►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Commission Meeting 7 18 2019
Description
City of Watertown, SD Board of Adjustment and Plan Commission Meeting
A
A
B
A
C
B
B
No
yard
setback
shall
be
reduced
in
dimension
below
the
minimum
requirement
set
for
the
district
in
which
such
yard
or
a
lot
is
located.
This
is
to
allow
for
the
non-conforming
3300
square
foot
30
by
110
foot,
building
to
be
constructed,
15
feet
from
the
rear
north
property
line,
where
a
minimum
30
foot
is
required.
B
Staff
finds
that
storage
units
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c3
Highway
commercial
district,
421
20,
28,
Oh
311.
The
definition
of
storage
units
is
a
building
or
buildings
for
the
storage
of
commercial
or
private
goods
and
materials
in
individual
units
within
a
common
structure
without
water
or
sewer
utilities,
the
applicant
submitted
site
plan
and
written
request
which
reflect
or
do
not
reflect
the
following
requirements
of
the
ordinance.
This
board
must
review
21:02,
o22
b7
A
through
H,
which
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses.
B
This
includes
ingress
and
egress
to
the
property
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering
signage,
refuse,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
area.
The
purpose
of
the
c3
zone
is
to
establish
appropriate
locations
along
major
streets
and
highways
for
highway
and
automobile
related
retail
and
service
establishments,
and
to
permit
development
of
highway
service
centers
in
the
appropriate
locations
shown
in
the
comprehensive
Land
Use
Plan.
B
The
2163
is
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements,
and
you
will
see
on
the
site
plan
that
he
has
given
us
some
of
his
information
on
parking
and
it
is
also
subject
to
or
the
application
is
subject
to,
compliance
with
the
landscape
and
lighting
standards.
Chapter
21
73,
the
site
plan
is
lacking
details
regarding
screening
and
buffering
signage,
refuse
and
exterior
lighting.
The
Duff
dumpsters
must
be
screened
again.
It
does
not
show
that
or
where
they
are
placed
at
adequate.
Screening
of
a
parking
lot
from
adjacent
residential
used
property
shall
be
provided.
B
There
is
no
adjacent
as
in
directly
adjacent
residential
property,
but
there
is
senior
living
dwellings
up
here
in
the
500
16th
Avenue
Northeast
area
here
parking
lot
lighting
in
order
to
maximize
negative
impact
of
parking
lot
lighting
on
adjacent
properties.
The
city
requires
the
use
of
shoe
box
lighting.
D
Then
we
can
address
the
variance,
because
if
we
address
the
variance
at
first
and
then
the
conditional
use,
you
know,
there's
a
procedural
element
here
so
prior
to
the
public
hearing.
I
would
recommend
to
the
chair
that
the
public
hearing
be
held
on
both
requests,
variance
and
the
conditional
use,
but
so
that
we
don't
get
confused
in
the
motions.
I
would
begin
by
making
a
motion
to
approve
the
conditional
use
per
the
ordinance
absent
the
variance
and
then
from
there.
We
can
have
a
public
hearing
on
all
the
elements.
I.
A
A
A
E
A
A
D
F
E
F
D
Question
is,
is
how
bad
of
a
backer
up,
or
do
you
have
to
be
to
not
be
able
to
squeeze
a
boat
in
on
a
43-foot
I
was
on
pepper
Slough
last
week
and
I
backed
boat
into
the
end
of
the
shore
perpendicular,
with
with
no
no
issues
there.
My
thinking
is
that
even
an
old
farm
boy
could
get
back
a
trailer
and
a
30
foot
trailer
in
on
a
even
on
a
40
foot
square
turn
well.
D
E
H
I
E
D
D
D
B
F
J
B
F
K
Commissioner
Ford,
it
appears
just
looking
at
the
aerials
here.
There
is
a
shoulder
lane
on
both
sides.
Now
I
can't
speak
to
still
one
or
both
our
designated
bike
path,
lanes,
I
assume
at
least
one
of
them
are,
but
without
having
that
information
in
front
of
me.
I
can't
speak
to
that,
but
there
are
two
striped
shoulders,
one
on
each
side
of
that
roadway.
There.
D
Have
a
question
for
staff
in
1996,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
went
to
superwash
came
in
for
a
special
exception.
That's
what
we
call
conditional
uses
back
then,
and
it
looks
like
to
me
that
the
Board
of
Adjustment
in
their
in
the
minutes
it
provided
by
staff
provided
for
the
special
exception
for
only
a
car
wash.
Was
there
anything
else
in
the
minutes
or
anything
that
you
could
find
why
they
are
only
specifying
a
single
use
on
that
property
back
in
1996?
D
D
I
B
D
Been
okay,
there's
trees
that
are
right,
adjacent
to
the
pond.
