►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Comm Mtgs 10 22 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
A
D
A
B
Conditional
use
approval
to
operate
a
home
daycare
business
out
of
a
single-family
dwelling
located
in
the
r1
single-family
residential
district
per
ordinance
applicant
for
condition.
Yeah
I
mean,
is
seeking
approval
to
care
for
up
to
12
children,
including
two
of
her
own
and
her
owner
occupied
home
ever
approved.
The
board
may,
if
approved
by
this
board
applicant
plans
to
register
with
the
state
she
has
received
and
will
comply
with
the
ordinance
requirements
for
the
home
occupations
per
ordinance
applicant,
will
regularly
utilize
the
main
and
lower
levels
of
approximately
three
thousand
56
square
feet.
B
Split-Level
dwelling
for
daycare
business.
According
to
the
applicants
stamina
site
plan,
the
property
has
a
double
garage
and
26
foot
wide
concrete
driving
a
parking
area
allowing
three
legal
off
street
parking
spaces.
The
minimum
number
required
is
to
the
board
to
consider
require
an
additional
complying
office.
Great
park
uses
as
secondary
uses,
approval
good.
A
A
We
should
we
don't
have
a
member
of
the
police
department
here
tonight.
Do
it
how
about
fire,
did
I
see
chip
walk-in
chip?
Do
you
look
at
these
see
if
you
have
any
issues
or
questions
on
the
home
daycare
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea
if
we'd
run,
those
addresses
by
the
police
department
make
sure
there's
been
no
complaints
or
issues
at
those
addresses
before
we
approve
them.
Chip
with
Fire
Department.
E
A
A
Anyone
else
have
any
questions
that
I'll
close.
The
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
Albertson
second
by
mr.
stone
barger
any
other
discussion
on
it
home,
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
applicant
Alyssa
Hart
permit
number
one
six
for
100
request
the
variance
for
the
property
in
1334
harmony
lane
in
regard
to
a
garage.
B
This
portion
of
the
garage
went
through
a
Board
of
Adjustment
back
in
1976
and
was
granted
to
be
built
with
a
three-foot
offset
apparently
in
76,
but
the
actual
construction
document
or
survey
now
indicates
it
was
only
2.3
feet,
but
what
they
are
requesting
to
do.
They
requested
just
to
build
straight
back
with
in
line
with
the
existing
garage.
B
They
have
a
bunch
of
utilities,
gas
lines
and
water
lines
everything
that
comes
in
over
here,
so
it
makes
it
real
hard
to
try
to
push
it
over
that
haven't
really
cleared
all
of
that
and
they're,
basically
just
wanting
to
stay
in
line
with
what
they
got,
so
they
can
get
some
of
their
boats
and
trailers
and
stuff
off
the
street
again.
This
is
another
one
that
we
have
not
been
contacted
by
anybody
for
or
against
with
regard
to
this
issue,
so
the.
A
B
F
C
A
By
mr.
Arnold's
I
included
it
to
request
that
they
put
the
rain
gutters
on
that
side.
That
slopes
to
the
say
goodbye
mr.
McGuire
any
other
discussion,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
third
item
on
the
agenda.
I'm.
Sorry,
fourth
item
on
the
agenda
is
Alvin
and
Diane.
Wisenheimer
Poorna
permit
number
164
one
to
feel
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
ordinance
in
regard
to
a
primary
structure
located
at
120
and
124
third
street
southwest.
B
B
Again,
a
little
bit
of
history
here,
this
was
constructed
in
2007
as
a
complaint
complying
duplex
here
with
the
detached
garage.
The
applicant
now
needs
a
place
for
rehabilitation.
He
has
some
physical
forms
and
what
they
also
want
to
do
is
they
want
to
take
this
garage
now
and
attach
a
breezeway
between
it,
so
they
can
go
by
a
ramp
from
the
existing
garage
to
the
house
which
you're
not
able
to
do
from
the
inside
garage,
because
the
steps
from
that
garage
into
the
house
and
then.
B
B
E
A
All
whoa
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
A
motion
to
approve
motion
by
mr.
stone
burger
say
goodbye
mr.
Stein,
any
further
discussion
on
er,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
50
item
on
the
agenda.
Spawn
fake
homes,
permit
number
one
six,
two
five,
eight
two
peals
a
zoning
ordinance
in
regard
to
the
property
at
one
four,
three,
four
second
Street
Northwest.
B
What
happened
here
is
they
built
the
house
and
there's
two
sets
of
plans
without
their.
He
started
with
a
set
of
plans.
That
said,
it
was
gonna,
be
a
twenty
foot
and
Nate's
here.
If
you
have
any
questions
for
Nate
again,
this
was
public
notice.
All
public
notice
requirements
are
met
and
nobody's
I
was
contacted
by
one
neighbor
just
to
find
out
what
the
issues
were,
but
they
neither
had
yes
or
no
to
it.
I'm
just
gonna.
Let
me
tell
you
what.
K
K
My
foundation
excavator
got
a
plan
that
had
the
garage
24
feet
deep
when
I
stake
out
that
lot,
I
give
the
foundation
contractor
reference
points
for
the
back
wall
line.
He
pulls
his
measurements
off
that
back
wall
line
forward
and
since
that
garage
is
24
feet
deep
now,
instead
of
22
feet
deep,
it
pushed
it
into
the
front
yard
setback
I
about
1
foot
4
inches.
