►
From YouTube: BOA & Plan Commission Meetings 03 07 2019
Description
City of Watertown, South Dakota BOA and Plan Commission meetings
C
B
C
A
C
B
This
is
in
the
Derby
Downs
area.
The
property
address
is
30,
11
4th,
Avenue
Northwest.
The
conditional
use
request
is
that
the
applicant
seeks
to
operate
a
home
daycare
business
from
her
single-family
dwelling
located
in
the
r1
single-family
residential
district
for
21
1403
1
&
5
contingent
upon
compliance
with
section,
21,
7.1,
home
occupations,
21700
to
home
occupation
standards
and
2100
202
to
b7
A
through
H.
Specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
staff
finds
that
all
public
notices
noticing
has
been
met.
B
A
daycare
home
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
r1
single-family
residential
district
for
21,
1403
and
5,
provided
that
such
facilities
shall
provide
not
less
than
35
square
feet
of
interior
floor
and
50
feet
of
square
feet
of
outdoor
recreation
space
for
each
child.
In
addition,
such
facilities
shall
supply
adequate
off-street
parking
and
other
suitable
plan
for
the
loading
and
unloading
of
children
so
as
not
to
obstruct
the
public
streets
or
create
other
traffic
or
safety
hazards
per
orden.
B
Ordinance
definitions
daycare
is
the
providing
of
care
and
supervision
of
children
and
adults
as
a
supplement
to
regular
parental
home
care
without
transfer
of
legal
custody
or
placement.
For
adoption,
with
or
without
compensation
on
a
regular
basis
for
part
of
a
day
a
day
care
home
is
where
care
is
provided
in
a
dwelling
and
the
number
of
children
adults
cared
for
is
subject
to
specific
conditions
and
standards.
The
principle
use
of
the
property
shall
be
as
the
primary
residential
dwelling
for
the
provider
and
the
daycare
business
use
shall
be
accessory.
Conditional
use.
B
Approval
is
required
prior
to
commencement
of
operation,
so
Reese
will
regularly
utilize
both
levels
of
the
2372
square-foot
single-family
dwelling
for
the
daycare
business.
The
property
surpasses
the
minimum
square
footage
of
interior
floor
area
and
fenced
outdoor
recreation.
Space
required
for
up
to
12
children
per
city,
ordinance,
1403,
1
reese,
is
not
registered
with
the
state.
The
applicant
submitted
the
written
request,
site
plan
and
floor
plans
which
reflect
compliance
or
non-compliance
with
the
following
section.
B
Also
chapter
20,
170,
home
occupations
and
standards,
Reese
has
acknowledged
by
signature.
Her
understanding
and
assurance
to
comply
with
this
section
of
the
ordinance
and
signage
is
not
desired
at
this
time,
but
any
signage
in
the
future
must
comply
with
21700
8.
So
this
board
must
determine
if
the
request
shows
that
satisfactory
provision
and
arrangement
concerning
chapter
2020,
170,
section
20
102
to
be
seven
through
a
through
H
in
chapters
21
63,
65
and
70
73.
A
A
One
question,
but
before
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
the
the
thorough
letter,
because
this
this
letter
is
really
well
written
and
demonstrates
that
you
understand
both
the
regulations
that
we
have
in
place
and
also
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
we
regularly
have
for
for
home
operators
of
daycare.
So
so
thank
you
for
that
addressing
the
hours
of
operation,
parking,
loading,
fencing,
signage,
etc.
D
D
A
E
A
A
A
A
B
Okay,
this
owner
applicant
is
Michael
Stewart
and
Walford
Properties
LLC
the
property
address
is
1234
East
Kemp.
The
conditional
use
request
is
that
the
applicant
seeks
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
four
family
dwelling
in
the
art
to
a
single-family
attached
residential
district
pursuant
to
21
1804
in
21
1603,
to
contingent
upon
compliance
with
21000
to
to
be
7
A
through
H,
which
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
a
little
bit
of
property
history,
the
just
the
most
current
in
2014
michael
stewart,
the
current
owner
and
did
demo
a
single-family
dwelling
here.
B
It's
currently
a
bear
parcel
staff
finds
that
all
public
notice
requirements
have
been
met.
Previous
to
stewart
property
owner
demolishing
the
primary
structure
in
2014.
This
was
a
single-family
dwelling
property
in
Walford.
The
purchaser
now
seeks
to
redevelop
the
property
with
a
two-story
four
dwelling
apartment
building.
Three
and
four
family
dwellings
is
a
listed
conditional
use
for
the
r2,
a
single-family
attached
to
residential
district
421
1603
to
in
21
1804.
The
applicant
submitted
the
attached
site
plan,
which
reflects
or
does
not
reflect
the
following
requirements
of
the
ordinance
section.
B
21
o
2
O
2
to
b7
A
through
H,
is
specific
rules
governing
individual
conditional
uses
and
requires
that
this
board
review,
ingress
and
ingress
off
street
parking
and
loading
screening,
buffering
signage,
refuse,
exterior
lighting
required
yards
and
open
space
and
general
compatibility
with
the
neighborhood
titles,
518,
21
and
24
sidewalk
trail
curb
and
gutter
and
subdivision
of
land.
The
proposed
parcel
is
a
merger
of
four
plaited
Lots,
for
which
a
development
lot
agreement
is
required
in
lieu
of
replanting.
This
redevelopment
will
require
installation
of
sidewalk.
A
H
F
H
One
of
my
first
concerns
is
the
effect
that's
going
to
have
on
the
value
of
the
properties
on
each
side.
It
will
be
difficult
to
sell
those
properties
that
full
value,
because
I
know
when
I
bought
my
property.
One
of
the
things
I
told
the
realtor,
don't
even
show
me
anything.
That's
near
an
apartment
building,
because
I
didn't
want
that.
H
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
amount
of
traffic
that
will
be
entering
camp
with
six
cars
coming
out
of
one
area
and
also
might
there
be
extra
cars
that
will
be
parking
along
camp
because
we
know
that
a
lot
of
times
people
have
a
lot
of
cars
and
if
you've
got
three
bedrooms,
you
might
have
more
cars
than
they
were
allowed
for.
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
effect
of
six
cars
coming
being
parked
in
the
back
and
coming
into
the
Le.
H
I
just
go
through
it
a
little
bit
ago.
You
can
get
a
vehicle
to
it,
but
to
get
out
from
the
garage
you
cannot
back
into
the
it's
so
narrow
that
you
can't
back
into
the
LA
to
go.
You
have
to
kind
of
move
around
on
your
lot.
It's
very
difficult
to
get
into
the
LA
I've
never
seen
it
course.
This
is
a
bad
winter.
I've,
never
seen
it
as
bad
as
this
year.