The
property
line
I
use
this
car
washed
three
times
a
week,
so
I
mean
I,
think
there
are
trees
that
line
up
next
to
the
I'm,
not
sure
what
size,
if
they're,
on
the
brown
clinic
site
or,
if
they're
on
the
applicant
site.
But
there
are
trees
where
those
yeah.
I
D
I
A
D
A
Have
a
motion
to
have
a
second
I'll?
Second,
have
a
second,
so
just
before
we
take
a
vote
on
that.
I
would
just
say
that
the
the
conditional
use
of
storage
units
does
seem
to
me
to
be
consistent
with
the
zoning
district,
as
well
as
the
the
location
being
adjacent
to
both
a
highway
in
a
major
collector
route.
This
is
a
use
case
scenario
that
we've
done
in
other
areas
of
town,
including
the
the
dual
use
on
a
commercial
property.
L
B
D
K
Commissioner
case,
if
I
could
that
mr.
chairman
respond
to
that
under
once
under
one
circumstance,
I
could
see
if
the
widening
of
that
roadway
that
bike
lane
area
would
need
to
be
utilized
for
traffic
purposes,
for
additional
lanes
that
be
one
one
case
where
we
would
may
may
would
implement.
Maybe
would
implement
some
sidewalk
er
off-street.
A
D
D
J
D
A
D
D
H
C
D
F
I
I
agree
with
you:
Rhonda
I
think
coming
at
it
from
both
sides.
A
little
smaller
and
a
little
bit
young
would
be
the
appropriate
and
I
do
compliment
the
owner
on
cleaning
up
that
property.
That's
certainly
it's
true
and
I
think
we're
all
pleased
with
with
that,
but
I
do
agree
that
it
would
be
better
to
implement
it
as
Rhonda
described,
I.
Think.
L
It
would
matter
a
lot
more
if
there
was
an
adjacent
residential
or
commercial
structure,
but
considering
that
there's
40
or
50
or
60
feet
of
parking
lot
to
this
to
the
north
of
it.
The
setback
doesn't
seem
like
it
matters
as
much.
To
me,
I
mean
that
the
purpose
of
the
setback
is
to
create
room
for
sound
for
sight
issues
for
fire
issues.
J
Would
say
the
growth
mr.
Klain
and
I
also
would
say
that
for
the
15
feet
that
is
being
requested,
the
off
side
of
that
would
be
the
safety
of
vaca
in
the
trailers
or
youth
licensing
and
accessing
the
storage
units,
because
not
everyone
as
a
skilled,
as
our
friend
mr.
cave,
when
it
comes
to
backing
up
trailer.
So
I
think
that
that
is
a
reasonable
trade-off.
The
setback
for
the
safety
of
a
larger
maneuverable
area
to
access
these
storage
units
and.
D
N
G
I
C
A
D
D
E
F
A
A
A
A
B
The
owner
of
the
property
is
Watertown
Development
Company,
the
applicant
is
Ashley
Fox.
The
property
address
is
208
East
Kemp
Suite
number
one.
There
is
a
this
property
is
divided
into
two
Suites
east
and
west.
Pursuant
to
zoning
ordinance,
21
24,
Oh,
3/4,
bar
or
tavern
applicant
seeks
site
approval
to
be
eligible
to
apply
for
alcoholic
beverage
licenses,
which
may
include
video
lottery
on
this
property
located
in
the
c1
community
commercial
district
contingent
upon
compliance
with
24:01.
B
The
purpose
of
the
c1
zone,
21:02
o2,
to
be
7a
through
H
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
and
22
point
O,
102
location
staff
finds
that
bar
or
tavern
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
c1
community
commercial
district
for
21
24.
Oh
three
for
the
definition
of
bar
tavern
is
any
establishment,
including
restaurants
and
gambling
establishments
licensed
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
upon
the
premises
where
sold
or
provided
the
term
bar
or
tavern
shall
also
include
establishments
licenses
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
consumption
off
the
premises
were
sold.
B
The
purpose
of
this
c1
zone
is
to
provide
retail
and
service
uses
that
serve
the
whole
community
and
supply
a
wide
range
of
goods
and
services
required
by
the
primary
marketable
population
and
to
permit
permit
development
of
community
retail
centers
of
a
size
and
in
the
locations
shown
in
the
comprehensive
land
use
plan,
2.0,
102
location
that
I
referred
to
just
a
moment
ago.
These
that
is
about
being
so
far
from
a
boys,
girls
club
Church
community
center.
That
kind
of
a
thing
the
c1
zone
is
actually
exempt.
B
So
we
can
check
that
one
off
chapter
21
63,
is
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
and
engineering
designs,
design
standards.
Again
the
c1
zone
is
exempt
from
this,
so
parking
is
or
off.
