![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/ZzfXjmp14I8/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Council Meeting 09 18 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
E
A
E
F
Basically,
this
is
the
revised
ordinance.
We
went
through
all
of
the
changes
at
the
September
7th
long
term,
CIP
meeting
that
you
guys
I'm
approved
and
we're
Kate,
okay
with
and
all
of
those
are
implemented
here.
So
nothing
else
has
changed
since
then,
if
you
guys
have
any
questions,
I
can
answer
it,
but
otherwise
it
reflects
the
original
plus.
These
changes
that
we
had
already
gone
through
so
just.
D
A
Item
number
four
ordinance:
number
17,
36
amending
section;
seven
point:
zero:
eight,
zero,
six
and
striking
section
eighteen
point:
zero:
one:
zero;
eight
to
clarify
the
authority
of
the
street
superintendent.
It's
a
second
reading
and
we'll
have
council
action
tonight.
You
have
a
motion
and
second
motion.
B
A
Second,
behind
Albertson
discussion:
yes,
I
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
that
was
about.
Basically,
we
had
some
redundant
ordinances
having
to
do
with
the
street
superintendent
duties,
so
the
former
city
attorney
cleaned
that
up
for
us
and
what
we're
left
with
is
an
ordinance
which
is
in
compliance
with
the
state
law,
and
it
should
be
cleaner
there.
Any
questions
or
further
discussion
about
that
see.
None
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
all.
A
Item
number
five
ordinance:
number
17,
40
amending
section;
eighteen
point:
zero:
one:
zero
one
section:
three
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
to
prohibit
the
parking
of
boats,
jet
skis
and
campers
RVs
on
residential
streets
have
motion
and
said,
should
I.
You
know:
Vince
had
a
slightly
different
version:
yeah
yeah.
G
A
H
I
got
to
have
question,
and
maybe
this
is
out
because
this
is
a
city
police
issue
right
and
regard
to
their
enforcement,
so
I'm
I
come
into
town
because
I
don't
live
here
and
I
go
stay
at
somebody's
house
and
I
come
and
bring
my
boat
for
the
weekend.
I
can't
park
my
my
pickup
and
my
boat
on
the
street
when
I
stay
at
their
house.
Can
I.
G
I
C
You
were
getting
there,
Vince
I
have
a
quick
question.
Is
it
we
say
reasonable
length
of
time,
reasonable
location
is
that?
Are
we
defining
that
enough,
or
maybe
we
can't
do
better
I?
Don't
I
don't
know,
but
what
is
that
I
mean?
What
do
we?
What
is
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
to
load
and
unload
and-
and
perhaps
was
this
in
the
earlier
version
is-
is
in.
G
G
Well,
the
only
change
is
the
underlined,
and
you
know
the
question
on
what
you
should
do
is
if
you
wish
to
take
the
police
department
suggestion
and
include
that
language,
then
you
vote
to
approve.
If
you
don't
want
to
include
that
language,
it
would
remain
as
is,
and
the
words
reasonable
would
still
be
in
there.
That's
that's
an
issue
for
another
day,
which
is
a
good
issue.
J
A
C
I
A
H
H
K
Big
thing
with
this
ordinance
is
back.
We
remember
when
we
went
through
when
we
did
the
storage
outside
and
did
the
camp
campers
and
everything
we
actually
had
a
revision
in
there
or
a
line
in
there.
It
was
number
11
on
street
parking
is
prohibited,
separate,
alias
vehicles,
so
that
allowed
us
to
ticket
the
campers
that
you
guys
on
the
Sun
council
didn't
want
the
trailers
that
you
didn't
want
on
the
streets
when
Justin
went
through
and
moved
that
it
didn't
get
put
in
there.
I
K
So
then
we
met
with
Justin.
We
said
we
need
to
get
that
back
in
there,
because
that
was
the
direction
we're
given
at
that
time
when
we
created
that
ordinance,
and
that
also
did
allow
us
to
do
trailers
which
is
not
in
here
either.
It's
watercraft
trailer,
but
not
like
an
enclosed,
trailer
or
hauler
trailer.
Those
type
of
trailers
aren't
in
there
either.
So
I'd
had
some
conversations
through
email
with
Vince.
E
A
Is
before
this
in
the
code
book
it
says
no
owner
or
person
in
possession
or
control
of
a
motor
vehicle
or
other
vehicle
of
any
kind,
including
trailers,
whether
motorized
or
non
motorized,
shall
be
parked
or
remain
upon
any
street
following
a
snowstorm.
So
it's
then
we
number
two
is
similar,
except
as
provided
below,
no
motor
vehicle
or
other
vehicle
shall
be
parked,
remain
upon
a
street
or
Avenue
right
away
in
any
one
location
for
a
period
of
time
exceeding
24
consecutive
hours.
A
H
K
A
K
F
The
conversation
was
to
see
if
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
would
be
amenable
to
kind
of
take
the
city
out
of
at
least
the
reimbursement
portion
of
it,
because
the
reimbursement
will
be
throughout
the
life
of
this
construction
project,
and
so
he
did
have
a
conversation
with
them.
They
were
okay
with
that,
so,
instead
of
them
paying
the
contractor,
then
sending
it
to
us.
We
have
to
pay
them
so
that
we
can
get
reimbursed.
They're
just
gonna
send
they're
gonna
pay.
F
The
contractor
they're
gonna,
send
the
request
to
the
state
the
state,
because
we're
authorizing
them
is
going
to
pay
them
back
directly.
That
is
all
still
gonna
go
through
we're
gonna
get
copies
of
it
as
a
city
because
we
still
are
liable
for
that
grant
and
the
federal
requirements
of
that
grant.
So
we'll
still
get
copies
of
all
of
that.
Ted
of
first
District
will
still
take
care
of
all
of
the
other
requirements.
