![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/oiV9jPS8f0o/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: BOA & SCBOA Meetings 08 05 2015
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
A
B
A
D
A
A
Of
seven,
which
is
still
five,
so
all
five
members
need
to
vote.
Yes,
if
you
choose
to
withdraw
your
request
and
have
it
put
on
the
next
Board
of
Adjustment
meeting,
you
can
let
us
know
that.
Secondly,
can
we
open
the
public
hearing
closed
the
public
hearing?
If
they
don't
like
can
can
we
in
order,
so
we
don't
have
to
publicize
that?
Can
the
public
hearing
be
open
and
closed
and
then
tabled
the
request?
A
table
would
have
to
come
from
the
applicant
yep.
B
A
Everybody
understand
that
clear
as
mud.
First
item
on
the
agenda
is
Casey's.
General
store
incorporated
permit
number
one
six,
two,
seven,
six,
seeking
a
variance
for
the
relief
of
the
requirement,
the
zoning
ordinance
in
regard
to
the
construction
of
a
non-conforming
addition
onto
a
existing
non-conforming
building
right.
B
This
application
was
submitted
for
requesting
to
construct
two
nine
conforming
additions:
six
hundred
square
foot
15
by
40
and
140
square
foot
in
6
foot
8
by
21
feet
under
the
existing
legal,
nine
performing
two
thousand
seven
hundred
and
twenty
square
foot
building
located
on
a
substandard
parcel.
In
the
Iowan
light
industrial
district
said
addition
is
proposed
to
be
constructed.
Four
foot
to
four
point:
seven:
five
foot,
there's
a
slight
taper
along
the
property
line
that
the
smallest
point
is
four
foot
at
the
greatest
point.
B
It's
four
point:
seven,
five
from
the
side
west
property
line
where
twenty
foot
is
required
again
a
little
bit
of
history.
This
thing
this
was
currently
there
exists:
a
legally
non-conforming
twenty
seven,
two
thousand
seven
and
twenty
square
foot
and
forty
by
sixty
eight
structured
on
this
i1
light
zone
property
which
was
granted
variance
for
construction
in
1997.
So
the
original
building
was
granted
by
variance
in
1997
and
her
basically
just
wanted
to
add
on
to
the
south
and
the
north
of
this
with
what
was
already
allowed
previously
applicant
now
appeals.
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
B
B
B
E
B
A
F
A
Motion
by
mr.
stone
burger
sang
good
bye,
mr.
McGuire,
any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
third
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
applicant
Arian
Brenda
Schmidt
permit
number
one
six
to
seven,
seven,
six
of
variants
for
relief
from
the
zoning
ordinance
appealing
to
the
sections
of
the
property
at
five
five,
eight
South
Lake
Drive.
B
Again,
this
is
application
for
permit
number
162,
77,
Terry
and
Brenda
Schmidt
application
was
submitted,
requesting
to
construct
a
non-conforming
two-story.
Four
thousand
nine
hundred
square
foot,
single-family
dwelling
with
1270
square
foot
of
attached
garage
under
twenty
three
thousand
plus
square
foot
parcel
size
structure
proposed
to
be
constructed.
B
Applicant
proposes
to
combine
three
are
one
single-family
residential
loans,
owned
parcels
by
development,
lack
agreement
and
creating
one
twenty
three
thousand
plus
square
for
a
lot
of
record
upon
which
to
construct
a
six
thousand
one
hundred
and
seventy
square
foot,
non-conforming
property
and
primary
structure.
Three
thousand
seven
hundred
forty
square
foot
on
the
main
level
1160
square
foot
in
the
second
level
and
a
one
thousand
two
hundred
seventy
square
foot
detached
garage.
B
If
endorsed
staff,
recommends
the
board
clarify
Boulevard
requirements,
as
this
board
has
the
four
of
the
authority
to
compel
fulfillment
of
any
and
all
boulevard
requirements.
Conjunction
with
you,
structural
improvements
authorized
by
a
building
permit.
This
was
public
notice.
All
public
most
requirements
have
been
met
as
they
were
on
the
last
one.
Also,
the
applicant
is
here-
and
there
is
some
of
the
adjacent
landowners
that
are
here
to
support.
It
also
I
think
we
need
to
get
the
site
plan
out
on
this
one,
so
we
can
look
at
it.
It.