G
H
Extremely
narrow,
the
other
another
concern
I
have
is
the
noise
that
so
many
cars
are
going
to
be
making
coming
and
going
all
times
of
the
day,
because
we
know
that
with
that
many
people
living
there,
it's
not
going
to
be
one
particular
time
that
they're
coming
and
going
I'm
concerned
about
the
distance.
The
building
is
from
the
property
line.
It
looks
to
me
like
it
is
very
close.
I
thought
that
the
minimum
amount
was
nine
feet
but
indicated
on
the
drawing
it's
only
seven
feet,
so
it's
very
very
close
to
the
property
line.
H
The
building
design
is
very
unattractive
from
Kempe.
When
you
look
at
that
picture,
I
asked
you
there's
been
a
lot
of
questions
made
on
if
a
building
a
business
is
building
on
212
on
how
it
looks
to
212
I
asked
you
to
look
at
the
front
of
that
building,
and
are
you
going
to
be
proud
to
take
people
in
on
camp
and
say
this
is
what
our
houses
look
like.
This
is
the
front.
H
Maybe
are
there
any
plans
that
will
be
made
on
the
north
end
of
the
building
to
take
with
plantings
or
anything?
That
would
take
the
way
the
look
of
a
warehouse
or
dorm
I
am
really
concerned.
I
think
it's
it's
it's
an
awful
looking
building
I
wouldn't
even
want
to
see
it
in
Le.
How
soundproof
were
the
building
be
since
it's
very
close
to
the
adjoining
houses?
H
H
Will
there
be
commercial
garbage
containers
and
will
they
be
concealed
or
will
they
be
individual
garbage
containers?
I
know
in
many
apartments
they
have
commercial,
then
nobody
really
takes
care,
sometimes
getting
in
the
garbage
container.
Where
will
the
mill
mailboxes
be
located?
Will
they
be
a
long
camp
also
to
add
to
the
attractiveness
of
the
property?
One
concern
I
also
have
is
outdoor
lighting
outside
lighting?
Will
it
be
on
24
hours
a
day?
H
Will
it
be
on
at
night
all
the
time
mayn't
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
maintaining
of
the
outside,
of
the
building
snow,
removal,
grass
mowing
and
so
forth?
It
hasn't
been
maintained
very
well
when
it
was
an
empty
lot.
Is
it
going
to
be
maintained
any
better
when
there's
a
building
there?
One
question
I
had
on
the
drawing
on
the
drawing
and
the
North
in
the
south
side
of
the
ends
of
the
house,
there's
round
circles
on
the
second
drawing
one
it
doesn't
indicate
what
those
round
circles
are.
Those.
H
H
H
I
G
I
I
I
H
J
J
I
I
J
J
I
J
I've
called
on
this
lot
and
they
said
it's
cold
thistles.
You
know
it
to
do
whatever
I
called
last
year.
I
got
the
yard
of
the
month
and
I
called
the
city
and
they
said
and
you're
gonna.
Let
this
lot
be
like
that
and
they
tell
me
code.
It's
code,
he's
fine,
he's
fine,
you
know
and
I
don't,
and
you
know
if
this
building
is
cold.
I
question
not.
I
J
I
I
J
A
So,
as
Ken
stated
they're
not
asking
for
a
variance
to
the
setback
here,
so
so
from
a
standpoint
of
code
as
far
as
how
far
it
is
away
from
the
property
line,
you
know
that
that's
true,
it's
it's
within
code.
The
the
conditional
use,
however,
is
where
our
board
comes
in
play
to
determine.
Is
this
a
good
fit
for
the
neighborhood,
and
we
can
look
at
a
number
of
additional
criteria
beyond
what
is
setback
code
requirements?
Things.
J
A
From
your
standpoint,
though,
though,
ma'am
development
on
that
lot,
what
would
most
likely
improve
the
situation
by
cleaning
it
up
and
having
something
built
there
now,
whether
this
is
the
right
development?
That's
that's
what
we're
here
to
determine
today,
but
long
term.
You
know
if
you've
had
a
vacant
lot
next
to
you
for
four
years,
I
would.
H
H
That
just
something
that
just
came
to
my
mind,
I
wish
you
would
drive
down
campaign
and
take
a
look
at
the
houses,
the
residential
area
that
you're
putting
this
in
the
middle
of
it.
Last
year,
I
spent
over
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
on
the
outside
of
my
house:
redoing
things
repainting
new
roof
and
everything,
because
our
community
is
a
proud
community
of
how
things
look.
I
would
hate
to
have
anyone.
Drive
I
mean
if
you're,
bringing
in
one
thing
anybody
to
Watertown.
That
was
thinking
and
moving
here
and
you
drive
them
down
there.
G
G
F
G
I
G
I
L
Hi
I'm
Jillian
Lucas
and
we
live
at
12:22,
East
Kemp
and
my
biggest
concern
is
our
ally
because
we
don't
have
access
to
parking
off
Kemp
our
garages
in
the
alley,
and
that's
the
only
way
we
get
in
and
out,
and
there
currently
are
15
garage
doors
that
open
into
that
alley.
In
that
one
block,
they
want
to
add
six
more
already,
you
take
your
life
in
your
hands
to
go
down
that
alley,
especially
in
the
winter.
I
can
only
guess
what
it's
going
to
look
like
this
spring
when
it
all
Mills
is.
L
G
B
M
M
A
K
M
G
G
N
G
M
The
property
value
is
gonna,
go
up,
it's
gonna.
Look
like
a
split-level
house,
my
3d
view
I
gave
you
guys
the
reason
it
looks
so
bad
is
because
it's
four
feet
in
the
ground.
I
guess
I
should
have
spent
more
time
and
made
it
like
an
actual
picture
of
a
house.
But
the
reason
it
looks
so
tall
is
because
it's
a
split-level,
it's
four
feet
in
the
ground.
It's
not
gonna,
be
light
blue
with
gray
shakes.
It's
gonna
be
midnight
blue
with
white
corners
white
windows.
D
D
A
G
B
G
G
C
G
G
F
K
I
A
G
A
D
K
M
You've
got
to
come
in,
you
come
in
on
that
driveway
and
then
you'll
turn
in
you'll
come
in.
What
is
it
can?
Is
it
20
feet
from
probably
the
alley
to
the
to
the
parking
lot?
No,
everybody
else
was
sinking
there'll,
be
six
cars
just
pulling
parking.
It
won't
be
like
that.
They'll
come
completely
onto
our
property
turn
into
their
spot.
M
M
M
M
L
M
A
F
P
I'm
Mike
Stewart-
and
this
is
our
to
a
if
you
go
down
to
two
blocks
south
of
there-
maybe
three
I
think
it's
second
or
third
Avenue.
There's
a
four-plex
being
built
right
now
on
that
property.