B
B
E
K
K
J
E
K
A
C
K
K
K
H
A
A
D
B
C
J
A
B
B
B
I
D
A
B
D
B
D
A
Need
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
last
vote,
because
both
of
those
are
alternates
and
we
have
a
full
quorum.
We
need
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
last
item
number
five,
because
both
the
ELMO
motion
by
mr.
Stein
stand
by
mr.
Dahle
for
the
record
emotional
leave
by
mr.
Stein.
The
second
will
be
by
mr.
Dahle.
B
B
I
introduced
it
coho,
an
applicant
Travis
UT,
DBA,
Travis
Outfitters
applicant
was
submitted
for
the
construction
of
a
non-conforming
commercial
building
and
the
c3
highway
zone.
G1
Gateway
district
says
structure
proposed
be
constructed
as
close
as
27
feet
from
the
front
westerly
proper
line
or
minimum
forty
foot
is
required
and
with
open
on
screen
loading
facilities
facing
street
furniture.
B
The
applicants
requesting
up
there
the
applicants
requesting
the
variance
of
the
setbacks-
this
is
in
the
Gateway
overlay
district.
The
Gateway
overlay
district
and
c3
zone
has
a
40-foot
frontage.
This
has
3
frontages,
but
one
of
the
caveats
was
in
the
Gateway
district.
If
less
than
15%
of
that
yard
is
occupied
by
parking,
then
that
can
go
down
to
25
feet,
so
they
have
a
40-foot
here
have
a
40-foot
here
they
have
25
foot
here.
B
What
falls
into
this,
because
we
have
that
student
regular,
a
lot
here
as
this
little
shaded
corner
here,
is
what
he's
asking
for
variance
to
he's
doing
a
square
building
with
a
rounded
corner
versus
around
the
corner?
A
lot.
So
that's
that's
the
request.
For
that
part
and
within
the
dori
part
of
the
scenario,
I
got
a
picture
here
again.
The
Gateway
district
does
not
allow
for
doors
on
any
frontage.
He
actually
ends
he's
Harvard
by
three
frontages
here.
B
A
The
concept
with
that
in
that
part
of
the
ordinance
is
really
we
say,
doors
but
I
think
what
we
well
we've
looked
to
more
as
loading
docks.
That's
what
we've
tried
to
get
away
from.
Is
we
really
from
an
aesthetic
point
in
a
commercial
district?
We
try
to
get
away
from
the
loading
docks
and
I.
Don't
know
if
you've
got
did
they
give
us
a
picture
of
the
building?
Their
doors
are
really
not
loading,
docks
that
you
know
and
I
kind
of
looked
at
it
and
thought
aesthetically.
A
B
A
B
I
L
B
L
There
see
I
can't
run
your
button
either.
What
this
is
is
along.
The
bottom
of
those
doors
is
a
different
shade
than
the
top
of
the
door
so
that
it
will
blend
in
with
the
stonework
on
the
front
of
it.
The
idea
was
that
to
blend
these
doors
in
with
the
look
or
the
facade
of
the
building
so
that
they
wouldn't
stick
out,
you
know
the
idea
isn't
to
have
a
white
aluminum,
clad
door
with
oval
windows
in
it
like
you'd,
find
at
a
dock
or
or
at
a
service
garage
or
whatever
it
might
be.
L
The
idea
was,
you
know,
we're
gonna
put
doors
in
there
that
will
go
along
with
the
finishes
of
the
building.
Those
those
pull
through
bays
are
a
hundred
we're
proposing
they're
just
about
a
hundred
feet
deep.
We
have
four
different
pieces
of
equipment
that
we
use
to
go
out
to
job
sites
and
manufacturing
facilities,
and
that's
one
reason
for
building
this
new
facility.
The
way
we're
building
it.
Currently,
our
employees
have
to
load
and
unload
those
trucks
in
the
wintertime
across
icy
parking
lots
and
in
the
rain
and
everything
else.
L
Besides
the
fact
that,
on
the
weekends
we
pull
inventory
off
those
trucks
to
sell
the
customers
and
when
it's
10
below
outside
the
boots
are
10
below,
and
so
it
doesn't
make
it
very
conducive
to
selling
the
product.
So
so
that's
the
reasoning
for
those
doors
and
I'll
answer
any
other
questions
that
anybody
else
might
have
is.
F
L
This
is
exactly
what's
coming:
it's
not
exactly.
We've
made
some
changes,
the
curved
top
there
that
you
see
will
not
be
there
there'll
be
a
different
sort
of
roofline.
What
we've
done
is
this
was
our
conceptual
drawing
that
we
thought
we
had
pulled
down
to
get
it
within
our
budget
and
there's
a
few.
The
the
feeling
and
the
theme
of
the
building
is
going
to
be
intact,
but
there
are
some
small
things
that
aesthetically
that
will
have
to
change
just
to
get
within
our
budget.
L
A
F
J
L
I
guess
I
think
that
you
know
with
the
design
work
that
we
spent
the
architecture
dollars
that
we
spent
there's
a
reason
that
you
know
those
doors
cost
three
times
what
a
what
a
white
door
will
cost
and
we're
willing
to
make
that
investment
so
that
it
goes
with
the
so
it
it
it.
We
want
to
live
within
the
nature
of
what
the
intention
is
of
your
ordinance.