F
It's
just
they're
kind
of
we're
getting
taken
out
of
the
middle
of
the
reimbursement
and
pay
requests
which
will
help
keep
things
a
lot
neater
and
cleaner.
So
he
drafted
up
this
resolution
that
we
will
pass
along
to
the
state,
giving
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
the
authorization
to
do
that
versus
the
city.
Doing
that.
So
that's
what
this
is
going
to
do.
H
A
H
E
B
L
Thank
you
again.
As
the
mayor
stated,
this
resolution
has
been
prepared
for
the
application
of
a
solid
waste
management
program
grant
for
the
2018
construction
of
these
landfill
build-out
stormwater
improvements,
we've
budgeted
five
hundred
and
thirty-nine
thousand
six
hundred
dollars
for
these
improvements
for
the
engineering
and
construction
of
them.
These
improvements
will
collect
to
convey
stormwater,
which
is
generated
by
the
utilization
of
the
D
cell
waste
area.
L
They'll
it'll
convey
this
storm
water
to
the
stormwater
discharge.
Point
is
clean
stormwater
and
the
improvements
are
sized
to
accommodate
the
current
stormwater
flows
at
the
landfill,
as
well
as
future
stormwater
flows
that
will
be
generated
by
the
complete
utilization
of
the
details
as
time
goes
on.
So
these
improvements
and
consists
of
grading
plans
around
the
landfill
buildings
and
around
the
perimeter
of
the
D
cell
pipes,
culverts,
ditches
and
erosion
controls
will
be
installed
to
facilitate
the
stormwater
flow.
L
The
project
will
also
include
re-establishing
the
grade
and
existing
stormwater
ditches
to
facilitate
stormwater
flow
here,
as
regulations
prohibit
the
flow
of
stormwater
into
the
D
cell
waste
area.
So
it
looks
like
grant.
Funds
are
available.
This
quarter
and
DVD
depends
upon
the
number
of
applications
and
the
necessity
more
projects
receive
more
consideration
for
funding.
I
should
point
out
at
this
point
also
that
the
grant
funds
are
likely
to
include
some
low-interest
loan
funds,
as
well
as
sort
of
their
standard
practice.
L
Now
as
they
proceed
through
these
applications,
they
don't
normally
just
give
a
grant
funds
alone
anymore,
so
they
may
elect
to
fund
us
not
to
fund
us
and
if
they
fund
us,
they
mace.
If
there's
not
enough
applications
in
in
the
group,
we
might
receive
a
50
percent
grant,
which
is
what
we're
applying
for
what
we're
likely
to
receive
a
lesser
grant
of
about
30
percent
and
maybe
a
20
percent,
low-interest
loan
and
the
remaining
balance
of
the
request.
L
L
L
The
the
hydro
can
model
to
look
at
the
facility
now
and
into
the
future,
so
that
when
the
waste
is
placed
above
grade,
these
improvements
will
not
just
function
now
for
the
stormwater
standing
around,
but
will
be
sized
for
the
flow
of
the
complete
utilization
of
the
complete
when
the
landfills
fill
to
capacity.
These
improvements
should
still
be
there
functioning
to
accept
all
that
stormwater.
Okay,.
B
L
Assume
yep
these
grant
funds
are
something
the
pool
of
the
grant
funds
where
the
money's
coming
from
is
something
we
actually
contribute
to
every
dollar
of
municipal,
solid
waste
that
goes
into
our
landfill.
We
pay
a
dollar
to
the
state
and
then
the
and
then
the
tire
dealers
put
some
money
into
this
fund
and
they
did
distribute
it
back
around
within
the
state
to
the
applicants.
L
B
A
M
M
M
So
with
that,
the
city
staff
has
been
working
with
the
developer
on
various
aspects
of
the
project,
one
of
which
was
easements
for
the
turnarounds
or
the
dead-end
streets
word
would
be.
We
do
have
an
easement
included
in
the
packet
that
we
would
pursue
upon
approval.
The
other
one
of
the
other
items
is
the
cost
share
pro
at
ofor,
second
or
second
street
that
was
constructed
a
few
years
ago,
and
the
portion
of
the
sanitary
sewer
is
also
included
in
the
development
agreement
that
would
come
forward
if
this
Platts
approved.
M
So
all
of
those
items
have
been
included
in
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
most
recently,
we
did
have
a
few
minor
concerns
with
the
drainage
calculations,
which
we
have
subsequently
yet
gotten
resolved
with
satisfactory
calculations
back
from
the
developers
engineer
with
that,
I
guess:
I'll
entertain
any
questions.
Shane.
M
A
M
H
M
M
M
H
M
Form
you
mean
yes,
I,
guess
I'm,
not
following
the
conversation.
There
are
I.
Guess
I,
don't
know
what
what
water
telling
that's
done,
but
in
past
communities
that
I've
worked
in.
We
coincide
storm
water
detention
facilities,
especially
the
ones
that
are
planned
on
being
dry
as
part
of
the
park,
and
you
just
don't
play
it
play
in
the
park
when
it's
wet,
but
you
know,
but
so
it's
not
uncommon
to
have
stormwater
features
within
a
park.
We
we
in
a
sense,
do
it
in
Highland
Park
right
now,
I
guess.
C
M
There's
there's
several
acres
there
and
then
the
other
part
of
their
Park
dedication
is
the
construction
of
grading
of
a
bike
trail
along
the
west
side
of
the
project
that
will
eventually
wrap
around
and
connect
to
North,
2nd
Street
at
the
north
and
the
development
through
future
phases
of
the
project.
So
there's
a
couple:
different
portions
of
Park
cause
a
park
dedications
that
were
discussed
both
the
Planning
Commission
and
Parks
and
Rec
board.