Is
it
I
want
to
know
if
they
had
to
go
through
the
same
stuff
to
do
that
and
they
actually
have
alley
entrance
garages?
They
take
up
their
entire
lot.
They
they're
set
up
property
line
to
property
line.
P
So
where
he's
he's
meeting
or
exceeding
what
you
guys
is
required
or
what
the
requirements
is
and
the
it's
a
10-foot
setback,
it's
a
he's.
Moe
going
11
foot,
six
that
leaves
bigger
side
yards
he's.
Gonna
have
more
feet
in
the
front
where
you
were
a
normal
house.
Wouldn't
have
yes,
he's
got
the
parking
lot,
but
he's
got
more
footage
in
the
front
and
the
back
again.
I
A
P
K
Guess,
I
into
your
response
to
trying
to
find
that
property
that
has
you
know
the
the
four-plex
my
contention
without
is
it
does
have
garages,
as
you
know,
so
the
vehicles
are
are
put
in.
If
that
was
a
split-level
home,
it
more
likely
would
have
a
garage
where
the
vehicles
are
not,
you
know,
being
parked
out
front
and
in
the
back
the.
A
Other
factor
that
comes
into
play
is
the
density,
so
the
number
of
bedrooms
in
a
unit
dictates
the
amount
of
parking,
for
instance,
the
the
way
that
the
parking
is
laid
out
in
access.
So
you
see
in
those
those
other
units
that
we
have
existing
here,
that
access
it
pull
in.
You
know
perpendicular
to
the
road
versus
parallel
set
up
that
we've
got
here
so
yeah
there's
some
similarities,
but
there
are
some
differences
and
we
look
at
each
of
these
properties
and
its
unique
setting
to
make
the
determination
yeah.
P
B
B
B
P
And
I
know:
I
had
worked
on
that
property
too
and
I
know
their
driveways
are
the
bare
minimum
off
of
the
alley
that
you
would
have
to
be
and
the
same
with
the
front
of
the
20
to
25
foot.
You
know
the
whatever
the
setback
is
in
the
alley.
So
really
what
he's
got
planned
he's
got
a
deeper
driveway,
so
the
cars
are
in
there
farther
than
what
they
would
be,
so
they
would
have
more
room
to
maneuver
around
then
what
this
piece
of
property
that
you
guys
already
had
proved
had.
I.
K
H
K
M
M
G
G
D
G
G
Only
discussion
that
I
have
is
that,
while
I
understand
that
this
is
a
different
use
than
what's
currently
in
the
ordinance
by
code,
it's
an
allowable
use.
It's
a
use
has
been
encode
for
many
many
years.
It's
a
use
that
allows
for
the
redevelopment
of
unused
property
within
the
community
and
and
while
I
I
do
understand.
G
The
neighborhood's
concerns
that
it's
different
in
its
and
its
change
being
that
it
is
a
listed
permitted
use
somebody
at
some
point
in
time
in
the
city
of
Watertown,
when
they
developed
the
rules
and
regulations
felt
that
this
was
an
appropriate
generally
compatible
use.
They
did
when
they
adopted
the
rules.
So
that's
the
reason
I
would
be
supporting
the
request.
A
K
K
K
Q
F
A
A
C
A
C
A
F
A
A
N
F
N
F
R
R
So
this
is
back
to
our
February
meeting.
We
had
talked
about
mixed
use
districts
and
we're
it's
a
follow
up.
So
if
you
see
in
your
agenda
packet,
there
is
a
model
mixed
use.
District
and
I
sent
that
out
three.
If
you
guys
have
a
chance
to
look
that
over,
that
would
just
be
an
idea
of
what
it
could
be,
but
I
think
the
bigger
question
is
and
that
the
two
points
that
we
should
really
answer
tonight
will
be.
R
G
Start
because
I
think
I
mentioned
it
in
the
last
meeting,
based
on
the
minutes
that
we
read
that
I
think
we
need
to.
We
need
a
standalone,
mixed-use
development
zone,
overlays
on
I,
don't
care
what
you
call
it
so
that
when
we
have
a
bear
piece
of
ground,
that's
looking
at
developing
or
something
that's
being
retrofitted,
and
we
wanted
to
try
something
that
we
can
have
that
to
go
in.
There.
G
We
go
out
and
geographically
select
where
those
areas
are,
then
what
we
end
up
doing
is
we
then
go
through
a
rezoning
process
to
create
the
overlay.
On
top
of
that,
this
would
be
an
up
zone
for
all
those
individuals
that
own
property
there,
because
they're
gonna
be
able
to
do
something
with
in
addition
to
what
they
can
already
do
already.
G
So
it's
not
a
Down
zone,
so
this
would
be
no
different
than
when
we
rezone
property
up
by
the
Masonic
Temple
years
ago,
when
we
actually
went
through
the
city
went
out,
noticed
the
individuals
and
saying
that
we
are
gonna,
create
an
overlay
district
on
top
of
your
property,
which
would
allow
you
to
use
it
as
it
is,
or
even
decide
to
put
housing
as
a
mixed-use
or
something
along
those
lines.
That's
that
would
be
my
preference
and.
R
If
we're
okay
with
it
I
think
the
only
value
to
or
a
value
to
having
it
as
a
conditional
use
in
the
existing
districts
is
that
the
adjacent
properties
that
may
be
bought
their
lot
with
the
idea
that
it
was
always
going
to
be
just
commercial
activity
and
no
residential,
and
then
it
would
give
them
the
opportunity
to
come
to
the
public
hearing
at
the
conditional
use.
Hearing
I
would.
G
I
would
say:
that's
fine
on
the,
if
it's,
if
it's,
if
we're
saying
it's
an
overlay
or
as
a
conditional
use
in
the
c3
district,
I,
think
it's
fine
on
properties
that
aren't.
If
how
do
I
just
say
if
we
do
an
overlay-
and
you
lay
that
over
on
top
of
the
c3
and
on
the
boundaries
where
the
new
overlay
c3m,
you
touches
the
c3,
that's
where
that
use
could
be
conditional
use.
But
if
it's
a
larger
area
in
the
interim
I,
don't
think
we
would
need
to
go
through
an
extra
work
again.
G
My
intent
from
the
very
beginning
is
that
we
eliminate
Board
of
Adjustment
actions,
so
whatever
we
can
do
either
through
special
permitted
uses
or
certain
criteria.
Once
we've
made
the
determination
as
a
city
that
property
is
to
be
zoned
and
those
uses
that
are
allowed
within
that
the
time
to
fight
that
is
that
the
adoption
of
the
policy,
not
the
implementation
of
it
I.