F
B
That's
all
right,
we
got
it
so,
as
you
can
see
here,
what
the
applicant
is
asking
for
is
a
front
which
is
actually
the
rear.
Currently
excited.
The
front
is
a
on
the
lake
side,
which
is
30
foot
here
and
25
on
the
backside
with
the
construction
of
the
house.
Their
action
for
15.4
versus
are
25
adjacent
to
the
road,
there's
also
an
extended
Boulevard
there
in
that
particular
area.
So.
B
Once
we
say
yes,
I
want
to
know
what
we're
expected
in
a
driveway
and
the
rest
of
me.
Grass
and
trees
are
exactly
what
we're
looking
for.
That
link
is
a
little
bit.
You
know.
Sometimes
you
prove
something
all
of
a
sudden
into
all
turns
into
cement
from
property
line
to
property
line,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
it.
You
know
at
this
meeting,
what's
expected
anticipated
and
the
landowners
here,
he
can
probably
tell
us
first,
what
he's
proposing
to
do.
B
B
G
Setbacks
at
that
point
in
time,
and
then
when
I
got
I
talked
to
some
people
and
they
said
it's
you,
you
people
were
pretty
reasonable,
so
I
wanted
I
didn't
want
to
have
a
straight
house.
I
wanted
to
have
you
know
Park
I,
let's
go
this
way
and
part
of
the
holes
go
that
way
so
I
get
so
the
main
part
of
the
house
gets
the
very
best
views
in
the
garage.
Does
a
straight
doesn't
open
straight
east,
but
slightly
southeast
because
of
the
prevailing
northwest.
G
Wind
I've
lived
out
there
or
had
houses
out
there
for
many
many
years
and
I
know
the
way
the
wind
works
right
through
there,
and
so
that
corner
will
help
me
out
with
the
garage
pointing
back
to
the
South
just
a
little.
It
help
me
with
the
wind
as
well,
and
also
we
wanted
to
get
as
after
we
had
it
all
set
in
there
and
realized.
You
know
what
it
was
going
to
look
like
on
the
lot.
We
realized.
G
We
didn't
have
a
lot
of
the
lawn
on
the
lake
side,
and
so
we
wanted
to
move
it
as
far
as
we
could
move
it.
As
far
as
you
would
allow
us
to
move
it
without
removing
that
big
giant
tree
right
right
there,
that's
a
that's,
an
incredibly
big
tree
and
it's
a
it's
a
it's
an
a
it's
a
good-looking
tree,
and
we
didn't
want
to
remove
that
tree.
So
we
wanted
to
go
as
far
to
the
south
as
you
would
let
us
go
without
without
getting
in
the
way
of
that
tree.
C
G
And
we
probably
won't
have
any
parking
like
we
do
now
right
now
there
was
always,
as
you
said,
parking
all
the
way
in
front
of
all
three
of
those
Lots.
That
was
parking
you
no
longer
owned.
We
would
probably
have
a
little
bit
of
that
in
front
of
the
garage
over
there
in
the
deepest
part
of
that
we'd
have
a
little
bit
of
cement
over
there.
We
would
have
a
little
bit
of
cement
over
here.
G
You
know
maybe
to
have
a
few
cars
park
right
in
here,
but
we
wouldn't
have
cement
all
the
way
across
here.
You
know
so
that
cars
can
park
all
the
way
along
here.
This
would
be
tiered
landscaping
here.
You
know
through
here
you
know
and
the
idea
we
don't
want
cars.
We
don't
want
cars
in
front
of
there,
and
so
that's
that's
the
plan.
There.
G
B
C
B
G
C
F
G
I
J
A
Concern
for
ears
would
be
your
view
that
is
it
gonna.
Well,
we
do
at
the
lake
most.
The
time
is.
Our
biggest
concern
is
always
on
lake
side
that
one
person
is
in
building
we're,
not
granting
a
variance
to
move
them
in
front
of
someone
else
and
block
their
view.
That's
my
biggest
concern
with
it
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
block
your
view
and.
H
A
That's
the
hard
part
on
a
variance.
We
have
to
provide
a
hardship
and
the
hardship
is
normally
the
lot.
You
know
the
lot
size
the
lot,
the
angles
on
the
lot
or
the
slope
of
a
lot
where
you
say,
I
have
to
build
over
this
way,
because
the
elevations
don't
allow
me
for
or
the
odd
shape
of
the
lot
requires
me
to
build
closer
to
the
lot
line
than
what
I
need
to
this
one's
a
little
different.