I
M
Railroad
we
reached
out
to
the
earlier
than
the
they
kind
of
stared
blankly
back
at
us
as
as
I
recall,
they
they
were
shocked
that
somebody
actually
contacted
them
for
one
and
we
did
and
they
handed
us
a
sheet
of
of
criteria,
of
what
you're
supposed
to
use
to
analyze
the
storm,
drainage
impacts
and
that's
exactly
the
type
of
software
that's
used
to
do
this.
So
basically
that
sheet
said
to
us.
If
we
fall
it.
Basically,
if
we
follow
our
city,
ordinances
and
the
water
according
to.
M
I
can't
speak
to
the
depth
of
that
conversation
that
the
developer
and
the
adjoining
property
owner
have
had.
Since
that
meeting.
We
did
have
a
meeting
upstairs
at
one
point
and
had
a
really
in-depth
conversation
and
I.
Don't
know
that
much
more
has
been
vetted
out
of
that
we
did
our
our
ordinances
allow.
For
you
know
we
we
have
to
have
the
developer,
contain
the
100-year
storm
event
and
release
it
at
Prius,
pre
development
rates
and
that's
the
calculations
that
have
been
provided
to
our
office,
and
so
that's
as
I
see
it.
N
M
N
M
A
O
O
M
The
tile
I'm,
referring
to
pardon
me,
is
the
actual
outlet
piping
for
the
tension.
Pond
was
going
to
be
stormed
within
a
storm
sewer
pipe
that
leads
it
back
to
the
southern
edge
of
the
development
and
releases
that,
in
conjunction
with
a
culvert,
underneath
the
Burlington
Northern
Santa
Fe,
if
you're
talking
about
storm
tile
or
drain
tile
subsequent
to
the
development
that
goes
beyond
that.
A
M
M
A
M
O
A
A
A
C
O
And
so
I
think
the
confusion
is
that
was
the
original
plan
of
the
the
plan
itself
was
to
allow
that
water
in
that
pond,
to
release
at
its
natural
discharge
point
but
per
discussion
with
the
adjacent
landowner
and
the
developer.
They
agreed
that
they
would
pipe
the
water
from
that
pond
to
the
south
to
help
alleviate
the
water
issues
on
the
north
part
of
the
land.
O
M
Correct
the
the
adjacent
landowner
was
concerned
about
having
that
water
I'm
discharged
in
his
opinion,
was
straight
directly
at
his
property,
where
the
house
sits,
and
there
is
a
culvert
that's
intended
to
carry
water
underneath
the
Burlington
Northern
Santa
Fe
that
would
take
water
to
his
residents,
except
that
somebody
on
the
downstream
side
has
filled
it
with
rocks
and
the
pipe
is
subsequently
silted
in.
So
it's
not
effective,
like
I,
don't
have
control
over
I'm,
not
zooming
in
on
anything
I.
Don't
have
anything.
I
H
M
M
H
H
O
O
E
H
It
did
okay,
so
I've
been
here
in
this
position
before,
like
you
know
we're
not
engineers.
At
least
I
can
speak
for
myself,
I'm,
not
an
engineer.
So
are
we
as
council
members
right
now
to
believe
that
this
is
ready
to
be
approved
by
this
council,
because
the
only
issues
I
hear
our
flood
water
issues
right,
stormwater
issues?
H
Okay,
are
we
absolutely
certain
that
everything
has
been
followed
ordinance,
wise
procedurally,
and
that
the
engineering
data
supports
us
approving
this
plat,
because
we
could
talk
about
this
all
day
and
I'm
really
shocked,
be
honest
with
you
that
the
discussion
that's
occurred
here
hasn't
prior
to
this
meeting
but
I
as
a
council
person
I
want
it
all
whether
all
of
those
things
have
been
met
and
we're
comfortable
with
the
engineering
data,
because
I
understand,
there's
been
several
looks
at
this.
Are
we
comfortable
and
is
it
your
recommendation
that
this
get
approved
by
this
council
I.
M
We've
we've
vetted
all
the
the
criteria
that
needs
to
be
here.
I
think
you
know
we
have.
We
have
reviewed
all
the
stormwater
calculations.
We're
satisfied
that
that
it's
going
to
function
correctly,
the
the
landowner
down
stream
is
taking
the
and
not
an
uncommon
view,
but
you
know
he
lives
in
the
country
and
the
country.
Water
law
is
slightly
different
than
development
law,
for
instance,
and
the
not
to
bring
up
the
subject
without
direct
input
from
the
previous
city
attorney.
M
But
you
know
he
was
comfortable
with
with
the
way
the
conversations
were
headed
with
regard
to
this
issue
of
releasing
water
on
to
the
downstream
property
as
well
as
long
as
we
followed
our
ordinance
retained
our
100-year
events
in
the
storm
ponds
and
released
him
at
the
prehistoric
rate.
That's
our
duty
beyond
that.
I
guess
could
be
vetted.
Whether
we
need
to
ultimately
have
other
stuff
downstream.
I
guess
is,
would
be
a
discussion
point,
but
as
far
as
the
requirement
I'm
not
sure
that
that
that
level
of
obligation
exists,
but
by
ordinance
:.
A
M
M
M
O
O
A
O
A
If
we're
not,
if
we're
following
our
rules,
we
won't
be
pumping
ground
water
to
the
surface
constantly
like
we
do
in
some
of
our
other
subdivisions.
This
one
we've
got
all
the
lowest
floor.
Elevations
right
throughout
the
whole
subdivision,
they're
all
above
a
couple
of
feet
above
the
ground
water
table,
so
we
will
have
dry
sumps
and
the
water
isn't
going
to
be
flowing
faster.
It
will
flow
after
a
storm
48
hours,
which
is
longer,
but
it's
only
after
a
storm.
It
won't
be
constantly
every
day
for
I.
Do.
