►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 7 19 2018
Description
Plan Commission agenda for 7-19-2018
B
C
C
D
A
So
that's
what
you're
being
presented
with
today
and
as
far
as
ever,
it
meets
everything
with
our
three
multifamily
residential
district,
all
of
the
requirements,
and
it
is,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
map
there
to
the
north.
There
is
our
three
which
would
be
the
same.
Zoning
which
is
directly
add,
are
immediately
adjacent
and
then
to
the
east.
There
is
county
land
to
the
south,
there's
AG
land,
which
is
the
st.
Mary's
Cemetery
and
then
to
the
west
across
19th
Street.
A
It
added
another
condition
that
the
City
Planning
Commission
does
hereby
recommend
to
the
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
that
that
it
be
rezone
dand,
that
it
be
that
the
zoning
be
extended
to
the
centreline,
but
then
also
that
no
building
permit
shall
be
issued
until
a
final
plat
of
the
above
reference.
Property
has
been
approved
and
recorded,
and
that
is
mainly
to
show
pertinent
easements
and
they
they
have
preliminary.
A
A
A
E
G
A
Long
term
planning
sounds
good,
okay,
so
and
and
that's
not
a
discussion
that
we
have
to
necessarily
approve
here,
we'll
relay
that
and
the
developer
and
their
agents
are
here.
So
we'll
have
those
conversations
and
then,
like
I,
said
the
plat
will
be
brought
forward
to
you
guys
at
the
next
plan,
Commission
meeting
and
then,
but
as
far
as
the
rezoning
I.
E
H
We
currently
finished
a
project
in
Aberdeen,
South
Dakota,
it's
a
72
unit
building
and
that's
what
we're
looking
at
building
here
in
your
town
and
I
know.
We
have
some
pictures
too,
of
what
we
did
over
there.
I
guess.
Our
plan
is
to
do
a
phase
one
and
also
a
phase
two
in
the
toll
money
that
we'll
spend
on
on
this
project
will
probably
end
up
being
around
that
thirteen
to
fourteen
million
dollars.
H
H
B
Sorry,
chip,
Ramos
Fire,
Marshal,
we've
discussed
this
and
we've
talked
about
with
the
fire
code
under
200
units.
You
can
allow
one
access
into
the
into
the
area
as
long
as
you
know,
the
building's
fully
sprinkled
and
I've
talked
to
the
developer,
about
with
apartment
houses,
they're
a
little
different
than
what
the
court
like
say
this
building
here
there's
a
hundred
percent
coverage
in
the
building
in
apartment
house.
B
D
H
I
Name
is
Gloria
young
and
do
I
understand
that
it
is
72
units
in
each
of
the
two
buildings
or
a
total
of
72
units
for
the
entire
lot,
or
we
aren't
certain
each
okay,
then
my
concern
would
be
the
acts,
the
access
in
and
out
for
neighbors
and
residents
nearby,
because
we
are
72
140
units
in
this
on
this
lot.
There
is
a
luxury
apartment
behind
where
I
live,
with
30-plus
apartments
and
they're,
also
building
another
luxury
apartment
with
another
30
plus.
So
we
are
beginning
to
have
a
lot
of
traffic
in
our
area.
I
E
Currently,
under
the
existing
PUD
designation,
the
PUD
is
only
just
a
holding
for
potential
mixed
use
or
could
be
that
this
this
could
come
in
under
the
PUD,
currently
correct
brandy,
and
so
the
community
as
a
whole
through
the
zoning
process
at
a
previous
board,
has
determined
that
this
is
an
area
where
higher
density,
residential
development
is
an
allowable
use.
It
has
access
to
a
collector
street.
It
has
all
the
the
base
requirements.
Infrastructure
to
accommodate
traffic
is
is,
could
potentially
be
an
issue,
but
from
a
land-use
perspective,
we're
looking
not
at
this
particular
development.
E
F
Since
they
will
not
be
contributing
to
those
will
be
contributing
directly
to
19th
going
forward.
I
would
say
at
this
time
there's
no
plan
for
any
stoplights
or
anything
like
that,
but
we
would
analyze
that
going
forward
to
determine
the
traffic
flow
on
19th
I,
don't
see
right
now,
a
need
for
it,
but
that
could
be
determined
by
traffic
counts
and
studies
later
on.
F
I
C
G
D
G
With
Hagen
Nelson,
Realty
and
I
just
want
to
make
one
comment
on
the
proposed
landlocked
property.
