►
From YouTube: Public Works & Safety Meeting 04 16 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
By
Councilwoman,
Mantee
and
second
by
councilman,
Bueller,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
public
input.
This
is
the
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward,
and
do
so.
Please
state
your
name
into
the
microphone
for
the
record
before
making
your
comment.
A
A
C
You
mayor
I'll,
begin
this
discussion
with
a
little
background
and
I
see
fred.
Hardy
is
here
to
maybe
represent
the
developers
and
owners
of
this
area.
If
you
have
questions
of
them.
So
as
my
screen
is
up
on
my
on
the
screen,
the
area
highlighted
in
blue
was
platted
in
1995
it
was
plotted
as
a
private
road.
There
were
sewer
and
water
main
installations
at
the
at
that
time.
C
C
So
they
haven't
accepted
it,
but
so
subsequently
in
September
of
2007,
the
road
was
paved.
It
has
curb
and
gutter
and
asphalt
surfacing,
and
we
are
currently
working
with
the
developer
and
their
representatives
to
find
the
path
to
accept
this
as
a
public
road
and
accept
the
public
utility.
The
sanitary
sewer,
in
particular,
I'm
not
sure
how
the
water
main
will
be
resolved
at
this
point.
C
Seal
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
their
intention
of
calling
it
a
chip
seal
is
the
same
thing
as
us
in
the
engineering
department,
calling
it
a
seal
coat
so
just
for
to
make
sure
all
the
language
chives.
We
are
poised
to
award
this
chip.
The
chip
seal,
the
seal
coat
project
tonight
and
I
just
wanted
to
have
a
discussion
on
the
council's
acceptance
or
denial
of
taking
over
the
seal
code
portion
of
this
discussion
tonight.
With
that
I'll
leave
it
for
any
questions.
D
To
monitor
the
the
infrastructure
that's
being
put
place
in
place
so
that,
in
the
event
Sunday
it's
being
asked
for
the
city
to
take
over
because
that's
really
the
question
right
now.
Isn't
it
for
us,
for
the
most
part,
is
the
roads,
the
easier
of
the
items
you've
got
the
water
main
and
you've
got
the
sanitary
sewer
right.
That
becomes
an
issue
correct,
so.
D
How
do
we
as
a
city
if
we
commit
to
this?
Are
we
taking
responsibility
for
all
those
things
or
are
we
taken
if
we
pay
this?
Are
we
actually
at
that
point,
taking
responsibility,
then
here
forward
for
the
road
only
or
is
it
just
that
we're
gonna
coat
it
and
it's
still
theirs,
but
what's
really
being
asked
of
us
at
this
point?
Okay,.
C
So
the
bait,
basically
it's
a
your
prom,
a
multi-prong
question
but
in
essence
the
we
have
gone
back
and
looked
at
the
records
of
what
we
do
know
or
believe
to
have
known
got
constructed.
The
curb
and
gutter
looks
like
it's
compatible
with
our
normal
curve
gutter
system.
The
asphalt
paving
is,
as
we
can
tell
meets
our
standard
and
it
is
actually
performed
rather
well.
C
C
They
are
asking
us
to,
but
we
haven't
gotten
to
the
point
where
we're
we're
negotiating
improvements
to
the
sanitary
sewer
system,
which
is
not
built
to
city
standards.
We
have
a
path
that
may
ultimately
lead
us
to
having
that
in
an
acceptable
state
and
when
we
get
there,
documentation
will
come
forward
to
the
city,
requesting
acceptance
of
both
the
street
and
the
sanitary
sewer
utility.
D
What
happens
to
questions
I
get
those
multi-prong
questions
you're
free
here?
What
happens
if
the
sanitary
sewer
or
water
is
not
acceptable?
The
road
itself,
the
curb
and
gutter,
is
what
do
we
do
then?
Do
we
accept
the
road
in
and
no
liability
responsibility
for
the
other
items,
or
is
it
all
or
nothing?
You
can
you
partially
accept
responsibility
for
something?
Yes,.
C
We
can
accept
just
the
roadway.
We
can
accept
the
sanitary
sewer
on
its
own
and
as
I
understand
it.