O
A
A
That
I
would
consider
due
diligence
and
I
believe
if
the
detention
palms
ponds
are
designed
properly,
they
will
discharge
longer
after
a
storm
because
there's
more
water,
but
not
for
days
and
days
and
days,
it's
you
know,
48
hours,
the
release
rate
for
a
maximum
design
storm.
So
within
two
days
the
pond
will
be
dry
until
the
next
rainfall
event.
So
that's
not
going
to
be
enough
to
cause
a
wetland
to
form
downstream.
O
C
M
Helms
&
Associates
review
the
hydraulic
calculations
related
to
runoff
coefficients
and
make
sure
that
we
were
consistent
with
what
what
our
stormwater
manual
does.
They
had
indicated
that
they
thought
that
things
were
a
little
bit
consistent
at
that
time.
I
did
not
have
Collin
on
staff,
but
since
his
arrival
we've
Reve
netted
that,
through
our
own
staff,
we're
at
a
right
now
at
a
comfort
level
that
we
feel
that
that
all
of
the
calculations
we've
asked
asked
for
some
tweaks.
A
O
I
will
also
point
out
that,
in
discussions
with
mr.
tesha's
lawyer-
and
they
also
hired
an
engineer
himself
to
look
at
the
calculations,
that
engineer
did
say
that
these
I'm
not
gonna,
put
words
in
another
engineers,
mouth
or
lawyers
mouth.
For
that
matter,
he
did
say
that
these
he
did
not
find
any
errors
with
these
calculations.
L
H
H
O
M
That
conversation
has
changed
and
evolved
all
through
this
conversation,
I
mean
from
yes,
so
I
mean
there's
been
many
different
angles
and
discussions
that
have
been
brought
by
the
adjoining
landowner
and
I
guess.
I
I
wasn't
included
in
all
the
discussions
because
the
developer
did
have
one-on-one
private
conversations
with
the
adjacent
landowner
and
I
think
the
developers
here.
M
If
you
want
to
ask
him
a
pointed
question
on
that,
I
guess
that's
at
the
discussion
of
the
council,
but
so
some
of
those
conversations
have
been
had
that
I,
don't
know
the
words
per
se,
but
I
know
what
that
they've
been.
The
conversations
of
have
been
had
and
they
didn't
ever
come
to
complete
terms,
but
that
the
concerns
have
evolved
over
the
course
of
the
discussion.
H
H
M
H
M
Well,
we've
we've
done
this.
The
research
we've
done
is:
we've
looked
at
all
the
past
historic
aerial
photos
that
we
have
go
back
to
2000,
at
least
the
ones
that
that
are
readily
at
our
disposal.
I
would
say
this
triangular
shaped
piece
is
the
portion
of
the
property?
That's
most
often
tilled
I'm,
not
sure
that
it
was
till
last
year
at
the
time
of
this
photo.
The
rest
of
this
has
been
primarily
pasture
throughout
that
history
of
time
that
I
have
a
glimpse
at
so
I.
H
N
Unless
that
day,
I'm
up
above
overflows
with
a
huge
rain,
there
isn't
any
water
in
your
mind,
going
to
cross
over
and
go
into
that
hay
land
to
the
north
because
it
has
changed.
You
know
this
is
it's
quite
a
change.
You
say
well,
it's
supposed
to
handle
that
water,
but
that's
without
a
whole
bunch
of
streets,
and
you
know
that
whole
land
up
above
has
changed,
but
your
mind
that
North
Dam
will
hold
the
water
and
it'll
send
it
down
south
to
go
under
the
culverts
to
the
south.
Okay.
M
M
A
M
M
A
A
M
L
I
J
H
A
H
A
H
C
You
know
I
will
say
that
it.
This
is
I
think
this
is
a
viable
question
that
she
has
for
this
Brad
I.
Do
it's
it's
a
part
of
the
plant.
It's
a
question.
She
has
I
think
it's
okay
to
ask
that
question.
Shane,
like
Shane,
has
said
this
has
been
vetted.
We've
looked
at
these
Platts,
the
Planning
Commission's
looked
at
them
and
now
it's
a
matter
of
do
we
feel
comfortable
with
the
end
result
and
do
we
feel
comfortable
with
what
our
city
staff
is
telling
us
in
regards
to
most
of
it
being
the
drainage?
C
A
Once
this
is
planted,
it's
ours
and
we
have
to
deal
with
it
so
I
I'm
concerned
about
safety.
This
is
good
here.
This
view
he's
bringing
up
has
shown
us.
The
side
slopes
are
six
to
one.
That's
good,
I'm
comfortable
with
six
to
one
side
slopes.
We
can
mow
those
easily
and
if
a
kid
goes
off
the
path
he's
not
gonna
hurt
himself.
If
he
falls,
if
it's
a
three
to
one
I,
probably
would
not
be
okay
with
that.
There's
no
shoulder
it's
a
ten-foot
wide
path.
A
A
A
C
D
Guess
just
a
comment:
after
fallenness
the
Planning
Commission
I
mean
I've
got
to
rely
upon
what
staff
is
telling
me.
I
mean
I
I'm,
not
an
engineer
either,
obviously,
and
and
so
I've
got
to
rely
upon
what
I'm
hearing
but
I
also
know
what
the
Planning
Commission
it
it
seemed
to
be.
They
seem
to
be
comfortable
that
we
were
following
our
ordinances
that
that
things
were
being
done
properly.
D
It
was
kind
of
a
qualified,
yes,
as
far
as
their
approval
subject
to
the
developer
and
the
landowner
getting
together
to
work
out
the
rent,
the
drainage
issue,
which
sounded
like
that
probably
hasn't
happened
yet
but
I
but
I
haven't
heard
anything
that
says
that
we're
not
following
we're
supposed
to
be
doing
as
far
as
bringing
it
forward
at
this
point,
I've
got
to
rely
upon
again
staff
and
what
the
Planning
Commission
has
done.
