►
From YouTube: Public Works & Safety Meeting 05 02 2018
Description
Public Works / Safety Committee Agenda for 5-2-18
Agenda Items include a discussion on revenue for PLWC Sponsorship agreements, update on property insurance claim and a discussion on upgrading street light poles & fixtures in conjunction with the US Highway 212 Phase II reconstruction project.
A
To
call
to
order
the
Public,
Works
and
Safety
Committee
meeting
of
Wednesday
May
2nd
2018.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda,
moves
by
a
Councilwoman
manty,
second,
by
a
councilman.
Why
any
discussion
or
questions
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye?
Those
are
posting
5,
say,
nay,
motion
carries
item
number
2
is
public
input.
This
is
the
time
for
the
public
to
state
their
concern.
Is
there
anyone
here
that
would
like
to
bring
up
a
concern?
A
A
A
So
you
might
want
to
include
that
in
a
motion
as
a
contingency.
If
you
need
to
otherwise
this
money,
will
the
extra
money
will
have
to
come
out
of
the
contingency
fund
to
pay
for
their
the
remaining
part?
If
we
enter
into
a
contract
with
confluence
for
this
project
and
a
wait,
we
can't
just
take
the
money
and
from
the
water
district
and
put
it
in
this
fund.
So
we
take.
A
B
The
the
35000-
this
is
a
consulting
of
all
the
groups
you're
trying
to
put
together
a
master
plan.
Is
that
what
we're
looking
at
okay?
The
third?
Is
there
additional
funds
that
are
available
state,
wise,
Water,
District.
Anything
like
along
those
lines.
I
know
we
moved.
This
is
only
moved
operate,
no.
A
B
A
Saw
some
really
exciting
ideas
at
the
presentation
this
company
confluence
did
downtown
Sioux,
Falls,
riverfront
master
plan
and
Vanessa's
here.
Do
you
know
how
long
ago
their
master
plan
was
done
for
downtown
Sioux
Falls
they've
been
picking
away
at
the
projects
from
that
master
plan
and
it's
spectacular
what
they're
doing
in
downtown
Sioux,
Falls
yeah.
D
I
do
believe
that
they've
been
working
on
it
for
well
over
ten
years.
It's
still
ongoing,
in
fact,
I
have
a
project
with
them
right
now
that
we're
revising
the
master
plan
because
I'm
throwing
a
kink
in
the
works,
but
you
know
having
a
living
document
and
something
to
grow
off
of
is
huge.
Confluence
is
also
very
good
at
their
visualization,
so
you
can
literally
see
what's
what
is
happening
and
the
overall
goal.
D
E
B
A
A
A
H
G
A
A
You
know
around
that
end
of
the
year
timeframe.
Nobody
was
$50,000
or
less
by
the
way,
I
think
the
the
lowest
one
was
68,000.
So
any
other
comments
or
questions
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
are
posting
a
fiber
saying,
nay,
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
A
Item
number
five
is
consideration
of
change
order
number
two
in
the
amount
of
thirty
three
thousand
five
hundred
fifty
three
dollars:
seventy
eight
cents
for
the
wastewater
treatment
facility,
digester
rehabilitation,
project
number.
Sixteen,
twelve
and
I'll
look
for
a
motion
and
second
and
then
we'll
have
Shane
tell
us
what
this
is
moved
by
councilman.
Why
is
second
by
a
Councilwoman
aunty,
okay,
Shane
Thank.
C
You
mayor,
this
is
a
project
at
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
they're
rehabilitating
the
two
digester
structures.
This
is
work
on
structure
number,
one
which
was
primarily
completed
last
construction,
construction
season
and
we've
been
working
on
some
extra
work
items
over
the
winter,
and
this
is
the
result
of
that.
C
What
we
found
was
in
the
fixed
digester
roof
when
the
structure
was
originally
built,
there's
what
they
call
a
mill
scale
on
steel,
it's
a
byproduct
of
them,
creating
the
steel
originally
and
most
often
that
sandblasted
off
before
he
put
any
coatings
on
it
for
whatever
reason-
and
we
don't
have
a
that-
documentation
was
never
presented
in
the
past
when
that
was
built.