The
water
utility
just
isn't
comfortable
with
taking
over
the
water
utility
at
this
time,
but
ultimately,
we've
spent
quite
a
few
hours
working
with
the
developer
to
try
to
get
this
project
where
we
can
accept
both
the
roadway
and
the
sanitary
sewer
utility.
C
A
Aren't
quite
there
yet
we
do
have
multiple
private
sanitary
sewers
in
public
roads
and
around
the
town.
It
isn't
our
normal
situation,
but
we
do
have
other.
This
wouldn't
be
the
first
and
also
the
road
was
gravel
for
a
number
of
years
before
it
was
paved
and
we
did
observe
the
the
pavement
and
we
saw
the
base
that
was
under
it
and
I.
A
A
This
is
a
one
of
those
situations,
though,
where
we
had
it,
it
wasn't
done
in
the
best
possible
way.
Our
ordinance
says
that
when
you
plat
a
private
road,
the
property
lines
go
to
the
center
of
the
roadway
and
every
property
owner
adjacent
owns
their
little
piece
of
road,
and
this
was
not
plaited.
That
way,
it
was
plaited
showing
a
private
right
of
way.
But
who
is
responsible
for
that?
The
property
lines
don't
extend.
A
So
in
the
future,
if
the
person
that
planted
this
goes
on
and
no
longer
exists,
who
is
responsible
because
people
didn't
buy
that
piece
when
they
bought
their
land?
It's
not
in
their
legal
description
that
they
owned
to
the
center
of
the
road.
It's
just
their
lot
as
though
this
were
a
public
road.
We
do
have
ordinances
that
prevent
that
and
for
whatever
reason,
they
weren't
adhered
to
at
the
time
that
this
was
plaited
and
nothing
we
can
do
about
that
now.
But
we
do
have
some
concerns
about
taking
this
over
as
a
public
road.
A
The
sewer
like
Shane
said
is
the
main
one
for
us.
We
normally
own
the
sewers
and
the
public
roads,
and
so
we've
figured
out
a
punch
list
of
things
that
would
bring
the
sewer
up
to
an
acceptable
standard
for
us
and
if
those
things
were
done,
we
could,
with
with
fair
confidence
except
the
sewer
as
equivalent
to
a
public
sewer,
and
then
we
would
be
responsible
forever
for
its
maintenance,
as
we
would
on
the
road.
A
Now
we
aren't
responsible
for
the
maintenance,
we're
not
responsible
for
the
snow
removal,
we're
not
responsible
for
this
anything
that
goes
on
in
the
sewer.
No
one
out
there
has
a
basement.
So
if
the
pumps
fail
sewage
would
come
on
to
the
street
before
they
would
back
up
into
someone's
toilet
to
our
knowledge,
I
has
never
happened,
but
that's
the
risk
of
a
failure
of
the
pump
okay,
yeah.
D
Mir
and
the
point
of
my
question
was
not
knowing
the
water
main
and
sewer
issue.
If
us
agreeing
to
this
meant,
we
were
going
to
accept
everything
if
this
means
today
that
we're
agreeing
to
take
over
the
road
itself
and
not
the
infrastructure
until
that's
proven
out,
then
I'm,
okay
with
it
I,
don't
have
a
problem
with
that,
but
if
it
means
if
it
means
we're
taking
on
all
those
other
things,
also,
then
I
don't
agree
with
it.
A
That
will
ultimately
be
up
to
the
council
and
I
know
Shane's
working
on
that
and
I.
Don't
think
he's
to
the
point
of
asking
that
question
yet,
but
he's
got
to
make
a
decision
on
his
sealcoat
bid
as
to
whether
to
award
that
or
not
and
if
he
doesn't
award
that
part
of
it,
it
won't
get
sealed
coated
unless
we
have
some
other
sort
of
agreement
where
the
property
owners
pay
for
it.
So
that's
a
pressing
question
right
now
and
Frank:
can
you
come
to
the
microphone?
Please
I'll
put
you
on
the
spot.
A
A
E
Yes,
we
have
talked
about
it.
In
fact,
pretty
much.
Everyone
has
agreed
that
that's
what
we
want
to
do
and
what
that
is
is
we
have
agreed
that
we'll
do
the
necessary
work
to
have
the
sewer
meet
the
city's
requirements.