Street
parking
is
actually
not
an
issue
because
the
c1
zone
is
is
not
considered
there
and
then
chapter
21,
73,
landscape
and
lighting
standards,
as
it
pertains
to
the
boulevard
again
c1
exempt.
B
A
Thank
You
Jill
the
interesting
point
of
clarity,
I
guess.
The
request
here
is
strictly
for
the
conditional
use
to
operate
bar
or
tavern
so
blessing
the
the
location,
the
land
as
acceptable
for
this
kind
of
use.
The
applicant
would
subsequently
have
to
go
before
the
City
Council
to
apply
for
a
license.
That's.
B
A
D
M
B
D
Jill,
the
other
question,
it's
more
of
a
procedural
and
a
historical
application
of
conditional
uses
in
this
situation.
If
Miss
Fox
decides
to
quit
doing
her
business
five
years
down
the
road
and
she
transfers
suite
101
to
whoever
does
the
conditional
use
for
the
alcohol
or
beer
sales
transfer
with
that
sale
of
the
property?
Or
can
we
restrict
the
CEP
to
only
apply
to
the
specific
use
and
its
associated
with
we.
N
L
C
C
D
O
O
D
C
A
D
D
N
D
A
B
The
Jesse
Craig
for
the
lofts
LLC
is
the
applicant.
The
property
address
is
well.
This
is
a
redevelopment
lot,
but
it
will
be
ten
North
Broadway
conditional
use
request
pursuant
to
21
24.
Oh
three
twenty-four
apartments
over
four
units
using
the
upper
floors
of
commercial
buildings,
the
applicant
seeks
approval
to
construct
and
operate
a
three-story
thirty-nine
unit
apartment
complex
over
ground-floor
commercial
uses
on
property
located
in
the
c1
community,
commercial
district
contingent
upon
compliance
with
21:24.
B
B
The
definitions
of
apartment
dwelling
unit,
apartment
house
and
multi-family
are
as
follows:
apartment
seed
dwelling
unit
dwelling
unit
is
a
residential
accommodation,
including
complete
kitchen
facilities
permanently
installed,
which
are
arranged
designed
used
for
or
intended
for
use
exclusively
as
living
quarters
for
one
family,
an
apartment
house,
sea-dwelling,
multifamily
and
multi-family
is
a
residential
building
designed
or
occupied
by
three
or
more
families.
This
is
a
redevelopment
project
in
downtown
Watertown,
where
building
has
recently
burned
down
in
historic
district.
B
We
can
check
off
chapters
21,
63
and
21
73,
which
is
dealing
with
off
street
parking
and
loading
and
landscape
and
lighting
again,
because
c1
zone
is
exempt
from
these.
So
this
board
must
determine
if
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
has
been
made
concerning
the
chapters
and
sections
described
above
and
if
generally
endorsed
the
board
may
consider
conditions
of
approval.
A
D
A
D
Wanted
to
begin
by
saying
that
I
support
the
concept
of
the
redevelopment
of
Uptown,
Watertown
and
I
I
think
this
could
be
potentially
just
be
a
new
anchor
something
that's
very
positive
for
the
community.
I
do
have
a
couple,
quick
questions
regarding
the
underground
parking,
which
is
new
to
the
city
of
Watertown.
Yes,.
P
P
D
Them
that
was
because
otherwise,
my
concern
for
downtown
Saturday
night
open
correct.
Another
quick
question
is,
while
the
city
has
not
formally
adopted,
or
the
proposed
changes
to
our
uptown
design
standards,
have
you
had
any
conversations
with
city
staff
on
what
we're
looking
for
wanting
to
make
the
uptown
look
like
on
these
redevelopment
projects?
Would
you
be
willing
to
consider
constructing
to
those
standards
that,
even
though
they're
not
technically
required
of
you
at
this
time,
I'd.
P
Actually
go
above
and
beyond
those
we've
had
those
discussions
in
regards
to
the
previously.
There
wasn't
really
a
lot
of
detail
in
that
for
the
amount
of
glass
that's
required,
or
the
amount
of
brick
and
certain
exterior
materials,
and
for
more,
you
know
up
north,
where
I
come
from
that's
kind
of
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
I'm
building
these
to
own
them,
not
to
sell
them
I'm,
not
just
a
developer,
I'm,
also
an
owner
and
a
property
manager
of
them.
P
D
D
E
D
M
A
P
C
P
P
There
would
be
a
you
know,
probably
a
three
quarter
wall
things
like
that,
and
it
wouldn't
be
a
door
that
closes
necessarily
it'd,
be
a
barn
door
and
so
we're
trying
to
look
at
different
ways
to
utilize
the
space
to
the
best
of
the
you
know
of
the
use
of
it
and
again
you
as
you're
looking
at
it.