D
R
G
By
eliminating
the
need
to
go
through
a
conditional
use,
we
are,
we
will
be
making
things
move,
my
smoother,
and
so,
if
we
spend
a
little
time
on
the
front
end
identifying
geographic
locations
where
this
is
allowed,
rezoning
them
appropriate
and
Allah
becomes
as
a
profound
tree
administrative
process
that
we
don't
have
to
see
it
and
the
City
Council
doesn't
have
to
see
it.
We've
made
the
decision
as
a
policy
as
a
community
as
when
we
adopt
that
ordinance
and
adopt
that
zoning
district
that
this
is
okay.
G
And
I
believe
Luke
has
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
already
within
the
land-use
plan
about
mixed
use
areas.
I
think
it's
just
going
on
saying
that
we're
okay
with
mixed
use
here,
whereas
nothing's
then,
and
then,
where
we're
talking
about
redevelopment
and
existing
commercial
zones.
Let's
just
identify
those
areas
where
we're
okay
with
it
we'd.
Do
it
one
time
and
we're
done
right.
R
G
F
G
R
And
the
you
that's
already
allowed
in
the
gateway
overlay
district
is
those
mixed
uses.
But
the
thing
is:
is
it's
only
over
a
certain
amount
of
property?
So
we
could
look
at
extending
the
gateway
overlay
district,
but
then
that
kind
of
ruins
the
integrity
of
that
district,
because
that's
that's
the
Gateway
to
the
city,
so
it.
G
This
guy,
okay,
so
the
perfect
example:
let's
go
to
14th
Avenue
and
19th
Street,
maybe
Bob
Fox
decides
he
wants
to
sell
that
property
and
develop
the
northeast
corner
there.
What
I
end
up
doing
there
is
I'm
gonna
I'm,
not
gonna,
that
a
situ
on
the
corner,
I'm
going
to
Britt
I'm
gonna
rezone
it
a
mixed
use
district
on
that
corner,
which
one
they
give
me
a
lot
more
flexibility
on
how
I
design
that
corner
yeah.
G
G
R
Yeah
and
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
got
a
chance
to
look
at
that
model.
Ordinance
at
all
I
think
that
now
that
I
have
a
better
idea.
I
didn't
want
to
spend
too
much
time
on
like
retrofitting
it
into
our
ordinance
and
how
we
would
and
the
different
uses
that
we
call
out
currently
until
I
really
had
a
solid
take
I
mean
you
guys
did
express
what
you
wanted.
The
overlay
district
is
a
really
good
addition,
I
think
so.
G
G
District
is
gonna,
be
a
combination
again
and
it
could
maybe
be
three
standalone
districts.
You
might
have
something
where
we
want
to
allow.
Depending
on
the
location.
You
know
a
Bob
Fox
corner
location
is
still
more
of
a
neighbourhood
notable
commercial
development
where
we
want
a
mixed-use.
So
maybe
it's
a
different
mixed-use.
If
I'm
putting
that
on
to
12
east
of
stones,
you
might
want
a
different
type
of
mixed-use
development
there
and
that's
right
and
yeah.
It's
more
work
for
you
on
the
front
end
and
more
work
for
us
on
the
front.
R
And
it's
really
about
the
different
areas
that
you
guys
envision
these
being
allowed
and
then
what
you
see
what
you
want
that
to
look
like,
and
so,
if
you
want
more
more
of
a
pedestrian
environment,
then
we'll
add
different
walkability
measures
in
there
and
setbacks
and
we'll
look
at
all
those
different
things.
So
yeah
we'll
take
a
little
more
time
and
try
to
tailor
one
ordinance
or
a
couple
on
an
overlay
district
and
then
present
that
to
you
guys,
we
can
pick
that
up
a
little
bit
more.
What.
G
R
F
C
R
Q
Chair
yeah
I,
just
for
point
of
clarity
when
we're
looking
at
I
understand
from
the
discussion
we're
looking
at
kind
of
a
hybrid
approach
for
these
mixed-use
districts,
one
as
an
overlay
district
and
then
another
as
a
standalone
district
of
its
own,
and,
again
just
for
point
of
clarity
for
to
help
you
have
staff
direction
here.
Would
those
stand
alone?
Districts
I've
got
some
concern
from
what
I
interpreted
of
the
comments.
We
wouldn't
necessarily
want
to
create
multiple
districts
of
multiple
use.
Q
G
I
think
what
I
was
trying
to
get
at
I
think
a
mixed
use:
development
at
different
parts
of
town,
whereas
currently
there's
nothing.
There
may
need
a
different
sort
of
standard
or
more
standard
review
or
even
minimum
requirements
if
I'm
placing
a
mixed-use
development
along
a
major
arterial,
Street
versus
a
mixed-use
on
a
local,
collector,
Street
or
maybe
some
different
requirement,
and
so,
if
you
just
have
a
one
standalone,
mixed-use
I'm
not
gonna,
be
able
to
plant
that
in
that
geographic
location,
on
a
virgin
piece
of
ground
as
opposed
to
another
places.
G
So
I'm
not
saying
it
has
to
be
a
separate,
but
we've
got
to
have
two
built
into
the
mixed-use.
Is
that
if
it's?
If
it's
locational,
if
it's
at
the
intersection
of
a
collector
and
an
arterial,
this
is
your
standard
of
review
or
your
performance
standards.
If
it's
located
here,
these
are
some
may
be
different
things
that
we'd
want
to
look
at
it.
Q
Does
yes,
so,
within
the
standalone
district,
you
would
have
some
criteria
set
forth
location,
only
determined
criteria
yeah,
and
that
does
help
I.
Think
that
you
know
staff
will
we'll
look
into
that
and
see
what
kind
of
options
could
be
presented.
One
point
of
thought
there
is
I
mean
we
would
want
to
quantify
that.
Q
G
Me
it
could
very
well
be
concepts,
and
then
we
could
flesh
out
some
of
those
a
little
bit
more
direction.
I'm
just
knee
jerking
at
this
point,
but
some
of
the
things
that
I
would
think
of
as
I
was
gonna
plan.
A
mixed-use
development
boom
right
on
the
edge
of
town
where
we
don't
have
anything
I
would
want
to
take
a
look
at
well.
What's
the
what's
the
adjoining
land
uses?
What's
the
adjoining
zoning,
what
is
the
the
available
infrastructure
in
the
air?
G
What
we
have
for
roads
and
streets
and
access
all
those
things
would
have
a
different
level
depending
on
where
that
proposed.
Mixed-Use
would
be
it's
based
on
what's
already
around
it,
so
we
so
again
if
we
can
get
it
done
on
the
front
end,
we
don't
have
to
come
back
and
do
a
conditional
use
or
some
sort
of
a
variance
or
some
sort
of
board
action
if
we
can
at
least
and
but
now,
if
something
comes
in
it
doesn't
meet
the
box.
Well,
then,
that's
when
it
needs
to
come
back
and
to
the
board.