You
know
to
the
east
of
here
the
future
cemetery.
If
you
feel
that
it's
really
mandatory
to
have
an
access
easement
there,
it
just
seems
more
plausible
to
go
to
the
north
through
Willow
Creek.
It's
a
much
shorter
distance
rather
than
the
slide
is
what
eight
hundred
and
some
feet
deep
brandy
and
I
think
the
next
phase
and
in
Willow
Creek,
is
currently
being
planted
right
now
and
so
much
shorter
distance
it
doesn't
it
does.
E
C
A
Don't
matter
but
just
since
they
presented
it
and
to
keep,
you
know,
keep
the
discussion
happening
and
then
now
we
can
have
internal
discussions
and
then
we
will
but
we'll
bring
the
plat.
But
it's
nice
to
have
your
input
on
where
you're
at
with
the
easements.
But
for
this
particular
motion
or
recommendation,
the
easements
are
flat.
That's
presented.
C
All
right
anyone
else
to
speak
at
the
public
hearing
with
respect
to
the
concerns
about
that
the
traffic
flow.
Those
are
always
issues
that
you
know
any
growing
area,
any
new
development.
You
know
we
take
a
look
at
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis
and
as
need
basis,
certainly
the
the
street
that's
out
there
in
19th
Street
now
with
the
turning
lanes,
and
you
know
when
I
was
growing
up.
That
was
a
gravel
road.
So
again
that
just
shows
you.
C
You
know
that
we,
the
city,
will
make
the
combinations
as
necessary
depending
upon
you
know
the
traffic
traffic
flow,
depending
on
whatever
is
developed
there
for
that
matter.
So
that
would
be
my
comment
with
respect
to
the
concerns
about
the
traffic
issue.
Anyone
else
have
any
comments,
questions
just.
E
That
I
think
the
proposed
intended
use
of
mixed
family
higher
density
residential
development
has
been
identified
in
our
land
use
plan
in
these
areas
that
are
in
high
corridor
19th
Street
collector
areas.
These
are
the
areas
that
we've
picked
and
that's
the
type
of
uses
that
we've
been
looking
at
as
acting
as
a
buffer
from
the
intensive
traffic
on
19th
Street.
So
I
would
support
the
resolution
number
to
2018,
25
and.
J
Thanks
Brady
excused
by
voice
this
afternoon,
little
stuffed
up
here.
This
was
basically
it
was
brought
out
by
member
of
the
peer
play.
Commission
has
moved
or
is
it
the
process
of
moving
roughly
a
mile
outside
of
the
city
limits
of
Watertown
and
he's
a
valid
valued
member
of
the
Planning
Commission?
The
mayor
thought
it
might
be
not
so
bad
of
an
idea
to
research
whether
or
not
we
could
have
a
member
of
the
play.
E
J
J
E
Think
this
is
an
appropriate
motion
being
that
we
do
have
joint
jurisdictional
zoning
and
periodically
people
that
live
outside
of
the
city
limits
may
feel
that
they
would
be
less
disenfranchised
if
they
there
was
a
voice
in
that
joined
jurisdictional
area
representing
them.
On
on
the
joint
zoning
board,
I.
K
Would
like
to
add
another
thought
in
there
for
you
to
consider
Sarah
Karen
mayor.
Currently,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
has
two
alternates
and
they
come
to
the
meetings
and
then
they
step
down
when
the
Planning
Commission
takes
effect.
What
if
those
alternates
were
actually
on
the
Planning
Commission
as
well?
So
that's
a
another
thing
that
we
could
add
in
to
the
ordinance
for
plan
commission
right
now.
It
says
on
the
Board
of
Adjustment
that
the
mayor,
subject
to
the
approval
of
the
City
Council,
shall
appoint
two
alternates
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
enabling.
E
Just
I
just
know:
I'm
a
county
side.
My
working
in
that
the
enabling
legislation
is
specific
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
and
there
is
no
specific
enabling
legislation
to
Optus
the
Planning
Commission,
primarily
because
the
Planning
Commission
is
just
a
board
of
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
There's
no
requirement
to
have
anything
more
than
a
simple
majority
of
those
present.
E
Except
for
the
alternate
most
most
places
this
out,
is
it
mm-hmm
most
places?
Is
that
way
either
the
community
is
the
county
council
that
on
board
is
acting
with
two
or
three
hats,
or
if
the
appointed
board
is
the
Planning
Commission
is
also
the
Board
of
Adjustment
and
so
I'm
just
saying
I
would
I
would
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
it,
but
I'm
just
not
sure
I.