You
know
they
get
real
long
and
narrow,
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
make
those
fit
a
little
better.
P
P
You
know
a
project
like
this
when
they're
home
they're,
usually
after
work,
showering
getting
ready
to
go
out
and
again,
the
walkability
is
amazing:
they're
going
to
want
to
go
to
their
nearest
restaurant
establishment
and
you
know,
sit
on
the
sidewalk
or
sit
on
their
patio
versus
on
a
little
four
by
a
patio
outside
of
their
apartment.
So
so
yeah
we're
not
gonna,
have
any
balconies
on
these.
A
P
Depends
on
again
how
how
close
the
city
wants
it
to
the
you
know
to
the
to
the
property.
Also,
you
look
accessibility
for
the
dump
truck
to
come
in
and
go
and
the
amount
of
concrete
that
they
drive
on
because
they
ended
up
doing
damage
over
time.
Literally,
it's
a
mount
frequency.
That's
picked
up
versus
the
size
of
the
dumpster
mm-hmm
so
and
again,
I,
don't
I
apologize
that
I'm
new
to
town,
so
I,
don't
know
if
there's
an
availability
to
have
services,
you
know
more
frequently
down
here
or
not.
P
There
is
okay
I,
usually
for
an
extra
charge.
We'd
have
it
picked
up
twice
a
week
or
something
like
that
and
again
as
we
as
we
kind
of
analyze,
that
as
we
go
along
will
be,
it
will
be
the
biggest
factor
or
if
you
have
people
moving
out
the
end
of
the
month,
then
you
have
a
little
bit
more
trash.
Typically,
when
people
are
cleaning
out
their
units,
if
there's
turnover
and
thing.
F
P
I
P
B
N
B
A
A
B
Okay,
the
applicants
are
Robert
and
Don
Johnson.
This
is
the
property
it's
address.
316
third
Street
southeast.
The
application
was
submitted,
a
requesting
tickets
requesting
to
construct
a
non-conforming
480
square
foot
20
by
24
addition
onto
an
existing
600
square
foot
20
by
30
attached
garage,
creating
one
1080
square
foot
non-conforming
structure.
On
a
sixteen
thousand
five
hundred
square
foot
parcel
said
structures
proposed
to
be
constructed,
six
point,
nine
feet
from
the
side:
south
property
line
or
a
minimum
nine
feet
is
required.
B
The
application
was
denied,
based
on
the
following
ordinance
regulations,
21:03
o,
to
prohibits
the
design
and
creation
of
non-conforming
structures.
21
1001
is
the
height
and
placement
regulations
and
twenty
one
six
zero
one
and
six
zero
to
relate
to
required
setbacks
that
shall
be
open,
unoccupied
space
and
no
adjacent
space
she'll
be
used
to
satisfy
in
or
any
yard
setback
required
for
any
structure
and
no
yard
or
setback
she'll
be
reduced
in
dimension
below
the
minimum
requirement
requirement
set
forth
in
the
district
in
which
they
are
located.
The
applicant
appeals
those
above
regulations.
B
The
staff
finds
that,
if
enlarging
a
non-conforming
structure
is
generally
endorsed
or
the
non-conforming
structure,
the
480
square
foot
addition
could
be
constructed,
constructed
compliant
to
current
minimum
required
setback
requirements
by
offsetting,
for
instance,
2.1
feet
to
the
north,
because
/
2100,
202
c
1d.
Any
variance
granted
under
the
provision
of
this
section
shall
be
the
minimum
adjustment
necessary
for
the
reasonable
use
of
the
land
offsetting
would
create
a
compliant
addition
on
a
non-conforming
existing
structure.
A
D
Q
Q
B
A
A
D
A
R
A
D
Q
A
D
D
B
Feet-
and
in
that
case
it
would
be
9
foot,
but
they
do
not
so
much
in
the
r1,
but
the
are
twos
usually
usually
go
down
to
the
50
foot.
6
foot
side
yards
just
one
clarification.
If
I
may
in
the
permit
history
in
1977
there
was
a
brick
home
built
and
in
1982
there
was
a
garage
built,
I,
don't
know
which
one
and
it's.
A
A
Know
what's
interesting
with
this
lot,
like
you
alluded
to
mr.
Caze,
is,
is
that
if
this
was
on
a
normal
50
foot
are
to
weigh
a
lot,
it
would
meet
the
setback
requirements.
This
particular
a
lot
being
two
lots
that
are
combined.
It's
a
little
bit
different
than
the
average
house.
You
see
in
this
area
that.
D
N
D
The
past
and
that
they're
further
no
objections
to
the
neighbors
to
the
south,
where
the
encroachment
is
impacting
them
the
most.
This
is
problematic,
I
mean
I
hate.