G
A
G
R
R
G
R
R
G
R
R
G
D
Only
thing
I
worry
about
limiting
too
much
is
bullet.
Three.
There
says
that
there'll
be
no
variance
granted
to
authorize
more
than
the
20%
of
attempts
or
whatever
we
changed
it
to
of
any
wall
facing
the
front
or
side
yard
and
I.
Think
if
we're,
if
we're
not
going
to
allow
them
to
even
come
to
us
and
and
ask
for
a
variance,
should
be
only
it's
not
true,
Horning
them
too
much
or.
R
I
I
C
I
think
we
could
probably
balance
it
or
try
to
balance
a
little
bit
if
you
go
to
some
of
these
places
now
that,
where
they're,
redoing
or
rebuilding
areas
that
either
were
vacant
or
putting
new
facades
on
a
lot
of
the
that
you
sort
of
corrugated
metal
as
accents,
Denver
and
I'm
thinking
of
like
the
River
North
District
in
Denver,
why
was
there
not
too
long
ago?
And
you
see
a
lot
of
that?
It's
really
neat
I
mean
we're,
obviously
not
Denver,
but
it's
it.
A
G
And
maybe
and
again
maybe
it's
you
know,
we
have
a
quite
large
c1
area
and
to
preclude
metal
in
the
entire
c1
area
might
be
a
little
bit
onerous
but
I.
Think
if
we're
gonna
talk
about,
are
you
talking?
You
know,
Kemp
Avenue,
those
historic
buildings
I
mean
we
are
technically
in
a
historic
district,
downtown
I
think
we've
never
actually
applied
historic
construction
standards
to
any
of
those
buildings.
G
Okay,
well,
very
good:
okay,
very
good!
The
solve
of
Coulomb
I
know:
steel
set
aside,
he's
not
allowed
the
ship
Oh
doesn't
approve
of
that,
but
anyway,
I
think
this
is
a
good
start.
That's
a
good
start.
I
think
we
again
applying
all
of
these
rules
or
standalone
rules
to
the
entire
c1
again,
because
we
have
different
uses
in
the
c1.
That's.
G
I
G
And
so
that's
my
point:
it's
like
I,
don't
think
we
can
just
whitewash
the
whole
thing.
You're
gonna
have
to
be
a
little
bit
surgical
and
how
you
apply
that
standard,
otherwise
we're
creating
more
work,
which
I
think
the
five
of
us
have
decided.
We
really
don't
want
to
see,
so
we
have
to
again,
let's
make
our
policy
right
on
the
front
end.
R
G
G
G
F
Q
G
R
G
G
A
O
Question
why
I
sat
up
here
a
second
ago
was
that
there's
two
ways:
I
typically
see
that
happen.
One
overlay
district
draw
the
box
and
here's
the
one
two
three
things
we
care
about
in
this
overlay
district,
that's
different
than
the
other.
You
get
that
point.
The
other
one
I've
seen
in
other
cases
is
that
they
will
just
say:
I
see
it
for
setbacks,
often
as
well
or
they'll
say
on
these
roads,
you
can
be
a
zero
setback,
but
on
these
you
can't
on
these
roads,
you
can't
have
steel
siding,
but
on
these
you
can.
O
That
would
be
the
other
way
you
could
do
it
in
the
stand-alones
in
the
existing
C
one.
However,
I
do
think
that
would
be
trickier,
because
you're
not
going
to
do
that
for
the
full
four
blocks
of
Broadway
or
something
like
that.
So
I
think
that
would
be
trickier.
I
think
you're,
probably
going
to
be
doubling
back
to
historic
district
urban
renewal
for.
R
Q
Yes,
mr.
chair,
that's
where
my
question
was
leaning
towards
as
if
we,
if
we
had
that
already
existing,
it
sounds
like
we
don't
necessarily
to
the
boundary
that
we
would
want
to
have
in
this
case,
but
create
a
downtown
aesthetics
overlay
district
that
wouldn't
apply
the
entire
C
one
zone
with
just
to
that
physical
geographical
area,
I.
R
F
F
R
C
The
only
other
thing
I
did
want
to
touch
on,
and
it's
in
here
at
108
is
the
maximum
setbacks.
I
think
that
that's
an
interesting
idea
because
of
a
you
know
recent
development,
it's
certainly
better
than
what
was
there
before,
but
I.
Don't
think
it
really
lends
itself
to
the
way
that
our
downtown
should
local
looks
and
what
I
mean
our
hands
were
tired,
I
think
at
that
point,
and
that
particular
instance
so.
C
Like
that,
the
way
it's
written
and
drafted
is
actually
kind
of
neat
I'm
108
to
ABC
through
a
through
D
I
kind
of
like
the
way
that
it's
written,
but
that
would
alleviate
sort
of
the
issue
that
we
saw
with
that
particular
one
of
the
issues
that
we
saw
with
it.
Because
what
happens
is
that
when
you
back
it
off
of
the
street,
you
create
a
break
for
pedestrians.
It
doesn't
the
flow,
doesn't
work,
you
can't
walk
up
and
down
it
anymore
and
I
think
it
becomes
less
safe.
C
I
mean
I,
think
that's,
maybe
I'm
wrong
on
that,
but
I
think
we
comes
less
safe
just
because
it
it's
no
longer
the
tall
buildings.
The
psychologically
you're
inclined
to
move
fast
around
the
street
when
you're
driving
on
it
I
think
more
open
space,
more
sort
of
a
Raceway
as
opposed
to
the
pedestrian
alleged
or
what
we
should
be
aiming
for.
A
pedestrian
friendly,
downtown
right.
R
G
A
A
O
I'll
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
go
longer.
Randy,
don't
worry
the
we
do
have
one
of
what
I'm
gonna
expect
to
be.
Two
more
meetings
is
what
I'm
planning
just
as
a
work
session
meeting.
This
is
going
to
be
a
brief
one,
so
I
will
get
to
it.
We
have
basically
two
and
a
half
topics
to
talk
about
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
The
one
part
I,
though
we're
not
in
talking
about
it
at
this
point
because
we've
talked
about
it.
O
A
lot
is
the
existing
or
sorry
the
future
land
use
map
of
the
existing
part
of
town
in
which
we
we
identified.
Potentially
some
new
zoning
districts
I
only
bring
that
up.
I
want
you
to
make
sure
you
familiarize
yourself
with
that
table
that
is
within
there,
as
well
as
the
the
map
itself,
because
some
of
that
includes
some
of
your
discussion.
O
You
already
had
on
mixed
uses,
such
as
office
district,
which
I
anticipate
on
being
something
that's
relatively
important
for
town,
which
would
take
care
of
some
of
that,
as
well
as
adding
another
sort
of
a
regional
commercial
kind
of
splitting
up
the
highway
commercial
district
into
a
couple
of
things
that
may
help
moving
on
to
what
I
want
to
talk
about
today,
I
am
going
to
focus
the
time
on
the
major
street
plan
and
focus
on
that
today.