Is
you
know
we're
not
asking
we
want
to
want
to
build
an
expensive
facility
here
that
we
want
water
tone
to
be
proud
of.
L
We
don't
want
it
to
be
something.
That's
an
eyesore
and
I
believe
that
building
it
in
this
fashion
is
far
better
than
if
you've
been
by
our
place
on
highway
20,
where
we
have
to
have
all
the
equipment
outside
and
we
got
to
push
snow
around
at
all
winter
I
think
that's
a
lot
more
of
an
eyesore
than
than
what
we're
proposing
to
build
here.
I.
C
Think
you
know
my
opinion
on
the
building.
I
think
it's
a
very
attractive
building,
I
understand
what
he's
trying
to
do
there
think
going
back
to
what
Pat
said
initially
is
that
we
don't
want
a
warehouse,
type
loading
ramps
and
things
on
the
front
side.
If
you
take
those
doors
the
way
they
look,
if
you
want
to
make
a
comparison,
take
stones,
stones
have
windows
that
are
put
in
there.
They're
truckstop
out
there
to
look
like
doors
and
those
face.
C
C
C
A
Other
questions
for
the
applicant,
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing,
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion.
I'll
move
motion
by
mr.
Arnold,
a
second
second
by
mr.,
was
it
Stein.
The
other
question
to
was
on
that
the
irregular
shape
on
that
northwest
corner
I
think
if
that
was
squared
off,
they
wouldn't
have
needed
that
and
I
can
see
that
was
squirted
off
I'm.
Just
gonna
make
a
note
that
this
includes
that
yeah.
E
A
E
A
A
M
A
Item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
October
7th
2015.
The
motion
in
a
second
motion
from
mr.
Dahle
second
by
mr.
McGuire,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
hose
motion
carries
second
item
is
Dinah
tune,
performance
and
towing
6:05
sign
in
graphics,
assign
permit
number
one
for
to
a
at
two
eight
at
1402,
26th
Street
southeast.
M
M
Towing
at
forty,
no
226,
Street,
north
or
south
east,
they
they
applied,
they
want
they
applied
for
their
sign
and
in
the
eye
two
in
the
eye,
one
zoning
district,
it
has
a
10-foot
setback.
They
are
appealing
that
and
would
like
to
go
to
a
zero
setback
in
in
that
area.
We
all
public
notices
were
met.
I
did
hear
from
an
adjacent
landowner,
who
is
here,
and
he
supports
this
applicant
and
would
like
to
maybe
see
some
changes
potentially,
if
it's
something
you
guys
want
to
look
at
doing
so.
M
M
M
A
M
M
A
M
M
N
The
question
and
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
you
see
in
industrial
districts,
similar
to
agricultural
districts
and
even
some
commercial
districts,
but
rarely
a
setback,
ten
feet
or
more
basically,
because
in
the
industrial
and
egg
types
of
districts,
the
idea
is
that
the
businesses
that
will
be
in
those
districts
are
not
ones
that
are
going
to
be
window
businesses
or
drive-by
businesses,
they're
going
to
be
ones
that
you
know
you're
going
there
when
you
do
so.
The
idea
is
there
just
to
name
the
business
once
you
pull
up,
that's
more.
N
M
Right
here,
like
in
this
scenario,
would
be
ten
foot
back
from
this
blue
line,
which
would
essentially
be
a
approximately
27
feet
from
the
back
of
the
curb
to
the
edge
of
the
sign.
It
would
be
able
to
fit
within
this
green
space
area,
but
it
would
be
pretty
close
to
the
to
that
concrete
on
this
picture.
O
M
Within
setback,
they
did
maintain
their
10-foot
I
can
zoom
out
and
get
you
there,
but
they
kind
of
take
advantage
of
the
road
curving
there.
So
the
appearance
is
because
their
lot
has
that
little
curve
to
it.
When
you
drive
down
the
street,
it's
essentially
like
a
zero
setback,
because
if
you
continue
this
straight
line,
that's
kind
of
where
the
edge
of
their
sign
is
so
they
kind
of
achieved
the
same
thing
with
it,
but
they
could
maintain
the
ten
foot.
So
it
it.
O
O
F
O
And
we're
kind
of
on
a
unique
shape
there,
because
the
way
the
road,
curves
and
stuff-
it's
not
like
you're
driving
on
a
on
a
block
for,
for
you
know
six
blocks
straight.
So
you
have
time
to
see
that
I
mean
you
turn
the
corners
there,
the
farther
back.
It
is
off
the
roadway,
the
less
effective
our
signs,
gonna
be.
If
we're
gonna
spend.
You
know
five
eight
thousand
dollars
on
the
sign.
We
want
to
be
able
to
get
some
use
out
of
it.
O
Obviously-
and
you
know
we're
proposing
a
very
nice
lid
cabinet
signs,
and
everything
like
that,
so
you
know
we
in
it
would
just
look
odd
placed
back
farther
and
we
had
to
have
our
concrete
out
that
far
to
be
able
to
have
enough
parking
spaces
to
accommodate
everything
is
to
meet
all
the
other
requirements.
So
I.