The
whole
aspect
about
granting
variance
is
a
difficult
one,
but
sometimes
if
the
the
existing
garage
wasn't
already
there
or
the
garage
further
to
the
east
wasn't
already
there
I
would
be
inclined
to
say
no.
Q
Aesthetics
easier
to
build
a
straight
wall
in
making
a
job
in
a
wall.
Now
we've
got
two
feet
of
structure
that
doesn't
really
look
conforming
to
the
rest
of
the
building
attached
to
it
and
kind
of
a
little
country
boy
logic.
You
got
one
wall
existing
build
on
three
more
and
you're
you're
good
to
go
so.
Q
Grassman
yeah
manraja
under
bat,
currently
sits
at
grade
level.
So
during
the
spring
thaw
we
do
get
some
runoff
from
the
North
alley
comes
down
into
the
garage
for
a
few
days.
While
the
ground
is
thawing
once
the
ground
thaws
able
to
zorb
the
moisture,
then
the
moisture
disappears
in
the
garage.
So
you
look
at
the
the
options
of
do
I
raise
that
floor,
getting
away
from
that
moisture
problem
or
do
I
move
over
ask
for
a
variance
to
construct
that
addition
make
a
nice
shop
area
and
at
some
point
in
the
future.
C
H
I
I'm,
just
looking
at
what
the
staff
found
here
where
it
says,
any
variance
granted
under
the
provisions
of
this
section
shall
be
the
minimum
adjustment
necessary
for
the
reasonable
use
of
the
land
and
I
guess.
I,
don't
think
aesthetics
is
preventing
them
from
the
reasonable
use
of
the
land
that
adjustment
2.1
feet
to
the
north.
D
I
A
B
B
The
applicant
appeals
those
requirements
of
the
current
zoning
ordinance
staff
finds
that
currently,
the
property
utilizes
six
unapproved
inset
Boulevard
parking
spaces
on
South
Broadway
for
customer
parking.
This
addition
that
they
are
proposing
would
eliminate
some
of
the
few
existing
required
off
street
parking
spaces.
They
have
on
this
property,
of
which
20
softs,
20
off
street
parking
spaces
are
required
and
three
will
be,
will
remain.
H
My
name
is
Larry
Henman
and
we
simply
got
a
room
without
growing
our
store.
We
need
more
space
and
we
want
to
build
within
the
boundaries
we
already
are
in.
As
far
as
that
parking
issue
goes,
we
very
seldom
have
six
customers
in
our
store
at
any.
Given
time
we
would
be
able
to
park
between
our
building
and
what's
doc,
Howard
there's
a
spot
there.
We
could
put
a
vehicle
if
need
be,
and
then
we
had
a
transformer
put
in
that's
what
put
in
three-phase
power
to
the
building.
There's
a
transformer
on
that.
H
H
F
J
J
B
H
H
D
J
D
A
H
B
B
R
H
C
H
J
J
B
B
B
B
C
C
J
S
H
B
The
ordinance
says
that
a
garage
permitted
prior
to
July,
11,
28th
2008,
which
is
entered
perpendicular
to
an
alley,
shall
not
be
located
closer
than
not
9
feet
to
the
alley
line
in
a
garage
permitted
after
July
2008,
which
is
entered
perpendicular
to
an
alley,
shall
not
be
located
closer
than
20
feet
to
an
alley
line,
a
garage
which
is
entered
parallel
to
the
alley
or
shall
not
be
closer
than
9
feet,
but
this
is
in
fact,
under
residential
accessory
uses.
That's
why
I
thought.
S
D
Chair,
it
seems
by
just
the
number
of
variances
that
are
in
front
of
me
in
front
of
this
board
that
it's
quite
obvious
that
the
zoning
regulations
for
all
practical
purposes
have
taken
nearly
99%
of
the
user
bill
aspect
of
this
property
without
a
variance.
So
you
take
the
next
step
bus.
Well,
if
this
property
was
was,
was
and
and
wanted,
I
wanted
to
come
and
build
could
I
do
anything
on
this
property
without
a
variance.
Yeah
I
think
the
answer
is
no
right.
D
So
back
in
2005,
the
city
had
commissioned
a
study
to
look
at
all
non-conforming
Lots
up
and
down
highways,
212,
80,
120
and
all
residential
areas
within
the
community.
I
know
a
couple:
things
did
come
out
of
that
study.
The
r2a
zoning
district
was
created,
but
we
never
took
out
a
look
at
trying
to
fix
the
issues
along
the
highways
specifically
along
highway
212.
That
study
indicated
that
they
are.
D
As
of
then
January
1st
of
2005,
which
have
an
existing
minimum
front
yard
setback
of
less
than
40
feet,
but
more
than
35
feet,
she'll
have
to
have
35
feet,
but
we
also
took
a
look
at
if
you
don't
meet
that
minimum
setback
you're
not
gonna,
be
penalized
as
long
as
the
addition
doesn't
further
go
into
the
zoning
into
your
non-conforming
area.