The
mill
scale
was
still
on
that
steel
and
then
they
coated
over
the
top
of
it.
So
that
was
part
of
the
issue.
C
The
other
part
of
the
issue
is
when
they
did
coat
over
the
top
of
it.
They
coated
over
the
top
with
about
three
times
the
normal
amount
of
paint
product.
So
in
essence,
it
created
extra
work
on
this
project
project
to
sandblast
off
all
the
extra
materials.
All
the
extra
paint,
all
the
mill
scale
all
and
it
took
about
an
extra
week
to
do
all
that
work.
So
this
is
a
change
order.
That's
been
negotiated
through
our
consultant
and
through
wastewater
staff
and
I'm
presenting
it
before
you.
C
It
does
include
seven
days
of
extension
on
the
liquidated
damages
for
that
phase.
One
portion
of
the
project-
and
it
is
in
the
increased
cost-
is
thirty-three
thousand
five
hundred
and
fifty
three
dollars
and
seventy
eight
cents
and
staff
has
approved
that,
and
the
funding
of
course
comes
out
of
the
burgers
capital
at
the
wastewater,
sole
and.
C
A
Right
any
other
questions
or
comments,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
number
six
is
discussion
of
20th
Avenue
Bridge
preservation,
project
number
1709,
and
are
we
looking
for
action
on
this
or
is
this
just
discussion?
I
see
Vanessa
mostly.
C
D
Basically,
in
a
nutshell,
is
we've
stirred
some
emotions
at
the
d-o-t
with
the
20th
Avenue
preservation
project,
as
it
turns
out
when
we
had
applied
for
the
big
grant
internally,
they
had
a
lot
of
debate
about
the
approach
for
preservation
and
just
to
refresh
your
memory,
we
are
doing
an
epoxy
duct
seal
to
preserve
the
deck
of
that
bridge.
That
was
built
in
2010.
D
Come
to
find
out
that
during
the
actual
construction,
there
was
some
design
issues
the
have
led
to
some
flaws
in
the
bridge
over
time,
and
they
thought
that
they
had
rectified
some
of
them
during
the
construction.
But
that
was
not
necessarily
the
case,
so
we
applied
for
epoxy
duct
seal,
which
is
$250,000
as
a
big
grant
and
they
were
debating
whether
or
not
they
wanted
to
do
that
or
overlay
project
to
fix
the
ride
of
the
bridge.
D
There
was
some
excess
camber
and
your
your
girders
that
when
you
drive
over
the
force
bands,
you
can
feel
every
single
span
when
it
was
constructed
that
camber
was
only
a
half
an
inch
more
in
each
of
the
spans,
and
by
three
weeks
ago
it
has
grown
to
almost
3
inches.
So
it
is
a
bumpy
ride
across
the
bridge
and
now
that
we
are
to
the
bidding
portion,
we're
still
revisiting
whether
or
not
we
want
to
fix
it
right
across
the
bridge
or
just
preserve
the
deck
itself.
D
Typically,
overlays
are
more
expensive
you're,
looking
at
three-quarters
of
a
million
to
a
million
dollars
to
overlay
this
bridge,
and
then
on
top
of
it.
Generally,
because
the
camber
does
grow
over
time
start
at
a
half
inch
and
we're
at
three
inches.
Now
that
you
want
to
make
sure
that
camber
has
stopped
growing
before
you
do
an
overlay,
because
it
could
still
wind
up
with
a
bumpy
road.
D
So
we've
had
multiple
discussions
with
the
d-o-t
and
I
have
to
say
that
they're,
taking
this
very
seriously,
both
the
head
of
road
design,
bridge
design,
local
government
assistant
and
the
Secretary
of
Transportation
have
all
weighed
in
on
this
topic,
and
they
are
presenting
three
options
for
the
city
and
that
I
don't
know.
If
you
can
see
this.
