►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 04 03 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
good
evening,
I
have
the
privilege
of
working
with
hospice
patients
and,
in
that
capacity,
I
come
face
to
face
with
the
reality
of
death
almost
on
a
daily
basis,
and
one
of
the
things
this
does
is
to
make
me
very
aware
of
what
a
wonderful
gift
life
is,
how
precious
and
fragile
it
is
and
how
fleeting
it
is.
So,
with
this
in
mind,
I
invite
you
to
pray
with
me
this
evening.
B
B
We
share
with
you
the
art
of
creativity,
the
exercise
of
grace
the
generative
power
of
making
the
world
a
better
place
and
with
your
son,
Jesus,
we
share
in
the
humble
act
of
selfless
service.
We
ask
you
to
bless
with
your
wisdom
and
guidance.
These
members
of
the
Watertown
City
Council,
give
them
discernment
in
making
difficult
decisions,
magnanimity
and
respect
for
the
opinions
of
others,
a
sense
of
humor
to
ease
the
burden
of
their
responsibilities
and
a
clear
conscience
from
living
lives
of
integrity
and
acting
for
the
good
of
the
people.
D
C
C
E
C
E
A
A
A
F
A
So
I'll
look
for
a
motion
is
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Glen
second,
by
John.
Any
questions
changes
that
you
need
hearing,
none
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
so
we'll
start
right
out
number
2a
authorization
to
advertise
for
bids
for
the
storm,
shelter
so
Shane
and
Don.
If
you
guys
want
to
handle
that,
for
us,
that'd
be
great.
G
G
G
This
is
kind
of
a
picture.
The
design
that
RSA
architects
put
forward
for
us
varnish
black,
would
be
on
the
outside.
I
think
the
inside
would
be
pretty
pretty
similar
to
that
as
well.
Next
slide
is
kind
of
just
the
overall
layout
of
the
storm
shelter.
Essentially,
we
did
not
have
a
partition
in
the
middle.
It
says
future
there,
but
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
put
that
in
I
did
talk
to
Jim
pop
and
is
the
state
mitigation
grant
director
and
he
did
give
us
a
Thor
'ti
to
move
forward
that
right
away.
G
G
G
Next
slide
is
just
basically
kind
of
a
major
overview
of
the
where
the
Softball
Complex
is
at
and
where
the
parking
lot
would
be
for
those
folks
that
would
be
coming
for
the
storm,
shelter
and
basically
the
sighs,
like
I,
said
it's
a
30
by
40
150
to
200
is
kind
of
the
number
that
they
say
we
can
use
for
it
and
cost
overall
cost
for
the
project
that
we
got
was
$225,000
not
to
exceed,
and
the
city's
portion
is
fifty-six
thousand
dollars.
Any
questions
was.
H
I
I
would
anticipate
is
that
we'd,
probably
we've
talked
about
various
kiosk
and
informational
pieces
over
at
the
softball
complex
I,
would
anticipate
that
a
sign
we
either
be
incorporated
into
a
kiosk
or
in
that
vicinity.
That
would
direct
them
over
to
the
Anza
complex
plus.
We
would
probably
have
a
written
itinerary
for
an
announcer
at
the
ball
field,
so
that
if
and
when
threatening
weather
is
coming
into
the
area
that
the
announcement
of
where
to
go
and
where
you
can
be
safe
would
be
I.
I
J
I
It
it's
certainly
safer
than
being
out
in
the
open,
but
it's
not
rated
for
storms.
This
building
that
we're
going
to
put
up
is
actually
a
special
concrete
block
and
then
all
of
the
cores
of
the
block
get
completely
filled
with
mortar,
so
it's
basically
a
cement
enclosure,
it's
very
and
even
the
roof.
It's
gonna
have
a
tornado
rated
rough
so
that
you
know
it
doesn't
collapse
in
them
and
hurt
anybody
either.
So
it's
a
pretty
intense
rebuilt
building,
there's.
K
I
G
L
G
H
I
I
Primarily,
what
those
most
they
operate
off
of
is,
of
course,
as
a
either
either
needs
to
be
telephone,
driven
where
you'd
have
a
forty,
some
dollar
fee
per
site
to
have
Wi-Fi
or
or
you'd,
have
to
have
it
hardwired
to
cable
or
something
else,
and
that
that's
where
the
cost
prohibitive.
This
is
it's
not
in
actually
trying
to
implement
it,
but
you'd
have
a
so
if
you're,
only
gonna
use
it
for
months
out
of
the
year,
and
you
had
to
pay
a
$45
phone
fee
to
keep
the
Wi-Fi
going.
It's
not
very
efficient.