It.
G
I'll
say
is
that
we
are
further
we're
further
back
than
the
original
house
was
on
Mary's
side
on
this
corner,
and
this
corner
right
here
were
further
back
to
the
north,
and
we
were
before
so
her
view
will
be
better
there
and
by
angling
that
this
house
we
the
way
we
did
this
part
right
here
again.
If
we
didn't
hang
you
let
it
be
out
here,
another
10
feet.
That's.
A
Your
only
saving
grace
it
when
I
look
at
it.
My
first
thought
was
no.
You
got
a
hundred
foot
depth
and
a
hundred
and
eighty
foot
wide
there's
plenty
of
lot
to
build.
The
house
there
is
I
looked
at
it.
Secondly,
I
said
I
would
it'd
be
more
palatable
if
you
at
least,
were
to
the
front
lot
line
to
use
your
entire
front
lot.
That
would
push
it
forward.
A
2.9
feet,
which
means
your
variance
is
six
point
seven
feet
in
this
case,
I
look
and
go
I
understand
when
I
see
a
lot
five
neighbor,
that
if,
if
we
say
no
on
the
variance-
and
you
say
heck
with
it,
I'll
just
build
it.
The
way
I
can
we're
going
to
impose
on
the
neighbors
view
so
I
in
that.
In
that
particular
case.
For
me,
it's
more
palatable.
A
If
you
move
forward,
we
give
you
a
six
foot:
seven
foot,
six
point:
seven
foot
variants
to
the
rear
yard,
and
in
doing
so
we
saved
a
house
being
built
in
front
of
Mary's
view.
I
mean
to
me
straight
faced
I
can
at
least
when
people
stopped
me
on
the
street
and
say
I.
Can't
believe
you
did
that
I
can
say
we
did
it
out
of
the
to
try
to
make
sure
we
don't
inhibit
anyone
else,
any
of
the
neighbors
on
the
lake.
A
Drive
by
him
and
go
my
goodness,
that's
more
house
than
that
lot
can
handle
or
that's
taller
than
that
I
can
handle.
So
some
somehow
we
try
to
be
in
between,
but
it
was
anyone
else
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
against
the
variance
seen
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
and
remember.
We
need
all
five
votes
to
be
yes
to
pass
the
variance
at
this
point.
G
H
B
A
B
A
B
I
I
A
I
B
B
I
Your
garage,
the
house,
is
over
to
the
right.
I
have
looked
at
trying
to
add
on
to
my
house
going
to
the
West.
If
I
was
going
to
add
on
to
my
house,
I
would
add
to
the
West
I
got
a
hundred
nice
feet.
I
got
plenty
of
room
to
add
on
a
bedroom
if
I
want
to
to
the
west
of
my
house,
if
I
do,
that
and
I
haven't
had
requests
yet,
but
I
may
decide
to
do
that
at
some
time
in
the
future
to
ask
for
a
to
add
on
to
my
house.
I
D
I
J
D
B
C
A
C
C
A
A
A
A
B
A
G
B
A
C
E
E
Several
times
about
a
particular
city
approved
home
daycare
having
a
non-resident
employee
working
in
the
home,
which
is
prohibited
by
variance
by
our
current
ordinance
by
our
current
ordinance.
The
provider
has
consistently
denied
this
accusation
in
the
past,
but
she
now
admits
to
having
a
helper
in
order
to
have
the
maximum
number
of
infants
allowed
by
the
state
in
her
care.
We
believe
that
there
are
probably
many
providers
who
are
doing
this
and
are
operating
in
non-compliance
with
the
city.
Zoning
ordinance
in
the
same
way
and
staff
is
seeking
the
board
of
adjustments
direction.
E
This
is
a
specific
application
that
came
before
you
about
a
year
ago.
Do
you
want
us
to
go
ahead
and
enforce
and
require
her
to
comply
with
the
ordinance
or
would
you
like
us
to?
Would
you
make
recommendation
that
the
staff
initiate
discussion
on
daycare
homes,
regulations
at
the
plan,
Commission
level,
so.
E
A
B
A
F
A
Well
now,
if
I
have
an
employee
or
two,
are
they
using?