F
D
D
So
your
beams
are
your
main
supporting
members,
and
these
are
pre-stressed
concrete
beams
and
you
pretense
pre
tension
in
the
steel
and
then,
as
that
beam
continues
to
gather
strength.
It
creeps
up,
it's
that's
literally
the
term
and
you,
your
beam
will
just
slowly
move
forward,
usually
not
this
much
so.
D
D
D
An
option
to
do
something
and
truth
be
told:
the
d-o-t
is
torn
5050,
everybody
that
I've
talked
to
half-hour
believe
that
we
should
be
doing
an
overlay
and
they
have
other
half
come
from
epoxy
duct
seal
is
the
way
to
go.
Let
the
camber
continue.
They
did
come
back
three
options.
The
first
is
to
sign
an
agreement
with
the
d-o-t
that
they
will
fix.
It
will
continue
with
the
epoxy
duct
seal
as
planned
and
in
15
years
they'll
do
an
overlay.
D
D
Who
knows
in
another
15
years,
if
there
was
an
accident
on
the
bridge
that
needs
to
be
repaired
or
if
you
have
a
large
flood,
and
you
have
some
embankment
issues,
it
would
be
boo-hooing
to
capitalize
on
low
mobilization
in
a
contract
bridge
contract.
Are
we
already
being
on
the
site
the
biggest
thing,
with
a
bumpy
ride
on
a
bridge
other
than
us
driving
across
it?
D
It
does
add
to
the
service
life
of
the
bridge,
it's
rough
and
it
increases
the
impact
every
time
your
tires
hit,
it's
50
miles
an
hour
out
there
and
it
really
kind
of
comes
down
to
a
cyclical
loading
that
increases
fatigue,
which
are
all
terms
and
fatigue,
really
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
concrete.
But
it
has
to
do
with
the
steel
in
the
concrete.
But
the
nice
thing
is
we
are
still
protecting
that
with
an
epoxy
duct
seal,
and
that
was
the
whole
premise
of
this
project.
D
In
the
first
place,
the
bad
thing
is,
you
have
the
bumpy
ride
for
15
years
and
staff
changes
we're
lucky
that
this
is
such
a
hot-button
issue,
because
10
years
ago,
with
the
people
that
are
higher
up
at
the
d-o-t,
we're
on
this
jobsite
and
remember
it.
But
in
another
15
years,
whether
or
not
you
will
all
be
here,
I
will
I
will
be
here,
but.
D
You
are
governed
in
on
your
big
rant.
That's
a
really
good
point,
so
we
applied
for
the
big
grant
and
that's
where
all
the
emotions
came
from,
because
I'd
love
to
fix
the
ride
of
the
bridge
if
they
were
going
to
pay
for
the
extra
amount
of
money,
but
even
it
as
it
stands.
If
we
bid
it
tomorrow
and
we
get
a
high
bid,
everything
over
that
grant
amount
comes
out
of
the
city's
pocket.
F
So
option
one
that
you
laid
out
was
that
the
d-o-t
will
agree
to
fix
it.
We
would
do
the
epoxy
fill
or
what
do
you
call
that
and
then
15
years
from
now
they
would
fix
it.
Yes,
is
that
contractual
so
that
as
these
people
come
and
go,
and
as
state
do
T
people
come
and
go
that
they're
still
obligated
to
that?
Yes,.
D
I'm
not
a
fan
of
option
three,
even
though
you
get
a
check
right
now,
but
who
knows
where
that
money
goes?
There
are
always
new
construction
methods
that
are
coming
up.
Our
infrastructure
is
in
crisis,
it's
all
failing,
but
there's
new
design
methodologies
that
are
going
into
it
so
15
years
down
the
road
we
might
not
be
even
talking
about
a
low
slump
overlay,
maybe
there's
something
way
better.
That
would
pertain
exactly
to
this
bridge.
That
would
be
cheaper
or
more
expensive.
D
F
D
I
mean
it's:
it's
not
ideal
on
the
ride.
We
do
have
some
ponding,
which
we
will
try
to
fix
with
the
epoxy
duct
seal,
but
the
only
the
only
major
safety
issue
would
be
the
ponding
and
the
dips
right
now
that
could
cause
hydroplaning,
but
other
than
that
the
bridge
is
functioning
and
it's
not
not
a
safety
detriment.