I
A
I
A
I
A
Q
A
A
C
G
G
I
think
that
to
answer
the
the
general
question,
I
think
that
we
could
propose
a
pretty
simple
ordinance
amendment
that
would
amend
the
setback
requirement
for
that
specific
geographic
area,
but
but
to
suggest
that
without
complying
with
the
public
hearing
requirements
to
grant
variances
to
the
setback,
we
short
of
doing
an
ordinance
revision,
Henry
and
everybody
else
out.
There
is
going
to
have
to
come
back
before
you.
G
So
maybe
the
thing
to
do
is
for
this
board
to
recommend
the
Sanko
Board
of
Appeals
recommend
an
ordinance
revision
that
would
define
geographically,
where
you
would
allow
a
zero
setback
or
whatever
you
want
to
wear
as
it
relates
to
sign,
permit
application.
So
Tim
and
Ken
aren't
having
to
come
back
here
every
time
and,
like
Pat
said
earlier,
spend
200
bucks
just
to
hear
you
say
yes,.
A
G
The
only
other
thing,
maybe
is
that
as
this,
if
this
does
move
forward
to
an
ordinance
revision,
maybe
some
instruction
to
ken
and
Tim
and
in
the
future
is
it
any
permit.
Application
is
going
to
get
referred
to
the
Planning
Commission.
Just
so
you
know
what
he's
what
he's
being
asked
to
approve-
or
maybe
you
don't
want
him
to
do
that,
but
under
the
code
Kenny
can
refer
any
permit
application
to
the
Planning
Commission
without
needing
to
convene
the
signed
coda
Board
of
Appeals.
Maybe
we
just
do
that
just
so.
D
A
D
R
K
A
R
A
A
R
R
Yes
and
I
I
apologize
for
the
late
handout
in
the
past.
We
we
didn't
bring
the
development
agreements
to
you
and
then
last
minute
engineering
staff
said
that
would
be
a
good
idea
to
bring
it
to
you.
I'm
at
this
point,
that
document
is
just
a
draft.
We
haven't
even
asked
Stan
to
look
it
over
yet
which
we
will
do
before
that
goes
to
council.
So
it's
just
a
draft
and
in
the
future,
when
we
do
Platts
I'll
have
those
in
the
agenda.
But
what
that
document
does
is
it?
R
It
says
you
know
the
the
legal
ramifications
of
what's
going
to
be
planted
and
built,
and
it
it
goes
off
of
what
you
guys,
as
preliminary
plan
was
and
and
what
roads
will
be
constructed
and
to
what
size
and
stuff.
So
that's
what
that
document
says
and
ultimately
goes
to
the
City
Council
to
be
approved,
but
today
what
I'm?
Looking
what
we're
looking
for
is
that
you
guys
approve
the
the
plant
resolution
and
that's
I'm
gonna
pull
up
a
picture
of
that.
Plat
should
be
going,
and
this
this
is
a
plat
for
Eastwood's
18th
edition.
R
This
development
has
been
in
the
works
this
summer,
they've
they've,
annexed
it
annexed
the
property
and
zoned
it
r1,
single-family,
residential
and
now
they're
looking
to
do
plat
it.
There
they're
plotting,
33,
residential
lots
and
computers,
moving
a
little
bit
they're
planting
portions
of
10th
Avenue,
north
12th,
Avenue,
North,
26th,
Street,
East,
27th,
Street
east,
and
a
little
bit
of
ninth
Avenue
North.
R
This
plat
is
phase
one
of
the
preliminary
plan,
which
you
guys
approved.
You
know
they
have.
They
have
a
drainage
quality
facility
and
a
lot
a
again
that
went
with
the
approved
preliminary
plan
was
this
kind
of
a
formality,
since
the
preliminary
plan
has
been
approved
and
the
plat
matches
that,
but
it
still
goes
before
you
guys
and
in
the
City
Council,
and
then
that
that
document
that
I
gave
you,
which
is
the
development
agreement,
well
go
to
City
Council.
Well,
thanks.
A
R
And
so
they
don't
officially
get
to
act
on
it
till
next
Tuesday
but
I
it's
so
it's
highlighted
as
a
reminder
to
fix
what
or
change
whatever
they
say,
but
it
we
we
drafted
in
there
kind
of
what
we
anticipate
them
to
say
based
on
the
preliminary
plan.
But
of
course
they
say
something.
Different
will
of
course,
change
that
before
bringing
it
to
council
is
that
water
is.
J
S
R
Most
it'll
take
care
of
most
the
water.
The
water
will
flow
down,
27th
Street,
there's
a
hill,
so
from
about
my
cursor
South
it'll
flow
down
and
you'll
have
to
enter
into
a
pipe
and
in
tenth
Avenue
will
continue
to
flow
down
and
it'll
flow
into
out
lot,
a
which
is
a
water
quality
facility
and
then
which,
after
it
it'll
after
it
goes
into
this
pond.
It'll
eventually
fall
out
into
through
pipes
under
the
road
into
a
drainage,
easement
and
eventually
down
to
the
city
ponds
that
are
just
north
of
Willow.
R
R
Future
developments
in
this
area
will
require
another
water
quality.
Pond
that's
planned
to
go
over
here
and
that
may
be
built
in
conjunction
with
this
one
or
may
be
built
at
a
at
a
later
time,
but
another
water
quality
pond
will
need
to
go
here.
That'll
overflow,
an
outlet
into
the
river,
but
at
this
time
with
33
Lots,
that
pond
is
gonna,
be
right.
There.