M
A
M
G
A
M
I
We're
even
gonna
have
a
inline
water
heater,
so
we
that's
a
requirement
that
we
have
hot
water
available
in
these
and
we
we
talked
about
doing
an
inline
heater
rather
than
invest
in
you
know,
gas
and
and
all
the
other
stuff
for
a
traditional
water
heater.
So
we've
pretty
much
covered
all
the
bases
that
we
think
we
would
need
for
this.
What's.
K
I
K
A
A
Three
ordinance
number
1713,
removing
chapter
7.1,
three
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
to
dissolve
the
Civic
and
Rec
board
and
place
to
pray,
Lakes,
Wellness
Center
under
the
Park
Park
and
Recreation
Board.
This
is
a
second
reading.
I
will
be
looking
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
further
discussion.
All.
D
A
N
Can
certainly
do
that
mayor
so,
as
you
recall,
with
the
advent
of
the
prairie
Lakes
recreation
center,
our
pretty
Lakes
Wellness
Center.
Excuse
me
that
the
use
of
the
Watertown
recreation
center
as
a
joint
use
facility
between
the
city
and
the
school
district
is
no
longer
present,
namely
the
use
as
a
joint
use.
Recreation
center.
N
So
therefore,
it
no
longer
constituted
a
quote
cooperative
recreation
system
which,
by
state
law,
would
allow
it
to
have
a
separate
civic
and
Recreation
board
as
a
result,
now
with
it
being
under
a
city
building
all
of
our
recreation
facilities
that
were
once
at
the
recreation
center
being
under
the
Prairie
Lakes
Wellness
Center.
There's
no
use
no
need
for
a
joint
you
structure
and
so
by
state
law.
Pers
s
TCL,
chapter
9
38
the
authority
to
manage
the
prairie
Lakes
Wellness
Center
would
be
need
to
be
vested
in
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Board.
A
Thanks
Justin
any
questions
on
that:
hey,
none,
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
thanks.
Justin
number
for
first
reading
of
ordinance,
number
1712
amending
section.
Twenty
one
point:
two:
three:
zero:
three
and
chapter
twenty
one
point:
nine
zero
other
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown.
Regarding
our
G
residential
garage
district,
shame
you
want
to
give
us
idea.
What's
going
on
there,
you
remember
we
had
that
in
front
and
there
was
a
couple
of
changes.
Yep.
I
So
brief
explanation:
the
this
was
brought
to
city
staff
through
the
Planning
Commission
meeting,
as
desired
to
enhance
the
buildings
or
the
ability
to
build
buildings
in
the
RG
district.
That
would
accommodate
recreational
sized
vehicles.
Campers
large
boats,
you
know
like
pontoons
and
different
things,
and
so
the
it
was
recognized
that
the
current
site
wall
height
of
ten
feet
was
not
adequate
to
accommodate
those
vehicles.
I
So
the
idea
was
to
increase
the
sidewall
height
to
16
feet,
so
we
discussed
at
length
a
lot
of
other
variations
that
we
did
with
this,
our
G
district
with
regard
to
those
structures,
so
it
came
out
that
we
would
do
an
articulation
on
a
side
wall
that
exceeded
20
feet
so
that
we
would
have
some
aesthetic
value
to
those
structures
and
that
just
have
a
big
box
sitting
out
there.
We
did
increase
the
maximum
height
of
the
building
to
230
feet
to
reflect
the
added
sidewall
height.
I
A
A
N
Justin
go
ahead,
Thank,
You
mayor
this
is
a
revision
meant
to
reflect
a
recommendation
by
the
urban
renewal
board
as
referenced
when
this
came
up
here
at
the
last
work
session.
This
has
been
a
two-year
ongoing
situation
regarding
this
particular
provision
and
really
what
has
happened
since
then
is
all
measures
or
all
indications
of
the
existence
of
this
ordinance
have
been
taken
care
of
the
signage.
N
A
number
of
folks
didn't
even
think
that
this
was
enforceable
anymore,
but
in
fact
there
still
is
this
language
in
ordinance,
and
so
the
urban
renewal
board
recommended
for
the
rationales
given
in
the
memo
that
this
ordinance
should
be
repealed
by
the
City
Council.
Given
its
enforceability
concerns,
given
you
know
the
prudence
of
the
city
injecting
itself
into
what
would
otherwise
be
a
matter
that
would
be
handled
as
neighbors
in
the
Uptown
area.
A
A
There's
a
there's,
a
there's,
a
basketball
game
going
on
tonight.
So
number
six.
First
reading
ordinance
number
1714
amending
section,
one
point:
zero:
five:
zero
one
of
the
revised
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Watertown
to
depict
the
correct
statutory
for
the
airport
board
again
Justin.
If
you
want
to
take
that
one
on
Thank.
N
You
mayor
and
be
happy
to
this
is
simple
housekeeping
measure
when
this
ordinance
was
adopted,
and
there
were
two
provisions
in
state
statute
that
allowed
for
municipalities
to
adopt
municipal
airport
boards.