We
also
talked
about
in
that
study
that
c3
zone
ownership,
parcels
platted
and
containing
non-conforming
structures
prior
to
January
2005
and
an
existing
non-conforming
structure.
D
As
long
as
the
minimum
front
yard
setback
is
not
further
encroached
upon.
I
said
that
already,
but
we
also
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
lot
area.
Many
of
these
lasts
don't
contain
20,000
square
feet,
so
it
just
seems
to
me
that
the
rule
themselves
are
onerous
in
this
situation
and
not
allowing
anybody
to
do
anything
with
this
property.
Whether
this
was
an
addition
on
to
this
lot
or
if
God
came
in
and
smite
it
out.
D
What
would
he
be
able
to
do
with
this
property
and
I
think
without
a
variance
and
the
answer
would
be
known
if
we
were
going
to
hold
to
the
issuance
of
variances
being
rarely.
We
might
as
well
just
buy
this
property
and
we
got
a
nice
big,
open
corner
that
the
city
has
so
I.
Think
in
this
situation,
I
would
be
reluctantly
willing
to
say
yes
to
the
variance
as
requested,
but
I
think
it's.
D
The
onus
is
on
the
Planning
Commission
City
Council
to
go
back
to
that
study
that
was
commissioned
15
years
ago
and
take
a
look
at
making
amendments
to
the
ordinance
that
will
address
not
only
this
gentleman's
a
situation
but
the
hundreds
of
commercial
lots
along
the
highways
that
we
need
for
retail
sales
and
those
types
of
things
in
the
area.
That's
my
random.
A
K
Mr.
chair,
if
I
may
just
one
last
comment
regarding
the
parking
stall
depth
in
front
of
garages,
I
would
just
note
that
one
potential
conflict
would
be
the
intrusion
or
extension
of
any
vehicle.
That's
parked
for
that
garage
out
into
that
public
alleyway,
which
would
obstruct
the
the
free
flow
of
traffic
through
that
public
alleyway.
Just
from
an
engineering
traffic
management
standpoint.
I
wanted
to
make
that
note.
Thank.
A
D
E
H
I've
been
told
that
they
are
talking
of
abandoning
that
alleyway
in
the
future.
It's
not
in
the
works
now,
but
it's
a
thought
that
the
city
is
having
so
I
mean.
If
that
would
happen,
we
would
actually
want
you
know
say:
yes,
we
want
to
be
able
to
access
it
from
2-12,
because
that
would
be
our
only
in
and
out,
but
that.
H
K
G
Mark
Meyer
utilities:
actually
we
have
gas
electric
there's
telephone,
cable,
TV
our
summer
project
is
we're
actually
burying
all
the
overhead
electric
this
summer,
and
so,
even
if
that
alley
was
vacated,
you
would
still
have
to
remain
as
a
utility
easement
as
it's
plumbed
full
of
utilities.
Thank
you.
B
N
A
C
A
A
B
A
A
I
A
S
I'm
gonna
take
the
time
just
to
note
that
there
was
a
public
notice
put
out
in
the
July
6th
paper
that
there
would
be
a
public
hearing
for
the
preliminary
plan
of
the
lakes
of
Willow,
Creek
and
river
ridge
estates.
But
those
are
not
going
to
be
on
this
meeting
as
you'll
see
on
the
agenda,
but
they
will
be
pushed
to
the
August
8th
meeting.
S
A
N
A
N
S
You
Blake,
so
this
is
a
tip
number.
Eight.
Previously
we
saw
tip
number
seven
for
the
Tareq's
project.
This
is
being
requested
by
water
tone
development
company
for
the
city's
participation
in
helps
with
improvements
to
the
infrastructure
lot
1
of
Kalvin
industrial
park,
as
well
as
for
the
street
improvements,
and
this
is
for
a
new
business
being
comprehensive
logistics,
inc
coming
to
town
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Tracy.
S
She'll.
Give
you
guys
some
background
on
it,
but
as
far
as
the
Planning
Commission
goes
as
far
as
SD
CL
11
9
for
a
recommendation
by
Planning
Commission
for
creation
of
district
designation
of
boundaries,
the
Planning
Commission
shall
designate
the
boundaries
of
a
district
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
be
created.
The
Planning
Commission
shall
submit
the
record
to
the
governing
body,
so
you
guys
are
looking
at
the
boundaries
Thank.
A
S
A
R
What
you
have
is
tip
number
eight,
that
I
wrote
a
project
plan
for
comprehensive
logistics
is
going
to
be
supporting
the
Terrax,
the
new
Tareq's
facility,
with
their
warehouse
parts
and
management
distribution
system.