A
R
A
A
R
Was
similar
how
most
of
Eastwood's
developed
I
mean
they
and
when
this
whole
quarter
section
was
developed,
they
labeled
this
area
as
being
drainage
and
park
area,
and
you
know
it
wasn't
given
initially
right
away,
it
was
planned
to
be
given
and
ultimately
it
was
given
to
the
city.
So
this
is
kind
of
following
a
similar
path
where
they
they
show,
where
they're
going
to
plan
on
doing
it,
and
then,
when
the
development
gets
to
that
area,
that's
when
it'll
get
planted
and
deeded
to
the
city
time.
T
Not
really
not
or
not
completely
all
say
it
that
way.
We
did
review
the
preliminary
plan
and
they
did
indicate
a
proposed
Park
dedication
and
then
the
park
board,
of
course,
gets
to
to
review
that
and
decide.
If
that
park,
dedication
that's
proposed
is
acceptable
or
if
they
have
an
alternative.
Now
we
listen
to
the
preliminary
plan
for
this
project.
What
a
little
month
ago,.
A
R
Most
of
this
quarter,
section
was
master
planned
as,
as
you
know,
all
of
it
was
drawn
in
the
original
master
plan.
Then
as
they
planted
it,
they
planted
pieces
and
that's
why
we're
up
to
Eastwood's
18th
edition,
because
they
did
first
editions
where
they
planted
a
couple
blocks
and
then
second
edition
where
they
did
a
couple
and
each
plant
has
followed
the
plan
and
then
and
that
you
know
that
plant
had
in.
Q
I'd
like
to
just
mention
also
that
I
think
as
a
park
and
Rec
board
and
as
this
body,
we
need
to
be
a
bit
careful
about
how
many
parks
we
actually
put
in
these
because
you're
looking
at
a
park,
maybe
two
blocks
away
already
now,
you're
gonna
add
on
another
huge
part,
it's
very
expensive
to
operate
parks.
You
know,
because
we've
got
mowing
that
is
constantly
out
there.
There's
a
ton.
J
A
Any
low-end
parks
because
you
have
too
many
that's
why
you
kind
of
look
in
the
planning
process
and
go
boy
if
here,
if
at
every
step,
you
want
ground,
but
was
it
part
of
a
master
plan
where
there
was
you
know
in
an
area
like
that
you'd,
you
know
what
are
we
one
two
were
four
blocks
by
four
blocks.
You
would
kind
of
think
one
nice
park,
rather
than
a
lot
of
little
parks,
yeah.
Q
Q
R
C
Well,
and
just
a
comment
and
I
totally
agree
with
everything
that
said,
except
in
my
mind,
if
you
tell
me
a
park,
I'm
thinking
of
a
park
where
kids
can
go,
play
and
there's
equipment
and
little
softball
field
and
play
football
and
all
those
things
a
nice,
green
grassy
area
is
nice,
but
it's
also
an
area
that
houses
cannot
be
built
on
that
was
accepted
as
a
park
and
it's
costing
the
city
a
lot
of
money
to
maintain.
But
it's
really
not
a
park
and
I
realize
I'm
not
on
the
park
board.
C
G
And
I
hope
this
isn't
that
order,
mr.
chairman,
but
but
once
it's
dedicated
as
parkland
and
some
folks
who've
been
around
the
city,
a
lot
longer
than
I
have
know
that
over
itby
south
of
highway
212
there
was
some
land.
It
was
a
former
landfill
dedicated
to
the
city
for
park
purposes
and
the
only
way
that
we
could
ever.
Maybe
this
is
a
poor
choice
of
words:
divorce
ourselves
of
that
land
that
was
dedicated
for
part
purposes.
G
You
have
to
have
a
special
election,
so
I
know
the
Park
and
Rec
board
takes
the
dedication
of
parkland
seriously,
because
once
it's
dedicated
and
the
deed
of
dedication
says
it's
for
park
purposes
under
state
statute
as
exists
today.
The
only
way
we
could
ever
not
have
that
as
part
ground
is
to
have
an
election
by
all
the
voters
in
watertown
to
say
city.
Do
you
want
to
continue
to
have
this
as
part
ground
or
not?
So
it's
a
decision.
They
weigh
very
seriously
and.
C
Q
A
Q
Would
like
to
speak
towards
that,
because
I've
been
very
involved
in
this,
that
was
master
plan
when
the
city
purchased
the
land
to
the
north.
It
was
all
intended
for
retention
and
and
in
fact
when
then
they
dedicated
the
bottom
part,
it
was
all
planned
to
have
water
that
came
surrounding
there
from
the
east
and
to
though
from
the
West
it
all
comes.
There
then
flows
down
that
Creek,
so.
A
In
the
hindsight
of
the
planning
plan,
as
it
was
designed,
it's
doing
exactly
as
it
was
planned,
but
the
current
owners
of
that
property
now
look
at
it
and
go.
We
don't
like
to
have
water
held
behind
our
homes
and
the
things
that
go
along
with
the
water
back
there.
So
now
the
city's
in
a
quandary
go
well,
it's
actually
a.
Q
J
C
As
an
example,
my
daughter
lives
in
Sioux
Falls
into
the
beautiful
area,
but
between
their
houses
and
on
the
cul-de-sac,
and
all
the
houses
to
the
south
of
them
is
a
wetland.