It's
an
inconvenience
on
on
your
ride.
A
A
D
F
To
go
through
these
I
agree
with
you
on
the
check
now
thing:
you
know
it's
a
carrot,
but
I
don't
think
it's
the
right
way
to
go.
I
look
at
option
two.
If
this
thing's
still
gonna
be
potentially
adjusting
itself
or
moving,
it
doesn't
seem
like
it'd,
be
appropriate
to
do
that
now
it
seems
like
we'd,
be
throwing
money
after
something
that
we
don't
know
what's
gonna
end
up
with,
so
it
seemed
like
option.
One
is
our
way
to
go.
F
C
B
A
F
G
C
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
just
informational,
only
I,
as
you
recall
the
city
previously,
it
asks
for
a
corridor
study
on
the
speed
limits
on
highway
81
coming
in
from
the
south
into
the
community,
and
their
initial
reaction
was
that
they
weren't
interested
in
changing
the
speed
limit,
but
they
did
ultimately
take
a
look
at
it
and
really
the
speed
limit
change
is
I'll,
say
independent
of
the
construction
of
the
roundabout,
but
certainly
the
roundabout
impacts,
the
overall
speed
that
goes
through
this
corridor.
So
just
to
recap,
what's
existing
there--now
is
right.
C
Here's
the
Multicultural,
Center
south
of
town
on
the
radio
tower
right
there
right
where
these
two
arrows
come
together,
is
where
the
change
from
65
miles
an
hour
to
50
miles
an
hour
happens
and
then
that
fifty
mile,
an
hour
speed,
continues
until
right
here
next
to
the
super
8
hotel
and
I,
don't
remember:
what's
on
the
west
side,
there
I
think
it's
the
part
of
the
John
Deere
dealership.
So
that's
where
it
changes
from
50
to
35.
C
I
always
call
it
the
sense
of
racing
when,
when
you
come
off
of
the
intersection
light
at
highway,
212
and
and
81,
if
you're
in
opposing
lanes,
if
you're
trying
to
jockey
for
position
to
get
down
to
the
intersection
that
go
through
the
roundabout,
you
know
there's
a
tendency
that
people
kind
of
not
intentionally
race
each
other
to
the
destination.
But
anyway
this
will
be
a
traffic
calming
effort,
in
my
opinion
and
I,
think
the
reduce
speeds
will
lend
itself
up
for
a
much
safer
and
more
functional
roundabout,
because
they'll
be
slowing
down.
F
Only
concern
is
that
we
create
a
it
seems
like
it's
a
drastic
move
going
from
65
to
45
when
there's
nothing
down
there
farther
to
the
south.
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
to
create
what
in
essence
becomes
a
speed
trap,
because
you've
got
there's
literally
literally,
very
little
out
there
that
from
a
traffic
standpoint
of
coming
in
and
out
of
off
the
road
that
is
going
to
create
any
significant
problems
for
us,
it
seems
like
going
from
65
to
45
is
a
bigger
step
than
is
necessary.
C
F
A
F
A
G
F
A
Will
just
say
this
about
the
do:
tease
methods
that
they
use
to
make
these
determinations
they're
more
scientific
than
emotional,
and
what
you're
describing
is
an
emotional
response
to
what's
going
on
here
and
and
I
think
you,
you
might
be
challenged
in
convincing
them
with
that
argument
when
they
have
numbers
and
traffic
counts
and
formulas
into
figuring
out
what
they're
doing.
But
if
you.
A
A
E
It's
ironic
but
I
agree
with
you
on
this.
By
the
same
token,
I've
talked
to
do
tea
staff
about
West
2:12,
where
we
go
from
65
to
45.
That's
an
awful
I
mean
that's
an
area
where
that
45
should
be
extended
out
further
beyond
the
event
center
than
what
it
is
and
I've
got
nowhere.
They
said.
Well,
no,
that's!