The
city
would
be
responsible
for
doing
it,
but
we
would
pay
as
far
as
the
water
man.
This
was
the
first
I've
heard
on
the
water
main.
We.
A
Just
had
a
message
from
the
municipal
utilities
department
that
said
they
weren't
interested
in
taking
over
ownership
of
the
water
main
because
they
didn't
observe
the
construction,
which
is
a
fair
I,
mean
that
we
can't
force
them
to
do
that
it.
They
would
have
the
same
issues
that
we're
having
with
the
sewers.
We
don't
really
know
what's
down
there,
although
we
haven't
had
issues
that
we're
aware
of
with
the
gravity.
Part
of
it
we
have
had
is
issues
with
the
force
main
and
the
pump
system,
and
those
are
proposed
to
be
upgraded.
A
D
My
suggestion
would
be
just
to
throw
it
out
if
it
needs
to
seal
coat
on
it.
That's
what
it
really
should
have
done
and
I'm
just
some
around
sooo
mean
I
would
prefer
that
they
work
with
the
city
we
get
it
done.
They
reimburse
us
for
that
amount
and
then,
when
all
the
I's
are
dotted
t's
across
and
we
know
exactly
what
it
is,
could
we
reimburse
them
then,
for
that
we.
D
Way,
you
got
your
road
that
you
need
to
maintain
should
maintain
anyway,
because
if
you
don't,
then
I'm
gonna
be
more
hesitant
to
accept
the
road
in
the
future,
and
it
sounds
like
there's
a
lot
of
questions.
Why
not
work
through
it
to
get
the
work
done?
Have
them
pay?
It
reimburse
us,
because
we
can
get
it
through
our
contract,
then,
and
if
we
can
get
everything
fix
that
we
take
over
the
road,
then
will
we
reimburse
them
another.
A
Question
I
would
have:
is
there
any
work
at
all
in
the
roadway?
That's
related
to
the
sewer
I,
don't
think
there
is
I,
think
the
pump
stations
off
to
the
side
and
everything
would.
But
if
we're
gonna
dig
up
the
asphalt,
we
should
not
be
overlaying
that
or
sealcoating
it
this
year
and
wait
until
next
year
as
we
do
and
we
do
a
sale
cold
project
every
year,
and
we
could
have
this
next
year
here.
D
A
C
That
the
circle
it's
on
the
north
side
of
the
bull
or
it's
only
a
few
feet
from
the
back
of
curb
we're
talking
about
digging
a
hole
right
here
and
putting
in
the
valve
vault,
which
be
you
know,
could
be
eight
feet
deep.
You
know
eight
feet
at
the
bottom,
probably
something
like
that
so
and
then
we
would
be
digging
alongside
the
back
of
the
curb
to
replace
the
force
main
force.
C
Or
the
new
force
main
will
be
if,
if
the
old
one
isn't
so
I,
don't
think
we'd
have
major
impacts
to
this
to
the
street.
That
the
reason
for
the
timing
of
this
council
is,
is
we've
been
working
with
the
developer
for
at
least
about
well
just
about
a
year
currently
in
our
current
stuff
and
didn't
really
want
to
leave
them
hanging,
can't
give
them
a
good
idea
what
it
would
cost
so
I
put
it
in
there
as
an
alternate.
We
could
either
award
the
alternate
along
with
this
year's
sealcoat.
C
We
could
opted
not
to
award
that
and
do
a
sill
coat
next
year,
I'm,
okay,
with
it
either
way,
but
I
felt
that
in
our
negotiations,
that
would
be
nice
to
have
a
real
number
to
work
with
and
instead
of
just
estimates.
So
that's
what
I
did
and
that's
where
rat
and
I
you
know
I'm
not
in
a
position
to
spend
city
money
on
a
private
road.
So
that's
why
I
needed
to
visit
with
you
folks
and
make
sure
that
you
knew
what
was
going
on.
A
Issue
would
arise
if
the
city
decides
not
to
take
this
road
over
and
it's
been
overlaid
and
we've
paid
for
it
and
then
we're
in
the
awkward
position
of
asking
for
them
and
which,
if
we
do
this
as
an
assessment
project,
that
cost
is
going
to
be
spread
out
over
a
number
of
years.