How
would
you
please
bring
that
up?
O
It's
a
bit
of
a
change
in
dynamic
or
a
paradigm
shift
a
little
bit
as
far
as
how
we've
handled
it
and
it's
more
to
open
the
door
to
do
it
and
here's
what
I
mean
if
you
look
on
the
I'm
going
to
invite
you
to
take
a
look
at
the
fringe
of
town.
Some
of
this
part
that
we're
starting
to
develop
and
see
developing
take
this.
O
For
example,
your
call
that
typically,
we
have
our
minor
collectors
shown
on
what
I
would
call
the
quarter
line
splits
down
the
middle
of
the
section,
but
we've
missed
some
of
them
as
we
go
out
there
and
at
this
point
we're
at
a
point
where
we're
gonna
need
to
have
north/south
connection
on
the
east
edge
of
town
period.
Right
now,
we've
got
19.
O
We've
got
anywhere
from
9
thousand
to
four
thousand
vehicle
trips
a
day
going
on
your
vehicles
per
day,
going
on
19th,
depending
on
where
you're
at,
and
we
only
have
half
of
it
developed
right
now.
The
east
half
still
is
to
go,
and
without
a
north-south
corridor.
We're
going
to
have
to
have
some
bottom
line
is
we're.
Gonna
have
to
have
some
north-south.
We
have
the
idea.
There
is
a
street
planned
through
a
through
a
planned
development
at
this
point
and
figure
out
how
to
get
that
north.
O
That
concept
is
not
necessarily
new
concept
in
terms
of
planning,
though
it
is
new
here,
the
the
best
way
I
can
think
of
it
to
describe
it.
Is
you
see
these
in
especially
in
residential
developments,
a
lot,
but
you
also
see
in
commercial
developments
where
you
may
have
that
collector
Street.
That
takes
me
from
this
development
to
that
development
and
those
developments
on
to
the
commercial
area.
O
This
minor
collector
scenario
where
you
run
one
right
through
the
heart
of
it
from
this
development
of
that
one
is,
is
something
you
see
regularly
in
in
subdivisions
and
I
use,
I
use
examples
of
San,
Diego
Avenue
and
in
Sioux
Falls,
or
look
into
some
of
those
that
go
from
one
development
to
the
next.
Yes,
you
do
have
some
houses
on
those,
but
they're
limited
in
the
amount
of
them,
and
it
goes
through
them.
It
cuts
through
that
area.
O
That's
what
this
is
planned
for
to
go
to
cut
through
some
of
those
existing
developments
and
as
we
go
to
the
outside.
Yes,
we
want
to
strive
to
have
a
collector
going
down
the
middle
of
the
this
middle
of
the
section.
However,
if
it
seems
more
appropriate
to
have
maybe
a
minor
collector
going
straight
through
connecting
to
both
of
them,
we'd
have
that
option.
Leave
that
door
open,
that's
really
what
that's
amounted
to.
So
what
we
did
is
we
looked
at
oK.
O
We've
got
some
streets
that
are
already
serving
that
purpose
anyway,
and
the
idea
is,
we
probably
ought
to
call
a
spade
a
spade
in
some
of
those
instances,
and
one
of
those
that
we
mentioned
was
I'll.
Of
course,
the
idea
of
this
that
would
come
through
future
developments,
but
also
in
18th,
as
we
see,
and
one
of
the
reasons
and
I
don't
know
how
your
mental
map
of
that
area
is,
but
Northridge
Development
did
not
go
all
the
way
up
to
the
quarter
line
in
that
case,
so
we
have
a
narrow
strip.
O
We've
got
about
a
100
foot
wide
strip
on
that
north
edge.
That
is,
left
hasn't
been
done.
We
could
probably
argue
that
that
might
have
been
because
of
the
idea
of
avoiding
a
collector,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
it's
highly
unlikely
that
we're
going
to
see
a
collector
go
right
on
that
quarter
line
anyway.
O
E
O
Already
at
both
sides
on
18
street,
it
actually
the
way
that
that
those
roads,
the
way
it
is
oriented
going
through
Northridge,
is
actually
oriented
quite
well
for
that
sort
of
thing.
So
that's
where
that's
a
good
example
of
how
you
do
it.
It
goes
through.
We've
already
got
plans
to
connect
and
there's
talk
back
when
the
Wellness
Center
had
gone
on
about
pulling
that
all
the
way
across
the
nineteenth
anyway,
and
then
you
actually
follow.
O
There's
an
existing
tree
built
it
lines
up
about,
even
with
that,
as
you
go
over
into
Bob
boxes
as
well.
So
bottom
line
is
that
makes
sense.
That
makes
more
sense
than
planning
that
if
you
move
that
to
the
north
one
we
already
have
development.
That's
that's
causing
a
problem.
If
you
had
East
you're
already
talking
about
some
existing
uses
that
are
going
to
have
to
move
the
farther
you
go,
there's
a
tricky
part
to
that
is
that
that
would
connect
up
to
19th,
Street
or
19th
19th
Avenue.
O
Sorry
18th
would
have
to
connect
up
to
19th
Avenue
within
Valley
View,
because
we
have
to
go
around
Jefferson
school.
However,
we
do
have
some
property
in
there
that
we
can
work
around
as
we
get
to
it.
So
bottom
line
is
that's
an
example
of
one
of
those
oftentimes
in
other
communities.
They
call
them.
Local
collectors
is
what
they'll
call
them
its
vernacular
minor,
collector
local
collector,
it's
very
similar
is
where
the
mouse
to
so
that.
A
A
O
O
Frankly,
the
town
has
developed
their
own
traffic
grid.
The
way
that
they're
handling
at
the
bottom
line
is
because
we've
got
more
things
going
on.
We
don't
grow
out
to
those
roads.
They
just
don't
happen.
We
don't
build
that
quarter
line
road.
That
turns
out
to
be
the
last
road
built
and
frankly,
we've
re-established
our
traffic
pattern
at
that
point
and
that's
on
purpose,
I'm
sure
to
a
degree
by
some
of
the
developers
to
defray
some
of
that
cost.
O
E
O
Well,
I'll,
stop
and,
and
a
little
more
comment
come
here
in
a
second
but
I
want
to
point
to
just
a
one
other
thing
that
came
back
in
and
one
other
thing
that
I
know
is
going
to
have
to
be
changed
here
from
this
draft
and
just
that
one
to
point
out
it
will
one
North
bypass
connector
comes
back
in
here.
If
you
see
previous
drafts,
it
wasn't
in
there
there's
some
discussion
about
having
it
out
for
a
while
the
idea
to
keep
that
in
there
as
an
option.