That's
me
nerd
right
out
there,
so
it's
ironic
that
they're
proposing
dropping
this
when
I
sight
a
better
area
where
I
think
it
should
be
dropped.
A
G
I
can
add
to
emotions,
but
also
speak
to
reality.
It
what's
the
distance
between
the
true
distance
between
the
roundabout
and
where
it
drops
or
starts
back
up
to
65
I
can't
tell
us
less
than
half
a
mile.
Okay
in
my
parents
live
or
my
mom
lives
in
town
that
has
115,000
roundabouts.
Okay,
so
ya
know
that
they
have
triple
roundabouts.
G
Literally,
what
I
can
tell
you
is,
as
you
come
in
from
212
and
you're,
starting
to
get
towards
that
roundabout
you're
gonna
start
slowing
down
in
that
area
fairly
quickly,
because
you're,
anticipating
getting
into
this
roundabout
and
you
may
have
to
either
yield
or
you're
going
to
get
all
the
way
around.
That
being
said,
when
you
come
out
of
the
roundabout
you're,
probably
going
about
15
miles
an
hour
and
by
the
time
you
get
up
to
where
it
would
be
65,
it
would
take
that
long
to
get
to
65.
A
G
C
G
C
A
C
This
is
more
of
an
informational
topic
to
because
really
we
don't
have
any
choice:
I
hate
to
use
those
words,
but
throughout
the
Phase
one
project
for
highway
212
construction
between
Highway
20
and
highway
81
we've
been
working
with
the
d-o-t
for
well
over
a
year
on
the
scope
and
the
design
of
this
project
and
all
along
we've.
The
city
has
said
that
know
that
we
don't
want
to
do
any
additional
work
to
our
sanitary
sewer.
C
Nor
do
we
we
don't
need
to
do
any
work
to
our
sanitary
sewer,
and
so
we
didn't
anticipate
any
project
coming
out
of
this.
But
here
at
the
eleventh
hour
as
the
design
for
the
phase,
1
project
is
nearing
completion
this
summer
and
fall
and
they
intend
to
bid
that
project
in
late
fall
in
November,
going
into
next
year's
project.
They've
identified
that
there's
going
to
be
a
conflict
between
the
new
bridge
structure
that
they're
proposing
and
our
existing
sanitary
sewer.
C
So
right
now
the
sanitary
sewer
is
a
21
inch,
concrete
pipe
that
goes
right
along
the
edge
of
highway
212
and
for
some
reason
they
were
able
to
build
this
bridge
deck
and
the
foundations
and
everything
without
disrupting
the
21
inch
line.
Now
there
is
a
chance
that
they
built
the
21
inch
line
or
rebuilt
the
21
inch
line
in
conjunction
with
that
bridge
when
it
was
built,
but
I
don't
have
that
documentation.
C
So
I
can't
say
that
for
for
sure
one
way
or
the
other,
however,
the
new
bridge
is
anticipated
to
impact
the
21
inch
line,
so
they're
asking
the
city
to
redirect
the
sanitary
sewer
and
we've
just
kind
of
taken
a
stab
at
some
ideas
here.
The
purplish
magenta
line
here
is
where
we
would
possibly
redirect
and
there's
other
utilities
in
here.
That's
why
I'm
out,
as
far
as
I
am
there's
a
high
pressure
gas
line,
there's
fiber-optic
lines,
there's
other
power
and
telecommunications
stuff
in
there
now.
C
One
option
that
isn't
shown
on
here
that
we
might
do
this
yellow
line
is
an
option
on
this
end
and
we
may
do
the
same
thing
on
the
west
end.
Where
we
do
an
angle
thing
and
that's
to
help
flow
through
the
pipe
so
that
there
isn't
as
much
turbulence
and
disruption
through
them
manuals
now
this
is
a
main
collector
or
not
even
a
collector.
It's
a
main
interceptor
that
converts
or
conveys
all
of
the
wastewater
from
the
lake
and
all
parts
west
of
of
highway.
C
20
come
through
this,
so
it's
a
high-volume
line
and
ideally
that
d-o-t
told
me
that
they
would
like
us
to
relocate
this
this
year
and
I
haven't
ruled
that
out
yet.