It's
water
retention,
it's
cattails
and
willows
growing,
and
but
that's
what
it's
there
for,
and
everybody
bought
around
that
and
they
realized
that's
what
it
was.
It's.
Q
T
Every
block,
just
a
complete
conversation,
I,
think
what's
being
proposed
as
a
park
dedication.
It
can
either
be
accepted
by
the
park
board
or
they
could
do
receive
money
and
kind
towards
a
park
that
would
maybe
be
built.
You
know
on
the
next
tier
of
developments
to
the
east.
I,
don't
think
it
has
to
be
a
hundred
percent
defined
in
the
preliminary
plan
of
court
process
that
initiates
the
discussion,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
that's
the
final,
but.
G
You
could
ask
the
question
as
well,
but
is
the
intention
for
this
to
be
dual
purpose:
that
it's
both
Park
dedication
and
drainage,
because
it
sounds
to
me
like
what
the
dedication
is
going
to
do
is
is
primarily
be
a
drainage,
facilitate
drainage.
But
it
also
may
have
some
park
features
and
is
that
some.
T
Any
retention
it's
kind
of
at
the
bottom
of
the
hill
is
where
this
proposed
Park
dedication
is,
and
it
does
include
a
dual
purpose.
They
do.
That
is
where
their
second
water
quality
facility
is
supposed
to
be
located
and
then
by
dedicating
that
to
the
city
that
allows
us
to
operate
and
maintain
the
water
quality
facility
in
adjacent
to
in
conjunction
with
the
park.
So
from
that
standpoint
it
isn't
a
bad
location
for
park
dedication
and,
of
course,
they
would
probably
put
playground
equipment
and
stuff
there
if
that's
what
words
finalized.
R
Want
to
you
know,
clarify
the
plan
at
hand.
Does
stop
at
you
know
27th
Street
and
doesn't
include
the
park
what
the
park
board.
If
they,
you
know,
decide
that
they
don't
want
Park
and
they
want
money.
I
mean
that'll.
I
mean
just
change
their
future
developments.
It
won't
change
this
one,
that's
being
presented
today,
this
one's
all
residential
lots
with
one
lot
for
drainage.
A
R
All
right,
that's
this
area
that
I've
highlighted
in
blue
and
got
a
little
lost
in
the
process,
but
this
plant,
this
property
was
annexed
and
zoned
and
did
have
a
preliminary
plan
that
was
approved
and,
and
now
we're.
You
know,
I'm
tying
up
loose
ends
and
having
it
be.
Plaited
I
have
a
picture
of
the
plat,
both
in
your
agenda
and
right
here.
R
R
A
A
M
A
A
It
into
two
it
would
have
only
had
one
building
right,
even
though
there
would
have
been
two
Lots,
five
or
less
Lots
legally
can
be
administratively
plaited,
but
many
cases
the
engineering
department
will
bring
things
to
us
just
to
make
it
a
public
notice
as
to
what's
going
on
and
keep
us
abreast
of
it
with
that
I'll
open
the
public
hearing,
if
anyone's
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
plat,
see
none
I'll
close.
The
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
Albertson,
second
by
mr.
A
I'll
need
a
motion
motion
by
mr.
Arnold
second
by
mr.
Dahle.
Any
other
discussion
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
sixth
item
on
the
agenda.
Luke
I'm
glad
you
brought
the
boys
along
to
help
us
out
with
this
one
six
item
on
the
I:
take
it
back
you're
on
numbers
you're
on
number
I'm
on
number:
five
we're
gonna
go
to
number
six
number.
Five
is
the
new
softball
complex
and
Ice
Arena,
just
a
rezone
discussion.
R
A
A
R
R
A
B
A
R
Did
a
lot
of
discussion
on
this
and
based
on
the
surrounding
uses
we
were,
we
were
hoping
you
guys
would
initiate
rezoning
it
to
see
one
community
commercial.
The
reason
for
that
is
we.
It
has
the
conditional
use
of
recreational
use,
whereas
our
other
C
zones
do
not
have
that
use
and,
of
course
our
residential
uses
have
recreational
use,
but
we
don't
want
it
zone
residential
because
of
the
you
know,
possibility
of
what
might
be
developed
in
the
future
to
the
South
Sea.
R
R
A
A
Q
Part
of
the
community
yeah
exactly
and
then
the
the
fire
department
is
actually
going
out
for
grants
right
now
to
put
in
a
storm
shelter
and
in
what
that
would
do.
It
would
really
help
the
the
trailer
court
to
the
north
there's
over
300
people
that
live
up
in
that
area
without
any
shelter
at
all.
So
if
we,
if
we
did
that
shelter,
it
would
really
help
you.
A
G
It
Jeff
I,
you
probably
know
this,
and
maybe
we've
talked
about
it
during
a
Tuesday
meeting
but
I
know
not
being
real
familiar
with
the
planned
design
of
this
facility
when
it's
all
completed,
I
know
that
there's
a
maximum
height
limit
in
the
c1
district.
Have
you
examined
that
and
is
that
potentially
going
to
be
an
issue
or
no
I
have.
R
B
E
A
R
M
M
We're
kind
of
this
this
area,
for
maybe
those
who
are
unfamiliar
this
this
area
of
Watertown,
which
is
the
same
area
that
Travis
outfitter
came
in
for
today,
stretches
from
kind
of
this
area
here
all
the
way
along
it
kind
of
squares
off.
