Building
to
the
north
east
is
a
property
with
three
single-family
homes,
and,
if
you
can
remember,
this
is
the
site
of
a
recently
approved
self-storage
facility
on
willow
lane
to
the
to
the
south
or
to
the
northeast.
Further
northeast
is
the
nursery.
G
As
a
project,
sam
summary,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
construct
a
one-story
home
on
each
of
the
five
legally
created
lots.
There
will
be
a
single
driveway
going
through
lot
three
to
the
rest
of
the
residences
grading.
There
will
be
great
encroachment
within
25
percent
or
greater
slope
there.
The
light
line
adjustment
will
involve
four
of
the
five
lots:
that's
slots,
62,
63,
64
and
65..
G
The
purpose
of
the
line
adjustment
is
to
redraw
the
lines
to
minimize
disturbance
within
the
natural
slopes
of
six
lots,
64
and
65,
which
you
will
see
in
later
slides
all
the
utilities
going.
All
the
new
retail
utilities
providing
services
to
the
single
family
homes
will
be
placed
on
the
ground
and
there
are
no
protected
trees
that
will
be
impacted
by
this
project.
G
G
G
G
Well,
let
me
back
up
a
little
bit
as
you
can
see.
64
and
65
are
predominantly
steep
slopes,
natural
tearing,
25
or
greater
after
the
proposed
light
line
adjustment.
If
it's
approved,
then
there
will
be
enough
development
pads
that
are
flat
enough
for
to
to
minimize
encroachment
within
25
or
greater
slope.
G
B
G
Lot
a
has
an
overall
lot
size
of
15
182
square
feet
with
with
forty
percent
of
it
being
twenty
five
percent
or
greater
lot
lot,
a
at
thirteen
thousand
square
feet,
fifty
six
percent
of
it
and
so
and
so
forth.
La
la
b
has
76
percent
natural
slope
c,
72
and
d
at
33,
so
the
encroachment
here
is
for
lat.
G
One
lottery
is
495
square
feet,
which
is
8.1
percent
off
the
25
slope
and
12
for
lats,
a
two
percent
for
lot
b
and
very
minimal
for
lat
c
lat
is
one
percent,
so
adding
the
totals
of
the
total
of
the
25
percent
or
greater
slope.
It
comes
up
to
69
000
square
feet,
which
is
61
percent
of
the
project
area.
Out
of
that,
the
total
disturbed
area
would
be
1800
square
feet
around
1900
square
feet
and
that
that
represents
2.7
percent
of
the
25
or
greater
slope.
G
This
have
you
seen
the
you've
seen
this
map
before
this
is
the
proposed
lot
line
and
the
next
slide
will
show
you
the
locations
of
the
houses
within
this
with
this
map.
So
this
shows
you
how
much
encroachment
is
being
that
is
being
used
up
here,
so
small
portions
of
each
of
the
lot,
each
of
the
resulting
luck.
G
G
G
This
is
a
depiction
of
the
conceptual
landscape
plans.
This
is
not
a
final
design.
This
is
just
conceptual.
The
final
design
will
be
reviewed
and
approved
by
at
the
staff
level
by
our
landscape
consultant.
As
you
can
see
it,
it
features
lots
of
trees.
Some
of
them
are
oak
trees
that
will
be
planted
to
to
reduce
the
visibility
from
the
freeway.
G
So,
as
far
as
setback
height
and
parking
standards,
it's
it's
been
outlined
in
the
staff
report,
and
this
complies
with
the
setback,
height
and
parking
standards
of
the
municipal
code.
The
contemporary
architecture
style
has
earth
tone-colored,
taco,
concrete
tiles
and
roof
materials,
as
called
four
in
our
precise
planet
design
guidelines.
G
Requires
minimal
grading,
step
floors
and
angled
roof
angle
structures,
sloping
roof
along
the
slope
and
and
landscaping.
These
are
all
features
of
this
project.
The
projects
has
has
fully
complied
with
our
thousand
municipal
codes
and
both
the
precise
plan
of
design
guidelines
and
the
free,
the
free
freeway
corridor
policy.
G
The
applicant
is
also
requesting
a
an
underground
utility
waiver.
The
municipal
code
provides
certain
criteria
to
waive
underground
requirement,
and
these
are
geological
soil
condition,
topographic
topographical
conditions,
existing
of
overhead
lines
and
cost
of
undergrounding
staff
is
supporting
this
to
due
to
the
existing
existence
of
existing
utility
lines
near
the
project.
G
There
will
be
a
100
foot,
brush
clearance
modification
zone
as
required
by
the
fire
department.
