►
From YouTube: BOA Meeting 09 09 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
B
B
A
You
first
item
on
the
agenda:
is
the
approval
of
the
August
20th
2015
minutes
gonna.
Give
this
motion
in
a
second
approve
motion
by
mr.
Stein
second
by
mr.
Dahle,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
for
the
record.
Second
item
on
the
agenda
is
in
an
application
for
an
adjustment
on
a
earlier
variance.
Permit
number
one
six
three
two,
oh
and
mr.
Stein
will
recuse
himself
from
this,
as
he
has
an
interest
in
ESCO
manufacturing,
a
small
and
small
interest,
Ken
all.
B
Right
this
is
application
for
building
permit
number
one.
Six
two
two
two
ESCO
manufacturing
application
was
submitted
requesting
to
a
large
and
existing
non-conforming
industrial
facility
by
constructing
a
non-conforming
offices.
Addition
said,
structure
proposed
to
be
constructed.
Forty
five
point:
nine
feet
from
the
front
north
side
of
the
property
line
where
75
foot
setback
is
required.
16
point:
oh
five
feet
from
this
side:
east
property
line
where
a
minimum
of
50
foot
setback
is
required.
B
B
I
really
goofed
up
on
the
first
thing
scratch
all
that
this
is
application
for
building
permit
number
163
two
0s
Coast
manufacturing
company,
an
application
was
submitted
requesting
a
large,
an
existing
thank
former
industrial
facility
by
constructing
a
non-conforming
offices.
Addition,
size
structure
proposed
to
be
constructed.
Forty
five
point:
nine
feet
from
the
front
north
property
line
or
a
minimum
of
75
feet.
B
Setback
is
required
and
twenty
four
point
six
feet
from
the
side:
east
property
line,
50-foot
setback
is
required
and
yes,
as
you
know,
that
on
7:23
15,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
approved
the
application
from
number
16
to
2
to
2
enlarged
and
existing
legal
9
performing
ITU's
owned
industrial
facility
by
constructing
the
non-conforming
5,000
square
foot.
Two-Story
office
additions
50
by
50
footprint,
2,500
square
feet
for
4,
with
a
288
square
foot
14
by
24,
canopy
drawer
fan
tree
40
5.9
feet
from
the
north
and
1605
from
the
west.
B
And
they
just
wanted
to
large-
that
building
now
from
the
50
feet
to
70
feet?
This
says
also
allowed
them
to
do
some
interconnection
between
the
two
buildings
that
are
actually
aligned
up
much
nicer
and
everything
else.
They
lengthen
their
20.
What
they've
also
pushed
it
over
from
our
original
16
feet
to
24
feet
and
thereby
lessening
the
reset
back
on
the
east
side
that
we
had
before
they're,
maintaining
the
exact
same
setback
we
had
from
the
north
side
before
I
get.
We
just
went
from
50
to
70.
C
D
B
A
You
any
other
questions
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
motion
by
mr.
Albertson.
Sorry,
second,
by
mr.
stone
burger
any
other
discussion.
All
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
applicant
Garry
and
Anita
Shephard
permit
number
one
six,
three
one:
nine
or
seeking
a
conditional
use
approval
to
rebuild
a
building
at
621,
First
Avenue,
North
East.
This
is
one
that's
in
a
c3
commercial
district
and
due
to
financing
reasons
when
they
need
a
conditional
use.
B
Again,
this
is
application
number
sick,
one,
six,
three
one,
nine
conditional
use
request
an
appeal
application
was
submitted
request
in
the
ability
to
rebuild
an
existing
non-conforming
structure,
use
a
single-family
dwelling
located
in
the
c3
highway
commercial
district
and
the
event
of
casually
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
21
to
803
18,
which
basically
allows
for
the
rebuilding
of
any
i1
i2
use
in
this
zone.
Again.
This
is
a
conditional
use
within
that
aspect.
B
Refinancing
issues
have
compelled
the
applicants
to
seek
Board
of
Adjustment,
prove
affordability,
to
use
and
rebuild
this
1902
single-family
dwelling
in
the
event
that
it
would
ever
be
damaged
beyond
sixty
percent
of
its
value.
This
is
a
substandard
c3,
Highway
commercial
zone,
parcel
that
has
been
used
heretofore
as
a
single-family
property,
but
single-family
developments
are
not
permitted
used
in
the
c3
zone.
B
A
B
B
E
Didn't
understand:
we've
lived
there
for
40
years
or
almost
40
years.
We've
never
had
trouble
financing
or
anything
else.
I
didn't
understand
why
we
needed
to
rezone,
so
I
just
said
to
leave
it
the
way
it
was
so
I
guess
it
wasn't
clear
that
I
was
gonna
end
up
with
all
tricky
a
tricky
property
to
finance.
It
was
always
able
to
finance
it
to
pass
a
problem.