It
just
so
happened
that
the
state
legislature
found
that
these
two
provisions
were
redundant
and
decided
to
get
rid
of
the
one
provision
that
we
utilized
in
our
ordinances
as
Authority,
for
the
municipal
airport
board
to
exist.
So
what
this
ordinance
does
is
simply
strikes
that
provision
replaces
it
with
the
authority.
N
A
A
N
N
That,
as
you
will
recall,
at
the
last
work
session,
there
was
discussion
about
potentially
expanding
the
scope
of
this
entire
chapter
and
that
had
once
regulated
bicycles
and
in
a
few
sections,
a
few
other
conveyances
to
cover
more
personal
conveyances
than
simply
bicycles.
And
so
what
has
transpired
since
then
is
a
substantial
rewrite
of
chapter
1907
to
include
all
manner
of
personal
conveniences
that
would
be
regulated
under
this
chapter,
though
the
framework
for
regulation
is
predominantly
the
same.
N
So
while
there
are
now
scooters
carts,
electric
wheelchairs,
rollerblades,
electric
personal
assistive
devices,
which
is
just
a
fancy
term
for
Segway,
like
devices
that
are
now
regulated
under
this
chapter,
the
other
provisions,
the
old
provisions
about
obeying
traffic
laws
being
ridden
carefully,
not
ridden
more
than
two
abreast
lighting
required.
Hitching
rides.
Those
all
remain.
The
one
additional
restriction
here,
however,
is-
and
this
was
alluded
to
again
at
the
work
session-
that
Segway
like
devices,
your
personal
electric
personal
assistive
devices.
N
M
N
N
M
I
gotta
make
a
comment:
I
know
that
is
a
game,
but
I
have
to
laugh
at
this.
Justin
I've
been
working
a
lot
back
and
forth
on
emails
here
and
last
week.
He
calls
me
and
I
was
busy.
I
couldn't
take
a
phone
call
from
him,
so
my
wife
took
a
message.
I
get
done
and
she
says
you
need
to
call
Justin.
Yes
and
I
said:
okay,
I'll
call
him.
She
said
you
know
wow.
She
said
he's
really
nice
and
calm
for
an
engineer
for
free
an
attorney.
So
that's
a
good
compliment.
L
P
N
Mayor,
how
really
you
know
this
is
work
that
was
driven
in
large
part
by
Councilman
Manties
work,
the
work
of
the
animal
control
board,
mr.
Miller,
who
I
see
is
in
the
audience
here
tonight.
If
you
would
like
to
mr.
Miller's
step
up
to
the
plate
and
be
part
of
this
conversation,
you're
more
than
welcome
to
come
swimming
manatee
feel
free
to
cut
me.
A
N
N
The
big
part
was
complying
with
federal
law,
making
sure
that
our
service
animal
lengths,
our
assistance,
animal
language,
captured
what
federal
law
currently
reads,
as
so
you'll
see
changes
in
here,
two
definitions
that
do
that
that
relate
to
certain
provisions
like
section
301,
oh
three,
how
assistance
animals
are
specially
treated
by
the
city
on
city,
property
and
there's
also
a
provision
in
here
that
clearly
exempts
police
dogs
from
all
of
chapter
301,
given
their
unique
status.
Another
provision
that
is
covered
in
here
relates
to.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
find
that
here.
N
N
A
K
A
F
Want
to
pitch
in
and
give
my
kudos
to
Justin
for
helping
us
take
our
scribbled
ideas
on
the
back
of
my
notepad
and
turn
it
into
ordinance,
so
I
know
Dan
and
Marc
and
Krishna
and
Justin
and
I
all
worked
really
hard
to
keep
cleaning
up
these
ordinances,
which
have
needed
to
be
done
for
last
ten
years.
I
think
so
anyway,
thanks
to
all
of
you,
okay.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We
will
we'll
move
on
to
number
nine
consideration
of
a
bridge
inspection
program
resolution
for
use
with
the
South
Dakota
Department
of
Transportation
retainer
contracts.
Resolution
number
17
2:09
this
time,
I'll
entertain
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
Mike
second,
by
Glen
and
I
will
let
you
Shane
take
this
okay.
I
I
A
I
This
is
a
completely
separate
thing.
This
is
a
mandatory
bridge.
Inspections
are
mandatory,
the
the
state
receives
federal
funding
to
assist
communities
with
that
inspection
cost,
and
we
have
to
agree
by
resolution
to
pay
20%
to
participate
in
that
program.
Otherwise,
100%
of
the
costs
of
the
inspections
would
fall
in
the
shoulders
of
the
city,
so
we
choose
to
participate
annually
in
that
program,
so
we
get
the
80%
cost
share
from
the
state.