Prior
to
this.
C
M
Believe
it
does,
I
mean
the
best
that
we've
done
is
we
I
mean
we
vetted
all
of
the
stormwater
calculations
we
went
through
with
all
of
the
park.
Dedications
we've
did
the
research
on
the
shared
costs
for
the
adjoining
streets
and
sanitary
sewer.
We've
worked
through
the
easements
for
the
temporary
turnarounds,
we've
we've
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
It
covered
all
of
the
bases
yeah.
H
Tina
I
do
have
one
of
the
question
as
I.
Look
at
this
I,
don't
remember
seeing
it
before
him.
It
was
probably
there
I
know
I
have
concerns
with
the
route
or
the
knot.
Roundabouts,
goodness.
We
don't
want
more
of
those
apparently
yeah
I
like
runneth,
but
the
cul-de-sacs
okay.
But
now,
if
we
go
up
into
the
next
part
of
it,
where
we
have
kind
of
a
quasi
cul-de-sac
design,
is
that
Rob
from
your
guys
a
standpoint?
P
We
did
discuss
review
team
meetings
and
they
did
reduce
the
call
to
sex,
but
from
what
I
understand
what
the
lay
of
the
land
it's
necessary
to
be
able
to,
you
know,
have
those
Lots
and
stuff
put
in
there
called
the
sacks
do
slow
us
down,
because
we
have
to
all
the
snow
out
of
those
areas.
He's.
H
P
A
H
Over
so
the
one
just
to
the
north
that
that's
not
in
this
that's
correct,
so
we
did
object
coin
phrase
but
never
Maya,
okay,
so
so.
A
M
Exactly
the
answer
we
got
because
we
did
vet
that
through
our
design,
review
team
and
they
said
well,
we
lose
one
whole
lot,
each
one
of
these
corners
based
on
the
topography
of
the
land,
because
you
have
these-
are
all
going
to
be
walk
outs
along
this
portion
and
to
lose
a
walkout
basement
because
of
the
standard.
Traditional
corner
intersection
was
a
concern
of
theirs.
E
B
A
B
A
M
So
the
development
agreement
like
gay
can
it
started
in
my
earlier
description,
we
did
review
and
include
well.
Of
course
we
have
all
of
our
standard
language
in
there
Park
dedication
and
stormwater
things
and
our
street
build-outs,
but
the
unique
things
to
this
one
was
the
cost
share
for
North
second
and
The
Associated
sanitary
sewer.
That
was
there.
There
was
a
another
trunk
sewer
line
that
came
along
the
western
boundary
of
this
development.
M
We
informed
the
the
city
wasn't
directly
included
in
an
agreement
between
parties,
but
we
informed
the
other
party
that
this
development
was
moving
forward
and
they
would
be
in
direct
negotiations
between
each
other.
If
there's
any
outstanding,
dedications
or
obligations,
we
did
not
receive
any
feedback
that
there
was
any
outstanding
obligation.
M
A
A
M
The
the
7
e
says
developer
shall
install
all
pedestrian
ramps
at
street
intersections
with
the
curb
and
gutter
improvements.
Ramps
must
comply
with
current
current
ATA
standards,
including
the
installation
of
detectable
warnings,
then
I
believe
we
also
have
the
for
the
provision
in
there
for
developer.
7A
shall
install
or
cause
to
be
install
sidewalks
in
all
public
right-of-way
adjacent
to
all
Lots.
So
they're
gonna
push
the
ones
that
the
individual
homeowners
will
put
in
to
the
homeowners
and
they
would
have
to
install
everything
else.
M
H
Is
there
anything
they
we've
ran
into
this
and
developments
before
where
that
lot
gets
sold
and
then
that
one
does
and
then
this
one,
and
so
you
have
a
little
piece
of
sidewalk
and
a
little
piece
of
sidewalk
and
next
thing
you
know
there's
like
for
some
reason:
there's
a
lot.
Nobody
wants
or
a
couple
of
them
that
just
doesn't
you
just
don't
get
sold.
Is
there
anything
in
this
or
ordinance?
That
says,
look
there's
a
certain
point
at
which
we're
just
putting
all
the
sidewalks
in
so
we
have
continuity
to.
M
A
M
M
H
M
It's
okay,
the
same
issue
I
mean
even
with
the
timeline.
It's
a
difficult
thing
to
enforce
and
implement.
It
can
be
done,
but
so,
let's
say
I
order,
a
sidewalk
in
in
a
gap
the
very
next
year.
Somebody
comes
along
and
builds
a
house
there.
What
are
they
going
to
do?
They're
going
to
destroy
that
sidewalk
in
the
process
of
building
the
house
and
then
they're
gonna
replace
the
sidewalk
at
their
own
expense
again,
so
it's
not
that
it
can't
be
done
it's
just
it
can
be.
M
It
is
a
potential
burden,
but
I'm
not
opposed
to
ordering
sidewalk.
You
know,
I
I
get
it
I
mean
there's
many
times,
I
go
for
a
walk
and
I
got
a
wander
out
on
the
street
around
two
or
three
Lots
and
then
make
my
way
back
to
the
sidewalk,
and
that's
fine
for
me
as
an
individual
that
has
no
impairment,
but
I
will
say
that
for
the
ad
a
impaired
person
utilize
and
say
like
it's
even.
H
Really
you
know
so
if
I
buy
a
lot
up
there
and
I
don't
build
on
it
right
away.
Do
the
terms
of
this
cross
over
to
me
and
go
with
the
lot?
So
yes,
yes,
it
does.
So
if
I
buy
the
lot
and
it's
ten
years,
I
still
haven't
built
on
it.
Can
you
say
we
want
your
sidewalk?
That's
according
to
this
development.