So
they
will
be
moving
across
the
street
basically
and
that
will
help
them
make
their
processes
flow.
A
lot
better.
S
D
R
A
You
have
a
question
on
the
the
site
plan.
Previously
we
had
looked
at
the
infrastructure
installations
and
the
previous
site
plan
didn't
show
the
the
sidewalk
going
all
the
way
to
the
corner
that
came
up
during
discussion.
The
proposal,
though,
would
be
to
install
all
the
infrastructure
up
front
during
this
development.
Yes,.
R
R
S
S
K
Mr.
chairman,
just
to
provide
some
clarity
on
that
subject.
As
I
recall,
the
discussion
was
because
there
were
no
no
other
sidewalks
in
the
vicinity
of
that
intersection,
its
standard
not
to
lead
the
pedestrians
out
into
an
intersection
without
a
ramp
on
the
opposite
side
or
across
either
direction
or
a
kiddy
corner
from
that
intersection.
So
we
were
gonna,
keep
a
separation
there
until
a
future
date
when
sidewalk
is
constructed
on
the
opposite
sides
of
it,
their
intersection
yeah.
J
L
L
S
R
R
So
they're
going
to
be
putting
up
a
16,000
square
foot
building
and
having
some
product
on
display
south
of
the
comprehensive
logistics
building.
The
improvements
that
they're
going
to
be
making
will
be
mainly
public.
None
of
the
money
will
be
going
towards
their
building,
it'll,
be
for
sidewalks
sight,
excavation
and.
C
L
C
R
D
L
S
N
S
You
Blake,
so
this
is
finally
our
downtown
aesthetics
ordinance
and
we've
been
working
on
it
since
March
and
so
in
front
of
you
is
the
final
product.
You'll
you'll
see
that
there
are,
you
know
anything
else.
That's
not
explicitly
listed
in.
There
will
fall
back
to
the
underlying
zoning
district,
which
is
all
c1
and
then
I.
Guess
if
you
guys
have
any
questions
or
things
that
you
disagree
with,
but
I
believe
we.
D
K
S
We
started
off
just
wanting
to
have
a
downtown
esthetics
ordinance
for
for
our
downtown
to
uphold
the
integrity
of
the
historical
district
and
so
by
looking
at
my
model,
ordinances
and
other
communities,
and
that
we
had
talked
about
and
you
guys
had
suggested
and
pulling
anything
from
there.
We
also
looked
into
our
existing
gateway,
overlay,
district
and
kind
of
use
that,
as
a
guidance
to
keep
things
consistent
and
then
just
picked
apart.
You
know
we
looked
at
illustrations
as
far
as
the
transparency
aspect
goes.
L
L
We
have
been
working
irrespective
of
your
projects.
We
had
run
into
a
instance
where
there
was
some
minor
development
downtown
and
there
was
no
aesthetic
requirements
in
place
and
it
didn't
really
conform
to
what
we've
got
going
on,
and
so
in
the
last
couple
months
we've
been
working
on
in
ordinance
to
sort
of
promote
a
somewhat
unified,
downtown
aesthetic,
particularly
in
relation
to
set
back
on
the
street
front.
So
you
don't
end
up
with
a
parking
lot
and
then
a
building.
You
know
on
these
Patois
curb
old
streets.
L
That
was
the
primary
concern
and
then
the
second
concern
I
think
was
the
transparent
space
from
zero
or
from
two
to
ten
feet.
Right,
I,
just
curious
what
your
experiences
were
in
Fargo,
if
what
their
ordinance
looks
like
or
what
you
think
works
or
doesn't
work
and-
and
it
will,
you
know
indirectly,
impact
your
business
correct.
P
Up
in
Fargo
I
mean
our
land
downtown
is
like
thirty
bucks,
a
square
foot,
so
we
don't
have
surface
parking
lots.
You
know
we're
trying
to
eliminate
those
I
think
even
you
know,
with
the
city
of
Watertown,
with
the
cost
for
snow
removal,
especially
this
last
winter,
and
things
like
that
and
Hall
lining
it
where
to
put
it
things
like
that,
the
removal,
those
is
kind
of
some
of
the
discussions
I've
had
with
city
staff
and
things
and
taking
those
surface
parking,
lots
and
putting
you
know
multi-level
parking
ramps
things
like
that.
P
Because
of
that
yeah
we
don't
have
the
the
need
to
worry
about
a
parking
lot
being
in
front
of
a
you
know,
a
building
so
to
speak.
I
think
you
know,
Brandi
had
sent
me
the
initial,
what
you
get
draft,
which
you
guys
were
working
on
things
like
that,
and
it
addressed
a
lot
of
the
material,
exterior
material
materials
and
things
like
that.