I
So
the
other
just
so
you
see
the
other
layer.
What
are
you
saying
so?
The
other
funding
is,
it's
called
big
grant
and
that's
for
big
infrastructure,
and
that
is
a
totally
separate
program
within
the
state
deal
T
and
we
do
currently
have
two
big
grant
applications
in
and
just
an
update
on
that
real
briefly,
is
that
we
expect
to
hear
whether
or
not
we're
funded
from
that
by
the
end
of
April,
so
I
hope
to
have
a
report
sometime
in
me.
Okay,.
A
Any
other
questions,
Harry
none
I,
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
10
consideration
of
a
resolution,
vesting
authority
of
the
City
Council
in
the
building
official
and
chief
of
police
to
jointly
approve
public
dances
or
festivals
on
city
property
and
right
away
and
to
approve
approve
contract
language
for
such
purposes.
Resolution
number
17-10
I'll,
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
purposes,
motion
by
bath
second
by
Randy,
so
go
ahead!
You
guys,
if
you
want
to
light
this
up,
whoever
I.
N
Talk
in
enough
circles,
and
then
we
can
get
our
story
straight
up
know
that
the
the
council
dealt
with
this
issue
here,
boy
about
a
month
ago,
month
and
a
half
ago,
where
the
discussion
started
about
how
to
broach
this
topic
of
Street
dances,
how
to
handle
it.
What
kind
of
potential
limits
might
be
placed
there?
N
The
full
gamut
of
considerations
there
well
in
the
meantime,
it
was
discovered
that
we
have
had
street
dances
in
the
past,
but
we
hadn't
the
formal
procedure
or
the
formal
protections
that
maybe
would
be
most
ideal
to
have
given
the
potential
liabilities
that
are
associated
with
street
dances.
The
concerns
they're,
making
sure
that
you
know
the
folks
that
are
running
these
street
dances
are
on
the
up-and-up
and
you
know
are
able
to
manage
risk.
Well.
N
Language
you'll
see
reference
to.
You
know
statements
of
ailments
by
the
applicants
that
they
are
licensed,
that
they
will
comport
to
their
liquor,
license
that
they
have
certain
entertainment
obtained
who
that
entertainment
is
their
contact,
information
and
other
representations,
including
particularly
indemnification
language,
which
is
helpful,
very
helpful
from
a
risk
risk
perspective,
so
anyways
I
either.
You,
gentlemen,
would
want
to
continue
the
discussion
yeah.
A
K
Can
a
couple
things
that
came
up
and
we
talked
about
this
before
the
main
concerns
ones-
a
volume.
Then
that's
pretty
easy
control,
but
this
document
I
guess
I
question:
should
it
define
or
specify
when
they
have
to
end
or
you
want
to
leave
that
ambiguous
as
we
go
for
each
one,
I
thought
it
I
thought
it.
It
says
it
has
blanks
for,
but
it
doesn't
specifically
say,
has
to
end
by.
N
K
O
That's
gonna
be
the
thing
we're
just
gonna
have
to
float
with,
for
a
little
bit,
we'll
have
to
see
I
mean
shooters.
So
far
is
the
one
that's
come
before
us,
but
we
have
had
some
interest
from
sparkies
and
they're
thinking
about
teaming
up
with
Duffy's
property
across
the
street.
You
know
if
it
gets
to
be
an
issue
that
this
is
becoming
so
much
might
have
to
revisit
that.
But
I
think
right
now
is
that
gotten
to
that
point
so
I
hate
to
just
start
a
bunch
of
rules.
I
don't
want
to
really
need
yet.
A
And
there's
been
some
some
real
discussion
of
where
the
bandstand
can
be.
You
know,
so
the
noise
doesn't
travel
all
the
way
north
or
south.
You
know
maybe
bounce
it
off
some
of
the
buildings
that
are
right
there
off
the
shooters
building
off
the
the
those
buildings
right
in
the
parking
lot.
There
sure.
K
Q
J
L
People
permission:
there
are
some
people
from
the
public
here
tonight
that
in
the
audience
that
have
participated
in
these
I
think
it
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
trying
to
keep
them
under
control.
I
mean
noises
noise.
The
amazing
thing
is
we
get
the
majority
of
our
noise
complaints
from
halfway
across
town
that
the
people
who
live
downtown,
like
the
ones
that
are
complaining
so
I.
M
A
couple
things
on
it,
I
would
feel
much
better
agreeing
with
this,
because,
quite
honestly,
without
pretty
specific
terms
of
what
we
all
have
agreed
to
in
regards
to
time
is
when
it
ends,
and
a
number
of
these
that
we
have
we're
going
to
be
the
ones
getting
the
phone
calls
and
without
I'd,
rather
agree
to
the
terms
that
we
all
clearly
understand
it
work
and
then
I'm
good
with
this
administrative
Lea.