O
F
O
The
other
one
that
I
was
going
to
point
out
is
this
minor
collector
through
subdivision
down
here.
This
is
the
industrial
park.
I
think
you've
done
some
you've
annex
that
that's
going
to
go
away.
That's
gonna
be
a
local
system
into
there,
so
that
could
go
away
with
that
being
industrial
with
that
I
all
back
away
from
that
part,
there's
another
part
about
taxonomy.
That
I
want
to
talk
about
for
a
moment,
but
is
there
anything
in
here?
O
G
G
G
E
A
O
G
Listen
realistically
I
mean
we
realize
that
the
four
sections
where
we're
gonna
see
the
next
development
in
the
next
sixty
years
are
those
two
sections,
these
two
19th
Street
north
and
south
of
3rd
Avenue
and
the
two
sections
north
of
14th,
Avenue,
east
and
west
of
81,
and
that's
I
mean
that's
where
we
get
it.
So
that's
why
we
really
have
to
be
sure
of
where
the
the
transportation
system
is
going
to
be,
because
that's
where
we
will
see
85
to
90
percent
of
our
growth
in
the
next
60
years.
O
A
O
O
O
G
G
A
O
O
O
It's
a
major
street
plan,
I'm,
not
saying
that's
how
that's
going
to
go
through
there
I
mean
in
reality.
Could
it
come
up
to
the
service
road
yeah?
It
certainly
could,
but
this
just
followed
some
property
lines.
That
also
assumes
that
a
given
property
owner
is
willing
to
split
his
property
right
down
the
middle,
so
I
mean
some
of
that
some
alignment,
but
we
have
in
the
past
had
indication
that
if
thirty-first
goes
away,
the
next
traffic
spacing
warrants,
at
least
at
least
as
of
about
six
or
seven
years
ago.
G
O
O
G
O
Realistically,
as
as
was
just
noted
realistically,
a
that
need
really
becomes
more
important
as
that
girl
hope
it
goes
away,
yeah
and
so
we've
really
just
as
a
as
a
community.
We've
got
to
be
responsible
and
think
about
how
on
earth
are
we
gonna
do
this
in
the
future.
We're
gonna
push
them
back
to
41st
and
Louise.
Are
we
gonna
find
another
way
you
know?
So
that's
that's
the
bottom
line
any
other
areas.
You
want
to
look
at
on
here
and
make
sure
if
that
project
is
on
there.
S
Sara
Karen
mayor
one
thing:
I,
don't
know
if
we
talked
about
this,
but
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
coordinating
this
major
street
plan
with
the
future
development
maps
that
we
include
I
I,
think
we
should
be
utilizing
this
one.
That's
done.
If
we
have
areas
that
want
to
develop
that
are
outside
of
the
area
that
we
think
is
appropriate
for
development
are,
are
we
going
to
be
prepared
to
say
no
push
it
in
or
are
we
gonna
amend
the
plan
or
what's
the
thinking,
why.
S
So
we
need
to
think
through
this
very
carefully
and
I
think
that
the
southerly
interchange
will
come
in
the
next
ten
years
and
I
think
we
need
to
show
that's
an
area,
that's
developable,
otherwise
we're
putting
a
road
in
outside
of
our
area
and
I.
Don't
have
that
map
handy,
but
you
showing
it
on
here
and
I
I.
Just
can't
remember
if
this
area
here
shows
development
around
it
in
the
future,
because
it
won't
happen
if
there's
is
going
to
be
warranted,
I
believe
by
the
development
that's
occurred
and
for.
G
F
S
G
And
I
think
that's
you
know
I'm
it's
my
intent
and
I'm,
hoping
that
as
a
community,
we
get
this
thing
wrapped
up
now,
because
in
2022,
when
new
census,
information
and
new
growth
data
comes
in
well
there'll
be
time
for
a
minor
update,
and
that's
probably
where
that
the
good
time
would
be
to
look
at
that
development
on
that
road.
I
think
I.
Think,
ten
years
an
optimistic
Brookings
just
went
with
a
northern
and
southern
interchange.
S
S
No
I
I
know
I
heard
that
part,
and
you
might
be
right
about
that.
But
what
I'm
saying
is
a
little
different.
It
will
be
warranted
whether
it's
built
or
not,
we'll
be
needing
it
and
and
there
will
be
demand
for
growth
around
that
area,
not
residential,
but
you
know
industrial
we're
trying
to
plan
for
that
now
for
sewer
and
what
you
know
that
kind
of
infrastructure
so
and
let's
not
show
roads
on
here.
We
think
we're
never
gonna
build
I,
don't
I
think
we
should
take
them
off.
S
G
S
S
I
agree
with
you,
though:
Todd
I
agree
with
you,
because
I've
looked
at
that
area
too,
it's
steep
slope,
its
floodplain,
it's
not
gonna
have
any
any
potential
for
commercial
and
it's
we're
showing
it
as
our
major
route.
That's
not
realistic.
This
is
not
a
plan.
That's
realistic
and
I
think
it
should
be.
S
F
O
Get
in
I
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
at
the
county
level,
but
bottom
line
is
to
the
north
side
of
that
is
proposed
for
development,
not
until
after
2025,
which
I
think
time
frame
wise,
probably
tracks
with
the
stant
was
what
we're
talking
about
here.
I
think
the
question
that
the
mayor's
mayor's
talking
about
is
perhaps
yeah.
S
O
O
S
G
S
G
O
S
F
O
So
that
those
points
that
the
mayor
made
dovetail
nicely
into
what
the
next
phase
of
our
discussion
will
be,
your
homework
for
next
time
is
to
get
familiar
with
this
map
that
I
had
on
there.
The
phasing
map,
as
well
as
as
well
as
the
uses
on
the
outside
edge
I,
don't
normally
we
would.
We
take
a
lot
of
time
on
that
and
guess
what
we
have
it's,
just
that
it
was
several
years
ago.
Okay,
so
what
I'm?
O
What
I'm,
really
asking
you
to
do
is
is
take
a
look
at
it
see
what
things
have
changed.
I
already
know
that
there
are
a
couple
of
them
that
will,
for
example,
the
lakes
lakes
at
Willow,
Creek
or
I,
don't
recall
what
that
is
called,
but
that
is
shown
on.
There
is
industrial,
that's
not
all
going
to
be
industrial,
so
that
it
was
also
envisioned
that
that
would
stay
mined
for
many
years.
It's
not
gonna
be
mine
for
many
years.
It's
gonna
be
subdivided.
O
O
I
see
going
on
is,
though,
I
anticipate
that
we're
going
to
have
these
work
sessions
wrapped
up
in
two
weeks
at
our
next
meeting,
that'll
be
the
last
one.