If
people
want
that,
and
some
of
them
might
be
hard-pressed
to
pay
it
upfront,
I,
don't
know
if
you
even
talked
about
that
with
the
others.
Have
you
Fred
I've.
D
D
Can
we
have
a
verbal
agreement
in
regards
to
reimbursement?
It
sounds
simple
to
me:
you
we,
we
have
the
work
done
on
there.
Ours
we
pay
for
it.
You
reimburse
us
the
amount.
We
have
it
on
record
here
and
you
wrap
up
the
written
detail
after
the
five
minutes
is
up
I
hear
I'm
with
you.
I,
don't
want
to
pay
for
something
that
ultimately,
in
the
end,
we
may
not
accept
and
I
mean.
Who
knows
what
we're
gonna
find.
C
And
I'm,
okay
with
either
way
they
just
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
with
the
developer.
To
get
to
this
point,
and
the
idea
was:
is
that
if
they
they
now,
what
I've
heard
from
mr.
Hardy
is
that
they're
really
ready
to
go
forward?
And
what
we've
talked
about
with
in
great
detail
is
all
the
sanitary
sewer
issues.
We
were
develop.
An
assessment
project
go
forward,
get
that
stuff
fixed
and
by
the
end
of
the
year.
This
thing
could
all
be
ready
to
be
accepted.
C
D
B
Could
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
seems,
like
sarah
has
a
good
background
on
this
and
you
too
Shane
the
thing
that
just
keeps
popping
into
my
head
and
I
I.
Think
it's
being
answered,
but
I'd
like
some
reassurance,
is
the
relationship
between
the
road
and
sewer
and
water
projects
that
still
need
to
be
done
to
bring
it
up
to
compliance,
and
it
goes
back
to
that
whole
idea
of.
Why
do
we
tear
up?
What
would
we
don't?
What
are
the
risks?
B
Do
you
see
what
I'm
saying
that
is
it
going
to
be
as
simple
as
this
is
the
road
project,
and
this
is
the
sewer
and
water,
or
are
there
going
to
be
times
or
places
where
we
could
potentially
be
overlapping?
These
I
know
you
said
you
don't
think
so.
I
just
I
just
want
some
confirmation
that
if
we
do
like
mica
saying
that
we're
not
going
to
come
back
and
have
the
whole
sewer
thing
bite
us
does
that
make
sense
sure
what
do
you
think
are
we
gonna
get
bid.
G
E
C
I'll
say
potentially,
yes,
and
the
only
reason
I'm
hesitant
is,
if
we
do,
if
we
weren't
gonna,
have
the
city
pay
for
the
sealcoat
all
in
the
ultimate
end.
I
was
gonna
roll,
the
cost
in
of
the
assessment
project
so
that
they
could
get
that
and
we're
trying
to
get
the
assessment
project
done
by
the
end
of
the
year
for
the
county
folks.
So
the
timing
of
this
whole
thing
is
if
we
agreed
to
do
a
seal
quote,
and
we
agree
to
do
the
sewer
work.
C
If
you
drop
one
piece
or
the
other
now
we
can
go
forward
with
assessments
based
on
an
$8,000
quote
that
I
have
right
now,
but
if
next
year's
sealcoat
cost
$9,000,
then
who's
gonna
pay
the
extra
thousand.
So
there's
a
lot
of
questions
here
and
I
know
this
isn't
an
easy
discussion
or
an
easy
answer,
but.
A
H
A
A
D
Know
what
it's
coming
down
to,
we
don't
have
any
say
in
in
the
coordination
of
this
of
is
the
work
going
to
get
done
or
not
I.
We
don't
have
any
knowledge
base
of
that.
No
project
management
to
ensure
that
that
one
can
have
that.
It
all
happens
in
an
order
that
it
needs
to
occur.
I
mean
if
some
it
can
tell
me
that
yes,
it'll
all
happen
exactly
how
it
has
to
happen
in
the
right
order,
so
that
we
aren't
disturbing
work
that
we've
already
done.
Then
we
can
make
a
motion.