This
a
brush
clearance
easement,
will
be
offered
to
the
surrounding
property
owner
so
that
the
responsibility
of
brush
clearance
will
fall
upon
the
applicant
not
on
the
adjacent
property
owners,
and
these
are
conditions
that's
required.
The
applicant
to
provide
to
before
the
building
permit
is
issued.
G
All
residences
will
be
on
city
sewer.
Four
of
the
residents
of
the
five
so
four,
which
is
up
on
the
hill,
will
be
on
its
own
water
wells,
because
the
finished
floor
for
each
exceeds
966
feet
in
elevation
and
our
city,
water
service
would
not
have
enough
pressure
to
provide
at
that
at
that
height.
Although
the
the
fire
spring
sprinklers
would
be
connected
to
city
water,.
G
G
A
C
C
G
C
G
C
C
C
C
C
G
C
Okay,
moving
on
to
water,
I
believe
you'd
mentioned
that
at
least
some
of
the
properties
that
would
be
created
here
would
have
individual
wells,
and
my
question
on
that
is
whether
one
property
digging
a
well
would
affect
access
to
water
for
an
adjacent
property
or
for
any
neighboring
property.
I
know
I
know
this
has
been
a
pretty
contentious
issue
out
in
the
san
joaquin
valley.
E
E
Yes,
it
it
definitely
can.
It
just
depends
on
what
the
groundwater
table
is
like
in
this
area,
and
that's
why
the
the
city
of
thousand
oaks?
We
don't
permit
the
wells
that
goes
through
the
county,
so
the
county
will
be
responsible
for
permitting
these
wells
and
as
part
of
that,
they
will
have
to
have
a
study
and
they'll
have
to
have
a
geologist
recommend
these
wells,
so
that
will
have
to
go
through
the
county
to
permit
that.
C
This
was
a
long
hillcrest
drive
at
the
corner
of
houston
and
with
the
idea
that
that,
while
there
wouldn't
be
an
immediate
requirement
to
underground
lines,
the
assessment
district
would
would
amass
the
funds
and
then
underground
them.
So
that
was
six
years
ago
and
the
lines
are
still
above
ground
there
and
here
we're
in
an
even
more
sensitive
place
to
to
fire,
and
we
know
that
lines
above
ground
can
be
a
fire
danger.
C
G
I'm
not
can't
recall
anything
in
particular,
I
mean
it
for
for
all
the
cases
that
I
brought
before
the
planning
commission,
most
of
the
underground
utility
waivers,
have
been
approved
by
the
commission.
I
don't
know
if
mr
bussell
here
would
have
knowledge
of
any
capital
improvement
to
underground
lines.
E
The
most
recent
underground
we
did
with
the
residential
housing
project
was
the
one
on
hillcrest
in
lone
oak.
That
is
just
completing
right
now
that
undergrounding
project
there's
been
some
multi-family
projects
where
we've
done
undergrounding.
Typically
for
the
single
family
homes,
we
have
not
been
requiring
underground
for
those
for
those
projects.
H
A
H
H
Newberry
road
is
another
example
that
we
use
those
funds
to
partner
with
the
developers
to
process
that,
because
of
the
rule,
20b
discounts,
we
can
get
from
southern
california
edison
for
any
areas
over
600
feet,
so
that
would
get
us
the
maximum
amount
of
underground.
We
can
get
for
our
dollar
money.
So
that's
the
process
we've
been
using
and
it's
been
very
successful.
H
C
A
F
Nelson
boss,
go
ahead
on
the
on
the
same
vein
of
this
undergrounding.
I
read
initially
in
the.
I
think
it's
in
the
summary
it
says
all
new
utilities
serving
the
homes
will
be
placed
underground
and
then
the
next
end
says
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
waiver
of
the
requirement
to
underground
existing
overhead
utilities
along
the
front
edge
of
lot
three
on
skyline
drive.
G
F
F
G
F
When
I
was
out
of
the
site,
I
spoke
to
one
of
the
neighbors
who's
got
an
existing
home
there,
john
condon,
and
I
asked
him
if
what
he
knew
about
the
project
and
he
said
that
he
had
not
been
reached
out
to
by
anybody
regarding
it.
I
didn't
do
a
measurement,
I'm
not
sure
if
he's
500
feet
away
or
not,
but
just
full
disclosure.
I
did
speak
to
that
gentleman,
but
my
so
my
question
is:
is
how
is
this
going
to
impact
the
drainage
in
that
area?
B
A
A
A
We
you
would
mention
the
storage
facility,
just
as
a
general
question.
Is
there
a
way
to
make
sure
that
the
dirt
hauling
is
not
going
to
be
concurrent
with
those
two
projects?