That's
what
I
anticipate
after
that,
then
I'm
gonna
have
to
go
back
and
do
some
edits
from
what
we've
talked
about.
You've
made
some
motions
to
throw
some
things
on
some
bullet
points,
as
well
as
and
primarily
I,
like
making
maps
I
like
having
maps
in
a
part
of
a
thing.
O
The
problem
is,
is
that,
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
there
are
some
things
that
change
over
five
years
and
so
I've
got
to
update
some
things
on
the
maps,
not
the
least
of
which
is
to
update
Road
systems
like
Kemp
Avenue.
Your
first
Avenue
going
into
Kemp
needs
to
be
on
the
maps
as
well
as
just
updating,
city
limits
and
other
things.
O
So
bottom
line
is
what
I
see
is
probably
about
a
six-week
process
before
we
get
to
public
hearings
for
me
to
update
the
draft
itself,
but
I'm
really
hoping
that
I'm
I'm
circling
in
pencil,
you're
early
meeting
in
may
to
hold
a
to
hold
a
public
hearing
on
and
use
plan
and
go
through
the
adoption
process.
At
that
point,
that's
why
I've
got
circled
now.
I
hope
it
works
that
way.
Okay,.
A
Q
In
regards
to
the
transportation
mapping,
I
don't
know
if
Luke
was
gonna,
expand
on
this
any
or
not,
but
just
wanted
to
touch
base.
Briefly,
first
of
all
and
inform
the
the
Planning
Commission
we
have
applied
for
a
grant
for
an
updated
long-range
transportation
plan
or
a
transportation
master
plan,
otherwise
known
as
through
the
deity's.
Q
Srp
funding
that
they
offer
that
application
was
due
last
Friday.
We
should
hear
back
and
within
the
next
month,
maybe
two
at
most,
whether
we're
successful
in
that
grant
the
current
transportation
master
plan
that
we
have
on
hand
was
completed
back
in
2005,
but
with
the
completion
of
an
updated
comp
plan
and
with
completion
of
our
our
payment
management
system.
Study
back
in
2017
those
three
documents
together,
transportation
related
will
work
work.
Well,
it
I
think
it's
a
great
time
to
apply
for
and
hopefully
accomplish,
the
completion
of,
an
updated
master
plan.
Q
As
far
as
the
classification
of
that
Road
and
then
we've
also
through
our
discussions
recognized,
there
are
pretty
unique
functions
that
each
one
of
those
maps
are
created
for
the
functional
classification
map
is
really
essentially
to
determine
whether
a
roadway
is
eligible
for
federal
funding.
That's
managed
through
the
d-o-t
and
that
functional
classification
map
is
created
in
collaboration
with
the
DoD
and
municipal
local
staff.
Q
Q
As
far
as
how
things
are
classified
closely
to
what
that
functional
classification
map
is,
we
did
notice
a
couple
of
streets
on
the
functional
classification
map
that
were
maybe
rated
higher
than
what
a
transportation
engineer
would
call
them,
which
again,
the
main
downside
for
that
is.
It
could
have
implications
for
development
along
that
corridor
that
we
maybe
wouldn't
want
to
administer
because
they're
a
little
too
egregious
because
the
roads
may
be
not
classified
that
high.
Q
So
that's
where
I
go
back
to
my
reference
of
that
functional
classification
be
a
little
bit
wider
of
a
brushstroke
and
calling
it
what
it
is.
So
there
might
be
a
few
roads
that
we
don't
direct
match
what
the
functional
classification
map
says,
but
for
the
most
part,
I
think
that
it
will
be
fairly
identical
and,
and
all
that
being
said,
we
will
wait
and
see
whether
the
transportation
master
plan
on
grant
gets
approved
and
move
forward
with
the
completion
of
that
and
on
that
particular
topic.
I
will
share
my
thoughts
briefly
here
in
2005.
Q
This
study
didn't
provide
as
detailed
of
information
as
I'm
used
to
seeing
a
long-range
transportation
plan
in
regards
to
future
expansion
and
growth
of
the
roadway
network.
It
kind
of
gave
a
it
gave
a
snapshot
of
the
functional
classification
map
that
exists
existed
back
in
2005
and
then
went
into
targeted
studies
of
certain
projects
of
expansion.
Q
Projects
like
the
South
Corridor
south
bypass
that
was
constructed,
Willow
Creek,
Drive
I
think
was
another
one
that
was
in
there
and
has
been
constructed,
and
then
it
also
touched
on
the
northern
bypass,
which
of
course
has
not
been
constructed
yet.
But
one
thing
I
would
hope
to
get
out
of
our
new
transportation
plan
is
a
map
that
anticipates
the
classification,
these
roadways
as
they
expand
and
grow,
and
you
have
a
10
25
50
year,
projection
of
what
that
roadway
network
looks
like,
and
that
is
then
established
by
a
licensed
professional
engineer.
Q
That's
a
traffic
transportation
expert
and
it
really
helps
be
one
of
those
driving
documents
to
help
support
this
major
Road
plan.
So
long
story
short,
that's
what
I'm
getting
at
these
three
things
really
do.
Work
well
together,
intertwine
and
are
meshed
in
their
functions,
but
yet
they're
all
kind
of
a
little
bit
unique
to
in
their
own
way.
So
timing.
Q
G
Q
Question
mr.
chairman,
the
the
d-o-t
would
manage
that
project
completely
and
pay
for
it
entirely
until
it's
completed
and
the
city
would
reimburse
them
our
share
of
what
we
went
into
an
agreement
with
them.
Initially
before
the
project
started.
The
the
program
requires
a
minimum
20
percent
participation
locally
in
our
grant
application.
We
we
indicated
a
25
percent
level
of
local
participation
just
to
try
to
help
foster
the
grant.
Approval
sounds.
O
Main
thing
I
would
point
out
with
with
regards
to
what
we
talked
about
as
far
as
functional
class
versus
matching.
This
is
that
I,
the
places
you
would
see
some
of
those
streets
not
match
is
going
to
be
in
in
the
developed
part
of
town
is
in
the
part
that
I
would
call
the
home
grid
just
from
a
standpoint
of
the
classification
of
them
on
the
fringe,
they're
largely
going
to
match
up
pretty
closely
thanks.
O
For
reference
we
commandeered
an
afternoon
with
the
County
Commissioners
conference
here
and
the
idea
was:
maybe
you
can't
always
get
out
to
wherever
it
is.
We
hold
our
planners
conference,
let's
maybe
haven't
have
at
least
one
more
shot
to
take
it,
and
also
to
focus
on
municipal
for
one
and
in
County
for
the
other,
and
so
that's
the
hope.
So
if
you
do
come
up
with
some
and
let
staff
know
let
yeah
well,
you
can
let
your
the
South
Dakota
planner
Association
secretary
treasurer
who's
sitting
to
my
left
here.