The
only
thing
I've
run
into
in
Fargo
with
the
transparency
is
they
wanted
to
have
a
certain
amount
of
glass
percentage
of
glass
on
the
main
level
that
was
great
to
it
agree.
P
But
what
you
ended
up
having
that
is
as
you're
driving
by
at
night
and
you
have
these
main
level
parking
garages,
indoor
heated
parking
garages
and
all
of
a
sudden,
you
see
all
the
cars
sitting
in
there
so
like
on
my
properties.
I
went
I,
tinted
all
the
windows
so
that
you
do
have
glass,
but
you
aren't
seen
inside
at
night
because
it's
a
real
distraction.
So
with
the
tinting
at
least
it
has
the
glass
front
and
the
clean
look
and
things
like
that.
P
But
when
you
get
into
more
of
the
defining
the
exterior
materials,
I
mean
we
got
away
like
there's.
No
steel
siding,
no,
nothing
even
resembling
steel,
siding
things
like
that.
There's
a
requirement
for
a
percentage
of
brick.
You
know
even
Drive
it
is
or
stucco,
is
reduced
to
a
minimal
percentage,
and
things
like
that,
but
I
think
there's
some
keys
of
that
and
there's
also
storefront
funding
and
help
that
I
think
is
gonna,
be
really
mandatory
for
cleaning
up
a
lot
of
these
blocks
because
you
have
a
lot
of
really
cool
existing
buildings.
P
N
P
But
I
think
if
you
got
the
people
that
are
putting
the
money
into
downtown,
whether
it
be
new
projects
or
you
know,
remodeling
and
things
like
that,
they're
gonna
want
the
the
best
aesthetic
that
they
possibly
can
I.
Think
there's
as
you
guys,
roll
through
that
and
Fargo's
learn
that
there's
there's
affordable
ways
to
get
the
look
you
want.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
all
high-end
costs,
and
things
like
that
so
but
Randy's
been
doing
a
great
job,
so
she's
control.
L
L
D
S
D
Say
all
within
that
it's
a
historic
district
but
there's
a
different
designation,
historic
district
versus
Historic
Register
in
the
buildings,
and
there
are
different
standards
in
place
when
you
do
work
and
the
island.
Those
buildings
I
just
want
to
make
sure
in
the
in
the
says
historic
material
shall
be
retained
were
possible.
We're
not
feasible
compatible
of
material
shall
being
encouraged.
We
might-
and
you
might
not
have
that
much
flexibility
on
some
of
those
buildings,
so
I
just
was
more
of
a
comment
to
you
as
an
administrator.
D
D
D
Reference
other
other
sections.
We
don't
have
to
have
it
everything
spelled
out,
but
I
think
again.
I
I
would
just
like
to
see
this
moving
forward,
but
as
we
start
to
drive
it
and
you
get
you
research
and
you
become
more
cognizant
of
what
the
other
aspects
of
Historic
Preservation
are.
It
might
be
just
a
good
conversation
that
staff
has
with
the
state.
S
D
I
want
to
be
very
careful
eternity
put
an
onus
on
individuals
that
if
there
is
some
flexibility,
when
you're
you
probably
realizes
when
you
start
rehabbing
historic
buildings,
it
can
become
very
expensive
real
fast.
If
you
follow
everything
exactly
to
the
T
and
if
there's
ways
of
maneuvering
that
system,
you
want
to
be
flexible.
P
Especially
with
the
historical
overlay
or
the
store
coal
registry
yeah,
but
it
also
like
you
know:
it
falls
back
on
the
owner
of
the
property
and
usually
that's
in
the
deed,
there's,
usually
a
restriction
on
that
that's
put
in
place
once
it's
on
the
registry
yeah.
When
you
get
into
that
and
trying
to
up
step,
you
know,
uphold
those
standards
for
the
store,
achill
registry.
It
gets
very
expensive
so
and.
K
With
that
restriction,
that's
the
comment
that
was
gonna
make
to
that.
That
would
be
a
property
owners
responsibility
as
far
as
following
the
National
Registry
of
Historic
Places
guidelines
and
regulations
for
being
on
that
registry,
and
certainly
if
staff
were
to
come
across
it,
we
would
advise
them
of
the
same
on
any
subsequent
appliquéd
I.
P
C
Now
back
in
no
question
the
Maple
Street
across
from
the
courthouse,
why
are
we
including
that
half
of
that
block
and
the
same
on
second
street
on
the
other
side
of
the
Congregational
Church,
only
to
kind
of
include
those
and
I
know?
There's
a
house
in
there
and
I
know
that
that's
you
know:
they're
not
I'm,
just
asking
what
yeah?
Why
aren't
we
just
including
those
in
that
district,
since
it
is
across
from
the
courthouse
when
to
be
kind
of
nice?
If
we
took
that
half
and
that
half.