K
And
I
think
there
have
been
times
where
we
really
struggle,
and
you
probably
don't
even
know
it
being
on
the
board
of
adjustment
or
the
Plan
Commission
that,
whether
or
not
there's
going
to
be
a
quorum
and
and
if
we
have
a
public
hearing
set
up.
And
then
we
hear
from
two
people
that
they're
not
coming
and
and
sometimes
people
don't
tell
the
staff
in
advance
that
they're
not
coming
and
we're
making
phone
calls
and
trying
to
make
a
quorum.
And
so
that's
the
reason
for
having
alternates
that
are,
can
actually
step
in.
For.
E
C
K
Clearly,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
is
a
quasi-judicial
body.
They
have
more
power
than
the
Planck
Commission,
but
those
people
are
here
for
the
meetings
and
they
often
stick
around
anyway
and
at
times
when
we're
struggling,
nabek
Wharram,
it
would
be
beneficial
if
they've
made
it
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
to
create
a
quorum
there,
and
we
don't
have
to
call
off
the
cancel
the
Plan
Commission
meeting
either.
It's
just
an
idea
that
I
like
you
to
think
about.
If
you
don't
think
it's
a
good
idea,
so.
C
I
would
I
would
I
would
I
would
agree
with
that.
Frankly,
because
I
went
through
that
same
process,
I
was
like
a
alternate
for
a
while
and
then
I'd
sit
up
here
that
I
leave
and
I
come
back
and
I
was
just.
It
was
just
a
very
strange
strange
arrangement
and
yeah
I
speaking
for
myself
and
well
aware
that
there
are
times
when
we
struggle
to
get
a
quorum,
but
we
had
the
discussion.
C
You
know
this
afternoon
and
we're
kind
of
counting
heads
are
ready
to
see
if
we
had
enough
people
here
and
if
we
had
people
that
were
coming
for
the
board
of
Justin.
Those
today
was
kind
of
an
odd
day
since
we
did
have
a
board
of
Justin's
meeting.
But
the
point
is:
is
that
if
we
had
those
folks
that
were
the
alternates
on
the
Board
of
adjustments
could
also
be
the
alternates
if
there
is
such
a
thing
on
the
Planning
Commission,
and
that
would
I
would
be
fine
with
that.
So.
A
K
G
K
A
G
A
E
So,
if
maybe
it
indeed
is
another
way
of
looking
at
it,
just
saying
that
if
you
you
appoint
a
nine-member
Planning
Commission
and
you
retain
the
two
that
are
usually
alternates
to
the
Planning.
Commission
airsoft
is
the
Board
of
Adjustment
and
then
they're
here
for
Planning
Commission
actions,
which
is
for
the
planning
the
recommendation
and
then
you
go
and
the
two
can
leave
for
the
Board
of
Adjustment
and
you
can
still
use
them
as
a
backup.
E
E
E
G
A
K
No,
no
it's
to
seven
member
boards
with
two
alternates
and
if
there
ever
were
a
case
where
we
lacked
a
quorum,
you
have
extra
bodies
to
add
to
it
and
I
think
you
know
up
to
seven.
If
you've
got
two
people
gone
the
and
you
don't
need
the
alternates,
but
they
can
serve
and
they
can
vote
and
you
still
have
seven
members
participating.
E
B
A
Don't
know
why
we
said
children,
14
years
of
age
or
older
or
young,
adult
I,
don't
know
what
we
put
in
there,
how
we
defined
that
actually,
but
so
is
14
years
of
age
and
they're
people
I,
don't
know,
but
then
so
the
request
came
about
if
we
were
to
rezone
these
properties
to
i1
from
I
to
where
it's
not
allowed,
because
the
business
that
was
kind
of
in
question
wants
to
relocate
into
this
or
this
building
here,
so
they
wouldn't
be
allowed.
They
wouldn't
be
children
under
the
age
of
fourteen
using
the
facility.
A
D
A
E
A
Then
so,
actually
it
was
just
these
two
properties
that
were
asked
about.
I
did
say
that
if,
if
this
property
owner
had
conversation
with
these,
two
property
owners
to
the
South,
I
mean
that
just
and
and
their
use
and
if
their
uses
are
compatible
with
the
I
one
zone
that
they
I
mean
they
should
reach
out
and
try
to
include
them
if
they
are
going
to
petition
to
rezone.
Just
you
know
make
it
even
also
I
one
is
more
restrictive,
so
they
would
be
up
zoning
and
then
it's
adjacent
to
our
three.