A
A
We
have
our
ordinance
also
says
when
you
develop
land
you
put
in
the
street
the
curving
under
the
sidewalk
you
put
in
everything
before
the
Lots
are
sold
and
we
always
wave
the
hat
requirement
with
this
agreement.
This
is
a
development
agreement.
That
is
a
promise
to
do
that
stuff.
These
things
are
required
by
our
ordinance
and
we're
putting
them
off
so
that
the
developer,
so
it
doesn't
cost
the
devel
for
as
much
I
have
worked
for
a
city
that
required
the
sidewalks
to
be
put
in
and
in
that
community,
since
putting
a
driveway
in.
A
Would
you
know
if
you're
driving
back
and
forth
over
a
four
inch
sidewalk
like
Shane,
said
that
could
destroy
it,
so
they
designated
where
the
driveway
was
going
on
each
and
every
lot
and
that
had
six
inch
sidewalk
and
then,
if
they
wanted
to
change
the
location
of
the
driveway,
they
could
but
they're
probably
going
to
destroy
the
sidewalk
in
the
process
and
have
to
replace
it.
That
was
the
landowners
responsibility
and
that's
an
option
we
could
pursue,
which
would
give
us
a
sidewalk
connection
right
away
as
soon
as
the
roads
go
in.
H
In
that
you
know
way,
I
just
think:
there's
got
to
be
something
in
there.
That
says
we
get
to
a
certain
point
and
we
just
got
out
of
the
sidewalks
in
and
to
me:
that's
either
some
percentage
of
homes
built
on
a
given
street
length
or
something
and
I
know
we've
had
discussions
about
this
in
the
past
guys
and
because
it's
yeah
I,
don't
know
why.
M
I
M
Do
we
or
do
we
do
it
by
time?
Do
we
say
after
five
years
all
sidewalks
should
be
installed,
or
should
we
do
it
by
a
percentage
of
Lots
I?
There
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
more
direction
than
just
telling
me
I
can
order
side
walking
because
I
can
go
around
and
make
75%
of
the
citizens
in
this
city
mad
tomorrow
morning
can.
M
B
M
H
H
A
A
A
Territory
over
water
service
and
that
lawsuit
was
settled.
There
was
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
settlement
agreement
and
of
that
municipal
utilities
would
pay.
Fifty
thousand
the
city
would
pay
thirty
thousand,
and
what's
the
name
of
the
public
public
assurance
Alliance
would
pay
twenty
thousand
dollars
and
the
city
is
jointly
responsible,
along
with
municipal
utilities,
because
we
annex
land
and
subdivide
in
these
territories
that
are
the
areas
of
contention
for
water
service.
So
are
there
any
questions
about
why
we
would
pay
thirty
thousand
dollars
glad.
A
B
A
L
May
5th
2016,
the
mayor
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
signed
an
option
to
purchase
80
acre
parcel
of
land
contiguous
with
the
northeast
corner
of
the
Watertown
landfill
from
Dolores
cook
or
her
successors.
Subsequently,
the
city
did
purchase
15
of
those
80
acres,
leaving
this
65
with
the
passing
of
Dolores
cook
on
August
23rd.
The
land
option
provides
that
the
city
shall
give
written
notice
to
the
successors
of
Dolores
cook
within
90
days
of
her
death
and
that
the
terms
of
the
sale,
the
remaining
65
acres,
shall
be
cash.
L
Do
within
45
days
of
the
dispatch
of
the
notice
of
intent
to
exercise.
So
we
are
required
to
provide
written
notice
to
of
our
intent
to
exercise
this
option
to
the
successors
of
Doris
cook,
or
this
option
will
lapse
and
become
void,
and
if
this,
if
the
notice
and
the
completion
of
the
sale
or
not
do
not
occur
within
a
time
set
forth,
which
is
notice
within
90
days
of
her
passing
and
then
payment
within
45
days
of
that
written
know
what
is
being
dispatched.
L
H
H
G
L
I
L
B
K
Just
like
to
point
out
a
few
things:
originally,
we
appeared
before
you
to
apply
for
this
grant.
We
had
a
little
bit
of
a
different
direction,
but
shortly
after
that,
we
had
our
recorder
system
would
alum.
Our
IT
staff
did
an
excellent
job,
eating
it
back
up
and
running,
but
it's
an
older
system.
They
recommend
we
replace
it.
So
we
applied
reapply
for
that
grant
and
change
directions
just
a
little
bit.
We
want
to
replace
this
recorder
system.
We
were
successful,
receive
the
grant.
K
However,
the
price
of
replacing
that
is
twenty,
two
thousand
nine
sixty
five,
which
leaves
us
about
five
thousand
four
hundred
sixty
two
dollars
short.
So
in
talking
with
the
mayor
and
Shelley,
we
do
have
some
money
in
our
CIP
from
this
year
that
we
have
not
expended
twenty
four
thousand
dollars.
It
was
for
us
to
purchase
the
body
cameras
which
we
received
another
grant,
and
we
were
able
to
do
that.
B
B
Q
Alright
yeah
it's
going
to
replace
they
have
an
old
analog
system.
In
addition
to
that,
it's
running
XP,
so
there's
a
security
risk
where
we're
having
with
the
current
system,
it's
gonna,
be
all
I
pee
based
and
it's
gonna
help
with
our
backups
quite
significantly,
I
feel
pretty
confident
with
that.
A
lot
of
research
went
into
it
yeah
any
other
questions.
I
can
help
you.
A
P
D
P
P
P
P
P
H
A
P
Now
and
we
have
actually
Mike's
gone
now,
but
back
in
2014,
we
had
our
first
snow
storm
on
middle
of
November
and
we
were
short-staffed
because
some
people
were
out
hunting
and
stuff
and
and
too
far
away
to
get
back
here.
So
I
did
call
Mike
Berger
and
he
was
able
to
get
a
couple
of
his
staff
members
lined
up
and
and
the
loader
to
help
us
out.