A
A
I
D
A
A
A
C
B
A
All
right:
Thank,
You,
Fred,
okay,
move
on
to
item
five
award
of
contract
for
the
Uptown
alley;
project
number
1807
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred.
Ninety
four
thousand
eight
hundred
twenty
one
dollars
to
crest,
Stone,
Builders
Inc.
We
have
a
motion
and
second
for
approval,
moved
by
a
councilman
Bueller
second,
by
a
Councilwoman
man,
T
Shane,
okay,.
C
Thank
You
mayor
one
thing
that
the
reason
this
isn't
on
the
consent
agenda
is
because
we
did
include
work
and,
if
you
might
screens
up
on
the
board
that
would
be
appreciated.
We
had
two
public
parking
lots.
This
one
here
isn't
located
next
to
the
vast
building.
This
one
here
is
located
next
to
I.
Believe
that's
a
church.
C
Now
it
used
to
be
an
apartment
building
anyway,
so
we
have
enough
budget
to
do
the
base
bid
of
two
stretches
of
alley,
but,
as
we
have
done
in
the
recent
past,
I've
also
included
alternates
to
do
the
adjacent
parking
lots,
because
we
found
that
to
be
a
very
beneficial
program.
If
we
can
do
that,
the
two
alternates
of
the
parking
lots
take
us
slightly
over
the
budget
that
I
was
anticipating,
but
we've
seen
such
good
bids
on
all
of
our
projects
this
year.
C
This
one
included
that
we
have
enough
cash
reserves
from
other
projects
and
the
212
funds
to
cover
the
cost
of
these
parking
lots.
But
again
it
takes
council
action
and
approval
to
spend
that
money
on
these
parking
lots
versus
because
it
is
outside
of
my
original
budget.
For
the
alleys,
so
that's
what
I'm
asking.
A
C
They're
in
need
of
some
work-
and
you
know
they-
they
all
have
a
little
bit
of
minor
drainage
problems.
We
try
to
fix
the
drainage
and
we
try
to
spruce
it
up
as
well
as
we're
going
by,
because
as
long
as
we're
doing
the
work
there,
it's
a
lot
cheaper
than
to
come
back
and
try
to
do
either.
One
of
these
as
an
individual
project
get
the
price
just
skyrockets,
so
we're
seeing
good
prices
when
we
do
partner
these
up
with
the
alley.
Improvements
are.
A
B
Think
I
wanted
to
add
that
it
really
does
make
a
difference.
Aesthetically
we're
encouraging
trying
to
encourage
people
to
use
our
public
parking,
some
of
those
types
of
things
in
the
history
where
we
have
done
the
parking
lot
with
the
alleys.
It's
been
tremendous
feedback.
It
has
good
aesthetics
and
I
think
that
it's
making
people
more
aware
of
the
parking
lots
if
we
go
just
flying
by
them
with
the
alley
and
do
nothing
to
the
parking
lots.
I
think
we
would
be
making
a
mistake
as
long
as
we've
got
numbers
like
this.
A
D
C
In
fact,
just
on
one
project
alone,
the
sanitary
sewer
project
which
you're
going
to
award
tonight
to
that
left.
Ninety
two
thousand
dollars
out
there
for
asphalt
that
we
didn't
that
we
don't
intend
to
spend
on
that
project
just
alone
and
we
have
the
11th
Avenue
project
which
were
also
going
to
award
as
a
budget
surplus
of
about
a
hundred
thousand.
So
we're
really
good
shape
on
our
two
twelve
projects
and
should
be
able
to
accommodate
these
little
extras.
Well,.
D
I
agree
with
Beth
it's.
If
the
work
needs
to
be
done
out,
you
wouldn't
bring
it
to
us
if
it
didn't
need
to
get
done,
but
where
we
have
done
the
alley
projects
that
I
think
have
made
a
huge
improvement.
Just
in
the
way
things
look
and
feel,
and
I
would
say
that
this
is
I
would
say
we
should
do
that.
Also.
H
A
Opposed
say,
nay,
motion
carries
item
number
six
is
award
of
contract
for
the
sealcoat
project;
number
1815
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred;
seventy
three
thousand
four
hundred
three
dollars
to
buy
two
minutes
paving
inc;
a
look
for
a
motion
and
second
for
approval,
move
by
dam
floor.