Here
it's
called
the
Gateway
overlay
district,
there's
some
different
set
of
rules,
the
one
that
came
earlier
yeah
and
then
in
your
packet
Jeff
did
include
that
I.
M
Guess
that's
red
shaded
area
within
there
of
of
what
it
is,
but
one
of
the
one
of
the
limitations
within
the
Gateway
overlay
district
is
only
properties
that
directly
about
highway.
212
are
allowed
to
have
freestanding
sign
that
can
be
made
of
a
pole
type
structure.
Otherwise
they
have
to
be
ground
monument
style
signs.
M
Kind
of
what
precipitated
this
question
was.
Was
you
have
Casey's
Heat
located
here?
The
former
ace
building
you
have
within
the
Gateway
overlay?
There
is
a
present
building
under
construction
right
here.
That
is
asking
questions
about
signage
and
and
on
this
side
of
19th
Avenue,
our
19th
Street.
Excuse
me,
you
can't
have
a
pole
sign
by
code
by
ordinance,
but
on
this
side
of
19th
Street,
you
can
have
a
pole
sign
up
to
30
feet
tall,
that's
in
the
C
3
zone.
M
They're
presently
is
one
located
here
at
this
church
down
here
and
this
little
specific
use
office
building
also
has
a
pole
style
sign
the
the
question
coming
towards
you
guys
is:
do
you
want
us
to
take
a
look
and
propose
something
to
bring
back
to
you?
It's
kind
of
the
same
thing
you
just
did
on
this
last
item.
Do
you
want
us
to
take
a
look?
Do
you
have
some
recommendations
on
what
you'd
like
to
see
showing
you
specifically
this?
This
area
here
is
like
I,
said:
highway,
212
off
premises.
M
A
J
E
N
Short
story
for
a
couple
year
project,
but
the
whole
idea
was
just
to
have
a
higher
design
standard
and
it
took
a
lot
of
different
iterations
that
started.
One
of
the
ideas
was
just
a
design
review
type
of
a
deal
similar
to
what
you
did
earlier
today
with
a
with
the
outfitter.
Where
you
looked
at
the
building
and
said
yeah,
that's
going
to
be
a
nice
building,
that's
gonna
fit
that'll
be
good
and
in
the
end
it
wound.
N
Up
being
you
know
what
we've
the
city's
got
a
lot
of
infrastructure
they're,
paying
for
a
lot
of
things
on
this
on
this
particular
property.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
going
to
fit
some
sort
of
a
specific
vision
or
or
type
of
development.
So
that's
where
the
City
wound
up,
having
very
specific
aesthetic
requirements
for
for
how
to
handle
any
sort
of
development.
So
that's
where
you
wind
up
seeing
all
of
the
building
requirements
that
we've
got
into
there.
N
It
was
to
lead
to
downtown,
as
has
been
said
before,
but
we
we
left
the
212
in
terms
of
signage.
At
that
time,
the
portion
along
212
was
left
the
way
that
it
is
because
of
the
fact
that
there
was
it
was
already
and
he
was
expected
that
would
continue
developing
the
same
way.
There
was
discussion
at
the
time
about
allowing
Paul
signs
along
19th
because
we
had
some
businesses
starting
there,
but
we
also
saw
businesses
on
the
other
side
of
the
road
having
monument
signs
and
that
sort
of
thing.
A
H
A
That
a
boundary
had
to
be
set
somewhere
and
if
you
move
the
boundary
to
well,
if
you're
abut
19th,
we're
gonna
give
it
to
you,
but
19th
isn't
212,
you
know
you
can
say
well.
The
guy
across
the
street
has
a
sign,
so
I
need
a
sign.
Well,
it's
just
gonna
leapfrog
and
then
the
signs
are
gonna
get
taller
and
taller,
because
they're
gonna
want
to
be
seen
from
six
blocks
away
on
highway
212.
A
But
I've
talked
to
a
few
of
the
guys
that
were
around
that
drafted
that
and
they
said
highly
recommend,
don't
mess
with
the
Gateway
overlay
district.
There
has
been
some
modifications
and
recent
council
meetings
as
far
as
the
the
probably
the
most
stringent
thing
in
the
overlay
district
was
the
selection
of
colors
and
Ken.
What
did
they
that
was
modified
a
bit
and
remember
this
started
10
years
ago,
the
city,
the
city
footed
the
bill
for
all
the
infrastructure
roads
curb
gutter.
B
A
I
think,
since
this
overlay
district
was
put
together,
branding
has
changed
from
the
and
that's
the
reason
for
that
is
you're.
Large
companies
that
come
in
that
may
want
to
locate
on
their
their
color
specific
for
their
buildings.
I
mean
branding
is
prynt
today
than
it
was
10
years
ago.
It's
more
important
now
than
ever
correct
and.
J
A
A
As
far
as
setbacks,
Greenway
just
openness
of
moving
down
there,
they
didn't
want
the
clutter
that
we
ran
into
and
the
clutter
isn't
nearly
as
bad
on
2:12
as
it
was
10
years
ago,
and
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
better
by
the
time
the
highway
goes
through,
but
I
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
allowing
signage.
The
deal
is
the
land
was
developed
there
under
certain
circumstances
and
purchased
in
there
under
circumstances.
C
M
M
M
M
It
that's
why
I
kind
of
put
this
preliminary
apply.