At
the
same
time?
Is
there
some
way
of
scheduling
those
things
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
done
at
the
same
time?
So
we
don't
have
duplicate,
duplicity
of
dirt,
hauling.
At
the
same
time,.
G
A
Again,
just
trying
to
see
if
there's
ways
to
minimize
the
effect
on
neighbors,
to
the
extent
that
there
would
be
that
kind
of
issue
the
the
word
I
know
the
the
applicant
which
we'll
get
to
in
a
second
owns
all
of
the
properties
at
this
point.
So
an
easement
with
regard
to
the
road
isn't
necessarily
applicable
at
the
moment,
because
you
can
have
an
easement
against
yourself,
but
at
some
point,
if
they
do
sell,
is
there
any
thought
with
regard
to?
A
G
G
E
G
A
B
B
A
B
C
F
B
No
sir
other
than
other
than
in
the
past,
I've
run
across
them
at
the
planning
commission
meetings.
You
know
if
I
ran
across
a
neighbor,
we
discussed,
you
know
things,
but
I'm
not
sure
which
neighbors
we
talked
to,
but
I
was
there,
I
think,
for
two
of
the
different
commission
hearings.
One
was
for
the
neighbor
next
to
us
a
residential
lot,
and
then
I
was
at
one
for
the
storage
complex.
A
A
F
This
is
commissioner
boss.
Checking
in
there's
no
public
comments.
There
are
no
public
comments.
All
right
copy
that
sounds
like
silence
is
consent.
Then
it
looks
like
all
the
ducks
in
a
row
all
the
questions
that
I
had
were
answered,
so
I'm
terrified
to
do
it,
but
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
all
these
numbers
straight
to
move
to
pass
this.
E
B
C
I
do
I
echo
the
comments
that
have
been
made
so
far.
I'm
glad
that
the
grading
is
minimal.
I
I
strongly
would
prefer
to
see
the
lines
being
undergrounded.
I
understand
why
they're
not-
and
I
learned
something
tonight
from
mr
free
about
that
the
city
is
moving
ahead
in
several
places
with
undergrounding
of
lines.
I
hope
that
will
happen
here.
C
I
don't
consider
that
a
showstopper,
but
I
would
like
to
see
that
happen
here
and
in
as
many
places
as
possible
in
the
future,
but
with
regard
to
this
project,
it
seems
very
well
done
and
completely
in
compliance
with
city
code,
except
for
the
waivers
we're
granting
tonight.
So
I
will
support
this.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you,
commissioner
newman
I
I
will
add
my
final
two
cents
and
that
it
was
great
to
see
that
the
staff
in
the
applicant
work
so
close
together
to
get
all
of
the
issues
done,
making
it
very
easy
for
us
to
kind
of
go
through.
I
mean
there's
some
issues
that
obviously
are
concerned,
but
I'm
very
appreciative
of
the
job
that
staff
and
the
applicant
did
in
terms
of
making
sure
all
the
things
were
crossed
off
and
things
were
checked
off.
So
I
will
support
it
as
well.
F
E
A
C
C
Perhaps
the
darkest
phase
of
this
pandemic
right
now
and
I'll
leave
it
to
commissioner
lansin
to
speak,
as
he
often
eloquently
does
about
the
need
for
us
all
to
take
to
take
care,
but
I
didn't
want
to
see
the
year
out
without
without
commending
the
staff
for
all
the
good
work
it's
been
doing,
despite
everything
that's
going
on.
So
thank
you
for
that.
A
A
Los
robles
is
overwhelmed.
They
have
no
further
beds
for
icus,
I
don't
think
they're
even
taking
new
people
new
patients
now,
unless
it's
cardiac
arrest.
So
again,
politics
aside
religion,
aside,
everything
aside
follow
the
rules
stay
home.
If
you
can
do
everything
you
can
so
we
can
get
through
this
port,
take
the
vaccine
and
hopefully
get
back
to
our
lives.
B
Thank
you,
chair
lansin.
We
do
not
have
any
follow-up
items,
announcements
or
upcoming
issues.
We
do
have
two
meetings
scheduled
for
january
11th
and
january
25th.
Each
of
those
meeting
dates
have
an
item
scheduled
currently.
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
starbucks
has
moved
to
the
january
11th
meeting.
We
have
a
municipal
code
amendment
scheduled
for
january
25th
that
it
involves
evaluation
of
objective
standards
as
prescribed
by
state
legislation,
so
I'll
be
coming
forward
to
the
planning
commission
for
recommendation
to
our
city
council,
and
that
is
all
I
have.