Second
by
l'olam
and
shane.
You
want
to
go
ahead
and
yeah.
C
Thank
you
mayor
again.
We
did.
We
have
our
discussion
on
the
13th
avenue
a
portion
of
this
project.
We
do
have
a
budget
shortfall
of
23,800,
even
without
the
eight
thousand
dollars
that
we
just
discussed
about
13th
avenue
and
what
that
was.
Is
we
have
a
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
budget
for
seal
coat
and
crack
seal,
and
we
already
awarded
our
crack
seal
bid
at
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
four
hundred,
and
then
we
we
didn't
really
know
how
good
of
sukkot
bids
we
were
gonna
get.
C
We
were
anticipating,
really
good
prices,
but
it
when
it
all
shook
out
in
the
end.
If
I
did
everything
that
was
planned
on
our
city
portion
of
the
Sukkot
project,
we
would
fall
twenty
three
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars
short
on
$400,000
budget.
Again,
I
would
ask
you
to
use
your
discretion
as
to
the
leftover
to
12
funds
and
just
accommodating
us
to
do
the
entire
sealcoat
project.
C
F
A
And
just
to
clarify
the
motion
was
toward
the
fall,
both
alternates
or
the
alternate
included
with
the
full
bid,
any
other
questions
or
discussion.
No
one
over
here,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
All
those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Okay.
Item
number
seven
is
award
of
contract
for
the
third
Avenue
Southwest
reconstruction
project
number
1806
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred;
thirty
nine
thousand
seventy-five
dollars
to
donek
Inc
and
should
I
wait
on
a
motion
chain
or
yes,.
C
Please
please
do
this
is
the
project
we
discussed
this
at
length
about
a
month
ago,
a
month
and
a
half
ago,
third
Avenue
from
13th
Street
West
to
18th
Street
West
is
the
project
that
also
would
include
some
segments
of
curb
and
gutter.
We
have
reached
out
to
all
of
the
homeowners
on
multiple
occasions
to
try
to
garner
support
or
lack
of
support,
either
direction.
I
can
report
to
you
that
I
have
about
52%
of
the
project
says
yes
33%
or
third,
almost
34%
no
contact.
C
In
other
words,
we've
tried
to
reach
out
to
them
by
letters
we
tried
to
reach
out
to
them
on
the
phone.
We
did
everything
short
of
just
going
around,
knocking
on
doors
and
couldn't
reach
that
34
percent
there's
one
gap
in
there
of
14.3%,
which
is
a
individuals
that
wouldn't
have
neither
support
or
refute
the
the
assessment
and
their
position
on
not
supporting
it
was
they
didn't
want
to
thrust
the
assessments
onto
other
property
owners
that
may
not
want
it,
but
they
certainly
would
not
oppose
the
assessment
process.
C
So
with
that
I
think
there's
a
solid
majority
that
would
willingly
accept
the
curb
and
gutter
project
portion
of
this.
But
again
the
base
bit
of
this
project
is
within
budget.
But
if
we
add
this
assessment
portion
on
for
the
curb
and
gutter,
we
would
exceed
the
budget
and
again
we
have
more
than
adequate
to
12
funds
to
cover
that
cost.
C
In
fact,
we're
only
looking
at
if
you
awarded
everything
I
think
we're
only
looking
at
a
shortfall
of
6200,
almost
sixty
three
hundred
dollars,
so
that
that's
small
amount
but
I
recommend
that
we
proceed
with
everything.
I
have
no
official,
no
votes
or
against
the
assessment.
Nothing
has
been
submitted
to
me
officially.
A
C
Unfortunately,
I'll
say:
yes,
it's
very
frustrating.
Every
time
we
reach
out
to
property
owners
that
their
lack
of
response
teams
seems
to
be
a
certain
percentage
that
just
doesn't
want
to
participate
and
I
can't
say
that
they
enjoy
getting
assessed,
but
they've
obviously
not
taken
the
measures
to
stand
up
in
opposition
of
it
either.