That's
not!
This
doesn't
hold
true
anymore.
It's
it's
closed.
So
essentially
anything
that's
on
any
of
these
Lots
right
here
could
have
a
bull
sign
if
the
signs
out
here
anything
that's
on
this
side
of
that
street
or
along
this
street
cannot
have
okay,
okay,.
F
A
I
I
think
I
think
we
wait.
We've
waited
for
ten
years
for
this
place
to
develop
and
we
bought
into
the
the
economy's
tough.
We
can't
sell
any
Lots,
so
we
went
in
and
we
ruiz
owned
to
our
two
in
there,
which
we've
been
beat
up
for
that
already
in
the
public
and
we'll
get
beat
up
worst
on
that
and
now
the
economy
is
actually
coming
back
now,
there's
some
interest
out
there
I,
don't
think
it's
I,
don't
think
we
throw
the
baby
out
with
the
bathwater.
Yet
what
is
prompting.
F
M
A
R
Right
now
we
have
one
meeting
a
month
plan:
commission,
third
Thursday
after
the
first
Monday
as
I
know.
You
are
all
well
aware
of-
and
it's
been
discussed
at
the
staff
level
about
adding
another
meeting
a
month.
So
we
would
do
two
meetings
a
month,
just
like
you
currently
do
to
Board
of
Adjustment
meetings
a
month.
R
If
you
guys
are
okay
with
that,
we
will
just
meet
with
the
boarding
with
the
Board
of
Adjustment
for
the
rest
of
this
year
and
then
starting
next
year,
starting
January,
we'll
probably
move
both
of
those
meetings
to
a
415
meeting,
so
that
you
know
it's
not
taking
up
your
lunch
and
your
whole
afternoon
with
a
long
meeting.
But
you
know
some
of
the
reasons
that
we
wanted
to
do.
This
is
just
currently
with
just
one
meeting
a
month.
If
an
applicant
misses
a
deadline,
they
can
wait
up
to.
R
You
know
six
weeks
to
get
on
to
a
Planning
Commission
agenda,
which
is
a
long
time
to
wait
and
if
we
had
more
meetings
that
be
they
wouldn't
have
as
long
to
wait
and
also
if
we
have
you
know
two
meetings
a
month.
Instead
of
one
hour,
our
meeting
times
shouldn't
go
as
long
I
mean
we've
had
a
couple
of
meetings
in
the
recent
past,
where
you
know,
we've
ended
up
with
a
large
agenda
and
we,
you
know,
pushing
7
o'clock
by
the
time.
R
We're
done
and
we're
hopeful
that
if
we
do
two
meetings
a
month,
we
can
keep
them
shorter
and
it'll
also
help
us
at
the
staff
level.
You
know
help
applicants
get
there
meet
the
deadlines.
I
mean
right.
Now
we
don't
want
to
let
an
applicant
miss
a
deadline
because
of
how
long
we'll
wait
that
that'll
create
with
them.
So
we're
you
know,
allowed
applicants
to
on
occasion
you
know
get
on
the
agenda
with
an
incomplete
application,
but
with
this,
if
we
were
meeting
twice
a
month
weekend,
we
can
tell
them
no,
your
application
isn't
complete.
A
The
other
room,
so
the
upside,
you
know
the
Wednesday
afternoon
meetings,
the
only
I
don't
like
about
them,
as
is
some
people
can't
get
off
any
day
during
the
afternoon
to
be
on
our
board.
If
we,
you
know,
I
think
it
hurts
us
for
being
able
to
find
board
members.
Secondly,
I
know
it's
tough
for
some
people,
when
they
say
I'm
going
to
be
out
of
the
office
for
an
hour
ends
up
being
two
or
longer.
So
that's
the
that's
the
upside
of
moving
it.
B
A
U
P
P
A
R
That's
part
of
what
sparked
this
I
mean
right
now.
If
an
applicant
misses
a
deadline
by
a
week.
Well,
instead
of
being
on
that
month's
meeting,
they
have
to
go
to
the
next
month's
and
then
that
end
up
waiting
they
get
their
application
in,
but
have
to
wait
six
weeks
to
for
it
to
get
hurt
by
you
guys
well
and
just
it's
a
long
time
to
hold
up
the
process.
U
R
R
C
B
November
November
stuff
has
already
been
advertised
and
put
out
there.
So
basically,
as
you
gather
December
December,
we
don't
have
a
to
meetings
anyway,
there's
generally
only
one
because
it
conflicts
with
Christmas
and
everything
else,
and
it
probably
won't
be
the
first
ones,
the
ordinary
guys.
You
might
have
to
look
at
your
schedule
to
see
because
I
think
the
December
meetings
an
odd
day
me
so.
B
R
D
A
J
A
A
A
R
T
Yeah
yeah,
they
all
there's
another
goal
here
is
if
we
meet
twice
a
month
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
all
those
items
go
to
the
council.
If
we
get
off
schedule,
you
know
things
that
we
do
here
aren't
approved
until
a
council
meeting
afterwards.
So
by
meeting
twice
we
get
the
process
going
at
the
council
level
quicker
as
well.
So
if
we
have
to
wait
like
Jeff
said
if,
if
somebody
misses
a
deadline
by
one
day,
they're
waiting
six
weeks
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
eight
weeks
before
the
council
hears
it
so.