E
E
E
A
B
E
And
so
my
point
being
is
that
some
of
these
I
to
uses
are
gonna
continue
being
I
to
uses
for
the
long
term
so,
and
we
know
that
the
property
on
the
on
the
are
three
zone
property
on
the
north
side
may
eventually
not
be
our
three
properties.
Zoning
and
long-range
use
of
that
property
as
well
can
go
away.
I
just
think
you
know.
This
is
something
more
than
just
a
simple
Planning,
Commission
action
I
think
it's
an
economic
development
discussion
that
needs
to
be
had
and.
E
Not
owned
appropriate,
pull
out
your
zoning
map
and
take
a
look
at
how
much
I
to
zoning
property
that
we
have
in
the
community
at
all.
That's
what
you
need
to
look
at
and
again,
if
they're,
fine,
with
reducing
the
amount
of
acres
of
i2
zoning
in
the
in
the
community,
I
would
be
more
than
supportive.
Well.
E
E
Excuse
me:
there's
not
a
lot
of
I
to
zoning
in
the
community
and
I.
Just
I
just
know
that
several
years
ago
we
did
to
conduct
some
analysis
before
the
Development
Corporation
and
the
business
that
I
work
in,
and
that
was
one
of
the
shortcomings
that
they
said
that
we
do
not
have
enough.
I
tucson
property
in
the
community
to
attract
certain
types
of
economic
development
activities,
and
so,
if
again,
I'm
just
deferring
if
that
kind,
Development
Corporation
our
town
development
company
is
comfortable
in
doing
that,
I
would
support
it,
but.
F
E
Again,
I
think
it's
a
great
discussion.
I
just
think
we
don't
have
all
the
right
players
here
to
talk
about
it
throughout
and
if
we
were
to
have
those
discussions
or
staff
wants
to
have
those
discussions
outside
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
bring
that
back
to
us.
I'd
be
more
than
glad
to
follow
and
support
what
you're
proposing
okay.
E
D
A
A
So
as
far
we're
having
or
I'm
having
an
independent
sign
consultant
look
through
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
good
on
being
content
neutral,
he
thought
that
he'd
be
getting
back
to
me
before
our
shortly
after
the
fourth
which
it's
already
July
19th.
Although
it
feels
like
it
was
just
the
fourth
so
and
then
also
I,
know
Ken
had
some
additions
that
he
wanted
to
make
just
like
more
clerical
things
and
then
I
think
that
just
so
we
can
get
everything
taken
care
of
at
one
time.
We
should
almost
have
a
billboard
discussion.
I
would.
E
Rather
us
take
on
temporary
signs
and
get
that
done.
We
spend
a
lot
of
time.
We've
had
people,
that's
been
wanting
action
on
that,
since
back
in
February,
my
recommendation
would
be
that
we
move
forward
on
the
temporary
science
get
that
put
to
bed.
Billboards
is
going
to
be
a
long,
drawn-out
discussion.
It's
not
something!
That's
going
to
happen
in
six
weeks
that
just
comes
from
experience.
15
years
ago
we
spent
two
years
on
the
deal.
There
was
a
committee
that
spent
over
a
year
just
two
and
a
half
years
ago.
E
C
Have
to
agree
with
that,
and
brandy
and
I
did
have
a
brief
discussion
on
that
and
earlier
this
afternoon,
about
that
and
I
would
be
concerned
that
we
rush
anything
through
with
the
billboard
thing
and
considering
the
fact
that,
as
far
as
our
understanding,
my
understanding
of
the
temporary
signs
that
one
we
are
done
with
you
know,
and
rather
than
throwing
something
else
in
the
mix
and
dragging
it
out
further
making
more
complex
there
and
and
and
it
and
Todd's
right.
They
are
two
completely
separate
animals
you
could
eat.
E
Also,
no
talking
just
to
one
of
my
staff,
persons
and
I
know
the
mayor's
asked
some
questions
about
the
comprehensive
land
use
plan
that
I
know.
Luke
would
like
to
start
having
formal
reviews
of
that
at
the
Planning
Commission
level
in
August
and
September,
we
figure
20
minutes.
It's
a
part
of
every
one
of
those
meetings,
with
the
onus
being
on
the
Planning
Commission
to
start
reading
that
380
page
document
and
then
Luke
would
be
going
over
certain
sections
and
asking
if
there's
any
questions
of
the
board,
not
reviewing
it
with
the
board.