C
So
it's
it's
a
very
tough
thing
by
law,
they're
supposed
to
either
attend
a
public
hearing
which
we
had
and
nobody
attended
or
submit
a
written
letter
in
opposition
and
neither
in
the
previous
hearing-
and
in
this
case
we
asked
for
the
same
thing
and
when
we
had
the
final
numbers-
and
we
knew
neither
time
received
an
official
opposition
to
the
project.
What.
A
D
D
We
also
talked,
if
I
remember
right
on
one
of
our
previous
discussions
and
council
or
at
this
at
the
work
session
or
whatever
it
was
that
we
talked
about
that
we
we
might
consider
them
use
that
word
might
consider
allowing
those
that
want
to
do
it
to
have
it
done
and
those
that
don't
to
not
allow
or
not
require
them.
Is
that
still
an
option?
I'll.
C
Leave
that
to
the
discretion
of
the
council,
I
I
really
can
go
either
way.
I
I
wouldn't
recommend
it
just
from
a
street
maintenance
standpoint
that
if
we
put
curtain
gutter
over
the
whole
street,
then
we're
back
everybody's
in
the
same
position,
I
mean
from
a
manager's
position.
I
would
want
all
the
curb
in,
but
from
forcing
people
to
pay
for
something
that
they
don't
want.
That's
not
a
decision
that
the
engineer
should
be
making
they.
A
A
D
Only
comment
is
that,
when
it's
not
a
true
public
need,
I
have
a
very
difficult
time
pushing
dollars
on
anybody
that
they
either
don't
perceive
or
don't
really
don't
realize
a
benefit
from
it
and
I
know
what
we
want.
In
theory,
I
have
a
very,
very
difficult
time
doing
that
and
from
that
standpoint,
when
we
do
have
the
option
allowing
some
to
do
it
and
others
not
that's
the
direction
I
would
prefer
to
go.
I
am.
F
G
Have
had
discussions
through
about
gaps
and
erosion
and
kind
of
thing
too,
and
the
curb
and
gutter
scenery
refresh
my
memory.
What
is
our,
what
is
the
assessment
percentage
for
like
alley,
reconstruction
or
construction?
We
have
a
percentage
that
we
typically
go
by
when
we
make
that
decision.
What
is
that
legally.
A
Is
you
can
just
do
it?
You
have
the
power
as
the
City
Council,
to
build
the
road
and
build
the
adjacent
property
owners,
and
it
would
take
fifty
five
percent
of
the
adjacent
property
owners
to
to
overturn
that.
So
that's
why
he
says
46.
If
you
have
46
answering
yes,
then
you
can't
have
55
saying
no.
But
the
way
the
law
is
written
doesn't
say
anything
about
46.
It
just
says
you
can
do
it
because
you're
the
City
Council
and
it
takes
55
percent
of
those
who
will
receive
the
bill
to
object
to
overturn
it.
A
B
Think
one
of
the
important
things
to
remember
here
is
that
everybody
received
the
same
opportunity
to
give
their
input
their
yes
or
no.
They
were
certified
letters
we,
you
know,
we
know
they
got
them.
It
wasn't
that
we
sent
them
a
text
and
so
I
think
that's
important.
You
know
to
understand.
That's
why
I
believe
that
finishing
the
whole
project
is
important.
A
A
D
I
H
A
Thank
you
motion
carries
okay
item
number;
seven,
no
see
on
to
eight
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
South
Dakota
ADOT
utilities,
certificate
and
right-of-way
certificate
for
the
20th
Avenue
South,
East,
bridge
preservation,
project,
number,
1709
and
I.
Think
I'll
get
a
motion
second
for
this,
and
then
let
Shane
explain
it.
Move
by
l'olam
second,
by
manty,
Shane
Thank.
C
You
mayor,
these
are
standard
documents
on
any
project
that
receives
funding
from
the
d-o-t,
which
this
project
has
a
big
grant
fund
applied
to
it.
So
basically
it's
certifying
what
utilities
are
adjacent
to
the
bridge
and
then
the
other
document
is
to
certify
that
we
have
the
right-of-way
to
do
the
construction
within.
We
don't
need
to
obtain
additional
right
away,
and
so
both
of
these
are
pretty
standard
and
should
be
easy
to
approve
any.