But
this
has
some
significant
permitting
challenges
all
this
land
that
you
see
that
this
is
occupying
on
this
land,
that's
owned
by
the
railroad.
C
So
that's
a
minimum
of
a
month
to
get
a
permit
to
cross
or
to
negotiate
your
things
with
the
railroad,
then
you're
crossing
the
river,
which
is
going
to
require
a
higher
scrutiny
from
the
DNR
and
the
Corps
of
Engineers.
One
other
thing
that
I
do
know
about
this
is
the
d-o-t
believes
that
at
least
in
the
location
of
the
bridge
here
that
the
river
channel
is
almost
as
deep
as
the
pipe,
and
so
there
is
potential
that
we
have
pipe
laying
at
or
very
near
to
the
bottom
of
the
river
channel.
C
Well,
that
will
mean
is
it
will
have
to
have
additional
casing
or
armoring
of
the
structure
so
that
it
doesn't
get
washed
out
during
a
high-velocity
flooding
ban,
and
so
there's
a
few
challenges
and
I'm
very
disappointed
that
we're
getting
this
information
literally
months
away
from
finishing
design
because
had
we
known
this
a
year
ago,
we
could
have
had
time
to
get
all
this
stuff
in
line
and
now
we're
looking
at
a
very
fast
design,
scope.
I,
don't
have
any
solid
answers
for
you.
I
wanted
you
to
know.
C
If
this
was
coming
in
that
get
her
down
quick
type
of
scenario,
the
municipal
utilities
has
a
project
where
they
hired
infrastructure
design
group
to
design
new
water
mains
through
this
exact
corridor
and
because
they
already
have
design
sheets
kind
of
laid
out
for
this
project.
I
am
going
to
try
to
negotiate
a
design
fee
for
from
idg
to
design
this
sanitary
sewer
and
pursue
the
permits
for
it.
C
B
A
B
C
Because
it'll
collapse,
just
as
fast
as
you
try
to
force
a
hole
through
it,
so
we'll
have
to
really
vet
that
I'm
thinking
we
may
have
to
build
a
cofferdam
redirect
the
river
during
low
flow,
and
you
know,
dig
the
cross
real,
quick
and
then
open
it
back
up
now.
Good
news
in
Watertown,
at
least
in
july/august,
the
Big
Sur
River
some
years
has
virtually
no
flow.
But
it's.
C
C
F
A
C
Thank
You
mayor
here
again
this
is
just
informational.
The
d-o-t,
along
with
this
phase,
one
project
has
been
negotiating
with
all
property
owners
along
the
corridor.
The
city
is
one
of
those
property
owners.
This
is
Hanten
Park
and
the
gray
or
the
it
looks
like
gray
here.
But
it's
actually
green
hatched
on
the
original
drawing
is
a
easement.
C
Then
there's
a
portion,
this
little
block
out
here
and
a
strip
along
the
edge
was
proposed
to
be
a
taking.
In
other
words,
they
would
buy
it
from
us.
In
this
particular
case,
I
believe
that's
dedicated
park
and,
if
that's
the
case,
I
will
redirect
them
to
do
another
easement
rather
than
a
taking,
because
we
can't
sell
parkland
without
a
referendum
of
the
public
as
I
understand
it.
So
we'll
discuss
that
further
with
the
d-o-t.
Another
property
here
is
the
swimming
pool
area
and
and
Thunder
Road.
C
Those
are
permanent
and
easements
again
because
that's
dedicated,
parkland
and
I
told
them
upfront
that
we
can't
sell
anything
to
you.
We'll
certainly
give
you
an
easement
and
so
that
that's
what
we
negotiated
there.
Another
parcel
land
that
the
city
owns
is
this
drainage
outlet
right
here
again,
there's
some
green
easement,
but
there's
also
a
little
strip
right
in
here
that's
hard
to
depict
on
these
drawings.
That
is
a
taking,
and
it's
like
four
feet
wide.
It's
nothing
serious!