Without
that
I
can't
support
it.
So
what
do
you
miss
them?
Yeah.
M
A
That
it's
fine,
you
know
issue.
If
let
me,
let
me
just
clarify,
hang
on
to
your
issue.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
mean
we're
sitting
here
and
and
we're
gonna
have
three
per
per
bar
or
something
like
that,
or
only
three
in
town
or
something
that's
a
tough
one
to
decide
on
so
I
just
want
to
throw
my
opinion
out
for
y'all,
so
they're.
M
Is
we
have
some
of
these
places
that
have
had
violations
in
the
alcohol
checks
and
I
question
whether
they
should
be
eligible
to
do
this,
when
they
have
had
a
failure
within
with
the
alcohol
check,
I
think
there
should
be
some
kind
of
consider
or
some
limiting
as
to
after
a
a
failed
alcohol
Jack
how
long
they
can
go
without
this
is
a
privilege
and
they
violated
the
original
privilege,
which
is,
is
the
requirement.
So
to
me,
there
should
be
some
language
in
there
that
that
deals
with
the
alcohol
check
violations.
N
H
E
K
E
E
Q
Q
Justin
came
up
and
put
in
here
because
there
were
things
that
came
out
of
that
meeting,
I'm
pretty
comfortable
with
most
of
the
stuff
in
here
I,
don't
know
what
I
want
to
be
the
sole
one
to
decide
if
we're
gonna,
have
these
dances
or
not
I'm
sure
gonna
be
looking
towards
the
mayor
and
the
rest
to
you
for
some
guidance
along
the
way.
There
are
some
bars
in
Tallinn
if
they
apply
I,
probably
going
to
be
opposed
to
it
because
of
some
violations.
Q
A
O
A
A
F
I
think
you're
closer
to
I
mean
I,
wouldn't
have
as
much
insight
information
on
who
violated.
What
is
you
would
you
know,
and
so
I
would
trust
to
your
judgment.
You
know
whether
or
not
this
is
something
good
or
not
to
pursue
so
I'm
comfortable
with
the
fact
that
you
know,
given
your
positions
and
the
fact
that
you
are
going
to
discuss
it
with
other
people,
you
know
as
long
as
you're
comfortable
at
that
level.
I
think
I
am.
Q
It
yeah
I
know
one
of
our
meetings.
We
talked
about
an
end
time
and
I
know:
Don
alluded
to
that.
It
does
say
it
shall
go
no
later
than
one
I
know.
There
was
some
discussion
about
12:30.
We
discussed
that
with
shooters
and
they
didn't
think
that
was
gonna
work
for
him
and
they're
here.
If
you
wanted
to
hear
from
them,
but
that's
what
they
told
us.
So
that's
why
the
one
o'clock
was
written
in
here.
A
Q
A
11
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
joint
powers,
maintenance
and
encroachment
agreement
between
the
Department
of
Transportation,
City,
Water
town
for
the
highway
81
and
20th
Avenue,
south
roundabout
project
and
Shane.
If
you
want
well,
maybe
I'll
get
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
and
then
then
Shane
I'll.
Have
you
go
on
that
motion
by
John
second
by
Dan
Shane?
You
want
to
go
through
this.
Yes,
Thank
You,
mayor.
I
I
This
particular
project
is
the
infamous
roundabouts
in
intended
for
construction
at
the
intersection
of
highway
81
and
20th
Avenue
South
the
anticipated
construction
schedules
that
would
be
under
construction
in
2018,
with
that
said,
the
d-o-t
and
the
city,
which
we
also
have
a
portion
of
the
project
to
realign
some
of
our
sanitary
sewer
within
the
intersection
to
accommodate
the
new
pavement
footprint
we
are.
Our
personal
project
is
about
$200,000
estimated
cost
and
we
are
planning
to
put
our
plans
within
their
project
and
have
it
loud
at
the
same
time.
I
A
To
proceed,
ok
and
I
just
wanted
to
comment
about
this.
You
know
because
Shane
we
we
are
bringing
this
forward.
There
are
some
some
folks
out
there.
Some
businesses
that
have
sent
in
a
request,
Don
you've,
probably
got
a
couple
letters
I
would
imagine
they
asked
me
where
to
send
them.
I
said:
send
them
to
Don.
A
M
Now,
what
is
describe
what
has
transpired
down
there
to
appease
some
of
those
people
and
the
issue
down
there
that
that
we
all
had
concerns
with
that?
Apparently,
that
has
lessened
in
that.
My
understand
is
its
lessened
greatly,
at
least
in
listening
to
people,
and
if
that
is
the
case,
so
if
you
would
describe
that
in
secondarily,
if
that
is
the
case,
why
would
we
go
to
the
trouble
of
reconstructing
this
whole
thing
and
spending
two
hours
of
the
city's
money?