So
he
had
to
be
nice.
If,
if
we
could
get
that
to
work
where
we
were
able
to
pull
in
another
department
staff
to
help
Wow.
P
There's
times
when
we
have
certain
pieces
of
equipment
setting,
because
we
don't
have
anybody
to
run
it,
it's
not
very
often
other
than
the
trucks,
because
we
have
changed
our
program
from
you
know
with
the
snow
gates,
it's
required
to
have
more
motor
graders.
So
we
do
have
some
trucks
generally
available
to
help
out
have.
P
P
P
I
I
C
C
P
E
F
F
No,
it's
just
every
city
is
different
on
how
they
pay
what
their
unique
contracts
are.
If
they
have
union
contracts
how
the
staffing
works
at
what
level
you
do
it.
The
other
thing
you
just
have
to
look
at
you
know
they're
out
at
3:00
a.m.
and
and
how
much
staff
and-
and
you
know,
just
to
make
sure
that
they're
being
safe
and
we're
not
creating
an
unsafe
situation.
So
you
know
I
mean
it's
I'm.
A
F
B
J
P
A
Other
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
thanks.
Rob
item
16
is
consideration
of
change
order.
Number
three
final:
two:
the
contract
with
hydrokleen
LLC
for
the
sanitary
sewer
rehabilitation
project,
increasing
the
contract
amount,
5730
$7.47.
We
have
a
motion
and
second
to
approve
the
change
order,
move
by
Solem.
Second,
by
Bueller,
discussion,
Shane
Thank.
M
You
mayor
this
year's
sanitary
sewer
rehabilitation
projects,
number
1708
was
a
lining
project,
so
we
didn't
do
any
or
much
open
excavation.
We
only
had
a
couple
of
manholes
that
were
replaced,
but
there
was
a
lining.
The
contract
was
awarded
to
hydrokleen
LLC,
which
has
the
local
presence,
which
was
really
nice
to
have
them
on
board.
Contract
was
amended
by
change
order,
number
one
which
was
to
clear
an
irregularity
on
the
bid.
So
we
did
that
one
right
away.
Subsequently,
we
had
a
change
for
number
two
which
slightly
increased
the
project
to.
M
195,000
505,
that
was
for
a
manhole
that
needed
a
service
rerouted
around
it
to
connect
to
the
new
pipe.
So
what
we
have
before
us
now
is
the
reconciling
change
order,
which
changes
all
of
the
plan
bid,
quantities
to
as-built
quantities,
and
what
that
resulted
in
is
an
increase
of
5730
$7.47
would
move
the
final
contract
amount.
200
and
1240.
M
E
A
A
Favor
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
signify
by
saying
aye
motion
carries
okay
item;
17
consideration
of
change,
order;
number
2
final;
the
contract
with
Bates
Construction
Company
for
the
landfill
cell
six
project,
decreasing
the
contract
amount;
thirty,
eight
thousand
five
hundred
ninety
nine
dollars,
sixty
four
cents.
So
a
motion
and
second
for
approval.
D
M
You
mayor
again,
this
is
a
long-standing
project
that
landfill
six
construction
was
started
in
the
project.
It
was
actually
started
in
2015
with
design
and
then
I
went
through
2016
with
construction.
The
contractor
didn't
get
completed
on
time,
so
the
construction
carried
over
to
this
spring,
the
I
guess
to
cut
to
the
chase
the
primarily
most
of
the
savings
of
this
thirty
eight
thousand
five
hundred.
Ninety
nine
dollars
is
due
to
$45,000
in
liquidated
damages
that
were
collected
due
to
going
past
the
completion
date.
So
we
did
our
due
diligence.
M
Hopefully
most
of
this
money
that
we
saved
here
covers
the
majority,
if
not
all,
of
our
extra
engineering
costs
that
we
also
accrued
on
the
other
end
of
this
portion
of
the
project.
So
you
know,
with
going
beyond
normal
boundaries,
we
had
to
pay
the
engineering
all
the
testing
services
to
stick
around
for
a
longer
period
of
time.
So
this.
L
A
Any
other
questions
or
discussion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
was
opposing,
say,
nay,
motion
carries
item
18.
Consideration
of
fireworks
show
permit
application
for
fireworks,
display
at
Watertown
aro
stadium
at
1600,
West,
Kemp
Avenue
on
September
21st,
2017,
a
motion
and
second
for
Whoville
move
by
Bueller.
B
J
J
D
A
C
Yeah
at
one
of
our
prior
meetings,
Mary,
you
desk
I
I
volunteered
to
have
discussions
with
the
county
in
regards
to
the
you
know,
just
kind
of
looking
at
some
possibilities.
Just
you
know
feeling
our
way
around
a
little
bit
on
in
regards
to
a
a
shared
facility.
You
know
City
Hall,
/
County,
whatever
and
I
have
had
conversations
with
a
bit
with
Brenda,
Hatton
and
I've
also
had
discussions
with
Lea
gable
since
that
time,
actually
Lee
and
I
are
going
to
meet
this
week.
C
C
If
that's
the
right
thing
to
do
mayor,
if
I
might
I'll
add
one
other
thing,
we
are
actively
in
the
process
of
trying
to
hire
a
new
finance
officer,
and
we
do
have
an
interview
committee
that
we
put
together
that
we'll
be
interviewing
latter
part
this
week
as
well.
So
we
are
trying
to
get
that,
get
that
any
cui
I
don't
last
as
of
last
week,
I
think
we
had.
You
know
a
few
qualified
applicants
that
we
were
going
to
going
to
look
at
so
just
I.
C
Bring
that
speed
on
that
and
then
I
do
have
question,
and
that
is.
We've
got
a
lot
of
new
folks
on
that
Planning,
Commission
and
I.
Don't
know
where
we're
at
at
this
point
in
time.
