![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/NBf-1LSeaUk/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 11 09 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
C
A
A
C
A
B
B
D
C
A
B
So
the
background
of
this
rezone
proposal
is
Jeffrey
and
Amy
McGill
submitted
the
application
in
petition
on
October
6
2017,
requesting
approval
for
rezoning
the
current
described
property
from
i1
light
industrial
district
to
r3
multifamily
residential
district,
because
the
property's
use
is
used
as
a
single-family
residence.
They
would
like
to
be
able
to
pull
a
building
permit
for
an
addition
for
to
the
house
on
the
property
which
is
not
possible
under
its
current
zoning,
as
the
residential
structure
is
not
allowed
in
an
industrial
zone.
B
After
discussion,
discussion
amongst
city
staff,
a
letter
was
sent
to
the
adjacent
landowners
in
the
same
situation
with
in
black
seventy
five,
a
third
Railway
Edition,
notifying
them
the
city
would
invite
them
to
be
included
in
the
rezone
of
their
residential
structures
to
be
brought
into
a
residential
zone
district.
The
letters
sent
out
is
attached
in
the
agenda
packet
as
far
as
adjacent
zoning
designations.
The.
B
B
And
then
c3
highway
commercial
district
is
across
the
highway
to
the
east
and
are
three
multi-family
residential
district
is
to
the
north,
which
is
what
they
are
proposing
to
be
rezone
to,
and
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
application
to
rezone
the
described
property
and,
as
I
passed
out,
the
amended
petitions
or
the
completed
petition
Mar.
So
is
that
after
we
sent
out
the
letters
to
the
landowners
they
all
were
in
favor
of
it.
A
D
B
B
D
Point
of
reference
yeah,
just
a
little
perspective,
I
mean
most
of
this
property
might
have
been
zoned
residential
years
ago.
Probably
it
was
always
owned
by
one
to
reflect
the
property,
existing
i1
development,
property
and
I.
Think
at
the
time
some
of
those
homes
were
just
thought.
Well,
maybe
this
would
be
an
opportunity
to
expand
I
one
into
that
area
at
some
point
time
in
the
last
20
25
years,
I'm
guessing
that
happened
being
that
we're
not
seeing
a
real
push
for
growth
for
industrial
development.
In
that
section
of
wire,
tony
moore.
D
D
B
These
properties,
I
mean
they'll,
be
able
to
get
a
building.
Permit.
That's
not
saying
that
they
won't
have
to
come
back
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
for
a
conditional
use
or
a
variance
if
for
whatever
they
wanted
to
do,
but
at
least
it
puts
their
single-family
dwelling
use
back
in
a
residential
zone
district.
A
D
B
All
right,
so
the
background
with
this
rezone
is
the
petitioner
submitted
an
application
in
petition
on
October
10th,
requesting
approval
for
rezoning
the
current
described
property
from
I
too
heavy
industrial
district,
2
i1,
light
industrial
district,
4
subdivision
purposes.
The
adjacent
zoning
designations
to
the
north,
south
and
east
is
i2
heavy
industrial
district,
which
it
is
currently
zoned
a1
agricultural
district
to
the
west,
which
is
the
airport,
and
then
there
is
no
adjacent
I
1
light
industrial
zoning,
which
we
do
caution.
The
spot.
B
Zoning
to
point
that
out,
the
adjacent
public
right-of-ways
will
be
included
in
the
rezone.
The
current
i2
heavy
industrial
district
is
more
restrictive
than
the
i1
light
industrial
district
or
more
there's
more
options
with
it
and
anything.
That's
included
in
the
i1
light
industrial
zoning
designation
can
be
used
in
the
I
to
the
minimum
required
lot
with,
for
the
i1
district
is
a
hundred
feet.
While
the
i2
is
300
feet,
there
is
approximately
593
linear
feet
of
frontage
and
included
in
the
proposed
rezone.
B
The
minimum
lot
area
for
I
1
districts
is
30,000
square
feet
and
for
the
i2
district
it
is
220,000
square
feet
and
approximately
one
hundred
and
forty-eight
thousand
square
feet
is
being
reasoned
to
be,
is
proposed
to
be
rezone
to
be
subdivided
into
four
I
won
lots.
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
application
to
rezone
the
described
property,
and
the
main
purpose
is
just
because
the
size
requirements
and
the
minimum
lot
area
difference
between
I
1
and
I
2.
A
C
Basically,
I've
expanded
my
property
from
the
north
coming
down
and
I
no
longer
used
that
property
to
the
south
or
it's
grassland
mow.
It
kill
weeds,
do
nothing
with
it.
I
don't
have
any
intentions
of
expanding
my
business
any
farther
to
the
south
and
that's
my
reasoning
for
the
reason
on
that
I'd
like
to
basically
plot
it
into
four
Lots
and
sell
them
similar
to
what
you
see
behind
water,
Tom
Ford
out
there.
C
D
C
Is
I
mean
I
actually
have
drainage
coming
down
to
the
center,
so
I've
already
talked
to
thousand
engineering.
I
have
to
have
a
drainage
easement
in
place,
and
the
way
to
lay
of
the
land
is,
let's
just
say:
I
sold,
something
to
the
right
hand,
side
that's
higher
up
and
it
would
ruin
the
next
guy's
property.
So
my
plan
is
to
get
close
and
in
there
get
it
flattened
off.
Decently
puts
the
word
wah
I
got.
The
sewer.
C
Easement
is
to
the
right
hand
on
that
angle,
there's
actually
an
easement
going
down
that
the
sewer
from
the
National
Guard
comes
through
there,
and
so
I
would
probably
run
sewer
either
in
the
ditch
on
14th
or
to
the
north
or
whatever
seems
the
best
deal
and
not
even
stub
it
into
lots.
But
so
people
would
have
sewer
and
water
if
they
so
chose.
Shane.
D
E
C
D
E
Most
of
the
time
the
traffic
would
be
ending
at
whichever
lot
they
were
turning
into
so
they'd
probably
be
doing
most
of
their
turning
movements
on
their
premise.
Okay,
so
from
that
standpoint,
I'd
say
no
and
it
wouldn't
change
anything
from
what's
existing
out
there.
Today,
I
would
say
that
that
is
a
paved
surface,
but
there
is
no
curb
and
gutter,
and
there
is
no
storm
source.
E
E
B
C
And
at
this
point
in
time,
I'm
putting
it
into
the
four
Lots
and
not
stubbing
the
sewer
and
water
into
each
lot.
But
someone
came
in
and
said
you
know:
I
want
to
all
right,
I
want
all
four
of
them.
So
be
it
right.
You
know
that's
kind
of
my
intent
on
yeah,
but
I
want
to
make
it
user
friendly
before
I
even
sell
it.
That's
why
I'm
here.