If
the
solution
that's
there
is
effective
and.
A
The
solution
and
Don
you
may
want
to
help
me
out
on
this:
the
solution
that
there
is
a
temporary
solution.
We
were
they're
still
going
to
put
in
some
rumble
strips
on
the
south
side
and
not
the
north
side,
because
I
believe
the
the
community
down
there
asked
that
the
rumble
strips
not
be
in
there.
The
state
felt
as
though
the
rumble
strips
should
be
there
just
for
safety
reasons.
They
don't
like
the
noise
that
they
produce.
A
It
has,
in
fact
lessened
the
and,
and
chief
you
may
step
in
here
to
there
hasn't
been
any
accidents
down
there.
Since
this
has
happened,
there's
some
confusion.
When
people
get
there
and
there's
cars
and
up
on
both
sides
and
and
on
the
on
the
east
and
west,
there
is
confusion
of
who
gets
to
go
first
and
who
gets
to
go
second.
A
I
I'll,
add
to
that
discussion.
Councilmen.
The
duty
is
in
the
driver's
seat
with
regard
to
the
reconstruction
of
this
intersection,
and
if
the
project
is
going
to
go
forward,
the
city
and
other
utilities
related
to
that
intersection
have
been
instructed
to
accommodate
the
new
construction
and
the
footprint
so
that
obligates
the
city
to
commit
to
its
portion
of
that
process
and
our
portion
is
estimated
at
$200,000.
I
A
M
A
K
K
I
Of
the
footprint
of
the
project,
you
can
see
that
it
does
twist
some
of
these
entrances
into
the
roundabout
and,
of
course,
that's
to
help
maintain
speed
and
in
get
directions
so
that
that
they,
you
start
to
curve
in
the
right
direction
of
going
around.
It
is
a
single
lane
around
the
ball
with
a
interior
area
for
the
trailers
of
the
semi
stuff.
Excuse
me
encroach
upon
towards
the
center,
so
single
lane
is
really
important.
I
That
was
a
big
design
element
that
we
discussed
with
the
state
at
length
because
we
didn't
want
people
moving
through
there
side
by
side.
That
was
not
going
to
be
a
safe
and
comfortable
fit
for
the
community.
So
this
footprint-
this
isn't
probably
the
final,
but
this
was
a
very
good
representative
of
what's
what's
intended
to
be
out
there.
If.
K
K
There
was
a
lot
of
concerns
about
some
of
the
trucking
folks,
specifically
those
with
a
pupper
second
trailer
on
the
back
end.
Is
that
going
to
be
able
to
fit
they
actually
sketch
us
out
and
I?
Think
if
you
go
online,
you
can
see
a
video
where
they
actually
sketch
this
out
and
drove
those
trucks
through
them,
and
naturally
you
got
to
slow
down
a
little
good
to
do
that,
but
that
was
part
of
the
reason.
So
I
those
two
points
I
think
need
to
be
refreshed.
Yep.
I
And
another
point
to
that:
they've
enhanced
this
roundabouts.
If
you
look
at
this
right
hand,
turn
movement
coming
from
the
south
to
the
east
and
coming
from
the
north
to
the
east
and
all
that
they've
actually
made
those
almost
into
what
we
could
call
a
free
right
turn
where
you
bet
you,
you
just
have
to
slow
down
or
enough
to
negotiate
the
curve
and
you're
right
on
your
way
going.
I
You
know
on
the
side
leg
without
even
having
to
enter
the
roundabout
proper,
so
they've
done
a
very
good
job
in
designing
this
that
only
those
people
have
to
go
completely
around
to
the
left
have
to
engage
the
circle.
Otherwise
you're
pretty
much
that
pretty
good
pattern
of
traffic
through
this
intersection.
So
so.
A
A
truck
you
know
reality
if
it's
coming
out
of
glacial
lakes
would
really
just
take
that
that
easy
right-hand
turn
to
go
south.
If
they
were
going
to
go
north,
they
would
have
a
bit
of
a
they'd
have
to
get
into
the
roundabout,
and
if
they
have
to
go
east
they
would
get
just
a
partial.
So
it
really
shouldn't
be
right.
A
Any
other
questions
on
it,
Harry
none
I,
think
I
have
a
motion.
Don't
I
show
me
now
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
thanks
for
putting
that
up.
There,
Shane
I
think
that
was
a
good
visual
number
twelve
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
send
a
professional
service
agreement
with
Houston
engineering
in
corporate
for
the
landfill
stormwater
plan
update
project
in
the
amount
of
forty
seven
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
this
time.
I
Thank
You
mayor
this
is
essentially
Phase
three
of
of
our
current
landfill
projects.
If
is
my
screen
up
again,
okay,
so
to
the
far
northeast
of
the
landfill
site.