As
far
as
training
goes
for
those
folks
but
I
think
that's
something
that
we,
if
we're
not
pursuing,
that
needs
to
be
going.
S
C
A
You
Bruce
I
could
not
agree
with
you
more
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
Justin
before
he
left
put
together
a
training
manual
for
them.
They,
then
they
did
receive
some
training
already
in
house
all
of
the
new
plan,
commissioners
and
the
old
ones,
and
then
all
of
them
were
offered
the
opportunity
to
go
to
the
annual.
A
Western
planner
Association
South
Dakota
planners
convention
in
Spearfish
last
week
and
four
people
went
so
there's
active
training.
They
all
want
it
and
they
want
more.
So
we're
going
to
continue
to
give
them
training
first
districts
that
they'd
help
so
appreciate
your
bringing
that
up.
Is
there
any
new
business
America.
H
I
just
well
whether
told
anew,
but
I
won't
go
back
to
this
forum
for
a
second
and
the
recommendation
that
Dan
made
to
us
of
possibly
considering
the
fire
department
making
these
decisions-
I
don't
know
if
they
can
be
given
a
set
of
general
guidelines
that
we
all
agree
to
or
such,
but
I
think
it.
It
does
make
sense
that
they
could
do
that
with
an
understanding
of
what
we
want
versus
having
each
one
of
these
things
come
to
us.
H
S
A
R
B
J
A
Summit,
thank
you
almost
slipped
my
mind.
Wednesday
afternoon
at
the
Event
Center,
the
fifth
annual
mayor's
big
Sioux
River
water
summit
will
be
held.
Mayor
Hugh
there
from
Sioux,
Falls
and
I
are
co-sponsoring
it,
and
there
will
be
three
concurrent
sessions
going
on
throughout
the
afternoon
with
a
whole
lot
of
Education
on
different
water
quality
issues
on
canoeing
and
kayaking
and
various
uses
of
the
river
flood
control.
All
kinds
of
topics
there's
something
for
everybody
and
I'd
really
like
to
encourage
all
of
you
to
go
and
it
starts
at
1:00
and
it
goes
till
5:30.
A
A
A
A
Also
I'd
like
to
say
the
the
three
committees
that
I've
formed
to
talk
about
my
hundred
day
goals
and
also
the
goals
throughout
my
term
are
starting
this
week.
The
first
meeting
is
tomorrow
at
noon.
It's
to
talk
about
the
economic
health
of
our
community
meeting
will
last
about
an
hour.
Next
meeting
will
be
on
Thursday
at
noon
also
lasts
about
an
hour
talk
about
development
and
what
our
challenges
are
and
opportunities
for
making
improvements.
And
then
the
third
committee
is
the
homeownership
and
affordable
housing
that
will
meet
a
week
from
Tuesday.
A
All
of
the
meetings
are
at
noon
in
the
community
room
at
the
public
library
and
they're
completely
open
to
the
public,
and
if,
if
you're
wanting
to
know
what's
going
on,
you
don't
have
to
make
a
commitment,
you
can
just
come
and
listen
if
you
want
to
participate,
it's
open
to
everybody.
So
please
come
if
you're,
able
and
Bruce
has
something
he'd
like
to
see
yeah.
C
I
do
Shelley
Shelley,
Lee
I
think
this
is
your
last.
Is
this
not
your
last
meeting
with
us,
which
I
could
you
smiling
over
there
way
way
too
much,
but
I
just
I
just
want
to
say
a
couple
things
and
and
I
think
I
speak
for
most
everybody
here
when
I.
When
I
say
these
things,
you
know
you
shali,
we
couldn't
had
anybody
easier
to
work
with
I
know
when
you,
when
you
started
this
job,
there
was
a
lot
of
work.
C
You
had
to
do
to
get
yourself
up
to
speed
when
Tracy
resigned
and
moved
on
to
Sioux,
Falls
and
I'm
sure
that
was
a
considerable
amount
of
work
that
you
went
through
to
get
to
the
level
that
you
felt
you
need
to
be
to
be
proficient
at
your
job
and
you
certainly
have
been,
and
it's
been
an
award-winning
department
and
I
think
you
know
Shelley.
We
talk
a
lot
about
how
well
you
do
with
the
worth
of
books
and
that
extra
set
of
books
that
you
keep
just
I'm.
C
But
no,
you
know,
but
but
also
the
other
side
of
your
job
has
been
a
management
position
as
well
and
I.
Think
you,
your
your.
Your
staff
has
worked
swimmingly
with
you.
I
think
you
guys
really
worked
well
together,
and
that
says
a
lot
for
your
management
capabilities,
your
skill
and
the
way
you've
handled
the
people
that
have
reported
to
you.
You've
been
extremely
responsive
to
us.
C
We
we,
whenever
we
contact
you,
we
can
eyes,
expect
a
call
in
a
very
short
period
of
time,
and
we
can
expect
to
get
a
good
answer
from
you
and
you
explain
it
that
some
of
us
are
a
little
bit
knothead
ish
when
it
comes
to
some
of
the
finance
stuff
and
you've
been
patient
and
you've
worked
with
us
and
and
let
us
down
that
path.
You've
been
at
these
meetings.
You've
been
prepared.
You
always
have
good
direction
for
us,
and
I'm
now
makes
an
all-night
deal,
but
I
just
you've,
just
been
a
good
leader.
C
I
think
you've
made
our
life
a
hell,
a
lot
easier
in
a
lot
of
cases.
Then
you
do
a
smile
on
your
face
most
of
the
time
and
it's
just
the
the
transition
you
made
into
this
position.
I
think
is
it.
You
just
grew
exponentially
and
in
your
in
your
position
and
I.
Think
I
speak
for
all
of
us
when
I
say
that
you'll
definitely
be
missed
and
we
appreciate
all
your
work.
So
thank
you.
Thank.