My
party
I
think
we'd
visit
about
it
because
I
agree
with
John?
Is
we
want
as
much
supervision
there?
We
don't
want
someone
getting
hurt
on
our
watch,
but
the
other
side
of
it
is
is
okay,
what's
the
maximum
amount
of
kids?
Is
that
being
changed?
When
you
add
another
supervisor
in
there,
should
it
be?
And
at
what
point
are
they
no
longer
old
school
home
on
home.
B
E
E
The
thing
is:
is
these
daycare
providers
in-home
day
care
providers
are
wanting
to
max
out
their
roster
with
this
in
which
is
and
be
in
compliance
with
the
state,
because
if
they
don't
have
a
helper
they're
limited
to
four
children
under
the
age
of
two
two
years
and
of
those
four
children,
two
of
them
can
only
be
under
one
year,
but
if
they
take
in
a
helper
which
is
an
employee
under
our
ordinance,
then
they
can
have
eight
children
under
two
years
and
four
of
those
eight
can
be
under
one
year.
That's.
A
F
One
point:
I'll:
throw
up
one
one
comment
for
thought
as
well
as
you're,
considering
this
a
lot
other
communities,
the
way
that
they'll
handle
say
a
specific
conditional
use
that
has
certain
conditions
like
a
home
occupation
in
this
case.
Is
it
if
there's
a
line
item
about
the
number
of
employees?
They
will
specifically
note
if
someone
is
in
apply
for
a
variance
to
that
section.
This
business
plans
on
having
one
unrelated
employee.
F
You
handle
that
as
a
variance
at
the
time,
so
that
when
you
send
out
the
notices
that
it's
made
clear
to
the
neighborhood
that
that's
what's
being
asked
as
well
at
the
time,
so
you
can
consider
that
as
a
variance
at
the
time,
Jen
just
asked
me
preference
and
that
depends
on
the
community
but,
as
you
know,
I'm
more
of
a
proponent
of
doing
things
without
variances.
If
you
can
help
it.
E
And
we
do
that
right
now,
when,
when
we
sit
down
with
the
Darracq
daycare
providers
like
this
one,
for
instance,
it
was
explained
to
her
very
well
how
the
state
and
city
differ
and
we
asked
them.
Do
you
want
to
appeal
that
part
of
the
of
the
ordinance
that
says
you
can't
have
an
employee
and
the
board
may
consider
granting
a
variance
to
that
for
you
and
she
didn't
so
very
few
of
them
do.
But
then
we
find
out
later.
A
I'd
say
bring
it
to
the
plan
commission,
so
we
can
kind
of
familiarize
ourselves
a
little
better
with
it.
Thank
you
anything
else.
Gonna
get
a
motion
requesting
motion
to
adjourn
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
second
by
mrs.
Johnson,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
water
town
sign
code
Board
of
Appeals.
D
K
Fourth
Street
northeast
the
application
was
denied
based
off
the
fact
that
this
is
an
r1
single-family,
his
own
parcel
property.
It
doesn't
allow
for
these
kind
of
signs
to
be
put
on
her.
All
public
notices
were
Matt.
We
didn't
hear
anything
back
from
anyone
up
there.
So
again,
like
I
stated
a
little
earlier.
We've
we
had
to.
We
had
one
directly
south
of
this
at
White
comas
and
song
funeral
chapel,
and
a
couple
Lots
north
of
this
at
Schneider
eye,
clinic
same
exact
situation,
where
the
signs
are
will
be
in
the
right
of
way.
K
A
K
A
A
Right
see
no
one's
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
public
here
and
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
ask
for
a
motion
and
second
for
discussion
motion
by
mr.
McGuire
sang
by
mr.
stone
burger
any
discussion
kind
of
one
of
those
that's
up
there,
we're
just
moving
it.
We're
not
enhancing
it
in
any
ways
we're
just
allowing
them
do
to
the
the
acquisition.
A
The
minutes
I
didn't
make
a
note
that
we
skipped
item
1
before
we
adjourn
I
need
a
motion
and
second
to
approve
the
minutes
from
June
3rd
motion
by
mr.
stone
burger
sang
about
mrs.
Johnson.
All
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
motion
to
adjourn
was
by
mr.
McGuire.
Second,
by
mrs.
Johnson,
all
in
favor,
say,
aye
motion
carries
were
adjourned.