This
is
our
landfill
site.
We
own
all
this
property
in
that
square.
So
six
is
the
most
recent
cell
that's
being
constructed
out
there.
That
was
scheduled
to
be
finished
this
summer.
It
wasn't
originally
scheduled
to
be
done.
Last
fall.
It
had
complications
and
did
not
get
done
right
next
to
it
was
self
five,
and
that
was
done
two
years
previous.
I
So
this
is
phase
3
and
phase
three
is
going
to
work
on
the
stormwater
impacts
along
the
north
boundary
along
the
east
and
we're
taking
water
out
of
these
byways
and
we're
going
to
redo
the
storm
sewer
system
throughout
the
entire
facility
and
this
engineering
agreement
that
we're
asking
you
to
give
the
mayor
authorization
to
sign
is
to
initiate
that
phase
three
project
and
it's
it's
required.
We've
done
enough
changes
out
that
the
existing
storm
sewer
system
and
plan
is
not
no
longer
up
to
date.
So
any.
A
Questions
for
Shane
on
this
okay,
none,
then
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
opposed
motion
carried
number
13
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
professional
service
agreement
with
banner
associates
incorporated
for
the
Willow
Creek
floodplain
map
update
project
in
the
amount
of
sixteen
thousand
one
hundred
and
eighty
dollars.
I'll.
Look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion.
I
I'm
still
on
good,
thank
you.
Excellent
Wow,
banner
and
associates
was
originally
hired
to
do
a
stormwater
drainage
study
for
Willow
Creek
as
it
enters
through
the
eastern
portion
of
the
community
and
define
how
the
flat
impacts
would
be
during
a
certain
storm
event.
After
that
initial
original
study
was
done.
The
city
adopted
that
into
an
ordinance,
and
so
we
have
a
Willow
Creek
floodplain
study.
I
Since
the
initiation
of
that
study,
there
was
some
a
few
anomalies
with
the
datum,
which
means
elevation
data
that
the
original
study
was
done
on.
So
since
then,
the
state
has
come
up
with
of
evaluation
of
elevations
called
lidar
and
that's
driven
by
technology.
It's
a
long
technical
term,
but
they
fly
the
entire
state.
They
receive
data
back
and
re-establish
what
elevations
are
out
there.
I
I
What
we
hope
to
do
is
this
updated
light.
Our
data
will
either
indicate
whether
that
is
accurate
or
not.
If
it's
not
accurate,
will
amend
the
map
to
take
that
area
out
of
the
Willow
Creek
flood
plain
area
secondary.
If
we
do
find
that
it
is
in
there,
it
appears,
based
on
the
original
study,
that
we
could
do
some
minor
work
on
this
portion
of
Willow
Creek
and
thus
remove
the
ice
Plex
and
the
softball
field
from
the
Willow
Creek
floodplain
impacts.
I
So
it's
a
two
pronged
approach,
we're
gonna
ask
and
with
that
we've
identified
there
were
several
tasks
given
in
the
report
by
banner,
but
we're
only
asking
that
we
approach
task
one
and
optional
tasks,
six
with
this
agreement,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
asking
for
permission
for
the
mayor
to
enter
into
the
agreement
to
get
this
work
done.
Let's
make
sure
that
that
we're
accurately
depicting
the
flood
plain
and
its
impacts
to
the
Willow
Creek
area
and.
A
I
And
I
want
to
be
clear,
because
that
is
that
in
and
of
itself
isn't
going
to
be,
that
I
would
consider
make
this
report
being
success
or
a
failure,
because
even
if
we
fail
to
achieve
that
goal
of
not
having
to
put
the
extra
fill
in
the
ice
Plex
well,
it
will
do.
Is
it
will
solidify?
This
will
Creek
study
so
that
we
can
more
accurately
depict
the
impacts
to
those
people
that
want
to
develop
all
the
way
through
the
district
all
the
way
from
the
Big
Sur
River
up
through
the
i29
corridor.
I
A
I
just
want
to
can
you
zoom
in
on
these
drops
of
property,
also
zoom
in
on
that,
just
a
little
bit
all
that
property
there,
just
for
for
your
information
has
recently
been
sold,
has
been
sold
to
a
earth
company
Earth
moving
company.
That
has
some
grand
plans
for
us
on
that
area,
which
will
be
coming
forward
in
just
a
short
time.
So
it's
exciting
to
see
that
happen.
A
Alright.
So
at
this
time,
if
there's
no
more
questions,
I
will
look
for
council
action.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
motion
carries
number
14
consideration.
Amendment
number
1
to
the
professional
service
agreement
with
HR
green
incorporated
for
the
wwt
F
laboratory.
That's
wastewater
treatment
facility,
laboratory
replacement
project,
increasing
the
contract
amount
by
$4,000.
A
Excuse
me
at
this
time.
I'll
look
for
a
motion
in
a
second
for
discussion
motion
by
bill.
Second,
by
Beth
any
questions
on
this
hearing.
None
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
proposed
motion
carries
number
15
consideration
of
bids
received
for
the
2017
alley
and
parking
lot
improvement
project
at
this
time.
I'll
look
for
a
motion,
a
second
for
discussion
wishing
buy-down
second
by
dan,
and
then
you
know
this
is
what
you've
been
waiting
for.
A
I
Summary
March
9th
we
took
bids
on
a
multiple
pronged
project.
One
was
a
ally
assessment
project.
The
other
portion
was
the
parking
lot,
reconstruction
for
the
Jackson
Park
boat
ramp
era,
and
the
third
piece
of
that
project
was
the
improvements
to
the
bike
trail
along
side
of
the
Jackson
Park
parking
lot.
I
The
bids
that
coming
above
engineers
estimates
the
alley
assessments
would
increase
roughly
by
a
couple
hundred
dollars
per
a
lot.
We
did
send
out
letters
to
the
landowners
that
were
a
part
of
that
project,
requesting
informational
feedback,
por
hora
con
2
that
we
received
no
information.
So
we
have
to
make
the
assumption
that
they
are
still
on
board
with
the
project
as
there
weren't
any
active
protests
lobby
to
the
city.
Now,
if
there's
anybody
in
the
audience,
I'd
like
to
hear
what
they
would
like
to
say.
P
P
A
A
I
A
A
So
I'll
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carried
so
then
I'm
gonna
go
down
to
number
two,
which
is
the
I'm
going
to
look
for
a
motion
a
second
for
bit
scheduled
number
two:
the
Jackson
Park
parking
lot
of
improvements,
I'll,
look
for
a
motion
and
discussion
for
motion
a
second
for
discussion,
I'm,
sorry
motion
by
Mike.
Second,
by
Brad
there
you
go
Shane,
okay,.
I
Thank
you.
As
we
previously
discussed
the
Jackson
Park
parking
lot,
improvements
came
in
over
estimate.
We
have
a
budget
of
$75,000
and
the
bid
price
came
in
at
104
643,
so
approximately
$30,000
over
our
project
budget.
As
we
discussed
that
the
work
session,
our
options
would
be
to
deny
or
reject
this
bid.
We
could
table
it
and
see
if
there's
some
way
to
negotiate
the
price
down
by
changing
some
material
aspects.
I
have
reached
out
to
the
contractor
with
regard
to
that
discussion
if
and
see.
A
I
We
would
schedule
a
pre-construction
meeting
sometime
in
the
next
month
and
determine
the
schedule
at
that
point
time.
One
of
the
provisions
that
we've
written
in
is
that
the
lot
be
open
to
the
public
as
much
as
possible
during
the
three
holidays,
in
other
words
Memorial
Day,
fourth
of
July
and
Labor
Day.
So
the
work
would
be
done
around
that
schedule
and.
A
I
They've
actually
presented
that
as
a
design
option
for
the
city
and
they're
looking
actually
requesting
the
city.
If
we're
interested
in
accepting
recycle
asphalt,
products
in
our
mix,
design
and
the
state
duty
allows
a
certain
percentage
of
recycled
asphalt,
products
and
they're
mixed
designs,
and
many
of
the
larger
cities
do
as
well
home.
It
is
typically
does
have
some
cost
savings
to
the
city,
because
you're
reusing
material
that
you
don't
have
to
go
out
and
buy
extra
virgin
materials
to
build
the
product
with
so.
I
A
I
M
A
K
A
A
A
Okay,
so
I
have
a
motion
by
Randy
and
second
by
by
Mike
any
other
conversations
on
it.
Hearing
none
I'll,
look
for
council
action,
all
those
in
favor,
say,
aye
opposed
motion
carried
I
will
probably
look
for
the
same
motion
on
bid
schedule.
Three
Jackson
Park
trail
improvement
since
I
doubt
if
they
would
want
to
do
that
without
the
other
end
of
it.
So
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
table
this
also
pushing
by
Mike
to
table
this
item
second
by
Glen
to
table
at
any
other
questions.
A
K
I
Actually
I
was
hoping
to
have
the
draft
letter.
I
can't
send
that
email
I
don't
have
enough.
The
supposition
was
that
there
was
a
lot
of
email
data
available.
I
looked
through
that
and
essentially
maybe
five
or
six
emails
is
all
I
have.
So
my
intention
is
to
we
send
a
letter,
updating
that
and
I
was
hoping
to
have
that
letter
in
the
council's
hands
tonight
to
review,
but
it
will
go
out
in
the
next
day
or
two
and
I
will
copy
all
of
you
on
that
contents.
That
letter.